Free Speech and Muslim Rage


We-People Defend Constitution

 

It’s time for the U.S. to stand up and protect the rights enshrined in the Constitution. If the U.S. government doesn’t understand that Islam is at war with the West and America, We the American citizens must start exercising our 1st and 2nd Amendment rights. Speak, Write, Draw, OPENLY Protest and even protect ourselves in those rights with our right to bear arms.

 

OR France’s Charlie Hebdo will become a common occurrence in the United States of America.

 

JRH 1/18/15

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Free Speech and Muslim Rage

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 1/16/2015 6:44 PM

 

In the wake of the deadly terrorist attacks on Charlie Hebdo, the satirical Paris newspaper, and the kosher grocery in Porte de Vincennes (France) between January 7th and January 9th, in which seventeen innocent Parisians were murdered, approximately three million French people, four by some counts, and forty world leaders, without U.S. President Obama anywhere in sight, marched through the streets of Paris to show unity against Islamic terrorism and their support for freedom of expression. For this one day, they did not allow their liberty to be constrained, but the messages emanating from this “Cry for freedom” unity rally are mixed at best.

 

Shortly after the first attack, an estimated 35,000 people appeared in east Paris at Place de La Republique. Some chanted “Charlie, Charlie” or held signs reading “I am Charlie” – the message posted on the newspaper’s website.

 

On Friday, January 9th, the iconic Arc de Triomphe on Champs-Elysees lighted with a banner reading “Paris is Charlie” in reference to Charlie Hebdo.

 

When Charlie Hebdo first published as L’Hebdo Hari Kari, its only mission was to be as “dumb and nasty” as possible (their words). And they succeeded, as millions from all faiths and all walks of life, including myself, found them to be beyond offensive.

 

Most notably, Charlie’s reprint of Jyllands-Posten’s (Dutch newspaper) cartoon that depicted the Prophet Mohammed negatively saw them prosecuted in 2005, for violating France’s “hate-speech” laws, representing a terrible assault on free speech. Ultimately they were acquitted through France’s freedom of expression laws. Even so, they never should have been charged, and their crime of “blasphemy” certainly did not warrant their death sentences.

 

Muslims, on a large scale, have raged against the U.S. and the West in their demands for justice. In their minds, justice entails the destruction of Israel and a blanket prohibition of any criticism of Islam (e.g. the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights and UN Resolution 16/18); and, despite Mahmoud Abbas’ recent statements that “human life is sacred” and the Grand Mosque of Paris’ condemnation of the Islamic terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo, they reserve the right in their Sharia law to mock other religions, to repress and murder non-Muslims and to destroy objects of other faiths.

 

Historically, totalitarian movements, such as the Islamic ideology, have advanced by restricting free speech, and unbelievably, most of the European Union now enforce laws in line with UN Resolution 16/18, which criminalizes any criticism of Islam. The Obama administration has advocated its adoption in the U.S. since 2009.

 

In April 2013, Paul Weston, the leader of the LibertyGB party was wrongfully arrested under Britain’s “hate-speech” law, Section 4 of the Public Order Act. His “crime” was that he read a forthright description of the true nature of Islam, from ‘The River War’ (1899) by Winston Churchill, as he stood on the steps of the Winchester Guildhall.

 

Similarly, one of fifty-four people arrested for “condoning terrorism”, the comedian Dieudonne, an “anti-Zionist”, was arrested 48 hours after the Paris rally for free expression on the weight of one sentence: “Tonight, as far as I’m concerned, I feel like Charlie Coulibaly”, a play of words on Charlie Hebdo and the terrorist Amedy Coulibaly.

 

Amedy Coulibaly, loyal to the Islamic State, was the terrorist who murdered four French Jews at the grocery in Portes de Vincennes, just hours before the Jewish Sabbath began. He died in the ensuing gun-battle with French security forces.

 

Dieudonne’s expression was certainly reprehensible and disgusting, but if anything, it should have simply targeted him for further scrutiny and investigation by the authorities. This same statement would not have warranted an arrest in the U.S., because it did not represent a “clear and present danger” to the public (Schenck v. U.S – 1919), above making people feel afraid.

 

U.S. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. suggested that the basis of our First Amendment is not “free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought we hate.”

 

However, this does not mean that a Muslim living in the U.S. can say anything without consequences, or that we must continue down this one-way road of tolerance. The U.S. must prosecute and deport anyone supporting Islamic terrorism and the implementation of Sharia law in the U.S., since advocating sedition and the destruction of our Constitutional Republic is an anathema to free speech.

 

Fear was precisely the entity these Muslims hoped to instill in people worldwide, by murdering Charlie Hebdo editor-in-chief Stephane Charbonnier, Jean Cabut (Cabu), cartoonist Bernard Verlhac (known as Tignous), Georges Wolinski and thirteen more unfortunate souls. These Islamic terrorists, Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi, who were born in France, wanted everyone to understand that criticizing Islam could result in a critic’s murder.

 

Fears of more attacks remain. Early Sunday, January 11th, Hamburger Morgenpost, a German newspaper that reprinted Charlie Hebdo cartoons ridiculing the Prophet Mohammed, was a victim of arson, without any injuries. The Brussels offices of the Belgian newspaper Le Spir were also evacuated after receiving a threat. And at this writing, anti-terrorism raids are occurring all across Europe.

 

Cowering in fear behind their political correctness and multiculturalist nonsense, the New York Times was the only major newspaper that did not run the Charlie Hebdo images, which are central to the story. By refusing to publish them, they admitted their fear and allowed freedom of the press to be held hostage by murderers, an unequivocal win for the Islamic terrorists.

 

Acting in the manner of responsible news outlets and in defense of freedom of the press, the remaining top U.S. newspaper editors published images from Charlie Hebdo on their covers, soon after the Paris attacks. The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, L.A. Times, the New York Post and the New York Daily News published them, taking a stand for liberty everywhere.

 

Liberty and our sacrosanct rights to freedom of speech and the press – all we hold dear – are under assault by Islamic terrorists, proponents for Sharia law, and this is a dangerous juncture for all free societies, in a real cultural battle between the Western civilization and Islam, with all its inherent evil. Americans must demand respect for our basic values and the right to criticize and even mock others, with or without Europe, and we must continue to speak the truth about the dark world of Islam, with its hate, intolerance, human rights violations and indiscriminate murder. And however we must defend it, through speech or force of arms, America must not allow Liberty to be held hostage by Islamic terrorists.

I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” __ Thomas Jefferson

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________________

Edited by john R. Houk

 

© Justin O. Smith

Author: oneway2day

I am a Neoconservative Christian Right blogger. I also spend a significant amount of time of exposing theopolitical Islam.

3 thoughts on “Free Speech and Muslim Rage”

  1. Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:
    Full comprehension of Islamic rage over exposure of Moe’s foibles requires some background information.

    The tribal society where Islam was invented and expanded is based on honor and shame. Moe’s real name was Kauthar; he bestowed the undeserved honorific “Muhammad” upon himself. Moe had no witnesses; his epileptic fits were observed, but nobody else saw or heard Jibril talking to him. Islam stands or falls on Moe’s character. If you discredit Moe, you destroy the foundation of Islam.

    We see pictures of raging mobs in Asia & Arabia because passions are intense in their tribal culture. They accept Islam as Moe preached it: a gift from Allah, the ultimate truth & justice. They are totally invested in it. If Islam is dishonored, they are dishonored.

    Moe knew that Islam is CamelShit. That fatal fact makes it weak and vulnerable to questioning and criticism. He took great pains to minimize those threats.

    5:101. O you who believe! Ask not about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if you ask about them while the Qur’ân is being revealed, they will be made plain to you. Allâh has forgiven that, and Allâh is Oft­Forgiving, Most Forbearing.

    Sahih Bukhari Volume 2, Book 24, Number 555:

    Narrated Ash-sha’bi:

    The clerk of Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba narrated, “Muawiya wrote to Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba: Write to me something which you have heard from the Prophet (p.b.u.h) .” So Al-Mughira wrote: I heard the Prophet saying, “Allah has hated for you three things:

    1. Vain talks, (useless talk) that you talk too much or about others.

    2. Wasting of wealth (by extravagance)

    3. And asking too many questions (in disputed religious matters) or asking others for something (except in great need). (See Hadith No. 591, Vol. Ill)

    Because of that sensitivity, Allah found it necessary to pass revelations defending his Messenger. In reality, Moe was issuing situational scripture, posing as Allah in retort to critics.

    12.111. Indeed in their stories, there is a lesson for men of understanding. It (the Qur’an) is not a forged statement but a confirmation of the Allâh’s existing Books [the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel) and other Scriptures of Allâh] and a detailed explanation of everything and a guide and a Mercy for the people who believe.

    52:29. Therefore, remind and preach (mankind, O Muhammad of Islâmic Monotheism). By the Grace of Allâh, you are neither a soothsayer, nor a madman.

    52:30. Or do they say: “(Muhammad is) a poet! We await for him some calamity by time.!”

    52:31. Say (O Muhammad to them): “Wait! I am with you, among the waiters!”

    52:32. Do their minds command them this [i.e. to tell a lie against you (Muhammad )] or are they people exceeding the bounds (i.e. from Belief in Allâh to disbelief).

    52:33. Or do they say: “He (Muhammad ) has forged it (this Qur’ân)?” Nay! They believe not!

    52:34. Let them then produce a recital like unto it (the Qur’ân) if they are truthful.

    81:22. And (O people) your companion (Muhammad ()) is not a madman;

    81:23. And indeed he (Muhammad ()) saw him [Jibrael (Gabriel)] in the clear horizon (towards the east).

    81:24. And he (Muhammad ()) withholds not a knowledge of the unseen.

    81:25. And it (the Qur’ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).

    So intense was the sensitivity to criticism that Moe ordered his companions to murder several critics including Kab Ashraf, Asma bint Marwan and Umm Qirfa. Read about it in his biography.

    Murder of Umm Qirfa
    http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n356/mode/1up

    Murder of Asma bint Marwan
    http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n362/mode/1up

    http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n355/mode/1up

    Assassination of Kab Ashraf pg 368
    http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n206/mode/1up

    Dissing Allah or Moe entails apostasy, which carries the death penalty for Muslims. The same punishment is applied to infidels under Shari’ah.
    o8.1 Apostasy: penalty
    http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=613
    o11.10 mentions something impermissible
    http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=627
    o9.14 alternatives for captured male
    http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=621

    Last week, Obanination’s hired Liar said that Obamination would attempt to suppress publication of any article about Jihadism deemed likely to provoke Muslims to attack our troops who are in harms way. That threat must be recognized as a direct infringement on thefirst amendment’s free speech clause.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/12/press-briefing-press-secretary-josh-earnest-1122015

    Since the first Barbary War, this nation has been under attack or threat of attack from Muslims. We must be free to discuss that threat and its basis in Islamic scripture, exegesis, sunnah & jurisprudence. If we can not fully and truthfully discuss those matters, our liberties will be lost sooner rather than later.

    Like

    1. Oops! Dajjal, for some reason some of your Comments go to an approval folder for this blog. I just today (1/25/15) was going over my NCCR comments and came across an approval notice for this comment. Sorry about that. I haven’t read the comment yet but usually when it is of this link it is worthy of a cross post.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s