Sean Hannity 2/16/18 – Hannity Fox News…


Here is a roughly 43-minute clip Hannity from 2/16/18. There is a smidgeon on FBI failure to heed the warning of the Parkland, FL Massacre. Most of the show relates to the Deep State trying to frame President Trump for what he did not do. For example a bit of Trump vindication with (witch-hunter) Robert Mueller actually indicting Russian nationals for election tampering. NOTE – There is mention in the indictment the indicted Russian nationals colluded with President Trump.

 

JRH 2/17/18

Please Support NCCR

*******************

VIDEO:  Sean Hannity 2/16/18 – Hannity Fox News Today February 16, 2018

 

Posted by Dennis Boyd

Published on Feb 16, 2018

Intro to LaSalle’s the Traitors Hillary & Barry


John R. Houk, Editor

William LaSalle, Author (Could be a pseudonym – not sure)

© February 16, 2018

 

William LaSalle posted a huge comment to my share at the G+ Community Truth Warriors. Google flagged it as spam with these loving words from the social platform masters: “Removed as spam and only visible to you”.

 

I thought, “Well that is annoying.” I began reading LaSalle’s post.

 

The LaSalle comment was huge which might have contributed to Google flagging as spam.

 

As (or if) you read the comment, LaSalle comes off as an angry person ranting about the state of affairs left for America by one of the most Presidential Administrations in U.S. history. The thing is LaSalle backs his rant with admittedly Conservative sourced links, yet he includes some links that are from the Left MSM.

 

AND I made the post even longer by adding some excerpts to most of those standalone source links for better context.

 

I might add I concur with 95% of LaSalle’s rants but not all. LaSalle has several paragraph-lists of nefarious individuals and organizations in which some overlap, one example:

 

The M.O. of George Soros, Barack Obama, Muslims, the Roman Catholic Church, Organized Crime, the United Nations, Obama’s Administration, Liberals, Socialists and Communists, and Hilary Clinton is the same.

 

I point the “Roman Catholic Church” in bold text. As huge as the comment is, his inclusion of the Catholics as nefarious actors is not sourced. This leads me to believe a bit of personal animus against Catholics which is not an uncommon issue even among good moral upstanding Protestants (as opposed to a hate group).

 

I am a Protestant/Charismatic/Word-of-Faith Christian. Being in this crowd I have received share of animus from Mainstream Protestants and Catholic in Denominational Christianity.

 

The irony of LaSalle’s animus toward Catholics is he is commenting to a post that showed my displeasure of Jew-Hating Muslims promoting the proven forgery/hoax document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as legit.

 

Those that have animus toward Catholics have some legit gripes with Catholic Dogma, such as: Papal Infallibility, encouraging prayers to angels and canonized saints and so on.

 

The reality is that devout Catholics have the same Conservative Family values as Biblical-minded Protestants. Today’s modern world has both Catholics and Protestants that have eschewed the Bible as God’s Word to Believers. These watered down diluted Catholics and protestants are worthy of criticism but not animus. Well, that’s my two-cents on the Catholics.
You might want to bookmark William LaSalle’s comment enabling to return to where you left off if you need a break from reading this book of frustration of virus of Leftists polluting the U.S. Government and the Constitution of the United States of America.

[Blog Editor Update 2/17/18: It took me forever to format this post at my flagship Blog. Forgive me, I’m feeling a bit lazy and I’m choosing not to the format thing on this blog. Ergo, I am truncating this post through William LaSalle’s first stand alone link. Read the rest at SlantRight 2.0.]

JRH 2/16/18

Please Support NCCR

***********************

William LaSalle

Posted as a comment “Article In Egyptian Government Daily: Trump’s … About Jerusalem Is … Phase In … Of ‘The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion’

Comment posted at G+ Community Truth Warriors

Truth Warriors Date: Feb 15, 9:52 AM

Comment Date: Feb 15, 2018

Comment Marked as Spam by Google awaiting Moderator/Owner Final Decision

 

The Traitors Hillary and Barry and the criminal, socialist, radical Islamic Terrorist supporting Democrats.

 

More than 11,000 private messages from Julian Assange reveal the WikiLeaks founder believed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a “well connected, sadistic sociopath.”

On November 19, 2015, Assange said: “Her role in the war in Libya is what should bring her down, however, the GOP is too close to others who have benefitted to exploit this, it seems. that Hillary helped to sew the foundation for ISIS against Pentagon generals’ advice seems huge. But the GOP resolutely ignores it.

Our CIA and FBI have no credibility because from 2008 through 2016 they were on the wrong side.

 

Robert Mueller and Huma Mahmood Abedin should be a FBI paid Informants, to escape charges of Treason and working against the Government of the United States, on the Treason of Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama and his Administration on the Uranium One Deal and the Election Tampering by George Soros and his NGO’s and the Nations with Islamic Law in 2008, 2012, and 2016.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal-russia-explainer-244895

What you need to know about Clinton and the Uranium One deal

Sessions has raised the possibility of the DOJ probing the matter, as Trump has publicly called for.

By LOUIS NELSON

11/14/2017 03:48 PM EST

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions this week raised the possibility that a special counsel may be appointed to investigate potential wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation, specifically suggestions that a U.S. government panel approved the sale of a large uranium firm to Russian interests in exchange for donations to the foundation.

 

The so-called Uranium One deal has been a focus of conservative media and President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly asked on Twitter why the DOJ is not actively investigating the matter.

 

What is the Uranium One deal?

 

The deal in question involves the sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining interests in the U.S. to Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy agency. The sale occurred in stages, beginning in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued in 2010, when the Russian agency took ownership of a 51 percent share of the company. In 2013, a third transaction gave Rosatom full ownership of Uranium One.

 

With its purchase of Uranium One, Rosatom assumed control of roughly 20 percent of uranium production capacity in the U.S. The current licenses issued to Rosatom’s U.S. subsidiaries, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prohibit the company from exporting uranium outside the country, according to OilPrice.com.

 

 

What are the allegations of wrongdoing?

 

Controversy surrounding the deal largely pertains to 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state in 2010 when the State Department signed off on Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One. Several of Uranium One’s owners were also donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to appease donors to her family’s … READ MORE at SlantRight 2.0

 

Article In Egyptian Government Daily: Trump’s … About Jerusalem Is … Phase In … Of ‘The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion’


 

Here is an example of classic Muslim Jew-Hatred. This time it emanates from a Daily newspaper in Egypt – Egyptian government daily Al-Yawm Al-Sabi’.

 

MEMRI’s English translated version simply drools with Jew-Hatred. The theme of lies and derision is based on the long debunked as fictional forgery is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

 

The Egyptian government daily use The Protocols as a racist Antisemitic reason that President Trump intends to the move the U.S. Embassy to Israel from Tel Aviv to the city that Israel calls its Capital – Jerusalem.

 

This is a great follow-up to the SlantRight 2.0 post about Antisemitism: “Shameful Social Media Jew-Hatred”.

 

And the Palestine Media Watch (PMW) has a great post on how Islamic terrorists with in the Palestine Authority (PA), Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon use The Protocols to incite the murder of Jews in Israel.

 

JRH 2/14/18

Please Support NCCR

********************

Article In Egyptian Government Daily: Trump’s Announcement About Jerusalem Is Another Phase In The Implementation Of ‘The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion’

 

Special Dispatch No. 7333

February 14, 2018

MEMRI

 

On December 11, 2017, the Egyptian government daily Al-Yawm Al-Sabi’ published an article by Hashem Al-Fakharani titled “From the ‘[Arab] Spring Plots’ to ‘the Buying of the White House’ – The Protocols of the Elders of Zion Are Realizing Their Goals after 100 Years …” In this article, Al-Fakharani claimed that President Donald Trump’s announcement that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel is the result of pressure by the Jewish lobby, and is another phase in the implementation of the Jewish-Zionist plot to take over the world set out in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. He wrote that, as part of the implementation of this plot, the Jews also extorted the Balfour Declaration from Britain and concocted schemes to destroy Arab countries and ignited the flame of “The Arab Spring” within them, which undermined their stability.

 

The article in the Egyptian daily; the image shows President Trump next to the cover of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Al-Yawm Al-Sabi’, Egypt, December 11, 2017)

 

The following are translated excerpts from the article:[1]

 

“Through diligent activity, in accordance with its dubious agenda, the occupation state has cautiously spun its web. For many decades, Israel replaced [its] sponsors in the region in order to [create] chaos-inducing scenarios. First, it extorted the Balfour Declaration from Britain during the Colonial period, then it replaced [the British sponsorship] with the patronage of the U.S., and finally it led [the U.S. to] the obscene announcement made by President Donald Trump, in which he declared Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and to his decision to move the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to the occupied city [Jerusalem].

 

“The unilateral American recognition [of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital], which ignored the warnings of the international community about its implications, was not sudden. Rather, it was part of the Zionist plot that the Jews of Europe started to weave, like a spider’s web, in the year 1901, by means of the document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which includes 24 protocols. [These protocols comprise a plan] to take over the world by appointing [the Jews’] henchmen to sensitive positions among decision-makers, and by establishing lobby groups – [collectively] known as the Zionist lobby – that tyrannically control the fates of the nations.

 

“The vile Protocols were written by an agent for the political secret police in Russia, the Russian Matvei Golovinski. He received the inspiration to write them from the book Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, by the [French] author Maurice Joly…

 

“The rabbinic council of the Jews developed the protocols with the goal of destroying the Christian hegemony in the world. Thus, after the [First Zionist] Congress – which took place in Basel, Switzerland, and was organized in 1897 by Theodor Herzl, the leader of the Zionist movement – the group of European rabbis amended the Protocols with the objective of establishing a national homeland for the Jews in Palestine.

 

“Following the Balfour Declaration, in which Palestine was given by those who did not own it [i.e. the British] to those who had no right to it [i.e. the Jews], schemes were concocted to destroy the peoples and armies that opposed the establishment of a state for the Jews in Palestine, and specifically the Arab countries that opposed the establishment of this state.

 

“An examination of the Seventh Protocol in The Protocols [of the Elders of Zion] reveals that it stresses the need to wear down every country that stands in the way of those plans, by creating internal crises that lead to wars, and by causing world wars. In order to actualize these protocols, Israel worked diligently to ignite the flames of the so-called Arab Spring, which undermined the [Arab] peoples in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and Libya. By means of this [Seventh] Protocol, Israel succeeded in weakening the capabilities of these countries’ armies, while the Egyptian army managed to stand firm against this diabolical plot.

 

“Following the revolution that broke out in March 2011, Syria, which is one of the countries in conflict with Israel, was worn down by the war between the Syrian army and terror organizations such as ISIS, Jabhat Al-Nusra, and Al-Qaeda. The same applies to Libya, Iraq, and Yemen. After about seven years of “Arab Spring” – which drove out [the population of] Syria, destroyed Libya, and wiped out Yemen – and more than 100 years after [publication of] The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Zionist lobby put pressure on the American president to make the perverted decision [about Jerusalem], which has been defined as Balfour Declaration II.”

 

[1] Al-Yawm Al-Sabi’, (Egypt), December 11, 2017.

__________________

© 1998-2018, The Middle East Media Research Institute All Rights Reserved. Materials may only be cited with proper attribution.

 

About MEMRI

 

Exploring the Middle East and South Asia through their media, MEMRI bridges the language gap between the West and the Middle East and South Asia, providing timely translations of Arabic, Farsi, Urdu-Pashtu, Dari, and Turkish media, as well as original analysis of political, ideological, intellectual, social, cultural, and religious trends.

Founded in February 1998 to inform the debate over U.S. policy in the Middle East, MEMRI is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)3 organization. MEMRI’s main office is located in Washington, DC, with branch offices in various world capitals. MEMRI research is translated into English, French, Polish, Japanese, Spanish and Hebrew.

 

MAIN PROJECTS & ARCHIVES

 

MEMRI allows easy access to its archives of over 6,000 reports from its Special Dispatch series, Inquiry & Analysis series, and MEMRI TV Project, on all subjects and countries, including nearly 16,000 minutes of translated material from the MEMRI TV Project. There are also over 30,000 individual blog entries available in the archives, as MEMRI adds over 10,000 entries annually to its blogs. The MEMRI TV Project maintains the world’s largest archives of translated clips from the Arab and READ THE REST

 

Paddock Autopsy – You Make the Call


John R. Houk, Editor

Posted February 13, 2018

 

Stephen Paddock’s autopsy report was released according to a report February 9 from the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The autopsy should debunk some Conspiracy Theories and might add some fuel to other Conspiracy Theories.

 

BUT – BUT – BUT

 

Medium’s report on the Paddock autopsy shows the assassin’s Time Of Death to be at NOON the day after the Mandalay Bay Massacre. Talk about pumping air into multiple Conspiracy Theories!

 

JRH 2/13/18 (H/T Black Listed News)

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Las Vegas shooter’s autopsy gives no clues

 

By Jeff German and Anita Hassan

February 9, 2018 – 3:26 pm

Updated February 11, 2018 – 10:17 am

Las Vegas Review-Journal

 

Autopsy records obtained Friday by the Review-Journal shed no new light on what might have contributed to Stephen Paddock’s motives for committing the Oct. 1 Las Vegas Strip massacre.

 

The autopsy, which included toxicology tests and a brain examination, found that Paddock had anti-anxiety medication in his system. It also confirmed what authorities had previously said — that Paddock died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to his head after he opened fire at an outdoor concert from his 32nd-floor Mandalay Bay suite, killing 58 people and injuring hundreds more.

 

“It seems that based on the autopsy reports there were no physical excuses for what Steve did,” said his younger brother Eric Paddock, who lives in Orlando, Fla. “We may never understand why Steve did this.”

 

The bullet that killed Paddock entered the roof of his mouth and traveled to the back of his head and then upward without exiting his body, leaving fractured bones along the way, the report says. Paddock also had scrapes on his right upper calf and knee and a bruise on his left calf.

 

A separate examination of his brain done at Stanford University found no major abnormalities, including no evidence of Alzheimer’s disease.

 

Amounts of nordiazepam, oxazepam and temazepam, which are consistent with the anti-anxiety drug Valium, were found in his urine, a toxicology report shows. There was no mention in the results of substances associated with alcohol.

 

Paddock, 64, also had hypertensive cardiovascular disease, according to the autopsy report, which was prepared by Dr. Lisa Gavin of the Clark County coroner’s office. Gavin performed the autopsy Oct. 6.

 

The results of the autopsy and brain examinations have been long anticipated. Police have yet to determine a motive for the shooting, and speculation has swirled about mental or physical health conditions that might have provided clues to his violent behavior.

 

Last week, at the request of the Review-Journal and The Associated Press, District Judge Timothy Williams ordered Clark County Coroner John Fudenberg to turn over Paddock’s autopsy records to the news organizations, but Fudenberg refused to release it until it was finalized.

 

In the same hearing, Williams ordered the coroner to release autopsy reports of the 58 people Paddock killed at the Route 91 country music festival in the worst mass shooting in modern American history. Fudenberg released the reports the next day.

 

He said in December that Paddock, a high-rolling video poker player, committed suicide. He killed himself as officers closed in on his hotel room after he stopped shooting.

 

After Paddock’s body was cremated, Fudenberg last month released the remains to the shooter’s family.

 

Eric Paddock flew to Las Vegas to pick up the ashes after he was unable to get the coroner’s office to send him the remains.

 

The newspaper reported several days after the mass shooting that a local doctor had prescribed diazepam, known by its brand name Valium, for Stephen Paddock in June. The prescription was for 50, 10-milligram tablets.

 

Diazepam is a sedative-hypnotic drug in the class of benzodiazepines, which studies have shown can trigger aggressive behavior.

 

Samples of Paddock’s blood, urine and hair were used to perform the toxicology testing, according to the report released Friday.

 

Paddock’s Toxicology Report

 

Laura M. Labay, a forensic toxicologist with NMS Labs, a private clinical and forensic toxicology lab in Pennsylvania, reviewed the results at the request of the coroner’s office, according to the report.

 

“Specifically, you would like to know if substances found in Mr. Paddock’s biological samples may be the reason for the production of violent and aggressive behavior,” Labay stated in a letter Monday to the coroner’s office.

 

Paddock’s toxicology results also found arsenic, lead and selenium in his blood. Labay stated that arsenic and selenium, even at high levels, were not linked to violent and aggressive behavior. While lead can be associated with cognitive effects, there was not enough of it in Paddock’s system to show that it would cause such behavior, Labay noted.

 

Mercury was also found in Paddock’s blood, according to the toxicology report. Labay noted that mercury levels can rise because of seafood consumption or environmental exposure. Eric Paddock said his brother frequently ate sushi.

 

“My opinion is that if Mr. Paddock was experiencing toxicity to any of the identified elements he would have experienced a constellation of symptoms specifically related to that element’s known toxic profile,” Labay stated.

 

Paddock’s toxicology results also showed concentrations of substances associated with benzodiazepines, drugs prescribed for conditions such as anxiety, insomnia and agitation, Labay stated.

 

“The finding of these substances in urine and not in blood show that Mr. Paddock had previously used or was exposed to this drug class,” Labay noted.

+++++++++++++++++

Stephen Paddock Autopsy Reveals Time Of Death At 1200 Hours (Noon) The NEXT DAY

 

By Thomas Michael

February 11, 2018

Medium

 

Paddock & autopsy TOD

 

On February 9, 2018, late in the afternoon on a Friday, the Associated Press (AP) released the original PDF of Stephen Paddock’s autopsy results by linking to it in one of their articles. Rather quickly, within an hour or two, the autopsy report was spiked out of the article. Subsequent coverage by news outlets have covered the bombshell report by focusing on anti-anxiety medication being found in Paddock’s system, and how the autopsy reveals no clues on motive.

 

Either these news outlets have not seen the autopsy results, or they are boldly lying to their respective audiences. Coupling this with the fact that, somehow, the AP, who sued for the autopsy results, had to remove the most important part of their would-have-been-bombshell-article to appease what appears to be the law enforcement agencies tasked with investigating the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history, is not only mind-blowing but demonstrates the AP’s complicity in covering-up the truth. At the time of writing this, no news organization — mainstream or alternative — has officially covered this story.

 

What is being hidden from the public, and this appears to be the explanation as to why law enforcement has fought tooth and nail to not have Paddock’s autopsy results publicly released, is Paddock’s Time Of Death — his Time Of Death is 1200 hours (Noon) on 10/2/17; that is the day after the shooting, and approximately fourteen hours after the shooting into Route 91 ceased.

 

There really is no conceivable way to look at this other than that everything we, the public, have been told about the Las Vegas Massacre has been 100% a lie and is astronomically false.

 

Paddock’s Time Of Death is what they have been hiding.

 

Sheriff Lombardo has told the public that Metro and SWAT first arrived on the 32nd floor at approximately 10:17PM on October 1st, but they did not initially breach the suspect’s room because the shooting had already ceased. They breached the door to room 32–135 at approximately 11:20PM. And, according to the police scanner audio, officers did indeed arrive upon a dead body in 32–135 after breaching the door — but we now know that could not have been Paddock’s body, as he was not killed until the following day.

 

So, the police scanner audio from that night is real, because what happened that night is real, but clearly the crime scene is not real and is staged. We must also assume that everything that law enforcement has told us to this point about the shooting and subsequent investigation are categorically untrue, and that law enforcement staged the crime scene.

 

When you couple these new revelations with the revelations of the PR firm’s disinformation campaign, which is Democrat-operated, the so-called ‘Resistance’ botnet army pushing the PR firm’s disinformation on Twitter, the owner of the hotel where the crime occurred being an outspoken Trump critic during the 2016 election, and all of the different operatives that have been throwing shade on this investigation and covering-up the real crimes from day one — the picture becomes much clearer, and it is unfortunately very grim…

 

The Las Vegas Massacre appears to be an attack that targeted Conservatives, and it appears to have been orchestrated by the U.S. intelligence community.

 

This story is currently developing…

__________________

Las Vegas shooter’s autopsy gives no clues

 

Contact Jeff German at jgerman@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4564. Follow @JGermanRJ on Twitter. Contact Anita Hassan at ahassan@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4643. Follow @anitasnews on Twitter. 

 

Copyright © 2018 Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc.

___________________

Stephen Paddock Autopsy Reveals Time Of Death At 1200 Hours (Noon) The NEXT DAY

 

Medium Homepage

 

Medium About Page

 

Ideas and perspectives you won’t find anywhere else.

 

Medium taps into the brains of the world’s most insightful writers, thinkers, and storytellers to bring you the smartest takes on topics that matter. So whatever your interest, you can always find fresh thinking and unique perspectives.

 

 

A platform built for…

 

advertisers

  • Not quantity
  • No sponsored content
  • No pop ups & banners
  • No clickbait
  • Not pageviews

 

people

  • quality
  • original ideas
  • clean reading experience
  • engagement & depth
  • viewpoints

 

READ ENTIRETY

 

Shameful Social Media Jew-Hatred


John R. Houk

© February 12, 2018

 

12 1 Now [in Haran] the Lord had said to Abram,

 

“Go away from your country,
And from your relatives
And from your father’s house,
To the land which I will show you;

 

3 And I will bless (do good for, benefit) those who bless you,
And I will curse [that is, subject to My wrath and judgment] the one who curses (despises, dishonors, has contempt for) you.
And in you all the families (nations) of the earth will be blessed.” (Genesis 12: 1, 3
AMP)

 

 

I chastised José Feliciano for his delusional anti-American photo:

 

 

The discussion became verbally heated. José then posted a long list of Jew-hating lies about what Jews did in which most cases the actual perpetrators were Muslims. I was about to respond when old José blocked me. Here is a truncated version that I gleaned from the email notification:

 

José Feliciano mentioned you in a comment on José Feliciano’s post.

+John Houk

A Brief history of Mossad Black Ops and False Flags, Mossad: a shell organization for Jewish/Israeli terrorism all over the world. False Flags: Committing an atrocious act, and blaming another party or nation for it. The point is to turn public opinion against an entity, and have someone else fight your battles for you.

Lusitania Churchill, who was 1/2 Jewish, leaked intelligence to Germany that Lusitania carried munitions, and then it was sent it in a U-boat infested area. The ship was…

 

Here is what I was about to respond with until José blocked me:

 

José, I don’t have time to go through the salacious lies about Jews here (but I will address them in a future blog post). But just as a point of reference for you and your fellow Jew-haters here are some links that discuss the blood libel lies that Antisemitic love to delusionally point their fingers at Jews:

 

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/conspiracy-theories-the-jews/

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/abraham-h-foxman/conspiracy-theories-anti_b_806777.html

 

https://www.adl.org/blog/explosive-growth-of-hateful-memes-and-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories-against-jared-kushner

 

José Feliciano is a Hispanic name typically associated with Catholicism. José is no Catholic because I was blocked I recall one of his retorts as something similar “God bless Hezbollah.” Hezbollah is a Jew-hating Islamic terrorist organization that nearly controls Lebanon and is a Shi’ite terrorist client of the crazy Shi’ite Muslims running Iran. Obviously, I can presume José Feliciano is a pseudonym for a radical believing Shi’ite.

 

I wish I had copied José’s Antisemitic tirade of lying accusations so I could rebut them with the truth. Oh well, c’est la vie.

 

This is what I’m going to do. I will address some Antisemitic blood libel lying Conspiracy Theories and put down a, “What really happened,” brief scenario. Beginning with what I can figure out of the cropped lie from my email notice.

 

Intelligence Agencies and National Interests

 

Intelligence agencies of nations with military/political power are very capable of acts that normal-citizens in society would find abhorrent. Nations off the top of my mind but probably not limited to are the USA, Russia (including 20th century versions of the USSR), China, UK, France, various Muslim nations, Germany AND even though a diminutive nation compared to any nation (powerful or not) – Israel. Those intelligence agencies typical motive for espionage is to act for the National Interest of their home nation. In this day and age, world domination is rarely ever viewed as a National Interest for any nation. Rather, National Interests typically surround a nation’s status in global economics and National Security from another nation’s National Interests which may do harm to the home nation. Today the clash of National Interests is the tinder box for war more than the useless concept of world domination.

 

In the USA a Capitalist economy and the personal Liberty of individuals to pursue happiness is the prime mover of American politics as viewed by voters. The current inner struggle among voters is the dichotomy of visions of traditional American values or a further transformation into a Social Democratic polity whence Liberty is defined by the State more than natural unalienable Rights. U.S. National Interests tend to sway back and forth depending on voter mandates during elections.

 

The National Interests of most European nations is a Social Democratic polity influenced highly by Multiculturalism.

 

The National Interests of Russia center around regional hegemony as a buffer from invaders.

 

The National Interests of China is also regional hegemony but more in the nature of securing economic power bolstered with the bully pulpit of an increasing military strength.

 

The Muslim nations’ National Interests primarily center around a medieval solidification of Islamic culture followed closely tribal power structures within the primarily European carved out national borders. In the case of solidifying Islamic Culture, itty bitty Israel has become a cultural slap in the face of the teaching that once conquered by Islam, then the land must always be Islam. It doesn’t help Israel that Judaism is eternally vilified in Islam’s revered writings – Quran, Hadith and Sira.

 

Tiny Israel’s National Interests center around securing their Biblical National Homeland and protecting its borders from Muslims believing Jews are the heritage of apes and pigs. Sometimes Israeli National Interests clash with Western Nations’ National Interest desiring to placate oil rich Muslim nations which too leads to cooperation with Muslim Antisemitism. It is in those cases that a sophisticated Israeli Intelligence agency (most noticeably Mossad) intrude in both the Muslim dominated world and Western Intelligence agencies which may include the USA when it shows sympathy to Jew-hating entities such as the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the umbrella of Islamic terrorist organizations that have the explicit goal of destroying Israel and killing Jews.

 

911 Executed by Jews

 

While there is no one theory uniting them [i.e. Truthers], it can generally be said they believe the U.S. government and/or the Jews and/or anyone other than unhinged terrorists orchestrated the events of 9/11 in order to further their own dark and secretive agenda.

 

 

Israel’s spy agency knew about the attacks, and got 4,000 Jews out of there

 

The blame-the-Jews theory is very popular in the Middle East. In a 2008 poll conducted in Egypt, as many as 43 percent of Egyptians thought Israel was somehow behind the 9/11 attacks. Among the most persistent post-9/11 rumors was that 4,000 Jews did not show up for work that September morning at the World Trade Center because Mossad, Israel’s spy agency, warned them against it.

 

Although an exact tally doesn’t exist, the consensus is that anywhere from 10 to 15 percent of the victims of the 9/11 attacks – up to 450 people – were Jewish religiously or had Judaism as their primary cultural affiliation. The U.S. Census has generally put the percentage of Americans who are Jewish at a maximum of 2 percent in recent years. It would be nonsensical of the Jews to leave hundreds behind as martyrs to cover their trail. Even if they had, it’s not as if Israel has been made any “safer” by 9/11. READ ENTIRETY (9/11 conspiracy theories won’t stop; By JOSHUA NORMAN; CBS News; 9/11/11)

 

 

Blame CIA and Mossad 

 

A former President of Italy gives conspiracy theories fuel when he assets that all of the Italian centre-left knows that the Central Intelligence and Mossad were behind the attacks, making Muslim terrorists as the fall guys. This allows the US to throw its full weight behind Israel. In addition, a former head of Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence agency asserts that the ISI had prior knowledge of the attacks, knowing that the CIA was acting with Israeli operatives to plan and mount the attacks. And the attacks were a perfect opportunity for the forces of Zionism to take control of world affairs in retribution. READ ENTIRETY (10 top 9/11 conspiracy theories; By Mick O’Reilly; Gulf News; 5/2/16 14:00)

 

Actual 911 Truth

 

WORLD TRADE CENTER

 

On September 11, 2001, at 8:45 a.m. on a clear Tuesday morning, an American Airlines Boeing 767 loaded with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center in New York City.

 

 

OSAMA BIN LADEN

 

The attackers were Islamic terrorists from Saudi Arabia and several other Arab nations. Reportedly financed by the al-Qaeda terrorist organization of Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden, they were allegedly acting in retaliation for America’s support of Israel, its involvement in the Persian Gulf War and its continued military presence in the Middle East.

 

Some of the terrorists had lived in the United States for more than a year and had taken flying lessons at American commercial flight schools. Others had slipped into the country in the months before September 11 and acted as the “muscle” in the operation.

 

The 19 terrorists easily smuggled box-cutters and knives through security at three East Coast airports and boarded four early-morning flights bound for California, chosen because the planes were loaded with fuel for the long transcontinental journey. Soon after takeoff, the terrorists commandeered the four planes and took the controls, transforming ordinary passenger jets into guided missiles.

 

 

TWIN TOWERS COLLAPSE

 

Less than 15 minutes after the terrorists struck the nerve center of the U.S. military, the horror in New York took a catastrophic turn when the south tower of the World Trade Center collapsed in a massive cloud of dust and smoke.

 

The structural steel of the skyscraper, built to withstand winds in excess of 200 miles per hour and a large conventional fire, could not withstand the tremendous heat generated by the burning jet fuel.

 

At 10:30 a.m., the north building of the twin towers collapsed. Only six people in the World Trade Center towers at the time of their collapse survived. Almost 10,000 others were treated for injuries, many severe. READ ENTIRETY (9/11 ATTACKS; History.com)

 

Steel Beams

 

 

One of the most-cited and well-publicized pieces of evidence offered by this group is the claim that jet fuel does not burn at high enough temperatures to melt the steel beams. By this logic, explosives or some other form of fuel must have been used to bring the buildings down.

 

While jet fuel, which burns at around 800 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit, may not reach the 2,750-degree melting point of steel, it is only about half as strong at 1,100 degrees, according to a comprehensive report compiled by Popular Mechanics in 2005. For the towers to collapse, the steel would not have needed to turn into a puddle of molten metal, it would only have had to bend enough to compromise the structural integrity of the building. READ ENTIRETY (5 Times Scientists Tackled Conspiracy Theories, and Won; By Nathaniel Scharping; Discover Magazine; 8/16/16 1:20 pm)

 

The Jews are Responsible for Sinking Sea-Liner Lusitania 1915

 

The U.S. and UK pointed fingers that a German U-Boat (submarine) sank the civilian sea-liner leaving New York City bound for Britain as a part of its WWI blockade. For sure this is at least a partial truth. A U-Boat shot a torpedo to sink the Lusitania. It is the “WHY” that history is having difficulty with:

 

The sinking of the Cunard ocean liner RMS Lusitania occurred on Friday, 7 May 1915 during the First World War, as Germany waged submarine warfare against the United Kingdom which had implemented a naval blockade of Germany. The ship was identified and torpedoed by the German U-boat U-20 and sank in 18 minutes. The vessel went down 11 miles (18 km) off the Old Head of Kinsale,[1]:429 Ireland, killing 1,198 and leaving 761 survivors. The sinking turned public opinion in many countries against Germany, contributed to the American entry into World War I and became an iconic symbol in military recruiting campaigns of why the war was being fought.[1]:497–503

 

Lusitania fell victim to torpedo attack relatively early in the First World War, before tactics for evading submarines were properly implemented or understood. The contemporary investigations in both the United Kingdom and the United States into the precise causes of the ship’s loss were obstructed by the needs of wartime secrecy and a propaganda campaign to ensure all blame fell upon Germany. Argument over whether the ship was a legitimate military target raged back and forth throughout the war as both sides made misleading claims about the ship. At the time she was sunk, she was carrying over 4 million rounds of small-arms ammunition (.303 caliber), almost 5,000 shrapnel shell casings (for a total of some 50 tons), and 3,240 brass percussion fuses, in addition to 1,266 passengers and a crew of 696.[2][3] Several attempts have been made over the years since the sinking to dive to the wreck seeking information about precisely how the ship sank, and argument continues to the present day.

 

Date 7 May 1915
Time 14:10 – 14:28
Location North Atlantic Ocean, near Old Head of Kinsale, Ireland
Coordinates 51°25′N 8°33′WCoordinates51°25′N 8°33′W
Cause Torpedoed by German U-boat U-20
Outcome
  • 1,198 of the 1,959 people aboard killed, leaving 761 survivors.
  • Turned international opinion against Germany.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Sinking of the RMS Lusitania; Wikipedia; last updated 1/30/18 14:53)

 

The general Conspiracy theory that has at least a probability of truth is that the Lusitania was that Germany was tricked by the UK or the USA (10 Conspiracy Theories That Sound Great, But PROBABLY Aren’t True!: 9 – The Lusitania was purposely sunk to draw the United States into World War I; Me Time For The Mind) to sink the Lusitania so American voters would abandon the long held Isolationist policy to foreign entanglements and the USA enter on the side of the Allies in WWI. The less credible Conspiracy Theory and frankly, quite absurd by lacking logic for the reality of resources, the Jews tricked the German Empire to sink the Lusitania for the U.S. to help secure a Jewish Homeland.

 

The credible Conspiracy website never mention any Jewish involvement with the Lusitania. However, there are plenty of Jew-hating websites of the White Supremacist or the Islamic nature spewing their fiction hate:

 

Steemit Example of Antisemitism

 

We are coming up to the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Lusitania, just off the Irish coast, on May 7th 1915.

We are also speeding towards the end of those liberties and freedoms which were won at such cost by our forebears, and given up so easily, by us, to the ‘Jew’ World Order.

 

Like every other ‘reason’ given before or since, for the occupied U.S.A government to ignore its own Constitution, and international law, and engage in official or unofficial war with nations that had never posed any threat to it, the sinking of the Lusitania was a ‘false flag’.

 

… the Lusitania was sunk by strategically positioned charges exploded at a discrete, observed, and documented interval after the German torpedoes had hit the Lusitania. We’ll consider the details of this particular false flag in a moment.

 

 

The Lusitania was a ‘success’ from the point of view of its planners. … the decision to go to war with Germany had been decided long in advance by the ‘Jewish’ Banksters in the U.S.A.

The false flag was just the last act in a chain of decisions and manipulations intended to produce the desired outcome.

 

 

The notion that America was forced to ensure ‘freedom of the seas’ after Germany began its campaign of submarine warfare was, and has always been, heavily pushed by the full spectrum propaganda machine of the Zionist ‘Jews’.

 

 

These forms of mass media were dominated and owned by the Jewish bankers who had made heavy investments in the European war. They had bought and sold bonds for the British government, which would have become worthless should Britain lose the war. These bankers would lose vast amounts of money should Germany win this war. Britain and France would have a terrible time trying to repay their huge war loans to the Banksters in the U.S and Europe.

 

 

Always and everywhere ‘Jews’ provoke fights, and then when their opponents fight back, they scream, in all the world’s media, that they are being ‘attacked’.

 

[Blog Editor: Now check out this blatant deceitful sanctification for both World Wars:]

 

In all cases in history it has been the Germans that were the most humane, and the Germans who always tried to respect international law and decency. Only to be demonized by the ‘Jewish’ propaganda machine, and thus demonized in all the official ‘histories’ of WWII, not to mention the mass media, and Hollywood, both of which have always been controlled and dominated by ‘Jews’.

 

 

Enjoy your ‘Jew’ World Order.

2800 ‘Goy’ slaves for every one of the 144,000 ‘Jewish’ masters.

Remember that ‘God’ made all the other non-Jews, the ‘Goys’, who are NOT human, in the FORM of humans, merely to be of better service to the ‘Jews’ as sex slaves, workers, and pets.

 

… This ENTIRE post on Steemit spews Jew-Hatred with proven lies. In fact, this post reminds me a lot of the José Feliciano Jew-Hate lies that he blocked me from responding (100 years after that ‘false flag’ called ‘The Lusitania’, we have learned nothing, and are being lead to war once more; By [Muslim sounding pseudonym[ troonatnoor; Steemit; “last year” being 2017)

 

Other Jew-Hatred Websites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trust me, the above is merely a sample of lying Jew-Hatred websites.

 

Jews Rule the World Via Rothschild Family Banking

 

It is the conspiracy theory perhaps most beloved by antisemitic anoraks the world over. First peddled in the mid 19th century, it’s now nearly 200 years and the myth that the Rothschild family – having plotted and profited from wars, caused the Holocaust and arranged the assassination of political opponents – secretly control the global economy is still going strong.

 

 

The Rothschilds have long been a favourite target of fascists. The Nazis made a 1940 movie about them, while American white supremacists and antisemites such as the Liberty Lobby have obsessed over their supposed control of the Federal Reserve Bank.

 

 

The original and most powerful Rothschild conspiracy theory contains many of the core elements of its later variations. The subject of the 1940 Goebbels production Die Rothschilds Aktien auf Waterloo, it dates back to 1846 and was published in a pamphlet written under the pseudonym Satan. It focuses on Nathan Rothschild, founder of the London branch of the bank and son of the dynasty’s creator, Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

 

As Brian Cathcart, professor of journalism at Kingston University and author of News From Waterloo: The Race To Tell Britain of Wellington’s Victory, has recounted, “Satan” (the cover adopted by a French left-wing antisemite Georges Dairnvaell), alleged that Nathan was on the battlefield in June 1815 to witness the French defeat. Hastily returning to Britain before the news broke back home, he was able to use his knowledge to make 20 million francs on the stock exchange. In Dairnvaell’s telling, Cathcart writes, the Rothschilds’ “vast fortune was built upon the bloodshed of the battle of Waterloo”.

 

 

Over time, the edifice upon which Dairnvaell constructed his story was demolished. Nathan was not at Waterloo. The newspaper which allegedly reported the story of his share spending spree turned out to contain no such item. And there was, in fact, not even a huge collapse in share prices from which he could have profited.

 

 

Perhaps the most pernicious and offensive of the Rothschild conspiracy theories, however, is that the family somehow engineered the second world war and the Holocaust in order to generate the sympathy necessary to establish the state of Israel. But, as Dunning notes, the “only seed of truth” to the claim that the Rothschilds “funded the Holocaust” is that the Nazis seized the Austrian Rothschilds’ assets, effectively holding the head of the family, Baron Louis, prisoner for several months as they stole his money. But for those wishing to stir the pot of antisemitism, the facts are never allowed to get in the way of a good story. READ ENTIRETY (The Rothschilds, the banks and antisemitism – the truth and the myths; By Robert Philpot; The Jewish Chronicle; 12/11/17)

 

Sandy Hook Massacre Antisemitic Idiocy

 

Iran’s Press TV scored an international scoop Tuesday. It turns out, it reports, the massacre of 20 schoolchildren and six of their teachers and administrators was not the work of a troubled loner. Rather, it was Israeli death squads exacting vengeance over a recent United Nations General Assembly vote granting Palestine nonmember observer status.

 

 

The claim came from Michael Harris, who was one of three panelists in a discussion about the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. While the other panelists focused on a culture of violence in America, or the issue of gun laws, Harris unleashed a torrent of Jew hatred. READ ENTIRETY (Iran TV Blames Israel for Sandy Hook; By Steve Emerson; Newsmax; 12/21/12 10:32 AM)

 

On December 14, 2012, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting occurred. The perpetrator, Adam Lanza, fatally shot his mother before murdering 20 students and six staff members at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and later committing suicide.[1]

 

 

Claims broadcast by Iranian television

 

 

The Washington Post reported that claims broadcast on Press TV contain a large number of “obvious logical fallacies” typical of Iranian propaganda, which “has a well-earned reputation for incendiary anti-Israel stories and for wild conspiracy theories.”[6] The Atlantic wrote that the story “obviously plays on the worst fears of those who believe in secret Jewish cabals that run the world, but it’s a pretty pathetic attempt at slander, even for Iran.”[5] – I just focused on the Antisemitic angle, there are a half-dozen or so other Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theories (Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories; Wikipedia; page last updated 1/31/18 19:07)

 

I’ve just looked at two of the idiotic accusations against Jews that absolutely make no sense. Here’s the granddaddy of Jewish Conspiracy theories created in France but most widely distributed in Czarist Russia that the Jews sole goal is world domination. I am writing about the most debunked document in modern history – The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

 

Five years after 9/11, lingering conspiracy theories hold that Jews planned the attacks. The charges’ staying power, though, is nothing compared to that of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

 

The century-old text has been discredited many times over its hundred-plus-year history. Yet even today the tale finds willing believers among those who oppose Zionism—the idea that Jews should have a homeland in Palestine, an idea that was fulfilled in the creation of the state of Israel in 1948.

 

 

The Protocols tell the tale of a secret plot in which a shadowy and powerful cabal of Jewish leaders and Freemasons sets out to dominate the world. The text purports to be the minutes of secret meetings held in Switzerland at the time of the First Zionist Congress in 1897.

 

The book outlines the group’s endeavors to conquer the globe by manipulating the media and the global economy, promoting religious conflicts, and supporting socialism.

 

A Web search reveals thousands of Web sites with Protocols-related content. Most refute the texts and offer ample evidence of their fraudulent nature. But plenty of others exist to propagate the myth.

 

 

Hoax Exposed

 

 

In 1921 the Times of London published convincing proof that The Protocols were largely plagiarized from books published decades earlier—primarily The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, by Maurice Joly (1864) and Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (1868).

 

In subsequent years similar exposés appeared in Germany and the United States. A U.S. Senate committee declared that The Protocols were bogus. And in 1993 they were officially declared fraudulent by a court in the country of their origin—Russia.

 

… READ ENTIRETY (pg. 1 & pg. 2) (Anti-Semitic “Protocols of Zion” Endure, Despite Debunking; By Brian Handwerk; National Geographic News; 9/11/06)

 

Here is a timeline excerpt of The Protocols from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM):

 

1864
French political satirist Maurice Joly writes The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Joly’s book never mentions Jews, but much of the Protocols would be fabricated based on ideas contained in it.

 

1868
Prussian writer Hermann Goedsche publishes the novel Biarritz, in which the twelve tribes of Israel meet secretly in Prague’s Jewish cemetery. Goedsche’s book, like Joly’s, contains ideas incorporated in fabricating the Protocols.

 

1897–1899
Although the origin of the Protocols is still a matter of debate, it was most likely fabricated under the direction of Pyotr Rachovsky, chief of the foreign branch of the Russian secret police (Okhrana) in Paris.

 

1903
An abbreviated version of the Protocols is published in a St. Petersburg, Russia, newspaper, Znamya (The Banner).

 

1905
Russian mystic Sergei Nilus includes the Protocols as an appendix to his book, The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth. By 1917, Nilus publishes four editions of the Protocols in Russia.

 

1920
The first non-Russian language edition of the Protocols is issued in Germany.

 

1920
The Protocols is published in Poland, France, England, and the United States. These editions blame the Russian Revolution on Jewish conspirators and warn of Bolshevism spreading to the West.

 

1920
Lucien Wolf, a British journalist and diplomat, exposes the Protocols as a fraudulent plagiarism in The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

 

1920
Automaker Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent publishes The International Jew, an Americanized version of the ProtocolsThe International Jew is translated into more than one dozen languages.

 

August 16–18, 1921
Journalist Phillip Graves exposes the Protocols as a plagiarism in series of articles in London Times.

 

1921
New York Herald reporter Herman Bernstein publishes The History of a Lie: The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion,the first exposure of the Protocols as a fraud for an American audience.

 

 

1924
Benjamin Segel, a German-Jewish journalist, exposes the Protocols as a forgery in his Die Protokolle der Weisen von Zion, kritisch beleuchtet (The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Critically Illuminated).

 

 

1927
Henry Ford issues a public apology for publishing the Protocols, which he admits are “gross forgeries.” Ford directs that remaining copies of The International Jew be burned, and he orders overseas publishers to cease publishing the book. Ford’s directives to foreign publishers are ignored.

 

 

1964
The US Senate Judiciary Committee issues a report titled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: A Fabricated “Historic” Document. The committee concludes: “The subcommittee believes that the peddlers of the Protocols are peddlers of un-American prejudice who spread hate and dissension among the American people.”

 

 

1988
Article 32 of the Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) reads: “The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”

 

1993
The Protocols is declared a fraud in a Moscow trial of Pamyat, an ultra-nationalist Russian organization that published the Protocols in 1992.

 

 

2002
The US Senate passes a resolution urging the government of Egypt and other Arab states not to allow government-controlled television to broadcast any program that lends legitimacy to the Protocols.

 

2005
A edition of the Protocols published in Mexico City suggests that the Holocaust was orchestrated by the Elders of Zion in exchange for the founding of the State of Israel.

 

2005
An edition of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, authorized by the Syrian Ministry of Information, claims that the Elders of Zion coordinated the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.

 

2007
A typical Internet search for the Protocols yields several hundred thousand sites.

 

READ ENTIRETY (PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION: TIMELINE; USHMM; Copyright © United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington, DC)

 

Evidently the last time the timeline was updated was in 2007. As the 2007 point suggests, an Internet search will display hundreds of thousands results. It will boggle your mind how many of those search results lead you to Jew-hatred websites. Hatred of Jews is becoming so virulent again, that even after proven debunking of the validity of The Protocols, the document is the center piece of spreading Antisemitism globally.

 

I just realized exposing Antisemites could turn into a book. If you’ve made this far, you are aware that I am erudite enough to write that book. If you are that erudite writer and have the time for research, PLEASE be the person that exposes the likes of Jose Feliciano and other Jew-Hating morons.

 

12 1 Now [in Haran] the Lord had said to Abram,

 

“Go away from your country,
And from your relatives
And from your father’s house,
To the land which I will show you;

3 And I will bless (do good for, benefit) those who bless you,
And I will curse [that is, subject to My wrath and judgment] the one who curses (despises, dishonors, has contempt for) you.
And in you all the families (nations) of the earth will be blessed.” (Genesis 12: 1, 3 AMP)

 

JRH 2/12/18

 Please Support NCCR

Sharia CANNOT Coexist in Western Law


John R. Houk

© February 9, 2018

An email sent by Maryam Namazie via the organization One Law for All addresses how the British government is handling the existence of Sharia courts in the United Kingdom (UK). As of this writing I’m have difficulty connecting with the website. Either http://onelawforall.org.uk/ is having server problems or there might be some kind of IP blocking involved. But the organization’s Facebook page is still up and here is some info from their Facebook About Page:

 

No Religious Laws
One Secular Law for All
Rights are for People not Beliefs

One Law for All was launched in 2008 to campaign against Sharia and religious laws in Britain and around the world. Sharia law is arbitrary and discriminatory against women and children in particular and works against equality, citizenship and secularism.

Under its family code, Sharia law treats the testimony of women as being worth half of that of a man, child custody is decided in favour of fathers regardless of the circumstances, women do not have the unilateral right to divorce as men do and violence against women is endorsed. Under its criminal code, there are over 100 offences punishable by death, including apostasy, homosexuality and adultery. Sharia courts in Britain decide on both civil and criminal matters.

Proponents argue Sharia law is a matter of choice; however, many women are pressured into using these courts. Moreover, violence and discrimination are not legitimate choices.

Whilst the far-Right blames ‘Muslim immigration’ for the implementation of Sharia law, it is READ THE REST

 

One Law for All’s apparent primary purpose is fighting the legitimization of Sharia Law in the UK as a tacit coexistent rule of law. In reality though the organization is Left Wing and is not friendly to any religious faith. This means they would not promote a Christian heritage in the UK.

 

Namazie politically is a Communist. As to religion she is an ex-Muslim atheist from Iran living in the UK. Since I am Christian, I don’t have a problem with Namazie’s virulent anti-Islam stand, BUT she is a militant atheist in which Christianity is on her hate-list too.

 

Nonetheless, Namazie and I are on the same page when it comes to Islam.

 

Namazie is concerned that the UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd has not gone far enough pertaining to rejecting Sharia courts as equal to the British rule of law. As an American, accepting anti-Western (and in the case of the USA – anti-Constitution) Sharia is in my belief must be anathema in our society and rule of law.

 

Here is the Executive Summary Home Secretary Rudd presented to Parliament (the whole pdf is 48 pages):

 

The independent review into the application of sharia law in England and Wales

Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty

February 2018

 

Executive summary

 

In May 2016 the independent review into the application of sharia law in England and Wales was tasked with understanding whether, and the extent to which, sharia law is being misused or applied in a way that is incompatible with the law within sharia councils.

 

Sharia is an all encompassing term which includes not only law in the western sense of the word but religious observances such as fasting and prayer, ritual practices such as halal slaughter, and worship in general. Sharia is written jurisprudence and law developed on the basis of a diversity of opinions among jurists in the classical period of Islam. While many aspects of sharia have been modified or modernised in most Muslim countries, in the area of personal law, especially marriage and divorce, many Muslim societies still observe rulings of classical jurisprudence. The word sharia is used in diverse ways by Muslims and this leads to varying degrees of understanding and application.

 

This review was set up to focus exclusively on the work of sharia councils in England and Wales and not to look at sharia practices in general. These councils call themselves sharia councils because they deal with aspects of Islamic law. The review has collected written and oral evidence from a wide range of sources. These include a public call for evidence issued by the review Chair Professor Mona Siddiqui, and oral evidence sessions with users of sharia councils, women’s rights groups, academics and lawyers, as well as other key stakeholders.

 

There is no clear definition of what constitutes a sharia council. Sharia councils vary in size and make up. There is also no accurate statistic on the number of sharia councils, with estimates in England and Wales varying from 30 to 85. To the best of our knowledge, there are no sharia councils in Scotland. For the purposes of this review we are defining sharia councils as a voluntary local association of scholars who see themselves or are seen by their communities as authorised to offer advice to Muslims principally in the field of religious marriage and divorce.

 

Sharia councils have no legal status and no legal binding authority under civil law. Whilst sharia is a source of guidance for many Muslims, sharia councils have no legal jurisdiction in England and Wales. Thus if any decisions or recommendations are made by a sharia council that are inconsistent with domestic law (including equality policies such as the Equality Act 2010) domestic law will prevail. Sharia councils will be acting illegally should they seek to exclude domestic law. Although they claim no binding legal authority, they do in fact act in a decision-making capacity when dealing with Islamic divorce.

 

Common misconceptions around sharia councils often perpetuate owing to the use of incorrect terms such as referring to them as ‘courts’ rather than councils or to their members as ‘judges’.

 

These terms are used both in media articles but also on occasion by the sharia councils themselves. It is important to note that sharia councils are not courts and they should not refer to their members as judges. It is this misrepresentation of sharia councils as courts that leads to public misconceptions over the primacy of sharia over domestic law and concerns of a parallel legal system. The recommendations included in this report, such as changes to marriage law, are designed to promote equality between religions in ways that should challenge misconceptions of a parallel legal system and encourage integration.

 

In collecting its evidence the review looked to examine why sharia councils exist, who uses them and for what reasons. The evidence heard by this review indicates that the vast majority, in fact nearly all people using sharia councils, are women. In most of these cases (our evidence indicates over 90%) the women are visiting the council seeking an Islamic divorce. In attempting to understand what motivates women to use sharia councils the review found that there are many reasons why Muslim women seek an Islamic divorce. A key finding was that a significant number of Muslim couples fail to civilly register their religious marriages and therefore some Muslim women have no option of obtaining a civil divorce.

 

The review sought to understand what occurs at the sharia council and whether and to what extent the practices are discriminatory. The evidence collected by the review indicated a range of practices occurring in the sharia councils. The review found evidence of good practice but also clear evidence of bad practice. Furthermore, there is unanimous agreement among the sharia councils themselves that discriminatory practices do occur in some instances within the councils in England and Wales.

 

From the very beginning, the review panel established the principle that recommendations would be based collectively on the evidence it received rather than the personal opinions of the panel members. While there was broad and respectful consensus on most issues, this report also reflects the particular area where there was a level of disagreement.

 

It should also be noted at the outset that those proposing a ban on sharia councils provide no counter proposal or any solution for anyone seeking a religious divorce. It is clear from all the evidence that sharia councils are fulfilling a need in some Muslim communities. There is a demand for religious divorce and this is currently being answered by the sharia councils.

 

This demand will not end if the sharia councils are banned and closed down and could lead to councils going ‘underground’, making it even harder to ensure good practice and the prospect of discriminatory practices and greater financial costs more likely and harder to detect. It could also result in women needing to travel overseas to obtain divorces, putting themselves at further risk.

 

We consider the closure of sharia councils is not a viable option. However, given the recommendations also proposed in this report include the registration of all Islamic marriages as well as awareness campaigns it is hoped that the demand for religious divorces from sharia councils will gradually reduce over time. These key recommendations address the issue of current discriminatory practices identified within the sharia councils.

 

Here is One Law for All’s response.

 

JRH 2/9/18

Please Support NCCR

*********************

The Independent Review on Sharia

Sharia Laws are part of the extremist threat and not a solution

 

Sent from Maryam Namazie

Sent 2/7/18 5:35 PM

Via http://onelawforall.org.uk/ [My browser timed out connection]

 

Read this email online. [My browser timed out connection]

 

One Law for All rejects sharia review pdf

 

Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP
Secretary of State
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF

 

6th February 2018

 

Dear Right Hon Amber Rudd, MP,

 

The Independent Review on Sharia: Sharia Laws are part of the extremist threat and not a solution

 

As black and minority women and human rights campaigners, we voice our dismay at the outcome of the independent review on Sharia laws commissioned by the government in 2016. Although the government has rejected formal recognition (through regulation), the way has been left open for the Sharia courts to continue to exist in a no-man’s land where they continue to produce discriminatory parallel laws while posing as an acceptable alternative dispute mechanism. Now they will be strengthened by a review that has endorsed their existence.

 

At the outset, we feared a whitewash but what we have seen is worse. The review is superficial, narrow and secretive; and completely lacks credibility. We protested when the Home Office appointed a theologian to lead the review and two Imams as advisers. How absurd that the Home Office now claims that the review ‘was not tasked with considering theological issues, for example whether Islam and Sharia law treat women in an unequal way’. Why then appoint three people whose only qualification for the job was their status as religious scholars?

 

Any review that is based on interviewing only eight women and a handful of organisations; and that provoked a boycott from most of the organisations that deal with women adversely affected by religious laws, cannot be considered legitimate. Demands for the acceptance of Sharia laws to govern family matters are part of a wider fundamentalist and ultra conservative goal to normalise profoundly misogynist values in the law and other public spaces. Our front-line experience has found clear evidence that both the intent and the process of the Sharia courts is abusive and discriminatory; that the Sharia bodies are run by organisations with links to extremist organisations; and promote the full range of fundamentalist goals such as strict gender segregation, imposition of hijabs and other dress codes, homophobia, bigotry and discrimination against non-Muslims and Muslim dissenters, blasphemy laws and attacks on apostates.

 

Our research also shows that they do refer to ‘courts’ and ‘Judges’, because of a clear intention of establishing themselves as a parallel law which ‘good Muslims’ must adhere to. The review suggests that that they are ‘Councils’ only and thus sanitises them.

 

In order to arrive at its conclusions, the reviewers conducted no investigation and ignored evidence that would have undermined their conclusions. They ignored the wider political fundamentalist drive to undermine human rights. They also ignored a considerable body of evidence submitted to the Home Affairs Select Committee in Parliament by members of our coalition and others. For instance, Maryam Namazie submitted two statements in evidence which contained details of statements made by Islamic law ‘Judges’, that exposed their wider political agenda. Knowing that hate speech and discriminatory speech is regularly erased from websites once it has been exposed, she had taken screenshots of their statements. She stated in conclusion, ‘despite all efforts to package Sharia’s civil code as mundane, its imposition represents a concerted attempt by Islamists to gain further influence in Britain’. If the reviewers did not wish to draw on our submissions, they could have applied some diligence and researched it themselves. Why did they not do so?

 

The coalition also gathered detailed testimony from many women. Unlike the reviewers, we did not ask for evidence solely from women who had experience of sharia courts, although we met and interviewed many who had tried to get a divorce under ‘sharia law’, were deeply traumatised by the experience and experienced further violence and abuse of their rights. We also published and put in evidence to parliament, a devastating letter signed by over 300 abused and marginalised women from all religious backgrounds expressing their fear of being controlled by religious laws.

 

Sweeping statements are made about the “choice” that Muslim women make to approach such councils without giving any consideration to the highly constrained religious context in which that “choice” is made. The review is utterly silent on the crucial concept of ‘zina’ (sex outside marriage), the grave sin punishable by death in many Muslim countries. It is fear of ‘zina’ which compels many women, even those with civil divorces to seek an Islamic divorce. Procedural changes in sharia councils will not diminish their role in spreading this concept; to which they provide the only ‘solution’. That is why use of Sharia bodies is increasing. Evidence before the Home Affairs Select Committee makes clear that fundamentalists insist that a civil divorce cannot be final. Yet earlier generations of women had civil marriage (as well as a Muslim marriage contract) and were satisfied with a civil divorce. Increased religious bullying is a major reason for women’s recourse to sharia, not simply their ‘conscience’. Indeed, the form of Sharia which the theologians of the panel have failed to challenge is much more regressive than Muslim personal laws in Muslim majority countries.

 

Unlike the review, we have shown that women cannot engage with Sharia Councils or the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal in relation to their divorce without this also impacting on their rights and freedoms in other areas. Our research shows that Sharia Courts/ Councils deal with more than divorce – they impose ‘mediation’, promote polygamy and child marriage, and interfere with child custody and criminal proceedings in relation to domestic violence. The review made no serious attempt to investigate these issues.

 

The review stands in direct contrast to the devastating observations made by Dame Louise Casey in her report in 2016 “women in some communities are facing a double onslaught of gender inequality, combined with religious, cultural and social barriers preventing them from accessing even their basic rights as British residents.”

 

A forensic examination of the operation of Sharia in Britain lays bare what fundamentalists do to achieve their goals, not merely what they think. We do not accuse them simply of ‘thought crimes’ but of promoting crimes and human rights violations.

 

The review is a botched attempt at consultation established with flawed terms of reference and an explicit disregard for gender discrimination. The government and the reviewers have failed the women most affected and ignored the concerns of rights advocates.

 

We will be providing a more detailed submission. Meanwhile, we call on you, as Home Secretary, to ensure that none of the recommendations contained in the review are implemented without consultation with those advocates who are able to make clear connections with extremism, fundamentalism and inequality. The government has, so far, failed in its duty to make an equality impact assessment, which it needs to do with the full weight of evidence before it. Continued indifference to the government’s duty to respect, protect and fulfil human rights will leave us in no doubt that there is no change to the social contract in which women’s rights are traded off as part of a process of appeasement of fundamentalists and extremists.

 

We look forward to your response.

 

Sincerely,

 

Gita Sahgal and Yasmin Rehman, Co-Directors, Centre for Secular Space
Pragna Patel, Director, Southall Black Sisters
Diana Nammi, Executive Director, Iranian Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation
Houzan Mahmoud, Culture Project
Sadia Hameed, Spokesperson, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
Rumana Hashem, Human Rights Advocate
Nasreen Rehman, Human Rights Advocate
Gina Khan, Spokesperson, One Law for All
Maryam Namazie, Spokesperson, One Law for All

 

For more information, please contact Gita Sahgal at 07972 715090 or email onelawforall@gmail.com.

____________________

Sharia CANNOT Coexist in Western Law

John R. Houk

© February 9, 2018

____________________

The Independent Review on Sharia

 

One Law for All No Sharia Campaign (pdf manifesto)

 

Chairman Ron Johnson: Interim Report on FBI Purposeful Intent To Exonerate Hillary Clinton During Email Scandal…


Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) serves as Chairman of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. As Chairman Senator Johnson has released a Committee Report on “DOJ/FBI” leadership small group suspiciously exonerating Crooked Hillary.

 

JRH 2/8/18

Please Support NCCR

************************

Chairman Ron Johnson: Interim Report on FBI Purposeful Intent To Exonerate Hillary Clinton During Email Scandal…

 

By sundance

February 7, 2018 4:14  PM

The Last Refuge

 

Senator Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has a very narrow focus on the DOJ/FBI ‘small team’ involvement into the 2016 election.  Johnson’s authority focuses on how the group inside the FBI worked to exonerate Hillary Clinton despite evidence of intentional wrongdoing.

 

FBI Characters illegally Exonerating Crooked Hillary

 

However, within that investigative oversight, Chairman Johnson is bringing to light all of the communication within the ‘small group’ which includes the text messages between lead FBI investigator Peter Strzok and lead legal counsel Lisa Page during their efforts.

 

Toward that end, Chairman Johnson has released an interim report on findings (Senate Link Here), and as outlined below in the embedded pdf.

 

WASHINGTON DC – U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, released a majority staff report Wednesday titled “The Clinton Email Scandal And The FBI’s Investigation Of It,” along with text messages between two agents that shed light on the investigation.

 

The report details the congressional investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and the oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s involvement with their investigation of Secretary Clinton’s private server.

 

Senator Johnson Interim Report SCRIBD

 

 

 

  • The report outlines how information available to the committee at this time raises serious questions about how the FBI applied the rule of law in its investigation. The majority staff report found that:

 

  • The FBI did not use a grand jury to compel testimony and obtain the vast majority of evidence, choosing instead to offer immunity deals and allow fact witnesses to join key interviews.

 

  • There were substantial edits to former FBI Director James Comey’s public statement that served to downplay the severity of Secretary Clinton’s actions, and that the first draft of the memo was distributed for editing two months before key witnesses were interviewed.

 

  • Director Comey stated that he had not consulted with the Justice Department or White House, when text messages among FBI agents involved in the investigation suggest otherwise. Two key investigators discuss an “insurance policy”against the “risk” of a Trump presidency, and “OUR task.”

 

  • Messages discuss “unfinished business,”“an investigation leading to impeachment,” and “my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.” The messages strongly underscore the need to obtain still-missing text messages and other information regarding the FBI’s actions and investigations into the Clinton email scandal and Russian involvement in the November 2016 election.

 

  • Senior FBI officials—likely including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe— knew about newly discovered emails on a laptop belonging to former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner for almost a month before Director Comey notified Congress.

 

_________________

The Last Refuge Rag Tag Bunch of Conservative Misfits – Contact Info: TheLastRefuge@reagan.com