South Africa’s White Genocide

After South Africa independence from Great Britain the Afrikaner White minority descendants of the Boers consolidated power. The Afrikaners created a society that was entirely beneficial to the heritage of the White Boer legacy. Native African inhabitants and immigrant non-Whites (primarily of Asian origin) became second class citizens much like Muslims treated non-Muslim dhimmis – NOT WELL.


Understandingly the South African majority grew extremely weary of being treated as a disparaged class or race of people. Unsurprisingly the politics that largely became attractive to the oppressed Black majority was Marxism. The Marxist utopian promise of a classless society perpetrated by a violent revolutionary transformation became to modus operandi of Black Activist Communists. In essence a Marxist/Leninist terrorism.


Undoubtedly to the chagrin of traditional Marxist globalists, the South African Black majority turned to nationalism rather than globalism. After Western pressure of further and further isolated the Apartheid racist ideology to White Minority South African government, Afrikaner elites bowed to reform and ended Apartheid rule to a representative government.


The result: a century of discrimination against Blacks placed the onus of power with the beloved Marxist leadership. Despite Mandela promises of a conciliatory society between Blacks and Whites, revenge inspired by years of oppression became ingrained among Black society egged on by Black Nationalist Marxists.


The worst-case scenario: an ever-growing genocide against the Afrikaner White Minority. A genocide almost totally neglected by a Left oriented Western Media. Even to the point of denying the statistics indicating a WHITE GENOCIDE.


JRH 3/17/18

Please Support NCCR


South Africa’s White Genocide

Black Hearts and Racial Hatred


By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 3/16/18 12:21 AM


The war is on right now against White South Africa, and the violence currently directed at whites by the black majority population and South Africa’s radical communist African National Congress (ANC) and Economic Freedom Fighters parties is at near genocide level. Open displays of racial hatred by South Africa’s leaders have fed a black and bloody tide of pent up rage, that has revoked Mandela’s pledge, if it was ever upheld; and, today in South Africa, white people are being ground into dust and forced to flee or prepare for civil war.


Many South Africans, such as my good friends, Herman and Sonaret Myburgh, owners of Pretoria Engineering in Murfreesboro, TN, recognized the warning signs early, and they left for America shortly after South Africa ended Apartheid in 1994. Even then, the violence against whites had begun, as the Myburghs often explained.


Nelson Mandela was a despicable communist, who allowed three-quarter of a million people to be slaughtered under his regime, but since his death, the violence against whites has become worse. In Johannesburg specifically, close to 60,000 white people have been reported murdered [This source claims 70,000], since Mandela fell from power, along with an estimated half a million more who have vanished without a trace, and while many human rights groups are calling this a “white genocide”, the mainstream media seems not to notice.


The rapid rise of this tragic situation can be largely attributed to the passage of the Expropriation Bill of 2008, which empowered the ANC and “any organ of state at any level of government” to take ownership and possession of property “simply by giving notice to the expropriated owner”. However, the most incendiary bill was passed (241 to 83) just this March 1, 2018 by Parliament, which authorizes the seizure of land from white farmers without paying compensation, as they amended section 25 of their constitution, on the insistence of the radical leftist EFF, and used their majority to legalize state theft from the politically powerless white minority.


In the wake of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa’s and the ANC’s tyrannical change to the constitution, the black majority has interpreted this move to mean “We have permission to kill white people”. And the violence has been further stoked by Julius Malema, leader of the EFF, who regularly leads crowds to chant “Kill the Boer, kill the white man”.


Malema claims his violent rhetoric is not really intended to move his followers to murder whites, when he shouts “hit them hard — go after the white man … We are cutting the throat of whiteness”. His followers didn’t get the memo and have taken his message to heart, as black gangs are roaming the countryside slaughtering entire white families.


On the West Cape in Stellanbosch, Susan Joubert, an eighty year old woman, was repeatedly stabbed and murdered by a marauding gang of blacks, and Leftists and the world news outlets ignore this and thousands of other similar slaughters of whites, because they are the wrong color. They claim race isn’t a factor, but even Ms. Joubert’s dogs were stabbed to death.


Lauren Southern, an independent journalist has been in South Africa preparing a documentary on this unbelievable crisis of humanity, this white genocide. Upon her recent return Ms. Southern offered the following condemnation:


“It’s being covered up. The government has stopped collecting all data based on race … so they can’t even show these brutal murders are happening disproportionately to whites. They are covering up all these murders as burglaries gone wrong … That is what’s being reported by the government and by the media.”


Now, the bloody handwriting is on the wall of many a Boer farmhouse, and thousands of white crosses bear testament to their murders at the Plaasmoorde (Farm Murders) Monument. Atrocities so wicked they strain the credulity of civilized men are being committed upon white people, by savages filled with racial hatred and more monster than human — evidenced by the raped, tortured and mutilated bodies of men, women and children and these crimes against humanity.


Whites have been made nearly helpless too, by the Firearms Control Act of 2000, which requires everyone to show an overriding need for a firearm. If one is not black or a member of the ANC or EFF, in other words if one is white, one is often arbitrarily denied a firearms license, which out of necessity leads whites to arm themselves “illegally”; and if they even minimally defend themselves, they are regularly punished, since self-defense itself verges on an offense, under the Marxists’ “constitution”.


The ANC controlled government has also enacted “laws” that ensure black people are given first choice for any job over a white person, which has made it almost impossible for most whites to live. Many have already been forced into private camps operated by charities, by a government policy that keeps them from working and takes everything from them. The government is systematically eliminating the white race from South Africa.


Can government and ANC operated internment camps be far behind?


Isn’t this the very same sort of operation the Nazi Einsatzgruppen socialists implemented in Germany to take property from the Jewish people and “cleanse” German society of Jewish people?


As Leo Hohmann renown author, recently noted (March 13th), provisions exist in the Refugee Act of 1980 and precedents are found in the 1990 Lautenberg program, that give the president and Congress some great latitude, if they wish to assist the white Afrikaners. The current situation in South Africa is well within those parameters, and a mass exodus of white Afrikaners on an emergency basis can be handled in an expedited and rapid fashion, especially if the U.S. can get help from the U.K, New Zealand, and Australia, too.


Hopefully, some concerned philanthropists, from across the free world, and benevolent expatriate South Africans will soon start raising funds to purchase supplies of food and medicine, from numerous sources, and arms and ammunition from overseas dealers for delivery to the white Afrikaners, who surely will welcome them. If handled properly, this need not violate any laws, other than South Africa’s “laws” of tyranny.


It was not supposed to be this way. Post-Apartheid South Africa was supposed to be the Rainbow Nation, throwing off their past of racism and injustice. It was supposed to be the model for the Brave New World that was promised by those on the Left, who peddle multiculturalism, diversity and identity politics.


The West convinced the White Minority Government of F.W De Klerk to end Apartheid in 1994. It is the West that now turns a blind eye to the crimes committed, aided and abetted by a regime even more reprehensible than the Apartheid it replaced.


Will the slaughter of the white Afrikaners go unnoticed, unreported and unavenged?


Will the death inflicted on them be dismissed as retribution for past injustices under Apartheid or decried for the horrific racist genocide that it is?


If the colors were reversed, the Leftist of the world, such as former UN Ambassador Samantha Power and Susan Rice, former Obama advisor, would be screaming “bloody murder” at the top of their lungs and protesting in the streets, and yet, they are not. They would rather fight for LGBT trendy causes, than be seen helping to save the lives of white Afrikaners. In their heart of hearts, they agree and are one with the ANC, and this genocide is seen only as a normal and acceptable path towards the “restoration of dignity“, in the words of Cyril Ramaphosa.


However, the Boers and Uitlanders will not go quietly into that night, once the hell and conflagration of war rises against them. They are the descendants of the voortrekkers and the 470 of Blood River, led by Andries Pretorius, who successfully withstood the onslaught of over 100,000 Zulu warriors in 1838, and they will not meekly submit to their own extinction. I hope they stand astride the graves of their ancestors and howl in defiance into the teeth of those who seek their blood.


The Dutch Boers arrived in southern Africa in 1652, and they gradually spread inland, taking possession of a virtually empty land. Historical revisionism notwithstanding, one-hundred and fifty years passed before the first significant encounters occurred between white and blacks, when Boers moving north clashed with Zulus moving south. Today’s white South Africans can rightfully claim South Africa to be their ancestral home, and if they wish, they would be right to stand and fight to retain their homes and their land.


By Justin O. Smith


Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets and source links are by the Editor.


© Justin O. Smith

Is Dislike of POTUS an Impeachable Offense?

Clem DeWitt takes on the Leftists desiring to impeach President Trump for the constitutional violation of not liking POTUS. WAIT! There is NO such clause in the U.S. Constitution!


Constitutional Sections Regarding Impeachment


Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5


The House of Representatives shall chuse [sic] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.


Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7


The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.


Judgement in Cases of Impreachment [sic] shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law.


Article 2, Section 4


The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.


… There Is MORE Pertaining to the Judiciary (Impeachment Clauses; University of ChicagoThe Founders Constitution; © 1987)


Impeachment Clause Commentary:





DeWitt includes the Leftist mania of smearing Conservatives’ character to brainwash voters to hate.


Enjoy the read.


JRH 3/16/18

Please Support NCCR


Is Dislike of POTUS an Impeachable Offense?


Discovered at PATRIOTS UNITED TO SAVE AMERICA (Facebook Secret Group)

By  Clem DeWitt

3/16/18 10:34am


Most Democrats and their reliable, compliant, obedient Brown Shirts that make up the bulk of the US press, are engaged in a relentless, bloodless coup against President Donald Trump, Constitutionally elected by We The People.

Before taking his Oath of Office, there were cries to Impeach Trump. Of course the Constitution’s ‘Impeachment clause’ only covers Officers of the Constitution, not those in waiting. On the Floor of the People’s House, Rep. Green, D-TX, has led a circus that offers Impeachment articles against Trump, articles that are not just outside the clause, they are particulars based on a dislike of Trump and nothing less, or more. The Framers, intellectually light years ahead of Trump’s detractors, did not include personal dislikes for removal from Office and this Republic is better for that wisdom. If Democrats should prevail by some bastardization of the clause, the Constitution would forever be subject to on-the-spot amendment, rendering it a catch all for someone’s pique, their angst, their politics.

Before the 2016 Election, daily we were treated to an accuser and another that followed the next day and the day after the next with complaints that Trump had engaged in sexual predation of a most unsavory nature. Led by Gloria Allred, a self-disgracing lawyer who listens for ambulance sirens, great theater was made public with Allred and an accuser complete with tears and tissues. After Trump was elected, the tears and tissues evaporated as quickly as did the accusers. (Lisa Bloom, Allred’s daughter, would highlight the sequel with her client offering a complaint against Judge Roy Moore, Republican Candidate from Alabama for the US Senate. Tears and tissues were followed by evaporation. Allred and Bloom make up the DNC’s Criminal Investigation Division when it comes to Snidely Whiplash Republicans)

Enter Stormy Daniels, latest darling of the Impeach Trump crowd. It should be noted that whatever might have taken place between Trump and Daniels took place before Trump became President. But, as steady as any drum beat, the Daniel’s story on most left leaning news organizations is front and center. In print, it is above the fold, in the visual world, it leads off so-called newscasts. To some minds vacant of understanding-knowing the Impeachment clause, Daniels is the Impeachable offense that can take Trump down.

“Asked on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” whether Daniels had ever been threatened with physical harm, Michael Avenatti (Daniel’s lawyer) succinctly replied, “Yes.” (THE HILL). Of course Avenatti would not entertain follow up questions, instead saying “people will have to tune in to ’60 Minutes’ on March 25,” when CBS is scheduled to air an interview with Daniels.” (Yep, CBS, the network that gave us Rather and Mapes, co-conspirators to bring down President George W. Bush) Will Avenatti reveal the nature of a physical threat made against Daniels and by whom? Or is this a page from the Allred-Bloom playbook of salaciousness fabricated by shadowy, evaporating accusers?

Stay tuned as this Kabuki Theater of The Absurd continues day after day after day and all because most Democrats and most in the US press dislike Trump to the point of seeking to upend the Constitution if necessary to take down Trump.


Title determined by the Editor from the text.

Edited by John R. Houk


© Clem DeWitt

The Mob of Mentally Ill Individuals

On March 10 I cross posted an edited Blogs for Victory post entitled, We Are At War. The post expressed frustration felt by American Patriots who have zero interest of a Leftist transformation of America. I urged readers who agree with such frustration to vent in a comment. On this particular blog comments automatically go to moderation. I found it on March 15 and I am cross posting the comment of March 16 on the blogs I manage. Thank you Bill sharpe.


JRH 3/16/18

Please Support NCCR


The Mob of Mentally Ill Individuals


By Bill sharpe

March 11, 2018 at 9:44 PM


Hello and greetings to my Christian constitutionalist patriots 3%ers and tea party freedom fighters.

We’ve all seen and read the post, that the Democratic Party is a mental illness and that’s exactly what it is! It’s a mob of mentally ill individuals who believe that there is nothing wrong with their ideas and philosophies, which this could not be further from the truth!.

The people that believe in their ideology go into schools and shoot up children, and in most mass shooting cases, or mob murders it’s always the Democrat, and just like any good mentally ill individuals they can always blame it on someone Or something else!

So then they want to impose penalties on something or someone who had absolutely nothing to do with it!, they are the Victimizers calling the Real Victims the Perpetrators, they want to penalize the Victims, and the whole time Patting Themselves on the Back and Pretending To Be Good People, pretending that they Are the Only Ones Who Know the Difference Between Right and Wrong and Good and Evil better than Anyone Else in the World!, and they are the only ones with a plan that actually works and Everyone Else is Wrong!.

So the whole entire time their intentions are entirely evil and deceiving we have seen this over and over in history we do not need to Repeat That Here in America!.

The Democratic Party which is in all reality the Communist Party, and their members include Islam, radical terrorist, mass murderers, master deceivers, people that walk into a church and pretend they are Christian, when the entire time they are a Islamic spy!.

They’re willing to Create and tell Any Lie Necessary to Accomplish their Goal which is to gain more and more power To Satisfy The Demons Inside Of Them, which can Never be Satisfied! You can see by their political ideology strategy With taxes, no matter how much they can get off of the people every year they will Demand More!!!.

They can never have enough power, or enough money to do the job right first time, because they spend so much money Being Paid Kickbacks and Payoffs, the funds for a project are never enough, Because the Money Just goes Around in a Circle and comes back TO Their Pockets.

So you see my friends This Is A Horrible Mental Illness that These People Have, and they Have Become an Army of Demons, telling Thousands Upon Thousands of Untruths, Creating Deception After Deception, and finally Thanks to our Founding Fathers We see that they are Out To Silence Our Voices before they try to Slaughter US, They Wish To Disarm Us To Make It Easier For The Mass Slaughter, just like their colleagues and friends Did – Hitler and Stalin!

Our Founding Fathers left Us an important message And laws, the two main tools And weapons that WE need to defend Ourselves AND our Freedoms and our liberties, Are the Freedom Of Speech And The Freedom to Bear Arms, and They are the Main Targets for this Demonic Army To be Successful!

Do Not Let Them Succeed !!!

Bill Sharpe.


The title arbitrarily developed from article by the Editor.

Edited by John R. Houk


© Bill Sharpe


Immigration Reform Thoughts

Looking at a Senator James Lankford Email

John R. Houk

© March 15, 2018


I live in Oklahoma. One of my Senators is Republican James Lankford. Yesterday I received what is probably a form email from Senator Lankford addressing Immigration reform and Border Security.


Since my name is used in the salutation, the Senator’s email is in response to a petitioned I signed or an immigration reform organization’s form email that I electronically signed. Either way, my signature was sent so long ago I don’t recall who I partnered with to share my feelings as an Oklahoman voter to Senator Lankford.


I vaguely remember that the issue was the Senator was supportive of a Border Wall for National Security against illegal border crossings. I do not recall the specifics of my displeasure with the Senator I did vote for in the past. The Senator Lankford email is what jogged my sketchy memory.


I did respond to Senator Lankford’s explanation of his Senate voting options. You should read the email I am cross posting, but since my response is shorter, I am posting that first. Some will agree with my thoughts. Some will partially agree. I have a suspicion some will strongly disagree with my favorability of inclusion of current benefactors of the so-called DACA dudes Obama unconstitutionally allowed to remain in the USA. The irony is I am with President Trump on giving immigration status to 1.8 million illegals as opposed to the fake Dem-proposal of (I think) 600,000 illegals.


Here was my email response to Senator Lankford:


Senator Lankford,


I’d rather jump at 1.8 million employed illegal immigrants to have a Green Card to become legal. I do not consider drug trafficking, human trafficking or gang membership to be gainful employment contributing to the benefit of the communities they live in. Those illegals need to be arrested then deported or imprisoned depending on the laws broken other than being just illegal.


BUT, before any move to legally absorbing gainfully employed illegals, border security needs to be enhanced. I appreciate your suggestion of expanding technology for a less expensive securing of the border, but I gotta tell ya; I don’t care how many billions taxpayers pay for a wall built even in difficult terrain. I’ve listened to various proposals by the private contractors and I am aware it is a physical possibility to accomplish a border wall. Combining tech with a wall provides at the very least that the government is serious about stemming the flow of illegal immigrants into the USA.


I am confidant many of my fellow Oklahoman voters feel the same way. So, by all means. Work on reforming the status of gainfully employed illegals, throw the book at the horrid criminal illegals and dear god, please end chain immigration in favor of merit immigration. That would make this voter happy.


And below is Senator James Lankford’s email sent to me and probably his Oklahoma constituents.


JRH 3/15/18

Please Support NCCR


Response from Senator James Lankford


By Senator James Lankford

Sent 3/14/18 9:18 PM

Sent from


Dear Mr. John Houk,


Thank you for sharing your thoughts and concerns on the congressional plan to fix our nation’s broken immigration system.  I have heard from other Oklahomans like you who also sent emails and letters or made phone calls to share their thoughts and ideas on proposals to repair our nation’s immigration policies.


As a member of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, I remain actively involved in conversations and negotiations surrounding proposals to repair the faulty immigration policies in our country.  My staff and I have had daily conversations and meetings for the past several months with Members of all political parties, in both Chambers of Congress, and with the Administration to develop policies that focus on the economic and security needs of our nation and can receive enough votes to become law.


Though immigration has been a contentious issue for some time, its resolution did not have a deadline.  However, on September 5, 2017, President Trump rescinded the 2012 Obama Administration initiative Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) because while he agreed that DACA recipients should receive protection, it is inappropriate for any president to create the program through executive action.  DACA provided temporary relief from removal for individuals who entered the United States as minors, most often with their parents, but it did not provide legal certainty for the DACA recipients or provide additional security for our nation.


When President Trump rescinded the program, he set the effective end date to be March 5, 2018, which gave Congress six months to provide legislative permanency for these individuals and time to include provisions to prevent a similar situation from happening in the future  It is worth noting that DACA-eligible individuals were at no time given the opportunity to go through the naturalization process unless they returned to their home countries for at least 10 years and then began the application process.


As you may know, the White House released its framework for immigration reform and border security on January 25, 2018.  I share the opinions of the President and other Administration officials who believe a permanent solution for individuals who qualify for DACA should be paired with border and entry security, reasonable limitations on family unification visas, and the elimination of the convoluted visa lottery.  The framework of this agreement was based on four pillars that Democrats and Republicans agreed to with President Trump during a White House meeting earlier in January.


As part of the negotiations to fund the government after a shutdown in January, during the week of February 12, the Senate opened the floor for proposals and debate to solve our nation’s immigration issues.  Throughout the week several groups of Senators proposed a variety of plans and ideas to create a solution for DACA-eligible individuals, but only one of the proposals, the SECURE and SUCCEED Act, included the necessary reforms in the White House framework and could have received enough votes to also pass the House.  I joined Senators Grassley (IA), Cornyn (TX), Tillis (NC), Perdue (GA), Cotton (AR), Ernst (IA), Corker (TN), Isakson (GA) and Alexander (TN) to introduce the Act.


Each of the four bills debated in the Senate received bipartisan support, but every bill fell short of the 60 votes needed to proceed to a final vote.


I have heard from some Oklahomans who have asked why I did not support alternate proposals that contained aspects of the four pillars.  For example, one proposal included funding for border security, but not until 2020.  Even then, the bill restricted how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could use those fund, and it included no enforcement provisions.  The bill created a convoluted process that could lead to a rapid pathway to citizenship for a large group of undocumented individuals.


For all other undocumented individuals in the country, it provided deferred action and a guarantee they could remain in the country illegally unless they committed a felony or three misdemeanors.  Regarding family unification, the bill’s proposal did nothing to help clear the visa backlog of family members who have already been sponsored by American citizens.  Another proposal provided a pathway to citizenship for many individuals with a variety of immigration statuses but authorized no funds for border security.  These provisions made the proposals impossible to support.


I believe strong border and entry security is an important step to necessary step to reform our immigration system.  Every nation, including ours, has the right to secure its borders and control its entry process for safety and economic development.  It is important to remember that the southern border is full of diverse terrain including mountains, desert, and the Rio Grande River.  I do not believe a 2,000-mile fence alone is the best and most cost-effective solution.  Technology like tethered drones, seismic sensors, and vehicle barriers are very effective in many areas of the desert Southwest.


The SECURE and SUCCEED Act appropriates $25 billion for a variety of border and entry security.  DHS has developed a ten-year plan for increased personnel and for a variety of infrastructure such as a wall system, fencing, levees, technology, and other physical barriers.  It also included necessary methods of enforcement, such as the permanent authorization of the voluntary electronic employment verification system (E-Verify) and the enactment of Kate’s law.


In addition to border and entry security, Oklahomans on both sides of the immigration debate are rightly concerned about permanency for DACA recipients.  The SECURE and SUCCEED Act provides an opportunity for 1.8 million DACA-eligible immigrants to earn naturalization in 10 to 12 years.  Much of this proposal mimics my original proposal from September 25, 2017, called the SUCCEED Act.  You can read more about the SUCCEED Act on my website


It is important to note that under DACA, recipients were not granted legal immigrant status, were not put on a pathway to citizenship, and did not have the right to vote in our elections.  Additionally, they are barred from receiving any federal public benefits, which would continue while the individual has conditional permanent residency.


Regarding family unification, our current system allows individuals who have earned a naturalization to petition for numerous extended family members, who in some instances may not otherwise qualify for a visa.  The SECURE and SUCCEED act would place reasonable limitations on family-based immigration to allow spouses and minor children visas to immigrate with their parent or spouse.  Other family members could still come to the U.S. for extended visits, but they would not get automatic citizenship eligibility.  This proposal is similar to the proposal made by the Clinton Administration in the 90s and the “Gang of Eight” bill in 2018.  It is important to note that this change would not affect individuals who have already petitioned for extended family members to enter the United States.


Currently, the Diversity Visa program provides green cards for up to 50,000 immigrants each year from countries with low rates of emigration to the United States.  Prospective immigrants register with the Department of State, which then selects applicants at random.  Both Republicans and Democrats have supported legislation to get rid of the diversity visa program in the past.  Similar to the Senate’s proposal in 2013, the SECURE and SUCCEED Act would end the lottery program and reallocate the visas to eliminate the existing family-based and employment-based immigration backlogs.


As I have said before, our nation was built on the strength and diversity of legal immigrants.  However, unchecked illegal immigration can create a serious threat to our nation’s security and a financial strain on our economy.  While I believe that all people are made in God’s image and deserve dignity and respect, it is reasonable to expect those entering and living within our borders to obey the laws of our nation.  Although the debate can get heated, we must remember that immigration is about real, live human beings, not just numbers on a page.


Although the SECURE and SUCCEED Act was limited to the four pillars I mentioned above, there are many other areas of our nation’s immigration system that need to be repaired by Congress, such as visa and Temporary Protected Status reform.


Congress needs to create clear and consistent immigration laws that establishes a better legal immigration system to disincentivize illegal immigration. As you may know, the March 5th deadline for DACA recipients became somewhat obsolete due to temporary federal court orders, but I will continue to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, in both Chambers of Congress, and in the Administration to come up with long-term solutions to fit the needs to the American people.


I hope this information is helpful to you.  Please feel free to contact me again via email at for more information about my work in the United States Senate for all of us.


In God We Trust,




James Lankford
United States Senator


Immigration Reform Thoughts

Looking at a Senator James Lankford Email 


John R. Houk

© March 15, 2018


Response from Senator James Lankford


Senator Lankford About Page


Senator James Lankford is committed to the protection of the future for our families, the transparency and efficiency of the federal government, and the ability of our nation to remain the world leader. He believes that empowering families, individuals, communities, and private enterprise will grow our economy and protect our values.


After serving four years in the U.S. House of Representatives, James was elected to the U.S. Senate to complete an unexpired term on November 4, 2014 and re-elected to a full six-year senate term on November 8, 2016.


As chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs and Federal Management, Lankford fights unnecessary and burdensome regulation and advocates for a more restrained federal government.


Personal faith, local decision-making, and opportunity for every person, regardless of their background, are core values for Senator Lankford. Before his time in Congress, from 1995 to 2009, James served as Director of Student Ministry at the Baptist Convention of Oklahoma and Director of the Falls Creek Youth Camp, the largest youth camp in the United States, with more than 51,000 individuals attending each summer.


James lives in Edmond with his wife Cindy. They have been married for 25 years and have two daughters: Hannah and Jordan. He enjoys spending time with his family, sport shooting, and reading.



Steven Hawking has died…

The Einstein of the 21st Century has passed away – Stephen Hawking.

Stephen Hawking: 1963 & just prior passing with ALS


JRH 3/14/18

Please Support NCCR


Steven Hawking has died…


Posted by furtherglory

March 14, 2018 9:11 am

Scrapbookpages Blog


You can read about Steven Hawking in this article:


You can read about the death of Steven Hawking in this news article:


The followin[g] quote is from the news article:


Begin quote


Hawking’s children, Lucy, Robert and Tim, announced their father’s passing in the following statement:


We are deeply saddened that our beloved father passed away today. He was a great scientist and an extraordinary man whose work and legacy will live on for many years. His courage and persistence with his brilliance and humor inspired people across the world. He once said, “It would not be much of a universe if it wasn’t home to the people you love.” We will miss him forever.


Hawking was first diagnosed with ALS in 1963, at the age of 21. He was only expected to live for another couple of years, but was ultimately discovered to have a rare form of the disease that progressed at a much slower rate. He was able to walk on his own for much of the 1960s with the help of crutches, but eventually required a mobilized wheelchair. When he lost the use of his voice, he began using a unique method of synthesized computer vocalizations that allowed him to remain vocal for the rest of his life.


End quote


Scrapbookpages Blog Homepage


FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up…

The FBI and the Las Vegas Police still have shared next to nothing on the Mandalay Bay Massacre that took 58 lives pinning the deed on Stephan Paddock.


Pamela Geller smells a cover-up on actual details to motive. She points to FBI as the perpetrators of a potential cover-up. The lack of details has led Geller to believe FBI insiders narrative a cover-up is motivated due to connections to ISIS and Paddock. Apparently, such a narrative is feared to change Homeland security options. My guess is the narrative-fear is based more on how the American public reacts to Islamic terrorism of such magnitude on American soil.


JRH 3/13/18

Please Support NCCR


FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Agents Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence Including ISIS Terror Link


By Pamela Geller 

March 12, 2018

Geller Report


Paddock Photo on ISIS Website


The shooting at the Mandalay Bay Casino in Las Vegas took 58 lives, and months later the FBI still has told us nothing about why it happened. This monstrous slaughter took place last October, and still the FBI has nothing and has said nothing about the killer Stephen Paddock’s motive. Yet they have dismissed ISIS claims out of hand, despite the fact ISIS does not take credit for attacks that are not theirs. Not only did they take credit, they did something they never did before – they doubled and tripled down. The Islamic State (IS) featured an infographic on the Las Vegas attack in the 100th issue of its al-Naba weekly newspaper, and indicated that the shooter, whom they called “Abu Abdul Barr al-Amriki,” had converted to Islam six months ago.


Jihad is the only motive that makes any sense. And the fact that the FBI has nothing and is engaged in a massive coverup points to that. That Stephen Paddock left no digital trail might very well be deliberate – to show how incompetent our law enforcement agencies are. ISIS took credit for the downing of the Russian jetliner in the Sinai. Everyone in law enforcement dismissed that too. Until ISIS provided proof a couple of weeks later, that is. I suspect we may see the same thing happen here. The Vegas attack mirrors the sophisticated planning and secrecy consistent with more complex ISIS plots such as the Sinai explosion of Russian airliner.


We have been told that because Paddock was white and 64, it is unlikely that he would be a convert to Islam. Why? Islam is ideological — it’s not a race or an age. It’s a belief system. It’s also being said that if Paddock was a convert, Homeland Security is going to have to change their whole approach to jihad terror in the Homeland. We can only hope. Because this war has nothing to do with age, race or gender — it’s religious. And profiling is required. On the top of my watch list would be converts. Who would be attracted to an ideology that is the cause of hatred, misogyny, subjugation and slaughter?


If you don’t believe that the FBI is capable of this level of corruption and dishonesty, just consider the fact that an undercover agent told one of the jihadis who attacked my free speech event in Garland, Texas to “tear up Texas,” and yet now claims that he didn’t know he was actually going to do it. This is not an FBI of patriots. This is Obama’s FBI.


“FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Agents Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence Including ISIS Terror Link to Mandalay Bay Massacre,” True Pundit, March 12, 2018 (thanks to Andrew Bostom):


The “official” narrative you’ve been fed by the FBI and Las Vegas officials about the massacre at Mandalay Bay that claimed 58 lives is purely fiction, a polished story contrived to cover up the disturbing facts surrounding the worst mass shooting ever in the United States, according the FBI insiders and high-ranking intelligence officials.


And now, after months of corporate-infused spin by MGM Resorts and outright lies from officials in the FBI and the Las Vegas Metro Police Department, federal agents and intelligence officials are spilling the beans about what really happened on and before the Oct. 1 massacre.


“It’s a movie script that was written after the shooting to rewrite what really happened,” one FBI agent said. “The investigation is an entirely different story that we are not allowed to talk about. If we do and get caught, we get fired and probably charged (criminally).”


But why the cover up?


The answer to that is perhaps even more complicated than the revelations surrounding the shooting, which can only be explained as shocking and troubling to everyday Americans not connected to the law enforcement community and political machine that has become today’s FBI. While few if any bright Americans believed the official back story of the supposed Stephen Paddock rampage, the truth — it turns out — is even more bizarre than fiction here.


In fact, it’s downright frightening.


The FBI maintains that Stephen Paddock — the reported lone gunman — was a mystery man and his motive for killing dozens and injuring over 500 people still has not been pinpointed. Those assertions are simply untrue, FBI officials confirm. Lies. In the coming weeks, True Pundit will detail various parts of its investigation into the shooting and more importantly, paint a detailed portrait of the events leading to the shooting and Paddock’s likely accomplices and associates.


The major, shocking revelations include:


When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence of multiple gunmen, they told agents to stand down and focus on Paddock only. Even a key internal audio captured by a hotel guest of multiple rifles firing from Mandalay Bay went ignored, covered up.

When FBI brass was provided the names of persons of interest who likely assisted Paddock, agents were instructed not to interview the individuals. One would-be target was never pursued despite pleadings from intelligence officials and agents that he was possibly the second shooter.

The FBI uncovered specific evidence showing that Paddock was anti-Trump and had an affiliation with ANTIFA, though it never was divulged to the public and agents did not follow such leads, per orders of their superiors.

When FBI brass was given evidence that the shooting was possibly linked to ANTIFA radicals working with an ISIS-linked terror faction — including the full identities of some of the suspects with ties to both radical groups and at or near Mandalay Bay the night of the deadly shooting — agents were never instructed to follow up on the investigation and pursue the suspects.

When intelligence officials approached the FBI and LVMPD with external evidence that Paddock was only one member of an organized terror cell — which included as many as five gunman who planned to fire from the Mandalay Bay suite — the compelling evidence was covered up. Never pursued.

When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence that Paddock’s death was not a suicide, the intelligence was never pursued by the FBI and LVMPD. FBI sources said Paddock suffered two gunshots. His autopsy report only details a single bullet to the head. FBI sources maintain Paddock’s autopsy was doctored and is a fraud.

When an ISIS-linked “businessman” from Turkey was pinpointed in the investigation — and found to be residing near Las Vegas at the time of the shooting — FBI agents were not instructed to follow up and pursue intelligence leads showing possible links to the massacre.

FBI and intelligence officials believe Paddock and associates chose to strike the Las Vegas country music concert with over 22,000 people because they likely supported President Trump. FBI agents said they were instructed to keep that key motive quiet too.

When MGM refused to share cctv footage from Mandalay Bay, FBI agents were threatened by superiors that any whistle blowers divulging such revelations to the media would lose their jobs. The FBI still has never been provided all the camera footage from the Mandalay Bay, FBI agents said.

When FBI agents and agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives informed FBI bosses that Paddock didn’t start buying dozens of guns until after Trump’s election, they were told to keep that fact quiet and shrouded.

When FBI agents followed up on an ABC News report that Paddock wired $100,000 to the Philippines shortly before the rampage they confirmed the report was untrue. Instead of disputing it, FBI bosses embraced the false story, saying it helped build the narrative the Bureau was constructing about Paddock. FBI agents believe the story was planted with ABC by their superiors.


And there is much much more that is not detailed here today. This is only a summary of True Pundit’s investigation.


This FBI-generated smoke screen has occurred during the watch of FBI Director Christopher Wray and his Las Vegas Field Office Special Agent in Charge Aaron Rouse, a disciple of Andrew McCabe, the defrocked and disgraced former deputy director of the FBI. It has unfolded during President Donald Trump’s first year in office. Does Wray even know about what amounts to a conspiracy led by the FBI to cover up a mass killing of U.S. citizens? Whether he does or does not seems to matter little. This is no longer his problem to fix. Trump and others must investigate and provide honest answers. The FBI can no longer be trusted to do so. On any level. Especially in Las Vegas. It is difficult to imagine that any competent director of the FBI would not know about this. Unless he was lied to by FBI brass….


Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.


Copyright © 2018 Geller Report


Geller Biography


Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of The Geller Report and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). She is the author of Fatwa: Hunted in America (foreword by Geert Wilders) (Dangerous Books), The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton) (Simon & Schuster) and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for numerous publications.


Geller’s activism on behalf of human rights has won international notice. She is a foremost defender of the freedom of speech against attempts to force the West to accept Sharia blasphemy laws, and against Sharia self-censorship by Western media outlets. Her First Amendment lawsuits filed nationwide have rolled back attempts to limit Americans’ free speech rights and limit speech to only one political perspective, and exposed attempts to make an end-run around the First Amendment by illegitimately restricting access to public fora. Her free speech event in Garland, Texas led to the capture or killing of several murderous jihadists, smoking out terror cells, leading to an increase in the threat level to BRAVO and to the consequent arrests of jihadists in several states.


Pamela Geller has been the subject of a profile on 60 Minutes, and of cover stories in the Sunday New York Times Metro section and READ THE REST


Attaching Global Domination to Jews – Tragic Fallacy

John 4: 22; Romans 1: 16 NKJV:


22 You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews.


16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ,[a] for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek.


John R. Houk

© March 12, 2018


On 1/30/18 I cross posted Dr. Lively’s call for Christian Clergy of all Denominations to rise up and confront the American Left’s (Deep State) assault on President Trump’s to Make America Great Again. Dr. Lively brought the imagery of the Revolutionary War’s Black-Robed Regiment involvement of using the pulpit to support Liberty from British tyranny.


On the NCCR version of this cross post, my Christian Brother Jyrki made several comments that began as Christian thoughts but trending toward a bit more of Conspiracy Theory.


Jyrki quotes from a Texe Marrs post that lumps all Jews with Communists who desire the destruction of our U.S. Constitution and Christianity in general. And to emphasize the anti-Jew thoughts, Marrs names the evil Jews such as Zionists, Israel and (OH MY GOD) the entire Rothschilds banking family (Jewish family highly connected to international banking spanning nations and centuries).


(I’m not posting Jyrki’s comment here but you can read the 3/11/18 comment HERE. Below this point are my thoughts inspired by Jyrki. Jyrki is a good guy, so I hope my disagreement with the concept of the Jews wanting to rule world doesn’t irritate him too much.)


I’ve always had a problem with people (especially Christians) that group the entirety of Jews as a group of evil because Left Wing people with a Jewish heritage gravitate toward New World Order godless Marxist totalitarianism. The reality is Jews are divided between Observant Jews (Orthodox, Conservative and probably even some Reform Jews) and Left-Wing Secularist Jews who too often reject the Jewish traditions of faith in God (an Observant Jew would write “G-d” out of reverent respect) and moral ethics involved in that faith.


Jyrki the thoughts you found above is supportive of the Un-Biblical Replacement Theology doctrine (a Christion Zionist perspective) and castigating all Jews because self-loathing godless Jews looking for Leftist utopianism largely along the Marxist paradigm.


Any association of Jewish Rabbis to global domination is simply counter-Judaic. Nine/Tenths of Observant Jews simply desire to worship without persecution which is the centrality of Zionism. The Jewish Left embraced Zionism because they want place to live where Jew-haters can’t persecute them as most recently (but not limited to) the Nazi Holocaust. Ergo, even secular Zionists do not desire global domination. Secular Zionists are merely people of Jewish heritage supportive of Israel – the Land of the Jews – to live out a counter-productive Leftist ideology.


Then there are those of Jewish heritage that have adopted a Marxist point of view. These guys are NOT Zionists. They are globalist Communists (Marx-Lenin-Stalin-Mao violent revolution or Gramsci cultural subversion) that are in a club that contains way more non-Jews than Jews. Communism has zero to do with Zionism if one defines Zionism as a movement for Jews to return to the land of their Biblical heritage. I have no doubt there a Jews that are Communists living Israel just as there are non-Jewish Communists (unfortunately) living in America or elsewhere.


The Communist (Marxist) goal is global revolution to destroy national heritages and transform/replace the old with a State acceptable transnational (aka globalist) culture devoid of religious morality. Any Communist who calls himself a Zionist is either self-deceived, outwardly deceptive or delusional.


JRH 3/12/18

Please Support NCCR


Further Reading:


Communism, Anti-Semitism & the Jews; By JERRY Z. MULLER; Commentary Magazine; 8/1/1988