Robert Mueller mandate as Special Prosecutor was to investigate if there was collusion between Donald Trump and Russia in the 2016 election. Guess what? Not a scintilla of such evidence has been uncovered against now President Trump.
Mueller’s indictments and guilty pleas are all related to individuals apart from President Trump for potential personal illicit actions connected to Russia except for Mike Flynn. Flynn hasn’t been connected to Russia in his guilty plea, rather Flynn pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI in a case of gotcha entrapment. The enchantment was getting Flynn on audio speaking to Russian Ambassador – WHICH WAS NOT ILLEGAL – then the FBI looked for the exact wording in their Flynn interrogation. The FBI audio of Flynn was likely acquired by a misrepresented FISA warrant acquired by using the FAKE Steele/Russia Dossier.
Thus, using the premise of the idiotic lie, Mueller is being fingered for lying under oath to a Senate panel in 2005. Here’s the story.
JRH 12/12/17 (Hat Tip Christian News Alerts)
Report: Whistle-blower says Robert Mueller lied to the Senate – that’s a crime
By Kit Perez
December 11, 2017
Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation has come under fire repeatedly for political bias. Now a whistleblower who once worked for Mueller claims the special prosecutor is more than just biased.
According to an exclusive report from Big League Politics, former FBI agent Chuck Marler says Mueller lied to the Senate in 2005 when questioned about an FBI surveillance program. Marler says that “Mueller and certain members of FBI Management deceived the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in 2005 and they intimidated and bullied the U.S. Office of Personnel Management from 2005 through 2008.”
Marler told Big League Politics that because of Mueller’s response then, “since Mueller has taken over as Special Counsel, I’ve been concerned about him continuing that behavior.”
Another Day, Another Scandal
Marler worked for the FBI’s Special Surveillance Group (SSG); Mueller was the FBI director at the time. As the secretive program rapidly grew in scope after 9/11, the agents involved asked for “better protection, better compensation and more clear duties defined through Congress.”
According to Marler, Mueller and FBI management were “continually notified” that the agency was growing “way beyond the scope of their operational plan” and the agent’s safety was at risk. But when FBI management didn’t respond, the agents took their case to Congress.
Marler says that two FBI employees wrote a letter, sending it to each member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) notified the agents that she had received the letter, and of Mueller’s response. Big League Politics reports:
The two employees involved in the SSCI letter were informed by staff at Senator Hutchison’s Office of Mueller’s response to the letter which the two employees knew the response was not truthful.
They sent another, less detailed letter to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The OPM opened a routine investigation in response; but once the the OPM officer assigned to the case initiated an investigation, she found herself threatened by the FBI with arrest – simply for doing her job.
Former agent Marler says the SSG agents who initially sent the letter were threatened with “arrest, imprisonment, raids of their residences and loss of their job.” All of the agents involved were “overtly and covertly punished, then and to this day.”
Mueller’s Corruption Runs Deep
Marler spoke out to Big League Politics because of their ties to Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group; the former agent hopes to shine a light on the dirty backroom deals Mueller was involved in and the threats that the FBI, under Mueller, leveled at those trying to do their jobs.
How does Marler know about it? He was one of the agents involved.
“I know the OPM Officer, the FBI employees and their supervisor because obviously, I was one of the four employees,” he wrote. He says the corruption “of certain members of the FBI management” eventually led him to quit and start his own business.
Marler doesn’t expect that the evidence will be easy to uncover, but he goes on to say that he “pray[s] Mueller will answer for his actions.”
Kit Perez is a Conservative Institute contributor. She is an intelligence analyst with a dual specialty in counterintelligence and HUMINT. She writes on national security, tech, and privacy issues. Kit has a B.A. in Counterintelligence and an M.A. in Intelligence Studies from American Military University.
© 2015-2017 Conservative Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Conservative Institute Mission Statement
The Conservative Institute exists to provide a platform for well-reasoned, well-written, and well-distributed articles and columns defending conservative values.
At the time of our founding, there exist only two types of conservative publications: popular-but-misleading and honest-but-boring.
Our goal is to ignore the mistakes made by both types of publications and instead create well-written, popular commentary that can help people understand the conservative narrative.
One of the biggest problems in political activism is that a feedback loop exists between media organizations and the “base” of activists that make up the foundational readers. Because the readers want to read content that says a certain thing, the media organizations only say simplified versions of that certain thing – and a blind feedback loop is created.
CI is different. We believe in focusing on content distribution that is less short-term oriented and allows us to say what needs to be said regardless of who is offended – even if that means sometimes disagreeing with the base or Republican leadership.
The fundamental value of CI is an open discussion. In other words, our goal is to help ensure that the political conversation in America isn’t lopsided towards the politically correct or mindless populism. Right now, nearly all content created falls under those two categories.
Our political values can be summarized as the pillar principles of a strong society, which is explained in our parent organization The Strong Society. We believe in natural morality, slow and gradual conservative reform, maximizing prosperity, never compromising on security, and pursuing individual justice in every area of life.
SEE ALSO CI About Page