One of my longtime blog friends and an expert on the nefarious side of Islam (it is my humble opinion any good side is based on ignorance), posted a comment on my NCCR blog responding to “CAIR-Hitler Angry Kelly File Reports on ‘Honor Diaries’”. In case you didn’t read it I culminated that post with a tongue-in-cheek video of the German high command hosted by Hitler speaking in German and dubbed with English subtitles as if the meeting was a Council on American-Islamic Relations meeting. So enjoy Dajjal’s comment that I am cross posting.
I am giving the comment an arbitrary title.
JRH 4/12/14
*******************************
Let’s Anger CAIR and Offend Muslims by Exposing Them
By Dajjal
Edited by John R. Houk
Let’s piss off CAIR and offend Muslims by exposing them for what they are. They emulate Moe as per QV 33.21. Moe told them something important for them to obey as regards their wives. This text comes from “The Life of Muhammad”, page 651. May the blessing of God be upon all who read it! (OCR does not work well with that book and I cannot see worth a damn, so there may be some typos in this quote. [Blog Editor: I am giving my best guess to the OCR errors])
You have rights over your wives and they have rights over you. You have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put them in separate rooms and to beat them but not with severity. If they refrain from these things thy have the right to their food and clothing with kindness. Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners with you having no control of their persons. You have taken them only as a trust from God, and you have the enjoyment of their persons by the words of God, so understand (this and listen to) my words 0 men, for I have told you.
Wives are prisoners of Muslims, having no control over their persons. Moe said that, not me.
Wikiislam quotes Tabari volume 9, pages 112-113, the last sermon, thusly:
Now then, O people, you have a right over your wives and they have a right over you. You have [the right] that they should not cause anyone of whom you dislike to tread on your beds; and that they should not commit any open indecency. If they do, then Allah permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain from [evil], they have the right to their food and clothing in accordance with the custom. Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from Allah, and you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word of Allah, so understand and listen Wives are like domestic animals, owning nothing.
Notice that, in both texts, Muslims are allowed to beat their wives, but not severely. Wife beating is explicitly permitted in Surah An-Nisa’ 4:34.
Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allâh has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property, etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most High, Most Great.
Note: the “lightly” qualifier is in a parenthetical expression, not in the translation. Get a clue: it ain’t in the Arabic text!
(4:34:29) wa-iḍ’ribūhunna and [finally] strike them.
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=4&verse=34
Of course that says nothing about honoricide, which must surely be a figment of Arabic culture, unrelated to Islam. Yeah, right 😉
I will extract the interesting parts from a long hadith: Sahih Bukhari 6.60.249
[…]Then they both got out of the boat, and while they were walking on the sea shore, Al-Khadir saw a boy playing with other boys. Al-Khadir got hold of the head of that boy and pulled it out with his hands and killed him. Moses said, ‘Have you killed an innocent soul who has killed nobody! Truly, you have done an illegal thing.’ (18.74) He said, “Didn’t I tell you that you can have no patience with me?’ (18.75) […]
Sahih Bukhari 6.60.250
[…] ‘His parents were believers, and he (the boy) was a non-believer and we (Khadir) feared lest he would oppress them by obstinate rebellion and disbelief.’ (18.80) (i.e. that their love for him would urge them to follow him in his religion, ‘so we (Khadir) desired that their Lord should change him for them for one better in righteousness and near to mercy’ (18:81). This was in reply to Moses’ saying: Have you killed an innocent soul.’? (18.74). ‘Near to mercy” means they will be more merciful to him than they were to the former whom Khadir had killed. Other than Sa’id, said that they were compensated with a girl. Dawud bin Abi ‘Asim said on the authority of more than one that this next child was a girl.
[….]
It is ok to kill a child in hopes Allah will give you one better. And it is not just in the hadith, its in the Koran, too!
18:74. Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him. Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had killed none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great Munkar – prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”
18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were believers, and we feared lest he should oppress them by rebellion and disbelief.
18:81. “So we intended that their Lord should change him for them for one better in righteousness and near to mercy.
Yeah, right; honoricide is in the Koran & hadith; must be a mistake or misinterpretation. Of ‘cuss. 😉 It is confirmed in Shari’ah!! Islamic law says there is no retaliation for offing yer brats. Read it and curse Islam.
Reliance of the Traveller lists, in o1.0, classes of acts not subject to retaliation.
(4) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring;
It is on page 602, look it up.
That leaves FGM; surely that is strictly Arabic culture, having no basis in Islam. Yeah, right. 😉
Sunan Abu Dawud Book 41, Number 5251:
Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah:
A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to page 77 and get a clue.
e4.3 Circumcision is obligatory (0: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)
That is Islamic law; obligatory according to the Shafi’i school of Islamic law.
http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/33/21/
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_Farewell_Sermon
http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/4/34/
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=4&verse=34
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/006.060.249.html
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/bukhari/006.060.250.html
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/018-qmt.php#018.074
http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=602
http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/Hadith/dawud/041.5251.html
http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=77
_____________________________________
© Dajjal
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
If you ever lifted a rock or other cover from a snake, how did its reaction differ from CAIR’s? Take a good close look at the Arabic word for Allah and tell me that ain’t a pictogram of a snake.
By uttering and publishing the relevant facts, we are attempting to bring the conversation back on track; away from the diversions of alleged hatred, bigotry and racism.
What race does Ms. Ali belong to? Did she change her race when she apostatized?? Islam plays the race and victim cards to divert attention from exposure of its true nature.
LikeLike
Let’s see if there is any denial on this and proof that you are wrong . —– Not going to happen
LikeLike
You got it, God Guts Glory and Ammo. Muslims learned early on, with the sad experience of Mike Ghouse, how I deal with al-Taqiyya so most of them do not bother trying,.
If they were going to take me on, they would begin by denying the authenticity of hadith, which form the basis of the Sira & Tahrik. How does one disprove a saying from the highest rated authentic hadith collection? If Tabari and Ishaq are bogus, what is left? How are Muslims to know what Moe did for them to emulate?
They can assert that two significant Qur’an verses were mis-translated or that I mis-interpret them. I can reply with quotes from the Arabic text and direct translation from Corpus Qur’an. Furthermore, the Qur’an is hadith: most of it was passed down from mouth to ear, not written immediately on revelation.
It is an argument they can not win. I have the facts and I pound those facts.
Thank you for reblogging this. The wider the audience. the better. Check out the Kab Ashraf account at Scribd where you will find pile driving pdf files you can embed in blog posts.
LikeLike
Thanks and I will check it out .
LikeLike
Reblogged this on GOD, GUTS,OLD GLORYand AMMO.
LikeLike
How gives you right to run propaganda about our religion. Do you even have any prove for what you have published above………
These are all the specimen of your hipocracy…….
You right that Islam was forcefully introduced and spread, Did Muhammad PBUH drew a single drop of blood at the event of Fateh Makha.
LikeLike
By the blessing of Almighty God, my great grandfather had the wisdom to depart from England & Canada and come to Michigan where he and his descendents could enjoy the protection of the Bill of Rights. The first amendment in that document establishes the write of free speech.
In a democratic form of government, open and unfettered discussion of public issues is required to maintain liberty.
We need and we have the right to expose the evil design, content, intentions and effects of Islam along with National Socialism, Fascism & Communism. And so, by God, we will blessed well continue to do, like this:
LikeLike
Osama the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives me the right to tell the TRUTH of the antichrist religion of Islam. Frankly I don’t know anything about “Fateh Makha”. I do know plenty that old Mo spilled blood like a butcher from the evil Quran and Hadith. Puke be unto him (PBUH).
LikeLike
The free speech clause of the first amendement seizes and holds fast to the natural law right given by YHWH in the act of creating us with organs of speech. If ya got ’em, use ’em; do not be silent in the face of existential evil but anounce its presence and accurately describe it to warn your fellows.
LikeLike
If your consider Islam a lie and it’s peace false then why are the Israeli invading and slaughtering the Muslims of Gaza. O my bad I think it’s Dajjal how said that slaughter those how are not of your opinion. If you think that you are so true then im right here convince me that you are true and Islam is wrong……
Bet you don’t have the guts to do that don’t you?
Actual you ppl don’t even know that who you even are.. You are the puppets of dajjal……..!!
LikeLike
Israel was invaded and occupied by slaves of Satan in 638. The Ottoman Empire lost the Levant after fighting on the wrong side in WWI. The Balfour Declaration resulted from a Jew helping England to synthesize nitrates which helped them win the war.
Gaza, Judea & Samaria were seized illegally by Jordan and Egypt in ’48. Israel won them back in ’67 when the Muslims tried and failed again to exterminate Israel.
Muslims attack, Jews retaliate. Israel should obliterate.
Slaughtering those “not of your opinion” defines Islam. In your arrogance and insanity you project your own evil onto your intended victims. The Islamic law of the Hanafi madhab, codified in the second volume of Hedaya, on page 216, is explicit. “Infidelity is an evil which must be removed from the world by Islam or death.” Kindly kiss my ass.
LikeLike
You ppl are just sitting over there to make a bad impression of Muslims all around the world………….
LikeLike
The vast majority of Muslims are descended from the early victims, first of deception; the world’s most vicious con game, second & more numerous, from conquest. Their ancestors were either tricked, converted at sword point or converted to get out from under grevious levy of Jizya.
The true believers, described in Surah Al-Anfal 1…5, Surah At-Taubah 9.111 & Surah Al-Hujuraat 49.15, are the worst of living creatures; willingly enslaved to Satan and ought rightly to be obliterated.
We write to warn our fellow Kaffirs of the existential threat to life, liberty & prosperity posed by Islam.
LikeLike
Osama no one has to try. Crazy Muslims do a good enough themselves to perpetuate a bad impression.
LikeLike
“Crazy Muslims” is redundant.
LikeLike
You forming your own Hadith does not give any authenticity to it.all the Hadith by prophet Muhammad PBUH are preserved carefully and with great authenticity.
LikeLike
Seventh century written Arabic was in its infancy, lacking vowels and diacritical marks, it had only consonants, thus it was no more than a memory aid with seven variant readings. Nothing in Islam is reliable or verifiable. The whole ball of turd is hearsay.
In my original posts, I cite sources and provide links to those available on the web. Like this:
LikeLike
Osama exactly. Your own considered holy books condemn MO (Puke be unto him) as a sadistic murderer. That is the perfect man of Islam.
LikeLike
Here’s smthng about dajjal…..
Dajjal who is the opposite of the saver Messiah is described as anti-messiah by the Jews. And Dajjal is believed to be killed by the breath of the Messiah.
In the Old Testament, Dajjal of the end of time is also mentioned. The evil forcef of Dajjal who destroys everything, prepares a dreadful plan, but is defeated in the end is mentioned in the book of Ezekiel. (2) Dajjal concept which also takes place in Zechariah and Joel shows itself in Daniel more clearly. Daniel sees him in person with naked eye and pictures a portrait of him. (3) This Dajjal is known as a big sovereign, commander of strong armies, who defeated three kings, and who destroyed temples.
Dajjal is especially mentioned in Christianity, too. According to St. Paul, it is one of the religious fundamentals of Christianity to believe in the coming of the Messiah in the end of time.
In the New Testament it is told that Dajjal will appear before the second coming of Messiah and will be killed by the breath of Hazrat Eesa (Jesus/Messiah). (4)
Dajjal is mentioned as Meshiha Daggala in the Matthew Bible. Meshiha Daggala is clearly mentioned in the Syrian translation of the New Testament. (5)
We see in a verse of the Matthew Bible, this is told about the false Messiah:
Students of Jesus asked what will be the sign for the end of the world. Jesus replied them: Do not let anyone turn you, because many will come in my name saying I am the Messiah and will lead many astray. And many false prophets will lead many astray, and many others will lose his love because mischief will rise. Only those who withstand until the end will reach salvation. (6)
In another verse, those false messiahs are described as to be able to show big omens and wonders. (7)
In the first letter of the John Bible, Dajjal is mentioned as antichrist as the opposite of Jesus. (8)
As it is seen, in those verses Dajjal is mentioned as a community rather than a person. However, most of the Catholic theologians agree that it will be a person. (9)
LikeLike
Messiah Ad-Dajjal is the anti-Muhammad, not the Anti-Christ. In Islamic eschatology, Isa, your pale imitation of Jesus, returns to kill the remnant of Jews & Christians and rule the world by the Koran. Jesus Christ is not a genocidal warlord. He came not to destroy men’s live but to save them. Moe said to the men of Mekkah: “I bring you slaughter.”
LikeLike
According to Hindus…….
One Hindu research professor, in his stunning book, claims that
description of avatar found in the holy books of Hindu religion is in
fact that of the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w). A little while ago, in India a
fact revealing book has been published, which has been the topic of
discussions all over the country. Amazingly, the author of
this book is a fair-minded famous professor, who happens to be a Hindu. His name is Pundit Vedaprakash Upadhai and the name of his fact-revealing book is “Kalki Avtar”. The author is a Hindu Brahmin by caste of Bengali origin.
He is a research scholar, a seeker of the truth and a well-known pundit in Allahabad University. After years of research work, he published this book and other eight pundits have endorsed and certified his points of argument as authentic.
According to Hindu belief and their holy books, the description of the guide and the leader, named Kalki Avatar, fits that of Prophet
Muhammad(s.a.w)of Arabia. Therefore, the Hindus of the whole world should look into this new information not wait any longer for the arrival of Kalki Avatar (the spirit) as he already arrived 1400 years ago. The
author produces following sound evidences from the Vedas and other holy books of Hindu religion in support of his claim:-
1. In Purana (a holy book of Hindus) it is stated that Kalki Avatar
would be the last messenger of god in this world for the guidance of the
whole world and all human beings. (according to Islam, prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) is also considered the last messenger of god in this world who was sent to guide all human beings).
2. According to a Hindu religion prediction, the birth of Kalki Avatar, would take place in an isle which again according to Hindu
religion is Arab region.
3. In books of Hindus, the names of the father and the mother of Kalki
Avatar are given as Vishnubhagat and Sumaani respectively. if we
examine the meanings of these names we shall come to a very interesting
conclusion: take Vishnubhagat, Vishnu (meaning God) + Bhagat(meaning slave)= slave of god Allah (god) + abd (slave in Arabic) = slave of god (Abdullah in Arabic name of Muhammed’s father) Sumaani = peace or calmness Amenah(Arabic) =peace or calmness (name of mother of prophet Muhammad (s.a.w)
4. In religious books of Hindus, it is mentioned that the staple food
of Kalki Avatar would be dates and olives and he would be the most honest and truthful person in the region. Without any doubt the prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) is acclaimed to possess these qualities.
5. It is stated in Vedas (holy book of Hindu religion) that the birth
of Kalki Avatar would take place in an honorable clan. This perfectly
fits the Quraysh where the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) belonged to.
6. God would teach Kalki Avatar through his messenger (angel) in a
cave. Allah taught Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w), through is messenger angel Jibraeel(Gabriel) in a cave known as Gaar-e-Hiraa(a cave in Mount
Hiraa).
7. God would avail Kalki Avatar with a very speedy horse to ride and
travel the whole world and the seven skies, indication of
Buraaq (horse) and Me’raaj (the night when prophet traveled the seven skies).
8. God would also avail Kalki Avatar with divine help. This was
particularly proved in the battle of Uhud.
9. Another dazzling account given about Kalki Avatar was that he would
be born on the 12th of a month. Whereas the prophet Muhammad (s.a.w)was born on the 12th of the Rabiul Awwal (Islamic calendar).
10. Kalki Avatar would be an excellent horse rider and a swordsman.
The author here draws the attention of Hindus that the real days of horses
and swords have gone and the present time is of guns and missiles.
In fact, the divine book, Holy Qur’an contains qualities and signs attributed to Kalki Avatar reflecting on the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w).
These facts are verified and supported by the eight eminent pundits. What the author and the eight other eminent pundits say is that the Hindus who are still anxiously awaiting the arrival of Kalki Avatar are simply subjecting themselves to a never ending pain.Because such a great messenger has come and departed from this world
fourteen centuries ago.
LikeLike
Allah Almighty says in Holy Quran
“… Those who follow the Messenger, the Immaculate One, whom they find mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel which are with them.” Al-Quran 7:158)
No doubt there are many prophecies regarding the advent of the Holy Prophet Muhammad in the Bible, but in the above quoted Quranic verse, the Torah and the Gospels are especially mentioned; because Moses and Jesus were prominent figures among all Israelite prophets.
Muslims look upon the source of Bible as holy and divine and its medium as truthful men. And here is a verse of Al-Quran which confirms this statement:
” Say ye: We believe in Allah and what has been revealed to us, and what was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac, and Jacob, and his children, and what was given to Moses and Jesus, and what was given to all other prophets from their Lord. We make no difference between any of them; and to Him we submit ourselves.” (Al Quran 2:137)
Of course, Muslims regard the Christian Scriptures as interpolated, but interpolation still implies retention of some original truths.
The principle that the Holy Prophet Muhammad testifies to the truth of all previous revelations, furnishes a strong foundation for harmony between the various religions of the world, as well as for the unity of the human race. The fact that all of the foregoing prophets testify to the truth of Prophet Muhammad constitutes a yet stronger testimony to the truth of Islam and the Unity of religions.
Moses prophesied about Hadhrat Muhammad.
In Deuteronomy 18:17-19, Moses prophesied:
“And the Lord said unto me. They have well spoken that which they have spoken, I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.”
The foretold prophet in this prophecy was not Jesus Christ, nor any other Israelite prophet, because none of them ever claimed to be the prophet promised here. We read in the Gospel of John (1:19-21) that in the time of Jesus, the Jews were expecting the advent of three prophets. Firstly Elias, secondly Christ, thirdly a prophet of such universal fame that in his case no other specification was thought necessary. “The Prophet” was enough to convey what was meant. Jesus claimed to be the Christ and he regarded John the Baptist as Elias (Matthew 11:14, 17:10-13). Further, he prophesied about his second advent in the last days when true faith would disappear from the earth (Luke 18:8).
LikeLike
Your quote of 7.158 is bogus. Here is a link to the real thing, word by word Arabic/English. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=7&verse=158 .
Kauthar is not named in the Bible, he is mentioned only generically as a false prophet. That unrepentent sinner was unworthy of the title of respect he bestowed upon himself. Henceforth in my responses to you I will refer to him as Moe.
Moe is not the comforter mentioned by Jesus. The comforter is the Holy Spirit; Moe was unholy flesh. 15″If you love Me, you will keep My commandments. 16″I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; 17that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you.…http://biblehub.com/john/14-16.htm
The Prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy could not be an Arab, he must be a Jew to be one of their brethren: Jesus Christ!
LikeLike
You ppl say and I quote ” PLEASE WAKE UP” brother it’s actually you who has fallen asleep and wondered off in to your dreams of deception.
LikeLike
When a Muslim can’t stand the scrutiny implicating his own holy writ as bogus they respond with the old ad hominem.
LikeLike
So Mr.” WHO EVER YOU ARE” why don’t you come and battle this argument…….
LikeLike
And there it is about the religion of peace! If a Muslim can’t successfully defend his theopolitical religion, the threat of violence typically follows.
LikeLike
‘The NeoConservative Christian Right’ as someone who has a vast knowledge on Christianity, your actions and words contradict the teachings of Christ, the same way in which the actions and words of Islamic extremists contradict the teachings of Islam.
The ‘knowledge’ you have on Islam derives from your deep rooted hatred of Muslims NOT from a reliable unbiased source, hence the ignorance you have has rendered you blind and deaf, the hatred you have in your heart has made you bitter and while you spew venomous hatred towards people who you view as the ‘Other’ , there are people out there coexisting peacefully regardless of race, religion, caste or creed, it is those people who realise we must judge one another as individuals, that we must ask questions to find out the truth, that we shouldn’t assume because to assume is to make an ASS out of U and ME. #FOODFORTHOUGHT
LikeLike
Pam you wrote:
“‘The NeoConservative Christian Right’ as someone who has a vast knowledge on Christianity, your actions and words contradict the teachings of Christ, the same way in which the actions and words of Islamic extremists contradict the teachings of Islam.”
Pam I will accept that my theology might be disagree with by other Christians; nonetheless it is my firm belief I am not saying anything that contradicts the teachings of Christ based on Matthew 7: 15-20 (NKJV):
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
Most extreme pacifists, Muslim Apologists and Progressive Christians like to quote Matthew 7: 1-2 about judgment:
1 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. (NKJV)
The thing is verses 1-2 need to be interpreted in the context of verses 15-20 of the same chapter seven. Clearly Jesus is saying not to judge an individual with the agenda of condemnation, especially those people of covenant.
BUT Jesus is saying become aware of those that bring falsehood as if it is truth or do wrong and say it is good. That is what I do pertaining to Islam which has a theology that contradictory paradigms are both true with duality thinking which enables a Muslim to commit wrong or lie if one believes it advances the cause of Islam.
Here are some examples exposing the nefarious thinking of Islam:
http://www.rgcombs.com/islam-dualism-and-the-golden-rule/
http://www.politicalislam.com/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-1-2/
http://www.politicalislam.com/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-2-2
Islamic Dualistic theology makes possible the Islamic ideology of Abrogation.
http://www.handbookforinfidels.com/Abrogation.html#.VItAOXtBlZY
The principle of abrogation plays a very important role in Islamic theology. In fact, it’s one of the primary reasons that Islam is so implacably hostile to non-Muslims, to human rights, and to progressive, democratic societies. …
… Abrogation means that those verses in the Qur’an that were revealed to Muhammad later in his career cancel out earlier verses that contradict them. That’s right, they cancel them right out! It’s as if those earlier “truths” were never revealed at all. … (Click the above link and READ ENTIRETY)
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/raymond-ibrahim/islamic-jihad-and-the-doctrine-of-abrogation/
… No careful reader will remain unaware of the many contradictory verses in the Koran, most specifically the way in which peaceful and tolerant verses lie almost side by side with violent and intolerant ones. The ulema were initially baffled as to which verses to codify into the Shari’a worldview—the one that states there is no coercion in religion (2:256), or the ones that command believers to fight all non-Muslims till they either convert, or at least submit, to Islam (8:39, 9:5, 9:29). To get out of this quandary, the commentators developed the doctrine of abrogation, which essentially maintains that verses revealed later in Muhammad’s career take precedence over earlier ones whenever there is a discrepancy. In order to document which verses abrogated which, a religious science devoted to the chronology of the Koran’s verses evolved (known as an-Nasikh wa’l Mansukh, the abrogater and the abrogated). (Click the above link and READ ENTIRETY)
In Christianity apparent contradictions differ from the Quran are time sensitive or limited in territory. Jesus himself proclaims He did not come to end the Law and the Prophets but to fulfill it. Thus the Redemptive act of dying on the Cross and arising bodily in a Glorified Resurrected body ends the curses of the Law and magnifies the blessings of the Law. For example in Leviticus the Law commands to stone homosexuals to death because the practice is an abomination to God. That is the curse. The blessing in Christ Jesus is the knowledge it is God’s will that humanity that believes in Christ will be Saved from eternal separation from God. Rejecting Christ keeps the curse activated however the punishment of the Law are dealt out in the Last Judgment. Every human being enjoys the Grace and Mercy through Jesus Christ the son of God in believing in the Redemptive act to the dying breath.
OR God’s command for the Twelve Hebrew Tribes to exterminate the inhabitants residing in the Land Promised to Abraham’s descendants through the lineage of the child of Promise Isaac (NOT Ishmael the child of the bondwoman Hagar) was to be active ONLY within the Promised Land and NOT the entire world. God’s explanation is that the future displaced inhabitants were beyond the point of return in corrupt morals with issues such as sex-sins, baby-murder, child human sacrifices, False God temple prostitution of both sexes to name a few. Once the Promised Land was secured and the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob perpetuate in obedience to God Almighty global Salvation would come from their numbers. That Salvation is through Jesus Christ the son of Mary and the Son of God. Mary is a descendant of David who is a descendant of Abraham.
On the other hand under Islam perpetual conquest and slaughter of the world is commanded by demonized Mohammed and attributed to the demon-god Allah until all humanity is Islamic or dead.
The only existent contradictions is the very nature of Islam’s BAD FRUIT.
LikeLike
Polyethene Pam, you made an ass of yourself by assuming that John and I are ignorant of Islamic doctrine & practice. You earned a Masters in Assininity with “the actions and words of Islamic extremists contradict the teachings of Islam.”
The teachings of Islam, contained in the Qur’an, exemplified in the hadith & Sira and codified in Shari’ah. IS contradicts them only by attacking & killing priests, monks & nuns and slaughtering men after they embrace Islam. Their propagation of war, incitement of terrorist acts, rape, plunder & slavery are fully compliant with Islamic doctrine, exemplar and law.
Since the post and subsequent commentary are well documented, I can only conclude that the space which should be occupied by your brain is instead filled with fecal matter.
Boko Haram, IS, al-Qaeda, HAMAS and all the rest of them are nothing more than false fronts for Islam affording it plausible deniability to those who are too stupid, ignorant or indolent to read Islam’s canon.
LikeLike