American Cities Explode

George Floyd’s murder by Derek Chauvin while three other Minneapolis police officers did zero is an act deserving of mass protests. HOWEVER Floyd’s murder is now being used as a pretext for Marxist Antifa to spur anarchy with senseless violence, rioting and looting. If the Dems don’t stop their ideological anarchists I have a suspicion Pro-2nd Amendment property protecting will escalate. Justin Smith goes over some details that has struck this match inflaming America.


JRH 6/1/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.


American Cities Explode

George Floyd’s Murder and Chaos Across America


By Justin O. Smith

Sent 5/30/2020 12:51 AM


It doesn’t matter whether #GeorgeFloyd was an upstanding member of society. It doesn’t matter whether blacks commit a disproportionate share of violent crimes. There is no excuse for the police to squeeze the life out of an unresisting individual. Period!”  ~ Dinesh D’Souza


No one finds justice served in the wake of any horrific, terrible tragedy, by burning their cities and towns down around them in the name of “peaceful protest”. Justice is not served by ignoring the due process of the law for police officers who have abused their authority and power, in a manner that can only be described as evil, no matter how justified one might believe one’s self to be in acting to mete out immediate, self-gratifying, vigilante justice. And justice absolutely was not served on Memorial Day, May 25th 2020, when a police officer ripped forty-six year old George Floyd, from the backseat of a police cruiser, and threw him to the ground and restrained him, with a known deadly hold, and pinned him by the neck until he was choked unconscious and died, as surrounding witnesses begged and pleaded for his life.


Floyd was an ex-convict who served five years stemming from an aggravated assault conviction in 2007, but he was trying to turn his life around, as seen in an old video, where he urges the youth of America to reject gun violence. At one point, Floyd states: “Our young are clearly lost, man, clearly lost, man. I don’t even know what to say anymore. You youngsters just going around bursting guns in crowds, kids getting killed.”


[Blog Editor – VIDEO: George Floyd before being killed, This is what he said 2 youth “Our young generation is clearly lost.”


Posted by Home250 news TV

May 28, 2020]


Floyd, 46, grew up in Houston, Texas, where he was known as a gifted athlete and hip-hop artist, according to the Houston Chronicle, and he was well known by the patrons of Conga Latin Bistro, where he worked security. As Luz Maria Gonzalez notes, “He’d keep us safe there”. On Tuesday, the restaurant shared a photo of Floyd in his blue security uniform, with the caption, “We’ll always remember you”.


George Floyd was a “gentle giant” and helpful man by all accounts, and sadly, the taking of his life, has left a little six year old girl without her father.


Floyd’s death came, after he supposedly “resisted” officers and was placed in handcuffs. But subsequent evidence has shown that he was not resisting or being violent, and he was not armed. He was first approached, around 8:00 pm, by four Minneapolis police officers — Derek Chauvin, Thomas Lane, Tou Thao, and J. Alexander Kueng — who answered a call to investigate a possible forgery attempt and a counterfeit $20 dollar bill. What followed, at least in part, was captured in a video, that has exploded across social media sites, made by a young woman, Darnella Frazier, who was standing nearby outside the Cup Foods Market.


4 Murdering Minneapolis Cops (from


[Blog Editor: Andrew McCarthy of the National Review (5/30/20 4:07 PM) adds some info to Mr. Floyd’s death that cannot be deciphered from video footage. The extra info does not help murderous cops but does add context to the whole idiocy.]


There on the corner of 38th Street and Chicago Avenue South, Officer Derek Chauvin is seen pressing his knee into George Floyd’s neck for nine long minutes, with Floyd’s face pressed so hard into the pavement his nose begins bleeding. And Floyd tearfully pleads with Chauvin: “Please, please, please, I can’t breathe. Please, man.”


“You got him down, man! Let him breathe at least” said one bystander in the background.


Someone asks, “You’re going to just sit there with your knee on his neck?”


One alarmed citizen exclaims, “Bro, he’s not even f###ing moving! Get off his neck!”


Another asks, “Did you kill him?”


Floyd told the officers he could not breathe twelve times, including within the first few seconds of the video. Floyd said, “I’m about to die … they’re gonna kill me”, and called out for his mother. Approximately four minutes into the video, he lost consciousness, stopped breathing and his body went limp. Forty seconds later witnesses were screaming that he was unresponsive. At least sixteen times bystanders begged the officers to take Floyd’s pulse. And all they received in return was a hard, cold, depraved indifference to a man’s life draining out beneath them.


Each time a concerned individual attempted to get Officer Tou Thao to check Floyd’s vitals or to stop Chauvin from choking him any further, Thao would become aggressive and combative and simply turn away from their pleas, exhibiting the same depraved indifference to a man’s life being snuffed out there on the pavement. Thao has previously had police brutality charges leveled against him, in 2017; the case settled out of court to the tune of $25,000.


Ms. Frazier told the Washington Post: “The police killed him, bro, right in front of everybody. He was crying, telling them like, ‘I can’t breathe’, and everything. … They killed this man.”


On Wednesday, May 27th, Bridgett Floyd, sister to George, said: “I would like for those officers to be charged with murder because that’s exactly what they did. They murdered my brother. He was crying for help.”


Representing the Floyd Family, Attorney Ben Crump observed: “It’s a ‘I can’t breathe’ again case in 2020, and it’s worse than Eric Garner in many ways because you hear the people even pleading with them, ‘Please get your knee off his neck. Have some humanity. This is a human being.'”


I have very nearly stated the exact words as Angela Stanton-King, Alveda King’s goddaughter, who tweeted: “Why didn’t someone stop George Floyd’s death? They should have fought at that pivotal moment. Instead of just standing there watching.” That was the time they should have been raising unholy hell, not a day later, not two and three days later and not against their own community.


Addressing the use of the knee on a suspect’s neck, Mylan Masson, a former Minneapolis police officer in charge of training, noted that once the officer has the individual under control, the hold is to be released. It is used until the threat has stopped. Floyd represented no threat whatsoever to anyone, as he lay prone on the ground in cuffs.


According to the Star-Tribune, George Kirkham, professor emeritus at the College of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Florida State University, said that placing the knee on a suspects neck is seldom taught in police academies anymore. The move has been acknowledged as risky and capable of causing brain death in a matter of a few minutes.


Water boils at 212 degrees, and in the aftermath of what can only be described as a callous and indifferent murder of George Floyd, Minneapolis and St Paul are exploding and burning at 1500 degrees in a violent response and riots across the area, as protests elsewhere in America unfold, from Minneapolis to Memphis, Los Angeles to Louisville, and Denver to Atlanta, even seeing barricades breached near the White House. Somewhere shortly before 9:00 CST, on May 29th, the 88th Precinct in New York came under attack by protesters, with police cruisers destroyed and multiple fires set, as reported by Bernie Kerik, former New York City Police Commissioner, to Fox News.


And, in fact, one of the four police officers, Derek Chauvin, was just arrested today, May 29th, and charged with third-degree murder/manslaughter, but shortly afterwards, Judge Andrew Napolitano told Fox News that there was enough evidence seen through a horrendous, gut-wrenching, soul-searing video to warrant a charge of second degree murder.


Ms. Stanton-King expressed her outrage, stating: “Choke a man to death with Your knee which we all know was intentional and you don’t get charged with 1st degree murder … How do he slide with just a manslaughter charge and 3rd degree murder?”


By Wednesday night, the situation had devolved to the point that Governor Tim Waltz and Mayor Jacob Frey called out the Minnesota National Guard to halt the violence that started around the 3rd Precinct Police Station, as protesters set fires and caused some massive damage to every business within a two block radius, according to CBS Minnesota. The 3rd Precinct had to be abandoned by the police and was soon overrun and completely destroyed by an angry mob.


More than one-hundred seventy businesses were also damaged and looted in the St Paul and “Twin Cities” area on Thursday, as the protests escalated. According to the Pioneer Press, numerous fires were set by large crowds across the city, and St Paul’s Mayor Melvin Carter noted that “the anger, the anguish, the sadness, the rage that we’re seeing in the community, it’s understandable.”


Disgusting and disturbing doesn’t even begin to describe what is occurring, as the left-wing interlopers of Antifa, anti-American fascists, are seen urging the destruction further, and young blacks are destroying their own neighborhoods and the very businesses owned and operated by their fellow black minority brethren and other minorities too.


One surely must wonder where was a similar outrage and calls to allow due process to take its course, and where were the riots, when Minneapolis Police Officer Mohammed Noor murdered Justine Damond. It’s hard not to miss the incongruity and hypocrisy of the views of the protesters, rioters and their apologists; and, with that said, the video evidence in the Floyd case is so damning that Chauvin’s arrest within four days’ time was one-hundred percent the right call, however, the charge may need to be revisited as all the evidence unfolds in the coming days.


Floyd’s family released a public call for an end to the violence, while also thanking all those who have actually been protesting peacefully. Speaking to the unrest, Courteney Ross, George’s girlfriend of three years, said, “I am heartbroken.”


Ross continued as she spoke with the Star Tribune: “Waking up this morning to see Minneapolis on fire would be something that would devastate Floyd. He loved the city. He came here [from Houston] and stayed here for the people and the opportunities. … He was about love and peace. … I want people to protest in a peaceful way.”


Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman is pursuing the murder charge against Chauvin and investigating deeper to see what charges might be forthcoming in regards to the other officers, who seemed to exhibit a disturbing and marked indifference to what was transpiring right in front of them. President Trump and Attorney General William Barr are also actively monitoring the case, and U.S. Attorney Erica MacDonald and FBI Special Agent in Charge Rainer Drolshagen will be conducting the federal investigation. And, in the meantime, as of May 28th, Freeman has acknowledged that all four officers involved in Floyd’s murder are not cooperating with the investigation and are pleading their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.


Now, newly released reports, by Anna Lastra and Eric Rasmussen, indicate that there exists a high probability that Chauvin, who has had 18 complaints of police abuse placed against him during his nineteen year career, knew Floyd from the El Nuevo Rodeo Nightclub, where they both had previously worked security for Maya Santamaria. According to Santamaria, Chauvin worked there for 17 years, as outside security, while Floyd worked as inside security. This certainly should be raising some eyebrows and demanding an intense bit of scrutiny and deeper investigation.


Some have suggested that we need to know what happened in the hour before the video was made, but it doesn’t really matter. Even if Floyd had allegedly committed a bank robbery or a murder in that time frame, police all across the nation take down and capture violent murderers every day without killing them in the process.


Yes, most police officers are outstanding, good and decent and honorable men and women, and they normally have a rough job and are asked to do unimaginably tough things, as they carry out their duty to “protect and serve” the community, that has hired them and where they usually also live. That same duty also extends to suspects, especially suspects in non-violent crimes, and especially when a suspect is cooperating and not resisting, as was the case with George Floyd. Their duty demands that they subdue and arrest suspects, in such a case, without taking the person’s life in the process.


Tragic as this case is, it still is not a free license to loot and destroy, simply because people are angry, and not one single criminal looter should be given a pass from any misplaced sense of justice, to assuage the outrage that may be genuinely felt by many, since many other outraged citizens have, in fact, expressed themselves angrily, loudly and peacefully.


At the same time, these police officers who set themselves up as judge, jury and executioners of George Floyd must pay for their gross negligence, their lack of professionalism and compassion, and their inexcusable depraved indifference to the distress Floyd’s mind and body experienced, as he knew his death was imminent. Not only did they prevent a female EMT from trying to save Floyd’s life, but for nearly 5 long minutes after warnings from witnesses, Chauvin kept his knee pressed on his windpipe, as all the officers knew Floyd was unconscious, was not breathing and that his body had gone limp. If the witnesses could so readily see that Floyd was dying, the officers had to have also known as well, and yet, they denied him oxygen, never attempted CPR, never took his pulse and never tried to save his life. The level of inhumane treatment in this case that took George Floyd’s life demands criminal charges for the other officers involved and prosecutions that end with hefty prison sentences for all four officers.


These officers failed to live up to anything remotely associated with simply being a good human being. Any further revelations will not change the simple truth, that with just a little more care and a sense of urgency and some common sense, one check of Floyd’s vitals at the first sign of distress, George Floyd would still be alive. Even sadder, it seems the price of a man’s life today sets at twenty dollars.


By Justin O. Smith


Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets and embedded links are by the Editor.


© Justin O. Smith


Twitter Fact-Checking Trump Perhaps Leads to Conservative Free Speech

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

Posted May 28, 2020


FINALLY! Conservative Free Speech is about to be protected from Leftists twisting facts to fit their agenda to fundamentally transform America. Free Speech loving Conservatives ironically can thank Jack Dorsey’s Twitter for placing a twisted fact checking banner on a President Trump tweet about the corruption often linked to mail-in balloting touting only the Leftist line claiming mail-in ballot safety.


JRH 5/28/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.


Trump Takes on Social-Media Censorship

The president will sign an executive order aimed at preventing leftist speech suppression.


Twitter Censors Free Speech


By Thomas Gallatin

May 28, 2020

The Patriot Post


On the heels of being “fact-checked” by Twitter’s clearly biased “right opinion” police, President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he would soon be issuing an executive order that would hold social-media companies to account for infringing on Americans’ right to free speech. “Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservative voices,” Trump said, warning, “We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen.”


Trump’s contention is made that much more relevant given the fact that Twitter has not “fact-checked” any of the demonstrably false COVID-19 propaganda posted from Chinese communist officials. This glaring inconsistency serves to expose the fundamental problem with these self-appointed arbiters of “truth” — they are playing off opinion-checking as fact-checking.


This reality has been demonstrated by the fact that Twitter’s “Head of Site Integrity,” Yoel Roth, who is responsible for “fact-checking” (which he got wrong, ironically) Trump’s tweet on the problem of fraud associated with mail-in ballots, is an avid anti-Trump and anti-Republican leftist based upon his own social-media history. Roth has called the Trump administration “ACTUAL NAZIS,” derided Trump supporters in “fly-over states” because they “voted for a racist tangerine,” and labeled Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell a “personality-free bag of farts.” He donated to Hillary Clinton in 2016, tweeting that “I just gave $100 to Hillary for America. We can’t f___ around anymore.”


Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey lashed out after Roth was unmasked as chief of Twitter’s opinion police, telling critics to “leave our employees out of this.” [Blog Editor: Boo Hoo] Dorsey then ridiculously asserted, “We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.” Actually, Twitter has yet to correct its erroneous labeling of Trump’s tweet on mail-in voting as a false claim despite the existence of numerous reports showing that those ballots are indeed susceptible to massive fraud.


Dorsey then hit overdrive in his double-speak, claiming, “This does not make us an ‘arbiter of truth.’ Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves. More transparency from us is critical so folks can clearly see the why behind our actions.” How exactly haranguing critics for exposing Twitter’s “Head of Site Integrity” for leftist bias equates to “more transparency” Dorsey failed to explain.


In truth, Trump’s decision has been a long time in the making, as his administration has increasingly raised alarms over the growing censorship practices by social-media giants Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. The Wall Street Journal reports, “As drafted, the White House order would seek to reshape the way that federal regulators view Twitter and other social-media companies — not as hosts of speech but as monopolies that control millions of Americans’ daily experiences on their platforms. … It could also lay groundwork for treating them as public squares where individuals’ First Amendment rights are protected. The draft order is far-reaching in scope.”


Following Trump’s announced crackdown on social media, it comes as little surprise that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg quickly came out criticizing Twitter. “I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,” Zuckerberg (rather hypocritically) insisted. “Private companies probably shouldn’t be, especially these platform companies, shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.” In other words, Thanks for screwing this up for us, Dorsey.


Twitter’s Trump ‘Fact Check’ Does Not Disclose Company Partnered with Groups Pushing Mail-In Ballots


Jack Dorsey – Prakash Singh/AFP/Getty Images


By Aaron Klein

27 May 2020



Twitter for the first time put a fact-check label on tweets from President Trump, using the controversial tactic on messages in which the president complained there is “no way” that “mail-in ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent.”


It may be instructive that Twitter seized on the mail-in balloting tweets as the first issue from Trump’s rapid fire social media feed to slap with a fact-check label. Twitter did not disclose in its so-called fact-check it is partners with two groups financed by leftist donors that engage in voter participation efforts, including drives pushing mail-in balloting.


Twitter sits on the “Premier Partner” list of one of those groups alongside ViacomCBS, the merger of Viacom and CBS. Twitter’s so-called fact-check about Trump’s mail-in balloting cited CBS political reporter Grace Segers vouching for mail-in voting.


Analysts have posited such proposals help the Democratic Party. Republicans specifically fear the prospect of voter fraud, since mail-in voting would be harder to authenticate.


Yesterday, Trump tweeted the following, earning him the badge reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots”:


Donald J. Trump

✔ @realDonaldTrump


There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone…..



Donald J. Trump

✔ @realDonaldTrump


….living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one. That will be followed up with professionals telling all of these people, many of whom have never even thought of voting before, how, and for whom, to vote. This will be a Rigged Election. No way!


7:17 AM – May 26, 2020

Twitter Ads info and privacy

37K people are talking about this


Twitter did not disclose it is an active “Premier Partner” of Vote Early Day 2020, an election advocacy group seeking to educate voters that they can cast their ballots prior to Election Day, including via the vote-by-mail option.


The front page of the group’s website promotes mail-in balloting, telling voters that “more states are adopting additional Vote Early options, such as vote-by-mail, and we are expecting these changes to increase voter turnout. We want everyone to know their options.”


The organization suggests voters “throw a party or parade” so “friends can come together to fill-in their mail-in ballots.”


The website states:


Through parties at the polls and community parades to early voting sites, organizations across the country will inspire more Americans to vote early. Even in states without in-person early voting, friends can come together to fill-in their mail-in ballots.


The group’s mission statement includes mail-in options (emphasis added):


When Americans vote early, they ensure that last minute problems will not prevent them from casting their ballots – and help shorten voting lines on Election Day for everyone. But voting early rules – both for in-person and by-mail options – vary widely all over the country, causing confusion and preventing voters from casting their ballots. We’re here to make voting early easier. Given our current conditions with COVID-19, having multiple options to safely cast your ballot is critical.


Vote Early Day openly states it is supported by one organization: “Vote Early Day is a holiday for all Americans supported by a project at New Venture Fund.”


The New Venture Fund, or NVF, is in turn managed under an administrative agreement with the shadowy, massively funded Arabella Advisors strategy company that pushes the interests of wealthy leftist donors.


Arabella specializes in sponsoring countless dark money pop-up organizations advocating progressive policies and designed to look like grassroots activist groups, as exposed in a recent extensive report by conservative watchdog Capital Research Center.


Billionaire activist George Soros’s Open Society documents that it provided financing to the Sixteen Thirty Fund, one of four nonprofits run by Arabella Advisors, another being the NVF. Arabella nonprofits also evidence close financial workings with initiatives for the Democracy Alliance, another network of highly influential donors, including Soros.


Meanwhile, Twitter serves as a “Premier Partner” of Vote Early Day 2020 along with ViacomCBS and other media firms.


Twitter’s “fact-check” about Trump’s mail-in balloting cited Segers, the CBS political reporter, tweeting the following about mail-in voting:


Other listed media companies that are “Premier Partners” of Vote Early Day are BuzzFeed, MTV, Univision and USA Today.


More “Premier Partners” include leftist groups such as the League of Women Voters, the Democracy Fund, Alliance for Youth Organizing and Rise.


MTV recently partnered with Michelle Obama to host a virtual prom with the subtheme of increasing voter turnout. The television event is produced in partnership with When We All Vote, an organization for which Obama serves as a co-chair and that seeks to increase voter participation.


Organizers of the MTV event with Obama said in a statement the television Prom-athon would include a “special focus on commemorating another important milestone for young people this year: registering and voting in the national election in November.”


Becoming a “Premier Partner” for Vote Early Day, as Twitter did, requires activism on the part of each partner organization.


The group’s website states that to join as a “Premier Partner” an organization must (below are all direct quotes):


  • Agree to include their name or logo in public materials (e.g. press release and website);
  • Share their Vote Early Day activation plans with the Steering Committee in advance;
  • Report back successes and feedback;
  • Commit to a flagship on-the-ground activation, mobilize a national network of at least 50 partners, or reach 1 million people through digital or platform integrations


Vote Early Day is not Twitter’s only involvement in election advocacy. The social media giant along with Google and Facebook is also a 2020 partner for the National Voter Registration Day, which says it “wants to make sure everyone has the opportunity to vote.”


The National Voter Registration Day also pushes mail-in ballots, saying it seeks to educate citizens to “request mail-in ballots, learn about early voting options, and more.”


Amid the coronavirus pandemic, National Voter Registration Day says it’s working on “incorporating supplemental resources and messaging in our toolkits, posters, and trainings about how to vote by mail.”


The National Voter Registration is sponsored by the Democracy Fund, a charitable foundation created by eBay founder and liberal billionaire Pierre Omidyar.


Omidyar’s self-styled “philanthropic investment firm” the Omidyar Network, is also a funder of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, which has partnered with Facebook to draft principals in an initiative to help determine whether a certain news story is “disputed.”


The Omidyar Network has partnered with the Open Society on projects and it has given grants to third parties using the Soros-funded Tides Foundation as a “fiscal sponsor.” Tides is one of the largest donors to left-wing causes in the U.S.


Twitter’s “fact-check” of Trump’s tweets on mail-in balloting, meanwhile, also cited the ACLU of Nebraska claiming “voting by mail is secure. It’s effective. It led to record turnout.”


The ACLU has been pumping materials urging Congress to pass coronavirus voting legislation that pushes mail-in voting. Soros’s Open Society Foundations donated $50 million to the ACLU.


Breitbart News extensively reported a slew of other progressive groups tied to Soros money have been working overtime to push mail-in voting.


Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow.

Joshua Klein contributed research to this article. Follow him on Twitter @JoshuaKlein


Exclusive: Matt Gaetz Drafting Bill to Drop Big Tech’s Legal Immunity over One-Sided ‘Fact Checks’


Matt Gaetz – Alex Wong/Getty Images


By Sean Moran

27 May 2020



Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) will announce today that he is working with Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee to craft legislation that would strip social media giants of their Section 230 legal immunity if they fact check content on their platforms, according to a copy of his podcast which Breitbart News exclusively obtained.


On the Florida conservative’s podcast, Hot Takes with Matt Gaetz, he said that he is working on a bill that would prevent social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google from fact-checking content on their platforms. Gaetz’s announcement follows as Twitter decided to fact check President Donald Trump’s tweet on Tuesday.


Twitter tried to fact check the president over Trump’s tweet, claiming that mail-in ballot would lead to increased voter fraud.


After Twitter fact-checked Trump’s post, the president threatened to regulate or shut down social media companies such as Facebook and Twitter.


“Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices,” Trump wrote on Wednesday. “We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen.”


Gaetz noted that social media companies such as Twitter and Facebook enjoy a special liability protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This immunity shields them from lawsuits if they were to remove and host content.


Gaetz said:


A lot of people don’t see that Facebook and Twitter … you see Twitter disadvantaging the president, they enjoy liability protections that are not enjoyed by your local newspaper or your local TV station, or Fox News, or CNN, or MSNBC. They have special benefits under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as digital platforms because they’re not creating content for which they should be liable. They’re not making decisions about content, they’re simply saying come one, come all with your content. And as a consequence of that, they’re getting a bunch of protections.


The Communications Decency Act stipulates that a platform, such as Twitter, cannot be sued for what users post on their platform as long as they act as platforms and not publishers.


Noting that the social media companies have become increasingly biased against conservatives, Gaetz questioned whether social media companies deserve to keep their Section 230 immunity.


He asked rhetorically, “Well now, it really begs the question with what Twitter is doing. Do they deserve that? Do they deserve it? And I would suggest that they don’t.”


Gaetz added that it is not “good for the country” regardless of politics when these social media companies cease to stay neutral platforms.


Gaetz said that he is working with members of the Judiciary Committee to work on legislation to remove big tech’s Section 230 immunity if they continue to fact check on their platforms.


He said, “I am currently working with my Republican colleagues on the Judiciary Committee to craft legislation to say that if you’re going to opine as to the truth or falsity of that which is put on your platform, for the sake of its viewers, you don’t get the protection of Section 230. You are not a platform. You are doing something else, you are editorializing.”


Gaetz’s office told Breitbart News that the legislation would make big tech companies’ legal immunity contingent on not offering editorial judgments, such as fact-checking content.


“If Twitter is going to fact-check President Trump, that really begs the question of who those fact-checkers and if they are groups of people that shown bias against the president,” Gaetz said.


Sean Moran is a congressional reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SeanMoran3


Trump Takes on Social-Media Censorship


Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots American Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!



The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind. Copyright © 2020 Publius Press and The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.


Twitter’s Trump ‘Fact Check’ Does Not Disclose Company Partnered with Groups Pushing Mail-In Ballots




Exclusive: Matt Gaetz Drafting Bill to Drop Big Tech’s Legal Immunity over One-Sided ‘Fact Checks’


Copyright © 2020 Breitbart


Future Blogging

To my faithful readers: I am writing from a tablet because my laptop has passed to PC death. I do not have the patience to figure how to efficiently use a tablet to blog. On other NCCR posts I have a support link that goes to my PayPal account. I say this because until I can budget money for a laptop repair or a new laptop purchase, I’ll be on a blogging hiatus. Thanks for reading to date and I’ll begin blogging again when my PC issue is resolved.

John R. Houk, Blog Editor




Canada: A Totalitarian State-in-Progress

Despotism might be Canada’s new name.

Nwo Report

Canada: A Totalitarian State-in-Progress - American ThinkerSource: David Solway

To describe Canada as a totalitarian state-in-progress sounds like a gross and indeed absurd exaggeration. Yet many premonitory signs are present. In the words of political philosopher William Gairdner, author of The Book of Absolutes, The Great Divide and The Trouble with Canada, Canada “has just crossed the red line between soft-socialism and soft-totalitarianism.”

Gairdner has assembled a virtual mountain of evidence for his claim: Bill C-25 seeking to impose “diversity” on all corporations; financial penalties against organizations that do not comply with government programs; a teeming brigade of government surveillance “Inspectors,” that is, spies — wage spies, speech spies, feminist spies, pay-equity spies, Human Rights spies; paralegal bodies known as Human Rights Tribunals with the power to levy crippling fines, bankrupt families and shut down businesses, to impose prison time for contempt of court, and to compel conformity via “re-education.”

The list goes…

View original post 1,377 more words

Islamophobia Laws Will Be Used To Shield Islamic Beliefs From Criticism

What is “Muslimness”? Well let’s look at the Quran, Hadith & Sira. Muslimness is death to non-Muslims refusing to submit to Islam. Muslimness history is pillaging, slaughtering, raping and slaving. In other words – Islam = Evil. Put me in the confirmed Islamophobia category of self-preservation!

JRH 12/5/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.


Ares and Athena

News Image

By Raheel Raza/Clarion Project December 04, 2019
Share this article:
Islamophobia — a concept that will grip us in the coming years, slowing stripping away our freedoms, if we don’t stand up and oppose some of the legislation proposed because of it.

View original post 914 more words

Flood Congress with NO IMPEACHMENT

John R. Houk

© November 7, 2019

Brigitte Gabriel has produced a 2:17 minutes ANTI-Impeach video garnering support for President Donald Trump against their scam to exact a coup against the President. Typically the links in these things are data collection and fund raising (although it never hurts to send money to ACT for America or YOURS TRULY your amiable Blog Editor) operations. NOT SO IN THIS CASE!


The Youtube link indeed takes you to a data acquisition page entitled STEP One, BUT after it is filled out you are redirected STEP Two to a prepared statement with your Representative’s name from your Congressional District in your State.


Below is the Gabriel video, the text to STEP  One, then the info you are sending to your Congressman/woman in STEP Two. READING IT IS GOOD BUT TO DO YOUR PART TO THWART THE COUP, YOU’LL HAVE TO CLICK TO PARTICIPATE!


JRH 11/7/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.


VIDEO: The Impeachment Scam Must Be Stopped!


Posted by ACT for America

66.9K subscribers – Nov 5, 2019


Take Action Against the Phony Impeachment SCAM Here:





Take Action (Step 1 of 2)


Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, other leaders in the Democratic party have called for formal impeachment charges to be brought against President Trump in relation to a call with Ukraine’s president.


The Left claims that President Trump violated terms of his office by asking the Ukranian President to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, for his shady business dealings in a Ukranian natural gas company.


President Trump has denied the allegations leveled against him and has been fully transparent with the investigation into these claims.  In fact, he released the full, unredacted transcript of the call in question and was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Department of Justice.


Even in the face of clear, indisputable evidence that the allegations against President Trump were unfounded, Democratic Members of Congress are still pushing to continue impeachment proceedings.  Instead of working to find solutions to our country’s pressing national security concerns, like the ongoing border crisis they refuse to compromise on, the Left would rather push this debunked impeachment narrative and attempt to delegitimize the President to help their campaigns.


We need to tell Congress to stop the political witch hunts targeting President Trump and focus on making our country a safer place.


To send an email to your local Representative against impeachment, fill out the required fields below and click continue.





Take Action (Step 2 of 2)


Recipients (YOUR REPRESENTATIVE)____________________


Subject: I say NO to Impeachment!




Dear Representative, Congress is moving forward with impeachment proceedings against President Trump even after he has been cleared of any wrongdoing in the call with Ukraine’s president by the Department of Justice. As one of your constituents, I implore you and your colleagues to end these impeachment discussions and instead turn your focus to our country’s pressing national security concerns like the ongoing border crisis. It’s time to END this Witch Hunt against our President and support his efforts to make this country great. I look forward to seeing your formal response to my request.




Flood Congress with NO IMPEACHMENT

John R. Houk

© November 7, 2019


The Impeachment Scam Must Be Stopped!


ACT for America Homepage


Suddfluffel Chain, Dem Impeachment & Senate Trial – Oh My!

John R. Houk

© November 3, 2019

A good Facebook friend shared a purported article by a “Hyram F. Suddfluffel”. At first I didn’t pay attention to the name and just went on to read. As a Trump supporter who whole-heartedly believes the Dems and the MSM are fabricating excuses (Note “excuses” because there is not one crime pointed to, merely politically charged excuses that Dems have been committing against Conservatives for decades) to impeach President Trump, the read brings an aura of excitement that impeachment will lead to a Senate trial that will lead to Dem indictments rather than a Trump removal.


My exuberance was so high I then went back to the attributed author’s name which is “Suddfluffel”. That’s when I realized this was more than likely an inventive chain (aka chain mail, chain email, chain message, etc.). Whoever the inventive author actually is even tried to add a sense of bona fides by placing “PhD” and in parentheses “Political Science”.


So I Googled, Duck Duck Goed and StartPage.comed “Hyram F. Suddfluffel”. Of course Left-Wing Snopes that castigates all things Conservative comes up first, flowed closely by an article in The American Spectator and


I can give Leftie Snopes credit for not going to the “False” label but rather going with “Unproven” likely because no Suddfluffel author can be found even as a pseudonym.


The American Spectator implies the subpoenaing of lying Deep Staters is possible in the Republican controlled Senate especially if those liars have anything to do with Dem approved articles of Impeachment. examines the Suddfluffel online pedigree and history of past Senate rules and procedures of Senate removal trials of President Andrew Johnson and Slick Willie (Bill) Clinton. And to me those procedures and rules managed by a Republican Majority Senate could quite probably spank wicked Dems.


A point of interest I did discover search engines the existence of a Hiram College webpage emphasizing a Political Science undergrad program. Could a clever student or Professor wanting to keep their Conservative leanings anonymous have come that institution of higher learning? Hmm…


So, in my cross posting fervor, I will begin with R.R. Brown’s Facebook Messenger share, followed excerpts the American Spectator and minus any reposted versions of the mysterious Hyram F. Suddfluffel. (Snopes bias is annoying to me, you’ll to visit the Leftist website to get their slant on Suddfluffel.)


JRH 11/3/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.


Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.


Shared by Rose Reed Brown

From Facebook Messenger

October 31, 2019 10:05 PM

Interesting Read…


By: Hyram F. Suddfluffel, PhD, (Political Science)

I have a degree in Political Science, and I am a card-carrying Libertarian. I’ve been studying politics and political history for the past 30 years. My specialty is U.S. Presidents. That said, I hope that the House of Representatives impeaches Trump. Let me tell you what will happen next!

1. The House can pass articles of impeachment over the objections of the Republicans and refer to the Senate for trial.

2. The Senate will conduct a trial. There will be a vote, and the Republicans will vote unanimously, along with a small number of Democrats, to not convict the President. Legally, it will all be over at that point.

3. However, during the trial, and this is what no one is thinking about right now, the President’s attorneys will have the right to subpoena and
question ANYONE THEY WANT! That is different than the special counsel investigation, which was very one-sided. So, during the impeachment trial, we will be hearing testimony from James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Glenn Simpson, Donna Brazille, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Christopher Steele, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper, and a whole host of other participants in this whole sordid affair and the ensuing coverup activities. A lot of dirt will be dug up; a lot of truth will be unveiled. Finger pointing will occur. Deals will start being made, and suddenly, a lot of democrats will start being charged and going to prison. All this, because, remember, the President’s team will now, for the first time, have the RIGHT to question all of these people under oath – and they will turn on each other. That is already starting.

4. Lastly, one more thing will happen, the Senate will not convict the President. Nothing will happen to Trump. Most Americans are clueless about political processes, the law, and the Constitution. Most Americans believe that being impeached results in removal from office. They don’t understand that phase 2 is a trial in and by the Senate, where he has zero chance of conviction. Remember, the Senate is controlled by Republicans; they will determine what testimony is allowed — and everything will be allowed, including: DNC collusion with the Clinton campaign to fix the election in favor of Hillary, the creation of the Trump dossier, the cover up and destruction of emails that very likely included incriminating information. They will incriminate each other for lying to the FISA court, for spying and wiretapping the Trump campaign, and for colluding with foreign political actors, especially George Soros. After the Senate declines to convict the President, we will have an election, and Trump will win. It will be a backlash against democrat petulance, temper tantrums, hypocrisy and dishonesty. Even minorities will vote for Trump, because, for the first time, they will see that democrats have spent 2+ years focused on maintaining their own power, and not doing anything at all about black murders in Chicago, homelessness, opioids, and other important issues that are actually killing people. And, we will spend the following four years listening to politicians and pundits claim that the whole impeachment was rigged.

So let’s move on to impeachment.


Absolutely, Let’s Have an Impeachment Trial

The House should vote to impeach President Trump and the Senate should start a trial — so the REAL fireworks can begin.


Donald Trump Speaking – TAS YouTube screenshot



October 1, 2019, 12:57 PM

The American Spectator


There is an email/social media post, bearing the delightful nom de plume of “Hyram F. Suddfluffel,” going around the internet at present, one which is pretty timely and quite well reasoned and which might make you rethink your preconceived notions about how much resistance we should all have to the Democrats’ impeachment madness.


At least, until the process gets to the Senate.


Here’s the email, cribbed in full so as to do it justice:



This thing has become such an underground sensation that Snopes has even weighed in, claiming that it’s “unproven.”


No kidding.


Snopes writer Dan MacGuill, whose nom de plume is nowhere near as colorful as Hyram F. Suddfluffel, claims that the email’s conclusion that a two-thirds vote for impeachment in the Senate is impossible is “exaggerated,” but he concedes most of the rest of the premise to be realistic.


But he argues it nonetheless. For example, MacGuill quibbles with the idea that Trump could call any witness he wants during an impeachment trial while conceding that the “Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment Trials” does include a formula of words for subpoenas in such trials, specifying that the subpoena can be issued on behalf of “the party impeached, or of his counsel.” He says that doesn’t mean an unlimited exposure to subpoena, as some of those potential subpoenas could be quashed by a federal court.


News flash: none of the people Trump is likely to call as witnesses in an impeachment trial are going to have their subpoenas quashed as irrelevant to the bill of particulars brought to the Senate by a House impeachment. The clowns in charge of the impeachment show in the House will make sure that’s true by throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Trump in the impeachment. And therefore all of the past three years will be relevant to the case — James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, Ben Rhodes, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, James Comey … we can go on and on about the Democrat and Deep State conspirators who came together in an attempt to derail and overturn the legitimate results of an American election under the guise of saving democracy from untoward meddling from foreign powers colluding with bad actors here.


They’re all fair game, and they’ll all go under oath to be cross-examined without end by the best trial lawyers money can buy — with the unlimited resources of the White House and the executive branch generating evidence to support and direct those questions.


And with the Senate Republicans in charge of the trial.


Does this sound at all like an environment Democrats believe will benefit them?


Increasingly it’s apparent the Democrat party isn’t very good at thinking through their actions before uncorking them. That’s precisely what impeachment, which plays exceptionally badly with people in red, purple, and light-blue states, is an example of.


Consider your author at least a half-serious proponent of the theory that what’s really at stake here isn’t a Democratic coup against the president, but rather a hard-left coup against Joe Biden within the Democrat party. Biden, whose dealings on behalf of his ne’er-do-well son in Ukraine and elsewhere cannot escape the steamroller an in-depth investigation of the Ukraine matter would become, would be finished, once again, as a presidential candidate. When he is, there would be no further old-school center-left leadership in that party, and the socialist crowd would inherit its ashes. Impeachment means Elizabeth Warren as the 2020 nominee and virtually certain defeat. And not just in the presidential election: the House would return to the GOP, and Nancy Pelosi, who is the captive queen of Capitol Hill, would be through.


But in 2024, the Democrats would become the Socialists, and a fresh new avatar of the Hard Left would be cut from whole cloth just as Barack Obama was. And should that candidate win election thanks to indoctrinated millennials and Generation Y-ers, the Hard Left believes, the long project to convert this country from the Land of the Free to the Home of the Tax Slave would be complete.


It’s hardly set in stone that this is our future. And it’s just a theory. But it’s as plausible as the idea the Democrats really are so arrogant that they think they can convince two-thirds of the Senate to vote to remove a duly elected president on accusations that, at worst, are a shadowy reflection of conduct their own people engaged in during the previous administration.


Scott McKay is publisher of the Hayride, which offers news and commentary on Louisiana and national politics. He’s also a novelist — check out his first book “Animus: A Tale of Ardenia,” available in Kindle and paperback.


Hyram F. Suddfluffel: The Origin & What’s True about the Viral Impeachment Post


By Stephanie Dube Dwilson

Updated Sep 26, 2019 at 12:46am


US President Donald Trump claps during a campaign rally in Rio Rancho, New Mexico – Getty Photo


A post from several months ago claiming to be from “Hyram F. Suddfluffel” about President Donald Trump’s impeachment is making the rounds on social media again. And as a result, a lot of people are searching for Suddfluffel on Snopes. Is Suddfluffel real? What’s the post’s origins? Interestingly, the post that claims Trump is playing a version of 4D chess with the impeachment first made the rounds back in June before it started making the rounds again in the last couple of days. The earliest signs that Heavy can find of that post didn’t show the Suddfluffel name attached. Read on to learn more about the post’s origins and what’s true and what’s not.


Early Versions of the Suddfluffel Post from June Didn’t Have the Name Attached


No one has ever officially come forward claiming to be the person who wrote the Hyram F. Suddfluffel post, and searches for Hyram F. Suddfluffel came up empty. Although there some elements in the impeachment post itself that are accurate regarding Trump’s chances of being impeached and some procedures, other elements are not. And an actual person named Hyram F. Suddfluffel cannot be verified. In fact, the earliest signs of this post didn’t have a name attached to it.


Here’s what the long post making the rounds says. Not everything in this is factual, but some points are.


The earliest version of this post showing up on an Internet search, Facebook, or Twitter is on a Freepublic discussion here. It was posted verbatim on June 3, 2019 with the subject line: “Come on Trump haters, PUSH for impeachment ‘PLEASE.’” The post was shared by contributer lonster who said “This was passed on by an old friend.” The name Suddfluffel did not appear.


Free Republic Screen Shot of ‘Impeachment Dam Breaking’


Later on that same day, someone else referenced the post as coming from lonster on Freepublic.


Impeachment screen-shot- Accredited to FReeper Lonster


Lonster very well may have gotten the copy from another source, but searches for the copy in that post showing up anywhere else on Google prior to that June 3 date came up empty. (Note: Below is just an example of one attempt to search the copy.)


screen-shot-Google Search Prior 6/3/19 Comes Up Empty


The note quickly started making the rounds at this point. You can see one person sharing pieces of it on Twitter on June 16, 2019.



Interestingly, searches on Duck Duck Go pulled up more information than Google searches. But the results date-wise are the same. Blogs began posting the same story in June frequently, and then it died down until the last couple of days when impeachment news started surfacing again. For example, Fergus Falls Journal just shared the post again in Letters to the Editor, submitted by Bill Schulz but quoting Suddfluffel.


The name Hyram appears to start showing up in late June, so it was connected to the post pretty quickly, although not widely used until August.


screen-shot- Suddfluffel Shows Up Late June


The post was also shared on 4 Chan’s /pol/ on June 18, 2019, and the poster at the time was “Anonymous” and they did not include the Hyram name with the post.


screen-shot of 4-Chan Hyram Suddfluffel version


The post also showed up on June 12 on Government in Exile without the name. By June 16, it was already making the rounds on Facebook and being shared on forums from Facebook posts. The June 16 post noted that the story was seen on a comment on a Wall Street Journal article. Subsequent searches showed the post has appeared frequently as a comment on news articles, which has probably helped it spread so fast.


Although the exact origin isn’t known, the long comment appears to have first shown up in early June 2019 and did not have the Hyram name attached in the earliest iterations. This article will be updated if earlier versions of the comment are discovered in subsequent searches.


Is Anything in the Content of the Post True?


Interestingly, some things in the content of the post are true, but certainly not everything (including some of the more conspiracy-theory-sounding notes.) But certain comments about procedures, for example, are true. The House can pass articles of impeachment over the objections of Republicans.


If all 435 House members vote, they would need 218 votes for a majority to be reached and for Trump to be impeachedThere are 235 Democrats in office in the House, one Independent, and 199 Republicans, Reuters explained. This means that it wouldn’t be too difficult to get those impeachment votes simply from Democrats alone. But like the post says, an impeachment does not mean removal.


The post is also correct in that the Senate would conduct a trial and, most likely, Republicans would not convict Trump. A 2/3 majority is needed in the Senate after the trial in order to remove a sitting President. In Trump’s case, a total of 67 Senators would need to vote to convict and remove the President. There are 45 Democrat Senators and 53 Republican Senators, plus two Independents who typically vote Democrat. So to reach the 67 total needed to remove Trump, they would need at least 20 Republicans to join with Democrats in voting to remove Trump (plus the two Independents), Reuters reported. This is unlikely to happen, although not impossible. If Trump is not convicted then he would be considered acquitted and would continue his term and could run again.


It’s also unlikely that anyone could be subpoenaed about anything. There isn’t a lot of precedent for Presidential impeachment trials. The most recent Senate impeachment trial involved Bill Clinton (and before him, Andrew Johnson), so Clinton’s trial can be reviewed for the most recent precedent and examples.


Rules for Senate impeachment trials can be read here. The 1868 rules are here. The Senate formulated its trial procedures and then-Vice President Thomas Jefferson wrote them down, and then additional rules were added by the Senate during Johnson’s trial, Heritage noted. Those rules were largely followed during Clinton’s trial.


The rules mention that subpoenas (spelled subpena in the document), would call people to testify their knowledge regarding the cause before the Senate.


In Clinton’s Senate trial, the Senators voted on procedural rules that would govern the trial, how many hours each side would have to present its case, and the like. They decided not to call live witnesses for Clinton’s trial, but instead showed video testimony. Senators debated their votes behind closed doors.


Interestingly, Heritage pointed out that the Chief Justice sometimes makes procedural rulings. In 1868, the Senate overruled the Chief Justice’s procedural rulings. In Clinton’s trial, the Senate never challenged the Chief Justice’s procedural rulings.


The Washington Post had an interesting article noting that Mitch McConnell, as the Senate Majority Leader, would have a lot of influence over the trial. The article posits that rules against hearsay evidence could be ignored if desired and the Chief Justice’s rulings overruled (as happened in Johnson’s trial.) McConnell might seek to have Joe Biden and Hunter Biden as live witnesses, for example, and they might look into Biden’s alleged actions in the Ukraine too. There also might be a lot of leeway in determining what would count as exculpatory evidence and, thus, necessary subpoenas to defend Trump.


In summary, Hyram F. Suddfluffel’s identity can’t be authenticated or verified, and the earliest examples of this post that’s circulating don’t include his name. There’s no evidence that Trump actually wants the impeachment or somehow planned for it to happen. There is quite a lot of reason, however, to imagine that Republican Senators likely would not vote for Trump’s removal. If more information about the post’s origins are found, this story will be updated.


Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.


Suddfluffel Chain, Dem Impeachment & Senate Trial – Oh My!

John R. Houk

© November 3, 2019


Absolutely, Let’s Have an Impeachment Trial


The American Spectator Homepage




The American Spectator was founded in 1924  by George Nathan and Truman Newberry over a cheap domestic ale in McSorley’s Old Ale House. In 1967, the Saturday Evening Club took it over, rechristening it The Alternative: An American Spectator, but by November 1977 the word “alternative” had acquired such an esoteric fragrance that in order to discourage unsolicited manuscripts from florists, beauticians, and other creative types, the club reverted to the magazine’s original name. Published remarkably without regard to gender, lifestyle, race, color, creed, physical handicap, or national origin.


The American Spectator Foundation educates the public on new ideas, concepts, and policies that favor traditional American values, such as economic freedom, individual liberty, self-sufficiency, and limited government.  To this end, the Foundation also trains and cultivates young writers for careers in journalism and serves as an outlet for a host of both young and established conservative writers and thinkers.


Hyram F. Suddfluffel: The Origin & What’s True about the Viral Impeachment Post


Copyright © 2019 Heavy, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Heavy


Heavy Inc. is a privately held U.S.-based digital media company that owns and operates and is a real-time news and information platform visited by 25 million unique visitors per month. is overseen by Editor-in-Chief Aaron Nobel. Heavy’s rapid reporting and user-friendly formats provide timely coverage of breaking news, sports, entertainment and consumer trends.


Heavy’s Gift and Shopping Guides provide 16 million shoppers a year with information to assist them in making the right buying decision at the time of purchase. Heavy’s entertainment guides help 2 million readers per year determine “what to watch” in a world of proliferating streaming content options.


Heavy’s goal is to provide our community with satisfying, accurate and actionable information to enhance their day-to-day lives. is Heavy’s Spanish language platform reaching 2 million unique visitors per month.


America, 2019, Fall of the Roman Empire redux?

Dream & Visions fro YWVH-Judah Liion & Signs

I just read this interesting post from Ares and Athena (which they discovered elsewhere) relating to the days and times we live in. The post reminded immediately of Last Days prophecies found in the Old and New Testaments. You should be awed – I was.


Joel 2: 28-32; Acts 2: 16-21 NKJV:


Joel 2:28-32 – God’s Spirit Poured Out


28 “And it shall come to pass afterward
That I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh;
Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,
Your old men shall dream dreams,
Your young men shall see visions.
29 And also on My menservants and on My maidservants
I will pour out My Spirit in those days.

30 “And I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth:
Blood and fire and pillars of smoke.
31 The sun shall be turned into darkness,
And the moon into blood,
Before the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord.
32 And it shall come to pass
That whoever calls on the name of the Lord
Shall be [a]saved.
For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be [b]deliverance,
As the Lord has said,
Among the remnant whom the Lord calls.


Acts 2:16-21


16 But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel:


17 ‘And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God,
That I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh;
Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,
Your young men shall see visions,
Your old men shall dream dreams.
18 And on My menservants and on My maidservants
I will pour out My Spirit in those days;
And they shall prophesy.
19 I will show wonders in heaven above
And signs in the earth beneath:
Blood and fire and vapor of smoke.
20 The sun shall be turned into darkness,
And the moon into blood,
Before the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord.
21 And it shall come to pass
That whoever calls on the name of the Lord
Shall be saved.’


JRH 10/11/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.


Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.


Ares and Athena

The following post is long but very truthful, thoughtful, and unfortunately, undoubtedly prescient.

The Book Is About To Close On The Late Great United States Of America

by Michael Snyder

Our story could have ended very differently.  If America had embraced the truth, that would have put us on a far different road than the one we are on today.  Instead, we are steamrolling toward oblivion, and only a small handful of brave watchmen are even warning about the ominous fate that lies directly ahead of us.  We live at a time when “evil” is called “good” and “good” is called “evil”, and just about every form of human degradation that you can possibly imagine is absolutely exploding in our society.  For years I have been warning that if we stay on the path that we…

View original post 1,975 more words

No Matter Who Wins in 2020, There Will Be Blood

It’s speculation, but it is spot on speculation!

JRH 9/15/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.




Sept 13, 2019  By William L. Gensert

The machinations of an illiberal left, on display in its ever-increasing violence accompanied by the ululations of a propagandist media in contravention of an imaginary “white supremacist” right, have riven the nation into diametrically opposed camps.

The right will never accept socialism, while the left will accept nothing less.

Trump Wins

Those on the left will not allow a Trump victory, even should he win the popular vote and the Electoral College.  They are used to getting what they want and like spoiled brats, have learned that tantrums work.

Should Donald Trump prevail in his bid for a second term, the left will go insane, deploying every “insurance policy” weapon at their disposal to negate four more years of the Orange Man.  What Obama, Comey, and Brennan et al. did to Trump in his first term will seem mild in comparison to what the…

View original post 757 more words

Lawsuit Claims Mueller Blocked Probes Into Saudi Arabia’s Complicity in 9/11 Attacks

Mueller is crook! He committed crimes gotten away with due to his FBI affiliation and I’m certain the Dems knew this when Mueller set him as the figure head of the Trump Witch Hunt! Prosecute him!

JRH 9/10/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.


Lawsuit Claims Mueller Blocked Probes Into Saudi Arabia’s Complicity in 9/11 Attacks

Former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director Robert Mueller (shown) was hailed by the mainstream media for his lengthy investigation into allegations that Russia had interfered in the United States’ electoral process. But when Mueller, as FBI director, had the opportunity to investigate Saudi Arabia’s multiple connections to the 9/11 attacks, he impeded his own agents’ investigations, covered up evidence, and even helped Saudi suspects leave the country, reported the New York Post’s Paul Sperry.

Mueller “was the master when it came to covering up the kingdom’s role in 9/11,” Sharon Premoli, who was rescued from the rubble of the World Trade Center in 2001, told Sperry.

“In October of 2001, Mueller shut down the government’s investigation after only three weeks, and then took part in the Bush [administration’s] campaign to block, obfuscate and generally stop anything about Saudi Arabia from being released,” Premoli maintained.


View original post 575 more words