The Mo OCD Understanding of Islam


An Intro by John R. Houk

© December 3, 2019

OCD – Also known as Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. I am a member of Michael Lederman’s MeWe Group called Islam: The Truth. I came across one of his posts yesterday where he examines some of the eccentricities of Islam’s founder known to the West as Muhammad (aka Mohammed or Mahomet and so on). According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica Mo’s name was: Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim, (born c. 570, Mecca, Arabia [now in Saudi Arabia]—died June 8, 632, Medina).

 

Lederman’s OCD examination is sure to rile Multiculturalists brainwashed to accept cultures not traditionally Western and Muslims brainwashed to believe Muhammad is the perfect example of a human man.

 

REGARDLESS, the Lederman OCD examination goes a long way to explain the virulent activities AGAINST non-Muslims. When a person with obvious OCD hang-ups is placed on a pedestal of perfection which a billion or more followers are told to emulate, that emulation definitively will NOT bode well for the non-Muslim and in my humble opinion, causes an inner socio-cultural harm among the devotees of Islam as well.

 

Because of the nature of this truth upsetting Muslims in particular (I could care less about upsetting a Left-Wing Multiculturalist – they self-destructive) I am not sharing on much Social Media. If you don’t mind the venom of Social Media Jail (e.g. Facebook & Twitter suspensions or bannings temporarily or longer), then share away and more to the truth of cultural survival.

JRH 12/3/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

***************************

Muhammad’s Dietary Compulsions And Jewelry Obsessions

Michael Lederman – Owner

12/2/19

MeWe Group – Islam: The Truth

 

#thepeoplevsmuhammad

 

Sticky brain

 

We’ve covered a lot of ground in this particular section of Muhammad’s psychoanalysis and I believe it to be pertinent to conclude the investigation of this disorder with the aforementioned symptom, “Sticky brain.” What exactly does this peculiar mental anomaly entail? If a patient is to perform an action, or should an image pop into their thought process, often it becomes nigh impossible to forget and repeat.

 

Consequently, the individual will experience haunting memory echoes, compelling them to repeatedly check the procedure, verbalize the action, or perform a compulsive ritual attempting to replace or erase the thought from their consciousness. If one is to research OCD extensively, they will find that this compulsion is highly prevalent in those with the condition, and is the precursor before an individual descends into compulsive mental torture.

 

After researching the Hadith, chapter, and verse, it’s abundantly evident that Muhammad’s Islam gravitates entirely around his mental disorder. The symptom “sticky brain”, is echoed numerous times, and on one particular occasion, Muhammad verbally reprimands Aisha for exacerbating his condition:

 

Narrated Anas: Aisha had a thick curtain (having pictures on it) and she screened the side of her house with it. The Prophet said to her, “Remove it from my sight, for its pictures are still coming to my mind in my prayers.”

Sahih Bukhari 7:72:842

 

As you can see here, the evidence for the sticky brain is quite obvious. Muhammad must have suffered strong mental echoes for the remainder of his life, and consequently destroyed every piece of art. Perhaps this is also why the hijab was created, as the physical aspects of a woman’s face might also have perturbed him. And while Islam will purport that the prohibition for pictures derives from ‘idolatry’, their assertion is simply erroneous upon acknowledging this tradition and the following.

 

Thus, if any reader still has doubts about whether Muhammad did actually suffer from the illness, I shall re-introduce a Hadith tradition which will substantiate my claim:

 

Narrated by Anas

“Whenever Allah’s Apostle greeted somebody, he used to greet him three times, and if he spoke a sentence, he used to repeat it thrice.”

Sahih Bukhari 8:74:261

 

As we can see here, Muhammad was compelled to offer salutations and repeat himself over three times to adhere to his condition. For any rationally minded person, there is no need to conduct oneself as such, unless his followers were suffering from an epidemic of hearing difficulties.

 

However, I am fully aware that even the worst firebrand of Muslim apologists will refute my claim. And so, I will once again introduce another Hadith to reconfirm my suspicions. Again, the protracted account in the following tradition not only confirms Muhammad’s incapacity to refrain from his compulsive nature but proves that even his followers began to psychologically develop repetitive sticky brain because of him:

 

Narrated Abu Dharr:

I came to the Prophet while he was wearing white clothes and sleeping. Then I went back to him again after he had got up from his sleep.

 

He said, “Nobody says: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’ and then later on he dies while believing in that, except that he will enter Paradise.”

 

I said, “Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?”

 

He said. ‘Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft.”

 

I said, “Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?”

 

He said. ‘Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft.”

 

I said, ‘Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft?’

 

He said, “Even if he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and theft…”

Sahih Bukhari 7:72:717

 

No less than 3 times did Muhammad and his lackey refrain from repeating themselves. Ladies and gentlemen, this is obsessive-compulsive order defined! Hypothetically, to watch both OCD patients converse while living out their conversational compulsions would be a sight to behold. How exactly would they be able to break the habit is unfathomable.

 

However, if you are still not convinced, and believes that the ‘prophet’ most probably was only highly eccentric and exceptionally particular in his conduct, I suggest them to watch The Aviator (2004) based on the life of the OCD stricken, Howard Hughes. The very last scene of the film exposes the extent of “sticky brain” as Hughes suffers a complete mental breakdown, compulsively repeating a particular phrase to himself.

 

Throughout the traditions, there is a pattern of compulsion of which he conformed to. It’s abundantly clear the ‘prophet’ was afflicted with the condition considering that he never gave any plausible explanation for his odd ways. However, it’s obvious that his schizophrenia invariably played a crucial role in his OCD, as his hallucinations effectively trickled down into daily ritual and routine. Evidently, the majority of his perturbing actions were the brainchild of his psychotic delusions. The irony is that Muslims believed his irrational behavioral compulsions were ‘divine’, sent by Allah. When in truth, his example was nothing more than a mental illness which remained undiagnosed for over 1400 years.

 

OCD is so common, that up to 3% of adults and children suffer from the condition. Ironically, just like every other mental illness, Muhammad possessed, early Muslims were also compelled to imitate another psychological disorder of his. Evidently, the extent of his illness saw his ordinances unabatedly grow out of control to form a tightly constrictive society based on psychologically compulsive affiliations including washing, checking, counting, launching paranoid accusations and developing spiritual anxieties. Yet, it’s amazing how Islam still continues to flourish considering the detrimental nature of it’s so-called ‘godly’ commandments pertaining to hygiene.

 

The life-threatening bacteria contained in the Zam Zam Well and the Well of Buda’ah should’ve killed off the early Muslims before Sharia could ever take hold in the region. Likewise, the mass consumption of camel urine should’ve also finished the cult as it’s only recently been reported that the bacteria replete excretion has been linked to MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome).

 

If we acknowledge Muhammad’s excessive wastage of precious water, which he squandered for his personal obsessions over ‘cleanliness’, it’s abundantly clear that early Islamic cult members would’ve been appalled by his irresponsibility with the vital resource. It’s highly likely he was aware of growing resentment, as Arabs would’ve culturally considered water as the highest priority; their life’s blood. Thus fearing a full-scale revolt, the grandmaster of the universe qualified urine as a substitute for the consumption of water.

 

Sadly, because Muhammad’s irrational behavior continued unabated until his death, his followers were never able to recognize his illness and accepted that his OCD was entirely normal. This was the consequence of years of psychological grooming, and having the ‘prophet’ repeatedly drum into their psyche’s that his example mirrored god. They only had themselves to compare to the ‘prophet’ of whom he regarded himself as the ‘perfect human’. The irony is that his disciples’ rational thinking became irrational, and vice versa.

 

It’s evident from the repetitive patterns of his compulsions, Muhammad desperately tried to control his illness, yet this only made matters worse. Psychologists who prescribe ‘cognitive behavior therapy’ teach patients not to give in to their repetitive thinking, and advocate breaking the habit. Had the ‘prophet’ been aware of this technique, it may have helped him overcome his affliction. Although, it’s highly probable that his illness derived from genetic influence.

 

It’s assumed that hereditary genetics plays a strong role in the individual obtaining the condition. If we study Muhammad’s life and genetic line, it’s possible that not only he, but many of his predecessors within the Quraish tribe suffered from OCD. Indicative of the religious compulsive characteristic, during the pre-Islamic era, the clan would compulsively circumambulate the Ka’aba seven times (an odd number) and obsessively prostrate themselves before the edifice. Likewise, the fact that they were exceptionally superstitious folk who unapologetically believed in jinn, solar eclipses that signified omens, lunar-based holidays like Ramadan, and phobias of females, of which lead to infanticide, could all be attributed to a hereditary genetical disposition for the condition. Or perhaps their fundamental religious tenets were created by one of whom was an afflicted individual.

 

This is not a preposterous argument as even today, there are many non-Muslims who will take a pinch of salt, and throw it behind their left shoulder. While anyone will tell you that this particular ritual was born from superstition (attributed to Leonardo Da Vinci’s ‘Last Supper’, throwing salt at the devil’s face), it’s more likely the byproduct of an obsessive compulsive’s anxiety.

 

Nevertheless, the foundations of Islamic doctrine was built with Muhammad’s anxiety. Anxiety is a central component of fear. Fear is the core of OCD – the inherent worrying over things that are out of the individual’s control. And fear is what binds Islam together. And wherever there is fear, there is guilt. Guilt itself is also a key component in Islam’s inherited compulsive disorder. [Bold Text by Blog Editor]

 

As we are soon to discover, it’s possible that Muhammad felt unremitting guilt regarding his rampant sex-addition and especially his sexual encounter with his dead aunt. These haunting incestuous memories would’ve compelled him to obsess over cleanliness and genital ablutions. Eventually, his washings became ritualistic upon developing OCD, which was a result of his obsession to forget his indelible sordid past.

 

In truth, Muhammad was running scared. Being an individual born into poverty, and evolving into an overly dependent character, his newfound military authority would’ve acted as a double-edged sword. And the more powerful he became, the more fearful he was of losing the throne. As a simple incompetent peasant thrust into the pinnacle of political Arabia, undoubtedly the thrill would’ve worn off as the crushing reality of his ‘prophethood’ demanded that only he could decide the future of the Ummah. This confronting fact would’ve undoubtedly rattled his psyche, undoubtedly bolstering a life-long anxiety disorder. It’s obvious after reading the Hadith, that many times he was caught unawares and had to fabricate nonsensical superstitions and compulsions to counteract any threat to his crown.

 

Mirroring Muhammad’s own life, the aforementioned legendary oil tycoon Howard Hughes also faced a similar predicament. Inheriting enormous wealth and fear of losing his position of power, fame, and fortune, Hughes eventually fell into the same psychological trap. Though exempt from schizophrenia, the tycoon resorted to the same Muhammadan irrational hygienic rituals, compulsions, and repetitive verbal delivery. Sadly, not only her but everyone around him was affected.

 

Like the Islamic Ummah, Hughes’s exceptional vision for the future, his personal residence, his relationships, and his vast wealth and assets were invariably influenced by the intricacies of his compulsions. Muhammad, also being influenced by OCD, charted a compulsive war machine dedicated to obsessive taxation and tribute to his imaginary god, Allah. Like Hughes’ employees, Muslim disciples had to conform to their master’s irrational behavior and were commanded to live where he wanted them to live, and befriend whom he wanted them to befriend.

 

Today, Muslims will argue to the tooth that these alleged ‘divine’ revelations and his example is the truth, and should be performed to please god. However, the truth is that it’s irrefutable his conduct was indicative of OCD. We know this, as he never ‘revealed’ any divine explanations to justify his irrational behavior. Why should a man wipe his anus an odd number of times? Why should any person put his right shoe on first? Why can’t people drink while standing? To be frank, these exhortations are nonsensical!

 

Yet, Islamic theology is based around the concept that Muhammad was the ‘perfect human’, completely exempt from any mental disorders, anxieties, self-doubts, irrational thoughts, and psychological imperfections. However, his eccentricities showed no sign of intelligent order, no “method to his madness.” In reality, the man was another statistic in a widely documented behavioral disorder.

 

OCD is indicative of imperfection, as the brain struggles without the necessary serotonin levels. If Muhammad is considered to be the ‘perfect human’, then his evidential affliction with the condition destroys the claim. His mind was not perfect in the slightest, and in no way was he qualified to lead an already superstitious, ignorant flock who looked up to him for intelligent guidance. In truth, it was like the blind leading the blind.

 

Islam was facilitated through dogmatic compulsion, but ultimately became a punitive legislative society basing its ethos only on his obsessions. Sadly, those who refused to conform to his irrational behavior were invariably murdered for being ‘apostates’. Ironically, Muhammad’s callous act of burning down the houses of those who forgot to pray was highly uncharacteristic of OCD, and more symptomatic of dangerous narcissism.

 

However, the truth is that Muhammad was an irritating, pedantic, fussy, neurotic man trapped in a personal universe, plagued with indescribable obsessions. And although he relished being regarded as the center of the universe, he couldn’t handle being the odd one out. Consequentially, his followers were forced to mimic him to protect themselves, or to convince the world they weren’t worshipping a delusional, irrational compulsive individual; as the saying goes “if everyone is doing it, it must be right.”

 

Finally, the Quranic verse “there shall be no compulsion in religion” is a hypocritical statement regarding Muhammad’s true psychological nature. Muslims are compelled.

________________________

The Mo OCD Understanding of Islam

An Intro by John R. Houk

© December 3, 2019

_______________________

Muhammad’s Dietary Compulsions And Jewelry Obsessions

 

Michael Lederman – Owner

12/2/19

MeWe Group – Islam: The Truth

 

Motives Behind the False Narrative on Islam and the West


I found a Raymond Ibrahim post on FrontPageMag.com that writes about the poisonous propaganda spewed by Left-Wing Multiculturalist and Islamic Apologists brainwashing susceptible Western minds for decades. You should read to discover if YOU are a victim or a collaborator of said brainwashing.

 

JRH 12/2/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***************************

Motives Behind the False Narrative on Islam and the West

How — and why — reality was turned upside down.

 

An Islamic Mosque

 

By Raymond Ibrahim

December 2, 2019

FrontPageMag.com

 

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

 

Any honest and objective appraisal of Islam’s historic jihad on the Christian world must be eye-opening, to say the very least.  In the first century of its existence (between 632-732) Islam permanently conquered, Arabized, and Islamized nearly three-quarters of the Christian world, thereby permanently severing it.  Europe came to be known as “the West” because it was literally the remaining and westernmost appendage of Christendom not to be swallowed up by Islam.

 

For roughly a millennium thereafter, Arabs, Berbers, Turks, and Tatars—all of whom called and saw themselves as Muslims—launched raid after raid, all justified and lauded as jihads, into virtually every corner of Europe.  They reached as far as Iceland and provoked the U.S. into its first war as a nation.  The devastation was indescribable; some regions in Europe, particularly in Spain and the Balkans, remain uninhabitable due to the incessant raiding.  Some 15 million Europeans were enslaved during this perennial jihad and, according to contemporary records, treated horrifically.

 

In short, “if we … ask ourselves how and when the modern notion of Europe and the European identity was born,” writes historian Franco Cardini, “we realize the extent to which Islam was a factor (albeit a negative one) in its creation.  Repeated Muslim aggression against Europe between the seventh to eighth centuries, then between the fourteenth and the eighteenth centuries … was a ‘violent midwife’ to Europe.”

 

Here the inevitable question arises: How could such a long, well-documented history of unmitigated Islamic aggression that had immense repercussions on the development of Western civilization now be presented as the antithesis of reality?

 

The answer revolves around a number of modern philosophies—from the Enlightenment to moral/cultural relativism—that have each contributed to an all-pervasive “Narrative” concerning the historic relationship between Islam and the West.  In presenting the West as aggressor and Islam as victim—hence the latter’s ongoing “grievance”-based animosity—this history is as entrenched as it is the reverse of reality.

 

To understand this, one must first understand that, despite its many manifestations, permutations, and emphases over the centuries, the Narrative’s unspoken driving force has largely been the same: to demonize and thus justify a break away from Europe’s traditional heritage, religion, identity, and mores.  If this sounds farfetched, consider: whereas by any objective standard the West is responsible for practically every boon taken for granted today—from scientific, technological, economic and medicinal advances, to the abolition of slavery and anti-discrimination laws—today no people of any race or civilization despise their heritage except Western people.    Clearly something is amiss.

 

Or consider how leftists/liberals/progressives who forever whine against any vestige of Western traditionalism, habitually make common cause with Islam—despite the latter’s truly oppressive qualities.  Thus feminists denounce the Western “patriarchy”—but say nothing against the Muslim treatment of women as chattel; homosexuals denounce Christian bakeries—but say nothing against the Muslim execution of homosexuals; multiculturalists denounce Christians who refuse to suppress their faith to accommodate the religious sensibilities of Muslim minorities—but say nothing against the entrenched and open Muslim persecution of Christians.

 

The reason for these discrepancies is simple:  “The enemy [Islam] of my enemy [Christianity] is my friend.”

 

From here, how and why such a formally well-known history of Muslim aggression against Europe was not merely suppressed but reversed should start making sense: of all non-European, non-Christian peoples, only Muslims lived alongside and interacted with (that is, constantly encroached and warred on) Europe for over a millennium; this made Muslims the only people—the only foil—that could be used to support the Narrative’s argument against premodern Europe.  But first an intellectually satisfying way of casting Muslims as victims not conquerors was needed.

 

Enter literary professor Edward Said’s 1978 book, Orientalism.  Its central thesis is that the Orientalists—the Europeans who began the academic study of the East centuries ago—were not writing objectively about Muslims and their history, but rather intentionally slandering and stereotyping them in order to justify dominating them during the colonial era.

 

This made perfect sense—but only because the postmodern Western mind had already been primed for it.  For if, as Marxist Materialism teaches, ideas/religions have no influence on history (and thus, economic want, not “jihad,” caused Muslims to expand); if, as Relativism and its spawn Multiculturalism teach, there are no absolute truths, religious or otherwise (and thus no culture or civilization is “better” than another); if, as pop psychology teaches, violent and negative behavior is always a product of societal injustices (and thus the more Muslims behave violently, the more that only proves they are frustrated victims)—then what does one make of the aforementioned centuries of European writings that uniformly depict Muslims as ideologically driven by violence and lust?

 

Simple: dismiss them all as bigoted and hypocritical lies by nefarious Europeans intent on demonizing a superior, more tolerant faith and civilization.   Thus a whole new academic approach to Islam—stripped of all historic writings not conforming to the Narrative—was born.  History would no longer shape ideas and attitudes; rather, preexisting ideas and attitudes—wishful thinking—would shape history.

 

Bernard Lewis, himself a target of Edward Said’s Orientalism, summarized this new approach—or “pseudo history”—well:

 

According to a currently fashionable epistemological view, absolute truth is either nonexistent or unattainable.  Therefore, truth doesn’t matter; facts don’t matter.  All discourse is a manifestation of a power relationship, and all knowledge is slanted.  Therefore, accuracy doesn’t matter; evidence doesn’t matter.  All that matters is the attitude—the motives and purposes—of the user of knowledge, and this may simply be claimed for oneself or imputed to another.  In imputing motives, the irrelevance of truth, facts, evidence, and even plausibility is a great help.  The mere assertion suffices” (Islam and the West, 115).

 

Orientalism’s success lay less in anything intrinsic to it—American classicist Bruce Thornton characterizes it as an “incoherent amalgam of dubious postmodern theory, sentimental Third Worldism, glaring historical errors, and Western guilt”—and more because it fit the West’s prevailing zeitgeist (which, of course, thrives on “dubious postmodern theory, sentimental Third Worldism, glaring historical errors, and Western guilt”).

 

Nor does the Narrative predominate today because people are well read or pay attention to academe; as French historian Marc Ferro demonstrated in his Cinema and History (1988), the overwhelming majority of Western people’s knowledge of history comes from movies.  And almost any major film dealing with premodern Europeans and Muslims—Robin Hood (1991), Kingdom of Heaven (2005), etc.—contrasts hypocritical, intolerant, and fanatical Christians with sophisticated, advanced, and tolerant Muslims.   Commenting on such films back in 1997, Lewis wrote, “The misrepresentation of the past in the cinema is probably the most fertile and effective source of such misinformation at the present time…”

 

Twenty years later the Narrative has only metastasized and infected all aspects of public life, including politics and so-called “mainstream news.”   Meanwhile, social and other media giants—YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter—increasingly censor material that contradicts the Narrative.

 

Such is how a previously well-known history was turned upside down and used to weaken the West—the greatest sin of which is ever again to think or behave like its “awful” ancestors did concerning Islam.

 

For more on the true history between Islam and the West, see the author’s recent Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_______________________

© Copyright 2019, FrontPageMag.com

 

Donate to Front Page Magazine

 

ABOUT FPM

 

The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four  Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

 

DiscoverTheNetworks.com, launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining the chief groups and individuals of the Left and their organizational interlocks.  It is a full service encyclopedia of the READ THE REST

 

Donate to Front Page Magazine

 

Addressing ‘mohammedbasha’ Comment Promoting Islam


John R. Houk

© November 13, 2019

 

Photo capture of website exposing Origins of Islamic Culture. CLICK HERE then scroll to bottom of page to click image info.

 

At my SlantRight 2.0 blog I have comments set for moderation ONLY. The reason most comment are of a spam advertising nature – some product oriented and some just vulgar porn. Along that same line I typically IGNORE off the bat when a comment is authored by “Anonymous”. Once in a while out of the corner of my eye I might an “Anonymous” commenter with a valid comment to a post – that person would get lucky and get added as a comment. BUT that would be few and far between and especially RARE.

 

Here is the reason for going over comment practices on the SlantRight 2.0 blog. I actually got a comment to moderate from an individual self-identified as “mohammedbasha”.  If you go to mohammedbasha’s Blogger profile page the info on identity is quite pseudonymous yet quite obviously the image of a Muslim Apologist. In case you are unaware, like American Dems Muslim Apologists at worst outright lie or at best so brainwashed by their religious leaders are sadly deceived to believe infamous actions are good for humanity. Here is a copy and paste of mohammedbasha’s Blogger profile page:

 

My blogs

 

 

Contact me

 

 

On Blogger since October 2019

 

About me

 

Industry: Religion

 

Occupation: Consultant

 

Location: Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

 

Since mohammedbasha was good enough to not post “anonymous” I first examined the post being commented on which is “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?” posted on 11/4/17. The purpose of that post hopefully summed up in these excerpts:

 

On 11/2 I vented a bit about the hypocrisy of the Mainstream Media (MSM) reporting like wimps on the Islamic terrorist attack by Sayfullo Saipov in Manhattan. Saipov killed eight and injured many others on Halloween for Allah, Muhammad and ISIS.

 

I shared the blog post on the G+ Community Boycott!🚫CNN, MSNBC & LIBERAL MEDIA (among other Communities and Groups). Two Community commenters had an interesting enough dialogue that I have decided to cross post most of it as a standalone post. The dialogue was between “ron keramer” and “Christina Johnston”.

 

You can definitely read the ire I had with Muslims acting on Islamic revered writing in the embedded links in the first paragraph. Unfortunately G+ Communities as a social platform no longer exist ergo you cannot read those sources. The next paragraph of “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?” clarifies the existence of the hypocrisy that Muslim Apologists and Multicultural Leftists hold against the critics of Islam:

 

The title of the post is “I Am Islamorgizo not Islamophobic”. The context of the post is being weary of the MSM insisting anyone that is critical of Islam is an Islamophobic racist. So, I found a Greek word that connotates a fixed anger akin to settled opposition. That Greek word is orgízō. Just as Multiculturalists and Islamic Apologists hooked “Islam” with the Greek derivative for “phobia” to form Islamophobe, I connected Islam with orgízō to create Islamorgizo – a settled angry opposition to Islam. Then I explained the reason why Islam deserves settled angry opposition not only for its revered writings justifying violence against non-Muslims, but also to show contrasting Quran and the Bible that Islam is specifically an Antichrist religion. Incidentally, Islam is the ONLY non-Christian religion that specifically denies the centrality of the Christian faith. You’ll have to read “I Am Islamorgizo not Islamophobic” for the details.

 

Sadly, to my knowledge, the term “Islamorgizo” has never caught on to counter calling critics of Islam Islamophobes. Allow me to reiterate that I do not have an irrational fear Islam but I have an angry opposition for what Islam stands for in that socio-political religion’s obsessed violent hatred of all things non-Islamic with the specific labelling of the “People of the Book” (meaning the Holy Bible) as the people who have twisted the so-called original revered writings (meaning the Quran that never existed in any form prior to the recollections of Muhammad’s fellow pillagers, rapists and slavers put their leader’s sayings to pen and paper) – Interesting afterthought: “The Myth: Muhammad Would
Never Approve of Rape – DEBUNKED
”)
of Islam’s Allah.

 

With all the above embedded links a non-Muslim – especially a Jew and Christian – should be concerned with the socio-political religion known as Islam, below is the brief comment (not approved to be posted to “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?”) by mohammedbash:

 

mohammedbasha has left a new comment on your post “Where do You Stand: Keramer vs Johnston?“:

 

Misconceptions About Islam

 

Misconceptions About Islam is a website that misrepresents by misleading readers about what Islam’s revered writings stipulate AND what history records. Here’s an excerpt example:

 

Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) Founded Islam?

 

It’s been Misconceptions About Islam and misunderstood by many that Islam was founded by Prophet Muhammed around 1400 years ago in the middle of Arabia. But the truth is advent of Islam dated since origin of Adam, who was the first human being to worship the one and only God. Prophets who came later were also Muslims and propagated Allah is the true creator with no companions or children. A true Muslim submits self to the true God and accept Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) as his final messenger. [Blog Editor: A demonic lie if communicated by Quran, it was only by the lips of Muhammed later recorded into writing by a follower (or followers) of Muhammed into writing after the false prophet’s death in 632 AD (or CE for secular minded scholars).]

 

Allah; the God for Muslims Only?

 

The Real Meaning of the word Allah is “One True God” in Arabic. It also refers to the one who created heavens, earth, sea, mountain and everything that stays in the universe. Even Arabic speaking Jews & Christians refer God with the name of Allah. So essentially our faith/belief is up on one and only powerful God though cited with multiple names (Allah, Yahweh or God the Father)

 

Blog Editor: I am convinced the Muslim faith are taught and believe “Allah” means “One True God”. But that literally is not accurate.

 

From YourDictionary.com:

 

Allah: Islam – God

 

Origin of Allah

Arabic All?h from al, the + il?h, god, akin to Classical Hebrew (language) eloah, God (citing: Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Fifth Edition Copyright © 2014 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

 

Allah: God, especially in Islam.

 

Origin of Allah

Arabic allāh al- the ‘ilāh god ℵl (citing: THE AMERICAN HERITAGE® DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, FIFTH EDITION by the Editors of the American Heritage Dictionaries. Copyright © 2016, 2011 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

 

Of more interest on “Allah” from webpage entitled, The pagan origin of the word, “Allah”:

 

 

The pre-Islamic origin of “Allah”

 

  1. There is absolutely no question that Allah was worshipped by the pagan Arabs as one of many polytheistic gods.

 

  1. Allah was worshipped in the Kabah at Mecca before Muhammad was born. Muhammad merely proclaimed a god the Meccans were already familiar with. The pagan Arabs never accused Muhammad of preaching a different Allah than the one they already worshipped.

 

  1. Many scholars say “Allah” is derived from a compound Arabic word, AL + ILAH = Allah. “Ilah” in Arabic is “God” and “Al” in Arabic is a definite article like our word “the”. So from an English equivalent “Allah” comes from “The + God”. Others, like Arthur Jeffery say, “The common theory is that it is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and the article al-; thus al-ilah, the god,” becomes Allah, “God.” This theory, however, is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words borrowed into the language in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic.” (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion, Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)

 

  1. Although “Allah” has become known as the proper name for the Muslim god, Allah is not a name, but a descriptor that means literally, “the god”. All pagan cultures have these generic terms that refer to their “top god” as “the god”. In comparison to the perfect monotheism of Judaism and Christianity, “Allah” was originally no more a proper name for the Muslim God, than the word Hebrew “elohim” (god) or Greek “theos” (god) are proper names of the one true God of the Bible. “Jehovah” is the only revealed proper name for the “Elohim” of the Old Testament ( Ex 3:13; 6:3) and “Jesus” is the only revealed proper name of “Theos” in the New Testament. (Acts 4:12) Islam has no proper name for their god, but merely transformed, by universal use and confusion, the generic Allah into a proper name. So although today, Muslims use “Allah” as a proper name, it was never used this way originally. Allah, therefore is equivalent to “elohim” and “ho theos” but not “Jehovah” or “Jesus”. Allah is not the name of the nameless Muslim God. However Muslims will claim that Allah is the name of God that corresponds to Jehovah. Both the Father and the Son are called “ho theos” (The God). Jesus is called “The God” many times in the New Testament: John 20:28; Heb 1:8. An important conclusion from this, is that the mere fact that “Allah” is equivalent to “elohim” and “ho theos” does not mean they are directly corresponded. It certainly doesn’t prove Allah is the same as the God of the Old or New Testament. It does not prove that Muslim’s worship the same God as Christians. If this correspondence proved the Muslim god was the same as the Christian God, then because pagan religions also have generics that correspond to “the god” (Allah), this correspondence would also prove that Allah is the same god as the Buddhist god, for Buddhists also refer to their god as “the god”.

 

What scholars say about the origin of the word “Allah”:

 

  1. It is not related that the Black Stone was connected with any special god. In the Ka’ba was the statue of the god Hubal who might be called the god of Mecca and of the Ka’ba. Caetani gives great prominence to the connection between the Ka’ba and Hubal. Besides him, however, al-Lat, al-`Uzza, and al-Manat were worshipped and are mentioned in the Kur’an; Hubal is never mentioned there. What position Allah held beside these is not exactly known. The Islamic tradition has certainly elevated him at the expense of other deities. It may be considered certain that the Black Stone was not the only idol in or at the Ka’ba. The Makam Ibrahim was of course a sacred stone from very early times. Its name has not been handed down. Beside it several idols are mentioned, among them the 360 statues. (First Encyclopedia of Islam, E.J. Brill, 1987, Islam, p. 587-591)

 

  1. “The verses of the Qur’an make it clear that the very name Allah existed in the Jahiliyya or pre-Islamic Arabia. Certain pagan tribes believed in a god whom they called ‘Allah’ and whom they believed to be the creator of heaven and earth and holder of the highest rank in the hierarchy of the gods. It is well known that the Quraish as well as other tribes believed in Allah, whom they designated as the ‘Lord of the House’ (i.e., of the Ka’ba)…It is therefore clear that the Qur’anic conception of Allah is not entirely new.” (A Guide to the Contents of the Qur’an, Faruq Sherif, (Reading, 1995), pgs. 21-22., Muslim)

 

  1. According to al-Masudi (Murudj, iv. 47), certain people have regarded the Ka’ba as a temple devoted to the sun, the moon and the five planets. The 36o idols placed round the Ka’ba also point in this direction. It can therefore hardly be denied that traces exist of an astral symbolism. At the same time one can safely say that there can be no question of any general conception on these lines. The cult at the Ka’ba was in the heathen period syncretic as is usual in heathenism. (First Encyclopedia of Islam, E.J. Brill, 1987, Islam, p. 587-591)

 

  1. The name Allah, as the Qur’an itself is witness, was well known in pre-Islamic Arabia. Indeed, both it and its feminine form, Allat, are found not infrequently among the theophorous names in inscriptions from North Arabia. The common theory is that it is formed from ilah, the common word for a god, and the article al-; thus al-ilah, the god,” becomes Allah, “God.” This theory, however, is untenable. In fact, the name is one of the words borrowed into the language in pre-Islamic times from Aramaic. (Islam: Muhammad and His Religion, Arthur Jeffery, 1958, p 85)

 

  1. “If a Muslim says, “Your God and our God is the same,” either he does not understand who Allah and Christ really are, or he intentionally glosses over the deep-rooted differences.” (Who Is Allah In Islam?, Abd-Al Masih, Light of Life, 1985, p. 36.)

 

  1. Now there dwelt in Mecca a god called Allah. He was the provider, the most powerful of all the local deities, the one to whom every Meccan turned in time of need. But, for all his power, Allah was a remote god. At the time of Muhammad, however, he was on the ascendancy. He had replaced the moon god as lord of the Kaaba although still relegated to an inferior position below various tribal idols and three powerful goddesses: al-Manat, goddess of fate, al-Lat, mother of the gods, and al-Uzza, the planet Venus. (Islam and the Arabs, Rom Landau, 1958 p 11-21)

 

… AND MORE with a total of 66 refutations about the origins of  “Allah” – The pagan origin of the word, “Allah”; Written by Brother Andrew; The Interactive Bible.

 

At this point I appreciate the Muslim Apologist going by mohammedbasha chose not to comment anonymously. But pointing to a website misleading about the reality of Islam’s animus toward non-Muslims needed to be addressed in a stand-alone post. AND THERE YOU HAVE IT.

 

JRH 11/13/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

America Is Burning


Yesterday I posted “Dhimmi-Sharia Compliance in Tulsa OK”. The day before Justin Smith submitted “America Is Burning” but had not read the submission yet. My post was how a TPD Officer was fired for Social Media posts that occurred even before he was hired in Tulsa. He was fired by the combined actions of a local Leftist activist and Muslim Brotherhood-oriented CAIR. THAT LINES UP WITH Justin’s opinion piece “AMERICA IS BURNING”. IT DESERVES TO BE READ!!!!

 

JRH 10/29/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***************************

America Is Burning

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 10/27/2019 5:37 PM

Cross Posted:

 

 

 

Yes — The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria [aka ISIS, ISIL or DAESH] has largely been defeated physically and militarily, but its ideas burn hot still in the hearts of millions of Muslims this very moment. And as everybody and his brother seems so overjoyed that ISIS leader Al Baghdadi was just killed by U.S. Special Forces and they are giving back-slaps over defending America from Islamic terrorism in an overseas arena, these same fools have essentially sold America out to the Muslims for decades now.

 

In every city across America today there is a second city comprised of Muslims who have superimposed their Sharia law over entire sections of those cities, such as Dearborn, Islamberg, Minneapolis and many others, as they run a parallel system antithetical to our Constitution and freedom.

 

This is an expansionist stage that no country has ever managed to overcome, because it is the only science in which the Sons of Allah have always excelled — invading, conquering and subjugating.

 

Islam’s most coveted prey has always been Europe and the Christian world, and now America is in its sights and within its grasp. Democrats are aligned with Islam and its anti-Christian, anti-Constitution, anti-freedom and anti-American agenda, and globalist communist black robed judges and justices are protecting their efforts and policies through the judiciary.

 

If one yells anti-American slogans today and calls Americans – especially supporters of Pres. Trump – fascists, murders and the enemy of humanity, all is fine and well and considered “normal” behavior and an act of virtue, by our Democratic Party, the enemy from within, collaborationists and traitors. However, use of such slurs towards Islam and one is pilloried and subjected to more name calling and castigation.

 

The truth comes into sharp focus when we see so-called “leaders” in America seeking to implement rules of censorship and hate-speech “law” similar to that which exists in the European Union to silence any free speech that counters their anti-American communist globalist plans, favoring America’s Muslim Brotherhood as their foot soldiers in the plan to end America’s republic, favoring the establishment of heresy and the end to free thinking in America.

 

One by one, U.S. cities are giving preference to Muslim minorities over Americans born and raised here and families whose ancestry sometimes goes all the way back to America’s founding days. Already, several U.S. states are largely controlled by a Democrat-Islamist alliance, seen in Minnesota, California and New York.

 

What sort of government attempts to prevent us from thinking and speaking, from going against the wind, rebelling against and opposing those who muzzle us and invade us, stamping our freedom in the ground? A tyranny and an insult to our democratic republic. It is a government of lies and deceit and one that must be pulled out by its damnable, blackmailing illiberal anti-American roots.

 

What sort of democratic republic is it that in place of listening to its people and being concerned for America’s children silences them and hands them to the enemy? One that will surely meet a dismal fate and be burned to the ground, sooner than later.

 

America is burning in the flames of Islam, a government within a government, from all four corners of this America I love so well. And it’s far past time to fight fire with fire, close America’s borders to Islam and defeat it with extreme prejudice, stamping its fire out and sending it back to the hell that spawned it.

 

By Justin O. Smith

++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets and source link are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Intro to ‘America Withdraws From Syria’


Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

By Justin O. Smith

Posted October 22, 2019

 

President Trump wants to pull out of Syria for the very valid reason of stopping involvement in “endless wars.” The difficulty President Trump is facing is one of our staunchest allies against Islamic terrorism has been a group of stateless Kurds that are located in multiple Muslim nations that include Turkey, Iraq, Iran and of course Syria. The none of those nations have ever had any sympathy for the Kurdish people to form an independent Kurdistan with Turkey being the most vehement AGAINST an independent Kurdistan. Turks and Kurds have ethnic commonality and the Turks have jealously protected their land mass and cultural heritage left over after losing WWI. A Jealousy that during and after WWI has led to genocides of non-Turks residing in former Ottoman Turkey and present Republic of Turkey. Armenian and Greek Christians were the initial genocidal victims. YET because Muslim Kurds did not desire to assimilate to Turkish Islamic culture, Kurds also had and have become victims to Turkish genocidal efforts.

To be realistic though, my guess is Arab and Iranian (history’s Persians) efforts of committing genocide against Kurds has more to do with the lack of power than the lack of will to terminate Kurdish-Cultural Muslims. So, I do have sympathy for stateless Kurds. BUT the problem I have with 21st century Kurds is their independence efforts have been led by Communists. In case you missed the history-memo, Communism is a despotic political movement favoring a State-dominated dictatorship ending political Liberty, Individual Liberty, Religious Liberty (favoring atheism), Market Economies AND not least of all – ENDING National Sovereignty.

 

The Turks are going to exterminate any people they feel is a threat to Turkish-Muslim Culture. That includes Christians, Jews, Shi’ites (primarily Iranian threats) and sadly stateless Communist-oriented Kurds fight for independence which would include some Turkish territory.

 

Supporting today’s Kurds is a complicated proposition. Here are some titles that might lead President Trump to say something like, “Forget about it!”:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Am I defending Turkish instituted genocide? GOD NO! If Muslim-Turks thought they could get away with it, they’d exterminate Americans too. If you doubt that, take a look at Ottoman Turk empire building history.

 

Justin Smith gives me choices of titles for his submissions. The Kurdish issue is so complicated I couldn’t decide. So I chose a primary title and italicized the rest.

JRH 10/22/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***********************

America Withdraws From Syria:

Trump Lets the Fires of Chaos Consume Syria

 

Why Is America Still In Syria?  

U.S Abandons Syria to Russia and Iran

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 10/20/2019 4:38 PM

 

President Trump’s announcement that the U.S. would be withdrawing from northeast Syria, after a phone call with Turkish President Erdogan and a tweet, created a flurry of condemnation from former military leaders, politicians and the media, who called it a betrayal of the Kurds, “precipitous” and a move that would allow ISIS to renew itself. They act as though our alliance with the Kurds was based on a treaty when it wasn’t, and they ignore the fact that this was a loose alliance of United States and Kurdish interests coinciding on the ISIS terrorism issue; the fact remains that both the United States and the Kurds understood that America wasn’t staying in Syria forever and this withdrawal day was coming one day.

 

No doubt, President Trump could have handled this situation a bit more adroitly, by intensely planning our disengagement through the Pentagon and the State Department, rather than announcing it on October 7th and starting the withdrawal the next day, something that was strongly opposed by the Pentagon. There should have been a plan in place to be implemented that would have afforded the Kurds a safe position, minimizing the “betrayal”, since they have shed blood and lost 11,000 fighters in the fight against ISIS, at the behest of the U.S.; and, Turkey’s concerns should have been met too, since the PKK [Kurdistan Workers’ Party] communists, a designated terrorist organization, were the operational head of the Kurdish forces in the north even though sixty-five percent of the population in that area are Christian Arabs and Yazidis.

 

Obviously, the Kurds have been useful partners in the fight against ISIS, but they have also destabilized surrounding governments, to the best of their ability, and Leftist Democrats and “Conservative” Republicans suggesting Trump is betraying consistent allies is essentially a load of bull. The Kurds regularly taunted and attacked Turkey, making the situation in Syria more tumultuous and they constantly used their ISIS prisoners as leverage against the U.S. by constantly threatening to release ISIS prisoners and their families.

 

Until a few weeks ago, a joint U.S-Turkish effort effected border patrol, demilitarized the Syrian Democratic Forces along the border and the U.S. was attempting to provide Turkey the security guarantees it required. And as of yet, I have not heard why that was not enough for President Erdogan, other than his demand of 6,000 square mile “buffer zone”, within Syria, that Erdogan would control. This shouldn’t be a requirement for repairing Washington’s and Ankara’s relations, but Turkey’s miscalculations in diplomacy with Russia and Iran pushed the issue, since three million Syrian refugees in Turkey have become a political problem; some 115 million more now appear ready to breach the Turkish border under the current Russian-Syrian-Iranian drive to fill the power vacuum that is underway, and this is more than likely why security mechanisms created four months ago were not enough to satisfy Erdogan.

 

If the U.S. had attempted to construct a KRG model in Syria, we might not be here, but we never attempted to build such a construct. It also greatly angered Erdogan that we inverted our relationship through disjointed policy makers on the ground, who forgot the mission was to simply eradicate ISIS, while they started acting as agents for their PKK proxy — only a splinter group of all Kurdistan — and representing the Kurds’ cause to our Turkish ally as if the PKK was representative of all Kurds and worthy of equal footing with the nation state of Turkey.

 

Essentially, we elevated a small splinter terrorist organization of a minority to equal stature of one of the strongest nations in the entire Middle East and a NATO ally, albeit a flawed allied of late. This was one-hundred percent untenable to the Turks.

 

The world is witnessing invading Turkish forces moving to secure and control the area, while Russia and Syria move into areas abandoned by the U.S., now aligned with the Kurds who signed an agreement with Syria on October 13th, and whoever is trapped within the current blockade of the area is in a terrible situation; Turkey’s President Erdogan, an Islamist and aspiring caliph, will not discriminate between PKK and the rest of the population, that was supposed to have been given five days to evacuate the area, so Turkey can control a twenty mile deep and three hundred mile long “buffer zone” within Syria, even though some of the five million Kurds in the area have lived there for a century or more.

 

Fighting was ongoing between various militia’s and the Turks on October 17th despite the “cease fire”, and air and artillery strikes continued to hit the Kurdish fighters, civilian settlements and a hospital in the border town of Ras al-Ayn, in northeastern Syria.

 

In recent days, Sinam Mohamad, U.S. Representative for the Syrian Democratic Council, offered an impassioned statement and observation: “The Syrian situation is not only with the PKK.  What’s going on in Syria is not related to PKK. It’s the Syrian people, Arabs, Kurds. In this region, we have five million people living there. They are not all PKK — they are not (all) Kurds. They are Arabs. Do you think these Arabs are accepting to be a puppet in the Kurds hands? … So who is the alternative here? (The Turkish soldiers) who came to the region killing (civilians) after arresting them as it happened to (the secretary general of Future Syria Party) Hevrin Khalaf? So this is the alternative?”

 

On October 12th 2019, Hevrin Khalaf, the secretary general of Future Syria Party, was murdered by the Turkish backed Ahar al-Sharqiya fighters near the M4 Motorway in northern Syria, during the Turkish military operation against Syrian Democratic Forces and its YPG militia in Rojava, largely led by Kurds.

 

To be fair, President Trump had been telling his advisors for months to get this withdrawal planned out and prepared for implementation, since he was adamant about keeping his promise to “end forever wars”, and even Erdogan, as evil a man as he is, showed restraint over the past months, as he continuously warned he wouldn’t tolerate a PKK base of operations in northern Syria, that had the capability of being used against Turkey, at a later date, in a continuation of the Kurds century old fight to create a united Kurdistan, of 30 million Kurds, taking regions of Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria.

 

However, modern day Turkey under Erdogan is no longer the secular Turkey that it was, when it joined NATO. Erdogan has facilitated the return of Islamic fundamentalism, even to the point of allowing ISIS to operate from Turkey, when the U.S. fought ISIS in Iraq, and buying black-market oil from ISIS, essentially funding their continued war in the region. He murders his opposition, he has gone around embargoes and sanctions facilitating Iran’s nuclear program, he has purchased the S-400 from Russia, and his security people actually beat opposition protesters during one visit to D.C.

 

This is not a good ally. This is not a regime the United States should be aiding, and America damned sure shouldn’t be facilitating the extraterritorial aggression of Turkey either in Iraq or Syria.

 

Americans must always ask the important questions. Why are we in Syria and what’s the benefit and the U.S. interests in Syria? Please recall, the only mandate there was to address ISIS, not to aid the Kurds in their fight against Turkey or create a Kurdish state.

 

Many in U.S. leadership positions, such as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, are uncomfortable leaving the fate of the area and the continued fight against ISIS in the hands of Russia, Syria and Turkey, since the Kurds have had to shift to focus from the prisons housing thousands of ISIS fighters — with approximately 1000 already having escaped — to defending the entire area against Turkish soldiers who will not hesitate to kill them on the spot, as Erdogan has already made clear, by way of his statement that he would “crush their [PKK] heads”. Through a phone call and a tweet, President Trump essentially set this all in motion and gave Erdogan the green light to invade, so Trump is apparently comfortable leaving the region to America’s enemies, Russia and Syria.

 

On October 13th 2019, President Trump spoke in a laissez-faire manner, stating: “The Kurds and Turkey have been fighting for many years. Others may want to come in and fight for one side or the other. Let them!”

 

The only winners here for the moment are ISIS and Russia with a side benefit for Iran.

 

President Trump should have at least forced Erdogan to give the U.S. something in return. The U.S. received no concessions. This is what America gets when Her president operates by the seat of his pants on a wing and a prayer.

 

On a humanitarian level, the world is looking at approximately a third of Syria cast into chaos once more, while nearly half of Syria’s entire population is already internally or externally displaced, with millions having migrated to Lebanon, Turkey, Jordan and elsewhere. And yes, some affiliate themselves with pro-Syrian defense forces, even though their ranks cut across all ethnic lines and walks of life, filled with Christians, Kurds, Arabs and Turkmen and tribes that have followed their tribal leaders into so very much a tribal geopolitical fight. These people are being slaughtered, while living under already absolutely horrific circumstances; missing is the up-close and intimate coverage of the substantial numbers of women and children who are literally dying of malnutrition, and with the approach of winter, many thousands will freeze to death; and, in more acts against humanity, the YPG, Turkish proxies, remnants of ISIS, Al Nusra and others still use these civilians, women and children in particular, as shields and political victims for their fight: And this must be stopped regardless of what the United States does.

 

With that said, there was a lack of any long term strategic purpose and logical policy for keeping U.S. forces in Northern Syria. Surely no one could seriously expect us to keep a thousand soldiers, or more with mission creep, in country for the next fifty or seventy-five years — Could they?

 

Despite President Trump’s assertion that this was a move to keep his promise to “end forever wars”, a U.S. presence is currently still deployed in eastern Syria along the border with Jordan. Those 700 soldiers being removed from the north are simply being redeployed in western Iraq and joining 2000 more in Saudi Arabia where they will act as a contingent deterrence to Iran’s continued expansion, across the Middle East. So, as everyone can see, this isn’t really a “withdrawal”, as 300 Special Forces troops will remain in the southern Syrian outpost of Al-Tanf, to fight an ISIS resurgence, and America still isn’t ending Her forever wars.

 

Had this been a true professionally conducted withdrawal, rather than this fiasco, and President Trump not spoken out of both sides of his mouth and spoken frankly to the American people, many might not now be faulting him, even though pulling back for Erdogan’s march into Syria was an unnecessary move that removed one more tool to fight Iran’s aggressive expansion, that now has forced every group and nation that has an implied or an actual treaty guarantee that the U.S. will fight on its behalf to take a second look at its arrangements. The American public no longer has the will to fight the Long War in Syria or anywhere else, at a time when Congress is moving to continue operations in Syria as a firewall against Islamic terrorism, and in the meantime, President Trump will rightly take criticism over his handling of Syria and the shuffling of troops. And at a time he should have been reconciling U.S. national security interests to proper strategies through the constitutionally mandated process, Trump has instead decided to let this fire consume what it will and burn itself out.

 

By Justin O. Smith

++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor. In full disclosure I could not source some of the content in Justin Smith’s submission. Which frankly is part of the reason for an untimely submission to post discrepancy. Also the issue of the Kurds is very complicated leading for both sympathy and disdain for them from this Blog Editor. On a personal level I hate such inner conflict.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

The Palestinian Myth


I found this very supportive rendition for a sovereign Jewish nation and the delegitimizing of nationhood of Arabs pretending to be Palestinians on a MeWe group a few days ago. It read much like past chain emails I had read in the past. Due to the “chain email” potential I did not want to place it on my blogs without checking it out even though I am quite the Christian Zionist.

 

What you are about to read I have validated noted by source links. Where minor errors existed I corrected them to a clearer factual contention than was in the original text. If you are a faux-Palestinian Muslim – boohoo. If you are Jewish committed to your heritage or a Biblical oriented Christian noting the prophetic return of Jews to their Land what that means for the return of Jesus the Messiah/Christ – yeah baby be excited.

JRH 10/18/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**********************

The Palestinian Myth

 

Peter Baum

10/13/19 11:00 PM

MeWe Group: The Conservatives

 

I need help from anyone interested in exposing the anthropological miracle or should I say myth known as the ‘ indigenous Palestinians’.

If these so called people ever existed as a race, a culture, a tribe etc.; could anybody assist me with the answers to the following questions.

 

  1. Name and dates of any wars or battles fought by those identifying themselves as indigenous Palestinians against any foreign or domestic invaders during the period 3000 BC to 1948 AD.

 

  1. The name of any indigenous Palestinian leader during these wars in this period.

 

  1. The place of any building constructed by indigenous Palestinians during this period.

 

  1. The currency used by indigenous Palestinians.

 

  1. Where in the Quran or Bibles are the indigenous Palestinians mentioned?

 

  1. What do indigenous Palestinians call themselves in their indigenous language? There is no sound for the letter ‘P’ in Arabic so if the Palestinians in their mother tongue (assuming it’s Arabic) must call themselves Filastinians. This is the Arabic for Philistines who came from Greece and the name derives from the Hebrew word Pleshtim which means invaders. The Philistines became extinct in 1200 BC, So maybe today’s Palestinians think they miraculously were reborn from an extinct race of Greek invaders??? [Blog Editor: Got Questions depends on Biblical asserting Greek origin of Philistines. Two articles reporting on a 2019 archaeological science publication asserts southern European origins implying Greek Islands influence: a) Biblical Philistines Came from Europe, Ancient DNA Reveals; by News Staff; Sci-News.com; 7/4/19 AND b) Ancient Greeks the Biblical Philistine Enemies of Jews, DNA Study Claim; By Philip Chrysopoulos; GreekReporter.com; 7/4/19]

 

  1. Where is it written that Jerusalem is connected to the indigenous Palestinians? I cannot find the answers to any of the above questions but perhaps someone out there knows….my guess is that indigenous Palestinians are a myth and that those currently identifying themselves as such were simply immigrants from surrounding countries who came to today’s Israel for work created by the economic benefits that Zionism created. [Bold text Blog Editor’s]

We do know that the Palestinians sided with the Nazis during WW2 [Blog Editor – SEE: HERE & HERE] and both the Palestinian Charters of the Palestinian Authorities [Blog Editor: Actually the Palestinian Authority (PA) didn’t come into existence until 1994 via the Oslo Accords. Prior to the PA the primary representative group of Arab Faux-Palestinians was the Palestine Liberation OrganizationGatestone Institute-2016 (PLO – more origin info: The New American-2009 & BREITBART-2015) of Arab-Islamic terrorists. The subsequent dates are PLO Charter dates]  of 1964 and 1968 [PLO Charter Analysis] and the Hamas Charter of 1988 demand the extermination of Jewish people and the subservience to Islam of all other races and religions…..

As an interesting aside, International Law is immutable regarding Israel’s legal borders which include Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) and Gaza.

The League of Nations Treaty of 1922 which includes the Mandate for Palestine, the San Remo Treaty and the Balfour Declaration are specific on this geography and thus Israel’s borders are defined to include both.

When the United Nations [Full UN Charter] took over from the League of Nations all previous Treaties were included, endorsed, honoured legally unchallenged and unchanged as per Article 80 [Article 80 implications for a Jewish nation – HERE & HERE].

The international binding legal principles of Acquired Rights and Estoppel further endorse the immutable legal position of Israel.

++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

 

ACT for America Cancelled by Trump’s Mar-a-Lago!


What the HECK!?

John R. Houk

© October 13, 2019

 

You’ve probably heard by now that President Trump’s private enterprise at Mar-a-Lago (though probably not controlled by Trump while President) cancelled an annual event hosted by Brigitte Gabriel’s ACT for America event due Leftist/Muslim pressure.

 

The irony is Gabriel’s Counterjihad work too often goes out of its way to emphasize ACT for America is not Anti-Muslim but IS anti-radical Islam especially as it leads to Islamic terrorism.

 

In that sense it has always been my opinion Gabriel has been too soft on Islam yet still doing great work in exposing the nefarious actions of Muslim terrorists and educating on Islamic history, a history though accurate you will rarely hear or read about due to Multiculturalist/Muslim-Apologist whitewashing.

 

Especially since I am still in Facebook Jail, I have no qualms in saying ISLAM is freaking EVIL according to its own revered writings instructing Islamic adherents to despise ALL non-Muslims specifically naming Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians (mostly killed off by early Muslims), with some vehement hatred toward adherents of polytheistic religious beliefs. From Hugh Fitzgerald on Islamic revered writings displaying hate against non-Muslims:

 

The main texts of Islam are the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the Sira. The Qur’an is the Uncreated and Literal Word of God. It cannot be changed. It contains contradictions within itself, which long ago were resolved in favor of what are thought to be the later, and harsher verses. The “harsher” verses are said to date from Muhammad’s time in Medina, after he conquered that city. No longer needing to curry favor with anyone, as he had had to do in Mecca, he could afford to be as harsh as he pleased. The interpretive vehicle for dealing with contradictions in the Qur’an, and favoring the later verses, is “abrogation” or naskh. The doctrine dates back more than a millennium. Nonetheless, some have suggested that the doctrine be abandoned, so that the harsher verses no longer would be held to abrogate the softer verses from Muhammad’s “Meccan” period. This is unlikely to be accepted by more than a handful of would-be “reformers of Islam.” (A Vademecum On Islam: Five Pillars, Qur’an, Hadith, Sira; By Hugh Fitzgerald; Geller Report; 8/2/17)  

 

Here is a link to specific portions of Islamic revered text expressing adversarial instructions for Muslims to apply: https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Dhimmitude

 

And those are a mere few there are much-much more. YUP I am definitely Anti-Islam. AND I am Anti-Muslim toward any who abides to Islamic writings revered as Islamic truth yet detrimental to my existence. From what I’ve read and heard, Brigitte Gabriel is NOT on that same anti-Muslim train. She is only on the anti-Radical-Islam train.

 

Consider Brigitte Gabriel’s justified dismay upon learning a Meeting Place owned by President Trump – whom Gabriel has ardently supported through thick and thin! – cancelled her paid-for contractual event under accusations of being “Anti-Muslim”:

 

VIDEO: Mr. President, Stand for Free Speech!

 

 

Posted by ACT for America

66K subscribers – Oct 12, 2019

 

Mar-a-Lago Cancelled ACT for America’s 11th Annual Dinner Gala. We are asking for President Trump to stand with free speech and overturn the decision.

 

Below are a couple of articles you can place in the dismay realm from Understanding The Threat and One News Now.

 

JRH 10/13/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**************************

Administration Officials Welcome Senior Muslim Brotherhood Leader to White House

 

Posted By John Guandolo

October 8, 2019

Understanding The Threat

 

In the face of public criticism from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and Hamas doing business as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Trump Organization shut down an Act for America event scheduled at the President’s Mar a Lago resort in November featuring Michelle Malkin.

 

If that were the only surrender to the suit-wearing jihadis, it would be bad enough. But it is worse than just a cancelled event.

 

On September 25, 2019, the Department of Homeland Security and Administration officials hosted an event in the White House entitled “Faith Based Safety and Security Symposium” attended by Vice President Mike Pence and senior DHS officials.

 

Senior Muslim Brotherhood Leader Oussama Jammal (green tie) inside the White House.

 

Unfortunately, Oussama Jammal, a man UTT identifies as one of the top two Muslim Brotherhood leaders in the United States, also attended.

 

Jammal is the Secretary General of the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO), the Muslim Brotherhood’s mothership in the United States. The USCMO is a conglomerate of Muslim Brotherhood organizations which identifies itself as a “political” entity.

 

Oussama Jammal – Sec Gen USCMO

 

Days before the White House event, Oussama Jammal along with U.S. Hamas Leader Nihad Awad – a man UTT identifies as the General Masul or Leader of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood – met with Turkish President Erdogan in New York.

 

Yellow Identifies: Erdogan (Left) & Jammal (Right)

 

Yellow Identifies- CAIR Natl Exec Dir Nihad Awad

 

Understanding the Threat (UTT) assesses Turkish President Erdogan is the likely next Caliph for the global Islamic Movement, and assesses the enemy is in their final stages of preparing to announce the caliphate.

 

The Administration’s participation with leaders of the hostile Islamic Counter-State like Oussama Jammal reveals a gross lack of understanding of the true nature of the threat, and dangerous surrender to their efforts.

 

This should be a clear call to all Americans that this war will be won or lost at the local level. Citizens must know and understand the threat from the Islamic Counter-State at the LOCAL level, and force local officials to take actions to dismantle the jihadi networks and keep future networks from being established.

 

UTT is a leader in the counter-jihad and is the only organization in America giving citizens, police, elected officials and local/state leaders tools to identify and dismantle jihadi networks in local communities.

 

Reach out to us at UnderstandingtheThreat.com.

 

About John Guandolo

John Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).

++++++++++++++++++

Left works to shut down conservative group at Mar-a-Lago

 

By Steve Jordahl

 October 11, 2019

One News Now

 

Lean Left Button

A conservative national grassroots organization was kicked out of President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate after liberals complained.

 

ACT for America has one gala dinner a year to raise money for its mission to ensure the safety and security of Americans against foreign and domestic threats – including Islamic terrorism.

 

ACT for American Chairman Brigitte Gabriel pointed out that this year’s event was reserved earlier in the year at Trump’s Florida estate Mar-a-Lago.

 

Brigitte Gabriel

“We signed a contract with Mar-a-Lago back in April that we were going to have this dinner gala,” Gabriel stressed. “We had elected officials invited to be honored, [and] we had Michelle Malkin as the keynote speaker.”

 

The nationally syndicated columnist, Malkin, blasted activist groups on the left for shutting down and silencing conservatives.

 

“I planned to talk to ACT for America’s gala attendees about the ongoing national security threat that jihad-coddling Muslim grievance groups and other identity politics agitators in the ‘Open Borders, Inc.’ infrastructure pose to our country’s very existence,” Malkin wrote in her op-ed published on ONN. “But thanks to the Southern Poverty Law Center, Council on American Islamic Relations, Miami Herald, copycat journalists and the Trump Organization, the event was banned from Mar-a-Lago.”

 

She said it isn’t hard these days for liberals to keep those with opposing views from meeting and speaking.

 

“All it took was a noisy little echo chamber of lazy media lemmings in search of weekend clickbait,” Malkin continued. “On Saturday morning, the Miami Herald published an inflammatory attack masquerading as ‘breaking news’ with the headline: ‘Anti-Muslim extremist group says it will host $1,500-a-plate gala at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago.’”

 

Gabriel echoed Malkin’s concern, recounting what happened once the usual suspects on the left got wind of the event.

 

“The Southern Poverty Law Center put an article out on Friday at midnight are basically saying that we are an anti-Muslim hate group,” the leader of ACT for America explained. “And then, of course, the Miami Herald put it out and within a couple hours we got an email on a Saturday morning from the Trump organization saying we are cancelling the event.”

 

In fact, the Trump Organization – not to be confused with the Trump Campaign or administration – said, “This event will absolutely not be taking place at Mar-a-Lago.”

 

Gabriel indicated that lawyers at the resort simply panicked.

 

“Of all organizations, the Trump Organization … should understand what it’s like … for people to accuse an innocent person by calling them names,” she argued.

 

Gabriel is very clear that she does not blame the president for the cancellation and that the still supports him.

+++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_______________________

ACT for America Cancelled by Trump’s Mar-a-Lago!

What the HECK!?

 

John R. Houk

© October 13, 2019

_______________

Administration Officials Welcome Senior Muslim Brotherhood Leader to White House

 

Copyright 2019. Understanding the Threat. All rights reserved.

____________________

Left works to shut down conservative group at Mar-a-Lago

 

All Original Content Copyright ©2006-2019 American Family News Network – All Rights Reserved. “OneNewsNow”, “OneNewsNow.com“, and the “OneNewsNow World” logo, are Trademarks of the American Family News Network – All Rights Reserved.