No, White-Supremacist Violence Is Not a Major Problem


If you solely listen to the Left Stream Media would sense that White Supremacist violence (in other words violent acts of racism perpetrated by White People) is a problem on the rise globally.

If you surf Social Media it is my sense a fine line is arising between Caucasians weary of White People being blamed for all the ills of non-White People and actual White Supremacists such as Neo-Nazis, Skinheads (UK & USA), KKK, White Nationalists warping the Christian faith and other racists escaping the top of my thought process. The Left too often racks White People weary of being blamed for racist woes with the racist variations inherent in White Supremacism. That is an error that could very well push the weary-of-blame crowd to be supportive with actual White racists.

 

The Patriot Post article below evokes the weary-of-blame crowd pointing out the obvious statistically; viz., Islamic terrorism far outnumbers violence associated with White Extremism.

 

JRH 4/11/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

********************

No, White-Supremacist Violence Is Not a Major Problem

The New York Times peddles a false narrative that violent white extremism is on the rise.

 

By Political Editors

Apr. 10, 2019

The Patriot Post

On Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing that Democrats billed as an examination of “hate crimes, the impact white nationalist groups have on American communities, and the spread of white identity ideology.” It quickly became quite evident that the Democrats’ true intention for the hearing was to promote the mendacious narrative that “white extremism” is a major and growing problem — and President Donald Trump is supposedly the driving force behind it.

 

In a seemingly coordinated effort to advance this narrative, The New York Times last week ran an article claiming that “Attacks by White Extremists Are Growing.” The story highlighted the attack in Christchurch, New Zealand, where a self-proclaimed white supremacist murdered 50 people in an act of terror aimed at Muslims. The article then claimed that the Christchurch murderer “drew inspiration” from “an informal global network of white extremists whose violent attacks are occurring with greater frequency in the West.”

 

Once again we have a case of the narrative leading the story. It’s clear that the narrative the Times is pushing is that violence perpetrated by white supremacists is a serious and growing threat that is worse than people may believe. But do the facts support such a conclusion? Well, as is often the case with Leftmedia outlets like the Times, not so much.

 

The Times excluded several important contextualizing details, which immediately calls into question the reliability of the entire narrative. For example, no numbers were provided so as to establish the total number of extremist-related violent incidents globally. In 2017 alone, nearly 20,000 people were murdered by groups associated with radical Islamic extremists — a number not provided by the Times.

 

Meanwhile, the Times offers a nine-year timeline that notes 15 incidents of “white extremist” violence resulting in 194 people killed that were purportedly committed by individuals motivated by white racism. However, after a closer look into these attacks, one quickly finds that the motive of “white extremism” is not entirely clear … or even there at all.

 

As Seth Barron, writing for City Journal, observes, “Some of the most prominent killings … resist categorization as acts of white racial terror. Ali Sonboly, the son of Iranian Shi’ite Muslim immigrants and visibly a racial minority, carried out the 2016 Munich mall shooting. The 2016 Umpqua Community College shooting was carried out by a self-identified ‘mixed-race’ man, as was the 2014 Isla Vista massacre, whose perpetrator believed that being half-Chinese made him unattractive to women. The 2018 Toronto van massacre was perpetrated by a white man who declared that he was part of an ‘Incel Rebellion’ against the ‘Chads and Stacys’ of the world — in other words, he was angry that he could not get a girlfriend and was committed to overthrowing the ‘beautiful people.’ The killer mowed down pedestrians in Toronto’s business district at random. The Times’ inclusion of these four incidents calls into question the value of its diagnosis of ‘white extremist killers.’”

 

Finally, as The Wall Street Journal reports, “Since 1990, far-right extremists have killed 477 people in 214 attacks in the U.S., according to the crime data. A majority of the assaults targeted minorities, with 241 people dying in 170 attacks. (In the same period, the Global Terrorism Database records 31 far-right attacks with one or more deaths.)” In other words, violent attacks committed by “white extremists” are not on the rise — rather, the frequency of these violent hate crimes has remained relatively steady for the past 50 years. In any case, the crimes are dwarfed by attacks perpetrated by Islamofascists.

_____________________

Like what you just read? To protect our independence, we have never accepted advertising. Nor have we ever charged a subscription fee in order to reach the largest audience possible. Our operations budget depends solely on the generosity of readers like you. Please help us keep the timeless message of Liberty in front of grassroots Americans around the nation and make a donation today.

 

The Patriot Post Mission

 

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. We are not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we do not accept advertising to ensure our advocacy is not restrained by commercial influence. Our mission and operation budgets are funded entirely by the contributions from Patriots like you. Please support The Patriot Fund today! [MORE ON ABOUT PAGE]

 

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

 

Copyright © 2019 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

 

Antifa v. Alt-Right in Charlottesville — and America


Mark Alexander of The Patriot Post writes about the hypocrisy of the Dems, Leftist MSM, and RINOs reporting on the Charlottesville rumble. It’s a great follow-up on my post “Charlottesville Violent Participants Pt ONE”.

 

JRH 8/16/17

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Antifa v. Alt-Right in Charlottesville — and America

The coming battles between sociopathic Leftists — the socialist “anti-fascists” and the “alternate-right” anarchists.

 

By Mark Alexander

Aug. 16, 2017

(Email Alert Sent: 8/16/2017 2:39 PM)

The Patriot Post

 

“It is the manners and spirit of a people, which preserve a republic in vigor. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution.” —Thomas Jefferson (1787)

 

Liberals ME & Liberals in USA

 

Last weekend, according to NBC Chicago, there were nine people killed and more than 30 wounded in gunfights on the streets of Chicago — and those figures don’t include the deaths and injuries from other weapons within that Democrat Party pit.

 

This is a recurring tragedy in Chicago, and yet it’s highly probable that 99.999% of Americans have not heard about those deaths. Indeed, even though most of the murdered were black, who beyond the immediate family and friends of the deceased can name a single unfortunate victim of all the hatred and violence that is commonplace there?

 

The reason their names and faces are anonymous is that their lives have no value as political fodder for the Demo/media propaganda machine or its so-called “Black Lives Matter” constituency. Those victims are simply tossed onto the pile of 430 homicides in Chicago thus far this year, to the horror of those of us who believe that “all lives matter.”

 

Now consider this: Last weekend, there was one person murdered in Charlottesville, Virginia, by an Ohio man, and the whole world knows the name of that unfortunate victim.

 

Charlottesville is, as anyone who has been there can attest, a great town. In January, I declined an invitation to attend the Trump inaugural fanfare, opting instead that weekend to meet my son in Charlottesville for a few days visiting friends and re-visiting historic sites.

 

This area is, in my opinion, the richest historic region in America.

 

Charlottesville is the site of Declaration of Independence author Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello home, which sits just above the town, and his beloved University of Virginia. Just beyond Monticello is James Monroe’s Highland home place. To the north is Montpelier, home of our Constitution’s author, James Madison. To the west is Lexington, home of Washington and Lee University and Virginia Military Academy — and burial place of Virginia sons Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. Northeast is George Washington’s Mount Vernon, and the home of George Mason. To the east are Richmond, Williamsburg, Jamestown and Yorktown — the final battle site of the American Revolution.

 

Despite being the epicenter of such extraordinary history, Charlottesville is also lorded over by a disgraceful mayor, Mike Signer, and his Leftist city council — a group of Berkeley wannabes who have led local historical purges of Thomas Jefferson and Robert E. Lee.

 

It was the planned removal of a small statue of the latter from a city park that was the catalyst for the obscene riots last weekend in this otherwise quiet and idyllic town.

 

That riot was a clash between sociopathic forces — the antifa, the ironically self-styled “anti-fascists” leading the Leftist intifada against anyone supporting Liberty or any economic system other than socialism, and the alt-right, an anarcho-fascist fringe movement of white supremacists. Notably the alt-right racists had an ACLU-defended permit for their protest hate speech. The antifa socialists and black supremacists showed up in mass without a permit.

 

Thugs Clash in Charlottesville

 

Eight years of racial antagonism by Barack Obama and his radical regime led to mass riots in more than 20 American urban centers, fomented by Leftist groups operating under the banners of Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, antifa, et al. That violence erupted in Oakland, Akron and Pittsburgh in 2009; Santa Cruz, Oakland and Los Angeles in 2010; Oakland in 2011; Chicago and Anaheim in 2012; Brooklyn in 2013; Ferguson and New York City in 2014; Baltimore in 2015; Anaheim, Chicago, St. Paul, Milwaukee, Charlotte, Standing Rock, Oakland and Portland in 2016; and DC, Berkeley, Anaheim, Berkeley part 2, Berkeley part 3, Olympia and Portland in 2017.

 

While Republicans, Democrats and the mainstream media have correctly tagged one side of the hateful antagonists in Charlottesville as “white supremacists,” you won’t find any reference by any Democrat, or their Leftmedia propagandists, to the “black supremacists” who were at the center of, or significant participants in, all the aforementioned urban violence.

 

Nor did a single politico or media outlet rightly tag Micah X, who murdered five police officers in Dallas a year ago, a “black supremacist.” He was just the latest manifestation of the Democrats’ playbook, which endeavors to foment disunity to rally constituencies. To them, dead police officers are just collateral damage.

 

Remarkably, the riot in Charlottesville has already received more mass media bandwidth than the attempted mass assassination in June of multiple Republican congressmen in Alexandria, Virginia, by a hate-filled Bernie Sanders supporter.

 

Perhaps “Virginia is [not] for Lovers” after all? Actually, Virginia is a great state when it’s not baiting anarchist haters.

 

Given the media feeding frenzy inspired by the riots in Charlottesville, allow me to impart a few observations.

 

First: Regarding President Donald Trump’s repeated condemnation of both the racists and the socialists

 

Assessing the violence, Charlottesville police chief Al Thomas noted, “Other groups [opposing the alt-right faction] began amassing along the street and in the park. Gradually, the crowd sizes increased along with aggressiveness and hostility of attendees toward one another. … We did have mutually combating individuals in the crowd.”

 

This mutual violence was evident to everyone present, and it was affirmed in real time by New York Times reporter Hawes Spencer, who observed, “Protesters maced each other, threw water bottles and urine balloons — some of which hit reporters — and generally beat the crap out of each other with flagpoles.”

 

However, Trump should not have dared to suggest that the violence was from both sides of the idiot line. According to the Leftmedia, the antifa groups are just a bunch of wholesome all-American “counter-protesters” defending our country against an epidemic of right-wing (Republican) hatred.

 

After concurring with the police chief and other observers about “mutually combating individuals,” Trump said, “We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides. No matter our color, creed, religion or political party we are all Americans first.”

 

But that denunciation wasn’t sufficient for the Leftmedia — or for establishment Republicans, who knew full well that the Demo/MSM would label them as “soft on supremacists” because Trump dared to identify both ugly factions.

 

Sunday, the White House communications staff followed up with: “The President said very strongly in his statement yesterday that he condemns all forms of violence, bigotry and hatred and of course that includes white Supremacists, KKK, neo-Nazi and all extremist groups. He called for national unity and bringing all Americans together.”

 

But even that was insufficient for the Leftmedia. Trump had failed to elevate the standing of the conflict to the level that best serves the Demo/MSM agenda and the need to cash in on the chaos for ad revenue and political contributions.

 

So Trump on Monday called a press confab and repeatedly condemned the racists in what was to be a unifying speech.

 

But that was too little too late for the Leftmedia.

 

MSM reports Trump Said

 

On Tuesday, in a contentious confrontation with MSM agitators, Trump dared again to suggest that the violence was mutual: “You had a group on one side that was bad, and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent, and nobody wants to say that. But I’ll say it right now: I think there is blame on both sides and I don’t have a doubt about it and you [reporters] don’t have a doubt about it either.”

 

He also condemned the removal of historic markers, saying, “This week it’s Robert E. Lee. I notice that Stonewall Jackson’s [statue is] coming down. I wonder, is George Washington next week, and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You really do have to ask yourself, when does it stop?”

 

Of the Leftmedia “outrage” over Trump’s responses, Vice President Mike Pence said, “I take issue with the fact that many in the media … have spent an awful lot of time focusing on what the president said and criticisms of what the president said, instead of criticizing those who brought that hatred and violence to the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia.” He is correct.

 

Second: The Bannon problem

 

While I believe Trump’s response to the violence was measured — if very Trumpian — I also believe he has a problem on his staff by the name of Steve Bannon, chairman of his 2016 campaign and now his chief strategist.

 

Here’s the problem.

 

Jason Kessler is the white supremacist organizer of the “Unite the Right” protest in Charlottesville. He’s a University of Virginia graduate who lists on his résumé his last job as being a writer for “Daily Caller,” an online “conservative” news website co-founded in 2010 by Fox News host Tucker Carlson. For the record, despite the fact that I like Carlson’s commentary, our staff considers Daily Caller a well-funded titillation tabloid, and for that reason, it undermines the standing of genuine grassroots conservative publications. Indeed, as of this week, Daily Caller has scrubbed the commentary it hosted from Kessler.

 

Kessler’s colleague, Massachusetts native Richard Spencer, also a UVA graduate, was agitating the hatefest in Charlottesville.

 

Spencer is the founder of AlternativeRight.com, the alt-right homepage espousing, among other things, white supremacist views. After Trump’s election, Spencer led an alt-right conference group with “Hail Trump, hail our people, hail victory!” chants. When Trump tapped Bannon to be a senior advisor, Spencer claimed he was in “the best possible position” to influence policy.

 

That brings me to Bannon himself, who took control of Breitbart News in 2012 after the death of Andrew Breitbart. Bannon did to Andrew’s popular website what Jeff Bezos is doing to the once-respectable Washington Post — adulterating its content to comport with extremist political views.

 

Breitbart News described Spencer’s website as the “center of alt-right thought,” and in 2016, Bannon declared Breitbart “the platform for the alt-right.” Spencer concurred, noting that Breitbart “has acted as a ‘gateway’ to alt-right ideas and writers.”

 

This, of course, doesn’t make Bannon or Trump “white supremacists.” Bannon, like Trump, has a propensity for shooting from the hip and saying stupid stuff. And most Trump supporters would have no idea what the “alt-right” is because, in fact, it’s nothing more than a minuscule fringe political identity group. But the Leftmedia would have you believe it’s the very foundation of the Republican Party.

 

In November 2016, Trump responded to questions about Bannon’s appointment, saying, “I’ve known Steve Bannon a long time. If I thought he was a racist, or alt-right … I wouldn’t even think about hiring him.”

 

But can you detect the problem here?

 

All you need to know about Bannon is that he does not have enough humility, in the interest of Trump’s agenda, to resign.

 

Third: Regarding the Orwellian trend of “historical cleansing” underway by Leftists

 

The “progressive” use of violence to force the removal of historical monuments from public spaces should concern Americans of all political stripes. This extremely dangerous trend by Leftists, like those sitting on the city council of historical hub Charlottesville, smacks of socialist Soviet “airbrushing” and the Maoist “Cultural Revolution.”

 

Longtime friend of The Patriot Post, distinguished George Mason University professor Walter Williams, has issued erudite warnings about the consequences of historical ignorance here and here, including the removal of historic markers to Confederate generals and the rewriting of American history.

 

The vast majority of Americans, including me, who strenuously object to tearing down and stamping out our historical heritage do not object because of some racist affinity. We object because this is our story, and because whitewashing it is an affront to American history and to our legacy of Liberty.

 

Predictably, seizing the mindless momentum, the Black Congressional Caucus issued demands for the first phase of monument removals in the U.S. Capitol building.

 

Booker T Washington quote on racism

 

As 20th century philosopher George Santayana concluded in his treatise, “The Life of Reason”: “Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

 

English writer Aldous Huxley put it more succinctly: “That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history.”

 

Fourth: The ACLU and Charlottesville Police

 

Notably, ACLU observers on Twitter were among the first to report that the Charlottesville police had stand-down orders, allowing the violence to escalate: “Clash between protesters and counter protesters. Police say, ‘We’ll not intervene until given command to do so.’” But that order never came.

 

This was affirmed by Fox News reporter Doug McKelway, who was in the middle of the combatants. “When the tear gas started to fly, thrown by protesters, the police themselves began to evacuate. I asked the guy who was in charge, ‘Where you going?’ He said, ‘We’re leaving. It’s too dangerous.’ They had a chance to nip this thing in the bud and they chose not to.”

 

If police officers are wholly unprepared for the level of violence, they should retreat. But this retreat looked more like the “stand-down” order that accelerated the 2015 Baltimore race riots.

 

Fifth: Who is funding antifa, Black Lives Matter and all the other Marxist/black supremacist groups that have emerged since 2008?

 

Judicial Watch is suing America-hating billionaire socialist George Soros for his funding records of Leftist political groups. Keep a sharp eye on the outcome of this lawsuit.

 

Finally, regarding the Republicans’ stampede to distance themselves from phony Leftist charges of racism, seeking to distance yourself from something already far removed actually feeds the narrative that maybe it is not so far removed.

 

To paraphrase a line from Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “Republicans doth apologize too much, methinks.”

 

The Democrat Party and its Leftmedia outlets are colluding to publicize, and thus politicize, upcoming alt-right-versus-antifa venues for conflict in order to advance their agenda. In doing so, they hope to hang these riots around Republican necks.

 

But let’s be clear: Every drop of blood that’s shed in these riots — and there will be more of them — is on the hands of the Demo/MSM propaganda machine that is fomenting the disunity that propagates them — and Republicans had better start shining a light on that, as Donald Trump has done, rather than cowering behind a microphone.

 

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

_____________

Copyright © 2017 The Patriot Post.

 

From the email alert:

 

REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: “The Patriot Post (http://patriotpost.us/subscribe/)”

 

Support The Patriot Post

 

 

About The Patriot Post

 

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington (1779)

 

Mission and Objective

 

In 1996, concerned about the erosion of our Republic’s political and social institutions under Bill Clinton’s regime, and the virtual monopoly the mainstream media held on public opinionMark Alexander launched the online journal The Federalist — now published as The Patriot Post.

 

He did so with sage advice from conservative protagonists William F. Buckley (National Review, Emeritus) and Ed Feulner (Heritage Foundation, Emeritus), foreseeing a day when the Internet would overtake print and cable media as a primary source of news, policy and opinion — the most significant First Amendment advancement since our nation’s founding.

 

Alexander assembled an impressive National Advisory Committee and recruited an editorial team of young conservatives from across the nation. Together, they READ THE REST 

 

Europe: Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism


Making Eurabia

John R. Houk

© March 2, 2015

 

The reason I chose another <<sales narrative>> in the compendium was among other things to prevent them from immediately ending the ideological discussion with their <<6-million-omg-nazi-enough-said>>- bashing stick. I know a lot of people will be disappointed when reading this, but my love for Israel is limited to its future function as a deportation-port for disloyal jews. I am aware of the sad fact that all available statistics confirm that only aprox. Three percent of eurojews oppose multiculti (but from an anti-islamist perspective), and that only approx. 0.2 percent support nordic indigenous rights. I wish it wasn’t so. The reason why so called <<counterjihadists>>, at least the great majority, seemingly <<praise>> Israel, is to avoid the above described suppression-tactic. However, there is in fact a strong anti-nordicist/ethnocentrist wing within the counter-jihad movement, represented by Fjordman and his Jewish network, the EDL-leader, the SIOE-leaders, Wilders, Farage etc., but their organisations are so heavily infiltrated by nordicists and ethnocentrists that it’s hard to say which wing are actually controlling them. (Anders Breivik – Norwegian-to-English translation)

 

The above translated to English quote defines the real difference between Europe’s Neo-Nazi/Fascist movements and the nationalistic Right Wing Counterjihadist movements. The first is nationalistic racism politically and the second is nationalistic cultural preservation that is anti-Islamic (but not maliciously violent racist) and not antisemitic.

 

The Neo-Nazis, which in 21st century, are more likely to describe themselves as advocates of a pure Nordic Supremacist race rather than German Aryan Supremacists of Hitler’s Nazis.

 

European Counterjihadists wish to prevent the immigration of counter-culture Muslims, demand assimilation acceptance standards of resident immigrants, naturalized immigrants and natural born Muslims; or the deportation of Muslims who refuse to respect Western (not necessarily Christian) laws and cultural mores.

 

The European Multiculturalist Left (and their North American Leftist cousins) group Nordic Supremacists and Counterjihadists and call them extremist Right Wing nut jobs. Counterjihadists deplore being grouped with Nordic Supremacists. AND Nordic Supremacist purists deplore Counterjihadists and the Nordicists that swing toward tolerance of Counterjihadists.

 

I sense it is a good guess that Nordic Supremacists contribute to the rising antisemitism in Europe by grouping Left Wing Jews as traitorous Eurojews. I suspect there is no love for Observant Jews either, but I could not tell from the Nordicist Norwegian essayist explaining his belief system. Rather than follow the Hitler Final Solution of annihilation he supports deporting Left Wing Jews to Israel.

 

Contrary to the Nordic Supremacists, the Counterjihadists are quite favorable toward European Jews because Leftist Jews have very much so assimilated to Western Culture and Observant Jews have zero intention of affecting Western Culture or the Rule of Law in any way negatively on the Western nation they have are citizens (probably dwelling therein for many centuries for that matter).

 

Ergo Nordic Supremacists are racists and Counterjihadists are not racists but are promoters of their nationality’s indigenous culture and Rule of Law.

 

I am cross posting the Google English translation of Bjorn Brataas’ essay to get a good snapshot of the differences between Nordic Supremacists and Counterjihadists. I just want to be clear I am in no way supportive of Nordic Supremacism. As far as I am concerned Nordicists are as counter-culture as Islamic Supremacists. BUT it is my belief Americans need to understand what is currently convulsing Europe. Islamic radicalism is bringing more and more voting citizens in Europe toward an affinity of Nordic Supremacism and Counterjihadism. The problem is the standard cross-European voter does not really distinguish between the two movements but are just darn weary of the violent turmoil erupting in their neighborhoods from violent Muslims.

 

European Leftists really control the dispensing of the Rule of Law in Europe primarily through the auspices of the European Union (EU). And as such, Leftists are grouping both movements as Right Wing extremists to keep the voters voting for them. It is my suspicion that Muslim violence will increase in such a way that European voters will eventually vote more and more for the most eloquent nationalist that wishes to prevent Muslim violence. Let the world pray that eloquent anti-Muslim violence representative is a Counterjihadist rather than a Neo-Nazi Nordicist. Counterjihadists will be a positive for the preservation of the heritage of Greco-Roman-Judeo-Christian cultural influences. Nordicists will be as culturally disruptive as Islamic Supremacists.

 

JRH 3/2/15

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

Fjordman and his Jewish network …” Lest this letter from Breivik?

Anders Breivik Jewed the Jews

 

By Bjorn Brataas

February 22, 2015 6:27 pm

VITNET

[English by Google Translate]

[Also read Gates of Vienna version from Breivik and commentary which is excellent]

 

This letter, i.e. the availability of it – and in English – is now a year and a half old. I did not know about it until I came across it by chance.

 

It is not entirely uninteresting reading. The quote I pasted in the headline is a gold grain itself, though not exactly representative of the rest of the content of the letter.

 

I present text here when one of Witness main functions is to disseminate information that is not readily available – while we trust that the reader has their own judgment and it is up to him whether he “likes” or “dislikes,” or agrees or disagree substance posted. It is this media is all about.

 

[Bjorn Brataas]

—————

Anders Breivik - screen capture from Anders Breivik to Gates of Vienna & International Press

 

Anders Behring Breivik letter 13-09-29 to International Press

 

Explanations, clarifications and the peace proposal – NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG and Dagbladet (<<the big five>>), are refusing to consider.

 

The ideology known as <<Nordicism [Metapedia and Wikipedia]>> has two wings; Nordic superiority (NS) and Nordic survival (indigenous rights activism). Being a nordicist of the latter category; my primary purpose is to contribute to secure the survival and prosperity of the Nordic ethnic family (the Nordic, race). National socialists and hitlerists refer to the west-nordic people as the <<Aryan race>>. There are three European races; Nordic (physical characteristics: blonde/blue eyed/longer forehead/etc.), alpine (half nordic/half Mediterranean – f. example the French) and Mediterranean – f. example most people in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece etc.). <<Meds>> are approx. 20 percent Nordic and 80 percent Asiatic. The essence of nordicism isn’t to exclude or discriminate but to strive for the pure Nordic ideal. Wiki Madison Grant [White Supremacist praise of Madison] for more info. Whenever a northern-European nationalist is talking about the genocide, deconstruction or ethnic cleansing of his people, he is talking about the following (illustration box):

 

Overview: The estimated time until extinction for the Nordic ethnic family if our survival is not secured: ethnic composition-13 Nordic countries in percent. Nordic vs. non-nordic. Overview of the 13 largest Nordic countries where Nordics have status as an indigenous people and until recently made out the majority: Germany, England, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Norway, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Finland, Iceland and Luxembourg.

 

 

Year

 

Nordic (1)

 

Nordic (2)

 

Tot. North.

 

Tot. Non-North.

1900

 

71

 

19

 

90

 

10

1939

 

69

 

16

 

85

 

15

1960

 

62

 

13

 

75

 

25

1990

 

47

 

8

 

55

 

45

2013

 

35

 

5

 

40

 

60

2050

 

14

 

1

 

15

 

85

2100

 

2,9

 

>0.1

 

3

 

97

Nordic (1) = purity: 60-95%
Nordic (2) = purity: <95%+

 

The estimated time until extinction for the Nordic race occurs sometime between 2050 [Blog Editor: Hence the title of Breivic’s PDF document “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence”] and 2100. Presupposes today’s non-nordic immigration of 1% per year, today’s fertility rate, and that Nordics are not granted autonomous indigenous states. The biggest threat is neither African nor Asian immigration, but in fact inter-EEC immigration from members from the Mediterranean ethnic family and from the alpine.

 

When dealing with media-psychopaths

 

And this is where it gets problematic. The <<big five>> and liberal media in general have over the last 68 years developed multiple suppression-tactics for <<handling>> nordicists and other nationalists. Propaganda, or the use of false or exaggerated information for the support of a view or case, has been used for thousands of years to suppress political opposition, and unfortunately it’s quite effective.

 

All research, illustrated by a report published in <<Scientific American Mind>>, Jan/Feb. 2013, shows that the professions; “Media (TV/Radio)” and “Journalists” top the list over the most psychopathic professions, as they are among the most notorious manipulators, liars and deceivers. When a journalist in addition is a leftist, who is tasked with making an <<objective>> characteristic of a <<right wing extremist>>, you know that the result will be everything but credible.

 

The editors of Norway’s <<big five>> are even more leftist than their colleagues in other countries, with exceptions being Sweden and Germany. Most, if not all, of the influential editors are disciples of the 68-revolutions ideals. For example the chief editor in Aftenposten; Haugsgjerd, is a former member of AKP (Workers Communist Party), which used to make <<kill-lists>> of right wing politicians, and several of Dagbladet’s editors are self-proclaimed communists. Unfortunately, Norwegian and northern-European editors are such people. The most influential editors in Norway, for example Stanghelle, Giever, Strand, several in NRK etc., are so influential that they, a small group of no more than 20 editors, literally define reality, in Norway. The editors in NRK, Aftenposten and VG are referred to as <<the Oslo mafia>> by smaller media companies, and are known for their consensus-decisions and left wing orientation. The northern-European media’s zero-tolerance stance towards nationalists the last 68 years has been our greatest problem.

 

Although the British cultural elite admitted in 2008/09 that Nordic brats are in fact indigenous to the UK, their Norwegian colleagues are still refusing to acknowledge the fact that nordic-Norwegians are indigenous to Norway. These 20 editors are simply refusing to discuss the issue, and if you try to stress the issue you will be labeled as a Nazi and held accountable for the Jewish holocaust etc., an effective suppression-tactic.

 

22/7 was an attempt to force these 20 editors, and their colleagues in the other 12 Nordic countries into dialogue with their country’s nordicist-movements (you call them Nazi-movements). The compendium was an experimental approach. I wanted to try a different approach by making it impossible for the MSM in all 13 Nordic countries to end the discussion, using the Nazi-tactic. I was obviously naive enough to think that this approach would lead to a scenario where there could be a serious discussion about the MSMs 68-year witch-hunt and about securing Nordic survival.

 

If I could say anything to the editors in NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG, Dagbladet, and their northern-European colleagues, it would be; can we please just skip all the false propaganda and B.S. and focus on solving these issues through dialogue. You can start by announcing a formal apology and declare that the Nordics are indeed indigenous to all 13 Nordic countries. Afterwards, you can accept the invitation to dialogue with the nordicist-movements. Let’s start discussing <<Project Yggdrasil>>. My book; <<The Nordic Federation>> describes this peace-plan through 400 pages, but, it has been blocked by Norwegian prison authorities since 11.07.13. It’s also important to note that <<Project Yggdrasil [Blog Editor: This is the name of a blog devoted to Breivik thoughts. It has been taken down by Blogger probably due to the info found in this pro-Breivik Blog]>> [Blog Editor: What’s the reference to “Yggdrasil”?  Yggdrasil is the Norse mythological Tree of Life] was developed after 22/7 [Blog Editor: 22/7 refers to the date July 7, 2011 in which Breivik is responsible for the slaughter of 77 people – mostly youthful teens] and has nothing to do with the compendium [i.e. his 1500 page manuscript linked above]. Securing the survival of our Nordic race is an issue of utmost urgency. Consider this a formal invitation to reconciliation-talks, talks which should have taken place in 1945. I would have been able to contact the nordicist-leaders in all 13 countries, if it weren’t for the letter ban. Whatever you choose, know that you, the editors, have the influence to decide whether this conflict will end. Be smart, choose dialogue instead of persecution, for the first time in 68 years.

 

The reason I chose another <<sales narrative>> in the compendium was among other things to prevent them from immediately ending the ideological discussion with their <<6-million-omg-nazi-enough-said>>- bashing stick. I know a lot of people will be disappointed when reading this, but my love for Israel is limited to its future function as a deportation-port for disloyal Jews. I am aware of the sad fact that all available statistics confirm that only approx. three percent of eurojews oppose multiculti (but from an anti-Islamist perspective), and that only approx. 0.2 percent support nordic indigenous rights. I wish it wasn’t so. The reason why so called <<counterjihadists>>, at least the great majority, seemingly <<praise>> Israel, is to avoid the above described suppression-tactic. However, there is in fact a strong anti-nordicist/ethnocentrist wing within the counter-jihad movement, represented by Fjordman and his Jewish network, the EDL-leader, the SIOE-leaders, Wilders, Farage etc., but their organisations are so heavily infiltrated by nordicists and ethnocentrists that it’s hard to say which wing are actually controlling them.

 

When dealing with media psychopaths, a good way to counter their tactics is to use double-psychology, or at least so I thought. The compendium was, among other things, of a calculated and quite cynical <<gateway-design>> (the 2+?+?=6 -approach), created to strengthen the ethnocentrist wing in the contra-jihad movement, by pinning the whole thing on the anti-ethnocentrist wing (many of the leaders are pro-multiculti social democrats or liberalists), while at the same time protecting and strengthening the ethnocentrist-factions. The idea was to manipulate the MSM and others so that they would launch a witch-hunt and send their <<media-rape-squads>> against our opponents. It worked quite well.

 

I was never kicked out of Stormfront [Blog Editor: A racist White Supremacist website founded by Don Black – SPLC profile (I usually critical of SPLC because they lump legitimate Conservatives with actual White Supremacist) and ADL profile]. Instead, I attacked them in the compendium in order to protect them, as I knew the authorities would use the fact that I frequented the site, against them, and that an army of leftist journalists otherwise would strike hard. I tried to hint about this double-psychology, by quoting <<war is deceit>> x number of times, but I couldn’t make it more obvious, as it had to be credible to the aggressive army of 2000 media psychopaths (the MSM-rape-squad). The <<hug-your-opponents, kick-the-ones-you-love>>-tactic is one of the oldest in the book. The infiltration of the Freemasons, followed by the publication of the Freemason-pic, was in fact a deliberate and calculated attack against them.

 

Obviously, none of the above would have worked if it wasn’t credible. When I tried to publish three essays describing all of this, on 20.08.12, I was notified about the <<gag-directive>> which came into effect 08.08.12. Apparently, many people didn’t comprehend my deliberate usage of double-psychology, and this is my own fault. In any case, the Fjordman-network figured it out quite early, which explain why they have attacked me so viciously. It wasn’t my intention to cause the outing of Fjordman, with subsequently him being brutally media-raped by 200 MSM-psychopaths. But on the other hand, ethnocentrism gained momentum at the same time as I managed to prevent a significant crackdown against the European and US nordicist movement.

 

There has been an active power-struggle between the two factions within the contra-jihadist movement for years, and the reason why it’s so critically important to dominate and influence this movement is because it acts as a <<supplier of terms>> to moderate European nationalist parties with a base consisting of tens of millions of Europeans. The battle within the <<counter-jihad>>-movement is in many ways a battle for the future content of northern-European nationalism. This makes it even more ironic that many nordicists and ethnocentric nationalists, Stormfront included, still don’t know that I systematically used double-psychology in order to protect them, and in an attempt to prevent the multiculti MSM from using their <<I-win-button>>.

 

Did I serve the nordicist cause more effectively by using this tactic, rather than using rhetoric which would immediately allow them to label me as a Nazi? I believe so, but other than me should be the final judge of that.

 

When dealing with an angry mob of influential journalists and editors representing the worlds most advanced propaganda machinery, you’re fundamentally screwed no matter how you choose to maneuver. Propagandists will not waste a single second on people they do not view as threats. I could have easily avoided excessive pathologisation by keeping the message short and by clinging to the already established ideological cliff of national socialism (it’s important to remember that this was at a time when all right wing radicals were labeled as Nazis), but if they had been allowed to label me as a Nazi, the ideological considerations and discussions would be over, and my court-speeches and propaganda performance would never be broadcasted worldwide, during the trial. Furthermore, people would not be forced to seek answers in the compendium along the way. Regardless of their efforts, I felt I managed to make the best out of an almost impossible situation, despite of the fact that I made a few mistakes during the process.

 

As for my efforts to try to force the editors and ruling politicians in each of the 13 Nordic countries into dialogue with the nordicist-movements, I failed miserably, not surprisingly. It is after all a theoretical impossibility that a single soldier could manage to succeed where potent movements have failed for 68 years. But everyone should know that 22/7 happened in order to try to force a dialogue between the chief editors in the <<big five>> in all 13 Nordic countries, and the so called <<fascist movements>> in the corresponding countries.

 

I remember there was at least one journalist during the trial touching the core of this issue, as he stated; <<The only thing that could prevent the extinction of Nordics are racial hygiene-programmes on a full scale, something which is impossible in today’s multiethnic and multicultural societies. Therefore, it is pointless to enter into dialogue with “these people”. We simply can’t co-exist with them>>. First of all, we are of course fully aware of the fact that you feel you have no other choice than to suppress us, due to this reason. And you have been brutal the past 68 years. This harsh suppression and persecution has driven thousands of nationalists in northern-Europe to suicide, something which explains why these editors don’t like to admit to being responsible for these acts. However, if only more than one out of 5000 Nordic journalists could be this honest, 22/7 and approx. 500 annual nationalist and <<racist>> attacks could be avoided in the future.

 

Of course we understand that full scale racial hygiene-programmes are difficult in today’s societies. But if they had just stopped their bigotry for one second and listened to what we have to say, they would have learned that we can coexist. First of all, one of the reasons the first- and second-generation nordicist leaders have failed with entering into dialogue, is because of their <<all-or-nothing>>-strategy. From a “third-generation” point of view, considering that we lost the European civil war (WW2), the <<all-or-nothing>>-approach has been a complete failure, and continuing this path is counter-productive, irresponsible and may lead to extinction of the nordic race. Changing this to an <<all-or-something>>-approach is the only way to go. One bird in the hand is better than ten on the roof. <<Project Yggdrasil>> is a very good solution and a realistic compromise.

 

I believe I will be able to sell in PY to the vast majority of nordicist-leaders in all 13 Nordic countries, as soon as you lift the letter ban. The message I would send to the chief editors in NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG and Dagbladet, is; I ask that you support <<Project Yggdrasil>> in Norway, contributing to a situation where we are allowed to secure nordic-Norwegian survival in <<Norway-Yggdrasil>>, a Norwegian-nordic indigenous state located in Østfold, consisting of two percent of the Norwegian territory. It’s also a very small price to pay in order to end a 68 year old conflict. If an agreement is reached you will be free to transform 98 percent of Norway into your multiethnic and multicultural utopia, without the risk of facing the alternative. This model would succeed in northern-Europe, just as it would succeed on a purely political level – securing peace between <<islamofascists>> on one side, and liberalists/social democrats on the other, in countries such as Egypt and Pakistan.

 

I’m quite sure that project Yggdrasil in Norway, and in the other 12 Nordic countries, would solve a conflict which has been unsolved during the last 68 years. I ask that I’m allowed to present this peace plan to the leading nordicist voices in Norway; Tore Tvedt, Varg Vikernes, Erik Blucher, Nicolay Kvisler and others (no need to target them, as they are all non-militant political activists). Securing Nordic survival is the most important cause for all of us, and I believe they will be willing to abandon their <<all-or-nothing>>-approach, for the sake of a small but sovereign indigenous state.

 

If my assumption is correct, then a peace agreement can be reached within a year, if the chief editors in NRK, TV2, Aftenposten, VG and Dagbladet decide to support the plan, and the same could be a reality for the rest of northern-Europe within two years, if movements in these countries follow.

 

The forming of a parliamentary basis for the founding of this autonomous Norwegian-nordic indigenous state in south-west Østfold will only be possible with the backing of the editors in these five companies, as they define the political agenda in Norway. Not a single parliament member in Norway will ever dare to back project Yggdrasil without the blessing from the editors in these companies.

 

If these editors continue to refuse to have anything to do with me, the above mentioned individuals are all capable. They are the unofficial leaders of the Norwegian nordicist movement, through example, personal sacrifice and continued effort, whether they like it or not. When the Norwegian MSM announced that Fjordman was my role model and idol, they couldn’t be more wrong. These four individuals, on the other hand, are all worthy of trust, respect and praise, due to their past and continued efforts. Their advice and recommendations should be listened to by all Norwegian nationalists. Furthermore, the candidates they support can be trusted. I hope they soon will contribute to take responsibility by uniting the Norwegian nationalist movement by forming an equivalent entity to that of the Swedes Party. The reason I’m saying all of this is because it’s likely I’ll soon be <<out of the game>>, as I won’t be able to survive the SHS-programme for much longer.

 

Unfortunately but not surprisingly, the response from editors to the mentioned information will either be total silence or even more ridicule and pathologisation. After this letter I’ll probably have +2 conditions and +3 personality disorders, or perhaps the imaginary <<bad childhood>> will end up being worse. But before these editors reject <<Project Yggdrasil>>, and of course they will; they should ask them-selves; are you 100 percent sure that dialogue and reconciliation-attempts isn’t the way forward?

 

In any case, their limitless bigotry and denial, until now, has at least been quite amusing.

 

[These were the first 5 pages, the remaining pages haven’t been published in full yet.]

 

[The following quotes were taken from document.no]

 

I have guaranteed and will continue to guarantee that I will no longer propagate violence as a political tool, or for any other reason, as my only plan has been to attempt to become a fascistic “Mandela”, or to contribute to work for Nordics rights in other ways. (Page 10)

 

The reason why I’m so intensely hated by the left, and many others, has little to do with my acts, but everything to do with the “negative” media campaigns which have been, and continue to be carried out. The word “mass murderer” or “mass killer” is used consistently by journalists.

 

These 100 individuals were sons, daughters, fathers and mothers, and their families experienced an equal tragedy to that of the 22/7-families. Both myself and Sønsteby were radical nationalists fighting against foreign enemies and against Norwegians who facilitated a foreign invasion. The only difference was that Sønsteby, uninformed regarding the Labour Party’s future plans concerning forced ethnic and cultural deconstruction (muliticulti), fought to bring the social democrats to power, while I fought against Labour. (s. 16)

 

… a conflict that will continue for decades to come. Why can’t we all get along, and stop acting like angry 12-year olds? We have wanted dialogue with you for 68 years, and you refuse to even acknowledge the existence of the Norwegian fascist movement and instead try to label us as nuts and victims of child abuse. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

… tormented until I am pushed to take my own life.

 

Ila is refusing me to move on with my life, despite of exemplary behavior for 27 months, without exception.

 

The 22/7-attacks are today celebrated by the far right in all European countries, either you like it or not, and I have been celebrated as a hero, martyr, role-model and as a source of inspiration by tens of thousands. One of the reasons why more people began to support the reasons for the acts, is because I carried out the trial with dignity, in many people’s eyes, and that I at the same time continuously have demanded that Europe’s political elites, including European mainstream media, must immediately stop treating Norwegian, Nordic and European nationalists and fascists like animals, and instead go into dialogue with us, in order that we are granted a minimum of self-determination.

 

I have the last 27 months proved that the only thing I desire is to be a good role model to others.

 

The large majority of my supporters are, perhaps surprisingly to most, non-militant and non-violent “right-wing radicals”. It would also have ruined every chance to become what I feel obligated to try to be; a non-violent ideologue and a more active politician.

 

Violence is not, and has never been, a part of my ideology. The action was among other things a mean to bring attention to an important cause, and therefore to get a chance to bypass the wall of censorship to propagate important information, but it was not a part of my ideology.

 

It’s correct that the manifesto was a terror manual, like any other ideology’s terror-manuals. But a so called terror-manual is simply propagating means, and is never part of an ideology.

 

In other words I’m not longer a right wing extremist.… (willing to use violence), but a so called right wing radical.

 

The main reason for the fall of Labour, however, was the easily anticipated effect of double-psychology concerning the initial sympathy-phase. It was easy to see that Labour was going to make the critical mistake of misusing this opportunity, which caused significant over-exposure and subsequent antipathy. As a student of history, it was very easy to anticipate these events.

 

Even the Nazis treated Russian prisoners of war and the Jews more humanely, both in Auschwitz – Block 11, and later in Auschwitz-Birkenau. It may be true that the prisoners were forced to work until they couldn’t take it anymore, for economic gain, but they were executed in the most humane manner by zyklon-B-gas. The work able men who behaved exemplary during the stay were rarely subjected to either high- or low-intensive torture. They were all spared the suffering of long-term isolation, and were given the opportunity to be part of a community together with their own. Most of them were later, through humane executions, granted an honorable martyr’s death.

 

And if any of them wanted to end the forced labour, they could at any given time request a painless and honorable martyr’s death, by letting a guard know.

 

Apparently, all the Auschwitz-Jews got off easily, as they were evidently shown a much greater degree of humanism than I have been shown by the Norwegian Ministry of Justice and the prison authorities.

 

I showed a greater degree of humanism on 22/7, than what I have been shown after. I did in fact everything in my power to ensure that the 50 AUF-leaders and the 15 regular AUF-members were granted a quick and painless death. I granted them all an honorable martyr’s death, and due to their political sacrifice they were all, and are still, celebrated as champions of the internationalist socialist movement …

 

I would never, even if I was given the opportunity to do so, torture another human being, not even my worst enemy.

 

So if you are not willing to contribute to stop the torture, then you should at least show me the level of humanity that I and the Nazis showed.

 

I cannot kill myself, because my religion does not permit me. Suicide is a cowardly and unforgivable act that must never be considered by anyone. On the other hand, that’s easy for Jesus to say. He only had to hang on the cross for three days, and not 27 months.

 

Islamofascists in the Arab world, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, are treated just as badly as the nationalists in Europe.

 

But I have never hated them, not even now.

 

You have treated me much worse that an animal for 27 months! This is a fate much worse than death, and I would have preferred, if it was possible, to be granted at least the same degree of humanity that the Auschwitz-Jews were shown by the SS, instead of being subjected to abuse and treated worse than an animal for six more months.

_________________________________

Europe: Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism

John R. Houk

© March 2, 2015

______________________________

Fjordman and his Jewish network …” Lest this letter from Breivik?

 

© 2015 witness. Editor for Vitnet.no is bear Brataas.

 

Blog Editor: Google English translation edited by John R. Houk and spellcheck. Words that I was unsure were left alone as well as the British spelling of English words. I allowed spellcheck to capitalize many words that in my estimation should have been so; however it is possible that Anders intentionally did not capitalize some words. Keep in mind this is an English translation from Norwegian text so I am going to assume Google needed an alternative spelling. Explanatory embedded links are by the Editor.

CRT is Evil and the Obama Influence


Soledad O'Brien v. Joel Pollack 2

John R. Houk

© March 14, 2012

If you are wondering way President Barack Hussein Obama’s Harvard U student embrace of Professor Derrick Bell is important then watch this Soledad O’Brien Leftist attempt to inform CNN (known to Conservatives as the Communist News Network) viewers that Bell’s Critical Race Theory is not about calling White people supremacists in general. Editor-in-Chief Joe Pollak of Breitbart.com handles himself quite well with O’Brien’s invective defense of BHO’s warm affection for Professor Bell.

VIDEO:The Vetting: CNN Implodes Over Breitbart’s Obama/Bell Video

Now here is the thing about Soledad O’Brien’s misrepresentation of Critical Race Theory. Pollak busted O’Brien on her inaccuracy about the White Supremacist component about the theory which cited from Wikipedia. Unfortunately for O’Brien the original Wikipedia article sided with Pollak. Evidently a large amount of people attempted to go into the article to change it to match O’Brien’s inaccurate rendering so Wikipedia “froze” the article and put an older version of Critical Race Theory. Can you say Left Wing cover-up?

The Daily Caller reports that Wikipedia has frozen its entryon Critical Race Theory, reverting to the version of the page that existed before her on-air implosion in debate with Breitbart.com’s Joel Pollak.

At the time, O’Brien–evidently citing the first line of the Wikipedia entry–claimed that Critical Race Theory had nothing to do with white supremacy. However, the same entry she relied upon–or which producers provided via her earpiece–mentions white supremacy twice.

The Daily Caller quotes a senior Wikipedia editor as saying that the entry is being frozen for a short time because of attempts to cover for O’Brien–and competing attempts to uncover the cover-up: “Given the flurry of reverts by and of anons yesterday I’m semi-protecting the article for a week.”

As for O’Brien, she has yet to correct the record, and attacked Pollak for an entire segment in her Monday show, leading even sympathetic media critics to mock her attempted “do-over.” She has asked angry viewers to “stop tweeting” her about the subject. (Brietbart.com 3/13/12)

So let’s look at Critical Race Theory from another source than Wikipedia.

Slate.com is a website that I think everyone would agree is Leftist oriented. And in being Left Wing Slate author Will Oremus defends Critical Race Theory and therefore Professor Derrick Bell and ultimately President Barack Hussein Obama.

Oremus first goes through a brief educational moment on Critical Race Theory (CRT). I am going to excerpt the part of his article that defends CRT as a non-supremacist race theory in the sense that CRT does not accuse the entire White Race of the supremacism that emanates from say the Ku Klux Klan, Arian Nation idiots and the like.

Bell in particular advanced what he called “interest convergence theory,” which holds that whites will support minority rights only when it’s in their interest as well. For example, he saw the Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 school-desegregation decision, Brown v. Board of Education, as a part of a Cold War effort to improve America’s standing among Third World countries. To redress racial wrongs, he sympathized with black nationalists’ calls for separate black institutions but also pushed for affirmative action at Harvard and elsewhere.

On CNN, O’Brien and Pollak clashed over Pollak’s assertion that “white supremacy is at the heart of critical race theory.” It’s true that Bell often used that loaded term to describe what he saw as an entrenched racial hierarchy. He didn’t mean, however, that America is full of white supremacists, in the Ku Klux Klan sense. As Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic note in “Critical Race Theory: An Introduction,” those who subscribe to it believe that racism can be an everyday fact of life for people of color even if whites rarely notice it.

So is the theory radical? Yes, in the sense that it questions fundamental assumptions. Critical race theorists argue that what many Americans think of as the “white race” does not describe a distinct group of people but rather a social construct that serves to benefit some groups and marginalize others. And unlike some strands of academic and legal thought, critical race theory has an open and activist agenda, with an emphasis on storytelling and personal experience. It’s about righting wrongs, not just questing after knowledge.

But Bell and his fellow theorists, who include Kimberlé Crenshaw, Mari Matsuda, and Charles Lawrence, were not radical in the sense of advocating extreme tactics to achieve political ends, like Greenpeace or the Irish Republican Army. They fought their battles in the halls of academia, not on the streets. And many of their ideas are not radical today in the sense of being outside the mainstream: Critical race theory is widely taught and studied, not only in law but in sociology, education, and other fields. And it is part of the mainstream debates over affirmative action, immigration, and hate-crime laws. (Slate.com March 9, 2012, at 2:59 PM ET)

So Oremus is saying CRT was not advocating a Black Revolution to terminate the U.S. Constitution and redistribute power and wealth to give minority races (Bell is thinking African-Americans) a leg up on the White Race like violent White Supremacists would do to minorities to denigrate their racial existence. CRT is different than violent White Supremacists because the theory advocates a societal-cultural transformation by writing about it in academia. What? So CRT is good because it wants to destroy the American experiment in Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness of Constitutional government because the White Race wrote the instruments of power to remain superior to any other race on a subliminal level; ergo it must change. Change how?

Oremus DOES NOT really delve into the CRT methodology of this transformative change. I think the methodology is evident in the GramsciAlinskyObama model to use the U.S. Constitution to destroy the U.S. Constitution.

The change Bell intended for America and that President Barack Hussein Obama subscribes to may not be an immediate minority revolution to overthrow the White Race, but the Bell-Obama concept of Change is a racial theory to terminate the U.S. Constitution. After the Constitution is rendered to a relic of history the intention is to continue to whittle away the vision of the Founding Fathers to make America closer akin to a Marxist Amerika in which self-initiative, merit, power and property are redistributed in such a way that minorities tell the White majority how to exist in a kind of reverse Apartheid.

Violent or not, Professor Bell was an anti-White racist with a hatred that moved him to rip power and property from his perceived enemy race to bring equality to minorities in an egalitarian-authoritarian manner. In full disclosure I believe Bell intended to share that power and property with the enemy White Race, but only with those with a utopian Marxist like vision that eliminates property and Liberty that is still constitutional today.

Breitbart.com has a better explanation of Critical Race Theory than Oremus’ pro-CRT view. It is a bit lengthy but you need to read it to understand how anti-American Derrick Bell was and to understand that President Barack Hussein Obama totally buys into this theory to destroy the American way of life.

JRH 3/14/12