The Left’s only enemy


PALWATCH- Christian-Jew-Hatred

Evidently the nation of Israel is experiencing the same Left-Right polarization that the USA is experiencing. Mahmoud Abbas stood at the UN podium and spoke egregious lie after lie (See Commentary on Abbas Lies) about Israel. The Israeli Right quite properly expressed the reality about Arabs that call themselves Palestinians; i.e. LIAR.

 

But here is some incredulity! The Israeli Left and the American Left praised the leader of the Palestinian Authority (PA – See Also Jewish Virtual Library) and Chairman of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) as a great seeking Liberty and Freedom for the non-existent group of Arabs that maintain they are Palestinians. Arabs as Palestinians did not exist until the Arab League via Egypt set up the PLO (Early Seeds of PLO: HERE and HERE) to create a reason for continuous attacks on Independent Israel to exterminate all the Jews living there. That creation date was 1964. Israel’s hard fought Independence from about SIX invading Muslim Arab armies were won in 1948.

 

Caroline Glick exposes the Leftists of America and Israel. Her theme is that American Leftists and Israeli Leftists don’t see a foreign enemy; rather they see their fellow citizens of the Right as the enemy. If the Left succeeds, Israel’s existence will be very tenuous.

 

JRH 10/5/12

Please Support NCCR

*************************

The Left’s only enemy

 

By Caroline Glick

October 4, 2012, 9:27 PM

CarolineGlick.com

 

epa00926738 Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (R), Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal (C|) and Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh walk inside the Grand Mosque in Mecca early on Friday 09 February 2007. Rival Palestinian factions sign a deal to form a unity government, hoping to end bloodshed between their followers and to win back Western aid halted because of the hostility of Hamas to Israel.  EPA/SUHAIB SALEM / POOL

 

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s legal term in office expired nearly four years ago. But his supporters don’t care. In Israel, Washington and throughout the world, Abbas’s supporters extol the authoritarian leader as a great moderate. In 2002, desperately searching for a face for the Palestinians that wasn’t Yasser Arafat’s face, the Left pushed Abbas out from behind Arafat’s shadow. Abbas, who served as Arafat’s deputy for 39 years, was upheld as a great moderate and placed in the invented position of Palestinian prime minister.

 

The fact that Abbas was an inveterate Jew-hater who spent four decades in the senior leadership of a terrorist organization and whose doctoral dissertation was a long denial of the Holocaust, was brushed aside.

 

His leftist supporters don’t care that he says Israel has no right to exist. They are untroubled by his 2008 rejection of then-prime minister Ehud Olmert’s unprecedentedly generous offer of peace and Palestinian statehood. They don’t mind that Abbas has refused to negotiate peace with Israel for the past four years. They don’t care that he has signed two unity government deals with Hamas or that he seeks to gain sovereignty for a Palestinian state through the UN and so establish a Palestinian state in a formal state of war with Israel.

 

They don’t care. But most Israelis do. Due to their recognition of his hatred for Israel and due to the terrorism Abbas has condoned and financed for decades, the vast majority of Israelis do not consider him a potential partner for peace. They do not believe that either Abbas or the Palestinians as a whole are remotely interested in being appeased by Israel.

 

As a consequence, most Israelis greeted Abbas’s speech at the UN General Assembly last week with indifference. In that speech, Abbas made clear – yet again – that he remains Arafat’s loyal deputy. The majority of Abbas’s speech involved a litany of libels against Israel, which he accused of everything from terrorism to apartheid, colonialism, racism, murder, theft, etc., etc., etc.

 

Then he moved on to his demands. In addition to reinstating his demand that Israel agree to every Palestinian demand as a precondition for negotiations, Abbas demanded that Israel release all Palestinian terrorists from its prisons.

 

No, none of Abbas’s attacks had an iota of truth to them.

 

But who cares? Abbas certainly doesn’t. And neither do his supporters. Their support for Abbas has nothing to do with what he says or does. It has to do with who they are and what they want. Abbas is their prop, not their partner.

 

Abbas’s Israeli supporters are the core of far-leftists who brought us the phony peace process with the PLO. Two thousand dead Israelis later, and with no peace in sight, their camp is much smaller today than it was in 1993. But it is still dedicated. And it is overpopulated by members of the media.

 

TIPPING HIS hat to this group, this week Defense Minister Ehud Barak announced in a media interview that he thinks that Israel should unilaterally withdraw from much of Judea and Samaria.

 

For most Israelis, Barak’s plan is self-evidently insane.

 

We left Gaza and see the consequences of that unilateral withdrawal every day as southern Israel is bombarded with missiles and rockets. We left and Gaza was transformed into a hub for global jihad, increasingly indistinguishable from Sinai. The very notion that our defense chief could suggest adopting an identical strategy for Judea and Samaria is both obscene and frightening.

 

What can he be thinking? Barak is thinking about elections, which are apparently about to be called. Barak thinks his best bet politically is to try to win the support of Abbas’s ever shrinking support base.

 

Barak lost his political base when he left the Labor Party and formed his own Independence faction with other breakaway Labor politicians at the beginning of 2011. He needs Abbas’s Israeli supporters to vote for him if he is to get elected to the next Knesset. Even more crucially, Barak needs Abbas’s supporters in the Israeli media. So to win their support, he opted to run on a platform of expelling Jews from their homes.

 

Barak’s move doesn’t tell us anything we don’t already know about him. He remains the political opportunist he has always been. His move is interesting because of what it reveals about the nature of Israel’s Left.

 

There is no rational way to argue that Israel can gain any advantage by surrendering Judea and Samaria to the Palestinians. If Israel departs, either Abbas will gobble up the territory and demand more, or he will swallow the concession and get swallowed by Hamas, which will demand more – as happened in Gaza.

 

Either way, Israel loses.

 

But that doesn’t matter for the Left. The Left continues to support Israeli withdrawals because its members know that the biggest loser of such an action won’t be Israel as a whole. It will be the Israeli Right. And that is all the Left cares about.

 

The only enemy they are interested in fighting, the only adversary they wish to defeat, is their fellow Israelis. And in a bid to win their support at the ballot box – and on the evening news – Barak has decided to embrace their cause. He will fight their fight against their Israeli enemies for them.

 

The Israeli Left is not alone in its belief that its number one priority is to destroy its domestic political opposition. Throughout the Western world, the political Left is increasingly rallying around positions that are in fundamental conflict with their nation’s interests as well as with the specific ideological commitments of the Left, for the sole purpose of gaining and maintaining power.

 

In recent weeks, the Left in the US has exposed its motivations and purpose in profoundly troubling ways. If Jewish settlement of the Land of Israel is the core of the Zionist revolution, freedom of speech is the foundation of America. Without Jewish settlement, there is no Israel. Without freedom of speech, there is no America.

 

IN RECENT weeks, US President Barack Obama and all of his senior aides and supporters have launched an assault on freedom of speech. They have attacked previously unknown figures because they dared to exercise their freedom of speech to produce an anti-Islamic film and broadcast it on YouTube. The White House pressured Google (which owns YouTube) to take the movie down. Obama’s media supporters have gone along with this shocking assault on bedrock American principles.

 

The Left’s support for Obama’s bid to repress freedom of speech in relation to the movie was not an isolated incident. Today the enlightened leftists of New York and Washington are apoplectic because a federal judge required New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority to post paid advertisements by the Stop the Islamization of America human rights group calling for Americans to support Israel against jihad.

 

The content of the ads is self-evidently reasonable. They read, “In any war between the savage and the civilized man, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.”

 

SIOA’s founder Pamela Geller submitted the ads to the MTA last year in response to a rash of anti- Israel ads calling for the US to end its support for the Jewish state. Those ads were published on New York buses and subways and on public transportation around the US.

 

The MTA rejected SIOA’s ad but the group sued. Citing the US Constitution, the court required the MTA to post them. When after a year’s delay the ads were finally posted last week, the US Left in the media and beyond had a collective fit.

 

From The New York Times to radical rabbis to pro- Islamic Christian pastors to The Washington Post, everyone is wringing their hands. In a televised debate with Geller, the anti-Israel evangelical pastor Rev. Jim Wallis condemned the ads, told Geller she was going to get Christians killed, (by what or whom, he never said), and demanded that Geller silence herself. As he put it, “Stop talking.”

 

It is important to be clear. The American Left doesn’t have a problem with free speech, per se. And they aren’t concerned – as Wallis would have you believe – that calling jihad savagery is going to get people killed, (by not-at-all savage jihadists).

 

The problem with messages like Geller’s is that talk about jihad distracts people from what the Left wants them to be thinking about.

 

Like the Israeli Left, the American Left doesn’t want Americans to think about the actual threats to the US emanating from the Islamic world. They want the public to think about what for them is the only real threat to their values and their ability to win and wield power.

 

That threat doesn’t emanate from the Islamic world where women are treated worse than farm animals, homosexuals are hanged in public squares, Christians are forcibly converted and assaulted, churches are burned to the ground, the annihilation of the Jewish people throughout the world is an ardent desire, and “Death to America” is a political program.

 

For the American Left, the primary threat to their way of life comes from people who oppose abortions and gay marriage and gun control. It comes from people who oppose unionization of government workers and nationalization of healthcare.

 

And it comes from people like Geller who state the obvious about jihad.

 

The reason that Islam is supposed to be immune from criticism is that for American leftists as for Israeli leftists, the only important battle is the one against domestic foes. And just as the abysmal results of leftist policies have left the Israeli Left with no choice but to shoot the messengers, so too the American Left must deal with policy failure by silencing the opposition.

 

In Israel, leftist appeasement of Palestinian terrorists has led to a horrific death toll and the obvious absence of peace. So the Left must silence those who have the temerity to oppose that failed policy. The Right’s most visible members are the religious Zionists, who are disproportionately situated beyond the 1949 armistice lines, and so the Left must destroy them through expulsions, no matter what the cost to Israel.

 

In America, the Left’s most conspicuous failure is its claim to promote women’s rights, equality and civil liberties in the culture war, even as it defends the Islamic world’s addiction to female genital mutilation, forced marriages, honor killings and executions of homosexuals for the “crime” of being gay. So the Left must silence critics of jihad and Islamism, and hope no one will notice its hypocrisy.

 

The upshot of all of this is that the Left must be denied its ability to dominate national discourses. Because Abbas and the pathologically Jew-hating society he leads is a threat to the Jewish state, while religious Zionists are not. And the assaults on American embassies throughout the Islamic world are not due to Internet movies, but to the savagery inherent in jihadist Islam.

 

In these perilous times we cannot permit ourselves to be led astray by those who insist we are our worst enemies.

 

Originally published in the Jerusalem Post.

__________________________

© 2012 Caroline Glick

 

About Caroline Glick

Dearbornistan Stones Christians and Police Defend Stoners


Muslims stone Christians freeze-frame Dearborn

John R. Houk

© July 5, 2012

 

The Muslims of Dearborn, MI have an annual festival. Dearborn is just outside of Detroit. The Muslim population of Dearborn is so significant that many anti-jihadists as me have dubbed the city Dearbornistan.

 

Religious Freedom is a near holy Liberty in the USA. By the 21st century any religion and cult that can get a 501(c)3 IRS designation is a religious totally free to practice its tenets as long as those tenets do not break the rule of law based on the U.S. Constitution. For example kidnapping, robbery, assault, murder and so on is not condoned by the rule of law even if it is a central tenet of a religion.

 

This brings me back to Dearbornistan. Dearbornistan is probably one of the best examples of a Kafir Free Zone (Usually called No-Go Zones) in America. In this age of Islam using American Liberty to schmooze the unconstitutional portions of Sharia Law into America one multiculturalist Left Wing Judge at a time,  which which most pundits have labeled No-Go Zones have a titular meaning if they are known as Kafir Free Zones. Roughly the word “kafir” represents a non-Muslim.

 

The notion of the existence of a Kafir Free Zone in this exceptional American Republic is repugnant to the real meaning of Religious Freedom. Kafir Free Zones in America brings to remembrance the KKK burning down Black Churches in the South because they were considered inferior to White Christians. KKK desired to see the old post Civil War culture of Black people as second class citizens, hence the existence of No Black Zones better known as Whites Only locations.

 

When the Civil Rights Movement was in full swing to update our culture to all citizens is equal under the law with equal rights enabled the Black minority to an increasing enforced equal treatment regardless of color, race and religion. Are there still race problems in the USA? Duh! Yes there is. However the lot of Black-White equal rights under the law in 2012 is paradise compared to what it was prior to the 1960s. It is only on America’s Left and Black Supremacists like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Attorney General Eric Holder, President Barack Hussein Obama and others that promote the illusion that American racism is as bad as ever.

 

Astonishingly the racism-religious supremacism in Dearbornistan is perpetrated by the minority religion known as Islam against any non-Muslims that desire to exercise their civil rights in Dearbornistan. For example Christian proselytizing has been an expression of Religious Freedom by all Christian Denominations since our American Republic had formed a Union of States under the U.S. Constitution in 1788 when the ninth State New Hampshire ratified it. Rhode Island became the last of the original 13 Colonies to ratify the U.S. Constitution in 1790.

 

So think of that! A minority religion – Islam – prohibits demonstrations and proselytizing of the majority religion in America. This prohibition of Religious Freedom in Dearborn is upheld by its Police Chief (What a surprise – Muslim) Ronald Haddad. Answering Muslims has a summary of entering the Kafir Free Zone in Dearborn since 2008: Dearborn.

 

Dearbornistan has become such a Kafir Free Zone that the Dearborn Police look the other way as Muslims begin stoning Christians exercising there Free Speech and Religious Freedom.

 

Frankly as a Christian and an American the thought of stoning Christians in the home of the brave land of the brave is extremely annoying. It is time to shed political correctness and Christians of all Denominations – Protestant, Catholic and Eastern Orthodox – need to unite to do our version of the million man march. If Dearbornistan refuses to provide the permits for such a protest of the unconstitutional actions occurring in Dearbornistan by Muslim residents and city officials, then march ANYWAY!

 

Here is the outrage as written at Stop RadicalIslam.org. I am posting two Stop RadicalIslam.org articles and the email from The United West that alerted me about the stoning of Islam. (Trust me, this thing has gone viral and can be found at many anti-jihad bloggers.)

 

You can read these cross posts at SlantRight 2.0.

 

JRH 7/5/12

Please Support NCCR

______________________________

 

VIDEO: American Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, MI (Original edit)

 

Here is a File on UN Agenda 21 , the International Transformation of the USA


Tony Newbill sent a PDF document which he believes is a succinct description of Agenda 21. Often times it is a difficult to transfer a PDF document into a blog post, so if there is a bit of ugliness in appearance it is entirely my fault.

 

JRH 5/27/12

Please Support NCCR

************************

Here is a File on UN Agenda 21 , the International Transformation of the USA

 

Sent by Tony Newbill

Sent: 5/26/2012 9:00 AM

 

Here is a File on UN Agenda 21, the International Transformation of the USA.  This explains the Program in detail and you may want to share this with your Colleagues.

 

And we wonder why the Free Market Capital Economy is not working when faced with this agenda???

___________________________

How Americans are Losings their Freedom ... banner title

 

How Americans are losing their Freedom and Liberty in One Easy Lesson

Your Hometown & the United Nations’ Agenda 21

 

Compiled by John R. Marler

Williamson County Texas Tea Party

jmarler@marfam.com – Georgetown, TX

 

What is Agenda 21?

 

My definition is Agenda 21 is a United Nations Global governance plan to regulate and control every facet of human activity on the face of the earth to implement one-world government and “global citizenship!”

 

If you were to hear that in the very near future the United States will have no privately owned property, no air conditioning, no dams, no paved roads, no way to correct rivers for flood control, no golf courses, no pastureland used for grazing, would you believe it?

 

These are all mandates of a United Nations program called Agenda 21 which was born in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. All delegates watched as four men, holding poles attached to an “Ark of Hope” which contained this Agenda 21 document! Within its pages are a substantial attack on the American Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. The primary target for the changes proposed in 1992 is the United States of America.

 

Here is a list of some of their “Unsustainable” Targets:

 

 SECTION Number

 

Unsustainable =We will take this away!

 

 

 

337

 

Ski runs

 

 

 

350

 

Grazing of livestock

 

 

 

351

 

Disturbance of soil surface-plowing of soil, building fences

 

 

 

728

 

Commercial Agriculture-Modern farm production, chemical fertilizers, fossil fuels, etc.

 

 

 

730

 

Any Industrial activity

 

 

 

730

 

“Human-made caves of brick and mortar (single family homes)

 

 

 

730

 

Paved and tarred roads, Railroads, floor and wall tiles

 

 

 

733

 

Technology, range lands, fish ponds, plantations or rangelands

 

 

 

738

 

Harvesting timber and modern hunting

 

 

 

748

 

Logging activities

 

 

 

755

 

Dams and reservoirs, straightening of rivers

 

 

 

757

 

Power line construction

 

 

 

763

 

Economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.

 

It is clear that AGENDA 21 is designed to replace the economic and social structure of the United States. The first version of the Declaration of Independence used the phrase “Life, Liberty and Property” and was changed to “Pursuit of Happiness” so that non-landowners could aspire to ownership, thus happiness.

 

According to the United Nations, the objective of sustainable development is to integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.

 

Biodiversity is a key component of the UN Agenda 21. Through this “word” an entire program is created and being implemented without Congressional approval or American Voter involvement through Non-Government Organizations such as “Envision Central Texas” where members are selected through appointment, not elections. These NGOs are granted authority by Federal Executive Orders and Agency Regulations to control much of our daily lives. End result is the BIODIVERSITY MAP that has 85% of the United States uninhabited!

 

https://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/tag/dr-michael-coffman/

 

Combined with Public-Private Partnerships and NGOs (Texas.org shows thousands of these entities in Texas,) we have a “created underworld” of government designed to eliminate the checks and balances of the American citizens.

 

Operations like WILDLANDS PROJECT and WETLANDS PROJECT are samples of how a citizen can lose rights to property, required to pay taxes for the “ownership” without having any say in how that property is to be used and therefore, making this land unsellable!

 

President George H.W. Bush called Agenda 21 and UN Charter “Sacred Principles” and called on all Americans to pledge allegiance to these same principles!

 

President Clinton, in 1993, issued an Executive Order requiring EVERY FEDERAL OFFICE to implement the principles of Agenda 21 in all possible areas of authority! ALL subsequent presidents reinforced these orders and Barack Hussein Obama has issued more executive orders to expand on this non-constitutional regulatory reduction of liberty.

 

These “Sacred Principles” are expressed as the “Triple Bottom Line” or the “Three E’s.”

 

EQUITY

 

Social EQUITY or Social INJUSTICE. Agenda21 intends to restructure Human nature through Law and Regulation. The agency created to bring Agenda21 down to the local city and county of the United States and the rest of the world is the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (hereafter referred to as ICLEI) and have offices in every State of the United States!

 

Social justice is defined as the right and opportunity of all people “to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment.” As preached by the current President Barack Hussein Obama, this includes redistribution of wealth. Agenda21 proclaims that private property is a social injustice since only those owning property are able to benefit or build wealth from it. National sovereignty is a social injustice. Lack of universal health care is a social injustice.

 

ECONOMY

 

Economic Prosperity is defined in the preamble of Agenda21, “The developmental and environmental objectives of Agenda 21 will require substantial flow of new and additional financial resources to developing countries”

 

This thinking is based on the failed belief that the wealth of the world was made at the expense of the poor, forcing them to be poorer while the rich got richer! The United States was founded on the premise that individual freedom, free market economics would benefit all by raising the living level of all. The ability to succeed in America was open to all “Equality of opportunity,” not equality of results!

 

I believe this all is intended to centralize all financial and political power into the hands of the elite few who will be the government for the world, The UN.

 

ENVIRONMENT

 

“Sustainable Development” is, simply, the vehicle of the United Nations to remove the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution from the legal foundation of the United States. The Cato Institute, in 2002, stated, “This fact alone casts a serious shadow of doubt on the motives of Sustainable Development planners who would discard the unalienable rights to life, liberty and property in order to pursue dubious programs!”

 

The Agenda21 is nothing less than an Anti-Human Initiative. By using the three E’s to sell the Agenda21 plans, the major attack point on America is though the educational system and the capture of children’s minds and bending them into “global citizens” and instruction that is designed to “broaden their loyalties to a world-wide society” or as Hillary Clinton states, “It takes a Village!”

 

Outcome based education (OBE) and School to Work (STW) programs are major efforts being adopted in school systems nation-wide. Straight from the Soviet Union, schools are using the tax funds to operate indoctrination centers to foster “World Citizenship” and “Environmental Responsibility.” Nazi mandates were similar in turning children against parents by “exposing the failure of parents” to adhere to the “Consensus” of the State. The State now being promoted is the United Nations.

 

Most of these people are what Lenin called “Useful Idiots” in they do not try to identify if actions and votes they make are within the framework of the United States or State of Texas Constitutions. For political and financial reasons (Block Grants, etc.), they sign away the freedoms that generations have died to preserve!

 

Hide Agenda 21’s UN roots from the people

 

“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development.

 

The UN has accomplished this through a little-known (to us) vehicle called the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) – Local Governments for Sustainability. Quoting ICLEI documents from this article (emphases added):

 

Our campaigns, programs, and projects promote Local Agenda 21 as a participatory, long-term, strategic planning process that addresses local sustainability while protecting global common goods. Linking local action to internationally agreed upon goals and targets such as Agenda 21, the Rio Conventions, the Habitat Agenda, the Millennium Development Goals and the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation is an essential component.[Sic]

 

Chapter 3, Section 1 states, “The eradication of poverty and hunger, greater equity in income distribution and human resource development remain major challenges everywhere. The struggle against poverty is the shared responsibility of all countries.”

 

Just in case, all of this is from UN official documents. I am including the map of the United States as envisioned by the BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT of the United Nations for Sustainable Development. Through REGULATION, not voter involved legislation, what you see below will be effected through the regulations of NGO’s, Private-Public Partnerships, and regional government interlocal groups. For you to see the gravity of this effort to make the sovereignty of the United States of America become nonexistent and “global citizenship” is the end result and the US is ruled by UN mandates and regulations. Every City and County in the United States is engaged in this process.

 

wildlands-map-2010_Merrit

 

We need to remove all such agreements from our city, county and Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s), Public-Private Partnerships(PPP’s) and all entities that circumvent voter involvement in effecting regulations that govern our lives is direct OPPOSITION to the Constitution of the United States.

 

In Closing, Agenda21 is an octopus with millions of tentacles squeezing the very life of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution from our God-given unalienable rights. Each tentacle or program, such as Smart Meters, Smart Growth or LEED Building Codes comes to each of our homes and reaches out through City, County, State and Federal agencies, never “needing” citizen approval or congressional oversight!

 

Revelation demands a response! I see my role described in Ezekiel 33 where Gods says, “When the watchman sees the sword coming and sounds not the warning, the blood loss I will attribute to him.” I want to encourage and train others to evangelize the citizens of our Great State and Nation to rise up. In Tea Parties, 9-12 Groups and other patriot organization and begin reclaiming America.

 

A Final Quote from Agenda 21 advocate, “Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project

 

Important Websites

 

A. The Good Ones

 

Agenda 21 Today

 

http://freedom21.org/

 

http://agenda21today.com/

 

Agenda 21 Resources on Central California Tea Party http://www.californiateapartygroups.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=262&Itemid=318

 

Progress Report – Agenda 21 implementation

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fsovereignty.net%2Fp%2Fsd%2Fagenda21rpt.htm&h=72477

 

Vision 2050

 

Disturbing document known as Vision 2050, recently created by a group of 29 Global Corporations, including Duke Energy, Toyota, Sony, Alcoa, and more. This document envisions our world in the year 2050 under Sustainable Development. The entire document is available online to read at:

 

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wbcsd.org%2F&h=72477

 

Redevelopment: The Unknown Government – What It Is. What Can Be Done.

 

This is a very revealing document as and highly recommended as a read for any who want to fight Agenda 21.

 

http://www.missionviejoca.org/pdfs/rug_2004.pdf

 

Resisting Agenda 21 Implementation in Central Texas

 

http://www.resist21.org/

 

Bear Witness Central

 

http://bwcentral.org/

 

Smart meters

 

http://www.refusesmartmeters.com/

 

IV. Best videos

 

Agenda 21 for dummies

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM&list=PLF387E4D34D0C7634

 

U N Agenda 21 quote “There Will Be No Private Housing” with Peter Schiff, John Stossel and Judge Napolitano

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ee6S9_H1Vk&list=PLD0AFD619FACFCF55

 

AGENDA 21 vehicle ownership and private property

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8YCLzlpDlw&list=PLD0AFD619FACFCF55

 

Agenda 21….You are dead….

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2I37RT3TCo&list=PLD0AFD619FACFCF55

 

What is AGENDA 21? Infobullet Series #1

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43u936bgTps&feature=related

 

What are Smart Meters? An accurate analysis of the issues.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oik1agiIam4

___________________________

 

John Marler Speaks at civic, patriotic, Tea-Party and 9-12 groups concerning the threat of AGENDA 21 and how it invades every facet of our daily lives. Schools, Businesses and Religions are key elements of the AGENDA 21 effort to change the America as a Republic into a “Global Citizen of the World Community” and be reduced to just that – a minor member of the world community!

Green Agenda a Leftist Revolution of an Elite Internationalism on USA Resources


Jolly BHO Green Giant and Marxism

Tony Newbill begins with Eco-Marxist info and finishes with Russia being trained on American soil. Russians I might add that still have a love affair with Marxism.

 

JRH 5/14/12

*************************

Green Agenda a Leftist Revolution of an Elite Internationalism on USA Resources

 

By Tony Newbill

Sent: 5/9/2012 8:06 AM

 

Have you ever read this guy’s stuff? He covers Russian influences and the link between the Left, the Green Movement and the Russians. It’s quite interesting.

 

Snapping up, locking down the land, so is the Green Agenda a Leftist Revolution of an Elite Internationalism on USA Resources??

 

Author warns Obama agenda to deliberately seal off assets

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/snapping-up-locking-down-the-land/ 

 

The author of “Eco-Tyranny: How the Left’s Green Agenda will Dismantle America” warns that the federal government has been collecting properties across the country for years, even now is working to control more and ultimately wants to block off any use by the American people.

 

In a commentary published in Forbes, author Brian Sussman argues that every American is heir to an “unfathomable fortune” in natural resources on nationally owned land but is condemned to bankruptcy by a government that won’t let them use it.

 

Sussman says it’s the deliberate policy of a government “beholden to the green agenda.”

 

He reports that “the feds now own nearly 700 million acres of property” that contain huge amounts of natural resources the country could use in difficult economic times, including oil, natural gas, minerals, timber and water.

 

Instead, the federal government has permanently removed these lands from economic development, deliberately harming the interests of the country to please environmentalists.

 

Now, Sussman reports, “the Obama administration … seeks to sell low-valued federal land, void of natural resources, and purchase more lucrative private property to cobble together a colossal new federal estate, which will not only be off-limits to development of natural resources, but off-limits to you.” (READ MORE)

 

___________________________

Talk Show Host Sounds Warning About Russian & U.S. Military Joint Anti-Terrorist Drills 

 

Steve Cooper
TheConservativeMonster.com (Newbill provided no link for this story)

 

Talk show host John Moore claims that “his sources” from CIA headquarters told him that there will be 200 Russian Special Forces ‘Spetsnaz’ troops participating in the anti-terror drills at Ft. Carson. I do believe this to be true.

 

These anti-terror drills will take place May 21st – May 31st, 2012 crossing over Memorial Day weekend. For U.S. Troops to be doing military drills with Russians troops on U.S. soil over Memorial Day weekend is even shocking to me (that is not easy to do).

 

Where are the U.S. Military leaders? You have failed the American people for allowing this to even take place. Don’t give me that crap that the ‘Cold War’ ended. Tell that to the morons that watch MSNBC. 

 

John Moore also claims that up to 30,000-100,000 might be on U.S. Soil by the end of the year. This I can’t confirm, but anything is possible judging by the direction that we are heading.

 

If these soldiers disappeared into the American population it could be a danger to National Security like never seen before. John Moore clearly knows about Russian Spetsnaz soldiers and how deadly they are. They are well trained in everything that you could imagine.

 

These Spetsnaz soldiers could assist Al Qaeda terrorists in attacking crucial U.S. targets (Pink Terror). This will be done to further soften up the U.S. infrastructure. The Spetsnaz troops could also just commit the terrorist acts themselves (Red Terror).

 

I believe that these Spetsnaz soldiers are coming for only one purpose and that is to eventually commit sabotage against the USA prior to a massive ‘staged’ war. Whether it is this summer, before the 2012 elections or after the elections will not matter. What will matter is that they are going to be on U.S. Soil and that is huge. 

 

The next stage is pink terror, “when active military operations have not yet begun and there is still peace, but when some of the best spetsnaz units have already gone into action.” This leads directly to “red terror” – which is open warfare between major powers. – JR Nyquist – http://www.financialsense.com/node/277

__________________________

Grey Terror

 

By JR Nyquist

5/13/04

Financial Sense

 

It is generally believed that Mohammed Atta was the leader of the 9/11 strikes against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Atta was an Egyptian, a student of architecture in Cairo and Hamburg, born on Sept. 1, 1968. His studies continued to the end of the 1990s. We are told that he was seriously religious, though he was seen drinking alcohol and playing video games at a sports bar the week before 9/11.

 

In May 2003, Capt. Vladimir Hucin, formerly with Czech intelligence (BIS), made a curious statement in front of Petr Cibulka, the head of the Right Bloc (Pravy Blok) in response to a question about Atta: “I had information that Mohammed Atta was trained in the Zastavka terrorist training camp in 1988, by Czechoslovak Communists and STB.”

 

Cibulka was not surprised by Hucin’s claim regarding Atta. According to Cibulka, al Qaeda is the child of the Communist Bloc and its rogue state allies. “[Al Qaeda] is supplied and trained by Iraq,” said Cibulka in a 2003 interview. “But the real brains behind this global terrorist campaign against the free world … is in fact the Russian GRU. Moscow fights against the United States with a hidden hand.”

 

There is no question that the FBI and the CIA, in their infinite wisdom, would dismiss Cibulka’s statement and the allegations of Capt. Hucin. The reasoning of the FBI and CIA goes something like this: People who have fought communism their whole lives are deeply committed to their views, even when communism has collapsed. Those who hate communism do not stop hating it, and their judgment is distorted by this hatred. Therefore, statements connecting today’s terrorism with “International Communism” are not to be taken seriously.

 

Perhaps the prevailing wisdom of the FBI and CIA deserves the honored place it now enjoys. On the other hand, an admission that anti-Communism can become an obsession does not automatically discredit everything anti-Communists have to say. Soviet Communism invented modern terrorism. The Communists trained Arafat, Mandela, Carlos the Jackal and others. To what end was this training?

 

There is an old book by a GRU defector who wrote under the pen name Viktor Suvorov. The book’s title is Spetsnaz: The Inside Story of the Soviet Special Forces. Chapter 15 in this book is about Spetsnaz’s role at the outset of World War III. It makes very interesting reading.

 

Russian Spetsnaz commandos are trained as paratroopers, explosives experts, terrorists and assassins. According to Suvorov, World War III will not begin with conventional military operations, or even with massed nuclear missile strikes. On page 196 he describes “a series of large and small [terrorist] operations the purpose of which is, before actual military operations begin, to weaken the enemy’s morale, create an atmosphere of suspicion, fear and uncertainty, and divert attention of the enemy’s armies and police forces to a huge number of different targets….” According to Suvorov: “The principle method employed at this stage is ‘grey terror.'” This is a kind of terror that is carried out “in the name of already existing extremist groups not connected in any way with the Soviet Union, or in the name of fictitious organizations.”

 

Suvorov claimed that “grey terror” would have a psychological warfare component. The Russian special services, he wrote, would launch a scandal parade. Dirt would be invented, created or dug up on America’s leaders, on America’s defense establishment and on America’s friends abroad. According to Suvorov, various nations would begin to distrust their leaders. The peace movement, he wrote, would make use of these scandals. “In many countries there are continual demands to make the country neutral and not to support American foreign policy, which has been discredited.” When America’s international support erodes away, explained Suvorov, the “grey terror” gathers in scope and “reaches its peak.” The next stage is pink terror, “when active military operations have not yet begun and there is still peace, but when some of the best spetsnaz units have already gone into action.” This leads directly to “red terror” – which is open warfare between major powers.

 

Perhaps it is crazy to make this suggestion: But is it possible the “grey terror” of Viktor Suvorov has begun? Are key leaders in al Qaeda paid agents of the old Communist Bloc, paving the way for “pink terror” and the “red terror” that logically follows?

 

One hesitates to accept, at face value, the statements of anti-Communists in Eastern Europe (since their statements are so grim). And yet, there is something strange about the terrorists and their war against America. What do these terrorists hope to achieve for themselves? Islam is not going to take over the United States. The Islamists have no army. They don’t even have a country that dares to openly embrace their cause.

 

Last Sunday night I received a call from an American businessman recently returned from South America. He had a strange encounter. He’d met a Russian down below the equator. This Russian thought South America was safe place to be at the moment. The businessman talked about life in South America. “Life is better in the United States,” he said. The Russian answered. “Yes, but the United States is not going to be there much longer.”

 

The Russian refused to elaborate. Perhaps he doesn’t need to.

________________________________

 

Audio from the John Moore Radio Show

VIDEO: 30,000 – 100,000 Russian Troops Scheduled within next 7 Months – May 2, 2012

http://youtu.be/yY4s4SfgEEM

 

Published on May 3, 2012 by wakeupyt

 

RUSSIA is not part of NATO! So, why are they coming here with theirdrills at the Denver Airport? This is not good news people!
Link:
http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/nato_countries.htm

John Moore said on Wednesday’s broadcast, that he got news from the CIA Headquarters a report that says within the next 7 months, there will be between 30,000 – 100,000 Russian Troops coming to America to stay. First wave of troops begins on May 21st.

Please note this video contains edited parts from the John Moore show on May 2, 2012. I have been given permission to use the audio form John’s shows for my videos.

May 2, 2012 Show: http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Moore/2012/05/Moore_1_050212_070000.mp3

The John Moore Show is on RBN, Monday – Friday 7-8AM CST: http://republicbroadcasting.org/shou…shoutcast.html

RBN’s Archives: http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Mo…212_070000.mp3

I originally posted about this last week.
Russian and American Airborne Forces Unite for Drills in the USA
http://theconservativemonster.mobi/2012/04/27/russian-and-american-airborne-forces-unite-for-drills-in-the-usa.aspx

 

Steve Cooper
The Conservative Monster.com

 

U.S. Military leaders are sworn to defend against enemies both ‘foreign and domestic’. Are they living up to their oaths?

The U.S. Government is riddled with overt Communists that are openly preaching Communist propaganda daily as they hide behind the label Progressive. These Progressives know that they are untouchable at this point. Now, American and Russian troops will be doing ‘terrorist drills’ together ON U.S. SOIL.

Terrorist drills with the Russians? That is interesting since terrorists around the world seem to be running around with Russian made weapons in their hands. The State Dept. claimed that the War on Terror is over. So, why are these terrorist drills needed? The March Towards Socialism is Ending the ‘War on Terror’

Our military leaders should be ashamed of themselves for allowing this charade to happen. I am still against these ‘joint drills’, even if this is some type of deception for the Russians to lower their guard. Russia sells weapons via proxies to terrorists that have killed U.S. Soldiers since the Vietnam War. Someone with some guts needs to open their mouth. Allen West and Sarah Palin seem to be the only ones that have the guts to say anything.

The new #1 man from Al Qaeda, Ayman Zawahiri was trained by the Russian FSB. Notice that the War on Terror has ended now according to the State Department? So, I guess Zawahiri gets a free pass for helping to orchestrate 9/11 for Iran and Russia? The Democrats benefited very much from 9/11 as well. Think about it….

http://rt.com/news/russian-american-airborne-drill-923/

Russian warships to get NATO Communications Equipment
http://en.rian.ru/world/20120425/173053100.html

 

_______________________________

The Russians are coming! First joint ‘Top Gun’ drills to be held in US  

 

Sent by Tony Newbill

Sent: 5/10/2012 9:46 AM

 

This is in response to Economic collapse and default of the Dollar trade currency status due to a rejection by the BRIC nations as they cut off export supplies to the USA while we go down in a heap due to a lack of Industrial manufacturing capacity, and so we will end up after this transition period BEGGING for a supply line from the BRIC nations and that will come with a Whole New meaning for the USA. This was all planned out carefully with the 1990s WTO Free Trade Agreements.

 

http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

 

Internment and Resettlement Operations Manual

HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

February 2010

 

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD contractors only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 8 December 2008. Other requests for this document must be referred to the Commandant, U.S. Army Military Police School, ATTN: ATZT-TDD-M, 320 MANSCEN Loop, Suite 270, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473-8929.

 

DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.

 

Table of Contents

 

PREFACE ……………………………………………………….viii

 

INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………. xi

 

Chapter 1 INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT AND THE OPERATIONAL

 

ENVIRONMENT ………………………………………………………………..1-1

 

Conduct ……………………………………………………………………………….. 1-1

 

Principles ……………………………………………………………………………… 1-3

 

Personnel Categories ……………………………………………………………………………… 1-5

 

Status Determination ………………………………………………………………………………. 1-7

 

Article 5 Tribunals …………………………………………………………………………………… 1-8

 

Appeals and Periodic Reviews of Civilian Internees ……………………………………. 1-9

 

General Protection and Care of Detainees, U.S. Military Prisoners, and

 

Dislocated Civilians …………………………………………………………….. 1-10

 

Agencies Concerned With Internment and Resettlement …………………………… 1-12

 

Protecting Power ………………………………………………………………1-13

 

Planning Considerations for Internment and Resettlement Operations ………… 1-14

 

Military Police Capabilities ………………………………………………………………..1-16

 

Chapter 2 INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE SPECTRUM OF OPERATIONS ………………………………………………………………..2-1

 

Support to Combat Operations ………………………………………………………………… 2-1

 

Support to Stability Operations ………………………………………………………………… 2-3

 

Support to Civil Support Operations ………………………………………………………….2-8

 

Army Command and Support Relationships ………………………………………………. 2-8

 

Considerations Within the Operational Area and the Area of Operations ………. 2-9

 

Chapter 3 COMMAND AND STAFF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ……………………… 3-1

 

National and Theater Reporting Agencies …………………………………………………. 3-1

 

Roles and Responsibilities ………………………………………………………………………. 3-2

 

Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center Commander/Military Intelligence

Battalion ………………………………………………………………3-7

 

Intelligence Analysts ………………………………………………………………………………. 3-8

 

Human Intelligence Collectors …………………………………………………………………. 3-8

 

Interpreters and Translators…………………………………………………………………….. 3-9

 

Military Police Organizations in Support of Internment and Resettlement

 

Operations …………………………………………………………………………. 3-10

 

Staff Duties and Responsibilities in Support of Internment and Resettlement. 3-12

 

Guard Force …………………………………………………………………………. 3-18

 

Chapter 4 CAPTURE, INITIAL DETENTION, AND SCREENING……………………………….. 4-1

 

Detainee Flow ……………………………………………………………….4-1

 

Detainee Processing ………………………………………………………………………………. 4-5

 

Custody and Accountability of Property, Evidence, and Intelligence

 

Information ……………………………………………………………..4-12

 

Detainee Movement ……………………………………………………………………………… 4-15

 

Methods of Transportation ……………………………………………………..4-16

 

Detainee Release …………………………………………………………………………………. 4-19

 

Chapter 5 DETAINEE OPERATIONS ……………………………………………………………………… 5-1

 

Command and Control ……………………………………………………………………………. 5-1

 

Planning Considerations …………………………………………………………………………. 5-2

 

Intelligence and Interrogation…………………………………………………………………… 5-3

 

Medical Support ………………………………………………………………5-6

 

Dental Support ………………………………………………………………………………………. 5-8

 

Specific Detainee Support Requirements………………………………………………….. 5-9

 

Detainee Deaths ……………………………………………………………….5-13

 

Legal Considerations ……………………………………………………………………………. 5-14

 

Chapter 6 DETAINEE FACILITIES …………………………………………………………………………. 6-1

 

General Considerations …………………………………………………………….6-1

 

Detainee Collection Point ………………………………………………………………………… 6-4

 

Detainee Holding Area ………………………………………………………………..6-10

 

Fixed Detainee Internment Facilities……………………………………………………….. 6-14

 

Theater Internment Facility ……………………………………………………………………. 6-17

 

Strategic Internment Facility ………………………………………………………………..6-37

 

Transfers or Releases …………………………………………………………………………… 6-38

 

Chapter 7 CONFINEMENT OF U.S. MILITARY

 

PRISONERS ……………………………………. 7-1

 

U.S. Battlefield Confinement Operations Principles ……………………………………. 7-1

 

Planning Process for U.S. Military Prisoners ……………………………………………… 7-1

 

Battlefield Facilities ………………………………………………………………………………… 7-2

 

Processing, Classification, and Identification Requirements ………………………… 7-3

 

Clothing, Meals, and Dining Facilities……………………………………………………….. 7-4

 

Medical Care and Sanitation ……………………………………………………………………. 7-5

 

Discipline, Control, and Administration ……………………………………………………… 7-6

 

Emergency Planning and Investigations………………………………………………….. 7-11

 

Rules of Interaction ………………………………………………………………………………. 7-12

 

Use of Force ……………………………………………………………………………. 7-12

 

Escape …………………………………………………………….7-12

 

Transportation ……………………………………………………………………….. 7-13

 

Transfer and Disposition of U.S. Military Prisoners …………………………………… 7-13

 

[SlantRight Editor: You get the picture, right? There are a total of ten chapters and 326 pages which includes appendixes and figure illustrations.]

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/re-education-camp-manual-includes-rules-on-isolating-political-prisoners.html

 

Re-Education Camp Manual Includes Rules On Isolating Political Prisoners

Document also describes forced labor

 

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, May 7, 2012

 

A shocking U.S. Army manual that describes how “political activists,” including American citizens, are to be indoctrinated in re-education camps also includes rules on forced labor and separating political prisoners by confining them in isolation.

 

Aside from detailing how PSYOP teams will use “indoctrination programs to reduce or remove antagonistic attitudes,” as well as targeting “political activists” with indoctrination programs to provide “understanding and appreciation of U.S. policies and actions,” the manual directs political prisoners to be separated from the rest of the camp population.

 

On page 284, the manual (PDF) describes how “Malcontents, rabble-rousers, trained agitators, and political officers who may attempt to organize resistance or create disturbances within the I/R facility,” are to be confined “in isolated enclosures to deny them access to the general population.”

 

The document also makes clear that the internment facility is not only a re-education camp but also a forced labor camp. Page 277 of the manual states, “Detainees constitute a significant labor force of skilled and unskilled individuals. These individuals should be employed to the fullest extent possible in work that is needed to construct, manage, perform administrative functions for, and maintain the internment facility.” (THERE IS MORE!)

 

The Russians are coming! First joint ‘Top Gun’ drills to be held in US

http://rt.com/news/russian-american-airborne-drill-923/

 

For the first time in history, Russian and American airborne forces will hold joint drills in the US. The anti-terror exercises scheduled for May 2012 will get off to a flying start with a tactical landing operation and “terrorist” camp raid.

 

­“This is the first time such an event is being held,” Russian Airborne Forces spokesperson Col. Aleksandr Kucherenko stressed, announcing the plan. “The Russian airborne will contribute a special task group that will exercise with US special service weapons.”

 

The drills were arranged by the Russian Airborne Command and a US military delegation in Moscow last December.

 

Russian soldiers will receive preparatory training in Colorado’s Fort Carson with the US weaponry and equipment they are to use during the operation. The drills include parachuting, operation planning, reconnaissance, assault operations and evacuations by helicopter.

 

According to the exercise scenario, soldiers of the two countries will hold a tactical airborne operation, including reconnaissance of an imaginary terrorists’ camp and a raid,” Colonel Kucherenko revealed.

 

The drills will take place between May 24 and 31. But it’s not all work: on May 27, the Russian paratroopers will get a chance to unwind at a baseball game in Colorado Springs.

 

 

It is funny Obama and NATO are equipping Russia with this equipment don’t you think????

 

Russian warships to get NATO Communications Equipment
http://en.rian.ru/world/20120425/173053100.html

 

Russian warships will be equipped with NATO navigation and communications systems to improve coordination in anti-piracy missions around the world, Chief of the Russian General Staff Nikolai Makarov said on Wednesday.

 

The issue has been discussed during a meeting of the NATO-Russia Council in Brussels.

 

“We decided to install standard NATO navigation and communications systems on our warships,” Makarov said.

 

NATO warships have been patrolling the pirate-infested waters off the Somali coast since 2008, as part of Operation Ocean Shield. NATO has recently extended its mission in the Gulf of Aden and adjacent areas until 2014.

 

Russia joined the international anti-piracy mission in the region in 2008. Russian warships have successfully escorted more than 130 commercial vessels from various countries since then.

 

Task forces from the Russian Navy, usually led by Udaloy class destroyers, operate in the area on a rotating basis.

 

A task force from Russia’s Northern Fleet, led by the Udaloy class destroyer Vice Admiral Kulakov, will arrive in the Gulf of Aden in the beginning of May to join the anti-piracy mission. [BRUSSELS, April 25, 2012 (RIA Novosti)]

 

________________________

Russian soldiers burning flag of the United States

 

Sent by Tony Newbill

Sent: 5/13/2012 1:35 PM

 

Why are Russian and American airborne forces holding joint drills in the US this month when we have them Burning the US Flag???

  

Russian soldiers burning flag of the United States

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnUzlCr0Q9k&feature=player_embedded

 

____________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Look Out for Muslim Brotherhood Organizations in USA


MB in No. Amer. Chart

John R. Houk

© April 23, 2012

 

The Muslim Brotherhood is using the tools of democracy to install anti-democracy Sharia Law in Egypt. Unless there is outside influence say on the Egyptian military, I have no doubt a Muslim Brotherhood political party will win the Egyptian government and the Egyptian legislature.

 

The irony is the striking similarity to a moment in history in Germany prior to WWII. Hitler’s Nazis eventually led the majority coalition that had Hitler named as Chancellor. With the use of Jew-Hatred and some criminal political violence which included the burning down of the Reichstag (Historical dispute on blaming Hitler) and blaming it on German Communists.

 

Once the Nazi government controlled the apparatus of government anti-Nazis were shut down from speaking and writing while a fear-state was established that disseminated information via the propaganda control of the German press.

 

In Egypt the vilified people are Jews and Coptic Christians. Only dumb Jews live in Egypt so the eye of persecution falls onto the Copts. A Muslim Brotherhood government will blame mock tragedies on the Copts, the Zionist Jews and the Zionist supporting Americans. And BAM! The Muslim Brotherhood rules Egypt with all the authority afforded by Sharia Law.

 

In the realm of Human Rights, Sharia represents everything anti-Liberty and anti-Civil Rights.

 

There are people who recognize that Sharia Law is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution. In Islam the concept of Sharia is more than a holy standard to live one’s life by. In Islam Sharia must also be the governing standard for the rule of law. For Muslims living in an Islamic dominated nation this may be fine. Islam is a theo-political religion and Muslims have lived under the nature that all law must be integrated with Islam; thus even in nations where Islam dominates and a modicum of secularism has been invested in government, Islam is still inseparable as the governing rule of law standard. In America Conservatives and the Christian Right view America’s republic foundations derive just as much from a Judeo-Christian influence as from a secular philosophy evolved from a Greco-Roman tradition.

 

As much as some Christian Right adherents desire a greater turn to Christian principles in our rule of law, even they realize the Constitution is law derived by the institution of the agreement of the citizens of the USA through representative government. The foresight of the Founding Fathers in preparing a document to be approved as the ruling instrument by the original Thirteen States infused secularism with the Right of citizens to choose (or choose not) any religion desired to worship. The Original Intent of the Constitution was to keep government out of religion while religion is able to influence but not demand government. Okay I realize that American Liberals view the Constitution as both a Living document that evolves with the times and that not only is government to stay out of religion but religion must stay out of completely. For America to survive the Original Intent vs. Living Constitution debate, someday an Amendment or Amendments to the Constitution will have to bring clarity to the debate.

 

At any rate the full American political spectrum agrees the Constitution is law by men. The Constitution is not law by one of man. The Constitution is not law directly from the Judeo-Christian God, the Islamic Allah, or the gods of the Hindus, the insight of the Buddha or any other religion. Now the American Christian Right believes the Hand of God is on America and behind the historical documents that led to the two most influential documents of America’s founding – the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. I personally am with the Christian Right about God’s Hand on America; however that does not deter the fact that the Constitution is a human document and not a Divine document. As long as American citizens adhere to Christian principles America will remain exceptional. The more American citizens gravitate toward Secular Humanism and a Moral Relativity based on godlessness the more America will cease to be exceptional. When America ceases to be exceptional America will begin to decay from within much like the Roman Republic began a downward move of inner decadence as the Roman Empire.

 

The irony of Islam is that religion has the same moral standards as Judeo-Christianity; however the tolerance of human choices is absolutely void in Islam. Christianity is all about free choice of leaving a sin-laden age and choosing the God-kind of life through faith in the Risen Savior Jesus Christ finding release from the penalty of the curse of the Law. Islam takes the curse of the Law to a human enforcement level of prescribed punishments that can range from whippings to loss of life. (The sin-punishment thing in Islam is one reason I know the Allah of Islam is NOT the God of Christianity. I have to admit ignorance on how Judaism has dealt with sin-punishment issues of the Law in modern times; nonetheless I know even the most religious Jews do not lop off hands for theft or execute people today according to the Law.) I am also aware that the more secularized a Muslim nation is today the less application of the sin-punishment penalties of Sharia are used. AND YET the more adherent a Muslim nation is to the theo-political aspects of Islam the more that nation enforces the application of Sharia punishments for breaking the rule of law whether the crime is secular or religious.

 

The point is that Sharia Law is an integral part of Islam. American Courts are beginning to adjudicate civil and penal laws involving Muslims according to the traditions of Sharia Law. THIS MUST STOP! Significant portions of Sharia are downright unconstitutional and for a Court to justify a Muslim decision based on Sharia Law begins to place our Constitutional in jeopardy of becoming irrelevant. Radical Islamic organizations in America are fully aware that if Sharia becomes part of the judicial legal precedents in America that the Constitution will become diluted. The more the Constitution is diluted the more Radical Muslims can justify actions that are specifically against the law of the land.

 

Americans are somewhat misled by the term Radical Islam. We are told by our politicians and media that Radical Islam is a fringe fundamentalist practice of Islam. We Americans must realize a better term for Radical Islam is Purist Islam. Radical Islam is really a reform movement within Islam to return the Islamic principles exampled by Islam’s founding prophet Mohammed. You have to realize that ALL religious Muslims consider Mohammed the perfect man that ALL Muslims should emulate. That concept is not just a Radical Islamic principle that is a universal Islamic principle. This principle is one reason we Americans watch scenes of rioting with wonder among majority Muslim areas over the perception that Mohammed has been insulted or disrespected. The inculcation of Islamic Supremacism via the Hadith and Sharia rattles the mind of a Muslim when divine perfection is insulted or disrespected. Religious Christians that perceive disrespect of faith or Christ are taught the Golden Rule – Do unto others as you would have do for you. Or to use the Turn the Other Cheek Principle demonstrating the Love of God that should be inherent in a Christian Believer. Unfortunately Biblical principles prescribed for Christian actions have not been followed well in Christian history. The failure of Christians in history is something a Muslim Apologist loves to point out. Muslim Apologists acting as Accuser fail to mention Christian failures are not endorsed by the Bible yet Muslim violence and persecution are indeed supported in the Quran, Hadith, Sira and Sharia.

 

This brings us back to the Muslim Brotherhood which was founded in Egypt but has become a transnational organization by planting MB affiliated organizations around the world. The Islamic terrorist organization Hamas which is devoted to Israel’s destruction in the name of the non-entity Palestine is a MB organization.

 

There are Muslim organizations in America that have passed themselves off as Moderate Islam when in fact they are devoted to the Purist Islam of the MB. It is these organizations that have gone to great lengths to use the American judicial system to subvert the American Constitution by playing the victim card to protect Religious Freedom for Muslims. The Religious Freedom part is awesome; however forcing the rule of law to accept un-American and for that matter Unconstitutional aspects of Islam in the name of Religious Freedom should not be protected by the rule of law. Any religion or ideology that seeks to end the Rights of people that are part of the Constitution’s first ten Amendments (Bill of Rights) cannot be viewed to practice as Religious Freedom.

 

Muslim-American organizations have gone to great lengths to shut down a movement of State legislations that are aimed to keep Sharia Law and foreign law that are not a part of the Constitution out of the judicial system. Unfortunately these Muslim-American organizations have had great success when the legislation specifies Sharia Law. In court the advocates of Sharia have been adept to show Sharia as a standard of conduct; thus specifying anti-Sharia laws is Unconstitutional according to the First Amendment guaranteeing Religious Freedom. The Courts refuse to draw the line between religious worship and Islamic judicial actions inherent in Sharia Law.

 

So a new strategy has emerged that has been labeled American Laws for American Courts (ALAC). ALAC legislation which appears most often as an Amendment to a State Constitution is focused on wording that prevents the usage of foreign laws in judicial systems of State Courts. When worded properly the word Sharia does not even appear and yet the aspects of Sharia that a Muslim might plea adjudication would fall into not being part of the State Constitution. It is still tricky stuff because Muslim-American organizations are fully aware that Sharia cannot be used on a State level to dilute a Constitution AND if an ALAC law is repudiated on a Federal level the Courts would have to justify Constitutionally how it is Unconstitutional to prevent foreign legal precedents out of a State adjudication.

 

So who are those Purist (i.e. Radical) Muslim-American organizations that have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt? I am going to look at a few here but this will not be an exhaustive list and I will be excerpting from anti-jihad pundits and bloggers that have made it study to expose the darker nature of Islam that most Americans are ignorant of. Also I am not attributing any order of significance.

 

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

 

CAIR seems to be in the news most and so is the most visible of the Islamist organizations in America. CAIR tends to receive most of its funding from foreign sources rather than the Muslim-Americans CAIR wants you to believe they are looking out for.

 

CAIR’s MB and Hamas Connection

 

Founded in Egypt in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood aims, in the words of a recent Dutch intelligence assessment, “to act as a bulwark against advancing Western cultural and ideological hegemony” and seeks to “’re-Islamize society’ in accordance with an ultra-orthodox doctrine.”1 In 1987, Hamas was created “as an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood.”2

 

According to the U.S. government, shortly after the formation of Hamas, “the Muslim Brotherhood directed its Palestinian Committees throughout the world, including the United States, to carry out the mandate of assisting” the newly-formed organization.3 …

 

 

From October 2-3, 1993,5 key members of the U.S. Palestine Committee came together at a Marriott Courtyard hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for a conference that was monitored and recorded by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents.6 Wiretaps of this meeting, which were entered into evidence at the 2007 trial of the Holy Land Foundation (HLF), reveal an extremely savvy group of individuals committed to exploiting America’s freedoms in order to turn the U.S. into a “safe place for the Movement.”7 The wiretaps also provide incontrovertible evidence of the deeply duplicitous nature of these men and their organizations. From calling Hamas “Samah”8 throughout the meeting to acknowledging that they “cannot say…that I’m Hamas” when talking to Americans9 to advising that “War is deception,”10 the attendees display a cunning that served them effectively for years, allowing their organizations to operate with relative impunity throughout the 1990s.

 

For example, the Texas-based HLF was able to develop into the largest Muslim charitable organization in the U.S., raising millions of dollars.11 Similarly, IAP, the other key organization represented at the Philadelphia meeting, trumpeted on its website in 2000 that it had “grown into the largest Muslim, Arab, and Palestinian American grassroots organization dedicated to the cause of Palestine with tens of regional and local chapters, representatives, and offices around the country.”12 Despite their firm commitment to supporting Hamas’ radical agenda, HLF and IAP adeptly couched their actions in the language of humanitarianism and multiculturalism. …

 

Also of deep significance at the Philadelphia meeting is discussion about the need to form a “political organization and public relations” organ,16 “whose Islamic hue is not very conspicuous.”17 One of the attendees saw this new organization as a necessity because the groups that were in existence at the time were “purely Islamic organizations” and may be “burned” and “unable to work.”18 Less than a year after the meeting, two attendees and one-time IAP officials founded the Council on American-

Islamic Relations (CAIR), which now serves as the self-appointed voice of the American Muslim community in the national media, regularly offering “diversity training” to law enforcement and able to access the highest levels of the U.S. government. Notably, in a filing in the HLF case, the U.S. government identifies CAIR as a member of the U.S. Palestine Committee.19

 

 

The Agenda

 

Prosecutors introduced the conference’s agenda into evidence during the HLF trial; that document states that the meeting’s goals during the four sessions were “determining the strategies, policies, and frames of Islamic activism for Palestine in North America in the near and far stages in its following aspects: Political action and public relations. Popular action. Charitable action. Media action.”84

 

 

Discussion: A New Operating Environment in the U.S.

 

Throughout the two day conference, the attendees frequently highlight the fact that the Oslo Accords have radically altered the U.S. environment.

 

For example, Gawad (last name unknown) tells the group that you “no longer have the right to resist the occupation. All of that will be classified according to the American concept. There is no occupation now…This will be classified as terrorism according to America…How are you going to perform Jihad?” He continues, “You must formulate the position of the Palestinians and the Muslims here in America to support the resistance…That’s a problem by itself. In the same time, not falling under the accusations of terrorism and those who harbor terrorism or tend to according to the American [definition]…This, really, is a true problem.”104 Addressing a similar theme, Abdelhaleem Ashqar declares, “now that the agreement is in place…your actions now are terrorism and not a resistance.”105

 

 

During the conference, Omar Ahmad also points out that the groups risk alienating Muslims by seeking to appease non-Muslim Americans. He comments, “if you want to [talk to] the Americans, you lose the Muslims. If you address the Muslims, it means that you cannot reveal your address to the Americans. Frankly speaking.” Providing an example, he says, “Like when you’re talking opposition to peace…people are telling us that we have become peace-loving, for instance…But, one could interpret peace-loving that we have surrendered and another would interpret it that we…use diplomatic terms…if someone asked you if you want to destroy Israel, what are you going to say on TV?” He tells the group, “if you give an inconclusive response which is like you didn’t answer the question, someone will come to you and tell you that you have forsaken your principles.”111 (“The 1993 Philadelphia Meeting: A Roadmap for Future Muslim Brotherhood Actions in the U.S.”; by Josh Lefkowitz; NEFA Foundation PDF Publication; 26 pp.; 11/15/07 READ ENTIRE REPORT)

 

CAIR’s inception was part of an insidious plot to cripple America’s support for Israel under the deception of moderation. CAIR is an untrustworthy Purist Muslim organization that received its marching orders from the MB via the Palestinian cause to eradicate Israel particularly through the Hamas version of the MB.

 

Muslim American Society (MAS)

 

The Muslim American Society (MAS), established in 1993 and based in Falls Church, Virginia, claims to be “America’s largest grassroots Muslim organization with over 50 chapters nationwide.”  While MAS portrays itself as a mainstream organization that attempts to serve the social, educational and religious needs of American Muslims, the organization has a troubling history of associations with radical organizations and individuals that promote terrorism, anti-Semitism and reject Israel’s right to exist.

 

The organization’s ties to extremism are apparent in several ways:

 

·         MAS leaders have said that the group was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamic extremist movement that originated in Egypt and has spawned and inspired terrorist organizations around the world, including Hamas and Al Qaeda.

 

·         MAS-affiliated Web sites have featured articles advocating jihad and suicide martyrdom.

 

·         The chairman of the Islamic American University, a Michigan-based subsidiary of MAS, is Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, a leading Qatar-based Muslim Brotherhood ideologue known for his support of terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah.

 

·         Current MAS leaders and advisors held positions in the now defunct-Islamic Association for Palestine, described by the U.S. as part of a “propaganda apparatus” for Hamas.

 

·         Abdurahman Alamoudi, a prominent member of MAS and the founding president of the Islamic Society of Boston, is serving a 23 year prison sentence for illegal dealings with Libya and his involvement in a plot to assassinate Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah.

 

(Backgrounder: Muslim American Society; ADL; Updated 1/18/12 READ ENTIRITY)

 

Muslim Student Association (MSA)

 

 

As revealed in documents seized by the FBI and entered as evidence in a Texas court, the Muslim Students Association is a legacy project of the Muslim Brotherhood.[1] The Brotherhood is an organization formed by a Hitler-admiring Muslim named Hasan al-Bannain Egypt in 1928.[2] It was designed to function as the spearpoint of the Islamo-fascist movement and its crusade against the West.

 

 

A formal plan for targeting America was devised three years after the Iranian revolution, in 1982.[6]. The plan was summarized in a 1991 memorandum written by Mohamed Akram, an operative of the Muslim Brotherhood. “The process of settlement” of Muslims in America, Akram explained, “is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process.’” This means that members of the Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”[7]

 

 

The organizations Akram saw as advancing the Islamo-Fascist movement in America included, among many others, the Islamic Society of North America, the North American Islamic Trust, the Islamic Circle of North America, the International Institute for Islamic Thought, and the Islamic Association for Palestine – from which came the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) three years later. But perhaps the most important of these groups in terms of the long term infiltration and conquest the Brotherhood envisioned was The Muslim Students Association (MSA).

 

 

Founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, MSA was named in Mohammed Akram’s 1991 memorandum as one of the Brotherhood’s likeminded “organizations of our friends” who shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were described by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion Islam is made victorious over all other religions.”[13]

 

From its inception, MSA had close links with the extremist Muslim World League, whose chapters’ websites have featured not only Osama bin Laden’s propaganda, but also publicity-recruiting campaigns for Wahhabi involvement with the Chechen insurgents in Russia. According to author and Islam expert Stephen Schwartz, MSA is a key lobbying organization for the Wahhabi sect of Islam.[14] (The Muslim Students Association and the Jihad Network; FrontPageMag.com; 5/8/08 READ ENTIRITY)

 

The Muslim Brotherhood might have its tentacles in the MSA, but it is the Saudi Wahhabis that provides a big chunk of financing.

 

This is only the tip of the iceberg. There is overwhelming evidence that the MSA, far from being a benign student society, is an overtly political organization seeking to create a single Muslim voice on U.S. campuses—a voice espousing Wahhabism, anti-Americanism, and anti-Semitism, agitating aggressively against U.S. Middle East policy, and expressing solidarity with militant Islamist ideologies, sometimes with criminal results.

 

A Saudi Creation

 

On its website, the MSA describes its emergence as spontaneous and disavows any link to foreign governments.[5] In fact, the creation of the MSA resulted from Saudi-backed efforts to found Islamic bodies internationally in the 1960s. Alex Alexiev of the Center for Security Policy states,

 

The Saudis over the years set up a number of large front organizations, such as the World Muslim League, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, the Al Haramain Foundation, and a great number of Islamic “charities.” While invariably claiming that they were private, all of these groups were tightly controlled and financed by the Saudi government and the Wahhabi clergy.[6]

 

In the United States, two leading Saudi-backed organizations were the MSA and the Islamic Society of North America (the MSA’s adult counterpart), both of which received major funding, direction, and influence from Riyadh. (Islamism’s Campus Club: The Muslim Students’ Association; by Jonathan Dowd-Gailey; Middle East Quarterly; Spring 2004, pp. 63-72 READ ENTIRITY)

 

Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)

 

Established in 1981 by the Saudi-funded Muslim Students’ Association of the U.S. and Canada (MSA), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) calls itself the largest Muslim organization on the continent. ISNA was created by MSA with the help of one of Palestinian Islamic Jihad‘s founding students, Sami Al-Arian. Another noteworthy founding member of ISNA was Mahboob Khan.

 

 

ISNA focuses heavily on providing Wahhabi theological indoctrination materials to a large percentage of the mosques in North America. Many of these mosques were recently built with Saudi money and are required, by their Saudi benefactors, to strictly follow the dictates of Wahhabi imams — an edict that affects the tone and content of the sermons given in the mosques, the selection of books and periodicals that may be read in mosque libraries or sold in mosque bookshops, and the policies governing the exclusion or suppression of dissenters from the congregations.

 

Through its affiliate, the North American Islamic Trust — a Saudi government-backed organization created to fund Islamist enterprises in North America — the Saudi-subsidized ISNA reportedly holds the mortgages on 50 to 80 percent of all mosques in the U.S. and Canada. Thus the organization can freely exercise ultimate authority over these houses of worship and their teachings.

 

 

ISNA was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document — titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” — as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.” (ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (ISNA); Discover The Networks; READ ENTIRITY)

 

Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)

 

 

The Center for Security Policy stated that the ICNA has announced a “$3 million dollar” campaign promoting Shariah law in America, featuring billboards in at least 15 U.S. cities, “Shariah seminars” on 20 college campuses, and town hall-style forums and interfaith events in 25 cities. Such information can be found here.

 

The Center for Security went on to say that the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) was founded in 1971 by leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami, an anti-American fundamentalist, Taliban-supporting organization also known as the Pakistani branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The Jamaat’s primary goal is the establishment of Islamic states worldwide, governed by the tyrannical, oppressive system of Shariah law.

 

 

ICNA reveres Ayatollah Khomeini: After 9/11, ICNA’s PR campaign for the “Great Leaders of the last 100 Years” featured Ayatollah Khomeini, leader of the anti-American, violent Shi’ite revolution and totalitarian regime in Iran.  The campaign stayed up at the website for years before ICNA scrubbed it, prior to mounting the current PR campaign promoting Shariah law in America.

 

ICNA reveres Qutb and Mawdudi, the inspiration for al Qaeda: ICNA’s “Great Leaders of the last 100 Years” PR campaign also included the two great ideological leaders of modern jihadist terrorism: Sayyid Abul Ala Mawdudi and Sayyid Qutb, both primary  influences on al Qaeda.

 

ICNA’s role models advocate jihad to achieve political goals: ICNA’s identified “Great Movements of the Last 100 Years” included Al-Ikhwan Al-Muslimeen (Muslim Brotherhood), and Pakistani Islamist groups Jama’at-e-Islami and Tablighi Jama’at. (ICNA’s “Shariah for America” hides extremist beliefs, associations scam alert; by Christopher Collins; Examiner.com; 4/2/12 READ ENTIRITY)

 

North American Islamic Trust (NAIT)

 

The Illinois-based North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) is a waqf –an Islamic trust or endowment — which serves U.S.-based Muslim institutions. A not-for-profit entity that qualifies as a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, NAIT is a financial subsidiary of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). NAIT functions as a safeguard for mosques, Islamic centers, and Islamic schools by holding the mortgages on their facilities, raising funds for them, and offering them limited interest-free loans. The organization currently holds the titles to hundreds of Islamic properties across the United States. …

 

Because NAIT controls the purse strings of these many properties, it can exercise ultimate authority over what they teach and what activities they conduct. Specifically, the organization seeks to ensure that the institutions which fall under its financial influence endorse the principles of Shari’ah (Islamic law) and Wahhabism (an extremist form of Islam).

 

 

NAIT was founded in 1971 by the Muslim Students Association of U.S. & Canada (MSA), which is the parent group of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Both MSA and ISNA function as key lobbying organizations for Wahhabism, and both have close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

 

NAIT was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document — titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” — as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.” (North American Islamic Trust (NAIT); Discover The Networks; READ ENTIRITY)

 

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT (IIIT)

 

 

IIIT was co-founded by Anwar Ibrahim, who strives to present himself to the West as a moderate, but who in fact is an Islamist who promotes global Islamic rule based on Shari’a Law.

 

 

IIIT was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document — titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” — as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

 

 

Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology and terminated his membership in disgust — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them. This plan was an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood’s deceptive “General Strategic Goal for North America.”

Although the term was coined in the early 1990s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11.

 

Controlled by the extremist, Saudi-based Wahhabi movement, IIIT maintains that reports about mosques distributing hate-filled literature are untrue, and claims that the concept of jihad in no way condones or connotes violence. As an IIIT public-relations flyer puts it: “Jihad does not mean ‘holy war.’ Literally, jihad in Arabic means to strive, struggle and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to improve the quality of life in society, struggle in the battlefield for self-defense or fighting against tyranny or oppression.” The back of the flyer contains a list of recommended websites and books on Islam. Among the authors of these books are such apologists for extremism as John Esposito, Karen Armstrong, Hassan Hathout, and Bill Baker.

IIIT has numerous documented links to terrorism. According to court documents, in the early 1990s the organization donated at least $50,000 to a think tank run by Sami al-Arian, the World Islam Study Enterprise, which served as a front group for Palestinian Islamic Jihad.  IIIT is also named as a defendant in two class-action lawsuits brought by victims of the 9/11 attacks.  One alleges that the Institute received the bulk of its operating expenses from the SAAR network, whose component groups are accused in another class-action suit of being “fronts for the sponsor of al Qaeda and international terror.” The same suit lists IIIT and nearly all of its officers as supporters of the SAAR network. 

Moreover, IIIT’s 2003 tax-exempt IRS filing lists a $720 donation to the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation of Ashland, Oregon, which in 2004 was designated by the U.S. government as a terrorist-funding entity guilty of tax fraud, money laundering, supporting Chechen mujahideen affiliated with al Qaeda, and maintaining “direct links between [its] U.S. branch and Usama bin Laden.”

 

 

IIIT is a prominent endorser of the book Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, an authoritative compendium of sharia written by an eminent 14th-century Islamic jurist. By IIIT’s reckoning, the English translation by Umdat al-Salik is “a valuable and important work” that is highly successful in “its aim to imbue the consciousness of the non-Arabic-speaking Muslim with a sound understanding of Sacred Law.” According to Andrew McCarthy, Reliance “denies freedom of conscience, explaining that apostasy from Islam is a death-penalty offense”; contends that “a Muslim apostatizes not only by clearly renouncing Islam but by doing so implicitly — such as by deviating from the ‘consensus of Muslims,’ or making statements that could be taken as insolence toward Allah or the prophet Mohammed”; “approves a legal caste system in which the rights and privileges of Muslims and men are superior to those of non-Muslims and women”; “penalizes extramarital fornication by stoning or scourging”; endorses the death penalty for homosexuals and for people who make interest-bearing loans; venerates jihad; and exhorts Muslims “to strive to establish an Islamic government, ruled by a caliph.” (INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT (IIIT); Discover The Networks; READ ENTIRITY)

 

Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC)

 

 

n 1986, MPAC was formed as a political action arm of one of the largest Wahhabi mosques in America, the Islamic Center for Southern California.

As the Center for Security Policy’s Team B II report entitled “Sharia: The Threat to America” notes, “The founders of the Islamic Center for Southern California are Hassan Hathout and his brother Maher Hathout. The late Hassan Hathout was a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement. The two brothers Maher spent time in an Egyptian prison during the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities there, led by the Brotherhood’s founder Hassan Al Banna.  MPAC’s own publication, The Minaret, has proudly called Hassan a ‘companion of’ and Maher ‘a close disciple of’ Brotherhood founder Hassan al Banna.”

Maher Hathout also founded and is currently a senior advisor for MPAC.  He and others at MPAC also currently work for and maintain a close relationship with the Islamic Center of Southern California.

Hathout was also on the board of directors and a member of the American Muslim Council (AMC) from 1993 to 1997. AMC was founded by the al Qaeda financier and Hamas operative Abdurahman Alamoudi who is currently serving 23 years in prison for funding terrorist groups including al Qaeda. (Muslim Brotherhood Front Group Trains Airport Screeners; by Connie Hair; Human Events; 12/6/10 READ ENTIRITY)

 

The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) has a detailed PDF document on MPAC that is 81 pages. The IPT report is a tale of a close associate of MB founder Hassan al Banna coming to America and became the main thrust of what was become MPAC. MPAC has become a disseminator of hate speech against Jews and Americans as well as a supporter of Islamic terrorist organizations abroad. The report is entitled, “Behind the Façade: The Muslim Public Affairs Council.”

 

As I said this is not an exhaustive list of Purist/Radical Islamic organizations in America. These are simply the ones I am most familiar with. One thing you should understand is that nearly all these groups pass themselves off as Modern Muslim groups rather than radical. Some of these organizations have been very active in an advisory role in the Federal government ranging from the FBI, State Department and even as high as the White House. Regardless of their purported public view of moderation in Muslim Civil Rights or bridging an understanding between Islam and non-Muslim Americans, these front groups receive a good deal of financial or ideological support from either the Muslim Brotherhood or Wahhabi interests within Saudi Arabia (the Saudi government and Saudi private citizen). The goal of these groups is to subvert the traditions of American Liberty and replace those traditions with Islamic Sharia Law.

 

Please do not go out and be a hater if you agree with the tone of this post. Most Muslims in America are clueless about the intentions of the organizations that purport to be in existence for American Muslims. Nonetheless, the constant propaganda disseminated by the Purist/Radical Muslims ever increases adherents to that theo-political ideology of Islamic Supremacism.

 

JRH 4/23/12

Asian-Pacific Geopolitics: China, Japan and USA


China Critical Sea Lanes

 

John R. Houk

© September 29, 2011

 

There are three (maybe four if one looks at Australia) big players in Asia-Pacific geopolitics: China, Japan and USA. China and Japan are Asian and the USA is the North America Super Power that has a big stake in Asian-Pacific geopolitics.

 

The decade long Global War on Terror (GWOT) has somewhat obscured the reality that China is a Communist dictatorship that has had an ongoing successful upgrade on their economy and military. China’s upgrading of its geopolitical status in a strong economy and a modernization of its military has shown China is willing to be more and more confrontational with its neighbors.

 

In my opinion China’s geopolitical growth has made Japan (the old WWII nemesis) important to American National Interests. Japan still has a strong economy although some believe a diminishing economy. Japan has a modern military yet its military is greatly tied to the WWII victor’s in the USA.

 

I personally have focused on the geopolitics of a militant Islam that threatens Western culture and have little knowledge of the specifics of Asian-Pacific geopolitics. Every once in a while I run across an article should alert me and you about a Chinese geopolitical agenda. One such article I found at AEI by Michael Auslin entitled “The Bleak Future of Sino-Japanese Relations”.

 

The Auslin title suggests that “Sino-Japanese” relations will remain strained; however Auslin planted some seeds that imply there are those in the Japanese government and military that may see things through different lenses. That implication suggests a slight moving away from American influence because China and Japan have mutual economic-natural resource needs that when withheld from each causes a prick in each of their sides. (If I am pricked, do I not bleed?)

 

The question for America has to be: How much can America trust Japan as an ally in the future as Japanese National Interests might gravitate toward a closer symbiotic relationship with China? Does America need to encourage Japan to focus more on their military defense needs rather than American power making up the military defense difference for Japanese security? If a self-militarizing Japan occurs that could act as a military competitor with China, allow America to view Japan as an effective counter-measure to China’s modernizing military? If Japan effectively modernizes into a more than competent geopolitical military power, might that militarization lead Japan down the path of asserting their National Interests in the Pacific viewing America as more of a global competitor and less of a friendly ally?

 

In other words are the unknown variables of militarizing Japan as a buffer to China in the future a good or bad thing?

 

JRH 9/29/11