Islam is Dangerous to America

Frank Gaffney

Clare Lopez - CSP VP









John R. Houk

© April 15, 2016


I found an email in my inbox promoting a new book written by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Clare Lopez of the Center for Security Policy (CSP) entitled “See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Line of Defense”.


The email breaks down the book to how Radical Islam has been creeping into America due to government policies that are designed to show favoritism to all Islam. And when I say “all Islam” I am saying government policies are looking at Islam as peaceful in general hence believing the lies that Radical Muslims are advocates of Moderate Islam.


This gullibility by the U.S. government was actually began by one of my hero Presidents in G.W. Bush. After the 9/11 attack on American soil by al Qaeda Bush accurately described the act brutality as the work of Islamofascists and that we will find and bring down those who were responsible. Thus began our invasion of al Qaeda’s protectors the Taliban then ruling Afghanistan.


American Patriotism made many Americans angry. Many Americans joined the U.S. Military to do their part in a war effort against Islamofascism. Other Americans had no intention of serving militarily but were still incensed. Angry Americans have a tendency to operate in spontaneous acts of vengeance against people perceived as Muslims.


Thus many Americans and resident aliens that had a Middle Eastern look about them were treated as Islamofascists rather they were non-violent Muslims or Muslim look-alikes such as Sikhs who as a part of their faith wear turbans.


So very soon after President Bush’s hunt-the-Islamofascists down promise, Bush went public with the meme that not all Muslims are Islamofascists to head off the American emerging revenge mindset against all people appearing to be Muslim. President Bush went public with the semi-falsehood that “Islam is peace” statement implying that good Muslims are Moderates in their faith of a true Islam.


Let’s be truthful. A majority of Muslims that are religious indeed believe that Islam is peace because that is what they are told by their religious leaders (Clerics, Mullahs or whatever). Shoot even Radical Muslims believe Islam is peace at least between Muslims that follow Sharia Law.


The reality is that if you read the Quran, Hadith and Sira through unfiltered lenses will see that Islam is violent theopolitical religion against those that refuse to believe in Islam and even against Muslims if they don’t follow the rules of Sharia or the writs of their revered writings.


It is my opinion unwittingly promoted the Islam is peace meme to prevent violent chaos against peaceful people. However, it is also my opinion that President Barack Hussein Obama took this peace meme to the next level that has welcomed Radical Muslims into sensitive jobs in the U.S. government. With most of these Radical Muslims sympathetic or even in collusion with the Radical Islamic paradigm of a global Caliphate.


This is where Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Clare Lopez come into the picture exposing Islamic infiltration into America and offering a scenario to defeat Islamic terrorism. I have not read this book myself yet, but I do intend to pick a copy up. Below is the email promoting the book “See No Sharia”.


JRH 4/15/16

Please Support NCCR


BOOK RELEASE: SEE NO SHARIA: How Our First Lines of Defense Have Been Disarmed

See No Sharia book jacket

Sent by Adam Savit |

Sent: April 14, 2016 1:52 PM

Sent from: Secure Freedom – (CSP link to email)


(Washington, D.C.): For much of the past fifteen years, the United States government has failed to understand, let alone decisively defeat, the enemy that, under the banner of its al Qaeda franchise, murderously attacked our country on September 11, 2001.  The reason why that has been so – notwithstanding the bravery and skill of our men and women in uniform and the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars – has been unclear to most Americans, including some in government.  Until now.


With the publication by the Center for Security Policy of a new book by two of its leaders, President Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Vice President Clare Lopez, See No Sharia: “Countering Violent Extremism” and the Disarming of America’s First Lines of Defense, the case has been forcefully made that this sorry state of affairs is a product of a sustained and highly successful influence operation by Islamic supremacists. Under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Islamists in general and the Muslim Brotherhood in particular have gained access to and considerable sway over policymakers in the White House, the FBI and the Departments of State, Justice, Defense and Homeland Security.


[Blog Editor: The email at this point has a photo of Frank Gaffney with a link to a Youtube video associated to the photo. In place of the photo here I am posting the Youtube video.]


VIDEO: See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Line of Defense



Posted by securefreedom

Published on Apr 14, 2016


For more information visit:


See No Sharia describes the trajectory that has flowed from such penetration and subversion.  It traces how fact-based counterterrorism and law enforcement have inexorably been supplanted by an approach defined by accommodations demanded by Islamists – purged lexicons and training programs, limitations on surveillance, case-making and rules of engagement and above all, eschewing anything that gives “offense” to Muslims.


In addition to showing the perils associated with such policies and practices as America faces the growing threat of global jihad and its animating doctrine of sharia, this book provides specific recommendations as to how to restore our first lines of defense – the FBI and other law enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, the military and the intelligence community – whose effective service is needed today more than ever.


Frank Gaffney noted,


“Americans expect government officials to fulfill their oaths of office by protecting the Constitution, the Republic it established and its people from all enemies, foreign and domestic.  The vast majority of our public servants yearn to do their duty. Yet, as See No Sharia makes plain, for at least a decade and a half, they have been obliged to conform to policies that greatly diminish their chances for success.  We simply cannot afford to disarm those in our first lines of defense against Islamic supremacism and its jihad – both the violent kind and the stealthy sort the Muslim Brotherhood calls ‘civilization jihad.’”


Clare Lopez added,


“As a career intelligence professional, the extent to which our policymaking apparatus has been penetrated and subverted by Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist operatives is deeply problematic.  This book is meant to expose their handiwork – and to impel the urgently needed and long-overdue policy course-correction.”


The Center for Security Policy/Secure Freedom is proud to present this monograph as a superb addition to its Civilization Jihad Reader Series.  “The Gulen Movement: Turkey’s Islamic Supremacist Cult and Its Contribution to Civilization Jihad in America” is available for purchase in kindle and paperback format on


Click here for a full PDF of the newly released monograph.


Islam is Dangerous

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2016


BOOK RELEASE: SEE NO SHARIA: How Our First Lines of Defense Have Been Disarmed


About The Center for Security Policy


The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public. For more information visit


Donate to CSP

Is the hen safe when the fox guards the henhouse? Part 1

Paul Sutliff begins the examination of infiltration into the U.S. government by Muslim purists.
JRH 4/9/15

Please Support NCCR

Is the hen safe when the fox guards the henhouse? Part 1
 Fox Guarding Hen House
By Paul Sutliff
April 8, 2015 8:31 AM
What happens when the fox guards the hen house?
When a fox guards the hen house, hens disappear and become tasty meals not all at once, but one or two at a time. The protector plays at guarding while making snacks out of the items he is supposed to watch over. Is such a thing happening in the United States?

Flashback to 1991. Members of Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) in the US and Canada publish amongst themselves “The Explanatory Memorandum of the North America.” This document went unnoticed until 2003 when a search warrant was served and a hidden sub-basement was found with 90 bankers’ boxes of documents of which this is one. In one paragraph the term “Civilization Jihad” is mentioned as the mission of the Muslim people in the United States. Specifically, it refers to “destroying them (the North American governments) by then and their own hand”: This speaks to deliberate infiltration of governmental structures with the purpose of bringing about destruction. Is this happening?

According to Admiral James A. Lyons, a former Commander of the Pacific Fleet the infiltration of our federal government is extensive! This is not some crackpot. He was the man our Presidents called on to get the job done.

This man is retired. Yet he was one of those who had Security Clearances to receive Top Secret classified materials. He probably still has active connections within the military and may be still utilized as a consultant for his vast knowledge.

What can the average man look for that would be indicators of infiltration that we could observe? Are there things that just stand out and say “LOOK HERE ANTI-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES” being carried out by government personnel?

I propose that are at least 10 things we can look for as average citizens and judge for ourselves if our safety is at risk because we have been infiltrated.

1.       If we are watching for Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of our government you would expect to see an inordinate reflection of the population in high government roles. For example if the US population of Muslims was 3% you would not expect to find 25% of high governmental positions are filled by Muslims.
2.      Obfuscation of historical facts would be utilized to paint a pretty picture of the Muslim Brotherhood which has a violent history. The more popular terms here is propaganda would be used to recreate the Muslim Brotherhood into an imaginary non-violent hippie type group.
3.      Compliance with Muslim Brotherhood front group demands is something you would expect of persons affiliated with Muslim Brotherhood members. Not something you would expect of the federal government.
4.     Questionable priorities would be apparent. This would be a shift away from making protecting America a priority. Possible evidence may indicate a shift to use weapons and intelligence against our young men and women in uniform.
5.      Questionable Alliances would be formed with known Muslim Brotherhood front groups.
6.     Guests of those who infiltrated would likely be affiliated or known to be associated with the Ikhwan in some manner. Visitation logs and guest monitoring should be able to reveal a change of mannerisms towards Islamist persons from less favorable to very friendly.
7.      Attempts would be made to place Islamists in positions that would disable the system from pointing the finger at the ones infiltrating. The best terminology here is non-acceptance of accurate intelligence.
8.     Replacements would be created for accessing information not normally available to the average person when positions become available. Excuses for replacing the natural next person in line for the position would be given.
9.     Occasional slips of truth may leak out revealing the true nature of the person(s) who had entered for the purpose of subverting or damaging the government.
10.  Promotion and acceptance of previously unacceptable behaviors. True leaders inspire other to follow. Those who infiltrate would likely choose to use others rather than inspire. There would be a lack of vision because the opposite of buildup is tear down.
Have we seen evidence of any of these 10 symptoms of infiltration? These are things that an average person would expect to see as evidence if our government has been infiltrated. Watch for more of this series, Are We Safe: Parts 2 to 4, to see what evidence does exist that questions if we truly are safe.
Educator who pushes truth and rightness even when it is unpopular!
I am writer and a teacher. You can find my books on Amazon portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad!
Edited by John R. Houk

National Security Vetting of Potential Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration

Islam Infiltrates USA

John R. Houk

© August 9, 2012


I believe infiltration by Radical Islamic believing Muslims has been a problem for our government stretching back incredibly to the Bush Administration. I also believe the Obama Administration has exacerbated the proliferation of Radical Muslims in the Executive either overtly or foolishly because of his upbringing in his days with a step-father in Indonesia.


I have made numerous posts relating Huma Abedin because of the heat Democrats and remarkably from Establishment Republicans blown Rep. Michele Bachmann’s way for bringing this potential infiltration to the fore.


§  Bachmann-Ellison Wars over the Muslim Brotherhood


§  Support Members of Congress Calling for Muslim Brotherhood Investigation


§  Huma Abedin’s Mother exposed by CSP


§  America’s ‘Iron Lady’


§  Foreign influence – Muslim Brotherhood and our leadership


§  Keep Examining Huma Abedin




Thanks largely to Obama making hypocritical accusations about Romney’s tax returns while ignoring documents and records he has had sealed by paying millions of dollars in legal fees to his lawyers, some of furor of Muslim Brotherhood connections within the U.S. government has subsided a bit.


I intend to keep posting on Muslim Brotherhood fifth column infiltration to do my part in keeping in this in the public mind. Thus below is an email from Mathew Staver of Liberty Counsel Action about Huma Abedin’s associations to the Muslim Brotherhood and how this could affect National Security even if Huma is an American patriot (which I find doubtful because it is my opinion that Left Wing Democrats believe in tearing down America to recreate the dream of a Leftist Collective Utopia).


JRH 8/9/12

Please Support NCCR


Islamic infiltration: How widespread is it in our nation?


Mathew Staver, Chairman

Liberty Counsel Action

Sent: August 7, 2012 2:40 PM


Without question, Michele Bachmann and her congressional associates nicknamed the “National Security Five,” have stirred up a hornet’s nest, exposing potential radical Muslim infiltration and influence in strategic positions within our federal government. 


On the list of government officials with highly questionable connections is a woman named Huma Abedin – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff.  Liberty Counsel Action supports investigation of anyone suspected of subversive activity against our nation, no matter who it implicates!  Please see my crucially important message below – Mat.


Huma Abedin, the longtime aid to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and wife of disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner, has come under scrutiny as being directly connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamic group.


Three of Abedin’s family members—her late father, her mother, and her brother, are well-documented Muslim Brotherhood collaborators, if not functionaries.


Liberty Counsel Action’s friend and ally on Capitol Hill, Frank Gaffney, President of the Center for Security Policy, recently wrote…


“A book published and translated by the mother of Obama administration State Department Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin provides fresh evidence that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s closest aide has deeply problematic foreign associations that could, in violation of departmental guidelines, ‘create… a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, inducement, manipulation, pressure, or coercion.’”  


++The cry for action deserves LCA’s full support!


Today, even as I write this urgent message, Frank Gaffney and the Center for Security Policy is hosting a key press conference at the National Press Club presenting new information on the Muslim Brotherhood operations inside the Obama administration.


This important presentation includes new revelations about Huma Abedin’s role in the Brotherhood’s infiltration of the highest levels of executive leadership in our federal government.


Frank Gaffney and other key Liberty Counsel Action contacts are telling us that the Abedin investigation is just the tip of the iceberg!  There is already a great deal of evidence that Abedin was NOT properly vetted for her key position in the State Department.  Such breakdowns in security MUST be exposed!


No formal charges have been brought forward by Representative Bachmann and her colleagues among the National Security Five, although they are demanding the specifics of Huma Abedin’s security clearance. 


Liberty Counsel Action expressly supports the National Security Five – Representatives Michele Bachmann (MN) Louie Gohmert (TX), Trent Franks (AZ), Lynn Montgomery (GA) and Tom Rooney (FL) in their efforts.


Obtaining an improperly vetted security clearance is one of the many ways any radical Muslim could gain access to sensitive information involving national security – or to potentially influence our government’s foreign and domestic policy decisions. 


++The National Security Five are daring to expose the reality of what is happening within our government!


These five Members of Congress are calling on our Inspectors General to begin internal government investigations into the involvement and influence of organizations and individuals tied to known Islamic extremist groups. 


That’s why we are now petitioning key Members of Congress to get behind the call for these investigations – and expose any subversive activities by individuals or entities operating in positions of influence over the foreign and domestic policies of our nation!    


We are calling on friends of LCA for at least 100,000 signatures on our petition – which will be initially delivered to Members of Congress as soon as the first 50,000 signer mark is reached. 


We hope to make this happen very quickly as time is of the essence!  Please click here to read and sign our petition of support:


++There is a “real and present danger.”


The Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated many federal government agencies, universities, and other taxpayer funded schools – and they have powerful friends in the media and in Congress.


For instance, President Obama has invited Brotherhood leaders to the White House and has endorsed their violent takeover in Egypt.


The Muslim Brotherhood is associated with the world’s foremost terrorist groups and other organizations that promote Islamic supremacy in the United States, including:


Hamas …The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)…The Islamic Society of North America …The North American Islamic Trust…CAIR…The Muslim Public Affairs Council…The Muslim American Society…and other radical groups.


The Muslim Brotherhood has greatly impacted the overthrow and subsequent power grabs in Libya, Egypt, and other Middle Eastern countries. They are poised to do the same in Syria. They are tightly aligned with terrorist organizations Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).


The Muslim brotherhood’s stated goal is to wipe out America, the “Big Satan,” – and Israel, the “Little Satan.”


Their chief strategy for conquest, called “civilization jihad,” consists of infiltrating governments and affecting their foreign and domestic policies; introducing Sharia into the nation’s laws; silencing Christian churches and other non-Islamic sects; and permeating the victim society with their own oppressive religion and culture.


++We must endorse a thorough congressional investigation, demanding support from our elected officials!


But, sadly, Congress will only act if you and I and others DEMAND it with an outpouring of citizen action.


Liberty Counsel Action’s powerful petition to Speaker of the House John Boehner and other key Members of Congress calls for support for an immediate widespread investigation into this radical Islamic group and its activities in America. 


Please take a moment and add your name to this important petition:


++In order to fight terror, we must understand and confront the enemy within!   


Our government MUST be purged of the radical influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and other jihadist Islamic organizations!  Supporting the call for investigations by our Inspectors General is only the beginning! 


Please click here to sign our powerful petition of support:


Thank you for taking immediate action on this critical issue. We will keep you informed of new developments on this issue as they arise!


God bless you,

Mathew Staver, Chairman

Liberty Counsel Action


P.S. I believe we are just beginning to see the extent to which our federal government has been infiltrated by radical Islamic extremists.


This is clearly among the most important petitions we have yet brought to you for action – PLEASE sign right away and let the National Security Five know you support their courageous efforts!


National Security Vetting of Potential Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration

John R. Houk

© August 9, 2012


Islamic infiltration: How widespread is it in our nation?


+ + Comments? Questions?


Liberty Counsel Action is a 501(c)4 organization. Gifts are not tax deductible. For full notice including notices for individual states, go here.

Huma Abedin’s Mother exposed by CSP

Hillary Clinton & Saleha S. Mahmood Abedin

John R. Houk

© July 22, 2012


The Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) – sometimes recognized as the lamestream media – in collusion with Muslim apologists have attacked Rep. Michele Bachmann and four other Congressmen have been attacked as bigoted Islamophobes for demanding an investigation to Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the U.S. government.


Although I don’t have an irrational fear of Muslims as connoted by the epithet of Islamophobe, I like to think I wear the Islamophobe badge proudly. Islamophobia could better be defined as a rational caution relating to the agenda of Radical Islam to force an international Caliphate on the world that if they are sane will have nothing to do with the anti-Liberty principles inherent within Sharia Law.


As such Radical Islamic proponents view that there are two enemies to be destroyed; i.e. the little Satan Israel and the great Satan America.


Now that Egyptian voters have elected a Muslim Brotherhood (MB) candidate to be President of Egypt, the MB is now or should be recognized as a transnational organization that government National Security interests should be focusing on. Somewhat in the same way (hopefully) there is a National Security watch on Iran.


The MB is big on the concept that the USA is the big Satan that must be destroyed by infiltrating America to create the environment that will allow Islam to overcome the U.S. Constitution. You Need to READ:


§  The Muslim Brotherhood “Project”


§  The Muslim Brotherhood “Project” (Continued) – “The Project” Translated


§  MB General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America (The English Translation after the original Arabic)


So when U.S. Congressmen recognize there are individuals with ties to the MB or an MB affiliate in the U.S. government and desire an investigation then that is NOT bigotry! Rather an investigation is awareness that something is afoot that endangers the U.S. Constitution of which every government employee up to and including the Office of President of the United States is sworn to uphold. If there are people in government that have sworn to uphold the Constitution OR at the very least work in a government Office sworn to uphold the Constitution yet desire the Constitution’s demise, then those people need to be excised from government responsibility at the very least. If there is an “at most” a criminal investigation must occur to discover if our nation has been harmed internally.


I am glad that the Center for Security Policy (CSP) has put together an exposé of Huma Abedin’s mother Saleha S. Mahmood Abedin. Huma Abedin is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s close aide. That means she has access to Classified materials that her MB mother might be interested in acquiring. That would not be good for America. Below is the CSP email sent to highlight a free PDF document entitled “Ties that Bind? THE VIEWS AND AGENDA OF HUMA ABEDIN’ S IS LAMI S T MOTHER”.  


JRH 7/22/12

Please Support NCCR


Center Report Reveals Radical Islamist Agenda of Senior State Department Official Huma Abedin’s Mother


Sent by Center for Security Policy

Sent: Jul 22, 2012 at 11:33 AM




For more information and to schedule an interview, contact

David Reaboi (202) 431-1948


WASHINGTON, D.C.:  A book published and translated by the mother of Obama administration State Department Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin provides fresh evidence that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s closest aide has deeply problematic foreign associations that could, in violation of departmental guidelines, “create… a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, inducement, manipulation, pressure, or coercion.”


In light of the escalating controversy over the role being played in U.S. security policy-making by Ms. Abedin and others with personal and/or professional ties to the Muslim Brotherhood (see Part 8 of the Center for Security Policy’s online curriculum at, the revelations contained in a new Center report– Ties That Bind? The Views and Agenda of Huma Abedin’s Islamist Mother— could not be more timely, or important.


The Center’s report excerpts and analyzes relevant passages from a book published and translated by Saleha S. Mahmood Abedin called Women in Islam: A Discourse in Rights and Obligations by Fatima Umar Naseef. Naseef is a past head of the “women’s section” and professor of shariah at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, where Dr. Abedin is also on the faculty.  The book was published in 1999, the same year Dr. Abedin founded Dar Al Hekma, a university for women also in Jeddah, that Secretary Clinton visited and spoke admiringly of with Huma Abedin in February 2010.  [See Remarks on that occasion by Mrs. Clinton, including her comment that Huma holds a “very sensitive and important position” in her department, and those by her hosts.]


Excerpts from Women in Islam in Ties That Bind? The Views and Agenda of Huma Abedin’s Islamist Mother include Islamic shariah justifications for the following:


§  Stoning for Adultery when Married; Lashing for Adultery when Unmarried


§  No Death Penalty for the Murder of an Apostate


§  Freedom of Expression Curtailed to What Benefits Islam


§  Women’s Right to Participate in Armed Jihad


§  Social Interaction Between the Sexes is Forbidden


§  Women Have No Right to Abstain from Sex with their Husbands


§  A Woman Should Not Let Anyone Into the House Unless Approved by Her Husband


§  Female Genital Mutilation is Allowed


§  Man-Made Laws “Enslave Women”


The organization responsible for the publication of Women in Islam was the International Islamic Committee for Woman & Child (IICWC), chaired at the time by Dr. Abedin.  IICWC misleadingly describes itself as “an international organization of concerned women who are committed to improving the condition of women and children around the world.”  In fact, like the Muslim Brotherhood, the Muslim World League (MWL) and other Islamist organizations with which it is associated, the IICWC is committed to eviscerating the rights of women and children by imposing everywhere shariah, a code that denies them fundamental – and, in the United States, constitutional – liberties.


Specifically, the book published by Dr. Abedin wholeheartedly affirms: limits on women’s free expression; the permissibility of stoning as a punishment for adultery, killing of apostates and female genital mutilation; the contention that “man-made laws” enslave women; and more.  It also endorses women’s right to fight in armed jihad.  Women in Islam is available online and sold at the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs, an Islamist organization co-founded by Huma Abedin’s mother and her late father, Dr. Syed Zainul Abedin.


On July 21, former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy posted an essay at National Review Online that should be required reading for everyone commenting on the request by five Members of Congress led by Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota for Inspector General investigations of Muslim Brotherhood influence operations within the U.S. government.  In it, he observed that the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs “was backed by the Muslim World League. As the Hudson Institute’s Zeyno Baran relates, the MWL was started by the Saudi government in 1962 ‘with Brotherhood members in key leadership positions.’ It has served as the principal vehicle for the propagation of Islamic supremacism by the Saudis and the Brotherhood.”


Mr. McCarthy notes that:


The five House conservatives… are asking questions that adults responsible for national security should feel obliged to ask: In light of Ms. Abedin’s family history, is she someone who ought to have a security clearance, particularly one that would give her access to top-secret information about the Brotherhood? Is she, furthermore, someone who may be sympathetic to aspects of the Brotherhood’s agenda, such that Americans ought to be concerned that she is helping shape American foreign policy?


Andrew McCarthy, who successfully prosecuted the Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdul Rahman – a convicted terrorist and clerical inspiration for jihadists worldwide, whose release from federal prison at the insistence of Muslim Brother and Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi has been the subject of discussions within and enabled by Mrs. Clinton’s State Department – goes on to observe that:


The State Department is particularly wary when it comes to the category of ‘foreign influence‘ – yes, it is a significant enough concern to warrant its own extensive category in background investigations. No criminal behavior need be shown to deny a security clearance; access to classified information is not a right, and reasonable fear of “divided loyalties” is more than sufficient for a clearance to be denied. The [Department’s own security] guidelines probe ties to foreign countries and organizations because hostile elements could “target United States citizens to obtain protected information” or could be “associated with a risk of terrorism.” Note: The Brotherhood checks both these boxes.


Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., President of the Center for Security Policy, said upon the release of the Center’s new report, Ties That Bind? The Views and Agenda of Huma Abedin’s Islamist Mother:


In the interest of informing the debate about the need to investigate Huma Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and its agenda, and those of others shaping policy in the Obama administration, the Center for Security Policy offers in Ties That Bind? further cause for such an investigation.  That includes, for instance, evidence of Dr. Saleha Abedin’s personal involvement with the International Islamic Committee on Woman and Child’s affiliated organization, the International Islamic Council for Da’wah and Relief (IICDR). The IICDR was banned in Israel in 2008 for its collaboration with Muslim Brotherhood cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s Union for Good in the funding of the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist organization, Hamas. In the United States, the Union for Good was designated a terrorist entity in late 2008.


This further documentation of Dr. Abedin’s positions on shariah law, her leadership of the IICWC and its affiliation with a designated terrorist entity such as the IICDR makes plain that a thorough investigation is fully justified regarding her daughter’s access to classified information and policy-influencing role.  In particular, in connection with the latter, Ties That Bind powerfully reinforces the Center’s earlier warning that the IICWC is currently advocating for the repeal of Egypt’s Mubarak-era prohibitions on female genital mutilation, child marriage, and marital rape, on the grounds that such prohibitions run counter to shariah. Americans want no part of such an agenda. They should they have no reason for concern that senior officials in their government are stealthily encouraging it.




Huma Abedin’s Mother exposed by CSP

John R. Houk

© July 22, 2012


Center Report Reveals Radical Islamist Agenda of Senior State Department Official Huma Abedin’s Mother


About the Center for Security Policy


The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public.

‘Civilization jihad’ and Obama’s connections

MB - USA Seals[4]

Yes I am on the WND email list that notifies of articles and opinions. I was hooked by a WND email that point to an article that was supposed to talk about six Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers that are member of the Obama Administration and operate as infiltrating members of government promoting Sharia Law in America. The article is awesome because it is basically an advertisement for a Muslim Brotherhood exposé from the Center for Security Policy headed by Frank Gaffney, Jr.; however the article fails to actually name the six infiltrators that hooked me to read the article.


That was a bit disappointing so I Googled something similar to the WND hook. I found an article that names MB infiltrators in the U.S. government especially in the case of the Obama Administration. I don’t know if any of the listed in the article I found is the same as the six infiltrators intended in the WND hook. I am going to cross post that article but if you can’t wait you can read it HERE. (Actually as I was researching I realized WND has been exposing a Fifth Column in the USA for some time. God bless WND. Here is an article from the Archive.) In the mean time below is the WND article about viewing for FREE a ten part course on the Muslim Brotherhood in America.


JRH 4/29/12

Please Support NCCR


Muslim Fifth Column in U.S. Government Exposé

MB - USA Seals


WorldNetDaily sent a link to an article that demonstrates the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) has infiltrated the U.S. government on a greater scale than most comprehend. MB infiltration has gone on through a number of Presidential Administrations; however high level placement of MB associated or openly MB sympathetic Muslims has taken place under the Obama Administration.


Now why in the world would President Obama be so in tank with radical Muslim ideology attending a Christian Denomination that has a penchant Progressive Christianity and the Marxism of Black Liberation Theology (BLT)?


Here are some guesses:


1.   BHO was raised among Muslims until his Grandparents began to raise him in Hawaii.


2.   BHO attended a Church heavily involved in the racist-Marxist teachings of BLT.


3.   BHO apparently had Black Superiority drilled into thought patterns along with Progressive Christianity which meant Biblical spirituality is a Whitey invention.


4.   BHO has no affinity for Biblical Christianity thus desires a societal transformation along Socialistic/Marxist terms that must attack Biblical Christianity in order to emphasize the transformation.


5.   BHO’s Progressive-BLT Christianity allows for pushing Islam and its Sharia Law to denigrate Biblical Christianity. One can perhaps see BHO thinking with his association to Louis Farrakhan of Nation Islam.


I would describe BHO as a Progressive Christian steeped heavily in Secular Humanism. BHO was under the tutelage Rev. Jeremiah Wright for a couple of decades. Rev. Wright is a Black racist at worst and a Black Supremacist at best. Although BHO would deny being influenced by negative aspects of Wright because of political correctness, I have no doubts the President harbors his mentor Wright’s world view.


BHO’s apparent reckless regard for the Muslim Brotherhood goes a long way to explain why some cities in America force their employees including the police to attend a Mosque in the name of multicultural diversity training. This practice seriously violates the First Amendment by forcing an individual to attend a religious service that is contrary to his belief system. In the case of Tulsa Police Department Officer Paul Fields, he was ordered to attend a police appreciation day at the radical Mosque Islamic Society of Tulsa. Fields refused to attend and TPD police Chief Chuck Jordan demoted and suspended Fields without pay.


When one finally apprehends the realization Islam has nothing in common with the American way of life, which began to develop with the experimentation of the Revolutionary War and the approval of the U.S. Constitution including the first ten Amendments, then one will realize Islamic authoritarianism and Islamic dualistic ethics cannot work in America.


Is WND reporting on MB infiltration based on own investigations? Not this time. WND is reporting the words of former FBI John Guandolo (Read about Guandolo at this SEG about page) and what WND calls a Muslim reformer named Tarek Fatah.


JRH 8/28/11