Grassroots Boneta Reverses Obama’s Cursed Transformation


Patrick Henry speech 2

John R. Houk

© November 8, 2014

 

Leftists, Dems and even some Republicans that I have to assume that are in the RINO category have been shouting down critics of the UN Agenda 21 as a fringe part of the Ring Wing Conspiracy Theorists. If you haven’t leaned yet let me say that when a Leftist or Dem Party Leftist goes out of the way to paint a picture of lunacy to an accusation from a Conservative there is probably more validity than lunacy.

 

I mean a majority of voters have demonstrated they have caught onto Dem lies on the November 4 elections when they threw the bums out of the control of both Houses of Congress. The Dem’s liar-in-chief Obama has painted a picture of ‘I didn’t do it’ for six years with the American Press backing up his lies. Just look at some of the more prominent scandals which are essentially just lying cover-ups hidden under the power and thumb of Presidential authority. Actually Obama’s lies and deception seems to be a lifetime component – For Example:

 

·         THIS IS BARACK OBAMA: ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW, IN ONE PLACE (DTN)

 

·         Official Obama Administration Scandals List! (ConservativeAmerican.org 10/15/08)

 

·         The NEW Obama Scandals List! (ConservativeAmerican.org 12/10/13)

 

Voters that truly love America have their own priority of Obama scandals that just should be impeachable or – my God – at least be investigated to discover just how heinous that scandal is without Executive Privilege used as an excuse to cover-up crimes against the law. The scandals that bother me the most are the ones actually aimed against voters to deceive or impugn for political reasons:

 

1. Benghazigate: It was bad enough that there was zero attempt to send help before four Americans died as the hands of Islamic terrorism, but the Administration tried to spin the debacle as it was the fault of a foreign national creating a poorly acted trailer of a movie portraying Mohammed in a negative light even though bad acting made the true story look ludicrous. That was an outright freaking LIE to get reelected in 2012. CAN YOU SAY WATERGATE TRADITION?

 

VIDEO: Benghazi Scandal – Obama’s Paid Liar – New Documents Revealed – Hannity

 

2. IRS Scandal: The IRS acted as a Secret Police-like arm of Obama Administration to silence the voice of Conservative organizations like the Tea Party in hope of keeping Conservative truth from American voters. ANOTHER WATERGATE TRADITION!

 

3. Veteran Affairs Scandal:

 

Beginning in April 2014 and continuing for a number of weeks thereafter, an ever-growing amount of information was learned about a massive scandal that quietly had been infecting the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for several years. Initially it was reported that VA patients were being forced to wait for inordinately long periods of time before they were permitted to see a doctor and get medical treatment — particularly at one VA hospital in Phoenix, Ariziona (sic). To be seen by a primary care provider, for example, generally required a 115-day wait. These long wait times sometimes resulted in dire health consequences for the patients: According to CNN, as many as 40 veterans had died while on wait lists at the Phoenix hospital. READ THE REST (VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) SCANDAL OF 2014; DTN)

 

As if the VA isn’t nefarious enough on its own, it is currently been uncovered White House officials under Obama’s watch directly ordered a VA cover-up so that no political fallout comes to the liar-in-chief’s doorstep:

 

Almost two months ago, a whistleblower from inside the Department of Veteran Affairs claimed that the Inspector General watered down the final report in the VA’s wait-list scandal to minimize the political damage. IG Richard Griffin denied that he had been pressured to adjust his findings, which the Arizona Republic found used a nearly impossible standard for responsibility to get the VA off the hook for hundreds of fraud-related deaths.  On Friday, though, the House Committee on Veteran Affairs published e-mails that clearly show the White House demanding those changes to the final report: READ THE REST (Emails show White House “requested” IG to change VA scandal report; By ED MORRISSEY; Hot Air; 11/3/14 1:01 PM)

 

Trust me the three scandals I just mentioned are a mere drop in the bucket to the nefarious practices that should lead to an Obama impeachment. BUT probably won’t because the Republican Establishment (and incredulously some Conservatives) would rather let Obama get away with crimes against American citizens and American voters ‘for the good of the country’.

Martha Boneta

 

This brings me back to the Left stealth subversion against the USA via Agenda 21. While Obama dismantles America overtly embracing Establishment fears to impeach him, Agenda 21 keeps methodically on dismantling the American Constitution. The Daily Signal has embraced the remarkably under reported case of Martha Boneta battling Virginia’s Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC) agenda to rip away her property rights. For me though The Daily Signal conspicuously fails to connect the PEC to Agenda 21. Largely I believe this failure is because PEC continues to act with impunity even though the Virginia Right to Farm ACT passed:

 

VIDEO: Freedom Farmer & American Hero: Freedom to Farm WITHOUT FEAR

 

This legislation passed by the Virginia State Assembly and signed into law by a Democratic Party Governor places a curb on the power of the eco-Marxism of Green Lefties. It was a win for Property Rights over collectivist thinking. BUT Martha Boneta still endured eco-fascism from the Agenda 21 group promoting the globalist policies of so-called sustainability in which the United Nations Leftists look to promote an elitist global vision in which the population is manipulated by abortion, government ordered authority over private property and ways of living to place the planet’s population to certain permanent level. Martha Boneta over an eight year period actually was forced to manage her family farm under Gestapo-style tactics to either force to submit to what the Piedmont Environment Council (PEC) dictated to her in the management of her farm.

 

VIDEO: All She Wanted to Do Was Farm, But an Environmental Group Got in the Way

 

On Thursday November 6 Martha and the PEC presented their cases on who controls the property – owner or easement holder in which a new owner did not sign. The arbitration went to the State government appointed Virginia Outdoors Foundation. The VOF board members are appointed by the State elected Governor. This means there is some oversight in the decision making process of the VOF. The VOF sided with Martha Boneta.

 

RICHMOND – Martha Boneta’s eight-year battle with an environmental group over a conservation easement on her farm in Virginia’s Hunt Country moved closer to resolution yesterday as another organization agreed to take over enforcement activities.

 

Boneta and representatives of the Piedmont Environmental Council appeared at a meeting of the Virginia Outdoors Foundation’s board of trustees in the Virginia General Assembly building here. The foundation is a co-holder of the easement on Boneta’s farm.

 

Each side made 20-minute presentations about the easement on Boneta’s property and what she has called abuses on the part of the environmental council in its enforcement of the terms.

 

 

After the presentations, the Virginia Outdoors Foundation’s seven-member board voted 6-0 to adopt a resolution expressing its willingness to take over enforcement activities.

 

 

State Del. Brenda Pogge, R-James City County, attended the meeting and told The Daily Signal afterward that she plans to introduce legislation in the upcoming session of the Virginia General Assembly to reform easements on public lands.

 

“I’m a citizen legislator who is outraged by the abuse we have seen in this case,” Pogge said, adding:

 

“The way Martha was treated does not resemble truth, justice and the American way. That’s what we need to get back to. My bill would address the use of easements on public lands that would include schools, firehouses and other public buildings. It’s just a start. My bill would not address private lands.” (Outdoors Foundation’s Offer Could End Farmer’s Dispute With Green Group Over Property Rights; By Kevin Mooney; The Daily Signal; 11/7/14)

 

People like Martha Boneta are the leaders of the next American Revolution. Obama represents the new King George. Only when grassroots Americans wake-up to withstand the anti-Constitution Left will the principles of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness return.

 

The depraved morals the Left transforms America into leads to the second dark ages of human depravity and ignorance. The masses will become tied to the land again. Collectivist masters will become the new feudal lords. The masses dependent on the largesse of the collective will have no need to read, write or think because their needs will be dictated from the upper directorate administered by the feudal bureaucratic managers who themselves who no need for educated means. Why? Just follow the dictates from above means there is no need for learning – just obeying. Obedience to the State supplies all mass needs. Only the elite need formal remedial knowledge. Only the elite of the elite need to develop the ability to think to perpetuate a sustainable static existence. The essence of sustainability is submission to the politburo plan. Deviation from sustainability is personal Liberty.

 

America is Liberty. The grassroots Bonetas are Americans weary of the despots demanding a sustainable agenda.

 

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. … The Declaration of Independence

 

MR. PRESIDENT: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfil the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

 

 

… Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask, gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? …

 

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. … There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable²and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

 

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace²but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death! (Patrick Henry. Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death! St. John’s Church, Richmond, Virginia March 23, 1775. History.org)

 

Is America at the point of arms? NO! Or at least not yet. The Republican Party election victory on November 4, 2014 might be the last chance for Americans that have enjoyed Liberty fought for by our Founding Fathers to counter President Barack Hussein Obama’s fundamental transformation of America. If the Republican leadership fails to heed the call of American voters the static sustainable agenda of the global stealth Marxist elite will continue to envelope this nation until the need for arms might be all that remains to resist the despotic designs of the Leftist transformation of America.

 

Keep in mind that transformation agenda is subtle. Keep the masses poor and dependent on government. Destroy America’s Christian heritage that has been the foundation of a strong moral society. Part of subtlety is atheism, Islam Supremacism and a collectivist mind-set.

 

Whatever undermines American Exceptionalism is a surrender to the Obama fundamental transformation.

 

JRH 11/8/14

Please Support NCCR

 

Get Ready for a Wall Street Crash


Sustainable Dialectic of Tyranny

Sent by Tony Newbill

Sent: 5/7/2012 6:36 PM

 

Get Ready for a Wall Street Crash because This is how the USA Parts Supply Shortage will become our Hyper inflation event.

 

This will split the European Union away from the USA and the Federal Reserve alliance that’s been in place since the end of WW2 and was the foundation for the dollar as world trade currency. Once This BRIC/China alliance is formed with France the PIIGS and they are formally trading with the Yuan instead of the dollar the dollar bond traders will leave the dollar for the Yuan and the dollar will devalue like a rock!!!   Get Ready for a Wall Street Crash because This is how the USA Parts Supply Shortage will become our Hyper inflation event.

 

 

New French Socialist President Seeks to Unite with BRIC and End the Dollar

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R2lzZcG-cw

 

_________________________

Outsourcing was Part of the Plan to Make the USA Dependent and Breakable

 

By Tony Newbill

Sent: 5/7/2012 10:00 PM

 

Outsourcing was part of the plan to make the USA Dependent and Breakable,  so what will happen here is all our Equipment: Case International Harvester, Caterpillar, John Deere, Ford new Holland, plus all the car manufacturers, plus all the After Market parts suppliers like NAPA, O’Reilly’s –  all these Manufacturers Import ALL the Parts they assemble their equipment with. We will see these parts become almost unattainable when the dollar loses its reserve currency status as these BRIC Suppliers who we Import our parts supplies all together reject the dollar exchange at the rate we have been operating at. Our result will be much like Iceland’s was in 2008, only way bigger a civil unrest because Iceland was only 98,000 people. We are 311,000,000  and reducing their level of abundance will be way bigger a deal than what it was in Greece or the other PIIGS countries that tried austerity only to reject it and vote for the Socialist like they did in France hoping for a return to their abundance. However, it won’t happen as the BRIC nations are only gathering them for the Slaughter later. We have seen this before in that region. First you promise them the moon for control over the resources. Only to bait and switch to the oppressive famine and strife that depopulation is all about. And this is not a conspiracy they are talking about today as a remedy for Earth’s salvation, like a Collective Salvation you know!!!   

 

 Seven big problems for 7 billion people

 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44990504/ns/us_news-life/  

 

Sometime on Monday, Oct. 31, the world’s population is projected to hit 7 billion. Is that numerical milestone a cause for celebration or concern?

 

A little bit of both, according to the United Nations Population Fund. The organization, an international development agency that promotes the right of every person to enjoy a life of health and equal opportunity, on Wednesday released a report detailing the achievements and setbacks faced by an ever-crowded world.

 

How we respond now will determine whether we have a healthy, sustainable and prosperous future or one that is marked by inequalities, environmental decline and economic setbacks, according to “The State of World Population 2011” report.

 

 

In response to the report, msnbc.com asked seven notable figures to identify some major problems — and potential remedies — confronting a world with 7 billion inhabitants. Here’s what they had to say:

 

[SlantRight Editor: The rest of this article lists a person MSNBC lists their version of an expert that lists a problem followed by a solution. These guys have Eco-Marxist concepts that deal with an earth view with Eco-Marxist solutions; such as dumbing industry to reverse Climate Change, control farming methods for food, control people by via birth scenarios, finding ways to force people depopulation and the like.] (By James Eng; msnbc.com; updated 10/26/2011 10:46:46 AM ET)

 

Paul Ehrlich on depopulation: ‘We’re going to go over the top’ – audio
www.guardian.co.uk/environment/audio/2012/apr/26/paul-ehrlich-depopulation-audio 

 

Paul Ehrlich, American professor and bestselling author, talks to John Vidal about population decline. Professor Ehrlich voices his concerns about depleting global resources and discusses his predictions for the future of our planet.

 

Paul Ehrlich is known for his outspoken stance on overpopulation. Although he was not the first to raise the alarm about population issues – concern had been widespread in the 1950s and 1960s – his approach brought the issue to a new level of media prominence.

 

[SlantRight Editor: In the audio file Paul Ehrlich talks about predicted ecological disasters – which BTW, his time table has never panned out – that he believes Eco-Marxist solutions will save the world by depopulating it. You will have to go to the link to listen to Ehrlich.]

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/nov/01/peak-stuff-message-green-technology?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

 

Society is faced with a profound dilemma – one that is sharpened considerably by the twin threats of financial crisis and climate change. The dilemma is this: to resist economic growth is to risk economic and social collapse, but to pursue it is to endanger the ecosystems on which we depend for long-term survival.

 

For a long time this problem has gone unrecognised in mainstream policy or in public debate. When reality begins to impinge on the collective consciousness, the best suggestion offered has been to somehow separate growth from its material impacts (and continue to do so while the economy expands exponentially.)

 

But this proposition has to be tested. Against historical reality, technological possibility, demand for future resources, ecological targets, and the social and economic forces that drive society forwards.

 

The analysis by Chris Goodall described in the Guardian this week is an essential starting point to address the most critical question of all: can a society based on growth really make that separation fast enough to avoid ecological catastrophe? This is exactly the kind of analysis that is often sadly lacking at policy level and desperately needed as the basis for a green economy.

 

 

In short, it’s quite clear that there is considerable potential for technological change. And we already have at our disposal a range of useful options: renewable, resource-efficient, low-carbon technologies capable of weaning us from our dangerous dependence on fossil fuels. These options have to provide the platform for the transition to a sustainable economy. But the idea that they will emerge spontaneously by giving free reign to the market is patently false. So while Goodall’s analysis is valuable, there is only cold comfort in these statistics. (‘Peak stuff’ message is cold comfort – we need to embrace green technology; by Tim Jackson; guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 1 November 2011 06.37 EDT)

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/apr/26/world-population-resources-paul-ehrlich

 

The world’s most renowned population analyst has called for a massive reduction in the number of humans and for natural resources to be redistributed from the rich to the poor.

 

Paul Ehrlich, Bing professor of population studies at Stanford University in California and author of the best-selling Population Bomb book in 1968, goes much further than the Royal Society in London which this morning said that physical numbers were as important as the amount of natural resources consumed.

 

Link to this audio

 

The optimum population of Earth – enough to guarantee the minimal physical ingredients of a decent life to everyone – was 1.5 to 2 billion people rather than the 7 billion who are alive today or the 9 billion expected in 2050, said Ehrlich in an interview with the Guardian.

 

 

“Most of the predictions [in Population Bomb] have proved correct [SlantRight Editor: That’s a lie, the Population Bomb is false propaganda]. At that time I wrote about climate change. We did not know then if it was warming or cooling. We thought it was going to be a problem for the end of this century. Now we know it’s warming and a problem for the beginning of the century; we didn’t know about the loss of biodiversity. Things have been coming up worse than was predicted. We have the threats now of vast epidemics”.

 

 

But he agreed with the Royal Society report that said human population and consumption should not be divided. “[They] multiply together. You have to be deal with them together. We have too much consumption among the rich and too little among the poor. That implies that terrible thing that we are going to have to do which is to somehow redistribute access to resources away the rich to the poor. But in the US we have been doing the opposite. The Republican party is wildly in favour of more redistribution, of taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich.” (Cut world population and redistribute resources, expert urges; by John Vidal; guardian.co.uk, Thursday 26 April 2012 06.19 EDT)

 

 

  

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/audio/2012/apr/26/audio-population-john-sulston?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

 

Extract from an interview on population with Sir John Sulston – audio

 

Sir John Sulston, the author of a Royal Society report entitled People and the Planet, reacts to comments by author and climate sceptic Matt Ridley: Audio Download of Sir John Sulston mocking Ridley.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/apr/26/earth-population-consumption-disasters

 

World population needs to be stabilised quickly and high consumption in rich countries rapidly reduced to avoid “a downward spiral of economic and environmental ills”, warns a major report from the Royal Society.

 

Contraception must be offered to all women who want it and consumption cut to reduce inequality, says the study published on Thursday, which was chaired by Nobel prize-winning biologist Sir John Sulston.

 

The assessment of humanity’s prospects in the next 100 years, which has taken 21 months to complete, argues strongly that to achieve long and healthy lives for all 9 billion people expected to be living in 2050, the twin issues of population and consumption must be pushed to the top of political and economic agendas. Both issues have been largely ignored by politicians and played down by environment and development groups for 20 years, the report says.

 

“The number of people living on the planet has never been higher, their levels of consumption are unprecedented and vast changes are taking place in the environment. We can choose to rebalance the use of resources to a more egalitarian pattern of consumption … or we can choose to do nothing and to drift into a downward spiral of economic and environmental ills leading to a more unequal and inhospitable future”, it says. (World needs to stabilise population and cut consumption, says Royal Society; by John Vidal, environment editor; The Guardian, Wednesday 25 April 2012 – There is More)

 

  

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2012/apr/26/royal-society-report-consumption-population

 

9.15am: The Royal Society has published today a landmark report – 21-months in the making – that it says is the “first substantive offering” in its 350-year history on the topic of the “impacts of human population and consumption on the planet”.

 

The report (pdf, 5.7MB) lays out nine recommendations for, what it hopes, will “be a springboard for further discussion and action”. In doing so, it appears to imply that rising consumption levels need tackling ahead of rising population levels:

 

In the short term it is of the utmost urgency to reduce consumption and emissions that are already causing damage, for example greenhouse gases, deforestation, and land use change amongst others. Furthermore, unless the goal is a world in which extreme inequality persists, it is necessary to make space for those in poverty, especially the 1.3 billion people living in absolute poverty, to achieve an adequate standard of living.

 

The intertwined issues of consumption and population have, of course, long been cornerstones of the wider environmental debate. But, in recent years, the consensus among environmental commentators seems to have moved towards the view that over-consumption is, indeed, the more pressing concern. In 2011, when the human population reached 7bn for the first time, a major report by French national agencies concluded rather bluntly that “the rich must stop consuming so much“. (Does consumption need tackling before population?; by Leo Hickman; guardian.co.uk; 4/26/12 – There is More)

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/overconsumption

 

[SlantRight Editor: The above link is a list of Guardian articles promoting the Eco-Marxist agenda.]

  

http://www.timelinetothefuture.com/index.php/en/prepare/social-economic-impacts/over-consumption

 

[SlantRight Editor: The above link is about consumer consumption is an evil that is bring the world to the brink of disaster by depleting the world’s resources beyond that word used by Eco-Marxists to dredge up fear in the heart’s of humanity; i.e. “sustainability.” Use your imagination on how an Eco-Marxist plans to limit human consumption so that the earth has a sustainable cycle for human existence.] 

 

 

Now consider how long we have before we consume enough of Earth’s natural resources so that human life is no longer sustainable. If The Story of Stuff is accurate, we know that 30% of Earth’s natural resources have been consumed in the past 30 years. Let’s use a conservative estimate of 10% for our global consumption of natural resources in all the previous history up to 1975. Just a guess, but it would appear to be a conservative estimate. This means that we have consumed 40% of Earth’s total natural resources up to this moment in human history. No matter how you graph this data, you will generate a consumption curve that is exponential. With a little extrapolation, you would also realize that the human population is likely to consume another 30% – 40% of Earth’s remaining resources within the next 10 years. This means that sometime before the year 2020, mankind will have consumed 80% of Earth’s natural resources.

 

Many would probably like to assume that we have until 2020 to fix this problem, but this also assumes that we don’t run out of some essential resources before then. What happens if 100% of drinkable water, forests, or coal runs out before then?

 

It doesn’t take a genius to understand that the only way to achieve sustainability in any environment is to consume only what can be replenished or replaced at an equal rate. Not only is our current rate of consumption unsustainable and irresponsible, but our rate of consumption over the next few years will be catastrophic and unconscionable. Does anyone really believe that with a continuously expanding world population, that our consumption rates will stabilize or actually start reversing?

 

The only way to reverse this spiraling abyss would not only be to halt consumption at their current levels, but we would actually need to reduce our consumption levels to those of nearly 50 years ago. And how do you accomplish that when the world population is continuing to expand out of control with more and more people are uneducated, starving, and suffering?

 

The Earth experience involves learning everything from conscious evolution to sustainability. Learning to replace what we have destroyed and depleted is part of this experience, but more importantly is learning how to balance our existence with nature.

 

 

How do we move the entire world consciousness from irresponsible over consumption to responsible under consumption overnight? If you live outside the matrix and in any form of reality, then you know this is not possible while the world is controlled through greed and self-indulgence. It’s also not realistic to think that these control factors and the PTB [SlantRight Editor: Conspiracy Theory thoughts on Powers That Be] are going to disappear and everyone else is going to achieve a sufficient level of belief and understanding overnight. As you can see, with only our patterns and addictions to over consumption and not even taking anything else into consideration, the world as we know it is unsustainable and spiraling rapidly into total catastrophic collapse.  (Social Economic Impacts: Over Consumption; by Timeline to the Future; There Is More)

 

__________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

May 14, 2012

Please Support NCCR

Fodder System for Livestock Means More Land for Human Consumption Crops


Verticle Farm Urban

 

Tony Newbill commented at my TCUnation blog post entitled “Let’s Bend the Mind a BIT”. This was actually a link to the larger post of the same title to the SlantRight 2.0 post which in turn is a post of a series of Tony Newbill posts. I am guessing Tony’s comment is somewhat of an addendum to the emails that I posted as one. In this case the addendum concentrates on sustainability, food production and population consumption of food. I am unilaterally making up a title for the comment. Tony’s comment is worth a post ergo here it is.

 

JRH 10/23/11

*******************************

Fodder System for Livestock Means More Land for Human Consumption Crops

 

Tony Newbill

Edited by John R. Houk

From Two Comments at my TCUnation Blog

October 16, 2011

 

I believe we can expand the Food chain with this Technology and promote freedom and Prosperity towards Peace. The Economic Promotion at the Government level all across every nation of the world should be centering on this innovation solution for a new foreign policy approach to expanding vital human needs.

 

This should be a Top Priority in Foreign Policy because of the national and international security this can bring in altering a shrinking food supply worldwide. The Math on this evolution of feed production for livestock will reduce water use in feed production by 1000 times the current use. And TODAY in the USA we use some 90 million acres of farm land for feed production to sustain the livestock feeds demand, but with this fodder system the amount of seed that would be needed to replace the current feed production can be produced off just 10,000,000 acres. So we can make available the rest of the 80 million acres of farmlands we were using for feed production for other food crops so now we can expand the overall production and stabilize the future of Inflation worldwide. Plus we can save energy use and chemical, fertilizer use, all these savings helping to lower and stabilize inflation in the economy worldwide. And if we consider taking this method and advancing it into other food groups using the same technology as is shown in this link – www.verticalfarm.com  – now we can expand supply and save resource use in the minerals groups even more and stabilize long-term future growth demands for an even bigger plea for humanitarianism in foreign policy.

 

This is a Huge breakthrough of a old technology that’s coming at a time that’s in need of Government Economic Policies that will incentively promote private capital investment into these innovations, but we cannot raise the awareness by those in Power that are on a different kind of Mission, to De Develop the USA – http://www.cnsnews.com/node/75388 – and judging by the CZARS’ backgrounds in the Obama Administration you know they are not going to promote these kinds of population growth promoting conceptions.

 

When we leave a war torn region we should have these infrastructures to advance their society then our foreign policy would benefit greatly.

 

Welcome to Fodder Solutions

 

http://www.foddersolutions.org/home

 

The world markets are telling us this by their unsustainable growth patterns over the last 12-14 years, compare these charts:

 

http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/historical/djia1900.html 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat_yields_in_developing_countries_1951-2004.png 

 

The stagnant growth in equity and supply in grain is obvious, and you cannot have sustainable growth in any durable goods unless the bread basket is growing with it. See “UP TO” 1998 all cylinders of growth were advancing together as the futures traders could see world food supplies advancing at unlimited growth projections because plant breeding was producing increased yielding grains. Also from the early 1980s till then development of arable farmland was rising worldwide but peaked in the late 1990s as the only new farmland that could be irrigated or have substantial rain fall which would affect yields that could keep up with overall demand on food supplies was in the rain forest areas of South America where timber harvested opened up these areas for food production, but this all ceased from the pressure of the environmental movement which has taken over the world economy with the leaders of these environmentalists being the Top Financial People of the world who make the Loans for the economic purposes of supply-side production and expansion.

 

So we are seeing this war of attrition bleed us out now of our primary wealth supply, as we are only seeing the Governments of the world lending out little pieces of capital funding to specific areas of industry for either political favors or the most immediate needs to keep them supplied as they rein in the control over these supplies like we saw Obama do with the Executive Order Rural Councils [SlantRight Editor: See The New American article on Obama EO’s and Agenda 21].

Let’s Bend the Mind a BIT


Obamasiah

 

Here are three Newbill emails relating to President Barack Hussein Obama’s handling of the economy that has all the appearances of an Obama-Marxist agenda of a New World Order.

 

JRH 8/22/11

AFTER AMERICA Info on Agenda 21


 

John R. Houk

© November 28, 2010

 

Have you heard of the Agenda 21 Conspiracy Theory? I first became aware of Agenda 21 from a person that went by the pseudonym Savant Noir.

 

The international mantra that is the drive behind re-shaping the world is ‘man-made climate change’. The ‘green revolution’ has pervaded every level of our Society and there is not a day that goes by that we are not bombarded with advertisements touting how environmentally friendly some product is, or how ecologically responsible some corporation is. Its nauseating. I am neither a Geologist nor a Climatologist, so as I pour through all the scientific arguments I must admit that I cannot confer credibility with absolutism upon either side of the debate.

However, I can ask if this ‘climate-change’ is being used as an excuse to foist a political agenda? There have been numerous publications and statements made that certainly reveal the intent to create a crisis so that the Elitists can step in and tender their solution.

 

 

The Elite Class has had a plan in the hopper for some time now, and it is rapidly coming to fruition. The universal acceptance of Agenda 21 has ushered in this new era, and just by giving a cursory glance over the 40 chapter titles that comprise Agenda 21 would reveal the depth of this Master Plan. Never heard of Agenda 21? Perhaps you have heard the words ‘sustainable’, ‘smart growth’, ‘social justice’, ‘biological equity’, and a plethora of similar words that have pervaded our societal lexicon. Whenever you hear such words realize they are derivatives of Agenda 21. (From SlantRight link above quote)

 

I then had a series of emails from Tony Newbill that edited into two sets of three-part posts. I say two sets because much of the Newbill info on Agenda 21 was similar so I added new data into a rewrite of the first set of three parts. You can read the beginning of the two sets of three HERE and HERE.

 

Newbill has pointed out a very lucid essay about Agenda 21 written by pseudonym AfterAmerica by the blog of the same name – After America’s Blog.

 

JRH 11/28/10