President Trump: Nullify This Election


Justin Smith examines – dare I say treasonous – failure to adjudicate election crimes in 2020.

 

JRH 12/14/20

I need your generosity via – credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business making yourself extra cash – OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*******************************

President Trump: Nullify This Election  

Poison Fruit Election Results Harm All America – America’s Election Integrity Hangs In The Balance

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 12/13/2020 2:42 AM

 

The United States Supreme Court once again exhibited its own feckless irrelevance, in an incomprehensible asinine and ignorant fit of cowardice of the highest order, when [JOS] they rejected the Texas lawsuit seeking relief from the unconstitutional and illegal acts of the key swing states, prior to and during the election, that now have Joe Biden poised to take the White House. In so doing, they have violated their own oaths to the Constitution and seemingly chose to ignore clear Constitutional direction, with even three Trump appointees joining the majority of seven Justices, as they allow Biden to benefit from the illegal acts and essentially move one step closer to the Presidency, from the poison fruit of his henchmen and Democratic Party cronies’ illegal acts.

 

America is standing in dire straits and the most dangerous times to freedom and liberty I have ever witnessed in my lifetime. All America is in danger, whenever a time has arrived that allows one political party to institutionalize its criminal election fraud, in order to ensure its candidates’ win no matter what the consequences to the nation on the whole, as it violates Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

 

Backing Texas, 126 Republican Representatives filed a brief on December 10th noting that “unconstitutional irregularities” had “cast doubt” on the 2020 election results and “the integrity of the American system of elections”. In a hard-hitting conclusion, they further declared: “The case demands that the High Court invalidate the four states’ aggregate 62 total Electoral College votes [that are] sufficient to overturn Joe Biden’s election to the presidency.”

 

These same Republican Congressmen observed:

 

“The legislature of every Defendant state had established detailed rules by which that state’s appointment of presidential electors should have been conducted. However, in the months before the 2020 election, those rules were deliberately changed by both state and non-state actors. The clear authority of those state legislatures to determine the rules for appointing electors was usurped at various times by governors, secretaries of state, election officials, state courts, federal courts, and private parties.”

 

States’ electors in several key states have been chosen unconstitutionally, [especially] since the mechanisms whereby they were chosen were set in place illegally and unconstitutionally from the beginning of this election cycle. Inasmuch, this situation demands, at the very least, a new set of electors to be determined by the states’ legislatures and based on numbers from the time prescribed by law that the polls should have been legally closed.

 

Under any set of circumstances, Joe Biden cannot and must not be inaugurated as the 46th President of the United States.

 

Biden and his Democratic Party Communists are not representative of anything remotely American or the old Yellow Dog Democrats. They do not work within the pillars of the Constitution, and instead, they work outside the Constitution which they despise and seek to destroy. They have to destroy the Constitutional firewalls in order to be able to operate their criminal schemes that ensure they acquire and keep power, complete and total power over the American people.

 

Let’s not forget that the Supreme Court’s failure to duty follows on the heels and in the midst of a color revolution aimed at removing President Trump from office, by any means necessary and as openly plotted through the 2019 Transition Integrity Project and implemented by America’s Marxist domestic terrorists and insurrectionists and America’s international enemies. However, more than harming President Trump politically, their main goal has always been to fundamentally transform America and the efficacy of the Constitution, using tactics that come straight out of the Special Force’s guide to overthrowing governments, especially in areas concerning our elections.

 

In every single Democrat held stronghold across America, election fraud ran rampant during the course of the 2020 election, especially in and around the Atlanta, Georgia area and the key states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, in the most egregious case of corruption and criminal behavior America has ever witnessed, at least in many decades. How else does anyone explain the Democratic Party Communists’ driven effort to remove any requirement for signatures on ballots, signature comparisons on ballots and postmarks on ballots? Why else would they seek to count votes after deadlines set by law?

 

The answer is simple. The Democratic Party has always been an authoritarian totalitarian party and it always will be, just as it was during the Civil War years and throughout segregation and on through the Obama administration and the weaponization of the IRS, FBI, CIA and DOJ against conservative, traditional America.

 

In two short paragraphs, the [JOS] Supreme Court rejected the case from Texas and eighteen other states, as it simply stated that Texas has no standing, essentially implying that the criminal election misconduct by election officials and these four states was not Texas’s business, with all Democrats and even some RINOs arguing the same; however, this is a gross error on the part of the Court, since there are obvious and blatant widespread institutionalized corruption and violations of Article II Section One, Clause Two of the United States Constitution in several cases before the Court, and the Justices just threw their hands up and let those cases die.

 

How can there be no standing, when these four states’ actions affect Texas and the rest of the Union, and a conflict exists between these states? This does fall precisely within the original jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court, anyway one looks at it, and the Supreme Court may need to revisit the legal definition of “standing”, which so many of them now seem to misuse or misunderstand. They have simply resorted to a syntax game similar to Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court’s use of the word “latches” to avoid dealing with its own constitutional dispute.

 

I really do wonder if some high echelon Democrat wasn’t sent pictures of Chief Justice John Roberts having an unnatural interaction with some farm animal or something. And just how did Roberts convince three relatively conservative Justices, such as Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett to ignore the facts and truth that abound in these instances, in so disgusting a manner? So fearful of angering the Leftists of America and their mouthpieces, such as Linda Greenhouse, Roberts would simply abandon America to whatever may come from the Court’s inaction.

 

One case involved Pennsylvania’s legislature violating its own state constitution. A state cannot arbitrarily violate its own constitution, especially when the violation effects selecting state electors in a presidential election.

 

In answering the emergency appeal to the court to halt Pennsylvania’s certification of its election results, that gave Biden the state through some 1,950,000 illegally cast votes, the Supreme Court delivered one sentence to the offices of President Trump and Vice-President Pence, that said “we’re rejecting your emergency appeal”. And now it rejects the Texas lawsuit that showed a clear Constitutional issue at hand and Democrats violating numerous laws to change the rules at the last moment, in the days leading up to the election, in order to ensure Biden and other Democrats won.

 

The Court has ignored the fact that the defendant states’ criminal acts blatantly violated the equal protection clause for the other states, and they raise many other issues. And yet, the Court has the blind, incompetent hubris to tell Texas that what transpires in other states is none of their business. This is the point to where America has now arrived.

 

It would now appear that “the rule of law” is merely a fiction and anything goes, with the precedent being set by the Democratic Party Communists. Institutionalized fraud and corruption can be anyone’s game now, since the Supreme Court seems unconcerned that Pennsylvania’s state legislature violated its own constitution and changed election laws to benefit Biden. The Court also seems fine with the signature requirement change in Georgia, that weak RINOs, such as Gov. Kemp and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, agreed to make, as they caved to demands from Stacey Abrams, a radical Democrat.

 

As President Trump observed early on in a tweet: “The Consent Decree signed by the Georgia Secretary of State, with the approval of Governor @BrianKempGA, at the urging of @staceyabrams, makes it impossible to check & match signatures on ballots and envelopes, etc. They knew they were going to cheat. Must expose real signatures!”

 

If the tables were turned and these were lawsuits by the Democratic Party, there would be bloody-hell to pay. And if they were in charge of the Senate, as Republicans now are, they would be immediately moving to make changes to the Supreme Court. They would not tolerate such, if the case were so obviously turned in their favor. But in this instance, Republicans shouldn’t tolerate it, because it is so intellectually dishonest and the effects are so detrimental to the future of freedom and liberty in America.

 

And the lawsuits and legal briefs are still flying.

 

As I noted in early October, in ‘America Stands At Its Rubicon’, America is drawing very near to a hot civil war situation, given all the attempts by the Democratic Party Marxist and Maoist Communists, since the waning years of the Obama administration, from the illegal spying to the many phony assertions of Russian collusion, throwing everything but the kitchen sink into the mix, as Democratic Party mayors and governors also allowed American cities and entire sections of the country to be destroyed by the radicals of Antifa and Black Lives Matter. President Trump’s inability to remove the Obama holdovers only exacerbated the situation, as they have used their positions as guerrilla warfare agents within Trump’s institutions. This along with the unfolding Marxist insurrection in America’s streets prompted me to suggest Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act; this option has not left the table.

 

Another avenue of some great common sense has come to light in the [JOS] Open Letter to President Trump written by Vic Biorseth on December 10, 2020. He notes that just as the Supreme Court gave itself power not existing in the Constitution — the power of Judicial Review — in adjudicating Marbury v. Madison (1803 [Justin uses the date 1807 from the Vic Biorseth open letter. The actual date is 1803]) [Blog Editor: Two perspectives on Marbury v. Madison: HERE & HERE], President Trump could set a new precedent and the “Constitutional Principle of Presidential Review“, in regard to the election, since the branches of government are co-equal and his interpretive authority is just as valid as that of the Supreme Court.

 

President Trump and his team of legal advisors and lawyers have until January 20th to fight this thing, through any legal channels they wish to pursue, in order to highlight the very real theft of the election that has occurred in the open and before the eyes of all America, in order to convince the greatest majority of Americans to stand by them. And in the end, given all the proof positive that exists in this matter and all the willful blindness to the election fraud, along with the complicit engagement by many actors and agents in an ongoing coup, in cooperation with America’s enemies from within, if no principled and righteous relief is forthcoming from the state legislatures, the Supreme Court and Congress, President Trump and his administration and all those loyal to the Constitution and America would be well within their rights, under the law and the Constitution, to simply nullify this election and let events fall as furiously as they may unfold, no matter the consequences or the amount of blood that may flow in our streets.

 

Freedom and Liberty will not be saved, and neither will America, if an illegitimate pretender named Joe Biden is granted an easy and open path to seizing power illegally, simply because too many within the nation were too much the coward to stand up to these Communists and tell them “we know what has happened and you will not profit from your poison fruit.”

 

By Justin O. Smith

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets are by the Editor. Embedded links are by the Editor except where indicated by Justin’s initials “JOS”.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Texas Puts SCOTUS into Play


Will SCOTUS Defend Republic or Criminal Coup?

 

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

December 10, 2020

 

As of 3:12 PM 12/9/20; The Gateway Pundit reports SEVENTEEN States joined Texas in suing Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania over Election UNCONSTITUTIONAL issues directly to SCOTUS. (My opinion: Nevada and Arizona should be included as culprits.)

 

I am cross posting three articles beginning with the article by TGP. This will be followed by an Epoch Times article touching on President Trump’s perspective. Which will be followed by a Just The News article examining a Constitutional application of the Texas-Plus lawsuit.

 

Hopefully more States demand SCOTUS end this Dem-Marxist Election criminality AND a bunch of Patriots swamp the SCOTUS building in peaceful (UNLESS the Dem-Marxist paramilitary Antifa/BLM show up) protest.

 

JRH 12/10/20

I need your generosity via – credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

******************************

UPDATE: 17 States Join Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania Over Fraudulent Election

 

17 States (including TX) Join Lawsuit to SCOTUS (MO hasn’t been updated to red on map yet) – Map by Henri

 

By Jim Hoft
Published December 9, 2020 at 3:12pm

The Gateway Pundit

 

earlier today TGP reported that Missouri is the latest state to join Texas in their lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin at the US Supreme Court.

 

 

It’s not just Missouri, on Tuesday Allen West told Steve Bannon on the War Room, “I think you’re going to see ten states sign on to this petition and lawsuit. I know as you said Louisiana just came on board.”

 

Seven states have already reportedly joined Texas in their lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

 

And the list has now grown to 17 states.

 

MO, AL, AR, FL, NE, ND, OK, IN, KS, LA, MS, MT, SC, SD, TN, UT and WV.

 

 

Here is a Scribd document of the lawsuit.

 

Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Trump Says He Will Intervene in Texas’ SCOTUS Election Case

 

An American flag waves in front of the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington on Nov. 2, 2020. (Patrick Semansky/AP Photo)

 

By TOM OZIMEK

December 9, 2020 Updated: December 9, 2020

The Epoch Times

 

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he and/or members of his legal team would join, as intervenors, the lawsuit brought by Texas’ Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton to the U.S. Supreme Court against four battleground states.

 

“We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!” Trump said in a tweet.

 

An intervention, in legal terms, is a procedure that lets a nonparty join ongoing litigation if the case affects the rights of that party. The court considering an application to intervene, in this case the U.S. Supreme Court, has the discretion to allow or deny such a request.

 

In the lawsuit, Texas is alleging that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin introduced last-minute unconstitutional changes to election laws, treated voters unequally, and triggered significant voting irregularities by relaxing ballot-integrity measures. The lawsuit is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to declare that the four battleground states conducted the 2020 election in violation of the Constitution.

 

The suit, filed on Dec. 7 and docketed the next day, is also seeking to prohibit the count of the Electoral College votes cast by the four states. For the defendant states that have already appointed electors, it asks the court to direct the state legislatures to appoint new electors in line with the Constitution.

 

Trump’s remarks about joining the suit as an intervenor came after several states expressed their support for the lawsuit. Attorneys general for Arkansas, Alabama, Missouri, and Louisiana have issued statements in support of Paxton’s motion.

 

On Tuesday, the president wondered if lawmakers or judges have the courage to help him challenge election results in key battleground states.

 

“Let’s see whether or not somebody has the courage—whether it’s a legislator or legislatures, or whether it’s a justice of the Supreme Court or a number of justices of the Supreme Court. Let’s see if they have the courage to do what everybody in this country knows is right,” Trump told a press conference in Washington during a summit on COVID-19 vaccines.

 

In the complaint to the Supreme Court, Paxton argues that the four battleground states had acted in a way that violated their own election laws and thereby breached the Constitution through enacting and implementing new measures, rules, and procedures right before the Nov. 3 election.

 

In some instances, the defendant states enacted such measures through the use of so-called friendly lawsuits, in which the plaintiff and the defendant collude to procure a court order, the lawsuit alleges. In other instances, a variety of state election officials allegedly exceeded their authority to promulgate rules and procedures that should have been enacted by each state’s legislature, as required by the Constitution’s Elections and Electors clause.

 

“The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” Paxton said in a statement.

 

Attorneys general from the defendant states have disputed the allegations in the lawsuit.

 

Paxton argued that the actions he outlined in his complaint “constitute non-legislative changes to State election law by executive-branch State election officials, or by judicial officials” and, as such, votes cast by Electoral College electors pursuant to these actions should not be considered constitutionally valid.

 

Texas is also asking the Supreme Court (pdf) to grant a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order to block the four states from taking action to certify their election results or to prevent the state’s presidential electors from taking any official action. The presidential electors are scheduled to meet on Dec. 14.

 

The court has ordered the defendant states to respond to Texas’s motions by 3 p.m. Thursday, Dec. 10.

 

Janita Kan contributed to this report.

Follow Tom on Twitter: @OZImekTOM

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Texas files lawsuit directly to Supreme Court challenging election results in four states

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argues WI, MI, PA and GA made changes to election rules without legislative consent, violating the U.S. Constitution

 

By John Solomon and Carrie Sheffield

Updated: December 8, 2020 – 3:49pm

Just The News

 

In a novel legal strike, the state of Texas has asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia, arguing officials in those four battleground states violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval.

 

The lawsuit filed late Monday night by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”

 

The suit argues that changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”

 

“I’m worried about the credibility of elections, not just right now, but I’m worried about the credibility of elections going forward,” Paxton told Just the News on Tuesday afternoon in a phone interview. “I’m not making a fraud argument, I’m making an argument based on the Constitution. And what we know happened, which was that we know state law was changed by people other than the state legislature, which is the only constitutionally authorized changes that are allowed … My argument is that the law was violated, the constitution was violated. I’m not addressing whether there was 2 million fraudulent ballots cast in Pennsylvania. I don’t know, and there’s no way to know, the way the system got set up, the way the rules got changed.”

 

States are allowed in certain circumstances to appeal directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing lower federal courts, in disputes involving other states. Paxton argued the state of Texas was wrongly harmed by the unconstitutional acts of the other states.

 

“These non-legislative changes … facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution,” the suit stated. “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”

 

You can read the full lawsuit here:

 

Texas Lawsuit 12 – 8- 20.pdf

 

Paxton said the defendant states may have had good intentions in making changes to the elections to address COVID-19 but nonetheless violated the Constitution, requiring a dramatic remedy.

 

“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting,” the suit argued. “The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect they made the 2020
election less secure in the Defendant States.”

 

The lawsuit was backed by the Thomas More Society’s Amistad Project, a conservative group that has taken the national lead in challenging election irregularities in 2020. “The lawless nature of the 2020 election is on full display in the suit filed by Texas,” Amistad director Phill Kline said. “There was a coordinated and unprecedented effort of private interests improperly joining with leftist government officials to illegally support the democrat ticket in this election. This involved the sharing of sensitive citizen information with the private sector and the flow of more than $500 million from the private sector to targeted government officials and local governments.”

 

Paxton told Just the News he did not rely on research from the Amistad Project in his lawsuit and as of Tuesday afternoon had not spoken with other states about the issue but anticipated he could when he arrives in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday. Paxton’s scheduled to meet with President Trump on a pre-arranged meeting.

 

Paxton rejected interpretations of stare decisis arguments saying that some states have wrongly trying to redefine who has constitutional authority over running elections in order to sow chaos and delay a clear presidential election result.

 

“I know what the Constitution requires, and it’s always required that,” Paxton said. “It’s the Constitution, so if case law says that the Constitution shouldn’t be the Constitution, well, I think that case law’s wrong.”

 

However, Paxton said he is hopeful the U.S. Supreme Court — including with the newly-sworn Justice Amy Coney Barrett to possibly tip the balance — will ultimately restore Constitutional order under a strict textualist reading that prohibits what Paxton said was last-minute judicial usurpation of the prerogatives of state legislatures to make election rules.

 

“I’m always for reading based on what the Framers meant, otherwise we don’t really have a Constitution if it’s just nine judges up there and they can make up whatever they want,” Paxton said. “We don’t really have a Constitution, we just have a ruling oligarchy of nine judges. And I’m in favor of judges who aren’t making the law for us and telling us what to do. I’m in favor of judges who are put there, they look at the law as it was written, whether by a legislature by the Founders, and they follow it. That’s their job.”

___________________________

UPDATE: 17 States Join Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania Over Fraudulent Election

 

© 2020 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

__________________________

Trump Says He Will Intervene in Texas’ SCOTUS Election Case

 

Copyright © 2000 – 2020 The Epoch Times

_________________________________

Texas files lawsuit directly to Supreme Court challenging election results in four states

 

Just The News

© 2020 Bentley Media Group, LLC

ABOUT Just The News

 

“THIS MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT SPEECH I’VE EVER MADE” – PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP


Since the MSM refused to broadcast Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, exposing the rampant Election Fraud; I have to believe the MSM is a part of the Election Coup trying to steal an election victory for President Trump. Here is that speech from 12/2/20 uncensored by the MSM and Big Tech. Watch, be educated AND DEMAND COURTS DO THEIR JOB TO STOP CRIMES (that’s right – plural) IN THE 2020 ELECTION. An avalanche of messages should be sent to Attorney General William Barr that these are felonious crimes to be prosecuted more than civil complaints subject to the whimsical interpretations of standings and complaints of fraud.

 

SHARE WIDELY!

 

JRH 12/3/20

I need your generosity via – credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms

********************************

Bitchute VIDEO: “THIS MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT SPEECH I’VE EVER MADE” – PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

Posted by Banned Youtube Videos – specializedtom

Posted December 3rd, 2020 16:01 UTC 4015 subscribers

 

President Donald Trump on Wednesday called for a full forensic audit of mail-in ballots that were cast in key states during the Nov. 3 presidential election.

 

In a lengthy pre-recorded speech, the president said that “tens of thousands [of ballots] have fraudulent signatures” in key states.

 

It means “a full forensic audit is required to ensure that only legal ballots from lawfully registered voters that were properly cast are included,” Trump added.

 

“The reason for this is clear,” he said, “they were not verifying signatures because they know the ballots have not been filled out by the voters in whose names they were cast.”

 

The only way to remedy the situation, Trump said, is to carry out a full review of ballot envelopes, which contain the signatures. He did not say what states should carry out the auditing process.

 

Over the past three weeks, Trump’s legal team has sent several letters to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, demanding a full signature audit. Raffensberger, however, has responded by saying that it’s not possible to match the ballots and the envelope with the signature, citing privacy laws. His team and other Republicans have pushed for signature-audit procedures in Pennsylvania.

 

“We need a systematic analysis of the mail-in ballots to review the envelopes,” Trump said. “It’s about the signature. And if they’re on the envelopes, we can only review the envelopes. And that will tell us everything. This is the absolute minimum we should expect.”

 

On Election Day and beyond, poll watchers were not allowed to watch the tabulation process in several heavily Democratic areas, Trump said, arguing that it further compounded the allegedly fraudulent vote-tabulation process. In testimonies over the past week in Michigan, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, GOP poll observers said they witnessed irregularities, saw votes that were cast for Trump going to Biden, and were harassed by election workers.

 

Secretaries of state in these places have said there has not been sufficient evidence of voter fraud or irregularities that would overturn the election result. Going further, a spokesman for Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, told Epoch Times that Republican poll watchers who testified in front of the Michigan Legislature this week displayed a “lack of knowledge” about vote-counting and promoted “conspiracy theories,” without elaborating.

 

Trump, meanwhile, argued that his efforts to find voter fraud and irregularities are a bid to safeguard the U.S. election system.

 

“This is not just about my campaign, although it has a lot to do with who’s going to be your next president,” Trump remarked.

 

“If we don’t root out the fraud, the tremendous and horrible fraud that’s taken place in our 2020 election. We don’t have a country anymore,” he said.