BREAKING Hannity, Lahren And O’Reilly Back With New Network…


On April 30, 2017 I posted some interesting speculation about the potential creation of a Conservative news network to rival Fox News or even replace the network that is appearing to move Left like the rest of MSM.

 

I ran into a video made by the Youtube Channel calling itself The Hill Gossip. This video reprises much of the speculation on my post “New Conservative News Network?” Yet since my post, the last Conservative authority figure at Fox News was forced out – Bill Shine.

 

This means Rupert Murdoch’s Leftist sons – James and Lachlan – appear to have control of the path Fox News will take. This even leads greater credibility that a new Conservative network might be formed, nay Conservative leader, MUST BE formed.

 

Below is the video I discovered and it description.

 

JRH 5/4/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

VIDEO: BREAKING Hannity, Lahren And O’Reilly Back With New Network – You Won’t Believe Where They’ll Be Wor[…]

 

Posted by The Hill Gossip

Published on May 4, 2017

 

BREAKING Hannity, Lahren And O’Reilly Back With New Network, – You Won’t Believe Where They’ll Be Working…
Check The Source Here: https://goo.gl/3aDLFm

 

Be a Proud Patriot, Wear Your America T-Shrits [sic]: http://goo.gl/XgtvW8
Support Us, Donate For Our Cause Here: https://goo.gl/IIMAA5, GOD Bless America

 
On the heels of major shakeups at the Fox News Network, an alternative conservative network is being actively discussed amongst conservative fat cats.

A well-placed source close to the proposal tells Mediaite that serious discussions are underway to create an alternative conservative cable network on the belief that the Fox News Network is moving too far to the left. The source, who is engaged in the talks, says a meeting is planned for today with two prominent high-powered television executives, some underperforming conservative networks and people who have an interest and the ability to fund a new network.

The potential aim? Putting “the old band” back together. There are certainly plenty of (out-of-work?) conservative powerhouses to pick from that could star on a new network, and perhaps even some executives from within Fox News who might be lured by the new opportunity. Could the new channel include stars like the ousted Bill O’Reilly, who didn’t waste much time hitting the podcast waves after he was fired amid a sexual harassment scandal? Could Tomi Lahren, the conservative mega star, who was recently sidelined at The Blaze also take on a prominent role? The exact “who” won’t be clear until the deal is more defined but the source says the pitch is that the network could immediately reach at least 85 million homes.

This news comes on the heels of a long profile in last weekend’s New York Times which paints a picture of a changing Fox News Network with Murdoch’s sons, James and Lachlan, CEO and co-chairman of parent company 21st Century Fox, at the helm. The piece struck fear into the minds of some Fox News’ hardcore conservatives with talk of the sons wanting to rid the company “of the old-guard culture on which their father built his empire” and bringing “a warmer and fuzzier workplace” that would move away from an “anti-politically correct environment.”

On Thursday, New York Magazine’s Gabe Sherman, a constant thorn in the side of Fox News, reported that “sweeping management changes” may be coming to the network as well. Sherman’s report cited three anonymous sources that contend that the network’s co-President Bill Shine recently asked the Murdoch sons to release a statement in support of him amid the roiling lawsuits and scandals. Both Fox News and 21 Century Fox have vigorously denied that Shine made such a request but the report by Sherman prompted a rather mysterious tweet about the “total end of the FNC as we know it” by the network’s biggest remaining star [READ THE REST at Breaking News24]

 

New Conservative News Network?


John R. Houk

© April 30, 2017

 

Yesterday I posted my concerns that Fox News was moving leftward on the political spectrum. Today I discovered that typically Left oriented Mediaite broke the story that Conservative media moguls are mulling over the idea of beginning an alternative Conservative News Network due to the Murdoch boys primping Fox toward the Left.

 

Then in trying some confirmation to Mediaite I ran into a Freedom Outpost article claiming there is ample proof that Bill O’Reilly’s termination from Fox News was a smear campaign from uber-Left media outlet Media Matters:

 

Liberals everywhere are rejoicing at the latest news that their TV boogeyman, Bill O’Reilly has been forced out of Fox News, his longtime home, for alleged sexual harassment. Those on the left shouldn’t be too quick to cheer however; the only reason these allegations are surfacing is because of a targeted smear campaign by politically-linked parties, further jeopardizing the independence of the media. Or perhaps they just don’t care?

 

… Right Wing News shows the evidence that the George Soros-funded group Media Matters was behind the smear campaign against O’Reilly. The smoking gun was an email from the Bonner Group, a leftist fundraising Super PAC for Hillary Clinton, which openly thanked Media Matters for the exposé. Whether O’Reilly is guilty or not, this is further proof of the tactics the globalists will resort to in order to silence dissenting media opinions. Who’s next on their list?

 

American Mirror Writes

 

Are Fox News execs about to hand over the scalp of their ratings king to the smear group Media Matters? (UPDATE: Yes.)

 

On Wednesday, talk radio host Glenn Beck tweeted an email from the Bonner Group, a leftist fundraising firm that works for Media Matters.

 

Bonner Group Email Soliciting to Media Matters Smear Campaign

 

The April 13 email is an invitation to join a briefing call on Media Matters’ campaign against the network’s biggest star.

 

“Thanks to Media Matters, O’Reilly and READ ENTIRETY (Did George Soros Orchestrate the Firing of Bill O’Reilly from Fox News? By MICHAEL DEPINTO; Freedom Outpost; 4/24/17)

 

If I didn’t receive email alerts from Liberty Headlines, I would never have heard (at least at this point) that an alternative Conservative News network might be in the future. The Independent Sentinel uses Mediaite as a source, but does add this:

 

Axios claims he’s one of the people meeting with “high-powered television executives and potential funders” to talk about a new network.

 

Roger Ailes is said to be involved in the talks.

 

The “pitch is that the network could immediately reach at least 85 million homes,” Mediaite writes.

 

There are certainly plenty of conservative powerhouses – some out of work – to pick from that could star on a new network. They might even be able to lure some executives away. (Serious Discussions of a New Right-Leaning Network Are Taking Place – Updated; By S. Noble; Independent Sentinel; 4/29/17)

 

Here is the Mediaite story.

 

JRH 4/30/17

Please Support NCCR

*****************

EXCLUSIVE: Advanced Talks Underway For New Conservative Network Amid Fears Fox News Moving Too Far Left

 

By Rachel Stockman

April 28th, 2017 10:45 am

Mediaite

 

On the heels of major shakeups at the Fox News Network, an alternative conservative network is being actively discussed amongst conservative fat cats.

 

A well-placed source close to the proposal tells Mediaite that serious discussions are underway to create an alternative conservative cable network on the belief that the Fox News Network is moving too far to the left. The source, who is engaged in the talks, says a meeting is planned for today with two prominent high-powered television executives, some underperforming conservative networks and people who have an interest and the ability to fund a new network.

 

The potential aim? Putting “the old band” back together. There are certainly plenty of (out-of-work?) conservative powerhouses to pick from that could star on a new network, and perhaps even some executives from within Fox News who might be lured by the new opportunity. Could the new channel include stars like the ousted Bill O’Reilly, who didn’t waste much time hitting the podcast waves after he was fired amid a sexual harassment scandal? Could Tomi Lahren, the conservative mega star, who was recently sidelined at The Blaze also take on a prominent role? The exact “who” won’t be clear until the deal is more defined but the source says the pitch is that the network could immediately reach at least 85 million homes.

 

This news comes on the heels of a long profile in last weekend’s New York Times which paints a picture of a changing Fox News Network with Murdoch’s sons, James and Lachlan, CEO and co-chairman of parent company 21st Century Fox, at the helm. The piece struck fear into the minds of some Fox News’ hardcore conservatives with talk of the sons wanting to rid the company “of the old-guard culture on which their father built his empire” and bringing “a warmer and fuzzier workplace” that would move away from an “anti-politically correct environment.”

 

On Thursday, New York Magazine‘s Gabe Sherman, a constant thorn in the side of Fox News, reported that “sweeping management changes” may be coming to the network as well. Sherman’s report cited three anonymous sources that contend that the network’s co-President Bill Shine recently asked the Murdoch sons to release a statement in support of him amid the roiling lawsuits and scandals. Both Fox News and 21 Century Fox have vigorously denied that Shine made such a request but the report by Sherman prompted a rather mysterious tweet about the “total end of the FNC as we know it” by the network’s biggest remaining star, Sean Hannity:

 

Sean Hannity

@seanhannity

Gäbe i pray this is NOT true because if it is, that’s the total end of the FNC as we know it. Done. Best Sean https://twitter.com/gabrielsherman/status/857604245197119488

3:31 PM – 27 Apr 2017

 

“I just don’t see Fox News and Sean having a long relationship. If Sean becomes available, you have 100 percent turnover in primetime and a huge opportunity,” a television executive, who didn’t want to be identified, but is involved in some of the talks, told Mediaite.

 

“I’m working on it (the new conservative channel) hot and heavy,” the source said. “It’s live, it’s real.” The new channel could come to fruition within the next 10 to 12 months, the executive said.

 

It is no surprise that a savvy investor would see the turmoil within Fox News as a major opportunity. As The Times piece noted, analysts estimate that Fox News produced 25 percent of 21st Century Fox’s operating income last year or a whopping $6.6 billion. Conservative news remains a cash cow for investors, but the media landscape is quickly changing with younger viewers “cutting the cord” and turning to alternative over-the-top live streaming platforms like Hulu, Amazon, Roku and YouTube TV. Could a conservative alternative channel with some big names have an edge on the 20-year-old conservative network? Stay tuned. Our source is convinced it can happen.

 

Update 12:58 p.m: This article has been updated with a quote from a television executive who is involved in the talks.

 

___________________

New Conservative News Network?

John R. Houk

© April 30, 2017

__________________

EXCLUSIVE: Advanced Talks Underway For New Conservative Network Amid Fears Fox News Moving Too Far Left

 

© 2017 Mediaite, LLC

 

Pamela Geller vs Imam Anjem Choudary on Fox News, Hannity: ‘You Want Her To Die!’


Pamela Geller vs. Anjem Choudary

Pamela Geller vs. Anjem Choudary
 
Last night the psycho-Imam from the UK was on Hannity to debate Pamela Geller on if she should die or not for exercising her First Amendment right of Free Speech. In case you are stuck on Left Wing media outlets, Imam Anjem Choudary felt Geller should be judged and held accountable according to Sharia Law for organizing the Mo Cartoon Contest entitled the Muhammad Art Exhibit at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland TX. The murderous intention of Jihadi Muslims Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi was nipped in the bud quickly by the security off-duty Garland Police Officer who shot the Muslim dolt duo just after they open fired (See HERE and HERE).
 
JRH 5/7/15 (Hat Tip: Pamela Geller – Atlas Shrugs)

Please Support NCCR

***************************
 
 
Posted by YouLatestNews
Published on May 6, 2015
 
SHOCK VIDEO: Radical Imam Tells Pamela Geller on Live TV She Should be SLAUGHTERED. Hannity: ‘You’re Evil and Pathetic’. ‘You want her to die!’: Hannity clashes with Islamic extremist over anti-Muslim activist Pamela Geller. ‘You Want Her to Die!’ Hannity, Pam Geller Come to Blows with Anjem Choudary. Pamela Geller: FBI Has Not Contacted Me Despite Terrorist Threat by ISIS. Fox News Hannity Sean Hannity and Pamela Geller got into a pretty fierce shouting match with Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary over whether Geller should be put to death for organizing a cartoon contest to, as Choudary put it, insult Muhammad and all Muslims. (Pam Geller Claims No Contact from FBI, Homeland Security Since Terror Attack).The contest, of course, was targeted by two shooters who ended up dead and have reported ties to ISIS.
Choudary has been on Hannity’s show many times before, and tonight Hannity asked him point-blank, “Do you support this death threat against Pam Geller because she ran a free speech contest?”

RELATED: Ingraham Grills Geller: Why ‘Go Out of the Way to Offend a Billion Muslims’? [Blog Editor: Link by this Editor rather than Youtube poster.]

Choudary argued there’s a difference between cartoons of Mickey Mouse and cartoons of Muhammad, and said Geller went in “knowing full well” many Muslims consider blasphemy an issue worthy of the death penalty. Hannity went off and shouted, “You want her to die!”

Choudary said Geller should be put before a court and tried, and she would end up punished. Geller shot back, “To blame me and say that my cartoons are controversial… murdering cartoonists is controversial.”

They got into a shouting match (Geller told him to stop interrupting and at one point said “I know you’re used to stepping over women”), and Choudary told her she “knew the consequences.” They continued fighting, Choudary went off on a tangent about the U.S. “murdering innocent people,” and Hannity ended by calling him “evil and pathetic.”

Islamic Imam Anjem Choudary told Pamela Geller tonight that she should be slaughtered for her Texas cartoon contest.
This was an AMAZING exchange
Anjem Choudary: We’re talking about people who deliberately had a competition to insult the messenger Mohammad… If you saw the cartoons that Charlie Hebdo drew you would understand the anger. And now this woman was to draw cartoons or have people draw cartoons to insult the prophet knowing full well that this carries the death penalty in Islam… She should be put before Shariah court and tried and of course she would face capitol punishment.
This was an amazing exchange.
Best Line—
Pamela Geller to Anjem Choudary: “I’m talking, sir… I know you’re used to stepping over women but you’re not going to have it here.”

Video footage caught on tape cellphone camera surveillance raw dash cam air live on tv share comment like most popular HD

_________________________

ISNA Radical – OK Local ISNA Chapters Radical – Alton Nolan Radical


Islamists LUV inability Connect Dots

John R. Houk

© October 10, 2014

 

I am on a Jihad Watch alert list for posts. I received an alert relating to Robert Spencer (Mr. Jihad Watch) being on Hannity talking about the Oklahoma City Mosque that was attended by Jihadi assassin formerly known as Alton Nolan but now for the glory of allah goes by Jah’keem Yisrael. The name of that Mosque is Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City.

 

On Hannity was not only Spencer and Hannity but also the pseudonymous former Muslim and former member of the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City called Noor. I actually first saw Noor (or I should say his blacked-out version) on The Kelly File hosted by Megyn Kelly.

 

On The Kelly File Noor exposed the OKC Mosque as a stealth hotbed of Radical Islam that covertly support Islamic Terrorism while to the public the Mosque officials lie through crescent moon teeth about being on the side of Moderate Islam.

 

SIDE NOTE: There is a sister Mosque of the Islamic Society of Greater OKC called the Islamic Society of Tulsa. The very same Mosque that the Tulsa Police Chief ordered Captain Paul Fields to attend fake Law Enforcement Appreciation Day which was really a Muslim proselytization moment. As a Christian, Captain Fields refused to subject himself to the worship and tenets of Islam. The Police Chief disciplined Captain Fields by suspending him. Remarkably on 9/15/14 Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Tulsa Police Chief’s violation of Captain Field’s First Amendment Rights of Religious Freedom.

 

The website Wizbang provides a pro-TPD version claiming Captain Fields erred in claiming his First Amendment Rights were violated. Wizbang completely sides with the three Appellate Justices (3-0) decision against Paul Fields. Here is an excerpt of Wizbang’s excerpt of the Appellate ruling:

 

TPD had engaged in community policing for more than two decades, participating in about 3,500 community events between 2004 and 2011. Of those events, more than 350 were held at religious venues or institutions or were sponsored by religious organizations of various faiths. After TPD spent months protecting the Islamic Society and the school next door from a terrorist threat, the Society decided to hold the “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day” event to thank TPD for its help…

 

…No informed reasonable person could view the purpose or effect of TPD’s attendance at the event as suggesting that Islam is a preferred religion. Officers attending the event were not required to attend a religious service (and the timing of visits ensured that no officer would be required to be there during a service), read Islamic literature, or even discuss Islam. Those who wished to learn more about Islam could do so. The Establishment Clause does not prohibit governmental efforts to promote tolerance, understanding, and neighborliness. There is no evidence in the record of any attempts to convert officers to Islam, as opposed to providing information. And in any event, if perhaps some representatives of the Center crossed the line, there is nothing that would suggest to a reasonable observer that such conduct had received governmental endorsement. (About That Gossip …; By David Robertson; Wizbang; 9/29/14)

 

Are Justices over there at the 10th Appellate idiots? Captain Paul Fields was punished and moved to another precinct for refusing to attend the Radical Mosque’s pseudo-Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. It was an attend-or-else order. Then Wizbang author David Robertson steps into the idiocy putting out …

 

“The officers who attended were not required to participate in a Muslim worship service. On the contrary, the event was scheduled during a time when there was no Muslim worship service taking place. Also, the officers were not required to participate a pro-Islam discussion or to read literature about Islam.

 

 

By the way, if a single guest-speaker at a religious institution defines that institution, then Liberty University is a liberal Democrat university, because Ted Kennedy once gave a speech there.”

 

Being in an ungodly worship service is participation in that service even if you do not perform the religious acts of that service. Islam is an antichrist religion and that is insulting to Biblical-minded Christians. Then the pears and apples comparison used implying one Radical Muslim does not make a Mosque radical any more than Conservative Christian Right Liberty University became a Leftist institution when Left Winger Senator Ted Kennedy spoke there.

 

Kennedy may have been a baby-killing supporting, big government and more socialism than Capitalism Senator but he never condemned the Constitution or the operation of his government (even though interpreted both incorrectly) with a – conform or die mandate – as Islam does with its Sharia Law. TALK ABOUT IDIOCY! You can look at how ISIS runs things where in control or how Iran runs things to comprehend that Sharia to-the-T is not only incompatible with the U.S. Constitution but is absolutely antithetical to Christianity. As is the Islamic Society of Greater OKC so is the Islamic Society of Tulsa. Both are affiliated with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and ISNA is a completely radicalized Islamic organization. Paul Fields legal representation is appealing to SCOTUS – HERE and HERE and SEE HERE. END OF SIDE BAR

 

Radical Islam is already in America! DO NOT be scared away by Multicultural Leftists and lying Muslim Apologists that begin to shout “Islamophobe!” That word is as a pejorative to bring guilt for speaking and/or to know about the truth. DO NOT feel guilty about defending your American Values and/or your Judeo-Christian faith. When a religion has kill the Jews and kill the Christians because these “People of the Book” have become ignorant of what Muslims have deluded themselves into believing as the truth.

 

Islamic Society of OKC mosque

 

Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City

 

 

Now I had mentioned that I watched the pseudonymous Noor on The Kelly File. Hannity is giving credit to Robert Spencer for first breaking the news of Noor exposing what goes on for the Muslims-only crowd at the Islam Society of Greater Oklahoma City. Here is that very enlightening Spencer interview with Noor posted on 10/2/14 at JihadWatchVideo:

 

VIDEO: Robert Spencer interviews ex-member of Oklahoma beheader’s mosque

 

Pamela Geller posted some thoughts from a person she only identifies as an ex-Muslim still living in the OKC area that is similar to the words of Noor:

 

I went to the same mosque the Oklahoma Muslim who beheaded his co-worker today. I live ten minutes away!

 

The Imam was Imad Enchassi the last I heard. He was a friend of mine. He is a Lebanese-born Sunni who hates Israel. He once gave a sermon that the Israelis were trying to collapse al-Aqsa mosque by digging tunnels underneath it. They have no issue with Palestinian suicide bombings because, as it was explained to me, that is the only weapon the Palestinians have.

 

They sold Milestones in the book shop while I was there, which as you know calls for replacing all non-Islamic governments with Islamic ones. I remember listening to a tape a friend of mine, Yahya Graff, another white convert to Islam, had that prayed for the destruction of Israel and America.

 

The imam when I first converted, Suhaib Webb, is hailed as a moderate by liberals in the United States but he was the one that explicitly told me that according to Islam, three choices are to be given to non-Muslims: convert, pay the jizyah tax and live under Islamic rule, or jihad. They try very hard to whitewash Islam when the media is around, but they believe in their religion and the ultimate goal of an Islamic caliphate. (Oklahoma beheader’s mosque taught caliphate, destruction of US and Israel; By Pamela Geller; Atlas Shrugs; 9/27/14)

 

Here is a shorter in scope dialogue that includes Hannity, Noor and Spencer on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show from 10/6/14:

 

VIDEO: Robert Spencer on Fox News Sean Hannity Show

 

Now this shows the mind-blowing insensitivity that President Barack Hussein Obama has for the victims of homicidal jihadis such as Alton Nolen. Attributed to the White House so one has to believe at the very least signed off on by BHO a special message marking the end of the pilgrimage period to Mecca called Eid Ul-Adha; however the purpose of the message from the White House was to congratulate the ISGOKC Mosque for voluntary work contributing to rebuilding the Moore community from last year’s devastating tornado that ripped through the OKC suburb city:

 

Today, an official from Washington D.C. flew in to Oklahoma to present a special thank you to the Muslim congregation.

 

He read a message from President Barrack Obama, extending warm greetings from the American people during the Muslim holiday.

 

“Your service is a powerful example of the powerful roots of the Abrahamic faiths and how our communities can come together with shared peace with dignity and a sense of justice,” President Barack Obama said.

 

The Imam, the leader of the prayer service, stated during his sermon that the Muslim faith has been called a “cancer that needs to be cut off from the American society.”

 

Now, with the recent praise, Oklahoma Muslims have been reassured that they are a part of the American society. (Oklahoma Muslims receive special praise from White House officials; By ANDREW DONLEY; KFOR.com – Channel 4; 10/4/14 3:26 PM – UPDATED 10/6/14 07:31PM)

 

See Also Western Journalism

 

What the Imam said for OKC Channel 4 cameras was public hence a load of hogwash because Islam is a cancer that needs to be cut off from American society, especially the kind of Islam practiced by the Mosque at ISGOKC. AND when the Imam told whatever Muslims call a Mosque congregation they can now be reassured that Muslims were a part of American society, based on the Radical Islam that Noor reports goes on behind closed door I can imagine that Imam felt he had to flush his Taqiyya gullet with mouth wash.

 

Check out Radio host taking the Taqiyya of a Muslim Apologist defending Islam:

 

VIDEO: Radio host takes on Muslim over lies

 

Allow me to finish with this. Thanks to Justin Smith I found an article at Raw Story reporting on a Muskogee, OK State Representative John Bennett at a Townhall meeting telling the people about Islam in light of Jihadi assassin Alton Nolen beheading of Colleen Hufford who had just had her Moore residence rebuilt. (I wonder – does anyone see the irony of the ISGOKC Mosque receiving praise from President Obama for aiding in rebuilding of Moore, OK and the beheaded victim that just had her home rebuilt?)

 

I find John Bennett a bold guy for bucking political correctness to face criticism for voicing a mistrust for Muslims that claim to be devout. At Raw Story Bennett is made out to be a product of – what for it- Islamophobic Conservative Talk Radio for his words:

 

In a town hall appearance in Muskogee, Republican Oklahoma State Rep. John Bennett told the assembled crowd that the expansion of rights for Muslim Americans is no different than the growth of the Nazi Party in Germany before World War II.

 

Bennett argued that there are no distinctions between radical Islamists and everyday Muslims, that all of them are programmed by their faith to attack and destroy Christianity.

 

“Mohammed’s teaching only teaches one thing,” he told the Muskogee Patriots this week. “And that’s the violence that we’re seeing today in ISIS and in the beheading in Moore and other places.”

 

In September, a 30-year-old employee of Vaughan Foods attacked two women, killing and beheading one of them. The suspect, Alton Nolen, had recently converted to Islam and had reportedly tried to convert coworkers. However, police have not ascribed a religious motive to the murder, which is being prosecuted as an act of workplace violence.

 

Rep. Bennett, however, sees the attack as evidence of a growing domestic jihad movement in this country.

 

Audience member Tina Kelley accused Bennett of needlessly fomenting suspicion and fear of Islamic people, citing her friendships with Muslim families.

 

“They don’t like having their government say that they’re no better than ISIS,” Kelley said, “and having their Oklahoma neighbors made afraid of them.”

 

“Well, let me ask you a question,” Bennett countered. “Where are your nice friends? Why aren’t they here? Why aren’t they out there saying, ‘Hey, we don’t believe in that?’”

 

He said that Muslims condemn violence against the innocent, but that no one outside the Muslim faith is considered truly innocent by Islamic standards. Muslims, said Bennett, can only be trusted if they fully renounce their faith.

 

“Do you think every German was a Nazi?” he asked. “No, they weren’t. But what happened with the Nazis was that once they got in power, all those Germans that sat quiet or were scared to say anything had no choice but to follow and support what they were doing.”

 

“So is every Muslim bad? No,” he said, “but if they subscribe to Islam and what it teaches, and if they’re not standing up and condemning what Islam teaches, then they’re just going right along with them, just like the Germans did when the Nazis were around.”

 

In September, U.S. Muslim leaders drafted and sent a 17-page open letter to the leaders of ISIS denouncing them and their use of violence in the name of their faith. British Muslims started the #NotInMyName campaign to denounce the group’s violence and extremism.

 

Media watchdog group Media Matters pointed out that multiple mainstream Islamic groups around the world have forcibly denounced ISIS, and yet conservative media regularly demand to know why more Muslims aren’t speaking out. (Oklahoma Republican: Muslims can’t be trusted if they practice Islam; By DAVID FERGUSON; Raw Story; 10/8/14)

 

At the very end of the article author Ferguson embeds a PBS news story on that Town Hall meeting held by Rep. John Bennett. On the blogs I operate typically only Youtube videos are allowed to be embedded; ergo here is that link to the PBS video: http://videos.oeta.tv/video/2365339599/  

 

Now just to comment on Tina Kelley’s thoughts that she has some dear Muslim friends who are not violent and are afraid of the government when good Representatives like John Bennett tell the truth about Islam. There is an element in truth on what Kelley says. But you need to understand that what Tina Kelley views as a good Muslim is a Muslim who has cherry picked their religion to act on what is good and ignore what is bad. Radical Muslims despise the Muslims that cherry pick their religion as selective kafir or secularist kafir who should pay the price for not being a devout Muslim according to what Muslims believe is the perfect man in the pseudo-prophet Mohammed and the very words of allah disseminated by Mo in the Quran.

 

The dualistic nature of Islam is something that is difficult for a Westerner to understand. Islamic dualism allows contradictory Quranic words or thoughts to be compatibly correct depending on the physical situation a Muslim or the Muslim ummah may find itself in. Hence when the Quran proclaims there is no compulsion of religion in Islam that works in the West; however in a Muslim dominated land (Dar al-Islam) any unbeliever (i.e. kafir) that does not submit absolutely to the tenets prescribed for unbelievers can be executed for disrespecting Islam and Mo. Hence the kill-them-wherever-you-find-those-kafir – also in the Quran – is just as valid as the call for no compulsion of religion or the call to respect the People of the Book; viz. Jews and Christians. The contradictory concepts are valid depending on the situation.

 

AND THEN as to the European campaign of “#NotInMyName” or the 17 page American-Muslim leaders denouncing ISIS, that is the exception rather than the rule among the Muslims in the West.

 

I know I said I was wrapping it up, but I have to share this with you. According to Ralph Mauro and expert in Islam but not a Muslim shares the extreme deception of this 17 page open letter:

 

A published letter to the Islamic State (ISIS) signed by 126 international Muslim leaders and scholars, including top American leaders, is getting major press for rebutting the theological arguments behind the actions of Islamic State. Unfortunately, the same letter endorsed the goal of the Islamic State of rebuilding the caliphate and sharia governance, including its brutal hudud punishments.

 

Point 16 of the letter states, “Hudud punishments are fixed in the Qu’ran and Hadith and are unquestionably obligatory in Islamic Law.” The criticism of the Islamic State by the scholars is that the terrorist group is not “following the correct procedures that ensure justice and mercy.”

 

The Muslim “moderates” who signed the letter not only endorsed the combination of mosque and state; they endorsed the most brutal features of sharia governance as seen in Iran, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere.

 

An example of a hudud punishment is the death penalty for apostates (Muslims who leave Islam). The letter does not dispute or oppose that. It says that labeling Muslims as apostates is only permissible when an individual “openly declares disbelief.”

 

The signatories are not condemning the execution of apostates, only how the Islamic State is deciding who qualifies as an apostate.

 

Point 7 states that Islam forbids the killing of diplomats, journalists and aid workers, but READ THE REST (Muslim Leaders Sign Letter Against ISIS, But Endorse Sharia; By Ryan Mauro; The Counter Jihad Report; 10/1/14)

 

This is theopolitical Islamic duality in action. It enables schmoozing to non-Muslims while simultaneously maintaining the superiority of Islam to the ummah.

 

The Media Matters organization is a Left Wing propaganda tool of George Soros utilizing the guilt complex of making Conservative Talk Radio to be the pejorative sense of the manipulative word “Islamophobia”.

 

JRH 10/10/14 (Hat Tips to Justin Smith & Tony S.O.)

Please Support NCCR

 

Palin vs. Boehner – Who do YOU Agree With?


Sarah Palin - John Boehner

John R. Houk

© July 10, 2014

 

Yesterday I posted about and whole heartedly agreed with Sarah Palin’s July 8 Breitbart Op-Ed column calling for President Barack Hussein Obama’s impeachment. Today I learned Palin stood by her Op-Ed by appearing on Hannity defending her impeachment call against Obama.

 

VIDEO: Sean Hannity Interviews Sarah Palin – Time to Impeach Obama Now! – Fox News – July 8, 2014

 

 

Published by SpecialStuffMix

Published on Jul 8, 2014

 

July 8, 2014 – (Fox News) – Sean Hannity Interviews Sarah Palin – Time to Impeach Obama Now! —— Sarah Palin joined Sean Hannity tonight to explain why she’s now calling for President Obama’s impeachment; namely, she’s tired of the president’s lawlessness and use of executive power, and the Republicans can’t just “bring a lawsuit to a gunfight,” they need to “halt an imperial presidency.”

Palin argued that Obama is becoming an imperial president who’s “lying to the American people” that needs to be reined in. She dismissed the idea this would be a losing issue for Republicans and, in fact, argued that the impeachment of the president is a bipartisan issue that plenty of Democrats should be able to find agreement with.

Hannity wondered if the GOP would seriously take this up. Palin said if they don’t have the “cojones,” they should, and declared that any person who cares about the safety and security of the nation needs to get behind filing articles of impeachment because “enough is enough.”

 

Of course you know (if you read my yesterday’s post) I concur with Sarah Palin – “enough is enough”.

 

I was not surprised to learn that Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) curtly responded to Palin’s Hannity appearance – “I disagree”.

 

VIDEO: John Boehner – ” I Disagree on Impeachment for Obama ” – Reply to Sarah Palin Republicans – 7-9-14

 

 

Published by NewsLoadNow

Published on July 9, 2014

 

7-9-14 – (John Boehner on IMPEACH OBAMA Stance by Republicans and Sarah Palin) – Yesterday, when a reporter asked Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) if he agrees with Sarah Palin’s call to impeach President Barack Obama, he politely responded, “I always respect other people’s opinions,” before saying he has no plans to make such a proposal. When House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) was asked the same question at his press conference this morning, his response was a bit more terse to say the least. He appeared to lose interest in the question as it was being asked, saying curtly, “I disagree,” while scanning the assembled press to see who he could call on next.

When the reporter continued to ask about House Republicans who also think Obama should be impeached, his expression grew more stern and he repeated, “I disagree.”

Last month, when Boehner confirmed his plans to sue President Obama over his use of executive actions, the speaker insisted, “This is not about impeachment, this is about his faithfully executing the laws of our country.”

 

 

Boehner’s flippant answer in a disdainful manner is at least one of the reasons Tea Party Conservatives desire him to be replaced as the lead Republican making him Speaker of the House. It is also a classic example of Republicans labeled RINOs and of Conservative Republicans more concerned about political position than moving the USA back to the very Conservative principles enumerated in the Republican Party Platform (2012). I suspect when Palin was referring to a Party Platform it was to point two – We The People: A Restoration of Constitutional Government. Here are the subsections of this platform point:

 

o   A Restoration of Constitutional Order: Congress and the Executive

 

o   Defending Marriage Against An Activist Judiciary

 

o   A Sacred Contract: Defense of Marriage

 

o   Living Within Our Means: A Constitutional Budget

 

o   Federalism and The Tenth Amendment

 

o   The Continuing Importance of Protecting the Electoral College

 

o   Voter Integrity to Ensure Honest Elections

 

o   The First Amendment: The Foresight of Our Founders to Protect Religious Freedom

 

o   The First Amendment: Speech that is Protected

 

o   The Second Amendment: Our Right to Keep and Bear Arms

 

o   The Fourth Amendment: Liberty and Privacy

 

o   The Fifth Amendment: Protecting Private Property

 

o   The Ninth Amendment: Affirming the People’s Rights

 

o   The Sanctity and Dignity of Human Life

 

o   Respect for Our Flag: Symbol of the Constitution

 

o   American Sovereignty in U.S. Courts

 

 

Now I can understand why President Closet-Communist thumbs his nose at these platform headings, BUT I cannot accept that the current most powerful person in the Republican Party does not think Obama has flagrantly abused these Constitutional stands. When Speaker Boehner proclaims publically at a press conference, “I disagree,” he also thumbing his nose at the GOP Party Platform. I have to wonder – does this mean Boehner intends to abandon Conservative principles in supporting the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution?

 

Boehner is only the tip of the iceberg of Republicans lacking cojones to act on what needs to be done to protect this nation from Obama’s agenda of transforming America from the Founding Father’s constitutional vision to a top-down Leftist utopian government. The writer that goes by the pseudonym AllahPundit at Hot Air brings up some great observations about Republicans that are bona fide Conservatives yet play politics above the needs of WE THE PEOPLE:

 

… He [Boehner] wants to do something bold to show conservatives that he’s resisting Obama’s power grabs, but not so bold that it’ll blow up in the GOP’s face in November. The lawsuit is the perfect gesture. It gives him an excuse to rail against executive overreach publicly while booting the disposition of the matter to the courts. If they rule against him, it’s the judiciary’s fault, not his. And if it takes a year or more for the case to wend its way up to the Supreme Court, even better. It’s off his plate, which is what’s important. (Said Palin to Hannity last night, “You don’t bring a lawsuit to a gunfight, and there’s no room for lawyers on our front lines.”) For him to turn around and agree with Palin on impeachment after all that would be bizarre. Why pursue a circuitous legal route to rein in Obama if he’s prepared to try to remove him from office entirely?

 

It’s not just Boehner who’s running away from impeachment either. In purple-state Iowa, GOP Senate nominee Joni Ernst — who’s been endorsed by Palin — carefully explained to Yahoo News yesterday that she didn’t really say she wanted to impeach Obama the last time she said she wanted to impeach Obama.

 

Republican Iowa U.S. Senate candidate Joni Ernst attempted Tuesday night to walk back statements made at a January event in which she said President Barack Obama had “become a dictator” who should be “removed from office” or face “impeachment.”…

 

“To be clear, I have not seen any evidence that the President should be impeached,” the statement …

 

… Could Boehner’s impeachment-avoidance strategy end up backfiring if he loses his lawsuit? Imagine a federal judge rules that the House’s dispute with O over executive power is a political question that should either be decided by the people at the polls or by the people’s representatives through their Article I powers — which, of course, includes impeachment. The courts will have essentially punted this issue back to Boehner and told him, a la Erick Erickson, to man up and accept the political risk of trying to remove the president if he’s allegedly so troubled by executive overreach. What’s Boehner’s move then? Use the power of the purse to choke off funding for Obama’s priorities and quietly ignore impeachment altogether, right?

 

… (Boehner: I disagree with Palin about impeaching Obama; By AllahPundit; Hot Air; 7/9/14 12:41 PM)

 

This indicates that among RINOs and Conservatives in the Republican Party, their power structure has become political rather than considering their constituents or this American Republic designed to accommodate the American people in Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Hannity had asked Palin toward the end of his interview if Palin was considering leaving the GOP. She answered carefully and semi-cryptically to the effect she had no intention to leave the Republican Party but if the Party leaves her what choice would she have. Since the Republican debacle of Election 2012 I have sensed the Republican Party has left true Conservatives. What choice should we make?

 

JRH 7/10/14

Please Support NCCR

Wikileaks Founder a Terrorist?


Hannity interviews Ann Coulter about WikiLeaks. Read this: http://www.slantright.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2852. Coulter talks about WikiLeaks, National Security and the treasonous homosexual behind the leak to WikiLeaks.

 

JRH 12/2/10 (Hat Tip Ed)