Did Illegal Surveillance Pass Laws in USA?


John R. Houk

© July 14, 2017

 

I realize there are a lot of unsubstantiated Conspiracy Theories out there. Because of this Conspiracy Theories are much like the old story of a Boy who Cried Wolf. In this day and age of television, video games, laptops, etc.; parents may not share classic stories like Aesop’s Fables that end with a learning moral. The moral of the Boy who Cried Wolf is if you tell an alarming lie all the time, when you tell the alarming truth, no one will believe you.

 

Deciphering the credible from the incredible Conspiracies brings up the Boy who Cried Wolf scenario in believability. I have unappreciated disagreements with Conspiracy Theory enthusiasts about the credible and incredible.

 

The current Deep State conspiracy to bring down the Trump Administration by any lying means necessary is remarkably credible hence believable.

 

The sad thing about this anti-Trump conspiracy is that a huge swath of Americans that ONLY get their information from the primary Mainstream Media (MSM), televised or print, are probably duped into believing President Trump is a corrupt criminal. The problem is the MSM is a part of the Deep State cabal conspiring against President Trump and the agenda he was elected to perform.

 

Ergo, if the MSM actually tells the truth about some info, their dishonesty has been so pervasive, I can’t believe them. AND YOU shouldn’t believe their wolf crying either.

 

Thanks to the Winning America Now e-newsletter, I have discovered some Deep State info that Chief Justice John Roberts may have been blackmailed into being the deciding Justice in validating Obamacare.

 

What was the possible dirt collecting method against Chief Justice Roberts? Illegal surveillance by the CIA and/or NSA perpetrated by the Obama Administration.

 

In full disclosure of the credibility/incredibility scale, one of the sources involved in making this public is former Sheriff Joe Arpaio who nearly convinced me that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii. Arpaio made some very credible assessments of Obama’s Birth Certificate validity. **

 

** On a personal level of opinion, I believe Obama was indeed born in Hawaii rather than Kenya. However, sometime between Hawaii to Indonesia and back to Hawaii, something hinky happened with Obama’s citizenship status. It is my opinion that Obama’s citizenship records were thus messed up in the travels that may have even gotten him into Occidental College as a foreign exchange student. For me this explains the suspicious Birth Certificate and the reasons Obama school records from childhood through college have been sealed from public exposure. That’s my conjecture and not a proven fact.

 

Below is the illegal Obama surveillance story that if true, should cause a huge Constitutional crisis with Obama forcing an unconstitutional law into constitutional validity via clandestine blackmail.

JRH 7/14/17

Please Support NCCR

**************

EVIDENCE: Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Was ‘Hacked’ By Obama Officials

 

By Patrick Howley, Editor-in-Chief

July 12, 2017 8:07 am EST

Big League Politics

 

Evidence shows that John Roberts, chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, was “hacked” by a Deep State surveillance operation overseen by Obama administration CIA director John Brennan and Obama director of national intelligence James Clapper.

 

Roberts, the Bush appointee who made the decisive vote to uphold the constitutionality of Obamacare before the 2012 election, was allegedly the victim of the same Deep State surveillance program that spied on President Donald Trump.

 

Tapes released by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow — preserved on a Whistleblower Soundcloud page — show real estate billionaire Timothy Blixseth explaining Brennan and Clapper’s surveillance program to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and detective Mike Zullo. The existence of this surveillance program has been corroborated by Wikileaks’ “Vault 7” release and by the public comments of former CIA and NSA contractor Dennis Montgomery, who says he worked on the program for Brennan and Clapper.

 

Montgomery has gone public with his claims exposing how the program was used to spy on President Donald Trump when he was a private citizen. Montgomery has gained immunity and desperately wants House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes or other lawmakers to call him to testify about what he knows.

 

On the explosive tapes, Blixseth walks Arpaio and Zullo through the details of the program on a computer screen. At one point, the three begin pulling up specific names of targeted individuals.

 

“You know who that guy is? That’s the head of the FISA court they hacked into, Reggie Walton,” Blixseth tells the investigators.

 

“John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, was hacked,” Blixseth tells Arpaio and Zullo.

 

LISTEN TO THE TAPE HERE (18:00 Minute Mark)

 

Insiders have always been skeptical of Roberts’ motives for siding with President Obama on the 2012 Obamacare case. While there’s still no available evidence that Roberts was blackmailed, the allegation that he was “hacked” by Obama officials provides some more context into the justice’s controversial career.

 

As Big League Politics reported, former FBI director James Comey seized and buried volumes of information that demonstrated this wide-ranging government surveillance operation targeting Donald Trump before he became president.

 

Larry Klayman, attorney for former NSA and CIA contractor and whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, delivered to the FBI 47 hard drives and data amounting to more than 600 million pages of documentation on the surveillance scheme. Then-FBI director James Comey’s general counsel James Baker took the data into his possession, according to multiple sources. But despite possessing Montgomery’s bombshell whistleblower revelations, Comey never acted on or publicized the information.

 

Additionally, Comey’s former firm Lockheed Martin granted entry to Montgomery to one of its facilities to help him work on the alleged mass surveillance program, which was allegedly overseen by Obama administration officials John Brennan and James Clapper and specifically targeted Trump.

 

“This guy showed me 900 million phone calls. And I see myself in there. I see people I know. I see Donald Trump in there a zillion times, and Bloomberg is in there,” Blixseth said on the tape, referring to information that Montgomery allegedly showed him.

 

“We don’t have any comment,” the FBI told Big League Politics when questioned about the existence of the program.

 

“I provided to the FBI seventeen businesses of Donald Trump, including the Trump Tower, the Trump leasing programs, all of these different programs, and including Trump himself and the various family members that had been wiretapped under these programs,” Montgomery said in a recent interview. “There has been a wiretap on Trump for years.”

 

“I started by going to Maricopa County and showing that Sheriff Arpaio himself was wiretapped under the Obama administration,” the whistleblower said.

 

“I was a CIA contractor both under John Brennan and under James Clapper and these individuals were running domestic surveillance programs in the United States collecting information on Americans. This isn’t political. They were collecting information on Republicans and Democrats. But they collected everything they could find. Bank accounts, phone numbers, chats, emails, and they collected a massive amount of it under the Obama administration,” Montgomery said.

_____________________

Did Illegal Surveillance Pass Laws in USA?

John R. Houk

© July 14, 2017

__________________

EVIDENCE: Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Was ‘Hacked’ By Obama Officials

 

© 2017 Big League News

 

About Big League Politics

 

Big League Politics is a fast-paced news site led by a team of top-level investigative reporters, filmmakers, and citizen journalists all over the country. We challenge powerful politicians in both the Republican and Democratic Parties. We are not conservative. We are not liberal. We are road warriors fighting the good fight for journalism. How did this happen? It happened because the mainstream media and corporate journalism outlets are bought off by shady interests and they don’t tell the truth. We got sick and tired of it. That’s why most of our writers are completely incapable of getting a job anywhere else.

 

Our Ethics

 

  1. All stories on Big League Politics are factually accurate.

 

  1. All stories on Big League Politics are in the public interest. We don’t suck up to politicians. We expose corruption and give people the best information on the politics of the day. If we’re reporting it, then it’s important.

 

  1. No target is too big or too small. If someone has broken the public trust, we will be there in his/her face with a video camera.

 

  1. We let our writers have a voice. It is not our job to agree with everything that our writers say. But free speech is under attack at most publications and we think that’s wrong. At Big League Politics, censorship is READ THE REST

 

Judicial Tyranny or Constitutional Supremacy:


SCOTUS Travel Ban Ruling Decides

 

By John R. Houk

© June 4, 2017

 

Here is a quote that rings true about Lower Federal Courts striking down President Trump’s Executive Order travel ban from Islamic terrorist ridden nations or areas:

 

Lower federal court judges have struck down the executive orders as unconstitutional based on their ideology, not the rule of law”.

 

The quote comes from journalist author Douglas V. Gibbs at the Canada Free Press speculating with some positive certainty that SCOTUS will strike down the Lower Courts to President Trump’s favor.

 

Gibbs’ positivism comes from the plain English of the U.S. Constitution. Ergo Gibbs posits that SCOTUS will uphold the rule of law spelled out in ink in the Constitution.

 

I pray Gibbs is correct. We are about to find out of a Trump appointee to the Supreme Court was worth waiting to elect him as President.

 

There are roughly two trains of thought on Constitutional interpretation: Original Intent of the Founders and the Living Constitution which can loosely interpreted to fit the Secular Humanist’s view of what society is or will be.

 

President Trump’s EOs ran into Left-Wing Activist Judges committed to the Living Constitution interpretation.

 

The Activist Judges struck down President Trump’s Travel Ban Eos by interpreting Donald Trump’s campaign speeches as being anti-Islam and so the EOs were aimed at discriminating against Muslims rather protecting American citizens.

 

If a majority of SCOTUS Justices follow the Living Constitution methodology of interpretation you can kiss Separation of Powers goodbye in the separate but equal Checks and Balances that Civics so often affirmed as a constitutional doctrine of the U.S. Government.

 

WHY?

 

Because a Living Constitution Judicial Branch becomes the dictator of laws made by man rather than the rule of law. A Judicial dictatorship was one of the great concerns of the Founding Fathers of the constitutionally created Judicial Branch:

 

“[N]othing in the Constitution has given [the judiciary] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the executive to decide for them. Both magistracies are equally independent in the sphere of action assigned to them… the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional, and what are not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature & Executive also, in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch.“- Thomas Jefferson [Undeniable Quotes: The Founding Fathers Warn About SCOTUS]

 

“[A] limited Constitution … can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing … To deny this would be to affirm … that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.” – Alexander Hamilton [Undeniable Quotes: The Founding Fathers Warn About SCOTUS]

 

Thomas Jefferson letter to Charles Hammond

Categories: Courts / Judiciary

Date: August 18, 1821

It has long, however, been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression . . . that the germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal judiciary; . . . working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped. (Thomas Jefferson – It has longQuotes Database)

 

Alexander Hamilton The Federalist Papers Federalist No. 78

Categories: Courts / Judiciary

Date: June 14, 1788

The Judiciary . . . has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will. (The JudiciaryQuotes Database)

 

Thomas Jefferson letter to Judge Spencer Roane

Categories: Courts / Judiciary

Date: September 6, 1819

The Constitution . . . is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please. (The ConstitutionQuotes Database)

 

Alexander Hamilton The Federalist Papers Federalist No. 78

Categories: Courts / Judiciary

Date: June 14, 1788

And it proves, in the last place, that liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have everything to fear from its union with either of the other departments. (And it ProvesQuotes Database)

 

James Madison The Federalist Papers Federalist No. 47

Categories: Separation of Powers

Date: January 30, 1788

The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. (The Accumulation of all PowersQuotes Database)

 

These are just a few quotes by the Founding Fathers on concerns of one Branch dominating the others thus promoting tyranny. To do a little reading on your own about the concerns of dominant Branch tyranny go to Quotes Database category Separation of Powers Quotations.

 

My concern currently is Judicial Tyranny which the concept of the Living Constitution enables. And it was Judicial Tyranny stemming from Living Constitution ideology that struck down the Executive Orders of President Trump.

 

The President has asked SCOTUS to expedite a decision on those Executive Orders. How SCOTUS rules will either strengthen Living Constitution Judicial Tyranny a take an important step toward Constitutional Supremacy.

 

Here is some further reading:

 

Why Judicial Supremacy Isn’t Compatible with Constitutional Supremacy; By RAMESH PONNURU; National Review; 9/10/15 4:00 AM

 

Living Constitution, fancy words for judicial tyranny; Posted by Dstarr; News from the Northwoods; 2/15/16 3:22 PM

 

Thomas Jefferson on Judicial Tyranny; By Tenth Amendment Center; 6/4/12

 

A ‘Living Constitution’ for a Dying Republic; By Mark Alexander; The Patriot Post; 9/16/05

 

JRH 6/4/17

 Please Support NCCR

****************

Supreme Court to Lift Ban on Travel Ban

 

By Douglas V. Gibbs

June 4, 2017

Canada Free Press

 

In Trump’s Travel Ban Executive Order, the laws he is executing with the order are listed.  Among them is a law that gives the President the ability to prohibit persons from entering the United States if he believes they may be a danger to the national security of this country.

 

Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution authorizes Congress to make laws prohibiting persons from “migrating” into the United States with legislation.

 

Based on the original intent of the United States Constitution, Trump’s travel ban regarding a few Muslim-majority countries who have proven they are sponsors of terrorism, and are willing to harbor terrorists, is completely constitutional.

 

Lower federal court judges have struck down the executive orders as unconstitutional based on their ideology, not the rule of law.

 

There is no authority granted to the courts to strike down executive orders in the U.S. Constitution, so the actions of these judges have no foundation in constitutional law.

 

If President Trump understood all of these things, then he would simply tell the lower court judges to kiss off, and he would execute his travel ban, anyway.  The courts have no enforcement arm, and have no authority over his executive branch agencies.

 

However, the president decided to let the courts decide, and the next stop within days will likely be the United States Supreme Court.  A ruling is expected soon that would, based on their “opinion” and the current misguided view of the Constitution, lift a temporary stay on President Trump’s revised executive order banning travel from six mostly Muslim countries.

Immigration in the sense of who can cross the border, as per Article I, Section 9, is a federal issue.  The 1st Amendment’s religious clauses only disallow the Congress from making law establishing a state religion, or writing laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion within our jurisdiction.  It has nothing to do with the religion of who is entering (if Islam is a religion at all in the first place), and Article I, Section 9 does not mention that a religious test cannot be used in connection with which migrants can be prohibited.  It also does not violate the Due Process Clause of the 5th and 14th Amendments because this is regarding people who aren’t even citizens of the United States.  As for the alleged ban on nationality discrimination in the issuance of immigrant visas contained in a 65-year-old congressional law, all Congress has to do is repeal that law, and replace it with a new one.

 

The Democrats have somehow equated the rejection of Islam by conservatives as being akin to how Germany treated the Jews while under the NAZI regime prior to, and during, World War II.  The reality is, Islam is not a religion, it is a political system and full way of life that calls itself a religion, and it has more in common with the NAZIs than it does with the persecuted Jews.

 

As Commander in Chief, among his primary functions, the President must protect the country (national security), and that is what his travel ban executive order seeks to accomplish.  Despite what one may think, the reality is that terrorism runs rampant in Islam, and in the countries listed.  If Islam doesn’t want us fearing them, and having the inclination that all Muslims are either terrorists, or support terrorist activity, then Islam needs to clean its own house (if that is even possible).  The problem is, like the Germans who were not NAZIs in Germany, the moderate Muslims are a moot point.  The violent jihadists are the ones driving the message of Islam, so that is what we have to address, despite the alleged notion that the poor moderate Muslims are not in agreement with the violence.

 

We, as a nation, have the right to protect ourselves from any potential enemy, no matter what they choose to call themselves (regime, government, or religion).

 

While there is no timetable on how quickly the Supreme Court will issue a final ruling in the case (again, I am not a supporter of the unconstitutional concept of judicial review, but as the system is thought to be now, this is the last resort the President has. . . aside from ignoring the courts, and carrying out his duties despite their opinions), there are other lower court decisions also brewing regarding the issue.  Two federal appeals courts are also currently considering the issue, and a ruling from the 9th Circus is still pending.  Trump’s Justice Department, however, has asked the Supreme Court to get involved in the issue now.

 

According to Fox News:

 

“The justices have the discretion to wait indefinitely to decide the broader merits of the case, but will issue an order in the meantime on whether the ban can be temporarily enforced. The federal government asked the high court to allow the order to go into effect now, and proposed oral arguments be held in October.”

 

The White House frames the issue as a temporary move involving national security, as they should.  Bureaucrats and men in black robes should not be able to interfere with the duties of the President as Commander in Chief.  His job to protect the United States, while on some fronts are dependent upon Congress (such as when it comes to funding), is his to prosecute, and for judges to abandon the rule of law and act in a manner based on ideology regardless of the law is disgusting, and unconstitutional.

 

The executive order is the second one.  Rather than fight for the first one, the language was changed in a manner that was considered to be “bullet proof,” and then was issued March 6.  The revision, in addition to the added “bullet proof” language, also removed Iraq from the list of countries.

 

Officials say the new executive order only applies to foreign nationals outside the U.S. without a valid visa.

 

The appeals court said its decision was based on what Trump said on the campaign trail about “banning Muslims.”

 

Chief Judge Roger Gregory called it an “executive order that in text speaks with vague words of national security, but in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination.”

 

Intolerance?  The Islamic culture has declared war on the United States, and the liberal left Democrats are treating this like it is a slight misunderstanding.  What about Islamic intolerance?  How about we ban mosques in the United States until Muslim countries start welcoming the building of churches and synagogues on their lands.  Did you know if you fly into a Muslim country, if they search you and discover you have a Bible, it will be destroyed onsite?  What about the genocide against Christians occurring in Muslim-majority countries?  Is that tolerance?
During World War II, would these judges have considered a ban against persons from the axis powers intolerant?

 

By the way, the law that started this thing about the President’s authority to prohibit immigration began with the The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 also known as the McCarran–Walter Act, which gives the president the allowance to restrict immigration into the United States if he believes the persons to be a danger to our national security.  It was passed during a time when we as a country were worried about communist infiltration.  Some Democrats weren’t too happy back then, either, despite the reality that it was a Democrat sponsored law.  Carter, Reagan and Obama all used it to deny entry to certain refugees and diplomats, including from nations such as Iran, Cuba, and North Korea, but you don’t remember the courts worried about Obama’s use of it, do you?

 

The court’s attacks against the executive order has nothing to do with the law, and everything to do with who wrote the executive order. Congress should drag these activist judges before Congress and make them answer to the legislative branch for their unconstitutional rulings, and then impeach each and every one of them for their bad constitutional behavior.  Congress should also pass law nullifying each and every one of those unconstitutional rulings (a power they have according to Article III’s “Exceptions Clause”).

 

The problem, in short, is not that the courts are misbehaving, but that Congress and the President are letting them.

 

The judicial branch is supposed to be the weakest of the three branches.  They are not supposed to be a check against Congress or the President, other checks exist (or existed) to take care of that.  The judicial branch’s job is clear.  Their job is simply to apply the law to the cases they hear.  If they believe the law is unconstitutional or unjust, then they can issue an opinion so that Congress may reconsider the law.  What they are doing now has nothing to do with applying the law, or the rule of law.  These leftist judges are simply ruling against the president for political reasons, and then are misinterpreting the law to make it sound like their rulings are within the law.

 

They all need to be thrown off their benches, and either replaced, or those particular inferior courts need to be dismantled and the regions absorbed by another court – again, an authority that Congress has, but has been unwilling to wield.

________________

Judicial Tyranny or Constitutional Supremacy:

SCOTUS Travel Ban Ruling Decides

 

By John R. Houk

© June 4, 2017

________________

Supreme Court to Lift Ban on Travel Ban

 

Douglas V. Gibbs of Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary, has been featured on “Hannity” and “Fox and Friends” on Fox News Channel, and other television shows and networks.  Doug is a Radio Host on KMET 1490-AM on Saturdays with his Constitution Radio program, as well as a longtime podcaster, conservative political activist, writer and commentator.  Doug can be reached at douglasvgibbs [at] yahoo.com or constitutionspeaker [at] yahoo.com.

 

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the ‘fair use’ exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2017 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2017 Canada Free Press.Com

 

Pro-Life Journalists Seek Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in Free Speech, Baby Parts Case


I just finished posting about the extremely questionable prosecution, jailing and exorbitant bail against Sandra Merritt this morning. Then, I go to my email inbox. Lo and behold! I found an email from Operation Rescue reporting the Ninth Circuit of Appeals (located on the Left coast) ruled that the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) undercover obtained videos and recording cannot be turned over to the police EVEN if criminal conduct is reveal!!!!!!

 

“A three-member panel of the liberally activist Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that additional footage obtained through the CMP’s undercover investigations – even those recordings that contain evidence of criminal conduct committed by Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation officials – cannot be released to law enforcement personnel. A requested review by the full Ninth Circuit was denied.”

What is our nation coming to when even the Judicial Branch condones lawlessness in the name of protecting the Leftist transformative agenda that has hammered into American thought?

 

Here is the Operation Rescue article that was linked in my email alert.

 

JRH 5/9/17

Please Support NCCR

****************

Pro-Life Journalists Seek Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in Free Speech, Baby Parts Case

 

By DeAnn Flanagan

May 8, 2017

Operation Rescue

 

San Francisco, CA – The Center for Medical Progress and its founding members, including Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue, are seeking to appeal a draconian Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court in order to protect the First Amendment Rights of journalists to report to law enforcement evidence of crimes contained in undercover recordings.

 

A three-member panel of the liberally activist Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that additional footage obtained through the CMP’s undercover investigations – even those recordings that contain evidence of criminal conduct committed by Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation officials – cannot be released to law enforcement personnel. A requested review by the full Ninth Circuit was denied.

 

The ruling is related to a federal lawsuit, National Abortion Federation v. CMP, et al, that was filed in 2015 after the CMP released several videos showing Planned Parenthood executives haggling over top dollar to illegally sell aborted baby organs and tissue. The NAF sought to block the further release of possibly incriminating videos.

 

Attorneys for the American Center for Law and Justice are representing Newman in that case.

 

A joint motion filed May 5, 2017, is seeking a stay of the Ninth Circuit’s mandate pending the filing of a certiorari petition with the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

The motion states that the court wrongly upheld a “prior restraint” on CMP’s First Amendment speech, which had captured great public interest. The undercover videos were also the subject of investigations by House and Senate panels that later referred Planned Parenthood organizations to the U.S. Department of Justice and state Attorneys General for further criminal investigation and prosecution.

 

“Prior restraints are ‘the most serious and least tolerable infringement of First Amendment Rights,’” stated the motion to stay.

 

So radical was the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that the pro-life leaders’ defense attorneys argued:

 

Outside the context of trade secrets and classified information, no federal court – other than now this Court – has upheld an order suppressing information of high public interest based simply on the agreement of the parties to do so. Other federal courts have declined to put the weight of their contempt power behind the enforcement of private agreements to defeat the public’s right to know.

 

“In a case of critical importance to free speech rights, the Ninth Circuit has wrongly barred pro-life citizen journalists from reporting crimes and submitting evidence to law enforcement. Instead, the Court has opted to protect the ability of the NAF and Planned Parenthood to conceal possible criminal activity,” said Cheryl Sullenger, Senior Vice President, Operation Rescue. “The rogue Ninth Circuit has showed their penchant for liberal, pro-abortion judicial activism once again, and we look forward to the U.S. Supreme Court once again overturning one of their grossly unconstitutional decisions.”

 

Order denying appeal to full Ninth Circuit.


Defense Motion to Stay Mandate pending SCOTUS filing.

 

_______________

Copyright © 2017 Operation Rescue, Inc. 

 

Who We Are

 

Operation Rescue® is one of the leading pro-life Christian activist organizations in the nation. Operation Rescue® recently made headlines when it bought and closed an abortion clinic in Wichita, Kansas and has become perhaps the most visible voice of the pro-life activist movement in America. Its activities are on the cutting edge of the abortion issue, taking direct action to restore legal personhood to the pre-born and stop abortion in obedience to biblical mandates.

 

Click here to donate.


Click here to contact.

 

READ: Operation Rescue’s Non-Violent History is a Matter of Public Record

 

Troy Newman, President

 

Adopted at birth and raised in San Diego, Troy Newman has more than 27 years of experience and leadership in business and pro-life ministry with great success growing Christian organizations. Troy is an accomplished strategist with remarkable insight.

 

His vision, expertise, and leadership have  READ THE REST

 

A Frightening Preview of Hillary’s America


crooked-hillary

The David Horowitz Freedom Center sent a for insightful essay by Daniel Greenfield that demonstrates what life probably will be like in Crooked Hillary’s America.

 

The essay is not linked, but I’m confident a simple Google search would find many locations for the essay.

 

JRH 10/20/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

A Frightening Preview of Hillary’s America 

Dark and unaccountable

 

By Daniel Greenfield

Dated: October 20, 2016

Sent: 10/21/2016 8:00 AM

Sent by: David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

Hillary Clinton, of all people, summed up this debate and this election best.

“What kind of country are we going to be?”

The Evita of Arkansas is a compulsive liar who has never told the truth in her life. But this time around she was right. This election does not come down to the personalities. It comes down to the kind of country we are going to have. And in the third debate, the one that took a break from the petty haranguing of media lackeys like Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz, the issues took center stage.

The core issue came into focus with the very first question asked by Chris Wallace. Wallace asked Hillary and Trump if their vision for the Supreme Court was based on the Constitution or not. Hillary launched into a spiel about a Supreme Court that would stand for class warfare and gay rights. The only time she mentioned the Constitution was when she insisted that the Senate was constitutionally obligated to confirm Obama’s nominee. That is her vision of the Constitution; a document that grants her power to reshape the country without regard to the Founders or any previously existing rights or freedoms.

It fell to Trump to speak of justices who would “interpret the Constitution the way the founders wanted it interpreted”. And that is the core issue. Personalities and politicians come and go. Today’s trending topic has been forgotten a day later. Outrages explode like fireworks and then fizzle out.

The weapons of mass distraction have been deployed and detonated. They keep going off in blasts of media gunpowder to divert our attention from whether we will live under the Constitution or under the Hillary. Will we have the rights and freedom bound into the Constitution or corruption justified with cant about the need to defend the oppressed by giving unlimited power to the oppressors.

The final debate finally focused on the issues. Instead of leading with the scandals, it asked about gun control, amnesty and open borders. It asked what kind of country are we going to be?

And, are we going to be a country at all or an open border weeping undocumented migrants destroying what’s left of the middle class as the masterminds rob the country blind while preaching piously to us about all the poor Syrians, Mexicans and LGBT youth they want to protect?

Americans have had a preview of the country that Hillary Clinton would create under Obama. They received yet another preview of it at a final debate in which Hillary echoed Obama’s Orwellian language in which endless spending was dubbed “investing” and in which government would save the middle class by regulating and taxing it out of existence for the greater good of the officially oppressed.

Hillary Clinton promised free college and cradle to grave education that would be debt free. Americans would be the ones plummeting deeper and deeper into debt to pay for degrees in gender studies. She promised viewers pie in the sky to be paid for by higher taxes on the rich. But as Trump pointed out, that’s the class that her donors come from. Did Warren Buffett and George Soros invest all that money into her victory just to pay higher taxes? Did they do it right after they bought the Brooklyn Bridge?

Or will Americans buy the bridge believing Hillary’s promise that she “will not add a penny to the debt”?

The only way Hillary can hope to do that is to appoint Bernie Madoff to be her Treasury Secretary.

When Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump wrangled over tax hikes or tax cuts, the debate is whether crooks like the Clintons should have a massive pot of taxpayer money to “invest” into their donors.

But beneath it is the same big question; do we live under the Constitution or under the Hillary?

In Hillary Country, just like in Obama Country, there are always more “investments” to make and you had better pay your “fair share”. There are always special identity group interests that need money. There are always more regulations, taxes, fines and fees. And it’s all for the children.

The ones that Hillary will grimace at when the cameras are on her and nudge away with the point of her shoe when the little red light turns off.

But there is no lie that Hillary Clinton will not tell and no lie that her pet media fact checkers will not back her up on. Obama doubled the national debt and yet Hillary insists that, “We’re actually on the path to eliminating the national debt”. That might be true only insofar as we’re approaching the point that no one will lend us any money. We’re headed toward a $20 trillion national debt.

And Hillary’s plans won’t add a penny to the national debt. They’ll add hundreds of trillions of pennies.

Hillary talked of bringing “our country together” and not “pitting of people one against the other” and instead “we celebrate our diversity”. If she does half as good a job as Obama, these celebrations of diversity will climax with race riots across America. How exactly does Hillary plan to unite with the “deplorables” of the country? How has Hillary united anyone in the country except in disdain?

Hillary Clinton’s entire campaign pitch is based on demonizing Trump and his supporters. She believes that if she convinces enough voters that Trump is the devil, they may hold their noses and accept the return of the corrupt Clinton dynasty and everything that it represents. That gamble is what we are seeing on the news. It is what we heard at the debate. Hillary cannot win on her own merits.

She warned at the final debate of the “dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system”. It’s hard to imagine a bigger source of dark, accountable money than a foundation being used as an international slush fund that has been beyond unaccountable.

But it’s Hillary’s vision of government that is dark and unaccountable. From the beginning of the debate, she made it clear that she does not wish to be accountable to the Constitution. Her email cover up made it painfully clear that she does not want to be accountable to the American people. Instead Hillary would like everyone in the country to be accountable to her. A mass of regulations and enforcers will force everyone to be accountable to the dark and unaccountable force in the White House.

“It really does come down to what kind of country we are going to have,” Hillary repeated.

It does indeed. Americans have had a preview of the kind of country that Hillary would bring into being.

 

________________

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

 

DONATE to DH Freedom Center

 

About David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

OUR MISSION: The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

VIDEO: Our Mission – Updated June 2013

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is READ THE REST

 

Newbill Crooked Hillary Corruption Themes


most-corrupt-candidate-ever-hillary

Here is a collection of Tony Newbill emails that examines the crookedness of Hillary Clinton and the kind of corruption she inspires the Left to accomplish.

 

JRH 9/7/16

Please Support NCCR

**************

Newbill Crooked Hillary Corruption Themes

Tony Newbill Email Collection

Posted September 7, 2016

 

This is how a totalitarian system can be installed at the state level of Government and transform the entire USA to the Federal Level

8/20/2016 10:50 AM

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/somali-muslim-candidate-denies-accusations-of-bigamy/

 

Somali Muslim candidate denies accusations of bigamy
Minnesota Democrat says Trump-supporting ‘racists’ out to smear her

America’s soon-to-be first female Muslim legislator has a problem on her hands.

She’s accused of being married to two men, at the same time, including one who may be her brother. The second marriage was allegedly a sham, meant to deceive the U.S. government’s immigration system, allowing him to emigrate from the United Kingdom, according to local Minneapolis media.

But Ilhan Omar, a 33-year-old Somali refugee who was the victor in Minnesota’s Aug. 9 Democratic primary, denies the story, issuing a statement calling it “categorically false” and based on “absurd rumors that don’t bear repeating.” She charged those raising the issue are “racists” using “Donald Trump tactics” to drive a wedge between various demographic segments of Minnesota voters.

But local attorney Scott Johnson, an author of the well-read PowerLine blog, dropped a bombshell a few days after the primary with a story so shocking that the local media was forced to emerge from its euphoric coverage of Minnesota’s “first female Muslim refugee legislator” and acknowledge that this candidate has legitimate questions to answer.

So far she hasn’t answered many of them. Instead she issued an initial terse statement of categorical denial, then a second statement Wednesday that offered a few more details about her marriages.

“Fraud, deceit, lies, corruption, cover-up, bigamy, immigration law violations, law breaking – all appear to be associated with the first Somali American winner of a Democratic primary in Minnesota,” Bachmann told WND. “The newly discovered documents and witness testimony cry out for an investigation.”

“If true,” she added, “the candidate should withdraw immediately from the general election this fall.”

But instead of dropping out, Omar responded by denying the charges, calling the blogger who reported them an “Islamophobe” and hiring a lawyer.

Brian Lambert summed up the fallout in READ ENTIRETY (Somali Muslim candidate denies accusations of bigamy; By LEO HOHMANN; WND; 8/19/2016 8:50 PM)

Remember here in Oregon we had a Similar thing happen with our Governor Kitzhaber having a Fiancé that used the system to gain money and help an Immigrant gain status:

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/12/us/as-scandals-swirl-around-oregons-embattled-governor-kitzhaber-fatigue-sets-in.html?_r=0  

 

Love and Politics Collide as Scandals Plague Oregon’s Fourth-Term Governor

SALEM, Ore. — The allegations swirling around Gov. John Kitzhaber and his live-in fiancée did not seem to bother Oregonians much when they re-elected him last fall to an unprecedented fourth term. But now, with hints of scandal tumbling out almost by the day — about the business dealings of the fiancée, her previous marriage and her role in state government — the reaction has descended into a mix of tittering gossip, outrage and dismay, threatening to tarnish the last years of one of the state’s most enduring politicians.

Mr. Kitzhaber, a 67-year-old Democrat in a heavily Democratic state, faces a long list of problems: two petition efforts to recall him, demands for his resignation from various newspapers, and an ethics investigation by the state into the business dealings of his fiancée, Cylvia Hayes. Separately, the Oregon attorney general, Ellen Rosenblum, said Monday that she was opening a criminal investigation of the couple.

The inquiries stem from contracting work that Ms. Hayes, 47, a clean-energy consultant, performed and was paid for while living with the governor and advising him on clean-energy issues. …

The revelation prompted her to apologize publicly, not least to the governor, who she said knew nothing about it. Marriage fraud is a federal crime, but the five-year statute of limitations had passed.

“It was a marriage of convenience; he needed help, and I needed financial support,” Ms. Hayes said at a news conference in October. …

Willamette Week also suggested in a story that Ms. Hayes had used access to the governor for economic gain in consulting contracts for her company, 3EStrategies. And a drumbeat of new questions has continued since. The Oregonian, the state’s largest newspaper, reported last week that two people involved in Mr. Kitzhaber’s 2010 campaign helped Ms. Hayes find paid work with groups interested in Oregon policy. In an editorial last week, the YOU GET THE IDEA  – DEM IMMIHRATION FRAUD & CRONY CAPITALISM (Love and Politics Collide as Scandals Plague Oregon’s Fourth-Term Governor; By KIRK JOHNSON; NYT; 2/11/15)

 

Questions about Ms. Hayes began last fall, when she confirmed a newspaper report that said she had married her third husband, an Ethiopian immigrant, for money in a sham marriage in 1997. She said she had been 29, struggling financially, and was paid about $5,000 to marry an 18-year-old man who wanted to stay in the United States.

 

But the point here is that these methods of Usurpation of the USA Legal system is why we see Totalitarian abuses of Liberty for legal citizens.

 

+++

this is another way tyranny is being implemented on our legal system and it needs to stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8/20/2016 11:34 AM

 

George Soros needs to be arrested for being an Enemy of the US Constitution and we the people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/17/leaked-board-documents-soros-organization-tried-to-buy-supreme-court-ruling-on-illegal-immigration/#ixzz4HntBfvlw

 

Leaked Board Documents: Soros Organization Tried To Influence Supreme Court Ruling On Illegal Immigration

 

Open Society Foundations, Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros’ stated vehicle for progressive social change, orchestrated a well-funded attempt to secure a desired outcome in a U.S. Supreme Court case on illegal immigration enforcement, according to a newly discovered memo between the organization’s top U.S. officials and board members.
The February 2016 memo was among thousands of internal OSF documents released to the public by anonymous hackers whose stated goal is to “shed light on one of the most influential networks operating worldwide.” OSF U.S. Programs director Ken Zimmerman and deputy director Andrea Batista Schlesinger co-authored the memo, which is addressed to the 14 advisory board members of the organization’s U.S. operations.

Members of the advisory board include Soros family members, left-wing activists, Ivy League professors and columnists for The Washington Post and Foreign Policy magazine.  The memo, entitled “State of U.S. Programs,” is part of a 75-page file containing internal documents from a READ THE REST (Leaked Board Documents: Soros Organization Tried To Influence Supreme Court Ruling On Illegal Immigration; By Peter Hasson – Reporter Associate Editor; Daily Caller; 8/17/16 10:12 PM)

+++

And Now we can Thank Hillary Clinton and the Corrupt crony DOJ for creating the Collapse of Justice!!!!!! 

8/21/2016 1:43 PM

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-20/clinton-defense-becomes-popular-argument-other-espionage-cases-though-experts-doubt-?AID=7236

 

“Clinton Defense” Popularity Surges In Espionage Cases

 

Earlier this week we wrote about 29-year-old Navy sailor, Kristian Saucier, who had plead guilty to espionage charges for snapping 6 photos of classified areas of a nuclear submarine and was facing up to 78 months in prison for his “crime” (see “Convicted Spy Is Using Hillary’s “Lack Of Intent” Defense To Seek Leniency“).  Even though he knew the pictures were classified, Saucier said he took them to “be able to show his family and future children what he did while he was in the Navy” and denied ever showing the pictures to any “unauthorized recipients.”

 

Saucier’s attorney used the “Clinton Defense” at his sentencing hearing earlier this week, arguing that he possessed just 6 sensitive photographs which was “far less than Clinton’s 110 emails” that were ultimately deemed to contain classified information.  Saucier’s attorney went on to argue that “…it will be unjust and unfair for Mr. Saucier to receive any sentence other than probation for a crime those more powerful than him will likely avoid.

 

Unsurprisingly, Saucier didn’t make out quite as well as Clinton but the “Clinton Defense” may have resulted in some level of leniency in his sentencing.  According to The Hill, Saucier was facing up to 78 months in prison for his admission to “mishandling information” but a federal judge on Friday sentenced him to 12 months instead.  Greg Rinckey, Saucier’s lawyer, said READ THE REST (“Clinton Defense” Popularity Surges In Espionage Cases; By Tyler Durden; Zero Hedge; 8/20/16 3:01 PM)

 

The stonewalling defense of Hillary and her ilk saying over and over that she regrets and has learned from her mistakes and then the FBI saying She is too Unsophisticated to know what she did wrong to be charged with Intent. How can you be so Unsophisticated to know what you did was wrong to be charged, but then say you are sorry for what you did not know what you were doing??????????

 

Clinton Deemed too “Unsophisticated” to Pursue Charges Against so why would you want Hillary as POTUS?

 

http://sputniknews.com/analysis/20160709/1042711310/hillary-unsophisticated-fbi-primary-comey.html

hillary-wink-2-dumb-to-jail

Clinton Too Dumb to Jail: People Laugh as FBI Calls Hillary Unsophisticated

FBI Director James Comey justified his decision to not recommend charges against the former Secretary of State, at a congressional hearing this week, over her alleged mishandling classified documents by appealing to the fact that she was too stupid to fathomably have the requisite criminal intent.

There is a general rule among attorneys who practice white-collar law – most defendants are guilty, but some are simply too dumb to realize they did anything wrong with the phrase “criminally stupid” applied to this group by their own lawyers. Prosecutors traditionally have mercy on this type of defendant and based on FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before Congress, it seems Hillary’s “get out of jail free” card may not have been her corrupt cronyism, but apparently just sheer idiocy.

 

The Case to Indict Hillary Was Ironclad
Comey rattled the world for 14 minutes on Tuesday morning laying out the elements of the case against Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton establishing each element of the crime that she was charged with in perfect legalese leaving viewers to just wait for him to utter those final words that … but the suddenly the unthinkable happened – … never came.

 

He further determined that “no reasonable person” would believe that the private server was an appropriate place to house classified documents which she “knew or should have known” she would receive on her system.

Comey further laid out the fact that several of the documents contained HUMINT and SIGINT, information that was acquired by CIA analysts who often imperiled their own lives in order to obtain the information that the former Secretary of State dangled out in front of hostile foreign actors like a piece of meat.

It has further been determined that Hillary Clinton’s emails contained the identities of at least 47 undercover CIA personnel operating in posts around the world and that her system was likely hacked on several occasions due to not only her private email server, but also exposing information abroad by using a Blackberry while in foreign countries to access her email system.

 

 

Comey Changed the Statute to Justify the Decision

Comey characterized Hillary’s mishandling of classified information as “extreme carelessness,” a synonym for the term gross negligence but with the FBI Director requiring an even higher level of intent, known as criminal intent or purposefully engaging in an unlawful act, which was not actually required by the statute.

This stands in stark contradiction of the very first cannon of statutory construction, as was adopted by the Supreme Court in Caminetti v. United States, 242 US 470 (1917) that law enforcement and judicial officers are not to try to read beyond the language of a statute if its language is plainly stated.

“It is elementary that the meaning of a statute must, in the first instance, be sought in the language in which the act is framed, and if that is plain then the sole function of the courts is to enforce it according to its terms,” said Justice William Day writing for the …

 

 

There was no internal contradiction in the statute, but Comey read an added intent element into it anyways befuddling a questioning American public and a Republican-led Congress that was at its wits end to hear that the FBI Director had laid out every piece of the case in an unusually transparent way, but decided against prosecuting anyways.

 

Clinton Deemed too “Unsophisticated” to Pursue Charges Against

It was at this point that Comey exposed what this case was really about – Hillary was indeed a would-be defendant who was so criminally stupid, bordering on complete incompetence, that it just didn’t seem right to waste taxpayer dollars to whack her with an indictment. 

 

 

Too dumb to jail – there is certain brilliance to the way Hillary wiggled out of this latest scandal. READ ENTIRETY (Clinton Too Dumb to Jail: People Laugh as FBI Calls Hillary Unsophisticated; Sputnik International; 7/9/16 21:08 – Updated 7/10/16 04:01)

This all stinks as a Double standard when you read the ZeroHedge Link!!!!!

 

Tim Kaine sings the I made a mistake, and I regret Hillary song and dance. Where was the interviewer asking Tim Kaine how can you say Hillary knows she made a Mistake when FBI Comey said she was too Unsophisticated to know she made a Mistake?????

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp2twbhfkJw#t=184

[Blog Editor: The Newbill link above begins at the 1:84 mark of the interview with Kaine. The embedded video below represents the entire 4:15 minute interview]

 

VIDEO: Tim Kaine: I Support Public Release Of FBI’s Notes On Hillary Clinton’s Emails (Full) | TODAY

 

Posted by TODAY

Published on Aug 17, 2016

 

In an exclusive interview with TODAY’s Savannah Guthrie, Hillary Clinton’s running mate, Sen. Tim Kaine, says that in questioning Clinton’s physical stamina, Donald Trump is merely trying to deflect attention from other issues. Interviewed along with his wife, Anne Holton, Kaine also says that anything that is given to Congress in regard to the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails should also be made public. … READ THE REST

 

+++

What we are watching …

8/23/2016 12:38 PM

 

What we are watching evolve is a Lawless UN-accountability that is forging a Dictatorship right in front of our American Rights!!!  Hillary will be an Unimpeachable Dictator!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 https://www.facebook.com/fartonhillaryclinton/videos/1160661003965585/

 

I never ask you guys (or gals) to share anything, but dammit! share the hell out of this video! Hillary Clinton says Mexico is a problem, Mexican Government policy is pushing immigration, US needs to secure border, and illegals should be deported! #artoftheflipflop  #trumpstalkingparrot #neverhillary
Transcript: “Mexico is such an important problem. Mexico’s policies are pushing migration North. There isn’t any sensible approach. What need to do is simultaneously, you know, secure our borders, new technology, personnel, physical barriers, if necessary, in some places, and we need to get tougher employer sanctions, and we need to incentivize Mexico to do more. If they’ve committed transgressions of whatever kind, they should be obviously deported. ”

 

From a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2006. Only edited for time. The video and sound are slightly out of synch. (Hypocrite Hillary Clinton; Crooked Government on Facebook; Posted 6/9/16)

 

VIDEO: Hypocrite Hillary Clinton

Uploaded to SlantRight2 Youtube Channel

 

 

+++

You Are Not Going to Believe This …….

8/24/2016 12:00 PM

 

Recently Leaked Documents Confirm Clinton Haitian Gold Scheme

 

http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Recently-Leaked-Documents-by-Georgianne-Nienabe-Clinton-Bill_Clinton-Cash_Clinton-Foundation_Donors-160823-957.html

 

The Clinton exploitation of Haiti will eventually go up in flames, and when the smoke settles an emotional and fiscal disaster of enormous proportions will finally be visible to the world. It will be difficult to sift through the ashes to find truth, but the truth is there. Follow the money, follow the pandering, follow the emails, and follow the favors traded for gold.

 

Another email linked to Hillary Clinton’s pay-for play scandal involving State Department favors for the Clinton Foundation has surfaced, but it is not one of Clinton’s famously deleted emails. A confidential email to possible capital investors for a $26.5M fully operational open-pit gold processing facility in Haiti says it all.

 

“Haiti is geographically located in a ‘safe zone’, within the sphere of U.S. influence. This sphere of influence included Anthony Rodham, brother of the then-Secretary of State. Anthony (Tony) Rodham served on VCS Mining’s Advisory Committee, “providing the company with strategic insight and exposure to key high-level business and government relationships,” according to a confidential document provided by a source.

 

 

Hillary Clinton’s brother, Anthony (Tony) Rodham was a prominent player in the mining scheme, according to corporate VCS documents. Rodham has no background in mining, no college degree, and his only qualification to be intimately involved in a mining venture in Haiti was as the brother of Hillary Clinton and the brother-in-law of the Special Envoy to Haiti Bill Clinton. Rodham joined the advisory board of VCS Mining in October 2013 and the 2014 VCS memorandum touts his influential connections to the Clinton’s “inner circles” and “power bases” within the beltway.

 

leaked-vcs-document-imagr

Leaked VCS Document Image

 

As the brother of the former 1st (sic) Lady and Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the brother-in-law of President Bill Clinton, Anthony is a well-respected American public figure. For years a part of Bill & Hillary Clinton’s “inner circle”, Mr. Rodham has worked side by side in the highest levels of U.S. politics since 1974. His connections with big business, his access to international influencers, and his connection to the power- base inside Washington (DC) serves Mr. Rodham’s clients well.

 

document-screenshot

Document Screenshot

 

The memorandum also explains where excess power generated by the internationally- funded Caracol Industrial plant could go, and it was not to Haitian homes as promised by USAID and the Clinton Foundation. On page 17, VCS Mining says “2.5MW of power will be supplied to VCS by the Power Plant at USAID’s Caracol Industrial Park, which has upwards of 50% excess generating capacity.”

 

This is a complicated story fraught with intricate detail and begins with the fraudulent installation of a crooked Haitian president, a Korean trade deal, an industrial park facilitated by the Clinton Foundation, donations from the owners of the clothing behemoth, Gap, Inc., and donations to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign from a Saipan clothing magnate with ties to the Abramoff lobbying click here scandal. The money trail and pay-for-play does not end with the transfer of the all-but-impossible-to obtain Morne Bossa gold mining permit to VCS.

 

 

It would be scandal enough if Tony Rodham and VCS benefitted from a gold mine permit in Haiti, but the potential electrical power lines for that gold mine lead straight to one of the biggest lies to come out of Haitian “reconstruction.” Think of the Clinton Foundation as covert commodities trader, whether it involves strategic minerals, access for the garment industry, special trade deals, or the guarantee that Haiti will always be held within the “sphere of influence” of the United States.

 

 

… Haitian people had a President installed by the Organization of American States with the complicity of President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

 

Clinton would later write that although the official 2010-11 Haiti Presidential vote tally was at odds with results obtained by the Organization of American States (OAS), her goal was to reach a “peaceful resolution.” She did not admit that her “resolution” would involve over-turning the official results. Clinton termed this Machiavellian move, “democracy in action” in her book Hard Choices. In the subsequent run-off using the OAS results, a “celebrated musician,” using Clinton’s words, would become the next President of Haiti. This was Clinton’s premise of “good governance,” and Michel Martelly would embody U.S. mastery of the disaster, becoming the fulcrum for a new axis of foreign intervention and capitalism. The United States had officially declared that fixing elections was “Democracy in action.”

 

As Clinton’s Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills said in email CO5779428 to Haiti Ambassador Kenneth Merton and READ ENTIRETY (Recently Leaked Documents Confirm Clinton Haitian Gold Scheme; By Georgianne Nienaber; OpEdNews.com; 8/23/2016 at 14:43:30)

 

+++

Clinton Foundation Largest Unprosecuted Charity Fraud in History-Charles Ortel

8/30/2016 12:28 PM

 

http://usawatchdog.com/clinton-foundation-largest-unprosecuted-charity-fraud-in-history-charles-ortel/

 

Wall Street financial expert Charles Ortel claims the Clinton Foundation is the “largest unprosecuted charity fraud in world history.” He also says this global fraud could not be pulled off without a lot of help.  Ortel explains, “I think this is an example of a vast left-wing conspiracy.  If you go back into the history, the Clintons always like to expose the things that go down for their credit, and they always try to hide the stuff that doesn’t make them look so good.  When you go back into the history of the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, and now Chelsea, have been monetizing government service.  They have been operating as Robin Hood in reverse.  Stealing from the poor to reward their rich cronies. . . . I think what you have here is a case study on the proponents of the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party, and they tend to be left-leaning, how these people got together and figured out a charity where foreigners can give unlimited amounts of money, and U.S. players can give unlimited amounts of tax deductible money to an entity. …

 

…  Ortel charges on his website that “Clinton Foundation documents omit crucial facts, include false and materially misleading statements, and exclude legally required audits of financial statements for each year of operation, that must be prepared on a consistent basis.”

 

Ortel goes on to say, “On the other hand, on charity fraud, it’s a very different thing. In charity fraud, unlike pay-to-play, you don’t have to prove intent.  Under New York State law, in particular, the requirement is merely that you prove the public filings in the Clinton Foundation are false and materially misleading, and they certainly are. 

 

 

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Clinton Foundation researcher, Charles Ortel of CharlesOrtel.com.

 

(There is much more in the video interview.) READ ENTIRETT (Clinton Foundation Largest Unprosecuted Charity Fraud in History-Charles Ortel; By Greg Hunter; USA Watchdog; 8/28/16)

 

+++

How can we be about to reelect the Clinton Crime Syndicate to the Highest Office of the USA?

9/5/2016 10:37 AM

 

The 1998 Clintons Crimes Syndicate against the USA that was part of Impeachment hearings was a Lot more than Just Monica!!!!!!!!!!

 

Commercegate Chinagate illegal sale of US Department of Commerce Trade Mission Seats for campaign contributions, Judiciary Committee evidence, Judicial Watch interim report on crimes and other offenses committed by President Bill Clinton, December 1998

 

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CDOC-106sdoc3/html/GPO-CDOC-106sdoc3-7.htm 

 

[Impeachment of President William Jefferson Clinton – The Evidentiary Record Pursuant to S. Res. 16 – Index to Senate Document 106-3, Vols. I-XXIV]

 

[Volume VII – Transcript of October 5, 1998 presentations of David Schippers and Abbe Lowell, and debate on H. Res. 581, beginning an impeachment inquiry. Committee Print, Ser. No. 8, December 1998]

[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

 

 

106th Congress                                                 Document

1st Session                      SENATE                         106-3

 

IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON

 

__________

 

THE EVIDENTIARY RECORD

PURSUANT TO S. RES. 16

VOLUME VII

 

 

Transcript of October 5, 1998 presentations of David Schippers and Abbe Lowell, and debate on H. Res. 581, beginning an impeachment inquiry.

Committee Print, Ser. No. 8, December 1998

 

READ THE REST

 

+++

Regardless of the Opinion of the DOJ and the FBI, the Law is Clear, and Hillary Clinton is Disqualified for POTUS!!!!!!

9/5/2016 11:22 AM

 

18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally: 

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

 

 

Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a)

Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b)

Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Title appears some space after the “Search Form” text – 18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally; Cornell University Law School)

 

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

The Anti-Hillary


If Hillary Elected -  Uncle Sam Dies

In this latest submission from Justin Smith, he expands upon his Facebook thoughts in which I cross posted entitled, “Memo to Third Party and ‘Never Trump’ Thinkers”. I concur with Justin that for Conservatives to stay home on election day or to vote for a Third Party candidate is the EXACT same thing as placing a check mark next to Crooked Hillary’s name on the ballot in November. Justin thus expands this theme.

 

JRH 8/28/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

The Anti-Hillary

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 8/27/2016 1:46 PM

 

Donald Trump may not be the strong constitutionalist that many conservatives saw in Ted Cruz. Still, we can acknowledge Trump’s abundant flaws, his Big Government Leftist leanings, just as I have done in several columns, and vote for him with a clear conscience, since a corrupt society gave us both Trump and Hillary Clinton. Save the political infighting over “true conservative values” for after the election. We are not responsible for Trump’s shortcomings; but, we can certainly take advantage of his known strengths, as we unify against Hillary Clinton, who is an evil ideologue hell-bent on the abolition of individual and religious liberties, the most corrupt elitist to ever seek the presidency.

 

Hurt feelings or not, the intransigent “never Trump” conservatives appear to be throwing a politically immature toddler-like temper tantrum. Reveling in their false pride, their patriotism questionable, they point to Trump’s assertion he could survive without them, while they endanger our republic by still refusing to vote for Trump, who is the only candidate with a real chance of beating Clinton. They bring Hillary Clinton one vote closer to the White House and the Clinton Foundation ever closer to its next billions in “donations” [bribes] from foreign governments, forcing the Founding Fathers’ edifice ever closer to becoming a banana republic.

 

Morally speaking, everyone, including “never Trump” groups and conservative Democrats, must look at which candidate will preserve human rights, our unalienable rights under the U.S. Constitution. Which candidate will best protect our right to free speech, property ownership, self-defense and life that natural law and reason guarantees all human beings?

 

Hillary Clinton is a political chameleon, changing position as the situation demands __ pro and anti-free trade [TPP], anti and pro-raising the minimum wage and anti and pro-same sex marriage. Her consistent views are shameful. She met with 57 Islamic nations in December of 2012 in New York to discuss how best to induce the Senate and the House to criminalize any criticism of Islam, a blatant attack on free speech. And during her presidential campaign, Clinton has warned abortion opponents moved by faith that their “religious beliefs” would “have to be changed.”

 

On June 21st, 2016, Donald Trump met with hundreds of Christian leaders in New York City [A Conversation with Donald Trump], where he gave extremely encouraging answers to the tough questions posed by nearly 1000 evangelical and Catholic leaders. He pledged to always appoint pro-life, pro-Second Amendment and pro-religious liberty judges and Supreme Court Justices, and he promised to eradicate the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which unconstitutionally silences pastors from the pulpit on issues of the day.

 

Clinton will be a full scale disaster. Along with her pro-Death [abortion] comments, she has already been clear about her intentions to succeed in disarming Americans. She will appoint a fifth Supreme Court Justice to gut the First and Second Amendments. She’ll further cripple our military, and she’ll force American industry to bow to her will through tax ploys and the regulatory infrastructure.

 

Leftist indoctrination of two generations of Americans, through our universities, has moved the Democratic Party far left of many European socialist parties; so much so that Hillary Clinton feels comfortable enough to brazenly suggest that her government will dictate to companies how much employees must be paid. Can you say “unconstitutional”? How about “fascist”?

 

Trump’s proposals to undo the immense tax and regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, the job creators, will bring many old businesses back into the U.S., along with new businesses. Money currently outside the U.S. will return, and the result will be an economy that will benefit all Americans, if they are willing to work.

 

Concerning the Supreme Court, Donald Trump has sought the guidance of the conservative Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation, as he notes that these well respected think tanks have set “the gold standard” on judicial appointments. These think tanks helped him list 11 judges with the judicial temperament and constitutional knowledge that we can expect from any of his potential nominees to any federal court or the Supreme Court.

 

If Hillary Clinton is elected, she’ll bury every one of her and Bill’s secrets and settle old scores with her enemies. Her agenda and the Progressive agenda is at stake, from Uranium One and donors like Gilbert Chougary and advocating unnecessary wars like Libya to Obamacare, the Iran Nuclear Deal and more potential unConstitutional Executive Orders, which is great motivation for the vast left-wing Clinton apparatus to fight to retain the levers of government power.

 

Unlike Obama’s “experts” in the DOJ and the CIA and Hillary’s State Department, Trump takes a more pragmatic approach to governance. He will encourage law enforcement policies that make U.S. cities safe for all regardless of color or ethnicity in opposition to progressive policies of division. He correctly sees the Islamic State as a bigger problem than Assad, where Obama and Hillary failed. He doesn’t mind re-evaluating allegiances that have been taken for granted, and he has castigated U.S. ally Mexico for its lack of border controls and the flood of illegal aliens into America. He has also said that Saudi Arabia would have to do more in the fight against the Islamic State, which would be a significant change from the Saudis’ prominent role in funding terrorism against the West.

 

Hillary Clinton policies vary only slightly from Obama’s. If Obama’s progressive policies had been proper and backed by action over the past seven years, would we now have such racial and ethnic strife in America? Would the Islamic State’s diseased brutality persist? Would America’s middle class be disintegrating? Hillary will give America four more years of Obama’s malaise and defective, negligent, incompetent and treasonous government.

 

I’m not voting for Trump to be my new best friend. I’m voting for him to be the Anti-Hillary. I don’t care if he’s mean and hurts the tender feelings of the fey and fainthearted, or even if he grows fangs and fur every full moon. I know Hillary Clinton is a worse person who would be unrestrained in power and pose a significant chance of plunging America into violence.

 

Donald Trump’s nationalist populism is not the death knell to conservative values that several conservative Christian pundits will have one believe. His current proposed policies will actually serve as a breastwork against all of Obama’s policies and terrible legislative legacy and Hillary’s planned radical destruction. Trump is a strong advocate, by and large, for the GOP platform, which contains mostly traditional conservative positions, and placing Trump in the Oval Office will prevent Hillary Clinton’s undoing of America, the destruction of the U.S. Constitution and America’s transformation into a godless neo-Marxist banana republic.

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Vote for America — Vote for Trump


Trump- Americans Come 1st NOT ...

Justin Smith makes the case for the reason Conservatives/Republicans that are Never Trumpers are handing the November 2016 election to Crooked Hillary – America’s worst lying, corrupt, deceptive and more than likely treasonous [perhaps on a larger scale than Obama] politician EVER.

 

JRH 8/15/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Vote for America — Vote for Trump

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 8/13/2016 1:38 PM

 

If ever there was a time to stand on one’s principles and the principles that built America and made Her strong, it is now. The future of America is at stake, and for anyone to still be screaming “never Trump” is not very principled, especially in light of Donald Trump’s “America First” policies and the great speech he presented to the Detroit Economic Club recently. Screaming “never Trump” is actually fairly anti-American and immoral, if one understands that the alternative is Hillary Clinton and policies that are certain to undo the U.S. Constitution and destroy America. [Bold text emphasis by the Editor]

 

Once one looks at the stark differences between the two candidates, despite any valid points myself and others made in opposition to Trump during the primary, one must ask the “never Trump” people, just what principles are you holding on to so tightly that you would pave the way for Hillary Clinton — the most corrupt, dishonest and despicable politician in American history, a Chavez imitator and an Alinsky acolyte — to win the presidency and implement plans that will kill the U.S. economy and individual liberty?

 

Donald Trump said it best on August 8th: (Hillary Clinton) supports the high taxes and radical regulation that forced jobs out of your community … and crime policies that made you less safe … and immigration policies that have strained local budgets … and the trade deals like NAFTA, signed by her husband, that have shipped our jobs to Mexico and other countries …”.

 

Ninety-four million Americans are currently outside the labor force, 14 million of those added under Obama, while American households are earning $4000 less than they were over a decade ago. And Progressive Democrat policies have driven seven million more Americans into poverty. Hillary Clinton offers more of the same.

 

The large number of Democratic promises to implement a massive socialist expansion of government, including everything from subsidized abortions and “sky-is-the-limit” confiscatory taxation to new job-killing regulations and the radical climate change agenda, makes the current $20 trillion national debt look like chump-change. Literally millions of new federal employees will be required to operate such an intrusive government.

 

As Trump noted in Detroit, “If you were a foreign power looking to weaken America, you couldn’t do better than Hillary Clinton’s economic agenda.”

 

During his speech at the Democratic National Convention, Bernie Sanders told the crowd: “Together, my friends, we have begun a political revolution to transform America, and that revolution, our revolution, continues.”

 

Hillary Clinton elaborated clearly in her acceptance speech, as she promised amnesty for approximately 30 million illegal aliens currently in the U.S. This is part of her greater plan to make these illegal aliens U.S. citizens with full voting rights, in order to build a permanent Democratic majority that controls America.

 

Hillary is also proposing a 550% increase in Syrian refugees, importing 65,000 Syrians in a single fiscal year in addition to the 149,000 Muslims granted green cards annually, and this would amount to roughly 214,000 in her first year as president. She could potentially resettle 1.5 million Muslims to America, if she served two terms. But Donald Trump promises to halt this Progressive insanity and all immigration from regions that support and export terrorism, like Syria.

 

The next President of the United States could potentially appoint four Supreme Court Justices. While Clinton will certainly appoint Leftist Supreme Court Justices, modeled after Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who regularly usurp the U.S. Constitution in favor of “social justice”, Trump will appoint Conservative Justices, similar to Antonin Scalia, with the possible exception of his sister, who respect the rule of law expressed in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, including the inalienable right to life and the Laws of Nature and God. Clinton will protect Obama’s anti-American policies, and Trump will rip Obama’s dastardly legacy up by its roots.

 

Donald Trump has proven that he will go bare-knuckles with Obama and Hillary on every major scandal and issue during their terms in office, from Fast and Furious and the Iranian Nuclear Deal to Benghazi, Hillary’s illegal email schemes and Pay-to Play corruption. This is his badge of honor. He is fighting to keep America from becoming far removed from the America of the 20th Century and far removed from anything resembling a nation founded on freedom and liberty, as envisioned by our Founders.

 

Trump’s finely articulated policy plans spoke of “jump (starting) America” out of “the weakest so-called recovery since the Great Depression” (only 1.2% growth), ending over-regulation that costs America $2 trillion annually and tax reforms for all Americans (Make America Grow Again). He also offered logical, well-thought and common-sense ideas for energy and trade.

 

Without going into the details, part of Trump’s message stated: “A Trump administration will end this war on the American worker and unleash an energy revolution that will bring vast new wealth to our country … When we reform our tax, trade, energy and regulatory policies, we will open a new chapter in American Prosperity.”

 

How about crime? Trump claims the title of “the law and order president”. Clinton invited the mothers of thugs to speak at the DNC.

 

If this is really a matter of conscience and principle for the “never Trump” conservatives, are they actually prepared to hand Hillary the Oval Office by refusing to vote or vote third party? Or worse — will many of them vote for Hillary, as some have suggested, setting in motion the completion of Obama’s destructive and catastrophic fundamental transformation of America?

 

How will they feel about their principles once America lies at their feet in shambles?

 

The principled vote is one cast for Donald Trump, who loves and fights for America, if “never Trump” conservatives are honest. If anyone believes Trump to be bad, Hillary, who loathes America and desires unrestrained power, is worse, as she coddles America’s enemies and neglects national security concerns. Hillary’s disastrous socialist ideas are pulled straight from the despots’ historical ash heap and the burial grounds of millions of their victims, nations destroyed by crushing poverty, civil strife and violence. Donald’s ideas are straight from traditional conservative principles that offer peace through strength and economic prosperity for our country. And economic prosperity, history proves, always provides greater individual liberty.

 

“We will put new American metal into the spine of this nation … Only by changing to new leadership, and new solutions, will we get new results. We need to stop believing in politicians, and start believing in America … We are ready to dream great things for our country once again. We are ready to show the world that America is Back –Bigger, and Better and Stronger Than Ever Before.” — Donald Trump speaking at the Detroit Economic Club on August 8th, 2016.

 

By Justin O, Smith

_______________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any text embraced brackets are by the Editor. Text embraced by parentheses are by Justin.

 

© Justin O. Smith