Russian Hack or DNC Whistleblower Leak?


OR Maybe a Combination of Hack & Leak?

 

John R. Houk

© December 17, 2016

 

I heard Obama yesterday give a definitive answer to the storyline that Russia hacked the DNC to disseminate info to hurt Crooked Hillary to the favor of Donald Trump. I’ve read some Republican elites like Senator John McCain and Senator Lindsey Graham are also towing the Obama line of a Russian hack.

 

BUT STILL no one connected to Intelligence Community investigation has released any definitive evidence against the Ruskies. These Intelligence investigators have even refused the Constitutional oversight of Senate and House Intelligence Committees who actually have security clearance for such a review.

 

NOW LET’S BE CLEAR, I am not exonerating Russians of nefarious actions against the United States. Ever since the Russians went Communist, their power elites have worked for despotic global domination. Since the end of WWII Russians have been to achieve a status of geopolitical/military superiority. Communism has been the preferred ideology. Even after the Soviet Union dissolved Communism has had an ideological influence among Russian elites. After all Putin himself was a former KGB official in the Soviet spy apparatus.

 

I have no trust for Russian motives. BUT GUESS WHAT, neither do I trust anything to do with Obama minions and the Left Wing Dem Party in general.

 

Until Donald Trump is sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, I am going to continue to speculate the Dems are trying to pull a fast one to keep Trump from becoming President. If it happens it could unconstitutional political means or coup involving Leftists politically or even Obama instigating the military he so decimated of Patriot leadership of the last eight years. I have no doubt any of these attempts will result in America’s second Civil War.

 

In which case I pray a smooth peaceful transition from Obama Leftists to Trump populists takes place on January 20, 2017.

 

Below are some excerpts that should make you question the validity of the Obama narrative and Russia:

 

The Obama administration suggested earlier Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally authorized the hacking of Democratic officials’ email accounts in the run-up to the presidential election and said it was “fact” that such actions helped Donald Trump’s campaign. The White House also assailed Trump himself, saying he must have known of Russia’s interference.

 

No proof was offered for any of the accusations, the latest to unsettle America’s uneasy transition from eight years under Democratic President Barack Obama to a new Republican administration led by Trump. The claims of Russian meddling in the election also have heightened already debilitating tensions between Washington and Moscow over Syria, Ukraine and a host of other disagreements. (Obama: US Will Take Action Against Russia for Hacking; Newsmax; 12/15/16 08:37 PM)

 

Hmm…

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI is supporting the CIA’s conclusion that Russia interfered in the presidential election with the goal of supporting Republican candidate Donald Trump.

 

In a message sent to employees, CIA Director John Brennan said he had spoken with FBI Director James Comey and James Clapper, the director of national intelligence.

 

Brennan said in the message that “there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election.”

 

A U.S. official who had seen the unclassified message from Brennan confirmed it to The Associated Press on Friday.

 

President Barack Obama is promising that the U.S. will retaliate against Russia for its suspected meddling in America’s election process, an accusation the Kremlin has vehemently denied.

 

 

White House officials said it was “fact” that Russian hacking helped Donald Trump’s campaign against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. White House press secretary Josh Earnest on Thursday also assailed Trump himself over his refusal to acknowledge the hacking and his attacks on the U.S. intelligence community.

 

 

There has been no specific, persuasive evidence shared publicly about the extent of Putin’s role or knowledge of the hackings. That lack of proof undercuts Democrats’ strategy to portray Putin’s involvement as irrefutable evidence of a directed Russian government plot to undermine America’s democratic system.

 

But the White House pointed to a U.S. intelligence assessment released publicly in October that asserted “only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” And Obama’s deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, connected the dots further, saying Thursday Putin was responsible for the Russian government’s actions. (Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive; By AP News; Townhall; 12/16/16 2:51 PM)

 

More news that shows there is more to the story than Obama and the Dems are sharing with Americans.

 

There are several problems with the theory, not the least of which is that there is no evidence that the election was influenced by the Russians. None.

 

President Obama openly dismissed the idea that the Russians could have influenced the election.

 

Another issue is that the Republican National Committee asked the FBI to investigate whether it had been hacked and – after a lengthy investigation – found that, in fact, the RNC had not been subjected to hacking attempts. (Diplomat Claims DNC Leak Source is NOT Russian Hackers, But Inside Party Whistleblower; By Melissa Davis; US Herald)

 

More on a DNC Whistleblower:

 

 

A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by ‘disgusted’ whisteblowers – and not hacked by Russia.

Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.

‘Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,’ said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. ‘The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.’

 

His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.

 

If we’re to take Murray at his word, he flew to the United States specifically to meet with an unnamed Democratic National Committee operative. They allegedly made contact “in a wooded area near American University, in northwest D.C.” The Democrat was supposedly disgusted at the DNC’s efforts to tilt the primary in Hillary’s favor and against Bernie Sanders, as well as being worried that corruption at the Clinton Global Initiative could wind up costing them the election. (Wikileaks source: The emails came from inside the DNC, not Russia; By JAZZ SHAW; Hot Air; 12/15/16 8:01 AM)

 

The Washington Times is going with a DNC Whistleblower leak more than the Obama/Dem/Leftist MSM assertion of a Russian hack of the DNC:

 

 

Meanwhile, several former intelligence officials outlined this week why they believe signs in the situation point to an inside leak, and not a hack by an outside actor.

 

If hacking were involved, the National Security Agency would likely have digital footprints that could be used to back up the CIA’s claims, wrote the former officials, led by former NSA official William Binney.

 

“In sum, given what we know of NSA’s existing capabilities, it beggars belief that NSA would be unable to identify anyone — Russian or not — attempting to interfere in a U.S. election by hacking,” Mr. Binney and the officials wrote in the memo, published by Consortium News.

 

Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign were, in fact, leaked by a whistleblower disgusted with the Clintons.

 

“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the Daily Mail. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.” (Sen. Ron Johnson: CIA refused briefing in wake of Russia hacking reports; By David Sherfinski; Washington Times; 12/16/16)

 

JRH 12/17/16

Please Support NCCR

____________

Further Reading:

 

Obama Plans to Rule America Outside the White House; By Daniel Greenfield; Sultan Knish; 12/16/16

 

RUSSIAN HACKING CONSPIRACY THEORY IMPLODES; By Matthew Vadum; FrontPageMag; 12/16/16

 

It Sure Sounds Like a Coup Attempt


President Barack Obama, joined by Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, left, and Vice President Joe Biden, right,  speaks at the CIA Headquarters in Langley, Va., Wednesday, April 13, 2016, after a meeting with his National Security Council. Obama pays a rare visit to CIA headquarters as the United States weighs sending more forces to Iraq to fight the Islamic State group. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
President Barack Obama, joined by Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, left, and Vice President Joe Biden, right, speaks at the CIA Headquarters in Langley, Va., Wednesday, April 13, 2016. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

John R. Houk

© December 16, 2016

 

The American Left publicly led by President Barack Hussein Obama and Crooked Hillary acolytes are using Fake News as the absolute truth pertaining the accusation Russian hacks influenced the U.S. election in which President-Elect Trump won.

 

In the debates, Crooked Hillary said no less than SEVENTEEN Intelligence organizations have proclaimed that the Russians hacked the DNC. – LIE!

 

while-u-sleep-msm-creates-your-realityMSM Leftists are repeating the Crooked Hillary lie.

 

Now the American Left is proclaiming that Russia directly hacked voting machines in favor of Trump. –LIE!

 

The only Intelligence Agency pointing to Russian hacking is the CIA. AND within the CIA there is open rebellion about the validity of a Russian hack. INDEED, the CIA leaks claiming a Russian hack of the DNC are all Obama political appointees and political hacks within the CIA. Perhaps CIA anti-Obama agents leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks as Judge Napolitano suggested.

 

Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee requested to review the information alleging a Russian hack, the Intelligence Agencies REFUSED. The disinformation reason allegedly from the Intelligence Community is that the Intelligence is currently incomplete. After completion, the classified report will be released to the House Intelligence Committee.

 

WHAT? If the report is so incomplete to share the proof that Russia hacked the DNC, was there a leak in the first place from the CIA?

 

fbi-vs-ciaThe FBIin charge of domestic criminal investigationsdoes not concur there is proof of a Russian hack. Multiple other Intelligence agencies has NOT confirmed the CIA political-Obama acolytes’ public accusation against Russia and against President-Elect Trump.

 

Now I love a viable Conspiracy Theory, yet I’m not one to give full credibility to a Conspiracy Theory as an accurate gospel of truth. But I gotta tell ya. There is an ample appearance the Dems are conspiring to pull a coup d’état justification to prevent a Presidential Administration of Donald Trump.

 

Below is a Cliff Kincaid article about Dem duplicity with the Russians which is followed by a forty-five-minute video of Kincaid interviewing Toby Westerman, the author of Lies, Terror, and the Rise of the Neo-Communist Empire (Book Review) along the same lines pertaining to the Russians and the CIA.

 

JRH 12/16/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Corrupt CIA Feeds Crooked Media

 

By Cliff Kincaid | Accuracy in Media

Posted by TMH

December 15, 2016

NoiseyRoom.net

 

Isn’t it strange how the left suddenly finds the CIA to be a worthwhile organization now that it has been turned into a weapon against Trump?

 

We need congressional investigations into the politicization of the CIA under John Brennan, whose claim to fame has been bringing sexual “diversity” to the agency. Perhaps he should have been doing his job, which is to defend the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

 

Reuters reports, “The overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, three American officials said on Monday.” Reuters reported that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (or ODNI) “does not dispute the CIA’s analysis of Russian hacking operations,” but “it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump.”

 

All of this flatly contradicts the fake news story in The New York Times that the CIA judgment on Russia was built on a “swell of evidence.” It is evidence not seen by other intelligence agenies [sic] and the FBI. Even the CBS Evening News reports that the “FBI has not concluded its investigation into this, but so far it is not siding with the CIA.”

 

Common sense tells you that Moscow was perfectly content to let Hillary win, and probably thought she would win. After all, Hillary sold out America to Moscow’s interests with a Russian reset that failed and opened the door to more Russian aggression. Her State Department also sold American uranium assets to Moscow. She was the perfect Russian dupe.

 

This whole discussion in the media about the Russians backing Trump is fake news.

 

The obvious conclusion is that Brennan is on a mission to overturn the election through propaganda and disinformation. This is not only the last gasp of sore losers but represents corruption of the intelligence process.

 

If the purpose of the Russian hacking was to undermine confidence in the American democratic process, as some “experts” originally thought, Brennan’s CIA is doing a good job of that.

 

House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes has sent a letter to James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, saying, “On November 17, 2016, you told the Committee during an open hearing that the IC [Intelligence Community] lacked strong evidence connecting Russian govemment cyber-attacks and WikiLeaks disclosures, testifying that ‘as far as the WikiLeaks connection, the evidence there is not as strong and we don’t have good insight into the sequencing of the releases or when the data may have been provided.’ According to new press reports, this is no longer the CIA’s position.”

 

The WikiLeaks disclosures, of course, involved hacked emails from the Clinton campaign.

 

The CIA position” changed” because Brennan saw an opportunity to use the controversy againt Trump. Nunes refers to the CIA’s reported revision of information previously conveyed to this Committee.” Once again, we see evidence that the CIA is making things up.

 

There is no doubt that WikiLeaks has worked for the Russians. Julian Assange himself worked for the Russian propaganda channel RT. But that doesn’t constitute evidence that the emails were stolen by the Russians and given to WikiLeaks.

 

It now seems clear that the CIA is going far beyond what the evidence in its possession actually shows. This means that the original story in The Washington Post was based on misleading, if not false, information. That story was headlined, “Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House.”

 

In short, the Post was duped by Brennan’s CIA. This constitutes a case of the intelligence community using a major media organ to mislead the American people. Since Post owner Jeff Bezos does business with the CIA, this is a matter of utmost concern.

 

In a statement, Nunes said, “Russia’s cyber-attacks are no surprise to the House Intelligence Committee, which has been closely monitoring Russia’s belligerence for years—as I’ve said many times, the Intelligence Community has repeatedly failed to anticipate Putin’s hostile actions. Unfortunately the Obama administration, dedicated to delusions of ‘resetting’ relations with Russia, ignored pleas by numerous Intelligence Committee members to take more forceful action against the Kremlin’s aggression. It appears, however, that after eight years the administration has suddenly awoken to the threat.”

 

Obama’s CIA director “woke up” because it was politically convenient for him to do so. He’s trying to exploit the Russian cyber attacks, which the CIA and other agencies failed to prevent, for political purposes.

 

Even more sensational than Brennan is former CIA official Michael Morell, who openly backed Hillary. He declared, “A foreign government messing around in our elections is, I think, an existential threat to our way of life. To me, and this is to me not an overstatement, this is the political equivalent of 9/11.”

 

It seems clear at this point that the corruption in the media has spread to the CIA.

 

An investigation is certainly needed. It should be conducted into the various former and current CIA officials who have been using the agency and their associations with the agency to wage war against the duly-elected president of the United States.

 

It may turn out to be the case that the real government meddling in our elections has been from the Obama administration and its CIA.

 

Cliff Kincaid

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org. View the complete archives from Cliff Kincaid.

 

+++

What’s Wrong With The CIA?

 

By Cliff Kincaid | America’s Survival

Posted by TMH

December 15, 2016

NoisyRoom.net

 

The author of Lies, Terror, and the Rise of the Neo-Communist Empire, Toby Westerman, talks to host Cliff Kincaid about the problems in the CIA and what President Trump can do about them. Westerman and Kincaid also discuss the threats posed by Russia and China.

 

VIDEO: What’s Wrong With the CIA?

 

Posted by USA Survival

Streamed live on Dec 13, 2016

 

________________

It Sure Sounds Like a Coup Attempt

John R. Houk

© December 16, 2016

________________

Corrupt CIA Feeds Crooked Media

And

What’s Wrong With The CIA?

 

© 2016 NoisyRoom.net