Dem Witch Hunt Will Collapse like Massive Fail Supernova


John R. Houk

© July 18, 2017

 

A massive, dying star that astronomers thought would explode has instead quietly collapsed into a black hole. The event, which NASA calls a “massive fail,” could be a more common pattern for giant stars than astronomers previously suspected. (IN ‘MASSIVE FAIL,’ DYING STAR MYSTERIOUSLY REBORN AS BLACK HOLE; By JESSICA WAPNER; Newsweek; 5/25/17 4:20 PM)

 

Eventually the Dem Witch Hunt against President Trump and his Administration will look like a star preparing to go supernova but instead end up as a Massive Fail by collapsing into a Black Hole political despair.

 

Part of this Russia – Russia – Russia thing going on – now slurping over Donald Trump, Jr. – will collapse because of the nothingness that exists. Then fizzle … The Dem Party becomes irrelavent.

 

When Donald Trump, Jr., and some relatively high level (future) President Trump advisors met with Natalia Veselnitskaya and some suspiciously Russian government connected individuals, the dumb-light should have been flashing on the Trump-side of individuals.

 

VIDEO: Donald Trump Jr. Exposes “Fake” New York Times! Main Stream Media Death Spiral! Will Never Recover!

 

Posted by theunitedwest

Published on Jul 16, 2017

 

So, Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer, BIG FREAKIN’ DEAL! Well, for the unhinged New York Times, the nutso lefties and the News crazies, like CNN and MSNBC, this is a big deal. That’s why PROJECT CLARITY takes on the big guys and challenges them to put up or shut up! Watch this video expose’ and see how the LEFT hates America and the Trumps more than they care for TRUTH, Law and reality. In this piece Tom Trento explains how Don Jr. has all his media enemies in the metaphorical “Kill Box,” and they don’t even know it! Don is so deep in their heads that they can’t see past Moscow. In this video you will see, maybe for the first time, the actual Federal statute upon which the unhinged New York Times and unbalanced Democrats politicians base their case that Don Jr. is a TRAITOR! Tom carefully goes through the law and shows that Don Jr. broke no laws and will be fully vindicated. This media attack is beyond insane but exactly what happens when the fourth estate abandons the intellectual process of truthful, analytical thinking and uses hate and vitriol to try and take down President Trump. Watch this powerful video and share it with your friends, together we must expose lies and tell the truth!

 

Don junior was excited about getting dirt on Crooked Hillary which he knew had to be out there, but he also should have realized the Clintons had dodged felony bullets for over a quarter-century. To suggest there was Crooked Hillary dirt the Dems would have allowed to stick to their crooked candidate family was unlikely.

 

The Dems and the Clintons in particular, have proven themselves to be masters of making untruthful dirt stick to their political opponents for decades. I can see the Don junior excitement but Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort should have been wary of dirty tricks and smell a set-up to make dirt stick on the Trump campaign. I have to wonder if then campaign manager Manafort was fired not for Russian connections but for being stupid to allow to be played by Dems and their Russian connections.

 

This whole has been a piranha feeding frenzy for the Dems and the Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM). As usual these Leftists have taken dirt that has zero legal merit and have propagandized the whole nation with words like “treason” and “impeachment.” They know darn well there is no espionage moment that took place at this Don junior/Natalia Veselnitskaya meeting.

 

If there is any collusion going on here it is probably from a combination of Dems, Leftist MSM and a displeased Putin who didn’t appreciate President Trump tough-talk at the G-20 Summit in Germany. So, mysteriously a meeting that took place in June 2016 before the November election has become public fodder for the American Left. AS IF the American Left (including the MSM) has indulged in some kind unethical Oppo-research against a political enemy. Yup and gasp, the GOP pushes the envelope on Oppo-research too. And man did I believe the treacherous Barack Hussein Obama should have been impeached.

 

The same reality about an Obama impeachment holds for President Trump as well. A simple House majority is needed to impeach. The Senate needs 2/3 (the number is 67 today) of member to vote convict to remove the impeached President. As to Slick Willie Clinton: A simple Republican House impeached Clinton but the GOP could muster only 50 of the 67 Senators needed to convict Clinton. The Dems currently don’t even have a majority in the House let alone in the Senate.

 

In these day of a divided America the political reality is no Dem will impeach President Trump as long as the GOP is the majority Party in the House. The Dems won’t get past the first step.

 

Ergo, one should understand how ridiculous it is for the Dems to spout treason and impeachment against the President. As to Don junior, I doubt there are twelve jurors anywhere that would unanimously convict junior of treasonous espionage with no laws broken.

 

So, let’s look list the participants of this meeting that the Dems and MSM are running an idiotic smear campaign:

 

Russian Side –

 

Natalia Veselnitskaya

Veselnitskaya started her career at the prosecutor’s office in the Moscow region in 1999, but became known after 2001 for defending property deals that her opponents and activists labelled corporate land grabs. …

 

In Russia’s notoriously corrupt court systems, good connections are important, and she has them. She is married to Alexander Mitusov, former deputy prosecutor for the Moscow region, and she has represented the family of Pyotr Katsyv, vice president of state-owned Russian Railways and former transportation minister for the Moscow region. In 2012, the respected Novaya Gazeta newspaper documented how Veselnitskaya, her husband and the Katsyvs allegedly were involved in major corporate raiding cases.

 

She also represented Katsyv’s son, Denis, in a money-laundering case in Manhattan that was settled for $6 million in May, three days before it was to go to trial.

 

The case was related to a $230 million Russian tax-fraud scheme that was brought to light by a whistleblower named Sergei Magnitsky, who was arrested and died in a Moscow prison in 2009. An official Russian investigation of his death said he suffered a heart attack, but a report by the presidential human rights commission found that Magnitsky was beaten and denied medical treatment. In 2012, the US Congress passed the Magnitsky Act, imposing sanctions on Russian officials involved in alleged human rights violations in the case. Russian lawmakers responded by passed a measure that banned Americans from adopting Russian children. (Natalia Veselnitskaya to Rob Goldstone, cast of Donald Trump’s Russian connections; FirstPost.com; 7/15/17 22:39:46 IST)

 

Rob Goldstone

The British-born Goldstone is the co-founder of Oui 2 Entertainment, a Manhattan-based music management company that says on its website it has represented Michael Jackson and BB King, among others.

 

The Agalarovs hired Goldstone to help with the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Goldstone has worked with Emin Agalarov since then, most recently organising a concert featuring Canadian musician David Foster in St Petersburg last year.

 

In an interview Monday with the AP, Goldstone said he set up the 2016 meeting with Donald Trump Jr and said Veselnitskaya stated that she had information about purported illegal campaign contributions to the Democratic National Committee that she thought Trump Jr might find helpful. (Natalia Veselnitskaya to Rob Goldstone, cast of Donald Trump’s Russian connections; FirstPost.com; 7/15/17 22:39:46 IST)

 

Anatoli Samachornov – Veselnitskaya’s translator

A Russian translator who worked on behalf of the State Department, including during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, was reportedly present at the June meeting at Trump Tower with President Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

 

 

Samachornov is more than that. According to his LinkedIn profile, from 2005 until recently, Samochornov was a project manager at the Meridian International Center, which describes itself as a “nonprofit, global leadership organization headquartered in Washington, DC.”

 

Meridian is a principal partner of the U.S. State Department.

 

Samochornov’s LinkedIn profile says he was an interpreter and a “partner/owner” in Interpreter Boutique, which provided translation services.

 

The LinkedIn profile further describes his work on behalf of the State Department, purportedly while he was at Meridian. The timeline of his work at Meridian includes the period when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. (New York Times Omits Clinton State Department Link to Trump Jr. Meeting; By Aaron Klein; Breitbart.com; 7/17/17)

 

Rinat Akhmetshin

Rinat Akhmetshin, a Russian-American lobbyist who has been accused of being a former Soviet intelligence officer …

 

 

His name has surfaced before involving Russian lobbying efforts to kill the Magnitsky Act, which also involved Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya and Fusion GPS, the firm of former journalists that solicited the Christopher Steele dossier against President Donald Trump.

 

 

… Akhmetshin was part of a group of Russians – and an American firm Fusion GPS (which was behind the salacious Steele dossier) – who were involved in lobbying efforts to defeat it.

 

 

… He is now based in Washington DC as a lobbyist. He was previously hired by clients with the mandate to generate negative publicity. He was paid by a previous client to derail the US asylum application of a Russian citizen using false allegations of anti-Semitism.” READ ENTIRETY (Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know; By Jessica McBride; Heavy.com; 7/14/17 10:16am Updated 5:47pm)

 

Unidentified 8th person said to be representing Agalarov interests

 

Donald Trump Jr.’s attorney, Alan Futerfas, has told CNN he has spoken by phone to the eighth person in the room during the meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016.

 

CNN reported last week that the individual was there on behalf of a Russian family, the Agalarovs, who had asked for the meeting to be set up, according to two sources familiar with the circumstances.

 

 

Futerfas says the person, who he declined to name, was a US citizen and said he was not employed by the Russian government. But Futerfas acknowledged he didn’t know his entire history. The Agalarovs and their attorney have not publicly explained who the employee was who attended. (Trump Jr. attorney offers details about 8th person at meeting; By Pamela Brown; CNN [aka Communist News Network]; 7/18/17 Updated 1:13 AM ET)

 

Russians not at meeting but involved in making the appointment –

 

Emin Agalarov

 

Emin Agalarov is best known in Eastern Europe for his music, but he’s becoming known in the U.S. for his appearance in an email chain that led to Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya on June 9, 2016. The meeting took place just days after future President Donald Trump clinched the Republican presidential nomination.

 

 

The 37-year-old Agalarov, who is known professionally by just his first name as “Emin,” is also the son of Aras Agalarov, the chief of the Crocus Group.

 

 

Emin’s father Aras is like the “Donald Trump of Russia,” running the Crocus Group, a real estate development firm. The company even owns the largest retail-entertainment complex in Russia, called “Vegas.”

 

 

Also like Trump, Aras has his son play a key role in the company. Emin is First Vice-President of the company.

 

Emin has been working at Crocus since 2001, after he graduated from Marymount Manhattan College in New York. His first position was Commercial Director. He was promoted to Vice President in 2012 and became Executive Vice President two years later.

 

 

Emin Was Married to the Daughter of Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev

 

Emin isn’t married, but he has two children, twins Ali and Mikail.

 

Meydan TV reported in May 2015 that Emin split from his wife of nine years, Leyla Aliyeva. (Emin Agalarov: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know; By Daniel S. Levine; Heavy.com; 7/11/17 1:40pm Update 9:53pm)

 

Aras Agalarov

Agalarov is sometimes referred to as the “Trump of Russia” due to his penchant for self-branding his buildings. In 1989, he founded Crocus Group, one of Russia’s leading development firms.

 

 

The Agalarovs have amassed a fortune partially from contracts for state-funded construction projects, including one for the construction of a stadium for the F.I.F.A. World Cup Championship in 2018 in Kaliningrad.

 

 

Do the Agalarovs link Trump to Putin?

 

It certainly is one step closer. Aras has acted as a liaison between the heads of state, even delivering a gift to Trump from Russian President Vladimir Putin after the latter canceled a planned meeting before the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow. Crocus’s Russian state contracts coupled with Aras’ Order of Honor of the Russian Federation show close ties and allegiances to the Kremlin. (Meet Aras Agalarov, The Russian Developer Connecting The Trumps And Putin; By Cameron SperanceBisnowCONTRIBUTOR; Forbes; 7/12/17 10:05 AM)

 

Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika

In one email, Goldstone tells Trump Jr. that “the crown prosecutor of Russia” met with the elder Aglarov and “offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.”

 

There’s only one problem — there is no such thing as a “crown prosecutor” in Russia.

 

Goldstone may have been referring to the office of the prosecutor general, who heads Russia’s judiciary system and is the highest ranking official in that government branch. Russia’s prosecutor general is responsible for overseeing the country’s court and legal system and supervising all the highest branches of the law.

 

The title is currently filled by Yury Yakovlevich Chaika, appointed to the role by Putin in 2006. Chaika has ties to Veselnitskaya and is a very high-level official in the Russian government, the New York Times [Blog Editor -aka Fake News Times] reported on Tuesday. (Donald Trump Jr.’s emails reference meeting the crown prosecutor of Russia – here’s what that might be; Veronika Bondarenko; Business Insider; 7/11/17 1:03 PM

 

More Yuri Chaika

When Donald Trump Jr, the US president’s eldest son, was alerted last year to what he thought was dirt on Hillary Clinton coming straight from the Kremlin, he thought he was meeting a representative of the “crown prosecutor of Russia”. No such crown prosecutor exists in Russia. Robert Goldstone, the British music publicist who set up the meeting, was more likely referring to Yuri Chaika, Russia’s prosecutor-general and one of the Kremlin’s most powerful law enforcement officials.

 

Chaika, the prosecutor general since 2006, is a longtime confidant of Putin and one of Russia’s most powerful law enforcement officials. The Russian president nominates the prosecutor general, who is approved by the upper chamber of parliament. In Putin’s 17 years in power, the chamber largely has been a rubber-stamp body.

 

In 2015, Russian anti-corruption crusader Alexei Navalny, Putin’s most popular opponent, published a damning investigation that detailed what he described as shady deals involving Chaika’s sons and other senior prosecutors. It documented how the sons built a business empire on their father’s connections. One son, the investigation alleged, was involved in business deals with the wives of Russian gangsters who terrorised a town in southern Russia until they were arrested and charged with killing a family of 12 in 2010. Despite evidence that local prosecutors had turned on a blind eye on the gang for years, Chaika kept his job.

 

Chaika called the accusations false and accused Navalny of following someone’s “order” to discredit him. Amid public pressure to investigate Chaika and his family, Aras Agalarov was one of the few to spring to his defence, buying a newspaper ad lashing out at Navalny and dismissing his findings as relying on “groundless accusations.” (Natalia Veselnitskaya to Rob Goldstone, cast of Donald Trump’s Russian connections; FirstPost.com; 7/15/17 22:39:46 IST)

 

Americans Present:

 

Donald Trump Jr.

Donald John Trump Jr. (born December 31, 1977) is an American businessman and former reality TV personality. He is the oldest child of the 45th President of the United StatesDonald Trump, and his first wife, Ivana. He currently works alongside his brother Eric as a trustee and executive director of The Trump Organization. The trust was established to oversee all his father’s assets during the latter’s presidency. (Donald Trump Jr.; Wikipedia; last edited 7/17/17 07:54)

 

More Don Jr.

 

Several Democrats have argued that U.S. election laws prevent campaigns from receiving anything of “value” from foreign entities, and have said in Congress and in television interviews that items of “value” can be more than money, and can also be information.

 

That, Democrats say, is why President Trump’s campaign violated election laws when Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian lawyer who said she had dirt on Hillary Clinton.

 

But in an interview that aired Saturday night on Fox News, Dershowitz said campaign finance laws have never been prosecuted that way. He also said using the law to prosecute people who obtain information from non-U.S. sources would violate the First Amendment.

 

 

Dershowitz went on to say that just as newspapers are free to print any information they obtain from others, even when the source obtains it illegally, candidates for office have the same right to get information anywhere they want.

 

He also stressed again there is no legal precedent to treat information as money under U.S. campaign finance laws.

 

“You can’t include information under the campaign finance law,” he said. “That would be unconstitutional.” (Alan Dershowitz destroys Democrats’ ‘unconstitutional’ argument against Donald Trump Jr.; By Pete Kasperowicz; Washington Examiner; 7/16/17 5:32 PM)

 

Jared Kushner

Jared Corey Kushner (born January 10, 1981) is an American investor, real-estate developer, newspaper publisher, and senior advisor to President Donald Trump.

 

Kushner is the elder son of real-estate developer Charles Kushner and is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka. He was chief executive officer of the real-estate holding and development company Kushner Companies and of Observer Media, publisher of the New York Observer. He is the co-founder and part owner of Cadre, an online real-estate investment platform.[2][3]

 

On January 9, 2017, Kushner was named as a senior White House advisor. He consequently resigned as CEO of Kushner Companies and as publisher of the Observer,[4] but his private financial interests remain a subject of controversy.[5] He has also been linked with Russian officials, and helped develop and run Trump’s digital media strategy. (Jared Kushner; Wikipedia; last edited 7/17/17 17:18)

 

Paul Manafort

Manafort’s ties to foreign oligarchs and dictators have raised questions for decades, but his work for the Trump campaign likely has him under FBI investigation.

 

Raised in politics and business

 

Manafort was born in 1949 and raised in New Britain, Connecticut, a majority Democratic town where his father served three terms as a popular Republican mayor.

 

Like Trump, Manafort comes from a real-estate family. Alongside his political work, his father also ran the family construction company, Manafort Brothers Inc., founded by his Italian immigrant father.

 

Instead of taking over the family business, Manafort decided to pursue his interest in politics and moved to Washington, DC, where he earned both an undergraduate business degree and a law degree at Georgetown University.

 

 

Manafort’s international work has long raised eyebrows among Democrats in Washington. In 2004, he became a top adviser to Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, a pro-Russian strongman whom Manafort is widely credited with helping win the presidency in 2010.

 

 

Why is Manafort under fire now?

 

On March 22, the Associated Press reported that Manafort was paid $10 million between 2006 and 2009 to lobby on behalf of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, a close Putin ally, using a strategic “model” that would “greatly benefit the Putin Government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success.” (Paul Manafort was in the Russian lawyer meeting with Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Jr. — here’s what you need to know about him; By Eliza Relman and Natasha Bertrand; Business Insider; 7/14/17 3:50 PM)

 

Did Russia try to influence the U.S. election in 2016? DUH! Did Donald Trump actively seek Russian government help to win the 2016? UNLIKELY! Or at least just as much as the Dems did as well both in 2016 and in the past.

 

IN FACT, there is more evidence that the 2016 Dem nominee for President actively colluded directly with and to benefit the Russian government to reap personal gain for the Clinton Foundation. Can you say Uranium One and 20% of American Uranium ore? Hmm … And what is uranium used for? Are the uses of uranium only for nuclear energy? Gosh, Russia has one of the world’s largest nuclear arsenal!

 

We need to ask ourselves about the reason Russia would favor influencing a Trump victory over Crooked Hillary when the Clintons had already proven to be a power couple willing to screw American National Interests for personal gain.

 

It is my opinion Russians (meaning Putin) probably believe the Clinton card had played out as a benefit to Russian National Interests. I have no doubts that if Russia did not hack Crooked Hillary’s unprotected personal email server or the DNC, the Russians undoubtedly had access to the info. Perhaps Putin decided courting favor with a President Trump would be less expensive to the Russian National Interest than the personal gain payout the Clintons would demand.

 

ERGO, I don’t believe Donald Trump didn’t solicit Russian collusion, but that Russia made a National Interest decision that would fry Crooked Hillary and the Democratic Party. I also believe Trump rubbed Putin the wrong way at the G-20 Conference in Germany and began leaking info about Donald Trump, Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner meeting with Russian assets to gather dirt on Crooked Hillary. AND with Russian foresight in mind, used the opportunity to lobbying seeds about the Magnitsky Act which tied up access to Russian assets. The lobbying pertaining to the Magnitsky Act would provide plausible deniability for Russian election meddling while placing the Trump on the possible extortion hook for the future.

 

Well that’s my two-cents on Russia – Russia – Russia. President Trump wants the Dems to back off, he should ignore the MSM agenda of dump-Trump and unleash the U.S. resources at the President’s disposal to bring Clinton, Obama and other crooked Dems to justice over their hypocrisy about demanding justice. Dem corruption has been going much-much longer than President Donald Trump’s involvement in politics. And just maybe Trump’s agenda to make America great again can get back on track.

 

JRH 7/18/17

Please Support NCCR

PUTIN’S REAL SYRIA AGENDA


While Dems are crying about the unproven collusion between President Trump and the Russians to win Election-2016 AND ignoring Dem collusion with the Russians (which is better documented), Russia is quietly changing the balance of power in the Middle East by colluding with Iran for geopolitical regional power.

The Dems are either saps or more than willing to stealthily cooperate with the former Soviet Union whose President is a former uber-spy Vladimir Putin.

 

JRH 3/20/17

Please Support NCCR

************

PUTIN’S REAL SYRIA AGENDA [Summary/Intro]

 

By Genevieve Casagrande

Mar 20, 2017

Institute for the Study of War [ISW]

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s primary objective in Syria is to constrain U.S. freedom of action – not fight ISIS and al Qaeda. Russia’s military deployments at current levels will not enable the Iranian-penetrated Assad regime to secure Syria. Moscow’s deepening footprint in Syria threatens America’s ability to defend its interests across the Middle East and in the Mediterranean Sea. The next U.S. step in Syria must help regain leverage over Russia rather than further encourage Putin’s expansionism.

 

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) produced this report with the Critical Threats Project (CTP). The insights are part of an intensive multi-month exercise to frame, design, and evaluate potential courses of action that the United States could pursue to destroy the Islamic State in Iraq and al Sham (ISIS) and al Qaeda in Syria. The ISW-CTP team recently released “America’s Way Ahead in Syria,” which details the flaws in the current U.S. approach in Iraq and Syria and proposes the first phase of a strategic reset in the Middle East.

 

+++

Putin’s Real Syria Agenda

By Genevieve Casagrande and Kathleen Weinberger

March 2017

ISW – PDF

 

Russia’s intervention in Syria in September 2015 fundamentally altered the balance of the Syrian Civil War.1 Russia re-established momentum behind Syrian President Bashar al Assad and his Iranian allies at a moment when major victories by ISIS and Syrian rebels threatened to force the regime to contract into Syria’s central corridor.2 The capabilities Russia deployed were not limited to the airframes, artillery, and personnel needed to conduct a counter-terrorism or counterinsurgency mission, however. Russia deployed advanced air defense and ballistic missile systems, naval units, air superiority aircraft, and other capabilities in a display of major Russian force projection in the region. Russian President Vladimir Putin is altering the balance of power in Syria and the Eastern Mediterranean through sustained Russian military operations and additional deployments of high-end capabilities.

 

Russian Force Projection

 

Russia ultimately seeks to expand its permanent naval and air bases on the Syrian coast in order to further project force into the Mediterranean and Middle East. Russia’s establishment of an anti-access and area denial (A2/AD) exclusion zone from its bases at Latakia and Tartous allows Russia to create de-facto no fly zones in the Eastern Mediterranean as well as over most of Syria. These A2/AD zones constrain U.S. freedom of movement and ultimately raise the cost of U.S. involvement in Syria.3 Russia deployed the naval version of the S-300 to protect the airspace over Latakia airbase in Syria in November 2015.4 Russia also deployed the S-400 in late November 2015 shortly after the Turkish downing of a Russian jet.5 Russia has since deployed an additional seven S-300 systems in an effort to build in redundancies, advance the integration of its air defenses, and provide more comprehensive coverage.6 The S-300 and S-400 systems are road mobile and interoperable, increasing the difficulty of neutralizing the systems. [See Appendix I]

 

Putin wants to challenge the U.S. and its allies by increasing Russian military and political influence in the Middle East. Russia has rotated a wide range of naval vessels to participate in the conflict in order to demonstrate the capabilities of these units and Russia’s willingness to deploy them in the Mediterranean. Russia has deployed some of its most advanced non-nuclear naval capabilities to the Eastern Mediterranean.7 Russian subsurface and surface vessels successfully engaged ground targets in Syria after launching Kalibr cruise missiles from the Mediterranean and Caspian Seas.8 Russia has shown it can undertake precision strikes with the nuclear-capable Kalibr cruise missile at significant distance.

 

Russia also maintains anti-ship capabilities in the Mediterranean, including the Bastion-P coastal defense system. Russia demonstrated the land attack capabilities of the Bastion in November 2016.9 Russia has also deployed battle cruisers that bring advanced anti-ship and air defense capabilities off the Syrian coast. Russia’s deployment of its much-ridiculed aircraft carrier the Admiral Kuznetsov nevertheless showcased its force projection capabilities and intent to exhibit its naval presence in the Mediterranean.10 [See Appendix II]

 

Putin has deployed air defense and anti-ship systems to Syria in order to threaten the United States. Russia does not need these systems to support the counter-terrorism campaign it claims it is waging against anti-Assad opposition groups in Syria. Those groups do not operate aircraft or naval vessels. Russia also deployed the nuclear capable SS-26 ‘Iskander’ ballistic missiles to Syria and used the systems to attack opposition held terrain.11 The Iskander missiles provide no meaningful additional advantage against the opposition. The only conceivable target for these advanced systems is the U.S. and its allies. [See Appendix III]

 

Constrain U.S. Freedom of Action

 

Russia has used its deployment to constrain U.S. freedom of action and limit American policy options in Syria. Russia deployed the S-300 and S-400 air defense systems to deter the U.S. from direct military action against the Assad regime through the unilateral establishment of a no-fly zone. Russia has also forward deployed assets beyond its air and naval bases on the coast in order to further complicate the personnel are primarily concentrated in Latakia, Aleppo, and Tartous Provinces, but are also active in Hama, Homs, Damascus, and Hasakah and include a wide range of units including air assault, tank, medical, naval infantry, and special operations forces. [See Appendix IV]

 

Russia has intentionally removed potential U.S. partners within the armed opposition from the battlefield in Syria. Russian airstrikes from October 2015 to March 2017 have primarily targeted the mainstream Syrian opposition – not ISIS – in order to ensure the opposition’s defeat through its submission, destruction, or transformation. The Russian air campaign has driven what remains of the mainstream opposition closer to Salafi-jihadi groups, which are stronger and better able to defend against intensified pro-regime military operations. Russia is also exacerbating radicalization through its deliberate, illegal targeting of civilians. Russia has consistently targeted hospitals, schools, and other critical civilian infrastructure throughout the sixteen months of its air campaign.

 

Russian Testing Grounds

 

Russia has also used sustained use of transport aircraft in Syria to exercise the Russian military’s overall combat readiness and force projection capabilities. Expeditionary logistics and force projection is difficult for militaries to exercise, in general. Russia is exercising expeditionary logistics by air and sea in Syria.13 Russia is refining its ability to deploy its military personnel and equipment rapidly at a large scale in order to message its ability to threaten the U.S. and its NATO and European allies. Russia announced its intent to prioritize the development of naval equipment for troop transport on March 8 in order to increase the Russian Navy’s ability to provide logistical support in Syria and in other coastal zones.14 Russia also re-supplies and provides combat support for prospect of direct U.S. strikes against the Syrian regime for fear of inadvertently hitting Russian troops. Sources estimated that Russia maintains between 1,500 and 4,000 military personnel in Syria.12 These forces in Syria through frequent deliveries from Russian Il-76 and An-124 transport aircraft. As of October 2016, these transport aircraft were making multiple trips to Syria each month and it is likely that these aircraft continue to make regular trips to Syria. [See Appendix V]

 

Limitations of Russian Capabilities

 

Putin faces a number of economic and military constraints that limit the resources Russia can bring to bear in Syria. Russia’s economic crisis has forced Russia to balance limited resources across key theaters like Ukraine, the Baltics, the Middle East, and domestically in Russia. Putin has opted to pursue multiple, mutually reinforcing lines of effort using a diverse set of naval, air, missile, and ground capabilities in Syria. The overlap allows Russia to extract significant benefits with minimal cost. The Russian military has demonstrated its many shortcomings during its deployment to Syria, including frequent friendly fire incidents, losses of Russian aircraft, a poor performance by Russia’s aging aircraft carrier the Admiral Kuznetsov, and reports of mechanical failure of Russian equipment.15

 

The Russian deployment, at current levels, will be insufficient to grant Assad victory over the opposition, al Qaeda, or ISIS. Russia, Iran, and the regime have been unable to sustain significant simultaneous operations against ISIS and the Syrian opposition, despite Russia’s considerable airframe deployments. Russian airframes were unable to prevent ISIS’s recapture of Palmyra in December 2016 alongside a final pro-regime push to defeat the opposition in Aleppo, for example.16 Russia has instead used ‘cessation of hostilities’ agreements to drawdown its airstrikes against the opposition and surge its air campaign against ISIS for limited periods of time.17 Salafi-Jihadi groups have meanwhile begun to consolidate the opposition under more effective command-and-control structures, increasing rebels’ capabilities and resiliency.18 This dynamic will not only lead to a protracted and bloody civil war for the foreseeable future, but it ultimately raises the requirements for the U.S. to deal with the conflict.

 

Implications

 

Russia is both an unacceptable and ineffective partner against jihadists in Syria. The Russian deployment is inconsistent with Putin’s narrative that Russia intervened in Syria in order to combat terrorists. Many of its capabilities have no utility in the anti-ISIS fight. Putin instead seeks to use Russia’s deployment to subordinate U.S. military action and policies to Russian objectives in Syria. Russia’s aggressive deployment to Syria intends to deter the U.S. from intervening for fear of incurring significant costs. Russia has largely pursued its objectives in Syria with impunity. It has deprived the U.S. of freedom of maneuver, disrupted U.S. partnerships with key allies in the region, and facilitated Russia’s emergence as a geopolitical force in the region. Any potential partnership with Russia in Syria will further strengthen jihadists and force the U.S. to capitulate to a Russian vision for the broader Middle East that endangers America’s security interests.

 

Genevieve Casagrande is a Syria Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War. Kathleen Weinberger is a Russia and Ukraine Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War. Institute for the Study of War Twitter: @TheStudyofWar Critical Threats Twitter: @criticalthreats

 

[Blog Editor: From this point forward the rest of the report are the Appendices (i.e. charts) and Notes. The last section is actually longer than the report itself. To view the Appendices and Notes go to the PDF.]

 

____________________

©2007 – 2017 THE INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF WAR

 

Who is ISW

 

We are on the front lines of military thinking.

 

Our Mission

The Institute for the Study of War advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. We are committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve U.S. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.

 

Our History

Dr. Kimberly Kagan founded ISW in May 2007, as U.S. forces undertook a daring new counterinsurgency strategy to reverse the grim security situation on the ground in Iraq. Frustrated with the prevailing lack of accurate information documenting developments on the ground in Iraq and the detrimental effect of biased reporting on policymakers, Dr. Kagan established ISW to provide real-time, independent, and open-source analysis of ongoing military operations and READ THE REST

 

Conspiracies Undermining Trump


left-targets-trump-conspiracy

Sent by Tony Newbill

Edited by John R. Houk

© February 28, 2017

 

Pseudonymous contributor Tony Newbill looks at Obama disruption of the Trump Administration, tax reform concepts, food availability, policing for profit, Censoring News under the Fake News moniker, human gene manipulation, Intelligence monitoring of communications of government employees and private citizens, Special Prosecutor of Crooked Hillary more important looking at Trump involvement with Russia AND nefarious cooperation between Bezos-owned WaPo and the CIA.

 

JRH 2/28/17

Please Support NCCR

************

Timeline Strongly Suggests President Obama Set Up Intelligence Scheme

2/17/2017 10:21 AM

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/17/the-lame-duck-timeline-strongly-suggests-president-obama-set-up-intelligence-scheme-to-undermine-trump/

 

The Lame Duck Timeline Strongly Suggests President Obama Set Up Intelligence Scheme To Undermine Trump

 

Jay Sekulow outlines the case (Video Here [** Youtube Version Below]) that President Obama set-up a plan for the intelligence community to target President Trump.

 

***VIDEO: Jay Sekulow Provides EVIDENCE Obama Set Up Coup Against Trump

 

Posted by Prissy Holly

Published on Feb 17, 2017

 

+++

This is Interesting …The Tax Revolution Is Here

2/20/2017 9:28 AM

 

One year after it launched, the Tax Revolution Institute — true to its name — is radically distinguishing itself from other organizations in the tax-reform space. TRI’s claim is that the fundamental problem with our tax system is not that it isn’t flat enough, fair enough, low enough, or simple enough — but the simple fact that the government does not have to earn our money.

 

The Problem

Our tax system guarantees politicians an uninterrupted stream of revenue, regardless of whether it is spent honestly, wisely, or effectively. This creates an environment of weak accountability and a lack of responsiveness to the impact of government spending on people’s lives.

 

The Solution

What if the government had to earn our money?

 

In other words, what if individuals could redirect their tax dollars whenever they saw them spent wastefully, corruptly, or in ways that just don’t have a positive impact on people’s lives? What if Americans could maximize the good that government does by effectively voting with every tax dollar?

 

Public Support for Voluntary Taxation on the Rise

Could society be changed for the better if the public were allowed to redirect their tax dollars to civil society instead of the government? TRI Videographer Ford Fischer walks the streets of Washington, DC, to see what the average person has to say.

 

READ ENTIRETY: http://taxrevolution.us/public-support-for-voluntary-taxation-on-the-rise/ (Public Support for Voluntary Taxation on the Rise; By Ford Fischer; Tax Revolution Institution; 2/17/17)

 

Ending Hunger in America One College “Food Pantry” at a Time

The story of Justin Franks’s food pantry is a compelling reminder of the power of individuals when they freely come together to find societal solutions. Franks shares his experience with TRI in this one-on-one interview.

 

READ ENTIRETY: http://taxrevolution.us/ending-hunger-america-college-food-pantry/ (Ending Hunger in America One College “Food Pantry” at a Time; By Guillermo Jimenez; Tax Revolution Institution; 2/17/17)

 

 

Civil Asset Forfeiture: Why Ending an Economic Incentive Can Change Policing for the Better

 

The entire country, including the police, would do well to see an end to the perverse economic incentives created by civil asset forfeiture. TRI’s Editor in Chief, Guillermo Jimenez, breaks down the ugly history of “policing for profit” and explains why the public must demand its abolishment.
READ ENTIRETY: http://taxrevolution.us/civil-asset-forfeiture-ending-an-economic-incentive-better-policing/ (Civil Asset Forfeiture: Why Ending an Economic Incentive Can Change Policing for the Better; By Guillermo Jimenez; Tax Revolution Institution; 2/17/17)

 

+++

Breaking

2/22/2017 11:00 PM

 

Breaking: Infowars and Natural News under attack

 

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/breaking-infowars-and-natural-news-under-attack/

 

Alex Jones’ infowars.com and Mike Adams’ naturalnews.com are both under attack.

 

Infowars has been dropped by its ad platform provider — adroll.com, which spreads ads for Infowars products to many, many media outlets. Last year, that ad operation accounted for more than $3 million in sales for Infowars.

leftist-anti-trump-conspiracies

Natural News has been “delisted” by Google. Google appears to have wiped out 140,000 pages of listings for Mike’s website. I just typed in “natural news” at Google and what came up was something different, natural.news — another tiny site owned by Mike, not naturalnews.com, as the top listing.

 

The Empire is striking back. This isn’t debate or discussion or even baseless accusation. This is war by attrition. And censorship.

 

This is part of the elite mantra: if we don’t like it, wipe it out.

 

If you’ve been awake for the past year, you’ve seen an escalation, along many fronts, of the so-called “Progressive” forces to censor what they don’t want to read or hear.

 

It’s taken a new turn. They want to take down key independent media outlets.

 

They want to narrow down the “information superhighway” to a one-lane road that runs directly into their headquarters, where all the big-time fake news is dispensed, every day, to the hypnotized masses.

 

Don’t let them win. At the very least, take the independent news you judge is vitally important and spread it out far and wide.

Finally, for now, a message to those individuals who, by work and sweat and intelligence, by their own efforts, have built and created independent news sites:

 

WHATEVER DIFFERENCES YOU MAY HAVE HAD, FROM TIME TO TIME, WITH ONE ANOTHER, THIS IS BIGGER THAN THAT. MUCH BIGGER. THIS IS ABOUT CENSORSHIP OF FREE SPEECH. THIS IS ABOUT A WAR AGAINST THE FREEDOMS WE HOLD DEAR, THE FREEDOMS THAT MEAN THE MOST WHEN THEY ARE UNDER ATTACK. DEFEND EACH OTHER.

 

Update: Part-2 here (Breaking: Infowars and Natural News under attack; By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 2/22/17)

 

Genetic manipulation of humans: Jeff Rense and Jon Rappoport

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/genetic-manipulation-of-humans-jeff-rense-and-jon-rappoport/

 

(Update: Part-1 here, Part-2 here)

 

Listen to a brand new conversation between Jeff Rense and Jon Rappoport, on the subject of new vaccines that will permanently change the DNA of humans. This is vital information.

 

VIDEO: New Frankenstein Synthetic DNA Vaccines Forever Change YOU [44:23]

 

Posted by Jeff Rense

Published on Feb 22, 2017

The next gen of vaccine horror is here. You better pay EXTREMELY close attention to this conversation.

‘Science’ has announced that vaccines are moving away from traditional formats and will now be composed of viruses that will carry entirely new forms of DNA right into your cells where they will REPLACE or join your body’s existing, God-given NATURAL DNA with this new SYNTHETIC DNA. This new DNA will allegedly confirm protection on you from various viruses that each new DNA type is created to kill. However, this new virus-delivered SYNTHETIC DNA can be created to do almost ANYTHING to you…permanently and forever. This fake DNA can CHANGE ANY PART OF YOUR BEING…from intellectual and emotional processes to all physical traits that are created and regulated by our natural DNA. We are entirely governed by our birth DNA but soon, according to one scientist, ‘EVERYONE WILL HAVE SYNTHETIC DNA.’ We are talking about ABSOLUTE CONTROL of the human species through synthetic, DNA. This is a monumentally important video.

 

+++

Deep State … can President Trump rebalance Liberty?

2/23/2017 10:09 AM

 

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/02/23/andrew-napolitano-chickens-have-come-home-to-roost.html

 

drain-swamp-of-deep-state

 

The surveillance state regime today permits America’s 60,000 military and civilian domestic spies to access in real time all the landline and mobile telephone calls and all the desktop and mobile device keystrokes and all the digital data created and used by anyone in the United States. The targets today are not just ordinary Americans; they are justices on the Supreme Court, military brass in the Pentagon, agents in the FBI, local police in cities and towns, and the man in the Oval Office.

 

READ ENTIRETY (The chickens have come home to roost; By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano; Fox News; 2/23/17)

 

+++

Where’s Crooked Hillary’s Special Prosecutor?

2/27/2017 10:57 PM

 

Where the Hell is the Special Prosecutor for Hillary Clinton giving Russia US Technology for donations to the Clinton Foundation??????? [Among other dastardly deeds]

 

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/clintons-close-ties-to-putin-deserve-scrutiny

 

Four Times When Hillary Clinton And Her Allies Sold Out American Interests To Putin In Exchange For Political And Financial Favors

 

Clinton Sold Out American Military Technology To Putin As Secretary Of State In Exchange For Russian Money For Her Foundation:

crazy-crooked-hillary-russians

Clinton “Worked Aggressively” To Lure Large American Technology Companies To Invest In Russian Firms Based In Skolkovo. “Consider Skolkovo, an ‘innovation city’ of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset. … Mrs. Clinton’s State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worthy of Russian investment.” (Peter Schweizer, “The Clinton Foundation, State And Kremlin Connections,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/31/16)

 

U.S. Military Experts Believe These Skolkovo-Based Companies Serve As Vehicles To Expand Russia’s Military Capacity. “Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised  officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a ‘vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.’”(Peter Schweizer, “The Clinton Foundation, State And Kremlin Connections,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/31/16)

 

The Clinton’s Family Foundation Has Received An Influx Of Funds From Russian Companies Tied To Skolkovo. “Russians tied to Skolkovo also flowed funds to the Clinton Foundation. Andrey Vavilov, the chairman of SuperOx, which is part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster, donated between $10,000 and $25,000 (donations are reported in ranges, not exact amounts) to the Clinton’s family charity. Skolkovo Foundation chief and billionaire Putin confidant Viktor Vekselberg also gave to the Clinton Foundation through READ THE REST (CLINTON’S CLOSE TIES TO PUTIN DESERVE SCRUTINY; Press Release; DonaldJTrump.com; 10/9/16)

 

+++

Washington Post-CIA marriage

2/28/2017 9:21 AM

 

The Post is in bed with the CIA to the tune of $600 million. If that isn’t the foundation of fakery on a grand scale, what is?

 

Try to find one major news outlet that has exposed and pounded on this Washington Post-CIA marriage. You can’t. You see, the fakers protect their own. It’s a club. If you join, you keep your mouth shut about the inherent unholy alliances within the club. It’s a rule.

 

Memo to the New York Times, LA Times, CNN, FOX, NBC, CBS, ABC, BBC, Reuters, AP: If you want to prove you’re not fake, go after the Washington Post, hammer and tongs, on their marriage to the CIA. Don’t let up. Demand conflict of interest statements from the Post, for starters.

 

And here’s a talking point for you. Was Jeff Bezos’ cash purchase of the Washington Post a mere coincidence, placed next to his $600 million contract with the CIA, or did he buy the Post so he could offer the CIA an even tighter relationship with the number-one paper of record?

 

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/02/28/washington-post-fake-news-partner-with-the-cia/#comment-213102

[Blog Editor: The above Rappoport link is actually a link to the Trump Press Release talking Hillary’s crooked dealings with Russia under the pseudonym “Tommy Tunes” which is the same as Tony Newbill pseudonym. Part or all of the above text is excerpted from the Rappoport link. Here is an excerpt from the Rappoport link which I think draws a better picture referring to the Bezos-WaPo/CIA marriage.]

 

 

Here are key statements from Norman Solomon’s AlterNet article about the Washington Post, its owner, Jeff Bezos, and the CIA (12/18/13):

 

“The Post’s new owner, Jeff Bezos, is the founder and CEO of Amazon — which recently landed a $600 million contract with the CIA. But the Post’s articles about the CIA are not disclosing that the newspaper’s sole owner is the main owner of CIA business partner Amazon.”

 

“Even for a multi-billionaire like Bezos, a $600 million contract is a big deal. That’s more than twice as much as Bezos paid to buy the Post four months ago.”

 

“And there’s likely to be plenty more where that CIA largesse came from. Amazon’s offer wasn’t the low bid, but it won the CIA contract anyway by offering advanced high-tech ‘cloud’ infrastructure.”

 

“Bezos personally and publicly touts Amazon Web Services, and it’s evident that Amazon will be seeking more CIA contracts. Last month, Amazon issued a statement saying, ‘We look forward to a successful relationship with the CIA’.”

 

“As Amazon’s majority owner and the Post’s only owner, Bezos stands to gain a lot more if his newspaper does less ruffling and more soothing of CIA feathers.”

 

 

And here’s a talking point for you. Was Jeff Bezos’ cash purchase of the Washington Post a mere coincidence, placed next to his $600 million contract with the CIA, or did he buy the Post so he could offer the CIA an even tighter relationship with the number-one paper of record?

 

Get it? Or am I going too fast for you? READ ENTIRETY (Washington Post: fake-news partner with the CIA; By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 2/28/17)

 

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

All photos placed by the Editor. They are not related to the original excerpt.

 

© Tony Newbill

  

 

Crooked Hillary, Trump, Obama & U.S. Intelligence


hacking-report-political-hoax

John R. Houk

© January 11, 2017

 

Crooked Hillary lost and Donald Trump won to become the President Elect until January 20 when the Donald gets to say, “You’re Fired!” And yet Crooked Hillary acolytes and Obama including his acolytes have spent the lame duck period trying to undermine the Trump Electoral College victory. (Heads up to popular vote counter-constitutionalists: The Founding Fathers set up the Electoral College because of a mistrust of direct democracy AND to level the playing field between the most populated States and the lesser populated States. HELLO! Take away New York and California then ask, “Who wins the popular vote then? And that is two out of fifty States.)

 

The Dems have – in an absolute sense – pointed their fingers at Russia for directly manipulating the election process in the USA. The problem with the Dem finger pointing there is proof the Russians or private hackers never accessed the voting process.

 

So, what are the Dems saying when pointing their fingers at Russia with an election manipulation accusation? The Dems at the very least influenced the election to Trump’s favor by exposing the Dem Party and the Crooked Hillary emails to the voting public.

 

Hmm … So, Russia has become evil for revealing Hillary Clinton and the Dem Party are crooked and corrupt in its practices.

 

Now we can seriously point to Russian actions that are evil in the sense of undermining the freest republic in world history. Here is a far incomplete list of Russian provocations during President Barack Hussein Obama’s Administration:

 

  • Russia invaded the nation of Georgia to bring Abkhazia and South Ossetia under the Russian orbit by making them independent nations.

 

  • Annexing Crimea and usurping land from Ukraine at the behest of Russian speaking Ukrainians planted there during the Soviet era.

 

  • Russia often has military exercises directly near NATO protected nations as well as sending war planes into NATO nations’ airspace.

 

  • Russia has intervened in the Syrian civil war on the side of Abbas despotic regime which allies with the Iran military and the Hezbollah terrorists. (I have indecisive feelings here since the parties engaged in aiding Abbas are also attacking the Islamic terrorists of ISIS. Are there still moderate Sunni-Syrians trying to overthrow Assad? Frankly I don’t know about that due to all the Islamic terrorist organization involved in the civil war which stretches beyond just ISIS.)

 

  • Russia has sent aid to Iran in regard to the Shia Muslim’s nation’s nuclear aspirations. The kind of aid that Iran could easily escalate to military uses.

 

Of Possible Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

You are darn toot’in the Russians are up to no good vis-a-vie America. Are the Russians willing to interfere in America’s internal affairs? I have no doubt. I have a lot of doubts the Russians would favor Donald Trump to Crooked Hillary. After all, it was under the direction of Crooked Hillary and Obama that a huge chunk of Uranium fell under Russian control.

 

Trump’s campaign moniker of making America great again including a rebuilt stronger military is definitely NOT in the national interests of Russia.

 

Also, there is the appearance that America’s Intelligence Communities have absorbed the Obama global agenda and are willing to toss President Elect Trump under the bus with Buzzfeed publishing good old fashioned fake news (as opposed to the actual content of the DNC email servers). On television (Fox News) I heard this so-called Trump Dossier might be a part of a feud between the incoming President and the American Intelligence Community with the inference the CIA in particular.

 

If I was Trump, on January 20 I’d initiate investigations not only toward Crooked Hillary but also the Obama Administration that should include Barack Hussein Obama.

 

At any rate below are two reports. The first is the Angry Patriot talking about yet another Wikileaks expose showing Crooked Hillary had close financial ties with George Soros. The second report is a video entitled “Report on Russian Hacking is a Political Hoax” in which Cliff Kincaid and Jerry Kenney deconstructing the Intelligence Community’s belief that Russia was behind a hack of the DNC.

 

JRH 1/11/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

BREAKING – We Now Know WHO Was Behind Hillary Clinton All Along. Surprised?

 

By Sgt. Freefall

Angry Patriot

 

Leaked documents have now revealed who is pulling Hillary Clinton’s dusty puppet strings.

 

BREAKING – We Now Know WHO Was Behind Hillary Clinton All Along. Surprised?

 

Leaked documents have now revealed who is pulling Hillary Clinton’s dusty puppet strings.

 

In an email released by WikiLeaks, George Soros gave Hillary Clinton step-by-step instructions. This included a list of people Soros thought should be official mediators sent to Albania in 2011. Days after the email was sent, someone on the list was sent as the mediator by the EU, as per Investor’s Business Daily.

 

This past weekend, an organization called DC Leaks put up 2,500 documents from Soros’s Open Society Foundation’s servers, revealing more corruption and connections to Clinton and others. The emails are from as far back as 2008.

 

However, the mainstream media are refusing to say anything about this leak, no doubt because Soros funds them or they fear retaliation. Soros is quick to use his money to get what he wants even if that is to influence an election.

 

No mainstream media platform, such as CNNCBS, or the New York Times, has said a single thing about these emails. Only conservative media have touched the story.

 

They’re not airing this information because of lack of interest or out of fear it wouldn’t get viewers’ attention—it’s because the details are truly disturbing and deeply important.

 

These documents show how Soros’s organizations manipulated European elections in 2014, including a “List of European Elections 2014 Projects” that details over 90 projects in total in that year alone. He also gave $4 million away to anti-Israeli groups to “challenge Israel’s racist and anti-democratic policies.”

 

In the states, Soros wanted to give $200,000 to the Center for American Politics to create a smear campaign to hit conservative activists with. And in 2015, his Open Society gave $650,000 to “invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.” It was then that the BLM movement seemed to start to advocate for violence.

 

Soros doesn’t care if American police officers die because he has emboldened and financed a hateful group. He doesn’t care that actual black community issues will be neglected as the movement pushes for all the wrong solutions!

 

Previously, Soros had known close ties to the failed presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton, but there was no evidence Clinton was literally taking Soros’s orders. This past year, he gave around $7 million to Clinton’s PACs alone. Altogether, he gave over $25 million to Democrat politicians and causes.

 

If Soros was a conservative, the media would be all over him—they may have even been harder on him than they are on Donald Trump. They would tear into his schemes and works and try to expose him for what he is, but because he’s a liberal, the media are looking the other way.

 

Soros, like Hillary Clinton, gets a pass for his corrupt schemes. Looks like his organizations are another swamp to drain!

 

+++

The CIA’s Dump Trump Campaign

 

Sent by Cliff Kincaid

Sent January 10, 2017 9:24 PM

Sent from (ASI) USA Survival News

 

Cliff Kincaid President America’s Survival, Inc.:
www.usasurvival.org

www.noglobaltaxes.org

www.religiousleftexposed.com

www.sorosfiles.com

www.leninandsharia.com 

 

Dear Friend of America’s Survival:

 

It’s getting serious.

 

Mr. and Mrs. America, the CIA is again trying to overthrow Trump.

 

CNN has unleashed another round of vague, unsubstantiated and unsourced allegations against Trump:

cnn-intel-chiefs-russia-compromised-trump

 

CNN claims the allegations are “that Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.” Claimed?

 

This is another effort by the CIA to undermine Trump even before he takes office. We recorded a show on this effort. Watch our show here.

 

The allegations were apparently referenced by Democrat Sen. Harry Reid in a letter to FBI Director Comey. Reid claimed: “In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity. The public has a right to know this information.”

 

Notice Reid’s reference to sources in “the national security community.” This is code for the CIA.

 

Send me your thoughts at Kincaid@comcast.net

 

+++

VIDEO: Report on Russian Hacking is a Political Hoax

 

Posted by USA Survival

Published on Jan 8, 2017

 

The CIA says that Russian hackers released true information about Hillary Clinton. Horrors! Cliff Kincaid and Jerry Kenney analyze the “Declassified Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections,” in order to show how the CIA and other intelligence agencies are trying to subvert the Trump presidency with bogus claims. The CIA report proves the validity of what Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer meant when he said, “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”

_______________

Crooked Hillary, Trump, Obama & U.S. Intelligence

John R. Houk

© January 11, 2017

______________

BREAKING – We Now Know WHO Was Behind Hillary Clinton All Along. Surprised?

 

Please share this story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice! You can also reach out to me on Twitter at @AP_SgtFreefall to discuss this story.

________________

The CIA’s Dump Trump Campaign

 

Cliff Kincaid Biography 

President, America’s Survival, Inc.


A veteran journalist and media critic, Cliff concentrated in journalism and communications at the University of Toledo, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree, and came to Washington through a national journalism program headed by conservative author and journalist M. Stanton Evans. At his college newspaper, Cliff won an award for editorial writing from the Society of Professional Journalists. He also serves as director of the Accuracy in Media (AIM) Center for Investigative Reporting.

 

Cliff Kincaid’s books include:

 

  • The Playboy Foundation: A Mirror of the Culture? (Capital Research Center) 1982.

 

  • Profiles of Deception (with Reed Irvine) 1990.

 

  • The News Manipulators (with Reed Irvine and Joseph C. Goulden) 1993.

 

  • Global Bondage: The U.N. Plan to Rule the World (1995).

 

  • Global Taxes for World Government (1997).

 

  • Michael New: Mercenary or American Soldier (with Daniel New) 1998.

 

  • The New United Nations’ Welfare Giveaway (2000).

 

  • The Hijacking of American Foreign Policy (2003).

 

  • Why You Can’t Trust the News (with Reed Irvine and Notra Trulock) 2003.

 

ASI was the first national organization to warn of global taxes and the proposed International Criminal Court, holding news conferences on these matters at READ THE REST

 

About America’s Survival

 

Is Braverman a Victim or Hidden?


eric-braverman

John R. Houk

© January 2, 2017

 

Ever heard of Eric Braverman? I have not myself noticed the name. Evidently, he WAS the CEO for the Clinton Foundation.

 

Braverman Yale Profile:

 

Eric Braverman was chief executive officer of the Clinton Foundation from 2013 to 2015.  At the Foundation, Braverman led an effort to help ensure long-term sustainability—securing an endowment, transforming the organization’s use of data, establishing governance practices to reflect changing laws and public expectations, consolidating entities, and creating professional development for staff. 

 

Previously, Braverman served as a partner at McKinsey & Company, where he advised leaders in the public, private, and non-profit sectors on strategy, organization, and operations. Named by Fortune magazine in 2010 as one of the “40 Most Influential Leaders in Business” worldwide under 40 years old, Braverman co-founded McKinsey’s public sector practice and directed its work on government innovation globally. He also served as an advisor on performance management and technology for President Obama’s transition team in 2008.

 

Braverman is a frequent speaker on government at events, conferences, and seminars around the world—both in academic and practitioner-oriented settings—focusing particularly on innovation in government and the importance of partnership between the public, private, and nonprofit sectors to improve lives.

 

The Angry Patriot has noticed that Braverman not only resigned from the Clinton Foundation but has seemingly disappeared from public view. Angry Patriot then goes into educated speculation mode.

 

As we know the Democratic National Committee (DNC) either had their email server hacked or someone leaked server info to Wikileaks. The Dems say the Russians hacked their servers and released the data to Wikileaks. Julian Assange of Wikileaks says the Russians didn’t do the whistleblowing but a disgruntled Clinton insider gave the data to Wikileaks. (See Also 12/14/16 Washington Times report)

 

Angry Patriot wonders if Eric Braverman was the disgruntled insider because of the timing of Braverman going off the public grid.

 

With Clintons’ history of potential finger-pointers disappearing by prison or death, I wonder if Braverman was disposed by the Clintons or if Wikileaks helped him disappear to protect him from nefarious designs by the Clintons or Dem Party Cleaners.

 

On December 29, 2016 a Joint Analysis Report (JAR) was released as the combine work of the FBI and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) entitled, “GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity”. The report definitely fingers Russian hacking. Here is the PDF first paragraph:

 

This Joint Analysis Report (JAR) is the result of analytic efforts between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This document provides technical details regarding the tools and infrastructure used by the Russian civilian and military intelligence Services (RIS) to compromise and exploit networks and endpoints associated with the U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. Government, political, and private sector entities. The U.S. Government is referring to this malicious cyber activity by RIS as GRIZZLY STEPPE.

 

“RIS” is the acronym for Russian Intelligence Services. Meaning more than one specific Russian intelligence agency was involved in hacking the DNC.

 

Here are some articles that does a decent job in translating the technical language of the report into normal English:

 

The Guardian:

 

 

The government report follows several from the private sector, notably a lengthy section in a Microsoft report from 2015 on a hacking team referred to as “advanced persistent threat 28” (APT 28), which the company’s internal nomenclature calls Strontium and others have called Fancy Bear. Also mentioned in the government document is another group called APT 29 or Cozy Bear.

 

 

The Microsoft report contains a history of the groups’ operation; a report by security analysts ThreatConnect describes the team’s modus operandi; and competing firm CrowdStrike detailed the attack on the Democratic National Committee shortly before subsequent breaches of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign were discovered.

 

Security experts on Twitter criticized the government report as too basic. Jonathan Zdziarski, a highly regarded security researcher, compared the joint action report to a child’s activity center.

 

Tom Killalea, former vice-president of security at Amazon and a Capital One board member, wrote: “Russian attack on DNC similar to so many other attacks in past 15yrs. Big question: Why such poor incident response?”

 

READ ENTIRETY (FBI and Homeland Security detail Russian hacking campaign in new report; By Sam Thielman; The Guardian; 12/29/16 17.19 EST)

 

Robert M. Lee:

 

 

If anyone is like me, when I read the above I became very excited. This was a clear statement from the White House that they were going to help network defenders, give out a combination of previously classified data as well as validate private sector data, release information about Russian malware that was previously classified, and detail new tactics and techniques used by Russia. Unfortunately, while the intent was laid out clearly by the White House that intent was not captured in the DHS/FBI report.

 

 

 The report is intended to help network defenders; it is not the technical evidence of attribution

 

There is no mention of the focus of attribution in any of the White House’s statements. Across multiple statements from government officials and agencies it is clear that the technical data and attribution will be a report prepared for Congress and later declassified (likely prepared by the NSA). Yet, the GRIZZLY STEPPE report reads like a poorly done vendor intelligence report stringing together various aspects of attribution without evidence. The beginning of the report (Figure 2) specifically notes that the DHS/FBI has avoided attribution before in their JARs but that based off of their technical indicators they can confirm the private sector attribution to RIS.

 

 

But why is this so bad? Because it does not follow the intent laid out by the White House and confuses readers to think that this report is about attribution and not the intended purpose of helping network defenders. The public is looking for evidence of the attribution, the White House and the DHS/FBI clearly laid out that this report is meant for network defense, and then the entire discussion in the document is on how the DHS/FBI confirms that APT28 and APT29 are RIS groups that compromised a political party. The technical indicators they released later in the report (which we will discuss more below) are in no way related to that attribution though.

 

Or said more simply: the written portion of the report has little to nothing to do with the intended purpose or the technical data released.

 

Even worse, page 4 of the document notes other groups identified as RIS (Figure 4). This would be exciting normally. Government validation of private sector intelligence helps raise the confidence level of the public information. Unfortunately, the list in the report detracts from the confidence because of the interweaving of unrelated data.

 

As an example, the list contains campaign/group names such as APT28, APT29, COZYBEAR, Sandworm, Sofacy, and others. This is exactly what you’d want to see although the government’s justification for this assessment is completely lacking (for a better exploration on the topic of naming see Sergio Caltagirone’s blog post here). But as the list progresses it becomes worrisome as the list also contains malware names (HAVEX and BlackEnergy v3 as examples) which are different than campaign names. Campaign names describe a collection of intrusions into one or more victims by the same adversary. Those campaigns can utilize various pieces of malware and sometimes malware is consistent across unrelated campaigns and unrelated actors. It gets worse though when the list includes things such as “Powershell Backdoor”. This is not even a malware family at this point but instead a classification of a capability that can be found in various malware families.

 

Or said more simply: the list of reported RIS names includes relevant and specific names such as campaign names, more general and often unrelated malware family names, and extremely broad and non-descriptive classification of capabilities. It was a mixing of data types that didn’t meet any objective in the report and only added confusion as to whether the DHS/FBI knows what they are doing or if they are instead just telling teams in the government “contribute anything you have that has been affiliated with Russian activity.”

 

 

In some locations in the CSV the indicators are IP addresses with a request to network administrators to look for it and in other locations there are IP addresses with just what country it was located in. This information is nearly useless for a few reasons. First, we do not know what data set these indicators belong to (see my previous point, are these IPs for “Sandworm”, “APT28” “Powershell” or what?). Second, many (30%+) of these IP addresses are mostly useless as they are VPS, TOR exit nodes, proxies, and other non-descriptive internet traffic sites (you can use this type of information but not in the way being positioned in the report and not well without additional information such as timestamps). Third, IP addresses as indicators especially when associated with malware or adversary campaigns must contain information around timing. I.e. when were these IP addresses associated with the malware or campaign and when were they in active usage? IP addresses and domains are constantly getting shuffled around the Internet and are mostly useful when seen in a snapshot of time.

 

 

So what’s the problem? All but the two hashes released that state they belong to the OnionDuke family do not contain the appropriate context for defenders to leverage them. Without knowing what campaign they were associated with and when there’s not appropriate information for defenders to investigate these discoveries on their network. They can block the activity (play the equivalent of whack-a-mole) but not leverage it for real defense without considerable effort. Additionally, the report specifically said this was newly declassified information. However, looking the samples in VirusTotal Intelligence (Figure 7) reveals that many of them were already known dating back to April 2016.

 

 

The only thing that would thus be classified about this data (note they said newly declassified and not private sector information) would be the association of this malware to a specific family or campaign instead of leaving it as “generic.” But as noted that information was left out. It’s also not fair to say it’s all “RIS” given the DHS/FBI’s inappropriate aggregation of campaign, malware, and capability names in their “Reported RIS” list. As an example, they used one name from their “Reported RIS” list (OnionDuke) and thus some of the other samples might be from there as well such as “Powershell Backdoor” which is wholly not descriptive. Either way we don’t know because they left that information out. Also as a general pet peeve, the hashes are sometimes given as MD5, sometimes as SHA1, and sometimes as SHA256. It’s ok to choose whatever standard you want if you’re giving out information but be consistent in the data format.

 

 

The report goes beyond indicators to include new tradecraft and techniques used by the Russian intelligence services

 

The report was to detail new tradecraft and techniques used by the RIS and specifically noted that defenders could leverage this to find new tactics and techniques. Except – it doesn’t. The report instead gives a high-level overview of how APT28 and APT29 have been reported to operate which is very generic and similar to many adversary campaigns (Figure 8). The tradecraft and techniques presented specific to the RIS include things such as “using shortened URLs”, “spear phishing”, “lateral movement”, and “escalating privileges” once in the network. This is basically the same set of tactics used across unrelated campaigns for the last decade or more.

 

 

This ultimately seems like a very rushed report put together by multiple teams working different data sets and motivations. It is my opinion and speculation that there were some really good government analysts and operators contributing to this data and then report reviews, leadership approval processes, and sanitation processes stripped out most of the value and left behind a very confusing report trying to cover too much while saying too little.

 

We must do better as a community. This report is a good example of how a really strong strategic message (POTUS statement) and really good data (government and private sector combination) can be opened to critique due to poor report writing. READ ENTIRETY (Critiques of the DHS/FBI’s GRIZZLY STEPPE Report; By Robert M. Lee; 12/30/16)

 

So, I’m not an expert, but the JAR data suggests a combination of RIS and private hackers. Because of the lackluster of specific finger pointing in the JAR data made public how the DNC had their server data dispersed is still up in the air.

 

A whistleblower could have sent data to a private Russian hacker in which the RIS picked up and then either the RIS or private Russian hacker dispersed the data to Wikileaks.

 

Of course, either way, there is something rotten going on in Russia in connection American private and public organizations. As such, some kind of American response should proceed. HOWEVER, the deed was done and the DNC and Crooked Hillary have been exposed as just as corrupt and manipulative as anything of Russian origin. ERGO, the DNC and the Crooked Hillary campaign must be investigated as well. EVEN IF THE SOURCE IS AN OUTSIDE HACKER!

 

JRH 1/2/17

Please Support NCCR

****************

REPORT – Clinton Foundation CEO Disappears, Media HIDING What REALLY Happened

 

Email alert sent December 31, 2016

Angry Patriot

 

Someone has to step up and ask questions about the disappearance of Eric Braverman, the Clinton Foundation CEO from 2013 to 2015, or no one will!

 

Eric Braverman disappeared in October, just a few weeks before Hillary Clinton’s defeat sent shock waves through Washington, D.C. and liberal cities across the country. So far, few outside the political blogosphere even knew the man existed, let alone disappeared without a trace.

 

Why are the mainstream media ignoring the disappearance of a top-level Clinton Foundation official? Perhaps because many have speculated Braverman went into hiding after an email mentioning his name surfaced on WikiLeaks just days before he went missing.

 

In a leaked email from March 2015, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden told Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager and longtime pal, John Podesta, that they had a mole within the Clinton Foundation. In his responding email, Podesta told Tanden the mole was none other than Eric Braverman, the Stream reports.

 

Shortly before the emails between John Podesta and Neera Tanden had taken place, Braverman abruptly resigned as the CEO of the Clinton Foundation. Almost immediately after WikiLeaks made the emails public, the former executive completely vanished.

 

This not only sounds like a story in dire need of good old fashioned investigative reporting—it sounds like the makings of a television movie special. Once upon a time, a real free press would be all over the sudden disappearance of a top official who worked for a former president and a former Oval Office contender.

 

The last evidence of Eric Braverman being active on a public level was on October 12. He made a post to Twitter, which he reportedly did about once a month.

 

Braverman’s partner, Neil Brown, has reportedly not tweeted since August. The former Clinton Foundation CEO is still listed as a lecturer at Yale where he has given speeches for the past several years.

 

Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and close friend of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, claims the leaked emails from the Democrat Party were not taken by the Russians but by a disgruntled insider. Could this have been Eric Braverman, who sadly got caught up in his own behind-the-scenes whistleblowing on the Clintons?

 

Braverman was allegedly hired as the Clinton Foundation CEO by Chelsea Clinton, who wanted to find and clean up any corruption within the family charity. Braverman was allegedly forced out of the job by John Podesta.

 

Chelsea was allegedly very upset by examples of misspent funds. One example of such corruption was the more than $1 billion Bill Clinton raised to rebuild 100 villages in India. Reportedly, only $53 million was ever actually spent on the project.

 

Click here to get my DAILY Trump email newsletter free!!

 

Please share this story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice! You can also reach out to me on Twitter at @AP_SgtFreefall to discuss this story.

 

_________________

Is Braverman a Victim or Hidden?

John R. Houk

© January 2, 2017

_______________

REPORT – Clinton Foundation CEO Disappears, Media HIDING What REALLY Happened

 

The Angry Patriot Copyright © 2017.

 

About Sgt. Freefall – Angry Patriot

 

The Making of Sergeant Freefall

 

Some people are born angry, some are made angry through tragic life events. The latter is true for Marine Gunnery Sergeant Freefall.

 

While we sat in front of our TVs in horror on 9/11, a family of American Eagles was tragically destroyed. Sgt. Freefall’s parents created a nest at the top of the World Trade Center in early August. They thought they had found the perfect home to raise a family. Soon thereafter, Sgt. Freefall’s mother laid her first egg.

 

Unfortunately, just as the egg was ready to hatch, the terrorist attack took place in New York City. While Sgt. Freefall’s mother and father were killed in the bombing, the egg fell from the sky and miraculously landed in the hands of a fireman. Inspired by these events, that fireman would join the Marines to fight for his country.

 

Once again,  READ THE REST

 

 

Newbill Emails on Crooked Hillary 2nd Set


crooked-hillary-descriptors

Edited by John R. Houk

Posted November 6, 2016

 

This batch of emails focuses on Crooked Hillary. There is some email information on Donald Trump through the eyes of Left Wing detractors. Newbill examines a post from a Bernie Sanders supporter that calls Crooked Hillary an evil Neocon. I disagree with the appellation Neocon on Hillary Clinton. I explain my disagreement on the Neocon accusation and that Neoconservatism is not evil down below.

 

JRH 11/5/16

Please Support NCCR

**************

Trump needs to Identify this Person and use his Extreme ECO-Marxism to Label Hillary with an ANTI-Economic Growth vision

10/14/2016 11:18 AM

 

Trump can say this shows we are Out of Balance with how Obama and NOW Hillary want to Implement policies that will enable the People’s access to their Rights and Liberties!!!! There is No Way we can Have a Robust Economy that serves the people when these people want to OPPRESS access to our Resources with Extreme ECO-Marxism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

We Must EXPOSE this Hillary Clinton Campaign Manager as the ECO-Marxist. [This ECO-Marxist represents] the People doing the Dirty work behind our Government’s Closed Doors that’s KILLING OUR LIBERTY!!!!!!!!!!

 

http://www.hcn.org/issues/47.9/john-podesta-legacy-maker     

 

…  It was 2014, and McCarthy, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was about to make her case for blocking the controversial Pebble gold mine planned for Alaska’s Bristol Bay watershed, home to one of the world’s most prolific salmon fisheries. …

 

But McCarthy also knew there would be a new player in the room. Longtime Democratic operative John Podesta, Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff, had just returned to the White House as counselor to Barack Obama. And Podesta had a reputation for bold conservation policy.

 

 

And 10 minutes into the conversation, Podesta broke in. He said that he and the president endorsed McCarthy’s plan, and then laid out exactly how the announcement would roll out. McCarthy left the room, dumbfounded and elated.

 

 

“Nobody in the 21st century in U.S. government has had the influence that he has had on public lands and climate change,” says Douglas Brinkley, a Rice University professor of history.

 

 

Podesta’s political philosophy was shaped by his time at Knox College, a small liberal arts school in Galesburg, Illinois, where he joined Vietnam War protests and civil rights demonstrations. His first major political experience involved working on the doomed 1972 presidential campaign of liberal Democrat George McGovern.

 

 

Podesta also understands how public lands can be leveraged to benefit his boss and political party. Toward the end of the Clinton administration, he supported Forest Service Chief Mike Dombeck’s proposal to permanently protect the remaining roadless areas on national forests from logging, mining, drilling and other development. …

 

… But as the point man for the many scandals that plagued the Clinton White House, he got a reputation for having an evil twin known as “Skippy,” who could be harsh and unusually direct. …

 

… in2001, Podesta and some colleagues decided to create a progressive think tank that would be tough enough to compete with those on the political right. They called it the Center for American Progress, and it grew into a revolving-door powerhouse that harnessed the intellectual and political capital of the academic, NGO, philanthropic and government communities, often shuttling people in and out of key positions in all these realms. … and today, it boasts a staff of 314 policy wonks, professors and writers.

 

“Democrats and progressives did not have an institution dedicated to thinking up policies and finding a way to move them into the public sphere,” … “We called it a think-and-do tank. …”

 

Liberal pundits and mainstream journalists have occasionally questioned Podesta about his think tank’s financial and policy ties to its energy, defense and pharmaceutical company funders. … Hansjörg Wyss, a billionaire businessman who, for two decades, has financed efforts to conserve public lands. Podesta’s financial White House disclosure showed he collected $87,000 in 2013, for consulting for the HJW Foundation, a Wyss philanthropy.  The conservative Daily Caller website accused Podesta of violating White House ethics rules for taking funds from Wyss and then pushing Obama’s proposal to expand the area off-limits to oil and gas drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge …

 

Together, HJW and Wyss Foundation donated more than $5 million to the Center for American Progress between 2011 and 2013 … The article is pro-Podesta & pro-Eco-Marxist – I chose the info that demonstrates that (John Podesta: Legacy maker; By Elizabeth Shogren; High Country News; 3/25/15)

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/20/fbi-doj-launch-probe-firm-clinton-campaign-chairman-john-podesta/

 

The FBI and Justice Department have launched an investigation into whether the Podesta Group, the lobbying and public relations firm co-founded by Hillary Clinton presidential campaign chairman John Podesta, has any connections to alleged corruption that occurred in the administration of former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych.

 

 

The Podesta Group, run by John Podest’s [sic] brother Tony Podesta, was retained by the Russia-controlled firm UraniumOne in 2012, 2014, and 2015, to lobby Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The lobbying firm was paid a total of $180,000 according to public records.

 

 

As it was first detailed in the New York Times bestselling book Clinton CashUranium One — which hired the Podesta Group — is the firm that funneled millions to the Clinton Foundation as the Russian government gained ownership of the company.

 

 

According to the New York Times, Russian President Vladimir Putin had a “goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.”

 

The Times reported last April:

 

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

 

“And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock,” the Times report said.

 

According to the Daily Caller, Uranium One “paid the Podesta Group $40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service, and the National Security Council for ‘international mining projects,’ according to a July 20, 2012 filing.”

 

Distancing itself from the work it did for an organization with ties to Yanukovych’s pro-Russian regime, the Podesta group said it hired lawyers to READ ENTIRETY (FBI, DOJ launch Probe into Firm of Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta; By JEROME HUDSON; Breitbart; 8/20/16)

 

+++

These are the Weasels that have created Groper-gate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 10/14/2016 11:18 AM

 

The Enemy’s with-in!!!!!

 

Trump needs to go after these “So Called Biographers” with the “Hey Wayne Barrett, Gwenda Blair, Michael D’Antonio, Harry Hurt and Timothy O’Brien where’s your same Criticism of the Clintons, Bill on the Women Abuse side and Hillary on the Breaking All the Laws of the USA Side”???????????

 

 

This Guy and all these so-called Biographers of Trump need medication for their Bias-ism disease!!!!!!

 

http://www.michaeldantonio.net/ 

 

Drawing upon extensive and exclusive interviews with Trump and many of his family members, including all his adult children, D’Antonio presents the full story of a truly American icon, from his beginnings as a businessman to his stormy romantic life and his pursuit of power in its many forms. For all those who wonder — Just who is Donald Trump? – Never Enough supplies the answer. He is a promoter, builder, performer and politician who pursues success with a drive that borders on obsession and yet, has given him, almost everything he ever wanted.

 

Read More (Never Enough: Donald Trump and the Pursuit of Success; Book synopsis of author Michael D’Antonio; MichaelDantonio.net)

 

I watched this Guy this Morning on The MS Media paint the most disgusting image of Trump as a guy with a Pattern towards abusing Women!!!!! I would elevate this “Screen Writer” Michael D Antonio “up to the Level of” PORNO Propagandist!!!!!!

 

This one is awful:

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/donald-trump-2016-biographers-214350

 

Back in early March, Politico Magazine brought together five Donald Trump biographers for a conversation over lunch at Trump Tower. At the time, the country was just beginning to grapple with the reality that the presidential nominee from one of the two major American political parties stood a good chance of being a real estate mogul and entertainer. Wayne Barrett, Gwenda Blair, Michael D’Antonio, Harry Hurt and Timothy O’Brien knew him better than anybody, had studied him more than anybody, had written an aggregate 2,195 pages in books.
So much has happened over the past seven months: the crackpot conspiracy theories, the rageful late-night Twitter tirades, the surges and slides in the polls, an onslaught of investigative reporting that painted him as a racist, sexist, selfish, uncharitable, lying predator. So we thought it was time, especially in the wake of “grab them by the pussy,” for an emergency reconvening of the Trumpologists. [Blog Editor: “Trumpologists” in this case means Leftist MSM hit squad.]

 

He is, the biographers said, “profoundly narcissistic,” “willing to go to lengths we’ve never seen before in order to satisfy his ego”—and “a very dangerous man for the next three or four weeks.” And after that? “This time, it’s going to be a straight‑out loss on the biggest stage he’s ever been on,” one biographer predicted. And yet: “As long as he’s remembered, maybe it won’t matter to him.”

READ ENTIRETY if you desire to vomit (‘I Think He’s a Very Dangerous Man for the Next Three or Four Weeks’; By SUSAN B. GLASSER and MICHAEL KRUSE; Politico Magazine; 10/12/16)

These People, Like the Bill and Hillary Clinton & Co., are a Disease on FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+++

Hillary’s Shadow Government

10/18/2016 9:37 AM

 

Dear John, you need to Please talk about Hillary’s Shadow Government that the FBI refers to in this Investigation report and say this is why Washington does not work for the American People and Shields Hillary and themselves from the rule of LAW!

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (it’s on page 56)

 

vault-home-%e2%80%a2-hillary-r-clinton-%e2%80%a2-hillary-r-clinton-part-04-of-04-pg-56-screen-capture

Vault Home • Hillary R. Clinton • Hillary R. Clinton Part 04 of 04 – pg. 56 Screen Capture

+++++++++++

The Corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.

10/19/2016 3:42 PM

**************ATTENTION****************

Here is an EYE-OPENING summary of the corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.

 

http://www.thecsconservative.com/podestaemails/

 

Here is a summary of the corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.

 

John Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign Chairman. Podesta previously served as Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton and Counselor to President Barack Obama.

 

On October 7th, 2016, WikiLeaks publish thousands of emails belonging to Podesta’s private email archives. More emails were released in the days that followed. Below is a compilation of some of the most revealing and damaging emails discovered:

 

POLICY / POSITION

 

Transcripts from Hillary Clinton’s lucrative closed-door paid speeches delivered to elite financial firms and other special interests groups (which she has refused and failed to disclose to the public after much demand) have finally surfaced:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 (See Attachment)

 

Clinton staff conspiring to stage ‘leaking’ of favorable excerpts from wall street speech, in efforts to calm down the public while leaving out more damaging parts:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8086#efmAYqAgR

 

Leaked private speech, Clinton: “You Need Both A Public And A Private Position”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmAaQAdiFjUFkd

 

Leaked private speech, Clinton: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmFjUFkd

 

Mocking environmentalists in private meeting with unions, Clinton: “I want to defend fracking.” Climate change environmentalists should “Get a life”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9617 (See attachment)

Politico article

 

Leaked private speech transcript shows Clinton’s warm ties to Wall Street’s most powerful figures: Clinton: “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives” The pressure on officials to sell or divest assets in order to serve, she added, had become “very onerous and unnecessary”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmDEMDKk

 

Leaked private speech to Goldman Sachs, Clinton: Wall street was only accountable for the financial crisis for political reasons. The blame placed on the United States banking system for the crisis “could have been avoided in terms of both misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmA2YA5Q

 

Leaked private speech to Goldman Sachs, Clinton: I mean, right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to to restart economic growth.”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11011

 

Leaked private speech, Clinton: US will “ring China with missile defense”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 (See attachment)

 

Hillary Clinton flipped her public position on TPP after her team discussed how she would be “eaten alive” by Labor:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8452#efmAH1APRA0NA5c

 

Clinton speechwriter: “We are trying to find a good way to leak her opposition to the pipeline without her having to actually say it”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3855#efmAAGADH

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

 

Hillary admits Qatar & Saudi Arabia are funding ISIS:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774#efmBA5BDe

 

Qatar gifts Bill Clinton $1,000,000 for his birthday:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396#efmAEOAGW

 

Clinton’s advisors agree to take foreign lobbyists money: Clinton’s National Finance Director, Dennis Cheng: “how do we explain to people that we’ll take money from a corporate lobbyist but not them; that the Foundation takes $ from foreign govts but we now won’t”. Campaign manager Robby Mook responds: “I’m ok just taking the money and dealing with any attacks. Are you guys ok with that?”, “Take the money!!” – READ THE REST (Breaking News – Wikileaks Release Exposes Hillary Clinton Corruption; By Robert Z; The Common Sense Conservative; 10/17/16)

 

++++

Huma Abedin Admits to a $12 Million Dollar Pay-For-Play

10/20/2016 11:59 AM

 

Hillary’s top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million dollar pay-for-play from Morocco!

 

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/day-debate-wikileaks-strikes-hillary-pay-to-play-shocking/#ixzz4Ne3uQoEu

 

We have always known that Hillary Clinton was for sale during her time at the State Department.

 

Many politicans [sic] try to do this, but Hillary’s corruption is so massive that it’s historic.

 

Now, just hours after the debate, WikiLeaks provided the smoking gun we’ve been waiting for. Hillary’s top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million dollary pay-for-play from Morocco!

 

This leaked email from the 13th batch of John Podesta’s hacked emails shows direct confirmation that a meeting was set up with Hillary Clinton, and it was paid for with that massive cash payoff:

wikileaks-huma-abedin-emailWikileaks Huma Abedin Email

 

And Hillary Clinton confirmed that the WikiLeaks emails are authentic last night during the debate:

 

 

Hillary Clinton can blame the Russians and foreign agents all she wants. The emails are real, and so is the criminal corruption. Hillary Clinton used the Secretary of State’s office to become obscenely wealthy, and she put America’s national security at risk repeatedly.

 

Hillary couldn’t apply for a job in the federal government because READ ENTIRETY (Day After Debate, WikiLeaks Strikes Hillary With The Most Shocking Leak of 2016! By Kosar; Political Insider; 10/20/16)

++++

Russia has already Bribed Hillary!!!!!

10/20/2016 11:01 PM

 

What Romney says WAS BEFORE WE HAS THE RESULTS FROM FBI Comey … and if Hillary Clinton has already COMPROMISED U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY. The First response by the FBI would be to act in the best Interest of the USA and the Market and divert from this conversation!!!!

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/24/romney-every-appearance-that-hillary-clinton-was-bribed-on-uranium-deal/

 

Mitt Romney made the argument around which everyone else danced yesterday after the New York Times exposed the UraniumOne deal and its principals’ big cash avalanche to the Clinton Foundation. The State Department’s approval of the deal under Hillary Clinton wasn’t just “undue influence,” and not “a poor choice of timing,” either. “It looks like bribery,” Romney told Hugh Hewitt last night:

 

VIDEO: Mitt Romney on Clinton foundation uranium payments: “It looks like bribery”

 

Posted by Hugh Hewitt Show

Published on Apr 23, 2015

 

Hugh Hewitt Interview w/ Mitt Romeny [sic]

 

READ THE REST (Romney: “Every Appearance That Hillary Clinton Was Bribed” On Uranium Deal; ED MORRISSEY; Hot Air; 4/24/16 10:01 am)

 

Hillary Clinton has already been Bribed, we just did not realize it until the Lawless FBI ran its course letting Hillary off so she could skate into the Oval Office and Pardon her and her cohorts!!!!!

 

http://www.bing.com/search?q=Hillary+Clinton+bribed+by+Russia+&qs=n&form=QBLH&pc=MOZO&pq=hillary+clinton+bribed+b&sc=0-24&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=45D62613D14A40A48C2FAF788F995258

 

[Blog Editor: Bing Search Link under the query “Hillary Clinton bribed by Russia”]

+++

Hillary has already been bribed

10/21/2016 7:05 AM

 

The FBI cover up through Lawless Means shows this:

 

What was the U.S. Asset that was used as the bribed is the Question?

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/24/romney-every-appearance-that-hillary-clinton-was-bribed-on-uranium-deal/

 

[Blog Editor: See above summary of the same link.]

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-clinton-campaign-and-brian-fallon-stop-accusing_us_57fcab23e4b0d786aa52bcaa?

 

Brian Fallon recently accused WikiLeaks of working on behalf of the Russian government to help Donald Trump. Fallon’s Twitter barrage was full of accusations against the whistleblowing organization, including an ironic plea for WikiLeaks to disclose Trump’s tax returns. Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton and her campaign have engaged in Cold War-era propaganda, primarily to deflect from numerous cyber-attacks. There’s also the tiny issue of 20% of U.S. uranium sold to the Russian government from a company run by Clinton Foundation donors.

 

Thus far, WikiLeaks, DC LeaksGuccifer 2.0, and apparently “Russian hackers” have managed to hack into computer networks associated with the Democratic Party. Rather than assess why these various cyber-attacks have taken place, Brian Fallon, Robby Mook, and others in the Clinton campaign have leveled baseless accusations against WikiLeaks and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials might believe Russia is involved with the leaks, but have yet to disclose any evidence READ THE REST (Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia; By H. A. Goodman; Huffington Post; 10/11/16 05:27 am ET)

 

Look at the Credits in this video, it is HUGE!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAM48bmtMDc

 

VIDEO: NEW CLINTON EMAIL SCANDAL: State Dept Bribed FBI To Protect Hillary From Espionage Act Indictment

 

Posted by H. A. Goodman

Published on Oct 16, 2016

 

My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an author, columnist, and journalist www.hagoodman.com
Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-clinton-campaign-and-brian-fallon-stop-accusing_us_57fcab23e4b0d786aa52bcaa

 

New FBI files contain allegations of ‘quid pro quo’ in Clinton’s emails:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/15/new-fbi-files-contain-allegations-quid-pro-quo-in-clintons-emails.html
PODESTA 9 JUST RELEASED! https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787625546461175808
WikiLeaks releases transcripts of Hillary Clinton Goldman Sachs speeches:

 

http://myfox8.com/2016/10/15/wikileaks-releases-transcripts-of-hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-speeches/
Subpoena: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391

 

FAKE CRAIGLIST: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
Podesta Suggested Coordinating With State Dept. To ‘Hold’ Hillary’s Emails With Obama:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/14/podesta-suggested-coordinating-with-state-dept-to-hold-hillarys-emails-with-obama/

 

READ THE REST

 

If Hillary has already been bribed whatever was bribed is grounds for Impeachment as this article shows.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it

 

For months, I have been arguing that Hillary Clinton should be impeached. It is all well and good to prosecute a former government official for any crimes she has committed. Indeed, the Constitution expressly provides for criminal prosecution in addition to impeachment. Nevertheless, for the Framers — and, if we had common sense, for us — the imperative was to deprive a corrupt person of any further opportunity to abuse government power. Whether the official should also be convicted and sent to prison was not unimportant but, in the greater scheme of things, decidedly secondary.

Interestingly, the main pushback I received upon positing this argument was not that Mrs. Clinton is undeserving of impeachment. That, of course, is a measure of the seriousness of her high crimes and misdemeanors: the e-mail scandal; the reckless mishandling of classified information that has surely exposed our national-defense secrets to hostile powers; the mass destruction of thousands of government records after Congress asked for them; the obstruction of government investigations; the serial lies to Congress and the public; the shocking failure to provide security for Americans stationed in Benghazi and the failure to attempt to rescue them during a terrorist siege; the lies to the American people and to the families of murdered American officials about the cause of the attack; the trumping up of a prosecution against the video producer scapegoated for the Benghazi attack; the Clinton Foundation corruption involving the sale of influence for donations, the favors done for shady benefactors at the expense of national security, and the use of the State Department as an arm of the Clinton pay-to-play enterprise.

 

… How could she be removed from an office she does not hold based on offenses not committed while wielding presidential power?

These questions and the non-incumbency theory behind them fundamentally misconstrue the constitutional remedy of impeachment, which is not limited to removal from power but includes disqualification from future office. Moreover, their premise is wrong: The proceeding against Clinton would not be a presidential impeachment; it would be an impeachment based on her abuses of power as secretary of state, which would have the constitutional effect of disqualifying her for the presidency.

… Article I endows the House of Representatives with the “sole Power of Impeachment” — i.e., the power to file articles of impeachment. It further empowers the Senate with “the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” Significantly, in prescribing the standard for conviction in the Senate, Article I, Section 3 states that “no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present” (emphasis added).

 

Note carefully: The Constitution does not say the impeached person must be a current officeholder. As we shall see, that makes perfect sense: The point of impeachment is to deny power to any person — not necessarily an incumbent official — whose high crimes and misdemeanors have demonstrated unfitness for a high public trust.

 

The constitutional standard for impeachment also elucidates that incumbency is not necessary. The standard, prescribed by Article II, Section 4, is the commission of “Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Obviously, one need not be in office to commit treason or bribery; but if one has at any time committed these heinous offenses, one is unsuitable for public office. The same is true, by definition, of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a term of READ ENTIRETY (Impeach Clinton to Bar Her from Holding Federal Office. It’s Constitutional; By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY; National Review; 9/6/16 4:00 AM)

+++

Hillary Clinton: Oliver Stone & U.S. Foreign Policy ‘Elite’

10/21/2016 9:02 AM

 

Oliver Stone has penned a powerful and emotional takedown of Hillary Clinton

https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/03/31/were-going-to-war-oliver-stone-opines-on-the-dangerous-extremism-of-neocon-hillary-clinton/

 

 

Oliver Stone has penned a powerful and emotional takedown of Hillary Clinton, focusing on her insane neocon foreign policy chops in a piece published in the Huffington Post titled, Why I’m for Bernie Sanders.

 

What follows are just a few paragraphs, I suggest reading the entire thing:

 

We’re going to war — either hybrid in nature to break the Russian state back to its 1990s subordination, or a hot war (which will destroy our country). Our citizens should know this, but they don’t because our media is dumbed down in its “Pravda”-like support for our “respectable,” highly aggressive government. We are being led, as C. Wright Mills said in the 1950s, by a government full of “crackpot realists: in the name of realism they’ve constructed a paranoid reality all their own.” Our media has credited Hillary Clinton with wonderful foreign policy experience, unlike Trump, without really noting the results of her power-mongering. She’s comparable to Bill Clinton’s choice of Cold War crackpot Madeleine Albright as one of the worst Secretary of States we’ve had since … Condi Rice? Albright boasted, “If we have to use force it is because we are America; we are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future.”

Hillary’s record includes supporting the barbaric “contras” against the Nicaraguan people in the 1980s, supporting the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia, supporting the ongoing Bush-Iraq War, the ongoing Afghan mess, and as Secretary of State the destruction of the secular state of Libya, the military coup in Honduras, and the … You can read the rest of this Leftist rant if you choose (“We’re Going to War” – Oliver Stone Opines on the Dangerous Extremism of Neocon Hillary Clinton; By Michael Krieger; Liberty BlitzKrieg; 3/31/16 12:01 pm)

 

***[Blog Editor: I disagree with Mr. Krieger that Crooked Hillary is a Neocon. Part of that disagreement is because I believe the venom and vitriol against Neoconservatism is based on erroneous perceptions from both sides of the political aisle. Did Neocons make some bad decisions after 911? It turns they did. However, at the time the concept of throwing despotic leadership to give people a more democratic representative choice was a valid objective. The reason is history has shown people are given a voting representative choice their government tends toward more individual freedom. Examples are post-WWII Germany and Japan. Both those nations developed into solid allies of America according to the needs of U.S. National Interests. The thing Neocons didn’t count on is Islamic culture which is totally contrary to Western Liberty, especially in the USA. Islam by nature is intolerant and despotic of any individual choice that might run counter to Islamic tenets. Muslims for the most part concur with their faith of intolerance. This Muslim intolerance will factor into a mutual National Interest benefiting the USA or a Muslim nation. The Neocon failure was finding this out the hard way. The Neoconservative key is a foreign policy that validates U.S. National Interests, keeps America strong and keeps America Exceptional. NONE OF WHICH is of interest to Crooked Hillary (falsely accused of Neoconservatism) or to uber-Leftist Bernie Sanders who author Michael Krieger has endorsed]***

 

U.S. Foreign Policy ‘Elite’ Eagerly Await an Expansion of Overseas Wars Under Hillary Clinton

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/10/20/u-s-foreign-policy-elite-eagerly-await-an-expansion-of-overseas-wars-under-hillary-clinton/#comment-114647

 

Comment 114647 is Tony Newbill

N3angus — October 21, 2016 at 7:22 am

 

Facebook has blocked me from public comment posting of this, Hillary has already been bribed.

 

The FBI cover up through Lawless Means shows this.

 

What was the US Asset that was used as the bribed is the Question?

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/24/romney-every-appearance-that-hillary-clinton-was-bribed-on-uranium-deal/

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-clinton-campaign-and-brian-fallon-stop-accusing_us_57fcab23e4b0d786aa52bcaa?

 

My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an author, columnist, and
journalist http://www.hagoodman.com

 

Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia. Look at the Credits in this video, it is HUGE!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAM48bmtMDc

 

If Hillary has already been bribed whatever was bribed is grounds for Impeachment as this article shows:

 

For months, I have been arguing that Hillary Clinton should be impeached.

 

Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it

 

[Blog Editor: This comment is covered above in a Newbill email.]

_________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

 

Russia/Trump Hacked DNC? NOT!


hillary-worked-married-is-liar

John R. Houk

© November 2, 2016

 

Do remember in the Trump-Hillary debates that Crooked Hillary said the Russians are trying to elect Trump and the proof is that seventeen different U.S. Intelligence agencies claimed that Russia was behind the DNC hacks that Wikileaks was/is dumping for Americans to read?

 

VIDEO: The Quint: Final US Presidential Debate: Clinton and Trump on Vladimir Putin

 

Posted by The Quint

Published on Oct 19, 2016

 

The U.S. presidential candidates clashed over the issue of Russian hacking during Wednesday night’s debate in Las Vegas.

Both accused the other of not doing enough to combat foreign interests from influencing the US election campaign.
Republican Donald Trump said Russian president Vladimir Putin had no respect for his rival Hillary Clinton who accused Trump of failing to condemn Russia for an alleged cyber attack.

 

READ THE REST

 

YUP, SHE LIED!

 

JRH 11/2/16

Please Support NCCR

____________________

FBI: No Tie Between Trump and Russia

 

By Philip Hodges

November 1, 2016

Eagle Rising

 

The New York Times is reporting that the FBI has found no evidence that ties Donald Trump to the Russian government.

 

Most of what has been said by Democrats and Hillary’s campaign regarding Trump’s alleged ties to Russia and Putin are unsubstantiated claims. They’re pure conjecture. But if you repeat a lie enough times, it becomes self-evident. And it gives Hillary’s supporters something to blame for all of her woes.

 

WikiLeaks

@wikileaks

 

No link between Trump & Russia
No link between Assange & Russia
But Podesta & Clinton involved in selling 20% of US uranium to Russia

 

8:48 PM – 31 Oct 2016

 

The New York Times seems to corroborate at least one of those statements made by WikiLeaks: 

 

For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.

 

Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.

 

This seems to contradict claims from the left that FBI Director James Comey is “sitting on” information that indisputably proves Trump to be an “unwitting agent of Putin.”

 

Senator Harry Reid wrote a scathing letter to Comey in response to the FBI Director’s decision to reopen the Bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton.

 

“In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity,” Reid wrote.

 

Even in the case of Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, the FBI’s concern over his connection to Russia had little or nothing to do with foreign influence over the U.S. election. The concern there was that he didn’t declare income that he had made in the Ukraine. Remember, what’s worse than a drug dealer or a terrorist in the eyes of the U.S. government? A tax cheat.

 

By now, Manafort’s ancient history. And what’s left of any supposed tie between Trump and Russia is so little that it doesn’t warrant any investigation. Ironically, Hillary Clinton and John Podesta have more ties to Russia than Trump does.

 

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com

_______________

Russia/Trump Hacked DNC? NOT!

John R. Houk

© November 2, 2016

_____________

FBI: No Tie Between Trump and Russia

 

Copyright © 2016. EagleRising.com is a member of Liberty Alliance. All rights reserved.

 

About Eagle Rising

 

Eagle Rising seeks to share breaking news about culture, media, politics, etc., from a Christian perspective.

 

Eagle Rising is a division of Bravera Holdings, LLC. Founded in 2013 by Gary DeMar and Brandon Vallorani.