Muslim Immigration is What ISIS Wants


 

Do you want to discover the reason there is NO negotiating with Caliphate-minded Muslims? Here is a clue. Caliphate-minded have one objective – establish a global Caliphate. The ONLY acceptable negotiations these Muslims is temporary until a position of superior strength is established to achieve the objective. Daniel Greenfield has the erudite details.

JRH 12/28/15

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

Muslim Immigration is What ISIS Wants

By Daniel Greenfield

December 27, 2015

Sultan Knish

To understand ISIS, you have to understand the difference between terrorists and Islamic terrorists.

Ordinary terrorists have two goals; to compel the enemy to meet their political demands and to rally their supporters to consolidate their class, race or national identity group behind them.

Islamic terrorists are not interested in the “political demands” part. They will occasionally accept concessions and even offer Hudnas, temporary truces, but no permanent separate peace can be achieved with them. It’s why Israel’s peace process with terrorists has gone on failing for decades. It’s why the attempt by Gaddafi to achieve peace with the LIFG ended in a civil war and his death. It’s why Obama’s attempts to negotiate with the “moderate Taliban” failed miserably.

Al Qaeda and ISIS are not “negative” protest movements formed in response to our foreign policy. That’s a foolish self-centered idea held by foolish self-centered Westerners. Al Qaeda and ISIS are “positive” movements that seek to achieve larger religious goals entirely apart from us. Islamic terrorists are not responding to us. They are responding to the Koran and to over a thousand years of history.

Osama bin Laden did not carry out 9/11 to inflict harm on Americans. That was a secondary goal. His primary goal was to rally Muslims to build a Caliphate by encouraging them to attack America.

The ritualistic “Why do they hate us” browbeating favored by the chattering classes is nonsense. Al Qaeda hated us because we were not Muslims. But it was only using us as the hated “other” to consolidate a collective Muslim identity. We are to Islamists what the Jews were to Hitler; a useful scapegoat whose otherness can be used to manufacture a contrasting pure Aryan or Islamic identity.

No dialogue is possible with an ideology whose virtue is premised on seeing you as utterly evil.

You can negotiate with terrorists, though you shouldn’t. But Islamic terrorists rarely even bother to negotiate. Their core focus is on rallying local Muslims and the Ummah behind them. They don’t recognize national borders so any hope for a permanent peace behind recognized borders is wishful thinking. Islam is a transnational movement. Islamic terrorism is a race between terror groups around the world to carve out their own Islamic states and then use them as a springboard to a Caliphate.

ISIS is the end stage of Islamic terrorism. Its leader is a Caliph with all Muslims obliged to submit to him. The Islamic State is not just in Syria and Iraq. It is everywhere that a Muslim outpost swears allegiance to the Caliph. On its own maps the Islamic State encompasses parts of Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Russia. The more local Islamic terror groups pledge allegiance to ISIS, the bigger it becomes.

ISIS doesn’t plan to defeat America through acts of terrorism. The plan for defeating America, like every other country, Muslim or non-Muslim, is to build a domestic Muslim terror movement that will be able to hold territory and swear allegiance to the Islamic State.

The idea of an American Emirate may seem silly but consider Molenbeek, the neighborhood in Brussels known as the Jihadi capital of Europe, deemed a no-go zone by local authorities, right in the capital of the European Union. You can take a taxi from NATO HQ to a Muslim micro-state linked to most of the major recent Islamic terror attacks in Europe including the latest ISIS attack in Paris.

Molenbeek provides ISIS recruits for its war and a gateway for ISIS attacks in Europe. The media is filled with articles about what ISIS wants, but there is no question that Molenbeek is what ISIS wants.

And it’s only Muslim immigration to Europe that makes an ISIS base like Molenbeek possible.

ISIS has short term and long term needs. In the short term, ISIS needs as many recruits as possible. And it is in the West where traditional Muslim ties of kinship and community are so frayed that the transnationalism of heading out to fight for a Caliphate in someone else’s country is most deeply appealing. ISIS aggressively seeks to recruit Muslims in the West because they have the skills, money and naiveté to be useful to the Islamic State. But in the long term, ISIS needs more Muslim immigration to the West to create a steady supply of recruits, collaborators and eventually Western emirates.

If ISIS is serious about making a bid for Italy, it needs a large Muslim population on the ground. It doesn’t even matter if this population comes from refugees fleeing ISIS. The children of these refugees will still be Sunni Muslims in a foreign land where Algerian, Somali, Syrian and Pakistani Muslims discover that they have more in common than they do with the natives. It is this accidental Western multiculturalism that erases tribal Muslim rivalries and makes the ambition of a single Muslim Caliphate appear plausible.

ISIS does not plan to defeat America with terror plots. But those plots will eventually accumulate into an organized domestic terror organization. An Islamic State in America based around a majority Muslim town or neighborhood with its own leader pledging allegiance to the Caliph of the Islamic State.

An American Molenbeek; and there are already plenty of candidates for that horrifying honor.

Any Muslim plans for expanding into the West depend on Muslim immigration. Whether it’s ISIS or its Muslim Brotherhood ancestor, or any of the other Islamist organizations and networks, they all require manpower. Some of that manpower will be provided by high Muslim birth rates, but it won’t be nearly enough, not for a country the size of America, without a large annual flow of Muslim migrants.

We are told that halting Muslim immigration would only encourage Muslim terrorism. But our open door to Muslim immigration certainly hasn’t stopped terrorism. Instead it has increased it by providing reinforcements to the terrorists. If we can’t stop Muslim terrorism with the population we have now, how are we going to manage it if the Islamic population continues doubling and even tripling?

Even if we defeat ISIS tomorrow, Al Qaeda and other Islamist groups descended from the Muslim Brotherhood will continue pursuing the same goals. And they will rely on the Muslim population in the United States to provide them with money, supplies, cover and an infrastructure for terrorism.

ISIS can’t defeat us with terror attacks. The only hope for an enduring Islamic victory over America is through the rise of domestic groups that pledge allegiance to the Caliphate. ISIS can’t invade America. It has to be invited in. That’s what our immigration policy does.

Trump isn’t a threat to national security. Muslim immigration is.

Islamic terrorists can’t defeat us no matter how many planes they fly into buildings. But they can and will defeat us if they continue landing planes at JFK and disembarking thousands and tens of thousands of settlers who will serve as a base population for their war against America.

Muslim immigration is the Islamic State’s only hope for victory over America.

___________________________

About Daniel Greenfield

 

My name is Daniel Greenfield. I am a blogger and columnist born in Israel and living in New York City. I am a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

My original biweekly column appears at Front Page Magazine and my blog articles regularly appear at Family Security Matters, the Jewish PressTimes of IsraelAct for America and Right Side News, as well as daily at the Canada Free Press and a number of other outlets. I have a column titled Western Front at Israel National News and my op eds have also appeared in the New York Sun, the Jewish Press and at FOX Nation.

I was named one of the Jewish Press’ Most Worthwhile Blogs from 2006-2011 and my writing has been cited by Rush Limbaugh, Melanie Philips, Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes, Judith Klinghoffer, John Podhoretz, Jeff Jacoby and Michelle Malkin, among others.

My investigative pieces have included the story of Obama and Pfleger, which I was the first to break months before the mainstream media. I also detailed for the first time many of Obama’s radical clergy ties, including Farrakhan supporters, as well as exposing Rabbis for Obama as being a front group for Pro-Hamas appeasement supporters.

I revealed that the Vice-President of the Center for American Progress and the new senior adviser for Nancy Pelosi had participated in terrorist fundraising and READ THE REST

Kafir Slaughter is the Norm not Aberration


John R. Houk

© December 5, 2015

Islamic Terrorism. Yup, I wrote Islamic Terrorism.

The butchers of San Bernardino were following their Islamic tenets as handed down by their fake-prophet Mohammed.

When a Muslim or a group of Muslims attack a group of non-Muslims with the intent to hurt, maim, rape women and/or kill people because his/her perfect man – Mohammed – set the example in the Quran and explained in the Hadith and Sira; that is terrorism based on the tenets of Islam.

Here are some excerpts from an Answering Islam essay demonstrating ten reasons Islam is NOT a religion of peace as exposed in the Quran. I’m excerpting some explanatory notes, followed by the ten reasons (read the essay for the expanded explanation for each reason) and I’ll end with some justification explanations of the ten reasons:

… In order to prevent the standard, reflexive “out of context” defense from Muslim apologists, the context of each verse in the Quran is explained either in this article or in the links provided within each of the ten reasons. No verse is taken out of context, and Muslim translations are used.

Verifiable? The readers are invited to look up each verse in the Quran in multiple translations, by visiting the website www.quranbrowser.com and typing in references, like so: 61:10-12. (61 is the chapter or sura, and 10-12 are the verses).

But first we must answer a Muslim strategy. A Muslim missionary or polemicist who believes that Islam is the best religion in the world and who wants it to spread around the globe attempted to refute this top ten list. But attempting to refute such a list is like reviewing a book only from the last chapter. The reviewer has skipped over the hard work of reading all of the chapters. In the same way, the Muslim polemicist or missionary has skipped over the hard work found in the back-up articles and the links. This top ten list is only a summary of many articles and a lot of strenuous labor from the present author and many other authors. The answers to the Muslim’s criticisms are all found in these articles. So his criticism is hollow, and his scholarship is shallow, since he has not done the hard work. He certainly does not understand the Bible. Plus, he whitewashes Islam in his attempted refutation. The back-up articles will show how. Thus, he whitewashes Islam either deliberately or unknowingly, which means he does not know his own religion or he knows it, but covers it up. Whatever the case, the truth about the real Islam must get out.

10. Muhammad nicknames his weapons.

9. Muhammad commands in his Quran that adulterers and adulteresses should receive a hundred lashes.

8. Muhammad in his Quran permits husbands to beat their wives.

7. Muhammad in his Quran commands that the hands of male or female thieves should be cut off.

6. Muhammad assassinates poets and poetesses.

5. Muhammad in his Quran commands death or the cutting off of hands and feet for fighting and corrupting the land.

4. Muhammad aggressively attacks Meccan caravans.

3. Muhammad in his Quran promises sensuous Gardens for martyrs dying in a military holy war.

2. Muhammad unjustly executes around 600 male Jews and enslaves the women and children.

1. Muhammad launches his own Crusades.

What the ten reasons mean for us today

These ten aspects of violence that have burrowed into the hemorrhaging heart of early Islam have eight implications for us today. The first three are theological; the rest are practical.

The theological implications are as follows:

First, as each reason in this article has hinted at and the links explain more thoroughly, Christ never, ever engaged in such violence. For example, he never assassinated opponents, whipped adulterers, cut off the hands of thieves, or launched his own Crusades (what the Medieval Europeans did is not foundational to Christianity). Christ expresses the love of God. Therefore, Christians and all fair-minded persons have the right to question whether the true God would reveal the Quran when it contains such violent verses that conveniently support Muhammad’s violence, whereas the New Testament does not have such violence.

Second, Muslims believe that the New Testament is corrupted, whereas the Quran is inerrant. Even if we assume only for the sake of argument that these claims are true (but they actually are not), then why would reasonable seekers of the truth prefer the “pure” but violence-filled Quran over the “corrupted” but peaceful New Testament?

Before Muhammad is allowed to throw around unsubstantiated charges about alleged New Testament corruption, he and his Quran must pass a down-to-earth test regarding his dubious, violent practices. But he and it fail the test badly, as this article demonstrates, whereas Christ and the New Testament pass with a perfect score. Therefore, if Muhammad is so wrong about down-to-earth matters like whipping adulterers and cutting off the hands of thieves and beating wives, then he is likely wrong about unresearched accusations of New Testament corruption—and factually he is wrong.

Please refer to the articles listed on these pages for more information: [1], [2].

Third, since Muhammad who claims divine guidance is so wrong about practical matters, why should we believe him about theoretical matters like the deity of Christ and the Trinity, both of which he denies? Clearly, he was not divinely guided in practical matters because the true God would not degrade religion by endorsing such gruesome violence six hundred years after Christ came—the historical span is critical. Christ and the New Testament do not have even one example of such violence. Again, if Muhammad first fails the down-to-earth test, then he likely fails the theological or theoretical test—we have no reason to believe him in such high doctrines, especially since he was no theologian and his revelations are now empirically suspect.

The practical implications of the top ten reasons are READ ENTIRETY (Top ten reasons why Islam is NOT the religion of peace: Violence in Muhammad’s life and the Quran; By James M. Arlandson; Answering Islam)

Now let’s look at the reality of the Hadith encouraging Muslims into acts of violence especially toward non-Muslims:

Jihad in the Hadith

The Hadith are the recorded sayings and deeds of the Prophet Muhammad. It is second in authority only to the Qur’an and is often used to clarify things not specified in the Qur’an. The following is what Muhammad had to say about Jihad as recorded in the Hadith.

1) The second best deed is to participate in Jihad (Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25, Narrated Abu Huraira) – Allah’s Apostle was asked, “What is the best deed?” He replied, “To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked, “What is the next in goodness? He replied, “To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah’s Cause.” The questioner again asked, “What is the next (in goodness)?” He replied, “To perform Hajj (Pilgrimage to Mecca) ‘Mubrur, (which is accepted by Allah and is performed with the intention of seeking Allah’s pleasure only and not to show off and without committing a sin and in accordance with the traditions of the Prophet).”

2) Muhammad said if someone leaves Islam, to kill them (Volume 4, Book 52, Number 260, Narrated Ikrima) – All burnt some people and this news reached IBn ‘Abbas, who said, “Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, ‘Don’t punish anybody with Allah’s Punishment.’ No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, “If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.”

3) Volume 1, Book 2, Number 35, Narrated Abu Huraira ”The Prophet said, The person who participates in holy battles in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him to do so except belief in Allah and his Apostles, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in the battle as a martyr). Had I not found it difficult for my followers, then I would not remain behind any saiya going for Jihad and I would have loved to be martyred in Allah’s cause and then made alive, and then martyred and then made alive, and then again martyred in His cause.”

4) Volume 3, Book 46, Number 726 ”Allah’s Apostle said, A pious slave gets a double reward. Abu Huraira added: By Him in Whose Hands my soul is but for Jihad (holy battles), Hajj, and my duty to serve my mother, I would have loved to die as a slave.”

5) Volume 9, Book 93, Number 555 ”Allah’s Apostle said, Allah guarantees (the person who carries out Jihad in His Cause and nothing compelled him to go out but Jihad in His Cause and the belief in His Word) that He will either admit him into Paradise or return him with reward or booty he has earned to his residence from where he went out.” (Jihad in the Quran and Hadith; Contender Ministries)

Just to confront the Muslim apologist that claims there is a Greater Jihad and a Lesser Jihad with the “Lesser” being the violent aggressive edict and the “Greater” being the primary directive of Islam of warring with self to be a better person, here are some excerpts that relates the truth about this deceptive hogwash:

… Next to the Qur’an in importance is the Hadith, which refers to collections of traditions about what Muhammad said, what he taught, and what he did. These collections are also called Sunna or “tradition”; hence the term Sunni Muslims, or “traditional” Muslims. …

Muslims naturally felt a need to preserve traditions about the Prophet from the time of the earliest witnesses. However, over the years since Muhammad’s death some of these traditions became embellished and others were fabricated. In the ninth century a number of Islamic scholars undertook the task of sifting the genuine traditions from the spurious and of gathering the former in written collections. In Sunni Islam six of these collections in particular are considered sahih (“reliable”). These sahih sittah (“reliable collections”) are:

o Sahih Bukhari, compiled by the Imam Muhammad ibn-Ismail al-Bukhari (810-870).

o Sahih Muslim, compiled by Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Qushayri (821-975).

o Sunan Abu Dawud, compiled by Abu Dawud as-Sijistani (d. 888).

o Sunan ibn Majah, compiled by Muhammad ibn Majah (d. 896).

o Sunan At-Tirmidhi, compiled by Abi ‘Eesaa Muhammad At-Tirmidhi (824-893).

o Sunan An-Nasai, compiled by Ahmad ibn Shu’ayb an-Nasai (d. 915).

All these collections of hadith are highly respected in the Sunni tradition, but the first two even more than the others, and so they are given the additional specific designation of sahih. And of those two, Sahih Bukhari is considered the most important and most reliable. Those ahadith occurring in both the Bukhari and Muslim collections have the highest status of all.

Only One Jihad

These compilations of hadith are voluminous, and they have a lot to say about jihad. However, before going to these classic collections, we should begin by looking at one hadith that is very often quoted to demonstrate a nonviolent meaning of jihad:

Upon his return from battle Muhammad said, “We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad (i.e. the struggle against the evil of one’s soul).” (1)

This is very often cited as a proof-text for the “real” meaning of jihad being inward, spiritual struggle. But there are two problems:

1. Even a “lesser” jihad is still jihad and thus a duty and a virtue.

2. Muhammad never made such a statement.

The hadith in which Muhammad is said to speak of “greater” vs. “lesser” jihad is of doubtful authenticity. It does not appear in any of the six collections of the sahih sittah. In fact, a number of scholars maintain that this hadith is a forgery (2). One scholar analyzes this hadith and considers a number of factors, such as chain of transmission and other more reliable, contradictory ahadith (3). …

This seems to leave little doubt as to how Muhammad understood jihad. But let us not make the case on just one example. There are many ahadith on jihad, and they make its meaning quite clear. First and foremost, jihad meant combat on the battlefield, and specifically against non-Muslims.

Jihad as Fighting the Nonbeliever

The following sequence of ahadith will clarify this. Many of these are extremely well attested, occurring multiple times in the most trusted collections, the Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. I will cite some of these multiple attestations just to show the high status of these ahadith.

Reading through the hadith on the subject of jihad, what we do not find is an exclusive emphasis on self-defense or on struggling with one’s desires. Jihad is physical combat, not just for self-defense but for the purpose of spreading Islam, and there is no greater virtue: READ ENTIRETY (Jihad in the Hadith; Peace with Realism – Updated website About Page)

The Sira includes the Sunna which are the sayings of Mohammed:

The easiest way to learn about Islam is to learn about Mohammed. His biography is called the Sira, and this book is a condensation of it.

The Islamic bible—the Trilogy

Islam is defined by the words of Allah in the Koran, and the words and actions of Mohammed, called the Sunna.

The Sunna is found in two collections of texts—the Sira (Mohammed’s life) and the Hadith. The Koran says 91 times that his words and actions are considered to be the divine pattern for humanity.

A hadith, or tradition, is a brief story about what Mohammed did or said. A collection of hadiths is called a Hadith. There are many collections of hadiths, but the most authoritative are those by Bukhari and Abu Muslim, the ones used in this book.

So the Trilogy is the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. Most people think that the Koran is the bible of Islam, but it is only about 14% of the total textual doctrine. The Trilogy is the foundation and totality of Islam.

The Relative Sizes of the Trilogy Texts

Islam is defined by the words of Allah in the Koran, and the words and actions of Mohammed, the Sunna. (A Taste of Islam – The Life of Mohammed – The Sira; By Bill Warner; Center for the Study of Political Islam; © 2010 CSPI, LLC)

Here is an example of the wickedness of Islam displayed in the Sira courtesy the Australian Islamist Monitor:

And in the sira, endless examples of violence to others in offensive attacks: eg Sirat Rasul’allah by Ibn Ishaq.

Booty is made lawful as a gift from that compassionate allah (p 326-327 –which also notes allah telling Mohammad NOT to take prisoners until he has made slaughter in the earth —ie kill to manifest the religion!!). Page 464-466 records the beheading of ~800 males and one female, the enslavement of females and children and Mohammad taking a female for his enjoyment. This ‘pattern’ is repeated in other acts of slaughter, enslavement and rape eg p 493, p 511. In one attack over 6000 women and children plus animals were taken (p 592-593) with the remnants of the men ‘converting’ to try to retrieve their families!!! Mohammad handed out GIRLS for friends to enjoy (p 593) as sex with tiny girls is allowed in Islamic law eg Hedaya Vol 4 p 106. (see more in Islam’s genocidal slavery – Part A – Mohammad’s example 23-08-09 on site) Of some 48 -67 battles in those last 10 years, Mohammad ‘stayed home’ for some and led 27 yet still claimed 1/5th of the booty! But along with big battles were endless small attacks on others, murders, threats and demands for tribute or else! Simple farming communities were often suddenly attacked by these well armed Islamic ‘heroes.’

**Ibn Ishaq: p 572-3 (sirat rasulallah) “Muhammad is the man, an Apostle of my Lord……. Evil was the state of the B. Qasiy in Wajj…they lost the day …Fortunes change. We came upon them like lions of the thickets. The armies of Allah came openly……. almost flying at them in our rage…. We were as lions of Liya there until we destroyed them and al-Nusur were forced to surrender….. and blood flowed freely. In former days there was no battle like this. We slew B. Hutayt in the dust. ….Those who escaped were choked with terror. A multitude of them were slain. If they are guided to Islam….If they do NOT accept it THEY call for god’s war in which they will have no helper. As war destroyed the B. Sa’d and fate the clan of B. Ghaziya.” (the Muslim view is that those who resist allah/Islam CAUSE wars) (Islam is Conquest by Violence and Fear: Hadith, Sira, laws, comments part 2; By Circe; Australian Islamist Monitor; last updated – 5/9/11 18:47)

So figure it out! Islam is an inherently violent religion even if a majority of Muslims practice a peaceful version of their theopolitical religion. The reality is the Islam that Left Wingers, Multiculturalists and deceived Conservatives call “Moderate” Islam; IS NOT the true Islam of the Quran, Hadith and Sira.

In the light of the San Bernardino Massacre perpetrated by the Islamic terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook and his Pakistani wife Tashfeen Malik that went on a kafir killing spree, I became very irritated with the authorities – local, State and Federal – failing to state the obvious that this was an act of Islamic terrorism. Then of course that irritation became stoked when Obama and his Dem-Leftist cadres refused the term Islamic terrorism and followed that colossal public irresponsibility with blaming lax gun control laws for the shooting.

The gun control theme is especially idiotic considering the gun control laws in California are not exactly NRA friendly. Perhaps if

some of the good citizens of San Bernardino were packing, a couple of kafir-hating Muslims might have discovered their Allah deity is closer to an antichrist demon than a ludicrous promise of eternal virgins in Paradise fulfilling the carnal/fleshly desires of unrestrained sex and the taste of wine without becoming intoxicated quicker and with non-Muslim victims. (I’m unsure of any eternal promises for female shahids. Tough luck Tashfeen.)

I’ll culminate my thoughts by sharing the thoughts of Justin Smith I found on his Facebook page. Justin wrote his thoughts before the FBI struggled to admit the San Bernardino Massacre was an act of terrorism; however take note there is still the refusal to call the massacre an act of Islamic terrorism.

JRH 12/5/15

Please Support NCCR

****************************

Justin Smith Thoughts on San Bernardino Terrorist Attack

By Justin O. Smith

December 3, 2015 11:35am

Facebook Page

In light of the San Bernardino terrorist attack, I wish to reiterate the following:

Well – now. We see another example in Syed Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik of the only “contribution” I’ve seen Islam and Muslims give to America and the world over my entire lifetime — 58 years. Rest assured that this was more islamofascist terrorism, since all the evidence, the planning, the weapons and the explosive devices are indicative of such.

Most Americans, many of our leaders as well, are aware that terrorists infiltrating groups of refugees are only part of the problem. They are not speaking of imaginary space-aliens, when they cognitively and logically reason that the ideological doctrines within Islam, such as the mandated perpetual war between the House of Islam and the House of War (non-Muslims) and the supposed supremacy of Islam, creates the prime motivation for the endemic violence of Islam. Americans understand that the terrorists are found in the ranks of converts like Carlos Bledsoe, second and third generation U.S. Muslims like Anwar al-Awlaki and refugees like the Tsarnaev brothers; and, as such, it certainly does not make any sense to import tens of thousands of more potential terrorists, in the middle of a generational and civilizational war between Islamic and Western principles.

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said that we shouldn’t be accepting “any Syrian refugees without complete assurance those we are welcoming intend us no harm”, but when dealing with the agents of Islam, “complete assurance” would be a false assurance. One cannot offer an assurance against Muslims insidiously infiltrating any neighborhood, as they frequent ballgames, movies and restaurants and act like normal citizens, until they unleash bloodbath upon bloodbath, just like the Abdeslam brothers did in France, terrorist bomber Ramzi Yousef did at the World Trade Center in 1993, nineteen terrorists did on 9/11 and Abdulazeez did at the Chattanooga Naval facility.

_______________________

Kafir Slaughter is the Norm not Aberration

John R. Houk

© December 5, 2015

_____________________

Justin Smith Thoughts on San Bernardino Terrorist Attack

© Justin O. Smith

Dajjal Explains Reason ‘Islam’ NOT ‘Peace’


Mo says, U Convert or Die

 

By Dajjal

Posted April 27, 2015

 

Apparently Paul Sutliffs cross post Taqiyya Interfaith Practioner caught claiming “Islam means Shalom inspired Dajjal for he left four lengthy comments in response.

 

JRH 4/27/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************************

dajjal | April 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM

 

Islam is peace: of ass! The Arabic word means submission. Ibn Sad recorded a saying in which Moe said that he was raised for Jihad and not for tillage. He also said that he was sent with a sword to see that none is worshiped but Allah.

 

2.216 ordains Jihad for Muslims: it is Islamic law; they must wage war. 2.190 can be interpreted as calling for defensive jihad if we ignore the context.

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].

 

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

 

2:192. But if they cease, then Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

 

2:193. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allâh (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)

 

2:194. The sacred month is for the sacred month, and for the prohibited things, there is the Law of Equality (Qisâs). Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him. And fear Allâh, and know that Allâh is with Al-Muttaqûn (the pious see V.2:2).

 

2:195. And spend in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd of all kinds, etc.) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allâh), and do good. Truly, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good-doers).

What is the cause of Allah?

 

9:24. Say: If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your kindred, the wealth that you have gained, the commerce in which you fear a decline, and the dwellings in which you delight are dearer to you than Allâh and His Messenger, and striving hard and fighting in His Cause , then wait until Allâh brings about His Decision (torment). And Allâh guides not the people who are Al-Fâsiqûn (the rebellious, disobedient to Allâh).

 

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâhs Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success.

 

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

 

Narrated Abu Musa:

 

A man came to the Prophet and asked, A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allahs Cause? The Prophet said, He who fights that Allahs Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allahs Cause.

 

Muslim: liar! Slave of Satan!! I call you out!!! Where in the context of these damnable verses is the element of defense???

 

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

 

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

 

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious see V.2:2).

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.039


http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.029


http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/009-qmt.php#009.123

 

8:59. And let not those who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will never be able to save themselves (from Allâhs Punishment).

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.059

 

How is that defensive? Do not overlook 8.57 & 8.60 in answering this question.

 

What was Moes prime motivating factor; what is Allahs? Answer in the light of this curse-worthy verse:

 

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/008-qmt.php#008.067

 

What did Moe say about the Jihad imperatives? What is defensive about those statements??

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:


Narrated Anas bin Malik:


Allah
s Apostle said, I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah. Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred? He replied, Whoever says, None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 92, Number 388:


Narrated Abu Huraira:


When Allah
s Apostle died and Abu Bakr was elected as a Caliph after him, some of the Arabs reverted to disbelief, Umar said to Abu Bakr, How dare you fight the people while Allahs Apostle said, I have been ordered to fight the people till they say None has the right to be worshipped but Allah And whoever says: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah. waves his wealth and his life from me unless he deserves a legal punishment lusty, and his account will be with Allah! Abu Bakr said, By Allah, I will fight him who discriminates between Zakat and prayers, for Zakat is the Compulsory right to be taken from the wealth By Allah, if they refuse to give me even a tying rope which they use to give to Allahs Apostle, I would fight them for withholding it. Umar said, By Allah, It was nothing, except I saw that Allah had opened the chest of Abu Bakr to the fight, and I came to know for certain that was the truth.

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196:


Narrated Abu Huraira:


Allah
s Apostle said, I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and whoever says, None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)

 

How does one save his life & property from Moe? His attacks are on account of not being Muslim, aggressive, not defensive!

 

+++

dajjal | April 25, 2015 at 7:42 PM

 

Muslim: liar, whose tongue is a worm slithering from Satans anus!!! I know something you wish I did not know. Lurking in a Pal Talk chat room frequented by Muslims, I learned that Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters. A handful of them are included in The Sealed Nectar. One of them is included in Sahih Bukhari. But one Islamic web site has three pages of them. While most leave something to the imagination, one does not. I reproduce it here with a link to the source. I challenge you to explain this away!!!

 

LETTER TO THE CHIEFS OF AQABA

 

In the name of ALLAH the compassionate, the Merciful

 

From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah

 

To the People of Aqaba

 

May peace be on you. I praise Allah who is one and except whom there is nobody else to be worshipped.

 

I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.

 

These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.

 

If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.

 

I assure you that I am a true Prophet of Allah. I believe in Allah, and His Books, and His Prophets and am of the faith that Maseeh (Messiah) son of Mariam (Mary), is a Prophet of Allah and His word.

 

Hurmala (Raziallah AnhoA.) who brought to me 3 wasaq (about 6 quintals) of barley, recommended your case. Had it not been in compliance of the command of Allah and the good opinion of Hurmala for you, it would not have been necessary for me to correspond with you and instead of it, there would have been a war. If you will obey my messengers, you shall immediately have my support and the help and support of everyone who is attached to me.

 

My messengers are Shuraih-beel, Obaiy, Hurmala and Hurais (Raziallah AnhoA.) and whatever decision they take in respect of you, shall be acceptable to me.

Your people are under the protection and responsibility of Allah and His Prophet.

 

Supply provisions to the Jews of Maqna, for their journey to their country.

 

If you accept obedience, may peace be on you.

Seal: Allahs Prophet Muhammad.

 

http://alquraan.net/letters/letters_3.html#LETTER%20TO%20THE%20CHIEFS%20OF%20AQABA

 

+++

dajjal | April 25, 2015 at 7:46 PM

 

For the benefit of intellectually impaired slaves of Satan who cannot read long posts, I extracted the most crucial sentences from the extortion letter posted above… Read them and weep, Muslim, for they exposes your Profit as a barbarian warmonger.

 

I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.

 

If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.

 

+++

dajjal | April 25, 2015 at 7:50 PM

 

Islam wages war against those who refuse to convert or make annual extortion payments.


The Sira written by Ibn Sa
d includes many more of Moes extortion letters. This one largely mirrors the one posted above. Decent men of good moral character will read it and curse Islam, demanding the extinction of Muslims, which is necessary for the preservation of life and liberty for the human race.

 

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.2.73.3

 

Volume 1, Parts II.73.3


They said: The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, wrote to Yuhannah Ibn Rubb
àh and (other) chiefs of the people of Aylah: You are safe. I praise Allah before you; there is no God but He. I will not fight against you unless I write to you (in advance). So, join the fold of Islam or [P. 29] pay the jizyah. Obey Allah and His Apostle and the messengers of His Apostle, honour them and dress them in nice clothes, other than the uniform of the ghazis. Provide Zayd with good clothes. If my messengers will be pleased with you, I shall also be pleased with you. The jizyah is a known thing. If you like that, peace might prevail over the land and sea; you should obey Allah and His Apostle. You will not be required to pay dues you have been paying to the Arabs and the Ajamis, and you will pay the dues to Allah and His Apostle. If you send them (my messengers) back and do not please them, I shall not accept anything from you, and shall wage war against you and make your young ones captive and shall stay your elders. Verily, I am the Apostle of Allah to communicate the truth. I believe in Allah, His Books and His Apostles. I believe in Masih Ibn Maryam (Messiah son of Mary) who is His word, to be His Apostle. Come to me before you face the evil. I have given advice to my messengers about your affairs. Pay three wasag (Wasaq is a camel-load equal to sixty sa`s, each sa` being equal to four mudds, and each mudd is equal to 1-1/3 lbs., thus a wasaq is equal to nearly four maunds of Pakistan.) of barley to Harmalah. Verily, Harmalah has recommended your case. Had there been no Allah and this (recommendation) I would not have had any correspondence with you and you would have seen armies marching against you. If you obey my messenger, verily, Allah is your defender and (also) Muhammad and those who follow him. Verily, my messengers are Shurahbil, Ubayyi, Harmalah and Hurayth lbn Zayd al-Tá’i. If they conclude a treaty, I shall approve of it and you will be under the guarantee of Allah and Allahs Apostle Muhammad. Salàm to you. If you obey, you should arrange provisions for the people of Maqna to go to their land.

 

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Dajjal

 

MOHAM-MAD AND ISLAM.


Mo Heheads Banu Qurayza Jews

So if you believe Mohammed was a good man and that Islam is a religion of peace, then check out what the Quran (the claimed words of Allah) and Hadith (The collected reports of what the Prophet Muhammad said and did during his lifetime (Arabic plural: ahadith).) reveal about Islam and its psycho-prophet.

 

JRH 1/30/15

Please Support NCCR

************************

MOHAM-MAD AND ISLAM.

 

By DrAlaya M Akhter

January 27 at 2:34pm

Facebook Group: Koran and its Satanic teaching

 

In Islam, not only is rape of children (“marrying”) allowed, but divorcing of pre-pubescent children is OK (Koran 65:4). Moham-mad, the ideal man (Koran 68:4, 33:21) was 51 when he married his child bride Aisha 6. He didn’t deflower her until she was 9 and he was 54. (Bukhari 7.62.88) Remember: not only marriage, but divorce of pre-pubescent girls is allowed for Muslims according to All*h (Koran 65:4).

 

1)   Moham-mad is considered a prophet and the ideal man. (Koran 68:4, 33:21)

 

2)  Moham-mad (51) married his favorite child bride Aisha when she was 6. (Bukhari 7:62:88)

 

3)  Moham-mad (54) deflowered the nubile Aisha when she was 9. (Bukhari 7:62:88)

 

4)  Moham-mad ordered all dogs to be killed because of a puppy. (Bukhari 4:54:540) (Kitab Al-Libas wa’l-Zinah) Muslim :: Book 24 : Hadith 5248

 

5)  Moham-mad helped behead (Koran 47:4) 600 – 900 captives in one day.

 

6)  Moham-mad and insults against him and Islam (Koran 9:61-:63, 33:57-:58) require death. (Koran 33:61)

 

7)  Moham-mad had women killed for insulting him. (Asma bint Marwan, Abu ‘Afak, Kab bin Al-Ashraf)

 

8)  Moham-mad orders anyone leaving Islam to be killed. (Koran 2:217, 4:89) (Bukhari 9.84.57)

 

9)  Moham-mad curses his aunt and uncle to hell. (Koran Chapter 111)

 

10)               Moham-mad was made victorious through terror. (Bukhari 4.52.220)

 

11)Moham-mad had a woman from Ghamid stoned to death for adultery after weaning her baby. (Kitab Al-Hudud)  Book 17 : Hadith 4205 and 4206

 

12)                Moham-mad got 20 percent of all stolen property. (Koran 8:41)

 

13)                Moham-mad was spoken to by the devil. (Koran 17:73-:75, 22:52-:53, 53:19-:26)

 

14)               Moham-mad rode a buraq (winged half-donkey/half mule) to heaven and back meeting Moses. (Koran 17:1) (Bukhari 5:58:227)

 

15)                Moham-mad led 27 battles and ordered 47 others.

 

16)               Moham-mad had over 50 sex slaves and wives. (Koran 4:3, :24, 5:89, 23:5, 33:50, 58:3, 70:30)

 

17)                Moham-mad never had a son. (Koran 33:40 – thus the Sunni and Shia Sects)

 

18)               Moham-mad alone was allowed to have unlimited wives. (Koran 33:50)

 

19)               Moham-mad was ordered by All*h to marry his adopted son’s stunning wife. (Koran 33:37)

 

20)               Moham-mad colored his hair. (Red with Henna). So you can imagine what a prophet of doom Moham-mad was! All sort of evil acts his so-called Allah made okay for him but not for his followers! Wow! What a Allah he is! Listen Moham-mad was himself a true voice of Satan. Now look at his character! You will find nothing good but evil and these are all rape, lust for sex, loot, murder, terrorism, hatred. Even an Atheist will say Moham-mad was not a prophet but a true satanic voice of Satan. Satan put mask on his face and claimed Allah himself. But be honest, there is no Allah but it was Moham-mad himself who picked that name from Kabaah to justify his all sort of evil acts holy. And very sad to say all Muslims follow this Satan and his satanic rules and regulation.

 

_______________________

About Koran and its Satanic teaching (Public Group)

 

Islam is Mohammad’s brain child. Islam is not a religion but a true deadly and Satanic evil cult. Our aim to EXPOSE Koran and Mohammad and unmask Mohammad so Muslims may leave Islam. Non-Muslims may understand Mohammad and know his true evil face.

A Dajjal Compilation of Informative Comments


Evil Mo

Editor John R. Houk
© January 28, 2015
© Dajjal
I have three comments worthy of an independent post from the pseudonymous Dajjal. The thing is I have lost patience in posting each one separately.  Ergo I have taken the liberty to provide a title to each comment which includes an introduction that I intended in separate posts.
Dajjal is a very knowledgeable Counterjihad writer. Indeed he has a resource he has compiled entitled the Crusader’s Armory. If you want to spend a little time educating yourself on the evils of Islam from Dajjal’s perspective you should go to that site and check it out.
In the meantime here is a compilation of Dajjal comments that were originally posted to my NCCR blog.
JRH 1/28/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************
Dajjal makes a comment to Justin O. Smith’s “Free Speech and Muslim Rage” on my NCCR blog. Dajjal sets the environment to comprehend any Muslim rage using the Quran, Hadith and Sunnah. So when a Muslim Apologist or Left Wing advocate tells you that is not what most Muslims believe know that is poppycock. Dajjal gets his information from Islamic sources that are revered.
JRH 1/26/15
**********************
Full Comprehension of Muslim Rage
(Title by Editor)
By Dajjal
Original Comment: 1/18/15 10:52 PM
Comment to: ‘Free Speech and Muslim Rage
Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:
Full comprehension of Islamic rage over exposure of Moe’s foibles requires some background information.
The tribal society where Islam was invented and expanded is based on honor and shame. Moe’s real name was Kauthar; he bestowed the undeserved honorific “Muhammad” upon himself. Moe had no witnesses; his epileptic fits were observed, but nobody else saw or heard Jibril talking to him. Islam stands or falls on Moe’s character. If you discredit Moe, you destroy the foundation of Islam.
We see pictures of raging mobs in Asia & Arabia because passions are intense in their tribal culture. They accept Islam as Moe preached it: a gift from Allah, the ultimate truth & justice. They are totally invested in it. If Islam is dishonored, they are dishonored.
Moe knew that Islam is CamelS**t. That fatal fact makes it weak and vulnerable to questioning and criticism. He took great pains to minimize those threats.
5:101. O you who believe! Ask not about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if you ask about them while the Qur’ân is being revealed, they will be made plain to you. Allâh has forgiven that, and Allâh is Oft­ Forgiving, Most Forbearing.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 2, Book 24, Number 555:
Narrated Ash-sha’bi:
The clerk of Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba narrated, “Muawiya wrote to Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba: Write to me something which you have heard from the Prophet (p.b.u.h.).” So Al-Mughira wrote: I heard the Prophet saying, “Allah has hated for you three things:
1. Vain talks, (useless talk) that you talk too much or about others.
2. Wasting of wealth (by extravagance)
3. And asking too many questions (in disputed religious matters) or asking others for something (except in great need). (See Hadith No. 591, Vol. Ill)
Because of that sensitivity, Allah found it necessary to pass revelations defending his Messenger. In reality, Moe was issuing situational scripture, posing as Allah in retort to critics.
12.111. Indeed in their stories, there is a lesson for men of understanding. It (the Qur’an) is not a forged statement but a confirmation of the Allâh’s existing Books [the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel) and other Scriptures of Allâh] and a detailed explanation of everything and a guide and a Mercy for the people who believe.
52:29. Therefore, remind and preach (mankind, O Muhammad of Islâmic Monotheism). By the Grace of Allâh, you are neither a soothsayer, nor a madman.
52:30. Or do they say: “(Muhammad is) a poet! We await for him some calamity by time.!”
52:31. Say (O Muhammad to them): “Wait! I am with you, among the waiters!”
52:32. Do their minds command them this [i.e. to tell a lie against you (Muhammad)] or are they people exceeding the bounds (i.e. from Belief in Allâh to disbelief).
52:33. Or do they say: “He (Muhammad) has forged it (this Qur’ân)?” Nay! They believe not!
52:34. Let them then produce a recital like unto it (the Qur’ân) if they are truthful.
81:22. And (O people) your companion (Muhammad ()) is not a madman;
81:23. And indeed he (Muhammad) saw him [Jibrael (Gabriel)] in the clear horizon (towards the east).
81:24. And he (Muhammad ()) withholds not a knowledge of the unseen.
81:25. And it (the Qur’ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).
So intense was the sensitivity to criticism that Moe ordered his companions to murder several critics including Kab Ashraf, Asma bint Marwan and Umm Qirfa. Read about it in his biography.
Murder of Umm Qirfa
Murder of Asma bint Marwan
Assassination of Kab Ashraf pg. 368
Dissing Allah or Moe entails apostasy, which carries the death penalty for Muslims. The same punishment is applied to infidels under Shari’ah.

 

o8.1 Apostasy: penalty

 

 

o11.10 mentions something impermissible
o9.14 alternatives for captured male
Last week, Obanination’s hired Liar said that Obamination would attempt to suppress publication of any article about Jihadism deemed likely to provoke Muslims to attack our troops who are in harm’s way. That threat must be recognized as a direct infringement on the first amendment’s free speech clause.
Since the first Barbary War, this nation has been under attack or threat of attack from Muslims. We must be free to discuss that threat and its basis in Islamic scripture, exegesis, sunnah & jurisprudence. If we cannot fully and truthfully discuss those matters, our liberties will be lost sooner rather than later.
_________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
© Dajjal
+++++++++++++++++
Expose the Evil Core of Islam
(Title by Editor)
By Dajjal
Unlike Europe, America enshrines freedom of expression in our Constitution. We therefore have a right to expose the evil core of Islam. Before reading this excellent post, I read another at Jihad Watch, and replied as follows to another comment:
3:32. Say (O Muhammad): “Obey Allâh and the Messenger (Muhammad).” But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like the disbelievers.
33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
Islam commands obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe. Allah commanded Jihad under penalty of eternal damnation, local disbelievers first. Moe conquered the local Jewish settlements in the Hijaz.
How then can we be expected to respect and tolerate Islam? We must amend our organic law to state flatly: “No person enslaved by Allah and under orders therefrom to attack, rape, plunder and enslave those of us nearest them shall enter or reside within the borders of the United States of America and no Islamic institution shall remain or be established within those borders. The manifesting, practice & propagation of Islam are felonies punishable by de-naturalization and expulsion.” [Bold Text by Editor]
_________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
© Dajjal
+++++++++++++++++++
Islam is Inseverable
(Title by Editor)
By Dajjal
Compiled from Comments beginning January 25, 2015 at 4:53 PM
Comment to post ‘Islam: A Diseased Ideology
Islam cannot be contained, it is contagious, spread sexually and by military force as well as dawah. It can also be contracted voluntarily, from books and the internet.
“until they are all dead or they no longer seek to spread Islam by the sword and go forth to make war no more.”
Each Muslim can have up to four wives and keep them constantly knocked up. Due to the large population base, they breed faster than we could kill them with conventional weapons if we had the political will to exterminate them, which we do not.
“its leaders have stubbornly refused to modify, humanize and reform Islam and reconcile Islam with the modern, civilized world.”
Reformation: false expectation. It ain’t possible!!!
Reform Reform Islam??!!Islam!!
Published by Kab Ashraf
Calls for reforming Islam are generally oriented towards image, not substance. The speech by Egypt’s President Al-Sisi on new year’s day is no exception. I reproduce below… [You Can Read the Rest at the Scribed Link or view my valiant effort of the embed below.]

Reform Reform Islam??!!Islam!!

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/252004497/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

“problem within Islam that awaits rectifying”
Islam is the problem: it is mercenary and martial by design and beyond any hope of reform.
“why do the leaders of the United States and the European Union insist on bringing hundreds of thousands more Muslims into our nations, when the greater percentage of them seek our destruction and the end of our liberty?”
They are TRAITORS, not leaders; part of the problem, not the solution. They seek to destroy our system and replace it with Communism; they view Muslims as allies in that Communist revolution.
“irrational, angry Islamofascists”
Muslims; normative, nothing extraordinary.
“without a peep of protest squeaking out from any of the so-called “moderate” Muslims”
Muslims who abjure Islam sign their death warrants thereby. See Reliance O8.0–7.
”Islamic component of terrorism”
Islam is inseverable; terrorism is an intrinsic component which cannot be ignored, abandoned or removed. I refer doubters, deniers & dissenters to 2.85 and this list of ayat & ahadith: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:
See my comments on the original post. [Blog Editor: which is this post I believe.]
In the present case, I found several important points to drive home and took them on immediately and serially as I discovered them.
The part I missed was “diseased ideology”. Islam is not infected, distorted, perverted, twisted nor hijacked. It is Islam: contrived for Moe’s personal empowerment & emolument through the perpetuation of war. It is what it is by design. It cannot be cured, repaired, restored or rendered anodyne. For clues, turn in the Koran to Surah Al-Anfal (8) and in Khan’s translation of Bukhari, to The Book of Khumus (53).
_____________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Although the old ‘spellcheck’ tried to capitalize the first letter in some sentences I left those alone because they were within quotes. Text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
© Dajjal

Counterjihad Exposes Islam


Islam- What the West Needs to know

John R. Houk

© July 12, 2014

 

I am one of those guys that many would describe as a Counterjihad writer. Muslims and Leftists would look at the word “Counterjihad” and visions of an Islamophobic Muslim-hater enters into their mind. For Leftists and Muslims the word “Islamophobe” is meant to be a pejorative word to describe a person that should be reviled.

 

Here’s a thought that is sure to rile Leftists and Muslims: I do not view myself as a person that hates Muslims as people. It is true I do hate the religion that is known as Islam. As a Christian I am not a big fan of any religion that has an antichrist spirit about it. Islam specifically calls non-Muslims infidel (kafir) AND the Quran specifically singles out Jews and Christians as untrustworthy dudes worthy of death. It is true the Quran describes Jews and Christians as the “People of the Book” meaning the Bible. However, Islam teaches that the Holy writings of Jews and Christians are a corruption of Allah’s original message and hence an error that will lead to whatever Islam calls hell.

 

While Mohammed preached in Mecca before fleeing to Medina from persecuting polytheistic Arabs who were displeased about being told their pantheon of gods were non-existent idols and that only Allah is worthy of worship. Mo’s followers in the early Mecca days ONLY numbered in the hundreds at that time. In those days of Mecca preaching he thought of ways to entice two of the monotheistic religions Judaism and Christianity to join him as the true prophet of Allah (God). It is one of the reasons you will read of Old and New Testament Patriarchs, Prophets, Kings, Jesus and Mother Mary as true Muslims. In other words Mo stole the content of the Holy Bible and rewrote (or retold) them from a perspective that favors Arab superiority and indicating the Holy Bible had become corrupted from the truth. Unfortunately for Mo Jews were already pros at having kings and nations trying to change their Judaic faith typically in not a nice way. Christians had become the dominant religion of the Middle East by Mo’s early 700s; however they also experienced a bit of harassment from Romans trying stamp them out as not being Roman enough such as viewing Caesar-Emperor as a divine entity. So Mo had little success with getting adherents from Jews and Christians.

 

Thus as People of the Book, Jews and Christians were initially not to be recipients of the convert or die imperative. Polytheists on the other hand were to be completely reviled as idolaters worthy of death for not seeing the truth of submitting to Allah and the prophet Mohammed.

 

AS A CHRISTIAN I have a problem as being singled out along with Jews to be tolerated as long as I don’t practice my faith openly or don’t act out or say anything deemed insulting to Islam or Mo. The nail in the coffin of looking the other way to Islam is that religion’s treatment of the Lord Jesus Christ Himself.

 

Mo steals Jesus as one of the great prophets just before Mo’s revelation. Furthermore Mo denies the death on the Cross, burial and the Resurrection all occurred within three days. AND Mo tells his followers specifically that Jesus was just a man the human son of Mary and not the Son of God both equally man and equally God as the third person of the Trinity – Father, Son and Holy Spirit as three persons and ONE God simultaneously.

 

1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God,3 and every spirit that does not confess that[a] Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world.

 

4 You are of God, little children, and have overcome them, because He who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. 5 They are of the world. Therefore they speak as of the world, and the world hears them. 6 We are of God. He who knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. (1 John 4: 1-6 NKJV)

 

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. 4 In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend[a] it.

 

14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.

 

18 No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son,[a] who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him. (John 1: 1-5, 14, 18 NKJV)

 

30 I and My Father are one.”

 

Renewed Efforts to Stone Jesus

 

31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. 32 Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?”

 

33 The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.”

 

34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, “You are gods”’?[a] 35 If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), 36 do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’? 37 If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; 38 but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe[b] that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.”39 Therefore they sought again to seize Him, but He escaped out of their hand. (John 10: 30-39 NKJV)

 

13 By this we know that we abide in Him, and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit. 14 And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world. 15 Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God. (1 John 4: 13-15 NKJV)

 

8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart”[a] (that is, the word of faith which we preach): 9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.”[b] 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. 13 For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”[c] (Romans 8-13 NKJV)

 

30 And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; 31 but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. (John 20: 30 NKJV)

 

Now I realize a Muslim devoted to the Quran will quote suras in an attempt to show the Holy Bible is corrupted in the same way I quote the Bible to the Quran is an antichrist document. Yet here’s the thing to think about. The Lord Jesus of the Bible asks those who believe in Him to share and not coerce or threaten. If you freely and willing choose to believe that Jesus is the Christ (the anointed ONE of God) and the Son of God the new believer has life in the name of Jesus.

 

Islam does not mean peace as apologists and propagandists tell us non-Muslims. The true meaning of Islam is submission. The context of Islamic submission is the acceptance of the way of life as governed by Sharia Law. What this means for a non-Muslim none of the benefits Islam defines for its adherents is applicable to the non-Muslim. If you are lucky enough to be a part of the People of the Book there are a set rules that are acceptable for a non-Muslim to live under. PRIMARILY even as a non-Muslim you must submit or face severe consequences. This means especially in a Muslim dominated society the severe consequences is usually death. And even a Muslim nation’s authorities fail to enforce these consequences many interpret the Quran, Hadith and Sira (Sunna) to allow Muslims not associated with law enforcement to exact the consequence of death themselves.

 

That friends (and enemies) is the difference between “believe” and “submit”. I will never submit to the directives of Islam.

 

I have to go back to the pejorative meant term of Islamophobe. My Christian faith precludes me to hate people whether believing Christians or non-believers in the Risen Savior. Admittedly my particular personality places me in a position that challenges me to prevent being angry at unjust people. I too often find myself in the position of having to repent from not nice thoughts I may place into unseemly words. I pretty much have overcome the urge to express violence toward ideological idiots and antichrist-minded individuals. In writing this full disclosure I rarely hold back in denouncing Left Wing ideologies, overtly antichrist religious individuals and venom spewing antichrist atheists. BUT I will never make plans to harm individuals or groups of people for their open thoughts. On the other hand I am a firm believer in self-defense.  I will not be a doormat rug in which individuals violently stomp me down and I will call for duly representative authorities to protect the public good from violent individuals or groups of peoples. God has ordained authorities to exist to protect law abiding Christians.

 

1 Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. 4 For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. 5 Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience’ sake. 6 For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God’s ministers attending continually to this very thing. 7 Render therefore to all their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor. (Romans 13: 1-7 NKJV)

 

The term Islamophobe used as a pejorative although accepted today is actually greatly misused. In breaking the word down Islam refers to the religion and phobe comes from phobia. Phobia means fear. Thus Islamophobia really means an unnatural fear of Islam.

 

1. I do not fear the religion of Islam, I loathe it.

 

2. Neither do I have an unnatural fear of the adherents of Islam i.e. Muslims. Rather I feel sorry for them for being blinded by an antichrist spirit and thus pray for the eyes of their understanding become enlightened.

 

3. I have no problem with defending myself from adherents of Islam when they embark in acting nutso-crazy.

 

4. I have no problem with the ordained authorities to use lethal force against the perpetrators of violence and the protectors of the violent whether it be civil police or the duly trained military.

 

Points three and four will undoubtedly be twisted by Leftists and Muslim apologists will harangue me for being an unchristian hypocrite. I do disagree. I do believe in the principle of turning the other cheek and the Christian Golden Rule of doing for others as you would have them do for you. Turning the other cheek does not mean being an unwilling target for violence when God has ordained the authorities of a government exist by the Hand of God to protect me with the rule of law. Turning the other cheek has is designed for insults and individuals that desire to brawl. Insults are provocative and brawling indicates participating in a heated argument between an individual and/or individuals. Turning the other cheek does not mean putting yourself in a position to be a victim of crime, terrorism and war between nations.

 

Another accusation delivered by Leftists and Muslim apologists is the documented history of nations that have called themselves Christian perpetrating atrocities in the name of Christ. Trust me there are plenty of examples of atrocities committed in the name of Christ. The two most common by Muslim apologists seem to be the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition.

 

History shows the Crusades being initiated by Pope Urban II under the reasoning that Muslims were attacking Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land and Byzantine Emperor Alexius I Comnenus asked the Pope for help. The Muslim Seljuk Turks had conquered the Levant and Anatolia away from the Byzantine Empire and was threatening Constantinople. The city built and named by Constantine that ended Roman civil wars and made Christianity the State Church after hundreds of years of Roman persecution of Christians. The Europeans that cared realized that Constantinople was a block to Muslim conquest invasions to Europe that would end Medieval Christian culture of the time.

 

The pride problem the Byzantine emperor faced is that Constantine was the leader of the Eastern (Greek) Orthodox Church which split from the Latin Churches of Europe largely over the issue of Ecclesiastical primacy between Latin and Greek Churches (See HERE and HERE). Frankly I believe Urban II was less interested in aiding Emperor Alexis I Comnenus and more interested in preventing Muslim lunatics from ending Christendom in Europe.

 

So Pope Urban II gave one of the most famous (or infamous depending on perspective) sermons of the Medieval Church inspiring European Nobleman from typically warring kingdoms (but French leadership) to unite and march to deliver Byzantine and the Holy Land from Saracen (Muslim) control.

 

There is currently a bit of scholar war going on pertaining to the actual historical motives of the Crusades but that is simply to weighty to address here. For the sake of clarification I’m on the side that Muslim conquest and raiding was more responsible than the politically correct historians that distort history to make it appear the Crusaders were marauders purely interested in unprovoked booty and land conquest.

 

No matter the perspective scholars promote there is no getting around the facts that all the Crusader incursions into the Holy Land was followed by the bloody slaughtering of Muslims, Jews and even occasionally Byzantine Greek Orthodox Christians. The atrocities occurred in the name of Jesus. BUT should we blame the Biblical theology pertaining to Jesus Christ as a part of Christian doctrine toward non-Christians? NOT AT ALL!

 

The entire New Testament is about sharing the Love of God to humanity to choose freely to be in Christ or reject Christ. There is NO WHERE in the New Testament that calls for the death or execution of non-believers in Christ. The treatment of rejection I think is best by said by the Son of God Jesus Christ:

 

15 that whoever believes in Him should not perish but[a] have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

 

18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21 But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.” (John 3: 15-21 NKJV)

 

51 Now it came to pass, when the time had come for Him to be received up, that He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem, 52 and sent messengers before His face. And as they went, they entered a village of the Samaritans, to prepare for Him. 53 But they did not receive Him, because His face was set for the journey to Jerusalem. 54 And when His disciples James and John saw this, they said, “Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?”[a]

 

55 But He turned and rebuked them,[b] and said, “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. 56 For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.[c] And they went to another village. (Luke 9: 51-56 NKJV)

 

Jesus did not favor destroying the lives of humanity that rejected Him. Contrast Jesus with the words of Mohammed for those who rejected him:

 

191 And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers.

 

192 But if they desist, then lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

 

193 And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.  (Quran 2:191-193 – Pickthal)

 

56 As for those who disbelieve I shall chastise them with a heavy chastisement in the world and the Hereafter; and they will have no helpers. (Quran 3:56 – Pickthal)

 

89 They long that ye should disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level (with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor helper from among them, (Quran 4:89 – Pickthal)

 

12 When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. (Quran 8:12 – Shakir)

 

29 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (Quran 9:29 – Yusafali)

 

Well you get the idea. Mo is fairly intolerable to people who deny Allah and his antichrist prophet Mohammed. (Hat Tip: The Religion of Peace)

 

The next most cited accusation against Christianity is the Reconquista of Spain and the Spanish Inquisition. The Reconquista lasted 700 years with Isabella and Ferdinand delivering the final blows around 1492. Yes the violence and atrocity toward Jews and Muslims was horrendous. BUT again no, it is not what Jesus commanded to do. The reassertion of the Catholic Church over the land conquered by invading Muslims was just as brutal as that of the Muslims. The greater tragedy is that the Catholic Christians exacted some ethnic cleansing to rid Spain of the Jewish and Muslim presence.

 

The biggest losers in discrimination against non-Christians were definitely the Jews. After Muslims faced expulsion from recaptured land by Christian leaders, the Muslims ultimately had a land to fall back on for an Islamic way of life. Unfortunately for the Jews, the losing of a few religious related rebellions against the Romans between roughly 66 AD and 135 AD. Romans grew weary of suppressing the Jewish national identity in their own homeland; hence the Romans expelled the Jews. Thus the Jews were without their God Promised homeland until they were restored in 1948 AD.

 

Nations that called themselves definitely were not innocent of violence and atrocities. BUT I need to reiterate, atrocities committed in the name of Christ was absolutely contrary to Christian Scriptures.

 

On the other hand if you look at the atrocities committed in the name of Allah and his prophet Mohammed were executed directly as a result of the writings considered holy in the Quran, Hadith and Sira (and Sunnah a part of the Sira).

 

As far as religious atrocities go, Islam far outstrips all atrocities committed by any other religions that have had periods of intolerance. AND as far as the world’s major religions goes, Islam is the only religion that demands to make all other non-Muslim cultures and non-Muslim religions extinct:

 

These figures are a rough estimate of the death of non-Muslims by the political act of jihad.

 

 

This gives a rough estimate of 270 million killed by jihad. (Bold-Underlined emphasis is mine – Tears of Jihad; By Bill Warner; Political Islam; 3/3/08)

 

This is one of those posts in which my meandering thoughts could me a badly written unpublished book. I think you get the point. Islam as a whole is an antichrist religion bent on intolerant domination forcing society to mold its every action under the theo-political doctrine of Islam and Sharia Law. Islam is evil. Non-Muslims and Islamic adherents who do not see this are blinded be the Deceiver Christians call Satan.

 

I have to be honest. This post actually was to be an introduction to a short Bill Warner video posted on Political Islam entitled “Good Muslim, Bad Muslim” posted three days ago. The video is only four minutes and fifteen seconds long. The mini-lecture is there questions about a Moderate Muslim and a Radical Muslim or perhaps your nice Muslim friend as compared to the Muslim that wants to chop your head off for being a kafir.

 

Bill is sure to irritate Leftists, Muslim Apologists and Muslims who consider themselves law abiding citizens of the USA. Bill simply tells it like it is according to Islam’s own considered holy writings.

 

Astonishingly Bill Warner pulls out one nice Muslim’s name that is a loyal American, a Medical Doctor, who served time in the U.S. Navy and actively is one of the few Muslims of note that denounce Radical Islam as evil – M. Zuhdi Jasser MD. It is people like Dr. Jasser that I have wavered back and forth over years that Islam has a shot of abandoning the Mohammed of Medina and emphasize the Mohammed of Mecca before he went nuts with power. Then Bill Warner brings me back to the belief that Islam is unredeemable as a religion of peace and tolerance.

 

JRH 7/12/14

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

Good Muslim, Bad Person

 

By Bill Warner

July 9, 2014

Political Islam

 

A good Muslim is one who practices Islam. Since there is no unmitigated good in Islam for the Kafir, it follows that someone who practices Islam has no unmitigated good for the Kafir. There are good people who call themselves Muslims, but their goodness comes from something other than Islam.

 

VIDEO: Good Muslim, Bad Person

 

Published by Bill Warner

Published: Jul 8, 2014

 

_________________________________

Counterjihad Exposes Islam

John R. Houk

© July 12, 2014

_____________________________

Good Muslim, Bad Person

 

copyright (c) CSPI, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.

www.politicalislam.com

Look Out! The Muslim Red Coats are COMING!



Screen Capture Vimeo Video - Unholy War - British Muslims who want to Murder Christians

John R. Houk

© June 16, 2014

 

On June 1st I posted a Shamim Masih submission entitled “New Ideas, New Players”.

 

Shamim’s report exposed how badly Pakistan Muslims treated Pakistan Christians. Here is a short excerpt from the report to give you a snapshot of the brutality Christians experience at the hands of Muslims:

 

The worst is that their children, particularly young girls are the targets of their violence. Girls are kidnapped, raped and forced to convert to Islam. Young girls that refuse to convert and marry are beaten, physically tortured and either killed or simply raped and left to die naked in the wilderness. It is unfortunate that Christians do not have access to the legal system in Pakistan. Police arrest them for any crime they are accused of and they are really only accused of one crime: blasphemy, which carries an automatic death sentences. Judges in Pakistan know that if they ever find a Christian innocent of blasphemy that the judge and his family will be murdered.  …

 

I shared this at several Counterjihad exposé groups on Facebook. I wish I could remember a particular group that Dale G. Brown left a very simple link as a comment. I copied the link and emailed it to myself failing to include the Facebook link. Oops.

 

The link was to a Vimeo video that I tried without luck to find the carbon copy on Youtube. The reasoning is that all the blogs I post on makes Youtube embedding quite easy. At least one of my blogs only allows me to post Youtube but I will give it a shot just in case that blog location on WordPress now allows it. (It may be the case that I don’t know the trick to post Vimeo videos there.)

 

The Vimeo video is entitled “Dispatches – Unholy War – British Muslims who want to Murder Christians”. The title is fairly self-explanatory. Muslims in Britain have become numerous enough that have demanded the government to recognize Sharia Law and British Muslims have been dodging hate-crime and hate-speech crimes consistently enough that many Brits are beginning to wake up that Multiculturalism has failed in ensuring civil harmony.

 

American Leftists have not yet learned this lesson. Although Americans still have a greater degree of freedom in our First Amendment Rights then do the Brits or the Europeans for that matter, Leftists in the USA have gone to great lengths to accommodate Islamic apologists and activists in the name of Diverse Multiculturalism. These Islamic Supremacists are demanding government recognition of Sharia Law for Muslims even though that Muslim theopoliticalJurisprudence for the most part is unconstitutional especially under the enforcement of the First Amendment.

 

I’ll make the attempt to embed this video but if it doesn’t take watch on this link: https://vimeo.com/34627153

 

Here is the Vimeo summary found underneath the video:

 

Defend our Freedom! ACT NOW! Join us at Stop Islamization of the world! siotw.org/

 

When muslims convert to Christianity, muslim cult followers go temporary insane and wish to murder the apostate. Full video report on the dangers and intimidation faced by former Muslims who have converted to Christianity in Britain. Looks at how hundreds of such converts have to worship in secret and how there has been silence on the subject from Muslim and Christian leaders. Conversion is viewed within Islam as apostacy, punishable by death in some Islamic countries and advocated by radical Islamic groups.

 

JRH 6/16/14

Please Support NCCR

_______________________________

Look Out! The Muslim Red Coats are COMING!

John R. Houk

© June 16, 2014

_____________________________

Dispatches – Unholy War – British Muslims who want to Murder Christians

 

From raskolnikov

January 5, 2012 3:10 PM

 

From the SIOTW About IslamPage

 

Islam is NOT a religion of peace. By its nature Islam is radical, it has no shades.

Most people are simply unaware that Islam is NOT just another religion but a totalitarian political cult-like ideology, which compels its followers into blind obedience, teaches intolerance, brutality and locks all Muslims and non-Muslims in a struggle deriving directly from the 7th century nomadic, predatory, Bedouin culture.

Islam means “submission” to the will of Allah and the teachings as depicted in the Qur’an which include jihad – the genocidal slaughter of infidels by the sword, killing by beheading, intolerance of other religions, as well as forcing submission to Islam. The ultimate goal of jihad is the domination of Islam over the entire world.

In Islam, one is considered “moderate” if one supports the goals of jihad, if not the tactics. Those who totally reject the violent teachings of Islam are considered apostates of Islam and as such, are condemned to death. Moderate Muslims are peaceful “in spite of Islam,” not because of it. The “religion of peace” is a concept the West is eager to embrace – all in the name of political correctness – refusing to believe that a major world religion poses such a devastating threat to humanity.

This site is designed to show you the dark side of Islam, the REAL Islam that the West does not want you to see. The Islam that Western media refuse to show you. The Islam that is slowly but surely changing the West. You may feel uncomfortable looking at this site. You should. You will feel anger and disgust that our leaders do not understand Islam when it comes to the motives that drive our enemies to commit suicide for their ideology.

Look at the photos, watch the videos, most of which come right out of the Muslim world, a world that glorifies death and destruction of all that is not Islamic. Understand that elements of Sharia law are creeping into our daily lives under shelter of religious freedom. Listen and learn about the real Islam, then tell your family and friends.

Do not fear being labeled an ‘Islamophobe.’ Winston Churchill was once accused of being a ‘Naziphobe.’