The Witting and/or Unwitting Muslim Lie


John R. Houk

© January 13, 2019

A Muslim commenter on my NCCR blog calling him/herself The Wannabe, disagrees with my portrayal of Islam as an Antichrist and violent religion. The Wannabe began a Muslim Apologist series of comments to a 3/8/16 post entitled, “We Don’t Worship the Same God”. The Wannabe began his comments on January 5, 2019:

 

The Wannabe says:

January 5, 2019 at 5:35 AM

 

behold how perverted they [Christians] are!” . I would like you to provide specifics of this verse, please.

 

I called out The Wannabe on Christians being perverted with this response:

 

oneway2day says:

January 7, 2019 at 10:20 AM

 

In the Quran, any religious belief other than Islam is evil. Christians believe the same about their faith. The difference: Muslims ordered by Quran to kill unbelievers; Christians are taught Biblically to pray for their enemies & those who despitefully abuse you. Hmm … Which faith is perverse?

 

To which The Wannabe tried to be conciliatory yet firm in the defense of Islam:

 

The Wannabe says:

January 10, 2019 at 11:55 PM

 

I understand your opinion. I would feel the same too. Except, your source of information is wronged. Our Prophet (pbuh) was taught to be patient to all the Kuffar (disbelievers). They threw rocks at him while praying. He never got angry, the most angry he ever was, he kept silent. Killing is one of the biggest sins in Islam. How can you say we have been taught, let alone ORDERED to kill disbelievers, that too, by the Holy Qur’an? Also, I would like to know which specific line from which specific chapter of the Book you have taken the reference of “perverted religion” from.

 

Islam, the religion of peace?

 

“Kill them [unbelievers] wherever you find them… And fight them until there is no more unbelief and worship is for Allah alone” (Quran 2:191-193).

 

“Strike off their heads and strike from them every fingertip” (Quran 8:12).

 

“Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties; in exchange for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they slay and are slain” (Quran 9:111).

 

“Truly Allah loves those who fight in His cause in battle array…” (Quran 61:4)

 

“The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah” (Sahih Muslim 1:33).

 

Surahs excerpted (DOES ISLAM PROMOTE VIOLENCE OR IS IT “A RELIGION OF PEACE?” By Doug Ponder; Christianity.com; 2/1/15)

 

MORE:

 

Now when ye meet in battle those who disbelieve, then it is smiting of the necks until, when ye have routed them, then making fast of bonds; and afterward either grace or ransom till the war lay down its burdens. That (is the ordinance). And if Allah willed He could have punished them (without you) but (thus it is ordained) that He may try some of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He rendereth not their actions vain (Surah 47:4, emp. added).

Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors. And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. But if they desist, then lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers. The forbidden month for the forbidden month, and forbidden things in retaliation. And one who attacketh you, attack him in like manner as he attacked you. Observe your duty to Allah, and know that Allah is with those who ward off (evil) (Surah 2:190-194, emp. added).

Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that ye hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that ye love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, ye know not. They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel his people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing. And they will not cease from fighting against you till they have made you renegades from your religion, if they can (Surah 2:216-217, emp. added).

Freedom from obligation (is proclaimed) from Allah and His messenger toward those of the idolaters with whom ye made a treaty: Travel freely in the land four months, and know that ye cannot escape Allah and that Allah will confound the disbelievers (in His guidance). And a proclamation from Allah and His messenger to all men on the day of the Greater Pilgrimage that Allah is free from obligation to the idolaters, and (so is) His messenger. So, if ye repent, it will be better for you; but if ye are averse, then know that ye cannot escape Allah. Give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who disbelieve. Excepting those of the idolaters with whom ye (Muslims) have a treaty, and who have since abated nothing of your right nor have supported anyone against you. (As for these), fulfill their treaty to them till their term. Lo! Allah loveth those who keep their duty (unto Him). Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful (Surah 9:1-5, emp. added).

 

Additional allusions to warfare in the Quran are seen in the surah, “The Spoils,” dated in the second year of the Hijrah (A.D. 623), within a month after the Battle of Badr:

 

And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah…. If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them…. And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others beside them whom ye know not…. O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty stedfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred stedfast they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence…. It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise. Had it not been for an ordinance of Allah which had gone before, an awful doom had come upon you on account of what ye took. Now enjoy what ye have won, as lawful and good, and keep your duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful (Surah 8:39,57,59-60,65,67-69, emp. added; cf. 33:26).

 

… No wonder a substantial number of Muslims manifest a maniacal, reckless abandon in their willingness to die by sacrificing their lives in order to kill as many “infidels” (especially Israelis and Americans) as possible. They have read the following:

 

Now when ye meet in battle those who disbelieve, then it is smiting of the necks…. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He rendereth not their actions vain. He will guide them and improve their state, and bring them in unto the Garden[Paradise—DM] which He hath made known to them (Surah 47:4-6, emp. added).

O ye who believe! Be not as those who disbelieved and said of their brethren who went abroad in the land or were fighting in the field: If they had been (here) with us they would not have died or been killed…. And what though ye be slain in Allah’s way or die therein? Surely pardon from Allah and mercy are better than all that they amass. What though ye be slain or die, when unto Allah ye are gathered?…. So those who…fought and were slain, verily I shall remit their evil deeds from them and verily I shall bring them into Gardens underneath which rivers flow—a reward from Allah (Surah 3:156-158,195, emp. added).

 

Even if the vast majority of Muslims in the world reject violence and refrain from terrorist activity (which would appear to be the case), it is still a fact that the Quran (as well as the example of Muhammad himself) endorses the advancement of Islam through physical force. … (Violence and the Quran; by Dave Miller, Ph.D.; Apologetics Press; © 2005 Apologetics Press, Inc.)

 

Then go to TheReligionOfPeace.com for a list of 109 Surahs of wanton violence in the Quran all to promote the supremacy (NOT!) of Islam including commentary answering Muslim Apologists that utilize deceptive justifications:

 

Does the Quran really contain over a hundred verses that sanction violence?

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that speak of war with nonbelievers, usually on the basis of their status as non-Muslims. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

 

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, most verses of violence in the Quran are open-ended, meaning that they are not necessarily restrained by historical context contained in the surrounding text (although many Muslims choose to think of them that way). They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran.

 

The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God. Most contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book’s call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Islam’s apologists cater to these preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally don’t stand up to scrutiny.  Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.

 

 

Quran

 

Quran (2:244) – “Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (2:216) – Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot. (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (4:74) – “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.” The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”

Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward ” This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (4:101) – “And when you (Muslims) travel in the land, there is no sin on you if you shorten your Salat (prayer) if you fear that the disbelievers may attack you, verily, the disbelievers are ever unto you open enemies.  Mere disbelief makes one an “open” enemy of Muslims.

Quran (4:104) – “And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”(See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (8:12) – “(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels… “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle, given that it both followed and preceded confrontations in which non-Muslims were killed by Muslims.  The targets of violence are “those who disbelieve” – further defined in the next verse (13) as those who “defy and disobey Allah.” Nothing is said about self-defense.  In fact, the verses in sura 8 were narrated shortly after a battle provoked by Muhammad, who had been trying to attack a lightly-armed caravan to steal goods belonging to other people.  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (8:15) – “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”

Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah” Some translations interpret “fitna” as “persecution”, but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during the pilgrimage. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there – but not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, as it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah”, meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that “Allah must have no rivals.”(See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

Quran (8:67) – “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…

Quran (8:59-60) – “And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.” As Ibn Kathir puts it in his tafsir on this passage, “Allah commands Muslims to prepare for war against disbelievers, as much as possible, according to affordability and availability.” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (8:65) – “O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight…”

Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence at the time of Muhammad was to convert to Islam: prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion’s Five Pillars. The popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.  (See also: Response to Apologists)

[Note: The verse says to fight unbelievers “wherever you find them“. Even if the context is a time of battle (which it was not) the reading appears to sanction attacks against those “unbelievers” who are not on the battlefield.  In 2016, the Islamic State referred to this verse in urging the faithful to commit terror attacks: Allah did not only command the ‘fighting’ of disbelievers, as if to say He only wants us to conduct frontline operations against them. Rather, He has also ordered that they be slain wherever they may be – on or off the battlefield. (source)]

Quran (9:14) – “Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “heals” the hearts of Muslims.

Quran (9:20) – “Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” The Arabic word interpreted as “striving” in this verse is the same root as “Jihad”. The context is obviously holy war.

Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has instructed them to make Islam “superior over all religions.” This chapter was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths. (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:38-39) – “O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.” This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.  The verse also links physical fighting to the “cause of Allah” (or “way of Allah”). (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:41) – “Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows (9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them” This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and – in this case – on Christian soil, according to the historians).  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:73) – “O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.” Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It explains why today’s devout Muslims generally have little regard for those outside the faith.  The inclusion of “hypocrites” (non-practicing) within the verse also contradicts the apologist’s defense that the targets of hate and hostility are wartime foes, since there was never an opposing army made up of non-religious Muslims in Muhammad’s time.  (See also Games Muslims Play: Terrorists Can’t Be Muslim Because They Kill Muslims for the role this verse plays in Islam’s perpetual internal conflicts).   (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:88) – “But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:111) – “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” How does the Quran define a true believer?  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (9:123) – “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (17:16) – “And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction.” Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is “utter destruction.” (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

Quran (18:65-81) – This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (v.74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would “grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son. [Note: This parable along with verse 58:22 is a major reason that honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.12).] (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (21:44) – “…See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?” 

Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness with it.” – The root for Jihad is used twice in this verse – although it may not have been referring to Holy War when narrated, since it was prior to the hijra at Mecca.  The “it” at the end is thought to mean the Quran.  Thus the verse may have originally meant a non-violent resistance to the ‘unbelievers.’  Obviously, this changed with the hijra.  ‘Jihad’ after this is almost exclusively within a violent context.  The enemy is always defined as people, rather than ideas.

Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease (evil desire for adultery, etc.), and those who spread false news among the people in Al-Madinah, cease not, We shall certainly let you overpower them, then they will not be able to stay in it as your neighbors but a little while Accursed, wherever found, they shall be seized and killed with a (terrible) slaughter.” This passage sanctions slaughter (rendered as “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators – those who speak out against Islam. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out, which is what today’s terrorists do.

Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet (fighting Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)… If it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.” Holy war is to be pursued against those who reject Allah. The unbelievers are to be killed and wounded.  Survivors are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.  (See also: 47:4 for more context)  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,” (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (48:17) – “There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ If so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

Quran (48:29) – “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves” Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that two very distinct standards are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for ‘hard’ or ‘ruthless’ in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as ‘painful’ or severe’ to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:1040:46 and 50:26..

Quran (61:4) – “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His cause” Religion of Peace, indeed!  The verse explicitly refers to “rows” or “battle array,” meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9), which defines the “cause”: “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.” (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.  (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (61:10-12) – “O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of’Adn- Eternity [‘Adn(Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.” This verse refers to physical battle waged to make Islam victorious over other religions (see verse 9). It uses the Arabic root for the word Jihad.

Quran (66:9) – “O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end.” The root word of “Jihad” is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include “hypocrites” – those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.   (See also: Response to Apologists)

Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”(Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to “fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you” leading some to claim that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families.  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah’s rule (ie. Muslim conquest).  The use of the word “persecution” by some Muslim translators is disingenuous – the actual Arabic words for persecution (idtihad) – and oppression are not used instead of fitna.  Fitna can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  A strict translation is ‘sedition,’ meaning rebellion against authority (the authority being Allah).  This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned “until religion is for Allah” – ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.  [Editor’s note: these notes have been modified slightly after a critic misinterpreted our language. Verse 193 plainly says that ‘fighting’ is sanctioned even if the fitna ‘ceases’.  This is about religious order, not real persecution.] (See also: Response to Apologists)

Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org. (Violence; TheReligionOfPeace.com [TROP]; ©2002 – 2018 Site developed by TheReligionofPeace.Com) 

 

AND THAT IS AN INCOMPLETE LIST because you can read, TROP directs you to AnsweringIslam.org for more inherently violent Surahs in the Quran.

 

AND this cross post of TROP’s list on “Violence” is only an excerpt. The next subheading of the “Violence” post is “Hadith and Sira” on perpetuating Islamic violence.

 

One thing people are unaware concerning the Quran (even many Muslims). Muhammad’s words during the Mecca preaching BEFORE the Hegira (when Mo fled Mecca in fear of non-Muslim Arab animosity toward Mo’s criticism of polytheism) and Muhammad’s in the Quran DURING Medina and the CONQUEST of Mecca from Medina.

 

The Quran of Mecca is peace. The Quran of Medina (and return to Mecca) is about hate and kill Muhammad’s perceived enemies in the name of the moon-deity retooled as monotheistic Allah. A great summary of the Mecca/Medina Quran divide is from the pseudonymous Bill Warner:

 

In Mecca, the texts have nothing to say about jihad. So in Mecca we have a peaceful Islam, but in Medina we have violence. Both the Sira and Hadith confirm the peaceful nature of Islam in Mecca and its unlimited violence in Medina. (A Picture of Duality; by Bill Warner; Political Islam; 4/29/11)

 

Two key terms to understand about Muslim Apologists promoting Islam as a Religion of Peace: Duality and Abrogation. (See Also: a) Statistical Islam Part 5 of 9 – Abrogation and Dualism b) The Doctrine of Deceit)

 

Islamic duality allows contradicting concepts to both be correct and expounded authoritatively according to the circumstance of the occasion. BUT when push comes to shove, the Islamic ideology of Abrogation comes into play.

 

Here is the simplest to understand explanation of Abrogation: Muhammad’s Quranic words have a most valid component when contradictions are involved. Validity is measured by when Muhammad said something not what he said. All of Muhammad’s earliest sayings can be overruled by the most recent sayings. In other words, the peace/Mecca Quran is overridden by the violent/Medina Quran.

 

There is a problem in deciphering when the Mecca/Quran and the Medina/Quran are spoken. Why? The Quran is not put together in chronological order. The Quran is arranged by longest Surah to shortest Surah regardless of where and when the origin is. WikiIslam has arranged a chronological order comparing to the traditional (longest to shortest) that help you view what can be proclaimed abrogated – HERE.

Ergo, when The Wannabe tells you, “Our Prophet (pbuh) was taught to be patient to all the Kuffar (disbelievers).” He/she is wittingly or unwittingly (depending on the knowledge of the Islamic principles of Duality and Abrogation) IS LYING!

 

JRH 1/13/19

 Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

The Major Vulnerability of Islam


Elsa shows optimism in human nature relating Islam. She believes the more non-Muslims are educated into the true facts relating to Islamic history – including the actions of its self-proclaimed prophet, people will understand Islam ideology is unacceptable and incapable of merging into Western Culture.

 

I pray she is correct, but I do have doubts. What about you? In essence, the observed vulnerability of Islam is TRUTH.

 

JRH 8/1/18

Please Support NCCR

***********************

The Major Vulnerability of Islam

 

By Elsa Schieder

Sent July 29, 2018, 12:42 PM

Sent Via World Truth Summit

Original Post: Elsa’s Blog

 

I’ve been wondering, what is the Achilles’ heel of Islam in the West? What is its major vulnerability? 

 

 

Everything has vulnerable points. But until you know that Achilles’ vulnerable point is his heel, you’re not likely to attack it.

It’s clear that Islam very much cares to maintain the image of Islam-religion-of-peace, which it has gone to great pains to project to non-Islamics in the West. Otherwise why would Islamic forces (OIC, CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood, etc., etc.) have invested such an enormous amount of money and energy into:

– blocking and criminalizing freedom of speech about Islam via the many hate laws and blasphemy laws throughout the West;

– creating an environment in which many people are hit by negative consequences if they speak out – loss of job, loss of friends, loss of reputation, law suits, jail (just think of Tommy Robinson);

– purchasing text book publishing houses in the West and rewriting textbooks so the content on Islam becomes major and positive;

– trotting out the story of “it was mental illness” every time there is a jihad murder spree.

It is clearly important to Islam to be seen, overtly anyway, as benign, by most non-Islamics in non-Islamic countries.

Yet most Islamic organizations have not worked to stop violence done in the name of Islam, including in the West. Instead, for instance, Saudi Arabia has openly promoted and exported very traditional Islam.

So it also seems to matter to most Islamic forces that non-Islamics in the West simultaneously experience Islam as dangerous. Maybe all the people working to spread the truth about Islam have in fact helped Islam be experienced as dangerous. Fear helps keep people in line.

My image is of a huge veiled dancer, supposedly a beauty, veils swirling so they reveal glimpses, to all, of hairy legs and who knows what else. By now, millions of people are tugging at the veils, so that ever more of what’s underneath becomes visible.

It becomes tricky, keeping some balance between the main image and the unsavory glimpses, especially as ever people know Islamic ideology and talk about it. Each person who knows moves aside tiny bits of the veil.

Of course at some point there is a tipping point. The indoctrination about Islam as a religion of peace stops working, by and large. The reality of Islam becomes visible to too many people. Currently we have the proliferation, in Europe and Australia, of political parties against Islamization and sometimes against Islam – parties labeled by the mainstream as ultra right wing, racist and even Nazi, to keep as many people away from them for as long as possible.

Yet the breakthrough is inevitable. It’s just a question of when, how soon, and how fully the shift to reality perception of Islam is made.

There’s also the question of what will the outcome be.

What’s the vulnerable point, the Achilles’ heel, for Islam? One vulnerability is the possibility of being seen early, so that, for instance, Islamic incoming is stopped before there is a considerable Islamic population. That has happened in only a few eastern European countries.

It’s my sense that another vulnerable point is during the shift in perception. It’s like when an animal with an exoskeleton molts. No shell, for a time. In this case, no veil.

My sense is also that, the quicker the shift, the more likely there can be a relatively non-violent resolution in favor of human rights and freedoms, for the re-establishment of freedom of speech and good thinking skills.

That makes our efforts ever more important, each of us doing what we can to help with the shift – millions of us each tugging aside more and more of the veil.

Part of the impact will be on things like whom we vote for, the education about Islam in the schools, the stories about the mental health of jihadis.

Another part of the impact will be on Islamics. As our knowledge of their ideology changes, as ever more non-Islamics are aware of Islamic ideology, aware of Islamic history, aware of the story of Mohammed. Islamics will know, when we look at them, that the ideology of their religion and the life of Mohammed, are generally known. There will be a powerful group energy in our gaze. Each of us will know we’re not alone. And they will know they are being seen, as people adhering to an ideology that aims to destroy Western human rights and freedoms. Quite a shift, I’d say.

I wonder, is the core vulnerability of Islam, that Islamics will know their religion is accurately seen? Not noble. Not savory. Not peaceful. Calling for the subjugation and killing of non-Islamics.

What will this do to the many Islamics who are used to denying or ignoring the reality of Islamic ideology, who might even be ashamed of much of it?

Will Islam be drained of a considerable portion of its energy?

Just think of the response of most Germans and Austrians after World War II, when the reality of the Holocaust became known. Generations of people feeling shame.

Anyway, I am sure that the major Islamic organizations are aware of the impending tipping point. 

We will see how things go.

As always, all the best to all who care and dare,

Elsa

 

PS. This is online at:
http://elsasblog.com/180729-islam-achilles-heel.html

By the way, re the tipping point in the perception of Islam, the kids’ video, Islam – Who, What, How, can be very helpful. It tells the truth in a simple fun sweet non-confrontational manner. And it tells it to children, to inoculate them against indoctrination, so they won’t have to undo brainwashing. If you haven’t seen it, join the 165,000 peoplewho have. And please keep sharing.
http://livefreedom.net/islam-who-what-how.html

PPPS. It’s clear that the rights movements have been hijacked, from movements for the rights of people who very obviously do not have equal rights, to movements like Black Thugs Matter. Now someone has written that “Hyper-liberalism is liberalism turned inside out and upside down.” In other words, the same hijacking has happened to liberalism. Of course. The hijacking is everywhere. It’s clearly more than time to take back the rights movements! Here’s the article on the hijacking of liberalism:
https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/john-gray-hyper-liberalism-liberty/

 

PPPPS. In case you’re worried about polar bears:

 

Billboard- Stop Global Warming Hype

 

The info is from http://cfact.org:

For lots more, come explore
http://elsasblog.com
and
http://ElsasEmporium.com

 

*Religion France 38 incidents* *France incidents…


France - Michael Lederman photo

Google+ friend Steven Corda forward some info compiled by Michael Lederman on Islam in France. The picture painted is such that Islam is in no way a moderate religion. The practice of Islam is exactly what claimed to be holy books tell its readers. Islam is all about submission and COMPELLING people to become Muslims or to admit that Islam is superior and be ready for the Islamic ordained consequences for insulting Islamic Supremacism.

 

Thanks to Muslim-American organizations such as CAIR, the non-Muslim American majority may soon face the same societal chaos of violence perpetrated by Islamic Supremacist thinking which is currently plaguing France.

 

JRH 4/23/14

Please Support NCCR

******************************

*Religion France 38 incidents* *France incidents…

 

Sent Privately via Steven Corda

Sent: April 22, 2014 12:35 AM

Google+

 

 

Michael Lederman originally shared:

 

Religion France 38 incidents

France incidents of Muslim on Non-Muslim incidents of violence and crime as reported by Major Media it is estimated that is this less than 1% of all incidents.

Full Report Here: http://goo.gl/Gg5M8Y

 

France

A public high school philosophy teacher [has] gone into hiding under police protection after receiving a series of death threats, including one diffused on a radical Islamist online forum

Muslims riot over a reading of a 265-year-old play by Voltaire. Youths set fire to car and garbage cans

Attackers Ram Burning Car Into Synagogue

Three Jewish Teens Attacked And Injured By Muslim Immigrants

Parisian Jew Kidnapped By Muslims, Savagely Tortured, Stabbed And Killed

French Muslims Wage ‘Intifada’ On Police, Injuring On Average 14 Officers Each Day

Anti-Semitic Attack On Teenage Girl In Paris

Gang that Tortured & Murdered Jew, Yell’s ‘Allahu Akbar’ at Victim’s Family

Police Once Again Under Attack By Firebomb Wielding North African Muslim Immigrants on Sunday

30 Muslim Youths set passenger bus alight in Paris & Stone Firefighters

Lebanese-born Canadian Arrested in Connection With Paris Synagogue Blast Which Killed 4

Jewish Woman Brutalized by Muslim Arabs in France

French Rabbi Attacked And Hospitalized

French Muslims Jailed for Kidnap, Torture & Murder of Young Jewish Man

Again, Muslims Riot For Third Consecutive Night;10 Cars & 7 Stores Set on Fire, Policemen & Firemen Attacked

French Jews Begin Exodus; 2 Thousand Jews to Leave For Israel in 2009

40 Muslim Youths Riot in Paris Suburb, Hurling Molotov Cocktails at Police & Firefighters, Torching Cars & Firing a Handgun

‘Immigrant’ Youths Riot in France

Jewish Women Called a “Dirty Jew” and Physically Assaulted by Two Muslim Teenagers for Eating During Ramadan

Muslims Throw Rocks at Church of Saint-Jacques During Mass, One Worshipper Hit And statue of Virgin Mary Damaged

Two men attack 21-year-old man with pellet gun after claiming he ‘looked Jewish.’ Victim sustains sever wounds

French magazine office burns and website hacked as Islam issue hits stands

Muslims rejoice over Molotov cocktail attack, and more death threats over cartoons force website to be closed

Muslim jailed for punching female nurse in the face because she tried to remove his wife’s burqa during childbirth

Jewish students pass themselves off as Muslims to avoid being physically and sexually attacked

Muslim murders Jews, including three children at a Jewish school in Toulouse to “avenge” the death of Palestinian children

12-year-old boy beaten outside his Jewish school in Paris by youths reciting anti-Semitic slogans

30 “pro-Palestinian” activists invade lobby of Israeli airline, cry “Death to Israel” “Death to the Jews”, terrorize, threaten, and intimidate passengers, preventing them from check-in

Three young Jews, including one girl, attacked by ten Muslims wielding a baseball bat and steel bar, two Jews hospitalized

Muslims stone Christians in church during Mass.

A Muslim woman, two men and a minor attack three police officers over face veil

Church in Chassieu vandalised on a Friday night with graffiti reading “Islam is growing in power” and “M. Merah”, town council quickly arranges for graffiti to be erased, hypocritical media ignores incident

Muslim student assaults teacher after a lecture on Islam, slapping, punching and head butting him, throwing around furniture and attacking another teacher who intervenes, hitting her in the shoulder and throwing things at her

4 people injured after two individuals dressed in black throw an explosive device inside a kosher supermarket, attack possibly a reaction to “Innocence of Muslims” video clip (Update: Muslim terrorists arrested)

Qur’an art exhibit pulled after a near riot, a young woman is slapped by a Muslim for putting her foot on a projected Qur’an verse

Increased security at Jewish religious sites after blank shots fired at a synagogue and police arrest 11 people on suspicion of being part of an jihadist cell

Muslims threaten wine sellers, butchers who sell pork, as well as vendors who sell “light clothing”, ban them from coming back to market on pain of death,
 
“Anti-Semitism previously came from the extreme right, expressed through words. Today’s anti-Semitism doesn’t end with words…” France admits violent antisemitism coming from Muslims.

 

#Islam   #islamic   #muslim   #terrorism

 

__________

Comments as of this date:

 

1pen2books

4/22/14 4:42 PM

 

I don´t want to be a visionary but I think, this question of Islam in Europe will have a tragic end. The European Muslims´ traditional tactic of setting European media and public on Jews and Israel is backfiring.

Islam and real democracy are incompatible. But the too well paid and fat Eurocrats in Brussels don´t want to confront with the Islamic immigration because they want a pleasant and peaceful life and retirement without trouble even if they have to sell the future of European generations to the Ulema’s owners of petrol to achieve that goal.

 

###

Steven Corda

Responding to 1pen2books

4/22/14 4:49 PM

 

More and more people are getting fed up. Organizations have sprung up and people are getting involved in politics. People can choose to stand up to the tyranny Moslems bring and take back their countries. Otherwise Europe and its distinct nations along with their culture, traditions and history will be wiped out as Moslems outbreed them into extinction.

________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Anything within brackets added by Editor. Spellcheck may have capitalized some words intentionally meant to be uncapitalized as a matter of diminishment.

Since this was sent as a private message by Steven Corda I am removing identity links for all except Michael Lederman.

Core Tenets of Islam Match the Radical more than the Moderate


True Islam is Radical - Shhh

 

John R. Houk

© February 5, 2014

 

Muslim Apologists tell Westerners that the ideology known as Radical Islam is a so-called minority element within Islam that does not represent the “true” Islam. Muslim Apologists attempt to sell the reasoning that Radical Islam is not representative of the “true” Islam by claiming the “true” is a religion of peace and the false/warped Radical Islam is a religion of violence and terrorism. Frankly I don’t buy the reasoning because Islam’s core writings – including the Quran – encourage violence to punish irreverence toward Islam and violence up to and including vicious forms of capital punishment that Westerners would consider minor infractions toward religious beliefs and/or discipline.

 

When confronted with the reality of Muslim holy writings as violent Muslim Apologists move toward obfuscating that truth by claiming Judaism and Christianity have inherent violence in their holy writings as well. OF COURSE this is a deceptive lie. The violent conquest of the Promised Land in the Old Testament was a limited scope that was to end once the Canaanite people had been eliminated due to their ungodly practices. For Christians the New Testament shows that Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets hence Redemption delivers us from the consequences of the Law and magnifies the blessings of the Law. NON-VIOLENCE is the key theme of the New Testament. Divergent from the Christian Scriptures history shows us that much violent and tragic occurrences took place in which human rulers attempted to validate their actions by doing so in the Name of Jesus and the Kingdom of God. HOWEVER – and unlike Islamic holy writings – violence perpetrated in the Name of Jesus for conquest and/or punishment is absolutely contrary to Christian Scriptures.

 

If the majority of Muslims that Westerners are told follow the peaceful strictures of their theo-political ideology, then these so-called Moderate Muslims do not follow the purity of Islamic doctrine. BUT the so-called minority Muslims that act on their core doctrines are actually following the “true” Islam.

 

Becoming aware then that Islam’s core holy writings encourage acts of violence especially against non-Muslims, YOU should be concerned about the amount of Muslims that have a close association with Radical Islam that are either a part or have security clearance to some of the highest levels of the American government.

 

In past posts I have put a lot of focus on one of Hillary Clinton’s top aides in Huma Abedin. Abedin has direct and disturbing ties to one of the most recognizable of Radical Islamic groups to Westerners; i.e. the Muslim Brotherhood. There is person that has a disturbing link to the Muslim Brotherhood in the highest level of the United States government that should cause even more concern than Huma Abedin. This is a person that the Mainstream Media (MSM) and Republicans are extremely hesitant to bring up this subject of the Muslim Brotherhood connection. Democrats would blow a gasket and label such a connection as the warped accusations of racist-bigoted Right Wingers. So who is this high level government person that should cause concern? It is President Barack Hussein Obama.

 

In disbelieving consternation most may ask, “Who is this person of a Muslim Brotherhood persuasion that connect the President of the United States to a Radical Islamic group that has both overt and stealth plans to bring the world under the despotic thumb of an Islamic Caliphate?”

 

This Obama connection is to Abon’go Malik Obama (AMO), the older half-brother of Barack sired by the same Kenyan father Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. AMO is a big dog in the Muslim Brotherhood’s international investments wing of the now Egyptian labeled terrorist organization. I am cross posting an article by Determine The Networks below that thoroughly explains AMO’s bona fide following of the purist Radical Islamic organization we Westerners call the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Abon’go Malik Obama

 

JRH 2/5/14

Please Support NCCR

***********************************

ABON’GO MALIK OBAMA

 

Discover The Networks

 

Born (in 1958) and raised in Kenya, Abon’go Malik Obama (AMO) is the older half-brother of U.S. President Barack Obama. He holds a degree in accounting from the University of Nairobi, and as a young man he spent the better part of 14 years working in the United States—mostly as an accountant—for Lockheed, Fannie Mae, and the American Red Cross. During that period, AMO developed a close relationship with Barack Obama—serving as “best man” at the latter’s 1992 wedding to Michelle Robinson (Obama). Barack, in turn, was best man at one of AMO’s numerous marriage ceremonies. A practicing Muslim, AMO currently has twelve wives—two of whom he has been accused of beating.

In 2008 AMO established the Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) in memory of his (and President Obama’s) biological father, Barack H. Obama, Sr. (1936-82). The foundation’s stated purpose was to “provide people everywhere with resources to uplift their welfare and living standards.” But from 2008-11, BHOF operated illegally as a nonprofit entity—falsely claiming tax-exempt status for which it had never formally applied. According to Ken Boehm, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, this constitutes “common law fraud and potentially even federal mail fraud.”

Apart from his work with BHOF, Abon’go Malik Obama helps to oversee the international investments of the Muslim Brotherhood. He also serves as executive secretary of the Sudan-based Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), which:

 

o   seeks to expand Wahhabist Islam on the African subcontinent;

 

o   bankrolls a “Gaza relief” program with funds that initially pass through the Al Shamal Islamic Bank—an al Qaeda-linked institution founded by the late Osama bin Laden—and are then distributed through the terror group Hamas to selected recipients;

 

o   is a member of the Coalition of Islamic Organizations, which also includes the Islamic Society in Gaza—a group that was established by Hamas co-founder Ahmed Yassin and was headed for nearly a decade by former Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniyeh; and

 

o   is an arm of the terrorism-sponsoring Sudanese government (whose president since 1993 has been the Muslim Brotherhood member and jihadist Omar al-Bashir).[1]

 

 

Also in AMO’s orbit was the late Libyan dictator Muammar Qadhafi, with whom the Kenyan had a close relationship from the 1980s until Qadhafi’s death in 2011. AMO once interceded on Qadhafi’s behalf during the Libyan civil war.

In 2010, AMO was photographed at a public event in Yemen wearing a ‘keffiyeh’—or scarf—bearing two anti-Israel slogans associated with Hamas. They read:

 

o   Jerusalem is ours—WE ARE COMING

 

o   From the river to the sea”—a Hamas rallying-cry claiming that 100% of the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, which is where Israel is situated, rightfully belongs to the Palestinians (while Israel has no right to exist)

 

 

In March 2013, AMO ran for a county gubernatorial seat in western Kenya but was defeated decisively. He captured just 2,792 votes—some 140,000 fewer than the victor.

That same month, AMO told Mail Online about the close relationship he continued to enjoy with his half-brother, Barack, who was “always at the end of a phone line if I want to talk.” “I last saw him on November 19 last year,” Abon’go added, “shortly after the U.S. election. I went to the White House and offered him my congratulations.”

In July 2013, AMO similarly told GQ magazine that he and his half-brother spoke to one another on a regular basis. “Of course we’re close!” he said. “I’m the one who brought him here to Kogelo in 1988! I thought it was important for him to come home and see from whence his family came—you know, his roots.”

NOTE:

[1] AMO once attended an IDO board of trustees meeting where President Bashir vowed “that the enemies of Islam who attempt to impose hegemony and make a siege and … encourage plots [and evil measures] towards Sudan will fail.” Further, terrorism expert Walid Shoebat reports that AMO’s boss within the IDO, Suar al-Dahab, has explicitly and repeatedly called for Israel’s destruction.

________________________

Core Tenets of Islam Match the Radical more than the Moderate

John R. Houk

© February 5, 2014

_____________________________

ABON’GO MALIK OBAMA

 

About Discover The Networks:

 

VIDEO: Discover the Networks

 

 

By David Horowitz

Published: Mar 20, 2012

 

Introduction to www.discoverthenetworks.org and a brief overview of the powerful website and tool produced by the David Horowitz Freedom Center

Shopping while non-Muslim


Shopping While Muslim Video Screen Shot

On October 10th I received an email from ACT for America that I wish I had read much earlier than today. The email introduces a tongue-in-cheek video that exposes that Islam is NOT a religion of peace! A clue about the nature of the video is that was produced by Acts17Apologetics and placed on their YouTube Channel. Look out Muslim Apologists and Leftist dhimmi apologists, you are about to be exposed as the red-headed stepchild.

 

JRH 10/15/13

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

Shopping while non-Muslim”

 

Sent by ACT for America

Sent: 10/10/2013 01:15 PM

 

As the video below points out, in places like Nairobi, Kenya, “shopping while non-Muslim” can get you tortured and murdered.

Last year, an obscure video somehow whipped countless Muslims around the world into a frenzy.

After the gruesome jihadist attack in Kenya, nary a peep was heard from most Muslim leaders and organizations around the world, including here in America. Reformist Muslims like Zuhdi Jasser and Tawfik Hamid who denounced the attack were the exception.

The inescapable conclusion is that, for countless Muslims and their leaders, the lives of “infidels” count for nothing compared to 14 minutes of video that nobody had even seen.

 

VIDEO: The Nairobi Mall Massacre

Published on Sep 28, 2013

http://www.answeringmuslims.com

 

Western leaders and the media assure us that the recent terrorist attack at a Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya has nothing to do with Islam, and that the terrorist group al-Shabaab is violating the commands of Allah and Muhammad. But what happens when we open the Qur’an to see what it teaches? We find that Islamic history has been repeating itself for fourteen centuries.

_______________________

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

 

Support Acts 17 Apologetics via PayPal

Muslim Unhappy I Expose the Real Islam


Sharjah circled, UAE 3

John R. Houk

© October 6, 2013

 

Every once in a while the old archive website SlantRight.com sends an email of a general comment made there. I received a comment that was more of a threat than a comment on an old post. Guess what religion the commenter subscribes to?

 

Muslim Coward Here is your comment:

 

A visitor of to your web site used the form for contact and sent the following:

Form #: 0
Contact or Theme: Comments
Your Name: Muneeb Azhar
Your Email:
muneeb.azhar@midasia.ae
Homepage:
Company:
Phone Number:
Location:

Comment: You are an evil bastard that will burn in hell forever. You are a pig and not worthy of writing about our beloved prophet Mohameed (P.B.U.H). I SWEAR BY Allah if ever I found you I will slaughter you like a ship. Continue licking the balls and ass of the kuffars and by Allah your end is very dreadful and you will continue to burn in hell fire for ever

 

This is my response:

 

Muneeb your beloved Mo-Ham-EED was a butcher not worthy of a title such as “prophet”. Your despicable language is evidence Mo-Ham-EED’s so-called religion of peace – uh NOT. Your allah is a demon spawn of Satan because only demons would talk about ‘licking the balls and ass of kuffars [to you fortunate enough not be a Mohammedan/Muslim that would be an epithet description of unbelievers in Islam]”. Your Mo-Ham-EED enslaved people, raped women, stole wives, was a pedophile to 9 year girls and was simply an all-around heathen dog disrespecting the God of Abraham, Isaac (son of Promise) and Jacob. AND take notice I didn’t say the fake god allah the god of Abraham and Ishmael (the son of the slave-girl Hagar). Muneeb may God Almighty through the redeeming Blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God have mercy on your self-deception and that you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior thereby saving you from the flaming fires of Hell.

 

Muneeb, by the way, I do know where you live:

 

Geolocation Information

Country:

United Arab Emirates clip_image001

State/Region:

Sharjah

City:

Sharjah

Latitude:

25.3573  (25° 21 26.28 N)

Longitude:

55.4033  (55° 24 11.88 E)

 

Geolocation Map:

 

http://mapq.st/16N0T5Q

 

I am guessing you are feeling pretty safe to use such incitement in your Islamic Supremacist Sea of violent Muslims.

 

JRH 10/6/13

Please Support NCCR

Islam Hasn’t Changed: We Have


Truth about Islam

 

I just found one of the best essays that utilizes history to demonstrate just how ludicrous it is to consider Islam one of the great and peaceful religions on the planet. Islam is NEFARIOUS and VIOLENT! I am G+-ing the original link but this so GOOD I have to share it on my blogs! You should share it as well for at the end of the essay you are encouraged to do so.

 

JRH 9/13/13 (Hat Tip: Stephanie Ashmore Rodriguez)

Please Support NCCR

******************************

Islam Hasn’t Changed: We Have

 

By Rachel Molschky

Posted: September 9, 2013 4:28 am

Posted by mkamal

No Compulsion: Where Islamic Tyranny Meets Liberty

 

When the most violent religion on earth is called the religion of peace, it may be time to consider the fact that something is seriously wrong with our society. In the past, Westerners and other non-Muslims had no trouble speaking their mind on a religion which has been all about the sword from the get-go. There are various compilations of quotes from an array of statesmen, philosophers, historians, and theologians throughout the ages on the brainwashing, the savagery and the lies which are all intrinsic to a religion which not only conquers with the sword but also maintains itself with the sword. In other words, convert or die (or live as a dhimmi, a second-class citizen), and if you leave and become an apostate, you die as well.

 

Qaradawi might know a thing or two about Islam. He is described by Pam Geller as “a preeminent Egyptian scholar. Articulate and widely read, he is one of the most commented on scholars of Islam. Al Qaradawi is a founder of the website IslamOnline.net, one of the intellectual leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, and the most influential leader associated with the movement.” Why would a highly respected Muslim scholar say such a thing if it weren’t true, if Islam really was a “religion of peace”?

 

The fact is that Islam has not changed. The apostasy punishment is as valid today as it ever was. What has changed, however, is society and our reaction to Islam and Muslims in general.

 

The Haran Gawaitha is a Mandaean text written during the 7th to 9th centuries. It refers to Muhammad as “the Son-of-Slaughter, the Arab,” “a false prophet,” and explains that he “converted people to himself by the sword.” As a point of reference, Muhammad lived from 570-632 CE. His battles occurred in the 7th century, and therefore this work was partially written in the same timeframe or close to it.

 

Hundreds of years went by, yet nothing changed. Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274), a famous theologian, minced no words when he wrote of Muhammad: He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men… no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning, Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms…”

 

These violent murders continued throughout history, totaling over 200 million. Just since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, there have been over 21,000 deadly attacks around the world, and the body count from those attacks is unfathomable. The Islamic conquests of Muhammad continue, though now in a more deceptive manner, spreading to the West, conquering and reconquering parts of Europe and working their way to countries like the US and Australia, mainly through liberal immigration laws. But once in, homegrown terror acts and money laundering to fund terror are a piece of cake. And the Muslim expansion naturally occurs while families settle, have children and build mosques where “death to the infidels” is preached. Then second generation Muslim immigrants are able to run for public office or get appointed to key government positions, and the face of the nation is changed.

 

Yet Islam itself has not changed, nor have its believers. What has changed is us. Compare how we felt about Islam in the past to our current “open-minded” politically correct mentality:

 

Then:

 

“Qur’an… an accursed book… So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.” -William Gladstone, British Prime Minister four times in the 1800s

 

Now (2002):

 

“America treasures the relationship we have with our many Muslim friends, and we respect the vibrant faith of Islam which inspires countless individuals to lead lives of honesty, integrity, and morality.” -US President George W. Bush

 

Then:

 

“…Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.” -Sir Winston Churchill, British Prime Minister during WWII and in the early 1950s

 

Now (2011):

 

Islam is a religion, observed peacefully and devoutly by over a billion people. Islamist extremism is a political ideology, supported by a minority… Someone can be a devout Muslim and not be an extremist. We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing.” -British Prime Minister David Cameron

 

Then:

 

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.” -US Minister to France and later 3rd President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, on Tripoli’s Ambassador response as to what right they had to start a war upon nations that had done them no harm (in the context of the First Barbary War)

 

Now (2002):

 

Islam brings hope and comfort to millions of people in my country, and to more than a billion people worldwide. Ramadan is also an occasion to remember that Islam gave birth to a rich civilization of learning that has benefited mankind.” –US President George W. Bush

 

Islam, as practiced by the vast majority of people, is a peaceful religion, a religion that respects others. Ours is a country based upon tolerance and we welcome people of all faiths in America.” -US President George W. Bush

 

Then:

 

“He (Muhammad) poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature…” -6th President of the United States John Quincy Adams

 

Now (2013):

 

 Throughout our history, Islam has contributed to the character of our country, and Muslim Americans, and their good works, have helped to build our nation — and we’ve seen the results. We’ve seen those results in generations of Muslim immigrants — farmers and factory workers, helping to lay the railroads and build our cities. Muslim innovators who helped build some of our highest skyscrapers and who helped to unlock the secrets of our universe.

“Every day, Muslim Americans are helping to shape the way that we think and the way that we work and the way that we do business. And that’s the spirit that we celebrate tonight…” -President Barack Hussein Obama at the annual White House Iftar dinner for Ramadan

 

Then:

 

“Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” – Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaeologus (1350 – 1425)

 

Now (2013):

 

“…Neither Islam nor UK foreign policy to blame for Woolwich attack.” –London Mayor Boris Johnson’s response to Lee Rigby’s murder

 

Then:

 

“I studied the Quran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad…” – French political thinker and historian Alexis-Charles-Henri Clérel de Tocqueville (1805 – 1859)

 

Now (2007):

 

It is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the Muslim way of life, not the other way around.” British Prime Minister David Cameron

 

Then:

 

“The sword of Mahomet, and the Coran, are the most fatal enemies of Civilization, Liberty, and Truth, which the world has yet known.” –Sir William Muir, KCSI (1819-1905), Scottish historian and writer specializing in the history of the time of Muhammad and the early caliphate

 

Now (2013):

 

“This was not just an attack on Britain and on the British way of life, it was also a betrayal of Islam and of the Muslim communities who give so much to our country. There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act. -British Prime Minister David Cameron after the brutal Islamic slaying of soldier Lee Rigby

 

Then:

 

“[Islam] is essentially an obstructive, intolerant system, supplying just sufficient good to stand in the way of greater good. It has consecrated despotism; it has consecrated polygamy; it has consecrated slavery. It has declared war against every other creed; it has claimed to be at least dominant in every land… When it ceases to have an enemy to contend against, it sinks into sluggish stupidity… It must have an enemy; if cut off, like Persia, from conflict with the infidel, it finds its substitute in sectarian hatred of brother Moslems… By [only] slightly reforming, it has perpetuated and sanctified all the evils of the eastern world. It has, by its aggressive tenets, brought them into more direct antagonism with the creed and civilization of the west.” –Edward Augustus Freeman (1823-1892), English historian and politician

 

Now (2008):

 

Muslims make a huge contribution to Britain’s success – to our prosperity, our society and our culture. And of course, Ramadan is an opportune time to consider the contribution of Islam not just to Britain, but to the world: Islamic art, science, and philosophy have enriched our lives over many centuries.” -British Prime Minister Gordon Brown

 

Then:

 

“To me it seems certain that the fatalistic teachings of Muhammad and the utter degradation of women is the outstanding cause for the arrested development of the Arab. He is exactly as he was around the year 700, while we have kept on developing. –General George S. Patton, US Army general known for various commands throughout his career, especially during WWII

 

Now (2009):

 

The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam… In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical not just in rolling back the violent ideologies that people of all faiths reject, but also to strengthen opportunity for all its people…. We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country. The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans… Our focus will be on what we can do, in partnership with people across the Muslim world, to advance our common hopes and our common dreams…” -President Barack Hussein Obama II to the Turkish Parliament

 

Nothing has changed throughout the course of history in terms of Islam, and these quotes from the past still ring true today. Sure, there have been periods of calm here and there, but the violence reignites. And it is not only in one country or another. It is worldwide. Syria, Afghanistan, Egypt, Nigeria… these are perhaps expected. But the US, the UK, Sweden, France…? Churchill, Jefferson, Adams, Gladstone- these leaders understood Islam and never would have allowed this attack on our civilization to occur without fighting back. Open border immigration policies and over-the-top political correctness are nothing short of negligence. We need leaders with the courage and boldness of our past. The fear of stepping on someone’s toes is not exactly leadership. And if something doesn’t give, this pendulum which is currently too far to the left will suddenly go too far to the right because when things get out of hand, the typical human reaction is to overcompensate. Many of these issues can be resolved by changing policies and laws. It’s a start, at least, if our leaders are courageous enough to go against “today’s” grain and follow in the footsteps of our great leaders of yesteryear.

 

Article by: Rachel Molschky

 

Source

 

Be Sociable, Share!

__________________________

Copyright © 2013

 

About No Compulsion

 

I was Born in Alexandria, Egypt to an average Muslim family… Like most of my generation, we considered Islam to be the most important thing we should learn to please God; and to gain Paradise after death.

 

And as we were taught, the only religion accepted by God is Islam, all the rest are falsehoods as in  Qur’an verse 3:85, “If anyone desires a religion other than Islam , never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good).”…..So, automatically when anyone ask us, “What’s your religion?” We answer, “Al-hamdu-lillah muslimah!” or “Thanks be to God, I am a Muslim!”

 

Islam for me, like for all of us was life and life was Islam. Lessons and speeches came and went from the mouths of our teachers and Imams we took them always as incontestable realities; we shouldn’t (or couldn’t) ask, “why, how or who?” To be part of the flock of Allah we must not ask, just believe and apply, as in Qur’an verse 5:101, “O ye who believe! Ask not of things which, if they were made unto you, would trouble you; but if ye ask of them when the Qur’an is being revealed, they will be made known unto you. Allah pardoneth this, for Allah is Forgiving, clement.”

 

I spent 27 years fooling myself, to be fooled and fooling others, tuning all around in an endless infernal circle …… It was a circle of lies and evil.

From the time I was able to think for myself, a simple question plagued me; READ THE REST

No Compulsion of Religion in Islam – It’s Poppycock


Muslim April Fools toon

John R. Houk

© May 18, 2013

 

Many a Muslim in defending the theopolitical cult of Islam will quote this phrase to emphasize the propaganda and false perception that Islam is peace: There is compulsion in religion.

 

The phrase is straight from the Quran which Muslims consider the infallible directs words of Allah passed onto Mohammed who then shared them with his adherents. It can be referenced as Quran 2:256 or as Al-Baqara 256.

 

Here are a few English translations of Quran 2:256:

 

Muhammad Asad

 

THERE SHALL BE no coercion in matters of faith. Distinct has now become the right way from [the way of] error: hence, he who rejects the powers of evil and believes in God has indeed taken hold of a support most unfailing, which shall never give way: for God is all-hearing, all-knowing.

 

Pickthall

 

There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.

 

Al-Muntakhabclip_image001

 

Compulsion is incompatible with religion, therefore let there be no compulsion in religion. Now the path of righteousness has been distinguished from the path of error and holiness distinguished from vindictiveness. Therefore, he who rejects false beliefs and turns his attention to Allah with a religious mind, will have firmly grasped the eternal, unchangeable and most secure handhold which shall never separate, nor shall it suffer a break, and Allah is Sami‘un and ‘Alimun.

 

** Read more translations from Islam Awakened

 

There are Muslim scholars of considerable weighty importance that have written the Quran 2:256 has been abrogated by Quran 9:29:

 

Sahih International: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

 

Pickthall: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.

 

Yusuf Ali: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

 

Shakir: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

 

Muhammad Sarwar: Fight against those People of the Book who have no faith in God or the Day of Judgment, who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful, and who do not believe in the true religion, until they humbly pay tax with their own hands.

 

Mohsin Khan: Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

 

Arberry: Fight those who believe not in God and the Last Day and do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled.

 

** From Quran Arabic Corpus

 

You can understand why many Muslim scholars claim Quran 9:29 abrogates (or nullifies) Quran 2:256’s “There is no compulsion in religion”. According to 9:29 Muslims are to fight non-believers in Islam and Mohammed’s version of the Last Day. The Last Day meaning all non-Muslims will be confined to the torments of hell. Thus if you believe in the Muslim way you are worthy of death. That sounds like compulsion to me!

 

Fascinatingly there are Muslim scholars that claim 9:29 does not abrogate 2:256. This Muslim thinking works something like this: The fight against unbelievers is not an invocation to kill but rather to submit to the Islamic theopolitical culture as subservient. A lack of subservience does mean brutal measures up to and including death. So thinking is not compelling one to convert to Islam but create a dhimmi class that pays the jizya tax (poll tax to stay alive) in humiliation so that the dhimmi knows their place in Muslim world. Breaking the dhimmi deal requires punish according to how Islam has been violated or insulted. Guess what the conquered people chose to do rather than suffer the humiliations of dhimmitude. If you guessed conversion to Islam you are the big winner!

 

In essence dhimmitude was the long term path to convince the conquered to convert to Islam. The plan might be long term but it still is compulsion in religion.

 

Here are some thoughts written more articulately on the issue of abrogation or non-abrogation of Quran 2:256 by Quran 9:29:

 

Immediately following is the famous statement that “there is no compulsion in religion” (v. 256). Islamic spokesmen in the West frequently quote it to disprove the contention that Islam spread by the sword, or even to claim that Islam is a religion of peace. According to an early Muslim, Mujahid ibn Jabr, this verse was abrogated by Qur’an 9:29, in which the Muslims are commanded to fight against the People of the Book. Others, however, according to the Islamic historian Tabari, say that 2:256 was never abrogated, but was revealed precisely in reference to the People of the Book. They are not to be forced to accept Islam, but may practice their religions as long as they pay the jizya (poll-tax) and “feel themselves subdued” (9:29).

 

Many see v. 256 as contradicting the Islamic imperative to wage jihad against unbelievers, but actually there is no contradiction because the aim of jihad is not the forced conversion of non-Muslims, but their subjugation within the Islamic social order. Says Asad: “All Islamic jurists (fuqahd’), without any exception, hold that forcible conversion is under all circumstances null and void, and that any attempt at coercing a non-believer to accept the faith of Islam is a grievous sin: a verdict which disposes of the widespread fallacy that Islam places before the unbelievers the alternative of ‘conversion or the sword.’” Quite so: the choice, as laid out by Muhammad himself, is conversion, subjugation as dhimmis, or the sword. Qutb accordingly denies that v. 256 contradicts the imperative to fight until “religion is for Allah” (v. 193), saying that “Islam has not used force to impose its beliefs.” Rather, jihad’s “main objective has been the establishment of a stable society in which all citizens, including followers of other religious creeds, may live in peace and security” – although not with equality of rights before the law, as 9:29 emphasizes. For Qutb, that “stable society” is the “Islamic social order,” the establishment of which is a chief objective of jihad.

 

In this light verses 256 and 193 go together without any trouble. Muslims must fight until “religion is for Allah,” but they don’t force anyone to accept Allah’s religion. They enforce subservience upon those who refuse to convert, such that many of them subsequently convert to Islam so as to escape the humiliating and discriminatory regulations of dhimmitude — but when they convert, they do so freely. Only at the end of the world will Jesus, the Prophet of Islam, return and Islamize the world, abolishing Christianity and thus the need for the jizya that is paid by the dhimmis. Then religion will be “for Allah,” and there will be no further need for jihad. (Excerpted from Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 2, “The Cow,” verses 222-286; By Robert Spencer; Hot Air; 7/15/07)

 

Now here is the reason I thought it important to understand the Islamic notion of there being no compulsion of religion. Raymond Ibrahim wrote a no holds barred expose on how Muslims indeed compelled Christians to convert or die throughout the centuries to this present day. Ibrahim describes some savage historical incidents in which Muslims butchered Christians for not converting to Islam. The essay is entitled “Islamic Forced Conversions — Past and Present”.

 

JRH 5/18/13

Please Support NCCR

Islamic Supremacist Propaganda to Choose a Lie


Jesus slave of Islam

John R. Houk

© March 18, 2013

 

Islamic organizations in America spew propaganda about ‘Islam is peace’ to deceive American non-Muslims (who Muslims address as ‘kafir’) all the time. You need to realize that Islamic holy writings such as the Quran, Hadith and Sira address kafir in a negative light.

 

Now if you are faithful to another religion other than Islam it would be normal to address the Islamic religion in a negative light. For instance I am a Christian and I view Islam as an Anti-Christ religion even if it is politically incorrect as proscribed by Islamic Apologists, Diversity and Multiculturalist Leftists.

 

The difference between my beliefs on non-Christians and Islam’s beliefs on non-Muslims is the difference between spiritual warfare and physical-corporeal warfare.

 

The Biblical plan for non-Christians is forgiveness, prayer and non-violence against the enemies of Christ. Now I realize history shows that those that call themselves Christians as a political force have not followed the guidelines of the Biblical plan. God have mercy on those ill gotten decisions.

 

ON THE OTHER HAND

 

The Quranic-Hadith-Sira plan for non-Muslims is to present the option of willing conversion, barring that – submitting to Islam in absolute honor above the religious beliefs adhered to OR die for rejecting submission.

 

With this in mind you need to read this post at the Shoebat Foundation that reports that Pamela Geller’s counter-ad campaign against a local CAIR group’s Muslim propaganda that Islam is peace is makingGeller showing book - SIOA headway.

 

CAIR has been advertising on public busses and billboards that Islam is peace and that the concept of jihad is primarily a spiritual inner struggle to overcome sin or evil. The truth is the concept of jihad is a struggle to convert the humanity of the whole earth to the despotism and submission of Allah as developed by the false prophet Mohammed. Thus Islam’s history is a picture of Islamic command to violence against non-Muslims in conquest and the punishment of Muslims that do not tow the Sharia Law line of living a Muslim lifestyle.

 

JRH 3/18/13

Please Support NCCR

Un-merry Christmas to Christians from Islam


Muslims Attack Christmas

The blog Political Islam posted a ‘wake-up and see the real Islam’ essay yesterday. The theme is the treatment of Christians in Muslim dominated lands with a focus on Christmas.

 

JRH 12/24/12

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

Un-merry Christmas to Christians from Islam

 

By Kenneth Roberts

December 23, 2012

Political Islam

 

Is Islam tolerant of Christianity? Muslims say yes, but what are the facts?

 

Mullahs around the world warn Muslims not to respond to the words ‘Merry Christmas’. If Jesus is the ‘prince of peace’, it makes Mohammed look bad. In the last years of his life, Mohammed led and commanded violent aggression every six weeks. Mohammed was the ‘prince of jihad’.

 

Muslims believe angels announced the birth of Jesus, but Muslims do not believe the Gospel where the angels said, “Peace on earth.” Peace with Kafirs is not possible. The Christmas greeting to Christians around the world is still the same as it was in 630 AD: “Aslim, Taslam!” (Surrender to Islam and be safe). Where Christians do not surrender to Islamic terrorists, their lives are now in danger.

 

For the Muslim, the world cannot be at peace until every government on earth follows the laws of Allah. The duty of Muslims is to create the conditions that drive non-Muslims into the arms of Sharia law, ‘whether by persuasion or by force’ as ibn Khaldun wrote.

 

If Christians won’t voluntarily change their laws to Shari’a, then it is the duty of every Muslim to induce Christians in three ways: violence, extortion or enslavement.

 

Muslims around the world are particularly aware of Christianity at Christmas time when they become even more determined to impose Sharia. This leads to jihad attacks in churches in Egypt, Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia. Attacking worshipping Christians is jihad. The purpose is to discourage them from their non-Islamic worship. In Nigerian churches, most women have been asked not to bring a purse and armed guards stand at the door with metal detectors to screen every worshipper. This is because jihadists are taught in the hadiths to lull enemies of Allah into trust before betraying them. Every person entering a church might be a jihadist.

 

The purpose of jihad is to implement discriminatory Sharia. Sharia is not benign to Christians.

 

The purpose of Sharia is to destroy Christian and other cultures and replace them with theocratic totalitarianism. Jihad is the method for imposing Sharia. Jihad is aggressive: it can take the form of deception or disinformation, robbery, lawsuits or it can be violent with the destruction of property or assassination of church leaders. All jihad is good because it is Mohammed’s sacred method.

 

Since 1990 in Nigeria, some 1000 Christians have been murdered by jihadists every year. Probably, the number is much higher with many jihad-motivated murders being put down as ordinary homicides or accidental manslaughters. Most of the jihad murders take place in northern Nigeria where Islamist want to impose Sharia law.

 

Nigeria has one of the highest scholarship rates in Africa. As Nigerians gain graduate and post-graduate degrees, they often leave Islam and switch to Christianity which they identified with Western progress. Islamists see going to university as the problem. Better to stay at home, memorize the Koran and remain loyal to Mohammed, the perfect man, than to learn to improve society, build infrastructure, services, health sciences or engineering in the country.

 

Boko Haram (meaning ‘Western education is taboo’) is the main Islamic terror group fighting the rapid Christianization of Nigeria. They are now allied with Al Qaeda. Their trademark is to attack congregation while they are worshipping or throw bombs into restaurants where Christians eat after services. This is ethnic cleansing and genocide. Mohammed ethnically cleansed the Jewish tribes in Arabia, so it is normative Islam. Boko Haram wants to ethnically cleanse Christians from northern Nigeria. Mohammed’s ethnic cleansing method goes like this: intimidate, humiliate and expropriate until you can annihilate.

 

Most of the countries that are now Islamic were once Christian. The Christian presence in Turkey is almost nil, and in most of North Africa it is tiny, but it was once close to 100% in all of them. What changed things was Sharia law. Under discriminatory Sharia law, Christians must live in an inferior social status to Muslims, they must wear clothing that humiliates them, they must never ride on a horse, they must pay a punitive tax, they must never speak about Islam or the Koran, they must never ring their church’s bell, they must never have an outdoor religious ceremony or speak to a Muslim about Christianity, they must move aside when a Muslim walks down the street. As well, no new churches may be built and old ones may never be repaired unless hefty bribes are given to the authorities. The policy of Sharia is to systemically make life difficult for Christians to practice their faith, all the while encouraging them to convert.

 

Then there is the ‘love jihad’. Mohammed started this with the comment ‘marry one woman (out of four wives) for the religion’. Muslim men have taken this as a commandment to abduct a Christian girl, confine her and then declare her to be married without her consent. The girl’s family is then told she has converted to Islam and they may never see her. Police do nothing, because it’s Sharia and Sharia trumps any man-made law. No one can estimate how many Christian girls have been abducted and sequestered in the ‘love jihad’, but the fact that many African Christians tattoo a cross on the forehead and cheeks of their girls speaks volumes.

 

The reason Christians were not substantially cleansed from Islamic countries until the Turkish genocides of 1915-1924 is because Christians were used for a supply of jizzya [dhimmi tax] and they were very useful in medicine, the arts, building and garbage removal. Turkey ethnically cleansed three million Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Christians to confiscate their wealth and properties for a government at war that was strapped for ready cash. The Young Turks were also jihadists hoping to make Turkey the capital of a global caliphate promoting Sharia law. Discriminatory Sharia law is like a ratchet that only tightens a bolt even though it apparently moves back and forwards. Sharia only benefits Islam.

 

So when Americans hear the church bells ring on Christmas Eve, remember that Christians worshipping in Islamic regions like northern Nigeria may hear the sound of bombs thrown in the church door, guns shooting down the main aisle or the sound of fire on the church roof.

 

Merry Christmas.

 

Written by Kenneth Roberts

_________________________

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink:
/blog/un-merry-christmas-to-christians-from-islam/


copyright (c) CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com

 
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit
.


www.politicalislam.com