Blog Archives

Israel Apartheid Week is Hate Jews and Lie about Israel Week

John R. Houk

© March 11, 2013


VIDEO: Is There Anti-Semitism on College Campuses?


This video was posted in February 2012 to briefly let people know that Antisemitism is alive and well on U.S. university campuses. Unfortunately I am a little late with this post which is a condemnation of a pro-Palestinian/Anti-Israel propaganda seminar accusing Israel of human rights violations and completely letting Islamic terrorists off the hook for their murder and mayhem of Jews in Israel. That propaganda seminar is called Israel Apartheid Week.


Below is an email from David Horowitz that tells what really happens in Israel and on American College Campuses pertaining to Jews. Tragically Jews are persecuted by Islamic terrorists in Israel with blood and mayhem and Jews and supporters of Israel are vilified by Islamic racists often connected to either Palestinian (Islamic) terrorists or from organizations affiliated with the Jew-Hating Muslim Brotherhood. This week of Antisemitic lies is allow to occur on college campuses that have bought into the propaganda disseminated by Islamic terrorist connected organizations operating with near impunity in the USA.


I am cross posting the Horowitz email but first You should take the time to view this video exposing the lies of Jew-Haters that are the supporters of Israel Apartheid Week:


VIDEO: Israeli Apartheid Week 2013 (The Real Truth)


JRH 3/11/13

Please Support NCCR


Must Read Article

[Islamic Apartheid Week]


Sent by David Horowitz

Sent: March 8, 2013 9:03 AM

Sent from David Horowitz Freedom Center


Dear Friend,

Earlier this week, I sent you an email about the advertisement the Freedom Center will be running in campus newspapers at Colleges and Universities around the country. Today, I wanted to share with you an article, written by the Center’s Daniel Greenfield, which illustrates why getting this ad distributed as far and wide as possible is so critical.

I hope you’ll take a moment to read this article, and if you haven’t already, make a generous, tax-deductible donation to support our efforts.


A Double Standard on Hate

By Daniel Greenfield

Every year college campuses across the country hold a festival of hatred aimed at Jews and the Jewish State. Israeli Apartheid Week has become notorious for the targeted harassment of Jewish students, support for Hamas and even physical violence.

This year the David Horowitz Freedom Center has responded to Israeli Apartheid Week with Islamic Apartheid Week. Unlike Israeli Apartheid Week, which is based on a lie, Islamic Apartheid Week addresses the sexism, homophobia and religious bigotry threatening minorities in the Muslim world. To promote Islamic Apartheid Week, the Freedom Center attempted to place an ad in forty college papers.

The ad called “Faces of Islamic Apartheid” drew attention to the victims of Islamic sexism, homophobia and theocracy by briefly telling the stories of gay men hanged in Iran, women and girls murdered by their governments and their families for the crime of falling in love and the Christian Minister for Minorities Affairs in Pakistan’s cabinet who was murdered for trying to reform his country’s theocratic blasphemy laws.

These four women, three men and one little girl were the victims of Islamic Apartheid. Five of them have been murdered. Their memory lives on only when they are remembered. One has been on death row for six years. Telling her story may help save her life. The remaining two live under threat of death.

Instead of listening to their stories, the campus culture of political correctness drowned out their voices and apologized for even allowing their stories to be told.

Nine college papers turned the ad down, five of them in the University of California system which has been criticized for tolerating anti-Semitism. When the California State Assembly passed a resolution condemning anti-Semitism on campus and warned that no public resources should be used for anti-Semitic hate, the University of California objected on free speech grounds. However free speech for Israeli Apartheid Week did not translate into free speech for Islamic Apartheid Week.

Seven college papers took the advertisement. Of those papers, Tufts University’s Tufts Daily and Austin’s Daily Texan both ran apologies from their editors for even printing the ad.

Tufts Daily editor Martha Shanahan called the decision to run the ad an “editorial oversight.” Daily Texan editor Susannah Jacob denounced the attempt to tell the stories of victimized women and children as “hateful” and “an unspoken incitement to violence.”

Martha Shanahan spent two pages apologizing for the existence of the “Islamophobic and violently offensive” advertisement, the existence of Tufts Daily, its staff and her own existence. At no point during her long series of apologies, did Martha acknowledge that her paper had run four editorials in a single week from Students for Justice in Palestine attacking Israel and promoting hatred for the Jewish State. And in an unequal response to this, it also ran a brief letter from Tufts Friends of Israel distancing itself from the ad and politely suggesting that apartheid shouldn’t be used to refer to Israel.

Anthony Monaco, the President of Tufts University, took to Twitter to denounce the advertisement for vilifying Islam, but made no such denunciation of the Tufts Daily’s op-ed, “The Case for Israeli Apartheid” which (not coincidentally) appeared on the same day as the ad. At Tufts, no one apologizes for accusing democratic Israel of apartheid. There are only apologies when theocratic Iran and Pakistan are accused of practicing Islamic Apartheid.

When anti-Israel voices are outweighed 4-to-1 and the editor apologizes for publishing another perspective that would have made it 4-to-2 then the freedom of debate at Tufts University is in a very sad state. When that same editor prints editorials describing Israel as an apartheid state, but promises to put in place an entire system of oversight to make certain that no advertisement challenging Islamic Apartheid is ever printed again, then a system of censorship has been put into place silencing the voices of victims and encouraging their persecutors.

The Daily Texan’s Susannah Jacob claimed that the crosshairs over the faces of the victims were an incitement to violence when they were actually a way of bringing urgency to the violence that had been committed against them. And making it clear that she never even saw the advertisement that she was denouncing, Susannah described the ad as depicting six women, when it included two gay men, one Christian man and one little girl.

Susannah further distorted the truth about Islamic Apartheid when she described the pervasive sexism, homophobia and theocracy that these people fell victim to as “discrete incidents of violence by Muslims” being used “to implicate all Muslims” while ignoring the fact that five of the victims in the ad had been targeted by their governments or with government backing.

Can the Daily Texan’s editor honestly claim that Iran’s persecution of women and gay men or Pakistan’s persecution of Christians are “discrete incidents of violence”, rather than state policy? Could she find a single human rights organization that would agree with such a dishonest whitewashing of the terror under which millions live?

The responses to the advertisement have established once again that some forms of apartheid are privileged on campus and that some forms of persecution cannot be talked about. Demonizing the Israeli victims of Islamic terror is within the realm of campus free speech, but speaking about the vulnerable minorities in the Muslim world is not.

If the advertisement was wrong, then there would have been no need to censor it. False claims can easily be disproven. Five minutes with Google would have told every reader and editor whether there was any truth to the Faces of Islamic Apartheid.

It is never necessary to censor lies. It is only necessary to censor truth.

That is why the majority of campus papers – ten so far, including Harvard whose editors said they would not print it under any circumstances — refused to run this paid advertisement. It is why those few who did have begun making ritual apologies while lying about its contents. It is why the attacks on the advertisement have taken refuge in vague platitudes about offensiveness, without a single attempt at a factual rebuttal. It is why every response to the advertisement has consisted of claiming that speaking about Islamic bigotry is the real bigotry.

There were eight faces and eight names in the censored advertisement that the President of Tufts, the editors of Tufts Daily, the Daily Texan and the editors of ten college papers that turned down the ad, did not want their students to see or know about because it might disturb the manufactured campus consensus that they have constructed with great effort around Israel and Islamic terrorism.

These are the names. Amina Said. Sarah Said. Afshan Azad. Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani. Shahbas Bhatti. Rimsha Masih. Mahmoud Asgari. Ayaz Marhoni.

They were repressed as individuals. Now their story is being repressed on the American campus.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center


Begin forwarded message:

From: David Horowitz
Date: March 5, 2013 11:05 AM EST
Subject: Expose the lies on our campuses


Dear Freedom Center Supporter,


Anti Semitism on America’s campuses—nonstop bashing of Israel and glorification of Hamas and other jihad groups, and even physical intimidation of Jewish students—is worse than ever. Administrators and faculty accepts all this as part of the university’s standard operating procedure. But the Freedom Center calls it for what it is—an intellectual reign of terror.

And we’re fighting back!


Think of what is allowed to take place these days as part of our universities’ business as usual:


  • “Israel Apartheid Weeks” staged every year by hate groups such as the Muslim Students Association that echo the call of Hamas for the “liberation” of Palestine “from the river to the sea,” which really means destroying the Jewish state and pushing its inhabitants into the sea;
  • “Nakkba” demonstrations that see the founding of Israel as a “crime against humanity;”
  • Calls by the growing BDS movement for Boycott or Divestment from Israel; and
  • Sanctions against Israel because it is a “fascist state” whose official policy is “apartheid.”

These unrelenting attacks against Israel and Jewish students are shameful and disgusting. Will you help the Freedom fight back today with a tax-deductible donation of $25, $50, $100 or more?

While the truth about the Middle East is systematically turned upside-down and inside-out, no one is stepping forward to defend Israel and remind her enemies that:


  • Israel is the only apartheid-free state in the Middle East;
  • Countries such as Lebanon and Jordan that have apartheid-style laws on their books; and
  • Islamic supremacists viciously subjugate women and persecute gays, Christians and other religious and racial minorities.

There’s only one organization willing to go onto our campuses to tell our students the truth about this brutal discrimination that occurs under Islamic Sharia Law—and that’s the Freedom Center.

This year the Freedom Center is sponsoring “Islamic Apartheid Weeks” on over 50 campuses across the country. These events will provide a truth-telling, in your face response to the Big Lies that are at the foundation of the leftist “Israel Apartheid Weeks.” They will explain and explore the many forms of Islamic apartheid—racism, ethnic cleansing, gender discrimination, political oppression and slavery—that have been part of the Middle East for over a millennium and are now spreading into Africa and other regions of the world.

One of the main components of the Freedom Center’s campaign is to insert full-page ads like this one in campus newspapers across the country. Under the headline “Faces of Islamic Apartheid,” the advertisement will features victims of Sharia law abroad and in the U.S. such as Amina and Sarah Said, murdered in Texas by their father for dating non-Muslims, and Shahbas Bhatti, the sole Christian minister in Pakistan’s cabinet who was murdered by members of the Taliban for advocating reform of Pakistan’s strict blasphemy laws.

While our college students hear the Big Lie about Israel every day, they never hear the truth about the body count, even in the U.S., that results from the teachings of radical Islam. And we need them to! So will you support our efforts with an immediate tax-deductible donation of $25, $50, $100 or more?

We are currently submitting this ad to 50 campus papers around the country to coincide with March’s “Israel Apartheid Week” events. We have already received confirmations that the ad will run in the papers at the following Colleges and Universities,


  • Rutgers;
  • Colorado State;
  • George Washington University;
  • University of Texas – Austin;
  • Tufts;
  • UNC – Chapel Hill; and
  • University of Pennsylvania.

We are targeting at least another 40 campuses this week. But the cost of running ads in just these newspapers is about $75,000! So please follow this link right now to make a tax-deductible donation of $25, $50, $100 or more to support our efforts.

These ads do what nothing else can do—highlight the true sources of “apartheid” in the Middle East put the campus Islamists attacking Israel on the defensive. The Freedom Center is on the front lines in the war on campus between the Big Lie and the truth in the Middle East. Your support is critical to making this effort a success.

Thank you for everything you do to help me and the Freedom Center.



David Horowitz
President & Founder

P.S. We need your help to place this ad in campus newspapers at Colleges and Universities across the country. Will you make a tax-deductible donation of $25, $50, $100 or more to the Freedom Center right away? We must raise $75,000 by midnight tomorrow, so I’m counting on you. Thanks—David


Israel Apartheid Week is Hate Jews and Lie about Israel Week

John R. Houk

© March 11, 2013


Must Read Article


The David Horowitz Freedom Center
P.O. Box 55089
Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964


About David Horowitz Freedom Center


OUR MISSION: The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad…. READ THE REST


The UN vs. Israel

UN vs Israel -  End of World

Israel is a very small nation established in part because of thousands of years of gross persecution culminating with Hitler’s Holocaust which murdered around SIX MILLION Jews. More importantly from a religious Jewish and Biblical Christian perspective, Israel’s reestablishment is prophetic. I can’t speak for Jews but Biblical Christians believe Israel’s return as a Jewish homeland is a prophetic precursor to the Return of King Jesus to sit on the Throne of David to rule the nations of the world. has a video on their website showing how the United Nations goes out of its way to publish Palestinian propaganda about Israel human rights violations while totally ignoring the brutal butchery of Islamic terrorists upon Jews attempting to terminate the Jewish State. Also the video points out the HUGE human rights violations in other larger nations than Israel ARE NOT APPROACHED nearly as much as the UN comes after Israel that is merely trying to defend its existence surrounded by a sea of hostile Muslim States.


Below is the video:


JRH 3/4/13 (Hat Tip: Nora Mitchell – World News & Events Dissected)

Please Support NCCR


The UN vs. Israel

The UN is obsessed with one country’s human rights record, and it’s not North Korea, Iran or Syria.


By Anne Bayefsky and Prager University

March 2, 2013




Youtube version: Prager University: The UN vs. Israel

Posted by: Prager University

Published on Feb 24, 2013


In the last few decades the United Nations has been obsessed with one country. Is it North Korea, Zimbabwe, Iran, Syria, China or some other nation with a reprehensible human rights record? Those would all be fair guesses and they would all be wrong. Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Human Rights Institute, answers this riddle and explains the upside down moral universe in which the United Nations resides.


© 2013


About Page:


Since its launch in February 2000, has become the world’s largest Jewish content website, logging over a million monthly user sessions with 380,000 unique email subscribers.


We’ve published over 10,000 articles — on career, dating, parenting, spirituality, Israel events — offering “wisdom for living” for the modern world.’s goal is to give every Jew the opportunity to discover his or her heritage in an atmosphere of open inquiry and mutual respect., a 3-time winner of USA Today’s Hot Site award, has been heralded for its technical sophistication and sleek graphic design. James Besser, the New York Jewish Week columnist, writes: “The supersite,, reacting to READ THE REST

Iranian Propaganda Tool Press TV


John R. Houk

© December 21, 2012


To those of you who do not realize it. There is media outlet known as Press TV. You should know that articles appearing in Press TV too often passed along as American press; however Press TV is an Iranian run media organization. Iran and the USA are not friends even if Obama extends a hand of friendship in the name of negotiated peace.


Below is a very credible profile excerpt about Press TV:


When the Iranian government launched Press TV in 2007, the global channel said its goal was to “heed the often neglected voices and perspectives of a great portion of the world” and to “embrace and build bridges of cultural understanding.”


“The priority was to look and sound like CNN and BBC,” said one former Press TV journalist. This journalist, who left shortly after Iran’s controversial 2009 elections, said editors initially sought a credible reputation for the state-funded channel, to make it a player in the increasingly crowded market of global satellite news channels.


And on occasion, Press TV has operated with journalistic vigor. “I would often monitor their website,” said Nazila Fathi, a New York Times reporter who was based in Tehran for 15 years. “Sometimes Press TV had the information first, which wasn’t expected, but they did.”


But even as the government said the channel was created to build bridges, Press TV’s bosses gave its 400 staff members another task. “Exposing the plots of propaganda networks of the enemy is among your duties,” CEO Mohammad Sarafraz told employees at the channel’s opening ceremony.


It does not take much viewing time to see how that task is translated into Press TV’s broadcasts. Though the channel offers plenty of timely visuals of breaking news in the Middle East, much of its programming reflects the often aggressive, hard-line politics of the Iranian leadership.


“Press TV was purely propaganda, and still is,” said Jamal Dajani, vice president for the Middle East region at Internews, an international media development organization.


Dajani’s view is a common one among international journalists, as well as some who have worked for Press TV, only to leave after concluding it was little more than a “government mouthpiece.” (Excerpted fromA slick propaganda tool against the West”; By Stephanie Coutrix, Global Media WarsREAD ENTIRE ARTICLE)


So why did I do a write-up on Press TV?


Because I just posted a story that has all the markings of a Conspiracy Theory. I often post Conspiracy Theories because of plausible credibility presented in the theory.


Well check it out! Press TV has their own Conspiracy Theory on the Sandy Hook Massacre. The title of the Press TV article pretty much sums the Iranian propaganda Conspiracy Theory: “Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook”.


Yup that’s right. The mouthpiece of Iran claims Israel sent Israeli Intelligence death squads to kill children as part of a plan for a Jewish New World Order.


Below is the insanely ludicrous Press TV Conspiracy Theory.


JRH 12/21/12

Please Support NCCR


Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook


By James H. Fetzer

Dec 20, 2012 7:27PM GMT

Press TV


While liberals and some conservatives believe the time has come to ban assault weapons, the graver threat to our nation’s security has been swept under the rug.

The Sandy Hook massacre appears to have been a psy op intended to strike fear in the hearts of Americans by the sheer brutality of the massacre, where the killing of children is a signature of terror ops conducted by agents of Israel.

This is being used as powerful incentive for banning assault rifles, where most of the public is unaware of the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has acquired 1.5 billion rounds of .40 caliber, hollow-point ammunition, which is not ever permissible in warfare under the Geneva Conventions.

A Senate Subcommittee has issued a report (3 October 2012) based upon its review of 680 “fusion center” reports (from 2009-2001) and found not a single indication of any domestic terrorist threat-not one! None! Since the only domestic “terrorist threats” are ones contrived by the government, especially the FBI, the public needs to know.

This information-as well as the existence of more than 300 FEMA camps and special boxcars to carry dissidents to them-has been deliberately withheld from the American people, because if they were aware of the facts of the matter, it would become obvious that those camps and ammunition are intended to be used against them.

When DHS is gearing up to conduct a massive civil war against the American people, what better excuse could there be for banning assault weapons than the massacre of 20 innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary School?

The choice appears to be covertly revealing, where “Sandy” means guardian of men (as an allusion to guns) and “Hook” as a euphemism for hooking, gathering or confiscating the only weapons that DHS fears. And who better to slaughter American children than Israelis, who deliberately murder Palestinian children?

Mike Harris of Veterans Today has exposed the pattern relating what happened there to earlier assaults: “This is exactly what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions against Israel was retaliated against by a ‘lone gunman’ who killed 77 children. This is what Israel always does, they go after the children.


“It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It is what happened at Sandy Hook. Nobody buys the ‘one gunman’ story anymore, not with the Gabby Giffords’ shooting, not with the Aurora “Batman” shooting, certainly not with Breveik, and certainly not in Connecticut.”

The most likely scenario, given what we know now, is that Adam Lanza and his mother killed the day before. Adam’s body picked up by local police. He was attired in a SWAT outfit, including body armor, and stored in the school.

A three-man team entered the school, one was arrested in the school–cuffed and put on the lawn–two went out the back door, one was arrested, the third appears to have escaped. You can find this on helicopter videos.

Those arrested are currently not in police custody; their names were never released. That is a telling sign that we are being sold a story that is based on fiction, not on fact. What else are the local police concealing?

A parallel situation in Aurora, where there appear to have been multiple participants, but the police concealed information about them. The DC Sniper, John Allen Muhammad, was even a active member of Delta Force, but the public was not informed.

His assistant in this killing spree, Lee Boyd Malvo, had been detained in Seattle but was released, even though he was an illegal alien, where INS has refused to explain how that happened. Did “higher authority” intervene?

Nidal Malik Hasan, the US Army Major who killed 13 and wounded 29 during a rampage at Ft. Hood, Texas, even sat next to the Director of Homeland Security during an event at George Washington University. Can that be coincidental?

When the “long gunman” cover story falls apart, then the national press, which William Colby told us was infiltrated by agents of the CIA-“The agency owns everyone of significance in the major media”-resorts to stories of Mind Control and use of drugs.

We have to see through the smoke and mirrors. These attacks typically involve three-man shooting teams, where, once the story is tainted with bogus MK/Ultra conspiracy disinformation, crucial data, like the assault rifle the Sandy Hook having been left in his car, swiftly disappears.

Lenin and Trotsky were terrorists. Lenin was an outspoken proponent of terrorism. The founder of the Lukid Party and sixth Prime Minister of Israel was an Irgun terrorist. Study its history. No nation in the world cares more about its own interests and less about those of the United State than Israel.


The bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on 22 July 1946, was a stunning example. The attack on the USS Liberty and Israel’s bombing of its own Embassy and Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994 are other illustration.

Those who study 9/11 are all too aware of the role of the Neo-Cons and the Mossad. But the American press covers it up-and Congress is controlled by AIPAC. As Bill Casey, former CIA Director, observed, “Our disinformation program will be complete when everything the American public believes is false.” Sandy Hook is the latest example.



Iranian Propaganda Tool Press TV

John R. Houk

© December 21, 2012


Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook


Dr. James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth. A leading expert on the death of JFK and on the atrocities of 9/11, he has published extensively as a journalist for Veterans Today. He edited ASSASSINATION SCIENCE (1998), MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA (2000), and THE GREAT ZAPRUDER FILM HOAX (2003) on the assassination and chaired or co-chaired four national conferences about it. The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, he has published THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), organized the Madison Conference on “The Science and Politics of 9/11″ and, during 2012, The Vancouer Hearings, which brought together experts on different aspects of the case. The conclusions to emerge include that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, that all four of the crash sites were faked or fabricated in different ways, that mini or micro nukes were the most likely explanation for the “collapse” of the Twin Towers, and that Israel and American Neo-Cons planned 9/11 to promote their political agenda. The archives for his radio show, “The Real Deal”, on, at, include more than 500 interviews on the most complex and controversial issues of our time. His most recent and important articles are accessible via “Veterans Today, Jim Fetzer”


© Copyright 2012 Press TV. All rights reserved.

The Picture They Painted in Charlotte

Warped BHO picture


The Patriot Post refutes the message of the Democratic National Convention. Wait – refute is probably too kind. The Patriot Post repudiates the deceptive and lying Democrats trying to win the hearts of the voters Goebbels type propaganda.


“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” (Goebbels And The “Big Lie,” Jewish Virtual Library)


JRH 9/9/12

Please Support NCCR

CBS 60 Minutes: An Unholy Attack on Israel

Broken 60 Minutes

Yesterday I was alerted to Sunday’s (4/22/12) 60 Minutes story lamely being used as the propaganda tool of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas. The propaganda is Israel policies are scaring Arab-Christians out of Judea-Samaria (aka West Bank) and not Arab-Muslims dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the obliteration of Jews. The alert was sent via the San Fernando Valley ACT for America email list and the story was by Yuval Zaliouk. I was outraged especially after I watched the clip of the CBS news magazine!


I received another email alert from Honest Reporting has a bit more details. I am cross posting the Honest Reporting article along with some supportive articles that demonstrate is simply an Israel hating Left Wing media tool.


JRH 4/25/12 (Read the two page HR article as one page at SlantRight 2.0)

Please Support NCCR

We Should Suppress Palestinians Rather than Give them a State

Dry Bones Arab Spring & Jew-Christian Hatred


John R. Houk

© December 7, 2011


Western nations led by America, EU, Russia and the UN have been pressuring Israel to cave in to allowing a new State to arise from their Biblical Land for Arabs that call themselves Palestinians. As brutal as it sounds I believe Israel should drive Muslim Arabs from Judea-Samaria and Gaza to Jordan and Syria. Jordan especially was carved out of the original British Mandate for Palestine as a gift to the Hashemite family for aiding the British to victory in WWI over Turkey (then the Ottoman Empire). The British awarded the Hashemites other carved out areas as well; however the Mandate for Palestine was created with the purpose of restoring Jews to their homeland. Take note this was BEFORE the Holocaust that murdered approximately SIX MILLION JEWS. In recognition that the majority population of the area was Muslim and Christian Arabs, the huge Mandate for Palestine was intended to create an Arab State separate from the Jewish State.


Incidentally the Christian Arab population was much greater in Palestine Mandate days than they are now. Does anyone know why? It is because from the time that Arabs that call themselves Palestinians became recognized as a political entity the Muslim majority in Judea-Samaria began persecuting the Christian minority. Christian Arabs have responded by leaving traditional areas of population concentration (like Bethlehem) for safer places to live. PA-Hamas-Hezbollah propagandists have attempted to bend statistics that Israel is the fault for Christian Arabs leaving Judea-Samaria and that Christian Zionists (i.e. Evangelicals) are spreading propaganda that Islam is the reason for Christian Arabs leaving their homes. The actual truth is that Islam is to blame, the Christian Arab population in Israel has tripled and Evangelicals are countering the propaganda of Islamic terrorists. Malcolm Lowe utilizes statistics to shine a light on the blatant manipulation Muslim propagandists are using in creating lies.


Islamic terrorists are real big on using propaganda to lie their way into a sovereign Palestine on Jewish land. The propaganda has been so successful that Western governments are trying to kowtow to the terrorists by telling their citizens that stealing Jewish land and giving it to Arabs that call themselves Palestinians will bring peace to the Middle East.


Western governments are failing to tell the truth that Arabs in the Jewish territories, that their education and media are training Arabs - from cradle to the grave – to hate Jews and American Christians. Here are five example clips from Al-Aksa TV (Hamas) of how Jews are portrayed to Muslims courtesy of MEMRI TV.


Why in the world is our American government joining three other Western entities to nearly bludgeon Israel into accepting a sovereign Palestine State right alongside the Israeli border? This Palestine will be controlled by the Palestine Authority which ultimately will include Hamas controlled Gaza. The Palestine Authority is just as devilish in propagating Jew and American hatred as Hamas. Unless the Islamic terrorists accept the existence as a Jewish State and cease from brainwashing Jew-hatred, the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians will NEVER cease from a having a violent society with the primary ethic of killing Jews and destroying Israel.


JRH 12/7/11

Let’s Take on Radical Islam in America

Islam Exposed


John R. Houk

© September 9, 2011


ACT for America is probably in the forefront in America in educating about radical Islam and Stealth Jihad to infiltrate American government agencies and congresses on a Federal and State level to make it possible to achieve special favors for Islamic adherents that desire Sharia Law to evolve into the law of the land rather than the U.S. Constitution.


The successes of ACT for America has not gone unnoticed by Muslim-American organizations that claim the moniker of “moderate” when in fact nearly every large Muslim-American organization has connections to the radical Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood or the Wahhabi influence of Saudi Arabia.


Legal Jihad has been an effective tool for Muslim-American organizations to silence those that expose the agenda of radical Islam in America. One of the biggest thorns to the lying Muslim-American organizations is that the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial and convictions has exposed just how connected they are to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Palestinian proxy terrorist group Hamas.


Muslim-American organizations have begun the strategy learned from the Islamic terrorists of the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians. That strategy is to twist facts, fabricate and stage scenes to place blame on others and the good old fashioned outright lie.


Thus ACT for America is mobilizing a campaign to find 400 stable donators that are willing to give $19 monthly in order to meet the challenges of Legal Jihad and Stealth Jihad that now is focused on discrediting the credibility of ACT for America.


Below are two emails that brilliantly make the case for joining ACT for America’s Patriot Partner Program.


JRH 9/9/11


Brigit Gabriel on 911 and Islamic Terrorism

A Palestinian Should be Ashamed


John R. Houk

© April 17, 2011


A person commented on my SlantRight 2.0 blog concerning a post dated March 27, 2011. The post is entitled, Lies of Palestinian Propaganda”. The comment congratulated me on my fine post followed simply with a link to a YouTube video entitled, “I Am Palestine”.


When I first examined the comment I suspected it was spam that would send readers to a marketing or porn site. I also like to give commenters’ the benefit of the doubt so I went to confirm my suspicions by copying and pasting the YouTube link to a browser as a due diligence before I was going to delete the comment.


To my surprised delight “I Am Palestine” was a video of sarcasm showing all the things Palestinians are proud of and that the rest of the world should be wagging the finger of shame to you Palestinians.


From the YouTube site a transcript of the rapid moving words of the video is available.  I will post those words followed by the video.


JRH 4/17/11


I am Palestine


By Jean Vercors

Apr 10, 2011

From: Honest View YouTube Channel


My people were invented by the Arab countries in the 60′s
with the goal to destroy Israel.
We came from, Syria, Egypt and Irak.
No Arab political entity was called by that name
before that date.

I have no idea who before Arafat
was a Palestinian Leader
I claim borders for an Arab country
that never was.

I can speak Arabic that is my mother tongue,
forget about the Palestinian Language

I claim Jerusalem as my capital
though not mentioned once in the Quran
but mentioned 700 times in the bible.
King David founded Jerusalem,
Mohammed never set foot in it, so what?
Jews pray facing Jerusalem,
Muslims face Mecca.
If we Palestinians
are between the two cities,
we pray facing Mecca,
with our backs to Jerusalem.

Today There are 22 Arab countries,
not counting Palestine.
But We Muslims constantly scream
and whine about Israel
occupying Muslim lands in Israel.

Israel is surrounded by hostile states
650 times their size in territory
and sixty times their population.
who is occupying what?

BDS: Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
and all ignorant people have so much hate
for the Jews that why they support us.
And we like that…

Don’t tell me ! The only true Apartheid states
in the Middle East are Islamic states
in which Jews are not allowed to live
and where Christians, Copts, Kabyles, Baha’is
and other religious minorities are objects
of discrimination and persecution.
Or that The entire Jewish population of Muslim countries
had to flee as the result of violence and pogroms.
I don’t want to hear it, that’s not my business!

I Want peace
but I rejected the peace plan
in 1948 and 2000.
Why ? simply because I teach Jihad
and martyrdom to my children,
they are glorified as the means
to liberating “Palestine”
and children’s poems contain calls
to war and bloodletting.

we Arabs were supporters of Hitler in the 1930,
The father of Palestinian nationalism.
Haj Amin Al-Husseini, was a devoted Nazi
who spent the war in Berlin
and worked with members of the Third Reich
to plan extermination camps for the Jews
of the Middle East.

BDS: Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
and I don’t like Israel’s Security fence
that is an apartheid wall
because I cannot commit suicide bombings
and rocket attacks on Israeli citizens.

We Arab refugees from Israel
began calling ourselves “Palestinians” in 1967,
two decades after (modern) Israeli statehood.

no Arab country would take in us,
the “Palestinians” who were invited into camps
and were kept there by the Arab regimes
to stir up hatred against the Jews.

it suits Arab states very well
to have the Palestinians
endure permanent refugee status.
our special thanks to UNRWA,
an agency exclusively
serving the Palestinian.
a special UN agency
that was created just for us
and even better
Some UNRWA personnel belong to Hamas.

I am a base of thousands of rocket attacks
against schoolyards and townships in Israel.

I am a well known media manipulation expert
and the anti Israel media bias love us,
Have you ever heard of Pallywood?

I use Human shields:
a military and political technique
that is the deliberate placement of civilians
in or around combat targets to deter
an enemy from attacking those targets.

Human shields are the weapon of our resistance.
the use of human shields constitutes
“perfidy” under Article 147
of the Geneva Convention IV
defining the laws of war
but we consider it a noble cause.

I am proud to be Palestinian because
i receive the most humanitarian aid
per head of population
(in 2008, receiving US$2.6 billion
and US$799 million respectively).
That’s right, Palestinian people
receive the largest amount of donations worldwide.
we mean business.

According to serious studies, during 2009 and 2010 the PA’s reliance on donations increased — with a 20% growth in donations, totaling some $3.96BN per year.
In fact, the Palestinian people receive the largest amount of donations worldwide. we mean business.

I preach and engage in violence and terror
in order to destroy the state of Israel
and replace it with an Islamic state.
My virulent hatred of Jews and Judaism
is deeply rooted in the anti-Semitic
writings of Muslim Brotherhood theologians.

I wish to thank
the US and EU taxpayer,
the UN and the anti Israeli media
for their continued efforts
in our ignoble cause.


Overcome the Leftist Pursuit of Crisis Creation

Leftist Media Lying

John R. Houk

© January 11, 2011


A huge tragedy happened on the American scene when Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was part of an assassination attempt that killed others including a Judge and a nine year old gal but left the Representative in critical condition. One would think the incident would form one of those rare unified moments in America as when everyone was on the same page on 9/11 (at least momentarily). Unfortunately this is not what happened.


Leftist talking heads and bloggers immediately blamed the Tea Party Movement and unsurprisingly Sarah Palin. Evidently Leftist hatred spurred by popular voting to remove the Democrats from power in the House and slimming down the gap of the Dem majority in the Senate, has led to a propaganda moment that Leftists could not resist.


Leftist propaganda strategy is to twist military and target practice terminology utilized by the Tea Party and Palin as a reason for Jared Loughner’s inability to internally resist putting into action the shooting of Rep. Giffords. After all, it is true Rep. Giffords barely retained her seat from opposing Tea Party Republican candidate Jesse Kelly which had a lot of support from Sarah Palin as well. Giffords won by a mere 2% of the vote over Kelly. Kelly was a pro-gun Iraq war veteran that probably lost because of a M16 target shooting spree. The M16 incident was projected by Leftist propaganda as the actions of a Right Wing Nut which was framed as the actual target practice of incumbent candidate Giffords. Kelly’s pro-gun humor as an election antic for supporters became fodder for anti-gun skilled polemicists of the Left. This undoubtedly cost Kelly the victory in Arizona District 8. Left Wing polemicists and an amazing amount of Center-Right polemicists hopped on the band wagon of blame, to point fingers at Kelly’s M16 event and Palin’s cross hairs scope as reasons for Loughner’s shooting spree.


This blood pointing toward Conservative Tea Partiers is the height of hypocrisy as if Democrats never utilize military terminology in campaign strategy. When one thinks of Leftists one should think of the failed transformative ideology of Socialist Marxism. A good Leftist idea for society is to transform it. Transformation means killing people that might not agree with Marxism or Socialism; hence the genocides of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot. (No, Hitler was not a Right Winger: NAZI stood for political National Socialism and not practicing Free Speech, Religious Freedom or Market Economies.) Apparently some Dem Party strategists (oh my, a military term) quickly thought up the Rahm Emanuel axiom of never letting a good crisis to be wasted. A “blame the Tea Party” mantra was quickly established by the Democratic Party. In campaigning, it is a truism in elections that utilize military or violent terminology is something used on both the Left and Right as symbolic metaphors. Obviously the Right will use gun metaphors because they tend to be pro-Second Amendment; however I am guessing the Left utilizes an obfuscating version of weaponry to drive a point home.


Here is a blip from dt:


You’d think the right, and the Tea Party in particular, would pause to consider that the intimations and subtle endorsements of violent revolution might be misguided. But the founder of the Tea Party, Judson Phillips, has a different idea: Blame it on the left.


Of the shooting, Phillips wrote, “The left is coming and will hit us hard on this. We need to push back harder with the simple truth. The shooter was a liberal lunatic. Emphasis on both words.”


What’s even more mindboggling than his attempt to shift blame is that Phillips—even now—persists with the metaphors of violence. In the Tea Party worldview, the left’s critique is an attack, something that warrants counter-attack—it’s all a matter of transgressing battle lines.


Did you catch “violent revolution”? Does anyone know the paradigm in Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist global transformation? How Right Wing is it for Judson Phillips to claim correctly that assassin Jared Loughner was a “liberal lunatic”? I mean the young killer idolized Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto! The Left has attempted to paint a picture of Loughner as a Right Winger by placing Hitler and Marx in as an afterthought. If there is any Right Wing in Loughner it is of the fringe kind. For the Left all people on the Right are near to Skin Heads and for the violent overthrow of American by Militias. Dear God in Heaven a former High School acquaintance said of Loughner: “As I knew him he was left wing, quite liberal and oddly obsessed with the 2012 prophecy”. Loughner is indeed a Leftist loon.


Leftist Michael J.W. Stickings writes:


Perhaps this will be a turning point, a tipping point. Perhaps now the media and others will start paying attention to the rhetoric of violence that animates American conservatism today. You don’t have to go far to find it. Just listen to the Tea Party, to Beck, to Palin. They need to be held accountable.


I wonder if America’s Leftists should wish quid pro quo accountability for deceiving Americans into voting for Presidential candidate that has this list of American haters some of which call for the overthrow of America:


Bill Ayers


“We need a revolutionary communist party in order to lead the struggle, give coherence and direction to the fight, seize power and build the new society.”


The quotes above were scanned directly from a now long-forgotten book entitled Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism, which was written and published in 1974 by William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and other members of the Weather Underground. In this slim volume, which functioned as the Weather Underground’s ideological manifesto, Ayers declares himself to be a communist, and announces that his group’s bombing campaign was intended to start a violent revolution to overthrow the American government.


Saul Alinsky


In the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” – a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels and Lenin predicted – a revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and wholly unworthy of salvation. Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle for nothing less than the status quo’s complete collapse – to be followed by the erection of an entirely new system upon its ruins. Toward that end, they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly what types of societal “changes” are needed.


Jeremiah Wright


This view is entirely consistent with Rev. Wright’s devotion to the tenets of liberation theology, which is essentially Marxism dressed up as Christianity. Devised by Cold War-era theologians, it teaches that the gospels of Jesus can be understood only as calls for social activism, class struggle, and revolution aimed at overturning the existing capitalist order and installing, in its stead, a socialist utopia where today’s poor will unseat their “oppressors” and become liberated from their material (and, consequently, their spiritual) deprivations. An extension of this paradigm is black liberation theology, which seeks to foment a similar Marxist revolutionary fervor founded on racial rather than class solidarity. Wright’s mentor in this discipline is James Cone, author of the landmark text Black Power and Black Theology. Arguing that Christianity has been used by white society as an opiate of the (black) masses, Cone asserts that the destitute “are made and kept poor by the rich and powerful few,” and that “[n]o one can be a follower of Jesus Christ without a political commitment that expresses one’s solidarity with victims.”


Louis Farrakhan



According to Schlussel, “… a former Obama insider says that Obama’s sudden aversion to NOI and Farrakhan is belied by the fact that Obama employed and continues to employ several Farrakhan acolytes in high positions on his Illinois and U.S. Senate campaign and office staffs.”


One of those NOI members is Cynthia K. Miller, who served as Treasurer of his Senate campaign. Another NOI member is Jennifer Mason who currently serves as Obama’s Director of Constituent Services and who oversees the hiring of interns for Obama.



Sen. Obama’s pastor, Dr. Jeremiah Wright has been in the news recently over his anti-Israel statements and his recent awarding of a lifetime achievement award to his friend, Louis Farrakhan. The racist head of the Nation of Islam has referred to Judaism as a “gutter religion” and said that whites are only “potential” humans.


Father Michael Pfleger


Pfleger’s views on race were shaped, in large measure, by black radicalism in the 1960s. “I got very educated by the [Black] Panthers — very educated,” Pfleger once told Trumpet magazine, a publication of Rev. Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ.

Pfleger is also a great admirer of Louis Farrakhan: “I’ve known the minister [Farrakhan] both as someone who I have great respect for as a prophetic voice, as a mentor but also as a friend and as a brother,” said Pfleger.


More on Pfleger from Michelle Malkin:


Pfleger (who is white) grabbed the spotlight during the 2008 presidential campaign with jive-talking defenses of his fellow race-hustler and President Obama’s spiritual mentor, the Rev. Jeremiah “‘God Damn America!’ and ‘AmeriKKKa!’” Wright, and Jew-bashing hate-monger Louis “Judaism Is a ‘Gutter Religion’” Farrakhan. The racial-justice award winner called the latter a “great man” and welcomed him to his church.


There are more Obamanites that want to transform America away from the land of the free and home of the brave and who desire the pursuit of happiness, but I think you get the point. The kind of change these fellows want would stir a chaos in America that would lead to innumerable deaths of Americans. Where was the outrage of Leftist pundits, politicians and cowardly establishment Conservatives in 2008?


My God! Just think if Rep. Giffords was a Black-American or a Hispanic-American? Not only would the Tea Party Movement and Sarah Palin be blamed for the murder of six and attempted assassination of Giffords, the entire Conservative Movement from fiscal, 2nd Amendment, 10th Amendment and social Conservatives would be labeled as the promulgators of violence; ergo all things that are Conservative values must be suppressed to continue the Leftist vision of a Living Constitution that evolves with the temperament of the environment of NOW. Whatever that Leftist “NOW” is.


My fellow Conservatives here is a militant euphemism for you: Rise up and out-shout the Leftist propagandists to show that most American prefer Judeo-Christian Conservative values over the Leftist pursuit to never let a good crisis go to waste.


JRH 1/11/11

Muslim Apologist Lies on American Campuses

Stand Against Pal-Propaganda

John R. Houk

© December 10, 2010


Ari Bussel writes about the deceit of pro-Palestinian elements on American campuses. I have nothing against pro-Palestinian elements presenting their case; however I do have a problem when the Israeli perspective is restricted or non-existent. I am extremely pro-Israel and hence tend to get extremely upset when a Palestinian half-truth is told to demonize Israel. Arabs that call themselves Palestinians and their apologists consistently fail to tell how these particular Arabs are taught to hate Jews from the cradle to the grave. The failure lay in that almost nearly from Israel’s modern inception the Muslims of the Middle East have attempted to destroy Jews from their hereditary homeland via Islamic Supremacist violence.


The new Israel that became independent in 1948 won their freedom to exist on a fraction of their land that Jews have been ejected from by force for more than a millennia. Even after many Muslim-Arabs fled in 1948 at the behest of Muslim-Arab invaders to save them from what the invaders thought would be a bloody carnage decimating losing Jews, these Arabs expect the right to return to land voluntarily left from. The Arab version is that the Jews forced the Arabs to leave land by force. Although some Arabs experienced the wrath of independence minded Jews, the reality is this was the exception more than the rule. The reality is that wherever Jews came under the control Arab armies they suffered atrocities. The reality is that the land occupied by then Transjordan in 1948 resulted in the forced expulsion of Jews from their homes (some of them ancient as in the Jewish Quarter of the Jerusalem Old City that later became dubbed East Jerusalem) while Synagogues and revered Jewish burial sites were desecrated. You can tell the difference between Jewish and Muslim sense of history. In 1967 when Israel regained their land from occupying Jordan, the Israeli government then allowed the Islamic Supremacist Waqf to maintain its authority on the Temple Mount allowing Muslim Mosques (Al Aqsa and Dome of the Rock) to stand. If Israel had followed the example of Muslim-Arabs established in 1948, Jews could have desecrated the two Mosques on the most holy parcel of Land to all Jews worldwide.


I could go on and on about how Muslim-Arab apologists have managed to prevail about portraying themselves as the victims. Three thousand years of Jewish victimization including the present day is being failed to be presented. Ari Bussel elaborates on this.


JRH 12/10/10


Israelis, Haters of Israel

Arab Film Festival


By Ari Bussel

Sent: 12/9/2010 5:10 PM


A two-day Arab Film Festival was held recently at the School of Cinematic Arts at the University of Southern California.  The event was part of a yearlong program of USC’s Arts and Humanities Initiative called Visions and Voices.


“Eyes on the Middle East” was focused on a very narrow area of interest:  The Israeli Palestinian conflict.  Dubbed, “complex and controversial” the “conflict” was depicted by “filmmakers on both sides, using cinematic media to express a variety of perspectives about the struggles and the quest for peace.”


More accurately, the sixteen hours of movie watching looked, with the exception of eleven minutes, at only one side:  the Palestinian Narrative.  During a “rebuttal” time, the true colors of the Palestinian narrative were shown, in their own words, from UNRA schools in Gaza.  These, however, were cut short and were declared repeatedly to be “advocacy pieces” by Israel.


In short, Professor Jeremy Kagan, who did not try to disguise his own bias, has successfully exposed students and guests of one of USC’s premier schools to the most creative weapon in the Arab’s arsenal:  Manipulating the world’s public opinion via the use of storytelling.


The Muslims have successfully engaged in deceiving the Western World.  Deceit is permitted by their religion, even encouraged if it helps them attain their goals (of spreading Islam and reaching global dominance).  It seems there was no one who excelled in it better, in recent history, than Arafat himself.  He created the notion of a “Palestinian People,” of some “Nationhood” and craving for Jerusalem as its “eternal capital.”  In short, he stole the Jewish-Zionist two thousand year history and rewrote it into his own narrative.


So successful was Arafat, that hardly even three decades later, the world itself stands saluting the idea of a Palestinian Statehood (in the boundaries of what was once known as Israel), with a Right of Return of millions of Palestinians that were kept in refugee camps throughout the Arab world, and with Jerusalem as their eternal capital.


For Professor Kagan, Palestine exists and is very real.  Palestinians are hurting, and it is all because of the Israelis.  The necessary outcome:  Jews must return to their original homelands, Germany, Poland, the United States of America, and return Palestine to its original owners.  To achieve this, to bring down the Goliath, cinema “can play a powerful role in increasing international awareness and understanding.”


The awareness is not of homicide bombings by Muslims, the steps taken by Israel to minimize the deaths of innocents when her enemies fire from within civilian population centers or the tedious, unending process Israel has undergone to ensure human rights equal for all and to maintain her democracy at a very high cost to her Jewish citizens. 


The awareness stays away from brainwashing, hatemongering, glorifying terrorists and promising an afterlife rewarded with sexual pleasures to those who kill in the name of their god. 


This “so-called” awareness dismisses anything that impressionable souls may find offensive and focuses instead on blood libels. 


How was this conveyed during the festival?


Stories were shown in a continuum, taken out of context, without the proper background or timeline.  Thus, we were exposed to Palestinian workers who are in Israel illegally, hiding during the night in the fields at a “nine star hotel,” being chased by the police.  Interestingly, the construction site supervisors knowingly employed illegal workers. 


The worker’s reasoning:  There is no work back at home (in Ramallah), so they come to Israel.


Update:  Since the movie, Arabs are no longer employed in construction.  Foreign workers were brought from East Asian countries. They work hard and send much of their earnings to their families back at home.


Does that sound familiar to any American?  Have we ever bothered to extend a hand to the thousands of homeless people in our streets, many who served our country, others who are mentally ill?


The next story was of two young men sent to execute a homicide mission in Tel Aviv.  Their senders recruit others, but will not dedicate their own lives to reach that paradise full of virgins.  There is a fence that needs to be crossed, separating “Palestine” and Israel, designed exactly to prevent such occurrences.  As the movie shows, a fence can be very effective, but this one is torn open – allowing free passage.


As they cross, there is an Israeli waiting to take them to their destination.  He and his girlfriend will be paid once the mission is complete – once murder and mayhem rule and innocent blood is spilled.


There is a human side to terrorism, a toll even, and the viewer becomes absorbed and sympathizes with the perpetrators, almost wanting to participate himself.


All the while in Israel, Jewish (Israeli) and Muslim (Arab) parents try to bring about peace by sending their children to a bi-lingual, bi-national school.  The very premise of the school is faulted, for Arab Israelis are citizens who already possess equal rights in Israel.


At the school, children celebrate Hanukah and are taken to a mosque to pray.  Worse of all, the teachers present completely opposing viewpoints:  Israel’s independence day is celebrated by the Jews yet is a day of mourning for the Muslims – it is their “Catastrophe.”


Two life-changing moments in the movie, according to the filmmaker, were two friends, a Jew and a Muslim from the same class who go to the Jewish boy’s grandma’s house for lunch.  There, over spaghetti and meatballs, the grandma, who is in shock due to a terrorist attack that happened earlier the day, asks very poignant questions of the Arab boy.  Were the questions justified?  Not to a boy that age, but they highlighted the real theater in which this experiment took place, where Palestinians will butcher the Jews just because they are Jews and in order to take over.


The other scene is two girls, best friends; a Jew and a Muslim from the same class.  They go with the father of the Muslim girl to celebrate, and as they sit and eat, the Jewish girl, much older and wiser for her age, asks her friend’s father why is her friend never permitted to admit she is in love with a boy.


The father states that even when the daughter reaches the age of 25, if she decides to fall in love and dares to say anything, he himself will kill her and then go to the police station to confess.


This example of childhood innocence versus a backward society trying to force us back into the 7th Century should have been expunged from the movie, claim Arabs.  Like any other reality that is unpleasant to western ears and eyes.

To highlight co-existence, there are wonderful examples of minorities living in Israel without promoting the right of such minorities to overtake the country.  The country was founded as a Jewish state, in which minorities have full rights.  Those who view the very founding of the nation as a catastrophe have a choice:  to leave.  To overcharge young impressionable minds of third graders with a conflict of one nation to destroy another nation is neither fair nor warranted.


Again, bring it close to home:  Think about those aspiring to be Americans learning the language, celebrating our holidays and trying to become productive citizens.  If they are actively engaged against the United States of America, their place is not here.  [There are several recent examples of Americans aspiring to bring down the Government and establish Muslim Shaaria Law, including going and fighting against American forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.]


There was another story of a father and a son driving together.  The father recognizes the reality in which he lives and submits to checks at roadblocks designed to prevent the free passage of terrorists en route to homicide bombings or carrying other terrorist acts.  The son is influenced by his uncle’s “heroic” death (as a terrorist, Palestinian “Freedom Fighter”) and despises the father’s behavior.


The son wants to fight the brutal Zionist oppressors, to rid the country of them.  He is tomorrow’s Shaid, martyr, ready for the struggle.


The filmmaker explained during a panel discussion the difference between him, a Palestinian, and the new generation.  Interestingly, he is an Israeli-Arab from Northern Israel.  But his observation is correct:  The new generation is ready to fight to death until they destroy the Jews.  It is a generation raised on hatred, in what they see on TV, hear on the radio, see and experience in hip hop videos and are brainwashed and trained in schools and summer camps.


It is a generation lost to hatred, a generation that will fight to murder, for the sake of rewards in the afterlife, for glorification after their deaths in classrooms and city squares, on stamps and in textbooks and stories.


The same filmmaker made another true observation – Palestinians are excellent storytellers, but their story has not been heard until recently.  This very Film Festival is a testament to how effective story telling can be as a weapon, when the story is false yet it creates an illusion of authenticity and humanity.


The next full feature was damning to the Jews.  It is a great movie about a sleazy politician who becomes Israel’s Minister of Defense.  He and his wife move into a house his wife designed, bordering a lemon grove belonging to a widowed Palestinian woman whose family has been tending the grove for generations.


A decision is made to uproot the grove, due to security considerations vis-à-vis the safety of the Minister’s family’s life.  Compensation is offered, which goes beyond what the law requires.  The widowed owner, who depends on the lemon grove for her livelihood, decides to fight. 


We witness a politician in all his rotten glory, from making opposing statements as may befit the situation, having a possible affair with his young aide, forcing his wife to submit to his career, and otherwise a story not much different from Desperate Housewives. 


There is indeed a love affair between the widow and her lawyer, about half her age, and the story of a women fighting to save her lemons and the soul of the grove her father cultivated before her.


At the end the Israeli Supreme Court upholds the military court’s ruling, removing the requirement for any compensation but prohibiting uprooting the full grove, just trimming it down to nothing.


Here too there are several observations that are quite interesting and to which attention would not be normally paid:  First, the Supreme Court hearing was before a panel of three women judges.  In Israel, there is a woman on the Supreme Court (in fact, the Chief Justice is a woman) and there is also an Arab (non-Jew) as a Justice.


Also, although it is presented differently, only in Israel can anyone approach the Supreme Court, be the person an Israeli citizen or not, be heard and receive a fair trial.  Moreover, unlike the USA, where a case may or may not be heard and the process is particularly lengthy, the Israeli Supreme Court hears cases constantly, one does not need to mortgage’s one very existence to be heard, and the Court has traditionally been supportive of action that would seem to be contrary to interests of the State.


Indeed, it is the very same court that has constantly upheld individual’s rights over those of the State, and much of the “Wall” has had to change due to its decisions under Aharon Barak, the previous Chief Justice.


The movie also highlights a closed, backward society in which a widow is threatened not to defile her dead husband’s reputation, although he has been dead for ten years—she must remain in solitude for the rest of her life.


There are themes, throughout the two day event, that are recurring:  the notion of Paradise (and the confusion that murdering in the name of an All Merciful will bring one to a heaven full of virgins), lemon trees and oranges and the soul of the groves (replacing somewhat the olive trees, as no one seemingly is interested in peace any more), demolitions and taking over the houses and belongings of the Arabs, the notion of David, the victim, voiceless Palestinians against the Military Might of the Israeli Occupation Machine, WALLS, more WALLS, and the glorification of homicide bombings and generally breaking the law.


The next day started with a Palestinian whose grandfather was born in Jaffe either under Ottoman or British rule.  She was born and raised in Brooklyn, and now she comes to Israel to first get her grandfather’s inheritance (bank account from the pre-1948 War to eliminate the Jewish State) and to claim his house back.


She stops at nothing, from robbing a bank (which happens to be Arab) that refuses to give her the money, disguising her lover-comrades to lying and threatening.  Everything is permissible and no laws are to be observed as long as she thinks she it is right.


She ends up being deported back to the United States, but in the meantime succeeds in persuading herself and us that she was wronged, that Israelis must leave this country and return everything to the rightful owners.  To what is it similar?  To coming to New York and requiring that all the high rises, everything the eye can see, be left there and the residents leave, disappear. That Manhattan be returned to the Indians to whom they paid a mere $24.


The movie is full of overlaid juxtaposition of images of demolitions and Jewish immigrants and checkpoints and walls and separation, making us constantly aware the Jewish State was built over the remains of someone else’s country. That Israelis are interlopers without rights or justification for their existence.


Interesting, of course, are the scenes taken out of context, like construction sites that associate destruction rather than building and growth. This, indeed, is the difference between the Jews who made a desert flourish, dried the swamps, fought malaria and changed something barren into a living paradise and the Palestinians who want to ruin it all, turn it to ashes and bloodshed, into a large graveyard.


Most touching was the movie that compared the sorrow and grief by Israeli mothers whose sons and daughters were murdered in homicide bombings and other terror attacks with the Palestinian mothers mourning their sons and daughters, the Shaids, martyrs. 


Something was missing however, like how the Palestinian children were killed in an explosion (a work accident while constructing rockets or booby trapping a residential area?) or by Israeli Settlers SHOOTING TO MURDER?  The only instances known are those of Palestinians shooting dozens of bullets into passing cars or sharp shooters doing the same to murder Jews simply because they are Jews.


Alas, I am told, the reasons make no difference.  The story is about mothers grieving for their lost offspring.  And this is exactly the point:  There is NO MORAL EQUIVALENCY BETWEEN THE VICTIMS AND THE PERPETRATORS.  Israelis value life more than anything— theirs or their enemies.  The Muslims place no value on anyone’s lives, not theirs and definitely not their enemies.


It is a culture of death vs. the sanctity of life, and the director has committed a great sin against humanity by comparing the grief and equating it.


These subtleties are so refined, the message so intertwined, that the Arab Film Festival managed to do a purely amazing job at relating a story, of a Palestinian people who are all good, who crave for nothing more than what is theirs, and who will find the courage from within to fight the evil empire to achieve justice.


What is wrong with this picture?  The fact it is the height of deceit? 


For me, the most amazing observations were the following two:


First, most of the movies were filmed in Israel, by Israelis and with the support and financing of the Israeli Government.  One filmmaker explained it is the strength of Israeli society that allows itself to self-criticize.  I see it as a great weakness in a society that allows self-hate to take over and refusing to see the harm in perpetrating lies.


Second, there was no presence, other than one individual who usually fights alone, like Don Quixote.  After the Turkish Terrorist Flotilla, he managed to videotape a sixteen-year old courageous stance against a mob of Muslims, generating 800,000 hits and raising the morale of the Jewish People all over the world.

During the weekend festival, he managed to bring the short film, dubbed by the organizers “advocacy” and “propaganda,” and succeeded in having a few minutes of the film shown.  That tilted the hands of justice from a total lie to a small semblance of balance.


Noticeably absent were representatives of Israel.  The State of Israel vis-à-vis her local representatives, has focused on filmmaking and bringing filmmakers to Israel.  Here, some of her best were showcased, all in a light that disgraced her very being.


Why were the Israeli representatives, both Government diplomats and others, not here? 


For those who attended the Arab Film Festival and managed to get a glass-full of lessons in Palestinian suffering, as seen by Israeli eyes, created and crafted by Israelis and financed by their own government, the conclusion must have been simple:  ISRAEL IS AT FAULT AND SHE RECOGNIZES IT.


I beg to differ:  Israelis who hate Israel are at work while Israel stands idle and does nothing.  This must change, if Israel is to survive the war to destroy her. Her enemies from within and without are winning battles day after day and soon the Jewish people will awaken, too late, to their own demise.


Muslim Apologist Lies on American Campuses

John R. Houk

© December 10, 2010


Israelis, Haters of Israel


The series “Postcards from America—Postcards from Israel” by Ari Bussel and Norma Zager is a compilation of articles capturing the essence of life in America and Israel during the first two decades of the 21st Century.


The writers invite readers to view and experience an Israel and her politics through their eyes, Israel visitors rarely discover.


This point—and often—counter-point presentation is sprinkled with humor and sadness and attempts to tackle serious and relevant issues of the day. The series began in 2008, appears both in print in the USA and on numerous websites and is followed regularly by readership from around the world.


© “Postcards from America — Postcards from Israel,” December, 2010



First Published November 21, 2010


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 82 other followers

%d bloggers like this: