Examine Fatouros Deep State Posts


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 16, 2018

I found two posts from  Dee Fatouros on her blog The Realistic Observer which were actually cross posts themselves. Typically, I shy away from cross posting Fatouros blogs because she promotes in many of the same circles that I run in. I gotta tell ya, the info on these posts are extremely relevant yet you will not hear the details on the Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM). If you hear or read it, the actual data will be twisted, informers vilified and/or issue downright lies exonerating the Deep State actors.

 

Here’s the thing, the data presented on the two posts are actually sourced from actual entities rather than the infamous “anonymous source”. The most relevant source being the Inspector General’s (IG) very recently released report examining probable criminality in the DOJ and FBI from Obamanites before and after the election of President Trump. This report centers on Andrew McCabe nefarious activities and is entitled, “A Report of Investigation of Certain Allegations Relating to Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe”. Here’s a link to a Fox News upload of the report to Scribd.

 

Fatouros’ cross posts are from (in order of date) DC Whispers and The Last Refuge. I’m using The Realistic Observer version in my cross post because that is how I discovered them.

 

The Last Refuge post links to a Youtube video that is recommended to go viral because of the important info therein. I liked the roughly 15-minute video so much that I am sharing the actual video on my blog. Mysteriously to me, the audio unceremoniously terminates as if there was more to be said roughly two-minutes before the end of the full length.

VIDEO: BOMBSHELL: McCabe OIG Report and Loretta Lynch 

 

Posted by Tracy Beanz

Published on Apr 15, 2018

 

Support me on Patreon (THANK YOU!!) http://patreon.com/tracybeanz Support me on Paypal: tracybeanz@aol.com

Follow me on twitter/gab/dtube/bitchute @tracybeanz

 

INFO:

 

OIG REPORT: https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/us/politics/20180413a-doj-oig-mccabe-report.pdf

 

http://abcnews.go.com/US/justice-department-review-means-eric-garner-case/story?id=43085124

 

Prince Interview: https://youtu.be/Xg1r3BAPVbo

 

Timeline: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11zG0hTTsrejbrTlWPubhmwsRJo6i_EZ29jwq282_uSo/edit#gid=0

 

Giuliani: http://video.foxnews.com/v/5185914034001/?#sp=show-clips

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/31/mccabe-learned-about-clinton-emails-on-weiner-laptop-month-before-fbi-alerted-congress-report-says.html

 

And now, the double cross post of The Realistic Observer.

 

JRH 4/16/18

Please Support NCCR

******************************

More malfeasance from the Barack, Hillary, Bill triad

 

Posted by  Dee Fatouros

April 15, 2018 6:38:00 AM 

The Realistic Observer

By DC Whispers

Rub a dub dub, three crooks in a tub

 

IG Report Outlines How Obama DOJ Worked To Shut Down Investigation Into Clinton Crime Syndicate 
Posted on April 14, 2018

 

Lost in the haze of the Syria bombing, the Establishment Media’s purposeful ignorance, and the ongoing ripples following the stunning FBI raid on the offices of President Trump’s longtime attorney, is the scathing outline by the Inspector General regarding how the Obama Department of Justice aggressively shut down what was to be a widespread investigation into the Clinton Foundation looking into allegations of widespread financial crimes.

Talk about obstruction of justice!

Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitten [sic] caught the Clinton Foundation information within the IG report and is doing his best to get the word out even as the Establishment Media covers the eyes and ears of the American public in order to keep that information largely unknown:

 

 

There were rank and file FBI agents said to be increasingly frustrated that their efforts to investigate the Clinton Crime Syndicate were being halted at every turn. This move to insulate the Clintons (and likely the Obama White House) from damage was overseen at the highest levels of the FBI and Obama DOJ. These same high-level Deep State figures are the very same ones who have been orchestrating the ongoing attacks against President Trump – attacks that likely continue to be orchestrated by the Obama/Jarett Machine with input from the Clintons. (Like what took place during the secret tarmac meeting between then Obama AG Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. Top officials at the FBI refuse to hand over documents regarding that meeting due to their being “highly classified” even though both Lynch and Clinton claim they just talked about the weather and their grandkids.)

The Deep State continues to believe it controls the narrative. It’s up to all of you to prove them wrong.

Original Article:  DC Whispers

+++++++++++++++++

When the going gets tough, bad actors turn on each other

 

Posted by Dee Fatouros 

April 15, 2018 7:53:00 PM 

The Realistic Observer

Posted on April 15, 2018 by sundance 

 

Comey & McCabe-Left, Lynch-Center & Crooked Hillary & Obama-Right

 

There is no honor among thieves trying to cover their own posteriors. The following article contains many links and gives a very detailed inside view of the DOJ and FBI machinations prior to the 2016 election. 

 

Trail of James Comey’s Dirt on Loretta Lynch Discovered Within IG Report on Andrew McCabe…
Posted on April 15, 2018 by sundance [The Last Refuge]

 

A very interesting development is unfolding as a result of internet researcher TracyBeanz [Twitter HERE – YouTube HERE] and some insightful dot connecting by those following.

The outline begins via a relatively under-reported accusation about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch by former FBI Director James Comey in his upcoming book.

According to ABC News Comey writes in “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership,” that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of a mysterious development which he felt could cast “serious doubt” on Lynch’s independence.

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

It seems rather odd for James Comey to be making such an accusation against Loretta Lynch in the book. Why add that aspect? ..and why do so without expanding the details?

Well, keep in mind, that at the time the book was written, Mr. Comey had no idea exactly where the ongoing Inspector General investigation might lead; nor did he know the timing of release. Hence, the notation without expanded citation is likely explained.

However, with part of the OIG report released, within the Andrew McCabe background there’s a trail of evidence to the AG involvement James Comey was eluding toward.

On page six of the IG report (point number 4) we find a conference call between Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and the FBI field office in New York where the subject of the Weiner/Abedin/Clinton laptop findings overlap with: the Clinton Foundation (CF) investigation; the Clinton Email investigation; pressure for Asst. Director McCabe to recuse himself, and Washington DC via Loretta Lynch using DOJ Main Justice leverage from the Eric Garner case against the NY FBI office and New York Police Department.

From the OIG report:

4. The Attorney General Expresses Strong Concerns to McCabe and other FBI Officials about Leaks, and McCabe Discusses Recusing Himself from CF Investigation (October 26)

McCabe told the OIG that during the October 2016 time frame, it was his “perception that there was a lot of information coming out of likely the [FBI’s] New York Field Office” that was ending up in the news. McCabe told the OIG that he “had some heated back-and-forths” with the New York Assistant Director in Charge (“NY-ADIC”) over the issue of media leaks.

On October 26, 2016, McCabe and NY-ADIC participated in what McCabe described as “a hastily convened conference call with the Attorney General who delivered the same message to us” about leaks, with specific focus being on leaks regarding the high-profile investigation by FBI’s New York Field Office into the death of Eric Garner. McCabe told us that he “never heard her use more forceful language.” NY-ADIC confirmed that the participants got “ripped by the AG on leaks.”

According to NY-ADIC’s testimony and an e-mail he sent to himself on October 31, McCabe indicated to NY-ADIC and a then-FBI Executive Assistant Director (“EAD”) in a conversation after Attorney General Lynch disconnected from the call that McCabe was recusing himself from the CF Investigation.

(Page #6 and #7 – IG Report Link)

What makes this explosive is the timing and how reporting in 2016 was explaining this specific call and the outcome therein.

On September 28th, 2016, Andrew McCabe was made aware of information the New York Police Department and FBI has obtained from a captured laptop belonging to Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner. The laptop was evidence in the Weiner “sexting” case involving a minor; however, the laptop also contained thousands of State Department documents from Hillary Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife.

Some of the extracted laptop evidence was turned over to the DOJ Southern District of New York (SDNY) where Preet Bharara, a Clinton-Lynch ally, is United States Attorney.

Text messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok (Inbox) and FBI Special Counsel to Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page (Outbox):

 

Page-Strzok Texts – NYPD

 

[The letter to “Congress” at the end of the text exchange relates to notification of the re-opening of the Clinton investigation – Actual date of notification 10/28/16]

According to later reporting, FBI Director James Comey was not notified of the laptop issues for two to three weeks, after 9/28/16. However, in late October and early November, there were reports from people with contacts in New York police and FBI, about Washington DOJ officials interfering with the Weiner laptop investigation.

On the same date (October 26th, 2016) as the Lynch, McCabe and NY FBI phone call, former NY Mayor Rudy Giuilani [sic] was telling Fox News that an explosive development was forthcoming. Two days later, October 28th, 2016, Congress was notified of the additional Clinton emails.

However, a few more days later, November 4th, 2016, an even more explosive development as Erik Prince appeared on radio and outlined discoveries within the Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner laptop that was being blocked by AG Lynch.

Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week.

“Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.

“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said. (Link)

An earlier Grand Jury in New York had refused to return an indictment against the police in the Garner case. As an outcome of that grand jury finding, and as an outcome of their own investigation, the local FBI office and Eastern District of New York DOJ office was not trying to pursue criminal charges against the NYPD officers involved. This created a dispute because federal prosecutors and FBI officials in New York opposed bringing charges, while prosecutors with the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department in Washington argued there was clear evidence to do so.

On October 25th, 2016, Loretta Lynch replaced the New York prosecutors:

New York Times (Oct. 25) – The Justice Department has replaced the New York team of agents and lawyers investigating the death of Eric Garner, officials said, a highly unusual shake-up that could jump-start the long-stalled case and put the government back on track to seek criminal charges.

With that move on Oct. 25th, 2016, AG Lynch was now in position to threaten criminal prosecutions against the NYPD, and repercussions against the NY FBI and EDNY using the Garner case as leverage, just like Erik Prince outlined in the phone interview above.

Additionally, we see confirmation from the IG report, the Garner case was brought up in the next day (Oct 26, 2016) phone call to the NY FBI field office; just as Erik Prince outlined. Obviously Prince’s sources were close to the events as they unfolded.

The NY FBI and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) were threatened by Washington DC Main Justice and FBI, via Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe to drop the Clinton/Abedin/Weiner laptop investigation matters, or else the Garner DOJ Civil Rights Division would be used as leverage against the NYPD. And Loretta Lynch had SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara as the enforcer waiting for her call.

And so it was…

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

 

Comey & Lynch wearing Clinton-Kaine campaign shirts

 

Additionally, this excerpt from the Comey book is laughable:

“I never heard anyone on our team — not one — take a position that seemed driven by their personal political motivations. And more than that: I never heard an argument or observation I thought came from a political bias. Never,” Comey writes in his book. “Instead we debated, argued, listened, reflected, agonized, played devil’s advocate, and even found opportunities to laugh as we hashed out major decisions.” (LINK)

16. Please share my video on the topic, where I play the interviews, etc. – It really helps me… SPREAD THIS TWEET!! https://t.co/nH7ITZx2YC

— Tracybeanz (@tracybeanz) April 15, 2018

Lastly, I cannot help but be reminded of a post-election event where an FBI official from the same NY field office had her vehicle broken into and a laptop stolen which included “National Security information”. Everything was recovered, except the laptop.

Um, hey everyone, the Eric Garner case was handled by the EDNY. I was in the SDNY. Nice try @Barnes_Law https://t.co/3niXJHRbke 

— Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) April 15, 2018

@PreetBharara I don’t think you are looking at this right. AG Lynch was threatening to take the case and give it to you. YOU were the threat Lynch was using against the EDNY [who she (and McCabe) saw as a risk]. So what does that say about you? https://t.co/IFbZSbNZNJ

— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) April 15, 2018

Original Article: The Conservative Tree House

______________________________

Examine Fatouros Deep State Posts

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 16, 2018

________________________________

The Realistic Observer – “Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses. –Plato”

 

ALL Senators and Representatives for the 50 States : Contacts Information

 

Obama’s Political Persecution of Dinesh D’Souza


Dinesh D'Souza 3 - Director-Writer '2016- Obama's America'

John R. Houk

© February 2, 2014

 

There is a long line of Conservative individuals and organizations – especially the independent Tea Party organizations – that have been persecuted and/or targeted for being anti-Obama. Dinesh D’Souza has enter the long list for making the documentary 2016: Obama’s America which actually grossed $33 MILLION bucks at the box office.

 

Obama’s persecution campaign has been going on for some time either through the IRS or through the Justice Department. In D’Souza’s case the Justice Department is going after him for mistakenly giving more than allowed in a campaign donation for the Republican candidate for the New York Senate (who lost). The campaign of Wendy Long actually returned the excess. Even so, the Justice Department is going after D’Souza even though the money was returned. NOW THAT IS SOME CRAZY POLITICAL PERSECTUTION in the United States of America.

 

I first became aware of this Leftist persecution of a Conservative dissenter of Obama through a Facebook friend. I will post his alert along with the movie documentary 2016: Obama’s America after this news report I found at Freedom Outpost which delves into the specifics I just merely introduced.

Obama's America 2016 ad banner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JRH 2/2/14

Please Support NCCR

***********************************

Indictment Of Obama Critic Dinesh D’Souza Is A Warning For All Conservatives

By Janna Brock

January 25, 2014

Freedom Outpost

 

“2016: Obama’s America” was one of the most talked about movies of the summer in 2012. Directed by Dinesh D’Souza, an outspoken critic of President Obama, it explored the fundamental idea, “If Barack Obama wins a second term, where will we be in 2016?” Dinesh D’Souza probably never imagined that he would be indicted by a grand jury for giving “too much money” to a U.S. Senate candidate in 2012. In what amounts to nothing but trumped up charges, it stands to reason that this is direct targeting by the Obama Administration. Conservatives from all across the country, in any arena, need to heed the warning that Obama is after them. No one is safe.

 

Dinesh D’Souza is a well known author as well, having written the books Illiberal Education, What’s So Great About America, The End of Racism, and The Roots of Obama’s Rage, which “2016: Obama’s America” was based on, and many others. So it is no coincidence that the Obama Administration, using every available weapon at their disposal, would single out D’Souza. He had a bulls-eye on his back. All conservative Americans do. If the DOJ can indict Dinesh D’Souza for campaign finance “violations,” no one is safe.

 

Conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, whose documentary 2016: Obama’s America took a critical look at President Barack Obama and was a surprise hit in 2012, will be arrested in New York on Friday for allegedly violating campaign-finance laws, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.

 

Federal authorities accuse D’Souza of donating more than is legal to the campaign of Wendy Long, who ran in 2012 for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Hillary Clinton but lost to now-Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. Long, though, is not mentioned in an indictment obtained by THR on Thursday.

 

Insiders say D’Souza has been friends with Long since they attended Dartmouth College together in the early 1980s. According to the indictment, D’Souza donated $20,000 to Long’s campaign by aggregating the money from various people and falsely reporting the source of the funds. But Gerald Molen, a co-producer of 2016, says the charge is politically motivated.

 

“In America, we have a long tradition of not doing what is commonly done in too many other countries — criminalizing dissent through the selective enforcement of the law,” Molen tells THR.

 

D’Souza is accused of donating $20,000 to candidate Wendy Long, who was challenging Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Gillibrand beat Long by 44 percentage points. Long never stood a chance against Gillibrand, and her name was never mentioned in the indictment against D’Souza. The Daily Caller reports “that indictment claims that D’Souza, 52, deceptively used straw donors to donate the funds, and misreported the source of the campaign cash.”

 

Long only raised $785,000 total for her campaign against Gillibrand. To accuse D’Souza of deceptively using straw donors to donate funds and misreport campaign cash for a candidate that lost by almost 50 percentage points is ludicrous. This is political targeting. Obama’s DOJ had their eyes on D’Souza and decided to take him out. This was a choreographed hit.

 

In 2012, federal law “limited primary and general election campaign contributions to $2,500 each, for a total of $5,000, from any individual to any one candidate.”

Preet Bharara, an Obama appointee who is the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan, said, “As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process.”

The Obama Administration says they have a “zero tolerance” approach to corruption of the electoral process is akin to Islamists saying they have a “zero tolerance” for the killing of Jews. Nothing could be further from the truth. In 2008, Obama’s Department of Justice was accused of voter intimidation, when members of the New Black Panther Party were seen threatening voters in Philadelphia. Non-Citizens were caught voting in Ohio in the 2012 Presidential election. In February 2012, 1.8 million dead people were STILL registered to vote.

 

No, this is sweet justice for the Obama Administration, to categorically take down an outspoken rival. These charges are baseless in the face of obscene corruption by Obama and his fascist minions.

D’Souza first learned he was being investigated in the middle of 2013, several months after 2016 had earned $33 million at the box office and become the second-most-popular political documentary in U.S. history. The film included an interview with Obama’s half-brother, George Obama, who was mildly critical of the president.

 

Molen says D’Souza is being singled out for “an alleged minor violation” in the same way the IRS reportedly targeted conservative Tea Party groups for retribution. “In light of the recent events and the way the IRS has been used to stifle dissent, this arrest should send shivers down the spines of all freedom-loving Americans,” Molen says.

The timing is everything. D’Souza’s film earned $33 million dollars at the box office, and Obama was the subject of the movie. President Obama is using his office to take out his opponents; those who would dare speak out against him. Free speech is but a myth for conservatives in Obama’s America.

 

This is Obama’s America that Dinesh D’Souza warned the public about, but the sheeple chose not to heed the warnings. A tyrant and vicious dictator is using his power to wage war against his enemies, and when he is through with America, the landscape might not ever be the same.

 

About Janna Brock

 

I am a Christian and a staunch conservative. I am very interested in civil liberties and also arts and entertainment from a conservative point of view. I am interested in a wide variety of topics that have to do with the liberal war against conservatives. Christians are being attacked on all fronts, be it the homosexual agenda, abortion issues, and other forms of persecution. It is time to stand for Christ in a sin sick world. Janna Brock also contributes to The BrennerBrief.com.

 

View all posts by Janna Brock

__________________________________

Filmmaker prosecution revives accusations of conservative targeting

 

FoxNews.com
January 27, 2014

 

Less than a year after the IRS admitted to singling out Tea Party and other like-minded groups, federal agencies and prosecutors once again are facing accusations of going tougher on conservatives than their liberal counterparts.

 

In a case that riled conservative filmmakers and producers, federal prosecutors last week announced campaign finance charges against Dinesh D’Souza, the documentarian behind an anti-President Obama film released during the 2012 presidential campaign.

 

D’Souza pleaded not guilty on Friday, though his attorney did not outright deny that a violation of some kind may have occurred.

 

But colleagues rallied to D’Souza’s defense, calling the decision to prosecute the case politically motivated.

 

“When you make a film that hits the president between the eyes and could shift an election, you become a target,” conservative filmmaker Dennis Michael Lynch told Fox News, referring to D’Souza’s “2016: Obama’s America.”

 

Producer Gerald Molen, in a statement to FoxNews.com, called it a “selective prosecution.”

 

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, on Sunday, also described it as part of a pattern during his interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”  Though the comments were not aired on CBS, Cruz posted the full clip online.

 

VIDEO: Sen. Ted Cruz: The Abuse of Power from this Administration Concerns Me

 

“Can you image the reaction if the Bush administration had … gone and prosecuted Michael Moore and Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn?” Cruz said. “It should trouble everyone the government uses government power and the IRS in particular to target their enemies.”

 

D’Souza was charged with felony campaign finance violations, relating to allegations that he directed people to donate a total of $20,000 to New York Republican Senate candidate Wendy Long, and then reimbursed them.

 

His lawyer claimed there was no “quid pro quo” at play, “nor was there even any knowledge by the candidate that campaign finance rules may have been violated.”

 

Federal officials, though, described the alleged violations as serious.

 

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement that the office and FBI take a “zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process.”

 

“If, as alleged, the defendant directed others to make contributions to a Senate campaign and reimbursed them, that is a serious violation of federal campaign finance laws,” he said in a statement.

 

READ THE REST

______________________________________

Gerry Emery (Facebook Post)

Infidels United Facebook Group

January 26, 2014 12:07pm

 

Obama’s America 2016 by -Dinesh D’Souza. Watch this film and you’ll understand why Obama has targeted this film maker…

 

VIDEO: 2016 Obama’s America 41 minutes

_________________________________

Obama’s Political Persecution of Dinesh D’Souza

John R. Houk

© February 2, 2014

__________________________________

Indictment Of Obama Critic Dinesh D’Souza Is A Warning For All Conservatives

 

Copyright © 2014 Freedom Outpost
____________________________________

About Infidels United – Secret Group

 

We Welcome all Who See the DANGER of the ISLAMIC BEAST!


We do not believe in Muhammad he was demoniacally possessed and evil.

 
Please try to be courteous to your fellow members. Anti-Jewish Christian Hindu Buddhist Confucius Sikhism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, Taoism, Mormon remarks or post will get the member warned once and banned if the behavior continues. We are all brothers and sister against the evil of Islam treat each other like family.

 

548 members (5 new)  [As of 2/2/14]