Blog Archives

Overpopulation Stuff – Tony Newbill


 

Tony Newbill writes (in several emails) about Leftist utopianism in which a ruling elite desire to create circumstances in which the planet Earth’s population is reduced substantially (we are talking billions) that the Secular Humanist vision of a Green Earth maintains a sustainable population for food consumption and human waste.

 

If that intro is too cryptic to understand, Obama has people in places of power that is on an extra-Constitutional basis that desires to exterminate billions of people to keep earth an inhabitable planet as defined by Malthusian elitist rule.

 

JRH 12/27/11

Romney Supported De-Population Enthusiasts and Eco-Marxists


Romney RINO rides Dem Ass

 

John R. Houk

© December 23, 2011

 

Tony Newbill has been loading me up with links that demonstrate Mitt Romney is a Republican in Name ONLY (RINO) in a huge way.

 

In a 12/21/2011 email Newbill sent three links that tie Romney to Leftist thought on population control. And when I say population control I mean de-populating the earth to make earth resources more sustainable for those chosen humans to use in a way that is comfortable for the chosen few and the Secular Humanist Green Earth.

 

Now two of those links are the same story from the same author so I’m using the Human Events story. The first link is from a blog that begins with Mitt Romney’s connection and association with John Holdren which is one of President Barack Hussein Obama’s Czars. Holdren is one of these Left Wing de-populate the earth at all costs to save the earth.

 

The blog post on Romney-Holdren is excellent but lengthy and spends most of its space on Holdren. I am going to excerpt the part that relate to Romney; however if wish to know the Obama-Holdren agenda for planet earth and humanity you would do well to read the whole thing.

 

The Human Events article focuses on Mitt Romney’s connect to Paul Tsongas a former Dem Senator from Massachusetts. Romney was supporting Tsongas’ run for the Dem nomination for President in 1992. Tsongas was plugged into Holdren thoughts on de-population of the human race and eco-Marxist concepts of extreme Green ideology at the expense of Liberty and the Free Market to return the earth to some kind of illusory pristine utopian magical environment for the chosen few. The first half of the article is about Paul Tsongas the second half is about Romney’s support for Tsongas’ run for the Dem nomination in 1992.

 

JRH 12/23/11

********************************

Republican Mitt Romney consulted Population Control Eugenics Czar John Holdren

 

By Saynsumthn

October 18, 2011

Excerpted from: Saynsumthn’s Blog

Original Newbill Link: World Freedom Watch

 

H/T Pajamas Media

 

So we’ve learned over the past few days that a trio of Mitt Romney’s chosen advisers helped the Obama administration craft ObamaCare. And on top of that, that Gov. Romney sought the advice of Malthusian green activist John Holdren, when Romney was considering a cap and trade regime for Massachusetts.

 

Holdren’s views humanity as a plague on the planet and the Industrial Revolution as a tragic mistake. The fewer people, he believes, the better, and he’s not shy about the ways he would use to reduce their number.

 

Why Gov. Romney, a reasonable person, would pick such a man to advise him on anything is beyond us.

 

On Jan. 1, 2006, Massachusetts became the first state to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants, something the Obama administration is trying to do to all states through the Environmental Protection Agency’s draconian job-killing regulations and mandates.

 

A Dec. 7, 2005 memo from the governor’s office announcing the new policy listed among the “environmental and policy experts” providing input to the policy one “John Holdren, professor of environmental policy at Harvard University.”

 

This is the same person who wrote that a “massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States.”

Holdren wrote that along with Paul and Anne H. Ehrlich in the “recommendations” section of their 1973 book, “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.”

 

Paul Ehrlich is also the author of the 1968 tome, “The Population Bomb,” which warned of imminent mass starvation from overpopulation unless excess humanity is dispensed with.

Holdren has spoken in favor of such things as forced abortions, confiscation of babies, mass involuntary sterilization, bureaucratic regulation of family size, and a planetary regime to enforce climate regulation and population control.

 

Read Rest of story here [SlantRight: a further excerpt]

 

Campaigning: The GOP front-runner for 2012 sought advice on global warming and carbon emissions from the president’s current science czar — an advocate of de-developing America and population control.

 

Politics is said to make strange bedfellows, but no coupling in our view is more bizarre than when John Holdren, now President Obama’s assistant for science and technology, once advised GOP presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney on environmental policy.

 

Holdren’s bizarre views are best suited for an adviser to someone like, say, Pol Pot.

 

He views humanity as a plague on the planet and the Industrial Revolution as a tragic mistake. The fewer people, he believes, the better, and he’s not shy about the ways he would use to reduce their number.

 

Why Gov. Romney, a reasonable person, would pick such a man to advise him on anything is beyond us.

 

On Jan. 1, 2006, Massachusetts became the first state to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants, something the Obama administration is trying to do to all states through the Environmental Protection Agency’s draconian job-killing regulations and mandates.

 

 

Romney, speaking at a University of New Hampshire town hall on June 3, said: “I don’t speak for the scientific community, of course, but I believe the world’s getting warmer. I can’t prove that, but I believe based on what I read that the world is getting warmer. And number two, I believe that humans contribute to that.”

 

So do Holdren and Al Gore.

 

In June, Gore, on his blog, praised Romney’s climate stance: “While other Republicans are running from the truth, he is sticking to his guns in the face of the anti-science wing of the Republican Party.”

 

After researching eugenics and I reading several chapters of the book, Ecoscience, written in the 70s, by Paul Holdren, who is Obama’s Science Czar, I can see clear signs that everything that is coming down from Washington was being birthed in our society in READ THE REST FOCUSING JOHN HOLDREN

__________________________________

Romney Voted for Population-Control Fanatic Presidential Candidate

 

By Terence P. Jeffrey

11/30/2011

Human Events

 

When he ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1992, Paul Tsongas repeatedly made it clear: He loathed President George H.W. Bush‘s flip-flopping on abortion and his inattentiveness to what Tsongas perceived as the urgent need for global population control.
       
And he won
Mitt Romney‘s vote in the 1992 Massachusetts presidential primary.
       
“This land, this water, this air, this planet, this rain, this is our legacy to our young, yet the Reagan-Bush years have been a time of cynical avoidance of one environmental issue after another — acid rain, energy conservation, depletion of the ozone layer, global warming and uncontrolled world population,” Tsongas, a former U.S. senator from Massachusetts, said when he announced his presidential campaign in April 1991.
       

       
“I will tell you very strongly the No. 1 environmental issue I’m going to push for when I’m president is population control around this world so we can turn to later generations and say something except, ‘Sorry, folks,’” Tsongas vowed.
       
Two months later, Romney cast his vote for Tsongas.
       
That Massachusetts primary was a landslide in both parties. Bush beat Pat Buchanan
(who I served as research and issues director that year) 66 percent to 28 percent. Among Democrats, native son Tsongas took 66 percent to then-former California Gov. Jerry Brown’s 15 percent and Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton‘s 11 percent.
       
Two years later, when he announced he would seek the Republican Senate nomination to challenge Ted Kennedy, Romney told the Boston Globe
about his vote for Tsongas.
       
“Romney confirmed he voted for former U.S. Sen. Paul Tsongas in the state’s 1992 Democratic presidential primary, saying he did so both because Tsongas was from Massachusetts and because he favored his ideas over those of Bill Clinton,” the Globe reported on Feb. 4, 1994. “He added he had been sure the GOP would renominate George Bush, for whom he voted in the fall election.”
       
Romney’s vote for Tsongas came up again in a profile the Globe published Aug. 7, 1994.
       
“Like his father, he wasn’t a strong party man,” the Globe said. “He had been a registered independent all his life. He still was, as he pondered the Kennedy challenge. He had even voted for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Massachusetts Democratic presidential primary.”
       
When the Los Angeles Times mentioned the Tsongas vote in a profile published Oct. 7, 1994, it did so in the context of Romney’s wife pointing out that Romney had considered running for the Senate as an independent.
       
“When Romney decided to run, Republicans exchanged quizzical looks: ‘We didn’t know a single Republican when we jumped in in December,’ his wife, Ann, says,” the Times reported.
       
“As a registered independent, Romney had voted in the Democratic presidential primary in 1992 to support Paul E. Tsongas (though he backed George Bush in the general election, he says),” the Times reported. “He briefly considered running for the Senate seat as an independent, as well, his wife says, before rejecting the idea as impractical.”
       
Thirteen years later, when Romney was seeking the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, he appeared on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos.”  Stephanopoulos asked him about the Tsongas vote.
       
Now, Romney said he did it because he wanted the Democrats to nominate the weakest candidate.
       
“When there was no real contest in the Republican primary, I’d vote in the Democrat primary, vote for the person who I thought would be the weakest opponent for Republican,” Romney said.
       
“I’m a Republican and have been through my life,” Romney said. “I was with Young Republicans when I was in college back at Stanford. But a registered independent, so I could vote in either primary.”
       
And that is the core of his explanation.

__________________________________

 

Romney Supported De-Population Enthusiasts and Eco-Marxists

John R. Houk

© December 23, 2011

________________________________

Republican Mitt Romney consulted Population Control Eugenics Czar John Holdren

 

Saynsumthn’s Blog Home Page

_______________________________

Romney Voted for Population-Control Fanatic Presidential Candidate

 

Terence P. Jeffrey is the author of  Control Freaks: 7 Ways Liberals Plan to Ruin Your Life (Regnery, 2010.)

 

Copyright 2011 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.

The Elite’s Plan for Global Extermination Exposed


All Seeing Eye Genocide

 

John R. Houk

© June 23, 2011

 

This exposé demonstrates the thinking of the Obama Administration with his thoughts of “change”.

 

To those that are unfamiliar with anti-population terms of the early to middle 20th century here is a micro-primer that is in this post.

 

Malthusianism

 

The origin of apocalyptic overpopulation theory

 

In his 1798 Essay on the Principle of Population, Thomas Malthus argued that the growth in the food supply is linear, whereas the growth in the population rate is exponential. Whenever the population exceeds the food supply, social turmoil erupts until drastic checks such as famines, wars, and epidemics lowered populations down to sustainable levels. The only way to avoid periodic disaster is to implement strict population controls, which have historically included both voluntary restraints, as well as coercive measures such as limits on family size and mass sterilization of “undesirable groups.”

 

Malthus was wrong

 

Malthus predicted a population crash by the middle of the 19th century. In reality, living standards have increased over sixty times since 1820 despite a tripling of the European population in the 18th century.1 Meanwhile, family sizes fell naturally without the need for coercive measures.

Nevertheless, modern Malthusians perpetually extend the date of the inevitable apocalypse to the near future. Faced with the astounding growth of agricultural yields which virtually eliminated hunger in the West, environmentalists are continually discovering new resources to run out of, whether fossil fuels, metals, land, or water.

The discrepancy is explained by two errors in the Malthusian model: the population growth rate is not exponential, while the potential growth in human productivity is.

 

Read More at the Malthusianism Link.

 

 

Neo-Malthusianism

 

Ehrlich, one of the prominent thinkers in the neo-Malthusian tradition, argues that ‘…civilization is in imminent serious jeopardy.’ [6] The roots of the problems are mainly to be found in Asia and Africa where populations are growing the fastest. He continues by saying that population growth at current levels is a relatively new phenomenon, and has particularly occurred from the 1950s onwards, but has roots back to the industrial revolution. Despite this, the problem, he argues, lies in the fact that population does not grow so fast that it is perceived by individuals, and hence not regarded as a problem. If we do not end the population increase, he predicts, there is a real chance that nature will do it for us. [7] This reasoning stems from a view that environmental degradation is caused by how many people there are, and not how many resources they use, a criticism that will explored below.

 

Ehrlich further argues that instead of having nature controlling the population for us, we have to do so ourselves, as this will be a more human way than having ‘nature wiping out the surplus’ of human population. Population growth is labelled a cancer-like disease that needs to be treated by lowering birth-rates to just under the human death rate, through the use of contraceptions. [8] He also believed that if policies of population control were not accepted willingly, they should be forced, like in India where he advocated that all men with more than 3 children should be forcibly sterilised. He has also glorified China’s one-child policy. It is such an attitude that has helped justify incidents of forces sterilisation that has taken place in Africa and other parts of the developing world. [9] [Full disclosure: two typos were corrected]

 

To read of the variations of Neo-Malthusianism read this rather tongue-in-cheek toned essay entitled, “The definitive guide to modern-day Malthusians”.

 

Anti-Human Ideology

 

The global warming dispute starts with a doctrine which claims that the rough coexistence of climate changes, of growing temperatures and of man-made increments of CO2 in the atmosphere — and what is more, only in a relatively short period of time — is a proof of a causal relationship between these phenomena. To the best of my knowledge there is no such relationship between them. It is, nevertheless, this claim that forms the basis for the doctrine of environmentalism.

 

It is not a new doctrine. It has existed under various headings and in various forms and manifestations for centuries, always based on the idea that the starting point of our thinking should be the Earth, the planet or nature, not man or mankind. It has always been accompanied by the plan that we have to come back to the original state of the Earth, unspoiled by us, humans. The adherents of this doctrine have always considered us, the people, a foreign element. They forget that it doesn’t make sense to speak about the world without people because there would be no one to speak. If we take the reasoning of the environmentalists seriously, we find that theirs is an anti-human ideology. (Read the Rest …)

 

 

John P. Holdren

 

John P. Holdren has been named President Barack Obama’s ‘Science Czar.”

 

Holdren’s official titles are: Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy; Assistant to the President for Science and Technology; and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (Kathy Shaidle)

 

 

In 1969 Holdren wrote that it was imperative “to convince society and its leaders that there is no alternative but the cessation of our irresponsible, all-demanding, and all-consuming population growth.” That same year, he and professor of population studies Paul Ehrlich jointly predicted: “If … population control measures are not initiated immediately and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”

In 1971 Holdren and Ehrlich warned that “some form of ecocatastrophe, if not thermonuclear war, seems almost certain to overtake us before the end of the century.”

Viewing capitalism as an economic system that is inherently harmful to the natural environment, Holdren and Ehrlich (in their 1973 book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions) called for “a massive campaign … to de-develop the United States” and other Western nations in order to conserve energy and facilitate growth in underdeveloped countries. “De-development,” they said, “means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.” “By de-development,” they elaborated, “we mean lower per-capita energy consumption, fewer gadgets, and the abolition of planned obsolescence.” The authors added:

 

“The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge. They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than in the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential if a decent life is to be provided for every human being.”

 

On another occasion, Holdren, when asked whether Americans would “need to reduce their living standards,” said:

 

“I think ultimately that the rate of growth of material consumption is going to have to come down, and there’s going to have to be a degree of redistribution of how much we consume, in terms of energy and material resources, in order to leave room for people who are poor to become more prosperous.”

 

… (Discover The Networks excerpt)

 

Paul Ehrlich

 

 

Ehrlich started his academic career as an entomologist, an expert on Lepidoptera – butterflies.  But in 1968 he wrote one of the biggest best-sellers in the history of pseudo-scientific literature, The Population Bomb.  In it, Ehrlich reprised the work of Thomas Malthus, arguing that population growth would eventually, inevitably lead mankind to three choices:  Stop making new humans, stop consuming resources, or starve to death.  The book started “The battle to feed all of humanity is over … hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death.” He spent much of the next decade writing other books and articles in support of his thesis in Population Bomb, adding in a later article “By 1985 enough millions will have died to reduce the earth’s population to some acceptable level, like 1.5 billion people.” The book and his body of “work” through the seventies proposed a number of radical solutions to the overpopulation crisis; dumping sterilizing agents into water supplies, allowing only selected people the privilege of reproduction, and performing mass “triage” of nations, the same way an emergency room triages patients – …

 

By the mid-seventies, though Ehrlich broadened his sights a bit, beyond overpopulation and into geopolitics.  In 1975′s The End of Affluence, Ehrlich predicted cataclysmic food riots in America, leading the President to declare martial law.  But it did no good – in Ehrlich’s narrative – because the world was driven to destroy the US in a combined nuclear assault, spurred by our use of…

 

…pesticides.

 

He broadened it further with 1978′s The Race Bomb, which was a paranoid melange on the dangers of racial diversity, followed by The Golden Door: International Migration, Mexico, and the United States, in which he called for sealing off the border long before it became Tom Tancredo’s issue.

 

By the eighties, he’d joined with much of the left’s elite (who were, by the by, not busy participating in food riots or race wars, and were well-fed enough to go to protests) in warning about the danger of nuclear war, joining with Carl Sagan to write The Cold And The Dark, demanding the US disarm just in time for our generations of deterrence to render the point moot with the fall of the Soviet Union.

 

He was, of course, early on the Climate Change bandwagon, with Betrayal of Science and Reason: How Anti-Environment Rhetoric Threatens Our Future, a 1998 book co-authored with his wife Anne, which basically served as a model for the left’s response to questions about Global Warming this past decade – he didn’t call for Nuremberg trials per se, but he wasn’t that far off, either.

 

 

He’s (sic) blamed Western Civilization – especially our economic freedom – for successive waves of self-caused, predicted catastrophes.

 

He’s (sic) prescription to deal with these catastrophes has been, in every case, for the individual to surrender his/her autonomy, and even future, to an all-wise, all-knowing, all-powerful central entity that’ll make all the hard, life and death choices for them.

 

… (Ehrlich’s lifetime of hot air; Mitch Berg; Hot Air, 3/7/2010)

 

 

Planetary Regime

 

White House science czar John Holdren has called for the United States to surrender sovereignty to a “Planetary Regime” armed with sufficient military power to enforce population limits on nations as a means of preventing a wide range of perceived dangers from global eco-disasters involving Earth’s natural resources, climate, atmosphere and oceans.

 

As previously reported, WND has obtained and reviewed a copy of the 1970s college textbook “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” that Holdren co-authored with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich’s wife, Anne. The authors argued that involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by “climate change.”

 

On page 943, the authors recommended the creation of a “Planetary Regime” created to act as an “international superagency for population, resources, and environment.”

 

The authors argued, “Such a Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist.” (Holdren sought ‘planetary regime’; Jerome Corsi; WND, 10/10/2009)

 

Climate Change

 

2007-03-21 — WDC Media News — WASH—Mar 20—DJNS– The President of the Czech Republic , Vaclav Klaus responded in a letter to questions from U.S. Congressmen about global warming. Klaus is a free market economist and has seen first hand the debate in Europe over global warming. He told Congressmen, “As someone who lived under communism for most of my life I feel obliged to say that the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity at the beginning of the 21st century is not communism or its various softer variants. Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism.” Klaus said that this ideology preaches earth and nature and wants a “central (now global) planning of the whole world.”

Klaus said, “The environmentalists consider their ideas and arguments to be an undisputable truth and use sophisticated methods of media manipulation and PR campaigns to exert pressure on policymakers to achieve their goals. Their argumentation is based on the spreading of fear and panic by declaring the future of the world to be under serious threat. In such an atmosphere they continue pushing policymakers to adopt illiberal measures, impose arbitrary limits, regulations, prohibitions, and restrictions on everyday human activities and make people subject to omnipotent bureaucratic decision-making.” Klaus has revealed the spirit behind global warming, it is the spirit of communism by another name. (The Communist Influence Of Global Warming; Bill Wilson; PR with a Higher Purpose; 3-21-07)

 

JRH 6/22/11

*****************************

The Elite’s Plan for Global Extermination

Exposed by Dr. Webster Tarpley 1/4

 

Posted by Tomas Carter

Post on June 19, 2011

InChristNetwork (Registration and Approval Needed)

 

In this interview, Dr. Tarpley reviews the writings of John P. Holdren, the current White House science advisor. This interview conclusively exposes scientific elite’s true agenda: world-wide genocide and the formation of a global government to rule.

 

Historian and author Webster Tarpley exposes how White House science czar John P. Holdren, who infamously co-wrote a 1977 textbook in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, is a Malthusian fanatic in the tradition of the arcane anti-human ideology that originated amongst British aristocracy in the 19th century.

 

Holdren calls himself a “neo-Malthusian” in his own book, and as Tarpley explains, is a historical pessimist who has rejected the idea that America and humanity as a whole can progress through ingenuity, industry and economic growth. Instead, Holdren sees humankind as a cancer upon the earth.

 

Holdren wants to set up a “Science Court,” where potential developments could be blocked by government decree if they don’t conform to the planned society necessary under Holdren’s “planetary regime”. He also seeks to institute “de-development” worldwide to prevent the third world from ever lifting itself out of poverty and roll things back to “pre-industrial civilization” where average life spans would not be much more than 30 years.

 

Holdren’s co-author, Paul Ehrlich, is a discredited crank who wrote books in the 70′s claiming that England would not exist as a land mass by the year 2000 because of climate change. As Tarpley explains, Ehrlich’s warning of a “population bomb” has proven incorrect, with population in Europe, Japan and the United States falling when immigration is removed from the equation.

 

Not a member? CLICK HERE https://prisonplanet.tv/amember/signup.php to subscribe now!

 

[SlantRight Editor: you can read the entire Prison Planet article HERE.]

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 82 other followers

%d bloggers like this: