Pamela Geller Column: J’ACCUSE THE LEFT OF WAR!


While Dems blame Conservatives for inspiring Leftist assassin James T. Hodgkinson, Pamela Geller has a better guess. Geller believes years vitriolic hate spewed by the Left and reaching a zenith with hatred directed toward President Trump is the primary cause of an assassination attempt. Geller moves the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to the top of violence pushing list.

 

JRH 6/16/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Pamela Geller Column: J’ACCUSE THE LEFT OF WAR!

 

HOW THE LEFT DESTROYS THE NATION

 

By Pamela Geller 

June 15, 2017

PamelaGeller.com

 

Go over to Jihad Watch and read my latest report on the left’s war on freedom and America.

 

Yesterday’s shooting by an SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) supporting, Bernie Sanders devotee is the obvious and logical consequence of the left’s treasonous war on America. This is but another assassination attempt by a left-lauded Southern Poverty Law center supporter. SPLC, a vicious hate and smear machine, is  held up as some kind of authority by elite media and academic institutions. SPLC enthusiast Floyd Corkins  shot up the Family Research Council with the hope of killing as many employees as possible in August 2012. But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

 

SPLC Hit List:

 

VIDEO: Pamela Geller: SPLC Hit List


 

Posted by Pamela Geller

Published on Feb 22, 2016

 

For years, the left and its media lapdogs have created narratives out of whole cloth about the impending violence from the right. President Obama, inciter-in-chief, regularly used violent rhetoric to gin up the Democrats: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” He has supported the most violent, seditious movements of 21st-century America (Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, Muslim Brotherhood groups, etc.) while directing the Department of Homeland Security to track “right wing extremists” — in other words, Americans like you and me.

 

Here are some choice and sparsely reported quotes from Barack Obama:

 

“My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.” Obama to CEOs.

“Get in Their Faces!” Obama to his doorknockers.

“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!” Obama to ACORN crowd.

“Punch back twice as hard!” Obama to his Obomunists.

“We talk to these folks…so I know whose ass to kick.” Obama to the Left on the private sector.

“A Republican victory would mean hand to hand combat.” Obama to supporters.

“It’s time to Fight for it.” Obama in a speech to his supporters.

“Punish your enemies.” Obama to Latino supporters.

“I’m itching for a fight.” Obama to Democrats in a speech.

 

For years, the street thugs have been agitating, and for years the elites in the Democrat Party have egged them on, giving the violence their imprimatur, legitimacy and sanction. All the while, they blamed the right for unrelated violence. While there was no connection between what a Norway mass-murdering madman did and we what said, what we recommended for countering jihad terrorism and the brutal sharia, the left blew up and blood-libeled us almost to the point of extinction. When it came out in court that this Norwegian madman was inspired to violence by al Qaeda and Hamas, that was never widely reported. The left always blames us for violence, no matter how non-existent the ties. Even when I was the target of an assassination plot in Garland, Texas, for example, the left blamed me because I would not adhere to the blasphemy laws under the sharia.

 

Bernie Sanders fundraised by blaming Sarah Palin and conservatives in general for the 2011 shooting of Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-AZ). The Daily Caller reported that “there was never any actual evidence presented that Jared Loughner, a diagnosed schizophrenic who pleaded guilty to the shooting, was a Palin fan, a Tea Party supporter, or that he had ever seen Palin’s ‘crosshairs’ map” that was widely blamed for the shooting. In fact, according to the Caller, “one friend tweeted that ‘he was left wing, quite liberal.’”

 

Last week’s shooter in Portland was also a Bernie supporter; he ranted against Christians, Jews and Muslims, but the enemedia reported his shooting of two people as an “Islamophobic” “hate crime.”

 

I have been covering leftist and Islamic protests for years, and they are rife with hate and violence that never get reported in the mainstream media. My colleague, Pamela Hall, has been indefatigable in covering the rise of the left-wing totalitarians. Followers of my website, the Geller Report, know her work and what it proves: a systematic, organized movement to overthrow American freedoms and install an enemy regime.

 

At every pro-America, pro-Trump, anti-sharia, counter terrorism protest, leftists show up full of bloodlust and primed for battle. These primitives agitate, incite and attack our people whenever we peacefully assemble. And their stooges in the media, like clockwork, then report what happened as follows: “Violence breaks out at far-right rally…” “Far-right” the media’s term for anyone who doesn’t submit to these goose-stepping, jackbooted thugs. At my rally against CUNY’s invitation to terror-inciter Linda Sarsour to give its commencement address, New York City Mayor “Red Bill” de Blasio directed the NYPD to put the violent leftists not three feet from our people. It was not pretty.

 

Conservative and pro-Israel speakers are attacked and silenced on the rare occasions they are even invited to speak. Trump supporters have been beaten at rallies and demos in support of the President. From Berkeley to Brooklyn, college campuses have become nothing short of war zones.

 

As the Daily Wire noted: “In recent years, under the tender tutelage of the Obama Department of Justice, mass violent action by leftists has become commonplace across the country, from the Occupy Wall Street movement to Black Lives Matter-inspired mob violence in Ferguson and Baltimore, from campus chaos at California State University of Los Angeles to this sort of violence at Trump rallies.”

 

This is not static. This situation on the ground is fluid.  Do the leftists think freedom-lovers will continue to stand down? Does the left want war? They are going to get it. Because we know where this road leads. We saw this same kind of violent thuggery in the 1930s in Germany. And we have seen what happens when good people do nothing.

 

As for the “good people” in the Democrat Party, where are they? Where are the mass protests where Democrats proclaim, “Not My Party!” Why aren’t we seeing that the way we are seeing “Not My President!”

 

If you are a Democrat Party member, you are part of the problem.

_______________

Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the ResistanceFollow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.

 

Copyright © 2017 Geller Report

 

Geller: ‘Fake News’? Left-Wing War on Conservative Websites: Facebook, Google, LA Times, Obama Take Aim


daffy-duck-leftist-communication

I posted yesterday about Leftists using the Fake News meme to discredit Conservatives, in that case pertaining primarily to Pizzagate. Pamela Geller writes about the Leftist Conspiracy to shut down any news that disagrees with Leftist ideals or values as Fake News. (As if Leftist values is representative of traditional American values. I call hogwash!)

 

JRH 12/6/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Geller: ‘Fake News’? Left-Wing War on Conservative Websites: Facebook, Google, LA Times, Obama Take Aim

 

By PAMELA GELLER

6 Dec 2016

Breitbart – Big Government

 

The left-wing elites and their running dogs in the enemedia are in one of their fictional publicity campaigns that they masquerade as urgent news. Their latest terror is “fake news sites.”

 

The New York Times reported shortly after the election that Google and Facebook “have faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome.”

 

That was fake news: “fake news” didn’t influence the presidential election’s outcome, all too real news about the wrong direction in which our nation was headed under Barack Obama did. Nevertheless, the Times said that “those companies responded by making it clear that they would not tolerate such misinformation by taking pointed aim at fake news sites’ revenue sources.”

 

How would they do that? “Google kicked off the action on Monday afternoon when the Silicon Valley search giant said it would ban websites that peddle fake news from using its online advertising service. Hours later, Facebook, the social network, updated the language in its Facebook Audience Network policy, which already says it will not display ads in sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites.”

 

A Facebook spokesman explained: “We have updated the policy to explicitly clarify that this applies to fake news. Our team will continue to closely vet all prospective publishers and monitor existing ones to ensure compliance.”

 

The “fake news” controversy has become a huge international story, with the Los Angeles Times among those leading the charge with headlines such as “Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates list of sites to avoid”; “Fake news writers: ‘Hillary Clinton, here are your deplorables’”; and “Fake news writers abuse the 1st Amendment and endanger democracy for personal profit.

 

There is conspiracy theory and there is conspiracy fact, and what we have on our hands is one mother of a left-wing conspiracy parading as a right wing conspiracy. You can’t make this stuff up. It’s diabolical. In the run-up to the election, I reported on a number of fake conservative new sites created by left-wing operatives in order to discredit the conservatives’ news sites. If you have a bogus conservative site, it makes a conservative site look questionable. “News sites” like the Baltimore Gazette and the National Report were dropping hoaxes for months to discredit conservatives who might pick up the story.

 

I always understood that the objective was to taint the conservative newssphere. Sites were created to spread disinformation and shame the right-wingers who jumped on it. This is classic disinformation. It’s always games, games, games… from the people who brought you Soros’ rent-a-mob — rioting, looting and destruction in cities, etc. even going so far as to risk a few deaths all for the cause. But what I didn’t see coming is their ultimate goal: the shut-down of free speech. The left wants to crush free speech, which has been in their cross-hairs for some time now.

 

The left is always preaching about true democracy, but they seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as they can. And they’re always harping about “controversial” matters that either don’t exist or are fabricated, or are of little import.

 

If a blogger or news writer gets a story wrong, does that designate him or her, or his or her site, as “fake news”? If that’s the case, they’ll have to shut down the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, etc. They get things wrong all the time. Every article written about my colleagues, my work, or myself is fake. Most of what they wrote and didn’t write about the Orlando mass slaughter at the gay nightclub was disinformation and deception.

 

If you issue a correction, does that somehow remove the fake news scarlet letter? This is all a big fat lie — it is an end-run around the First Amendment, and it’s disastrous. It is indeed true that Facebook has too much power, but banning “fake news” sites is hardly the solution. That’s Zuckerberg’s fix-it? It would be funny if it weren’t so Hitlerian. Facebook has too much power. Its news curators, mini-Goebbelians — are more frightening than Kafka’s antagonists. Facebook should be broken up like Ma Bell was. Facebook doesn’t decide what’s good and what’s forbidden. Left-wing fascists do not and must not decide what news people can and cannot see. But that’s exactly what we are seeing on Facebook.

__________________

Copyright © 2016 Breitbart

 

Even Muslim Kids are Rape Jihadists


progressive-guide-rape-jihad-toon

John R. Houk

© November 23, 2016

 

Last Summer a five-year-old Idaho girl was raped by three migrant Muslim boys in their apartment laundry room. The boys were 7, 10, and 13 in age. The Leftist Prosecutor and activist Leftist Judge in Idaho refused to move forward with charges due to political correctness.

 

fawnbrook-apts-left-grant-loeb-right-leftist-prosecuter

Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls Idaho (left), where the 5-year-old girl was raped in the laundry room by 3 Muslim migrant boys; Grant Loeb (right) the liberal prosecutor who cares more about political correctness than justice.Mad World News photo

 

Here is some news dated yesterday excerpted from Mad World News:

 

After a five-year-old Twin Falls, Idaho girl was brutally raped over the summer by three Muslim migrant boys, aged 7, 10, and 13, the mainstream media repeatedly told Americans that a gang-rape committed by refugee children did not occur. However, new details are emerging as the case goes to court that will make your skin crawl, and what authorities are doing to the victim now is just as bad as what the boys did.

 

Most of us remember hearing about the rape that allegedly happened in Twin Falls, Idaho at an apartment complex, where three Muslim migrant boys held and sexually assaulted a five-year-old girl. However, what some might not remember are the conflicting stories from the liberal media that painted the news shared by alternative conservative outlets as false.

 

After the mainstream media and even Snopes “debunked” the facts, stating no knife and no gang-rape occurred, the truth was revealed in a hearing on Thursday. The 5-year-old victim was held at knifepoint as the 13-year-old migrant boy videoed the 7 and 10-year-old boys orally and anally rape her in the apartment complex laundry room.

 

According to Breitbart, the little girl’s mother said, “This is what my daughter has told me: that they grabbed her at knifepoint and forced her into the laundry room and told her that if she tried to leave, they would kill her. The seven-year-old boy took her clothes off. She tells me he put his private in her mouth and peed in her mouth, and put it in her private, and then peed all over her.”

 

Sobbing, the mother continued, “And she said they recorded her, too… She also told the emergency room CARES doctor that they had a knife as well, and they found on her neck a cut. Then the day after, they claimed it was a scratch, when in fact, it looked like a cut.”

 

Unfortunately, the liberal judge and prosecutor refuse to give the victim justice. Shockingly, these far-leftist scumbags in our criminal justice system don’t care about the little American girl as they rape her all over again in the courts in the name of political correctness, all so they don’t offend Muslims.

 

All of these boys are free. The judge didn’t send them to a youth detention center, where they belong, or deport them and their families. The now-14-year-old is even seen all over the Twin Falls community, but it gets worse. The little READ THE REST (Shocking New Details Emerge In Muslim Migrant Rape Of 5-Year-Old Idaho Girl; By Rebecca Diserio; Mad World News; 11/22/16)

 

This is the kind of horse-manure America’s Left desires to cover-up and worse, bring more hatethe Jews, Christian and American non-Muslims – Muslim migrants, refugees, or immigrants into the USA unvetted to know if their religious faith brings hatred or the concept of assimilation as in Out of Many, One (aka E Pluribus Unum).

rape-jihad-town-next-to-you

JRH 11/23/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

State officials mistreat girl, 5, raped by Muslim migrants
Exclusive: Pamela Geller says Idaho family ‘has suffered almost every kind of injustice’

By PAMELA GELLER

November 20, 2016

WND

 

Last summer, a 5-year-old girl was orally, anally and vaginally raped and urinated upon by three Muslim migrant boys in Twin Falls, Idaho. Since then, instead of getting justice, the victim’s family has been abused by law enforcement and governing authorities as if they were the criminals – because what happened to their little girl contradicts the politically correct narrative about Muslim migrants.

 

And it just keeps getting worse. The victim’s mother has now informed me that, despite the huge medical expenses for their daughter that this attack has necessitated, the state of Idaho has told her the maximum assistance that her family can get is $4,500.

 

Make sure you’re never raped in the state of Idaho: If you’re 5 years old and your attackers are from a politically protected class, you’re only worth $4,500.

 

There seems to be no willingness on the part of the state or the county to reimburse this long-suffering family for any of the other costs that they have incurred because of the crime. Because they felt threatened – with very good reason – in continuing to live next door to one of the attackers’ families, they have been living in a succession of hotels; they have spent in excess of $2,000 in hotels alone.

 

Why did they have to relocate? Because Muslims were stopping in front of their home at night and shooting bottle rockets at it at 11:30 p.m. Apparently that kind of menacing and harassment doesn’t qualify as demonstrating a need for relocation.

 

The family also incurred babysitting fees, as well as expenses for transportation to get themselves to and from court. Then there is the astronomical cost of their lawyer, and other costs that he will require to accomplish anything positive for them.

 

This poor family has suffered almost every kind of injustice, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel.

 

Get Pamela Geller’s book, “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America.”

 

It is outrageous. And it gets even worse. For the longest time, the attacker wasn’t even limited in his access to the community’s children; now he must be supervised by someone 14 years old or older. When they stipulated this, the court had to have been aware that there was a boy who videotaped the rape who was also 14. This is a gross insult against this victimized family – and a direct result of a judge’s decision.
Meanwhile, the neighbor of the family who caught the perpetrators in the act, an elderly woman known to all as “Grandma Jo,” has been living in constant terror since she first happened upon the grisly scene. She has been stalked by the Iraqi family of the 7-year-old attacker. Her apartment is back-to-back with theirs; they peer into her windows and pace back and forth in front of her apartment in a clearly menacing manner.

 

The prosecuting attorney, Grant Loebs, has gone out of his way to imply that this rape was false information. His interviews have led the media and public officials to deny clear facts of the case. The U.S. attorney for Idaho even vowed to charge anyone who made false statements about the perps. The Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations has whined that the case has become “a lightning rod for anti-Muslim, and anti-refugee sentiments.”

 

Meanwhile, the victim in Twin Falls, once a happy and social child, now frequently insists that she wants to be alone. She finds a small and safe space inside a closet and stays in it alone for hours. Once a very chatty and happy child, she has become very quiet. Even during the summer heat of Twin Falls, she always wore two T-shirts and two pairs of underwear. She talked constantly about “those naughty boys” and asked her mother repeatedly not to tell her father everything that happened because it will upset him.

 

The alleged attackers’ families had no trouble getting new homes, but the victim’s family is still without a new apartment. Now that the media firestorm has subsided, the family is simply being ignored.

 

This little girl deserves justice. And she is not getting it. We are not going to forget about this case. The authorities who have failed this family and betrayed it for political correctness need to be repudiated, rejected, rebuked and removed from office. Enough is enough.

 

Note: A GoFundMe page has been established to fund medical, legal and housing costs for the victim and her family

___________________

Even Muslim Kids are Rape Jihadists

John R. Houk

© November 23, 2016

_________________

State officials mistreat girl, 5, raped by Muslim migrants

Pamela Geller is president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America” and “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance.” Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

 

About WND

 

Since 1997, WND has been the world’s best-kept secret in Christian content and marketing. But the word is getting out.

 

There’s a reason WND.com has the largest reach of any Christian website on planet Earth.

 

 

WND can best be explained by its mission statement:

 

WND is an independent news company dedicated to uncompromising journalism, seeking truth and justice and revitalizing the role of the free press as a guardian of liberty. We remain faithful to the traditional and central role of a free press in a free society — as a light exposing wrongdoing, corruption and abuse of power. We also seek to stimulate a free-and-open debate about the great moral and political ideas facing the world and to promote freedom and self-government by encouraging personal virtue and good character.

 

READ ENTIRETY

 

Trump WON’T pursue case against Clinton


hillary-the-criminal

Donald Trump has conveyed that it is not a part of his new Administration to investigate Crooked Hillary.

 

I don’t know if President-Elect Trump has learned to play politics, backing out on the “Lock Her Up” or is keeping a Clinton/Obama investigation close to the vest to prevent or avoid Dem Party obstructionism.

 

I pray in one fashion or another that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton are at least investigated thoroughly to let the American people know that a President Trump truly plans to drain the swamp of Federal Government Corruption.

 

JRH 11/22/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

Trump WON’T pursue case against Clinton

 

 clinton-corruption-lock-her-up

LOCK HER UP

 

By Pamela Geller 

November 22, 2016

Geller Report

 

Hillary broke the law. And while I understand that this may very well be an olive branch to the Democrats, Trump is in for a rude awakening. There will be no quid pro quo. The Democrats will not play ball with him or give him an easier time or stop the violent rioting or calm their base. Like jihadis, they see kindness and peace offerings as signs of weakness.

 

I am sure many Trump supporters whose chant, “lock her up!,” is now a rallying cry for government corruption and lawlessness, will be hugely disappointed.

 

Trump should allow these investigations to continue and whatever will be will be. The good news is that Jason Chaffetz, the Utah congressman finishing his first term leading the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has vowed to continue to investigate Clinton’s email server.

 

trump-holding-sign-clinton4prison

Trump holding sign: Clinton for Prison

 

TRUMP WON’T PURSUE CASE AGAINST CLINTON, CONWAY SAYS

 

The Washington Post, November 22, 2016:

 

President-elect Donald Trump has decided that he won’t seek criminal investigations related to former rival Hillary Clinton’s private email server or her family foundation, his campaign manager said Tuesday

 

Trump’s apparent decison [sic], conveyed by Kellyanne Conway in an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,’’ is a change from his campaign rhetoric, in which he issued incendiary calls for a special prosecutor to reopen the FBI’s closed investigation of Clinton’s use of a private server while secretary of state and had also urged investigations of allegations of corruption at the Clinton Foundation. He nicknamed the Democratic nominee “Crooked Hillary” and encouraged chants of “Lock her up!” at his rallies.

 

Trump’s decision to pursue or not pursue a criminal investigation from the Oval Office would be an extraordinary break with political and legal protocol, which holds that the attorney general and FBI make decisions on whether to conduct investigations and file charges, free of pressure from the president.

 

Conway said Trump sees things differently. “I think when the president-elect, who’s also the head of your party, tells you before he’s even inaugurated that he doesn’t wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong message, tone and content” to fellow Republicans, she said. “Look, I think he’s thinking of many different things as he prepares to become the President of the United States, and things that sound like the campaign are not among them,” she added.

 

Trump has not spoken directly about his apparent change of heart but hinted at it in a post-election interview with CBS’s “60 Minutes.’’

 

‘YOU’D BE IN JAIL’: TRUMP SWIPES AT CLINTON DURING DEBATE

 

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump responded Hillary Clinton saying that he shouldn’t be in charge of the law in the U.S. saying, “You’d be in jail.” The comment was met with rousing applause from the audience. (The Washington Post)

 

“I’m going to think about it,” he said. “I don’t want to hurt them, I don’t want to hurt them. They’re, they’re good people.’’

 

Trump’s about-face drew immediate criticism from legal experts, who said it threatens the integrity of the justice system.

 

“The president-elect has demonstrated his complete lack of understanding of how the government makes these kinds of decisions,” said Stephen I. Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin. “The attorney general answers to the president, but the department is supposed to be independent, especially when it comes to prosecutorial decisions. Any president, especially our next president, needs to both understand and respect that – or else they risk politicizing criminal prosecutions in ways that can be damaging.”

 

hillary4prison-2016-shirt

Hillary for Prison 2016 shirt

 

The president-elect’s new position also stands in contrast with leading members of his party. Jason Chaffetz, the Utah congressman finishing his first term leading the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has vowed to continue to investigate Clinton’s email server.

 

“It would be totally remiss of us to dismiss [the email investigation] because she’s not going to be president,” Chaffetz said after the election, referring to the defeated Democratic nominee.

 

[Top House Republican says he’ll continue Clinton probe]

 

While FBI director James Comey has repeatedly said the bureau did not find enough evidence to recommend prosecuting Clinton over the email issue, he questioned her judgement in using a private server, calling it “reckless.’’

 

_______________

Copyright © 2016 The Geller Report

 

About PamelaGellar.com

 

Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of The Geller Report and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). She is the author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton) (Simon & Schuster) and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for World Net Daily, the American Thinker, Breitbart.com and other publications.

 

Geller’s activism on behalf of human rights has won international notice. She is a foremost defender of the freedom of speech against attempts to force the West to accept Sharia blasphemy laws, and against Sharia self-censorship by Western media outlets. Her First Amendment lawsuits filed nationwide have rolled back attempts to limit Americans’ free speech rights and limit speech to only one political perspective, and exposed attempts to make an end-run around the First Amendment by illegitimately restricting access to public fora. Her free speech event in Garland, Texas led to the capture or killing of several murderous jihadists, smoking out terror cells, leading to an increase in the threat level to READ THE REST

 

Muslim Refugees to U.S. Accelerated


Pamela Geller

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2016

 

In my post “Islam is Dangerous to America” I shared the CSP promotion of the book “See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Line of Defense”. Then I found a video at the Anti-Islam Alliance Google Community speaking of Obama bringing in his promised 10,000 Islamic refugees from the Syria-Iraq area in a quick stealth mode.

 

Now I use the word “stealth” not because it is a big secret, rather because our lame duck President Barack Hussein Obama said he was bringing these poor disenfranchised by ISIS Muslims into the USA. Obama made it clear it was the American duty to bring in Western-hating counter-culture Muslims into the USA. The reason I use “stealth” is because the Mainstream Media is not reporting this Muslim influx and the horrendous lack of vetting potentially allowing Islamic terrorists in with the Muslim refugees. It is already proven that ISIS is slipping terrorists into the even greater influx of refugees entering Europe (Reuters, AC News, Freedom Outpost and The Economic Times).

 

Actually the ONLY duty Americans should feel about ISIS displaced refugees are the Christians experiencing a brutal genocide in the Syria-Iraq area.

 

You will hear an amazing amount of West-hating Muslims coming to America on a weekly basis. A substantial amount of the video is the OAN newscaster interviewing Pamela Geller about the Obama refugee idiocy.

 

Incidentally, in case you are interested the OAN newscaster tells you that four main U.S. States are being targeted for this crazy influx:

 

  • Michigan

 

  • California

 

  • Pennsylvania

 

  • Illinois

 

JRH 4/15/16

Please Support NCCR

**********************

VIDEO: Pamela Geller on The Daily Ledger: Obama’s Surge of Muslim Syrian Refugees into US

 

 

Posted by Pamela Geller

Published on Apr 15, 2016

 

PamelaGeller.com for more.

 
Follow Pamela Geller on Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/pamelageller/

 
The overwhelming majority of the refugees who have been admitted are Muslim. Yet the real victims – the real refugees in Syria – are largely Christian. Obama has a clear preference for the Muslim refugees.

 
There is no way to vet these refugees. Records in many cases don’t exist – and ISIS doesn’t recruit people with criminal records.

 
ISIS has threatened to flood Europe with 500,000 refugees. To bring these people in is civilizational suicide.

 
Last February, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. And the Lebanese Education Minister recently said that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in camps in his country. 80% of migrants who have recently come to Europe claiming to be fleeing the war in Syria aren’t really from Syria at all.

_______________________

Muslim Refugees to U.S. Accelerated

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2016

_____________________

Pamela Geller on The Daily Ledger: Obama’s Surge of Muslim Syrian Refugees into US

 

Pamela Geller Biography

 

Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of Atlas Shrugs.com and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). She is the author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America, with Robert Spencer (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton) (Simon & Schuster) and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for World Net Dailythe American Thinker, Breitbart.com and other publications.

 

Geller’s activism on behalf of human rights has won international notice. She is a foremost defender of the freedom of speech against attempts to force the West to accept Sharia blasphemy laws, and against Sharia self-censorship by Western media outlets. Her First Amendment lawsuits filed nationwide have rolled back attempts to limit Americans’ free speech rights and limit speech to only one political perspective, and exposed attempts to make an end-run around the First Amendment by illegitimately restricting access to public fora. Her free speech event in Garland, Texas led to the capture or killing of several murderous jihadists, smoking out terror cells, leading to an increase in the threat level to BRAVO and to the consequent arrests of jihadists in several states.

 

Geller has also led awareness campaigns in U.S., Europe, and Israel on behalf of the victims and potential victims of honor killing, for the human rights of apostates from Islam, for the freedom of speech, and more. She has placed ads nationwide on buses, taxicabs, billboards, and in subway stations, calling attention to the plight of victims of Sharia and countering the deceptive and misleading ad campaigns of the Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Islamic supremacist groups.

 

In May 2013, she was awarded the Guardian of Freedom award by the Nassau County Federation of Republican Women. The Queens Village Republican Club, the oldest Republican club in America, honored Pamela Geller as the “American Patriot of the Year” in February 2013. That same month, the Creative Zionist Coalition gave her the Queen Esther Award for Jewish Heroism. Pamela Geller also received the Annie Taylor Award for Courage in 2010 from the David Horowitz Freedom Center. In October 2011, the United States Marine Corps presented her with the flag flown on September 11, 2011 over Camp Leatherneck, “amid the battlefields of Afghanistan during READ THE REST

Is Obama bringing Europe’s Rape Jihad to America?


John R. Houk

© January 8, 2016

Truth and Action got a hold of and printed a document roughly in November 2014 from Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration Office of Admissions (PRM). Here is an excerpt from Truth and Action about these projected Muslim refugees the Obama Administration is planning to bring to America:

The importation of these Muslim immigrants is part of the overall plan to destroy America from within. As revealed in a recent White House conference call on immigration, the intention is to establish ‘seedling communities’ across the U.S., then grow them all to become a ‘nation within a nation’, eventually with the immigrant nation overtaking the host.

Download a list of all cities accepting these refugees here: List of 190 Cities.

One major problem for the communities receiving these Muslim refugees that that little to no information is provided on the background of these immigrants. 100,00[0] Muslims brought in every year, and no info available on any of them. (LIST OF 190 CITIES WHERE OBAMA WILL BE PLACING SYRIAN MUSLIM REFUGEES; Truth and Action; Sourced from WND)

The link to the “List of 190 Cities” is a zip file containing a PDF file which is a PRM document. Take a look at it. You download the zip file or I found the PDF linked from the ConservativePost.com: HERE.

I need you to embed some Obama words in your memory he makes about admitting Syrian refugees at the G20 Summit in November and a Thanksgiving message equating these Muslim refugees with the Pilgrims escaping European persecution for their faith:

VIDEO: Obama on Syrian Refugees and Islam

 

Posted by The Daily Conversation

Published on Nov 17, 2015

President Obama speaks on the need for the United States to continue accepting Syrian refugees fleeing war and terrorist violence, stressing that America doesn’t have a religious test and shouldn’t begin applying one to Muslims who are trying to reach safety. READ THE REST

Is it really un-American to refuse refugee entry to a group of people (i.e. Muslims) whose very religion disagrees with the U.S. Constitution and considers all non-Muslims (i.e. I’m guessing over 95%) to be inferior infidels (kafir)?

Now check out Obama’s sentiments on equating Muslim refugees with the Pilgrims coming to America for religious freedom:

VIDEO: Obama Urges Americans To Accept Syrian Refugees

 

Posted by Opposing Views

Published on Nov 30, 2015

 

President Barack Obama urged Americans to be receptive to Syrian refugees in his Thanksgiving message on Thursday (November 26), reminding them that the Pilgrims who came to America in 1620 were themselves fleeing persecution.

I wonder if it was a part of the Pilgrim Christian faith to rape and steal from the Native American Indians because they were inferior infidels? Well, duh! No it was not. Whether it was mythological or factual the famous dinner of thanks took place between the Pilgrims and Native Americans with the Pilgrims directing their thankful gratitude to God for the survival and for the Native Americans showing them how to survive in the New World.

According to the Quran, Hadith and Sira; Islam was spread by Islamic conquest in which the conquered had to make a choice between submitting to Islam in humility, converting to Islam or die for refusing one of the other two choices. I don’t see any Thanksgiving there by Muslims. I see bloodshed, plundering, raping and humiliation from the once majority non-Muslims who in weariness of being treated as infidels began to convert to Islam for a better life over the next two or three hundred years or so of conquest.

Yup, Obama lied to the American public – AGAIN.

To drive home that point of Obama lying, I’m going to post a number of articles below that ends with a MUST SEE video from Ezra Levant on summing up the idiocy of accepting Muslim refugees in the first 10 minutes or so of a 37 minute YouTube video of his show.

JRH 1/8/16

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Syrian Husband Offers Wife’s Rape for Passage to Europe

Smugglers accepted the rape as payment. The wife placed a restraining order on her husband who reportedly joined in the daily sexual assaults.

January 7, 2015

The Clarion Project

Lacking in money, a would-be refugee offered his wife’s repeated rape as payment for the family’s passage from war-torn Syria to Europe, according to media reports.

This was compounded by the husband, who apparently participated in the daily rape of his wife during their journey to the European mainland.

Subsequently his wife obtained a restraining order against her husband. Now living in Berlin, Germany, the woman fears her husband or another family member could try to kill her because of the shame she brought upon the family.

While this story is seemingly unique in detail it is part of the broader story of the abuse of female refugees from the Middle East in recent months.

“A growing number of women and young girls housed in refugee shelters in Germany are being raped, sexually assaulted and even forced into prostitution by male asylum seekers, according to German social work organizations with first-hand knowledge of the situation.”

That is a quote taken from an item written by Soeren Kern of the Gatestone Institute in September 2015.

“Conditions for women and girls at some shelters are so perilous that females are being described as ‘wild game’ fighting off Muslim male predators. But many victims, fearing reprisals, are keeping silent, social workers say.”

Although rape occurs in all societies and cultures, there are ideologies that breed cultures where rape becomes endemic.

Clarion Project continues to educate the public about the abuses of women and girls that stem from sharia-based societies where females are frequently and legally treated as second-class citizens.

VIDEO: Dana Loesch: At What Point Do We Have to Teach Muslim Migrants Not to Rape?

 

Posted by jim hoft

Published on Jan 6, 2016

Conservative radio and TV host went on with Megyn Kelly on Wednesday to discuss the New Year’s Eve attacks in Cologne. Dana asked the question, “At what point do we have to teach Muslim migrants not to rape?”

___________________

1,000 Muslims rape, sexually assault women in Germany: Europe rape jihad

By Samantha Chang

January 5, 2016 9:46 AM MST

Examiner.com

VIDEO: Europe: Muslim RAPE JIHAD Against Women and Children

 

Posted by ArianrhodJelena

Published on Sep 27, 2015

Muslim RAPE JIHAD Against European Women and Children

Rapes have skyrocketed across Europe, including Sweden, Germany, the U.K. and Norway coinciding with the avalanche of Muslim refugees and migrants from the Middle East and North Africa. (AOL.com)

Police in Cologne, Germany, are outraged after receiving over 121 complaints of sexual assaults and rape by women who were attacked by 1,000 men of “Arab or North African origin” on New Year’s Eve.

The victims were groped, robbed and sexually assaulted by 1,000 Arab males at the main train station near the public square in Cologne, where crowds had gathered to celebrate New Year Eve’s festivities. Police expect more women to come forward, and have set up a task force to investigate these charges.

Many victims said they were called “sluts,” had their clothes torn off their bodies, and were groped. One victim, a 28-year-old woman, described the incident to German newspaper the Express:

Suddenly I felt a hand on my buttocks, then on my breasts. In the end, I was groped everywhere. It was a nightmare.

Although we yelled and hit back at them, the guys did not stop. I was desperate and think I was touched around 100 times in 200 meters.

Another woman said the mob of Arab males tore off her tights and underwear, while still another victim alleged she was gang-raped. Amazingly, the mayor of Cologne, Henriette Reker, blamed the victims, saying they should adopt a “code of conduct” to prevent being raped.

Sadly, this epidemic of rape and sexual assault across Europe is only worsening, as rapes rates have skyrocketed in England, Sweden and Norway, which have all taken in huge numbers of Muslim refugees and migrants from the Middle East and North Africa.

The problem has become so severe that Muslim refugees in Norway are being instructed to not rape or sexually harass women simply because they walk alone in public or wear clothes that bare more than their ankles.

Under sharia law, married women can be raped by their husbands with impunity. Under sharia, it’s also OK to rape any non-Muslim woman because they are “infidels.”

Rapes in Sweden and Norway — two of the most feminist and gender-equal countries in the world — have soared in recent years as their Muslim refugee and migrant populations have skyrocketed.

Sweden, which once boasted extremely low instances of rape, is now considered the “rape capital of the West.” Gang rapes in Sweden have exploded between 1995 and 2006, and culprits in most cases were immigrants from Muslim countries.

The news has not been highly publicized because Swedes fear being labeled racist or Islamophobic. In the U.K., the press refers to Muslim men in crime reports as “Asian” instead of “Arab” or “Muslim” so as to not anger its large Muslim population.

CBS News Reporter Sexually Assaulted By 100 Muslims In Egypt

In February 2011, CBS News reporter Lara Logan was sexually assaulted while covering the resignation of ex-Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak. Just minutes after Mubarak stepped down, Lara was attacked by a mob of over 100 Muslim men, who pinched, grabbed and hit her.

Precipitating the attack were comments from the crowd that Logan was an Israeli Jew (she is neither) and several men then suggested the crowd take her pants off. Logan recounted:

I feel hands grabbing my breasts, grabbing my crotch, grabbing me from behind. My shirt, my sweater was torn off completely.

I felt the moment that my bra tore. They tore the metal clips of my bra. They literally just tore my pants to shreds.

And then I felt my underwear go. When my clothes gave way I remember looking up and seeing them taking pictures with their cell phones, the flashes of their cell phone cameras.

READ ENTIRETY

_______________________

SCHLAFLY: RAPE JIHAD SHOWS ‘GERMANY IS NO LONGER GERMAN’

‘This massive immigration is simply changing the face of the world’

January 7, 2016

WND

German Chancellor Angela Merkel takes a “selfie” with a refugee (Photo: Twitter)

Globalists who demand that the West accept a wave of Muslim refugees have obliterated the face of Germany and are threatening to do the same to America, warns conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly.

“This massive immigration is simply changing the face of the world. It’s already changed Germany. Germany isn’t German anymore,” Schlafly told WND. “We want America to continue to be American, with our values, our Constitution’s values. The people who want to make us globalists do not have the best interests of our country at heart.”

Schlafly cited recent news of Islamic migrants rape jihad on women in Europe, where government officials are reported collaborating. As WND reported, public outrage is surging over reports of the mass sexual assault of German women in Cologne by Arabs and North Africans during New Year’s celebrations. And reports are coming in of attacks in other German cities, such as Hamburg and Stuttgart.

A leaked police report indicated several suspects in the Cologne sexual assaults claimed to be Syrian refugees. One suspect reportedly told authorities: “I am Syrian. You have to treat me kindly. Mrs. Merkel invited me.”

But, she warned, the U.S. cannot allow the same globalist threat to destroy the face of America.

“We believe America is a superior country. We have a superior system that has given us more freedom and prosperity than any other country in the world,” she said. “And if people want to come here, they should adapt to our ways.”

Should the floodgates in America continue to be opened to migrants, she warned the U.S. could see similar attacks on its women.

Ann Coulter’s back, and she’s never been better than in “Adios, America!: The Left’s Plan to Turn our Country into a Third World Hellhole.”

Schlafly cited a book, “Adios America,” in which the conservative author Ann Coulter reveals READ ENTIRETY

__________________

THE MUSLIM WAR ON WOMEN COMES TO GERMANY

The only way for European women to have a future is to fight Muslim migration.

By Daniel Greenfield

January 7, 2016

FrontPageMag

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

The city of Cologne’s website tells tourists that spending New Year’s there is “something to write home about.” It certainly is after the German city took in 10,000 mostly Muslim refugees last year. There are 120,000 Muslims already in the city making them more than 10% of the population. It has been estimated that Cologne will become a majority Muslim city by the last New Year’s Eve of the century.

When the anti-Islamist group Pegida came out to protest last year, the Cologne cathedral turned out its lights to condemn them while pro-migrant activists smugly held up signs reading, “Refugees welcome”.

But for this New Year’s Eve, the crowd outside the Cologne Cathedral was dominated by young Muslim men who threw fireworks at police and sexually assaulted women and girls trapped in the crowd.

In a crowd of 1,000 men, hundreds of Muslim refugees prowled, assaulting and robbing any woman they could find. A police officer described seeing crying women stumble toward him after midnight. He managed to rescue one woman whose clothes had been torn off her body from a group of her attackers, but could not save her friends because the mob had begun hurling fireworks at him.

The eight men he arrested carried asylum papers. They were among the mob of refugees welcomed by the people of Cologne.

Desperate efforts were made to suppress the crimes that had been committed, but too many women had been assaulted. More than 90 complaints had been filed. There was no telling how many more women had been too ashamed to go to the police. Or how many thought that there was no point because the authorities would not be on their side, but on the side of the Muslim refugee rapists.

A man spoke of being unable to protect his wife or teenage daughter from the mob. A British tourist fought against being forced into a car. A 17-year-old girl described being brutally violated and seeing other girls in the police station in the same condition. A 22-year-old woman recalled, “When I called for help, they laughed.” Even a volunteer policewoman had been molested.

Katia remembered walking through a “tunnel” made up only of “foreign men” who assaulted her on all sides. “Although we shouted and hit them, the men didn’t stop.” Instead they insulted and taunted her.

The over 1 million migrants brought to Germany by Merkel had already inflicted trauma on many women and girls while the offenders received little more than a slap on the wrist from the authorities.

Even pro-refugee activists working in camps in Germany had warned of a “culture of rape and violence” where unaccompanied women are viewed as “fair game” and rapes and sexual assaults are routine. A 16-year-old girl was raped on September 11 near a migrant shelter. Two Iraqis refugees had raped an 18-year-old girl behind a schoolyard. Another Iraqi raped a 17-year-old girl at a festival. A 7-year-old girl was raped in a park not far from where her mother was sitting.

Some of these cases were covered up. Others were dismissed as isolated incidents.

But the mass attack on nearly 100 women and girls by hundreds of men right in the center of the New Year’s Eve celebrations was too big to suppress. And when it broke, the outrage was tremendous.

Yet the rationalizations remain the same.

The authorities claim not to know who was responsible, but are somehow able to assure the media that none of them were refugees. Feminist groups protest broadly against sexual harassment, but insist that there “should be no racism under the guise of women’s rights.” …

While many remember the horrifying sexual assaults of the Arab Spring in Tahrir Square, including the attack on Lara Logan, such incidents are actually commonplace in Egypt, especially around Eid Al-Fitr. It doesn’t matter how the women are dressed. A 2006 story describes mass attacks on “any and every girl in sight, whether a Niqabi, a Hijabi or uncovered. Whether Egyptian or foreigner. Even pregnant ones.” 99% of Egyptian women report being sexually harassed. This behavior has is common in Muslim lands.

In Iraq, it’s eight out of ten women. In Afghanistan, rape and honor killings are routine. And this is the population that Germany’s mostly Muslim migrants are drawn from.

What happened is inevitable and it will go on happening. More READ ENTIRETY

_____________________

Geert Wilders on New Year’s Eve Sexual Assaults in Cologne Germany by Arab and North African men

By Jerry Gordon

6 January 2016

New English ReviewThe Iconoclast

Reports of sexual assaults and robberies of women gathered for celebrations in Cologne, Germany on New Year’s Eve have created a firestorm of concern in Germany, but also in neighboring Holland. Geert Wilders, leader of the Freedom Party (PVV) raised questions in the Hague Parliament of the ruling coalition cabinet members on January 5th. Today, Wilders sent a letter to Prime Minister Rutte leader of the VVD party ruling coalition requesting preventive actions to foil such possible attacks by migrants and refugees in Dutch reception centers and communities.

Reports of 90 incidents by women victims in Cologne of such sexual attacks and robberies indicated that the perpetrators were “Arabic or North Africa looking” males. It heightened concerns in this most culturally and ethnically diverse German city and among opposition political leaders who have questioned the wisdom of allowing in more than 1 million predominately Muslim migrants and refugees from the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia. That prompted Chancellor Merkel ,who has welcomed the mass immigration wave of Muslims, as a means of dealing with Germany’s acute labor shortage to have the ruling CD government Justice Minister investigate these charges and determine if any arrests can be made by local law enforcement. However, reports of riots at reception centers by migrants and refugees have aroused protests in a number of German communities.

The women involved in the Cologne sexual attacks gave evidence of what occurred:

One of the Cologne victims said she was too scared to go out alone following the ordeal.

“The men surrounded us and started to grab our behinds and touch our crotches,” she said.

“They touched us everywhere. I wanted to take my friend and leave. I turned around and in that moment someone grabbed my bag.”

She said she feared she could be killed or raped by the attackers.

“Nobody noticed and nobody helped us. I just wanted to get out.”

Another victim said she had unsuccessfully tried to fight off her assailant.

“But there were so many people around me that there was no control. There was no way out. There was no way to protect yourself,” she said.

“We ran to the police. But we saw the police were so understaffed. They couldn’t take care of us and we as women suffered the price.”

In a Dutch newspaper, The Post, on-line article by Wilders, “Cologne Assaults May Soon Happen on Large Scale in Netherlands Too,” he wrote:

If we continue to allow asylum-seekers and immigrants from Islamic countries to settle in our country en masse, then what has happened on New Year’s Eve in Germany will soon happen on the same large scale in the Netherlands, too. The first signs are already there.

During the parliamentary debate on October 14, 2015, I quoted from emails of ordinary Dutch citizens suffering from the behavior of asylum seekers and immigrants. These mails referred to young girls being “immorally touched”, daughters being “harassed,” women who are told “I want to f___k you.”

The events in Cologne are the signs of a future which lies before us if the government and the majority of the parliamentarians refuse to face the truth.

Cologne is nearby. Our wives and daughters must be protected. The government needs to wake up. Mark Rutte must do his duty. Our borders must be closed. We must de-Islamize the Netherlands.

Today, Wilders issued a follow up letter to Dutch PM Rutte saying:

Dear Mr. Prime Minister,

Yesterday and today, I received hundreds of emails. Hundreds of emails full of fear and indignation. About the horrific events on New Year’s Eve in Cologne.

I have not heard you about those events. I find that very strange. After Paris last November, we now have Cologne. After the Islamic terror, the sexual jihad. But we do not hear you. Hello, Mr. Prime Minister? Are you still there?

The plague of sexual assaults, robberies and rapes of young women by Muslim migrant young men in Sweden has made it what some allege has become the rape capital of Europe. Then we have the sexual grooming practices of young British girls by South Asia Muslim émigrés in the UK. With a million Muslim refugees and migrants who broke the borderless Schengen system, they are seeking more than sanctuary and possible economic employment, opportunities. Rather it may result in establishing virtual no go areas emboldened by sexual terrorism ruled under Sharia Islamic law condoned by EU countries under READ ENTIRETY

___________________

FINNISH POLICE HAD INTEL OF COLOGNE RAPE-JIHAD INTENDED FOR HELSINKI NEW YEARS EVE, STOPPED MUSLIM ASYLUM ATTACKERS IN TIME……

By KGS

January 7, 2016

The Tundra Tabloids

This is an update to a previous story.

So this was not just a random happening, it was organized in tandem with muslim operatives in Germany, and not only did German officials know about it in time (UPDATE: Finnish journalist contacts the TT and says not sure Germans warned the Finns), they passed information to Finnish officials who were able to act in time and prevent rapes, molestations and general robbery and thuggery by muslim settler males.

Cologne events were intended for Finland – police had intelligence information

JUHA-PEKKA TIKKA

1 hour and 10 minutes ago (updated 19 minutes ago) [Blog Editor: i.e. from the original Tundra post date]

Interior Minister confirms that asylum seekers on New Year’s Eve were apprehended for public harassment agitation.

Yle Radio 1’s interview with Interior Minister Petteri Orpo (Coalition Party) confirms that asylum seekers on New Year’s Eve in Kirkkonummi were apprehended, who would have incited a similar harassment as in Cologne, Germany.

According to the minister central criminal police had intelligence information.

– The police were informed that on New Year’s Eve there were planned criminal activities in Finland. Police worked fine proactively, the minister Orpo said.

– Great crowds can accommodate a few tending to cause confusion and to act inappropriately and illegally.

The police arrested six Iraqi men from the Aavaranta reception center on suspicion of the publicly prompting criminal activity. A few more suspects were added later. All were released on Saturday.

In Germany, up to a thousand men robbed and assaulted a number of women are sexually New Year’s Eve.

Petteri Orpo did not want to tell, what kind of READ ENTIRETY

________________

Syrian Immigrants Gang-Rape Two Underage German Girls on New Year’s Eve

By Jim Hoft

Jan 7th, 2016 11:00 am

Gateway Pundit

In 2015 German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened Germany up to one million third world migrants.

Seventy percent of the migrants entering Europe were men.

German officials later admitted they were not able to fingerprint all of the new migrants flooding across the border.

On New Year’s Eve a horde of young Muslim men sexually assaulted and harassed hundreds of German women outside of Cologne’s busy main train station during public celebrations.

Now this…

Syrian immigrants gangraped two underage girl on New Year’s Eve in Weil am Rhein.

SWR Fernshen (translated) reported, via Vlad Tepes:

Germany: A group of young men, according to SWR information, has gang raped two under age girls on Silvester night [New Year’s Eve] in Weil am Rhein.

The State prosecution of the district Lörrach has not yet made an official statement pertaining to this incident.

The two girls, ages 14 and 15, were raped multiple times, according to information received by SWR.

Four suspects are remanded in custody. They are young men from Syria aged from 16 to 20 years old.

____________

MORE EUROPEAN CITIES report Muslim Sex Attacks on New Year’s Eve: ZURICH, HELSINKI UPDATE: Austria, too

By Pamela Geller

January 7, 2016

PamelaGeller.com – Atlas Shrugs

Photo: One of the victims of the Stuttgart attack. (Photo from Facebook).

The news of Muslim sex attacks is being censored, whitewashed, and covered up. In Germany, the attacks were coordinated — that was a New Year’s jihad-terror attack.

Security guards hired to patrol the city on New Year’s Eve told police there had been “widespread sexual harassment” at a central square where around 20,000 people had gathered for celebrations.

Zurich: ‘Dark Skinned’ Men Molested Six Women on New Year’s Eve.” AFP, January 17, 2015:

At least six women have reported Cologne-style sexual harassment and molestation while celebrating the New Year in Zurich, according to local news sources.

Although information from the Swiss city has been less detailed than what is now known about the rapes, sexual harassment, and theft in German city centres, the victims have apparently reported men who were “dark skinned” to be the perpetrators.

It is not yet known if the Zurich sexual assaults have been committed by recently arrived migrants, as is believed to be the case in Cologne, but the news of the epidemic of sexual attacks now seems widespread across Europe and not simply confined to Germany.

READ THE REST

_______________

LISTEN Pamela Geller on Sean Hannity Radio Show: Muslim Refugee Sex Attack Mobs on New Year’s Eve, Germany

By PAMELA GELLER

January 7, 2016

PamelaGeller.com – Atlas Shrugs

Check out my segment with Sean Hannity on his radio show today:

VIDEO: Pamela Geller on Sean Hannity Radio Show: Muslim Migrant Sex Attack Mobs on New Year’s Eve, Germany

 

The rapists and attackers were the very Muslim migrants who were just welcomed into Europe. This highlights the problem of the refugees: they come with Muslim values that include approval for the sexual use of infidel women against their will.

They taunted the German police, shouting, “I’m Syrian. You have to treat me kindly. Ms. Merkel invited me here.” They know German authorities don’t want to punish them, and so act brazenly.

And make no mistake: this is Merkel’s handiwork. She has sown the seeds for the destruction of her own country. There will be many, many more incidents like what happened in Cologne. If these mass attacks aren’t enough to compel Merkel to abandon her disastrous Muslim immigration plan, then Germany is doomed.

READ THE REST

_______________

Police in Germany covering up extent of sex crimes committed by Muslim migrants, claims Germany’s largest newspaper

By Pamela Geller

January 7, 2016

PamelaGeller.com – Atlas Shrugs

Police have apparently been ordered to cover up extent of crimes, so as not to fuel “right wing extremist debate” — in other words, so as not to aid those who refuse to submit to jihad and sharia.

The not-so-shocking claim comes as Germany registered over one million migrants in 2015, five times last year’s total. The media refused to cover for days. Even ABC and NBC turned a blind eye to a New Year’s Eve story of 1,000 Muslim savages who raped and robbed female passers-by outside Cologne’s main train station while throwing explosives at New Year’s Eve revelers.

Germany’s largest television station, ZDF, issued an apology Wednesday for not reporting on the New Year’s Eve sexual assault scandal in the city of Cologne, where more than 100 women were victims of a “civil war like” situation.

Police in Germany are covering up the extent of crime committed by migrants, claim Bild… as country is revealed to have taken in 1.1 MILLION people during 2015

Asylum seekers are being recruited as cheap drug dealers and traffickers as well as petty thieves, Bild newspaper claims

But police have apparently been ordered to cover up extent of crimes so as not to fuel ‘right wing extremist debate’

Shocking claim comes as Germany registered over one million migrants in 2015 – five times last year’s total

Germany has taken more refugees from the Middle East and Africa than any other EU state

The country is a magnet for migrants partly because of its generous READ THE REST

____________

VIDEO: Ezra Levant Show: Muslim migrant rape and riot spree in Germany

 

Posted by Rebel Media

Published on Jan 5, 2016

Ezra Levant reports on the mass assaults that occurred in Germany on New Years Eve, carried out by Muslim refugees. Could the same thing happen in Canada?

____________

Is Obama bringing Europe’s Rape Jihad to America?

John R. Houk

© January 8, 2016

___________

Syrian Husband Offers Wife’s Rape for Passage to Europe

Copyright © Clarion Project, Inc. All rights reserved.

__________________

1,000 Muslims rape, sexually assault women in Germany: Europe rape jihad

© 2006-2016 AXS Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com

________________

Schlafly: Rape jihad shows ‘Germany is no longer German’

 

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.
______________

THE MUSLIM WAR ON WOMEN COMES TO GERMANY

© COPYRIGHT 2016, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM

__________________

Geert Wilders on New Year’s Eve Sexual Assaults in Cologne Germany by Arab and North African men

NewEnglishReview.org

_____________

FINNISH POLICE HAD INTEL OF COLOGNE RAPE-JIHAD INTENDED FOR HELSINKI NEW YEARS EVE, STOPPED MUSLIM ASYLUM ATTACKERS IN TIME……

Copyright © 2016 All Rights Reserved.

_____________

Syrian Immigrants Gang-Rape Two Underage German Girls on New Year’s Eve

2016 theGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.

___________

MORE EUROPEAN CITIES report Muslim Sex Attacks on New Year’s Eve: ZURICH, HELSINKI

LISTEN Pamela Geller on Sean Hannity Radio Show: Muslim Refugee Sex Attack Mobs on New Year’s Eve, Germany

Police in Germany covering up extent of sex crimes committed by Muslim migrants, claims Germany’s largest newspaper

About Pamela Geller

______________

[Blog Editor: “The Ezra Levant Show” was the only that differed with a Counter Jihad Report cross post of the New English Review original post.

HUGE Free Speech Victory for SIOA


You do realize Left Wing Multiculturalist thinking has hampered Counterjihad writers and/or organizations to utilize proper legal protections for their brand, right? Well, that might actually be ending soon.

Simon Shiao Tam won his appellate case that will force the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to register trademarks for organizations that may have a name that a race or group of people may find offensive. In Mr. Tam’s case it was to register the trademark “Slant” as representative of his Asian-American dance rock band. A whole slew of Conservative civil rights organizations joined Mr. Tam’s suit because the outcome affected many others denied a trademark by the USPTO under a Federal Law prohibiting trademarked names to include disparaging words as defined by the government.

One of those beneficiaries of the suit won by Tam was Pamela Geller who was a bit miffed when the USPTO rejected the SIOA and AFDI registered trademark names fighting the civil rights abuses that Islam’s Sharia Law does to Western Rights and the American Constitution in particular. Below is Geller’s victory dance post celebrating the Tam decision in a Federal Circuit Court.

JRH 12/24/15 (Hat Tip: Marlene of Out Spoken Patriots Google + Group)

Please Support NCCR

**************************

HUGE Free Speech Victory for SIOA: Federal Circuit Court Reverses 70-Year “Unconstitutional”

By Pamela Geller

December 22, 2015

PamelaGeller.comAtlas Shrugs

Longtime Atlas readers are quite familiar with our First Amendment trademark case. We have been fighting to trademark SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) but were repeatedly refused because it considered “disparaging” to Muslims. It was, in effect, an application of sharia law (‘do not criticize Islam.’)

Today we had a big victory against this fascist-style ban. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals just reversed 70 years of holdings that said there is no First Amendment protection in trademark cases. In reversing, it held as unconstitutional the “disparaging” prohibition, citing SIOA first and frequently.

What a wonderful Christmas miracle 🙂

The government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the expressive messages conveyed by the marks. It cannot refuse to register marks because it concludes that such marks will be disparaging to others. The government regulation at issue amounts to viewpoint discrimination, and under the strict scrutiny review appropriate for government regulation of message or viewpoint, we conclude that the disparagement pro- scription of § 2(a) is unconstitutional.

The USPTO had rejected AFDI’s trademark application [bad link] based on the following analysis:

“Islamisation” means converting to Islam or “to make Islamic;” and (2), “Stop” would be understood to mean that “action must be taken to cease, or put an end to, converting or making people in America conform to Islam.” Thus, the trademark, according to the “Office Action” ruling, disparaged Muslims and linked them to terrorism. (AFLC)

The court concludes that “Stop the Islamization of America” mark, as used by its promoters, is likely to be understood as “disparaging to a substantial composite” of Muslims, whether “Islamization” refers to conversion to Islam or to “a political movement to replace man-made laws with the religious laws of Islam.”

Now that Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has held as “unconstitutional” the disparaging prohibition we are going to move forward with getting our trademark.

government enacted this law—and defends it today— because it disapproves of the messages conveyed by disparaging marks. It is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment that the government may not penalize private speech merely because it disapproves of the message it conveys. That principle governs even when the government’s message-discriminatory penalty is less than a prohibition.

Courts have been slow to appreciate the expressive power of trademarks. Words—even a single word—can be powerful. Mr. Simon Shiao Tam named his band THE SLANTS to make a statement about racial and cultural issues in this country. With his band name, Mr. Tam conveys more about our society than many volumes of undisputedly protected speech. Another rejected mark, STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA, proclaims that Islamisation is undesirable and should be stopped. Many of the marks rejected as disparaging convey hurtful speech that harms members of oft-stigmatized communi- ties. But the First Amendment protects even hurtful speech.

The government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the expressive messages conveyed by the marks. It cannot refuse to register marks because it concludes that such marks will be disparaging to others. The government regulation at issue amounts to viewpoint discrimination, and under the strict scrutiny review appropriate for government regulation of message or viewpoint, we conclude that the disparagement pro- scription of § 2(a) is unconstitutional. Because the gov- ernment has offered no legitimate interests justifying § 2(a), we conclude that it would also be unconstitutional under the intermediate scrutiny traditionally applied to regulation of the commercial aspects of speech.

This is a big case – and it won’t only affect us but the Washington Redskins, the rock band

Here are some of the salient pssages in the finding:

Importantly, every time the PTO refuses to register a mark under § 2(a), it does so because it believes the mark conveys an expressive message—a message that is dis- paraging to certain groups. STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA is expressive. In refusing to register the mark, the Board explained that the “mark’s admonition to ‘STOP’ Islamisation in America ‘sets a negative tone and signals that Islamization is undesirable and is something that must be brought to an end in America.’” Geller, 751 F.3d at 1361.

We limit our holding in this case to the constitu- tionality of the § 2(a) disparagement provision. Recogniz- ing, however, that other portions of § 2 may likewise constitute government regulation of expression based on message, such as the exclusions of immoral or scandalous marks, we leave to future panels the consideration of the § 2 provisions other than the disparagement provision at issue here. To be clear, we overrule In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481 (C.C.P.A. 1981), and other precedent insofar as they could be argued to prevent a future panel from considering the constitutionality of other portions of § 2 in light of the present decision.

A disparaging mark is a mark which “dishonors by comparison with what is inferior, slights, deprecates, degrades, or affects or injures by unjust comparison.” Geller, 751 F.3d at 1358 (alterations omitted). To deter- mine if a mark is disparaging under § 2(a), a trademark examiner of the PTO considers:

Trademark Manual of Exam. Proc. (“TMEP”) § 1203.03(b)(i) (Jan. 2015 ed.) (citing Geller, 751 F.3d at 1358). If the examiner “make[s] a prima facie showing that a substantial composite, although not necessarily a majority, of the referenced group would find the proposed mark, as used on or in connection with the relevant goods or services, to be disparaging in the context of contempo- rary attitudes,” the burden shifts to the applicant for rebuttal. Id. If the applicant fails to rebut the prima facie case of disparagement, the examiner refuses to register the mark. The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure does not require an examiner who finds a mark disparaging to consult her supervisor or take any further steps to ensure the provision is applied fairly and consist- ently across the agency. Compare TMEP § 1203.03 (no discussion of action to take if examiner finds mark dis- paraging), with TMEP § 1203.01 (requiring examiner who finds a mark scandalous or immoral to consult his super- visor). A single examiner, with no input from her super- visor, can reject a mark as disparaging by determining that it would be disparaging to a substantial composite of the referenced group.

Second, the disparagement provision at issue is view- point discriminatory on its face. The PTO rejects marks under § 2(a) when it finds the marks refer to a group in a negative way, but it permits the registration of marks that refer to a group in a positive, non-disparaging man- ner. In this case the PTO refused to register Mr. Tam’s mark because it found the mark “disparaging” and “objec- tionable” to people of Asian descent. Tam, 2013 WL 5498164, at *6. But the PTO has registered marks that refer positively to people of Asian descent. See, e.g., CELEBRASIANS, ASIAN EFFICIENCY. Similarly, the PTO has prohibited the registration of marks that it found disparaged other groups. See, e.g., Pro-Football, 2015 WL 4096277 (affirming cancellation of REDSKINS); Geller, 751 F.3d 1355 (affirming rejection of STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA); Lebanese Arak Corp., 94 U.S.P.Q.2d 1215 (refusing to register KHORAN for wine); Heeb Media, 89 U.S.P.Q.2d 1071 (refusing to register HEEB); Squaw Valley Dev. Co., 80 U.S.P.Q.2d 1264 (refusing to register SQUAW VALLEY for one class of goods, but registering it for another). Yet the government registers marks that refer to particular ethnic groups or religions in positive or neutral ways—for example,

NAACP, THINK ISLAM, NEW MUSLIM COOL, MORMON SAVINGS, JEWISHSTAR, and PROUD 2 B CATHOLIC.

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on First Amendment Protection on Trademarks by Pamela Geller

[Blog Editor: The above link is to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision entitled, “Federal Circuit en banc opinion In re Simon Shao Tam rejecting 2(a) trademark disparagement”. Below is the embed from Scribd of that decision.]

 

In re Tam Fed Circuit en Banc Opinion by Jennifer Elgin

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/293858228/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&access_key=key-O7jMDbriKAQhSbs24JVn&show_recommendations=true

UPDATE: Here’s our law firm’s take:

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Finds First Amendment Applies to Trademarks and Rules that “Disparaging” Cannot Be Used to Deny Expressive Trademarks Like “Stop Islamisation of America”

As a kind of Christmas present to liberty and the U.S. Constitution, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc (the entire court), today reversed more than 30-years of jurisprudence by holding that trademark registration under the Lanham Act deserves First Amendment protection. The import of this holding is that trademarks may no longer be rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) just because the USPTO believes the mark to be disparaging.

In the case In re Tam, the federal court, which specializes in patent and trademark cases, found that the USPTO’s rejection of the musical group name “The Slants” because it disparaged Asians was unconstitutional because there was no “compelling state interest” to censure the viewpoint of the trademark owner. As a result, Simon Tam will now be able to register his band name as a federal trademark, thus allowing him to protect the name and products and services sold using that name against encroachers and counterfeiters.

What made this decision possible was the recent litigation waged by the American Freedom Law Center (“AFLC”) on behalf of Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer to register their trademark, “Stop the Islamisation of America” (“SIOA”). Like the Slants trademark, the USPTO rejected the SIOA trademark on the ground that it disparaged Muslims and even Islamists by suggesting they should be “stopped.” AFLC argued the case before a three-judge panel of the Federal Circuit Court, which upheld the USPTO ruling of disparagement.

However, on the heels of the SIOA decision, by the time the Slants case found its way to the important Federal Circuit Court, the appellate judges were apparently ready to reverse their prior rulings which rejected any First Amendment arguments. Indeed, the court’s opinion starts off referencing the USPTO’s rejection of the SIOA trademark as a rejection aimed improperly at censuring important expressive speech. The court went on to reference SIOA, and the underlying case of In re Geller, no less than seven times.

 

David Yerushalmi, AFLC co-founder and Senior Counsel, noted:

 

“This demonstrates an important adage about good lawfare and good lawyering.  Even when you lose initially you may still ultimately prevail because good, hard-fought lawfare has a way of exposing bad law and bad judgments.  This is one of those rare instances where a federal court has emphatically and quite properly reversed itself.  You can be certain that our clients will now proudly seek federal trademark registration.”

 

Robert Muise, AFLC co-founder and Senior Counsel, added:

 

“At the end of the day, this was a complete victory for the First Amendment and an absolute defeat for political correctness.  Our SIOA trademark case paved the way for this important decision, reaffirming that hard work, determination, and some good lawyering can create a favorable sea change in the law.”

 

___________________________

Pamela Geller Biography

 

Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of Atlas Shrugs.com and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). She is the author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America, with Robert Spencer (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton) (Simon & Schuster) and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for World Net Dailythe American ThinkerBreitbart.com and other publications.

 

Geller’s activism on behalf of human rights has won international notice. She is a foremost defender of the freedom of speech against attempts to force the West to accept Sharia blasphemy laws, and against Sharia self-censorship by Western media outlets. Her First Amendment lawsuits filed nationwide have rolled back attempts to limit Americans’ free speech rights and limit speech to only one political perspective, and exposed attempts to make an end-run around the First Amendment by illegitimately restricting access to public fora. Her free speech event in Garland, Texas led to the capture or killing of several murderous jihadists, smoking out terror cells, leading to an increase in the threat level to BRAVO and to the consequent arrests of jihadists in several states.

 

Geller has also led awareness campaigns in READ THE REST

 

Contribute to the fight!