Dem Propaganda & Deep State Coup?


John R. Houk

© March 6, 2017

 

The Dems have tried to frame President Trump with getting the Russians to fix the November elections to Trump’s favor. Indeed, traitor former President Obama has been exposed with his own self trying to sway the election with the Russian Fake News story combined with some Watergate style campaign spying in the name of National Security.

 

FINALLY! President Trump is pushing back! Our President is letting the cat out of the bag and the Dems are trying to obfuscate the push back with typical denials in their defense of treasonous Obama.

 

Here is some more Obama/Dem Deep State documentation of the travesty of pulling a legal coup against President Trump. I have to wonder. WHEN the legal coup fails, will the Obama/Dems begin a violent coup as evidenced in the streets with violence against Pro-Trumpers? Can you say Loretta Lynch?

 

VIDEO: Loretta Lynch Calls for MARCHING, BLOOD and even DEATH in Resistance to Trump in new Facebook Video

 

Posted by The Tolerant Left

Published on Mar 4, 2017

 

As to the push back against Obama, Mark Levin outlines the very same thing Trump refers to on Fox & Friends yesterday. The irony! The sources cited by Levin are Left oriented rags (Levin uses the term “another Right Wing” in a tongue-in-cheek fashion to get his point across).

 

VIDEO: Mark Levin PROVES Obama Wiretapping on President Donald Trump | Fox & Friends 3/5/17

 

Posted by KagenOfficial

Published on Mar 5, 2017

 

Mark Levin interview on Fox News Fox & Friends on March 5, 2017 3/5/17 and provides proof of Obama Administration Wiretapping Spying by FBI and NSA. Mark Levin proves wiretap trump tower

 

If you are foolish enough to watch other news outlets castigate President Trump for his tweets against treasonous Obama, YOU have to see the hypocrisy that Levin sources the Left for Obama meddling in the 2016 election cycle!

 

JRH 3/6/17

Please Support NCCR

************

SPYGATE: Mark Levin Provides The Timeline And Proof Of The Obama Administration Using Police Tactics Against Trump [VIDEO]

 

By Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

March 5, 2017 

Noisy Room

 

Obama Spying

 

Mark Levin is on a tear and it is a wonder to behold. I just watched him provide solid proof on Fox News on how all these police tactics against President Trump did indeed occur. The media provided most of the proof themselves that the two FISA requests were sought by Obama… the first one in June of last year, which mentioned Trump directly and was denied, and a second that occurred in October last year and was narrowed in scope, then was approved. It looks like it may have been targeting a server in the White House that was emailing Russian banks supposedly. No wrongdoing was found, unless of course you count what Obama did.

 

Levin has laid out exactly how this should be investigated and he has the full attention of the White House. His findings and recommendations have been circulated to several White House staffers, according to Washington Post reporter Robert Costa. The FISA orders and transcripts should now be made public and hearings should begin over all this. The media is still insisting there is no proof, when they provided said proof. This is insane.

 

From Conservative Review:

 

Mark Levin, Conservative Review’s editor-in-chief, recommends the Trump administration open an investigation into Barack Obama. Levin states the former president’s team used police-state tactics against then-candidate Trump during the 2016 election.

 

“The gravity of this is unparalleled. It appears that during the course of a presidential election, the Obama administration used both intelligence and law enforcement agencies to investigate the Republican nominee’s campaign and certain surrogates,” Levin tells Conservative Review.

 

Levin – who served as chief of staff for President Reagan’s Attorney General Ed Meese – explained the potential scandal on his Thursday evening radio show:

 

“We have a prior administration – Barack Obama and his surrogates – who are supporting Hillary Clinton and her party, the Democratic Party. Who were using the … intelligence activities to surveil members of the Trump campaign, and to put that information out in the public.

 

“The question is: Was Obama surveilling top Trump campaign officials during the election?” Levin asked on “The Mark Levin Show.”

 

Mark Levin is calling this a silent coup. And he is correct. I’ve looked right at this evidence for months and I never connected the dots. I’m so glad Levin did. It is obvious to me that Barack Obama did know about all this and had Lynch at the DOJ once again do his dirty work. There was and is an orchestrated plan to sabotage the Trump presidency and not only stop him from getting his appointees approved, but stop him from accomplishing anything of merit or that would hurt the Obama legacy.

 

A myriad of things now look very connected. The protests and riots, Valerie Jarrett moving into Obama’s mansion, Jarrett’s daughter being hired by CNN to cover the DOJ and Jeff Sessions when she’s not even a journalist, the attack on Jeff Sessions himself, and on and on and on. When do we wake up and realize we are at war within? And that Obama and his activists must be stopped and held accountable. You’ve got Loretta Lynch literally calling for blood and death in our streets: …They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again– Loretta Lynch, February 28 2017 This is who we are fighting and we must now see this through and show the left that we will not stand for police state tactics against Americans like this and especially against an elected President.

 

[Noisy Room Video posted above]

 

Full Interview [Fox & Friends Weekend]: http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/05/mark-levin-donald-trump-barack-obama-wiretapping

+++

WAS OBAMA’S TAP OF TRUMP LEGAL, AMERICAN?

Exclusive: Joseph Farah reveals why scandal is ‘bigger and worse than Watergate’

 

By JOSEPH FARAH

March 5, 2017

WND

 

After Donald Trump blew the whistle on the eavesdropping of his 2016 campaign headquarters by Barack Obama’s administration, few in the media or elsewhere seem to be asking the obvious questions:

Was it legal?

 

Was it ethical – in the American way?

 

One thing is for certain: If the roles were reversed and the Trump administration bugged Democrats, you can imagine the media would take a much different view.

 

Let’s first take a look at how the media reported this travesty of justice, political decorum, the Constitution and American legal tradition:

 

  • Washington Post: President Trump on Saturday angrily accused former President Barack Obama of orchestrating a “Nixon/Watergate” plot to tap the phones at his Trump Tower headquarters in the run-up to last fall’s election, providing no evidence to support his explosive claim and drawing a flat denial from Obama’s office.

 

  • CNN: Trump’s baseless wiretap claim

 

  • Atlantic: Trump’s Unfounded Claims of a “Nixon/Watergate” Wiretapping Scheme

 

  • Huffington Post: Obama Refutes Allegation that He Wiretapped Trump Tower During Campaign

 

  • New York Daily News: Trump’s poor understanding of national security investigations may prove dangerous

 

  • New York Times: President Trump on Saturday accused former President Barack Obama of tapping his phones at Trump Tower the month before the election, leveling the explosive allegation without offering any evidence.

 

The emphasis of all of these “fake news” reports is disingenuous to say the least. Obama didn’t deny his administration wiretapped Trump. He said no one at the White House did. That is a virtual admission that his administration did, probably Justice Department, meaning the “apolitical Loretta Lynch” who just called for “blood and death” in the streets to stop Trump, much to the approval of Senate Democrats. It’s an obvious parsing of words by the slick Obama.

 

The accusation is indeed bigger than Watergate, which began with an attempt not to eavesdrop directly on Richard Nixon’s opponent in the 1972 presidential election, but on Larry O’Brian, the head of the DNC, whose offices were in the Watergate Hotel. He was the Debbie Wasserman-Schultz of his day, but she and Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta didn’t bother securing their email communications, and you could read them all on WikiLeaks.

 

And that brings us to the excuse for Trump’s campaign being undoubtedly bugged – the elusive evidence for Russian hacking and interference in the 2016 U.S. election.

 

If you doubt there is no evidence, just carefully read every New York Times story on the fake scandal. Way down near the bottom of every story, the paper that has trumpeted this story the most admits there’s no evidence.

 

So, here’s the way this thing obviously went down.

 

Obama’s team first tried to get a broad FISA warrant to investigate the Russian fantasy. The judge turned it down.

 

It tried again with a narrower FISA warrant request. The judge turned it down.

 

Then it tried a third time, and the judge approved it in October. Coincidentally, that is the exact time Trump says the wiretapping began.

 

Not one of these big news organizations will tell you that.

 

It’s the attorney general who would request such wiretap authorizations for heavy-duty, politically charged requests such as this – not that any have ever been requested or authorized in the history of the republic.

 

Do news organizations really want to be covering up stuff like this? Don’t they understand the same tactics can be used against them? Obama, or (wink-wink) Lynch, just set the precedent.

 

Nixon never did anything remotely like this – and he was forced from office as a result. Obama or Lynch could well be prosecuted by the Trump administration. And one or both probably should be.

 

Misuse of FISA statutes is a clear violation of the law.

 

FISA can only be used for “foreign intelligence information” as the basis for surveillance to protect the U.S. against a “grave” or “hostile” attack, war-like sabotage or international terror.

 

Does anyone suggest such a thing with regard to Russian hacks?

 

That’s what makes this scandal, pardon the expression, “bigger than Watergate.”

 

Out of more than 35,000 FISA court requests, only 12 have ever been rejected. But two out of three requested by the Obama administration to investigate the Russia deal were. What does that tell you?

 

It tells me this was a political fishing expedition to build a case against Trump if or when he beat Hillary.

 

Since the election, the hysteria over Russia’s role in the election has only increased exponentially.

 

And that’s why:

 

1. I believe Trump.

2. I don’t believe Obama.

3. I don’t believe the “fake news cartel,” which is all in for finding the elusive Trump-Russia link.

 

What we’ve got here at first glance is a prima facie case for “bigger and worse than Watergate.”

 

But the Washington Post and New York Times have already signaled they won’t be investigating. They are already publishing front-page editorials that stake out a rather shrill “see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, speak-no-evil” approach.

 

Was it legal? No.

 

Was it ethical in the American political tradition? No.

 

Is it one of the most dangerous developments in American political history? Yes.

 

+++

The Obama Camp’s Disingenuous Denials on FISA Surveillance of Trump 

 

By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY

Originally NATIONAL REVIEW

March 5, 2017

Israpundit

Posted by Ted Belman

 

President Trump’s early Saturday morning tweeting has exploded to the forefront an uncovered scandal I’ve been talking about since early January (including in this weekend’s column): The fact that the Obama Justice Department and the FBI investigated associates of Donald Trump, and likely Trump himself, in the heat of the presidential campaign.

 

To summarize, reporting indicates that, prior to June 2016, the Obama Justice Department and FBI considered a criminal investigation of Trump associates, and perhaps Trump himself, based on concerns about connections to Russian financial institutions. Preliminary poking around indicated that there was nothing criminal involved. Rather than shut the case down, though, the Obama Justice Department converted it into a national-security investigation under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). FISA allows the government, if it gets court permission, to conduct electronic surveillance (which could include wiretapping, monitoring of e-mail, and the like) against those it alleges are “agents of a foreign power.”
FISA applications and the evidence garnered from them are classified – i.e., we would not know about any of this unless someone had leaked classified information to the media, a felony. In June, the Obama Justice Department submitted an application that apparently “named” Trump in addition to some of his associates.

 

As I have stressed, it is unclear whether “named” in this context indicates that Trump himself was cited as a person the Justice Department was alleging was a Russian agent whom it wanted to surveil. It could instead mean that Trump’s name was merely mentioned in an application that sought to conduct surveillance on other alleged Russian agents. President Trump’s tweets on Saturday claimed that “President Obama . . . tapp[ed] my phones[,]” which makes it more likely that Trump was targeted for surveillance, rather than merely mentioned in the application.

 

In any event, the FISA court reportedly turned down the Obama Justice Department’s request, which is notable: The FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct national-security surveillance (although, as I’ve noted over the years, the claim by many that it is a rubber-stamp is overblown).

 

Not taking no for an answer, the Obama Justice Department evidently returned to the FISA court in October 2016, the critical final weeks of the presidential campaign. This time, the Justice Department submitted a narrowly tailored application that did not mention Trump. The court apparently granted it, authorizing surveillance of some Trump associates.

 

It is unknown whether that surveillance is still underway, but the New York Times has identified – again, based on illegal leaks of classified information – at least three of its targets: Paul Manafort (the former Trump campaign chairman who was ousted in August), and two others whose connection to the Trump campaign was loose at best, Manafort’s former political-consulting business partner Roger Stone, and investor Carter Page.

 

The Times report (from mid-January) includes a lot of heavy breathing about potential ties between the Trump campaign and Russia; but it ultimately concedes that the government’s FISA investigation may have nothing to do with Trump, the campaign, or alleged Russian efforts to interfere in the U.S. election by hacking e-mail accounts. Trump’s tweets on Saturday prompted some interesting “denials” from the Obama camp. These can be summarized in the statement put out by Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis:

 

A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false.

 

This seems disingenuous on several levels. First, as Obama officials well know, under the FISA process, it is technically the FISA court that “orders” surveillance. And by statute, it is the Justice Department, not the White House, that represents the government in proceedings before the FISA court. So, the issue is not whether Obama or some member of his White House staff “ordered” surveillance of Trump and his associates.

 

The issues are (a) whether the Obama Justice Department sought such surveillance authorization from the FISA court, and (b) whether, if the Justice Department did that, the White House was aware of or complicit in the decision to do so. Personally, given the explosive and controversial nature of the surveillance request we are talking about – an application to wiretap the presidential candidate of the opposition party, and some of his associates, during the heat of the presidential campaign, based on the allegation that the candidate and his associates were acting as Russian agents – it seems to me that there is less than zero chance that could have happened without consultation between the Justice Department and the White House. [Blog Editor’s bold text]

 

Second, the business about never ordering surveillance against American citizens is nonsense. Obama had American citizens killed in drone operations. Obviously, that was not done in the U.S. or through the FISA process; it was done overseas, under the president’s commander-in-chief and statutory authority during wartime.

 

But the notion that Obama would never have an American subject to surveillance is absurd. Third, that brings us to a related point: FISA national-security investigations are not like criminal investigations. They are more like covert intelligence operations – which presidents personally sign off on. [Blog Editor’s bold text]

 

The intention is not to build a criminal case; it is to gather information about what foreign powers are up, particularly on U.S. soil. One of the points in FISA proceedings’ being classified is that they remain secret – the idea is not to prejudice an American citizen with publication of the fact that he has been subjected to surveillance even though he is not alleged to have engaged in criminal wrongdoing. Consequently, there is nothing wrong, in principle, with a president’s ordering national-security surveillance of a potential foreign agent who may be helping a foreign power threaten American security and interests.

 

That is one of the president’s main jobs – there would be something wrong if a president, who truly believed the nation was threatened by a foreign power, failed to take action. Prior to FISA’s enactment in 1978, courts had no formal role in the surveillance of foreign agents for national-security purposes – it was a unilateral executive-branch function. Beginning with the Carter administration during FISA’s enactment, it has been the position of presidential administrations of both parties that, despite the enactment of the FISA process, the president maintains inherent authority under Article II of the Constitution to order surveillance even in the absence of court authorization. [Blog Editor’s bold text]

 

Of course, doing so is controversial, as President Bush learned after he directed the NSA to conduct warrantless wiretapping of suspected terrorists following the 9/11 attacks. Nevertheless, we should not allow the statements of Obama spokesmen to confuse us here. The Justice Department and FBI have two missions: (a) criminal law-enforcement and (b) national security. It would be scandalous (though probably not constitutional unconstitutional) for a president to interfere in the law-enforcement mission by ordering the Justice Department to prosecute someone outside its normal procedures.

 

But it would not be inappropriate  e–ven though civil libertarians would raise holy hell — for the president to direct warrantless surveillance against a target, even an American citizen, if the president truly believed that target was functioning as an agent of a foreign power threatening U.S. interests. To be clear, there does not seem to be any evidence, at least that I know of, to suggest that any surveillance or requests to conduct surveillance against then-candidate Donald Trump was done outside the FISA process.

 

Nevertheless, whether done inside or outside the FISA process, it would be a scandal of Watergate dimension if a presidential administration sought to conduct, or did conduct, national-security surveillance against the presidential candidate of the opposition party. Unless there was some powerful evidence that the candidate was actually acting as an agent of a foreign power, such activity would amount to a pretextual use of national-security power for political purposes. That is the kind of abuse that led to Richard Nixon’s resignation in lieu of impeachment. [Blog Editor’s bold text]

 

Moreover, it cannot be glossed over that, at the very time it appears the Obama Justice Department was seeking to surveil Trump and/or his associates on the pretext that they were Russian agents, the Obama Justice Department was also actively undermining and ultimately closing without charges the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton despite significant evidence of felony misconduct that threatened national security. This appears to be extraordinary, politically motivated abuse of presidential power.  [I have updated the post, as indicated, to reflect that I meant “not unconstitutional” in a passage in which I erroneously said “not constitutional.] -[Blog Editor’s bold text]

__________________

Dem Propaganda & Deep State Coup?

John R. Houk

© March 6, 2017

_______________

SPYGATE: Mark Levin Provides The Timeline And Proof Of The Obama Administration Using Police Tactics Against Trump [VIDEO]

 

© 2017 NoisyRoom.net

______________

WAS OBAMA’S TAP OF TRUMP LEGAL, AMERICAN?

 

Copyright 2017 WND

_______________

The Obama Camp’s Disingenuous Denials on FISA Surveillance of Trump 

 

© 2005-2017 by Ted Belman. Some Rights Reserved. All views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the site owner or the rest of its participants.

 

Israpundit

 

About National Review

 

Newbill: Pizzagate, Trafficking, False Flag & Fake News


fake-news-leftist-style

By Tony Newbill

Edited by John R. Houk

Posted December 13, 2016

 

Here are some Newbill emails with link summaries by yours truly. Also I added a bit of my own commentary as well. The Newbill layout roughly follows the thought behind the title. (Not necessarily in the order of the title.)

 

JRH 12/13/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

 

***ATTENTION*********ATTENTION***

12/8/2016 12:57 PM

 

OBAMA LEGACY??????

LISTEN TO THIS NEWS REPORT!!!!!!!!!!

USA in NATIONAL CRISIS CHILD PORN ? SEX TRAFFICKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

VIDEO: Impunity for US government workers using child porn #Pizzagate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5YEkvMsdyw

 

Posted by Detodo Unpoco

Published on Dec 8, 2016

 

Is John Podesta involved in an International Child pornography/ Child Sex Trafficking???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUvrtNyQGI

VIDEO: #PizzaGate Breakthrough: ROTHSCHILD and CTR’s David Brock Had Social Ties w/ Jimmy Comet!

 

Posted by David Seaman

Published on Dec 8, 2016

 

If there’s nothing to PizzaGate, why have researchers found an image on Jimmy Comet’s Instagram of him at a private book party with Lady Lynn Rothschild—one of Hillary’s strongest backers in elite circles—and David Brock, creator of troll shop Correct The Record and propagandist establishment rag Media Matters. Although this proves nothing, we now know that “Jimmy Comet” of PizzaGate fame, at the least, had social relations with Lady Rothschild and Brock. That is unusual; why is a random pizza shop owner hanging with Rothschilds and longtime Clinton insiders like Brock? Some have found the trolling against PizzaGate researchers to be almost identical to Correct The Record’s flavor of attack during the election, rather than being an attack sourced back to any state-sponsored entity. Why would a random pizza shop, maligned by “Internet trolls,” have the resources for a national Correct The Record counter-campaign? It doesn’t make a lot of sense.

Via Free Thought Project: ’Buried in thousands of the former Secretary of State’s emails sent via her personal server, are intimations of her close relationship with the infamous Rothschild banking family and hints for a potential Rockefeller-State partnership.
Lynn Forester de Rothschild wrote an email on April 18, 2010, in which she tells Hillary she would “love to catch up” — and “I remain your loyal adoring pal.” Clinton responds “let’s make that happen,” and signs her response, “Much love, H.”
On September 23, 2010, Clinton emailed Lynn Forester de Rothschild (an email chain marked by heavy redaction) saying, “I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going …”’

Read more at  http://thefreethoughtproject.com/searched-hillarys-emails-indicted-win-presidency/#Q4VAjFbESyGeV2L0.99

Primary source bona fides- https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/1606

Follow- https://gab.ai/d_seaman
Support- https://paypal.me/DavidSeaman
Backup- https://vimeo.com/davidseaman

Newsletter: http://bit.ly/2d2SQpm

https://www.patreon.com/davidseaman

+++

Question

12/8/2016 1:59 PM

 

Does denigrating Humanity to create a Less than Exceptional Impression of Human Life as is displayed in the first link, and Child /Human Trafficking have anything in common with in elite circles of society?

 

https://sli.mg/a/mdv0hG  

[Blog Editor: The above link has volumes of photos of some kind of Occult bizarre event. Some of the photos are a bit hinky yet does include some famous people. The below title is the only text.]

Maria Occult Gala

 

+++

*****ATTENTION******

12/11/2016 12:22 PM

 

With what Ben Swann has exposed we can say with Confidence that a Psych-ops is going on RIGHT NOW with the claim of Russian hacking of the 2016 elections for a COUP by the Obama Globalists to retain POWER …… and with Ben Swann’s report we can say with confidence that these Investigations can be made up Propaganda!!!!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck/videos/1225315250866756/?pnref=story

 

[Blog Editor: Below is the Youtube version of the above Facebook link to the Ben Swann video.]

 

VIDEO: Reality Check: Pentagon Paid $500 Million to PR Firm To Create Iraq Propaganda Videos

 

Posted by Ben Swann

Published on Oct 11, 2016

 

If the Pentagon paid for Propaganda, then they can help Obama and Hillary Clinton try and Create a false narrative about Russia interfering with the election and the Loss of Crooked Hillary Clinton!!!!!!!!

 

CIA says Russia caused Hillary Clinton’s Loss.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvoExnjQJ2k

VIDEO: Hillary Election Loss Blamed on “Russian Hackers”

 

Posted by Mark Dice

Published on Dec 10, 2016

 

Liberals are once again claiming Russia is to blame for Hillary Clinton losing the 2016 Presidential Election to Donald Trump after an alleged Secret CIA assessment has been conducted on the issue. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story. Copyright © 2016 by Mark Dice.

Do not download or re-upload this video in whole or in part to any channel or other platform, or it will be removed for copyright violations and your account terminated. [Blog Editor: I am not uploading or downloading but I am using an embed.]
✔️ Subscribe now for more! http://bit.ly/1QHJwaK See you tomorrow!

 

— Order Mark’s New Book THE ILLUMINATI IN HOLLYWOOD– In Paperback on READ THE REST

 

Obama / Schumer ORDER Investigation

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/schumer-calls-for-full-investigation-by-congress-of-russian-interference-in-us-elections/ar-AAlotyP?OCID=ansmsnnews11

 

The CIA’s findings that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency are both “stunning and not surprising,” the next leader of Senate Democrats said, raising the need for Congress to conduct a full investigation.

 

The statement from Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), issued Saturday morning, was in response to a Washington Post story that intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee to boost Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton’s chances.

 

The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill last week, in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Agency briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was Russia’s goal, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

 

It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” said a senior U.S. official briefed on the intelligence presentation made to U.S. senators. “That’s the consensus view.”

 

READ THE REST of the Fake News Leftist Report (Schumer calls for full investigation by Congress of Russian interference in U.S. elections; By Ellen Nakashima, Kristine Guerra of Washington Post; msn.com; 12/10/16)

 

*** [Blog Editor: TAKE NOTE that this story being circulated by WaPo and picked up by other Leftist MSM outlets (like MSN) as truth is actually Fake News! If you read way down in the WaPo so-called exposé article you can see that even WaPo is unsure of its credibility.]

 

Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

 

 

[WAY DOWN]

 

The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

 

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.

 

 

On Oct. 7, the intelligence community officially accused Moscow of seeking to interfere in the election through the hacking of “political organizations.” Though the statement never specified which party, it was clear that officials were referring to cyber-intrusions into the computers of the DNC and other Democratic groups and individuals.

 

Some key Republican lawmakers have continued to question the quality of evidence supporting Russian involvement.

 

I’ll be the first one to come out and point at Russia if there’s clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence — even now,” said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a member of the Trump transition team. “There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it.” [Bold text by Editor]

 

 

Though U.S. intelligence agencies were skeptical that hackers would be able to manipulate the election results in a systematic way, the White House feared that Russia would attempt to do so, sowing doubt about the fundamental mechanisms of democracy and potentially forcing a more dangerous confrontation between Washington and Moscow. [Editor’s bold text]

 

The lack of an administration response on the Russian hacking cannot be attributed to Congress,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, who was at the September meeting. “The administration has all the tools it needs to respond. They have the ability to impose sanctions. They have the ability to take clandestine means. The administration has decided not to utilize them in a way that would deter the Russians, and I think that’s a problem.” [Editor’s bold text] (Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House; By Adam EntousEllen Nakashima and Greg Miller & Philip Rucker contributing; WaPo; 12/9/16)

 

[Blog Editor: And here is a direct rebuttal to the WaPo story that injected just enough stealth doubt for plausible deniability.]

 

CIA: Washington Post Report Linking Russian Government to Trump & Election Hacking Is “Outright Lie”

 

The Central Intelligence Agency is declaring the Washington Post’s much-hyped story linking the Russian government to hacking the presidential election to help Donald Trump an “outright lie,” according to CIA personnel with direct knowledge of the case.

 

The Washington Post, in a front-page splash on Friday, fingered the CIA for allegedly confirming the wild rumors of Russian hacking that were concocted and spread by Democratic lawmakers for months preceding the election and the weeks since the GOP win. The Washington Post’s story, however, contained no CIA sources and in fact, no credible U.S. intelligence agency sources whatsoever. Instead, it hinged on what unnamed lawmakers had supposedly been told by unidentified, supposed CIA-linked sources in “secret” briefings: That the CIA had developed proof the Russian state waged an orchestrated campaign to destabilize the U.S. election to benefit GOP-candidate Trump.

 

“It’s an outright lie,” a CIA analyst divulged to True Pundit. “There’s nothing definitive like that. There are leads from activity originating in Finland, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Britain, France, China and Russia.”

 

Multiple CIA sources are now denouncing the Washington Post for knowingly reporting misleading national security intelligence. Intelligence insiders said no one in the Agency or in the FBI, who is running at least one parallel inquiry, has ruled out a possible internal leak within the Democratic National Committee from actor(s) inside the United States who funneled private DNC emails to Wikileaks.

 

On the rabid Sunday morning political talk show circuit yesterday, fueled by the Washington Post’s thinly-sourced yet highly-lauded reporting, Sen. John McCain implored President Elect Trump to look at the CIA-Russian information which he said was credible. McCain, however, as the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, had strangely never publicly disseminated such intelligence prior to Sunday. And no other elected officials have stepped up to echo his narrative or that of the Washington Post.

 

CIA and intelligence sources, however, quickly countered McCain’s claims as speculative at best, saying his information is simply not accurate and he, as the Arizona senator has done previously, was grandstanding for the media without knowing key facts.

 

“If he (McCain) in fact is being told that information, it is bad information,” a CIA source said, pondering whether McCain had perhaps been briefed by outgoing CIA Director John Brennan or his loyal Agency underlings. Multiple sources said Brennan and his inner circle in the Agency could not be trusted to disseminate any true intelligence, especially in their final days on the job, without tainting raw data with political ideologies that parallel their White House boss.

 

Trump has already named Kansas Congressman Mike Pompeo as Brennan’s successor and CIA personnel anxiously anticipate Brennan’s departure, READ THE REST of NOT Fake News (CIA: Washington Post Report Linking Russian Government to Trump & Election Hacking Is “Outright Lie”; By admin; True Pundit; 12/12/16)

 

[Blog Editor: Back to the Newbill narrative.]

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-12-09/obama-orders-investigation-into-election-related-hacking-attacks-iwhy9nww 

 

President Barack Obama has directed U.S. intelligence agencies to conduct an investigation into hacking attacks related to the U.S. election and issue a report before he leaves office next month, White House counterterrorism adviser Lisa Monaco said.

 

The report, which will be provided to Congress but not necessarily made public, will examine what impact hacking by Russia may have had on the election last month, Monaco said Friday at a breakfast in Washington hosted by the READ THE REST (Obama Orders Investigation Into Election-Related Hacking; By Chris Strohm; Bloomberg; 12/9/16 9:31 AM CST – Updated 12:58 PM CST)

 

Obama to STAY IN POWER

 

https://www.intellihub.com/obama-regime-positions-retain-power/  

 

Obama Admins scurries to flip script

 

(INTELLIHUB) — Major coordinated attacks on the President-elect’s character and judgement have been launched as of late Friday night, after the New York Times and Washington Post both released major disinformation pieces, citing how the C.I.A. has ruled with “high confidence” that the Russians helped sway the elections, creating Trump’s win.

 

Astonishingly, I predicted this exact scenario just an hour or more before the bombshell propaganda pieces were released, which can be seen in the following Tweet. (Click on the Tweet to see full context)

 

Shepard Ambellas

@ShepardAmbellas

I bet, so he can show falsified data to steal away @realDonaldTrump‘s victory https://twitter.com/theblaze/status/807405210364735488

9:16 PM – 9 Dec 2016

 

 

“In briefings to the White House and Congress, intelligence officials, including those from the C.I.A. and the National Security Agency, have identified individual Russian officials they believe were responsible. But none have been publicly penalized.”

 

The New York Times went on to purport the following ‘fake news’ Friday, using haphazard terminology, which offers the publication an out, carefully writing how “cybersecurity companies believe”, meaning they actually have no proof they just “believe.” Just a play on words to push the new and patently false narrative.

 

 

In light of the recent propaganda push, President Obama has ordered Intelligence agencies to submit a report before he leaves office on Jan. 20, which Obama may potentially use to stay in power by declaring the elections were rigged.

 

The President-elect is rejecting claims of Russian espionage, saying, “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” which led to war and the deaths of over 600,000 people, according to a Lancet Survey. READ ENTIRETY (Obama regime positions to retain power, stay in office, as shitstorm develops; By SHEPARD AMBELLAS; INTELIHUB; 12/10/16 10:19 AM EST)

 

THERE WILL BE NO PEACEFUL TRANSITION OF POWER

 

Obama allowing Terrorists into the USA!!!!!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxjrpDIO1X4

VIDEO: UNBELIEVABLE!!! Obama is letting terrorists into the USA.

 

Posted by mrstepintime

Published on Dec 10, 2016

 

All these Muslims say is Obama says we can come into the country. Illegal Immigrants Tell Border Agents “Obama Said It Was OK To Come.
And if you don’t know by now, Obama plans to flood the country with Muslims, WHY? because he hates Christians, plain and simple, and this is his way of causing total Chaos and eventual martial law.

 

THE MILITARY WILL NEED TO POSITION THEMSELVES ON THE TERRORIST CELLS THAT ARE IN THE U.S.A. WHICH ARE OBAMA’S SHADOW SECURITY FORCE HE HAS ALLOWED IN OVER THE YEARS TO HELP HIM WITH THIS coup.

 

The Military needs to start now with Proxy Propaganda outing the Terrorist cells and their association with this Obama Mission to rally support away from Obama and Marginalize the factions in society that might support Obama but would not once they learn of the Terrorist cells that Obama has brought into the U.S.A. to create the destabilization that would jointly force the Military to act against the will of the People’s election!!!!!!!!

 

+++

DON’T DO AS I DO. DO AS I SAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12/12/2016 8:44 AM

 

House Quietly Passes Bill Targeting “Russian Propaganda” Websites

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-02/house-quietly-passes-bill-targeting-russian-propaganda-websites

 

On November 30, one week after the Washington Post launched its witch hunt against “Russian propaganda fake news“, with 390 votes for, the House quietly passed “H.R. 6393, Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017“, sponsored by California Republican Devin Nunes (whose third largest donor in 2016 is Google parent Alphabet, Inc), a bill which deals with a number of intelligence-related issues, including Russian propaganda, or what the government calls propaganda, and hints at a potential crackdown on “offenders.”

 

A quick skim of the bill reveals “Title V—Matters relating to foreign countries”, whose Section 501 calls for the government to “counter active measures by Russia to exert covert influence … carried out in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of the Russian Federation and the role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly.”

 

  • The section lists the following definitions of media manipulation:

 

  • Establishment or funding of a front group.

 

  • Covert broadcasting.

 

  • Media manipulation.

 

  • Disinformation and forgeries.

 

  • Funding agents of influence.

 

  • Incitement and offensive counterintelligence.

 

 

  • Terrorist acts.

 

As ActivistPost correctly notes, it is easy to see how this law, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, could be used to target, threaten, or eliminate so-called “fake news” websites, a list which has been used to arbitrarily define any website, or blog, that does not share the mainstream media’s proclivity to serve as the Public Relations arm of a given administration.

 

Curiously, the bill which was passed on November 30, was introduced on November 22, two days before the Washington Post published its Nov. 24 article citing “experts” who claim Russian propaganda helped Donald Trump get elected.

 

As we reported last week, in an article that has been widely blasted, the WaPo wrote that “two teams of independent researchers found that the Russians exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment, as an insurgent candidate harnessed a READ THE REST (House Quietly Passes Bill Targeting “Russian Propaganda” Websites; By Tyler Durden; ZeroHedge; 12/3/16 11:55 AM)

 

+++

Establish Media LIES about what is going on in Aleppo, Syria!!!!!!!

12/12/2016 10:53 AM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ509Z8uk_A  

VIDEO: Eva Bartlett Rocks

 

Posted by G Nyx

Published on Dec 10, 2016

 

Eva Bartlett. Syria truth.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VNQGsiP8M&feature=youtu.be

VIDEO: Western media lies about Syria exposed (Canadian journalist Eva Bartlett)

 

Posted by TyrannyUnmasked

Published on Dec 10, 2016

 

↓↓↓[[[All Links Below]]] ↓ ↓ ↓ Join the community http://www.con-tru.com/

Subscribe to our censorship free channels before it’s too late!:

 

https://www.minds.com/TyrannyUnmasked

 

 https://steemit.com/@tyrannyunmasked

Help this operation by READ THE REST

 

[Blog Editor: Eva Bartlett is supportive of Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria claiming that attacks that have killed Aleppo civilians were perpetrated by Islamic terrorists rather than by the Russian and Syrian regime forces. Furthermore, she claims that the so-called Moderate Syrian rebels are as vicious and horrific as the Islamic terrorists (most notably al Nusra). She claims in an effort to effect regime change the Western “Corporate” Media is disseminating U.S. and EU propaganda to poison our public against Assad’s Syria, Russia and by extension Iran.

 

I’m not going to she is incorrect because there are plenty of non-Left alternative news sights that corroborate her testimony before the UN (e.g. the website A Closer Look on Syria – Wikipedia-like info base – has some of the same info as Eva Bartlett on the Al-Quds Hospital destruction in Aleppo). However, I know that the Bashar Assad (who is a Shi’ite Alawite) has brutalized Sunni Muslims and that most of the power positions in Syria are Alawite (See Also HERE). I know that Syria has closely aligned itself with the Shia Twelver Ayatollahs of Iran. And I know that Russia is supporting the Assad regime and Iran as a counter-balance to American National Interests. This means Assad, Iran, Syrian Rebels & Syrian Terrorists, the Shi’ite terrorist of Hezbollah located in Lebanon are extremely anti-Israel Jew-Haters. And since Russia is supportive of these Jew-haters I can only assume Putin would either help or look the other way of yet another Muslim invasion or war with Israel to kill every single Jew living in the Land of Jewish Heritage. Sadly, I have no doubt that if Sunni Moderates (so-called) Sunni Terrorists fighting Assad’s regime would take up the Jew-hating mantle so insidious in the Muslim world. A prime example of this hatred among Muslims toward Jews is in the name of the hospital attacked – by someone. “Al-Quds” is the Arabic name for the “Jerusalem” of the Bible – The Holy city of the Jews and the Capital City of Israel no one recognizes out of idiotic fear of Muslims.  I HAVE A PROBLEM with that.]

 

+++

Democrats say Russia Hacked their emails but Hillary said

12/13/2016 10:01 AM

 

How can Hillary and the Democrats say Russia Hacked their emails when Hillary said, “No Evidence of Email Server Hack”???

 

Hillary Clinton: ‘No evidence’ of email server hack

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2015/09/17/hillary-clinton-email-server-polls-intv-tsr.cnn

 

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer speaks with Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton about her email server, recent poll numbers and whether she would be a better president than her husband.

Source: CNN

 

CNN VIDEO: Hillary Clinton: ‘No evidence’ of email server hack

[http://fave.api.cnn.io/v1/fav/?video=politics/2015/09/17/hillary-clinton-email-server-polls-intv-tsr.cnn&customer=cnn&edition=domestic&env=prod]

 

+++

[Blog Editor: of interest is this: “CIA Secret Assessment “Confirms” Russian Hack of US Election – Do You Buy It?” 12/12/16]

 

________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text or links embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill