Trump Profits, Deep State, Jews Run America & Neocons


John R. Houk

© April 27, 2017

 

I have a bit of a disagreement with Edward Abbey over credible and not credible Conspiracy Theories. Here is the comment he left to the post “Disagreement on Conspiracy Theory Pt 1”:

 

I wonder why you believe Trump not involved as he made money firing of the tomahawk missiles as he owns shares raytheon stock.He also ought to know the sad story media maintained for fifteen and a half years absurd defies known laws of physics and the deep state that actually always in complete control our country since the jfk coup calling themselves neocons did this with aid or phony ally Israel, ie mossad.Have you never read neocons very own web page PNAC.I never got far your comment until hear an answer to this question do you believe Arabs with boxcutters pulled this crime off? (unedited, which goes against my nature)

 

Donald Trump making money from Raytheon made Tomahawk missiles:

 

Snopes (Left Wing Fact Checker) – Doubtful

 

Then Snopes shows numerous FEC Documents disclosing finances concluding with this obvious analysis:

 

“Line 23 of that July 2015 form also disclosed that that portion of Donald Trump’s portfolio had a value of between $1,001 and $15,000 and brought him $201 or less in income

 

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) rates the Trump profiting from Tomahawk missile launch as Unverified. MBFC is suspicious of medias bias which indicates their fact checkers have a mistrust of the Mainstream Media (MSM). Yet MBFC cites Snopes as its source. MBFC chose Unverified rather than Doubtful because there is no record to show if Donald Trump currently owns Raytheon stock. But remember, Snopes is MBFC’s source; hence, if Trump made money, he added less than $200 to his billion-dollar fortune.

 

Interestingly MBFC said this about the Trump profiting from Raytheon according to a Bill Palmer article dated 4/7/17:

 

“… Bill Palmer states “Donald Trump owned stock in Raytheon up through at least the start of the presidential election cycle. There is no record that he subsequently sold that stock.” This claim is factually accurate because there isn’t a record that he sold it, however there also isn’t any record that he didn’t sell it. Without this information we rate this Unverified until more information is available.”

 

The “Deep State” argument is something I agree with. My sense though is the American Deep State has factions that disagree with each much like or greater than the factions operating within the scope of the U.S. constitutional government. That is an opinion I can’t really back up right now but is something I sense intuitively.

 

I have a huge difficulty in calling Israel a “phony ally” or talking of Israel most notable Intelligence agency Mossad as evil. That simply smacks of the incoherent belief that Jews are out to control the world. That is downright Antisemitic false thinking!

 

Even though many Americans were sympathetic to the creation of a sovereign state called Israel after the Nazis murdered 6,000,000 Jews, the American government offer little support other than full diplomatic recognition. This excerpt shows the reason the USA became so supportive of Israel:

 

Whilst the help of the United States helped the establishment of Israel in 1947, this did not mean resounding support for the Jews’ military activities throughout the 60s and 70’s. Even within the American government itself, there was worry that the creation of the Israeli State would jeopardize their trade relations with the Middle East.

 

So much so was the United States’ desire to maintain diplomacy with the Arabs that in the middle of the 50’s they managed to dissuade the British-Franco-Israeli alliance from military intervention in Egypt by nationalising the Suez Canal, which had been controlled up until then by the English and French. Furthermore, despite the fact that during Kennedy’s government the first important trade of weapons to Israel was authorised, the relations between both nations rose to a commercial plane, thanks to the arms race.

 

It was not until the end of the 1967 six-day war, that the Americans started to value Israel’s military power and to see in it, a strategic ally. Thus during this conflict, caused amongst other things by Israel’s proclamation that is was going to divert the Jordan River in order to build an aqueduct, the Jews had impressively defeated the Arab coalition’s troops, allowing them to expand their territory to the Golan Heights, the West Bank (including Eastern Jerusalem), the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula.

 

… Adrienne Weller summarises the mindset which Americans had towards their ally on the Middle East border.

 

“Alexander Haig, U.S. Secretary of State for the Reagan government, is one of the many officials who has recognised Israel’s value to the U.S. as a military power”, according to Haig himself: “It is the largest American aircraft in the world’, one which cannot be destroyed, and which carries not one U.S. soldier.” (When did the United States ally with Israel? By The Prisma; The Prisma; 2/17/13 22:29)

 

Here is some info on Israel’s early military help:

 

Jewish Attempts to Buy Arms and Czech Approval

 

The major Arab armies who invaded the newly born Jewish state were British led, equipped, trained and supplied. The Syrian army was French-equipped and had taken orders from the Vichy government in resisting the British led invasion of the country assisted by Australian troops, Free French units and Palestinian-Jewish volunteer forces in 1941. In their War of Independence, the Israelis depended on smuggled weapons from the West and Soviet and Czech weapons.

 

The leaders of the Yishuv (Jewish community in Palestine), already in the summer of 1947, intended to purchase arms and sent Dr. Moshe Sneh (the Chief of the European Branch of the Jewish Agency, a leading member of the centrist General Zionist Party who later moved far leftward and became head of the Israeli Communist Party) to Prague in order to improve Jewish defenses. He was surprised by the sympathy towards Zionism and by the interest in arms export on the side of the Czech Government. Sneh met with the Deputy Foreign Minister Vladimir Clementis, who succeeded the non-Communist and definitely pro-Zionist Jan Masaryk. Sneh and Clementis discussed the possibility of Czech arms provisions for the Jewish state and the Czechs gave their approval,

 

In January, 1948 Jewish representatives were sent by Ben-Gurion to meet with General Ludvik Svoboda, the Minister of National Defense, and sign the first contract for Czech military aid. Four transport routes were used to Palestine all via Communist countries; a) the Northern route: via Poland and the Baltic Sea, b) the Southern route: via Hungary, Yugoslavia and the Adriatic Sea, c) via Hungary, Romania and the Black Sea, d) by air, via Yugoslavia to Palestine.

 

 

Czech assistance to Israel’s military strength comprised a) small arms, b) 84 airplanes –– the outdated Czech built Avia S.199s, Spitfires and Messerschmidts that played a major role in the demoralization of enemy troops; c) military training and technical maintenance. On January 7, 1949, the Israeli air-force, consisting of several Spitfires and Czech built Messerschmidt Bf-109 fighters (transferred secretly from Czech bases to Israel), shot down five British-piloted Spitfires flying for the Egyptian air-force over the Sinai desert causing a major diplomatic embarrassment for the British government.  (Who did what for Israel in 1948? America did nothing; By Norman Berdichevsky; Sullivan.County.com; 8/4/10)

 

Next – French-Israel alliance:

 

The French-Israeli relationship began in the mid-1950s, when Israel became a major customer for the French arms industry. But the bond was not merely commercial: at the time France was trying to quash a rebellion in Algeria, and it shared with Israel a strategic interest in combating radical Arab nationalism. In 1956, France and Israel even fought together against Egypt in the Suez crisis.

 

Advertisement

The tacit alliance, championed by Israel’s deputy defense minister, Shimon Peres, deepened during the late ’50s and early ’60s through military cooperation and cultural exchanges. French technical assistance helped Israel get nuclear weapons, and France supplied the advanced military aircraft that became the backbone of the Israeli Air Force.

 

The relationship only grew warmer when Charles de Gaulle, the World War II hero, took over as French president in 1959. He recognized the historic justice of a Jewish “national home,” which he saw “as some compensation for suffering endured through long ages,” and he heaped praise on David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s founding prime minister, as one of the “greatest leaders in the West.”

 

The bilateral bonds ran outside the government, too, with strongly pro-Israel public opinion, both among French Jews and non-Jews. But with the end of the Algerian war in 1962, de Gaulle began mending France’s ties to the Arab world and the relationship came under strain. For a while, France tried to balance its relationships: Israeli officials were heartily welcomed in Paris, and de Gaulle continued to speak of Israel as “the ally and friend” of France.

 

This double game, however, ended when the Six-Day War in 1967 forced France to pick a side. In a shock to its Israeli allies, it chose the Arab states: despite aggressive moves by Egypt, France imposed a temporary arms embargo on the region — which mostly hurt Israel — and warned senior Israeli officials to avoid hostilities. (When Israel and France Broke Up; By GARY J. BASS; NYT; 3/31/10)

 

SEE ALSO Wikipedia – France-Israel Relations: 1940s – 1960s

 

After Israel’s impressive victory in the Six-Day War in 1967, THEN the USA began to view Israel as a valued military ally that would complement American National Interests and National Security. If anything, Israel has been used by the American government, not the other way around.

 

Now, unless a blatant diplomatic error by Israel, the American government have a little difficulty in pulling away from Israel because a majority of American voters are quite enamored by the little David-Israel withstanding the gigantic Goliath-Jew-hating-Arab World. In this representative Republic members of Congress (Senate & House) are answerable to an Israel-loving American constituency.

 

Religious Jews have no desire past the ancient Kingdom of David. More Left Wing Israeli Jews simply want defensible borders from Jew-hating Muslims determined to exterminate them because of the idiotic Islamic Supremacist concept – once imperialistically conquered for Islam then it is always Islamic.

 

I understand the Left’s hatred of Neocons. For the most part Neocons are former Leftists that have become disgusted with the failures of Marxist/Socialist ideals that have led more tyranny than a pipedream utopia. Thus, I am certain the Left views a Neocon as a traitor.

 

I have a bit of a problem understanding any Conservative hatred of Neocons unless on is an old-fashioned pre-WWII isolationist Paleocon. A Paleocon can be quite intractable in a different kind of pipedream utopia that will never be realized as long as America is a military superpower with other nations desiring our protection from tyrannical military powers.

 

The biggest lesson Neocons have learned is that the nation-building paradigm fails when the culture has been brainwashed into a socio-political system that is antithetical to Western values and particularly antithetical to the way of life Americans have lived with based on the U.S. Constitution.

 

Prior to the emergence of Neoconservatism, nation-building proved quite successful with cultures that had a heritage with Western culture (Nazi Germany) or a culture that was more than willing to adapt to enough Western principles to be a viable Western style sovereign nation (Japan).

 

Nation-building will never work toward Western expectations among a people brainwashed for centuries with Islamic principles of governance as if that is a good society.

 

Unless a Neocon is full of intractable hubris, they have learned that lesson. Even so, the classic Neocon will still promote less government domestically and bigger government militarily as well as in Foreign Policy.

 

Below are some Neconservative basics that any American Patriot not a Paleocon or Leftist would find very acceptable. The basics are excerpted from Wikipedia and a pdf from the now defunct Neocon think tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC)

 

Wikipedia on Project for the New American Century

Excerpts

 

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative[1][2][3] think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.[4][5] PNAC’s stated goal was “to promote American global leadership.”[6] The organization stated that “American leadership is good both for America and for the world,” and sought to build support for “a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity.”[7]

 

 

The Project for the New American Century ceased to function in 2006;[19] it was replaced by a new think-tank named the Foreign Policy Initiative, co-founded by Kristol and Kagan in 2009.

 

 

Statement of Principles

 

PNAC’s first public act was to release a “Statement of Principles” on June 3, 1997. The statement had 25 signers, including project members and outside supporters (see Signatories to Statement of Principles). It described the United States as the “world’s pre-eminent power,” and said that the nation faced a challenge to “shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests.” In order to achieve this goal, the statement’s signers called for significant increases in defense spending, and for the promotion of “political and economic freedom abroad.” It said the United States should strengthen ties with its democratic allies, “challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values,” and preserve and extend “an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.” Calling for a “Reaganite” policy of “military strength and moral clarity,” it concluded that PNAC’s principles were necessary “if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.”[5]

 

PNAC—–Statement of Principles

 

June 3, 1997

 

American foreign and defense policy is adrift. Conservatives have criticized the incoherent policies of the Clinton Administration. They have also resisted isolationist impulses from within their own ranks. But conservatives have not confidently advanced a strategic vision of America’s role in the world. They have not set forth guiding principles for American foreign policy. They have allowed differences over tactics to obscure potential agreement on strategic objectives. And they have not fought for a defense budget that would maintain American security and advance American interests in the new century.

 

We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.

 

As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world’s preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?

 

We are in danger of squandering the opportunity and failing the challenge. We are living off the capital — both the military investments and the foreign policy achievements — built up by past administrations. Cuts in foreign affairs and defense spending, inattention to the tools of statecraft, and inconstant leadership are making it increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world. And the promise of short term commercial benefits threatens to override strategic considerations. As a consequence, we are jeopardizing the nation’s ability to meet present threats and to deal with potentially greater challenges that lie ahead.

 

We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration’s success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities. Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power.

 

But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.

 

Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:

 

  • We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;

 

  • We need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;

 

  • We need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;

 

  • We need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

 

Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.

 

25 SIGNATORIES

 

Edward I hope a response to my stand has actual documented facts more than anecdotal conjecture. As I said in the post “Disagreement on Conspiracy Theory Pt 1”:

 

There are many Conspiracy Theories I concur with, yet many are simply beyond the believability scale especially when I know some facts that contradict a Conspiracy Theory accepted by way too many people.”

 

I cannot concur with the Conspiracies that you support as credible or factual.

 

JRH 4/27/17

Please Support NCCR

Newbill Emails on Crooked Hillary 2nd Set


crooked-hillary-descriptors

Edited by John R. Houk

Posted November 6, 2016

 

This batch of emails focuses on Crooked Hillary. There is some email information on Donald Trump through the eyes of Left Wing detractors. Newbill examines a post from a Bernie Sanders supporter that calls Crooked Hillary an evil Neocon. I disagree with the appellation Neocon on Hillary Clinton. I explain my disagreement on the Neocon accusation and that Neoconservatism is not evil down below.

 

JRH 11/5/16

Please Support NCCR

**************

Trump needs to Identify this Person and use his Extreme ECO-Marxism to Label Hillary with an ANTI-Economic Growth vision

10/14/2016 11:18 AM

 

Trump can say this shows we are Out of Balance with how Obama and NOW Hillary want to Implement policies that will enable the People’s access to their Rights and Liberties!!!! There is No Way we can Have a Robust Economy that serves the people when these people want to OPPRESS access to our Resources with Extreme ECO-Marxism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

We Must EXPOSE this Hillary Clinton Campaign Manager as the ECO-Marxist. [This ECO-Marxist represents] the People doing the Dirty work behind our Government’s Closed Doors that’s KILLING OUR LIBERTY!!!!!!!!!!

 

http://www.hcn.org/issues/47.9/john-podesta-legacy-maker     

 

…  It was 2014, and McCarthy, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was about to make her case for blocking the controversial Pebble gold mine planned for Alaska’s Bristol Bay watershed, home to one of the world’s most prolific salmon fisheries. …

 

But McCarthy also knew there would be a new player in the room. Longtime Democratic operative John Podesta, Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff, had just returned to the White House as counselor to Barack Obama. And Podesta had a reputation for bold conservation policy.

 

 

And 10 minutes into the conversation, Podesta broke in. He said that he and the president endorsed McCarthy’s plan, and then laid out exactly how the announcement would roll out. McCarthy left the room, dumbfounded and elated.

 

 

“Nobody in the 21st century in U.S. government has had the influence that he has had on public lands and climate change,” says Douglas Brinkley, a Rice University professor of history.

 

 

Podesta’s political philosophy was shaped by his time at Knox College, a small liberal arts school in Galesburg, Illinois, where he joined Vietnam War protests and civil rights demonstrations. His first major political experience involved working on the doomed 1972 presidential campaign of liberal Democrat George McGovern.

 

 

Podesta also understands how public lands can be leveraged to benefit his boss and political party. Toward the end of the Clinton administration, he supported Forest Service Chief Mike Dombeck’s proposal to permanently protect the remaining roadless areas on national forests from logging, mining, drilling and other development. …

 

… But as the point man for the many scandals that plagued the Clinton White House, he got a reputation for having an evil twin known as “Skippy,” who could be harsh and unusually direct. …

 

… in2001, Podesta and some colleagues decided to create a progressive think tank that would be tough enough to compete with those on the political right. They called it the Center for American Progress, and it grew into a revolving-door powerhouse that harnessed the intellectual and political capital of the academic, NGO, philanthropic and government communities, often shuttling people in and out of key positions in all these realms. … and today, it boasts a staff of 314 policy wonks, professors and writers.

 

“Democrats and progressives did not have an institution dedicated to thinking up policies and finding a way to move them into the public sphere,” … “We called it a think-and-do tank. …”

 

Liberal pundits and mainstream journalists have occasionally questioned Podesta about his think tank’s financial and policy ties to its energy, defense and pharmaceutical company funders. … Hansjörg Wyss, a billionaire businessman who, for two decades, has financed efforts to conserve public lands. Podesta’s financial White House disclosure showed he collected $87,000 in 2013, for consulting for the HJW Foundation, a Wyss philanthropy.  The conservative Daily Caller website accused Podesta of violating White House ethics rules for taking funds from Wyss and then pushing Obama’s proposal to expand the area off-limits to oil and gas drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge …

 

Together, HJW and Wyss Foundation donated more than $5 million to the Center for American Progress between 2011 and 2013 … The article is pro-Podesta & pro-Eco-Marxist – I chose the info that demonstrates that (John Podesta: Legacy maker; By Elizabeth Shogren; High Country News; 3/25/15)

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/20/fbi-doj-launch-probe-firm-clinton-campaign-chairman-john-podesta/

 

The FBI and Justice Department have launched an investigation into whether the Podesta Group, the lobbying and public relations firm co-founded by Hillary Clinton presidential campaign chairman John Podesta, has any connections to alleged corruption that occurred in the administration of former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych.

 

 

The Podesta Group, run by John Podest’s [sic] brother Tony Podesta, was retained by the Russia-controlled firm UraniumOne in 2012, 2014, and 2015, to lobby Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The lobbying firm was paid a total of $180,000 according to public records.

 

 

As it was first detailed in the New York Times bestselling book Clinton CashUranium One — which hired the Podesta Group — is the firm that funneled millions to the Clinton Foundation as the Russian government gained ownership of the company.

 

 

According to the New York Times, Russian President Vladimir Putin had a “goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.”

 

The Times reported last April:

 

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

 

“And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock,” the Times report said.

 

According to the Daily Caller, Uranium One “paid the Podesta Group $40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service, and the National Security Council for ‘international mining projects,’ according to a July 20, 2012 filing.”

 

Distancing itself from the work it did for an organization with ties to Yanukovych’s pro-Russian regime, the Podesta group said it hired lawyers to READ ENTIRETY (FBI, DOJ launch Probe into Firm of Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta; By JEROME HUDSON; Breitbart; 8/20/16)

 

+++

These are the Weasels that have created Groper-gate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 10/14/2016 11:18 AM

 

The Enemy’s with-in!!!!!

 

Trump needs to go after these “So Called Biographers” with the “Hey Wayne Barrett, Gwenda Blair, Michael D’Antonio, Harry Hurt and Timothy O’Brien where’s your same Criticism of the Clintons, Bill on the Women Abuse side and Hillary on the Breaking All the Laws of the USA Side”???????????

 

 

This Guy and all these so-called Biographers of Trump need medication for their Bias-ism disease!!!!!!

 

http://www.michaeldantonio.net/ 

 

Drawing upon extensive and exclusive interviews with Trump and many of his family members, including all his adult children, D’Antonio presents the full story of a truly American icon, from his beginnings as a businessman to his stormy romantic life and his pursuit of power in its many forms. For all those who wonder — Just who is Donald Trump? – Never Enough supplies the answer. He is a promoter, builder, performer and politician who pursues success with a drive that borders on obsession and yet, has given him, almost everything he ever wanted.

 

Read More (Never Enough: Donald Trump and the Pursuit of Success; Book synopsis of author Michael D’Antonio; MichaelDantonio.net)

 

I watched this Guy this Morning on The MS Media paint the most disgusting image of Trump as a guy with a Pattern towards abusing Women!!!!! I would elevate this “Screen Writer” Michael D Antonio “up to the Level of” PORNO Propagandist!!!!!!

 

This one is awful:

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/donald-trump-2016-biographers-214350

 

Back in early March, Politico Magazine brought together five Donald Trump biographers for a conversation over lunch at Trump Tower. At the time, the country was just beginning to grapple with the reality that the presidential nominee from one of the two major American political parties stood a good chance of being a real estate mogul and entertainer. Wayne Barrett, Gwenda Blair, Michael D’Antonio, Harry Hurt and Timothy O’Brien knew him better than anybody, had studied him more than anybody, had written an aggregate 2,195 pages in books.
So much has happened over the past seven months: the crackpot conspiracy theories, the rageful late-night Twitter tirades, the surges and slides in the polls, an onslaught of investigative reporting that painted him as a racist, sexist, selfish, uncharitable, lying predator. So we thought it was time, especially in the wake of “grab them by the pussy,” for an emergency reconvening of the Trumpologists. [Blog Editor: “Trumpologists” in this case means Leftist MSM hit squad.]

 

He is, the biographers said, “profoundly narcissistic,” “willing to go to lengths we’ve never seen before in order to satisfy his ego”—and “a very dangerous man for the next three or four weeks.” And after that? “This time, it’s going to be a straight‑out loss on the biggest stage he’s ever been on,” one biographer predicted. And yet: “As long as he’s remembered, maybe it won’t matter to him.”

READ ENTIRETY if you desire to vomit (‘I Think He’s a Very Dangerous Man for the Next Three or Four Weeks’; By SUSAN B. GLASSER and MICHAEL KRUSE; Politico Magazine; 10/12/16)

These People, Like the Bill and Hillary Clinton & Co., are a Disease on FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+++

Hillary’s Shadow Government

10/18/2016 9:37 AM

 

Dear John, you need to Please talk about Hillary’s Shadow Government that the FBI refers to in this Investigation report and say this is why Washington does not work for the American People and Shields Hillary and themselves from the rule of LAW!

 

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (it’s on page 56)

 

vault-home-%e2%80%a2-hillary-r-clinton-%e2%80%a2-hillary-r-clinton-part-04-of-04-pg-56-screen-capture

Vault Home • Hillary R. Clinton • Hillary R. Clinton Part 04 of 04 – pg. 56 Screen Capture

+++++++++++

The Corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.

10/19/2016 3:42 PM

**************ATTENTION****************

Here is an EYE-OPENING summary of the corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.

 

http://www.thecsconservative.com/podestaemails/

 

Here is a summary of the corruption exposed by Wikileaks about Hillary Clinton.

 

John Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign Chairman. Podesta previously served as Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton and Counselor to President Barack Obama.

 

On October 7th, 2016, WikiLeaks publish thousands of emails belonging to Podesta’s private email archives. More emails were released in the days that followed. Below is a compilation of some of the most revealing and damaging emails discovered:

 

POLICY / POSITION

 

Transcripts from Hillary Clinton’s lucrative closed-door paid speeches delivered to elite financial firms and other special interests groups (which she has refused and failed to disclose to the public after much demand) have finally surfaced:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 (See Attachment)

 

Clinton staff conspiring to stage ‘leaking’ of favorable excerpts from wall street speech, in efforts to calm down the public while leaving out more damaging parts:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8086#efmAYqAgR

 

Leaked private speech, Clinton: “You Need Both A Public And A Private Position”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmAaQAdiFjUFkd

 

Leaked private speech, Clinton: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmFjUFkd

 

Mocking environmentalists in private meeting with unions, Clinton: “I want to defend fracking.” Climate change environmentalists should “Get a life”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9617 (See attachment)

Politico article

 

Leaked private speech transcript shows Clinton’s warm ties to Wall Street’s most powerful figures: Clinton: “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives” The pressure on officials to sell or divest assets in order to serve, she added, had become “very onerous and unnecessary”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmDEMDKk

 

Leaked private speech to Goldman Sachs, Clinton: Wall street was only accountable for the financial crisis for political reasons. The blame placed on the United States banking system for the crisis “could have been avoided in terms of both misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmA2YA5Q

 

Leaked private speech to Goldman Sachs, Clinton: I mean, right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to to restart economic growth.”

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11011

 

Leaked private speech, Clinton: US will “ring China with missile defense”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 (See attachment)

 

Hillary Clinton flipped her public position on TPP after her team discussed how she would be “eaten alive” by Labor:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8452#efmAH1APRA0NA5c

 

Clinton speechwriter: “We are trying to find a good way to leak her opposition to the pipeline without her having to actually say it”:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3855#efmAAGADH

FOREIGN AFFAIRS

 

Hillary admits Qatar & Saudi Arabia are funding ISIS:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774#efmBA5BDe

 

Qatar gifts Bill Clinton $1,000,000 for his birthday:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396#efmAEOAGW

 

Clinton’s advisors agree to take foreign lobbyists money: Clinton’s National Finance Director, Dennis Cheng: “how do we explain to people that we’ll take money from a corporate lobbyist but not them; that the Foundation takes $ from foreign govts but we now won’t”. Campaign manager Robby Mook responds: “I’m ok just taking the money and dealing with any attacks. Are you guys ok with that?”, “Take the money!!” – READ THE REST (Breaking News – Wikileaks Release Exposes Hillary Clinton Corruption; By Robert Z; The Common Sense Conservative; 10/17/16)

 

++++

Huma Abedin Admits to a $12 Million Dollar Pay-For-Play

10/20/2016 11:59 AM

 

Hillary’s top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million dollar pay-for-play from Morocco!

 

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/day-debate-wikileaks-strikes-hillary-pay-to-play-shocking/#ixzz4Ne3uQoEu

 

We have always known that Hillary Clinton was for sale during her time at the State Department.

 

Many politicans [sic] try to do this, but Hillary’s corruption is so massive that it’s historic.

 

Now, just hours after the debate, WikiLeaks provided the smoking gun we’ve been waiting for. Hillary’s top assistant Huma Abedin admits to a $12 million dollary pay-for-play from Morocco!

 

This leaked email from the 13th batch of John Podesta’s hacked emails shows direct confirmation that a meeting was set up with Hillary Clinton, and it was paid for with that massive cash payoff:

wikileaks-huma-abedin-emailWikileaks Huma Abedin Email

 

And Hillary Clinton confirmed that the WikiLeaks emails are authentic last night during the debate:

 

 

Hillary Clinton can blame the Russians and foreign agents all she wants. The emails are real, and so is the criminal corruption. Hillary Clinton used the Secretary of State’s office to become obscenely wealthy, and she put America’s national security at risk repeatedly.

 

Hillary couldn’t apply for a job in the federal government because READ ENTIRETY (Day After Debate, WikiLeaks Strikes Hillary With The Most Shocking Leak of 2016! By Kosar; Political Insider; 10/20/16)

++++

Russia has already Bribed Hillary!!!!!

10/20/2016 11:01 PM

 

What Romney says WAS BEFORE WE HAS THE RESULTS FROM FBI Comey … and if Hillary Clinton has already COMPROMISED U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY. The First response by the FBI would be to act in the best Interest of the USA and the Market and divert from this conversation!!!!

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/24/romney-every-appearance-that-hillary-clinton-was-bribed-on-uranium-deal/

 

Mitt Romney made the argument around which everyone else danced yesterday after the New York Times exposed the UraniumOne deal and its principals’ big cash avalanche to the Clinton Foundation. The State Department’s approval of the deal under Hillary Clinton wasn’t just “undue influence,” and not “a poor choice of timing,” either. “It looks like bribery,” Romney told Hugh Hewitt last night:

 

VIDEO: Mitt Romney on Clinton foundation uranium payments: “It looks like bribery”

 

Posted by Hugh Hewitt Show

Published on Apr 23, 2015

 

Hugh Hewitt Interview w/ Mitt Romeny [sic]

 

READ THE REST (Romney: “Every Appearance That Hillary Clinton Was Bribed” On Uranium Deal; ED MORRISSEY; Hot Air; 4/24/16 10:01 am)

 

Hillary Clinton has already been Bribed, we just did not realize it until the Lawless FBI ran its course letting Hillary off so she could skate into the Oval Office and Pardon her and her cohorts!!!!!

 

http://www.bing.com/search?q=Hillary+Clinton+bribed+by+Russia+&qs=n&form=QBLH&pc=MOZO&pq=hillary+clinton+bribed+b&sc=0-24&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=45D62613D14A40A48C2FAF788F995258

 

[Blog Editor: Bing Search Link under the query “Hillary Clinton bribed by Russia”]

+++

Hillary has already been bribed

10/21/2016 7:05 AM

 

The FBI cover up through Lawless Means shows this:

 

What was the U.S. Asset that was used as the bribed is the Question?

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/24/romney-every-appearance-that-hillary-clinton-was-bribed-on-uranium-deal/

 

[Blog Editor: See above summary of the same link.]

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-clinton-campaign-and-brian-fallon-stop-accusing_us_57fcab23e4b0d786aa52bcaa?

 

Brian Fallon recently accused WikiLeaks of working on behalf of the Russian government to help Donald Trump. Fallon’s Twitter barrage was full of accusations against the whistleblowing organization, including an ironic plea for WikiLeaks to disclose Trump’s tax returns. Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton and her campaign have engaged in Cold War-era propaganda, primarily to deflect from numerous cyber-attacks. There’s also the tiny issue of 20% of U.S. uranium sold to the Russian government from a company run by Clinton Foundation donors.

 

Thus far, WikiLeaks, DC LeaksGuccifer 2.0, and apparently “Russian hackers” have managed to hack into computer networks associated with the Democratic Party. Rather than assess why these various cyber-attacks have taken place, Brian Fallon, Robby Mook, and others in the Clinton campaign have leveled baseless accusations against WikiLeaks and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials might believe Russia is involved with the leaks, but have yet to disclose any evidence READ THE REST (Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia; By H. A. Goodman; Huffington Post; 10/11/16 05:27 am ET)

 

Look at the Credits in this video, it is HUGE!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAM48bmtMDc

 

VIDEO: NEW CLINTON EMAIL SCANDAL: State Dept Bribed FBI To Protect Hillary From Espionage Act Indictment

 

Posted by H. A. Goodman

Published on Oct 16, 2016

 

My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an author, columnist, and journalist www.hagoodman.com
Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-clinton-campaign-and-brian-fallon-stop-accusing_us_57fcab23e4b0d786aa52bcaa

 

New FBI files contain allegations of ‘quid pro quo’ in Clinton’s emails:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/15/new-fbi-files-contain-allegations-quid-pro-quo-in-clintons-emails.html
PODESTA 9 JUST RELEASED! https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787625546461175808
WikiLeaks releases transcripts of Hillary Clinton Goldman Sachs speeches:

 

http://myfox8.com/2016/10/15/wikileaks-releases-transcripts-of-hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-speeches/
Subpoena: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6391

 

FAKE CRAIGLIST: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
Podesta Suggested Coordinating With State Dept. To ‘Hold’ Hillary’s Emails With Obama:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/14/podesta-suggested-coordinating-with-state-dept-to-hold-hillarys-emails-with-obama/

 

READ THE REST

 

If Hillary has already been bribed whatever was bribed is grounds for Impeachment as this article shows.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it

 

For months, I have been arguing that Hillary Clinton should be impeached. It is all well and good to prosecute a former government official for any crimes she has committed. Indeed, the Constitution expressly provides for criminal prosecution in addition to impeachment. Nevertheless, for the Framers — and, if we had common sense, for us — the imperative was to deprive a corrupt person of any further opportunity to abuse government power. Whether the official should also be convicted and sent to prison was not unimportant but, in the greater scheme of things, decidedly secondary.

Interestingly, the main pushback I received upon positing this argument was not that Mrs. Clinton is undeserving of impeachment. That, of course, is a measure of the seriousness of her high crimes and misdemeanors: the e-mail scandal; the reckless mishandling of classified information that has surely exposed our national-defense secrets to hostile powers; the mass destruction of thousands of government records after Congress asked for them; the obstruction of government investigations; the serial lies to Congress and the public; the shocking failure to provide security for Americans stationed in Benghazi and the failure to attempt to rescue them during a terrorist siege; the lies to the American people and to the families of murdered American officials about the cause of the attack; the trumping up of a prosecution against the video producer scapegoated for the Benghazi attack; the Clinton Foundation corruption involving the sale of influence for donations, the favors done for shady benefactors at the expense of national security, and the use of the State Department as an arm of the Clinton pay-to-play enterprise.

 

… How could she be removed from an office she does not hold based on offenses not committed while wielding presidential power?

These questions and the non-incumbency theory behind them fundamentally misconstrue the constitutional remedy of impeachment, which is not limited to removal from power but includes disqualification from future office. Moreover, their premise is wrong: The proceeding against Clinton would not be a presidential impeachment; it would be an impeachment based on her abuses of power as secretary of state, which would have the constitutional effect of disqualifying her for the presidency.

… Article I endows the House of Representatives with the “sole Power of Impeachment” — i.e., the power to file articles of impeachment. It further empowers the Senate with “the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” Significantly, in prescribing the standard for conviction in the Senate, Article I, Section 3 states that “no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present” (emphasis added).

 

Note carefully: The Constitution does not say the impeached person must be a current officeholder. As we shall see, that makes perfect sense: The point of impeachment is to deny power to any person — not necessarily an incumbent official — whose high crimes and misdemeanors have demonstrated unfitness for a high public trust.

 

The constitutional standard for impeachment also elucidates that incumbency is not necessary. The standard, prescribed by Article II, Section 4, is the commission of “Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Obviously, one need not be in office to commit treason or bribery; but if one has at any time committed these heinous offenses, one is unsuitable for public office. The same is true, by definition, of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a term of READ ENTIRETY (Impeach Clinton to Bar Her from Holding Federal Office. It’s Constitutional; By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY; National Review; 9/6/16 4:00 AM)

+++

Hillary Clinton: Oliver Stone & U.S. Foreign Policy ‘Elite’

10/21/2016 9:02 AM

 

Oliver Stone has penned a powerful and emotional takedown of Hillary Clinton

https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/03/31/were-going-to-war-oliver-stone-opines-on-the-dangerous-extremism-of-neocon-hillary-clinton/

 

 

Oliver Stone has penned a powerful and emotional takedown of Hillary Clinton, focusing on her insane neocon foreign policy chops in a piece published in the Huffington Post titled, Why I’m for Bernie Sanders.

 

What follows are just a few paragraphs, I suggest reading the entire thing:

 

We’re going to war — either hybrid in nature to break the Russian state back to its 1990s subordination, or a hot war (which will destroy our country). Our citizens should know this, but they don’t because our media is dumbed down in its “Pravda”-like support for our “respectable,” highly aggressive government. We are being led, as C. Wright Mills said in the 1950s, by a government full of “crackpot realists: in the name of realism they’ve constructed a paranoid reality all their own.” Our media has credited Hillary Clinton with wonderful foreign policy experience, unlike Trump, without really noting the results of her power-mongering. She’s comparable to Bill Clinton’s choice of Cold War crackpot Madeleine Albright as one of the worst Secretary of States we’ve had since … Condi Rice? Albright boasted, “If we have to use force it is because we are America; we are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future.”

Hillary’s record includes supporting the barbaric “contras” against the Nicaraguan people in the 1980s, supporting the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia, supporting the ongoing Bush-Iraq War, the ongoing Afghan mess, and as Secretary of State the destruction of the secular state of Libya, the military coup in Honduras, and the … You can read the rest of this Leftist rant if you choose (“We’re Going to War” – Oliver Stone Opines on the Dangerous Extremism of Neocon Hillary Clinton; By Michael Krieger; Liberty BlitzKrieg; 3/31/16 12:01 pm)

 

***[Blog Editor: I disagree with Mr. Krieger that Crooked Hillary is a Neocon. Part of that disagreement is because I believe the venom and vitriol against Neoconservatism is based on erroneous perceptions from both sides of the political aisle. Did Neocons make some bad decisions after 911? It turns they did. However, at the time the concept of throwing despotic leadership to give people a more democratic representative choice was a valid objective. The reason is history has shown people are given a voting representative choice their government tends toward more individual freedom. Examples are post-WWII Germany and Japan. Both those nations developed into solid allies of America according to the needs of U.S. National Interests. The thing Neocons didn’t count on is Islamic culture which is totally contrary to Western Liberty, especially in the USA. Islam by nature is intolerant and despotic of any individual choice that might run counter to Islamic tenets. Muslims for the most part concur with their faith of intolerance. This Muslim intolerance will factor into a mutual National Interest benefiting the USA or a Muslim nation. The Neocon failure was finding this out the hard way. The Neoconservative key is a foreign policy that validates U.S. National Interests, keeps America strong and keeps America Exceptional. NONE OF WHICH is of interest to Crooked Hillary (falsely accused of Neoconservatism) or to uber-Leftist Bernie Sanders who author Michael Krieger has endorsed]***

 

U.S. Foreign Policy ‘Elite’ Eagerly Await an Expansion of Overseas Wars Under Hillary Clinton

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/10/20/u-s-foreign-policy-elite-eagerly-await-an-expansion-of-overseas-wars-under-hillary-clinton/#comment-114647

 

Comment 114647 is Tony Newbill

N3angus — October 21, 2016 at 7:22 am

 

Facebook has blocked me from public comment posting of this, Hillary has already been bribed.

 

The FBI cover up through Lawless Means shows this.

 

What was the US Asset that was used as the bribed is the Question?

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/24/romney-every-appearance-that-hillary-clinton-was-bribed-on-uranium-deal/

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-clinton-campaign-and-brian-fallon-stop-accusing_us_57fcab23e4b0d786aa52bcaa?

 

My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an author, columnist, and
journalist http://www.hagoodman.com

 

Dear Clinton Campaign and Brian Fallon, Stop Accusing WikiLeaks of Working for Russia. Look at the Credits in this video, it is HUGE!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAM48bmtMDc

 

If Hillary has already been bribed whatever was bribed is grounds for Impeachment as this article shows:

 

For months, I have been arguing that Hillary Clinton should be impeached.

 

Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439715/impeach-hillary-clinton-congress-has-power-do-it

 

[Blog Editor: This comment is covered above in a Newbill email.]

_________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

 

Neocons and Templars


crusader-poker-jihad

John R. Houk

© September 17, 2016

 

On September 11 commenter Jeremy Auldaney asked a couple of question that had little to do with the post entitled “Donald Trump 10 PT Immigration Speech from Phoenix” at my NCCR Blog (I posted the same title at two other blogs). The questions had to do with the full name of the NCCR Blog and my use of the symbolism of a Templar Crusading Knight.

 

NCCR is the acronym for the NeoConservative Christian Right. Since Neocons are definitely on everyone’s vilification list these days I thought I’d state my reasoning in short fashion. I could have embellished a bit more but the short answer is good for now. Perhaps a long answer will be forth coming when the political correct crowd is willing to address the depravity of Muhammad’s Islam which is the same Islam that the blind West chooses to define as “Radical” Islam as if a “Moderate” Islam follows a different prophet today.

 

I provide the same short answer in the use of Templar Crusader symbolism as well. Again further embellishment would be beneficial; however, both expansive answers probably would take up the time of a small book or at least several long blog posts. For now, yawl will have to live with the short answers.

 

One thing I feel compelled to address though pertaining to Templar symbolism is to my Jewish readers. Some of you who may not know your Crusader history well may not realize that when the first Crusaders conquered Jerusalem, they slaughtered not only Muslim resisters but also Jewish inhabitants which had become quite substantial by medieval times. Some chroniclers of the period say the blood flowed on the streets that was ankle deep. This included Jews who had congregated in their Synagogues hoping for refuge from the Crusader conquerors. There was no Christian mercy for the Jews in Jerusalem. Jews that know their history are a bit peeved at my use of Templar symbolism because them it is just another atrocity of Christian Antisemitism that was so very present in medieval days (and unfortunately flowing through history even to this present day to one degree or another).

 

I indeed do feel shame for that Crusader Antisemitism; nevertheless, it was the Crusader mentality that began a longtime need reversal Muslim aggression in which the last vestige a Muslim empire was destroyed at the end of WWI and the dividing up of old Ottoman Turk holdings in the Middle East into independent Arab Muslim nations and the beginning to the return of Jews to their ancient homeland – ISRAEL. It is the Crusader mentality needed today to thwart the expansion of Islamic terrorism.

 

From this point I will poise the two questions Jeremy Auldaney poised followed by my answers on the NCCR Blog.

 

+++

 

Jeremy Auldaney

September 11, 2016 at 10:27 PM

 

I am puzzled by your name of NeoConservative. It is the NeoConservatives among the Republicans that are supporting the Liberal Conspiracy to set up a world government under Marxism.

 

oneway2day

September 17, 2016 at 12:58 PM

 

Jeremy you are misinformed probably by Jew-haters and/or Leftists. Neocons are largely former Marxists or ex-Dems that woke up to the dangers of a Leftist agenda to the Rights and Privileges guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Prior to the al Qaeda attack on 911 Neocons favored bringing democratic principles to intolerant Muslim nations ruled by oppression. The concept was sound, but the application to a Muslim society proved unworkable. Most Neocons recognize that reality. But Leftist propaganda has taken the failure of Neocon democratization to blame the former Lefties for war embroilments rather than recognize that Neocons had a plan better than sitting on their butts waiting for more terrorism on American soil. Obama Leftists went around the world apologizing for American ideals and blaming Neocons for American failures largely due to the American Left intransience on submission to Multiculturalism as the save-all for global peace. MULTICULTURALISM has proven to be a worse failure than Neocon democratization because inaction has made Islamic terrorism worse under Obama. At least Neocons subdued radicals rather allow than allow radicals to call the shots on a death agenda.

 

Now it is incumbent for Neocons and Conservatives to develop a better strategy for a subduing Islamic terrorism. That better strategy probably includes an agenda that politically correct Multiculturalists would find abhorrent because the rules of engagement would be much more brutal than GW Bush and Obama have utilized to date.

 

Jeremy Auldaney

September 11, 2016 at 10:31

 

Also I notice you use a picture of a Knights Templar. This is the secret society that is behind the Liberal Conspiracy Including the Masons and Jesuits.

 

oneway2day

September 17, 2016 at 1:11 PM

 

Actually my usage of Templar symbolism has little to do with the cultic aspects of Templar evolution leading to their final demise in subterfuge and betrayal AND more to do with the original call of the Crusades when Europeans became fed up with Muslim raids and military expeditions carving up Christian lands.

 

Persecution of Christian Pilgrims butchered or enslave on their way to medieval Jerusalem was the excuse (real or perceived) of a confrontation a long time in coming. After all the Middle East was a majority Christian land LONG BEFORE Muslim invaders conquered and oppressed the Christians to convert to Islam over a 2 or 3 centuries time until Islam became the dominant religion. Oppression was the conversion tactic not a free-will choice.

 

TODAY the world needs a Templar Crusader rules of engagement minus the Antisemitic hate to overcome Muslim oppression even if so-called innocent civilians are harmed by the rules of engagement. The Allies were not concerned about civilian casualties in a win at all costs war against Nazis and Imperial Japanese and neither should we be in this current threat to Western Society.

 

JRH 9/17/16

Please Support NCCR

 

Endless War Theme


The Hillary NWO

Tony Newbill is going after Crooked Hillary pertaining to Endless War Theory and the New World Order (two interesting views- HERE and HERE). Where Newbill and I part ways the common practice of vilifying Neoconservatism. Although no two Neocons are unanimous in their thoughts most are American Exceptionalists, promoters of Free Enterprise and utilizing a strong military to maintain American supremacy in a world where globalists and Leftists blame America for ills rather than praise the America that most people of the world wish to go for a better life.

 

JRH 8/14/16

Please Support NCCR

*************

Endless War Theme

 

Tony Newbill Emails

Edited for Blog

Posted August 12, 2016

 

Trump Right – Prevent Wars with Re-Industrialization

 

Tony Newbill

Sent 8/4/2016 6:07 PM

 

Mr. Trump is Right we need to Re-Industrialize the USA to Stop the Globalists’ Endless WARS!

 

The Evidence is astounding what the out sourcing and Consolidation of Industrial Might of the Western Nations has created with a world of Jobless societies that are fighting for their very existence. We all would be better off providing a greater portion of our own needs and trade any excess with other countries or trading in balance for what each other has for what each doesn’t have.

 

Here are the examples of how the Globalists have created the culture of Endless WARs over resource consolidation and to control Mankind ….     http://www.globalistagenda.org/

 

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” – “The First Global Revolution”, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider 1991.

 

Have you ever thought something is wrong? Have you ever thought you were being lied to by your politicians, government, teachers? Have you ever thought you were being manipulated by the television? Have you ever wondered about how the world really works? Have you ever caught the media in a lie? Do you want to know how money really works? Have you ever wondered what the elite of this world believe and where they are taking us? Here you will have an opportunity to at least get a first glimpse at the true nature of the world and how we have been misled and deceived at every level. This site is not the end all and be all but it’s a start.

Global Humankind Controlled Diagram

Global Humankind Controlled Diagram

 

The Globalist Agenda represents a plan to bring all of Earth’s inhabitants under the control of a single, global state. There is a small, but powerful group of individuals who are the architects and instigators behind the formation and implementation of this “New World Order”. Using their influence through international organizations such as the IMF, World Bank, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the United Nations, NATO, and hundreds of other non-governmental organizations, the objective of these internationalists is nothing less than the subjugation of everyone on the planet as servants to a one world government (servants means slaves). A government run by the same small group of elite that have ruled the masses for a very long time under various guises. These elite are the descendents of those that ruled for at least the past 2 centuries – kings and queens, bankers, robber barons, priests, and assorted subservient oligarchs and media representatives. Their desire for a return to a one world feudal state should come as no surprise to anyone who has read a little history. It is their nature after all.

 

In the modern manifestation these people can be seen as kings and queens, international bankers, the military industrial complex and their servants – the corporate CEOs, scientists, professors, lawyers, heads of NGO’s, politicians, and media leaders – all of whom the elite control partially or completely. Sad but true – you can buy or brainwash most national bankers, soldiers, bureaucrats, CEOs, scientists, lawyers, NGOs, politicians and journalists to say what you want them to say.

 

If you allow their plans to proceed, you will see how under the guise of keeping us all safe with anti-terrorist laws, the globalists will see all citizens gradually and incrementally lose their civil liberties preventing any dissent against either the government or the ruling elite who give the government their orders. The purpose of this website is to READ THE REST (The Globalist Agenda: How the Elite Control your Mind and your Life; ABOUTWelcome to The Globalist Agenda)

 

The Evidence is Clear:

 

“It’s time for the International Community and League of Nations to file War Crime Charges against Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama”!

 

The foreign policy of the current Administration is along with the Hedge fund investment community perpetuating conflicts to consolidate resources and generate wealth from it, and its displaying people in these areas and its time it stopped.

 

Did the Obama Administration create ISIS to be a conflicting force spreading into areas of the world where resources and durable goods are under threat of losing US dollar valuation and conflict gives way to US intervention to keep dollar valuation in place? This Video gives some insight to the question, Pay Attention to the “Leaked” Pentagon Document:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1aDciHCejA

VIDEO: Reality Check: Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria

 

 

Posted by Ben Swann

Published on Nov 19, 2015

 

There is so much debate over how the U.S. and other nations will stop ISIS but can these leaders be trusted? Ben Swann exposes secret DOD documents that prove the U.S. wanted ISIS to emerge in Syria.

 

I don’t care who these Crimes against Humanity implicate because this has to be stopped!

 

ISIS is getting control of Resource and Durable Goods production areas in world:

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3721696/A-fast-spreading-disease-New-map-shows-ISIS-truly-global-terror-group-outposts-far-Mali-Philippines.html

 

A fast-spreading disease: New heat map shows ISIS has become a truly global terror group, with outposts as far as Mali and the Philippines

A new map of the Islamic State shows the group is growing at an unfathomable pace and is no longer just a problem for the Middle East.

 

The map, a classified White House document obtained by NBC News, shows the terror group’s core countries, official branches and aspiring branches as of this month.

 

When the U.S. first started coordinating attacks against the group in 2014, ISIS was just a fledgling group with about seven nations where its affiliates were operating out of – but most of the fighters were concentrated in Syria and Iraq.
Islamic State Global Map

NBC News has obtained a map, showing the Islamic state’s current areas of operation as of this month. The areas with the darkest shading are where the original group is centered. The medium orange-shaded areas are where the group has official branches. The lightest orange-shaded areas are where there are burgeoning cells

 

 

Over the next year, that number nearly doubled to 13 countries. And as of this month, that country count is now up to a startling 18 countries. That’s about three times as large as the original 2014 estimate.

 

The map, created by the National Counterterrorism Center, includes for the first time countries where there are ‘aspiring’ ISIS branches.

 

Areas where the group are taking root include Egypt, Mali, Somalia, and Tunisia in Africa, and Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Indonesia in Southeast Asia.

 

On Tuesday, the U.S. Navy coordinated airstrikes against ISIS cells in Libya, showing that the terror group reach is truly becoming global.

 

 

Read more: New Counterterrorism ‘Heat Map’ Shows ISIS Branches Spreading Worldwide – NBC News (A fast-spreading disease: New heat map shows ISIS has become a truly global terror group, with outposts as far as Mali and the Philippines; By ASHLEY COLLMAN; Daily Mail; 8/3/16 07:46 EST – Updated 12:16 EST)

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Served On Board Of Company with ISIS Ties

 

https://www.mintpressnews.com/hillary-clinton-served-on-the-board-of-a-company-who-funds-is/219060/

 

As the race for the White House heats up, WikiLeaks continues to unveil sensitive information showing ties between the Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, foreign governments, and corrupt companies.

 

In a recent tweet, WikiLeaks reported its unveiling of Clinton’s dubious ties to Lafarge, an American company owned by a French conglomerate that, between 2011 and 2013, paid taxes [Blog Editor: aka jizya – protection tax] to the Islamic State (ISIS) in order to protect its cement factory 95 miles northeast of Aleppo, Syria. The arrangements were discovered by the French daily, Le Monde. The story became relevant once again after the Office of the Mayor of Paris recently struck a corporate partnership naming Lafarge as its main supplier.

 

 

Another investigation carried out by Zaman al-Wasl, an independent news organization based in Syria, adds that Lafarge may have also bought oil from ISIS regularly.

 

 

According to The Canary, “Al-Wasl reported that the CEO of Lafarge Cement Syria, Frederic Jolibois, had personally instructed his firm to make payments to Isis.”

 

 

According to an article from 2007 published by the Washington Post, Hillary Clinton was the Clinton family’s breadwinner in the early 1990s, when she was “earning more than $100,000 a year from her law firm salary and corporate board fees.” At the time, she served on Lafarge’s board, making about $31,000 a year from the company.

 

 

During the 2013 annual meeting of the Clinton Foundation, Lafarge’s Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric Olson, was a “featured attendee.” In both 2015 and 2016, Lafarge was listed as a donor to the Clinton Foundation.

 

READ ENTIRETY (WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Served On Board Of Company with ISIS Ties; By Alice Salles; Mint Press News; 8/2/16)

 

Hillary Obama and the Hedge-funds created ISIS for the Proxy War Force to control world Resources

 

https://mountainrepublic.net/2016/08/03/yes-hillary-clinton-served-on-the-board-of-a-company-who-funds-isis/#comment-19930

 

OPEN LETTER TO TEAM TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dear Mr. Trump, I saw Walid Phares on Fox Business Varney & Co this morning and I think he would be a Great adviser for your Administration!!

 

https://www.facebook.com/WalidPhares/videos/10154162710935239/?video_source=pages_finch_main_video

 

This link shows that the Truth has the Radical Left up in arms, as their Create-a-Crisis to Destabilize the world and that bring on a New One World Government is being challenged by TEAM TRUMP!!!!

 

http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/03/22/foxs-varney-lets-trump-adviser-falsely-claim-th/209447

 

 

Mr. Phares talked about this ISIS issue and from a Foreign Policy standpoint it can be said that Obama and Hillary and the Hedge-funds that access resources in the worlds locations of raw materials and durable goods created ISIS on Purpose and are Using them to stop the isolation of these resources by their nations prospective leaders.

 

This would show that Hillary and Obama are puppets to a Very Dangerous Cronyism that’s Leading the USA and Europe into the abyss of a totalitarian world instead of nations united in the production and trade of each others products, goods and services, the policy of READ THE REST (8/3/16 Comment to “Yes, Hillary Clinton Served on the Board of a Company Who Funds ISIS” under the name of n3angus [another pseudonym for Tony Newbill]; By Mountain Republic; 8/3’16 [In case you are curious Newbill made several other comments to this which may have been or will be read on this blog])

 

 

Hillary’s Hedge Funds Perpetuate Wars around the world listen2her @ 1:00 Petro Co in Sussman Hedge fund:

 

http://tinyurl.com/z3gs5t2

 

VIDEO: Newly surfaced footage of Hillary Clinton could damage her on ISIS/Terror/Iraq

 

 

Posted by Maurice Lawerence

Published on Dec 25, 2015

 

2014 – Hillary Clinton laughs about the “hard choices” of sending US soldiers to the Middle East, while admitting she made a mistake voting to authorize the Iraq War.

2011 – Hillary Clinton is excited about Iraq’s promising future as a business opportunity for US companies and Oil.

2002 – Hillary Clinton parrots Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld as she votes “with conviction” to give Bush the authorization to invade Iraq.

 

Hillary’s donor Sussman hedge fund Petro Corp to make money from Iraq war:

 

http://tinyurl.com/zajc9gv

 

Hillary Clinton’s Fossil Fuel Financiers

 

Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the presidency of the United States is powered by a lot of fossil fuel money. How can this be, when nearly all of the industry’s contributions are going to Republicans? For one, the oil and gas giants are very, very wealthy, so …

 

As it turns out, there’s a dirty secret in the world of wealth—bankers finance the oil, gas, and coal sectors. This uncomfortable truth has come to the fore thanks to the growing divestment movement: university endowments, pension funds, foundations, and institutional investors who claim concern about climate change are being challenged to end their catastrophic investments and instead invest in a clean future.

 

Those with great wealth almost invariably have dirty investments. There are very few billionaires not actively invested in destroying our planet’s climate. (In fact, there may be only one: hedge-fund-manager-turned-climate-activist Tom Steyer divested in 2014.)

 

And Clinton has more billionaire supporters than any other presidential candidate. Nine in ten dollars raised for Hillary Clinton’s campaign have come from large donors—a mere 22 people have contributed $43 million.

 

 

Team Hillary’s Big Bets on Fracking

 

The examples are easy to find, even in New York City’s backyard. Wall Street lost big in 2015 when New York banned fracking, but the fossil fuel industry has hardly been exiled from the state. …

 

 

Another key Hillary Clinton billionaire is Marc Lasry, who gave Chelsea Clinton her first job out of college at his hedge fund. Lasry is bullish on Hillary—and on the fracking industry. He has a $1.3 billion fracking junk-bond fund that has lost most of its value as natural gas prices have plummeted, but …READ ENTIRETY (Hillary Clinton’s Fossil Fuel Financiers; By Brad Johnson; Common Dreams; 4/19/16)

 

This needs to be investigated. Thank you.

+++

More Operation Mockingbird by the Press

 

Tony Newbill

Sent Fri 8/5/2016 8:38 AM

 

More Operation Mockingbird by the Press to Favor the Endless WARS Candidate Hillary Clinton!!!!!!

 

Rigging an Election — After Reuters “Tweaks” Poll, Hillary Lead Over Trump Surges

 

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/05/rigging-an-election-after-reuters-tweaks-poll-hillary-lead-over-trump-surges-2/

 

Washington, D.C. – With Trump’s poll numbers climbing dramatically after the RNC, and with Hillary gaining only a moderate bump after DNC, the establishment decided to take action to stem that growth. To emphasize this point, the Reuters/IPSOS poll, for the first time, had Trump taking a 1% lead following the Republican National convention.

 

Trump taking the lead and becoming the frontrunner for the presidency was an unfathomable thought to the political elite establishment as it would destroy the narrative the mainstream media had worked diligently to create.

 

Obviously, something had to be done – so Reuters “tweaked” its polling methodology – and miraculously Hillary was back in the lead!

 

Reuters explained their “tweaking” of their polling methodology by stating:

 

…in a presidential campaign notable for its negativity, the option of ‘Neither’ candidate appears to be an appealing alternative, at least to participants in the Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll. Many voters on both sides have been ambivalent in their support for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump, complicating the task of the pollsters trying to track the race. That sentiment may help explain an apparent skew that recently emerged in the Reuters/Ipsos poll results. Given the choice, a relatively large group of voters opted for “Neither/Other” candidate compared with other major polls, leading to an underreporting of several percentage points for one or other of the two major contenders at times in the race.”

 

Thus, Reuters/Ipsos amended their choice of wording by eliminating the word “neither,” claiming that it brings their poll in line with other polls.

 

Don’t be fooled by the media rhetoric, as the real reason for the methodology change is READ THE REST (Rigging an Election — After Reuters “Tweaks” Poll, Hillary Lead Over Trump Surges; By Jay Syrmopoulos; DC Clothesline; 8/5/16)

 

Oh and while they are rigging elections for the Endless Wars Candidate Hillary Clinton, it’s Obvious their support of ISIS will continue the policy of Endless Wars!!!!!

 

Major Muslim Leader Delivers This Message To All Christians: “If You Refuse To Convert To Islam, Then The Only Thing Between You And Us Is The Sword.”

 

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/05/major-muslim-leader-delivers-this-message-to-all-christians-if-you-refuse-to-convert-to-islam-then-the-only-thing-between-you-and-us-is-the-sword/

 

A major Muslim leader in Trinidad, Abu Sa’d at-Trinidadi, delivered this message to all Christians: “If you refuse [to convert to Islam], then the only thing between you and us is the sword.” Here is the full statement from at-Trinidadi:

 

To the Christians I say, you know that you have strayed far away from the true teachings of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus p. Your book was corrupted long ago by your leaders. I call on you to remember the first two commandments, for they are what led me to Islam and to the true teachings of all the prophets. Submit to the one who created you and do not differentiate between the prophets, for they all came with the same message. Follow the finalmessenger, Muhammad g, for in doing so you will be following all of the prophets p. If you refuse, then we offer you the option to pay jizyah and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation. If you refuse, then the only thing between you and us is the sword.

 

Here is the full report:

 

READ THE REST (Major Muslim Leader Delivers This Message To All Christians: “If You Refuse To Convert To Islam, Then The Only Thing Between You And Us Is The Sword.”; By Theodore Shoebat; DC Clothesline; 8/5/16)

 

+++

MORE on the “Endless WARS Candidate Hillary Clinton”!!!!!

 

Tony Newbill

Sent Fri 8/5/2016 9:30 AM

 

My God here is MORE on the “Endless WARS Candidate Hillary Clinton”!!!!!

 

What we need is a Leader who will Swiftly and Precisely allow “Rules of Engagement” That will Stop this Endless Wars strategy with a “Preservation of Peaceful People” winning ideology!!!!!

 

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange: “1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection” Demonstrate Her Sale of Weapons to Islamic Jihadists in Syria

 

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/05/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-1700-emails-in-hillary-clintons-collection-demonstrate-her-sale-of-weapons-to-islamic-jihadists-in-syria/

 

On Monday, I reported on the fact that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton engaged in the sale of arms to Qatar, which ultimately ended up in the hands of Islamic jihadists in Syria and Iraq that later became the Islamic State. Now, WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange is claiming that there are “1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection” which prove that she did just this.

 

While not supporting Democracy Now, nor democracy in general, I do think this interview with Julian Assange by Democracy Now is important information.

 

VIDEO: Assange: Why I Created WikiLeaks’ Searchable Database of 30,000 Emails from Clinton’s Private Server

 

 

Posted by Democracy Now!

Published on Jul 25, 2016

http://democracynow.org – In March, WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for over 30,000 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of state. The 50,000 pages of documents span from June 2010 to August 2014; 7,500 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The State Department released the emails as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request.

Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs weekdays on nearly 1,400 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch READ THE REST

 

READ THE REST (Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange: “1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection” Demonstrate Her Sale of Weapons to Islamic Jihadists in Syria; By Tim Brown; DC Clothesline; 8/5/17)

 

And this link shows how the “Endless WARS Candidate Hillary Clinton “after selling Weapons to ISIS aka Islamic Jihadists and giving Iran 400 million to be used to Finance the Jihadists this all fits right into the Endless Wars policy of the Clinton Global Initiative and their hedge fund special interests who make Money off the Endless Wars Policy that General Wesley Clark being a Clinton Global initiative member warns about in his Book “Don’t Wait for the Next WAR”. It could be said that the General is giving us an inside look at the Plan of the Clintons and their Special Interests as a Precursor of what will be the evolution to a Totalitarian state all in the name of the 5 Key Initiatives of the Clinton Global Initiative.

 

ISIS KILL LIST TARGETS 8,318 AMERICANS & ISIS ISSUIES WARNING, THREATENS TO MAKE WASHINGTON DC NEXT TARGET OF TERRORISM, & DHS WARN AMERICANS TO PREPARE FOR DISASTER

 

http://www.prepperfortress.com/isis-kill-list-targets-8318-americans-isis-issuies-warning-threatens-make-washington-dc-next-target-terrorism-dhs-warn-americans-prepare-disaster/#more-9915

 

 

The U.S. military carried out two airstrikes in Libya against ISIS fighters on Monday in the latest escalation of the U.S. war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State. The strikes took place in the city of Sirte. Pentagon officials said the campaign would continue until ISIS has been driven from the city, which it took over last year. Libya has been engulfed in fighting after a U.S.-backed military intervention ousted longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The Pentagon said Libya’s Western-backed unity government requested the airstrikes. The so-called unity government is one of three competing governments that claim legitimacy in the country. We speak to Phyllis Bennis, fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.

 

VIA: vocativ.com

 

ISIS “kill” lists have called on ISIS loyalists to attack everyone from Minnesota cops to State Department employees and ordinary Americans

 

A pro-ISIS “hacking” group calling itself the United Cyber Caliphate distributed its latest “kill” list this week. The group claims the list includes names, addresses, and email addresses belonging to 8,318 people, making it one of the longest target lists ISIS-affiliated groups have distributed.

 

In a post Vocativ uncovered on the messaging app Telegram that was written in both English and Arabic, the United Cyber Caliphate called on its supporters to “follow” those listed and “kill them strongly to take revenge for Muslims.” Click here and watch this video for more info.

 

Most of the names and the accompanying addresses listed appear to belong to people in the United States, Australia, and Canada. Out of 7,848 people identified as READ THE REST (ISIS KILL LIST TARGETS 8,318 AMERICANS & ISIS ISSUIES WARNING, THREATENS TO MAKE WASHINGTON DC NEXT TARGET OF TERRORISM, & DHS WARN AMERICANS TO PREPARE FOR DISASTER; By  AMY S; Prepper Fortress! 8/5/16)

 

Now let’s Consider what an Endless WARS policy of a Hillary Clinton Administration might spiral further out of control as Hillary tries to Control the Political Message and Mentally stay stable when she seems to have a Health Condition while managing the Endless Wars Image That’s Now becoming very Obvious???   It should be considered that the Special Interests that are Hooked on the Endless WARS policy for Profits are going to do everything they can to Put Hillary Clinton in the POTUS to continue their access to Government Power and Profits even at the RISK of Hillary’s Health, as this link shows:

 

Experts: Hillary is a Sociopath and Could Have Brain Damage:

 

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/05/experts-hillary-is-a-sociopath-and-could-have-brain-damage/

 

Bizarre behavior and strange seizures indicate major health and personality disorders

 

Hillary’s bizarre behavior and strange seizures: Is she having a breakdown or does she actually have brain damage?

 

I asked mental health experts about her strange outbursts that have been caught on camera.

 

They told me that the odd manifestations and facial ticks are likely side-effects of her blood clot.

 

But Hillary’s conduct also strongly indicates she is a sociopath who has a total lack of empathy for other people.

 

Watch the video to find out more.

 

VIDEO: The Truth About Hillary’s Bizarre Behavior

 

 

Posted by Paul Joseph Watson

Published on Aug 4, 2016

Hillary’s bizarre behavior and strange seizures: Is she having a breakdown or does she actually have brain damage?

I asked mental health experts about her strange outbursts that have been caught on camera.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

 

READ THE LITTLE BIT LEFT

 

+++

What Life will be like under The ***ENDLESS WARS*** Candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton

 

Tony Newbill

Sent 8/5/2016 10:23 AM

 

The reasons why we see a Clinton cronyism within the policy committees within the US Government that along with the Lobbyists are fueling special Interests that feed off things like endless wars!!!!!

 

Listen to General Westley Clark talk about Endless Wars in the Middle East during the GW Bush Administration, and when you hear what he lays out as the strategy in the Middle east, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have followed this Plan to a Tee:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DJ–Z3lvaQ#t=18

 

VIDEO: General Wesley Clark reveals US war plan – 2007

 

 

Posted by 21st Century Awakening

Uploaded on Nov 14, 2011

 

General Clark commanded Operation Allied Force in Kosovo War during his term as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) of NATO from 1997 to 2000.

During a 2007 interview with Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman, General Wesley Clark (Retired) explains a story that began shortly after the 9/11 attacks. Clark reveals 2001 USA war plan to invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. By now (2011) this plan is almost done. Only Syria and Iran are not bombed yet but those 2 are targets for US and Israel strikes.

 

The narrator of this Video lays out a great example of how the 2 Party Elites created ISIS and Endless wars for an Ideological strategy!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojcoKnTGf4s

 

VIDEO: General Wesley Clark explains ISIS was created by U.S. Allies

 

 

Posted by AMTV

Published on Feb 22, 2015

 

In today’s video, Christopher Greene of AMTV reports on a Wesley Clark interview on ISIS.
AMTV Website: http://www.amtvmedia.com
Donate $5 / month to AMTV: http://www.amtvmedia.com/donate/
Get our weekly Newsletter: http://www.amtvmedia.com/newsletter/

Like us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/amtvmedia
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/amtvmedia
Follow us on Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/107455227743332595314/107455227743332595314/posts

 

READ THE REST

 

In this next Video Listen to General Westley Clark Speak about his ” Ultimate Insider Status ” starting at the 20:00 Min mark forward for 15 mins, as he is a Clinton Insider and lays out a strategy that expresses an ideology that ” If we don’t Do as they think we will fall into a Totalitarian state ” but as we have seen this seems to be the path we are on anyway with Globalism under the Clinton Global Initiative!!! Wesley Clark, “Don’t Wait for the Next War”

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKOJhRKqAtI

 

VIDEO: Wesley Clark, “Don’t Wait for the Next War” [1:23:46]

 

 

Posted by Politics and Prose

Published on Nov 4, 2014

 

http://www.politics-prose.com/event/book/wesley-k-clark-dont-wait-next-war-strategy-american-growth-and-global-leadership
From World War II through the Cold War, America grew into a formidable world leader as the Arsenal of Democracy. But in recent years the nation has lost its way, Clark believes. The retired four-star general, currently head of his own strategic consulting firm and member of the Clinton Global Initiative’s Energy & Climate Change Advisory Board, argues that we need a new strategic vision, particularly in relation to the turbulent Middle East, China, and the unprecedented challenges of cybersecurity. (PublicAffairs)

Founded by Carla Cohen and Barbara Meade in 1984, Politics & Prose Bookstore is Washington, D.C.’s premier independent bookstore and cultural hub, a gathering place for people interested in reading and discussing books. Politics & Prose offers superior service, unusual book choices, and a haven for book lovers in the store and online. Visit them on the web at http://www.politics-prose.com/

 

So what the General Lays out explains why we see the Political Party Elites and their Special Interests all wanting to Continue the Endless Wars policy and why they are behind Hillary Clinton. And I think they ALL should be exposed as the War Mongers they have Become and start Charging them all with War Crimes!!!!!

 

And the General even talks about Voter Fraud, so this Ideology exists within the Clinton political Foundations, and no party leader seems to care!!! Shocking Undercover Videos Reveal Just How Easy It Is To Commit Voter Fraud…Over & Over & Over Again:

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-03/shocking-undercover-videos-reveal-just-how-easy-it-committ-voter-fraud

 

Shocking Undercover Videos Reveal Just How Easy It Is To Commit Voter Fraud…Over & Over & Over Again

 

No matter where you come down on voter ID laws, oppressive tool of right-wingers used to suppress minority and low-income voters or simple step to protect the sanctity of elections, one thing is quite clear, committing voter fraud in the absence of voter ID laws is pretty easy.  To prove the point, Project Veritas this morning released several undercover videos where journalists were able to walk into polling station across the State of Michigan and vote the ballots of, what should have been, easily recognizable public figures.

 

In the first video below, the Project Veritas journalist claims she is Jocelyn Benson, the Dean of Wayne State University Law School, but that she lost her ID.  The “Poll Supervisor” is quick to reassure Mrs. Benson that as long as she signs the affidavit on the back of the ballot she is free to vote.  When the journalist pushes back and insists that she feels an obligation to prove her identity the Poll Supervisor reassures her that “nobody can vote twice” because if the real Jocelyn Benson subsequently comes in she won’t be able to vote “because …

 

 

VIDEO: Election Officials Excuse Voter Fraud in Michigan

 

 

Posted by veritasvisuals

Published on Aug 2, 2016

In this video, James O’Keefe visits various polling locations in Michigan and requests the ballot of Jocelyn Benson, the Dean of Wayne State University Law School. O’Keefe is offered the ballot without ID, proving that voter fraud is easy to commit.

 

VIDEO: James O’Keefe Proves Why Voter ID is Necessary in Michigan

 

 

Posted by veritasvisuals

Published on Aug 2, 2016

In this video, James O’Keefe visits various polling locations in Michigan and requests the ballot of Detroit Free Press Columnist Brian Dickerson. O’Keefe is offered the ballot without ID, proving that voter fraud is easy to commit.

READ ENTIRETY – More Videos (Shocking Undercover Videos Reveal Just How Easy It Is To Commit Voter Fraud…Over & Over & Over Again; By Tyler Durden; Zero Hedge; 8/3/16 8:55 PM)

 

Death of the 2-party system: GOP bigwigs formally endorse Hillary Clinton:

 

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/05/death-of-the-2-party-system-gop-bigwigs-formally-endorse-hillary-clinton/

 

Whatever happens on November 8, Donald Trump can claim this achievement: His candidacy exposed the fact that the two-party system of Democrats and Republicans is an illusion.

 

What we have in the U.S. instead is a corrupt polity where Democrat and Republican élites form a single ruling party, as Professor Emeritus Angelo M. Codevilla stunningly asserted in 2010. (See “America’s Bipartisan Ruling Class vs. the People“)

 

The evidence?

 

The following list of Republican bigwigs who, by publicly declaring their support for Hillary Clinton — the pathological liar who had accomplished nothing as secretary of state, but violated U.S. laws and jeopardized national security with her unsecured private email server; lied about and left four Americans to die in Benghazi; and supports the absolute “right” of women to kill their unborn — instead of Republican Party presidential nominee Donald Trump, have peeled away their masks, revealing their true faces.

 

Here’s a list of the Republican élites who have declared they’ll vote for Hillary:

 

  • Dan Akerson, former chairman and chief executive of General Motors: ‘‘Serving as the leader of the free world requires effective leadership, sound judgment, a steady hand and, most importantly, the temperament to deal with crises large and small. Donald Trump lacks each of these characteristics.’’

 

  • Marc Andreessen, venture capitalist: ‘‘[Silicon] Valley wouldn’t be here, we wouldn’t be doing any of this if we didn’t have the amazing flow of immigrants that we’ve had in the last 80 years. And the idea of choking that off just makes me sick to my stomach.’’

 

  • Richard Armitage, deputy secretary of state and adviser to Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush: Trump ‘‘doesn’t appear to be a Republican, he doesn’t appear to want to learn about issues. So I’m going to vote for Mrs. Clinton.”

 

  • Max Boot, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and adviser to GOP presidential candidates: ‘‘I’m literally losing sleep over Donald Trump. She would be vastly preferable to Trump.’’

 

  • Sally Bradshaw, former top Jeb Bush adviser, who told CNN that she left the GOP and became an independent because of Trump: “As much as I don’t want another four years of Obama’s policies, I can’t look my children in the eye and tell them I voted for Donald Trump.’’

 

  • Arne Carlson, a former two-term Republican governor of Minnesota who … 29 in total are listed – READ THE REST (Death of the 2-party system: GOP bigwigs formally endorse Hillary Clinton; By Eowyn; DC Clothesline; 8/5/16)

 

Mr. Trump is Right we need to Re-Industrialize the USA to Stop the Globalists Endless WARS! The Evidence is astounding what the out sourcing and Consolidation of Industrial Might of the Western Nations has created with a world of Jobless societies that are fighting for their very existence. …

 

 

 

And we have General Wesley Clark saying the same kind of thing about Camps:

 

https://theintercept.com/2015/07/20/chattanooga-wesley-clark-calls-internment-camps-disloyal-americans/

 

Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for “Radicalized” Americans

 

Retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of the mass shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

 

He called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for READ THE REST – posted in earlier blogs (Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for “Radicalized” Americans; By Murtaza Hussain; The Intercept; 7/20/16)

 

And there has been a lot of debate within the Policy making positions of authority regarding Radical Religious people:

 

https://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

 

[(U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment – 10-page report villainizing Conservatives as much as actual extremists.]

 

And Justice Scalia is saying we will see Camps in the USA, so it seems there is an Ideology within the hierarchy of Government of this train of thought:

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/justice-antonin-scalia-says-world-war-ii-style-internment-camps-could-happen-again/article/2543424

 

Justice Antonin Scalia says World War II-style internment camps could happen again

 

Justice Antonin Scalia predicts that the Supreme Court will eventually authorize another a wartime abuse of civil rights such as the internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II.

 

“You are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again,” Scalia told the University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States, the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps.

 

The local Associated Press report quotes Scalia as using a Latin phrase that means “in times of war, the laws fall silent,” to explain why the court erred in that decision and will do so again.

 

“That’s what was going on — the panic about the war and the invasion of the Pacific and whatnot,” Scalia said. “That’s what happens. It was wrong, but READ THE REST (Justice Antonin Scalia says World War II-style internment camps could happen again; By JOEL GEHRKE; Washington Examiner; 2/4/14 12:00 AM)

 

Good Bye America and all she stands for If Hillary Rodham Clinton gets her way!!!!!

 

+++

Hillary Clinton is the Endless WARS candidate!!!!!

 

Tony Newbill

8/8/2016 10:04 AM

 

This is why Hillary Clinton will continue with the Endless WARs instead of making National Security Policy one that Wins the War on Terror a 4-5-year Policy like WW2 was.

Audit Reveals the Pentagon Doesn’t Know Where $6.5 TRILLION Dollars Has Gone

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/08/audit-reveals-the-pentagon-doesnt-know-where-6-5-trillion-dollars-has-gone/

Washington, D.C. – A new Department of Defense Inspector General’s report, released last week, has left Americans stunned at the jaw-dropping lack of accountability and oversight. The glaring report revealed the Pentagon couldn’t account for $6.5 trillion dollars worth of Army general fund transactions and data, according to a report by the Fiscal Times.

 

The Pentagon, which has been notoriously lax in its accounting practices, has never completed an audit, would reveal how the agency has specifically spent the trillions of dollars allocated for wars, equipment, personnel, housing, healthcare and procurements allotted to them by Congress.

 

Beginning in 1996 all federal agencies were mandated by law to conduct regular financial audits. However, the Pentagon has NEVER complied with that federal law. In 20 years, it has never accounted for the trillions of dollars in taxpayer funds it has spent, in part because “fudging” the numbers has become standard operating procedure at the Department of Defense, as revealed in a 2013 Reuters investigation by Scot Paltrow.

 

According to the report by the Fiscal Times:

 

“An increasingly impatient Congress has demanded that the Army achieve “audit readiness” for the first time by Sept. 30, 2017, so that lawmakers can get a better handle on military spending. But READ THE REST (Audit Reveals the Pentagon Doesn’t Know Where $6.5 TRILLION Dollars Has Gone; By Jay Syrmopoulos; DC Clothesline; 8/8/16) 

 

I bet there is a lot of the Missing Trillions in Hillary’s Hedge Fund donors pockets:

 
Did Hillary and Obama create ISIS to be a conflicting force spreading
into areas of the world where resources and durable goods are under threat of losing US dollar valuation and conflict gives way to US intervention to keep dollar valuation in place?
I don’t care who these Crimes against Humanity implicate because this has to be stopped!

 
Will Hillary cause WAR with Russia????

 

Why PUTIN hates HILLARY – UN meeting exposes the Truth! All USA need to see this! 2016 Please Share:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqPP1dpNHQw

 

VIDEO: Why PUTIN hates HILLARY – UN meeting exposes the Truth! All USA need to see this! 2016 Please Share

 

Posted by @admtrainee – “The Truth Is Out There”

Published on Jul 31, 2016

 

Help USA! All American People Need to see this before 2016 Elections! Please share with urgency. Hillary is a problem for Putin. This is very important to share! TV News is showing more proof! This is TV News! This is real facts. The power of Internet/YouTube is helping American people!
Share please.

People of America urgent news!! Public utility! Update to READ THE REST

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs

 

VIDEO: PUTIN DECLARES WAR WITH UNITED STATES INEVITABLE IF HILLARY CLINTON WINS

 

 

Posted by The Next News Network

Published on Jul 9, 2016

 

Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Kim Mclendon for the Inquisitr reports Hillary Clinton brings the real threat of war, not Donald Trump, according to Vladimir Putin, as election news has Russia gearing up for a possible attack.

See the report here:
https://youtu.be/I4ythLYtbEs

Read more: http://www.inquisitr.com/3225440/hillary-clinton-means-war-says-vladimir-putin-to-frightened-russian-people-american-militarism-has-a-female-face/

 

READ THE REST

 

+++

See what I mean about Hillary as the Endless Wars Candidate?????

 

Tony Newbill

Sent 8/9/2016 3:53 PM

 

Hillary as the Endless Wars Candidate????? With all the Corporate/donor Influence that makes $$ off the Nation Building it can be seen why we see establishment in all arenas lining up behind Hillary.

 

Pentagon, CIA Form Praetorian Guard for Clinton as Warmonger President

 

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/08/08/pentagon-cia-praetorian-guard-clinton-warmonger-president.html

 

Former director of the Central Intelligence Agency Michael J Morell is the latest in a phalanx of senior US military-intelligence figures who are shedding any pretense of political neutrality and giving their full-throated endorsement to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

 

In a New York Times opinion piece, Morell starkly backed Clinton as the most «highly qualified to be commander-in-chief… keeping our nation safe».

 

The ex-CIA chief’s op-ed piece also served as a blunt hatchet job on Republican presidential rival Donald J Trump. Morell said the New York billionaire-turned politician is «not only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national security».

 

 

After accusing Trump of being «careless with facts», Morell makes this reckless, sensationalist claim: «In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr Putin had recruited Mr Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation».

 

This is a breath-taking interference in the nominally civilian sphere of US politics by unelected military-paramilitary elements, whereby a candidate for presidency is accused of being a foreign puppet. It is a throwback to the Cold War witch-hunting days of McCarthy and «Un-American activities».

 

 

This rush to partisan politics by the US military has even led to unease among certain Pentagon quarters. Only days after the DNC’s militaristic rally, General Martin Dempsey, who was formerly Chairman of the Joint Staffs, took the unprecedented step of publishing a cautionary article warning: «Keep Your Politics Private, My Fellow Generals and Admirals».

 

 

What is that qualifies Hillary Clinton for such support? Former CIA boss Morell listed these «attributes» as …

 

In other words, what is most appreciated is how Clinton is prepared and willing to take America into ever more wars. Despite the horrific legacy that she is already responsible as Secretary of State in the Obama administration (2009-2013) when she prosecuted wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and, covertly, in Syria and Ukraine.

 

And yet, ex-CIA chief Morell, who served alongside Clinton in these disastrous wars, has the gall to censure Trump for «his lack of respect for the rule of law».

 

By contrast, Trump, for all his flaws and awry views on immigration and race relations, has not espoused warmongering zeal to any comparable extent. Indeed, the Republican candidate has called for normalization of relations with Russia in particular and has notified that he would order a withdrawal of US forces from Asia, Europe and other regions in order to «rebuild America first». His views on …

 

 

The Pentagon-CIA Praetorian Guard that is being formed around Clinton is not only a harbinger of the militarized totalitarian state administered from Washington; it is also a signal that READ ENTIRETY (Pentagon, CIA Form Praetorian Guard for Clinton as Warmonger President; FINIAN CUNNINGHAM; Strategic Culture Foundation; 8/8/16)

 

+++

More on Hillary as the Endless Wars POTUS

 

Tony Newbill

Sent 8/10/2016 10:50 AM

 

Here Pat Buchanan write a Piece about the CFR getting us into Endless Wars in the Middle East:

 

[Blog Editor: Here is one huge example I disagree with Tony Newbill and Paleocons. Paleocons (i.e. isolationists) join Neoconservatives with Leftist Globalists in manipulating the USA into a global New World Order. Neocons are American Exceptionalists that believe in a strong military and Free Enterprise. The purpose of a strong military to a Neocon is to maintain American dominance to protect Americans. A strong military does not equate to the Endless War theory Newbill focuses on in this post. The strong military is to place in vigorous check the enemies of the American National Interests. The Leftist Globalists (e.g. Obama & Crooked Hillary) have decimated the military weakening the U.S. making us a target to the enemies of the USA – Caliphate Muslims, Chinese Communists & Russian Restoring-Glory Expansionists! It is my opinion the mainstay of Endless War Theory is to create crisis pockets and instability globally with the goal of establishing a military of a One World Government (Hello the U.N.) to save the deceived populace who are actually being enslaved to totalitarianism. The only real disappointment for Neocons was the failed belief of nation building a pro-Western national state among Muslim dominated cultures. The learning experience is that was and is not possible.]

 

http://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2016/08/09/who-got-us-into-these-endless-wars-n2203082

 

Who Got Us Into These Endless Wars?

 

“Isolationists must not prevail in this new debate over foreign policy,” warns Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. “The consequences of a lasting American retreat from the world would be dire.”

 

 

Understandably, Haass is upset. For the CFR has lost the country.

 

Why? It colluded in the blunders that have bled and near bankrupted America and that cost this country its unrivaled global preeminence at the end of the Cold War.

 

No, it was not “isolationists” who failed America. None came near to power. The guilty parties are the CFR crowd and their neocon collaborators, and liberal interventionists who set off to play empire after the Cold War and create a New World Order with themselves as Masters of the Universe. READ ENTIRETY (Who Got Us Into These Endless Wars? By Pat Buchanan; Townhall.com; 8/9/16 12:01 AM)

 

And that got me to thinking about Hillary Clinton’s association with the CFR, as I explain in the links below.

 

The Last people we need to be Listening too is the CFR!!!!!!!  And with Hillary’s Hedge Fund donors wanting to Follow the CRF advice to perpetuate WAR in the Middle east so they can make Money off the intervention, you can bet these Hedge fund’s lobbyists will be blowing down the door to Hillary’s pay to play Whitehouse if she becomes President, and the USA will be Locked in Endless War Forever!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Here Richard Haas is a Big Hypocrite on the IRAQ WAR, and then says we are locked in a 30-year War.

 

These first 2 links are Haas saying he didn’t believe in the Iraq War, saying it was a Bush idea to change the culture to a democratic process:

 

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104088144

 

Richard Haass: ‘I Did Not Believe In The Iraq War’

 

After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center, President Bush vowed to rid the world of evildoers — namely the Taliban, al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.

 

 

Haass, who is now the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, was Secretary of State Colin Powell’s director of policy planning at the State Department during the Iraq war. He says the Bush administration was instead pessimistic about any kind of success in Afghanistan.

 

 

… In his book, Haass says he was 60 percent against going to war in Iraq, but despite that, he did the right thing by not resigning. He would have resigned, he says, if he had known for sure that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction and that the president had decided to invade anyway. …

 

 

“I believed in diplomacy, I believe in multilateralism, I believe in institutions,” he says. “I did not believe in the Iraq war. I thought the United States did have viable alternative policy options, and I feared by going to war, it would — to use the phrase that Colin Powell and I bandied about — ‘Take the oxygen out of the room on American foreign policy.’ … READ ENTIRETY (Richard Haass: ‘I Did Not Believe In The Iraq War’; NPR; 5/13/09 1:21 AM ET)

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-n-haass/iraq-war-10-years-later_b_2886880.html

 

The Iraq Invasion 10 Years Later: A Wrong War

 

Ten years after the U.S. invasion, the war in Iraq represents “a poor choice poorly implemented,” says CFR President Richard N. Haass, who was then a senior State Department official. …

 

 

There were a lot of assumptions. There was a lot of what turned out to be faulty intelligence. But that only became clear in retrospect. What was flawed was not only the intelligence but also the assumptions: that it was going to be quick and easy. That the Iraqis were going to welcome the Americans as liberators. That it was only going to be a short amount of time before we could safely depart and leave behind an Iraq that was filled, as I once sarcastically put it, by people reading the Federalist Papers in Arabic translation. And what this teaches you is that assumptions can be dangerous things. If you assume away most or all of the questions or difficulties, you can persuade yourself of just about anything. And that’s what happened here.

 

READ ENTIRETY (The Iraq Invasion 10 Years Later: A Wrong War; By Richard N. Haass; Huffington Post; 3/15/13)

 

But here on Charlie Rose he says the Exact Opposite about the WMDs in Iraq being the Main reason:

 

https://charlierose.com/videos/2744

 

Video Transcript Excerpt

 


Charlie Rose:
 What’s the idea that drove us into war with Iraq?

01:39

 

Richard HaassI think more than anything it was the concern about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, what they might do with them weather directly use them or indirectly hand them off to terrorists. I think also for some people there were additional reasons. I think for some particularly after 9/11 there was the feeling that we had to score a geopolitical victory that somehow we had to send the message, if you will, that we were not a helpless pitiful giant. We had to do something.

 

 

Charlie Rose: I said today to someone that I thought the Bush administration probably, like so many other people, believed that there were weapons of mass destruction. This person said to me, “I’m not so sure they actually believed that.” What do you say?

 


Richard Haass
I was sure and indeed I am frankly surprised that we’ve not come up with the — with hard evidence. Charlie, I’ve been in and out of government for over 20 years. I served for four administrations. When I read the intelligence about Saddam and about weapons of mass destruction, it was not a flimsy single piece of intelligence. We were talking about an entire intelligence estimate, an entire intelligence publication, lots of information, multiple sources, multiple years. It was a very strong case about chemical and biological weapons. I can’t think of one meeting I went to over the last few years where anyone stood up and said there’s not a case here there’s not a problem. There were debates about whether he was involved in terrorism. There were debates about the nuclear issue.

 

WATCH or READ ENTIRETY (Charley Rose/RICHARD HAASS Interview; 09/05/2003)

 

Hillary Clinton will be taking the advice of CFR President Richard Haas as she has said she does here in this video:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYq3TaBik64 

 

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton admits that the CFR runs the Government

 

 

Posted by Federaljacktube

Uploaded on Feb 20, 2010

 

And here Haas says we need to make intervention in the Middle east a Staple of Foreign Policy even saying the Middle East is like Europe was in a Period where 30 years of WARS was the Norm, so Hillary can be seen as the ENDLESS WARS POTUS:

 

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/richard-n–haass-argues-that-the-middle-east-is-less-a-problem-to-be-solved-than-a-condition-to-be-managed

 

The New Thirty Years’ War

 

NEW YORK – It is a region wracked by religious struggle between competing traditions of the faith. But the conflict is also between militants and moderates, fueled by neighboring rulers seeking to defend their interests and increase their influence. Conflicts take place within and between states; civil wars and proxy wars become impossible to distinguish. Governments often forfeit control to smaller groups – militias and the like – operating within and across borders. The loss of life is devastating, and millions are rendered homeless.

 

That could be a description of today’s Middle East. In fact, it describes Europe in the first half of the seventeenth century.

 

In the Middle East in 2011, change came after a humiliated Tunisian fruit vendor set himself alight in protest; in a matter of weeks, the region was aflame. In seventeenth-century Europe, a local religious uprising by Bohemian Protestants against the Catholic Habsburg Emperor Ferdinand II triggered that era’s conflagration.

 

Protestants and Catholics alike turned for support to their co-religionists within the territories that would one day become Germany. Many of the era’s major powers, including Spain, France, Sweden, and Austria, were drawn in. The result was the Thirty Years’ War, the most violent and destructive episode in European history until the two world wars of the twentieth century.

 

… To READ THE REST one has to log in (The New Thirty Years’ War; By RICHARD N. HAASS; Project Syndicate; 7/21/14)

 

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All data embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

 

On Neocon, Christian & Jewish World Domination


Pinky and the Brain - World Domination

Brain of ‘Pinky and the Brain’
 
John R. Houk
© January 5, 2015
 
A person going by the pseudonym ‘Phirst Lasname’ placed a comment to the NCCR post “Grand Jury Probable Cause Evidence”. That post is roughly a comparison of the police caused deaths of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and of Eric Garner in NYC. Both deaths were the result of an attempted arrest that was being resisted by Black Americans by White American Police Officers. My position was Brown’s death was justified because of an intimidating robbery followed closely by an extremely life-threatening resistance to Officer Darren Wilson’s arrest. And Garner’s death was unjustified even though he put up a resistance to about four NYPD Officers of which one – Daniel Pantaleo – placed Garner in an illegal (per NYPD rules) choke hold resulting in death. Brown’s crime was robbery and a drug crazed attack. Garner’s crime was selling single cigarettes black market style. To most of America it seems silly to arrest someone for hawking cigs on the streets but it is disdained in NYC because that city charges an exorbitant surcharge on cigarette packs and cartons. A deadly choke hold in Garner’s case is a bit exorbitant for a non-violent white collar black market crime.
 
That lengthy summary of that post was necessary because Phirst’s comment really did not make a lot of sense to that post. Phirst’s comment is a political-racist-Conspiracy Theory diatribe against Neocons, Christians and Jews.
 
Phirst begins his comment with a quote from me as the launching pad for his diatribe. The problem is the quote is from a December 7 cross post that was from United With Israel. He is commenting to my intro:
 
If you have read any posts on this blog pertaining to Israel you know I am an avid supporter of Israel. Also I am a bit off the politically correct path in today’s world in that I do not believe the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians are deserving of a sovereign nation in land originally intended for a Jewish State at the end of WWI AND from a Biblical perspective the Land is promised by God Almighty as the home of the Jews.
 
That being said President Barack Hussein Obama’s treatment of Israel is heinous as both a U.S. ally, the treatment of Israel in light of the Bible, the treatment Israel in promoting the Arab fakers that call themselves Palestinians. Not to mention that these pseudo-Palestinians are nothing but a combination Jew-hating Islamic terrorists and/or those that are Jew-hating supporters of Islamic terrorists.
 
Obama’s throw-Israel-under-the-bus mentality to create a sovereign Palestinian state will set Israel up for the destruction that Muslims around the world pray to their demonic deity Allah to occur. Part of sovereign Palestine fallacy is to rip half of the City of David which is Jerusalem away from the Jewish state to give it to the psycho-pseudo-Palestinians.
 
United With Israel reports that Obama’s insidiousness against Israel continues by threatening sanctions for building homes for Jews in their own Capital City. At the same time Obama continues to placate an Israel-hating Iran by removing sanctions emboldening this Muslim rogue nation to produce nuke Inter-Continent Ballistic missiles.
 
I am going to cross post Phirst Lasname’s diatribe for your reading displeasure, but first I am going to share my thoughts on Neocons, Christian world domination and Jewish world domination.
 
Neoconservative World Domination
 
Neocons are unpopular with both Leftists and Conservatives (particularly Paleoconservatives). The reality about Neocons is that many don’t agree with other. Some Neocons lean toward an affinity for some Leftist ideals, some lean more toward more traditional Conservative ideals yet have an affinity for big government especially in the sense of maintaining a high budget military and some definitely have the appearance of a Neocon yet may identify themselves as a Liberal or Center-Left Liberal or as a Center-Right Liberal or just a mere Centrist Independent. The thing is Neoconservatism have been so vilified that the appellation Neocon has become epithet to a large amount of the Left and Right.
 
The most critical on the Right and who is the most noted Paleocon is Pat Buchanan:
 
‘… [N]eoconservatism [is] “a globalist, interventionist, open borders ideology.”’ (Quoted from – quoted in the New York Times on September 8, 2002 and found at Wikipedia)
  
Buchanan’s venom is typical of the detractors of Neoconservatism. Now read a quote from the person considered the godfather of Neoconservatism – Irving Kristol:
 
‘Perhaps the most famous of Kristol’s aphorisms is that a “neo­conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality.”’ (The Moral Realism of Irving Kristol; By ERIC COHEN; National Affairs – ISSUE NUMBER 2 ~ WINTER 2010)
 
In full disclosure I have Neocon leanings yet I definitely lean more to the Right than the typical Neocon stereotype. In my youth I was not really a political person but I came from a loyal Dem Party family when it came to voting. My Grandmother was an adult during the Depression and my Mother was a teenager just after the Depression. Ergo my family unwittingly were devoted Dems because they were propagandized to believe FDR delivered America out of the Depression.
 
I grew devoted to Democrat Senator Henry (Scoop) Jackson who ironically many of the Neocon persuasion hail Jacksonian politics as a precursor to Neoconservatism. Like the youth of my day I was anti-Vietnam War but not because I felt the war was wrong. Rather I thought the military strategy in Vietnam of maintaining a status quo until the very corrupt South Vietnamese government was able to defeat both the Viet Cong rebels and the North Vietnamese regular army was a defeat waiting to happen – and defeat did come in 1975. Wars should be fought to win with whatever it takes or ultimately a defeat will occur.
 
I favored Unions even though Unions were not a powerful element in Washington State. I was a bit New Agie but hardly dedicated. I thought there might be something to Socialism but Communism I considered an evil of the ages. I held humanist ideals and questioned Christian ideals as outdated. But really the politics of it all was definitely not at the top of my list. I was a party-hearty doper looking for the next party.
 
Then I set out to prove the Bible as irrelevant to my than future first wife. I can’t explain how it happened, but I didn’t get past the four Gospels before I became a Born-Again Spirit-Filled Christian in the late 1970s. My old lifestyle definitely did not match my new man in Christ Jesus. So I plunged into studying the Bible eventually heading to Oklahoma to attend RHEMA Bible Training Center (now RHEMA Bible Training College).
 
Becoming a Conservative was not an immediate transformation in my case. In my mind Republican Conservatives were epitomized by Reagan loving nuke button pushing warmongers. I could not bring myself to vote for Reagan in 1980 but I didn’t wasn’t voting Democrat. So I delved into Libertarianism becoming a lover individual choice and a Market Economy. Over the next few years I began to realize Libertarians were dominated by Social Liberals as equally as they were to a Market economy. Again that didn’t match up with the new man Christian I had become. So I shed the Social Liberal Libertarians, kept the Free Market ideals and politically became a part of the Christian Right on a social level.
 
In 1984 I not only voted for President Reagan I relished in the moral-market-Conservatism he came to symbolize. Then came 1988 and my first disillusion with the GOP. Republicans nominated Vice President George H. W. Bush as President – he won. In my mind GHW Bush was a part of the corrupt cabal of Richard Nixon of notorious Watergate infamy. Gerald Ford gave Nixon a blanket pardon to protect him from prosecution. In January 1976 Ford made GHW Bush Direct of Central Intelligence (DCI) which lasted through January 1977.
 
As far as I could find GHW Bush had no direct link to the Watergate cover-up; however Nixon was cozy with Prescott Bush and thus moved GHW up the political ladder of the GOP Establishment all the while GHW being extremely loyal to Nixon even through the Watergate expose of illegal activities and the discovered cover-up.
 
With Ford blanketing Nixon from prosecution, Bush’s loyalty to Nixon and the subsequent Ford appointment of GHW as Director of Central Intelligence; on a personal level I had a great distrust of GHW Bush as Reagan’s VP and subsequent election to POTUS in 1988. In that 1988 election I voted for GHW because the other choice was über Leftist Michael Dukakis. In 1992 Ross Perot was Free Market Conservative enough that I voted for him. This undoubtedly led to Clinton’s victory.
 
By 2000 I had become closer to the Neocons. I went from reading the Objectivism of Ayn Rand to a fascination with Leo Strauss. Although it is doubtful that Strauss would identify himself as a Neocon, the fact remains that many former students and admirers have the label of Neocon. Strauss may have more critics than even the Neocons do. Strauss had an affinity for the ancient philosophers through to the 18th or perhaps early 19th century. Strauss believed that the bottom line of those philosophers was an esoteric teaching that only the intelligent elite might comprehend. But most of the criticism of Strauss is his highlighting of Plato’s Noble Lie. The Noble Lie is the thought the intellectual ruling elite by necessity keep negative info away from the general population to promote a religious and moral mythos that provides inner stability within society itself.
 
I got to tell you though the aspect of Neoconservatism I am all in with is the promoting of the principles of American Exceptionalism even if military action is required to do so. I was originally all in with the concept of nation building with the democratic-republic being taught to formerly despotic nations. I have modified that view with America’s decade-plus long war prosecuted in Afghanistan and Iraq demonstrated that the American principles of individual Rights, Liberty and Freedom will never stick among a people that totalitarianism is infused into cultures dominated by Islam.
 
Is there a Neocon cabal intent of global domination?
 
NO!
 
Closest thing to a Neocon cabal are a group of people intent on working within the framework of the U.S. Constitution to prevent Marxist principles from ruining America’s Liberty and to have a strong enough central government to maintain a strong military to at the very enforce a Pax Americana within our borders. Everything in between is in flux according to how far Right a Neocon might be. For instance on the issue of immigration would support reform to provide a stable manner of incorporating immigrants into an assimilation of American culture. Yet Neocons will have a difficult time forming a mutual consensus on booting out the current illegals or processing a program that promotes assimilation rather than multicultural diversity. Face it promoting multicultural diversity instills cultural chaos rather than societal common ground.
 
Christian World Domination
 
The closest thing there has ever been a Christian World Dominating polity is when Constantine the Great made Christianity the Roman State religion and made an effort to unify divergent dogmas via Ecumenical Councils.
 
On a personal level I believe the Presence of God was present in the early Councils via the Holy Spirit; however whenever human hands take the reins of interpretation human hands screw up the Will of God on the Divine grand design and only the unfathomable Grace and Mercy of God delays that grand design giving humanity every opportunity to draw nearer to God. There will be a time when the polity and culture of humanity will look closer to the days of Noah. When those days come God Almighty will force the issue of the Divine grand design for humanity and the earth in general.
 
There will be a day of a Christian World Domination but it WILL NOT be by the hands of humanity. Read the last couple chapters of the Revelation of John and discover World Domination will be instituted by the return of Jesus Christ as the Messiah/King who will eventually rule in perpetuity. By the way a message to you Jew-hating White Supremacists, Christians and Muslims: the return of Jesus entails returning Jews first the Land Promised them then to the rest of the nations of the world.
 
1 Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea. 2 Then I, John,[a] saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people. God Himself will be with them and be their God. 4 And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.”
 
5 Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” And He said to me,[b] “Write, for these words are true and faithful.”
 
6 And He said to me, “It is done![c] I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give of the fountain of the water of life freely to him who thirsts. 7 He who overcomes shall inherit all things,[d] and I will be his God and he shall be My son. 8 But the cowardly, unbelieving,[e] abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” (Revelation 21: 1-8 NKJV)
 
12 “And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.”[a]
 
14 Blessed are those who do His commandments,[b] that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. 15 But[c]outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.
 
16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star.”
 
17 And the Spirit and the bride say, “Come!” And let him who hears say, “Come!” And let him who thirsts come. Whoever desires, let him take the water of life freely. (Revelation 22: 12-17 NKJV)
 
Check that last two chapters to reading the last three chapters. Hmm … Just read the entire Revelation of John. Now that is Christian World Domination the God-way and NOT the man-way.
 
Jewish World Domination
 
There has NEVER been a Jewish agenda to rule the world. All that religious Jews ever wanted is to return to their homeland once expelled. Secular and dimwitted … err I mean unwitting Leftist Jews that embrace the Zionist movement of the early 20th century and desire a land to live in peace free of the global persecution they have experienced for thousands of years living as a Diaspora among predominantly Antisemitic/Jew-hating Gentiles.
 
If there are any morons out there that use the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as proof positive there is a cabal of Jews intent on World Domination your both deceived and delusional. This document was never written by any learned Jewish elders. It is proven that it is a hoax put together under the administration of Czar Nicholas II (the same executed by Communist Lenin) in the late 19th century which was adopted from a fiction story concocted in France then enhanced in Prussia and finally reaching to Czarist Russia (See HERE, HERE and HERE is a moronic page asserting the authenticity of the Protocols).
 
Jewish World Domination theologically is definitely not a present day phenomena. The true Jewish agenda from the very Orthodox to the Reformed is to better one’s self. From my brief gleaning of information most Jews (primarily the strictest Orthodox through Conservative) believe in some kind of Messiah coming to better the world’s existence, BUT that future Messiah is not of Divine origin as Christian’s do believe in Jesus Christ and His Second Coming.
 
Apparently there is a dispute among Jewish theologians that a Messianic age arrives depending on two sides of a coin. Some believe when the world has achieved a harmonious enough existence a Messiah will emerge to perpetuate that harmony eternally for the Jews and extending to the Righteous Gentile nations (no forced conversions to Judaism). The other side of the coin is the belief that the world becomes so sinfully and politically corrupt that a Messiah emerges to bring global harmony for the Jews and the Righteous Gentiles in perpetuity (Again, no forced Judaic conversions). The key for both sides of the coin is global peaceful harmony for all humanity because Jews and Gentiles alike will just know to do right and eschew doing evil. As a Christian Zionist myself that is the simplest summary I can think of yet I am positive from a Jewish perspective I have not provided a summary that Jews would find acceptable enough. As in theologies it is a bit more complicated.
 
ONE thing is certain though. Like the final outcome a Christian World Domination, a Jewish World Domination has nothing to do ruling by might, human emotional whims nor totalitarian despotism. Rather everyone just knows what is Right.
 
Some good websites that fill in the details of the Jewish “World to Come” (Olam Ha-Ba) are below for my fellow Gentiles and/or Christian Zionists:
 
 
 
 
o   Jewish eschatology – Wikipedia (Very Informative)
 
 
 
With all this being said, you have to know I was a bit annoyed with this guy who goes by the pseudonym Phirst Lasname. His warped sense of reality is pretty summed up by this quote from his comment below:
 
Neocons, Christians? And Jews? Alike, are a lot like arsonists posing as firefighters, a lot like John Orr.
 
I wasn’t sure who John Orr is. Apparently he was an arsonist that actually was an arson investigator: See HERE and HERE.
 
Phirst is thus comparing Neocons, Christians and Jews to a murderer who killed by fire.
 
CREEP!
 
 
JRH 1/5/15

Please Support NCCR

***************************
Phirst Lasname Attacks Neocons, Christians & Jews
 
Phirst Lasname (pseudonym) FB profile pic 7-11-14
Phirst Lasname from Facebook Profile 
 
 
 
If you have read any posts on this blog pertaining to Israel you know I am an avid supporter of Israel. Also I am a bit off the politically correct path in today’s world in that I do not believe the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians are deserving of a sovereign nation in land originally intended for a Jewish State at the end of WWI AND from a Biblical perspective the Land is promised by God Almighty as the home of the Jews.” [Blog Editor: Old ‘Phirst’ placed this comment under “Grand Jury …” but this quote is actually from my blog post entitled, “Obama Threatens to Punish Israel for …”. The quote is from my intro to a “United With Israel” cross post on NCCR from December 7, 2014.]
 
Is an Israel Firster any better than a blame America Firster?
 
Khazars who call themselves Jews.
 
Land promised by God 3000 years ago, and was lost 300-400 years later. Enter the New Second Covenant. Jesus. Christianity. A clean slate.
 
The new zionist state was created in 1948. Was that the third covenant?
 
WW1, people should listen to the Benjamin H. Freedman 1961 speech, and read his 1974 speech.
 
youtu.be/UH7ti2B8EPc (not spam, very useful information) [Blog Editor: 1 hour and almost 17 minutes of Israel/Zionist-hatred]
 
Israel did 9/11, and everyone right, left and center who is informed and honest, knows it.
Al Qaeda and ISIS/CRISIS are of, by and for the neocon agenda, militant zionism, Israel.
 
When it comes to Benghazi, all means, motive and opportunity points to neocon involvement, and the only beneficiary was at that time was then presidential candidate Mitt Romney…A manufactured foreign policy crisis against Obama was Romney’s “October Surprise” in September.
 
Nothing else adds up.
 
There are few things more insidious than misdirected patriotism.
 
Neocons, Christians? And Jews? Alike, are a lot like arsonists posing as firefighters, a lot like John Orr.
 
Watch the HBO 2002 tv movie ‘Point of Origin’ starring Ray Liotta as John Orr, and you will see how the neocon masters operate.
 
I used to be passionately pro-Israel for years…there was a time when I wanted Benjamin Netanyahu to be president of the United States.
 
But eventually I woke up, and I started to see things for how they actually are.
 
As for Obama, the gay Muslim socialist from Kenya, he must be doing something right for all the zionazis to hate him so much… Maybe it’s because he doesn’t believe in the White Horse Prophecy like Romney does.
 
Obama doesn’t want Apocalypse Now, and all the twisted nihilists and zionazis do, and they hate him for delaying their dream, what every sane person would call a nightmare.
 
Romney was a Rhino? … Does that mean he wasn’t nihilistic enough?… I think he was.
 
You wanna be real patriots?
 
Support the Constitution, RESTORE the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
 
Repeal the so called “Patriot Act”, and ban the TSA.
 
You want to really support the troops?
 
Then, BRING THEM HOME.
 
Do you love your children?
 
Then, DON’T START A NUCLEAR WAR.
 
Stop provoking the Russians in Ukraine, which used to be a democracy until the neocon mafia staged a coup and overthrew the Kiev government. THEN Crimeans voted to secede from the dictatorship in Kiev, which is every people’s right throughout the world, including in America. People have the right to self-determination.
 
If there was a coup in Washington, the states would have the right to break ties with Washington.
 
As for “terrorism”.
 
The neocons ARE the terrorists.
 
The real enemy and threat is militant zionism. The real caliphate is the zionist caliphate.
The real jihad is the neocon jihad against democracy and peace.
 
The war on terror is in truth a war OF terror by Israel, Washington and Riyadh. In that order.
The neocon war of terror is self-fulfilling and a vicious cycle that can only escalate and grow worse until it goes nuclear.
 
You want to win the war?
 
STOP FIGHTING IT.
 
Stop fighting a phantom menace, manufactured enemies like ISIS.
Tell Netanyahu to send his terror army back home, and end the genocidal proxy war against Syria.
 
Make peace with Iran…Iran would be a better ally than a fake enemy.
 
Throw Israel under the bus, and Britain, too — with friends like that, who needs enemies?
_______________________________
On Neocon, Christian & Jewish World Domination
John R. Houk
© January 5, 2015
________________________________
Phirst Lasname Attacks Neocons, Christians & Jews
 
Spellcheck editing by John R. Houk with some spelling ignored
 

Intro: Obama’s Dangerous Consistency


BHO Quran apology - BHO Constitution Disdain

John R. Houk

© September 22, 2012

 

Caroline Glick has some awesome insight on Obama’s Foreign Policy in relation to Egyptian animus toward the USA.

 

She begins by pointing out the Islamic hatred for American Free Speech. This Egyptian hatred of America is evidenced by Egypt placing arrest warrants against the makers of the Mohammed Movie and anyone associated with promoting the movie.

 

Just as a sidebar: Egypt asking the U.S. government to honor the arrest warrants for something that is protected by the First Amendment should give more importance to the grassroots movement of enacting American Laws for American Courts (ALAC). – End of sidebar

 

Glick points out that Egyptian Clerics – like from the Muslim Brotherhood – are calling for an end of attacks on U.S. Embassies; however call for Muslims to rise up in the USA to murder anyone connected to the Mohammed Movie.

 

Glick points out that the Obama Administration has been consistent in an appeasement foreign policy by using an apologetic strategy of courting friendship with Muslim nations and most notoriously the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt.

 

Glick rounds out her criticism of President Barack Hussein Obama by pointing out his Administration is attempting to take the voters’ eyes off the foreign policy failure by dredging memories of the Neocons of the old Bush Administration yet only and oddly falling into the myth that Neocons are Jewish. Hence, without using anti-Semitic words the Obama Administration is using antisemitism to separate Obama policies as the source of Muslim rage against Americans.

 

This is a good read!

 

JRH 9/22/12

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Obama’s dangerous consistency

 

By Caroline Glick

September 21, 2012, 9:39 AM

CarolineGlick.com

 

On Tuesday, Egypt’s chief prosecutor issued arrest warrants against eight US citizens.

 

Their purported crimes relate either to their reported involvement in the production of the Internet movie critical of Islam that has received so much attention over the past 10 days, or to other alleged anti-Islamic activities.

 

One of the US citizens indicted is a woman who converted from Islam to Christianity.

 

According to the Associated Press, Egypt’s general prosecution issued a statement announcing that the eight US citizens have been indicted on charges of insulting and publicly attacking Islam, spreading false information, and harming Egyptian national unity.

 

The statement stipulated that they could face the death penalty if convicted.

 

The AP write-up of the story quoted Mamdouh Ismail, a Salafi attorney who praised the prosecution’s move. He claimed it would deter others from exercising their right to free expression in regards to Islam. As he put it, the prosecutions will “set a deterrent for them and anyone else who may fall into this.” That is, they will deter others from saying anything critical about Islam.

 

This desire to intimidate free people into silence on Islam is clearly the goal the heads of the Muslim Brotherhood seek to achieve through their protests of the anti-Islamic movie. This was the message of Muslim Brotherhood chief Yussuf Qaradawi. Three days after the anti-American assaults began on the anniversary of the September 11 jihadist attacks on America, Qaradawi gave a sermon on Qatar television, translated by MEMRI.

 

Qaradawi struck a moderate tone. He called on his followers to stop rioting against the US. Rather than attack the US, Qaradawi urged his Muslim audience to insist that the US place prohibitions on the free speech rights of American citizens by outlawing criticism of Islam – just as the Europeans have done in recent years in the face of Islamic terror and intimidation.

 

In his words, “We say to the US: You must take a strong stance and try to confront this extremism like the Europeans do. This [anti-Islamic film] is not art. It has nothing to do with freedom of speech. This is nothing but curses and insults. Does the freedom to curse and insult constitute freedom of speech?”

 

Both the actions of the Egyptian prosecution and Qaradawi’s sermon prove incontrovertibly that the two policies the US has adopted since September 11, 2001, to contend with Muslim hatred for the US have failed. The neoconservative policy of supporting the democratization of Muslim societies adopted by President Barack Obama’s predecessor George W. Bush has failed. And the appeasement policy adopted by Obama has also failed.

 

Bush’s democratization policy claimed that the reason the Muslim world had become a hotbed for anti-Americanism and terror was that the Muslim world was not governed by democratic regimes. Once the peoples of the Muslim world were allowed to be free, and to freely elect their governments, the neoconservatives proclaimed, they would abandon their hatred of America.

 

As a consequence of this belief, when the anti-regime protests against the authoritarian Mubarak regime began in January 2011, the neoconservatives were outspoken supporters of the overthrow of then-president Hosni Mubarak, despite the fact that he had been the US’s key ally in the Arab world for three decades. They supported the political process that brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power. They supported the process despite the fact that Qaradawi is the most influential cleric in Egypt. They supported it despite the fact that just days after Mubarak was ousted from power, Qaradawi arrived at Cairo’s Tahrir Square and before an audience of two million followers, he called for the invasion of Israel and the conquest of Jerusalem.

 

In the event, the Egyptian people voted for Qaradawi’s Muslim Brotherhood and for the Salafi party. The distinction between the two parties is that Qaradawi and the Muslim Brotherhood are willing to resort to both violent and nonviolent ways to dominate the world in the name of Islam. The Salafis abjure nonviolence. So while Qaradawi called for the riots to end in order to convince the Americans to criminalize criticism of Islam, his Salafi counterparts called for the murder of everyone involved in producing the anti-Islamic film.

 

For instance, Salafi cleric Ahmad Fouad Ashoush issued a fatwa on Islamic websites last weekend calling for American and European Muslims to murder those involved with the movie. His religious ruling was translated by the SITE Intelligence Group on Monday.

 

Ashoush wrote, “Those bastards who did this film are belligerent disbelievers. I issue a fatwa and call on the Muslim youth in America and Europe to do this duty, which is to kill the director, the producer and the actors and everyone who helped and promoted the film.

 

“So, hurry, hurry, O Muslim youth in America and Europe, and teach those filthy lowly ones a lesson that all the monkeys and pigs in America and Europe will understand. May Allah guide you and grant you success.”

 

These are the voices of democratic Egypt. The government, which has indicted American citizens on capital charges for exercising their most fundamental right as Americans, is a loyal representative of the sentiments of the Egyptian people who freely elected it. The Salafi preacher is a loyal representative of the segment of the Egyptian people that made the Salafi party the second largest in the Egyptian parliament. Qaradawi’s call for the abolition of freedom of speech in America – as has happened in Europe – and to ban all criticism of Islam is subscribed to by millions and millions of Muslims worldwide who consider him one of the leading Sunni clerics in the world.

 

Free elections in Egypt have empowered the Egyptian people to use the organs of governance to advance their hatred of America. Their hatred has been empowered, and legitimized, not diminished as the neoconservatives had hoped.

 

The behavior of the Egyptian government, Qaradawi and the Salafis also makes clear that Obama’s policy of appeasing the Muslim world has failed completely. Whereas Bush believed the source of Muslim hatred was their political oppression at the hands of their regimes, Obama has blamed their rage and hatred on America’s supposed misdeeds.

 

By changing the way America treats the Muslim world, Obama believes he can end their hatred of America. To this end, he has reached out to the most anti-American forces and regimes in the region and spurned pro-American regimes and political forces.

 

When Obama’s policies are recognized as driven by appeasement, the seeming inconsistency of his war against Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi on the one hand, and his passivity in the face of the anti-regime uprising in Iran in 2009 and the Syrian uprising against the Assad regime today makes sense. Gaddafi was not a threat to the US, so he was unworthy of protection. The mullahs in Iran and Assad are foes of the US. So they deserve protection. Obama has assiduously courted the Muslim Brotherhood from the outset of his presidency.

 

The official and unofficial Egyptian exploitation of the Internet film as a means to intimidate and attack the US into disavowing its core principles is proof that Obama’s theory of the source of Muslim rage is wrong. They do not hate America because of what the US government does. They hate America because of what America is. And it is because of this that since September 11, the rationale for Obama’s foreign policy has disintegrated.

 

Rather than accept this basic truth and defend the American way of life, Obama has doubled down in the only way now available to him. He, his administration, his campaign and his supporters in the media have responded to the collapse of the foundations of his foreign policy by resorting to the sort of actions they accused George W. Bush, his administration and supporters of taking. They have responded with a campaign of political oppression and nativist bigotry directed against their political opponents.

 

Late last Friday night, law enforcement officers descended on the California home of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the man who made the film that the Muslims of the newly free Arab lands find so offensive. Nakoula was questioned by federal authorities and later released. His arrest was photographed. The image of a dozen officers arresting an unarmed man for making a movie was broadcast worldwide within moments.

 

Beyond persecuting an independent filmmaker, the White House requested that YouTube block access to it. YouTube – owned by Google – has so far rejected the White House’s request.

 

The Obama administration’s abetment of bigoted nativism to silence criticism of its substantively indefensible foreign policy was on prominent display last Sunday. Obama’s campaign endorsed an anti-Semitic screed published by New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd.

 

In her column, titled, “Neocons slither back,” Dowd wrote that Republican Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are mere puppets controlled by “neocon puppet master, Dan Senor.”

 

Neocon is a popular code for Jewish. It was so identified by Dowd’s Times’ colleague David Brooks several years ago.

 

Dowd said that “the neocons captured” Bush after the September 11 attacks and “Now, amid contagious Arab rage sparked on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, they have captured another would-be Republican president and vice president, both jejeune about the world.”

 

One telling aspect of Dowd’s assault on Senor as a neoconservative is that he and his boss in the Bush administration, Paul Bremer, were the nemeses of the neoconservatives at the Pentagon. The only thing Senor has in common with the likes of Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith is that all three men are Jews.

 

Moreover, Dowd drew a distinction between supposed “neocons” like Senor, and non-Jewish US leaders Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney who merely “abetted” the neocons.

 

So Senor doesn’t share the same ideological worldview as Feith and Wolfowitz but he’s a neocon. And Cheney and Rumsfeld do share the same worldview as Feith and Wolfowitz. And they are not neocons.

 

The Times’ public editor Andrew Rosenthal dismissed claims that Dowd’s column was anti- Semitic, arguing it couldn’t be since she never said a word about Jews.

 

The Obama campaign linked to Dowd’s column on its Twitter account with the message, “Why Romney and Ryan’s foreign policy sounds ‘ominously familiar.'” Obama’s campaign’s willingness to direct the public to anti-Semitic screeds against his political opponents is consistent with the administration’s general strategy for defending policies. That strategy involves responding to criticism not with substantive defense of his policies, but with ad hominem attacks against his critics.

 

His failed economic policies’ critics are attacked as “Wall Street fat cats.” His failed foreign policies’ critics are demonized as ominous neocon puppet masters.

 

There is a difference between appeasing parties that have been harmed by your actions and appeasing parties that wish your destruction. In the 1970s the US appeased the Philippines by transferring sovereignty over the Clark Air Force Base to the Philippine government. America was still America and the US and the Philippines became friends.

 

To appease a party that hates your way of life, you must change your way of life. The only way America can appease the Muslim world is for America to cease to be America.

 

Originally published in The Jerusalem Post.

_________________________

© 2012 Caroline Glick

 

About Caroline Glick