Something Else To Fret About: ISIS Mounting Dirty Bombs On Drones


You should be wondering the same thing that National Security and Homeland Security experts are taking seriously.

 

JRH 9/9/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Something Else To Fret About: ISIS Mounting Dirty Bombs On Drones

 

Drone Over City

 

By Tim Johnson from Special to McClatchy Washington Bureau

September 8, 2017

In Homeland Security

 

Here’s a fear that keeps counter-terrorism officials up at night: Extremists might use drones to drop dirty bombs or poison on Western cities.

 

It could just be a matter of time before Islamic State fighters take drone usage from the battlefield in Syria and Iraq to urban areas of the West, security officials say.

 

“I understand that an openly available drone, such as a quadcopter, which is able to hold a camera, can drop some dirty explosive device,” Friedrich Grommes, Germany’s top international terrorism official, told McClatchy on the sidelines of a national security forum.

 

“Even if only a few people are affected, it serves completely the idea of terrorism,” Grommes added. The payload would be “something which is poisonous. It could be a chemical or whatever is commercially available.”

 

Concerns about such tactics grew after Australian federal police said on Aug. 3 that they had disrupted an Islamic State plot to build an “improvised chemical dispersion device” that terrorists sought to deploy in urban areas. Plotters aimed to spread hydrogen sulfide, a poisonous gas.

 

Such a flying dirty bomb could be attached to a drone and used in Europe or North America, counter-terrorism officials said.

 

“That technology hasn’t quite crossed the Atlantic. It actually hasn’t left the battlefield,” said Chris Rousseau, director of Canada’s Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre, based in Ottawa.

 

Rousseau and other counter-terror experts spoke at the two-day Intelligence & National Security Summit 2017 in Washington.

 

After the panel, Rousseau spoke further about a drone carrying a terrorist weapon: “The question is at what point somebody’s going to get the idea to use that here.”

 

Extremists may not have the knowhow to manufacture deadly nerve or chemical agents, choosing simpler chemical components and combining them with an explosive, Grommes said.

 

“They will refrain from developing the complex chemical or biological attacks because they want to have the sudden spectacular blast,” said Grommes, who heads a directorate focused on international terrorism at Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service, known as the BND.

 

Counter-terrorism officials, speaking about other facets of the war on terrorism, said nations must not get complacent about a possible strengthening of al-Qaida, the extremist faction that launched the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, eventually retreating from Afghanistan to the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa amid sustained U.S.-led military pressure. The group has been overshadowed by the Islamic State.

 

In a reversal of al-Qaida’s earlier tactics, Sheikh Hamza bin Laden, son of the deceased al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, called in May for the group’s followers to embrace the kinds of “lone wolf attacks” used by Islamic State, its bitter rival, in which jihadists execute terror operations acting largely on their own and without direction.

 

Experts said the latest crop of terror attacks in Europe were largely carried out by men afflicted by anger more than driven by religious fanaticism.

 

Khalid Masood, a 52-year-old Briton who plowed a car into pedestrians on London’s Westminster Bridge on March 22, killing five people and injuring 50, left behind writings with “almost no real ideological content,” said Paddy McGuinness, Britain’s deputy national security adviser for intelligence, security and resilience.

 

Attackers find an outlet for rage in radical interpretations of Islam, McGuinness said.

 

“They are looking for something and they stick a sticker on it and they find their justification,” McGuinness said. “Their grip on their religion is so superficial as to be less than what you’d get by watching a television documentary.”

 

Rousseau, the Canadian official, echoed that belief.

 

“Religious ideology is very much the excuse,” Rousseau said, noting that little differentiates the anger of white supremacists and Islamic radicals.

 

McGuinness called on Britain’s allies to do more to remove radical Islamic content from the internet, where he said it becomes an echo chamber for radicals.

 

“People can radicalize very, very quickly,” McGuinness said. Just as some countries bar pedophiles from putting content on line, he said Western countries need to fight the presence of extremists online, “not allow them to be there.”

_______________

(c) 2017 McClatchy Washington Bureau

Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau at www.mcclatchydc.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

InHomelandSecurity.com is brought to you by American Military University | Online Degrees for Homeland Security Professionals

 

ABOUT THE BLOG

 

InHomelandSecurity.com is a top online resource for breaking homeland security news and analysis, brought to you by American Military University. InHomelandSecurity.com is maintained by a network of field experts who cover topics dealing with terrorism research, emergency preparedness, disaster response, border security, transportation and logistics, military intelligence, law enforcement, cybersecurity, and national security.

 

Check back daily for detailed analysis on breaking homeland security news from around the world.

 

Follow us on Twitter or Facebook for breaking news analysis or to discuss critical homeland security topics. Please join the conversation and provide your feedback.

 

Contribute to InHomelandSecurity.com

 

We are always looking for guest contributions from professionals, experts in the field, and guest writers. If you are interested in becoming a contributor or submitting a guest post, you can learn more about the contribution process by visiting our Terms of Use page.

 

Permitted Usage of Our Information

 

You are welcome to use, for any lawful purpose, the information that is posted to this site, provided that you link to and attribute InHomelandSecurity.com and the author of the content. Any 3rd-party material linked to or referenced on this site is subject to the rights of the owners of that material.

 

InHomelandSecurity.com is sponsored by American Military University. American Military University (AMU) is READ THE REST

 

Terrorism and COGITO


cogito

John R. Houk

© January 29, 2017

Rachel Ehrenfeld writes about the extreme vetting process that President Trump could use to quickly detect if a person has terrorist designs against the United States. Ehrenfeld has an idea based on some technology created in Israel yet commissioned by the United States Department of Homeland Security.

Check out this quote from Ehrenfeld on the technology:

An effective way to find out the applicant’s intentions would be screening through an efficient, unbiased, and non-intrusive system.  Such a system was developed by an Israeli company with a grant from the Department of Homeland Security, which the Obama administration refused to utilize.

 

The Suspect Detection System (SDS) has developed counter-terrorist and insider threat detection technology named COGITO.  This technology enables law enforcement agencies to rapidly investigate U.S. visa applicants (and other travelers) entering the country, insider threats among employees, etc.

 

COGITO technology is an automated interrogation system that can determine in 5-7 minutes if an individual is harboring hostile intent.  The system interviews the examinee with up to 36 questions while measuring the psychophysical signals of the human body.  The system has 95% accuracy and has helped security agencies globally to catch terrorists and solve crimes.

I did a little looking into this COGITO technology. My impression is the concept was initially developed for companies to use to vet their new employees with something more efficiency than a lengthy lie detector test. Evidently the COGITO technology can be streamlined for many psych detection purposes including terrorism.

In the process of investigating “COGITO” I discovered it is not an acronym for some scientific gizmo, rather it is an actual word. Here is an interesting definition for “cogito”:

1: the philosophical principle that one’s existence is demonstrated by the fact that one thinks

2: the intellectual processes of the self or ego

Origin and Etymology of cogito

New Latin cogito, ergo sum, literally, I think, therefore I am, principle stated by René Descartes
First Known Use: 1838 (Definition of cogito; Merriam-Webster)

Apparently SDS technology has taken a philosophical and retrofitted it to a psychological examination of discovering – so-to-speak – who a person is.

Here is the short version of the SDS COGITO technology that can be employed:

Suspect Detection Systems Inc.’s Cogito Data Center (Cogito DC) is a central knowledgebase and control server that serves as a complete analytical back office to the Cogito Rapid Interrogation System. Cogito DC will enable SDS customers to create a central storage base of all examinee data. The interrogation system collects an vast amount of data with each examination beginning with a scan of the examinees passport or identification card. The system then scans unique biometric identification information including fingerprint and iris (eye) imaging, and voice signature. The Cogito DC knowledgebase then aggregates and analyzes the interrogation results of all examinees. The system compares test results of potential suspects from common backgrounds, which then enables interrogators to perform intelligence analysis over the entire scope of collected metadata. (Cogito Data Center; SUSPECT DETECTION SYSTEMS INC.)

And here is an excerpt from the longer version of the technology behind COGITO:

General

The COGITO system is a technology-based concept and solution for the detection of suspects harboring malicious intent serves for detection of “Internal Threat” (employees of governmental agencies and enterprises that have destructive intents), Police interrogations and border security. The COGITO concept is derived from extensive interdisciplinary know-how in security, polygraph testing and field-proven security-related interrogation techniques.

The COGITO core technology is based on proprietary software – an “expert system” that emulates an investigator’s Modus Operandi by incorporating “soft decision-making” algorithms such as “Neural Networks” and “Fuzzy Logic”. All hardware elements are best-of-breed off-the-shelf third-party components. The technical solution is comprised of a front-end, the ‘Test Station’, and a back-office where multiple-station and multiple-site data is stored, managed and distributed.

COGITO presents a significant conceptual breakthrough that can assist international aviation and homeland security authorities in responding to increasingly sophisticated means of international terrorism. This concept is based on several well-established paradigms and assumptions.

Intent vs. Means

The COGITO concept focuses on detecting terrorist (malicious) intent as opposed to detecting the means (i.e. explosives or weapons). The value of detecting intent is based on several well-founded and proven assumptions. As proven in the 9/11 and many other terrorist attacks when entering a country, terrorists will not necessarily carry weapons or devices on their person. This has been well demonstrated in several international terror attacks. Moreover, terrorists with intent of perpetrating a chemical, biological or atomic terrorist attack are all the more not likely to carry such devices on their person while entering the United States through an official checkpoint or border crossing.

Stimulated Psycho Physical Reaction (SPPR)

The COGITO method is based on stimulating examinees with specific terrorism-related triggers using a “direct contact, interaction, conscious, portal” approach:

The COGITO method postulates that specific words or questions can force terrorist to generate a SPPR that is identifiably different than that of a non-terrorist’s SPPR to the same words or questions. Based on extensive field experience accumulated by Israeli security agencies, the only common characteristic to all suicide bombers and “effective terrorists” is their desire not to be caught by security authorities. The terrorist’s fundamental motivation to successfully perform the terrorist act and not be caught by security authorities clearly differentiates him from the innocent person not harboring such intent. This identifiable motivation is known as the “terrorist hunting–hunted syndrome” (THHS). In order to identify and isolate the terrorist, one needs to READ THE REST ([COGITO] TECHNOLOGY; Suspect Detection Systems: Human Psychophysiology Behavour Analysis)

On a personal level and at least a palpable negative argument for this rather quick vetting process, I think this is something President Trump should seriously take a look at! ESPECIALLY since President Barack Hussein Obama rejected this technology as a foreign immigrant vetting process.

Now for the Rachel Ehrenfeld article.

JRH 1/29/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Protecting America from ill-intended refugees

 

By Rachel Ehrenfeld @ American Thinker

January 28th, 2017 2:17PM

American Center for Democracy (ACD)

This is an updated version of the article on American ThinkerProtecting America from ill-intended refugees – 

President Donald Trump’s executive order on “Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals,” has been met, as anticipated, with alarm by opponents at home and abroad. Some resent the new American president and his actions to protect the country, as he promised to do. Others, like the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliated Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), protest the suspension of U.S. visas to Muslim refugees and travelers from the radical -Islamic-terrorist prone countries Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia.

His executive order proclaims (emphasis added): “The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism. In order to protect Americans, we must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes towards our country and its founding principles. Section 2 of the active order states that the policy of the U.S. is “(a) protect our citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States; and (b) prevent the admission of foreign nationals who intend to exploit United States immigration laws for malevolent purposes.”

To prevent such individuals from entering the U.S., the executive order requests the development of a uniform screening program, which in fact would reinforce requirements that have been deliberately ignored by the Obama administration.

However, radical-Islamic terrorists are not limited to the countries list by the EO. There are unknown numbers of ISIS volunteers who returned to Europe and other Western nations, which the new EO exempts. But even if the screening is done by the book, and all necessary documentation has been obtained and verified, and the applicant declares he holds no ill intentions toward America and Americans, nothing available to the screeners today would easily reveal that he or she is lying.

An effective way to find out the applicant’s intentions would be screening through an efficient, unbiased, and non-intrusive system.  Such a system was developed by an Israeli company with a grant from the Department of Homeland Security, which the Obama administration refused to utilize.

The Suspect Detection System (SDS) has developed counter-terrorist and insider threat detection technology named COGITO.  This technology enables law enforcement agencies to rapidly investigate U.S. visa applicants (and other travelers) entering the country, insider threats among employees, etc.

COGITO technology is an automated interrogation system that can determine in 5-7 minutes if an individual is harboring hostile intent.  The system interviews the examinee with up to 36 questions while measuring the psychophysical signals of the human body.  The system has 95% accuracy and has helped security agencies globally to catch terrorists and solve crimes.

According to the company’s website, the SDS allows the screening of a large number of people in a short time. It “does not require operator training. One operator can handle simultaneously ten stations.  It has a central management and database system that allows storing all tests results, analysis, and data mining, and is deployed and integrated with governmental agencies.”  Using this system would eliminate the need to use often biased U.S. Consulate employees.  Moreover, the SDS uses an automated decision-making system, which is “adaptable to a variety of different questioning contexts, different cultures, and languages. The examination lasts 5 minutes when there are no indications of harmful intent, and 7 minutes to ascertain it (with only 4% false positive, and 10% false negative).”

The COGITO is used in 15 countries including Israel, Singapore, China, India, and Mexico.  U.S. airlines operating in Latin America are using COGITO to check their employees.

But last year DHS refused to use the SDS, claiming that it “would constitute an intrusion on the privacy of those screened by the system” and “[i]t may reflect on VISA applicants or Immigrant’s civil rights.”  However, foreigners applying for a U.S. visa are not protected by American laws.

SDS capability to detect intent seems to fit President Trump’s promise of “extreme vetting” of Muslim refugees from high-risk regions.  This and other similarly objective systems would not only assist in making America safer but also be in keeping its policy and tradition of accepting refugees who do not wish us harm.

~~~

*This is an updated version of the article on American ThinkerProtecting America from ill-intended refugees

____________________

Terrorism and COGITO

John R. Houk

© January 29, 2017

_________________

Protecting America from ill-intended refugees

 

Copyright © 2013 | The American Center for Democracy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.

 

Support the ACD

 

About ACD

 

OUR MISSION

 

The ACD is dedicated to exposing threats to our free speech rights, political and economic freedoms and national security.

 

ACD is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. All contributions are tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.

 

OUR DISTINCTION

 

ACD fills an important gap created by inadequate risk assessments of our cyberspace, GPS & UTC. We use our Threatcon programs, our multidimensional Terrorist Finance Network Tracker (TFNT), and our experts to better inform government, public and private sectors’ policy makers.

 

CONNECTING THE DOTS

 

  • ACD’s synergistic approach to connect the dots on emerging threats is facilitated by extensive multidisciplinary global research in various languages. We publish our knowledge-based analysis and use the information to offer special tools to help prevent and mitigate such threats.

 

  • ACD’s Threatcon, offersindividually tailored programs of briefing and scenario gaming to encourage government, public and private sectors to cooperate in preventing and mitigating the risks to our political and economic freedoms and to our national security.

 

  • ACD’s Terrorist Finance Network Tracker (TFNT), a unique anti money laundering (AML) system, is using a multidimensional approach to build and regularly update a comprehensive database identifying operational and financial networks of transnational radical Islamic groups.

 

“Lean and agile, ACD/EWI is always ahead of the next threat: cyber attacks, market manipulation , the use of legal structures to inhibit free speech and stifle debate”- Richard Perle, former Assistant Secretary of Defense

 

OUR IMPACT

 

ACD Initiatives: READ THE REST

 

President-Elect Trump — Where He Stands on Radical Islam


trump-promise-2-protect-all-americans-from-rad-islam

After I got over the fact my GOP fav for President in Ted Cruz lost to now President-Elect Trump, I decided to find out what I could like about him. There are actually stands I am comfortable with, but this one gravitates toward the top of the list. That is to at least recognize the radical elements of Islam are not compatible to our Constitution and our American values. Trump’s thoughts on Islam hence includes vetting Muslim immigrants or Muslim refugees that might intend to come to America for nefarious reasons.

 

On a Christian level, I am quite displeased that Islamic sacred writings single out Jews and Christians as people to force submission to Islam or die as well as completely denying the central tenet that makes one a Christian; viz., denying that Jesus is the Son of God, Crucified to death and arose to life from death and ascended to sit at the right hand of the Father. In Islam that belief is blasphemous worthy of death.

 

JRH 11/10/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

President-Elect Trump — Where He Stands on Radical Islam

Policies to watch once Trump has a perspective from the Oval Office: opposition to the nuclear pact with Iran and not arming Syrian rebels.

 

By CLARION PROJECT STAFF

November 9, 2016

The Clarion Project

 

trump-acceptance-speech-pence-left-baron-trump-right

President-elect Donald Trump accepts the presidency after receiving a call from Clinton who conceded the election. (Photo: video screenshot)

 

Donald Trump, president elect of the United States, spoke out on the campaign trail against radical Islam. Trump opposed the Obama administration’s pressure on former Egyptian president and U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak to resign. That resignation paved the way for the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood across the Middle East. Expect President Trump to support anti-Islamist regimes in the Arab world and those individuals in America.

 

Trump has also said he would shut down extremist mosques in America, which would be a welcome policy to stop radicalization of America’s Muslims. He will need an expert team of legal experts to accomplish that goal since opposnents [sic] will argue that the line between freedom of speech and religion and incitement to violence is razor thin.

 

Policies to watch once Trump has a perspective from the Oval Office will be his stated opposition to the nuclear agreement with Iran and his opposition to regime change and arming the rebels in Syria.

 

Below is the platform that Tump [sic] campaigned on:

 

Domestic Islamists

 

 

  • Would revoke the passports of Americans who travel abroad to join the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL). Initially advocated a temporary ban on all Muslim immigration and has since scaled it back to only Muslim countries with major terrorist activity. In his national security speech in June, he proposed using ideological vetting such as support for extremist beliefs or links to extremist groups (not necessarily terrorists) in deciding who gets to enter the U.S. He cited polls showing high levels of support for Sharia governance in countries like Afghanistan.

 

Egypt & the Muslim Brotherhood

 

  • Opposed the Obama Administration’s pressure on Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to give up power.

 

 

Intelligence

 

  • Supports enhanced interrogation of terror suspects (considered torture by critics).

 

Iran

 

 

  • Thanked by the wife of an American pastor imprisoned in Iran for bringing attention to his captivity.

 

  • Endorsed airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear program in 2007.

 

ISIS, Iraq & Syria

 

  • Only candidate to support Russia’s military intervention in Syria against rebels fighting ISIS, as well as ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

 

  • Opposes involvement in the civil war and arming rebels.

 

  • Opposes a policy of regime change towards the Assad dictatorship.

 

  • “I say that you can defeat ISIS by taking their wealth. Take back the oil. Once you go over and take back that oil, they have nothing. You bomb the hell out of them, and then you encircle it, and then you go in. And you let Mobil go in, and you let our great oil companies go in. Once you take that oil, they have nothing left.”

 

  • “I would hit [ISIS] so hard. I would find you a proper general, I would find the Patton or MacArthur. I would hit them so hard your head would spin.”

 

  • S. should not get involved in Syria by supporting the rebels or launching airstrikes in retaliation for the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons.

 

  • Opposed the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

 

  • Opposed the invasion of Iraq and any policy aimed at removing Saddam Hussein from power.

 

  • S. should take Iraq’s oil and reimburse the countries who were involved in the 2003 invasion and give $1 million to the family of every U.S. soldier who died in Iraq.

 

Libya

 

  • Would only support military action in Libya against the Muammar Gaddafi leadership if the U.S. gets to take the country’s oil.

 

Gulf States

 

  • Would force Saudi Arabia and other countries to pay for the U.S. military presence that protects them.

 

Military Spending

 

  • Would increase military spending to foster deterrence.

 

________________

Copyright © 2016 Clarion Project, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

ABOUT CLARION PROJECT

 

There are times that require people to step out of their comfort zone, to step up for justice, tolerance and moderation. We know going in that the repercussions of taking action will draw a rain of accusations and attacks from the forces we are confronting. 

 

We do it anyway. We do it because it must be done.

 

Founded in 2006, Clarion Project (formerly Clarion Fund Inc) is an independently funded, non-profit organization dedicated to exposing the dangers of Islamist extremism while providing a platform for the voices of moderation and promoting grassroots activism.

 

Clarion’s award-winning movies have been seen by over 50 million people. They grapple with issues such as religious persecution, human rights, women’s rights, the dangers of a nuclear Iran and what the concept of jihad means for the West. Our dynamic READ THE REST

 

Ryan Mauro – National Security Analyst for the Clarion Project

 

Professor Ryan Mauro is the National Security Analyst for the Clarion Project, a nonprofit organization that educates the public about the threat of Islamic extremism and provides a platform for voices of moderation and tolerance within the Muslim community. Clarion Project films have been seen by over 50 million people.

 

Mauro is a frequent contributor to Clarion’s dynamic website ClarionProject.org, providing insightful analysis of the latest news around the global on this subject. The site is viewed by over 250,000 visitors per month.

 

 

He is also a consultant to various government agencies, political campaigns and policy-makers and a professor of homeland security, counter-terrorism and political science.

 

Mauro has made over 1,000 appearances on international radio and TV programs from both the left of the right, including READ THE REST

Trump the same as a Dem Administration?


Emphatically NO!

donald-trump-america-first 

John R. Houk

© October 12, 2016

 

Sifu is a Google+ comment contributor that usually makes a reasonable stand when he disagrees with me rather than a hysterical ad hominem attack. I appreciated that. Even though I do disagree.

 

These comments are between Sifu and I relating to the post “Trump vs. Crooked Hillary – Conservative vs. Leftist”. Sifu’s thoughts are in normal text and mine are in bold text as well as being indented.

 

JRH 10/12/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

Sifu Mode

22 hours ago

 

+John Houk He supports massive growth of government. That is his vision of “great”. How is that so different than Obama? Maybe he won’t be as weak. Maybe he will be rabidly nationalist. How are those necessarily good? Putin isn’t weak. Doesn’t make him good. Hitler was nationalist. Didn’t make him good. His goals are still very much in alignment with the liberals. Look at his recent history of support publicly and financially for Hillary and others on the left.

 

Hmm… I don’t see any massive growth of government EXCEPT in terms of an efficient military and National Security. In terms of National Debt and Gross Domestic Production I see government decrease. Obama is a globalist tending toward ending National Sovereignty – Crooked Hillary too. Is Trump a rabid Nationalist? NO, he is an America First Nationalist. Trump admires Putin’s leadership skills NOT his Russian imperialistic agenda. Trump is not Hitler! Hitler wanted a Socialist Despotic Aryan German Empire where nations were subservient and Jews dead. Trump wants to keep America good without Multiculturalist globalism destroying American exceptionalism. Trump’s goals are VERY MUCH unaligned with the American Left that supports the globalism of NAFTA and TPP! Trump supported the Clintons when it would benefit his business. He paid to get Clintons to play. The play benefited Clintons financially while charging for government favors. It is legal to donate. It is illegal to play for pay in government. It’s called corruption.

Those qualities can be good or bad. It depends on the underlying principles they are used to accomplish. Trump’s only consistent principle is to HIS PERSONAL DESIRES; see his history of the use of eminent domain. His ego and selfishness do nothing to inspire hope that those qualities would be used for good.

 

Trump worked within the law. Bill and Hillary worked outside the law and used power to become Teflon so no charges were filed. By the way Trump lost his imminent domain case and complied. Bill and Hillary LIED and people have died and American foreign policy has is in full disarray. Trump’s business is just fine.



Trump apolitical? That’s laughable. He is not PC, but that does NOT mean apolitical. He is VERY well versed in navigating politics and manipulating people to get what he wants. He is a very political personality; he simply hasn’t held office before.

 

Hmm … I believe history proves that wrong Sifu. You yourself mentioned how he has donating money to Dems. He also donating money to Republicans. The donations demonstrate advancing his business goals and profiting his investors. That’s not politics, that’s solid business in the realm of profit and loss. In America we call that Capitalism. Capitalism has made America wealthy enough that foreigners who hate us want to dip into that wealth by hook or by crook (mostly crook). Donald Trump at worst is a business personality and not a power-grabbing-monger like the Clinton clan.

 

Hillary’s Foolish Policies Carry Deadly Consequences


crooked-hillary-refuses-naming-boko-haram-terrorists

islamic-terrorist-orgs-toon

Justin Smith connects the actions of then Secretary of State (Crooked) Hillary Clinton to some of the worst decisions affecting American National Security. Most nefarious for me are links to the Islamic Terrorists Muslim Brotherhood and Boko Haram.

 

JRH 10/3/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Hillary’s Foolish Policies Carry Deadly Consequences

Keep Fools Out of National Security

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 10/1/2016 1:30 PM

 

” … a little folly outweighs wisdom and honor. The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Even when fools walk along the way, they lack wisdom and show everyone that they are fools.” Ecclesiastes 10:1-3

 

Hillary Clinton does not inspire confidence in most Americans, when she speaks of combating terrorism, the likes of which the American people recently witnessed over the past few weeks in Minnesota, New Jersey and New York, that left dozens of people seriously wounded. Her policies will be a continuation of the same weak, ineffectual, ineffective, cowardly, idiotic and treasonous policies of Obama and his band of Leftist fools, who have created this environment that is amenable to terrorism. And despite her assurances that she has a “comprehensive plan” to combat terrorism, she offers only a mirage and everything else other than a genuine and concerted effort to defeat the Islamic jihadi terrorists that now freely roam the streets of America.

 

On a daily basis, Hillary makes it quite clear that she cares more about Muslims’ sensitivities than American lives, especially when she remarks (last November): “Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”

 

Shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 17th and 18th, White House press secretary Josh Earnest declared, “We are in a narrative battle … We can’t play into this narrative that somehow the United States is fighting Islam.”

 

Then who are all these terrorists screaming “Allahu Akbar” as they detonate bombs in Boston and New York — who have tortured, raped, imprisoned, murdered and burned alive millions of victims worldwide?

 

The enemy is Islam and devout Muslims following the violent ideology that is central to Islam, mandated by their “prophet” Mohammed, which is a supremacist ideology of permanent conflict and conquest that denies the legitimacy of any other belief system. Exponents of this ideology are Islamic states such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, groups like the Islamic State and Al Qaeda and self-starting Islamofascist terror cells found in any country with a sizable Muslim immigrant population, including America.

 

Why should America keep flirting with death by terrorism by keep our doors open to Muslims?!?? So many have hidden within our society as “peaceful and tolerant” Muslims, until they committed their heinous acts of terror against our homeland.

 

There exists more than enough Muslims in America, Europe and the Middle East, who adhere to the violent commands of Mohammed in the Koran and the Hadith (Verses of the Sword), clamoring for the destruction of the United States to warrant an immediate ban on all Muslim immigration. Now that we also witness an increasing number of second and third generation U.S. Muslims and Muslim immigrants with permanent residence visas mounting attacks against America, our counter-terrorism experts in the FBI and intelligence groups must have their hands untied to go after the Islamic mosque leaders who preach hatred of the Western world and America.

 

Americans could never expect this sort of strong action from the Obama administration — the administration that ordered a cleansing of training materials and law enforcement manuals that were deemed offensive in 2011 by the Islamic Society of North America and the Council on American Islamic Relations. This is treasonous, once one understands the large number of terrorist ties found within these groups. Hillary, who was part of Obama’s policy failure that allowed the growth of Islamic terrorist groups globally, is highly unlikely to diverge too far from this idiotic and treasonous path.

 

One should also note that Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, supported the terrorist organization of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the Middle East and the United States; she refused to designate Boko Haram as a foreign terror organization, which allowed it time to become entrenched in Nigeria and expand, murdering over 20,000 people and displacing two million. She is also in agreement with Obama’s feckless and foolish Iran Nuclear Deal, which simply guarantees that Iran will become a dangerous and nuclear armed foe in the Middle East.

 

Eroding confidence in this administration even further, one must wonder if a Hillary Clinton progressive Secretary of Homeland Security will perform any better than Jeh Johnson. It recently came to light in the aftermath of the September attacks, that 858 illegal aliens from “special interest countries”, known to commit immigration fraud and export terrorism, were “mistakenly” given U.S. citizenship. Discrepancies between their names and birth dates weren’t caught because their fingerprints were missing from the DHS database, according to an internal audit released on September 19th.

 

Hillary will have many of this same band of Leftist fools in her administration, who promised a “robust” vetting of all immigrants. Their miserable failures to date demand their replacement with real security experts, capable of protecting America, and Heaven forbid we offend the sensibilities of Muslims, while Americans lie dying in our streets by their hands.

 

The Washington Times (David Boyer) quoted Donald Trump on the series of terrorist attacks: (These attacks) “should be a wake-up call for every American … The safety and security of the homeland must be the overriding objective of our leaders when it comes to our immigration policy … that’s why I’ve proposed extreme vetting for immigrants from troubled parts of the world where terrorists live and train, and (I) oppose Hillary Clinton’s 550 percent increase in the number of refugees from the conflict in Syria.”

 

According to David Inserra, a homeland security specialist at the Heritage Foundation, before the September 17th attacks, the United States was the target of eighty-nine Islamofascist terror plots and attacks since 9/11 and twenty-five since January of 2015.

 

Whether here in America or abroad, every U.S. administration from this day forward must have leaders willing to defeat Islamic terrorism by hunting down the terrorists and killing them, wherever we find them. Any presidential candidate unwilling to vigorously advance this policy does not belong in the White House: Terror can only be broken by terror.

 

America cannot trust Hillary Clinton, who lacks noble courage and knowledge, to protect our freedom and our people against the tyranny of Islam, or any enemy, with the world drowning in chaos due to her policies as Secretary of State. She still proposes to flood America with Muslim “refugees”, whose ranks are certain to be filled with Islamic jihadi terrorists sworn to kill Americans in the name of the “prophet” Mohammed. Her progressive passive appeasement of Muslims and her practice of placing her interests and Democratic Party interests over U.S. interests, along with her willingness to lie to the American people — witnessed through her false claims about Benghazi, enabled the Islamic State’s growth and its ability to reach inside the U.S., with ruinous and deadly consequences.

 

And, when the “three o’clock in the morning phone call” came in from Benghazi, Hillary CHOSE to abandon Americans to thirteen hours of combat and their deaths: Hillary Clinton is unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief.

 

By Justin O. Smith

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All source links arbitrarily selected by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Blanketed Truth: How Obama Has Hung Us Out to Dry


Brigitte Gabriel- ACT Prez

The elections are now in full swing in America. The American Left – Dems & MSM – are using every form of deception and character assassination against Donald Trump’s candidacy. The scale of Trump disinformation should remind us of the hell the Dems & MSM perpetrated against Sarah Palin in 2008. As much as the American Left (and sadly Paleocon Never Trumpers) hates Trump, they lie and pooh-pooh their candidate Crooked Hillary. The she-crook should be villainized in the press and be the recipient of at least several indictments for criminal behavior. All these Leftist attacks on Trump have effectively gotten the American voters to forget how Obama is importing tens of thousands of Muslim who have been taught from the cradle to the grave to hate the USA and Jews.

 

This Muslim hatred toward the West has devastated the populace of Europe even while the EU governing elites steeped in Multiculturalism make huge efforts to hide the rapes, hate-crimes and murders perpetrated by these Muslim refugees.

 

Brigitte Gabriel does her best to bring to remembrance the idiotic resettlement of Muslim refugees on American without proper vetting. Incidentally, as far as the election goes, Trump’s stand on Muslim resettlement is one issue that initially propelled Trump to popularity among aware Americans. And by the way, Crooked Hillary plans to continue the influx of tens of thousands of unvetted Muslims that Obama began.

 

JRH 8/23/16

Please Support NCCR

********************

Blanketed Truth: How Obama Has Hung Us Out to Dry

 

By Brigitte Gabriel

Sent by ACT for America

Sent 8/20/2016 6:46 PM

Originally Posted at Townhall

Originally posted Aug 17, 2016 12:01 AM

 

Europe is a war-zone. Its open-door refugee policy has enabled over a million migrants to enter the continent last year, many from Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Europe is amassing the consequences of this disastrous program, as trepidation and pillage intensify in direct result of their refugee populations. On our side President Obama aspires to bring in 10,000 additional refugees next year, and a Hillary Clinton presidency would guarantee 65,000 more right out of the gate.

 
ISIS already loftily announced its infiltration of refugee populations, so your town could be next on the list to harbor an influx of jihadists-in-training. If we continue in the footsteps of European leadership, our country will surely be second in line to becoming the next hot-spot for terror operations.

The process of resettling refugees is a strategic one, sneakily coordinated between the UN and the State Department. Essentially, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees chooses most of the incomers, and it is under the influence of a powerful Muslim group called the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. This means that U.S.-bound refugees are coming from countries with large numbers of people who hate us, such as Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.

Once the refugees are selected, the State Department distributes them to nine major federal contractors: Church World Service, Ethiopian Community Development Council, Episcopal Migration Ministries, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, International Rescue Committee, U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, and the World Relief Corporation. Six of these contractors are religious charities, and often play on emotion to guilt their pious volunteers into advancing their agenda. They also receive compensation for each entrant they resettle, an incentive to further romanticize resettlement programs and aggrandize “compassionate refugees” to the degree of exaltation.

Once the refugees are brought in, they are dispersed to 190 cities and towns at the jurisdiction of 350 sub-contractors. After six months, these sub-contractors submit paperwork to import the relatives of the original refugee and the whole cycle repeats itself. This program has cost the U.S. Treasury upwards of one billion dollars, not including the welfare, healthcare, and other benefits that are provided to the immigrants upon arrival. To this day, over 100,000 Somalis and 100,000 Iraqis have been resettled, with 10,000 more in the pipeline, and taxpayers like you are footing the bill.

Ushering in thousands of migrants each year has begun to take its toll on American cities. Infiltrating these communities with hordes of third-world aliens has presented a multitude of threats that extend far beyond terrorism itself. Since a lot of migrant resettlement flies under the radar, many towns are ill prepared to assimilate the surprise guests. School systems don’t have the staff to accommodate non-English speaking students, and subsidized housing languishes beneath the weight of increasing demand.

Numbers also reflect that refugee children receive more welfare benefits than poverty-stricken American children. Not to mention, unemployment rates skyrocket, thus resulting in crippled economies and surging crime rates.

These crime rates do not exclude the climbing rape and harassment offenses, especially among female victims. Multiple occurrences in several states have been recorded: Massachusetts, Idaho, Virginia, Utah, California, North Dakota and Minnesota. All have one common theme: the perpetrators were of refugee status.

This is the pattern of disrespect Muslim immigrants display towards our women, children, and Western values.

Refugee cities have also become hubs for foreign illnesses that were once well controlled. Local health departments are experiencing an increase in communicable diseases and disorders from these populations. Cases of highly infectious bacterial diseases like active Tuberculosis have been mushrooming all across the states as recorded:

Colorado: 16 cases, Ohio: 11 cases, Vermont: 35 cases, Wisconsin: 117 cases, Florida: 11 cases, Idaho: 7 cases, Indiana: 4 cases, Kentucky: 9 cases, and North Dakota: 4 cases.

Remember, these cases will swell beyond a few isolated incidents. 22 percent of resettled refugees in the state of Minnesota alone test positive for latent Tuberculosis. It is clear this contagion is festering and uncontained.

Toxic refugee programs are more than a mere side effect, they are the virus itself. The government has concocted a lethal epidemic, and we are enabling its injection directly into America’s bloodstream.

This administration is trying to detract from the unpleasant realities of mass Muslim immigration, and the president and his cronies seem delighted to distort the facts and further propagate their embarrassing slander. It is by far the most sinister cover-up of our time. Thankfully, as a democracy, we are able to exercise our right to determine America’s fate.

ACT for America’s, the nation’s largest national security organization has launched the “Refugee Resettlement Working Group”, where concerned citizens can join and help protect our nation by addressing a dangerously broken U.S. refugee program. Pockets of refugees are being haphazardly tossed into our communities without adequate screening or assimilation efforts. We will reform this process, and dedicate ourselves to resolve these issues in our local communities. It all starts with you. Join us.

For Freedom,

ACT for America
actforamerica.org
___________________

Copyright © 2016 ACT for America, All rights reserved.

 

Our mailing address is:

ACT for America

869 Lynnhaven PKWY

Ste. 113 #411

Virginia Beach, VA 23452

 

Donate to ACT for America

 

About ACT

 

About Brigitte Gabriel

_________________

Townhall.com is the leading source for conservative news and political commentary and analysis.


Copyright © Townhall.com. All Rights Reserved.

Renditions of Trump’s ‘The Vicious Snake’


Trump & Vicious Snake

John R. Houk

© August 19, 2016

 

My pseudonymous friend Tony Newbill sent me a link to an Alex Jones video rendition of Donald Trump voicing the poem “The Vicious Snake.” I was a little curious as to the reason Tony sent me to Facebook rather than to Youtube. I was curious because I always have difficulty posting videos that are not in a Youtube format.

 

Alex Jones’ version has Trump reading in the background as the video runs feeds of Muslims exacting barbarous actions from sexual harassment to Islamic terrorism.

 

The Alex Jones Facebook link: https://www.facebook.com/TheAlexJonesChannel/videos/1088563207861593/?pnref=story

 

I went to Youtube for embed purposes and the first version the search goes to a version that is age restricted:

 

VIDEO: The Vicious Snake

 

 

Posted by Rust E

Published on Jan 18, 2016

 

Do not allow the islamification currently happening in Europe to reach America. Act now before its [sic] too late.

A link to watch the video without age-restriction: https://www.youtube.com/v/yeJ-iv3MOTo

July 22, 2016:
This video become relevant almost every other day now, like clockwork. Attacks happening in Brussels, Orlando, Nice, Munich, etc. When will our politicians cut off the snakes [sic] head?

Videos like these do take time to create. I do not monetize them, nor am I getting paid to do them. If you would like to see more videos in the future, or would just like to donate to me, you can do so with BTC

my bitcoin address is as follows: 1CJrPeaCipj2bDu3n1sLSw3bDAmpxMH9P1

If you would like permission to re-upload my video, please contact me first. [Blog Editor: Full disclosure – I didn’t contact Rusty E. If he asks me to take down the embed I will comply.]

 

Here is a video of Donald Trump actually talking about murderous Muslims in the context of unvetted Muslim immigrants with The Vicious Snake poem reading to drive his point home:

 

VIDEO: FNN: Donald Trump Reads “Snake” Poem To Syrian Refugees

 

 

Posted by FOX 10 Phoenix

Published on Jan 12, 2016

 

Donald Trump reads “Snake” poem to a crowd of supporters in Cedar Falls Iowa on January 12, 2016.

 

AND here is a video of Trump reading The Vicious Snake in the background that incorporates Rust E’s graphics filled either with original content not shown in age restricted video OR the content blanked out in the age restricted video. I didn’t bother to investigate who did what:

 

VIDEO: The Vicious Snake, Trump Was Right

 

 

Posted by Fresh Light Source

Published on Mar 30, 2016

 

Trump was right. Listen to his viral words about what would happen in Europe. Then watch it happen. Donald Trump predicts what was and would be happening in Europe. He also reads The Snake lyrics which are a strongly evocative image of what is happening all over the world but especially in Europe.

This video is very similar to another viral video by the same name. I created it because I wanted to make sure people understood that Trump sees the situation for what it is in Europe when all of our so-called leaders are pushing us right over the cliff. Islam is not peaceful. That is obvious.

The battle for Europe (to paraphrase Winston Churchill) is just about lost. But the battle for America is still to be won or lost. You may not like Donald Trump but he “gets it” when it comes to what’s happening with the global agenda to break down the west through immigration.

I agree with Ted Nugent’s recent comments about Trump. http://www.infowars.com/ted-nugent-the-global-elite-hate-donald-trump-and-i-like-it/ When you look at who is against him, you realize that he has all the right enemies. That says something good about him. Here’s the group of Trump’s haters:

Obama is against Trump
The Media is against Trump
The establishment Democrats are against Trump
The establishment Republicans are against Trump
The Pope is against Trump
The UN is against Trump
The EU is against Trump
China is against Trump
Mexico is against Trump
Soros is against Trump
Black Lives Matter is against Trump
MoveOn.Org is against Trump
Koch Bro’s are against Trump
Hateful, racist, violent Liberals are against Trump

Encourage your friends to view The Vicious Snake, Trump Was Right. People need to see this no matter who they support for president.

 

I can say a hearty AMEN to that sentiment!

 

JRH 8/19/16