State Department Hosts Muslim Brotherhood Front Groups


One of the things that sealed the deal for me to vote for Donald Trump in 2016 was his anti-Islamic terrorism and anti-Muslim immigration stand. I have recently become convinced that President Trump’s National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster is removing pro-Trump people from the National Security Council (NSC). What’s up with that?

 

Now I am finding out President Trump’s Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is schmoozing with radical Islamists that hate America and Israel. What’s up with that?

Here are the radical Muslim details from Freedom Outpost.

 

JRH 8/13/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

State Department Hosts Muslim Brotherhood Front Groups

 

By TIM BROWN 

AUGUST 12, 2017

Freedom Outpost

 

While President Donald Trump is but one man, he was very vocal about Islam and speaking out against it, but it appears that those he chose to fill positions in his administration just don’t have the same mindset, and the latest to demonstrate this is Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, as he hosted designated terror organization and Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), along with other Muslims Brotherhood front groups at the State Department on Thursday.

 

Jordan Schachtel at Conservative Review that the meeting with State Department representatives to discuss the ongoing situation in Jerusalem was posted by the American Muslims for Palestine (AMP).

 

Schachtel writes:

 

The delegation was brought together by an umbrella conglomerate of Islamist outfits known as the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO). They went to the State Dept. to discuss the “ongoing Al-Aqsa Mosque crisis and Israel’s denial of religious freedom in Jerusalem, which is holy to the three Abrahamic faiths,” the AMP website said.

 

In July, Palestinian terrorists stormed outside the Al-Aqsa mosque compound and assassinated two Israeli police officers, setting off a diplomatic firestorm that would result in Israel securing the facility with metal detectors (which would later be removed due to international pressure).

 

Represented at the meeting included a CAIR official and members of other suspected Muslim Brotherhood front groups, such as the Islamic Circle of North America and the Islamic Shura Council of North America.

 

The delegation included Osama Abu Irshaid, a leader at AMP and an open supporter of Hamas. Terrorism expert Steven Emerson reported that he once served as the editor of “Al-Zaitounah” periodical, which Emerson describes as “pro-Hamas propaganda.”

 

Emerson has compared AMP as a whole to a “Hamas-support network” that mimics the Hamas-funding organizations that federal prosecutors shut down during the George W. Bush administration.

 

Islamic expert and author of numerous books on the subject, Robert Spencer wrote, “This is the kind of thing that should have ended with the inception of the ‘Drain the Swamp’ administration.”

 

“Unfortunately, Trump appointed too many people who did not share his vision, and so that vision is not being implemented, and Obama holdovers are still in charge,” he added.

 

All of these groups are known Muslim Brotherhood front groups who want Islam to dominate the world.

 

They have the same ideology as Herman Mustafa Carroll, executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth CAIR branch, does when he announced:

 

“If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land.”

 

Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi, who was a part of the delegation to the State Department, once called for Islamic law to dominate the world, declaring: “Allah’s rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that direction.”

 

Additionally, what many fail to remember regarding the Palestinians is that the Palestine National Charter of 1964 states:

 

We, the Palestinian Arab people, who believe in its Arabism and in its right to regain its homeland, to realize its freedom and dignity, and who have determined to amass its forces and mobilize its efforts and capabilities in order to continue its struggle and to move forward on the path of holy war (al-jihad) until complete and final victory has been attained.

 

In 1988, Hamas formed its own covenant in which it cites Imam Hassan al Banna:

 

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.

 

Nothing in this has changed! Not one word.

 

Now, look, I’m not Zionist by any stretch of the imagination [Blog Editor: In full disclosure, I consider myself a Christian Zionist fully supporting the existence of Israel as God’s plan], but when you have people who have put in print that they seek the utter destruction of an entire state and its people, and on top of that, their fellow brothers in the “hood” (Muslim Brotherhood) are literally Hell bent on taking over the US and the West in the name of the false prophet Muhammed and Allah, then there is a serious issue there.

 

While Trump has backed the idea of doing what the United Arab Emirates did and designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terror organization, Tillerson has done everything he can, just like H. R. McMaster to whitewash Islam and engage in taqiyya on the behalf of Islamists by seeking to block such efforts.

 

“There are elements of the Muslim Brotherhood that have become parts of governments,” he said, pointing out parliaments in Bahrain and Turkey as examples.

 

“Those elements… have done so by renouncing violence and terrorism,” he said.

 

“So in designating the Brotherhood in its totality as a terrorist organization… I think you can appreciate the complexities this enters into our relations with [governments in the region],” said Tillerson.

 

Nope, I can’t see the complexities, especially in light of the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood, which are to destroy the West and claim it in the name of Allah.

 

Tillerson is just demonstrating he is a stooge for Islam, just like others before him.

 

Welcoming these people who hold to these doctrines of demons into our places of government is not only a bad move, but in my opinion is dangerously close, if not over the line, to treason.

 

___________________

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com, SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. He is husband to his “more precious than rubies” wife, father of 10 “mighty arrows”, jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic rifle. Follow Tim on Twitter.

 

Copyright © 2017 FreedomOutpost.com

 

The biggest mistake the American voters ever made -TWICE.


This “If it quacks like a duck, then it is a duck” comparison to Barack Hussein Obama has actually been around for a while. Since it represents the essence of what a chain email looks like, I will make an effort to verify the claims. If I can’t find the claim connected to the phrase I will say so and try to find a similarity. If my Google and Bing search skills turn up empty I will admit it. (In all honesty, the admission may mean I inputted the incorrect search parameters. I you find something I didn’t, feel to rectify the case in a comment.)

 

Here is a Youtube video that covers many of the assertions of Obama quacking like a Left Wing betrayer of American values:

 

VIDEO: Obama Admits He Is A Muslim

 

Posted by FeelTheChangeMedia

Published on Aug 7, 2009

 

Obama admits that he is a Muslim. Obama bowing before a Muslim king. Obama talking about his Muslim family. Obama quoting from the Koran. Obama defending Islam. Obama visiting a Mosque. And many more clips of Obama and his Muslim connections. Legal Disclaimer: The writers, producers, and editors of this video are not claiming or implying that Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, or that Obama said he was a Muslim, rather they are only examining the evidence surrounding the rumor that Barack Hussein Obama might be a secret Muslim.

 

JRH 7/5/17

Please Support NCCR

******************

The biggest mistake the American voters ever made -TWICE.

 

Posted by Dennis Clack

G+ Community Conservatives

Jul 1, 5:26 PM

 

The REAL Duck

Whether we are willing to honestly admit it or not, folks, herein lies the reason and major source of many of our nation’s current problems! Elections do have their consequences, you know!

Keep this old adage in mind: If you walk like a duck and quack like a duck; have feathers like a duck; eat like a duck and lay eggs like a duck, there is a very high probability that you are a duck.

Mike Gallagher, the 8th most recognized talk radio personality in the country, is heard by over 2.25 million listeners weekly. He compiled and wrote the following essay: “Obama: It was You”. [According to TruthOrFiction.com, Gallagher didn’t write this essay. Rather he posted it on his Facebook page.]

President Obama,

This is why you didn’t go to France to show solidarity against the Muslim terrorists:

* It was you who . . .
spoke these words at an Islamic dinner – “I am one of you.”

 

[Blog Editor: I cannot find any references of Obama attending an Islamic dinner whence he told the Muslim diners “I am one of you”. Nonetheless, there are plenty of public appearances that Obama insinuated an Islamic affinity.]

* It was you who . . .
on ABC News referenced -“My Muslim faith.” [HERE & HERE]

* It was you who . . .
gave $100 million in U.S. taxpayer funds to re-build foreign mosques. [TopRightNews quotes CBS the taxpayer bill was closer to $770 BILLION to foreign Mosque refurbishing]

* It was you who . . .
wrote that in the event of a conflict – “I will stand with the Muslims.” [The context that the Left can’t or won’t admit]

* It was you who . . .
assured the Egyptian Foreign Minister that – “I am a Muslim.”

* It was you who . . .
bowed in submission before the Saudi King. [Quacks like duck: HERE and HERE]

* It was you who . . .
sat for 20 years in a [Black] Liberation Theology Church condemning Christianity and professing Marxism.

* It was you who . . .
exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare
that the rest of us have to pay. [After Obamacare passed coupled with Obama’s documented sympathy for Islam, read the potential Obamacare exemptions and then looking at Sharia Law, thought an exemption could arise for Muslims. However, the perception proved wrong.]

* It was you who . . .
purposefully omitted – “endowed by our Creator” –
from your recitation of The Declaration of Independence.

* It was you who . . .
mocked the Bible and Jesus Christ’s Sermon on the Mount while repeatedly referring to the ‘HOLY’ Qur’an.

* It was you who . . .
traveled the Islamic world denigrating the United States of America.

* It was you who . . .
instantly threw the support of your administration behind the building of the Ground Zero Victory mosque overlooking the hallowed crater of the World Trade Center.

* It was you who . . .
refused to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, but hastened to host an Islamic prayer breakfast at the White House.

* It was you who . . .
ordered Georgetown Univ. and Notre Dame to shroud all vestiges of Jesus Christ BEFORE you would agree to go there to speak, but in contrast, you have NEVER requested the mosques you have visited to adjust their decor.

* It was you who . . .
appointed anti-Christian fanatics to your Czar Corps [Kevin Jennings and John Holdren and Mohamed Magid]

* It was you who . . .
appointed rabid Islamists to Homeland Security.

* It was you who . . .
said that NASA’s “foremost mission” was an outreach to Muslim communities.

* It was you who . . .
as an Illinois Senator was the ONLY individual who would speak in favor of infanticide.

* It was you who . . .
was the first President not to give a Christmas Greeting from the White House [From what I looked at, verbally the word “Christmas” was used in greetings from the White House. However the Obamas, like many Leftists, tried to secularize Christ’s birth “Holiday” greeting cards], and went so far as to hang photos of Chairman Mao on the White House tree.

 

Mao Zedong Ornament (Noted Communist atheist dictator)

* It was you who . . .
curtailed the military tribunals of all Islamic terrorists.

* It was you who . . .
refused to condemn the Ft. Hood killer as an Islamic terrorist.

* It is you who . . .
has refused to speak-out concerning the horrific executions of women throughout the Muslim culture(a), but yet, have submitted Arizona to the UN for investigation of hypothetical human-rights abuses.(b)

 

  1. a) Perspective: HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE
  2. b) State Department Stands By Decision to Include Arizona in U.N. Human Rights Report

* It was you who . . .
when queried in India, refused to acknowledge [It’s the NYT, so you might need to scroll down a bit for details] the true extent of radical global Jihadists, and instead profusely praised Islam in a country that is 82% Hindu and the victim of numerous Islamic terrorist assaults.

* It was you who . . .
funneled $900 million in U.S. taxpayer dollars to Hamas.

* It was you who . . .
ordered the USPS to honor the MUSLIM holiday with a new commemorative stamp.

* It was you who . . .
directed our UK Embassy to conduct outreach to help “empower” the British Muslim community.

* It was you who . . .
funded mandatory Arabic language and culture studies in grammar schools across our country. [“Mandate” appears to be off. A better scenario is highly encourage.]

* It is you who . .
follows the Muslim custom of not wearing any form of jewelry during Ramadan. [Obama has not worn his wedding ring on numerous sightings other than just Ramadan. It might be a coincidence in 2009 travelling in Muslim nations not wearing his wedding ring. The Left claims the ring was in the shop being repaired.]

* It is you who . . .
departs for Hawaii over the Christmas season so as to avoid past criticism for NOT participating in seasonal White House religious events. [The only criticism I have about Obama vacationing in Hawaii during Christmas is the taxpayer cost.]

* It was you who . . .
was uncharacteristically quick to join the chorus of the Muslim Brotherhood to depose Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, formerly America’s strongest ally in North Africa; but remain muted in your non-response to the Brotherhood-led slaughter of Egyptian Christians.

* It was you who . . .
appointed your chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian, who is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. [Jarrett spoke at ISNA 2009  –  a Muslim Brotherhood American front group. John Gaultier’s blog is full of Muslim Sisterhood details and connecting Jarrett but is totally vague on sources.]

* It was you who . . .
said this country is not a Christian nation.

* It was you who . . .
said the Muslim call to worship is “the most beautiful sound on earth.” [Leftist NYT has the quote. Click “Find” on a word search, use the word “sound” and you’ll find it easily.]

QUACK! QUACK! QUACK! QUACK!

Distribute this far and wide, Please! [If or When you share, be sure to link to this blog. Most Social Media do not carry embedded links.]

____________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

Making America Muslim through “Refugees”


Islamic Dualism applied

A Muslim refugee will not ever be a long term friend as long as that Muslim is dedicated to the inerrancy of the Quran and reveres the Hadith and Sira which are essentially a collection of witness accounts of the actions and words of Mohammed. Paul Sutliff says a Muslim will act your as your friend – especially if he lives in a location in which Muslims are a significant minority. Islam tells its adherents to fool the non-Muslim (kafir) until he/she converts or the Muslim can assert an eventual majority stake in the population. Sutliff shows this Islamic fool than dominate paradigm is ethical in Islam theologically in English is called duality or dualism.

 

VIDEO: Dualism – Why is Islam puzzling?

 

 

Posted by CSPI International

Published on Aug 4, 2015

 

Islam is puzzling because it seems so contradictory. With contradictory statements in the Koran in regard to beating women, compulsion in religion, peace and jihad, torture and brutal punishments, one asks the question which statements are correct. The answer is that both are right. Islam is dualistic. It has whichever answer it needs when it needs it.

 

This another reason not to allow Muslim refugees or immigrants into America ESPECIALLY if those Muslims are devoted to Islam.

 

JRH 4/17/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Making America Muslim through “Refugees”

 

By Paul Sutliff 

April 16, 2016 3:10 PM

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

 

Ambassador Wells and Secretary Kerry welcome refugees

Ambassador Wells and Secretary Kerry welcome
Syrian Refugees they want to see in America

 

On April 14th, the State Department issued a press release headlining that “The United States Contributes $421 Million to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.” The press release reveals the willful nature of the Obama administration to remake the United States into a Muslim country through outward hostility to its Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.

 
According to the State Department, the U.S. Government has now contribution to UNHCR to nearly $698 million to date in 2016. In 2015, the United States contributed more than $1.3 billion to UNHCR to support continuing and emergency programs around the world. This included nearly $352 million to UNHCR for the continuing role it plays in responding to the Syria crisis.
 

In addition, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) published How to Screen 600 Syrian Refugees a Day: A “Surge Operation” by Nayla Rush that tells you what the State Department is not telling you!

 

U.S. ambassador Alice Wells said…The temporary processing center… will run until April 28 and will process 10,000 refugees. It is part of “our effort to reach President Obama’s directive to send 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States by September 30, 2016, while also ensuring that every refugee accepted by the United States has been thoroughly screened and vetted through our rigorous security process.”

 

Six hundred interviews will take place at the center every day to meet that goal. Most of the 10,000 refugees will be resettled from Jordan despite the fact that all Syrian refugees are covered by the surge.

 

According to Ambassador Wells this expediting system to rush Syrian “refugees” to America began on February 1st.  This means that they have had all of February, March and April to interview 600 persons a day, 5 days a week. 53 days since Easter and Presidents’ Day are two Federal holidays equates to 31,800 interviews to date as of April 15th.

Will America be flooded with Syrian Muslims as most of Europe is enduring today if President Obama keeps his promise to take a minimum of 10,000 Syrian Muslims as refugees? What will this like? What will it mean to American culture?
 

We can answer that question by examining what is happening in Europe today.  This is what we can expect:

1.  Islamic Enclaves will be created where sharia is enforced.The United Kingdom’s former head of Equalities and Human Rights Commission said this week that  Muslims are establishing “nations within nations” throughout Europe for the purpose of not assimilating into the culture of their new countries.

 

Guy Millière pointed out in his article for the Gatestone Institute this week, Europe: Suicide by Jihad” the inconvenient fact that:

 

One of the organizers of the Paris bombings, Salah Abdeslam, was able to live peacefully in Molenbeek for four months until police decided to arrest him. Belgian police knew exactly where he was, but did nothing until French authorities asked them to. After his arrest, he was treated as a petty criminal. Police did not ask him anything about the jihadist networks with which he worked. Officers who interrogated him were ordered to be gentle. The people who hid him were not indicted.

2.  Muslims will portray themselves as good “Americans to non-Muslims.” Brussels jihadist attacker Osama Krayem was featured in a 2005 documentary, “Without Borders — A Film About Sport And Integration.” In this documentary Osama was shown to be an excellent example of integrations into Western Switzerland culture. However, just 10 years later he became one of the jihadists who attacked Brussels, Belgium. The reason for this “change” is that the duality in Islam requires saying and appearing one way to non-Muslims while supporting your Muslims Brothers and Sisters. The Koran reveals this duality when it says to the Muslim:

 

O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as friends, they are but friends of each other. And whoever befriends them, then surely, he is one of them. (Surah 5: 51)

 

This order is given and backed up with other Islamic scriptures. The Tafsir Ibn Kathir vol. 3 pages 203-206 cover this in depth. Reading what Muslims tell other Muslims reveals a whole other world about Islam than what they tell us they believe. That is the duality. In Islam Allah is the “Great Deceiver” and war is won through deceit.

 

This means they will appear to be the greatest of friends but will stab the non-Muslim in the back when they feel safe to do so. When they move from a minority to a majority they will feel free to do what their Allah commands.

 

A British TV program ran a program that was created from an ICM poll that revealed many disturbing things about the growing population of Muslims in the UK.

3.  Muslims plan to commit Civilization Jihad They plan to take over through overpopulation by having more wives and babies than other Americans. This concept is so prevalent in Europe that people are now predicting that Denmark will soon cease to exist as a democracy in Europe and will be proclaimed an Islamic country soon.

 

This means infiltrating every level of government, schooling and society to prevent the truth about Islam from being told. (Read my Book: Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam)

 

4.  Muslims will work to take away your free speech beginning with your ability to insult Allah and Muhammad. The White House was caught censoring another head of state on this issue last week! This action simply put the word Islamic and terrorism together!

 

VIDEO: Did the Obama Administration Censor French President Hollande? (David Wood)

 

 

Posted by Acts17Apologetics

Published on Apr 2, 2016

 

http://www.acts17.net

Recently, President Obama met with French President François Hollande to discuss matters of international security. When footage posted on the White House website was discovered to be missing portions of Hollande’s audio, the White House replied that a technical problem had led to the gap in audio. However, a closer examination of the footage shows that the audio footage was not accidentally missing and then restored; instead, it was deliberately removed and then replaced when the censorship was exposed. David Wood discusses the evidence.

 

This is the reality we face today!

_______________________

About Paul Sutliff

 

I am writer and a teacher. Here is a link to my publisher and my latest book portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad! https://www.tatepublishing.com/bookstore/book.php?w=978-1-68237-562-4

 

Islam is Dangerous to America


Frank Gaffney

Clare Lopez - CSP VP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2016

 

I found an email in my inbox promoting a new book written by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Clare Lopez of the Center for Security Policy (CSP) entitled “See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Line of Defense”.

 

The email breaks down the book to how Radical Islam has been creeping into America due to government policies that are designed to show favoritism to all Islam. And when I say “all Islam” I am saying government policies are looking at Islam as peaceful in general hence believing the lies that Radical Muslims are advocates of Moderate Islam.

 

This gullibility by the U.S. government was actually began by one of my hero Presidents in G.W. Bush. After the 9/11 attack on American soil by al Qaeda Bush accurately described the act brutality as the work of Islamofascists and that we will find and bring down those who were responsible. Thus began our invasion of al Qaeda’s protectors the Taliban then ruling Afghanistan.

 

American Patriotism made many Americans angry. Many Americans joined the U.S. Military to do their part in a war effort against Islamofascism. Other Americans had no intention of serving militarily but were still incensed. Angry Americans have a tendency to operate in spontaneous acts of vengeance against people perceived as Muslims.

 

Thus many Americans and resident aliens that had a Middle Eastern look about them were treated as Islamofascists rather they were non-violent Muslims or Muslim look-alikes such as Sikhs who as a part of their faith wear turbans.

 

So very soon after President Bush’s hunt-the-Islamofascists down promise, Bush went public with the meme that not all Muslims are Islamofascists to head off the American emerging revenge mindset against all people appearing to be Muslim. President Bush went public with the semi-falsehood that “Islam is peace” statement implying that good Muslims are Moderates in their faith of a true Islam.

 

Let’s be truthful. A majority of Muslims that are religious indeed believe that Islam is peace because that is what they are told by their religious leaders (Clerics, Mullahs or whatever). Shoot even Radical Muslims believe Islam is peace at least between Muslims that follow Sharia Law.

 

The reality is that if you read the Quran, Hadith and Sira through unfiltered lenses will see that Islam is violent theopolitical religion against those that refuse to believe in Islam and even against Muslims if they don’t follow the rules of Sharia or the writs of their revered writings.

 

It is my opinion unwittingly promoted the Islam is peace meme to prevent violent chaos against peaceful people. However, it is also my opinion that President Barack Hussein Obama took this peace meme to the next level that has welcomed Radical Muslims into sensitive jobs in the U.S. government. With most of these Radical Muslims sympathetic or even in collusion with the Radical Islamic paradigm of a global Caliphate.

 

This is where Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Clare Lopez come into the picture exposing Islamic infiltration into America and offering a scenario to defeat Islamic terrorism. I have not read this book myself yet, but I do intend to pick a copy up. Below is the email promoting the book “See No Sharia”.

 

JRH 4/15/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

BOOK RELEASE: SEE NO SHARIA: How Our First Lines of Defense Have Been Disarmed

See No Sharia book jacket

Sent by Adam Savit | savit@securefreedom.org

Sent: April 14, 2016 1:52 PM

Sent from: Secure Freedom – (CSP link to email)

 

(Washington, D.C.): For much of the past fifteen years, the United States government has failed to understand, let alone decisively defeat, the enemy that, under the banner of its al Qaeda franchise, murderously attacked our country on September 11, 2001.  The reason why that has been so – notwithstanding the bravery and skill of our men and women in uniform and the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars – has been unclear to most Americans, including some in government.  Until now.

 

With the publication by the Center for Security Policy of a new book by two of its leaders, President Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. and Vice President Clare Lopez, See No Sharia: “Countering Violent Extremism” and the Disarming of America’s First Lines of Defense, the case has been forcefully made that this sorry state of affairs is a product of a sustained and highly successful influence operation by Islamic supremacists. Under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Islamists in general and the Muslim Brotherhood in particular have gained access to and considerable sway over policymakers in the White House, the FBI and the Departments of State, Justice, Defense and Homeland Security.

 

[Blog Editor: The email at this point has a photo of Frank Gaffney with a link to a Youtube video associated to the photo. In place of the photo here I am posting the Youtube video.]

 

VIDEO: See No Sharia: ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ and the Disarming of America’s First Line of Defense

 

 

Posted by securefreedom

Published on Apr 14, 2016

 

For more information visit: http://bit.ly/1T6Dcta

 

See No Sharia describes the trajectory that has flowed from such penetration and subversion.  It traces how fact-based counterterrorism and law enforcement have inexorably been supplanted by an approach defined by accommodations demanded by Islamists – purged lexicons and training programs, limitations on surveillance, case-making and rules of engagement and above all, eschewing anything that gives “offense” to Muslims.

 

In addition to showing the perils associated with such policies and practices as America faces the growing threat of global jihad and its animating doctrine of sharia, this book provides specific recommendations as to how to restore our first lines of defense – the FBI and other law enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, the military and the intelligence community – whose effective service is needed today more than ever.

 

Frank Gaffney noted,

 

“Americans expect government officials to fulfill their oaths of office by protecting the Constitution, the Republic it established and its people from all enemies, foreign and domestic.  The vast majority of our public servants yearn to do their duty. Yet, as See No Sharia makes plain, for at least a decade and a half, they have been obliged to conform to policies that greatly diminish their chances for success.  We simply cannot afford to disarm those in our first lines of defense against Islamic supremacism and its jihad – both the violent kind and the stealthy sort the Muslim Brotherhood calls ‘civilization jihad.’”

 

Clare Lopez added,

 

“As a career intelligence professional, the extent to which our policymaking apparatus has been penetrated and subverted by Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist operatives is deeply problematic.  This book is meant to expose their handiwork – and to impel the urgently needed and long-overdue policy course-correction.”

 

The Center for Security Policy/Secure Freedom is proud to present this monograph as a superb addition to its Civilization Jihad Reader Series.  “The Gulen Movement: Turkey’s Islamic Supremacist Cult and Its Contribution to Civilization Jihad in America” is available for purchase in kindle and paperback format on Amazon.com.

 

Click here for a full PDF of the newly released monograph.

______________________

Islam is Dangerous

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2016

____________________

BOOK RELEASE: SEE NO SHARIA: How Our First Lines of Defense Have Been Disarmed

 

About The Center for Security Policy

 

The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public. For more information visit www.securefreedom.org

 

Donate to CSP

Catastrophic Failure. And we keep going


I am on the email list of the World Truth Summit which is organized by Elsa Schieder of Canada. When I get an update I find interesting I like to cross post for my blog readers to digest. Elsa has sent out one such update.

Briefly for those who don’t know, the World Truth Summit gathers prominent Counterjihad experts from the realms of academia, journalism, blogging, politicians and so on. Elsa then provides provides a forum for a video Counterjihad seminar or interview.

This latest update focuses on the Stephen Coughlin book “Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad”. Stephen Coughlin became a bit controversial even before Obama became President in that he was rather unceremoniously released from his Intelligence/Pentagon job that was prominent to inform the U.S. military, Executive Branch Intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies as well as many politicians involved with Congress. Coughlin was the go-to guy for info on what makes Islam and Islamic terrorists tick.

Coughlin ran into problems when prominent Muslims in the same government affiliations began to protest Coughlin’s frank truth telling that obviously did not make Islam look like a religion of peace. Essentially he was fired by simply not renewing his employment contract.

Coughlin penned this in relation to his very important book which I found at Unconstrained Analytics:

 

The time has come to present this case to the American people.

 

I hope to offer to the reader the same quality of information and analysis that has been presented to national security professionals and which has been studiously ignored.

 

  • I will provide the necessary citations to Islamic law, both historical and contemporary, from books written in English for Muslim consumers of Islamic law (also called shariah), and will explain the key principles for interpreting these laws, particularly as they relate to non-Muslims and jihad.

 

  • We will go through, in detail, the Islamic legal concept of abrogation and how it impacts the actions of Muslims who have chosen to wage jihad.

 

  • We will examine the impact of Islamic scholar and Muslim Brotherhood ideologue Sayyid Qutb, and how his understanding of abrogation led to what I call “The Milestone Process,” which guides the performance of jihad for our enemies in the War on Terror.

 

  • We will discuss what is called the “Islamic Movement” and how the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and other groups oriented on the Milestone Process view themselves as unified by varying degrees against us.

 

  • We’ll examine the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation and see how their understanding of themselves as a kind of “Proto-Caliphate” may be accurate, even though our decision makers don’t even know they exist.

 

  • With this understanding of the rules and the players achieved, we’ll discuss how each of these groups works in accordance with Islamic law as they understand it, to the great detriment of those who fail to recognize the threat they pose.

 

  • We’ll examine the postmodern world of American national security policymaking, where fidelity to political correctness, the need for “balance,” and standards that put assumptions and social science theories before facts have left us dangerously exposed.

 

  • And we will examine how our failure to understand these factors has repeatedly led to tragedy and real loss of life, leaving America vulnerable to those who wish to destroy us.

 

I hope to show that returning to traditional standards of threat analysis—bolstered by common-sense professional standards and grounded in the obligations we have to support and defend the Constitution—will enable us once again to know our enemies and develop methods to defeat them. (Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad; By Stephen Coughlin; Unconstrained Analytics)

 

And now to the World Truth Summit update.

JRH 3/9/16

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Catastrophic Failure. And we keep going

By Elsa Schieder

Sent: Mar 6, 2016 at 10:13 AM

Email From: World Truth Summit

Do I have anything to say that I haven’t said before?

There’s a book I’ll recommend: Stephen Coughlin’s Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad.

The general outline has nothing new – for example, you’re not allowed to change anything from the Quran. Almost everyone knows that. But there are masses of details I didn’t know – such as, Islam has a triple lock system, like a maximum security prison. Lock one (as stated): if it’s in the Quran, and not abrogated, that’s the way things have to be forever. Lock two: if it’s become part of Sharia, whether or not it’s in the Quran, it must stand forever. Lock three: if Islamic scholars have agreed on something, whether or not it’s in the Quran or in Sharia, it must never be re-opened for questioning.

The first lock is enough to convince me that Islam is not open to reform – because to do so, you go against the Quran, and the punishment for that is murder. But then, two more locks. Heavy metal doors clang shut.

How do I feel about the triple-lock system? It’s good stuff to know – or we invite even more catastrophic failure.

What am I getting from Catastrophic Failure? Most of the time I act from knowing, with my head, that it’s vital to act against Islamization in its many forms. Reading this book makes me feel, on a gut level, how vital it is to do all we can.

How does Coughlin keep going, I also wonder. Before Obama, he was briefing top people in the American military, FBI, CIA. Now he’s an outsider – and he has kept going, doing, reaching anyone he can – with online videos, speaking engagements, and his powerful book.

It’s so important to be able to keep going, when the forces against us are gaining ground, sometimes massively – as has happened in Europe this past year with the mass influx of Islamics – and as is currently happening in Canada with the new pro-Islam prime minister.

This isn’t a story – like Star Wars, where we know that, somehow or other, all will be well in the end (until the next episode). This is life. The outcome isn’t set in stone. Even what happens next isn’t set in stone. Lots of surprises along the way – including good ones, like the emergence of Trump.

Anyway, today, not much to say. Except, as always, that it’s time to continue, to keep going and doing.

All the best to all of us who care and dare,

Elsa

PS. If you’re anywhere near Montreal on Wednesday, March 9th, ACT for Canada is bringing in Paul Weston, a rising politician of a mainstream political party in England concerned with terrorist threats and mass migration. He was arrested in 2014 for quoting a passage from Winston Churchill’s book, The River War. How could that be? Churchill did not have a great opinion of Islam.

Time: 7:30 p.m. sharp

Location: Ruby Foos Restaurant

Ticket price: $20.00; free for students

For further information, contact info@actforcanada.ca

Paul Weston

PPS. More about Stephen Coughlin. I first heard of Stephen Coughlin through a video on the OIC. The OIC? What was that? I had no idea. I learned a lot. We all need to know about it:

 

The Role of the OIC in Enforcing Islamic Law

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkAZUvQAzkc

VIDEO: Stephen Coughlin, Part 5: The Role of the OIC in Enforcing Islamic Law

 

And, in case you don’t know about the ‘Milestones’ Process:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t98WRrOPj2s

VIDEO: Stephen Coughlin, Part 3: Abrogation & the ‘Milestones’ Process

 

Also, Muslim Brotherhood, Arab Spring & the ‘Milestones’ Process:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMQ0B2ivjPs

VIDEO: Stephen Coughlin, Part 4: Muslim Brotherhood, Arab Spring & the ‘Milestones’ Process

 

Understanding the War on Terror Through Islamic Law:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsArto3UVT0

VIDEO: Stephen Coughlin, Part 2: Understanding the War on Terror Through Islamic Law

 

Then, an interview with Stephen Coughlin:

http://vladtepesblog.com/2015/09/11/stephen-coughlin/

 

Stephen Coughlin

AND HERE IS A BRILLIANT VIDEO ON INFILTRATION – SOVIET INFILTRATION, BUT MUCH RELEVANCE FOR US:

 

Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4

VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job (Complete)

 

Finally, in case you feel up to tacking Stephen Coughlin’s book:

Catastrophic Failure book jacket

The words in the corner, by the way:

Banned by the White House.

PPPS. For lots more, from the many times I had a lot to say, come to:

http://ElsasEmporium.com

____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

© Elsa Schieder

Is the hen safe when the fox guards the henhouse? Part 1


Paul Sutliff begins the examination of infiltration into the U.S. government by Muslim purists.
 
JRH 4/9/15

Please Support NCCR

*********************************
Is the hen safe when the fox guards the henhouse? Part 1
 Fox Guarding Hen House
 
By Paul Sutliff
April 8, 2015 8:31 AM
 
What happens when the fox guards the hen house?
When a fox guards the hen house, hens disappear and become tasty meals not all at once, but one or two at a time. The protector plays at guarding while making snacks out of the items he is supposed to watch over. Is such a thing happening in the United States?

Flashback to 1991. Members of Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) in the US and Canada publish amongst themselves “The Explanatory Memorandum of the North America.” This document went unnoticed until 2003 when a search warrant was served and a hidden sub-basement was found with 90 bankers’ boxes of documents of which this is one. In one paragraph the term “Civilization Jihad” is mentioned as the mission of the Muslim people in the United States. Specifically, it refers to “destroying them (the North American governments) by then and their own hand”: This speaks to deliberate infiltration of governmental structures with the purpose of bringing about destruction. Is this happening?

According to Admiral James A. Lyons, a former Commander of the Pacific Fleet the infiltration of our federal government is extensive! This is not some crackpot. He was the man our Presidents called on to get the job done.

This man is retired. Yet he was one of those who had Security Clearances to receive Top Secret classified materials. He probably still has active connections within the military and may be still utilized as a consultant for his vast knowledge.

What can the average man look for that would be indicators of infiltration that we could observe? Are there things that just stand out and say “LOOK HERE ANTI-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES” being carried out by government personnel?

I propose that are at least 10 things we can look for as average citizens and judge for ourselves if our safety is at risk because we have been infiltrated.


1.       If we are watching for Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of our government you would expect to see an inordinate reflection of the population in high government roles. For example if the US population of Muslims was 3% you would not expect to find 25% of high governmental positions are filled by Muslims.
 
2.      Obfuscation of historical facts would be utilized to paint a pretty picture of the Muslim Brotherhood which has a violent history. The more popular terms here is propaganda would be used to recreate the Muslim Brotherhood into an imaginary non-violent hippie type group.
 
3.      Compliance with Muslim Brotherhood front group demands is something you would expect of persons affiliated with Muslim Brotherhood members. Not something you would expect of the federal government.
 
4.     Questionable priorities would be apparent. This would be a shift away from making protecting America a priority. Possible evidence may indicate a shift to use weapons and intelligence against our young men and women in uniform.
 
5.      Questionable Alliances would be formed with known Muslim Brotherhood front groups.
 
6.     Guests of those who infiltrated would likely be affiliated or known to be associated with the Ikhwan in some manner. Visitation logs and guest monitoring should be able to reveal a change of mannerisms towards Islamist persons from less favorable to very friendly.
 
7.      Attempts would be made to place Islamists in positions that would disable the system from pointing the finger at the ones infiltrating. The best terminology here is non-acceptance of accurate intelligence.
 
8.     Replacements would be created for accessing information not normally available to the average person when positions become available. Excuses for replacing the natural next person in line for the position would be given.
 
9.     Occasional slips of truth may leak out revealing the true nature of the person(s) who had entered for the purpose of subverting or damaging the government.
 
10.  Promotion and acceptance of previously unacceptable behaviors. True leaders inspire other to follow. Those who infiltrate would likely choose to use others rather than inspire. There would be a lack of vision because the opposite of buildup is tear down.
 
Have we seen evidence of any of these 10 symptoms of infiltration? These are things that an average person would expect to see as evidence if our government has been infiltrated. Watch for more of this series, Are We Safe: Parts 2 to 4, to see what evidence does exist that questions if we truly are safe.
__________________________________
 
Educator who pushes truth and rightness even when it is unpopular!
 
I am writer and a teacher. You can find my books on Amazon portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad!
 
Edited by John R. Houk
 

Jizya Opposition to halal is irrational, is it?


Imposing jizya in Australia - Morning Mail photo

I am a member of the Facebook Group Stop Islam. Another member there found a Bret Harte article at the Facebook Group Australophobia. Just to be clear I am an American and not Australian; nonetheless there is a growing controversy in the Land Down Under that could creep its way into the USA. That Controversy is centered on legally forcing food packing or distribution companies to pay a fee to a certified Muslim who then gives the “halal” stamp of approval that notifies Muslims that the food is certified A-OK to consume according to Sharia. IN ESSENCE this would force various Aussie companies to pay the jizya tax for Muslim certification in which the fees would trickle into some Muslim theopolitical agenda (whether that be Mosque building, Muslim charity [Can you say terrorist funding?] and so on).

 

Australia’s controversy today will probably be America’s controversy tomorrow. I mean Radical Muslims are preaching in the National Cathedral in Washington DC.

 

My first inkling was to cross post this directly from Stop Islam; however it became apparent to me that the Facebook postings were without Mr. Harte’s links he included in his original post. So thanks to the old Google search engine I found a version at an Aussie location called Morning Mail dated 11/13/14. I included the original links from there. Take note that the Stop Islam version also has some of the Morning Mail comments at the end of the post. Those comments are currently longer than the Stop Islam version. I am not providing the comment links from the original. Also note the English grammar of the Aussies is similar to the British hence there are some spelling deviations from the grammar rules found in America.

 

JRH 11/20/14

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Jizya Opposition to halal is irrational, is it?
Exclusive
Bret Harte

Paula Wells shared Australophobia‘s post.

November 15 at 11:42pm

Stop Islam Closed Facebook Group

 

The craven halal-paying companies are striking back. Australians who oppose halal are prejudiced, ignorant, misinformed, extremists and inspired by hate, they say.

The Dairy Farmers Association talks of “irrational bullying campaigns” and urges members to go ahead and pay the halal levy.

So does South Australia’s Investment and Trade Minister, Martin Hamilton-Smith. He urged local exporters to “keep working” with the multi-million-dollar Middle Eastern market. “I encourage South Australian exporters to put enterprise and job opportunities ahead of the extreme views of a minority… prejudice has no place in Australia.”

And as for the cloth-head halal supporter, Darren Chester MP of the Nationals, he is more than a supporter of it, he is an apologist for it. In his own words, “The decision by a food company to meet halal requirements is a voluntary decision.” What? All these Australian companies suddenly voluntarily agreed to pay a religious tax? Chester is either pig-ignorant or is deliberately misinforming those who write to him.

So are Australians prejudiced, ignorant, misinformed, hate-inspired extremists?

Let’s start with the Jizya.

Muhammad very clearly established that people of other religions have to pay a tax – the jizya – to Muslims as a reminder of their inferior status.

It is specifically laid down in the Muslim Holy Book: “Fight those who believe not in Allah… until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Qur’an (9:29)

This is not some out-of-date old notion from the 8th century. The jizya is commanded by Allah himself. It is an obligation on all Muslims. But it is an obligation which actually coins money for them and as such one which has been enthusiastically endorsed by them.

The extortion has been followed through the centuries and was a part of the brutal Ottoman rule over Christians, Jews and others. The Serbs of Europe often had to hand over their children to satisfy the collector of the jizya. The children were converted to Islam and trained in jihad as warriors (Janissaries [Link]). This was the Devşirme [Link and Link] system.

In India, well into the 17th century, Muslim jizya collectors would even take the wives and children of impoverished Hindus and sell them into slavery for the jizya requirement.

This is why Islamic purists such as Hamas and the Taliban wish to reinstate the jizya.

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt have it as part of their current policy that Christians must pay a jizya and an Egyptian cleric on al-Hafaz TV said in 2013 that America that Muslims should demand more money as jizya from the Americans so that, in his words, “we can leave them alone.”

The notorious British Muslim preacher, Anjem Choudary, points out that “the normal situation is for [Muslims] to take money from the kuffar” (kuffars are non-muslims and is a term of contempt.) This cookie, by the way has been associated with around 20% of all convicted terrorism cases in the UK over the past 10 years, says he wants a passport to join ISIS, according to The Times.

The first thing ISIS does right now is impose jizya. The rounding up of women and selling them in the markets is one way how they collect the jizya. It is sanctioned by the ISIS Mullahs. Hamas has the same idea.

So the obligation is current, and it is no grand leap to see the halal levy as one way the jizya is paid. Under a masquerade of the thinnest kind a certifier decides that no pig fat was used anywhere in the production. They even certify water!

Muslims make no bones about it. Halal certification is a gold mine. They use this very phrase – a gold mine – in the Indonesian Jakarta Post. [Click on this link for a detailed look at Muslim enforcement of halal]

Now, it really does not matter how the money collected is disbursed – the very fact that it is collected at all is Australian’s acceptance of an inferior status to Muslims. This is why it is collected – to make Australians feel subdued At present, in Australia, it supposedly goes to charity.

Let’s assume it does.

What charity?

What are the objects of Muslim charity? Well, laid down as top of the list of charitable objects is building mosques. It is called Waqf.

Is that clear enough?

The money that Australian companies pays to Muslims as halal certification is used for the building of mosques.

And on the list of charitable objects is the support of jihad warriors.

Nowhere on the list is any non-Muslim objective, not one cent goes to the Royal Blind Society or the RSPCA or Vinnies [St. Vincent de Paul Society]. It is raised from Australian citizens to go to Muslim-only causes.

And in spite of all the poppycock talked about inspection by government authorities – there is none.

No Australian with an ounce of pride would pay the halal extortion.

But many Australian companies have no sense of national pride or honour; they are gutless appeasers of Islam following a buck. Literally they sell Australia’s soul for their profit.

And so too, do the ‘economic rationalists’ in Canberra.

* “During a roundtable discussion on U.S. and foreign aid to Egypt, an Islamic cleric, clearly of the Salafi bent—he had their trademark mustache-less-beard—insisted that the U.S. must be treated contemptuously, like a downtrodden dhimmi, or conquered infidel; that Egypt must make the U.S. conform to its own demands; and that, then, all the money the U.S. offers to Egypt in foreign aid can be taken as rightfully earned jizya.”

Source


Share this:

Email

{8 comments… add one}

Likeatreat

One thing I do know is that we are not the minority. If we were, what we say would be gospel, that is how this country works now.

REPLY LINK

Albert

Ordinary real Australians are being sold out to Islam by ignorant politicians and arrogant un-Australian companies all in the name of a buck. Even though the Islamics themselves say of the ‘Zakat’ (tax):

6. “Fi sabi `Lillah. Those who are fighting in the Cause of Allah, e.g., the Mujahideen.”

(Support terrorism?)

7. “Ibn as’Sabil. The wayfarer; Muslim travelers who need assistance while on a journey.”

(Pay fares of those going to join ISIS in Iraq?)

Those running these companies aren’t able to programme their one brain cell to recognise that aiding and abetting Islamic terrorise is treason and apparently the government doesn’t want to know about it either.

This national disgrace is about more than just building jihadist training centres (Mosques). It is about supporting Sharia with plans to introduce it into Australia as soon as they have the numbers here to pull it off.

In the words of an leading Mullah, “At a meeting of the Islamic Global Halal Congress held in Pakistan, the former Grand Mufti of Bosnia, Mustafa Ceric called upon all Muslims to, “Conquer the world through the Halal movement, as Halal means pure and hygienic and the non-Muslim world will have no choice but to accept it.” He went on to say, “The Halal certification movement has the strength to lead Muslims to rule the global economy, as food and other services are the basic need of every human being”.

Wake up Australia and boycott halal products. Go to www.halalchoices.com.au and become informed about the realities of this Islamic extortion racket that you are paying for.

________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Texts or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

About Morning Mail’s author Bret Harte:

 

Morning Mail does not want your real name or personal details as pen-names are the standard. Content character, not personal character. For a pen-name pick a quality, dead, non-Australian author. Jack London, Lord Byron, Bret Harte, Mary Shelley, Charlotte Bronte or let MM pick one. This provides a consistent look, and gives a spurious air of intellectualism to Morning Mail. (Contributor’s Page; Morning Mail; 10/24/13)

9/11: A Threat Assessment


al-Baghdadi- Our Appt in NY

This threat assessment by Justin Smith is an examination of the threat to America’s National Security from Islamic terrorism and Obama’s failure to address properly that National Security issue.

 

JRH 9/8/14 [Updated: 12:50 PM]

Please Support NCCR

******************************

9/11: A Threat Assessment

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 9/7/2014 7:22 PM

 

This September 11th America is once again under an intense terror threat from the Islamofascists and the Islamic State. While many Americans reflect on the horror of the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks, innocent Americans falling 100 stories and trapped under burning rubble, and the violent and vicious attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, our leaders must now join together in several courses of action to defeat the ideology of Islam at home and abroad, especially in light of ongoing genocides against Christians in Iraq and Syria and the recent beheadings of two Americans.

 

Whether one believes our war is a cultural clash with Islam or, as Great Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron recently stated, “a poisonous ideology of Islamic extremism that is condemned by all”, in brief, history shows that ISIS is actually implementing Islam exactly in the manner of Mohammed; history also shows that the Wahhabist philosophy followed by ISIS and the members of Al Qaeda and al-Nusra has been supported by the House of Saud since 1740, all of which are directly involved in global terrorism, along with their Muslim Brotherhood allies from Egypt’s Al Azhar University.

 

Wafa Sultan is a Syrian psychologist who left the Alawite sect of Islam, and she flatly asks, “What is this ‘moderate’, this ‘extremist’ Islam? I never heard such a thing in Syria growing up. Islam is Islam.” Ms. Sultan has made the point in numerous writings that “moderates” and “extremists” are purely a western invention, a myth.

 

The ISIS threat was known to the Obama administration well over a year ago, and yet, on September 3rd Obama admitted “We don’t have a strategy yet.” And on the heels of this admission, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel stated, “… we are aware of over 100 U.S. citizens, who have U.S. passports, who are fighting with ISIL forces. There may be more. We don’t know.”

 

Last year, Moyer Abu Salha, a twenty-two year old American citizen from Florida, went to Syria for terror training. He subsequently returned to the U.S. for a visit, before he went back to Syria and conducted a suicide-bombing for al-Nusra in May 2014.

 

Abdirahmann Muhumed, a 29 year old Somali-American, worked for Delta Airlines before he left the U.S. to fight for al-Shabab, with 39 others, and was killed on the battlefield, just as Troy Kastigar, a close friend of Douglas McArthur McCain, was killed in 2009 after joining al-Shabab in Somalia. McCain was killed in Syria weeks ago, fighting alongside ISIS. All three were from an area in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a large Muslim population and a mosque tied to anti-American propaganda and advocacy for Islamic supremacy.

 

As Muslims increasingly press for concessions to Islamic norms in America, seeking to superimpose Sharia law doctrine over Western principles, the U.S. Congress must halt all Islamic immigration in a sensible, self-preserving measure for America. And common-sense dictates that the U.S. must also stop the ideological subversion by Saudi and the Council on American and Islamic Relations lobby groups that place spies in our military and the upper echelons of U.S. government and terror recruiters in our prisons, as they bribe our State Dept. officials and national security advisors; close your eyes and CIA Chief John Brennan sounds like a Saudi Muslim.

 

Recently, many Americans were appalled and angered to hear the British islamofascist Anjem Choudary tell FoxNews host Sean Hannity, “get ready _ America will be under Sharia law.” Choudary is suspected of recruiting scores of British Muslims to fight for ISIS.

 

Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN) recently queried the FBI about American citizens fighting for ISIS and other terror groups. She asked, “Once they’re done fighting … what’s going to happen if they try to return?” The FBI replied, “Well, they’ll come into the country.” Bachmann continued, “Are you kidding me? We are not going to stop them from coming into the United States?” [Blog Editor: Bachmann-Beck interview]

Even though Findlaw.com and Senator Jim Rubens (R-NH) hold that “Natural born U.S. citizens may not have their citizenship revoked against their will” [Blog Editor: Rubens’ assertion], hasn’t one willingly abandoned their U.S. citizenship when they take up arms for an enemy of the U.S.?

 

One must certainly agree with Rep Bachmann, who made the following statement regarding her proposed legislation: “ISIS has declared the United States as their enemy. Once you join an enemy army … you should, by definition, lose your American citizenship, therefore your passport. You should have no ability to get back into the United States.”

 

But what about Obama’s open door policy? Isn’t this a severe national security breach and an impeachable offense?

 

According to Judicial Watch, intelligence officials believe a terrorist attack by ISIS and Al Qaeda, along the border between Juarez, Mexico and El Paso, Texas, is so imminent [Blog Editor: JW link] that Command Maj. Gen. Sean McFarland is being briefed at Ft Bliss. The DHS, Justice and Defense Dept. agencies have been placed on alert concerning this imminent threat and the mention of “car bombs and vehicle born improvised explosive devices.” [Blog Editor: NRO confirms]

 

What happens if the Islamic State acquires biological, chemical or nuclear weapon grade material?

 

Obama’s September 3rd message did not instill any further confidence that Obama and company would really do all that they could to ensure America’s national security, as Obama stated: “The primary U.S. objective is to degrade and destroy ISIS so that it’s no longer a threat not just to Iraq but also the region and to the United States.” This from the president whose policies created this crisis, who helped fund and arm ISIS from the beginning and who now says he will “shrink” ISIS “to the point where it is a manageable problem.” [Blog Editor: HERE, HERE & HERE]

 

Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) angrily retorted, “Terrorists who behead Americans are not ‘manageable’. They must be stopped, and we need President Obama to communicate a clear strategy … on how he plans to eliminate this threat.” [Blog Editor: Blunt retort]

 

The American people’s determination to defeat this new terror threat from ISIS and terror in general from the Islamofascists everywhere should not be underestimated. Americans remember the more than 3000 dead or missing and countless more lives devastated, as pregnant widows were left behind and two thousand children lost a parent on 9/11. Americans recall the images of our Ambassador Chris Stevens being dragged through the streets of Benghazi. Our leaders must resolve that we will not wait until there is another 9/11 before we destroy the Islamic State murderers and scatter their ashes before us.

 

By Justin O. Smith

______________

Edited by John R. Houk

All text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith