America Is Burning


Yesterday I posted “Dhimmi-Sharia Compliance in Tulsa OK”. The day before Justin Smith submitted “America Is Burning” but had not read the submission yet. My post was how a TPD Officer was fired for Social Media posts that occurred even before he was hired in Tulsa. He was fired by the combined actions of a local Leftist activist and Muslim Brotherhood-oriented CAIR. THAT LINES UP WITH Justin’s opinion piece “AMERICA IS BURNING”. IT DESERVES TO BE READ!!!!

 

JRH 10/29/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***************************

America Is Burning

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 10/27/2019 5:37 PM

Cross Posted:

 

 

 

Yes — The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria [aka ISIS, ISIL or DAESH] has largely been defeated physically and militarily, but its ideas burn hot still in the hearts of millions of Muslims this very moment. And as everybody and his brother seems so overjoyed that ISIS leader Al Baghdadi was just killed by U.S. Special Forces and they are giving back-slaps over defending America from Islamic terrorism in an overseas arena, these same fools have essentially sold America out to the Muslims for decades now.

 

In every city across America today there is a second city comprised of Muslims who have superimposed their Sharia law over entire sections of those cities, such as Dearborn, Islamberg, Minneapolis and many others, as they run a parallel system antithetical to our Constitution and freedom.

 

This is an expansionist stage that no country has ever managed to overcome, because it is the only science in which the Sons of Allah have always excelled — invading, conquering and subjugating.

 

Islam’s most coveted prey has always been Europe and the Christian world, and now America is in its sights and within its grasp. Democrats are aligned with Islam and its anti-Christian, anti-Constitution, anti-freedom and anti-American agenda, and globalist communist black robed judges and justices are protecting their efforts and policies through the judiciary.

 

If one yells anti-American slogans today and calls Americans – especially supporters of Pres. Trump – fascists, murders and the enemy of humanity, all is fine and well and considered “normal” behavior and an act of virtue, by our Democratic Party, the enemy from within, collaborationists and traitors. However, use of such slurs towards Islam and one is pilloried and subjected to more name calling and castigation.

 

The truth comes into sharp focus when we see so-called “leaders” in America seeking to implement rules of censorship and hate-speech “law” similar to that which exists in the European Union to silence any free speech that counters their anti-American communist globalist plans, favoring America’s Muslim Brotherhood as their foot soldiers in the plan to end America’s republic, favoring the establishment of heresy and the end to free thinking in America.

 

One by one, U.S. cities are giving preference to Muslim minorities over Americans born and raised here and families whose ancestry sometimes goes all the way back to America’s founding days. Already, several U.S. states are largely controlled by a Democrat-Islamist alliance, seen in Minnesota, California and New York.

 

What sort of government attempts to prevent us from thinking and speaking, from going against the wind, rebelling against and opposing those who muzzle us and invade us, stamping our freedom in the ground? A tyranny and an insult to our democratic republic. It is a government of lies and deceit and one that must be pulled out by its damnable, blackmailing illiberal anti-American roots.

 

What sort of democratic republic is it that in place of listening to its people and being concerned for America’s children silences them and hands them to the enemy? One that will surely meet a dismal fate and be burned to the ground, sooner than later.

 

America is burning in the flames of Islam, a government within a government, from all four corners of this America I love so well. And it’s far past time to fight fire with fire, close America’s borders to Islam and defeat it with extreme prejudice, stamping its fire out and sending it back to the hell that spawned it.

 

By Justin O. Smith

++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets and source link are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

The Jihad on the Christian Cross


Here is a politically incorrect thought sure to be reviled by Left Wing Multiculturalists and maybe even some Religious Liberty-minded Conservatives: Islam is soooo anti-Christian and Antisemitic in its revered writings, the death-cult should be illegalized as a legitimate religion in ANY Western Nation but especially in the U.S. of A.

 

Unless you are a Muslim supporter of this cult you might ask, “Why?”

 

I suspect Raymond Ibrahim would not publicly agree with me for politically correct reasons, his recent post – “The Jihad on the Christian Cross” – is a good enough reason to me to illegalize Islam.

 

JRH 6/7/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

***********************

The Jihad on the Christian Cross

 

By Raymond Ibrahim 

06/07/2019

RaymondIbrahim.com

 

Cover story photo of the 15th issue of Islamic State magazine, Dabiq, titled “Break the Cross.”

 

A 37-year-old Muslim migrant in Rome was recently arrested for homicide after he stabbed a Christian man in the throat for wearing a crucifix around his neck.  “Religious hate” is cited as an “aggravating factor” in the crime.

 

This is hardly the first “religious hate” crime to occur in the context of the cross in Italy.  Among others,

 

 

  • A Muslim migrant invaded an old church in Venice and attacked its large, 300-year-old cross, breaking off one of its arms, while shouting, “All that is in a church is false!”

 

 

The fact is, Islamic hostility to the cross is an unwavering phenomenon—one that crosses continents and centuries; one that is very much indicative of Islam’s innate hostility to Christianity.

 

For starters, not only is the cross the quintessential symbol of Christianity—for all denominations, including most forms of otherwise iconoclastic Protestantism—but it symbolizes the fundamental disagreement between Christians and Muslims.   As Professor Sidney Griffith explains, “The cross and the icons publicly declared those very points of Christian faith which the Koran, in the Muslim view, explicitly denied: that Christ was the Son of God and that he died on the cross.”  Accordingly, “the Christian practice of venerating the cross … often aroused the disdain of Muslims,” so that from the start of the Muslim conquests of Christian lands there was an ongoing “campaign to erase the public symbols of Christianity, especially the previously ubiquitous sign of the cross.”

 

This “campaign” traces back to the Muslim prophet Muhammad. He reportedly “had such a repugnance to the form of the cross that he broke everything brought into his house with its figure upon it,” wrote one historian (Sword and Scimitar, p. 10).  Muhammad also claimed that at the end times Jesus (the Muslim ‘Isa) himself would make it a point to “break the cross.”

 

Modern day Muslim clerics confirm this.  When asked about Islam’s ruling on whether any person—in this case, Christians—is permitted to wear or pray before the cross, Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Tarifi, a Saudi expert on Islamic law, said, “Under no circumstances is a human permitted to wear the cross” nor “is anyone permitted to pray to the cross.”  Why?  “Because the prophet—peace and blessings on him—commanded the breaking of it [the cross].”

 

Islamic history is a reflection of these sentiments.  For instance, the aforementioned Sheikh al-Tarifi also explained that if it is too difficult to break the cross—for instance, a large concrete statue—Muslims should at least try to disfigure one of its four arms “so that it no longer resembles a cross.”  Historic and numismatic evidence confirms that, after the Umayyad caliphate seized the Byzantine treasury in the late seventh century, it ordered that one or two arms of the cross on the coins be effaced so that the image no longer resembled a crucifix (Sword and Scimitar, p. 54).

 

Testimonies from the very earliest invasions into Christian Syria and Egypt of Muslims systematically breaking every crucifix they encountered abound.  According to Anastasius of Sinai, who lived during the seventh century Arab conquests, “the demons name the Saracens [Arabs/Muslims] as their companions.  And it is with reason.  The latter are perhaps even worse than the demons,” for  whereas “the demons are frequently much afraid of the mysteries of Christ,” among which he mentions the cross, “these demons of flesh trample all that under their feet, mock it, set fire to it, destroy it” (Sword and Scimitar, p. 27).

 

Reminiscent of the recent drawing of a cross in fecal matter on a French church, in 1147 in Portugal, Muslims displayed “with much derision the symbol of the cross. They spat upon it and wiped the feces from their posteriors with it.” Decades earlier in Jerusalem, Muslims “spat on them [crucifixes] and did not even refrain from urinating on them in the sight of all.” Even that supposedly “magnanimous” sultan, Saladin, commanded “whoever saw that the outside of a church was white, to cover it with black dirt,” and ordered “the removal of every cross from atop the dome of every church in the provinces of Egypt” (Sword and Scimitar, pp. 171, 145, 162).

 

Lest Muslim hostility to the cross still seem aberrant—limited to some obscure saying of Muhammad or “ancient history”—below is a very partial list of examples of how the crucifix continues to throw even “everyday” Muslims into paroxysms:

 

Egypt: A young Coptic Christian woman named Mary was mauled to death when her cross identified her as a Christian to Muslim Brotherhood rioters.  Similarly, 17-year-old Ayman, a Coptic student, was strangled and beaten to death by his Muslim teacher and fellow students for refusing to obey the teacher’s orders to cover his cross.

 

Pakistan: When a Muslim man saw Julie Aftab, a Christian woman, wearing a cross around her neck, he attacked her, forced battery acid down her throat, and splashed it on her face—permanently damaging her esophagus, blinding her in one eye, and causing her to lose both eyelids and most of her teeth.

 

Turkey: A 12-year-old boy in Turkey wearing a silver cross necklace in class was spit on and beaten regularly by Muslim classmates and teachers.

 

Malaysia: A Christian cemetery was attacked and desecrated in the middle of the night by unknown persons in the Muslim-majority nation.  Several crosses were destroyed, including by the use of “a heavy tool to do the damage.”  Separately, a Muslim mob rioted against a small Protestant church due to the visible cross atop the building of worship.  It was quickly removed.

 

Maldives: Authorities had to rescue a female Christian teacher after Muslim “parents threatened to tie and drag her off of the island” for “preaching Christianity.”  Her crime was to draw a compass—which was mistakenly taken for a cross—as part of a geography lesson in class.

 

As Islam’s presence continues to grow in Europe, it should come as no surprise that attacks on crosses are also on the rise.  Aside from the aforementioned attacks in Italy, the following occurred either in France and Germany, where attacks on churches and crosses have become endemic:

 

  • A Muslim man committed major acts of vandalism at two churches, including by twisting a massive bronze cross.  (Click for images.)

 

 

  • A Muslim man who checked himself into a hospital for treatment went into a sudden frenzy because there were “too many crosses on the wall.”  He called the nurse a “bitch” and “fascist” and became physically aggressive.

 

  • After Muslims were granted their own section at a cemetery, and after being allowed to conduct distinctly Islamic ceremonies, these same Muslims began demanding that Christian symbols and crosses in the cemetery be removed or covered up during Islamic funerals.

 

  • A German language report from notes that in the Alps and in Bavaria alone, some 200 churches have been attacked and many crosses broken: “The perpetrators are often youthful rioters with a migration background.”

 

In light of the above, it should come as no surprise that groups such as the Islamic State also make hostile references to the cross in their communiqués to the West: “We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women, by the permission of Allah[.] … [We will cast] fear into the hearts of the cross-worshipers[.]”  The Islamic State even once disseminated a video showing its members smashing crosses in and atop several churches in territories under its sway (since taken down by YouTube); it beheaded and stabbed a man with his own crucifix; and it published pictures of its members destroying Christian crosses and tombstones in cemeteries under its jurisdiction.

 

Similarly, in post “Arab Spring” Libya, a video of a Muslim mob attacking a commonwealth cemetery near Benghazi appeared on the internet.  As the Muslims kicked down and destroyed headstones with crosses on them, the man videotaping them urged them to “break the cross of the dogs!” while he and others cried “Allahu akbar!”  Toward the end of the video, the mob congregated around the huge Cross of Sacrifice, the cemetery’s cenotaph monument, and started to hammer at it, to more cries of “Allahu akbar.”  Other Christian cemeteries in Libya have suffered similarly.

 

In Iraq, pictures emerged from a Christian cemetery that was vandalized by the Islamic State.  Broken and scattered crosses appear.  In one picture, the jihadis broke into a coffin, snapped off the head of the withered corpse, and threw the crucifixes surrounding it on the ground.

 

Such is the history and continuity of Islamic hate for the cross—that symbol which represents the heart of the Christian faith, namely the death and resurrection of Christ, two events Islam vehemently denies.

 

The jihad on the cross began with Muhammad, was carried out by early caliphs, and continues to this day by the jihadis of the world, not to mention the occasional “everyday” Muslim.

 

Note: For more on the long history of jihad on the Christian cross, see author’s recent book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West.

_________________________

© 2019 · RaymondIbrahim.com ·

 

About

RAYMOND IBRAHIM is a widely published author, public speaker, and Middle East and Islam specialist.  His books include Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (Da Capo, 2018), Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (Regnery, 2013), and The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday, 2007).

 

Ibrahim’s writings, translations, and observations have appeared in a variety of publications, including the New York Times Syndicate, CNN, LA Times, Fox News, Financial Times, Jerusalem Post, United Press International, USA Today, Washington Post, Washington Times, and Weekly Standard; scholarly journals, including the Almanac of Islamism, Chronicle of Higher Education, Hoover Institution’s Strategika, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, and Middle East Review of International Affairs; and popular websites, including American Thinker, Bloomberg, Breitbart, Christian Post, Daily Caller, NewsMax, National Review Online, PJ Media, and World Magazine. He has contributed chapters to several anthologies and has been translated into dozens of languages.

 

Among other media, he has appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, C-SPAN, PBS, Reuters, Al-Jazeera, and NPR; he has done hundreds of radio interviews and some of his YouTube videos (here and here for example) have received over a million views each.

 

Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, including the National Defense Intelligence College, has briefed governmental agencies, such as U.S. Strategic Command and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits, and has testified before Congress regarding the conceptual failures that dominate American discourse concerning Islam and the worsening plight of Egypt’s Christian Copts.

 

Ibrahim’s dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East—has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the READ THE REST

 

FINALLY—In Spite of Islamic Ideology, Asia Bibi Escapes Pakistan


John R. Houk

© May 9, 2019

 

Asia Bibi Family Collage (includes husband Ashiq Masih. Daughters Eisham, Esha & Sidra)

 

In October 2018 the Pakistan Supreme Court – at great risk to Judges’ bodily harm – finally realized Christian-hating Muslims framed Asia Bibi of violating Pakistan’s incredulously moronic Blasphemy Law and gave her exoneration.

 

After Asia’s exoneration her family fearing death threats managed to flee Pakistan for safety. BUT the Pakistan government refused to allow Asia Bibi to flee for her life. THEN European nations with a Christian heritage refused to grant asylum to Asia Bibi out of FEAR of enraging their significant Muslim population boosted by recent years of Muslim migration (both legal and illegal).

 

SURPRISING to me, I have learned Canada has granted Asia Bibi asylum and indeed it is reported she has arrived in Canada safely. I say “surprising” because Canada’s current Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is a blatant Multiculturalist supporting Muslim refugees no matter the cost that Islamic theopolitical ideology is against the Western rule of law and culture.

 

Below are two stories cross posted from Vlad Tepes and The Gateway Pundit. Especially in The Gateway Pundit NOTICE the HUGE NUMBER of Muslims in Pakistan calling for the death of Asia Bibi. So much for the lie of moderate Islam versus radical Islam. OR perhaps the majority of Pakistan Muslims are radical?

 

No my friends, those Muslims calling for Asia Bibi’s death are merely following the hate inherent in Islamic revered writings.

 

JRH 5/9/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Asia Bibi in Canada

 

Posted by Eeyore

May 8, 2019

Vlad Tepes

 

VIDEO: Woman given death sentence for blasphemy leaves Pakistan

[Posted by CBC News

Published on May 8, 2019

 

Asia Bibi, a Pakistani Christian woman who spent eight years on death row over false blasphemy charges, has left the country. Bibi was acquitted by the country’s top court six months ago. Her lawyer says she has left for Canada.

 

To read more: https://www.cbc.ca/1.5127324]

 

It is possible that this is the first genuine refugee Canada has taken in. And it is an amazingly good thing that Canada did. One wonders if there are conditions to her being here such as limits to her freedom of speech to discuss Islam and its impact on minorities in Islamic countries. It is difficult not to believe that the Saudi girls are not under conditions like that as their language has been extremely measured since arriving here.

 

The CBC article failed to mention that the UK turned down her application because of concerns over how local muslims would behave. Once again showing who makes the law in the UK.

 

It is a powerfully good thing that Canada brought in Asia. However I personally have met migrants to Canada from Syria who were Christian but had to lie and say they were Muslim to get into Canada as a refugee. So while this extremely high profile case is an excellent event, someone needs to look in to the actual policy in Canada in terms of accepting genuine refugees of Islamic horror and discrimination against minority religions and see what is wrong in the system.

 

++++++++

Persecuted Christian Asia Bibi Flees to Canada After Muslim Blasphemy Law Acquittal in Pakistan

 

By Jim Hoft

May 8, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

In November 2018 hundreds of thousands of Muslims rallied in Pakistan demanding that Christian mother Asia Bibi be beheaded for insulting Islam. [PHOTO]

 

Asia Bibi, a poor farm laborer and Christian, was released in October from prison in 2018 for the blasphemy charges. [PHOTO]

 

Bibi was not allowed to leave Pakistan until her trial was over.

 

Muslims want her dead.

 

 

Earlier this week Asia Bibi arrived in Canada after fleeing Pakistan.


She was not safe there despite her acquittal.

 

FOX News reported:

 

The Christian woman who spent years on death row in Pakistan for alleged blasphemy before she was acquitted last year has left the country for Canada, her lawyer confirmed to Fox News on Wednesday.

 

Asia Bibi was convicted on blasphemy charges in 2009 after a quarrel with a fellow farmworker who accused her of insulting Islam’s Prophet Muhammad.

 

After spending eight years on death row, the 54-year-old’s conviction was overturned last year by the Supreme Court. Despite being a “free woman” after the death sentence was thrown out, she has been in protective custody – itself a kind of prison – because of religious extremists’ calls for her hanging.

____________________

FINALLY—In Spite of Islamic Ideology, Asia Bibi Escapes Pakistan

John R. Houk

© May 9, 2019

__________________

Asia Bibi in Canada

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger’s catholic

 

Copyright © 2019 Vlad Tepes All Rights Reserved.

_________________

Persecuted Christian Asia Bibi Flees to Canada After Muslim Blasphemy Law Acquittal in Pakistan

 

© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

 

Violence Continues as Pakistani Islamists Protest Christian Woman’s “Blasphemy” Acquittal


I am not surprised that Pakistan Muslims are so supremacist that they have reacted with such viciousness toward Asia Bibi due to the Pakistan Court overturning her conviction and I also expect Mullah egged-on violence against Pakistani Christians to follow (if indeed it may have already occurred and not yet reported by Western media).

 

If anyone has an update on Asia Bibi, such as a prison release date, health report, asylum in a nation outside of Pakistan, etc.; please email me at john.houk@gmail.com or those of you who know my private email – you can data there.

 

Below is an IPT report I found on the Asia Bibi situation.

 

JRH 11/2/18

In this current state of media censorship & defunding, consider chipping in a few bucks for enjoying this Blog.

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Violence Continues as Pakistani Islamists Protest Christian Woman’s “Blasphemy” Acquittal

 

By IPT News

Nov 2, 2018 at 9:15 am

Investigative Project on Terrorism

 

Thousands of Islamist demonstrators in Pakistan continue to violently protest the acquittal of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who was falsely accused of blasphemy and spent the last eight years on death row.

 

Protesters clashed with police, burned cars and disrupted traffic, blocking ambulances. Schools across Pakistan have been closed and a major zone in Islamabad is sealed off.

 

Asia Bibi was charged in 2009 with insulting Islam’s prophet Muhammad after drinking from a cup of water before allowing fellow Muslim farm laborers drink first. After being beaten in her home, Bibi’s accusers say that she confessed to blasphemy. She was sentenced to death in 2010.

 

On Wednesday, Pakistan’s Supreme Court overturned her sentence. For that, the Supreme Court judges “deserve to be killed,” said Muhammad Afzal Qadri, leader of the extremist Islamist Tehreek-i-Labaik party. But Bibi has not been released from prison, as negotiations for her safety broke down between the government and Islamists.

 

“Which government can function like this, blackmailed by protests?” asked Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, accusing the Islamists for “inciting [people] for their own political gain.”

 

Radical religious groups, including a charity founded by UN-designated terrorist Hafiz Saeed, vowed to join the protests today.

 

Public support for blasphemy laws in Pakistan remains high, driving a wedge between the ruling party and extreme Islamists stoking protests. And that sentiment is not limited to South Asia.

 

A Maryland mosque last year praised the terrorist who killed a former Pakistani governor critical of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. Salman Taseer was targeted by radical Islamists after he defended Bibi. In 2011, his bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri shot and killed him.

 

American Islamist groups said nothing about Taseer’s killing.

 

After Qadri was executed for the killing in 2016, the Gulzar E Madina mosque hosted a celebration in his memory, “attended by dozens of people including young children and teenagers.”

 

Radical Islamists in Pakistan, whether organized terrorist groups or mobs of people, often take matters into their hands.

 

In April 2017, a violent mob beat to death a university student who faced a blasphemy accusation that investigators later deemed false.

 

Sunni terrorist groups connected to extremist Pakistani organizations last year targeted minorities in several deadly attacks including Ahmadi Muslims, the Shi’a Hazara community, and Christians.

 

In December, for example, Islamic State terrorists killed nine civilians in a targeted attack involving a suicide bomber against a Methodist church in Quetta.

 

Pakistan has charged about 1,000 people with blasphemy since 1987, and convictions can carry the death penalty. These laws especially target members of Pakistan’s minority communities. But the law can be also applied to anyone that is seen as a threat to the government.

 

According to the US State Department’s International Religious Freedom Report for 2017, civil society organizations “reported lower courts often failed to adhere to basic evidentiary standards in blasphemy cases.”

 

Asia Bibi’s acquittal highlights the plight of all religious minorities in Pakistan and the destructive power of radical Islamists across the country.

__________________

Support IPT in their efforts in spite of Multiculturalist attempts to block Conservative/Counterjihad info websites.

 

About The Investigative Project on Terrorism

 

The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) is a non-profit research group founded by Steven Emerson in 1995. It is recognized as the world’s most comprehensive data center on radical Islamic terrorist groups. For more than two decades, the IPT has investigated the operations, funding, activities and front groups of Islamic terrorist and extremist groups in the United States and around the world. It has become a principal source of critical evidence to a wide variety of government offices and law enforcement agencies, as well as the U.S. Congress and numerous public policy forums. Research carried out by the IPT team has formed the basis for thousands of articles and television specials on the subject of radical Islamic involvement in terrorism, and has even led to successful government action against terrorists and financiers based in the United States.

 

The IPT accepts no funding from outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or religious institutions. Tax deductible contributions should be made to its fund-raising arm, the Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.

 

Founder and executive director Steven Emerson is an internationally recognized expert on terrorism and national security and author. Consulted by the White House, National Security Council, FBI, Justice Department, Congress and intelligence agencies, Mr. Emerson is in great demand as one of the most astute, insightful and knowledgeable experts in the world today on the threat and prospects of militant Islamic terrorism. He has been quoted in more than 500 news articles and has appeared frequently on network television. His 2002 best-selling book, American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us, provides the first context and understanding for how one of the most notorious terrorist groups in the world could have plotted the worst terrorist attack on American soil without detection or scrutiny by American authorities.

 

What others say about Emerson and the Investigative Project on Terrorism: READ THE REST

 

I appealed my G+ suspension – APPEAL DENIED!


google-censored

John R. Houk

© November 11, 2016

 

On November 9, I vented my frustration with Google for suspending my access to write on G+ because I was accused of violating “User Content and Conduct Policy”. I appealed that suspension largely based on guess work in 11/9/16 venting.

 

Yesterday Google notified me that my appeal was denied. The reason they gave me for violating “Content and Conduct Policy” was very lacking in details other than stipulating “… your content was in violation …”

 

Thus, the insinuation is that my content was in violation and not my conduct. AGAIN! The Google reasoning is my Conservative views and values is a violation of what is acceptable content.

 

Now let’s be clear: Any content I post does not have or contain profanity. There is NO incitement to commit acts of violence in my content. However, I have received threats of violence in the past, particularly from Muslims that grieve that criticism and the exposing of truth inherent in Islam as blasphemous. Unlike the Liberty inherent in the U.S. Constitution, Islam’s revered writings call for the death of anyone (even Muslims) who disrespect Islam or its prophet Muhammad. Hence the death threats against me and/or my family.

 

Leftists have occasionally threatened violence but most often like to hurl insults usually laced with profanity when they are unable to respond intelligently to my criticism. It is my thought that this current suspension I must experience for about two weeks (that includes an – OR ELSE from Google) is the result of Leftist frustration because Donald Trump won the election against – here comes a possible content violation – CROOKED HILLARY.

 

The OR ELSE might be expedited by Google in some future date for I refuse to believe criticizing the Left or their intelligence is a content violation in any social platform available to both Conservatives and Leftists. IF a social platform – Google, Facebook, etc. – desires to limit Conservative or Counterjihad content, those social platforms should spell out specifics. My reasoning is the hate speech and threats from Leftists and Muslims far exceeds any criticism leveled by the Right. Unfortunately, there a Right Wingers who do express racist vitriol however those tend to be on the extreme Right. AND YET extreme Leftists and “Radical” Muslims are able to exact profanity and threaten violence with impunity because of the Left thinking of Multiculturalism must be protected even if it is offensive to Conservatives, Jews and/or Christians.

 

I am still very annoyed by this G+ suspension. Can you tell? Do me a huge favor and plus-one this post via your Google+ account and perhaps even share it in a G+ community as a form of protest to unjust Google censorship.

 

Below is the G+ form letter email that I received so unworthily.

 

JRH 11/11/16

Please Support NCCR

**********

RE: [4-3734000014332] Google+ Profile Appeal

From: profiles-support@google.com

11/10/16 2:44 AM

 

Dear Google+ user,

 

Thank you for your message.

 

We have reviewed your appeal and found that your content was in violation of the User Content and Conduct Policy. Your access to Google+ has been limited for two weeks.

 

If you continue to violate our policies, your access to Google+ and Google’s other social services, such as Hangouts, may be suspended permanently. Learn more

 

We understand that these policies may not be for everyone. If you choose to leave, you can make a copy of your data first. If you like, you can also disable Google+ entirely.

 

Sincerely,

 

The Google+ Support Team

 

Replies to this email will not be monitored. If you have other questions or concerns regarding Google, please visit the Google Help Center.

Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043