Blog Archives

Islam is an Anti-American – Antichrist Religious Cult


Constitution-Bill of Right NOT Compatible Islam

Islam is an Anti-American – Antichrist Religious Cult

Including a Commentator’s Thoughts on Previous Post

 

John R. Houk

© February 21, 2014

 

I am a member of several Counterjihad groups on Facebook. Many of the posts I place on SlantRight 2.0 are shared on many of these groups. I received a very good comment from Ray Lanfear on the group No Sharia 4 America which I feel compelled to share as a separate post it shares an opinion that concurs with my thoughts that Americans need to WAKE-UP to comprehend that Islam is a theopolitical ideology that is a threat to the American way of life because its doctrines demand militant action to spread globally. DO NOT BE FOOLED! Islam is not peace. Islam is oppression. Islam is the absence of Freedom and Liberty that our U.S. Constitution ensures will not be violated. Now I realize Islamic adherents find my conclusions ridiculous primarily because they have decided to SUBMIT to Allah and the human Muslims call the prophet Mohammed. The problem arises between me and Islamic doctrine is my refusal to submit to the acknowledgment that Islam is the only way which means I have insulted Islam, Allah and Mohammed. This is doctrinally unacceptable in Islam. Islamic doctrine demands that a person like me – a Christian – that believes faith in Christ is the only way must be terminated for such an insult to Islam. Do not be fooled by any “People of the Book” malarkey. Under Islam the “People of the Book” are to be protected and tolerated ONLY if they submit to the superiority of Islam and understand they must live as inferior beings with no rights in comparison to Muslims and then are doomed to Islamic hell.

 

Now a Biblical Christian believes a person who rejects Christ will live their eternity in hell; however Scripturally, Christians should believe punishment in this life for rejecting Christ as long as a person lives in conjunction with the laws of the land are not to be punished or discriminated against for rejecting Christ. Judgment for eternity is in God’s hands not mans. Biblically it is the Christian’s duty to keep presenting the Good News of Redemption in Christ Jesus the Son of God until death in this life moves one to God’s judgment.

 

Admittedly and sadly, history has shown that where Christianity was the dominant religion the intolerance of non-Christians permeated society. First Jews then Muslims followed by primitive religions of an animistic nature were not tolerated by Christian rulers and Christian conquerors (in animism’s case especially on the North and South American Continents). In the early days of European Christian domination Jews were persecuted unjustly as Christ-killer culprits. The Christ-killer appellation was impugned even though Roman polytheists are as culpable in the unjust Crucifixion of Christ as the Jewish leadership jealous of losing their authority to Roman absolute control were culpable. And please do note I wrote “Jewish leadership”. The New Testament portrays Jesus as the most popular with the Jewish people that perceived that Jesus was alleviating woes of sickness and social idiocy. When push comes to shove though, most people will follow the direction of their religious leaders not perceiving any hypocrisy in leadership motives.

 

AND FURTHER for the plan of God to make Redemption available for humanity, it was absolutely necessary for an absolutely innocent human to sacrifice his life in order for humanity under the oppression of Adam’s curse for selling out to Satan. Jesus the son of Mary fit the human bill and Jesus the Son of God fit the sinlessness inherited from a Divine nature. Thus making Jesus Christ fully man (son of Mary) and fully God (Son of God the Father) simultaneously. In choosing the Redemptive Salvation of one’s on will in Christ one is transferred from Satan’s kingdom of darkness into the Kingdom of Light of God’s only begotten Son. The Promise is to live in perpetual fellowship in Right Standing (Righteousness) with God in Christ Jesus.

 

This is opposed to the Muslim promise of paradise for dying as a martyr for Allah experiencing carnal pleasures of 72 virgins and unlimited wine both forbidden to Male Muslims in their natural life.

 

In the case of brutality of Christianity with Muslims. By the Middle Ages a combination of European military innovations and the constant raiding Christian Europe began to lead the Christian leaders of the day to be fed up. So when it was reported (whether the truth was stretched or not) that Muslims were attacking Christians making a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, a unified excuse was presented for Christian Noble Families to prepare their own military expeditions to plunder the Muslims – quite brutally in the beginning – on the way to create new feudal kingdoms. To the Holy Land these were the Crusades in the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) this was the Reconquista. Reprehensibly the Jews were victims even more so during the Crusades and Reconquista for they had been basically a scattered people without a nation since the Roman Expulsion between 70 AD and 135 AD. It is my contention that the Crusades that Muslims whine about was the result of the Jihad and plundering excursions against Christian Europe. Neither side was exactly saintly in their rules of engagement.

 

Well … Chuckle, that was my unsuspected sermon of Good News of Redemption in Christ. Below is Ray Lanfear’s brilliant comment affirming Islam is contradictory to American Constitutional Life.

 

JRH 2/21/14

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Response to ‘Oklahoma Voters Know the Enemy

Original blog link – SlantRight 2.0

 

By Ray Lanfear 

February 19, 2014 7:01pm

No Sharia 4 America Facebook Group

 

Enough is enough. America, wake up over 500,000 Muslim/Refugee/immigrants our being relocated to the United States. It’s time to turn back this trend. Did you vote for that? No one voted on this? For the real truth Google [Editor: the arbitrary link that I used in my browser]TheProjectMuslimBrotherhood[Editor: Link to an Investigative Project on Terrorism PDF document of the original Arabic followed by the English translation]. It is their secret doctrine to destroy America from within. Guess what, they are succeeding folks. One only has to look at England, Belgium, France, Germany, and the rest of Europe today. It is sad what Paris has become, mainly due to the Muslim immigration; take a good look at Europe and that is America in 25 years, unless something is done to prevent “theprojectmuslimbrotherhood[Editor: This link to ‘The Project’ is from Discover The Networks] from making further inroads into America, our cities, schools, universities and textbooks and yes, even our own government.

 

Multiculturalism is literally destroying Europe. You give them one inch and they will eventually erode our American culture. There are now over 700 “Islamic no go Muslim Zones” within England, France and Germany. Islam is not a religion but a political ideology. It is the antithesis of a free society. Take a look at Dearborn-Michigan, [SEE Also HERE] Tennessee, New York, Indiana, S. Dakota, California and Colorado. [These States] have so far most of the immigrants. What State is next?

 

I have no problem with the “peaceful Muslim” that want to integrate into our culture and follow our laws. The problem lies in that they want to dominate and force Islam and Sharia Law upon us all. Awareness is the issue, put the word out folks. Most families are just trying to survive and pay their bills, working two jobs, raising their children. They just don’t have the time to keep up with what is really taking place across America today and the mainstream news will not carry it due to political correctness. [This is] Just not acceptable here in America folks! Stand up and be counted! “When good men and woman are quiet evil always wins”.

 

Forget about be labeled a racist, or being politically correct. Tolerance, diversity and multiculturalism is not good for America. Let them adapt to our culture, period Amen. Why should we adapt to their culture America?

 

Again for facts and truth Google “theprojectmuslimbrotherhood[Editor: This link is a 93 minute documentary all about the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda for North America. The discovered document is called ‘The Project’] [which] speaks volumes on the intent to destroy us from within. Who will stop this “insanity” from becoming a reality in America? Jews, Christians, Priests and infidels are being slaughtered and Christian churches are being burned to the ground. Enough is enough folks. Where is the condemnation of these acts from all the Muslims that are here? There are nearly 3 million here already yet you barely hear any of them condemn the atrocities. What you do will affect your children and grandchildren and future generations of America yet to come. Stand up and be counted to defeat this real threat upon America. Europe is losing the battle already, and America will be next. Forget about being labeled and do what is right America. We need a solution. Time is running out.

_______________________

Islam is an Anti-American – Antichrist Religious Cult

John R. Houk

© February 21, 2014

______________________

Response to ‘Oklahoma Voters Know the Enemy

 

Edited from original Facebook post

Links and bracketed content is by the Editor

UKIP Multiculturalism The Great Lie – Geert Wilders


Geert Wilders from Netherlands (aka Holland) bravely exposes the true nature of Islam as compared to Western Culture. Wilders is brave because most of Europe has stripped their citizens of Free Speech when it comes to expressing Biblical Morality or in Wilders’ case demonstrating from the Quran, Hadith and Sira that Islam is NOT peace. Here is a 9 minute speech from Wilders stating that Multiculturalism is destroying the West.

 

 

JRH 12/19/13 (Hat Tip: Infidels United)

Please Support NCCR

**************************************

VIDEO: UKIP Multiculturalism The Great Lie – Geert Wilders

 

 

Posted by bandi bandi

Posted on Jun 28, 2013

What to do when the Muslim Minority Assaults Non-Muslim Majority?


Muslim Violence forecast France

John R. Houk

© August 26, 2013

 

My friend Justin Smith via Facebook sent a video of this blonde French gal railing on her French government for doing absolutely zero to protect French people from the racist hatred of Muslims in France being executed in violence against White French people.

 

She describes an email she received describing how a French family was accosted by Muslims. The six months pregnant wife was pelted with stones while working in her own garden. Eventually she lost that baby with the cause being stated as STRESS.

 

The French family’s home was ransacked several times including twice in one day. The blonde gal says the police would not respond to the crimes because this family lives in an “unsafe zone” within their own nation.

 

One of the largest concentration of Muslims in America is in the Detroit metropolitan area – specifically Dearborn. Can you imagine Muslims attacking non-Muslims in this once car making home just because of their Christian beliefs? Guess what. That has happened!

 

VIDEO: Arab Festival 2010: Dearborn Police Defending Islam against the Constitution

 

A Christian group makes annual visit to Dearborn exercising their First Amendment Right of Religious Freedom to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ during a community festival. In the past the Dearborn police actually illegally made the Christians leave. In one case the Christian group was actually attacked by Muslim by the pelting of bottles and cans. The police did not protect the Christians but rather informed them their presence was inciting violence. WHAT! The event was and is public! Is America under United Nations rule that we are prohibited to exercise our Religious Freedom if doing so is insulting to Muslims? THAT IS CRAZY UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

 

The below video is 22 minutes long but you get the idea of Sharia in America in just the first two or three minutes:

 

VIDEO: American Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, MI (Original edit)

 

The Muslim violence epidemic affecting the French in their home within the framework of French Culture breeds fear for the French. The Dearborn example demonstrates that this plague in France is gaining a toe-hold in America. Do we want to allow this to happen in American because of the fallacy of Leftist Multiculturalism – protect the Muslim and persecute the Christian to make Muslims feel welcome? I say NO!

 

Clarity needs to be brought out that Religious Freedom does not mean violence against another religion is okay if the other religion is insulted. Of course that works both ways. Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus or even atheists should not attack Muslims due to their religious beliefs. Oops … I have not heard of such action since the days of the Ku Klux Klan White Supremacists attacking Black Churches in the South. This is the 21st century and that does not occur anymore.

 

When minority Muslims in the West (like France, America, UK and other nations) can attack with impunity because their Islamic Supremacism tells them they have the right to attack non-Muslims disrespecting Islam and the police structure allows such violence to occur, then we have a problem. If the problem is not solved immediately eventually there will be religious strife that will take on the picture of racial violence as the inherent culture becomes weary of unhinged Muslim violence against non-Muslims. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that hot heads will gather a following of wronged people or families by Islamic Supremacism within the native culture.

 

The Law of the Land must step in now even if there is a time of violence by recalcitrant Muslims until barriers are established that violence due to any religious beliefs will not be tolerated.

 

Below is that Blonde French Gal that touches on these issues passionately. Even though she speaks in French it is worth it to read the subtitles and match it to the emotion she is displaying. And even though she rails on the French government she finishes with Vive le France. Typically I am not a fan of the French because of the portrayal of an anti-American attitude; however in this case her emotion moves me to join Blondie –Vive le France!

 

JRH 8/26/13 (Hat Tip: Justin Smith)

Please Support NCCR

**************************************

Blonde of Youtube: “The time for talk is over”

 

Posted by Ban Koran

Published on Aug 23, 2013

_________________________

Transcript via Gates of Vienna

 

“The Time for Talk is Over”

Posted August 23, 2013 10:38 PM

Posted by Baron Bodissey

 

“The Blonde” returns with a few choice words aimed at Interior Minister Manuel Valls, and an appalling story about the treatment meted out by culture-enrichers to a young “person of French background” in the north of France.

 

Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

 

[Editor: This where Gates of Vienna inserts their copy of the video.]

 

Transcript:

 

00:02

 

Firefighters, police attacked.

00:06

 

suburbs freedom of expression censored

00:10

 

anti-white racism. Socialist Justice.

00:14

 

Dhimmitude. Apology for Communism.

00:18

 

Replacement of our Population.

00:22

 

France and her flag insulted.

00:26

 

Don’t touch our freedom of expression. Don’t touch my national anthem.

00:30

 

Don’t stone firefighters. Stop religious riots.

00:34

 

Blonde of YouTube

00:46

 

CouCou

00:50

 

Today a somewhat different video. Firstly,

00:54

 

apologies for the sound quality.

00:58

 

I’ll explain what’s going on.

01:02

 

Two weeks ago I received a worrying email asking me

01:06

 

for help, because he had big problems.

01:10

 

I responded, but

01:14

 

no more than that, as I get such messages

01:18

 

by the hundreds regularly.

01:22

 

So, the situation: this young man lives in the North

01:26

 

next to the city of Louches.

01:30

 

On hearing the name of this town

01:34

 

one feels like laughing, but knowing what is happening there,

01:38

 

it’s not funny.

01:42

 

So this young man moved there.

01:46

 

It started with anti-white insults;

01:50

 

it escalated. Three weeks ago his wife

01:54

 

was pelted with stones in her garden

01:58

 

while she was six months pregnant. His little brother

02:02

 

has also been violently attacked.

02:06

 

He intervened, and six of them jumped on him.

02:10

 

Result: both ended in the emergency room.

02:14

 

His house has been ransacked, twice

02:18

 

in two days. They destroyed everything, furniture,

02:22

 

baby things, crockery.

02:26

 

They returned that night to finish the job.

02:31

 

The police don’t come

02:35

 

because the district is too dangerous.

02:39

 

Social services and city hall know about it.

02:43

 

The police know about it.

02:47

 

But nobody does anything.

02:51

 

So he called me for help, because his wife,

02:55

 

with all this stress, just lost her baby

02:59

 

yesterday.

03:03

 

Labor was induced this morning.

03:07

 

Her baby was stillborn

03:11

 

because of all this stress

03:15

 

and the incapacity of our government.

03:19

 

I find this revolting,

03:23

 

because they have no idea of the situation

03:27

 

of these people. There are thousands of people like this,

03:31

 

but Mr. Valls [Manuel Valls, interior minister] fights Islamophobia instead.

03:35

 

I ask myself: what

03:39

 

if the wife of this man had been called “Fatima”?

03:43

 

You can imagine the huge reaction this would have caused

03:47

 

in all the (despicable) media.

03:51

 

We would have heard about it everywhere.

03:55

 

But as the victim was merely a little French whitey, no worries.

03:59

 

I am really outraged.

04:03

 

I am close to exploding, when I see Mr. Valls

04:07

 

call us Islamophobes:

04:11

 

stop the bulls***! What does Mr. Valls do for all these people

04:15

 

who live in and next to these cities,

04:19

 

who cannot go out in peace? What does he do for our police?

04:23

 

What does he do for our firefighters?

04:27

 

Nothing at all!

04:31

 

Except protect HIS police,

04:35

 

his political police, you know the ones I’m talking about.

04:39

 

I’m speaking of the “Antifa” [extreme left groups].They consider us

04:43

 

Fachos [Fascists].

04:47

 

“Fachos” because we love our country

04:51

 

as it used to be. We are called Fascists.

04:55

 

3/4 of us have no criminal record (as they do),

05:00

 

but it is we who are dangerous fascists.

05:04

 

It’s time to put things back into order

05:08

 

and DO something, because the time for talk is over.

05:12

 

Do something; send in the Army.

05:16

 

It’s not OK to let women live in fear,

05:20

 

let women lose their children because of stress.

05:24

 

It’s non-assistance to people in danger.

05:28

 

The government does not do its duty.

05:32

 

This has to stop.

05:36

 

If they don’t know, I can explain it to them, I get testimonies,

05:40

 

thousands of them, but

05:44

 

[Valls] couldn’t care less. He is in his beautiful big house, in security.

05:48

 

Mr. Valls is not worried,

05:52

 

nor are all the other clowns in our Government.

05:56

 

A solution must be found quickly. I appeal to lawyers.

06:00

 

I appeal to city hall, the Prefect,

06:04

 

ANYONE! Help this young couple

06:08

 

The young man, I spent more than two hours

06:12

 

on the phone with him. He was in a terrible state;

06:16

 

he was close to suicide. We were several patriots

06:20

 

trying to talk him out of it.

06:24

 

He was also close to going into the city to get himself killed

06:28

 

simply by provoking.

06:32

 

And no, nobody will do anything.

06:36

 

So, stop the bulls*** and do something

06:40

 

and clean up these cities. Stop the blah-blah. Talk fests are nice,

06:44

 

but there is never any action. As I said before:

06:48

 

The time for dialogue is finished.

06:52

 

Either they move, or we are the ones who will move you.

06:56

 

We cannot let people like this get attacked,

07:00

 

end up in hospital, their houses ransacked,

07:04

 

their cars burnt, and we remain silent,

07:08

 

while the police cannot even GO there.

07:12

 

My little sister called me three days ago to tell me

07:16

 

that she was grossly insulted, because she wears the same thing as I around the neck

07:21

 

We are FED UP!

07:25

 

I am angry, and we are all angry.

07:29

 

We try to calm people a little on the net,

07:33

 

but we will not be able to calm them

07:37

 

for ten years.

07:41

 

So, he [Valls] should stop questioning, let him get on the phone and send in the army.

07:45

 

He is not aware of the situation. All he does is…

07:49

 

yes… good… you are Islamophobes,

07:53

 

you don’t love Islam… yeah, that’s it.

07:57

 

Fed up, there are endless problems with Islam.

08:01

 

I am threatened, I am on the wall of the “Antifas”

08:05

 

the ones I call “THEIR” political police. Because their young men

08:09

 

are much more violent than we who are considered fascists.

08:13

 

Why? Because I defend the police, the firefighters

08:17

 

civilians, the army? But it’s YOUR work, not mine;

08:21

 

get your ideas in order

08:25

 

And so…

08:29

 

this crime must not go unpunished.

08:33

 

A baby is dead, a family is destroyed,

08:37

 

and it’s just ONE example among many

08:41

 

So: move! That’s all I have to say on

08:45

 

on this subject. And the next video

08:49

 

we will discuss [inaudible].

08:53

 

I wish you a good day, and Vive la France!

 

 

_________________________________

What to do when the Muslim Minority Assaults Non-Muslim Majority?

John R. Houk

© August 26, 2013

______________________________

Ban Koran” is quite anonymous for obvious reasons relation to the – cough – Religion of Peace.

____________________________

“The Time for Talk is Over”

 

Gates of Vienna Homepage

The Left Destroying America Inside Out


Typical Liberal

 

John R. Houk

© July 24, 2013

 

America’s Left – which means the Democratic Party and President Barack Hussein Obama – preach the acceptance of Diversity, Multiculturalism and Equality. As benevolent as those terms are they mean one thing to Leftists and promoted as something else to the typical Joe American voter.

 

Diversity

 

Joe American is told Diversity is fair and equal acceptance of belief systems and such ungodly practices as homosexuality. Compassion for all ways of thinking and lifestyle practices sounds very high minded and agreeable, right?

 

A Latin motto that can be seen on U.S. money and the Great Seal is E Pluribus Unum – Out of many, one. This addresses diversity in America. Below is the original intent of the motto. Also the early flow of immigrants in America expanded on the original intent:

 

On the Great Seal of the United States, the phrase appears in the banner held in the beak of the American eagle. The busy eagle is also holding an olive branch and a quiver of arrows in its left and right talons, respectively. The phrase is meant to symbolize the union of the 13 original colonies, and their close relationship with the federal government. Over time, people have also taken “e pluribus unum” to refer to the ethnic diversity in the United States. (What Does “E Pluribus Unum” Mean? wiseGEEK)

 

E Pluribus Unum does not emphasize an Out of many, ensure multiple ethnic and gender identities. Rather the motto emphasizes out of a diverse amount of people ONE America emerges. An article I found at The Road to Emmaus reproduced an essay from The Patriot Post. The essay addresses America’s immigration policy under the original intent of the Founding Fathers adoption of E Pluribus Unum. I like the assertions of the early part of the essay:

 

THE FOUNDATION

 

“[T]he policy or advantage of [immigration] taking place in a body may be much questioned; for, by so doing, they retain the Language, habits and principles which they bring with them. Whereas by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures and laws: in a word, soon become one people.”
—George Washington

 

Out of many, one.

 

That was the national motto proposed by Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson in 1776. Both simple and elegant, it embodied the notion that all who had come to America’s shores, and all who would come, must be united—must all form one front—in defense of freedom and liberty. For 200 years, we were, largely, one people united behind constitutional republicanism. But soon after the social turbulence of the ’60s and the economic woes of the ’70s, that unity began to crumble. This was the era in which multiculturalism emerged—the era in which ethnocentricity became chic.

 

Arthur Schlesinger, a former Harvard professor and senior advisor to JFK, published a retrospective on this era in 1991 called “The Disuniting of America.” Schlesinger wrote primarily about the orthodoxy of self-interested hyphenated-American citizen groups—who, rather than unifying to become one, were diversifying to become many. He warned that the cult of ethnicity would result in “the fragmentation and tribalization of America,” the natural consequence being that these special-interest groups would be co-opted by the political parties.

 

“Instead of a transformative nation with an identity all its own,” Schlesinger wrote, “America increasingly sees itself in this new light as preservative of diverse alien identities—groups ineradicable in their ethnic character.” He asserts, by way of inquiry, “Will the melting pot give way to the Tower of Babel?”

 

The disuniting of America is a foundational concern underlying much of the debate about immigration.

 

The disuniting of America is a foundational concern underlying much of the current security, economic and social debate (both rational and irrational) about immigration. This is the concern that a nation, which is already ethnically fragmented internally, risks complete disunity of its national integrity in the absence of borders. (E pluribus unum? Posted by The Road to Emmaus, Written by The Patriot Post [07 April 2006    |    THE Patriot Post.US  http://patriotpost.us/   |    Patriot No. 06-14] READ THE REST)

 

The Leftist concept of “Diversity” is not an American concept.

 

Multiculturalism

 

Multiculturalism and diversity go hand in hand. Multiculturalism is the practice of upholding cultural standards that are foreign to America rather than to assimilate into American culture. Assimilation brings unity of purpose to a nation. If each diverse culture separates from America in emphasizing a foreign heritage and language above that which unifies America then disunity will ensue. Disunity in a nation magnifies conflict. Conflict leads to social chaos. Intense social chaos leads to the fracturing of the fabric of a nation. When the USA fractures kiss that which has made America great goodbye. The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution which have formed a Union of States will become interests of past history rather than the center piece of American cultural unity.

 

Multiculturalism is a body of thought in political philosophy about the proper way to respond to cultural and religious diversity. Mere toleration of group differences is said to fall short of treating members of minority groups as equal citizens; recognition and positive accommodation of group differences are required through “group-differentiated rights,” a term coined by Will Kymlicka (1995). Some group-differentiated rights are held by individual members of minority groups, as in the case of individuals who are granted exemptions from generally applicable laws in virtue of their religious beliefs or individuals who seek language accommodations in schools or in voting. Other group-differentiated rights are held by the group qua group rather by its members severally; such rights are properly called group rights, as in the case of indigenous groups and minority nations, who claim the right of self-determination. In the latter respect, multiculturalism is closely allied with nationalism.

 

While multiculturalism has been used as an umbrella term to characterize the moral and political claims of a wide range of disadvantaged groups, including African Americans, women, gays and lesbians, and the disabled, most theorists of multiculturalism tend to focus their arguments on immigrants who are ethnic and religious minorities (e.g. Latinos in the U.S., Muslims in Western Europe), minority nations (e.g. Catalans, Basque, Welsh, Québécois), and indigenous peoples (e.g. Native peoples in North America, Maori in New Zealand). (Multiculturalism; Sarah Song; The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.))

 

Here are some excerpts from a Thomas Sowell essay on the evils of Multiculturalism:

 

Among the many irrational ideas about racial and ethnic groups that have polarized societies over the centuries and around the world, few have been more irrational and counterproductive than the current dogma of multiculturalism.

 

Intellectuals who imagine that they are helping racial or ethnic groups that lag behind by redefining their lags out of existence with multicultural rhetoric are in fact leading them into a blind alley.

 

 

Multiculturalism, like the caste system, paints people into the corner where they happened to have been born. But at least the caste system does not claim to benefit those at the bottom.

 

Multiculturalism not only serves the ego interests of intellectuals, it serves the political interests of elected officials, who have every incentive to promote a sense of victimhood, and even paranoia, among groups whose votes they want in exchange for both material and psychic support.

 

 

The biggest losers in all this are those members of racial minorities who allow themselves to be led into the blind alley of resentment and rage even when there are broad avenues of opportunity available. And we all lose when society is polarized. (READ ENTIRETY – The Dogma of Multiculturalism; By Thomas Sowell; National Review Online; 3/15/13 12:00 AM) 

 

Frosty Wooldridge on the evils of Multiculturalism:

 

 

Those people with hyphenated nationalities manifest “multiculturalism.”

 

By its very name, it destroys one culture by breaking it into many. It’s like throwing a baseball through a window in a house, fracturing it into many pieces. The window can no longer protect that house from rain, winds or snow. Additionally, with numerous cultures come multiple languages. Linguistic chaos equals unending tension. The writer, Kant, said, “The two great dividers are religion and language.”

 

 

On the other hand, millions respond and respect their one allegiance as that of being an “American.” Thus, we grow as a country at odds with itself. We lose our national identity with every added citizen who calls him/herself a hyphenated American.

 

Europe provides a peek into our future. Their Muslim-British immigrants stand at odds with everything English. If you visit London, you will find two separate societies. The Muslim-French immigrants balk at everything French. The Muslim-Dutch backlash against everything in Holland. Ethiopian-Norwegians will not assimilate into Norway’s culture.

 

 

Today, America’s grand 232 year run fractures, falters and degrades under the march of “multiculturalism.” The word sounds unifying, inclusive and respectful. Yet how unified can a nation remain where a foreign language forces its way into our national character?  Los Angeles provides a peek into our future where Mexican culture “overtook” its way into dominance.

 

….

 

A recent PEW report shows America adding 138 million people in four decades. Of that number, 90 million immigrants will reach America’s shores by 2050. One in five citizens will be born out of our country. They drag in 100 incompatible third world cultures.

 

The mind-boggling first question remains: should all these immigrants that arrive from failed cultures succeed in their demands that we respect the injection of their culture and language into ours?

 

 

Yes, integrity mandates respect for all cultures and people. However, when will Americans leap past “political correctness” to stop the death of America? (READ ENTIRETYMulticulturalism – Destroying American Culture; By Frosty Wooldridge; Rense.com; 3/13/08)

 

Regardless of what Leftists tell you, Multiculturalism is nation destroying and NOT nation building.

 

Equality

 

“Equality” is another one of those words that evoke fairness. Here are three online dictionary definitions of equality:

 

1.     [T]he state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities – Oxford Dictionaries

 

2.    [T]he state or quality of being equal; correspondence in quantity, degree, value, rank, or ability. 

 

[U]niform character, as of motion or surface. (Dictionary.com)

 

3     [T]he quality or state of being equal: the quality or state of having the same rights, social status, etc.

racial/gender equality  the ideals of liberty and equality  women’s struggle for equality (Merriam-Webster Learner’s Dictionary)           

 

As a Conservative Equality and Liberty are not interchangeable as Leftists view the terms. The best concise differentiation I have found on Equality and Liberty that I have ran into so far is from the website Community Of Liberty:

 

 

Here is the overview of this lecture by Thomas West, the Paul and Dawn Potter Professor of Politics at Hillsdale.

 

The Declaration of Independence

 

The soul of the American founding is located in the universal political principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence. The meaning of equality and liberty in the Declaration is decisively different than the definition given to those principles by modern progressivism.

 

Liberty is the right to be free from the coercive interference of other people. It is derived from nature itself, and is a natural right—something possessed simply because one is a human being.

 

Equality means no one is by nature the ruler of any other person. Each human being is equal in his right to life, liberty, and property which the Declaration calls “the pursuit of happiness.”

 

Equality, liberty, and natural rights require a certain form of government: republicanism, based on consent of the governed. Legitimate government, based on the consent of the governed, must accomplish three things: the establishment of civil laws that protect man’s natural rights; the punishment of those who infringe on others’ natural rights; and the protection of natural rights through a strong national defense.

 

The people themselves also play a vital role in protecting their rights. They must be educated in “religion, morality, and knowledge.”

 

Modern liberalism uses the same language of “liberty” and “equality” as the Declaration of Independence. Yet modern liberals mean something other than what the Founders meant by those words. For the Progressives, “equality” means equal access to resources and wealth, while “liberty” means the ability to utilize a right, rather than the right in itself. Both of these ideas necessitate government programs that help mankind liberate itself from its “natural limitations.”

 

The Declaration of Independence and modern Progressivism are fundamentally opposed to each other. The modern misunderstanding of “equality” and “liberty” threatens not just the Declaration of Independence, but the whole of the American constitutional and moral order. (What Did the Founders Mean by Equality and Liberty? Community of Liberty)

 

Equality under the Founding Fathers is closer to equality of opportunity rather than an egalitarian Equality in the State that takes from some to distribute others that are less innovative or less entrepreneurial in their financial portfolio. Equality is not providing the same benefits to an immoral person as a moral person. Equality does not mean equalizing ungodly lifestyles to godly lifestyles. Equality does not mean shutting out Christianity in order for Secularism and other religions enjoy extra rights to equalize with the majority cultural religion America.

 

Liberty means individual autonomy beyond the collective to accomplish a financial portfolio according to one’s ability and to live a life of any ideology or religion that does not break the equal protections in the rule of law that is dispersed on a collective basis. The rule of law must be enforced equally to the entire collective of the nation regardless of Race, Religion or Personal Beliefs. If ethnicity, Religion and Personal Beliefs diverge from the rule of law then it is the ethnicity, Religion and Personal Beliefs that transform to the rule of law. In America the rule of law is influenced by the first British and Europeans that came to America for Religious Liberty not experienced in the Old World where the State Established Church was preeminent. Another group of British came to America seeking economic opportunity that was not available back on the European continent. People that became the intelligentsia of early America were trained in the classical academics and Christian theology of the period. Ancient writers from Greece and Rome were an influence in an emerging political philosophy that the Founding Fathers combined with Christian principles that coalesced the nascent socio-political structure that became a part of America’s Founding Documents culminating in the United States Constitution.  

 

Political Correctness has been kind to ideological appellations of the left side of the political spectrum. Such names as “Progressive” and “Liberal” are as misleading as the terms Diversity, Multiculturalism and Equality. People who wittingly or unwittingly (unwitting = mesmerized by altruism) look leftward for a principal of life are LEFTISTS.

 

I originally intended these thoughts as an introduction to a Eugene Delgaudio email that informs about how the Leftist influenced government is silently criminalizing Christianity. The silence is because the Leftist natured Mainstream Media (MSN) does not report on the slow criminalization of Christianity on a National basis. On the other hand the MSM is quick to denounce anything related to Christianity that prays in a public forum that taxes are associated. Also the MSM is quick to denounce Christianity that confronts moral degradation in America such as homosexuality or pornography. This secret persecution of Christianity is reprehensible. I will use Delgaudio’s email in the next post so you too can feel my outrage.

 

JRH 7/24/13

Please Support NCCR

Blasphemy


Geller Standing for Free Speech in Manchester TN

 

Justin Smith writes about events in Manchester TN in which a County Commissioner added uncomplimentary musing on Muslims on his Facebook page. Let’s hope those musings were designed for Muslims that follow the Quran and Hadith to a T. Then the American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) tried a community outreach to convince people in Manchester that Islam is peace full of multiculturalism junk something like, Can’t we all just get along? Not notifying the public that Islam is actually intolerant of non-Muslims in which the superior suras and hadiths (or ahadith) tell Muslims that if a non-Muslim refuses to convert, they either must live in humiliation, convert or die.

 

Here is a roughly one hour video of the Manchester event. You probably should read Justin’s essay “Blasphemy”.

 

VIDEO: American Muslim Meeting

 

JRH 6/11/13

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

Blasphemy

 

By Justin Smith

Sent: 6/9/2013 10:58 PM

 

“I imagine myself following in Malcolm’s discovery… that some whites might live beside him as brothers in Islam.” -Obama, ‘Dreams From My Father (pg 86)

On June 4, 2013, approximately fifteen-hundred American patriots arrived in an inspiring and spectacular fashion at the Conference Center in Manchester, Tennessee. They came from as far away as Georgia, Texas and New York to defend the First Amendment, one of our most cherished rights, against Sharia law encroachment and manipulations and Department of Justice impediments and violations, as the Obama administration advances the plan to criminalize any criticism of Islam under the UN Resolution 16/18. Old and young alike, Armed Forces Veterans of several wars and community and spiritual leaders arrived, with a very few naively expressing support for the American Muslim Advisory Council’s (AMAC) position and most expecting a propaganda and indoctrination event; the latter were prescient in this matter.

The AMAC advertised this event, Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society, as communities learning about and achieving a better understanding of their American Muslim neighbors, which they organized due to a “distasteful” Facebook post made by Coffee County Commissioner Barry West regarding Muslims; however, early into the presentation, the condescension and arrogance of U.S. Attorney Bill Killian and other speakers made it quite apparent that any dialogue was going to be one-sided, and we were there to receive a lecture on Muslims as victims in the U.S. and excuses for criminalizing our free speech under the existing civil rights codes and 18 U.S.C. 249-Hate Crimes Act…no wonder the crowd became “combative”…No matter how despicable, bigoted or inappropriate one may view expressions such as West’s, they cannot legally or constitutionally be stopped or infringed upon, as the AMAC and Bill Killian attempted to suggest!

Zak Mohyuddin, the first AMAC speaker stated, “Nothing stays the same, everything changes. How do we effectively manage the change… how do we manage the past?” He seemingly indirectly intimated that Americans would have to consider changes to laws and even the U.S. Constitution, so as to avoid slandering Muslims and insulting Islam and Muslim sensibilities. But in the Islamic world, the definition of “slander” is anything that offends Muslims, even if it is a historical fact!

Christians in America and across the globe are used to the idea that their religion is open to criticism and ridicule. Most accept this as a price of living in a free society, and even those Christians deeply offended by such criticism aren’t going about en masse and killing over it, in the manner most Muslims do over every little perceived insult to Islam or Mohammed; while Muslims would be going crazy in the streets if Gordon Gee, president of Ohio State University, had jokingly addressed the Athletic Council with “You can’t trust those damn Muslims” rather than “You can’t trust those damn Catholics on a Thursday or Friday”, as he did recently, most Catholics would simply have a laugh over the silly remark.

Mohyuddin also alluded to “colonial injustices”, which made the audience groan in disbelief. America has bent over backwards in its efforts to help the Muslim community integrate and assimilate in one of the most tolerant nations in existence today. This comment illuminated the resentment many Muslims still have over Western domination of the post-colonial political structuring of the Middle East.

At one point during the propaganda film that was shown, ‘Welcome to Shelbyville’, a man identifying himself only as a Shelbyville pastor said, “We as God’s children..we need to get along with them (Muslims). Immediately, someone shouted, “Whatever happened to assimilation?”

Sabina Mohyuddin, born in Nashville and a Vandy graduate, delivered a sometimes rambling presentation in the face of numerous interruptions, which were largely provoked by her inaccurate version of American history and more Muslim victimology. Her narrative suggested that Muslims were working to strengthen America’s security, but we have already seen the AMAC align itself with CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood and actively work against Tennessee’s anti-terrorism bill; history shows that Muslim’s use America’s fascination with “moderates” to strike us when we least expect it, just like Anwar al-Awlaki, one of the world’s most notorious islamofascists, and also Abdurahman Alamoudi, a top Al Qaeda financier, who was promoted by Grover Norquist and welcomed at both the Clinton and Bush White House before being caught and sentenced to 23 years in prison in 2004!

In the name of multiculturalism, tools such as U.S. Attorney Bill Killian and FBI Special Agent Kenneth Moore have relaxed security procedures and scrutiny of the Muslim community in tandem with Homeland Security, which occurred at the urging of the Islamic Society of North America and with the cooperation of John Brennan, Muslim convert and presidential advisor, in 2010. And, while Brennan gave assurances towards the protection of Muslim “civil rights”, he did not receive any reciprocal assurances of their commitment to opposing terrorism; both the Homeland Security and the Department of Justice have made their obeisance to Islam by cleansing their training materials of anything in their curriculum that gives offense to the various islamofascist Muslim organizations.

Kenneth Moore attempt to convince the crowd to ignore their own lying eyes and ears as he stated: “People think we want to step on and stifle their First Amendment rights. Nothing could be further from the truth.” One certainly must question Moore’s truthfulness, especially in light of Hillary Clinton’s collaborative work with Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC) regarding the implementation of UN Resolution 16/18 under the guise of civil rights laws.

Although touted as a resolution to combat “intolerance”, Resolution 16/18 advances Islamic intolerance. Should one accurately state that Mohammed was a hashish addict and a pedophile, under 16/18′s “incitement to imminent violence” clause as a “test of consequences”, one could be criminally prosecuted if their statement caused Muslims to lose their self-restraint and riot. Such a prior restraint on free speech would be chilling; the “test of consequences” corrupts a free society by clearing a path for any administration to create a “consequence”, a phony scenario, that could justify a change in America’s free speech rights, just as Obama attempted with the anti-Islamic video and the 9/11 attack at Benghazi!

Who will decide what is inflammatory? …What Muslim scholar or Muslim jurist is going to set the guidelines for our nation that determine what constitutes “blasphemy”?… How can any of this even pass Constitutional muster?

America has survived wars upon wars, numerous sneak attacks, communist infiltration, presidential assassinations and social upheaval over injustice in race relations, but many Americans have turned a blind-eye towards Islam, the very peril that has infiltrated the highest levels of our government as it seeks our destruction. A significant portion of U.S. citizens are currently disavowing the ideology of our American Heritage, as they substitute the rights of individuals with the rights of groups that are identified by race, ethnicity, sex and sexual preference; so, Special Agent Moore’s observation, “What has always seen us through difficult times has been our unity as Americans”, serves as a reminder in the search for solutions that we must rediscover our creed of ‘E Pluribus Unum’: We must reject multiculturalism and the calls to identify the United States with the Middle East, and we must reassert that we are a Western people…part of the Western Civilization’s family.

Blasphemy laws are pure Sharia doctrine, and they are antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and have no place in America. Any de facto blasphemy restrictions in the U.S. threatens free speech and the free exchange of ideas; islamofascists would be enabled by any such restrictions to crush debate in these United States, in the same manner they do throughout the Islamic world. Blasphemy laws narrow the bounds of acceptable discourse in all spheres of life from religion to literature and science to culture in general. Rather than criminalize free speech and general criticisms and debate, which only aids the islamofascists in their attempts to impose a spiritually void and harsh ideology upon all the world, this administration should end any discussion of speech with the OIC and the UN. Our government should reaffirm and declare that in a free society, all views and religions are subject to criticism and contradiction, and they should firmly defend freedom of expression: If any administration fails in this duty and their oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the American Patriots residing in Tennessee will not!
________________________

© Justin O. Smith

Edited by John R. Houk

Intro – Top Norwegian Prof: Critics of Mass Immigration Mentally Ill


Per Fugelli 2

Per Fugelli

 

John R. Houk

© May 24, 2013

 

Fjordman writes an essay entitled “Top Norwegian Prof: Critics of Mass Immigration Mentally Ill”. If you are an American I urge you to read this essay! The essay is about Free Speech in Norway and how the Left utilizes Hate-Speech laws to shut up Conservatives and those against the mass immigration of culturally different people to Norway. The culturally different people are not non-Nordic people of Europe or of the Oriental Asian persuasion. The immigration of people with a totally divergent culture to Norway is Sharia-Minded Muslims that are literally taking over broad swaths of Norwegian communities. This is significant because of the rise of crime perpetrated by Muslims against the Norwegians. Blond Norwegian gals are so concerned of the rape epidemic perpetrated by Muslims against non-Muslims that they are dying their hair to a dark brunette.

 

Why should Americans be concerned of how Islam affects Norwegian culture or how Norway’s Left propagandizes multiculturalism so much that they try to throw anti-multiculturalists and Counterjihadists in jail to repress threats to reversing the acceptance of multiculturalism?

 

The reason is Norway’s limitation on Liberty and Free Speech is a snapshot of America’s potential future. With Obama now being exposed as running a politically corrupt Administration that actually uses government agencies (Like the IRS, Justice Dept.  or Agenda 21) to repress American Conservatives it is quite apparent the Norwegian snapshot looms near if we do not undo Obama’s “Change”.

 

JRH 5/24/13 (Hat Tip: Gates of Vienna)

Please Support NCCR

Multicultural Blindness to the Danger of Islamic Culture


True 5 Pillars of Islam

John R. Houk

© April 8, 2013

 

I have Fjordman on my Google email alert. I am a huge fan of Fjordman’s essays. Unfortunately Fjordman is often vilified in his native Norway for exposing the reality that modern Islam has a dark side that is completely related to the religion’s early days under its founder Mohammed and the following Caliphs that used Mo’s theo-political ideals to spread an empire and to culturally brainwash the conquered as much as was possible without completely killing them all.

 

It is terrifyingly fascinating that Leftists across the Western World get in line with the Muslim apologists that assert Islam has moderated today much as Christian culture in the West has abandoned its harsher actions in the name of promoting Christianity.

 

That which Leftists and Muslim fail to tell its listeners is that Christian holy writings condemn senseless violence to achieve goals related to the political world while Islamic writings specifically tell Muslims to use violence to defend Islam from verbal assault and to spread the religion’s theo-political ideological tenets.

 

When Fjordman writes the truth about Islam the vilification he receives flows in the form of the accusation of racism. The racist accusation is remarkable since Fjordman’s criticism of the practices of Islam is essentially a defense of Western culture as it has developed under the influence of Christianity and Greco-Roman thought.

 

The essay that has caught my attention is entitled, “Fjordman: Importing Islamic Nightmares — While Denying Them”. The Google email alert pointed me to the Winds of Jihad maintained by the pseudonym person called Sheik Yer’ Mami. However, the Fjordman essay was originally posted at FrontPage Mag.

 

Now that I have shown the pedigree of the essay here is the reason you should read it.

 

Fjordman writes about the blind eye of the Leftist governments in Norway and to a lesser extent to Sweden and shows how that blind eye has increased violent in Nordic nations to an alarming rate. It is alarming because Fjordman asserts violent crime had the fewer occurrences in Nordic nations than any other place in Free Europe. Tragically the violent crimes have less to do with criminal enterprises and more to do with expressing Islamic Supremacism over the native Nordic/Western Culture.

 

Now if you are an American reader you need to pay attention to this cultural blind eye toward Islamic culture and the Muslims that exude that religion because the ‘Islam is Peace’ crowd in America will perpetuate the idiocy of European Leftist cultural blindness in the name of Multiculturalism.

 

JRH 4/8/13

Please Support NCCR

Counter-Jihad Writing is Expose Islam Rather than Hate Muslims


What the West Needs to Know about Islam

John R. Houk

© August 25, 2012

 

Anders Breivik was recently convicted for his mass murder in Norway. There is no doubt Breivik created his delusional agenda by acting out from Counter-Jihad writers. That is a fair enough analysis. On the other hand it is an unfair conclusion to blame Counter-Jihad writers for Breivik’s mass murder.

 

Counter-Jihad writers do not expose the dark side of Islam to incite hate but rather to incite understanding and caution.

 

Why do non-Muslim Westerners need understanding and caution in relation to Islam?

 

It is Because Islamic Culture and Islamic Sharia Law is not compatible to Western Culture in concepts of Liberty and Freedom. This is especially the case with the United States of America which has Liberty and Freedom encoded in the Constitution’s First Amendment which touches on Religious Freedom, Free Speech, Free Press and the Freedom to Protest and to freely redress grievances to the government.

 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

So acceptance of Islam by Left Wing Multiculturalists is a path to destroying Western Culture as Muslim demand more and more acceptance of Islamic Supremacism inherent in their holy writings and Sharia Law.

 

Well that is my two-cents. Fjordman has some thoughts which I am cross posting from the Gates of Vienna. I am not going to include the Norwegian language version which can found at the end of the English version of Fjordman’s thoughts.

 

JRH 8/25/12

Please Support NCCR

The Silence of the Pulpits


Templar- Overcome Jihad with Crusade

I just finished reading one of the best essays by Bill Warner about how the non-Muslim West sticks their head in the sand as Political Islamic purists use our own culture’s sympathies. As long as Western Culture is plagued by Political Correctness and Multiculturalism we will look the other way as Muslims in Islamic cultural controlled areas butcher and rape non-Muslims. Warner is especially astounded by the silence of American Christian pulpits as Muslims maim, rape, pillage and kill Christians trying to survive in Muslim controlled areas of the world.

 

Read this essay and become willing to take a stand even if Islamic Apologists and Multicultural Leftists try to obscure efforts by calling you bigots and racists.

 

JRH 8/20/12

Please Support NCCR

Radical Islam in Tennessee


Sharia in America toon

John R. Houk

© August 6, 2012

 

The Rutherford Reader is a free local and weekly newspaper with circulation in the Murfreesboro, TN area as well as 43,000 online subscribers. The Reader’s money base is third party advertising for the Murfreesboro area.

 

So what, right?

 

The Reader is a local bastion against Radical Islam in its area making the newspaper a target for Radical Muslims pretending to be moderate and Multicultural Leftists. In the case of Murfreesboro, most of the large circulating Tennessee newspapers rag on the Reader (especially The Tennessean) as the local hate-speech and bigoted media.

 

The thing is there isn’t an iota of truth to the accusations. The Reader is simply having journalist contributors and perhaps the publisher report on the local Mosque which has deep pocket connections to Radical Islam. Unless you have been in a coma since September 2001 you do know America was attacked by the Radical Muslim transnational terrorist organization known as al Qaeda. The USA has been involved in the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) since 911. So whether bureaucrats in the U.S. government publicly recognize that war or not Islam in its so-called radical form has been at war ever since.

 

HENCE, after a Mosque engages with Muslim-American organizations that have ties with the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas or whatever terrorist organization, it is noble for a local newspaper to buck Liberal Multiculturalism and report on Radical Islam and/or the speakers promoting a Radical Islamic agenda for America. AND in case you have been victimized by Muslim Apologists, that Islamic agenda is not pretty or copacetic for Constitutional America especially as related to the Bill of Rights.

 

One of the contributing journalists to the Reader is Justin O. Smith. Justin is also a defender of the Reader when Muslim Apologists and Multicultural Leftists wrongly go after the Reader rather than say a newspaper like The Tennessean which has been caught lying to support in print Radical Islam in Tennessee.

 

On Facebook I found such a defense from Justin and I am cross posting it below.

 

JRH 8/6/12

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

Tired of the bullying!

Letters to the Editor…pg 4 of ‘The Rutherford Reader’ and Mrs. Pam King’s excellent article!…

 

By Justin O. Smith

August 4, 2012 5:36pm

Facebook

 

To the Editor:

Last week I sent the following message via Facebook to William Cripps: “I am very concerned that you and your wife have attempted to ruin a local business, The Rutherford Reader. When you contact business people and threaten them if they continue to advertise in The Reader, this is at best very unethical and at worst, just slimy! No one has actually proven that anything printed in The Reader is either hate speech or lies, it is only your opinion.

You certainly do have the right of free speech and so do I. I wonder how the people at ATI in La Vergne would feel if they were aware of your attempts to put a business out of business with unfounded opinions and and (sic) absolutely zero proof? I wonder how the Democratic Committee in Murfreesboro would like what Sara is doing? Are those the tactics they approve of?”

Needless to say, I have not received a response from either of them. I am seriously tired of the bullying! While working on a note to explain myself, I ran across the following
written by a Facebook friend, Dawn Ellen. Dawn has perfectly formalized my thinking so I quote her:

 

“People who spew the words “hatred” and “bigotry,” when you attempt to enlighten them about the reality of Islam are drowning in ignorance. They are being compliant and complicit in the Islamization of America and the world. They have never studied the Qur’an/Hadiths, the life of Muhammad, or the history of Islam. They only have Liberal sound bites and Islamic propaganda running through their brains. They spew those words because they have no intelligent argument or response. I laugh at their perpetual nonsense and then move on. There is no point in responding, because their brainwashed minds are not open to reasonable and logical debates, but rather they are blind to the truth and will never see it. It is most definitely pitiful.”

Pam King

Murfreesboro, TN

 

___________________________

Radical Islam in Tennessee

John R. Houk

© August 6, 2012

_________________________

Tired of the bullying!

 

About Justin O. Smith

 

From Facebook Page:

 

Studied at Middle Tennessee State University

Lives in Murfreesboro, Tennessee

Born on February 16, 1957

Political Views: Conservative

 

I found this on Justin at the end of a Counter Jihad Report Post from 7/5/12:

 

Justin O. Smith is a concerned citizen with a B.S.-MTSU/ International Relations & Cultural Geography, ex-firefighter, U.S. Army and freelance writer.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers

%d bloggers like this: