Neocons and Templars


crusader-poker-jihad

John R. Houk

© September 17, 2016

 

On September 11 commenter Jeremy Auldaney asked a couple of question that had little to do with the post entitled “Donald Trump 10 PT Immigration Speech from Phoenix” at my NCCR Blog (I posted the same title at two other blogs). The questions had to do with the full name of the NCCR Blog and my use of the symbolism of a Templar Crusading Knight.

 

NCCR is the acronym for the NeoConservative Christian Right. Since Neocons are definitely on everyone’s vilification list these days I thought I’d state my reasoning in short fashion. I could have embellished a bit more but the short answer is good for now. Perhaps a long answer will be forth coming when the political correct crowd is willing to address the depravity of Muhammad’s Islam which is the same Islam that the blind West chooses to define as “Radical” Islam as if a “Moderate” Islam follows a different prophet today.

 

I provide the same short answer in the use of Templar Crusader symbolism as well. Again further embellishment would be beneficial; however, both expansive answers probably would take up the time of a small book or at least several long blog posts. For now, yawl will have to live with the short answers.

 

One thing I feel compelled to address though pertaining to Templar symbolism is to my Jewish readers. Some of you who may not know your Crusader history well may not realize that when the first Crusaders conquered Jerusalem, they slaughtered not only Muslim resisters but also Jewish inhabitants which had become quite substantial by medieval times. Some chroniclers of the period say the blood flowed on the streets that was ankle deep. This included Jews who had congregated in their Synagogues hoping for refuge from the Crusader conquerors. There was no Christian mercy for the Jews in Jerusalem. Jews that know their history are a bit peeved at my use of Templar symbolism because them it is just another atrocity of Christian Antisemitism that was so very present in medieval days (and unfortunately flowing through history even to this present day to one degree or another).

 

I indeed do feel shame for that Crusader Antisemitism; nevertheless, it was the Crusader mentality that began a longtime need reversal Muslim aggression in which the last vestige a Muslim empire was destroyed at the end of WWI and the dividing up of old Ottoman Turk holdings in the Middle East into independent Arab Muslim nations and the beginning to the return of Jews to their ancient homeland – ISRAEL. It is the Crusader mentality needed today to thwart the expansion of Islamic terrorism.

 

From this point I will poise the two questions Jeremy Auldaney poised followed by my answers on the NCCR Blog.

 

+++

 

Jeremy Auldaney

September 11, 2016 at 10:27 PM

 

I am puzzled by your name of NeoConservative. It is the NeoConservatives among the Republicans that are supporting the Liberal Conspiracy to set up a world government under Marxism.

 

oneway2day

September 17, 2016 at 12:58 PM

 

Jeremy you are misinformed probably by Jew-haters and/or Leftists. Neocons are largely former Marxists or ex-Dems that woke up to the dangers of a Leftist agenda to the Rights and Privileges guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Prior to the al Qaeda attack on 911 Neocons favored bringing democratic principles to intolerant Muslim nations ruled by oppression. The concept was sound, but the application to a Muslim society proved unworkable. Most Neocons recognize that reality. But Leftist propaganda has taken the failure of Neocon democratization to blame the former Lefties for war embroilments rather than recognize that Neocons had a plan better than sitting on their butts waiting for more terrorism on American soil. Obama Leftists went around the world apologizing for American ideals and blaming Neocons for American failures largely due to the American Left intransience on submission to Multiculturalism as the save-all for global peace. MULTICULTURALISM has proven to be a worse failure than Neocon democratization because inaction has made Islamic terrorism worse under Obama. At least Neocons subdued radicals rather allow than allow radicals to call the shots on a death agenda.

 

Now it is incumbent for Neocons and Conservatives to develop a better strategy for a subduing Islamic terrorism. That better strategy probably includes an agenda that politically correct Multiculturalists would find abhorrent because the rules of engagement would be much more brutal than GW Bush and Obama have utilized to date.

 

Jeremy Auldaney

September 11, 2016 at 10:31

 

Also I notice you use a picture of a Knights Templar. This is the secret society that is behind the Liberal Conspiracy Including the Masons and Jesuits.

 

oneway2day

September 17, 2016 at 1:11 PM

 

Actually my usage of Templar symbolism has little to do with the cultic aspects of Templar evolution leading to their final demise in subterfuge and betrayal AND more to do with the original call of the Crusades when Europeans became fed up with Muslim raids and military expeditions carving up Christian lands.

 

Persecution of Christian Pilgrims butchered or enslave on their way to medieval Jerusalem was the excuse (real or perceived) of a confrontation a long time in coming. After all the Middle East was a majority Christian land LONG BEFORE Muslim invaders conquered and oppressed the Christians to convert to Islam over a 2 or 3 centuries time until Islam became the dominant religion. Oppression was the conversion tactic not a free-will choice.

 

TODAY the world needs a Templar Crusader rules of engagement minus the Antisemitic hate to overcome Muslim oppression even if so-called innocent civilians are harmed by the rules of engagement. The Allies were not concerned about civilian casualties in a win at all costs war against Nazis and Imperial Japanese and neither should we be in this current threat to Western Society.

 

JRH 9/17/16

Please Support NCCR

 

Christian Flock is Abandoned


Shamim asks:

Australia, Canada and many other countries have granted immigration to thousands of Afghan and Hazara people in the recent years. But Christians are rejected when they are also facing the same situation in Pakistan. Why?

“Why?” indeed! Obama and European nations have been placing Muslim immigrants displaced by wars and terrorism seeming on a quota basis, AND YET nearly ZERO Christians affected under the same circumstance are a part of any immigration quotas.

JRH 9/13/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Christian Flock is Abandoned

By Shamim Masih

Sent: 9/11/2015 9:23 PM

ISLAMABAD: There is news of Muslim mass immigration to Europe, America, Britain and other countries. Germany, America and Britain offered a big number of them [refuge] in their countries. Even Pope Francis called on [Catholics] Sunday that every European Church Parish and religious community to take in one refugee family in a gesture of solidarity, which he said would start in the tiny Vatican state where he lives.

It sounds good that Christian majority countries are offering mass immigration on humanity bases to Muslim migrants due to the cruelty by their own Muslim fellows. Thousands of the Syrian Muslims are travelling to Europe and the States. War has forced half of Syrians from their homes. The long insurgency in the country has been worsened by a sense of deprivation among the locals, and an inclusive political system is unable to achieve sustainable peace and stability.

“Wars, conflict and persecution have forced more people than at any other time since records began to flee their homes and seek refuge and safety elsewhere,” the United Nations said in June.

But one should think before offering them a space. Will the EU remain the same after these immigrants [arrive]? [The Muslim refugees have a] different culture, different approach/mindset and religion. If a top ISIS leader removes his beard and comes with this flock as an immigrant with the same mindset, what will the EU do? There are reports that Muslims immigrants denied taking food boxes printed [with the] “cross” sign on it. And one must think about it, are they refugees or this is invasion? This influx of migrants can pose a threat to Europe’s Christian universal values. And this has already proved [so] and the West is presently facing [a] threat as well. As again now they are entering with cries of “Allahu Akbar.” They want to take over.”

Gulf States such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have been criticized for resettling no Syrian refugees despite similarities of language, religion and culture. Saudi official say they are deliberately ignoring refugees, to allow the spread of Islam to flood the West. “We are ignoring the issue as a strategic maneuver. If these refugees go and settle in the West then they will take the beacon of light i.e. Islam, with them,” an official from the Saudi government said. [Blog Editor: I found this exact quote at the Khabaristan Times. I wish Shamim would have included the next line which adds even more of diabolic context from the Saudi government official: “What we are doing is waiting for them to set up camp so that they can show these infidel nations how to save themselves from kufr”. The word “kufr” in English is also often translated kafir which in English means infidel.

“…kufr literally means covering or concealing something, and in a religious context, it refers to hiding or denying religious truth. More specifically, the term indicates disbelief in Allah and His Messenger, Muhammad. Considered the opposite of iman, which means faith, kufr is considered a grave sin in Islam, punishable in the hereafter by hellfire.

In Islam, one who commits kufr, which means disbelief, is known as a kafir, or a disbeliever. Although the strict definition is argued among Islamic scholars, most Muslims agree that all non-Muslims are kafirs, or kuffar. The Ahl al-Kitab, a term which means “People of the Book,” refers to non-Muslim followers of faiths that have a revealed scripture. … And although they follow a revealed scripture, the Qur’an states that all non-believers of Islam will go to hell. (What Is Kufr in Islam? By Anthon Jackson; Opposing Views)]

 

We have also seen a criticism on this immigration; even a Hungarian Bishop has said that Pop Francis is wrong on the migrant crisis and the wave of Muslim migrants currently sweeping Europe actually represents an “invasion”. Bishop: ‘Pope Francis is wrong, Migrants are Invasion’ Breitbart, September 8, 2015. Yet it is said “the frustration for those of us who have been calling for compassion for Syrian victims for many months is that the Christian community is yet again left at the bottom of the heap… Britain should make Syrian Christians a priority….” [The Telegraph 9/5/15]

US President Obama directs [his] administration to accept at least 10,000 Syrian refugees in the next fiscal year. The US didn’t do it when people from Sudan and Congo, where Christians were displaced after the Islamists massacred 5 million of them and displaced hundreds of thousands. Why are now feeling compelled to do it with Muslims from the Middle East? Is it because they more valuable human being in the eyes of President Obama than the Christians from Sudan and Congo? Does it mean that Obama is having the same family background?

Being a Christian and a journalist by profession, I have solidarity with victims of migration too, but we Pakistani Christians have been facing discrimination and have been persecuted from decades [and yet] neither the EU nor the US stand for us. We are also have been ignored by local and international media as well. Thus I can say Pakistani Christians are being internationally discriminated [against]. Most recently, there are reports that more than 200 Pakistani Christians, including women and children, were arrested in Thailand by Thai police. Thousands of Pakistanis are seeking asylum in Thailand, Sri Lanka and Malaysia but the international community is not paying [attention] to them. Other than the major [deadly] incidents [that have] happened and the discriminatory laws, we face discrimination on a daily basis [from Sunni Muslims].

Europe and America simply deny visas to Pakistani Christians on the basis of religion fearing that he/she might go for asylum there. Sources confirmed that visa counselors are simply instructed to do so. Australia, Canada and many other countries have granted immigration to thousands of Afghan and Hazara people in the recent years. But Christians are rejected when they are also facing the same situation in Pakistan. Why?

For Americans especially, I have discovered the best way to donate to Shamim Masih is via Western Union sending money with this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Include Shamim’s phone – +92-300-642-4560

Be Blessed,

Shamim Masih

Correspondent,

Pakistan Today, (About Pakistan Today)

Blogger and Human Rights Activist

http://oiwerk.blogspot.com/

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Bracketed links and text are by the Editor. All other links are by Shamim.

 

© Shamim Masih