Leftist Censorship Thrives on University Campuses in America


Brigitte Gabriel emailed an excerpt from her new book being released on the 17th anniversary of the 9/11. Whereby Islam terrorists attack in NYC and the Pentagon as well as the sacrifice of lives who thwarted another Islamic terrorist attack by confronting Muslim hijackers of Flight 91 resulting in the jet crashing.

 

Gabriel trashes the hypocrites of the Left who bully via violent acts and Muslim apologists who defend Islamic terrorism and Jew-hatred all on college campuses across America.

 

Sounds like you ought to buy RISE: In Defense of Judeo-Christian Values and Freedom.

 

JRH 9/9/18

In this current state of media censorship & defunding, consider chipping in a few bucks for enjoying (or despising) this Blog.

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Leftist Censorship Thrives on University Campuses in America

 

By Brigitte Gabriel

Sent 9/9/2018 9:32 AM

Sent from ACT for America

 

Dear John,

 

The article posted below is an excerpt from Brigitte Gabriel’s newest book, RISE: In Defense of Judeo-Christian Values and Freedom, which is coming out this September 11th, 2018.

>>>>>>>>>>>

Leftist Censorship Thrives on University Campuses in America

By: Brigitte Gabriel

Originally Published on Townhall.com

 

In America today, there is perhaps no better example of the all-out assault leftists have launched against freedom of speech than on college campuses.

 

Leftists have progressively taken over American universities and, just as quickly, systematically eroded freedom of speech and engagement for the students. Not only are voices that leftist faculty members disagree with prevented from speaking, but voices espousing violent, anti-Semitic and radical Islamic rhetoric are welcomed in open arms.

 

One of the most active Islamic organizations on college campuses is the MSA-Muslim Students Association. They have nearly 600 chapters on college campuses in the United States and Canada, making them the most visible and influential Islamic student organization in North America. The MSA is mentioned in the Muslim Brotherhood memorandum for North America as one their front organizations to destroy America from within.

 

In May 2010, Jewish author David Horowitz was taking questions from an audience at UC San Diego when a female MSA student stood up to confront Horowitz about his views. When Horowitz asked the young woman if she supported the terrorist organization Hamas, she replied: “If I say something I’m sure that I will be arrested. For reasons of Homeland Security.”

 

In other words, of course she supported Hamas, but she didn’t want to be arrested or investigated on terrorism charges if she essentially admitted that she was a terrorist. But Horowitz pressed further. “I’m a Jew. The head of Hezbollah has said that he hopes that we will gather in Israel so he doesn’t have to hunt us down globally. For it or against it?”

 

After a pause, the Muslim student leaned into the microphone and with a cold, calculating voice stated, “For it.”

 

If that doesn’t send chills up your spine, nothing will. When a student can stand up and declare herself a supporter of Jewish genocide with absolutely no consequence and the terrorist-linked organization she’s a part of can still function openly on campus, we’re way past the tipping point.

 

Of course, adding to the absurdity of allowing terrorists and anti-Semites to openly flourish on campus, conservatives are shunned and accused of “hate speech.” In response to a scheduled appearance by Milo Yiannopoulos at leftist haven UC Berkeley, Antifa and their leftist comrades started a violent riot, smashing store windows, causing over $100,000 in damage and injuring innocent civilians.

 

Black-masked leftists threw large rocks, commercial fireworks and Molotov cocktails at police, in response to Milo setting foot on campus to say things they didn’t like. Over 1,500 angry leftists formed a mob and chanted, “No safe space for racists,” and “This is war,” but were strangely missing their pitchforks.

 

One innocent woman who is a Trump supporter was pepper-sprayed in the face while being interviewed on live television by an ABC affiliate. That’s strange, I thought the Left was supposed to be fighting for the rights of women.

 

Embarrassed by the national disgrace, administrators at Berkeley tried to play defense, while at the same time letting the violent mob know they support them in spirit.

 

“We condemn in the strongest possible terms the violence and unlawful behavior that was on display and deeply regret that those tactics will now overshadow the efforts to engage in legitimate and lawful protest against the performer’s presence and perspectives.”

 

See, it was all peaceful until 1,500 trouble makers showed up. They continued:

 

“While Yiannopoulos’ views, tactics and rhetoric are profoundly contrary to our own, we are bound by the Constitution, the law, our values and the campus’s Principles of Community to enable free expression across the full spectrum of opinion and perspective.”

 

There’s the continued attack on Yiannopoulos, an openly gay man, whose biggest crime was that he attempted to speak at a public university. When it comes to free speech, the aggressors are almost exclusively on the Left.

 

Remember, at multiple rallies then-candidate Trump spoke at during his presidential and primary campaign, countless interruptions of crazed leftists arose, as they screamed mindless babble at the top of their lungs to try to silence him. They knew that if the American people heard his message about putting America first and speaking truthfully about the threats of open borders he would win. So they tried desperately to silence him. But their plans failed, and President Trump won handily over Hillary Clinton.

 

How many times were Hillary Clinton’s speeches interrupted by conservatives during her campaign? Did she ever have Secret Service Agents rush the stage during one of her speeches after a crazed conservative tried to attack her, as a crazed leftist did President Trump?

 

No.

 

Did she ever have an actual rally in a major city cancelled due to a violent domestic terror mob taking over the arena, as was done to President Trump in Chicago?

 

No.

 

Hillary didn’t confront those issues for the same reason that an anti-Semitic terror sympathizer like Linda Sarsour [bad link – better Sarsour link] can speak at CUNY, and a domestic terrorist like Kathy Boudin can teach a class at Columbia, because the Left has a monopoly on violent anti-free speech radicalism.

 

The reality is freedom of speech, the most fundamental pillar of our Constitution and Western civilization at large, is under attack by two relentless enemies: radical Islam and the radical Left. Both are working together to shut you up and prevent your children and grandchildren from exercising the same rights that every American since the nation’s founding have had the privilege of doing.

 

Unless Americans take hold of this increasingly dangerous threat, our ability to fight back with truth could be gone forever. We must not take this most crucial freedom for granted, for if we do, it’s only a matter of time before the enemy takes it away. We must make sure those who represent us in Washington understand that freedom of speech is an absolute right, and that we will not be silenced.

___________________

ACT for America is the nation’s largest national security grassroots organization with over 1 million members dedicated to keeping America safe and its citizens secure from all threats foreign & domestic. Click here to support our efforts.

 

About Brigitte Gabriel, Founder of ACT for America

 

Brigitte Gabriel

 

Brigitte Gabriel is one of the leading terrorism experts in the world providing information and analysis on the rise of global Islamic terrorism. She lectures nationally and internationally about terrorism and current affairs. Her expertise is sought after by world and business leaders.

 

he has addressed the United Nations, Australian Prime Minister, members of The British Parliament/House of Commons, members of the United States Congress, The Pentagon, The Joint Forces Staff College, The US Special Operations Command, The US Asymmetric Warfare group, the FBI, and many others.

 

In addition, Gabriel is a regular guest analyst on Fox News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, and various radio stations daily across America.

 

Ms. Gabriel is Founder and Chairman of ACT for America, the largest national security grassroots organization in the U.S. with One million members dedicated to preserving national security and promoting Western values. She is a NYT best-selling author of three books the latest is “RISE” In Defense of Judeo Christian Values and Freedom.

 

Ms. Gabriel was READ THE REST

 

HUMA ABEDIN


huma-abedin-mb

On June 13, 2012 five U.S. Congressmen sent a letter of concern to the Inspector General’s Office of the State Department pertaining to Huma Abedin’s extremely close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:

 

  • Michele Bachmann

 

  • Louie Gohmert

 

  • Lynn Westmoreland

 

  • Trent Franks

 

  • Thomas Rooney

 

The problem is Huma Abedin has extremely close ties to Crooked Hillary going back to President Slick Willie days. All the time from the Clinton Administration to this present-day Huma Abedin’s ties to the Radical Islamic Muslim Brotherhood have been given a pass and ignored!

crooked-hillary-saleha-abedin-mom-huma-abdullah

Determine the Networks has the Huma breakdown ignored by the Executive Branch under Obama when Bachmann raised the red flag on Huma Abedin.

 

JRH 10/23/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

HUMA ABEDIN

Discover the Networks

 

  • Daughter of Saleha Mahmood Abedin, a pro-Sharia sociologist with ties to numerous Islamist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood

 

  • Longtime assistant to Hillary Clinton

 

  • Wife of former congressman Anthony Weiner

 

  • Longtime former employee of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, which shares the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of establishing Islamic supremacy and Sharia Law worldwide

 

See also:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Huma Abedin was born in 1976 in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Her father, Syed Abedin (1928-1993), was an Indian-born scholar who in the early 1970s had been affiliated with the Muslim Students Association at Western Michigan University.

Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood‘s division for women), Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief. This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

When Huma was two, the Abedin family relocated from Michigan to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This move took place when Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who served as vice president of Abdulaziz University (AU), recruited his former AU colleague, Syed Abedin, to work for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank that Naseef was preparing to launch. A number of years later, Naseef would develop close ties to Osama bin Laden and the terrorist group al Qaeda. Naseef also spent time (beginning in the early 1980s) as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which, as journalist Andrew C. McCarthy points out, “has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” IMMA’s close ties to the Muslim World League are further evidenced by the fact that IMMA’s in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), has long listed its official address as 46 Goodge Street in London — precisely the same address as that of the Muslim World League’s London office. In one noteworthy article written by Abedin’s mother, JMMA blamed America for having brought the 9/11 attacks upon itself. Another JMMA piece, from 1999, alleged that Jewish Americans who were pro-Israel had been able to “work the [political] system” in the United States to their own advantage, and had been “greatly aided by the American memory of the Holocaust.”

It is vital to note that IMMA’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs, designed, as Andrew C. McCarthy explains, “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.” For details about this agenda, click here.

At age 18, Huma Abedin returned to the U.S. to attend George Washington University. In 1996 she began working as an intern in the Bill Clinton White House, where she was assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Abedin was eventually hired as an aide to Mrs. Clinton and has worked for her ever since, through Clinton’s successful Senate runs (in 2000 and 2006) and her failed presidential bid in 2008.

From 1997 until sometime before early 1999, Abedin, while still interning at the White House, was an executive board member of George Washington University‘s (GWU) Muslim Students Association (MSA), heading the organization’s “Social Committee.”

It is noteworthy that in 2001-02, soon after Abedin left that executive board, the chaplain and “spritual guide” of GWU’s MSA was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al Qaeda operative who ministered to some of the men who were among the 9/11 hijackers. Another chaplain at GWU’s MSA (from at least October 1999 through April 2002) was Mohamed Omeish, who headed the International Islamic Relief Organization, which has been tied to the funding of al Qaeda. Omeish’s brother, Esam, headed the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood’s quasi-official branch in the United States. Both Omeish brothers were closely associated with Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.

From 1996-2008, Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as the assistant editor of its aforementioned publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with the al Qaeda-affiliated Abdullah Omar Naseef’s active presence at IMMA. Abedin’s last six years at the Institute (2002-2008) were spent as a JMMA editorial board member; for one of those years, 2003, Naseef and Abedin served together on that board.

Throughout her years with IMMA, Abedin remained a close aide to Hillary Clinton. During Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential primary campaign, a New York Observer profile of Abedin described her as “a trusted advisor to Mrs. Clinton, especially on issues pertaining to the Middle East, according to a number of Clinton associates.” “At meetings on the region,” continued the profile, “… Ms. Abedin’s perspective is always sought out.”

When Mrs. Clinton was appointed as President Barack Obama‘s Secretary of State in 2009, Abedin became her deputy chief of staff. At approximately that same point in time, Abedin’s name was removed from the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs‘ masthead.

Apart from their working relationship, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton have also developed a close personal bond over their years together, as reflected in Clinton’s 2010 assertion that: “I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma.” In 2011, Secretary Clinton paid a friendly visit to Abedin’s mother, Saleha, in Saudi Arabia. On that occasion, Mrs. Clinton publicly described her aide’s position as “very important and sensitive.”

On July 10, 2010, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, married then-congressman Anthony Weiner in a ceremony officiated by former president Bill Clinton. A number of analysts have noted that it is extremely rare for Islamic women—particularly those whose families have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—to marry non-Muslims like Weiner, who is Jewish. Indeed, Dr. Anwar Shoeb, the highest-ranking faculty authority at the prestigious College of Sharia and Islamic Studies in Kuwait, formally declared that Abedin’s marriage to Weiner was “null and void” under the dictates of Sharia Law, which explicitly forbids matrimony between a Muslim woman and an “infidel”; in fact, Shoeb classified the Abedin-Weiner union as a form of “adultery.”

Abedin went on maternity leave after giving birth to a baby boy in early December 2011. When she returned to work in June 2012, the State Department granted her an arrangement that allowed her to do earn outside income as a private consultant, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. This arrangement was made possible when Mrs. Clinton personally signed off on documents—dated March 23, 2012—that changed Abedin’s title from “deputy chief off staff” to “special government employee.” Abedin’s outside clients included the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and Teneo (a New York-based global advisory firm co-founded by Doug Band, a former counselor for Bill Clinton).

Abedin did not disclose on her financial report either the special employment arrangement or the $135,000 she earned from it, in violation of a law mandating that public officials reveal significant sources of income. In fact, her title change did not become public knowledge until May 2013. Good-government groups warned of the potential conflict-of-interest inherent in an arangement where a government employee maintains private clients.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit showed that both before and after Mrs. Clinton signed off on the special employment deal for Abedin in March 2012, Abedin repeatedly—for months on end—dodged State Department requests that she disclose financial and employment information about her husband, Anthony Weiner, who had left Congress amid personal scandal in June 2011. For details about Abedin’s repeated failures to comply with those requests, click here.

In June 2012, five Republican lawmakers (most prominently, Michele Bachmann) sent letters to the inspectors general at the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, asking that they investigate whether the Muslim Brotherhood was gaining undue influence over U.S. government officials. One letter, noting that Huma Abedin’s position with Hillary Clinton “affords her routine access to the secretary [of state] and to policymaking,” expressed concern over the fact that Abedin “has three family members—her late father, mother and her brother—connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” Some other prominent Republicans such as John McCain and John Boehner disavowed the concerns articulated in the letters.

On February 1, 2013—Hillary Clinton’s final day as Secretary of State—Abedin resigned her post as Mrs. Clinton’s deputy chief of staff. Yet she would continue to serve as a close aide to Clinton.

On March 1, 2013, Abedin was tapped to run Clinton’s post-State Department transition team, comprised of a six-person “transition office” located in Washington.

In early March 2015, it was reported that throughout her entire four-year tenure as Secretary of State (SOS), Hillary Clinton had never acquired or used a government email account, and instead had transmitted — in violation of government regulations — all of her official government correspondences via a personal email account that was housed on a private server. In addition, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, also had email addresses on the secret server while employed at the State Department.

 

After Hillary Clinton announced in the spring of 2015 that she was running for president (2016), Abedin was named vice chair of the Clinton campaign.

 

On August 28, 2016, the New York Post published excerpts and photos from sexually explicit texting exchanges in which Weiner had engaged with two women in the summer of 2015. The next day, Huma Abedin announced that she was separating from Weiner. She said in a statement: “After long and painful consideration and work on my marriage, I have made the decision to separate from my husband. Anthony and I remain devoted to doing what is best for our son, who is the light of our life. During this difficult time, I ask for respect for our privacy.”

 

Huma Abedin’s brother, Hassan Abedin, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is currently an associate editor with the JMMA. Hassan was once a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, at a time when the Center’s board included such Brotherhood-affiliated figures as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Abdullah Omar Naseef.

Huma’s sister, Heba Abedin (formerly known as “Heba A. Khaled”), is an assistant editor with JMMA, where she served alongside Huma prior to the latter’s departure.

__________________

Copyright 2003-2015 – DiscoverTheNetworks.org  

 

DTN Issues

 

This section serves as one of several portals to the DiscoverTheNetworks database. It is intended as a guide to the content of the site and to critical issues involving the political left. The contents of this section will grow over time. To request additional topics, or to provide additional information or related text and article links, use the READ THE REST

 

Racism Is the Excuse


Justin Smith attacks the idiocy of false accusations of racism in connection to the University of Missouri and Vanderbilt University.

Source and background links are by me the Editor.

JRH 11/16/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Racism Is the Excuse

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 11/14/2015 1:38 PM

Racism Is the Excuse

On November 9th 2015, the president of the University of Missouri, Tim Wolfe [Bustle], resigned amid student protesters’ allegations that he had not done enough to combat racism on campus. This same day, Vanderbilt University students renewed demands that Professor Carol Swain [Daily Signal and Carol Swain About Page] be suspended or forced to resign, because they claim that many of her past statements are “hate-speech.” A coincidence, one might ask. Not hardly.

Freedom and Liberty, Justice for All and the First Amendment are under assault at the University of Missouri and Vanderbilt University — universities across America in fact, such as Purdue and Yale University and Ithaca, Smith and Williams College — and leading the charge are some of America’s children, who have been brainwashed and indoctrinated through false anti-American narratives by white Commie inspired vermin, such as Melissa Click [PowerLine], a non-tenured professor in the Univ. of Missouri’s School of Journalism. Unable to accept any refutation of their beliefs, the intolerance of this new breed of white commies, black nationalist fascists, Muslim fascists and groups like Anonymous and Concerned Student 1950 [Bustle] is not really concerned about stopping “racism” and “hate-speech.” Their intent is to seize power and control at every opportunity and force our nation to abandon the very principles that make America great.

Carol Swain, a Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University, became a target for illiberal Progressive students, members of Coexist and the Muslim Student Association (a Muslim Brotherhood affiliate [Shariah – The Threat to America and DTN]), when she made a statement that is true and factual in any context. On January 15th 2015, she wrote a piece for the ‘Tennessean’ [Tennessean – might ask for subscription], addressing the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ attack on Jan. 7th, that stated, “Islam is not like other religions in the United States (and) it poses an absolute danger to us and our children, unless it is monitored better than it has been under the Obama administration.”

Some Muslim students called Prof. Swain’s piece “hate-speech” [Inside Higher Ed] and claimed that recent political events had made them feel “scared and unwelcome”; they state that this new protest is focused on “making this university (Vanderbilt) a welcoming and safe place for everyone.”

If Vandy’s Muslim students want all Americans to feel better about their presence in America and to feel safe and unafraid, they should expend their energy towards forcing Islam’s leaders, the ayatollahs and mullahs, to reform Islam, cease using mayhem and murder to subjugate others and cease bombing Europe’s and America’s cities.

And now, ludicrous calls are being made by these sad, pathetic close-minded “students” for Prof. Swain to stop using her title “to further broadcast her personal agenda … at the expense of our University’s Community Creed.” Carol Swain is an extremely educated (five degrees) successful black woman, who was formerly tenured at Princeton. She would not lose her title “professor” if she lost her job at Vandy today, and she did not lose her First Amendment rights when she accepted her position at Vandy. She is Professor Carol Swain, and she has the unequivocal right to use her title.

Responding to the students’ demand that she undergo “a period of diversity training” during her potential suspension, Professor Swain said [Facebook], “Only an idiot would think a 61 year old black woman who has spent much of her life in academia would benefit from sensitivity training.”

Bottom line — there is no such thing as “hate-speech”. There exists only free speech in America.

While the protesters at universities across America have their right to peacefully assemble, Professor Swain and President Wolfe also retain their right to freedom of speech and expression. No U.S. citizen should be silent in the face of intimidation, because if you do not assert your First Amendment rights, you are failing in the solemn duty of all citizens to uphold the entire Bill of Rights.

The “peaceful” protest at the University of Missouri had undertones of violence, with students angrily shouting down anyone with a different or opposing viewpoint. Prof. Melissa Click called for fellow protesters/fascist agitators to forcibly remove a student journalist [Youtube – 2:10], violating his Civil Rights as he tried to document the protest on November 10th. Many of the Concerned Student 1950 [Daily Caller] protesters had also taken part in the violent riots in Ferguson, MO., and they are of the same ilk as the Black Muslims, the Black Panthers, Students for a Democratic Society (1960s radicals) and Black Lives Matter — all too willing to call for the murders of policemen. And one of their leaders, Jonathan Butler [Daily Wire, Breitbart, Breitbart and PowerLine], is a graduate student who also protested in Ferguson.

Butler made it clear that there was much more at stake in this protest, their mockery of democratic principles, than simply addressing “race tensions”. After Tim Wolfe resigned, Butler told his cheering cohorts that their push against racism was part of a larger cause, like censoring and censuring anything and anyone that makes them feel unhappy or uncomfortable, extorting free tuition from universities and forcing innocent university officials to write apology letters, in a manner reminiscent of Chairman Mao.

If racism has been so prevalent at the University of Missouri over the years, as alleged, why has Jonathan Butler, a young black man from a wealthy family, attended classes there for 7 years?

One should seriously doubt the protesters’ depiction of a prevalent environment of racism at the Univ. of Missouri. While a few serious and heinous acts of racism have been documented between October and November 8th — feces used to draw swastikas in Gateway Hall, a criminal act of vandalism, and unidentified despicable cowards shouting “nigger” from the back of a moving truck [Fox Sports, WND and WND] — the protesters are some of the same people who turned a blind-eye to the truth of Michael Brown’s thuggery [Truth Revolt and Political Insider]; these agitators burned down the town of Ferguson in the name of a lie.

Is this where our culture is headed?

Peter Kinder, the current Lt Governor of Missouri, told Fox News [America’s News Room and Breitbart] on November 12th that racism has rarely occurred at the University of Missouri over the past few decades. He strongly stated that “the good people of Missouri are not racists.”

During the weekend of Nov. 7th, it became apparent that these agitators did not really desire the easing of racial tensions through an honest discussion. They surrounded and intimidated Tim Wolfe, and they repeatedly demanded that Tim Wolfe define “systematic oppression”, which implied some official wrongdoing; then they grew angry over his response: “Systematic oppression is because you don’t believe that you have an equal opportunity for success.” [Breitbart and The Federalist]

These protesters do not want an honest discussion on race relations and initiatives and solutions that diminish racist attitudes, leading by example and teaching all America the importance of one’s good character. They do not seek “social justice”; they want numerous unreasonable demands to be met and victory for their authoritarian and intolerant ideology, and racism is the excuse they use to tear apart the system.

The Progressive fascist students of Vanderbilt University and the University of Missouri, a large percentage of students at other schools, and the far left commie intelligentsia across America are similar to the 1930s Nazis who burned books and liked to control speech. As they speak of “micro-aggressions” that need to be eradicated, they do not understand that apprehension over any potential disturbance or being made uncomfortable is not enough to overcome the right of freedom of speech. Any word spoken in class or on campus that offends someone might cause a disturbance. But Americans do not ban words or criminalize certain forms of speech, because our Constitution and our history teaches us that our kind of hazardous freedom and openness is the basis for our national strength and the independence of Americans, who grow up and live in this great nation.

By Justin O Smith

_______________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text and links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

Funding the Muslim Brotherhood Through Uncle Sam


It is good for Westerners and especially Americans (I live there) to educate themselves on the actual tenets of Islam. Muslims, Islamic Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists will tell you information that will sound spiritual and enticing; however those promoting Islam or promoting acceptance of Islam are outright being deceptive or are self-deceived. In general Islam promotes a superiority mentality and extreme displeasure toward those that reject Islamic Supremacism.

On August 7 I cross posted Cheri Berens’ investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. Today here is some added information from the perspective Paul Sutliff who spends serious time understanding Islam and exposing that theopolitical ideology’s nefarious designs on the West. Paul also educates us on the Muslim Brotherhood.

This post was shared via an email link from Paul which was posted on the People’s Pundit Daily. I’d like to point out that Paul Sutliff also has his own blog: Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad.

JRH 8/11/15

Please Support NCCR

 

UPDATE: 8/12/15 2:35 PM – Paul Sutliff has requested that I link his essay to his blog rather than the People’s Pundit Daily because that site failed to properly use quotes to distinguish from his authorship.

*******************

Funding the Muslim Brotherhood Through Uncle Sam

By PAUL SUTLIFF

AUGUST 9, 2015

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

(Authors Note: This is the first of several installments to come on this issue.)

Since we were attacked on 9/11 by al Qaeda and have learned how the Muslim Brotherhood assisted in the planning and preparations, you would think that would mean that the U.S. federal government would not be offering them monetary handouts. But that is sadly not true.

In 2004, the United States served a search Warrant on Ismail Elbrasse [also spelled as Ismail Elbarasse], a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America at the time. Through that search of Elbrasse’s hidden sub-basement the Explanatory Memorandum was discovered. It revealed a sinister war of infiltration and subversion against both Canada and the United States of America. Below is just one paragraph from the missive written as early as 1991.

4- Understanding the role of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America:
The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Gods religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslims destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who choose to slack.

Under the Obama, Bush and Clinton administrations, funds from the federal government have gone directly to sources proven to have terrorist connections here in the United States. With this stated it is beyond this writers understanding why these organizations are allowed to exist in the USA much less receive financial assistance from the federal government!

Council On American Islamic Relations (CAIR) 059-90010

Anaheim, CA

Award Amount            $70,324

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) awarded the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) $70,324 to provide “Critical infrastructure and key resources protection” this past April 28th. It is important to note that CAIR is the former Islamic Association of Palestine and was listed as an Unindicted Co-conspirator in the largest terror funding trial in American history (USA v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, 2007, 2008). HLF was found guilty of funding Hamas and money laundering. Federal agencies such as the FBI have been forbidden from interacting with CAIR since 2008! But for some reason this year, they are trusted by the federal government to provide critical infrastructure and key resources protection. A true example of the Fox guarding the Hen House!

Dar Al Hijrah Islamic Center GS11B02021

Falls Church, VA

Award Amount:             $628,589

Federal funding of this mosque was first exposed by Steve Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) in 2010. Emerson rightly brought concern that the incredible laxness or overt funding of Dar Al Hijrah Islamic Center that had previously and continually proven to be one of the favorite stomping grounds of the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. Anwar Awlaki, was a former “spiritual advisor” to two of the 9/11 terrorists according to the 9/11 Commission at the Falls Church Mosque!

IPT cited White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs interview on CBS Face the Nation on May 23, 2010.

Mister Awlaki … supports al Qaeda’s agenda of murder and violence. In fact, in recent videotapes, he’s said he’s a member of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, who has an agenda just like al Qaeda to strike targets in Yemen, throughout the world, including here in the United States…. the President, yesterday [said] to graduates at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point that members of al Qaeda are small men who will be on the wrong side of history. Those cadets, many of them will go to Afghanistan to pursue our battles there, to keep our country safe. And the President will continue to take action directly at terrorists like Awlaki, and keep our country safe from their murderous thugs.

The date above was placed in bold in this quote to indicate that though Press Secretary Gibbs indicated that Amlaki was a terrorist in his May 2010 interview, the US government had been making two payments of $23,281.08, every three months. This means the US government was making a quarterly $46,562.16payment to the Dar Al Hijrah Islamic Center since October 1, 2008. This places approval for the contract under President George W. Bush’s administration. This contract was voided only because of the good work of the Investigative Project on Terrorism which exposed how the government was paying for a US Census Bureau office in the Falls Church Mosque. According to USA Spending.gov the last payment to this Islamist supporting mosque was on October 1, 2010. They received a total of $628,589 over a two year period.

Steven Coughlin’s book, Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad (2015) records several observations by the FBI of Anwar Awlaki’s connection to the Muslim Brotherhood. In one case he notes:

As late as 2006, FBI witness statements noted Awlaki’s Muslim Brotherhood status, going so far as to note that a witness had broke contact with Awlaki when learning of his Brotherhood connections. .[1]

Please do read IPTs extensive review of those charged with terrorism and what has been taught at the Dar Al Hijrah Islamic Center to see further evidence as to why any contract with this organization should NEVER have happened.

North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) -DUNS: 792211732

Columbia, Missouri

Awarded:             $10,000 +

Due to the numerous awards this organization has received its federal identification number (DUNS) is given instead of a contract or Grant number.

According to federal court documents, NAIT was listed seventh as a member organization on the Explanatory Memorandum quoted above, and was listed as an Unindicted Coconspirator in the USA v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, 2007, 2008 trial on terrorist funding of Hamas.

NAIT acts like a banking institution to establish mosques, aka Islamic Cultural Centers. It is registered as a Non-Profit with the Federal government. FOX News revealed on February 1, 2014:

Records show that since 1998, the North American Islamic Trust has received over $10,000 across 34 separate taxpayer-funded programs. NAIT’s two relatively small land plots are tax-zoned as“agricultural” — but they aren’t developed.
The group has been able to obtain farm subsidies legally without producing any crops because it is a nonprofit “charity group”landowner — so it received subsidies on top of being tax-exempt.

This means that funds to the Muslim Brotherhood entity known as NAIT, began under the Clinton administration. The Fox News report also had stated that the payments to NAIT had been stopped in 2008:

During the trial, the group’s farm subsidies stopped, only to be reinstated after a federal judge cleared them.

However, the group was not removed from the Unindicted Co-Conspirator list as the Fox news report appears to state! Which brings into question why payments were allowed to continue!

ISLAMIC CENTER OF LEXINGTON INCORPORATED

Lexington, KY

AWARDED:                  $38,000 +

According to Fayette County, KY records, the Islamic Center of Lexington is owned by the Muslim Students Association the first established entity of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. The Muslim Students Association was the first Muslim Brotherhood entity established in America. This was noted in the Holy Land Foundation trial on terrorist funding.

This mosque provides chaplain services to area prisons. It is a well known fact that Islamists recruit inside American prisons. Trusting an organization to provide chaplain services that is owned by an FBI identified representative of the Muslim Brotherhood (See USA v. HLF transcript), is an example of a lack of knowledge of who has declared war on the United States and Canada.

Conclusion

This research into the federal funding of the many Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist front groups is hardly extensive. It only scratches the surface of the federal government’s willing refusal to acknowledge those who threaten to harm us, the citizens of the United States and our representative government.

[1] FBI Witness Transcript – October 2006, Judicial Watch  Document regarding Al-Awlaki, Federal bureau of Investigation (FBI) document (Obtained by Judicial Watch for FOIA (31 May 2013) – DECLASSIFIED – labeled  1174529-000, pg. 257/348, 13 October 2006.

____________________________

About Paul Sutliff

Paul Sutliff is an educator and research writer particularly focused on Islam, whose work has been recognized by Ryan Mauro of Clarion Project and FOX News. His latest book is Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam.

(c) Paul Sutliff

If Muslims Can Express Free Speech Rhetoric, so Can Christians


MB-Hamas terrori network USA

John R. Houk
© December 6, 2014
 
Muslim terrorists have infiltrated American Universities. These sly devils don’t openly practice Islamic terrorism on American soil (anyway, not yet). Rather via Professors and university student activists they foment the Jew-hatred and Christian-hatred inherent in the Quran. A part of this hatred is to propagandize Muslim students and idiotic Left leaning students that America is the great satan and that Israel is the little satan.
 
The propaganda comes from foreign sources pulling the strings to undermine the USA. Those foreign agents of propaganda originate from the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt and the Islamic terrorist organization Hamas.
 
The Muslim Brotherhood is dedicated to establish a global caliphate reminiscent in power of the bloody ruthless days of conquest that brought the initial cancer to spread across the world that began to metastasize in the early 600s AD (that’s right Anno Domini – year of the Lord, not CE – Common or Christian Era).
 
Hamas is a wing of the MB embedded in Gaza that agrees with the MB agenda but is dedicated to destroy Israel and kill Jews pretending to be a non-existent people called Palestinians.
 
This network of radical Muslims foment the destruction of U.S. Constitutional rights while using the very same rights to do so. The U.S. government allows this out of the self-destructive concepts of political correctness, diverse multiculturalism and the vagueness in defining the width and depth of the First Amendment rights of Free Speech and Religious Freedom.
 
The universality of Free Speech rights in the First Amendment has left the courts to try and define what the extent of Free Speech should be. For most of the U.S. history the courts erred on the side of allowing government-Congress to define the line not to be crossed in Free Speech. Erring on the side of the government defining the limits of Free Speech began during WWI with the head of the American Socialist Party convicted in breaking the Espionage Act by printing pamphlets to resist the draft into the Army.
 
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the 1919 SCOTUS decision defining the limits of Free Speech is measured by how it is or is not a Clear and Present Danger to nation (as in National Security) and the public good. In this way SCOTUS effectively amended the First Amendment to bring a narrower grasp of the extent of the First Amendment.
 
Although the Clear and Present Danger doctrine established by SCOTUS rather than the Amendment process brought new legal challenges. It turns out there is a lack of definition to the context of the meaning to a Clear and Present Danger.
 
Between 1919 and 1969 SCOTUS struggled to pin down the parameters of a Clear and Present Danger.
 
The great break came in the Court’s 1969 decision in Brandenburg v. Ohio. There the Court said the government could not take action against a member of the Ku Klux Klan, who said, among other things, “We’re not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court, continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race, it’s possible that there might have to be some revengence taken.” The speaker did not explicitly advocate illegal acts or illegal violence. But in its decision, the Court announced a broad principle, ruling that the right to free speech does “not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” (Bold Emphasis Mine – Is Violent Speech a Right? By Cass Sunstein; The American Prospect; 12/19/01)
 
This Brandenburg v. Ohio decision provided a little more clarity in getting a grasp on judging a Clear and Present Danger. This refined Clear and Present Danger legal doctrine runs like this according Cass Sunstein:
 
First, the speaker must promote not just any lawless action but “imminent” lawless action. Second, the imminent lawless action must be “likely” to occur. Third, the speaker must intend to produce imminent lawless action (“directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action”). (Ibid.)
 
There still is leeway in pushing the envelope on what is legal and what is illegal. An example from I read from Sunstein is Civil Disobedience. Obviously if Civil Disobedience in non-violent in its nature one would think there would be no Clear and Present Danger to the public good. But what if the peaceful Civil Disobedience advocated by speech or print are acts that might be illegal. For example a march without city permission down a street, 18-wheeler trucks are advocated to block traffic on a busy Inter-State, a city ordinance requires Preachers to turn in a copy of their sermons to city government for speech approval and the preachers refuse and so on scenarios.
 
Those acts of Civil Disobedience are illegal by at least statute. Does promoting an illegal activity constitute a Clear and Present Danger to the public good?
 
No the KKK dude managed a Free Speech victory the 1969 SCOTUS:
 
We’re not a revengent organization, but if our President, our Congress, our Supreme Court, continues to suppress the white, Caucasian race, it’s possible that there might have to be some revengence taken.
 
I am fairly convinced that alluding that “revengence” could be taken if the three branches of the Federal government suppress White Supremacist ideology. A “revengence” act is an act of violence.
 
As a Christian Right political blogger I often call on readers to stand up to the government on restricting where and when Christians can practice their Religious Freedom. Am I inciting violence?
 
When I advocate Christians and Americans to stand up against Muslims in America promoting the destruction of the USA in favor of a Sharia based Caliphate, am I inciting violence?
 
When I advocate Christians to understand that Islam’s revered writings is full of Jew-hatred and Christian-hatred, am I inciting violence?
 
If I call for Americans – especially college age Americans – to protest Islamic hatred on American campuses, would I be inciting violence? After all the modern history of Islam shows that Muslims enter into crazy violence when non-Muslims have the courage to protest Muslim-hate ideology pertaining to Jews, Christians, Israel and American constitutional Liberty (because Sharia Law elements run counter to the Constitution’s Bill of Rights).
 
I ask these questions because the reading of the Quran, Hadith and Sunna enlists me to tell you that Islam is no religion of peace and spiritual fulfillment. The Quran specifically calls for the death of all people who refuse to submit to Islam. The evidence of this is the FACT that over the last 1400 years of Islamic history Muslim conquests have resulted in 270 MILLION non-Muslims (Christians, Jews, Hindus and more) killed in the name of Jihad to spread Islam around the globe. Obviously these 270 MILLION people refused to submit to Islam and lost their lives for it.
 
When hear, read about or see Muslims expressing this hate ideology on American campuses, it is this Islamic Superiority mentality of Jihad that killed 270 MILLION people.
 
 
Published by forbidislam
Published: Nov 16, 2010
 
This vid consolidates the points in Frontpage’s interview with Bill Warner “Islam: 270 Million Bodies in 1400 Years”.

May every kafir wake up and smell the coffee.

Islam is aids. Whoever in bed with it will be infected and die eventually. I used to say Islam is cancer, every muslim is a cancer cell in our society. Though some cancer cells may not or never spread, but once it does, it kills you. Now I found cancer is better than islam, at least cancer is not contagious.

Since EVERY Muslim supports jihad through the even division of their zakat, the mosque offering/tax, EVERY Muslim’s hands are full of innocent blood! Remember, 270 million died under the sword of Islam so that Muslims were able to enter Allah’s paradise full of beautiful virgin sex slaves!

In more than 1400 years, muslims have killed much much more than 270 million people:

http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html [Blog Editor: The Masada 2000 website (Wikipedia) has had a history of trouble to exist. This link may be dead. Webhosts tend to get complaints because of a controversial “S.H.I.T. LIST” which points toward Leftist Jews and I am guessing Muslim apologists. The website always seems to pop up again under another Webhost.]

Studies show that at least every three minutes is a Christian is tortured in the Muslim world and that in 2009 alone, more than 165,000 Christians have been killed, mainly in Muslim countries due to their Christian faith.

There are a number of organizations that report about this, but the cases are still greatly hampered by the power of the lefti’s journalistic elite, that READ THE REST

 
I want so badly to condemn the ideology of the haters of Islam, but I am choosing to err on the side of Free Speech. Muslim Apologists and Leftists could very easily come after me for hate-speech for exposing the true nature of Islam or for saying Biblical Morality trumps the legalization homosexual normalizing.
 
So those morons do have a right to express their moronic ideology. HOWEVER, that means I also have the right to upbraid anything that diminishes Christianity and the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution. Shutting me up violates my First Amendment Rights as much as forcing Radical Muslims to shut up.
 
On the other hand as a free society Institutions, organizations, business owners have the right to decide whose interests to support. So Universities that allow Muslims to express violent hatred toward Israel, Jews and Americans that want nothing to do with Sharia-hatred of Constitutional Liberty should – rather MUST – must have the freedom to shut down the hate.
 
In the case of Public Universities voters actually have the power to focus on the hate spewing from Muslims in racist overtones. Most sovereign States in America have an initiative process in which voters can legislate where state congresses fear to tread.
 
So embark on your own Civil Disobedience and protest those haters of Israel, Jews, Christians and American Constitutional Liberties!
 
JRH 12/6/14 (Hat Tip: Stop Islam Facebook Closed Group)

Please Support NCCR

**************************************
 
 
Published by Hamas On Campus
Published: Sep 30, 2014
 
The Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) is Hamas on Campus. An organization dedicated to wiping Israel off the map.

Find out how the The SJP was created to be Hamas on Campus and work in tandem with the Muslim Brotherhood proxy, the Muslim Students Association (MSA).

______________________________
If Muslims Can Express Free Speech Rhetoric, so Can Christians
John R. Houk
© December 6, 2014
_____________________________
 
HamasOnCampus.org was set up by a group of students and alumni from different campuses across the USA and Canada. We represent both Jews and non-Jews, left and right, liberal and conservative. We value freedom of speech, women’s rights and human rights. For this reason we are disturbed by the increasingly radical behaviour and rhetoric by Hamas supporting organizations on campus.
 
In particular, we are concerned by the activities of the MSA (Muslim Students Association) and SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine).  Both share anti-Israel and anti-democratic values.  We are most concerned about the SJP. It declares itself to be secular in nature but in fact, supports the values and deeds of Hamas. The SJP is financially connected to Hamas via a network of organizations including the MSA, CAIR and the AMP.
 
Please join us in exposing the SJP, also known as Hamas On Campus.
 
 

Terrorist Associated CAIR Strikes Again


Beware of CAIR signed 5 Congressmen (woman)

John R. Houk

© April 24, 2014

 

I became aware of CAIR doing their jihad against Free Speech again via the blog Bare Naked Islam. From BNI I learned that CAIR squelched a speaking engagement at a High School by accusing the sponsor and the speaker of being propagators of hate-speech against Islam. Unfortunately BNI has a way of using epithetical colloquialisms that I found distasteful. CAIR’s actions annoyed me because in a more public venue CAIR did a Free Speech jihad on Ayaan Hirsi Ali on her speaking at a Brandeis U commencement ceremony and removing a promised honorary degree as well by accusing her of hate-speech.

 

So I emailed my buddy Justin Smith who is from Tennessee if had the scoop on CAIR attacking Free Speech in Knoxville. From Justin I learned that Bill Warner was the target of CAIR this time with some honorable mention going ACT for America Knoxville. He also pointed the way to Bill Warner doing a short teaching video about his experience with CAIR and the original speaking engagement at Farragut High School in Knoxville entitled “Sharia and Fascism in Knoxville”. Then Justin pointed to the The Rutherford Reader had a written version of the same title attributed by Bill Warner that included a tiny bit about him and the cancelled event. Because my pal pointed me in this direction I’m going to cross post the brief Reader article and include the Youtube video. However I desired a bit more detail and going to post some of that directly after the Reader article.

 

JRH 4/24/14 (Hat Tip Justin Smith)

Please Support NCCR

**********************************

Sharia and Fascism in Knoxville

 

By Bill Warner

(PoliticalIslam.com)

The Rutherford Reader

April 17 – 23, 2014

VOL. 14, NO. 39 

 

 

Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.

 

Kafirs (non-believers) must submit to islam in all politics and public life. Every aspect of kafir civilization must submit to political Islam.

 

Mission of Political Islam

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to Kafirs (non-believers) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, allah.”

 

Many of you have heard of Dr. Bill Warner, as well as those who have heard him share the facts on Islam.

 

Dr. Warner has had a life-long interest in religion and its effects on history. He has studied the source texts of the major religions for decades. Even before the destruction of the World Trade Center he had predicted the war between Islam and America. The day after 9/11, he decided to make the source texts of Islam available for the average person. Warner’s training in scientific theory and mathematics shaped how he analyzed Islamic doctrine.

 

Dr. Warner holds a PhD in physics and math, NC State University, 1968. He has been a university professor, business-man, and applied physicist.

 

Middle Tennessee and beyond is very fortunate that Dr. Warner lives amongst us. He has and will play a big part in harnessing political Islam in this area. Facts and truth make him valuable in our war against Islam.

 

There is a partnership today between Islam and our public officials that is determining who can speak on what subjects. A recent talk in Knoxville shows us how far the government is away from free speech.

 

Dr. Warner was scheduled to speak at a high school in Knoxville recently but the venue was cancelled. The reason was that Muslim parents were upset with the flyer that was sent home announcing the program. One comment was that the content of the flyer had an aggressive tone. The Muslim Brotherhood/CAIR see Dr. Warner as “a hater” and they don’t like what he has to say.

 

We urge our readers to go to www.politicalislam.com and click on Sharia and Fascism in Knoxville and watch his video. Sign up for the Political Islam Newsletter and reap the research and facts about Islam that Dr. Bill Warner is providing to educate us on the dangers to our freedoms. He is a true Patriot and educator.

 

VIDEO: Sharia and Fascism in Knoxville

 

Posted by Bill Warner

Published: Apr 14, 2014

 

There is a wave of fascism in America. Now we have state and Federal governments dictating to us what the truth is, particularly about Islam.

 

__________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk as reposted from The Rutherford Reader PDF file. I had to clean up the OCR reading. Links and video added by Blog Editor.

 

All Rights Reserved. Copyright Rutherfordreader.com

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor:

 

The local news for the area WATE.com (ABC affiliate New Channel 6) tried to portray both sides of Muslim terrorist associated CAIR and John Peach the local director of Knoxville ACT! For America. The story begins with the feature that began on TV followed by a written report. I am posting the Youtube version of that feature and then I am going excerpt the John Peach statement which addresses thy hypocrisy of CAIR spokesman AbdelRahman Murphy which you will hear in the video.

 

VIDEO: Approval rescinded for Sharia Law event at Farragut High School

 

John Peach issued this statement late Friday afternoon:

 

“Why is it that Muslims engage in teaching about how good Islam is for Tennessee at the Cedar Bluff Library – a public building, but they feel “uncomfortable” when ACT! For America plans an event to show the opposite viewpoint at a public building? (This is documented as follows):

 

“Muslims like the support the University of Tennessee gives them to host activities and venues on their campus. Furthermore, it likes its Muslim Student Association (MSA) to hold events at their tax supported public UT campus.

 

“Why is it that all Tennessee social study textbooks to be authorized for use in our public schools must be approved by Muslim affiliates? (Hundreds of reviews have exposed the fact that our textbooks are overwhelmingly biased toward Muslims over Christianity and Judaism, with Islam always portrayed as being more significant than all other religions).

 

“Political Correctness has gone amuck and is destroying our country. Whatever happened to freedom of speech? If it’s right for Muslims to host events in tax-funded public facilities, then what is wrong with a group of citizens wanting the same privilege?

 

“Last December, ACT! For America – Knoxville Chapter was granted permission by Knox County Schools to use the facilities of Farragut High School to hold an educational forum including two speakers, followed by an opportunity for the public to answer any questions of the two. This we called the Town Hall – Farragut.

 

“We in good faith and urgent vitality have been promoting this event for the past four months, believing we were following all the guidelines given to us. We have spent over $1500.00 to advance this cause, including taking out a special insurance policy just to cover this occasion.

 

“The purpose of the meeting was to educate our local citizens about the dangers of Sharia Law, especially as it negatively affects our children, our churches, our law enforcement personnel, and our community leaders. Now, due to the fear of Muslims in the Knoxville area, the venue for the event that was open to everyone was cancelled. This is a great example of what Sharia Law is doing to America.” (Approval rescinded for Shari’a Law event at Farragut High School; By Whitney Good; WATE.com; Updated 4/11/14 3:47 PM CDT)

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bill Warner was supposed to speak TODAY. DailyRollCall.com has the most up to date info on Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas-CAIR Free Speech jihad that is dated today. Stay informed on what the Mainstream Media rarely reports.

 

JRH 4/24/14

**************************

Freedom Of Speech Squashed Again, But Not For Islamists

 

By DailyRollCall.com

April 24, 2014

 

Boy are Islamists lucky. Sharia law, which they are so eager to cast upon us, allows for no freedom of speech, so when that becomes inconvenient, they turn to the first amendment of our U.S Constitution, and they have all the freedoms they desire.

 

Case in point, the cancellation of an event that was to be held on April 24, 2014 in the Farragut High School (Knoxville) auditorium. That event was a forum with Dr. Bill Warner of http://www.politicalislam.com, where he was to speak about Sharia law. Dr. Warner knows more about Sharia, than most Muslims, and that is precisely why they sought to have the event cancelled. Below is a video excerpt with Remziya Suleyman explaining her lack of knowledge on Sharia (best viewed with Google Chrome)

 

VIDEO: Remziya Suleyman explaining her lack of knowledge on Sharia

[Blog Editor: If the video link does not work you’ll have watch at DailyRollCall.com]

 

So after CAIR-Hamas “welcomed” the announcement by the feeble superintendent of Knox County Schools, James Mcintyre, the islamists once again practiced their sharia on Americans, as they continue to enjoy their freedom of speech.

 

Letter to Farragut High School Principal: (Read full article here: http://cair.com/press-center/press-releases/12446-cair-welcomes-cancellation-of-anti-muslim-event-in-tenn-school.html)

 

CAIR Letter to Farragut High School Principal 4-8-14

 CAIR Letter to Farragut High School Principal 4-8-14

 

We have learned from a source at MTSU (Middle Tennessee State University) a publicly funded, STATE university, that the Muslim Brotherhood front group called the Muslim Student Association (MSA) uses several locations throughout the campus to host meetings and special events on a regular basis. Two events just happen to be occurring the same week Dr. Warner’s event was cancelled.

 

The premise by the islamists was a publicly funded entity should not host any events by whom they deem haters. Hmm…

 

On April 23, 2014, the MSA held their last meeting in the James Walker Library, in which new board members were to be nominated. (Of course, the radical Islamist hater Drost Kokoye “liked” this announcement)

 

MTSU MSA meeting Library

mtsu-on-meeting-in-library

 

In addition to this meeting, another event is being held this Friday. April 25 at the Business and Aerospace Building, once again involving Christian-Jew- American hater Ms. Kokoye whom is now working with the ACLU and proudly wears the MSA alumni badge.

 

Campus Dialogue & Multicultural Issue Forum

Campus Dialogue & Multicultural Issue Forum

 

The MSA (Muslim Student Association) is one of the first organizations brought to this country by the Muslim Brotherhood in 1963. The Muslim Brotherhood proudly proclaims the MSA to be their number 2 front group that extolls the same mindset of their goals.

 

So how is it that a taxpayer funded university is allowing a group that is a known terrorist organization affiliate to use taxpayer funded buildings?

 

Farragut High School in Knoxville has a policy that allows any group to use it facilities after hours, as long as it does not interfere with other events occurring at the school. What has clearly happened is the superintendent of Knox County Schools, James Mcintyre, has trampled the rights of its non-muslim citizens because the muslims are afraid of Dr. Warner and his knowledge of a doctrine they do not even understand. The word hate was used as a guise to manipulate the school administration to cancel the event. There is no hate in truth, unless you have an agenda and fear the truth.

___________________________

Terrorist Associated CAIR Strikes Again

John R. Houk

© April 24, 2014

______________________________

Sharia and Fascism in Knoxville

 

_____________________________

Freedom Of Speech Squashed Again, But Not For Islamists

 

About DailyRollCall.com

 

This site was created by a retired police officer to help the citizens of Tennessee and our country to understand the threat and indoctrination that Islamic doctrine imposes on our society.

Doesn’t This Matter?


Islam is Death Cult

Justin Smith writes about historical revisionism that portray Islam as one of the world’s great benevolent religions and Christianity as a major contributor to all that is evil in the world. This historical revisionism Justin writes about is implemented into America’s textbooks as fact mysteriously leaving out Islam’s ravaging brutal history toward non-Muslims. One of the principle examples used is the brutal inequality Islam places the female gender.

 

JRH 10/10/13

Please Support NCCR

********************************

Doesn’t This Matter?

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 10/10/2013 1:28 PM

 

Increasingly, it appears that many of our so-called “educators” do not have any qualms in aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood’s 25 Year Plan and the American Muslim Advisory Council’s dawa/proselytizing efforts, as they approve indoctrination events and textbooks across the U.S. and here in Tennessee, that describe the process for converting to Islam and teach how to pray like Muslims. Islam is presented in false and glowing terms as “a religion of peace,” which only serves to advance the agenda of wealthy Saudi Arabian Wahhabis and other islamofascists; these “educators” affirm an undeserved stature of Islamic superiority, which traps Muslim children in a cycle of Sharia law/doctrine abuses perpetrated under a controlling tribal and unreformed freedom-killing ideology, and this also creates greater opportunities for the indoctrination of vulnerable groups of American children!

In early 2010, Minnesota’s ACLU sued St Paul’s public k-8 Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy for violating the ban against government religious advocacy; Massachusetts schools adopted a Notebook advocated by Harvard’s Middle Eastern Studies Center that claims Muslim explorers discovered the New World and Native Americans had Muslim names; and, in September of 2010, the Texas Board of Education drew heavy criticism after issuing a textbook resolution asking publishers to fix the “pro-Islamic/anti-Christian half-truths, selective disinformation, and false stereotypes” that riddled the textbooks, just as the case has been in Williamson, Rutherford and now Sumner Counties in Tennessee…for example, the brutal and violent conquests of Christian lands by Muslims is now referred to as “migrations” of “empire builders.”

Amanda Elmore has indoctrinated students at Hendersonville High School through her World Studies classes, over the past ten years, but one young lady, a freshman, finally said “enough.” Mike Conner’s stepdaughter was given a zero, when she refused to attend a field trip on September 4, 2013 to one of the most radical mosques in the nation, the Islamic Center of Nashville of Carlos Bledsoe infamy; next, she also refused to accept the alternative assignment to “compare and contrast” the teachings of Jesus, Gandhi and Mohammed.

Conner’s daughter refused the alternative assignment due to its heavy bias towards Islam. She had been given one page of Bible verses, two thirds of a page about Gandhi and five pages about Mohammed. After a threatened lawsuit, she was allowed to simply compare any three of the five major religions through any information she could research on her own, as it should be.

On September 11, 2013, Sheridan Middle School (Arkansas) Superintendent Brenda Haynes argued that inviting a Muslim guest speaker, on this day of tragic memories for most of us, was motivated by pure intentions. “There was no thought of having this person address the classes to point Islam as ‘a religion of peace’,” Haynes stated. If there was truly “no thought” of such a scenario arising, how interesting is it that she felt compelled to mention it?

And, what a feeling of shock and disgust must have coursed through parent’s minds upon hearing that Principle Peter Badalament read a Muslim prayer over Concord-Carlisle High School’s (Boston) intercom system, instead of reading the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States; the poem, by Syrian-American poet Mohja Kahf, is contemptuous of America and Americans in general.

Islam is the ideology of death. It demands to this day the deaths of anyone who leaves it, and it regularly demands the deaths of adulterers, homosexuals, infidels, Jews, Christians, and even other Muslims who practice a less strict form of Islam.

Many Americans become offended and indignant over any suggestion, even when presented with proof, that child marriage, honor killings and female excision are, right this very instant, a very real fact of life for many Muslim girls in homes all across America; if 95% of Egyptian girls are genitally mutilated, what percentage of Egyptian girls born in the U.S. are circumcised? None? I don’t think so.

When educators in the U.S., out of a misguided notion founded in diversity, multiculturalism and the desire not to stigmatize Muslims, do not present any information about Muslim women kept from working and being productive, given frequent beatings and forced into arranged marriages that are approved by their parents, communities and imams/preachers, they deny countless Muslim girls their right to be free from this backward culture; they fail to live up to the ideas and values of our democratic republic, and they dishonor the memory of those American women who fought so long and hard for equal rights!

Islam is built on sexual inequality and on surrender of individual responsibility and choice. This is not just ugly; it is monstrous.

Sure, these things do not happen to all American Muslims, since some Muslims have assimilated better than others; however, we still see thousands of radical Muslim students, young men and women born in the United States, such as Lema Sbenaty of Murfreesboro, TN – a Muslim Student Association (MSA)/Muslim Brotherhood supporter, Islamic sympathizers and liberal educators, who have so manifestly benefitted from every advantage of Western education, ignore the profound differences between a theocratic mind-set and a democratic mind-set.

Sbenaty tells her associates in the Muslim Interscholastic Tournament organization that “We are Muslims in non-Muslim countries. As such, it is the duty of each and every one of us to inform and educate others about Islam… emphasize that your MSA is for anyone interested in … clearing misconceptions about Islam. This may facilitate school approval.” And, this would give her and other adult Muslim women access to young high school students for the purpose of “educating”/indoctrinating them about Islam.

All of this has contributed to the national dynamic, which has created a sanitized version of Islamic history and dogma that has infiltrated U.S. public textbooks over the last two decades; a great amount of this occurred through the efforts of Muslim convert Susan Douglas, from the Institute on Religion and Civic Values, who wrote lesson plans, advisories, guidelines and pamphlets to soft the image of Islam in public schools for ten years. Central to her works is the ‘Teacher’s Guide to Religion in the Public Schools’, which was promoted as an interfaith ‘First Amendment’. 

Surely, we can flatly state, “Islam, based on the Quran, that denies women basic human rights is backward,” even if only as an opinion. And, since this is a valid criticism, ignoring the practice of victimization of women that stems from the Quran only adds harm to its victims: Free speech is the bedrock of liberty and a free society. And yes, it includes the right to blaspheme and offend.

Doesn’t this matter to all those clever young Muslim girls in America, such as Lema Sbenaty?

A lot of Americans, some well-intentioned and some not, have a hard time accepting that all human beings are equal, but all cultures and ideologies are not. A culture that values women as masters of their own lives is better than a culture that mutilates young girls and confines them behind walls or murders them for falling in love. A culture that protects women’s rights… where a woman can be appointed to the U.S Supreme Court… is better than a culture that denies a woman’s inheritance rights and dishonors her by questioning her truthfulness as a rule of law. The American culture guided by the Western Enlightenment and the U.S. Constitution is better than anything Islam can offer or has ever offered!

If today’s Progressive Leftist educators and publishers were truly objective, they would tell a story of a Quran that is the ‘Mein Kampf’ of Islam, which means to eliminate and supplant all other religions and ideologies with the mother of all totalitarianisms, theocracy; they would write of events like the mass murders of innocents, such as occurred recently in Kenya, Nigeria and the Sudan, simply because the victims could not name Mohammed’s mother and were not Muslim, and these educators would recount the historic genocides perpetrated by Muslims across Constantinople, Armenia and Anatolia; they would explain the inherent violence of an ideology that does not respect any human rights and preaches the Holy War, the Jihad: All the evil that these Sons of Mohammed commit against us and themselves comes from the Quran.

There is a problem with Islam. By ignoring the facts, you, the Muslim student or adult…the “educators”, fail your community. If the goal is to truly seek the truth, which education and textbooks are supposed to provide, then no one can deny that a strict interpretation of Islam is preparation for bigotry, widespread strife and oppression. You cannot deny the link to Islamic beliefs and the failure of Islamic societies to provide peace, opportunity and prosperity to their people. No matter which Islamic country you call you ancestral “home”, you are no longer living there for a reason, so embrace the better life your parents sought for you, by giving birth to you in America or by bringing you to America. And, if you believe there should be Sharia law in America, go home and take a look at what it’s really like!

 

By Justin O. Smith

_______________________

© Justin O. Smith

Another Huma Abedin defender with an interesting background?


Amina Chaudary

The writer at WalidShoebat.com known as Administrator writes a good exposé about one of the defenders of Huma Abedin. He (or she) examines Amina Chaudary as an author that may be one of those Huma associations that bring questions to her ability to remain loyal to the U.S. government due to the hatred of Radical Islam for the American Constitution. Too many defenders of Huma Abedin are trying to defend her by raising the issue of bigotry and hatred of Islam when the case is a too close association with those who hate America enough to persuade Huma Abedin to divulge classified information that will be used against the USA.

 

Would Huma Abedin sell-out America for Allah and Mohammed? I have no idea; however because of her associations I am convinced the potential exists and if the potential exists an investigation must be required to see if Huma Abedin passes classified information to a host of Radical Islamists including Huma’s mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin.

 

JRH 8/21/12

Please Support NCCR

MSA Misleads – Professor Eisenstein Litigates


John R. Houk

© May 30, 2012

 

Associated Professor Maurice Eisenstein of the Political Science department at Purdue University noticed that a group of radical Muslims from Nigeria calling themselves Boko Haram (Warning: Link that tells what Radical Islamic Boko Haram is has a video showing just how evil these Muslims are by ritually beheading a Christian Nigerian) slaughtered some fellow Nigerians merely because they were Christians. Eisenstein objected to murder in the name of Islam as taught to do to non-Muslims by Islam’s founder Mohammed. Eisenstein objected in the public forum of Facebook.

 

A Muslim gal at Purdue commented on Eisenstein’s Facebook page that she was the equivalent of disgusted for insulting Mo the prophet. Evidently because the Muslim gal has tons of Muslim friends on Facebook, Eisenstein’s excellent though not politically correct call went viral among Muslim students at Purdue. And surprise-surprise, the Muslim Student Association (MSA) organized a fire Eisenstein movement on the Purdue campus. Here is a snapshot of the Facebook entry made by Eisenstein courtesy of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE).

 

Eisenstein Facebook Snapshot (Full Size)

Maurice Eisensten Facebook Controversy

 

In a FrontPageMag.com interview between Eisenstein and Jamie Glazov, Eisenstein said this:

 

“The entire attack on my free speech began over a post I made to Facebook in November 2011.  I posted a picture with a storyline about an Islamist Muslim group (Boko Haram) killing Christians in Nigeria.  I asked: Where were the moderate Muslims? They must be listening to that idiot Mohammad.

 

From this, one of my PUC colleagues, a Muslim, told me (on Facebook) that she believed my statement about Mohammad was beyond despicable.  Once she responded to me, then several of her students were able come to my Facebook page to tell me that they also believed that I was out-of-bounds for denigrating Mohammad.  Their essential issue was that I was offending Mohammed and Islam.  In the wake of that incident, the Muslim Student Association became involved and they did a press release saying that no prophet (Jesus, Moses, Mohammad — their argument not mine) should be insulted because offending a religion was not an acceptable use of freedom of speech.

 

Basically, this whole ordeal started because I insulted Mohammad.  I did insult Mohammad.  I may not have been nice about it, I may have been provocative about it, but quite frankly, I think killing Christians because they are Christian and not Muslim is much more insulting than calling Mohammad an idiot.

 

From this incident, there emerged an active campaign from the Muslim faculty and students, the Muslim Student Association (acting, as it claimed, on behalf of all Muslims), and their leftist supporters, active collusion to get the University to fire me for offending them.  Because the University could not fire me for Facebook comments, the faculty, students, and the MSA decided that it would then say that I was harassing and discriminating against students in my classroom.  Toward that end, audio tapes of one of my courses from Spring 2011 were then posted on YouTube. It was an Introduction to Judaism course, which I taught from a pro-Jewish and pro-Israel perspective.  Two of the books I used in the course were: Why the Jews? by Praeger and Telushkin as well as The Israel Test by George Gilder.  Anyway, I am very provocative and blunt — I like challenging students, particularly since most of what is taught on campus (irrespective of the discipline) comes from a center left perspective.

 

Now, there are over 40 to 45 hours of lectures from that class.  Out of those 40 to 45 hours, about 16 minutes were posted on YouTube and, of course, these 16 minutes were selectively edited so that I was portrayed in the worst possible light and without context.  Then, based on these tapes, in conjunction with my Facebook comments, 9 separate harassment and discrimination complaints were filed against me.” (Read Entire Interview)

 

Eventually the Muslim Student Association is a direct offshoot of the Salafist/Radical Muslim group known as the Muslim Brotherhood. That means the MSA as does the Muslim Brotherhood believes that Christians that refuse to submit to Islamic Supremacism must die. Since MSA is an American group, they will not come outright and say the Mohammed principle of the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) must choose between converting to Islam, submitting to the authority of the rules of Sharia-Dhimmitude or die. That would be a public relations disaster for them in America. So the MSA as do many Muslim-American groups that have roots in the Muslim Brotherhood or Saudi Wahhabism obfuscate their beliefs in America to produce the view that Islam is just another religion deserving Religious Freedom.

 

ACT for America is exposing the nefarious nature of the MSA in sharing about Eisenstein’s effort to sue Purdue for infringing on his Free Speech rights because Purdue considered the possibility of punishment for Eisenstein writing the obvious truth on his Facebook page.

 

The ACT for America email alert begins with harassment Eisenstein received then finishes the email with a Fox News report.

 

JRH 5/30/12

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

Maurice Eisenstein

Professor files free speech lawsuit

 

Sent by ACT for America

Sent: May 30, 2012 11:49 AM

 

When should free speech be limited?

According to the Muslim Students Association (MSA), apparently when it hears speech it deems “anti-Muslim.”

According to the Fox News story below (highlights added), a Purdue University professor who made comments on his Facebook page about Muslims was investigated after complaints by the MSA and other faculty.

The professor then filed a lawsuit alleging the investigation violated his free speech rights.

One of the faculty members expressed concern for the Saudi students on campus. She went so far as to argue that the “anti-Muslim” comments were comparable to yelling fire in a crowded theater. The implication is that the comments put Muslim students in danger and should be prohibited.

Someone needs to remind this professor who complained that we’re not living in Saudi Arabia, where speech deemed offensive to Muslims is prohibited and can put a non-Muslim in serious jeopardy. We still have free speech protections here, whether that speech is offensive to Muslims, Jews or Christians.

__________________________

Professor sues Purdue after probe of his anti-Muslim Facebook comments

 

By Mike Jaccarino

FoxNews.com

 

Purdue University Professor Maurice Eisenstein says the school’s investigation – which cleared him – still violated his free speech rights.

A Purdue University professor has filed a freedom of speech suit against his school and five co-workers after getting in hot water for inflammatory statements about Muslims on his Facebook page.

Tenured political science professor Maurice Eisenstein was cleared by a university investigation into his Facebook comments, which included a reference to “the idiot Mohammad [sic}, may his name be cursed.” But Eisenstein claims the investigation nonetheless damaged his reputation and disputes a finding that he retaliated against other faculty members.

“I was trying to be challenging as a professor, and do what I was trained to do,” Eistenstein, who joined the school’s faculty in 1993, told FoxNews.com.

The flap unfolded late last year, when Eisenstein posted a photo of the aftermath of a massacre of Nigerian Christians, purportedly carried out by African Muslims, on his Facebook page.

“Where are the ‘moderate’ Muslims’ reaction to this? Oh, I forgot they are still looking at the earth as flat …,” Eisenstein wrote above the post.

Other members of the faculty, as well as members of the Muslim Student Association, learned of the comments and went to school officials. Eisenstein maintained that the post was on his personal page and in no way reflected on the school. History professor Miriam Joyce, who later filed a harassment complaint against Eisenstein, told FoxNews.com the comments could alienate students.

“We have Saudi students,” Joyce said. “We have other Muslim students. This is wrong. It creates an unpleasant and unwelcoming atmosphere. “I’m concerned that Muslim students and their parents will get the wrong idea about my school.”

The Muslim Student Association could not be reached for comment.

The school’s investigation, led by Chancelor Thomas Keon, cleared Eisenstein in January of violating the college’s free-speech and anti-harassment rules. However, he received a written reprimand for allegedly retaliating against Joyce, as well as a second professor, Saul Lerner.

Eisenstein denied retaliating or harassing his colleagues, but acknowledged a bitter e-mail exchange with Lerner and denies making a callous reference to Joyce’s son, a former hedge fund manager who committed suicide.

Eisenstein said his freedom-of-speech suit is the result of the university’s investigation into his comments about Muslims – even though the probe ostensibly cleared him.

“When you investigate free speech, you chill free speech,” Eisenstein said. “How am I supposed to do my job without free speech. I’ve changed. Every time I go into a classroom, I look around and wonder who will complain about what I say.”

Eisenstein enlisted the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) in bringing his suit against the Big Ten school.

“This is not the first time and it won’t be the last time we will see a university punish a student or professor for constitutionally protected speech on Facebook,” said FIRE President Greg Lukianoff. “Professors at public universities should not have to go to court to defend their free speech rights.”

Joyce said freedom of speech shouldn’t permit a professor at a public school to gratuitously denigrate the beliefs of others, including students at the school.

“I’m all for free speech. I want it for me and I want it for everyone else, but there’s got to be some judgment used,” Joyce said. “You don’t cry fire if there isn’t a fire and then say it was protected by free speech.

“I’m a [history] teacher,” she added. “I’d rather be dealing with Bahrain than Eisenstein, anyway.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/18/professor-sues-purdue-after-probe-his-anti-muslim-facebook-comments/#ixzz1vp6PUbyS

 

________________________

MSA Misleads – Professor Eisenstein Litigates

John R. Houk

© May 30, 2012

____________________

Professor sues Purdue after probe of his anti-Muslim Facebook comments

 

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.