Newbill Conspiracy insights & Propositions Part 2


List of Why Hillary Lies Matter

Tony Newbill examines Crooked Hillary insinuated her goals in the matrix of a clandestine government. (Part One can be read HERE.)

 

JRH 7/19/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Newbill Conspiracy insights & Propositions Part 2

Tony Newbill

Posted July 19, 2016

 

Wed 7/13/2016 10:07 AM

Hilary is 2 Candidates in One

 

Hilary is 2 Candidates in One, first she’s a candidate for POTUS and then She’s a candidate for the “Deep State” and this is where the problem with maintaining USA Sovereignty exists.

 

The Deep State is who gave Hilary a Pass on accountability to the Civilians of the USA thus making US Citizens Subjects of the DEEP STATE!!!!!
These 2 links give insight to the Concept that Hilary Clinton is 2 candidates in one:

 

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/deep-state-america/

Deep State America

 

[Blog Editor: Newbill also used the last two links are also used as a comment to the dual post “Deep State USA” which includes the Deep State Conspiracy thoughts of Daniel Gladstein. Newbill has several comments on that post largely related to Gladstein’s thoughts. Newbill’s comments to the Deep State post will show in a later blog post because they are a little different than here even though the links are the same.]

 

It has frequently been alleged that the modern Turkish Republic operates on two levels. It has a parliamentary democracy complete with a constitution and regular elections, but there also exists a secret government that has been referred to as the “deep state,” in Turkish “Derin Devlet.”

 

The concept of “deep state” has recently become fashionable to a certain extent, particularly to explain the persistence of traditional political alignments when confronted by the recent revolutions in parts of the Middle East and Eastern Europe. For those who believe in the existence of the deep state, there are a number of institutional as well as extralegal relationships that might suggest its presence.

 

Some believe that this deep state arose out of a secret NATO operation called “Gladio,” which created an infrastructure for so-called “stay behind operations” if Western Europe were to be overrun by the Soviet Union and its allies. There is a certain logic to that assumption, as a deep state has to be organized around a center of official and publicly accepted power, which means it normally includes senior officials of the police and intelligence services as well as the military. …

 

 

As all governments—sometimes for good reasons—engage in concealment of their more questionable activities, or even resort to out and out deception, one must ask how the deep state differs. While an elected government might sometimes engage in activity that is legally questionable, there is normally some plausible pretext employed to cover up or explain the act.

 

But for players in the deep state, there is no accountability and no legal limit. Everything is based on self-interest, justified through an assertion of patriotism and the national interest. …

 

 

If all this sounds familiar to an American reader, it should, and given some local idiosyncrasies, it invites the question whether the United States of America has its own deep state.

 

 

In truth America’s deep state is, not unlike Turkey’s, a hybrid creature that operates along a New York to Washington axis. Where the Turks engage in criminal activity to fund themselves, the Washington elite instead turns to banksters, lobbyists, and defense contractors, operating much more in the open and, ostensibly, legally. U.S.-style deep state includes all the obvious parties, both public and private, who benefit from the status quo: including key players in the police and intelligence agencies, the military, the treasury and justice departments, and the judiciary. It is structured to materially reward those who play along with the charade, and the glue to accomplish that ultimately comes from Wall Street. “Financial services” might well be considered the epicenter of the entire process. Even though government is needed to implement desired policies, the banksters comprise the truly essential element, capable of providing genuine rewards for compliance. As corporate interests increasingly own the media, little dissent comes from the Fourth Estate as the process plays out, while many of the proliferating Washington think tanks that provide deep state “intellectual” credibility are READ ENTIRETY (Deep State America: Democracy is often subverted by special interests operating behind the scenes; By PHILIP GIRALDI; American Conservative; 7/30/15)

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department

 

Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States’ oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

 

Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region’s fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Department’s documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.

 

 

These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing — the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 — contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.

 

The Saudi deal was one of dozens of arms sales approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that placed weapons in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.

 

Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure — derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) — represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.

 

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.

 

American defense contractors also donated to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and in some cases made personal payments to Bill Clinton for speaking engagements. Such firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of Pentagon-negotiated deals that were authorized by the Clinton State Department between 2009 and 2012.

 

 

… She noted that “UAE-based donors have provided financial support to a variety of terrorist groups.” All of these countries donated to the Clinton Foundation and received increased weapons export authorizations from the Clinton-run State Department.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department; By DAVID SIROTA and ANDREW PEREZ; IBT; 5/26/15)

 

 

This link shows how the DEEP STATE is Protecting Hilary Clinton: [Blog Editor: The link below is actually a comment to the article entitled ‘Loretta Lynch Ducks 74 Questions From Congress: “Either Avoiding Appearances or Protecting Hillary”’. The identity of the commenter is “Tommy”. This means Tony Newbill and Tommy are one and the same. Since “Newbill” is a pseudonym, the mystery: has the anonymity been revealed? Or is it another pseudonym? The mystery continues. After the comment link is an excerpt from the actual article which I believe is Newbill’s actual intention.]

 

http://www.shtfplan.com/conspiracy-fact-and-theory/ag-lynch-ducks-74-questions-from-congress-either-avoiding-appearances-or-protecting-hillary_07132016#comment-3586197

 

Did Attorney General Loretta Lynch lie about or obfuscate her role in clearing Hillary in the investigations concerning the handling of classified emails on her private server?

 

Is there a quid pro quo among the two women, in which Lynch could have been promised a role in the next Clinton Administration in exchange for her help in calling off potential criminal charges that might derail Hillary’s campaign.

 

Lynch claims there is no such relationship. But she also refused to answer at least 74 of Congress’ questions about her private meeting with former President Bill Clinton and her relationship with the Clintons and/or their staff.

 

Recall, that the announcement that Hillary was off the hook, as it were, came immediately after the Attorney General and former president met.

 

As The Daily Caller reported at the time:

Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court late Wednesday seeking a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.

 

 

As example to this, Loretta Lynch refused an entire line of questions from Rep. Jason Chaffetz about whether or not it was hypothetically legal or illegal to retain classified information.

 

Despite the straightforward nature of this questioning, Attorney General Lynch refused to even acknowledge whether or not it is illegal to lie under oath.

 

Wow. This is stonewalling of READ ENTIRETY (Loretta Lynch Ducks 74 Questions From Congress: “Either Avoiding Appearances or Protecting Hillary”; By Mac Slavo; SHTFplan.com; 7/13/16)

 

++++++++++

Fri 7/15/2016 12:45 PM

Hilary’s Red and Blue Camps Plan to deal with peoples conflicting Religious views

 

Hilary’s Red and Blue Camps Plan to deal with peoples conflicting Religious views:

 

http://tinyurl.com/jecht9f 

[Blog Editor: The tiny url is to a Youtube post that demonstrates that Hillary Clinton intends to continue Barack Obama’s fundamental transformation of the USA away from American values by further diluting the Christian faith’s moral standards.]

 

VIDEO: Clinton Demands Christians Deny Jesus!

 

 

Posted by NicholasPOGM

Published on May 26, 2015

 

As I stated in the video, before making public statements, political candidates do demographic research so as to see what the public will accept or reject. And this is especially true with presidential campaigns! What Hillary Clinton says during a campaign speech confirms the powers that be, know for a fact that the majority of the churches in America no longer bow to Jesus, His Word, or even common sense for that matter! Her comments CONFIRM the leaders in the USA will remove religious liberty soon! The fact they have proof there will be little opposition is the green light they have been looking for.

(original video)
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4220594877001/same-sex-marriage-case-raising-religious-liberty-concerns/?#sp=show-clips

 

http://tinyurl.com/j3abcsw

 

[Blog Editor: This tiny url is to a Youtube video in which Hillary Clinton says she believes Americans need “Adult Camps” to teach them how to relate to cultural socio-religious mores acceptable to modernity (i.e. transform minds). Hmm… Crooked Hillary’s speech should make you think of Communist Chinese re-education camps or old Soviet re-education camps]

 

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton Says ” We Need Camps For Adults” (Concentration Camps)

 

 

Posted by DTAShieldOFaith

Published on Apr 14, 2015

 

At an event for camp professionals, Hillary Clinton pitches camp for grownups, where the “red” and “blue” cabins would have no choice but to work together.

.All praises to Yahawah Bahasham Yahawashi Shalawam ahchyam Double Honors to the Apostles and Elders of GMS
(The Elect) around the world teaching the word in sincerely and truth

 

And we have General Wesley Clark saying the same kind of thing about Camps:

https://theintercept.com/2015/07/20/chattanooga-wesley-clark-calls-internment-camps-disloyal-americans/

 

[Blog Editor: I am guessing the link about General Clark suggesting that radicalized Muslims be rounded up and placed in camps is Newbill’s shot at being fair and balanced. Clark is a Leftist in the Dem Party thus making his statement against Muslim be castigated by Obama and the current Crooked Hillary campaign. Think of the clamor if Trump made such a statement! I sense the point Newbill is reaching for is the willingness of Dems to form re-education camps – PERIOD.]

 

Retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of the mass shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

 

He called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”

 

READ THE REST (Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for “Radicalized” Americans; By Murtaza Hussain; The Intercept; 7/20/15 9:12 a.m.)

 

And there has been a lot of debate within the Policy making positions of authority regarding Radical Religious people, https://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

 

(U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment

 

7 April 2009

 

(U) Prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division. Coordinated with the FBI.

 

(U) Scope

 

(U//FOUO) This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States. Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States Government sponsorship.

 

 

(U) Key Findings

 

(U//LES) The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.

 

— (U//LES) Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts. Nevertheless, the consequences of a prolonged economic downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit—could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past.

 

— (U//LES) Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.

 

(U//FOUO) The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other READ THE REST (Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment; By Homeland Security Department – posted by Federation of American Scientists (FAS); Unclassified version released 4/7/09)

 

And Justice Scalia [was] saying we will see Camps in the USA, so it seems there is an Ideology within the hierarchy of Government of this train of thought: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/justice-antonin-scalia-says-world-war-ii-style-internment-camps-could-happen-again/article/2543424

 

Justice Antonin Scalia predicts that the Supreme Court will eventually authorize another a wartime abuse of civil rights such as the internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II.

 

“You are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again,” Scalia told the University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States, the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps.

 

The local Associated Press report quotes Scalia as using a Latin phrase that means “in times of war, the laws fall silent,” to explain why the court erred in that decision and will do so again.

 

READ THE REST

 

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any information enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill Content

 

One Liberal Justice Away


Dem Ass gun to American Uncle Sam

Justin Smith writes of the dangers to America’s Constitutional Republic as created by our Founding Fathers, if Obama successfully places another Left Wing Activist Justice on the Supreme Court. This is an awesome Editorial!

 

JRH 3/10/16

Please Support NCCR

*********************

One Liberal Justice Away

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 3/10/2016 12:00 PM

 

Scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question.”  – Alexis de Tocqueville, 1835

 

So much more than the Office of the U.S. President is at stake in the November election. The direction of a partisan U.S. Supreme Court is also a consideration, since the next president will quite likely select two or three of the next Justices; and if the Progressive Democrats and their unconstitutional and anti-constitution agenda control the Court, the future for our children will be damaged and liberty in America will be in grave danger.

 

Too many Justices from years past to the present have abandoned objective reason and impartial arbitration concerning our fundamental law, and they have consistently produced rulings that were distorted by their own personal feelings and prejudices, especially in cases seen as representing some aspect of “social justice.” This has resulted in the Supreme Court overstepping its own Constitutional authority by creating new de facto law through its rulings. And, when the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court cannot read the same law in the same way on the same day from the same Constitution and U.S. legal code, splitting along party lines in almost every case, we no longer have a court of law — we have an elitist body politic.

 

For thirty years, Justice Antonin Scalia opposed the judicial activists of the Supreme Court, until his death in February. He rigorously defended the U.S. Constitution in all areas, irrespective of the issue. His strong adherence to the fundamental law of the Constitution stood in stark contrast to those who viewed the Constitution as an infinitely malleable “living document”, and he opposed all who attempted to turn the latest left wing fads into the law of the land.

 

In past years, Democrats have called on Supreme Court nominees to accept Roe v. Wade as a super-precedent more fundamental than the Constitution itself. But in a 2009 interview, Scalia suggested that state constitutional amendments may take precedence to prevent abortions, effectively overruling Roe v. Wade; he also noted that nothing in the Constitution, especially in light of the 9th and 10th Amendments, specifically delegates the power to fund abortions to the federal government. So under what constitutional authority does the federal government mandate abortion policies over the states?

 

To paraphrase Senator Ted Cruz, America is one liberal justice away from having Her religious liberties erased and from the Supreme Court forcing us to violate our religious conscience upon pain of a fine or imprisonment. America is one liberal justice away from open abortion on demand — one liberal justice away from the Ten Commandments being erased from the countryside and from every government building wherever they are found — one liberal justice away from our Second Amendment being eradicated and one liberal justice away from U.S. law becoming subservient to The Hague and international law. [Bold Italic emphasis is Blog Editor’s]

 

Under the Leftist agenda, homosexual “marriage” is sanctioned by unelected judges, the innocent unborn can be murdered, gun ownership is only for the government, healthcare penalties to coerce behavior are taxes, religious liberty only protects private belief and the president can rewrite U.S. law at will.

 

In this political environment, the Republicans are well within their rights to reject all of Obama’s nominations to the Supreme Court, since Obama treats jurisprudence as a weapon of political warfare. In 2006 and well before the midterm elections, Obama, then a Senator, filibustered Justice Samuel Alito and demanded a 60-vote threshold; and, since his election in 2008, Obama has brazenly abused executive power and ignored Congress, in his race to embed his hard-left agenda within our American culture and force a fundamental transformation away from our Founding Principles.

 

Let’s not forget that then-Senators John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and 21 colleagues joined Obama against Alito. Let’s not forget Obama’s explanation that the Constitution requires “an examination of a judge’s philosophy, ideology and record”, as he criticized Alito as “somebody who is contrary to core American values.”

 

Nobody is more “contrary to core American values” than Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama nominee, who advocated for the acceptance of the integration of some aspects of Sharia law into the U.S. jurisprudence in 2006 when she was the Dean of the Harvard School of Law.

 

Does anyone really believe that Justice Sotomayor exemplifies “core American values”?

 

The Democrats are two-faced, when it concerns the Supreme Court, they fight dirty and they fight for keeps. They have two standards for judicial appointments – one for themselves and another for Republicans, but now they are crying “foul.”

 

So what if the Democrat controlled Senate under Pres. Ronald Reagan confirmed Justice Anthony Kennedy on February 3,1988? They only did so after excoriating and brutally impugning the honorable reputations of Robert Bork and Douglas Ginsburg.

 

Obsessed with identity politics and social justice, make no mistake, the brawlers in the Democratic Party, such as Senators Schumer and Reid, would be blocking Republican nominations, if the situation was reversed. In fact, they did filibuster one of Bush’s federal court nominees, Miguel Estrada, in 2003, simply because they thought he might make it to the Supreme Court one day. And more significantly, Obama voted against John Robert’s nomination because of Robert’s “overarching political philosophy.”

 

It is also worth noting that despite the Democrats’ insistence that Justice Scalia’s seat must be filled quickly, the Court is designed to function with very few Justices, if necessary, and it has throughout history. In 1789 there were only six Justices, but a quorum of four was required to do the Court’s business. In 1801 there were five Justices; ten existed in 1863 and Court held seven in 1866: There is no such thing as a rule of nine.

 

Think of all the narrow 5-4 decisions in recent history that upheld fundamental rights such as religious liberty, freedom of speech and the Second Amendment, and one will see this 2016 election to be an historic juncture of the utmost importance to America. Therefore, U.S. Senators have the obligation to the American people to prevent the confirmation of any liberal justice to the U.S. Supreme Court, who would use the Court like a continuing constitutional convention. They are obligated to defend the U.S. Constitution against all who would dismiss our rule of law in favor of their own arbitrary, arrogant and authoritarian rule of men, and this requires U.S. Senators to reject any of Obama’s radical judicial activists for a lifetime on the Supreme Court: Senators have the duty to advise and consent, not to say “yes.”

 

By Justin O. Smith

____________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets are the Editor’s.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

 

A Risen Conservatism will End RINOs & Dem Damage


Vote Conservative Republican

Edited by John R. Houk

By Dajjal

December 13, 2014

 

Dajjal posted a comment to the post “Dems Betraying America – It will be Stopped One Way or Another” on the NCCR blog dated 12/11/14. The post with that title was really some thoughts on a post by Danny Jeffrey entitled “Thirty Pieces of Silver” originally placed on Danny’s blog Fix Bayonets.

 

This probably an injustice to Danny’s post: The Thirty Pieces of Silver post’s theme is that American politics has become too corrupted by fringe Left Democrats to return to the principles of the vision of the Founding Fathers. That irreversible political situation is made worse because the Establishment Republicans have colluded (wittingly or unwittingly) with the Dems that threaten the U.S. Constitution. Danny views America’s last hope is no-compromise Conservative Senator Ted Cruz. However, it is too late for Cruz too effect any change because the GOP Establishment will do everything to prevent a Cruz election as President.

 

Since not even a great Conservative as Senator Cruz can undo Leftist damage America is only left with one option to rid the Republic established in the USA. That option is for a coup d’état ridding America of Leftist leadership authority.

 

In my post “Dems Betraying America” I concurred with Danny that a coup might indeed occur; however I refused to believe a grassroots movement either among Conservatives taking over the Republican Party on a County by County and State by State manner could lead to Constitutional changes that could reverse Dem damage to what has made America exceptional.

 

As you will read Dajjal totally disagrees that a coup will occur in the USA.

 

JRH 12/13/14

Please Support NCCR

**************************

A Risen Conservatism will End RINOs & Dem Damage

[Title by Editor]

 

Dajjal

December 11, 2014 at 6:55 PM

 

Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:

While I acknowledge the validity of the pessimism expressed in the citations below [Blog Editor: I am guessing both my view and Danny’s], I absolutely reject suggestions of military coups & violent revolutions. The officer corps has been purged of patriots and the armed forces have superior organization and fire power. Abandon those damn fool dreams entirely.

Barry Morris Goldwater was nominated in ’64 because the party base recognized the truth and intrinsic merit of his platform. He won in the face of total opposition from the establishment. He lost the general election because the party establishment abandoned him.

 

Ronald Reagan was nominated and won because the electorate recognized the truth and intrinsic merit of his platform and the ‘crats re-nominated an accursed traitor who hurt this nation immensely. The nomination of George H.W. Bush was a fatal flaw, an abandonment of principle in favor of expediency. We must learn from that error so that we never repeat it.

 

If it is not too late, it soon will be. Discover the election schedule and run a full slate of Conservatives for GOP precinct delegates. Run a Conservative slate for delegates to the state convention. Nominate Conservatives to the RNC and retake control of the party.

Pick one principled, articulate, aggressive Conservative such as Ted Cruz and back him to the hilt. Organize and motivate voters in the early primaries and caucuses. Tell the nattering nabobs of negativism who preach lifting the ‘crat’s tail and inserting our tongues to go to Hell and be damned. Plug your ears to the siren song of “the only one who can win”.

 

The prospective nominee must build an organization capable of selecting able minded and willing Conservative nominees for all open House & Senate seats and build a Conservative slate. Every RINO who voted for cloture on Obama Don’t Care and other damaging acts of Obamination must have principled, articulate and aggressive primary opposition.

Learn the forgotten lesson of ’80 – victory is not absolute and final. Every election cycle must be hotly contested. RINOs & LibTurds must be replaced with Conservatives. Conservative principles must be clearly expressed and successfully marketed. Balkanization & identity politics must be rejected. The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance: we can never go back to sleep.

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Dajjal

Black Leftists Use Racism to Destroy American Foundations


Race-Baiter-In-Chied & Anger Games

John R. Houk

© December 2, 2014

 

The Obama Administration fundamental transformation of America has embedded confusion among the populace, increased mistrust of government among the anti-Liberal populace, rampant government corruption and lies and the transformation of the American legal system into tools of a Leftist agenda unfortunately utilizing race-baiting as the instrumental tool.

 

Now believe it or not I am going to move toward the beheading of a White Woman by a Black Man, but I feel I need to drive a point home first.

 

I’m curious. If I said “Trayvon Martin,” would you recognize that name? How about if I said “Michael Brown,” do you recall that name?

 

Martin was the unarmed teen that was shot to death by George Zimmerman after the teen decided to attack Zimmerman for questioning the teen’s presence in his neighborhood. Brown is the eighteen year old Black thug that strong-armed the robbery of a carton of cigarettes from a convenience store followed closely by Ferguson Police Officer telling him to get out of the middle of the street in which Brown provocatively declined to obey the Officer. Officer Wilson then proceeded to place Brown in his squad car at which time Brown attacked Wilson grabbing for the Officer’s gun while pummeling the Officer’s face. Wilson managed to secure his weapon falling out of the squad car with Brown making a break for it. Wilson then told the young thug to stop. Instead of stopping the huge teenage thug turned to rush Officer Wilson resulting in the Officer shooting until he felt the lethal was necessary or get beaten up.

 

What did Martin and Brown have in common? They were both Black-American unarmed teens exploited by race-baiters inciting the Black-American to anger.

 

The first media reports on the Martin-Zimmerman incident was that the shooter was a racist white neighborhood watch person. Which was interesting since Zimmerman had a Hispanic-Black background (Mother: Peruvian born with Black Grandfather) and a Germanic background (Father: German ancestry and Roman Catholic even though Zimmerman can also be Jewish). The race-baiting by Left Wing Black & White Americans demonstrates hypocrisy.

 

The Brown-Wilson incident in Ferguson Missouri was largely stoked by a Left Wing media and race-baiting Leftists – both Black and White – who need social justice turmoil propaganda do win elections to perpetuate the lies propagandized to their dependent-entitled constituents. The lying myths created by race-baiters is accurately told by Bryce Buchanan which I found at the American Thinker:

 

The events in Ferguson, Missouri are the latest example of sick political theater, carefully orchestrated to shape public policy. The theatrical productions are pure fiction, but are presented as fact. They are morality plays with heroes and villains intended to create strong emotions directed at a political objective. All the elaborate productions are based on central lies. None would be possible without a complicit media to carry the script.

 

The fictional stories written for the Mike Brown/Darren Wilson and the Trayvon/Zimmerman morality plays followed nearly the same script. Two wonderful young black men were shot by racist white men for no reason at all. They were “executed”. They were “gunned down like dogs”. America is racist. Cops are racist.

The leftist media present the fictional story with glee, repeating the lies endlessly, sometimes doctoring the evidence and always ignoring the facts. They appear oblivious to the hatred and division that they are causing. Or worse, they appear to seek violence as a ratings booster. In Ferguson, the mob knew the script. For media and mob it was, “lights, camera, action!”

 

In reality, the Brown/Wilson tragedy does not fit the narrative of a racist cop killing a gentle black man. The opposite is true.  Let’s examine some of the other narratives that were pushed by the emotional, misinformed mobs. Three common chants and protest signs were: We Want Justice, Black Lives Matter, and Stop Killing Us.

 

“We Want Justice”: It is an undeniable fact that the credo, “snitches get stitches” dominates black culture. Cooperation with the police is explicitly forbidden and those who testify about crimes are very often punished for it. There are many black murder cases where significant numbers of people witnessed the murder and none of them will talk to the police. The do not want justice.

 

“Black Lives Matter”: Where are these demonstrators when thousands of other black lives are snuffed out? It appears that “Some Black Lives Matter” — the ones that are part of the show.

 

“Stop Killing Us”:  91% of black murder victims are killed by other African-Americans according to FBI statistics. You should stop killing you. White people and white policemen are not the problem. Thomas Sowell has some insight on the real problem here and Jason Riley here.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Sick Political Theater; By Bryce Buchanan; American Thinker; 11/29/14)

 

Martin-Zimmerman and Brown-Wilson are the classic examples of a situation infecting America successfully since January 2009. God help us if the 2016 elections don’t reverse this race-baiting domination by January 2017.

 

Now that I have refreshed your memories of four people I’d be surprised if you didn’t recall some of that recent history. Let me ask you another current event question. Do you know who Colleen Hufford was?

 

I’m willing to bet you do not have a clue who she was unless you maybe watch Fox News and in that case her name as a victim wasn’t really publicized too much.

Hufford is the Oklahoma woman assaulted and beheaded by Alton Nolen at her job and the executioner’s former job. The Mainstream Media (MSM) notoriously dropped Hufford’s victimhood when the Obama Administration’s FBI decided to classify the murder and assaults as workplace violence. Case closed – the local authorities can deal with murderer Nolen, right?

 

WRONG! Alton Nolen was a crazy homegrown jihadi driven to a murderous craze from the Islamic ideology spewed by the Islamic Society of Greater OKC which is a member of Radical Muslim Mosque network under the aegis of Islamic Society of North America. Unfortunately there is no proof Nolen was given marching orders from these Islamic terrorist supporting entities, but at the very least it wouldn’t take a rocket scientist to determine where his brainwashing began.

 

Ryan Burnside has an article showing some new relevant information that Colleen Hufford’s beheading was DEFINITELY NOT workplace violence. Not only was Nolen practicing jihad against non-Muslims but the info shows just how horrific the attack was. Released autopsy data shows that Hufford did not kneel down like an obedient dhimmi, rather she put up a fight in which the murderous Muslim Nolen had to wear Hufford out before he beheaded from the front rather than the typical submissive kneel made popular by ISIS videos.

 

How corrupt has the FBI become under the Obama Administration that America’s premier crime fighting police agency chooses the propaganda of workplace violence rather than the truth of Muslim-hate of people refusing to submit to Islam?

JRH 12/2/14

Please Support NCCR

************************

BREAKING: Shocking New Details Released About Woman Beheaded by Muslim in Oklahoma

 

By RYAN BURNSIDE

December 2nd, 2014

Conservative Tribune

 

New details have emerged regarding the woman who was violently beheaded by a domestic Islamic terrorist at an Oklahoma food plant in September.

 

Early media reports depicted the gruesome encounter as one where the radical Islamist, Alton Alexander Nolen, attacked and killed Colleen Hufford from behind.

 

But according to new[s] reports, Hufford wasn’t just an innocent victim who didn’t put up a fight – she fought valiantly to save her own life. (H/T Viral.Buzz)

 

The man, who the media only said was a “recent” Muslim convert, actually had multiple social media postings on Facebook that professed his allegiance to the Islamic State.

 

But the FBI still classified the crime as “workplace violence” and not what it truly was – domestic terrorism.

 

Hufford suffered multiple defensive wounds as she fought the Islamist at every turn, doing everything she possibly could to protect her life.

 

The autopsy report clearly shows that she did not die with her back turned.

 

She had wounds across her hands, cheeks, arms and neck before she was injured enough that the Islamist was able to carry out the beheading.

 

“Evidence from the autopsy indicates Hufford put up a fight before her death. The autopsy describes multiple defensive injuries to both hands and her right arm and other injuries to Hufford’s cheek, chest and upper arm.”

 

Hufford was a hero in her own right. Though she ultimately lost the battle for her life, she gave it all she had.

 

But did Obama acknowledge her death? Not a bit. As a matter of fact, he never mentioned her name once in public.

 

Yet, Trayvon Martin could be his son, and Mike Brown’s death was a tragedy.

 

Hufford won’t get the attention she deserves. We have the utmost respect for this American woman for at least attempting to fight this Islamic monster off before he took her life for no reason.

 

The killer remains in jail, where he’ll rot for a long time to come or hopefully face the death penalty.

______________________________

Black Leftists Use Racism to Destroy American Foundations

John R. Houk

© December 2, 2014

_______________________________

BREAKING: Shocking New Details Released About Woman Beheaded by Muslim in Oklahoma

 

About Conservative Tribune from its Facebook Page

 

© 2014 Conservative Tribune. All Rights Reserved.

Grassroots Boneta Reverses Obama’s Cursed Transformation


Patrick Henry speech 2

John R. Houk

© November 8, 2014

 

Leftists, Dems and even some Republicans that I have to assume that are in the RINO category have been shouting down critics of the UN Agenda 21 as a fringe part of the Ring Wing Conspiracy Theorists. If you haven’t leaned yet let me say that when a Leftist or Dem Party Leftist goes out of the way to paint a picture of lunacy to an accusation from a Conservative there is probably more validity than lunacy.

 

I mean a majority of voters have demonstrated they have caught onto Dem lies on the November 4 elections when they threw the bums out of the control of both Houses of Congress. The Dem’s liar-in-chief Obama has painted a picture of ‘I didn’t do it’ for six years with the American Press backing up his lies. Just look at some of the more prominent scandals which are essentially just lying cover-ups hidden under the power and thumb of Presidential authority. Actually Obama’s lies and deception seems to be a lifetime component – For Example:

 

·         THIS IS BARACK OBAMA: ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW, IN ONE PLACE (DTN)

 

·         Official Obama Administration Scandals List! (ConservativeAmerican.org 10/15/08)

 

·         The NEW Obama Scandals List! (ConservativeAmerican.org 12/10/13)

 

Voters that truly love America have their own priority of Obama scandals that just should be impeachable or – my God – at least be investigated to discover just how heinous that scandal is without Executive Privilege used as an excuse to cover-up crimes against the law. The scandals that bother me the most are the ones actually aimed against voters to deceive or impugn for political reasons:

 

1. Benghazigate: It was bad enough that there was zero attempt to send help before four Americans died as the hands of Islamic terrorism, but the Administration tried to spin the debacle as it was the fault of a foreign national creating a poorly acted trailer of a movie portraying Mohammed in a negative light even though bad acting made the true story look ludicrous. That was an outright freaking LIE to get reelected in 2012. CAN YOU SAY WATERGATE TRADITION?

 

VIDEO: Benghazi Scandal – Obama’s Paid Liar – New Documents Revealed – Hannity

 

2. IRS Scandal: The IRS acted as a Secret Police-like arm of Obama Administration to silence the voice of Conservative organizations like the Tea Party in hope of keeping Conservative truth from American voters. ANOTHER WATERGATE TRADITION!

 

3. Veteran Affairs Scandal:

 

Beginning in April 2014 and continuing for a number of weeks thereafter, an ever-growing amount of information was learned about a massive scandal that quietly had been infecting the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for several years. Initially it was reported that VA patients were being forced to wait for inordinately long periods of time before they were permitted to see a doctor and get medical treatment — particularly at one VA hospital in Phoenix, Ariziona (sic). To be seen by a primary care provider, for example, generally required a 115-day wait. These long wait times sometimes resulted in dire health consequences for the patients: According to CNN, as many as 40 veterans had died while on wait lists at the Phoenix hospital. READ THE REST (VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) SCANDAL OF 2014; DTN)

 

As if the VA isn’t nefarious enough on its own, it is currently been uncovered White House officials under Obama’s watch directly ordered a VA cover-up so that no political fallout comes to the liar-in-chief’s doorstep:

 

Almost two months ago, a whistleblower from inside the Department of Veteran Affairs claimed that the Inspector General watered down the final report in the VA’s wait-list scandal to minimize the political damage. IG Richard Griffin denied that he had been pressured to adjust his findings, which the Arizona Republic found used a nearly impossible standard for responsibility to get the VA off the hook for hundreds of fraud-related deaths.  On Friday, though, the House Committee on Veteran Affairs published e-mails that clearly show the White House demanding those changes to the final report: READ THE REST (Emails show White House “requested” IG to change VA scandal report; By ED MORRISSEY; Hot Air; 11/3/14 1:01 PM)

 

Trust me the three scandals I just mentioned are a mere drop in the bucket to the nefarious practices that should lead to an Obama impeachment. BUT probably won’t because the Republican Establishment (and incredulously some Conservatives) would rather let Obama get away with crimes against American citizens and American voters ‘for the good of the country’.

Martha Boneta

 

This brings me back to the Left stealth subversion against the USA via Agenda 21. While Obama dismantles America overtly embracing Establishment fears to impeach him, Agenda 21 keeps methodically on dismantling the American Constitution. The Daily Signal has embraced the remarkably under reported case of Martha Boneta battling Virginia’s Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC) agenda to rip away her property rights. For me though The Daily Signal conspicuously fails to connect the PEC to Agenda 21. Largely I believe this failure is because PEC continues to act with impunity even though the Virginia Right to Farm ACT passed:

 

VIDEO: Freedom Farmer & American Hero: Freedom to Farm WITHOUT FEAR

 

This legislation passed by the Virginia State Assembly and signed into law by a Democratic Party Governor places a curb on the power of the eco-Marxism of Green Lefties. It was a win for Property Rights over collectivist thinking. BUT Martha Boneta still endured eco-fascism from the Agenda 21 group promoting the globalist policies of so-called sustainability in which the United Nations Leftists look to promote an elitist global vision in which the population is manipulated by abortion, government ordered authority over private property and ways of living to place the planet’s population to certain permanent level. Martha Boneta over an eight year period actually was forced to manage her family farm under Gestapo-style tactics to either force to submit to what the Piedmont Environment Council (PEC) dictated to her in the management of her farm.

 

VIDEO: All She Wanted to Do Was Farm, But an Environmental Group Got in the Way

 

On Thursday November 6 Martha and the PEC presented their cases on who controls the property – owner or easement holder in which a new owner did not sign. The arbitration went to the State government appointed Virginia Outdoors Foundation. The VOF board members are appointed by the State elected Governor. This means there is some oversight in the decision making process of the VOF. The VOF sided with Martha Boneta.

 

RICHMOND – Martha Boneta’s eight-year battle with an environmental group over a conservation easement on her farm in Virginia’s Hunt Country moved closer to resolution yesterday as another organization agreed to take over enforcement activities.

 

Boneta and representatives of the Piedmont Environmental Council appeared at a meeting of the Virginia Outdoors Foundation’s board of trustees in the Virginia General Assembly building here. The foundation is a co-holder of the easement on Boneta’s farm.

 

Each side made 20-minute presentations about the easement on Boneta’s property and what she has called abuses on the part of the environmental council in its enforcement of the terms.

 

 

After the presentations, the Virginia Outdoors Foundation’s seven-member board voted 6-0 to adopt a resolution expressing its willingness to take over enforcement activities.

 

 

State Del. Brenda Pogge, R-James City County, attended the meeting and told The Daily Signal afterward that she plans to introduce legislation in the upcoming session of the Virginia General Assembly to reform easements on public lands.

 

“I’m a citizen legislator who is outraged by the abuse we have seen in this case,” Pogge said, adding:

 

“The way Martha was treated does not resemble truth, justice and the American way. That’s what we need to get back to. My bill would address the use of easements on public lands that would include schools, firehouses and other public buildings. It’s just a start. My bill would not address private lands.” (Outdoors Foundation’s Offer Could End Farmer’s Dispute With Green Group Over Property Rights; By Kevin Mooney; The Daily Signal; 11/7/14)

 

People like Martha Boneta are the leaders of the next American Revolution. Obama represents the new King George. Only when grassroots Americans wake-up to withstand the anti-Constitution Left will the principles of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness return.

 

The depraved morals the Left transforms America into leads to the second dark ages of human depravity and ignorance. The masses will become tied to the land again. Collectivist masters will become the new feudal lords. The masses dependent on the largesse of the collective will have no need to read, write or think because their needs will be dictated from the upper directorate administered by the feudal bureaucratic managers who themselves who no need for educated means. Why? Just follow the dictates from above means there is no need for learning – just obeying. Obedience to the State supplies all mass needs. Only the elite need formal remedial knowledge. Only the elite of the elite need to develop the ability to think to perpetuate a sustainable static existence. The essence of sustainability is submission to the politburo plan. Deviation from sustainability is personal Liberty.

 

America is Liberty. The grassroots Bonetas are Americans weary of the despots demanding a sustainable agenda.

 

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. … The Declaration of Independence

 

MR. PRESIDENT: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfil the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

 

 

… Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask, gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? …

 

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. … There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable²and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

 

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace²but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death! (Patrick Henry. Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death! St. John’s Church, Richmond, Virginia March 23, 1775. History.org)

 

Is America at the point of arms? NO! Or at least not yet. The Republican Party election victory on November 4, 2014 might be the last chance for Americans that have enjoyed Liberty fought for by our Founding Fathers to counter President Barack Hussein Obama’s fundamental transformation of America. If the Republican leadership fails to heed the call of American voters the static sustainable agenda of the global stealth Marxist elite will continue to envelope this nation until the need for arms might be all that remains to resist the despotic designs of the Leftist transformation of America.

 

Keep in mind that transformation agenda is subtle. Keep the masses poor and dependent on government. Destroy America’s Christian heritage that has been the foundation of a strong moral society. Part of subtlety is atheism, Islam Supremacism and a collectivist mind-set.

 

Whatever undermines American Exceptionalism is a surrender to the Obama fundamental transformation.

 

JRH 11/8/14

Please Support NCCR

 

Forget Political Realists & IMPEACH OBAMA!


Sarah Palin makes a point

John R. Houk

© July 9, 2014

 

I am a huge supporter of the politics of Sarah Palin. Indeed, I might be one of the few Conservatives that wishes she would run for President in 2016. If she was able to run her own campaign without McCain or GOP Establishment restraints I believe she would BOLDLY eschew political correctness to say what needs to be said about the Leftist agenda to “fundamentally transform” America. Transform that is as in change the Original Intent of U. S. Constitution into the Left Wing moldable Living Constitution which a human ruler, elite or Political Party duping the electorate – can interpret the rule of law in any darn way that justifies a man-made rule of law.

 

A fine example of this is the Op-Ed Palin wrote for Breitbart calling for Obama’s impeachment. Most political realists believe even if Obama is impeached he would not be convicted by at the least 60 Senators that would be needed to convict. Meaning if a 59 majority voted to convict Obama and actually remove him from Office, he would remain President of the United States of America.

 

It is my opinion that if voters FINALLY get fed up with Obama dictatorship before he unilaterally pulls a Hitler and declares himself America’s new glorious leader AND begin sending calls for impeachment to both the House and Senate by tens of millions or more, then even Dems might jump on the impeachment train. At this point if voters too stupid or irresponsible to live in the same America they were born into, then those voters are irresponsible and deserve Obama’s despotic transformation.

 

OnI cross posted Sarah Palin’s June 13 Facebook thoughts on the idiocy of Obama’s handling of child illegal aliens inundating across the Mexican-US border. Her thoughts then were primarily on the concern of how children were being treated full of diseases and bad living conditions. She really had of hint of calling for impeachment then. In this Breitbart Op-Ed gets down to business calling for Obama’s impeachment and I say AMEN.

 

JRH 7/9/14

Please Support NCCR

***************************

VIDEO: Sarah Palin: ‘It’s Time to Impeach Obama’

 

By Todd Cefaratti

July 8, 2014

TPNN

 

In a recent op-ed, former vice presidential candidate and Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin blasted away at the Obama Administration for their complete and utter unwillingness to enforce our nation’s existing laws.

 

In her op-ed penned for Breitbart News, Palin began by writing,

 

“Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president. His unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, ‘no mas.’”

 

Her logic is sound; after all, it’s not like President Obama has been a shining example of executive authority and only suddenly began disregarding his oath of office. For years, this president-turned-dictator has hand-picked what laws will be enforced and, just as dangerously, created new laws unilaterally to be enforced.

 

Make no mistake: this isn’t about a slight stretching of executive power; this is dictatorial rule.

 

“Without borders, there is no nation,” Palin writes. “Obama knows this. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate. This is his fundamental transformation of America. It’s the only promise he has kept. Discrediting the price paid for America’s exceptionalism over our history, he’s given false hope and taxpayer’s change to millions of foreign nationals who want to sneak into our country illegally. Because of Obama’s purposeful dereliction of duty an untold number of illegal immigrants will kick off their shoes and come on in, competing against Americans for our jobs and limited public services. There is no end in sight as our president prioritizes parties over doing the job he was hired by voters to do. Securing our borders is obviously fundamental here; it goes without saying that it is his job.”

 

Ultimately, Palin calls for the impeachment of Barack Obama. In bold terms, she states,

 

Who’s looking out for the American workers? Who has their backs? Who fights for them?

 

We should.

 

President Obama’s rewarding of lawlessness, including his own, is the foundational problem here. It’s not going to get better, and in fact irreparable harm can be done in this lame-duck term as he continues to make up his own laws as he goes along, and, mark my words, will next meddle in the U.S. Court System with appointments that will forever change the basic interpretation of our Constitution’s role in protecting our rights.

 

It’s time to impeach; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the left or right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.

 

The many impeachable offenses of Barack Obama can no longer be ignored. If after all this he’s not impeachable, then no one is.”

 

She is absolutely right. Impeachment is not something to take lightly; it is a removal from office that occurs as a dire resort. If Americans simply sour on the policies of a president, that is one thing; but when a president purposefully ignores his Constitutional obligations and violates the laws of land and encourages others to do similarly, it’s time for the despot to go.

 

We have endured his abuses long enough and Sarah Palin is absolutely right. The time to impeach is now.

 

VIDEO: Sarah Palin: It Is Time To Impeach Obama

 http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=92081&siteSection=tpnn&videoId=26378546

 

________________________________

Forget Political Realists – IMPEACH OBAMA!

John R. Houk

© July 9, 2014

_________________________

VIDEO: Sarah Palin: ‘It’s Time to Impeach Obama’

 

About Todd Cefaratti

 

A graduate of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the University of California Irvine (UCI) and (HBS) Harvard Business School Executive Program. Todd Cefaratti holds degrees in economics, marketing and digital marketing. Todd is one of the top internet marketing experts in his field. Todd is also the founder of the nonprofit organization TheTeaParty.net which began in 2009 at the height of the Tea Party movement and today is recognized as one of the top national Tea Party organizations in the movement. The organization is still growing at over a 1000 new patriots every day and going strong with over 600,000 loyal active members. Todd is also the CEO of a major marketing consulting and fundraising organization and the Tea Party News Network. In his spare time, Todd is active with his wife and two daughters in their Christian church and Christian school that both daughters attend.

 

Copyright © 2014 TPNN · TEA PARTY NEWS NETWORK· ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

 

TPNN Our Mission page

 

The goal of the Tea Party News Network (TPNN) is to provide a rapid, up-to-date political news service that is relevant to the Tea Party movement of Constitutional conservatives.  Our team of researchers and writers aim to cut through the smoke and spin of the “mainstream” media so as to provide an alternative hard hitting news product across a spectrum of current issues.

The House should Investigate and Subpoena Obama Administration to the Hilt


BHO calls scandals - Americans Call Crimes

John R. Houk

© June 15, 2014

 

In a recent Conservative Campaign Committee (CCC) fundraising email I discovered even more SMOKING GUN evidence that the entirety of the Obama Administration conspired to lie about the Benghazi attack to American voters for political reasons. The CCC email doesn’t harp on the political reasons as I think it should. You have to realize the political reasons were to ensure the reelection of Comrade Obama as the President of the United States of America in November 2012. The Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack on the diplomatic annex was a planned attack on September 11, 2012. Obama tried to make that attack appear to voters that the Islamic terrorist attack in Benghazi was a spontaneous motivated riot due to a sophomoric made Youtube video produced in America that was designed to be provocatively racist against Islam.

 

If you have ever gotten to see what is billed as a Youtube trailer before it was yanked you know the video is so poorly made that it is almost humorous. Unfortunately Free Speech in Islam’s Sharia Law is blasphemous so it is true Muslims were offended. SO WHAT! The Obama Administration has forced American Christians to participate in so many offensive measures from killing unborn lives (taxpayer supported abortions), forcing Christian Hospitals to perform abortions on demand, to force businesses owned by Christians to cater to the service needs of homosexuals even though that lifestyle is an oft repeated abomination to the Presence of God in the Holy Bible and more.

 

Christian Rights are vacated in the name multicultural acceptance. Christians are forced to absorb the mirth of atheistic Leftists and abortionists, Muslims spewing hate toward Christians (See Also HERE), homosexuals spewing hate toward Biblical Christians and more.

 

AND YET when a Christian or Counterjihad writer exposes what the actual Quran, Hadith and Sira of Islam do proclaim, it is called hate-speech or bigoted Islamophobia! (See Also HERE and HERE)

 

I have no doubts that the Obama Administration tried to both assuage Muslims and fool American voters that his Presidency is totally supportive of a Muslim’s right to go crazy due to multicultural deference.

 

Is lying to voters to gain an election victory a crime in the USA?

 

This is not just executive overreach. In many cases, Obama’s exercise of authoritarian power is criminal. His executive branch is responsible for violations of the Arms Export Control Act in shipping weapons to Syria, the Espionage Act in Libya, and IRS law with regard to the targeting of conservative groups. His executive branch is guilty of involuntary manslaughter in Benghazi and in the Fast and Furious scandal, and bribery in its allocation of waivers in Obamacare and tax dollars in its stimulus spending. His administration is guilty of obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

 

And yet nothing is done. (Prosecute the President; By Ben Shapiro; FrontPage Mag; 6/12/14)

 

That excerpt above lists only a fraction of the legal infractions committed either by President Obama’s direction and/or Obama’s Executive Branch. And there is no criminal investigations! Why?

 

PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY FROM JUDICIAL DIRECTION

 

By the decision of the Court in Mississippi v. Johnson,720 in 1867, the President was placed beyond the reach of judicial direction, either affirmative or restraining, in the exercise of his powers, whether constitutional or statutory, political or otherwise, save perhaps for what must be a small class of powers that are purely ministerial.721 An application for an injunction to forbid President Johnson to enforce the Reconstruction Acts, on the ground of their unconstitutionality, was answered by Attorney General Stanberg, who argued, inter alia, the absolute immunity of the President from judicial process.722 The Court refused to permit the filing, using language construable as meaning that the President was not reachable by judicial process but which more fully paraded the horrible consequences were the Court to act. First noting the limited meaning of the term “ministerial,” the Court observed that “[v]ery different is the duty of the President in the exercise of the power to see that the laws are faithfully executed, and among these laws the acts named in the bill. . . . The duty thus imposed on the President is in no just sense ministerial. It is purely executive and political.

 

“An attempt on the part of the judicial department of the government to enforce the performance of such duties by the President might be justly characterized, in the language of Chief Justice Marshall, as ‘an absurd and excessive extravagance.’

 

 

Rare has been the opportunity for the Court to elucidate its opinion in Mississippi v. Johnson, and, in the Watergate tapes case,724 it held the President amenable to subpoena to produce evidence for use in a criminal case without dealing, except obliquely,[p.580]with its prior opinion. The President’s counsel had argued the President was immune to judicial process, claiming “that the independence of the Executive Branch within its own sphere . . . insulates a President from a judicial subpoena in an ongoing criminal prosecution, and thereby protects confidential Presidential communications.”725 However, the Court held, “neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high–level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.”726 The primary constitutional duty of the courts “to do justice in criminal prosecutions” was a critical counterbalance to the claim of presidential immunity and to accept the President’s argument would disturb the separation–of–powers function of achieving “a workable government” as well as “gravely impair the role of the courts under Art. III.”727

 

Present throughout the Watergate crisis, and unresolved by it, was the question of the amenability of the President to criminal prosecution prior to conviction upon impeachment.728 It was argued that the impeachment clause necessarily required indictment and trial in a criminal proceeding to follow a successful impeachment and that a President in any event was uniquely immune from indictment, and these arguments were advanced as one ground to deny enforcement of the subpoenas running to the President.729 Assertion of the same argument by Vice President Agnew was controverted by the Government, through the Solicitor General, but, as to the President, it was argued that for a number of constitutional [p.581]and practical reasons he was not subject to ordinary criminal process.730

 

Finally, most recently, the Court has definitively resolved one of the intertwined issues of presidential accountability. The President is absolutely immune in actions for civil damages for all acts within the “outer perimeter” of his official duties.731 The Court’s close decision was premised on the President’s “unique position in the constitutional scheme,” that is, it was derived from the Court’s inquiry of a “kind of ‘public policy’ analysis” of the “policies and principles that may be considered implicit in the nature of the President’s office in a system structured to achieve effective government under a constitutionally mandated separation of powers.”732 … Although the Court relied in part upon its previous practice of finding immunity for officers, such as judges, as to whom the Constitution is silent, although a long common–law history exists, and in part upon historical evidence, which it admitted was fragmentary and ambiguous,734 the Court’s principal focus was upon the fact that the President was distinguishable from all other executive officials. He is charged with a long list of “supervisory and policy responsibilities of utmost discretion and sensitivity,”735 and diversion of his energies by concerns with private lawsuits would “raise unique risks to the effective functioning of government.”736

 

Supplement: [P. 582, add to text following n.738:]

 

Unofficial Conduct.—In Clinton v. Jones,9 the Court, in a case of first impression, held that the President did not have qualified immunity from suit for conduct alleged to have taken place prior to his election to the Presidency, which would entitle him to delay of both the trial and discovery. The Court held that its precedents affording the President immunity from suit for his official conduct—primarily on the basis that he should be enabled to perform his duties effectively without fear that a particular decision might give rise to personal liability— were inapplicable in this kind of case. Moreover, the separation–of–powers doctrine did not require a stay of all private actions against the President. Separation of powers is preserved by guarding against the encroachment or aggrandizement of one of the coequal branches of the Government at the expense of another. However, a federal trial court tending to a civil suit in which the President is a party performs only its judicial function, not a function of another branch. No decision by a trial court could curtail the scope of the President’s powers. The trial court, the Supreme Court observed, had sufficient powers to accommodate the President’s schedule and his workload, so as not to impede the President’s performance of his duties. Finally, the Court stated its belief that allowing such suits to proceed would not generate a large volume of politically motivated harassing and frivolous litigation. Congress has the power, the Court advised, if it should think necessary to legislate, to afford the President protection.10 (CRS ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION: Article II — Table of Contents; From Cornel University Law School, Legal information Institute)

 

Sifting through the legalese I am assuming that means the POTUS cannot be prosecuted for a crime but can be subject to a civil suit as long as it does not interfere with his Executive Branch duties. After his term of Office has expired then he may be subject to criminal proceedings. This is the unofficial reason President Gerald Ford gave President Richard Milhous Nixon a full pardon from any crimes committed while in Office. A sitting President that breaks the law can receive the equivalent of a political indictment called impeachment in the House of Representatives. The Senate acts as the equivalent of a political jury with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court acting as Judge. A Senate conviction ONLY means a removal from Office. Then criminal proceedings can be executed judicially.

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

 

The U.S. Constitution provides impeachment as the method for removing the president, vice president, federal judges, and other federal officials from office. The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives and follows these steps:

 

1.      The House Judiciary Committee holds hearings and, if necessary, prepares articles of impeachment. These are the charges against the official.

 

2.      If a majority of the committee votes to approve the articles, the whole House debates and votes on them.

 

3.      If a majority of the House votes to impeach the official on any article, then the official must then stand trial in the Senate.

 

4.      For the official to be removed from office, two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict the official. Upon conviction, the official is automatically removed from office and, if the Senate so decides, may be forbidden from holding governmental office again.

 

 

The impeachment process is political in nature, not criminal. Congress has no power to impose criminal penalties on impeached officials. But criminal courts may try and punish officials if they have committed crimes.

 

The Constitution sets specific grounds for impeachment. They are “treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.” To be impeached and removed from office, the House and Senate must find that the official committed one of these acts.

 

The Constitution defines treason in Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1:

 

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

 

The Constitution does not define bribery. It is a crime that has long existed in English and American common law. It takes place when a person gives an official money or gifts to influence the official’s behavior in office. For example, if defendant Smith pays federal Judge Jones $10,000 to find Smith not guilty, the crime of bribery has occurred.

 

 

What are “high crimes and misdemeanors”? On first hearing this phrase, many people probably think that it is just an 18th century way of saying “felonies and misdemeanors.” Felonies are major crimes and misdemeanors are lesser crimes. If this interpretation were correct, “high crimes and misdemeanors” would simply mean any crime. But this interpretation is mistaken.

 

The Origins of the Phrase

 

 

But the committee’s recommendation did not satisfy everyone. George Mason of Virginia proposed adding “maladministration.” He thought that treason and bribery did not cover all the harm that a president might do. He pointed to the English case of Warren Hastings, whose impeachment trial was then being heard in London. Hastings, the first Governor General of Bengal in India, was accused of corruption and treating the Indian people brutally.

 

Madison objected to “maladministration.” He thought this term was so vague that it would threaten the separation of powers. Congress could remove any president it disagreed with on grounds of “maladministration.” This would give Congress complete power over the executive.

 

Mason abandoned “maladministration” and proposed “high crimes and misdemeanors against the state.” The convention adopted Mason’s proposal, but dropped “against the state.” The final version, which appears in the Constitution, stated: “The president, vice-president, and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

 

The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. …

 

After the Constitutional Convention, the Constitution had to be ratified by the states. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote a series of essays, known as the Federalist Papers, urging support of the Constitution. In Federalist No. 65, Hamilton explained impeachment. He defined impeachable offenses as “those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”

 

… (High Crimes and Misdemeanors; From Constitutional Rights Foundation; © 2014 CRF-USA)

 

Finding a crime directly linked to a sitting POTUS is difficult for justice to be maintained. President Barack Hussein Obama has pushed the criminal envelope to the limits and appears near untouchable because of the blathering love of most of America’s media and the love of political power by the most Left Wing Democratic Party in American history. I am surprised the numerous “phony scandals” has not produced links to actual murder in the name of political power. Thank God so far, that extant of nefarious scandalous illegalities has not come up pertaining to President BHO.  

 

The CCC email I referenced at the beginning of these thoughts exposes the fact that the Islamic terrorists that attacked Libyan Embassy annex in Benghazi had acquired stolen “State Department-issued cell phones from our U.S. diplomatic facility”. The Islamic terrorists utilized these phones to coordinate their attack on the annex mission that resulted in the murders of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. The implication of the CCC email is that America’s Intelligence Community was listening to the Islamic attack coordination! This is another nail in the coffin of lies that exposes Obama and his Administration KNOWINGLY LYING to the American public just prior to the November 2012 election!

 

This is a ton of political evidence to bring Obama to an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives. BUT just like the Democrats in the Senate protected President Slick Willie Clinton from a Senate conviction, the same scenario would undoubtedly take place today in the Senate. EVEN if the GOP retakes the majority in the Senate there will be enough Democrats to ensure that a TWO-THIRDS majority would not be achieved to convict Obama and remove the most corrupt President from Office.

 

That leaves the only way for Obama to receive some justice for his criminal management of this Administration will be via the Civil Suit and/or criminal charges AFTER his term of Office ends in January 2017. AND there is a good chance Obama would escape that post-Presidential justice if a Democrat actually wins the 2016 election for President. Do you think someone like Hillary Clinton will allow civil or criminal discovery of Obama Administration law breaking to go on the public record? NO! A President Hillary would take a page out of the Republican playbook and give Obama a blanket full pardon preventing any kind of investigation from proceeding with the power of the independent Judicial Branch.

 

KNOWING these potential unjustified outcomes I say proceed with House impeachment proceedings at least after the 2014 election cycle to get something on the public record. Public revelations will make it more difficult for Hillary to become President and at the very least allow public opinion to force the Judicial Branch into action civilly or criminally.

 

JRH 6/15/14

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

New Benghazi Scandal Revelations

 

From: Office of CCC PAC

Sent: 6/14/2014 3:35 PM

 

Fox News has a stunning new report that shows that the Benghazi terrorists stole the State Department-issued cell phones from our U.S. diplomatic facility that they had attacked – and they used the phones to coordinate their attack with fellow terrorists.

But the most shocking aspect of the new report is that American intelligence agencies were listening in to the calls – and KNEW instantly that the attack on our compound in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

 

US Spy Agencies Here Benghazi Plans - Obama Lied

 

These stunning new reports are further proof that the Obama administration lied to us about the Benghazi attacks, and then tried to cover up the fact that it was indeed a terrorist attack, and not a political rally in response to a YouTube video.

Please, do not let those four Americans who lost their lives on that fateful night of September 11, 2012 be forgotten, swept under the rug by Democrat politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama who don’t want the American people to know about the lies and cover ups surrounding that horrific terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Please review our TV ad below demanding that Barack Obama be held accountable for the Benghazi cover up, and if you want us to keep the pressure on the Obama administration for this scandal, make a contribution to our TV ad campaign – HERE.

 

VIDEO: TV Ad: Hold Obama Accountable for Benghazi Scandal

 

You can help us keep these ads running on the airwaves by making a contribution of any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed contribution of $5,000. 

To make a contribution online – JUST CLICK HERE.

Ever since the Benghazi terrorist attack the Obama administration, with significant backing from the liberal media, have attempted to hide the truth about what happened.  To cover their failures in combating terrorism, they told lies saying it was not a preplanned terrorist attack, even when they knew that to be an absolute falsehood.

 

Susan Rice- Benghazi Not Preplanned Attack

 

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and countless members of the Obama administration have lied, concealed and attempted to cover up not only the truth but their failures.  As has been his pattern of appeasement in the face of Islamic terrorism, Obama himself would not even call this an act of terrorism.

 

USA Today- BHO says Benghazi Not Terrorism

 

Obama’s Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, said it didn’t matter whether Benghazi was a terrorist attack or whether she and the Obama administration had lied about it.

 

Hillary- What Diff Does It Make

 

The Obama administration has dishonored those who lost their lives on that fateful night of September 11, 2012 and now they say it doesn’t matter because it happened “a long time ago.”

 

Jay Carney- Benghazi Happened Long ago

 

It’s time to hold the Obama administration accountable for their misdeeds.

 

We know the media will try to whitewash the seriousness of this issue.  We need to get the truth out as soon as possible, so please make a contribution to our TV ad campaign that holds Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton accountable – CONTRIBUTE HERE.

 

Again, you can contribute any amount from as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed amount of $5,000.

 

You can also make a contribution online here:

 

Conservative Campaign Committee
ATTN:  Benghazi Ad Campaign

P.O. Box 1585

Sacramento, CA 95812

_______________________________

The House should Investigate and Subpoena Obama Administration to the Hilt

John R. Houk

© June 15, 2014

_____________________________

New Benghazi Scandal Revelations

 

Paid for and authorized by the Conservative Campaign Committee.  Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

REVOLT


Thomas Jefferson on Tyranny

Intro to ‘Revolt’

Editor John R. Houk

January 20, 2014

 

Justin Smith writes an essay entitled “Revolt”. The premise is an understandable disgust with Barack Hussein Obama crossing the line from Presidential authority to Presidential tyrant. There is a time emerging in America in which citizens who choose to cherish the freedoms our Founding Fathers’ fought, died for and won may have to assert themselves AGAIN. As Thomas Jefferson penned in the Declaration of Independence:

 

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. … (The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America; Congress, July 4, 1776; Charters of Freedom, Archives.gov)

 

Justin wrote he wrote his last paragraph with Isaiah 5: 20 and 7: 15 in mind. I believe he should have begun his essay with these two verses. So I am including them here for you to think about as you read this entire essay:

 

20 Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

 

15 Curds and honey He shall eat, that He may know to refuse the evil and choose the good. (Isaiah 5: 20; 7: 15 NKJV)

 

 

JRH 1/20/14

Please Support NCCR

**************************

REVOLT

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 1/19/2014 11:21 AM

 

It is not an exaggeration to name Barack Obama “a tyrant” or to state that America has entered a phase of soft tyranny under the Obama administration. Many would counter this assertion with examples of people still free to go to work, the stores, the movies and the daily routine of living, but tyranny never begins as cruel and oppressive; it starts out merely illegitimate and benign, just as so many of Obama’s executive orders and actions by Senator Harry Reid and the U.S. Senate have been in advancing the Progressive Movement’s agenda and shredding the U.S. Constitution.

Obama and the Progressive Democrats hate America. There can be no other explanation for their desire to fundamentally transform America from the greatest nation on earth, a nation that has helped to free much of the world both economically and physically, into a socialist/authoritarian shadow of its former self, impoverished, with every single aspect of life ruled by legislation from a central governing body of so-called “elites.” When Obama speaks of “economic equality”, he is actually calling for an end to individuality and individual liberty: Remember, this is the President and First Lady who have bragged about “disrespecting the American flag” and attending “numerous flag burnings” in the past.

Central planning is not about rationality and reason or knowledge and experience. It is about illegitimately exercising power over others through the deceit of moral relativism and situationalism. It is coercive and requires non-stop social engineering, while it concedes no failures and tolerates no deviation from dogma. And this is why, even in the face of the utter and miserable failure of the ACA [i.e. Obamacare], the Progressives refuse to broach any serious discussion with Republicans that considers abandoning the ACA in part or whole, although they applaud Obama’s unilateral and unConstitutional seventeen changes to the ACA.

Whenever, the issue of Executive orders is raised, the Progressives are quick to point to other presidents who signed more orders than Obama. The issue isn’t how many Executive orders he has signed; the issue is the kind of orders he has signed and their associated bureaucratic orders, rules and regulations (80,000 annually) unleashed on America.

Obama’s Executive order 13575 circumvented Congress’s rejection of the UN’s Agenda 21 and “sustainable development”, and in 2009, it placed controls on government and private lands, resources and energy; his National Defense Resources Preparedness order basically grants the president and his cabinet members absolute authority and power over all the nation’s natural resources and private materials, services and facilities; signed December 31, 2011, the National Defense Authorization Act allows the president to indefinitely detain any U.S. citizen on the mere suspicion that they might be a terrorist; and now the ACA , while not an executive order, is interfering in our individual choices and decisions to keep our own doctors and the health care plans we want and can afford.

During GM’s financial crisis and subsequent bailout, the Obama administration started its habit of targeting political enemies. Those GM dealers, who supported Obama’s election campaign, were allowed to stay in business, and those who did not support Obama were shut down.

Moreover, it is now evident that Obama has used his power through the IRS to target his political enemies, such as the Tea Party. Although he and his administration thoroughly deny this allegation, the circumstantial evidence is so heavy that any average American would already have been convicted and serving time on its weight alone.

Isn’t it surreal that the FBI ended its IRS investigation on the advice of Eric Holder’s appointee, Barbera Bosserman, who gave $6100 dollars to Obama’s campaign between 2008 and 2012? Whatever happened to independent counsels and select investigative committees?

Today, rather than target those who are most likely to commit terrorist atrocities, the islamofascists, Obama and the National Security Agency have placed the entire American population under a blanket warrant, for fear of being called “Islamophobic”. This sort of warrant was rejected by Americans, such as lawyer James Otis, in 1761, and the consequences of its implementation now are dangerous and authoritarian.

Do any of you remember Obama musing over the Chinese not having to contend with a “pesky Constitution”?

On January 14, 2014 many Americans may have finally been slapped awake by Obama’s statement, “I have a pen and a phone and I’ll act when Congress won’t”…to speak for “all the American people.” This is similar to his statement in December 2013, when he said, “If Congress refuses to act, I’ll do everything in my power to act without them.”

Our nation has been here before to a lesser degree under President Woodrow Wilson, who argued for obstructing and damaging constitutional primacy at every opportunity by corrupting the Constitution itself. He advocated for an all-powerful president, courts and judges willing to rewrite the U.S. Constitution (i.e. Chief Justice John Roberts) and controlling Congress in order to control state legislatures without limits, and in essence, expanding the federal government beyond Constitutional control: Obama has simply taken this plan to new, stunning and light speed levels of action.

During C-Span’s televised Congressional hearings in December of 2013, Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), Judiciary Committee Chairman, remarked that the president “doesn’t have a debate in the Oval Office about what he wants to do …He does what he wants to do, and then you no longer have a representative democracy.” The executive’s powers have overtaken the legislative power, and this is destructive to the center of our constitutional design.

America has a lawless administration that picks and chooses, which laws it will follow. Obama has ordered Attorney General Eric Holder not to enforce U.S. law as it applies to immigration, the 1965 Voter Act and drugs, and he has used the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulations as a weapon to destroy the coal industry.

Also in December 2013, Representative Trey Gowdy asked, “If Obama can ignore parts of Obamacare, could he ignore election laws too? If You can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?

There is no limiting principle that Obama and the Progressives are not willing to violate, due to the fact that they are ideologically driven, and they are out of control, as they place the Progressive agenda over any sense of duty or allegiance to the people of America. Obama actually had the temerity to declare the Senate out of session, when it was simply on a break. By concentrating power within the Executive Branch, Obama has become the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid.

After recent events, I have serious concerns over whether or not our traditional process will correct the course of our government’s trend towards authoritarian rule in time to save us. In past years, our differences were sorted out within the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution. What are we to do when one side decides to no longer be bound by the rules? The Progressives may have been born American citizens, but they are no longer American in their intentions for our nation. And, when the government, led by Obama and these Progressives, becomes lawless, it is not illegal or treason to finally take to the streets in protest/civil disobedience, at the very least, in the defense of the U.S. Constitution and America__to finally hold the criminals in the Obama administration accountable through armed revolt should it persist in its treason, since many of America’s veterans, past and present, took an oath to defend the U.S. against “enemies both foreign and domestic.”

Unlike the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a black liberation theologist and one of Obama’s mentors, who is a millionaire several times over because of the vast opportunity America offers everyone through its exceptional nature; and, who once said, “God damn America for as long as she acts like God and she is supreme”, I say, not taking the Lord’s name in vain but as my most fervent prayer, “No, no, no__God damn Obama and the Progressive Party for as long as they act like they are God and they are supreme__God damn them for the ruin they have wrought upon Our Beloved America. Amen, amen, amen.”

 

By Justin O. Smith

________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

© Justin O. Smith