FORMER CLINTON ADVISER EXPOSES THE TRUTH BEHIND THE ‘VACCINE PASSPORT


Elgato Weebee shares a War Room Pandemic (on Rumble) video on his UGETube channel of Naomi Wolf explaining the dangers of the COVID Vaccine Passports to American Liberty. COVID distortions are the Dem-Marxist tyrannical path to control and destroy the America of WE THE PEOPLE.

JRH 4/17/21

I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:

Please Support NCCR

Or if donating you can support by getting in the Coffee from home business making yourself extra cash – OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**************************

UGETube VIDEO: FORMER CLINTON ADVISER EXPOSES THE TRUTH BEHIND THE ‘VACCINE PASSPORT

https://ugetube.com/watch/former-clinton-adviser-exposes-the-truth-behind-the-039-vaccine-passport-039-mp4_hkdLckaWCy6zygb.html

[UGETube doesn’t embed apparently on WordPress. Click the link to watch the video.]

Posted by Elgato Weebee

Published on 15 Apr 2021

Can an Insurrectionist be a Patriot?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© January 20, 2021

I WILL NOT SUBMIT and I WILL RESIST to any government operated by the Dem-Marxist Party or by the current leadership of the Republican Party. I am an American Patriot that has witnessed lawlessness overtake the rule of law in the USA. Senator McConnell has called Election 2020 completely fair without fraud and sadly I have heard that one of my Oklahoma Republican Senators in James Lankford concurs.

 

I am 64 on a disability. I suspect any meager resistance I offer will result in a lower quality of life … SO WHAT! I’d rather drift into the sunset FREE than in bondage to a lawless government regardless of a Communist or Establishment Republican regime.

 

I am willing to admit to the glee of America’s Leftist controllers, I am an INSURRECTIONIST until America is set aright or I perish. I for the former but I suspect the latter.

 

To express my frustration here is some shares that exemplify my current frame of mind.

 

JRH 1/20/21

I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business making yourself extra cash – OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***********************************

A WARNING TO THE LEFT IN AMERICA

WARNING TO LEFT photo

 

By Vic Freeman

Jan 19, 2021

givemebass.com

BULLETin

 

Dear Leftist/Progressive,

 

Your life is in danger.

 

That wasn’t a threat: It’s a fact.  It’s a fact that I am taking this time to warn you of because a God you probably don’t believe in loves you.

 

You should keep reading because:

 

Below you will find instructions on how to save your own life.

_ _ _ _

The first thing you need to do…for your own safety will require some study.  Since you don’t even agree to disagree anymore, I certainly don’t expect you to ever agree with this information.  But you need to understand it.  Urgently.

 

  1. You need to research and understand what The Founders of America believed in and how they saw the world. Again, I won’t ask you to agree with their views but you need to understand their views for your own safety.

 

  1. You also need to research and understand the difference between a Republic and a Democracy.

 

  1. You need to research and understand The United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

 

  1. You need to research and study how exactly this country became independent in the first place, and you need to research and study how often it is that history repeats itself.

 

WHY THIS STUDY AND WHY IS IT SO URGENT


You need to gain a deep understanding of the founding principles of THE COUNTRY YOU ARE TRYING TO CHANGE, because you have awakened a ferocious sleeping giant.

 

As a “progressive” you need to understand WHAT it is that you are trying to progress away from.

 

Everyone understands that YOU want to change this country hence this warning: If it conflicts with the Founding Principles of this country it ain’t gonna happen.


WHY YOUR LIFE IS IN DANGER NOW


There have always been “Progressives” in America. There have always been those who wish to abandon Founding Principles in favor of some other way of life.

Thanks to the unprecedented greatness of America, up until now Progressives used to be perfectly free to safely disagree with the very Principles which gave them the right to safely disagree in the first place. But not anymore.


Progressives used to be safe to disagree, but you aren’t anymore, so what changed?


You see, we used to have civilized processes in this country which served the purpose of peacefully resolving disagreements and conflicts.


Thanks to the civilized processes we used to have, progressives and those who prefer the more traditional American way were able to get through disagreements and conflicts without any bloodshed.

It was a beautiful thing:


Everyone could openly express how they felt and believed and there would always be peaceful resolution. Even if it meant folks agreeing to disagree with each other we could always count on there being peaceful resolution. They were great times.


Some examples of the civilized processes we used to have, which used to do a great job of peacefully resolving disagreements and conflicts WERE:


-Freedom of speech

-The Courts

And a REALLY big one:

-Elections


All those wonderful processes of peaceful resolution are gone now. You have “progressed” them all into complete uselessness. You don’t want freedom of speech and freedom of the press to reign, instead you have chosen to censor, block and ban.


You don’t want to have any more actual discussions, instead you seek to silence all who disagree.


You don’t want courts which are effective in actually resolving any conflict between any differing sides, instead you want partisan human rubber stamps on your benches who are more concerned with activism than they are with justice.


You don’t want actual elections which actually give us four more years of actual peace, instead you just want to take power by any means necessary even if it means stealing the sacred right to meaningfully vote from over half the country.


You don’t want real Law Enforcement and real laws to maintain any real peace, instead you want chaos and no opposition to your chaos and law enforcement which magically appears only when YOU want to dial 911.


Someone should have told you to, “Be careful what you wish for” and if someone tried you should have listened because all peaceful process is dead in this country now. You killed all of it. You “progressed” all civility and all morality and all basic decency right into the ground.


It is quite the bed you have tried to make for America, and now you’re going to sleep in that bed alone as your real nightmare begins.

 

The Silent Majority has never loved your “Progressivism”, but we were willing to agree to disagree.


Many if not most traditional Americans have deeply resented your “Progressivism” for a very long time, but we chose to coexist.


But you have chosen not to coexist as you have tried to cancel and censor everything and everyone you’ve failed to coopt.


You tried to force your progressivism upon America against its will, and now the traditions of the greatest country and culture in human history will haunt you like the ghosts of its Founders and every soldier who ever died for it.


In a sneak attack of cowards, you tried to slowly erode the traditions and culture of America by indoctrinating school children with your “Progress” and you tried to erase our monuments so that American kids will never ask,


“Who is that mystery man and what did he stand for?”, because you don’t want them to ever ask “why is there a statue of someone not mentioned in my school books?”, because then Marx forbid, they might find out that Americans used to be free.

 

You have targeted and used people as you have ripped off old scabs and have poured salt in the most painful of wounds, just so you could point at those who stop your “progress” and say,


“ALL of your pain is THEIR fault!”


…when nothing could be further from the truth. You say,


“Destroy THEM for us and we will give you all of their stuff!”


…along with endless other promises you will never keep.


You have, with High Treason, used medical terrorism to terrify people so you could shutdown and lockdown to destroy businesses and try to make America too weak and too poor to resist your Global Communist masters, as you open the back door to their evil and roll out the red carpet for the global economic tyranny which OUR President whom WE chose in 2016 (and again in 2020) already said NO to.

 

__ __ __ __ __

I could go on, for a very long time, as listing out all of your evil would be like War & Peace minus the peace, so I’ll conclude…

SUMMARY

You have “progressed” yourselves into a place infinitely more dangerous than standing between a mama bear and its cubs:

You are standing between Americans and their freedom. And you need to run, not walk, away from where you are standing.

You need to stop talking the hate you’ve been talking as you shout, “No borders, no walls, no America at all”.

You’re marching with, “Death To America” is now acknowledged for what it is:

A declaration of war by YOU upon America.

As you’ve simultaneously destroyed all civilized processes of peaceful resolution in this country. Those were very bad ideas.

YOU are a bad idea.

The real America doesn’t like you and never has.


The real America doesn’t start fights…but has a very long history of ending fights.

The real America has combat veterans who came back from fighting for freedom only to be told they must wear a muzzle (aka mask) and can’t leave their homes at night, due to a “virus” which people need a test to even know they have it, and which doesn’t kill anyone who isn’t already 99% dead even if they do “have it”.

The real America is tired of being TREAD ON and doesn’t have much left to lose besides ammo.

 

And you went and disrespected every law enforcement officer in the country and then added injury to insult by defunding them.

And you’ll NEVER again be able to successfully claim that “Americans have no legitimate purpose for assault rifles” as you’ve burned cities and countless businesses halfway to the ground…while simultaneously Defunding the same police your Leftist gods have always said will handle every self-protection need Americans have.

The biggest thing you’ve achieved in 2020, is you’ve finally awoken the real America up to why The Founding Fathers of America immediately followed the 1st Amendment with the 2nd.

 

And there are many millions of Americans who truly would much rather die on their feet than live on their knees.

So, you “Progressives” have a choice to make:

STOP your “progress” or it will be stopped for you.

SHUT your mouths like you tried to shut ours, before you cause the Sleeping Giant you’ve awoken to snap.

Because while you may have plugged your ears to opposing views and made a mockery of the 1st Amendment in order to do that:

The 2nd Amendment doesn’t care if you’re listening.

And you can’t buy ammo with EBT.

 

Give Me Bass Homepage (marketing site) – Give Me Bass BULLETinTM – The Blog Of The Smartest Human™

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: MAJOR ARRESTS? EMERGENCY BROADCASTS? WILL THE WORLD BE SHOCKED BY THE EVENTS THAT ARE AHEAD?

Posted by JustInformedTalk

25111 subscribers – January 20th, 2021 03:45 UTC

 

DONATE:
https://justinformednews.com/donate-2/

Try Touchstone Essential Products TODAY!
https://justinformedtalk.thegoodinside.com/

OFFICIAL WEBSITE:
https://justinformednews.com/

RUMBLE:
https://rumble.com/c/c-294911

PARLER:
https://parler.com/profile/JustInformedTalk/posts

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Will President Trump Form a New Political Party?

 

By ANN CORCORAN

01/20/2021

Frauds, Crooks and Criminals: Demonstrating daily that diversity is not strength!

 

If he does, I will be among its first members.

 

I no longer care about the argument about siphoning votes from the establishment Republicans and thus allowing the Dems to win everything.

 

Frankly, the Democrats have perfected stealing elections, so Republicans are going to have a very hard time going forward anyway.  Does anyone in their right mind think there will be another Bush-like Republican President in the White House again?

 

I was looking for an opportunity to use this Hogan meme making its way quietly around Maryland. You gotta laugh at ’em!  It will drive them crazy!

 

For decades we have been told we must stick with the Republicans—Republicans like Senator Mitch McConnell and my own Governor and Never-Trumper Larry Hogan (who was the chairman of the National Governors Association)?

 

We have been told until I want to throw up to stick with the Rs and change the party from within.

 

No more!

 

I want to work within a party I feel passionate about.

 

So I am definitely cheering for the creation of a Patriot Party (or whatever it might be called).

 

Not that I needed to hear McConnell’s speech to make up my mind, but it surely was the last straw.

 

Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the mob was fed lies and “provoked” by President Trump and other people in a blistering speech on the Senate floor.

 

Youtube VIDEO: JUST IN: McConnell says mob was “provoked by the President”

[Posted by The Hill

1.03M subscribers – Jan 19, 2021]

 

Here is the Wall Street Journal on the possibility of a new party:

 

President Trump has talked in recent days with associates about forming a new political party, according to people familiar with the matter, an effort to exert continued influence after he leaves the White House.

 

Mr. Trump discussed the matter with several aides and other people close to him last week, the people said. The president said he would want to call the new party the “Patriot Party,” the people said.

 

Mr. Trump has feuded in recent days with several Republican leaders including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), who on Tuesday said Mr. Trump deserved blame for provoking the deadly Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. Polls show Mr. Trump retains strong support among rank-and-file GOP voters.

 

[….]

 

Third parties have typically failed to draw enough support to play a major role in national elections. Any effort to start a new party would likely face intense opposition from Republican party officials, who would chafe at the thought of Mr. Trump peeling off support from GOP candidates. [That is what they always say to keep us in line.—ed]

 

“Chafe!” They would be raging because frankly the Trump base (which he expanded!) is the base of the Republican Party.

 

A Trump-led party will kill the Republican Party and I am ready for that!  Are you?

 

Here is the Leftwing HuffPo on the subject:

 

Trump Reportedly Considers Exacting Revenge On Republicans By Forming His Own Party

 

And, they are so happy to quote Republican Neocon Bill Kristol on Twitter:

 

 

Fight Back! And have fun!

 

The next time you get a fund-raising letter from the RNC, or any Republican fundraising campaign for a candidate who turned on us, use the prepaid envelope and drop in one of these.

 

Monopoly Buck

 

But, don’t ask to be removed from their list, just do it every time they send you an appeal for money. Add a note if you feel inspired.

 

P.S.  Visit my Facebook page for RRW and see the hundreds of comments backing My Pillow Guy and the effort by the Cancel Culture to destroy his business.  Backfiring just as AOC’s attack on Goya Foods backfired.

 

ABOUT Frauds, Crooks & Criminals

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: DEPROGRAMMING THE “CULT OF TRUMP” / WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE US WITH PRESIDENT BIDEN? [MIRRORED]

Posted by Free Your MindEUMELs Media Library

46151 subscribers – January 20th, 2021 21:14 UTC

 

[Blog Editor: Originally posted at Youtube by
Sanity 4 Sweden. YT Link: https://youtu.be/3PLgUuBDSjs]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: SITUATION UPDATE, JAN 20TH – DAY OF RECKONING: WILL THE REPUBLIC DIE OR BE REBORN?

Posted by NaturalNews

21386 subscribers – January 20th, 2021 16:08 UTC

 

For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport

 

NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency.

 

MORE TO READ

 

Intro to ‘THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF SLAVERY…’


Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© July 20, 2020

 

When creepy Joe Biden echoes former President Obama about fundamentally transforming America, you can look at the COVID despotism coupled with Antifa/BLM rioting, vandalizing, looting and God help us murdering to comprehend how such a transformation will be accomplished. HOW CAN THIS HAPPEN in America? The answer is actually quite simple: Decades of brainwashing by a Marxist oriented (disguised as Progressive) Education System, Mainstream Media, Leftist infected Entertainment and worse – an American Political Party overtaken by Globalist Gramsci-like Eco-Marxism.

 

Which brings me to the purpose of this post. The Marxist pamphleteer media organization known as the New York Times sponsors a brainwashing project actually being picked up as fact by many Public School systems across the USA to continue this transformative brainwashing called the 1619 Project.

 

Nikole Hannah-Jones – NYT 1619 Project Clown

 

The 1619 Project is the current preeminent lie blackfacing America’s heritage with guilt based on distortions of facts on Slavery in America.

 

I am on The Ferocious Conservative’s email list and I am pleased to share how the Slave Trade actually functioned as it made it’s ugly way to the shores of America. The only disappoint I have is author John Gaultier didn’t provide much in the way of source linking or a bibliography. And so prior to reading the excellent Slave info provided by Gaultier, I offer a 1619 Project bibliographic critique:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AND NOW the meat of some terrific information who will not hear or read from Marxist-oriented outlets.

 

JRH 7/20/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

****************************

THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF SLAVERY THAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MARXISTS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE 1619 PROJECT DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT!

 

By John Gaultier

July 19, 2020 11:07 AM

THE FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST BULLETIN

 

FOLLOW THE TRUE HISTORY OF SLAVERY THROUGH THE AGES.  AND YOU NEED TO KNOW THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ISLAM AND SLAVERY IN AMERICA.

 

140 Million Victims Islamic Slave Trade

 

Before you read the history,  I want you to ask a simple question “why” does the left pin the slavery donkey tail on America!

It’s very simple! It’s because America is the richest country by far in the world. It is rich in wealth, Industry, infrastructure and Raw Materials. What a plum for the Marxist and Social Justice Thieves to steal! They are not into hard work. They want a free ride based on a lie. Yes there was slavery but there was slavery around the world in the 1600’s. Matter of fact African Tribes in Africa sold their brother Africans into slavery to their Muslim Pals. The Muslims were the biggest slave traders in the world. Read through my blogs and you will find posts documenting all of this.

So…Contrary to popular belief, the first slaves in the American colonies were not Africans. Also, the majority of Africans taken from their homelands for the purpose of slavery were not destined for the shores of what would eventually evolve into the United States. Slavery was a documented “established institution” dating back to as early as 1760 B.C., where it is referred to in the Code of Hammurabi.

 

Slavery was an accepted part of society in ancient cultures such as Greece, Assyria, and Egypt, and at one time, the Roman Empire’s total population consisted of 25% slaves, with Italy’s slaves comprising 30% to 40% of its total population. By 500 B.C., slaves comprised upwards of a third of the population in some Greek city-states. In Sparta following several slave revolts about the year 600 B.C., the Spartans restructured their city-state into an authoritarian regime, for the leaders decided that only by turning their society into an armed camp could they hope to maintain control over the numerically dominant enslaved population.

From the pre-Christian era up to colonization of the New World, slavery was an accepted part of daily life in countries and cultures across the globe, and whether or not a particular culture was enslaved was generally determined by their weakness in warfare. To the victors go the spoils, which in this case were the indigent peoples of the conquered lands. Slaves consisted of Irish, Turkish, Chinese, Arab, Persian, Greek, and many other cultures, and was not restricted to one particular race, ethnicity, culture, or country.

The Spaniards were the first Europeans to use Africans as slaves in New World colonies such as Cuba and Hispaniola (where the first African slaves arrived in 1501), where the native populations starved themselves to death rather than work for the Spanish. The natives were originally used as forced labor, but the spread of disease and their demise due to self-imposed starvation eventually forced the Spanish colonists to obtain laborers elsewhere, which ultimately began what came to be known as the Atlantic slave trade.

In Europe, the Dutch had overtaken the pre-eminent slave trade by 1650, until they were usurped by the British in 1700. Britain played a prominent role in the Atlantic slave trade, especially after 1600, and slavery was a legal institution in all thirteen of the American colonies and Canada (which had been acquired by Britain in 1763). The Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 by British Parliament effectively ended slavery in Britain.

Slaves from Africa were slaves in Africa long before they were slaves anywhere else in the world. From 1300 to mid-1800, nearly all African countries had a slave population that comprised one-third of their total populations. The status of slavery varied from a feudal vassal system, where the slaves tithed part of their income and crops to a land owner and had a small number of restrictions on their freedoms, to a slavery system that more closely resembled the one instituted in the American colonies of the 1700’s and 1800’s, where slaves were considered property, treated poorly, and had no personal freedoms whatsoever.

With regard to the Atlantic slave trade, Africans themselves participated in promulgating the practice with the selling of prisoners of war to European slave traders. These prisoners were primarily Africans and were being sold as slaves by their own people. As recently as the late 1990’s, evidence has shown that West Africa still actively engages in the practice of enslaving its own people for the purpose of forced manual labor.

In South America, the ancient Mayan, Aztec, and Incan civilizations routinely practiced slavery, and one of the more common reasons for introducing someone into the bonds of slavery was to pay off a debt (private or public, such as taxation), rather than for utilization as manual labor. In Brazil, slavery was an economic mainstay, and Brazil received 37% of all the African slaves shipped out of Africa via the Atlantic slave trade. Portugal began purchasing African slaves in 1550 for work in sugar plantations once they had depleted the indigenous populations.

By the middle of the 18th century, British and French Caribbean interests such as Jamaica and St. Dominique (now the Independent Republic of Haiti) had the largest slave societies of the region, rivaling Brazil as a destination for enslaved Africans. Haiti and Indonesia still actively practice slavery to this day, and despite the fact that slavery has been globally banned by various international organizations, there remains an estimated 25 to 30 million people in some form of slavery, whether it is the Asian sex trade (which traffics in young females) or more traditional slavery used for manual labor and servitude.

The first slaves used by Europeans in what would later become the United States territory were seen in the early 1500’s and were part of various Spaniard explorers’ attempts to colonize parts of North America or to find certain legendary locations like the Seven Cities of Gold and the Fountain of Youth.

In 1619 a group of twenty Africans were brought to the English colony in Jamestown, Virginia by a Dutch soldier and sold as indentured servants. The transition from indentured servitude to racial slavery happened gradually, and it was not until 1661 that a reference to slavery entered Virginia law (the law was directed at Caucasian servants who ran away with African servants). It was not until the Slave Codes of 1705 that African American status as slaves was sealed into American history.

Despite the popularly held belief that British North America (the United States) was the primary destination of African slaves, only about 5% of the slaves brought out of Africa actually ended up there. The vast majority of slaves were actually sent to the Caribbean (British and French holdings), Brazil, and South America. Also, many slaves in British North America were owned by plantation owners who lived in Britain and oversaw their land holdings and affairs from afar, without ever having set foot on American soil.

Contemporary knowledge regarding slavery, even by those who claim to be outraged at the oppression of their people as slaves, is extremely limited. As already stated, the United States only received about 5% of the total slave trade. According to the 1860 Federal Census, only 1.4% of the total White American population owned slaves, with 4.8% of the Southern White American population being slave owners.

While slavery is most often considered a black eye on the history of the United States, the United States actually played a very small part in the Atlantic slave trade from Africa, and an almost nonexistent role in the global slave trade. The first slaves in the United States were actually Caucasians and were brought from Britain when America was colonized. Following colonization, the settlers then attempted to use Native Americans in the slavery role before it evolved into where it stands today – with the public image of slavery being that of an African American being owned by a white American.

 

[A]nother known historical fact that is quietly swept under the rug is that all the slaves the “western” nations had, were originally purchased from the Islamic Caliphate. That is right, the supply side of the equation was an islamically approved and sanctioned slave market fueled by the belief that non-muslims (kaffirs) were less than human.

The Arab Slave Trade peaked in the 18th and 19th centuries, but it began in the 8th century with the Arab invasion of north Africa and extended into the first decades of the 20th century.  There were three main branches.[7]   The trans-Saharan route ran from northern Nigeria or Timbuktu to Tunis or Tripoli, carrying gold, ivory, and slaves seized from sub-Saharan, unconverted (non-Islamic) communities—an estimated 3.5 to 4 million over a 12-century period.

 

Map showing main slave routes from http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/African_slave_trade.png

 

Another route ran along the shores of the Red Sea carrying slaves from Muslim kingdoms in southern Sudan and the Christian kingdom in Ethiopia to Red Sea ports.  At the end of the 18th century, Darfur was sending 5,000 to 6,000 slaves a year along this route.  One scholar guessed that between 12 million and 15 million passed through Cairo in the 16th century.[9]

Finally, the Indian Ocean route began on the east coast and ended at ports on the Persian Gulf, transporting slaves to the Arabian peninsula and the Middle East, with some going to India and even Indonesia or China.

How many slaves did the Arab trade account for between the 8th and 20th centuries? Impossible to say, given the absence of records for most of the period.  Estimates by scholars range widely from over 8 million to 25 million.  For comparison, the Atlantic trade, which flourished between the 16th and 19th centuries, is said to have involved 12.5 million slaves.

 

Do you think the left and their Useful idiots will ask the Oil Rich Islamic Kingdoms for reparations?

 

Share the facts. The Truth is a great way to expose the FRAUD.

 

click here for more details https://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/2015/03/most-muslims-look-down-on-blacks.html

____________________________

Intro to ‘THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF SLAVERY…’

Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© July 20, 2020

___________________________

THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF SLAVERY THAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MARXISTS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE 1619 PROJECT DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT!

 

 JOHN GAULTIER’S FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE BULLETIN

 

Blogger Profile About John Gaultier

 

I AM A FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE RIGHT WINGER UNDERGROUND… IN EXILE IN AMERICA ! I AM AN UNRELENTING FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVE: Ferocious = (fə-rō’shəs) “Marked by unrelenting intensity; to the extreme” Conservative = (kən-sûr’və-tĭz’əm) “A political philosophy or attitude emphasizing respect for traditional institutions and distrust of government activism” My page is a place for Unrelenting Ferocious Activist Conservatives across our country to gather and discuss and plan our next moves. I am tired of sitting around and playing “nice” while the Progressive Liberals have spent the last 50 years attacking and denigrating our values and our beliefs while our side sits around and tries real hard to be accommodating and “Nice”! (Political Correctness!) NO MORE!! AS AN UNRELENTING FEROCIOUS CONSERVATIVES. I WILL ATTACK BACK!

 

[Minor Spell Check editing by Blog Editor]

 

Brigitte Gabriel Exposes the Wrap-Up Smear


Brigitte Gabriel has emailed her supporters on the Dem tactic of the Wrap-Up Smear. Gabriel rightfully so is blaming the smear tactic for the cancellation of the paid-for yet arbitrarily cancelled Mar-a-Lago Conference. I have posted in the past on the Wrap-Up Smear where Nancy Pelosi explains how the Left/Dems use the tactic (post still up but video embedded on post has been removed by Youtube with the explanation, “This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.”)

 

The Gabriel Wrap-Up Smear explanation is only about two-minutes. To be honest my sense the actual purpose for the email is fund raising. Since the Mar-a-Lago cancellation why not throw a little cash ACT for America’s way to thumb your nose at Leftist liars. (For that matter this BLOG would love a portion of cash support as well – 😊)

 

JRH 10/19/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**********************

Brigitte Gabriel Exposes the Wrap-Up Smear

 

Brigitte Gabriel

Email Sent 10/18/2019 1:26 PM

Sent via ACT for America

 

Dear Patriot,

 

Hold on to your seat because what you are about to see and hear will shock you.

It’s no secret that the Left hates conservatives and will stop at nothing to try to minimize our voices and shut us down for good. But now we have proof of their tactics. Their secrets are now revealed!

 

Watch my latest video below for a breakdown of the “Wrap Up Smear” in Nancy Pelosi’s own words.

 

VIDEO: Brigitte Gabriel Exposes the Wrap-Up Smear

 

 

[Posted by ACT for America

66.2K subscribers – Oct 15, 2019

 

Get involved at www.ACTforAmerica.org]

 

The SPLC and CAIR use this tactic daily with “hate group” labels, lies, and quotes taken out of context in an attempt to delegitimize ACT for America and other conservative groups. The smear machine then counts on their cronies in the Fake News Media to write “news” articles to validate their Fake News narratives.

 

They use this vicious practice of character assassination to deplatform and shut down conservatives, as we saw most recently with the cancellation of our Mar a Lago dinner gala, our only fundraiser of the year.

 

Now that we know what kind of underhanded and sneaky tactics we are up against, we must fight back and defend free speech against these radicals who seek to destroy us. 

 

Free speech is on the line, and ACT for America needs your help in the fight for the truth. Can we count on you to stand with us on the front lines of free speech and make an emergency donation today?

 

By pledging a monthly donation of $35, $50, or $65, you can help us take on the SPLC and CAIR’s smear campaigns and reach more people than ever with the truth about the dangers our country is facing.

 

Taking on the well-equipped and deep-pocketed Leftist smear machine will require us to fight like never before. We’re depending on you, one of our most loyal supporters, to equip us with the tools we need to fight for truth and freedom.

 

Thank you for standing by our side and being a part of our movement.

 

Always Devoted,

 

ACT FOR AMERICA  One-Time Donation Page

++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_______________________

© 2019 ACT Content LLC. This may not be reproduced for commercial purposes. ACT for America Education, Inc. is a registered 501 c (3) organization.
Address: 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 190, #614, Washington D.C., 20004 USA

 

ACT for America Education’s mission is to educate, engage, train, and mobilize citizens to ensure the safety and security of Americans against all threats foreign and domestic while preserving civil liberties guaranteed by the US Constitution.

 

Brigitte Gabriel NYT Best Selling Author and Political commentator

 

Brigitte Gabriel is a leading commentator on politics, culture and national security. As a legal immigrant to America born in Lebanon, Ms. Gabriel survived war in the Middle East living in an 8×10 underground bomb shelter from the age of 10 until 17.

 

She lectures nationally and internationally, and her expertise is sought after by world and business leaders.

 

Ms. Gabriel moved to Israel in 1984 and became news anchor for “World News,” an evening Arabic news broadcast for Middle East Television seen throughout Israel, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. Her work is of international scope having brought her in contact with world figures such as Margaret Thatcher, George H. Bush, Queen Nour El Hussein, Itzhak Rabine, and Shimon Perez.

 

Ms. Gabriel immigrated to the United States in 1989 and founded a television production and advertising company.  Her clients included ABC, NBC, CBS, Discovery, TLC, History Channel, CNN, the Oprah Winfrey show, 20/20, World News Tonight, and Good Morning America just to name a few. 

 

She has addressed the United Nations, MORE TO READ

 

Don’t Be Fooled by Leftist Lies About the Immigration Explosion


With all the lies the Dems are spinning on President Trump and Brett Kavanaugh’s SCOTUS  nomination, Leftist elites immigration agenda to transform the electoral demographics in America is being under reported.

 

Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for America addresses this seeming immigration conspiracy in an email alert.

 

JRH 9/21/18

In this current state of media censorship & defunding, consider chipping in a few bucks for enjoying (or even despising yet read) this Blog.

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Don’t Be Fooled by Leftist Lies About the Immigration Explosion

 

By Brigitte Gabriel

Sent 9/20/2018 12:09 PM

Sent via ACT for America

 

When did our immigration system start functioning like a charity to benefit third-world countries rather than America?

 

When did it become the case that the interests of foreigners should take precedent over those of American citizens?

 

It’s a peculiar thing. A massive wave of third-world immigration has been engulfing America for half a century, yet all American citizens hear about from the “lamestream” media is what a racist, intolerant country we have. As their thinking goes, if we don’t openly accept millions of individuals who have no desire to embrace the language, culture and values that made America the greatest country in the history of the world, then we must be racists.

 

It’s not the elites who have suffered the consequences of hundreds of thousands of unvetted foreigners flocking to the United States or had their communities transformed, endangered and eroded by 10 million illegal aliens.

 

It’s the average American citizen who bears that burden.

 

How it all started. Before 1965, immigration generally worked to benefit Americans. But that all changed when Democratic politicians came up with a scheme to change the demographics of the United States to electorally favor the Democratic Party.

 

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (H.R. 2580, enacted June 30, 1968), also known as the Hart-Celler Act, eliminated the concept of quotas that had been in place for several decades.

 

Rep. Emanuel Celler of New York sponsored the bill in the House of Representatives, Sen. Philip Hart of Michigan sponsored it in the Senate, and Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts bent over backwards to help promote it.

 

By removing the concept of national quotas, this bill significantly, and in my opinion intentionally, transformed the demographic makeup of the United States forever.

 

The new law changed the order of preference for visa categories that focused on family relationships with citizens or U.S. residents, rather than the skills that had previously taken precedent in visa decisions. If this was a scheme by the Democrats, as I believe it was, then it was a brilliant one.

 

From then on, immediate relatives of U.S. citizens and “special immigrants” had no restrictions or quotas, regardless of skill or country of origin. Let the chain migration begin!

 

Self-imposed suicide. America is actively being transformed before our very eyes. A nation that defeated the mighty British Empire to gain its independence, that helped defeat Hitler, that beat the menacing Soviet Union, put a man on the moon, pioneered countless scientific and medical breakthroughs, and changed the world forever is now strangling itself with its own suicidal blindness.

 

Many Americans know that immigrants are not assimilating to our culture. When polled by Pew Research, two-thirds of adults said that immigrants in the United States today “generally want to hold onto their home country customs and way of life,” and 59 percent of Americans also said, “Most recent immigrants do not learn English within a reasonable amount of time.”

 

Despite lectures about our racist intolerance from politically correct elitists, the United States has the world’s largest immigrant population, and it’s not even close. One in five of the world’s immigrants live in the U.S., and our foreign-born population since 1965 has gone from 5 percent to 14 percent today and will push it to a projected record of 18 percent in 2065.

 

Don’t be fooled by leftist lies about how this immigration explosion has always been the norm for our nation. The number of U.S. immigrants between 1965 and 2015 was 59 million, surpassing the European-dominated immigration waves during the 19th and early 20th centuries.

 

Today, only 12 percent of our immigrants originate from Europe, the percentage of immigrants we take from Africa and the Middle East has quadrupled since the early 20th century, and those from the Middle East are predominantly Muslims, as opposed to Christians.

 

Between 1840 and 1889, 14.3 million immigrants arrived in the United States, compared to 18.2 million between 1890 and 1919. More importantly, the immigrants America was taking in prior to 1965 were overwhelmingly from countries far more likely to share our values and Western culture.

 

After the replacement of the nation’s European-focused quota system, immigration from non-Western countries exploded. By comparison, both of the U.S. immigration waves in the mid-19th century and early 20th century consisted almost entirely of European immigrants. While the Left likes to brand this a racist historical policy, it would make sense for us to take in mostly Western-hailing immigrants considering this is a Western nation!

 

Between 1890 and 1919, 88 percent of immigrants to the United States came from Europe. A mere 2 percent of immigrants during that time period came from the Middle East, and those who did were mostly Christians fleeing persecution and who shared our values.

 

Immigrants from Africa during this time were mostly students. Now, only 12 percent of our immigrants originate from Europe, the percentage of immigrants we take from Africa and the Middle East has quadrupled since the early 20th century, and those from the Middle East are predominantly Muslims, as opposed to Christians.

 

In 1993, Islamic terrorists, most of them immigrants, made their first attempt at bringing down the World Trade Center when a truck filled with a 1,200-pound nitrate-hydrogen gas bomb exploded inside the parking garage beneath the buildings. The hope of the jihadis who orchestrated the attack was to send the North Tower crashing into the South Tower, bringing both towers down simultaneously and killing tens of thousands in the process.

 

At the time of the first World Trade Center attack, the U.S. Muslim population was approximately 1 million. Since then, that number has more than tripled, to about 3.45 million.

 

What kind of response is this to a potentially catastrophic terrorist attack? It not only continued to allow massive immigration from the Islamic world, but it also tripled the Islamic population in America in two decades, while we’ve been at war with radical Islamic terrorism.

 

We can’t be afraid to speak the truth when our values, culture, and very lives are being threatened. The worst part is, we’re doing it to ourselves.

 

We’ve come too far as a society to have radical leftists destroy us from within.

 

It’s time for a return to borders, culture, and the protection of our citizens over politically correct endangerment.

______________________

Brigitte Gabriel is a New York Times best-selling author, terrorism expert and the Founder and Chairman of Act for America. Her new book, “Rise: In Defense of Judeo-Christian Values and Freedom,” was released on September 11.

 

ACT for America Mission

 

ACT for America’s mission is focused on educating, engaging, and mobilizing citizens and elected officials to impact legislative outcomes to keep America safe and secure. Through training and education ACT for America is empowering citizens to help prevent criminal activity and terrorism while preserving civil liberties protected by the US constitution.

 

Yet Another Aspiring Apparatchik Exploits Norway’s 9/11


Axel Fjeld

 

I just read a great article at PJ Media (formerly Pajamas Media) rebutting a European Leftist crying Islamophobe. Bruce Bawer speculates Axel Fjeld is trying to use his academic prowess to make his bones to get a job working in some form of lucrative European Leftist media.

 

Unfortunately for Fjeld, Bawer shows the racist-Islamophobe accusations against Counterjihad writers is based on barefaced lies.

 

JRH 7/29/18

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Yet Another Aspiring Apparatchik Exploits Norway’s 9/11

 

By BRUCE BAWER

JULY 25, 2018

PJ Media

 

The ring-shaped sculpture made of steel which carries the engraved names of the victims of the Utoya massacre on the island of Utoya, Norway, on August 5, 2015. (Sigrid Harms/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images)

 

This year I was not going to write about 7/22, often known as Norway’s 9/11. It is the date in 2011 on which Anders Behring Breivik bombed government buildings in Oslo, killing eight people, and then gunned down sixty-nine more, mostly kids, on the nearby island of Utøya. Famously, Breivik wrote – or rather cobbled together – a massive “manifesto” consisting mainly of material from various sources that he had cut and pasted. Most of it was critical of Islam, and it was apparently meant as a justification for his actions. But none of the people whose work he borrowed had ever called for violence, let alone violence against children.

 

Nevertheless, after 7/22, the Norwegian left was quick to insist on a linkage between Breivik and serious critics of Islam, and to argue, moreover, that those critics needed to be silenced in order to avoid any more such atrocities. For a while there things got pretty dicey, with prominent academics, authors, and politicians demanding strict limits on freedom of speech and stiff prison penalties for anyone violating those limits. In one op-ed after another, I saw my name, and that of other writers, dragged through the mud. I ended up writing an e-book about it, The New Quislings.

 

Eventually it all died down. But every now and then the whole ugly business flares up again, especially when an anniversary of 7/22 rolls around. Ambitious young ideologues who are eager to kick off a career in politics, writing, media, or the public sector have discovered that a splendid way to do so is to join the pile-on. It’s easy enough to pull off: the point is not to soberly challenge the arguments made by critics of Islam, or to say any[t]hing [sic] remotely original, but to name-call – to smear them as Islamophobes, racists, and “Eurabia conspiracy theorists.” (I’ll explain that last one in a minute.)

 

Meet Axel Fjeld. On July 25, the newspaper Bergensavisen published a long essay by the thirty-year-old, who is studying for his master’s degree in philosophy. The essay was entitled “Is it possible to stop racism?” Its targets were the usual ones. For example, Hans Rustad, editor of document.no, which runs Islam-related news and commentary. Describing document.no as “Breivik’s old hunting grounds” (because he, like thousands of others, used to read it), Fjeld deplores the fact that Rustad has been invited to take part in debates in mainstream media. Similarly, he complains that Fritt Ord, a free-speech foundation, awarded a stipend to the Islam critic Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, a.k.a. Fjordman, whom Fjeld smears as a “genocide ideologist.” In the same way, recycling a years-old leftist gripe, Fjeld rebukes a certain former Aftenposten editor for having actually had a kind word to say about my 2006 book While Europe Slept.

 

Fjeld would have his readers believe that Rustad, Jensen, and I are all racists. He doesn’t make any effort to prove that we are. In fact we are not. I am not a racist, and I have never read a remotely racist word either at document.no or in Jensen’s voluminous writings. Fjeld, then, is barefaced liar. But this is how all of these people operate. We have the facts on our side. They have no good arguments for their position. So all they can do is hurl slurs. Moreover, even as they avoid representing our opinions fairly and honestly, they pretend that we have nothing reasonable to offer, and that they, in fact, are the reasonable ones. And why should reasonable people have to “debate” unreasonable people? As Fjeld puts it: “When we are tempted to debate rationally against opinions that are not based on reason, we cannot achieve anything other than to legitimize the irrational as something that is worth discussing.”

 

Fjeld pronounces it “unbelievable” that the likes of Rustad, Jensen, and me should be given air time or op-ed space in the mainstream Norwegian media. After all, those same media would never “waste time ‘debating’ people who think that the world is flat.” So why, he asks, should they welcome the voices of people who claim “that ‘Muslims are invading Europe,’ ‘it’s only Muslims who rape,’ or ‘dark-skinned people are on average less intelligent than light-skinned people’”? Frankly, I’ve never seen anybody in Norway make the ridiculous assertion that only Muslims commit rape; nor have I witnessed a Norwegian discussion of race and I.Q. (although I’m not discounting the possibility that this thoroughly legitimate question has come up at some point).

 

As for Muslims “invading Europe” – well, for heaven’s sake, Muslims are pouring into the continent, and the consequences are grim. Deny the obvious reality all you want, but no-go zones, forced marriages, honor killings, female genital mutilation, and “grooming gangs” exist. Muslim gangs commit rapes and burn cars. Muslim women experience the same oppression in Europe that they did in the Old Country. Muslim immigrants are bankrupting welfare states, resulting in severe cuts to education, elder services, and health care. Islamic terrorism is not a fantasy. European presidents and prime ministers may continue to mouth trite nonsense about the joys of diversity, but their intelligence services are busy monitoring countless terrorist cells and working overtime to keep down the number of jihadist atrocities. Try as hard as you want to connect Breivik to Islam critics, but the fact remains that none of those critics have ever endorsed violence, while Islamic terrorists are doing exactly what the Koran tells them to.

 

For the likes of Fjeld, to discuss any of this honestly is to be a racist, and should be against the law. He explicitly rejects the notion of “the liberal marketplace of ideas” – the belief that it’s healthy to allow the expression of all views, because in the end the strongest argument will win. His own position is that exposing people to what he labels “hate” will only make them less resistant to it. Translation: to allow cogent dissent from the dominant red-green orthodoxy is to risk toppling that orthodoxy. It’s Soviet thinking, pure and simple.

 

Oh, about that “Eurabia conspiracy theorist” business. I don’t know how many people have written books criticizing the rise of Islam in the West, but there are quite a few of us from a range of backgrounds. I assume that most, like me, started writing about the topic because they were observing changes that they found unsettling. If so many writers with such diverse histories are disturbed by the same phenomena, surely that must mean that there is, indeed, something going on out there that merits concern? Years ago, Norwegian leftists came up with a handy way to dodge this question, maintaining that we Islam critics, far from being individuals articulating our own ideas, are, instead, lockstep adherents of a conspiracy theory cooked up by Bat Ye’or, author of the 2005 book Eurabia. Never mind that many of us (myself included) started writing about Islam before we’d even heard of Bat Ye’or; if you read about us in the Norwegian papers – and this includes Fjeld’s article – you will see us identified as “Eurabia writers,” lockstep adherents of the “Eurabia conspiracy theory,” the essence of which is that there is, indeed, such a thing as jihad.

 

Fjeld’s article, in short, is a load of bunk – and an unoriginal load of bunk, at that. In The New Quislings I examined a series of articles by different writers all of whom seemed to be working from exactly the same list of talking points. That doesn’t mean that Fjeld has wasted his time. On the contrary, he’s put his name on the map. He’s made it clear to the powers that be that he’s a good soldier. He’s got the party line down cold, and is willing to spit it out, every bit of it, shamelessly dishonest though it is. As long as he keeps this up, Fjeld, with a little bit of luck, will go straight from grad school into a nice, cushy job at NRK (the state-run TV network), or as a columnist for one of the taxpayer-subsidized mainstream newspapers, or as a writer-researcher at some government ministry, or as an administrator at some tony cultural institution. That’s how the careers of his equally cynical predecessors have gone, anyway, once they’ve taken the obligatory high-profile swipe at critics of Islam: they all end up being well-paid apparatchiks. It will be interesting to see exactly which path Fjeld takes.

__________________

Copyright © 2005-2018 PJ Media All Rights Reserved.

 

About PJ Media

 

For media inquiries, please contact communications@pjmedia.com

 

Since its inception in 2005, PJ Media has been focused on the news that matters — from the insightful commentary provided by our all-star lineup of columnists to our writers’ quick takes on breaking news and trending stories. The media company’s founders — Academy Award Nominee Roger L. Simon, Charles Johnson (Little Green Footballs) and Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) — brought together a tightly knit band of bloggers into an integrated website that has evolved into a reliable source for original, unique, and cutting-edge political news and analysis.

 

We’ve been there through primaries and general elections; the U.S. border crisis; doctored climate change data; the gunrunners’ scandal; Department of Justice voter fraud and the Ground Zero mosque — stories that others in the media initially passed by.

 

As a company, we’ve always felt a special connection to the values which make America special, as well as a dedication to keeping America great for our children and our children’s children. That’s why our main focus is on the three main areas that will have the most impact on the future of America: politics, parenting and lifestyle.

 

PJMedia.com, the cornerstone of PJ Media, LLC, provides useful and helpful content for everyday Americans — especially parents who are trying to raise their kids in a very confusing and uncertain world. The website offers READ THE REST

 

Geller: ‘Fake News’? Left-Wing War on Conservative Websites: Facebook, Google, LA Times, Obama Take Aim


daffy-duck-leftist-communication

I posted yesterday about Leftists using the Fake News meme to discredit Conservatives, in that case pertaining primarily to Pizzagate. Pamela Geller writes about the Leftist Conspiracy to shut down any news that disagrees with Leftist ideals or values as Fake News. (As if Leftist values is representative of traditional American values. I call hogwash!)

 

JRH 12/6/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

Geller: ‘Fake News’? Left-Wing War on Conservative Websites: Facebook, Google, LA Times, Obama Take Aim

 

By PAMELA GELLER

6 Dec 2016

Breitbart – Big Government

 

The left-wing elites and their running dogs in the enemedia are in one of their fictional publicity campaigns that they masquerade as urgent news. Their latest terror is “fake news sites.”

 

The New York Times reported shortly after the election that Google and Facebook “have faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome.”

 

That was fake news: “fake news” didn’t influence the presidential election’s outcome, all too real news about the wrong direction in which our nation was headed under Barack Obama did. Nevertheless, the Times said that “those companies responded by making it clear that they would not tolerate such misinformation by taking pointed aim at fake news sites’ revenue sources.”

 

How would they do that? “Google kicked off the action on Monday afternoon when the Silicon Valley search giant said it would ban websites that peddle fake news from using its online advertising service. Hours later, Facebook, the social network, updated the language in its Facebook Audience Network policy, which already says it will not display ads in sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites.”

 

A Facebook spokesman explained: “We have updated the policy to explicitly clarify that this applies to fake news. Our team will continue to closely vet all prospective publishers and monitor existing ones to ensure compliance.”

 

The “fake news” controversy has become a huge international story, with the Los Angeles Times among those leading the charge with headlines such as “Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates list of sites to avoid”; “Fake news writers: ‘Hillary Clinton, here are your deplorables’”; and “Fake news writers abuse the 1st Amendment and endanger democracy for personal profit.

 

There is conspiracy theory and there is conspiracy fact, and what we have on our hands is one mother of a left-wing conspiracy parading as a right wing conspiracy. You can’t make this stuff up. It’s diabolical. In the run-up to the election, I reported on a number of fake conservative new sites created by left-wing operatives in order to discredit the conservatives’ news sites. If you have a bogus conservative site, it makes a conservative site look questionable. “News sites” like the Baltimore Gazette and the National Report were dropping hoaxes for months to discredit conservatives who might pick up the story.

 

I always understood that the objective was to taint the conservative newssphere. Sites were created to spread disinformation and shame the right-wingers who jumped on it. This is classic disinformation. It’s always games, games, games… from the people who brought you Soros’ rent-a-mob — rioting, looting and destruction in cities, etc. even going so far as to risk a few deaths all for the cause. But what I didn’t see coming is their ultimate goal: the shut-down of free speech. The left wants to crush free speech, which has been in their cross-hairs for some time now.

 

The left is always preaching about true democracy, but they seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as they can. And they’re always harping about “controversial” matters that either don’t exist or are fabricated, or are of little import.

 

If a blogger or news writer gets a story wrong, does that designate him or her, or his or her site, as “fake news”? If that’s the case, they’ll have to shut down the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, etc. They get things wrong all the time. Every article written about my colleagues, my work, or myself is fake. Most of what they wrote and didn’t write about the Orlando mass slaughter at the gay nightclub was disinformation and deception.

 

If you issue a correction, does that somehow remove the fake news scarlet letter? This is all a big fat lie — it is an end-run around the First Amendment, and it’s disastrous. It is indeed true that Facebook has too much power, but banning “fake news” sites is hardly the solution. That’s Zuckerberg’s fix-it? It would be funny if it weren’t so Hitlerian. Facebook has too much power. Its news curators, mini-Goebbelians — are more frightening than Kafka’s antagonists. Facebook should be broken up like Ma Bell was. Facebook doesn’t decide what’s good and what’s forbidden. Left-wing fascists do not and must not decide what news people can and cannot see. But that’s exactly what we are seeing on Facebook.

__________________

Copyright © 2016 Breitbart

 

SPLC/Leftist Lies as Truth


splc-true-hate-group

John R. Houk

© December 2, 2016

 

Do you know or realize that the American Left loves to group all Conservatives and Counterjihadists (as in telling the true nature of Islam) as racists, bigots, hate-speech inciters and so on grouping us with the extreme Right such as the KKK, Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, Islamophobes (irrational fear of Muslims) and homophobes (irrational fear of homosexuals)?

 

The reality is these Left Wing race baiting accusations are the actual people using hate-speech to raise the rabble of clueless voters that have been brainwashed that the Dems and other Leftists are looking out for the best interest of the poor, the downtrodden African Americans, Hispanic Americans and other clueless Americans being molded into various other identities that are being convinced a Multicultural America is better than an America First with the many different peoples, religions and races as the many becoming ONE PEOPLE – E PLURIBUS UNUM.

 

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is one of these Leftist transformationist organizations that attack and label Conservatives and Counterjihadists as bigoted racists.

 

True to the SPLC agenda against Conservatives and Counterjihadists, the Left Wing hate group takes a swipe at Brigitte Gabriel and ACT for America. If you do read the SPLC article you will soon realize the true aim is more toward Donald Trump than to Brigitte Gabriel. The SPLC labels the ACT for America glee over Trump’s is because our President-Elect has been adding – according the SPLC – anti-Muslim bigots to his proposed Cabinet. The truth is these Trump appointee-nominees understand the dangers of the militant anti-Western hatred encoded in Islamic revered writings such as the Quran, Hadith, Sira and various later later commentaries attributed to people like Taqi al Din Ibn Taymiyya (or its various spellings) and the handbook on killing non-Muslims “The Reliance of the Traveller” (yup, the two Ls is how it’s spelled) became the framework for modern Salafists and Wahhabis that subscribe to terrorism as a pure Islam. Ibn Taymiyya and The Reliance are both products of the 1300s.

 

Here is the ACT for America email that wears the SPLC lies like a badge of courage:

 

JRH 12/2/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

SPLC Terrified of ACT for America

 

Sent 12/1/16 9:20 AM

Sent by ACT for America

 

Wow! Do we have an article to share with you…

 

Attached you will find the most recent hit piece, written about our organization by the anti-American zealots at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

 

Although ridden with all the predictable and baseless clichés about “Islamophobia,” this article spells out in no uncertain terms, why ACT for America is such a powerful force to be reckoned with.

 

Our direct line to the most powerful offices in our government has those who oppose our vision for a safer America trembling. As it should.

 

So, as you read this piece, remember this, the more powerful our grassroots team becomes, the bigger the target on our back will be.

 

Wear that target as a badge of honor, the way elite NFL quarterbacks like Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, and Drew Brees, take pride in being booed on the road by hometown crowds.

 

Few will jeer the mediocre player on an opposing team, for they do not fear his talent. But all will jeer the best player, because they know what he is capable of.

 

You’re with a winner in ACT for America.

 

We are so glad you are with us, as we continue our influence as America’s indisputable grassroots champion of national security.

Click here to read the SPLC hit piece.

 

For Freedom,

ACT for America

http://www.actforamerica.org/

___________________

SPLC/Leftist Lies as Truth

John R. Houk

© December 2, 2016

_________________

SPLC Terrified of ACT for America

 

ACT for America  

869 Lynnhaven Pkwy, Suite 113, #411

Virginia Beach, VA 23452, United States

 

DONATE ACT for America

 

Trump Speech Shows Real Crooked Hillary


2 Hillary Faces- not lying & lying

John R. Houk

© June 23, 2016

 

I was browsing the Google+ communities that I belong to and came across a 41-minute speech of Donald Trump. The speech was hugely anti-Hillary and smacked around like a crooked ragged doll. For all of Hillary’s half-truth innuendos and outright lies campaigning against Trump, the anti-Hillary speech was a tour de force of triumph. Trump exposed every bit of the hypocrisy that Hillary has been tossing like dried cow-pies at the presumptive GOP nominee for POTUS. Essentially Trump’s speech rebuttals forced Hillary to slip on some wet slimy cow-pies which she also found on her face after ground impact.

 

I had a slight problem with two points of Trumps speech:

 

  • Inviting disgruntled Sanders voters to vote for Trump for real change against establishment politics.

 

  • Highlighting Trump’s stand against the U.S. invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush’s direction.

 

In the case of inviting disgruntled Sanders voters onto the Trump although potentially helpful for election is ideologically dangerous. Bernie Sanders is an avowed Socialist which means a big dose of taking everyone’s and redistributing it to people who are undeserving able bodies workmen who didn’t earn the money. Obama is a discreet Socialist/Marxist and Hillary follows that path of redistribution clandestinely as well. BUT Bernie (actually to his credit for truthfulness) forget the traditional Dem Party fooling American voters, let’s just be honest and tell that the Dems want to transform America into a failed faux-utopia. AND SANDERS VOTERS ABSOLUTELY BUY INTO THE MYTH OF UTOPIAN SOCIALISM! If Trump welcomes Sanders voters he may want to do that with a pro-Capitalist caveat.

 

As to invading Iraq, I then believed and still believe it was important to rid the world of the real Butcher of Baghdad in Saddam Hussein. Saddam was despotic dictator that terrorized his populace with equal opportunity. The Shia Muslims and the Kurdish Sunni Muslims were targets of often bloody oppression. And any Sunni Muslims that were not a part of Saddam’s Arab tribalistic affiliation faced his venom at any hint of backbone against the dictator’s regime. And there was the continuous threat against Israel that included sending scud rockets to Israel in the first Iraq war against American allies and the USA. Also let’s not forget at least two Saddam’s sons who marched around lawlessly even kidnapping women off the street to rape them. I might be wrong, but it seems the least persecuted group under Saddam Hussein were the indigenous Christian population. However, I have no doubts the Iraqi Christians had their share of Saddam persecution just not on the level of the rest of Iraqis and certainly not on the level Christians are currently experiencing under ISIS control.

 

It is my opinion that the big mistake with GW’s invasion of Iraq was the attempt to nation build Iraq as a single nation under the same ethnic-religious divides that existed from British creation right through the horrific regime of Saddam Hussein. The nation building would probably worked if Iraq was divided into at least three independent nations roughly along the lines of Sunnis, Shias and Kurds.

 

I understand the geopolitical reasons as to why GW didn’t divide Iraq up. Those reasons largely were the probability the huge Shia population would have become at least a dominion of Iran. And neither Turkey (our ally at the time) nor Iran (troublesome U.S. enemy) were too fond of an independent Kurdish nation since both those nations had significant Kurdish citizens also persecuted by Turkey and Iran.

 

American Leftists like to use the hindsight that no nuclear material was found in Iraq capable of making nukes. AND YET the Dems read the same Intelligence reports the Bush Administration read and signed-off on invading Iraq’s crazy Saddam. There are some legitimate reports that Russian Spetsnaz forces clandestinely transferred the usable WMD material Assad’s Syria (See Also HERE) and it is absolutely proven that U.S. naval vessels shipped yellowcake (See Also HERE) from uranium to Canada for reasons or purposes I’m currently unaware of. So it is understandable that American Intelligence erred on the side of inflating Saddam’s nuke capabilities. Saddam was so crazy that even a hint of the possibility of a nuke potential should have been good enough to remove the Butcher of Baghdad. ANYWAY, Hillary thought so as well (See Also HERE). She voted for invasion with the same Intelligence reports.

 

So, below is the full anti-Hillary speech from Donald Trump giving us a clue that he won’t lay down for the Left like Mitt Romney did and I’m following that with a FrontPageMag article showing the Trump speech closer to reality than the stench protruding from Hillary’s lips.

 

JRH 6/23/16 (Hat Tip: Josh S 6/22/16 – 4:57 PMUnited We Stand G+ Community)

Please Support NCCR

********************

VIDEO: Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Anti-Hillary Clinton Speech in NYC (6-22-16)

 

 

Posted by Right Side Broadcasting

Published on Jun 22, 2016

 

Wednesday, June 22, 2016: Full replay of Donald Trump’s anti-Hillary Clinton speech at Trump SoHo in New York City.

Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Anti-Hillary Clinton Speech in NYC (6-22-16)

 

+++

LIAR, LIAR PANTSUIT ON FIRE

And with Donald Trump’s renewed focus, is the comeuppance of economically illiterate “Crooked Hillary” at hand?

 

By Matthew Vadum

June 23, 2016

FrontPageMag.com

 

Editor’s note: Credit goes to Dr. Bob Shillman for the title of this article.

 

Hillary Clinton’s bizarre claim that billionaire businessman Donald Trump will cause a recession if elected to the presidency was overshadowed yesterday as Trump took deadly aim at the pathological liar’s horrifying public service track record.

 

For her part, Clinton glibly dismissed Trump.

 

“As I said yesterday in Ohio, Donald Trump offers no real solutions for the economic challenges we face,” Clinton said in a speech to the faithful in Raleigh, N.C. “He just continues to spout reckless ideas that will run up our debt and cause another economic crash.”

 

Around the same time, Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, laid into “Crooked Hillary” with a vigor and focus that Americans haven’t seen for a while. Trump’s speech, in which he accurately described Clinton as a “world-class liar,” was very well received and is making left-wing pundits nervous — for good reason.

 

Unlike Trump’s address, Clinton’s speech was a carefully constructed alternate reality held together by a tissue of leftist lies. Clinton’s oration was an economically illiterate catalog of hoary Marxist clichés, or as Dr. Bob Shillman quipped, “liar, liar, pantsuit on fire.”

 

Clinton offered a vague outline of her disastrous socialistic economic agenda, largely a continuation of President Obama’s anti-growth policies and tainted as it is by a focus on so-called social justice objectives at the expense of economic growth and individual rights.

 

She spoke nonsensically of “growth that’s strong, fair, and lasting … that reduces inequality, increases upward mobility, that reaches into every corner of our country.” To keep her union thugs happy, Clinton vowed to “say no to bad trade deals and unfair trade practices, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership,” and no to the “assault on the right to organize and bargain collectively.”

 

Ignoring the fact that she served front and center in a radically left-wing administration that over the last nearly seven and a half years has presided over the weakest economic recovery since the Great Depression, Clinton promised “to make this economy work for everybody … building it from the ground up, from every home and every community, all the way to Washington.”

 

Leftists like Hillary enjoy anthropomorphizing inanimate objects and abstract concepts because they can’t win policy arguments on the merits. They prefer fabricating monsters they can slay.

 

Guns and gas-guzzling SUVs “kill” people, they routinely claim as if machines were sentient, volitional beings. To them the U.S. Constitution is a “living document” that changes with the times. And like their cousins the Keynesians, they treat the economy like a circus animal that can be manipulated and taught tricks, instead of as the product of billions of individual decisions made every day by producers and consumers.

 

Clinton dredged up one of the Left’s favorite and most insidious talking points, declaring “it is way past time for us to guarantee equal pay for women.”

 

The fanciful claim that women earn less than men will probably never die because it is essential to the Left’s narrative that America is inherently unfair. Of course comparing men’s wages to women’s wages is like comparing apples to oranges. Women pull in less money because they tend to opt for more humanities and fewer science and math majors in college. Owing to family and child-rearing obligations, women as a group also tend not to work the long hours that men work.

 

Critiquing President Obama’s claim that women earn just 77 cents for every dollar men earn, the Manhattan Institute’s Diana Furchtgott-Roth wrote in 2013 that the 77-cent figure “is bogus because it averages all full-time women, no matter what education and profession, with all full-time men.”

 

“Unmarried childless women’s salaries, however, often exceed men’s,” she wrote. “In a comparison of unmarried and childless men and women between the ages of 35 and 43, women earn more: 108 cents on a man’s dollar.”

 

The feminist fabulist continued spinning yarns.

 

“Excessive inequalities such as we have today reduces economic growth,” Clinton said, pretending she likes the market economy. “Markets work best when all the stakeholders share in the benefits,” she said, paying homage to candidate Obama’s mantra that “when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

 

“There are great ideas out there,” Clinton said. “And we are going to be partners in a big, bold effort to increase economic growth and distribute it more fairly, to build that economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top.” The “Wall Street corporations and the super rich,” also known as her most ardent supporters, must be made to “pay their fair share of taxes.”

 

She promised to “make college debt-free for all” and to “rewrite the rules so more companies share profits with their employers and few ship profits and jobs overseas.”

 

Clinton defended the international cash-for-future-presidential-favors trading platform known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. She belittled Trump for highlighting the corruption endemic to the enterprise that is primarily devoted to enriching the Clinton family.

 

Trump is trying “to distract us” by “attacking a philanthropic foundation that saves and improves lives around the world,” she said with a straight face. “It’s no surprise he doesn’t understand these things.”

 

The Heritage Foundation’s Stephen Moore dismantled what he called Clinton’s “Twilight Zone” grab bag of proposals. A related speech Hillary gave the previous day “was vacant of ANY ideas at all about how to help the economy. The left’s idea cupboard is entirely empty. ”

 

Moore mocked her claim that here “in America we pay our bills,” a reference to what he called “Trump’s sensible idea of refinancing out debt to lock in historically low interest rates.” The Obama administration in which Clinton served has generated some $8 trillion of new debt, which is hardly “paying the bills.”

 

“It’s passing them on to the next generation,” Moore wrote.

 

Clinton’s claim that Trump doesn’t understand the new economy and job creation, is “a bold claim since Donald Trump is a highly successful businessman who actually has created thousands of jobs, while Hillary has gotten rich off of… politics.”

 

Moore continued:

 

“The class warfare theme ran throughout the speech, and yet this presents Hillary with another uncomfortable problem. Obama has raised the minimum wage, he already did spend $830 billion on infrastructure stimulus spending, and he has taxed the bejesus out of the rich. And the result wasn’t more equality and a resurgent middle class, but an angry and worried worker class that hasn’t seen a pay raise in 15 years and with household incomes in the last seven years that have fallen behind inflation. Some 95 million Americans aren’t working and the poverty rate is still hellishly high.”

 

 

Clinton “is selling the American voters sand in the desert: four more years of stay the course economic bromides at a time when two out of three voters say that the U.S. is on the wrong, not the right track.”

 

Trump fired back at Hillary yesterday, hitting her hard enough that Clinton worshippers are getting anxious.

 

Slate’s Michelle Goldberg lamented that the tide may be turning against the Benghazi bungler Trump paints as a corrupt, money-grubbing, political hack. Crestfallen, the diehard leftist called Trump’s Wednesday speech on Clinton’s record dishonest and demagogic but “terrifyingly effective” and “probably the most unnervingly effective” speech the man has ever given.

 

“In a momentary display of discipline, he read from a teleprompter with virtually no ad-libbing, avoiding digs at Bill Clinton’s infidelity or conspiracy theories about Vince Foster’s suicide,” speaking “for 40 minutes without saying anything overtly sexist.” Instead, he took aim at “Clinton’s most-serious weaknesses, describing her as a venal tool of the establishment.”

 

“Hillary Clinton gave China millions of our best jobs and effectively let China completely rebuild itself,” Trump said. “In return, Hillary Clinton got rich!” He added, “She gets rich making you poor,” and declared her possibly “the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency.”

 

Goldberg treated Trump’s address as brilliant performance art in which he “interwove truth and falsehood into a plausible-seeming picture meant to reinforce listeners’ underlying beliefs.”

 

Pretending her readers were complete idiots ignorant of Hillary’s history, Goldberg wheeled out Washington establishment yes man David Gergen to denounce what he called Trump’s “slanderous speech.” On CNN an animated Gergen made a fool of himself by castigating Trump for relying on the exhaustively documented allegations of graft and corruption in Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer.

 

Regurgitating the self-serving nonsense peddled by leftist slander shop Media Matters for America, the “conservative misinformation” monitor that Hillary herself takes credit for founding, Gergen said that the “book has been basically discredited.”

 

Not so. In fact, the New York TimesNew YorkerWashington PostWall Street JournalPolitico, Bloomberg, Reuters, ABC News, and CBS News have all confirmed several key details in Clinton Cash, investigative reporter Matthew Boyle points out.

 

Gergen added, “I’m sorry, at this level, you can’t slander somebody.”

 

Why Gergen has attained such prominence at this level in the Washington punditocracy is unclear.

 

What is clear is that he seems to know nothing about the Clinton family and has been asleep throughout Barack Obama’s Saul Alinsky-inspired presidency.

____________________________

Trump Speech Shows Real Crooked Hillary

John R. Houk

© June 23, 2016

___________________________

LIAR, LIAR PANTSUIT ON FIRE

 

ABOUT MATTHEW VADUM

 

Matthew Vadum, senior vice president at the investigative think tank Capital Research Center, is an award-winning investigative reporter and author of the book, “Subversion Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts Are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers.”

 

© COPYRIGHT 2016, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM


About FRONTPAGE MAG 

 

FRONTPAGE MAG IS A PROUD PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER

 

The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

 

DiscoverTheNetworks.com, launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining READ THE REST