Leftist Judges continue to shoot down the vetting of refugees from nations which Islamic terrorism is rampant:
Hours after a federal judge in Hawaii issued a nationwide temporary restraining order against President Trump’s travel ban, U.S. District Court Judge Theodore D. Chuang, in Maryland, issued a nationwide preliminary injunction prohibiting the enforcement of the 90-day ban against travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Chuang’s order denies the plaintiffs’ request to block other parts of Trump’s March 6 executive order, including the temporary ban on refugees. –READ THE REST (Trump Travel Ban Blocked Nationwide By Federal Judges In Hawaii, Maryland; By RICHARD GONZALES; KUT.org; 3/15/17 10:00 p.m. ET, 3/16/17 12:58 pm, Updated 3:30 a.m. ET)
None of these Judges cite the Constitution in their Judicial injunction but do use plenty of President Trump’s pre-election campaigning as if Free Speech is hog-tied in America as in Europe.
With that in mind, the Bill Warner suggestion for vetting Muslim refugees would probably make these activist Leftist Judges apoplectic.
Using Islam to Vet Muslims
By Bill Warner
Mar 15 2017
To vet Muslims, don’t talk about Islam; instead talk about the fruit of the Islam. Here is an example: wife beating. No apologist can support wife beating, but wife beating is found in the Koran and the Hadith:
Koran 4:34 Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and … send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them.
Dawood #2142 Umar reported the prophet as saying: “A man will not be asked as to why he beats his wife”.
I object to any wife beating doctrine. I don’t want immigrants/Muslims who believe in wife beating to be my neighbor.
The Islamic doctrine supports: slavery, torture, Kafirs must submit to Sharia, wife beating, inferiority of women, political assassin. I reject Sharia, wife beating, torture, killing of Kafirs. Notice that I do not say I reject Muslims.
So ask an apologist: Do you support wife beating? Assassination? Killing apostates?
You say you don’t know enough to quote Koran and Hadith. Then go ask Imam Google. The hadith and Koran verse I used came from web searching: “wife beating Koran”. Finding this kind of information used to be hard, now it is simple.
Why do we want to bring in anybody who buys into wife beating, the inferiority of Kafirs, assassinations?
So, deal with the fruit of Islam, not Islam. Ask the apologist to agree with this evil fruit of the doctrine, for instance, wife beating. Notice the method: Talk about the source doctrine and its fruit.
Is it fair to ask if a Muslim follows the doctrine? If not, will they condemn it?
Posted by Political Islam
Published on Mar 15, 2017
© 2007-2017 CSPI, LLC. all rights reserved.
About Political Islam
What is Islam?
Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.
Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.
The Five Principles
Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.
Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.
Islam divides the world into Muslims and unbelievers, kafirs.
Political Islam always has two different ways to treat kafirs—dualistic ethics. Kafirs can be abused in the worst ways or they can be treated like a good neighbor.
Kafirs must submit to Islam in all politics and public life. Every aspect of kafir civilization must submit to political Islam.