No Reward For Illegals


 

Obama Law Enforcement

 

Justin O. Smith shares some wisdom on immigration – legal and illegal.

 

JRH 3/29/13

Please Support NCCR

********************************

No Reward For Illegals

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 3/28/2013 3:24 PM

 

From both sides of the political aisle, Republican and Democrat alike, Americans are being treated like second class citizens with the sole purpose in life to meet the needs of illegal aliens, “undocumented workers”, who have entered these United States illegally. We have already been forced to endure President Obama’s refusal to uphold current immigration law, as he moved forward and circumvented Congress with his “Dream Act”, which is suspect at best due to its reliance on the illegal immigrants’ word to establish when they first arrived in America; and, since January 2013 to the present, Americans are now once again hearing a host of politicians, especially the new breed of Republicans such as Senator Marco Rubio, joining the Washington establishment Old Guard Republicans, such as Speaker John Boehner, in a new move towards nothing less than a poorly disguised amnesty for these illegals!

Too many Americans are too willing to view a plan suggested by both Obama and Rubio as a viable fix for our illegal alien problem. This plan calls for the illegal aliens to come forward and apply for a provisional visa, apply for a green card after eight years, then apply for U.S. citizenship after five more years, they also pay fines and back taxes. And after passing a citizenship test they will become U.S. citizens.

Notice that this process takes 13 years total. These politicians have purposely planned this, because the Congressional Budget Office scores the effect of any bill on its cost over a ten year period, and these Republicans and Democrats do not want the American people to understand the enormous cost to the taxpayer that will be attached to giving citizenship to 30 million people at once, as these illegals will also be bringing along their extended family members.

This plan amounts to amnesty because and although these illegal immigrants will technically go to the back of the line; they will still be remaining here in the U.S., ahead of millions of immigration applicants who applied legally. These illegals will receive all the services and benefits the U.S. offers despite what the administration states to the contrary, including Obamacare, as they remain a drag rather than a boost to the U.S. economy; far too many of this current crop of illegals are poorly educated, unskilled or semi-skilled and on the low end of the earnings scale, and they end up with little choice other than applying for social services and welfare.

A 1930 State Department directive provided that: “If the consular officer believes that the applicant may probably be a public charge at any time, even during a considerable period subsequent to his arrival, he must refuse the visa”. And now, today, we see the Obama administration giving public service announcements inside Mexico that explain how to obtain welfare and food stamps in the U.S.!

Many ultra-liberals/leftists such as Kirsten Powers, Fox News analyst, assert that people used to just show up at Ellis Island and become U.S. citizens within hours, and this was the status quo until 1882; however, by 1917 immigration officials were screening out criminals, persons likely to become a public charge, radicals and illiterates, and this policy intensified during the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in Russia, due to fears of left-wing radicalism. By 1943 FDR was giving special consideration to Chinese immigrants, and by 1952 special provisions were given to refugees due to America’s failure to provide a significant haven for refugees from Hitler’s Nazi Germany. Powers and others fail to note that most of the U.S. immigration policy historically dealt only with legal immigration and all those trying to enter America legally, in conjunction with the American people’s later decisions that immigration did need to be controlled as our nation grew; very little focus was given to illegal immigration until the Eisenhower administration, except when General Black Jack Pershing was sent to control Mexican bandits along the border in the early 1900s.

Since January 2013 the U.S. Senate has been working on an immigration bill with a path to citizenship, which would also allow them to bring their relatives in the same manner of chain immigration provisions already existing in the 1965 Immigration Act. At the same time, Speaker John Boehner called their efforts “a big step in the right direction”, as he offered: “So I would think you’re likely to hear a lot more about immigration reform on the House side soon.”

Now, at a time when millions of Americans are still out of work or under-employed with 50 million on welfare, even Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) disappoints America by pandering to the Hispanic vote. He recently declared at CPAC that if the nation’s 30 million illegal immigrants (official lie states 11 million) want to work in America “then we will find a place for you.”

Although no limits have been placed on H2A farm visas, over half of the one million field workers are comprised of illegal immigrants. Without the visa some illegals are targets of abuse, but many of them prefer the freedom of movement afforded them by remaining illegal and not having to be tied to any one employer; while on the other hand, farmers get to pay lower wages and avoid a lengthy and costly process in order to acquire just one H2A worker. It is no wonder so many corporate dairy farms are springing up just miles from the Mexican border, as many privately owned dairies across the nation are being run out of business!

Confounding the issue, Republicans are now flailing about, as some of their more prominent members are suggesting that the 2012 election was lost largely due to the “unfriendly” immigration position of the Republican Party. If they accept this nonsense, then they may as well disband now and become Democrats. Hispanics believe in big government intruding into the lives of people and “helping”, as it taxes the wealthy heavily. And, although Hispanics are mostly social conservatives, the following illustrates that, by and large, two-thirds of this group will inevitably vote Democrat, regardless of any immigration amnesty granted by a Republican administration: Hispanic Vote- 1980 Jimmy Carter 56%, Ronald Reagan 35%/ 1984 Walter Mondale 61%, Ronald Reagan 37% (amnesty)/ 1988 Michael Dukakis 69%, George H.W. Bush 30%/ 1992 Bill Clinton 61%, George H.W. Bush 25%/ 1996 Bill Clinton 72%, Bob Dole 21%/ 2000 Al Gore 62%, George W. Bush 35% (proposed amnesty in 2004 and introduced a bill for amnesty January 2007 that was defeated)/ 2004 John Kerry 58%, George W. Bush 40%/ 2008 Barack Obama 67%, John McCain 31%/ 2012 Barack Obama 71%, Mitt Romney 27%.

Most Americans are not trying to keep any good, moral, law abiding immigrant out of our nation. By the very definition of “illegal”, these illegal aliens have disqualified themselves, as they protest in our streets demanding U.S. citizenship and constitutional rights that do not apply to them…And what nation except ours would even tolerate such insanity? Since most of the current influx of illegals is from our southern border, our borders must be secured before proceeding with any immigration reform in the House or the Senate.

Nothing good is certain to be found in this new amnesty approved by Obama, Democrats and a troubling number of Republicans. This is a compromise with the Devil and a president who has worked to destroy America’s culture by spending millions of dollars on “bilingual education” programs that discourage immigrants from learning English and American history… a president who has ordered amnesty for illegal aliens which has been rejected by both Congress and the American people more than eight times. Millions of new Democratic voters will be created overnight and foreign workers will cripple American workers’ job prospects and wreck the GOP’s future. To quote Ann Coulter at the recent CPAC: “If amnesty goes through, America becomes California, and no Republican will ever win another national election. The state that gave us Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan will never elect another Republican”. But more important and pertinent to this issue, Senator Jeff Sessions’ (R-AL) words strike to the heart of the matter: “There is no moral or legal responsibility to reward someone who entered the country illegally”…. Secure the borders… Identify the illegal immigrants and deport them!

 

By Justin O. Smith

____________________________

© Justin O. Smith

Edited by John R. Houk

How Far?


Constitution Purpose - Federalist Papers

How far are we going to allow President Barack Hussein Obama and his acolytes to hate our Constitution and Christians? Check out what Justin Smith has to say about it.

 

 

JRH 2/1/13

Please Support NCCR

___________________

How Far?

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 1/31/2013 3:20 PM

 

While America’s political “elite” have squandered most of the opportunities over the past twenty years left for them by President Ronald Reagan and the annihilation of the Evil Empire, Barrack Hussein Obama has managed three times the spending of all the combined presidents, and he has led us to a $16 trillion national debt, annual deficits well over a trillion dollars and no budget during his regime’s rule; Obama states, “that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms requires collective action,” which indicates that Obama will pursue more policies destructive to Our American Heritage. His vision for the next four years will push America farther from common sense Constitutional governance and the basics, family, faith/Judeo-Christian (tolerant of all others) and flag/national sovereignty. His aides have suggested Obama will have to redirect American policy from the Oval Office, which is not shocking given his disdain for the U.S. Constitution, his affinity towards authoritarianism and his propensity for uttering unConstitutional executive orders!

John Jay stated in 1785, “I consider knowledge to be the soul of the republic, and as the weak and wicked are generally in alliance, as much care should be taken to diminish the number of the former as of the latter. Education is the way to do this.”

On January 25, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against another one of Obama’s numerous unConstitutional orders in relation to the Senate confirmation process and recess appointments. Three Obama appointments were nullified by this ruling, and 300 Labor Board decisions are now in question, and yet, in typical illegal, elitist, liberal fashion, Mark Pearce, the NLRB’s chairman, defiantly refused to obey this court’s decision; until Obama, never… NEVER in U.S. history has ANY U.S. President attempted to declare the U.S. Senate in recess, while it was still technically in session, solely on his own presumed authority!

During his 2013 inaugural address, as Obama stated, “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” he had already betrayed America’s children by adopting and implementing a UN Agenda 21 education curriculum called “Common Core/CSCOPE” and forcing all but five states to accept it through Stimulus bribes and threats to withhold federal funds and Title 190 programs for the poor and needy. CSCOPE is basically collectivist/communist indoctrination, which makes drastic cuts to classical literature and higher math programs, as it promotes Islam through teaching conversion methods and presenting verses from the Koran that denigrate other faiths: in Lesson 2, Unit 3, students are told Christianity is a “cult.” Also, CSCOPE has ties to Obama mentor and self-acknowledged terror group member Bill Ayers.

The science on “global warming” has long been dispelled as an outright lie driven by transnationalists’ and communists’ desire to “redistribute the wealth” worldwide to poor Third World nations through legislation such as “Cap and Trade.” This type of legislation has already been rejected by our U.S. Congress, however, Obama ignored Congress in 2009 and enacted nearly all of the UN’s Agenda 21 and “climate change and sustainable development initiatives” through, as of now, an unchallenged and unConstitutional Executive Order 13575, as well as EPA regulations. The changes increase energy costs, kill jobs, leave the U.S. less competitive globally and reduce us all to poverty!

Obama states, “We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else, because she is an American, she is free and she is equal, not just in the eyes of God but also in our own.” As noted by many past and reformed socialists such as David Horowitz, those nations which have put Liberty ahead of Equality have ended up doing better by Equality than those with the reverse priority, and even so, I dare say that the little girl described by Obama has had more than ample chances thanks to President Lyndon Johnson’s Economic Opportunity Act of 1964.

A highly respected economist, Thomas Sowell explains that penury in the U.S. is neither irremediable or hereditary, and only 3% get stuck in the bottom fifth of income distribution for more than eight years. The top or bottom earners are not closed private clubs that contain the same households every year. Many of today’s poor may be tomorrow’s wealthy, and the reverse is also true. But it will not hold true once Obama policies are fully implemented between now and 2017; for now, no such economic mobility can be found anywhere else in the world.

Obama hinted at a Republican agenda which would block important programs that would put millions of jobless Americans back to work as he stated, “we cannot mistake absolutism for principle”… this coming from the most corrupt and unprincipled U.S. President in history, who spent only about 6% of the Stimulus money on actual jobs programs, with the rest acting as a pay-off to his political cronies; it is this administration and Obama’s Leftist-Democrats who are killing jobs creation, because they advocate for immigration and economic policies designed to strengthen their hold on power through the continued destruction of the U.S. economy in order to place more Americans on the dole!

The American free-market and democratic republic is far from perfect, however, our complex of traditions and institutions, built upon principles that animated the American Revolution, have made it possible for more Freedom and Prosperity to be enjoyed by more citizens than in any other society in human history. The relatively little that was wrong with our system, before circa Obama, needed only to be reformed. A fundamental transformation was not called for by the people and neither has there been a large hue and cry from the people demanding communism, fascism and authoritarianism. But Obama is driven by ideology and ideology alone… by contempt and contempt alone for Our American Heritage!

I believe in the rule of law, but how far are we as a nation… those of us who still believe in the U.S. Constitution… supposed to go with an intransigent and divisive U.S. President who is not only attempting to transform our way of life but is destroying over 300 years of cultural and historical American Heritage? At what point will each of us be willing to put our lives at risk, say “ENOUGH” and pick up our rifles to march against an out of control government in order to preserve real Liberty, Freedom and Equality for future generations, just as the Founders did?

America will soon be embroiled in a massive political battle, fraught with ensuing upheaval and societal unrest, if this authoritarian Statist trend is not abated. Obama and the Leftist-Democrats have chosen to destroy the system as it now exists, and, as they seek to give amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, abrogate our right to make end-of-life decisions, and spend away our children’s and several generations’ future, they command us as subjects of the State rather than govern us as citizens of a democratic Free Republic; and in the process, they are paving the way for those like them, each new successive Democratic president, to rule by decree and according to their own personal whims, rather than have to adhere to the principles and guidelines contained within the U.S. Constitution. They are paving the way for tyranny, because they want to, and they believe in doing so… we must drag America away from the abyss before Obama drags Her over the edge!

We are a nation that has a government… not the other way around. And this makes us special among nations of the earth. Our government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government, which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.” -President Ronald Reagan from the 1980 Inaugural Address.

 

 

By Justin O Smith

_____________________

Edited by John R. Houk

© Justin O. Smith

 

Valued By Free Men


Bear Arms - Founding Fathers vs Dictator Socialists

Justin O. Smith provides an excellent essay on upholding the Original Intent of the Second Amendment in the face of Leftists making the attempt to circumvent the Second Amendment.

 

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. (Legal Information Institute; Cornell University of Law)

 

JRH 1/15/13

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Valued By Free Men

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 1/14/2013 12:22 PM

 

As cold as it may seem to some in light of the aftermath of the murders of twenty beautiful little children at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut… and I was shaken and my heart was torn along with all America… the facts still show that Our Second Amendment right is sacrosanct, it protects all of our other rights and responsible, sane gun owners have prevented many more crimes and deaths than the number of robberies and murders committed by armed uncaring, sometimes unhinged and mentally impaired, criminal and insane thugs. Unfortunately, Obama and the Democratic Party do not feel the same and never miss taking advantage of a crisis, and these political opportunists did not wait even 24 hours before deciding to once again attempt to infringe upon the right of each and every American to “keep and bear arms.”

Our Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

How different things might have ended in Newtown if only an armed citizen, an armed teacher or teachers and an armed Student Resource Officer had been nearby on that terrible day. People still may have died, but at least the chances would have been better that the assailant would be the only one dying, rather than twenty innocent and precious children.

Banning semiautomatic rifles just because they look like military weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines will not prevent every future horrific act of violence or eliminate evil from our society. In 1927 an insane former school superintendent killed children in North Carolina by detonating an ammonium-nitrate bomb inside their school. Criminals will always find ways to acquire weapons and use them to commit acts of violence.

Vice-President Joe Biden’s gun control commission is on track to offer proposals to the White House and Congress for new gun control laws and regulations shortly before this piece makes print. With his usual gall, temerity and arrogance, Obama stated that if Congress does not act in a timely fashion on this issue, he will enact gun controls by fiat and executive order. Nowhere is there any authority given to the U.S. President to countermand or modify any amendment to Our U.S. Constitution. Some on the Left, such as NY Mayor Bloomberg, are even counseling Obama to regulate guns through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, which once again, not only bypasses Congress as the Legislative Branch of government but also violates the U.S. Constitution.

No clause in the U.S. Constitution can be interpreted to give Congress, the President, any of the States’ legislatures or the District of Columbia a power to disarm the people or to control guns to the point that many now aspire. This flagitious attempt to abrogate Our Second Amendment Right… God given… is occurring in plain sight through incremental actions and under a general pretense in blind pursuit of inordinate power. This is what men such as Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and John Locke had in mind when they gave the American people the Second Amendment in order to prevent such abuse of power, preserve the rest of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, restrain the federal government and keep America and Americans Free… And in his ‘Commentaries on the Constitution’, Joseph Story, the first U.S. Chief Justice, considered the right to keep and bear arms as “the palladium of liberties of the republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers…”, which deters tyranny and enables the people to  overthrow their government should it prove necessary!

In the ‘Federal Gazette’ June 18, 1789, Tench Coxe wrote: “As civil rulers…may attempt to tyrannize…and…might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article (2nd Amend) in their right to keep and bear arms.” No writer of that era disputed or contradicted Coxe’s analysis that the Second Amendment protected the people’s right to keep and bear their private arms.

“Swords and every other terrible implement of the soldier are the birth-right of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people,” wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper #29. Hamilton, like many Americans today, did not view the right to keep and bear arms as limited to only active militia members or the National Guard.

Former Tennessee National Guard commander Richard A. Hamblen was closer to the Founding Fathers’ intent than the Supreme Court ruling in the United States v Miller-1939, which provided most of the rationale for all gun control laws since then. As Hamblen answered charges of possessing nine unregistered machine guns in 2009 (6th Circuit Court of Appeals), he stated, “There are no qualifiers on the Second Amendment. There are qualifiers on the Fourth (also the Fifth), so if the Founders had intended to restrict the right to keep and bear arms, they knew how to do it.” Under the Second Amendment each and every single one of us are well within our rights if we wish to carry Mr. Ronnie Barrett’s world renown .50 caliber automatic rifle down Broad St in Murfreesboro, TN.

Debra Maggart failed to retain her seat in the Tennessee House of Representatives after blocking a bill allowing people to keep guns locked in their cars in parking lots; and, while fairly recent Supreme Court rulings, District of Columbia v Heller-2008 and McDonald v Chicago-2010, upheld the Second Amendment as an individual right rather than only a collective militia right, they have failed to address the Framers’ Original Intent to allow all Americans to carry their arms in an unrestricted environment. Regardless of this truth, most states require a “fee” (registration or background) in order to obtain a “license” (concealed carry license) before keeping and bearing a firearm; a federal and/or state “tax” (firearms/ammunition sales “tax”) is always levied at the time of a firearm transaction: A state cannot impose a license, tax or fee on a Constitutionally protected right, Murdock v Pennsylvania-1942, and requiring licensing or registration of any Constitutional right is itself unConstitutional, Follett v Town of McCormick SC-1944. Any citizen’s license to openly carry any handgun or rifle in public is the U.S. Constitution!

As the debate on gun control continues, it will be interesting to hear the Left-Progressive Democrats’ response, as they attempt to reconcile their desire to take our guns with the Darling of the Left and Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s 2010 statement that the individual’s right to bear arms has “binding precedent” in the Supreme Court and “is settled law”. And, as late as December 22, 1012 even Obama mouthed the words of political expediency, “Look, like the majority of Americans, I believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms,” but that is not what his record shows, nor is it how the Left has misinterpreted this amendment for a long time.

As an American citizen, I repudiate the Progressive Democrats’ view on the Second Amendment and any attempt to ban semiautomatic weapons that have perfectly legitimate uses, under the guise of conducing (sic) our safety. One does not become something other than American in order to solve American problems, especially once one understands the uniqueness of our free institutions and the freedoms found in America… unknown in any other land. And this is all the more reason to resist any erosion of our individual rights. When our Founding Fathers forged a land “conceived in Liberty”, they did so by “watering the Tree of Liberty with the blood of Tyrants” with musket and rifle. They reacted to attempts to dissolve their free institutions and to keep them from establishing a free nation as a nation of armed men. And… when they sought to record forever a guarantee of their rights, they devoted one full amendment out of ten to nothing but the protection of their right to keep and bear arms against government interference. All Americans should give proper recognition and respect for this right most valued by Free Men!

“Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves?” -Tench Coxe (Pennsylvania Gazette Feb 20 1788)

 

By Justin O Smith

_____________________

© Justin O. Smith

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Let Everyone Prosper


Justin O. Smith

Here is an economy message from Justin O. Smith.

 

JRH 12/1/12

Please Support NCCR

**********************************

Let Everyone Prosper

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 11/27/2012 4:27 PM

 

It is obvious to a vast number of Americans that the divergent gap between the amount paid hourly workers for their labor is far disproportionate to that paid in profit margins and salaries and bonuses to CEOs, however, the answer is not found in higher tax rates, because no matter how high a tax is placed on companies it is always offset by higher consumer prices. If America is to remain a free-market capitalist system, at some point in the near future companies will necessarily have to create a better business model that partners labor in their efforts and presents a more balanced and equitable distribution of the net profits gained across each quarter; and, while I tend to view unions as organizations that price themselves out of competition in free markets, initially this was their mission as they attempted to close that gap.

 

Government can never force the closer of such a gap without completely destroying private businesses, because most businesses will simply shut down if they are not allowed to distribute their profits as they see fit, because it is their capital that started the business…their capital at risk…and since it is their private property, they do have the right to do with it exactly as they see fit; the worker actually risked nothing to start that business.

 

Obama would like to control all private business, and we have seen him too readily attempt to control certain aspects of our business world by picking winners and losers in the energy field as he subsidizes “green energy” technology through already failed companies, such as Solyndra, and works to utterly destroy the coal and oil industries. The only way that government could ever close the gap is by reducing America to a command economy, which sometimes seems to be Obama’s intent, and should this ever occur no one would have any real wealth, as we would all be reduced to the lowest common denominator in poverty, with only the elite ruling class garnering the bulk of the nation’s wealth.

 

Yes, I believe in a compassionate society that helps those who truly cannot do better, but we do not owe lazy people or people of low ambition a better living simply because they do not wish to expend the necessary energy to study harder in school, or try harder once they enter the work force, or because they simply have adopted an entitlement attitude and expect a great paying job to fall out of the sky and into their lap. Far too many in today’s America are now expecting something for nothing!

 

While the gap is vast, the beauty of a truly free market and capitalist society is that each and everyone of us can attain great wealth if we keep pushing through each failure until we achieve that success; usually the people who try, try again have become wealthy, but one also needs a modicum of intelligence and an idea for a business of one’s own combined with a decent level of ambition and the social grace and acumen to make the necessary business contacts. No one has ever said it was easy, but interjecting government to “level the playing field”…to make it easy for everyone…in the end only damages everyone in innumerable ways. Redistribution of the wealth is not a function of government no matter in what manner it is accomplished, and it should never be a final destination for any government that wishes to see a vibrant expanding economy, because history has shown time and time again that it has always failed wherever it was attempted with devastating effects on the society.

 

Hopefully, all America will get their heads together and start utilizing more pragmatic methods towards our nation’s real economic woes, but when Obama effortlessly spends nearly $9 trillion in four years with few results and a failed Stimulus that only distributed 6% back into the economy and Ben Bernanke is printing money at the Fed like there is no tomorrow, we have far more difficulties in this nation than the salary gap, especially when one considers the $100 trillion unfunded debt that has accrued throughout our history.

 

A larger centralized government, which is where Obama and the Progressives are taking us, will only serve to take more of the poor and middle class and even the wealthy’s earned income…their private property…and serve only to eventually further limit individual Freedom through over-regulation, just as we are witnessing through Obamacare; just look at the roaring 20s, when the government was small and regulations had been curbed back to only the barest of necessity and EVERYONE PROSPERED!

 

Even Pravda recently quoted Putin as saying that Obama was going down the path towards socialism.

 

By Justin O. Smith

 

Appeasement’s Deadly Consequences /or/ Obama’s Bloody Hands


BHO Foreign Policy Failure

Justin O. Smith appropriately castigates President Barack Hussein Obama for his appeasement style Foreign Policy.

 

JRH 9/17/12

Please Support NCCR

****************************

Appeasement’s Deadly Consequences /or/ Obama’s Bloody Hands

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 9/15/2012 1:28 PM

 

Our U.S. Embassies are attacked by islamofascists in a planned coordinated assault and our State Department issues an apology for the “hurt feelings” that a movie depicting Islam unfavorably has caused Muslims. From President Obama’s anti-Israel/ pro-Muslim stance and his Qaddafi misadventure to enabling “democratic” frameworks during the Arab Winter and his reluctance to help the rebellion in Iran or now in Syria, Obama is sending  clear signals that the U.S is weak and no longer a force to be considered and respected. Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma attributes the attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt and the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya on 9-11-2012 to “President Obama’s failure to lead and his failed foreign policy of appeasement and apology.”

The portents for trouble in these two hot-spots were readily apparent to anyone paying attention, and if State Dept spokeswoman Victoria Nuland really believes that “the security at Benghazi was appropriate for what we knew” then she did not know much and needs to be removed. Fathi Baja, a Libyan politician, described Ambassador Stevens’ four man security team as “sorely inadequate” in a country “still in transition” with extremists everywhere. And common sense alone suggested that islamofascists might see the 9/11 Anniversary as a prime opportunity for more terrorist acts.

While administration officials deny any forewarning had occurred, “The Independent” reported (9-13) that senior diplomatic sources stated that the U.S. State Dept had warnings 48 hours prior to these attacks that American missions would come under attack, but no further plans for increased security developed. Some forewarning evidently reached our Cairo U.S. Embassy, since the staff had long been evacuated prior to the “protester’s” attack and Egyptian security forces were conspicuously absent (the same security forces that swarmed protesters during the Tahrir Square uprising), as these anti-American islamofascists scaled the Embassy walls and replaced the U.S. Flag with the Al Qaeda flag… and then they tore and burned Our American Flag! One must wonder if a similar warning compelled Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens to speed to the Consulate in Benghazi that day, in an effort to save his staff.

How hard it must have been for our Marines to suffer the insult against America and not be able to repel these despicable and contemptible Sons of Allah, because one: they were restrained by bollixed rules of engagement, and two: they had no live ammunition.

With full understanding that chaos and upheaval in these two countries was far from over, why wasn’t better security and more Marines provided for the Cairo U.S. Embassy and why didn’t Ambassador Stevens have any Marines for his protection detail? Why weren’t multiple intelligence briefings, analysis and assessments undertaken by the Joint Chief of Staff and the NSA concerning the risk factors to these facilities in conjunction with the approaching 9/11 Anniversary?

These actions were not taken because America has a feckless President, Barry Soetoro…Barack Hussein Obama, at the helm of leadership in the White House these days; Obama attended only 43% of his intelligence briefings over the past 1200 days of his term, and, on the day before these attacks, Obama was absent from that briefing too. But he can damn sure get in his rounds of golf and scurry off to Las Vegas and Aurora for campaign appearances, before Ambassador Stevens’ body is even cold and in the ground!

Ambassador Chris Stevens was a highly praised career diplomat, who spoke fluent French and Arabic, and he started out with the Peace Corp as a young man; during his Libya posting, he worked with Qaddafi, but he became the main interlocutor to the rebels in Benghazi for the Obama administration.

The fact that some 200-300 armed “militants”/islamofascists with AK-47s and RPG grenade launchers surrounded the Libyan U.S. Consulate, that they were there ready for action, suggests more than a “spontaneous protest.” The “insulting movie” was nothing more than a ploy, and if it hadn’t been this, they would have fabricated another excuse for mobilization. All the evidence now points to a planned assault on the U.S. Consulate and murder of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens by Al Qaeda/ Islamic Maghreb!

Ambassador Stevens had just returned to Libya from Europe and his location was confidential, which now illuminates a security breach between Libya’s National Transition Council and the U.S. State Dept; sensitive documents are now known to be missing too. as the battle was met at the Consulate, some Libyans died fighting the murderous Sons of Allah, while other Libyan “security forces” removed Ambassador Stevens, Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, Terrence Woods (ex-Navy SEAL) and Glenn Doherty  (ex-Navy SEAL) to a safe house. Shortly upon arriving, this so-called “safe house” came under mortar fire, and then came the final betrayal, as the Libyan “security” handed them over to their murderers. They died horribly but bravely!

“How could this sort of attack occur in a country we helped liberate… in a city (Benghazi) we helped save?” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked this after the reported deaths of these American patriots. It happened because Obama is out of his depth and has thrown in his lot with enemies of the United States. Does anyone really believe that Libya’s National Transition Council isn’t full of Al Qaeda, Islamic Maghreb and Muslim Brothers? It happened because they hate us and the brainwashing and indoctrination through Islam makes many Muslims view killing infidels no more serious than slaughtering a cow, thus the term “kafir”. As a whole the Islamic ummah has a pathological psychology and loves death…especially that of non-believers and Americans!

President Obama’s and Secretary of State Clinton’s Neville Chamberlain brand of diplomacy through appeasement and apologies set the stage for the Cairo and Benghazi attacks and this new rash of Embassy attacks in Yemen, Tunisia, Morocco and Sudan… no matter that a later sterner condemnation of the attacks was released. Nation after nation is falling to this grotesque, debasing ideology of Islam… Our sovereign territory was attacked! Our American Flag was burned! American lives were taken… destroyed! I don’t give a good tinker’s damn if Muslims have hurt feelings when they regularly murder with impunity in the name of their bastard god Allah! Plans at the highest levels must be made for swift, fierce retaliation and retribution in the harshest of terms… with overwhelming and extreme prejudice! Where is Obama’s outrage over these heinous murders? And now, Obama pontificates on cooperating with the islamofascist Libyan government in order to “bring the terrorists to justice”, as he assuages his conscience… But the blood of these four Americans is on his hands…Hillary’s hands! May God Rest Their Souls.

 

By Justin O Smith

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

More Justin O. Smith on Radical Islam in Tennessee


Justin O. Smith posted four more comments at my NCCR blog which cross posted this SlantRight.com article: “Justin O. Smith on Radical Islam Supporters in Tennessee”. The four comments are dated January 10, 2012. Yeah I know, sometimes it takes awhile to get to the comments at all my blogs. Essentially this is some follow-up information on The Rutherford Reader free speech issues over exposing a Murfreesboro Mosque as disseminating radical Islamic ideology. Part of the issue of the radical Mosque’s support is from a prominent Tennessee newspaper like the Tennessean. The Tennessean and some of their newspaper friends and some radical Muslim friends like CAIR and foreign radical Muslin friends such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi-Wahhabi ideology.

 

JRH 1/16/12

*****************************

Comment 1 – Justin O. Smith

January 10, 2012 3:44 PM

 

Dear Mr. John Houk,

 

Just as a follow up, here is Diane Macedon’s article from FoxNews; that is me in the blue shirt standing in front of the camera.

 

Justin O. Smith 6-26-10 pro-Reader Protest

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/30/tennessee-businesses-face-backlash-banning-conservative-paper-hate-rhetoric/

 

It was primarily the last two paragraphs that a few within our community took exception to, but the majority within Murfreesboro seem to be in agreement with the assessment I and others have made in this matter; however, our elected officials are either oblivious to the threat Islam and Sharia Law represent to America or they are ignorant of the facts of the matter or they simply just do not care.

 

The battle is uphill when your elected officials refuse to properly acknowledge the concerns of its people. A similar battle was fought and won just prior to the beginning of the Murfreesboro controversy in Franklin, TN, and Thank God for Mrs. Laurie Cardoza-Moore, a member of the Jewish faith, who led the way; Franklin won because their elected officials heard and listened and acted in accordance with the wishes of their constituency…’We the People’!

 

Here are those controversial paragraphs…

 

The Koran and Islam promote an ideology that is incompatible with ideas based on freedom and our U.S. Constitution. Wherever a seedling of Islam takes root, it soon actively works to subvert and bend its host nation’s government towards Sharia Law. We must be careful when considering electing Muslims to positions in the U.S. government. The effects of allowing Muslims to enter any democratic government can readily be seen in France, the U.K., Belgium, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the former Yugoslavia, and Lebanon; most Muslims believe that the will of Allah supplants all, thus many of these nations now feel compelled to enact legislation to curtail Sharia Law encroachments. The U.K., however, is currently appeasing its radical Muslim population and accepting Sharia Law in its lower courts; their nation will not last long on this course.

 

Muslim immigrants may not enter the U.S. intent on acts of terrorism, but they all enter as good Muslims supporting the submission of the world to Allah. Also, it is good for one to remember that one of the Koran’s most famous verses states, in essence, “War is deceit”. While I respect the works of moderate Muslims such as Irshad Manji (‘Faith Without Fear’) and Tarek Fatah (‘Chasing A Mirage’), I whole-heartedly, unfortunately, must assert that the U.S. must halt all future Muslim immigration, until Muslims acquiesce to living within the legal structures of their host nations rather than striving to restructure nations under an evil, de-humanizing, backward and defiling 12th century ideology, even should this take the next 50 years. In past years, we would not have opened our borders to Maoists, Stalinists or Nazis, therefore, why is the Obama Administration not closing our borders to these Islamic fascists?

 

by Justin O. Smith

___________________________

Comment 2 – Justin O. Smith

January 10, 2012 3:56 PM

 

For Your discerning eye and the scrutiny of your readers, Mr. Houk…

 

http://www.facebook.com/MessianicKitty?sk=photos#!/note.php?note_id=194100087289236

 

Printed in ‘The Daily News Journal’

Mar 11, 2011

 

There exists no reason to introduce Sharia into the U.S. other than the Islamists and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) demand(s) it as a method to undermine the American culture and hurry the demise of our nation.

 

Muslim radicals can advocate Sharia all day long under the First Amendment, but Sharia can never be implemented within the U.S.; Sharia law represents a parallel, subversive ideology that demands the destruction of our own ideology. I have regularly seen Muslim clerics hold up a Qur’an and say, “This is our Constitution.”

 

Islam and Sharia law simply enforce religious edicts and fatwas from imams, while U.S. laws were set forth in advance to serve or punish through only legal enactments conforming to our U.S. Constitution. We all live by rules rather than by either arbitrary edicts or anarchy. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states in part: “… this Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof … under the authority of the United States shall be the Supreme Law of the Land.” The advocates for the Islamization of America cannot seem to grasp these facts.

 

Many Americans and proponents of mosque expansions and Sharia law do not recognize the underlying reality of terrorist sympathy within Muslim communities. They believe the U.S. can moderate radical Muslims by talking to them and convincing the Islamists to live in harmony with the Western cultures. This will never happen, until a worldwide Muslim majority reforms Islam itself, and Muslims reject the Sura and Hadith and the historically incorporated and embedded radical and politicized doctrines within Islam — much the same has already been suggested by Raheel Raza from the Islamic Canadian Congress and other noted Islamic scholars.

 

These same Sharia proponents are also aligned with ACLU groups that seek the destruction of the Judeo-Christian principles that created this nation. They would have us passively accept the Islamization of America, Islamic front groups that finance terror and the infiltration of Islamic terrorists; they would have us suffer the terrible consequences that accompany these preventable conditions. The anti-American, pro-Sharia element in America prostitute the law in the service of their ideology (CAIR vs State of Oklahoma/threatening Tennessee lawsuit), as they cripple the U.S. in the name of rights for terrorists and all who would destroy the U.S. if they could!

 

Anyone currently aligned against Murfreesboro state Sen. Bill Ketron’s Anti-Sharia legislation is standing on the wrong side of history regarding the Islamization of America and Shariah law. In the world of the critics of Ketron’s legislation, every deviation of the real world from the tidiness of their anti-American sentiments is considered to be someone else’s fault; if a terrorist did not have a happy childhood, then that becomes a reason to release him back in the Middle East, so he can return immediately to killing U.S. soldiers. If ever we needed guardians of liberty … if ever there was a time to stand upright and firm for American values and the Founding Father’s principles, the time is now. God Bless America and God Bless Our Republic!

 

by Justin O. Smith

__________________________

Comment 3 – Justin O. Smith

January 10, 2012 4:06 PM

 

http://www.newenglishreview.com/blog_display.cfm/blog_id/28486

 

The Iconoclast
Sunday, 11 July 2010
Muslims’ First Amendment Rights Are Protected

Justin O. Smith, regular columnist for the Rutherford Reader and resident of Murfreesboro, TN., writes in response to an interview with Saleh Sbenaty, an MTSU engineering professor in the DNJ (the sister paper to the Tennessean). Mr. Sbenaty complains that his first amendment rights are being violated because people are misinformed about Islam. Mr. Smith doesn’t seem misinformed to me.

 

The Qur’an states that a Muslim’s first loyalty is to the “umma” (worldwide Islamic community) and overrides any civic obligations to the “infidels”, non-Muslims. This explains why few Muslims speak up against the extremists among them; for every Zak Mohyuddin, an engineer, who calls America home and lives here honorably, there is a Nidal Hassan willing to kill in the name of Allah. Let us not forget, also, that one of al Qaeda’s top leaders, Ayman Zawahiri is a doctor.

 

No one is infringing on the Murfreesboro Muslims’ First Amendment rights. There is no question of their right to worship Allah through Islam; but do they have the right to expand if that expansion falls under auspices advocating Sharia Law or Wahhabi ideology, as it stands in direct contravention of our U.S. Constitution?

 

Too many Muslim immigrants are arriving here from nations sponsoring terrorism, such as Somalia, Pakistan and Yemen. Their views on the principles of freedom are vastly different from your average American’s view or even third generation American Muslims’ views, and many try to advance and propagate Sharia Law upon their arrival. Rather than assimilate and teach their children about America, its principles of freedom and the rich history surrounding its inception, they steep them in Sharia and Wahhabi propaganda; the proof is readily apparent in literature at the Dar el-Hijrah Mosque (which housed three 9/11 terrorists) in Falls Church, VA and numerous others; the Farouq Mosque was used to plot and stage the World Trade Center bombing; and the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have been working against U.S. interests from within the U.S. since 1962.

 

For too long I have watched as Sharia Law was implemented across Europe in France, Great Britain, the Netherlands and numerous other nations. The destabilizing results of radical fascist Islamic machinations can readily be viewed through the historical context of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Lebanon which are simply a few among many nations very nearly destroyed, due to these radical jihadists returning from battle with the Soviets in Afghanistan. Wherever the Muslim population approaches 30% of the population in any region, local or national, an advocacy for Islamic separatist movements and Sharia Law soon follows. After France withdrew from Lebanon in 1942, a concerted effort to destabilize Lebanon and inundate it with Muslim immigrants was enjoined by Iran and Syria; Lebanon has seen the years 1958 to the present through a veil of blood due to Islamic machinations.

 

Sharia financing is currently being introduced into our economy through special banks and mortgage loans that utilize these Sharia financing principles, and even our U.S. Treasury is researching the possibility of allowing Sharia financing within its domain. Now the U.S. is witnessing the encroachment of Sharia-like policies across the nation in cities like Chicago, ILL, New York, NY and Dearborn, MI. Just two weeks ago, Police Chief Ron Haddad, from Dearborn and a Muslim, arrested four men for promoting Christianity near a Muslim festival; a court ruled this unconstitutional, but it should never have occurred in America in the first place!

 

As a young boy, I stood beside my father nearly every Saturday night, with my hand over my heart, as the television signed-off with a waving American flag and the Star Spangled Banner. Most Muslims cannot relate to this, and while I have heard Muslims state that this is their home, I have yet to see them show a love of America; I have, however, seen them burn American flags in NYC and protest in support of the terrorist group Hamas right in the center of Murfreesboro, TN.

 

Everyone’s First Amendment rights must be protected, which means Muslims too. I do not wish their rights to be infringed upon, however, it is not an infringement of anyone’s rights to call for a temporary halt to all future Muslim immigration, as I did in April. I simply wish to see America’s Muslims grow to love this nation every bit as much as I do and develop a protective instinct towards the U.S. Constitution, that is as strong as the protective feelings I hold for this magnificent document. This conclusion was not lightly reached, and it was not based in hate of Muslims or Islam, but rather from love for America. We simply must give current Islamic immigrants more time to assimilate and be drawn away from the radical sects of Islam. It does not state anywhere in the U.S. Constitution that we must allow unfettered and unrestrained immigration for anyone seeking our shores, especially our enemies. Only by repudiating political correctness does America stand a chance; we must realistically view the world’s sociopolitical reality and withdraw from supposedly more sophisticated ideas that have little or no connection to observable reality.

 

Liberty is not unbridled will or the freedom to do as one likes; a society which recognizes no checks upon its freedoms soon becomes a society where freedom is in the possession of only a savage few. The Murfreesboro Muslim community does, in fact, have their First Amendment rights, but they do not have the right to expand if that expansion enables any furtherance of Sharia or Wahhabi ideology in the U.S. Their constitutional rights end where mine begin!

Tags: Murfreesboro mosque, Saleh Sbenaty, Justin O. Smith

_________________________________________

Comment 4 – Justin O. Smith

January 10, 2012 4:46 PM

 

Printed in ‘The Rutherford Reader’ May 28, 2010

Freedom of the Press in Danger

 

As much as I dislike the ACLU, due to its beginnings as a front organization for the American Communist Party, I do agree with it on some matters pertaining to freedom of speech and the press. In 1921 the ACLU Position Statement stated that there should never be any censorship by any agency at anytime or in any way, printed materials should never be subject to a political censorship and no system of license for distribution should be tolerated.

 

On May 14, Murfreesboro, TN witnessed the will of corporate tyrants infringe upon the First Amendment rights of Pete and Kaye Doughtie, owners and editors of ‘The Rutherford Reader’. An allegation was made that ‘The Reader’ prints “hate speech” against Islam and Muslims, and the local Krogers, KFC and Distributech acted in concert to bar further distribution of ‘The Reader’ from those locations. Rodney Barton, Distributech Rep., in an obvious rush towards the type of political correctness that will eventually destroy the U.S., is either following someone’s far left agenda or he did not understand what he read.

 

Pete Doughtie’s numerous warnings, regarding the Islamization of America, Sharia Law encroachments (the harshest form of law currently in existence throughout the world) within the U.S. and the fact that a core of numerous fanatical terrorist groups exists within the politicized Islamic religion (who just happen to want to kill or conquer us all), do not constitute “hate speech”; any Muslims offended by the truth exposed in ‘The Reader’ would be better served by eradicating fascism from the ranks of Islam as they guide it towards real and lasting peace.

 

Pete’s articles and editorials were hard-hitting and factual, however, they were far removed from the “hate speech’ alleged by Barton and his anonymous complainant; his articles have always been supported by good sources, references and thorough investigations. ‘The Reader’ generally relies on ‘Family Security Matters’, ‘The Wall Street Journal’ and a host of think-tanks such as the Cato Institute, the Hoover Institute, the Hudson Institute, and the Heritage Foundation. While some of Pete’s articles may be deemed offensive by some groups, they were not ever hateful in content nor intent; they were simply warnings from a man deeply concerned for the safety and security of his family and all Americans. Muslims could only been offended by ‘The Reader’s’ articles, if they were secretly cheering for the Islamic fascists and against America or if they were bearing the shame and guilt of their own silence in the face of Islamic fascism’s onslaught on America. Pete and Kaye Doughtie are good God-fearing American patriots, who have never slandered, libeled or defamed anyone. Rodney Barton, Kroger and KFC are complicit with the anonymous complainant in defaming Kaye and Pete in a most ignoble fashion, as this individual or group hides in the shadows.

 

Why would anyone block distribution of ‘The Rutherford Reader’ and not do the same with ‘The Tennessee Tribune’? If you are going to pull one newspaper, you should pull them all, because they all carry articles of varying political and religious persuasions, and someone will always be offended.

 

Kroger stocks ‘The Tennessee Tribune’ through Distributech. ‘The Tennessee Tribune’ regularly prints racist anti-white rhetoric and real “hate speech” written by current and former militant Black Panther Party members. For the record, this paper also contains some well written and commendable articles by numerous Tennessee leaders, including Gov. Phil Bredesen. Even though the anti-American racist articles by the Black Panthers grate on every decent bone in my body, they still have the right to be heard in America, as does Pete Doughtie; although Pete definitely does not engage in “hate speech”, even so-called “hate speech” is protected under the First Amend, as long as it does not advocate or call for violence against anyone or the government.

 

Gannett Press, ‘The Tennessean’ and ‘The Daily News Journal’ should be highly concerned over this developing story. While they are extremely influential throughout the region and wield immense political and economic power, there is always someone more powerful with an agenda of their own to attend. As political winds and the country’s mood changes, perhaps ‘The Daily News Journal’ could one day find itself under a similar assault as ‘The Rutherford Reader’.

 

There is a great tension in the world, a breaking point is near and monstrous changes are taking place that are shaping a troubling future. Many of these changes are the embodiment of evil, because they seek to eliminate America’s highest principles. Pete and Kaye Doughtie are on the front lines of this battle, as they fight to preserve the freedoms you and I hold so dear. The freedom of speech and the press are the most valuable things in the world, and the truth does not have to be careful or precise, because it can stand alone on its own merits recognizable like a new shiny silver dollar in the sunlight. ‘The Rutherford Reader’ and the Doughtie Family only print the truth, and I must always fight against any corporation, idea, religion or government which seeks to limit or destroy anyone’s freedom of speech!

 

by Justin O. Smith

Justin O. Smith on Radical Islam Supporters in Tennessee


Intolerant Islam - Tolerant USA

John R. Houk

© January 8, 2012

 

In July 2011 I posted this title: “Tennessean supports Radical Islam – Condemns Anti-Jihad Organization”. In July both Houses of the Tennessee General Assembly passed the law aimed at keeping terrorism out of Tennessee and enforceable by State law enforcement. The law became the Material Support to Designated Entities Act.

 

The Newspaper The Tennessean worked hard to condemn the anti-terrorist law. The Tennessean’s partial success was probably the influence to remove references to Sharia and Jihad. That was unfortunate.

 

My post was inspired by an ACT for America email I received condemning The Tennessean for a load of … hmm … misrepresentation, fact manipulation and outright lies. The newspaper’s pro-Islamic terrorist support led them to attack the voices that supported the anti-terrorist law. One of those hit pieces by The Tennessean was exposing ACT for America’s founder Brigitte Gabriel utilizes a pseudonym. Now why do you think a person that is behind one of the largest efforts in America to educate people on the dark side of Islam uses a pseudonym?

 

It is because these guys easily slip into hate mode and when Islam has the light of truth shining on the theopolitical religion’s darkness, they go psycho and act on that hatred. When Muslims act out hate it leads to violence up to the point of assassination.

 

Anyway a person that identifies himself as Justin O. Smith sent four comments to one of cross posting blogs the NCCR. Smith attributes each comment to articles he posted else.

 

Remember I wrote about the egregiousness of The Tennessean tactics against the Material Support to Designated Entities Act and the smearing of the Act’s supporters especially Brigitte Gabriel. Smith’s four articles are education moments of Islam, a defense The Rutherford Reader and a defense of The Rutherford Reader’s editor/owners Pete and Kaye Doughtie. The third article is heavy on criticism of The Tennessean. I am going to cross post the four comments/articles.

 

JRH 1/8/12

**********************************

Four Comments by Justin O. Smith

December 28, 2011

 

Published in ‘The Rutherford Reader’

 

July 7, 2011

NO SHARIA……. NO MINARETS

 

Our nation is forced to watch in stunned disbelief as the Obama Administration attempts to superimpose their donkey, the hammer and sickle and the star and crescent symbols across the face of America. These traitors to the United States of America love the Koran and ‘Das Kapital’ more than the Bible and Adam Smith’s admonishment that “mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent”. These parasites pray to Marx and Political Correctness. They speak of pacifism at any cost as they feed the Islamic alligator of appeasement, and in the process, they dishonor our Veterans by repudiating the wars that the U.S. fought against Nazi fascism and Stalin/Mao communism. Obama and his cronies weep for Hamas and the Taliban and curse our own patriots, such as our CIA interrogators. They forgive the Palestinians and the Muslim Brotherhood for every wrong, as Obama turns his back on Israel!

 

As of June 30, 2011, the U.S. has given the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and the Islamofascists legitimacy, as the U.S. recognized the MB and prepares to meet with them in Egypt. Much of this policy failure was a direct result of actions initiated through Obama’s Office for Outreach to the Ummah, created in 2009, with the “Ummah” being the world-wide Muslim community. Under Farah Parandith, an Indian Muslim, this office facilitated the efforts of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, as they taught the “students” in Egypt how to “organize”/revolt; further facilitation and funding was channeled through George Soros, Zbigniew Brezinski and the International Crisis Group. Nothing is much more disgusting and reprehensible than watching the travesty of negotiations with irrefutably “guilty” murderers and terrorists, unless it is seeing Obama snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in Afghanistan.

 

Outreach to the Ummah has steadily advocated for Islam, and it has released an entire array of publications and videos promoting Islam in America; they link the Muslim-American experience to those of other racial, religious and immigrant groups, as they supposedly assimilate. Parandith has inundated our Embassies with everything Islamic, from the star and crescent to imams having prayer meetings with all the officers of each U.S. Embassy and consulate. Our “president” attends Ramadan celebrations at the White House. Why aren’t priests and pastors invited during Christmas to give blessings or speak about Christianity in the United States?

 

The left has traditionally always screamed “separation of church and state”, and now their Big Lie and hypocrisy is easily seen. Where is their laicism, their secularism, their heralded liberalism? Did it ever exist? Basically, the Progressive Leftists and Islam have emerged as natural allies because both love authoritarian/totalitarian government, and the hate Christianity and the U.S. Constitution!

 

Further Islamization of America is moving at break-kneck speed. Umah Abedin is a U.S. citizen, but she was raised in Saudi Arabia from age two until after her university years. Abedin is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s primary aide, and she has access to some of the most highly classified U.S. materials; Umah Abedin’s mother is a well known Islamic scholar and a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an affiliate of the MB. While Ms. Abedin seems to be a loyal citizen, would it not be prudent to limit her access to our most sensitive classified information? Anything she tells her mother will make it straight to enemies of the U.S.

 

Ms. Abedin was born in the U.S., but many more Muslims are entering the U.S. and illegally overstaying their visas. Many of these “immigrants” are intent on bringing great harm to America. Imad Hamad, currently living in Michigan, came here in 1982 and committed immigration fraud and then marriage fraud in an attempt to avoid deportation; Hamad is a Palestinian and a “former” PFLP Islamic terrorist, who fathered six “anchor babies” in the U.S.

 

In 2009, Obama also appointed Arif Alikhan as assistant secretary for policy development at the Dept. of Homeland Security. Alikhan has, in past remarks, called the Hezbollah terrorist group a “liberation movement”; Alikhan also attended a fundraiser for the Muslim Public Affairs Council, a MB affiliate, two weeks before his appointment. Also, the Muslim Brotherhood is a pro-Sharia group, and Obama’s chief advisor on Islamic affairs, Dalia Mogahed, is a pro-Sharia Muslim, who once even defended Sharia on British television!

 

Elena Kagan as a Supreme Court Justice signifies more evil descending upon America. In Dec. 2005, she accepted $20 million from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal for her pet project at Harvard, the Islamic Legal Studies Program. Kagan has a deep appreciation of Islamic law, and in May of 2007 she presided over a lecture series dealing with constitutions in Arab nations in conjunction with creating an Arab civil code based primarily on the Islamic Sharia. Kagan’s benefactor, Prince Talal, advocates for Wahhabism and he has funded the building of more mosques in the U.S.; just this year, Talal began influencing FoxNews reports, as one of their largest new share-holders.

 

There exists an entire group of people in all echelons of our government, from the local and state to the federal, some citizens and some not, who have been educated and lived much of their lives abroad. From the “president” on down, many of these people have little connection and even less love for the traditional American culture and principles upon which the U.S. was founded. These collaborators and traitors continue to tolerate the abuses and acts of terrorism those sons of Mohammed commit. While they do not hesitate to command a 95 year old invalid to remove her diaper, a “possible security risk”, due to their own cowardice or complicity, they cannot name the enemy. The enemy is Islam and the Sharia doctrine that accompanies it!

 

Behind our culture is Homer, Socrates, Plato, Archimedes and Aristotle. There is Jesus who died on the cross so that we would learn love and justice. What has Islam given the world besides murder, conquest and the destruction of knowledge and any movement towards renaissance? Islam is the enemy of critical thinking and reason!

 

If America collapses so too does Europe and Israel. The whole of the Western world collapses. And not only financially, which seems to be the only concern of too many in America. The Muslim population has increased by 235% during the past 50 years, and their growth continues world-wide at 33 million a year. Within the U.S., our current Muslim immigration and birth rate will create numerous cities with Muslim majorities advocating for Sharia law. In 1970, there were 100,000 Muslims in the U.S., and today there are approximately 4-6 million (stats vary); by 2035 their numbers will be 50 million. The grandest schemes and most fantastic desires of Prince Talal and other Islamofascists will become our reality, as minarets replace bell towers and burqas replace mini-skirts. The Trojan Horse of Muslim immigration is changing Europe into Eurabia, and thus, we must not give it entrance here!

 

America cannot bear a migratory wave of people who have nothing to do with us and very little in common. Islam is here to absorb us and change our principles, values, identity and our way of life. In our culture, there is no room for muezzins, the minarets, the humiliating chador or the abasing burqa. And, even should that room exist, I would not relinquish it to them; it would be like erasing our identity and abrogating our accomplishments…like spitting on the freedom we have earned and the civilization we have established. It would be like surrendering and giving America away. This I will not do!

 

Justin O. Smith

__________________________________

Printed in ‘The Rutherford Reader’ and ‘The New English Review’

June 23, 2011

The True Nature of Islam/ or My Legitimate, Dutiful and Right War

 

Islam is not a meek, loving, beautiful and merciful ideology nor religion as the many collaborationists and traitors to America depict it. Islam is more dangerous and repressive than Stalin’s Communism or Hitler’s National Socialism and the Koran is the ‘Mein Kampf’ of a “religion” that seeks to destroy all others, as so ably noted by the late Oriana Fallaci (2006- may God rest her beautiful soul).

 

Islam hears the word “democracy” and does not readily see a constitutional representative democracy as displayed in the U.S. Islam views democratic governance in the context of majority/”mob rule”, because this works to its benefit in order to establish the theocracy it demands on a world-wide scale. Islam represents an evil, incarnate, totalitarian ideology that excludes free thought and choice for individuals.

 

Just look at the recent “Arab Spring” touted as a “student led movement for democracy” by idiots such as Anderson Cooper of CNN. Five short weeks after Egyptian Pres. Hosni Mubarak was forced from power, the Egyptian military aligned itself with the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Salafists (jihadists) and other fundamental Muslims were killing the Coptic Christians of Qena Province. Qena Province has a Coptic Christian majority, and a Coptic Christian was appointed by the military in April to govern Qena; however, the Salafists/Islamists are demanding the appointment of a Muslim governor.

 

A sufficiently large enough Muslim population within the U.S. would act in the exact same manner as the Muslim majority in Cairo, Egypt, because the Koran dictates the conversion or death of all non-believers, Christians and Jews. Think of how often the world has witnessed violence and rioting from the large Muslim populations in nations such as France, the UK and the Netherlands over imagined insults to Islam, in order to solicit for Muslim demands through violence as political blackmail. In today’s politically correct atmosphere, we are already seeing our own leader’s propensity to appease Muslims in conjunction with the current advocacy for Sharia Law by CAIR and other Muslim groups.

 

Quite often Americans hear that the U.S. has a “melting-pot” environment that encourages the assimilation of Muslims. However, more often the facts show an entirely different situation. New immigrants and second generation Muslims are becoming more isolated, largely due to the same sort of multiculturalism policies and agendas recently rejected by Germany but still embraced by the political left and the Obama Administration. An increasing number of young Muslims are attending Islamic schools and lectures sponsored by mosques with a “radical” fundamental Islamic agenda.

 

In 2004 at the Dix Mosque in Dearborn, I, a group of university educated Muslim women voiced their opinions on assimilation. One woman, a computer scientist, stated, “At work, I get up from my desk and go pray. I thought I would face opposition from my boss. Even before I realized he didn’t mind, I thought, ‘I have a right to be Muslim, and I don’t have to assimilate.’ ” This seems to be a common sentiment among Muslims, however, the only reason any self-respecting woman would want to be a part of this system relies on the fact that most of them are indoctrinated from birth and the converts don’t know any better; Islam does not allow women to go to school or even a doctor, and Islam as written by “the Prophet” actually forbids women to laugh or sing.

 

In 1883 when Emma Lazarus, a Jewish scholar, wrote, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore”, she probably expected, as do many of us, that they would all truly desire to live free in America and keep these liberties we cherish safe for future generations and all eternity. Instead, once again the U.S. was subjected to betrayal; on June 1, 2011, two Iraqi men from Bowling Green, KY were charged with conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals abroad (U.S. soldiers in Iraq), attempting to provide material support for Al Qaeda in Iraq, as well as to transfer, possess and export Stinger missiles!

 

Then on June 8th, Ayman al Zawahiri, Al Qaeda’s new leader as of June 16th, released a videotape calling on all Muslims in the U.S. to rise up and “destroy New York” and “bury Washington (DC)”. Zawahiri continued with, “Today, praise God, America is not facing an individual, a group or a faction. It is facing a nation that is in revolt, having risen from its lethargy to a renaissance of jihad.”

 

On June 16th, 2011 the authorities also arrested an Ethiopian Muslim who is also a U.S. Marine and a naturalized U.S. citizen, while he was attempting to make an ammonium-nitrate bomb and plant it near the Pentagon. It is now more than obvious that Muslim militants are infiltrating our Armed Forces, and they are lying in order to do so when they take the oath to protect and defend the U.S. and our U.S. Constitution.

 

America is in the fight of Her life, because Islam has declared war on Her. Not only does Islam seek our deaths, it wants to strike our souls. Its leaders want to destroy our way of life, our philosophy of life and our entire culture. They demand the death of our freedom and our Western civilization’s concepts of democracy.

 

In 1972, a rival of Yasser Arafat, George Habash, the man responsible for the bloodiest terror attacks in Europe, stated, “…the entire Arab Nation must go to war against Europe and America.” Habash concluded with, “To advance step by step, millimeter by millimeter, year after year, decade after decade…determined, stubborn, patient. This is our strategy. A strategy that we shall expand throughout the whole planet.” Habash was speaking of more than terrorism and massacres; he also meant the cultural war, the demographic war, and a religious war waged by stealing a nation from its citizens.

 

Look north to Bowling Gerenuk and we find Islamic terrorism in our own backyard; look south to Shelbyville, TN and one sees Somali Muslims, immigrants from a terror sponsoring nation with deep connections to Al Qaeda, who have little respect for our laws or culture. Since 2000 the Muslim population in the U.S. has increased by 156%. The current Islamic invasion of America is nothing more than the revival of Islam’s centuries old expansionism, imperialism and colonialism.

 

Our own memories, once searched, reveal the true nature of Islam. I close my eyes and I see mosques from Cologne and Turin to Miami and Falls Church overflowing with terrorists. I see those sons of Mohammed destroying the Catholic Churches, burning Crucifixes and urinating on Madonnas in Beirut in 1982; I see the Bamiyan Valley Buddhas from the Third Century dynamited as the Talban rejected anything artistic, historic or not of Islam’s making. Finally, I recall the Twin Towers collapsing and the chill that crept down my spine as tears streamed down my cheeks.

 

I suspect that Muslim appeasers, the collaborationists and the traitors to America would somehow find a way to blame the victims of the slaughter in Constantinople in 1453. The Ottoman troops beheade everyone in the cathedral, even babies; the massacre continued from dawn until afternoon, and four thousand nuns were raped and butchered in just a few hours. The murder abated only when the Grand Vizier spoke these words to the butchers from the pulpit of St. Sophia: “Rest. Now this temple belongs to Allah.” Not much has changed over the last six hundred years, has it?

 

I will not tolerate the intolerant. I will not tolerate the abuse and terrorism these Islamofascists are committing in my beloved America; I will not respect nor defend the Islamic culture that shows such a contempt for ours; I will not be intimidated or shut up by the politically correct or any son of Mohammed, because I am going to always defend my culture and America first! My war is right…legitimate, dutiful and right!

 

by Justin O. Smith

_______________________________

The Guardians of Liberty

 

http://newenglishreview.org/blog_email.cfm/blog_id/32968…Justin O. Smith writes from Murfreesboro, TN:

 

A free press stands as a guardian of liberty across the United States, and The Rutherford Reader stands very nearly alone as the only conservative bastion against the continuous asinine, liberal dribble that flows from news stories and editorials created by The Daily News Journal and The Tennessean. Gannett Press articles support Obama Administration socialist policies, and they have regularly taken a pro-Islam, pro-Sharia Law and pro-Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas stance during the past two years; it would be an egregious inaccuracy for anyone to suggest that The Reader slants its news in a similar fashion, since they confine any bias to their editorials and columns such as this (I confess. I am a conservative).

 

Pete and Kaye Doughtie, editors/owners of The Rutherford Reader, have never misrepresented a news story’s facts in pursuance of an agenda or misled the good people of Rutherford County. Unfortunately I cannot endorse Jimmy Hart or Sam Stockard, editors at the DNJ, or Tennessean writers Bob Smietana and Jennifer Brooks in the same way: Sam Stockard tried to equate Sharia Law to nothing more than simply “halal”/dietary rules. He either barely researched his topic and is utterly ignorant concerning Sharia, or he was purposely misleading the readers in a Nov. 2010 editorial; Ms. Brooks’ 2-27-11 Tennessean “news” story played semantics games as she stated that Khalid Aldawsari, a terror suspect, was “rounded up” by the FBI. This was a veiled attempt to make the FBI’s actions appear as harassment against a Muslim man, rather than the arrest of a terror suspect based on a plethora of probable cause.

 

Last summer The Reader was hit with allegations of “hate-speech” by Eric Bell and his MTRF socialist cronies. They never could define “hate-speech,” and their “evidence” amounted to a series of factual news stories and opinion pieces from Family Security Matters that they called “anti-Muslim.” They also focused on one of my past columns due to my description of some of Islam’s integral core doctrines as “evil, de-humanizing, backward and defiling.” I still defy any of them to explain to me where my error exists when Muslims are still killing Coptic Christians in Egypt and Iraq, apostates of Islam are burned to death, hundreds of woman are still stoned to death annually, and even here in the U.S. we witnessed several “honor killings” (murders) of young, innocent Muslim girls this year by their fathers.

 

The irony and incongruity should not be lost to anyone that Bell and MTRF support the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro expansion and Sharia Law under the religion clause of the First Amendment, while, at the same time, they are attempting to hamper the Reader’s free enterprise and squash free speech by going across Rutherford County and through the internet and telling people to boycott The Reader. These allegations of “hate-speech” by the far left and pro-islamists cannot exist in a conceptual or objective reality, especially when one is reporting readily discernable facts. However, a dangerous social vision is being propagated in the U.S. that attempts to prevent any feedback from reality. This is a similar movement to the one that set the stage for the arrest and trial of Geert Wilders, Member of Parliament in the Netherlands, due to “hate-speech” allegations made by Muslims.

 

Recently in an eight to one decision, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Westboro Baptist Church. They stated that their right to protest outside the funerals of our fallen soldiers and shout vile, horrid and atrocious curses was protected under the 1st Amend. Too many times the DNJ allowed mosque expansion supporters to depict their opposition as “bigoted,” “racist” or “right-wing extremists,” while they protected these same supporters from similar close scrutiny or harsh criticisms. Nothing printed by Pete and Kaye Doughtie has come even remotely close to either of these examples as they have upheld a certain high sense of journalistic integrity. The Supreme Court’s decision shows all Americans that “hate-speech” is a manufactured nonentity of the far left that applies only to conservative speech. Only free speech exists in America today!

 

There exists no reason to introduce Sharia into the U.S. other than the Islamofascists and CAIR demand it as a method to undermine American culture and hurry the demise of our nation. Muslim radicals can advocate Sharia all day long under the 1st Amend, but Sharia can never be implemented within the U.S.; Sharia Law represents a parallel, subversive ideology that demands the destruction of our own ideology. I have regularly seen Muslim clerics hold up a Qur’an and say, “This is our Constitution.”

 

Islam and Sharia Law simply enforce religious edicts and fatwas from imams, while U.S. laws were set forth in advance to serve or punish through only legal enactments conforming to our U.S. Constitution. We all live by rules rather than by either arbitrary edicts or anarchy. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states in part: “…this Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof…under the authority of the United States shall be the Supreme Law of the Land.” The DNJ, The Tennessean and advocates for the Islamization of America cannot seem to grasp these facts.

 

Many Murfreesboro mosque and Sharia Law proponents are also aligned with ACLU groups that seek the destruction of the Judeo-Christian principles that created this nation. They would have us passively accept the Islamization of America, Islamic front groups that finance terror and the infiltration of Islamic terrorists; they would have us suffer the terrible consequences that accompany these preventable conditions. The anti-American pro-Sharia element in America prostitute the law in the service of their ideology (CAIR vs State of Oklahoma/ threatening Tenn lawsuit), as they cripple the U.S. in the name of rights for terrorists and all who would destroy the U.S. if they could!

 

Anyone currently aligned against The Rutherford Reader or Sen. Ketron’s Anti-Sharia Legislation is standing on the wrong side of history. The numerous glaring inaccuracies of The Tennessean, the DNJ, Bell and the MTRF have left them with zero credibility, while The Reader has consistently delivered excellent and accurate information regarding the Islamization of America, Sharia Law and Islam with a sense of honor, moral certainty, community and traditional American family values. In the world of Gannett Press and critics of The Reader, every deviation of the real world from the tidiness of their anti-American sentiments is considered to be someone else’s fault; if a terrorist did not have a happy childhood, then that becomes a reason to release him back in the Middle East, so he can return immediately to killing U.S. soldiers. If ever we needed guardians of liberty…if ever there was a time to stand upright and firm for American values and the Founding Father’s principles, the time is now! God Bless America and God Bless Our Republic!

______________________________

http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_display.cfm/blog_id/36027…My Legitimate, Dutiful and Right War


Justin O. Smith writes from Murfreesboro, Tennessee:

 

Islam is not a meek, loving, beautiful and merciful ideology nor religion as the many collaborationists and traitors to America depict it. Islam is more dangerous and repressive than Stalin’s Communism or Hitler’s National Socialism and the Koran is the ‘Mein Kampf’ of a “religion” that seeks to destroy all others, as so ably noted by the late Oriana Fallaci (2006- may God rest her beautiful soul).

 

Islam hears the word “democracy” and does not readily see a constitutional representative democracy as displayed in the U.S. Islam views democratic governance in the context of majority/”mob rule”, because this works to its benefit in order to establish the theocracy it demands on a world-wide scale. Islam represents an evil, incarnate, totalitarian ideology that excludes free thought and choice for individuals.

 

Just look at the recent “Arab Spring” touted as a “student led movement for democracy” by commentators such as Anderson Cooper of CNN. Five short weeks after Egyptian Pres. Hosni Mubarak was forced from power, the Egyptian military aligned itself with the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Salafists (jihadists) and other fundamental Muslims were killing the Coptic Christians of Qena Province. Qena Province has a Coptic Christian majority, and a Coptic Christian was appointed by the military in April to govern Qena; however, the Salafists/Islamists are demanding the appointment of a Muslim governor.

 

A sufficiently large enough Muslim population within the U.S. would act in the exact same manner as the Muslim majority in Cairo, Egypt, because the Koran dictates the conversion or death of all non-believers, Christians and Jews. Think of how often the world has witnessed violence and rioting from the large Muslim populations in nations such as France, the UK and the Netherlands over imagined insults to Islam, in order to solicit for Muslim demands through violence as political blackmail. In today’s politically correct atmosphere, we are already seeing our own leader’s propensity to appease Muslims in conjunction with the current advocacy for Sharia Law by CAIR and other Muslim groups.

 

Quite often Americans hear that the U.S. has a “melting-pot” environment that encourages the assimilation of Muslims. However, more often the facts show an entirely different situation. New immigrants and second generation Muslims are becoming more isolated, largely due to the same sort of multiculturalism policies and agendas recently rejected by Germany but still embraced by the political left and the Obama Administration. An increasing number of young Muslims are attending Islamic schools and lectures sponsored by mosques with a “radical” fundamental Islamic agenda.

 

In 2004 at the Dix Mosque in Dearborn, MI, a group of university educated Muslim women voiced their opinions on assimilation. One woman, a computer scientist, stated, “At work, I get up from my desk and go pray. I thought I would face opposition from my boss. Even before I realized he didn’t mind, I thought, ‘I have a right to be Muslim, and I don’t have to assimilate.’ ” This seems to be a common sentiment among Muslims, however, the only reason any self-respecting woman would want to be a part of this system relies on the fact that most of them are indoctrinated from birth and the converts don’t know any better; Islam does not allow women to go to school or even a doctor, and Islam as written by “the Prophet” actually forbids women to laugh or sing.

 

In 1883 when Emma Lazarus, a Jewish scholar, wrote, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore”, she probably expected, as do many of us, that they would all truly desire to live free in America and keep these liberties we cherish safe for future generations and all eternity. Instead, once again the U.S. was subjected to betrayal; on June 1, 2011, two Iraqi men from Bowling Green, KY were charged with conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals abroad (U.S. soldiers in Iraq), attempting to provide material support for Al Qaeda in Iraq, as well as to transfer, possess and export Stinger missiles!

 

Then on June 8th, Ayman al Zawahiri, Al Qaeda’s new leader as of June 16th, released a videotape calling on all Muslims in the U.S. to rise up and “destroy New York” and “bury Washington (DC)”. Zawahiri continued with, “Today, praise God, America is not facing an individual, a group or a faction. It is facing a nation that is in revolt, having risen from its lethargy to a renaissance of jihad.”

 

On June 16th, 2011 the authorities also arrested an Ethiopian Muslim who is also a U.S. Marine and a naturalized U.S. citizen, while he was attempting to make an ammonium-nitrate bomb and plant it near the Pentagon. It is now more than obvious that Muslim militants are infiltrating our Armed Forces, and they are lying in order to do so when they take the oath to protect and defend the U.S. and our U.S. Constitution.

 

America is in the fight of Her life, because Islam has declared war on Her. Not only does Islam seek our deaths, it wants to strike our souls. Its leaders want to destroy our way of life, our philosophy of life and our entire culture. They demand the death of our freedom and our Western civilization’s concepts of democracy.

 

In 1972, a rival of Yasser Arafat, George Habash, the man responsible for the bloodiest terror attacks in Europe, stated, “…the entire Arab Nation must go to war against Europe and America.” Habash concluded with, “To advance step by step, millimeter by millimeter, year after year, decade after decade…determined, stubborn, patient. This is our strategy. A strategy that we shall expand throughout the whole planet.” Habash was speaking of more than terrorism and massacres; he also meant the cultural war, the demographic war, and a religious war waged by stealing a nation from its citizens.

 

Look north to Bowling Green, KY and we find Islamic terrorism in our own backyard; look south to Shelbyville, TN and one sees Somali Muslims, immigrants from a terror sponsoring nation with deep connections to Al Qaeda, who have little respect for our laws or culture. Since 2000 the Muslim population in the U.S. has increased by 156%. The current Islamic invasion of America is nothing more than the revival of Islam’s centuries old expansionism, imperialism and colonialism.

 

I close my eyes and I see mosques from Cologne and Turin to Miami and Falls Church overflowing with terrorists. I see those sons of Mohammed destroying the Catholic Churches, burning Crucifixes and urinating on Madonnas in Beirut in 1982; I see the Bamiyan Valley Buddhas from the Third Century dynamited as the Talban rejected anything artistic, historic or not of Islam’s making. Finally, I recall the Twin Towers collapsing and the chill that crept down my spine as tears streamed down my cheeks.

 

I suspect that Muslim appeasers, the collaborationists and the traitors to America would somehow find a way to blame the victims of the slaughter in Constantinople in 1453. The Ottoman troops beheaded everyone in the cathedral, even babies; the massacre continued from dawn until afternoon, and four thousand nuns were raped and butchered in just a few hours. The murder abated only when the Grand Vizier spoke these words to the butchers from the pulpit of St. Sophia: “Rest. Now this temple belongs to Allah.” Not much has changed over the last six hundred years, has it?

 

I will not tolerate the intolerant. I will not tolerate the abuse and terrorism these Islamofascists are committing in my beloved America; I will not respect nor defend the Islamic culture that shows such a contempt for ours; I will not be intimidated or shut up by the politically correct or any son of Mohammed, because I am going to always defend my culture and America first! My war is right…legitimate, dutiful and right!