No, White-Supremacist Violence Is Not a Major Problem


If you solely listen to the Left Stream Media would sense that White Supremacist violence (in other words violent acts of racism perpetrated by White People) is a problem on the rise globally.

If you surf Social Media it is my sense a fine line is arising between Caucasians weary of White People being blamed for all the ills of non-White People and actual White Supremacists such as Neo-Nazis, Skinheads (UK & USA), KKK, White Nationalists warping the Christian faith and other racists escaping the top of my thought process. The Left too often racks White People weary of being blamed for racist woes with the racist variations inherent in White Supremacism. That is an error that could very well push the weary-of-blame crowd to be supportive with actual White racists.

 

The Patriot Post article below evokes the weary-of-blame crowd pointing out the obvious statistically; viz., Islamic terrorism far outnumbers violence associated with White Extremism.

 

JRH 4/11/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

********************

No, White-Supremacist Violence Is Not a Major Problem

The New York Times peddles a false narrative that violent white extremism is on the rise.

 

By Political Editors

Apr. 10, 2019

The Patriot Post

On Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing that Democrats billed as an examination of “hate crimes, the impact white nationalist groups have on American communities, and the spread of white identity ideology.” It quickly became quite evident that the Democrats’ true intention for the hearing was to promote the mendacious narrative that “white extremism” is a major and growing problem — and President Donald Trump is supposedly the driving force behind it.

 

In a seemingly coordinated effort to advance this narrative, The New York Times last week ran an article claiming that “Attacks by White Extremists Are Growing.” The story highlighted the attack in Christchurch, New Zealand, where a self-proclaimed white supremacist murdered 50 people in an act of terror aimed at Muslims. The article then claimed that the Christchurch murderer “drew inspiration” from “an informal global network of white extremists whose violent attacks are occurring with greater frequency in the West.”

 

Once again we have a case of the narrative leading the story. It’s clear that the narrative the Times is pushing is that violence perpetrated by white supremacists is a serious and growing threat that is worse than people may believe. But do the facts support such a conclusion? Well, as is often the case with Leftmedia outlets like the Times, not so much.

 

The Times excluded several important contextualizing details, which immediately calls into question the reliability of the entire narrative. For example, no numbers were provided so as to establish the total number of extremist-related violent incidents globally. In 2017 alone, nearly 20,000 people were murdered by groups associated with radical Islamic extremists — a number not provided by the Times.

 

Meanwhile, the Times offers a nine-year timeline that notes 15 incidents of “white extremist” violence resulting in 194 people killed that were purportedly committed by individuals motivated by white racism. However, after a closer look into these attacks, one quickly finds that the motive of “white extremism” is not entirely clear … or even there at all.

 

As Seth Barron, writing for City Journal, observes, “Some of the most prominent killings … resist categorization as acts of white racial terror. Ali Sonboly, the son of Iranian Shi’ite Muslim immigrants and visibly a racial minority, carried out the 2016 Munich mall shooting. The 2016 Umpqua Community College shooting was carried out by a self-identified ‘mixed-race’ man, as was the 2014 Isla Vista massacre, whose perpetrator believed that being half-Chinese made him unattractive to women. The 2018 Toronto van massacre was perpetrated by a white man who declared that he was part of an ‘Incel Rebellion’ against the ‘Chads and Stacys’ of the world — in other words, he was angry that he could not get a girlfriend and was committed to overthrowing the ‘beautiful people.’ The killer mowed down pedestrians in Toronto’s business district at random. The Times’ inclusion of these four incidents calls into question the value of its diagnosis of ‘white extremist killers.’”

 

Finally, as The Wall Street Journal reports, “Since 1990, far-right extremists have killed 477 people in 214 attacks in the U.S., according to the crime data. A majority of the assaults targeted minorities, with 241 people dying in 170 attacks. (In the same period, the Global Terrorism Database records 31 far-right attacks with one or more deaths.)” In other words, violent attacks committed by “white extremists” are not on the rise — rather, the frequency of these violent hate crimes has remained relatively steady for the past 50 years. In any case, the crimes are dwarfed by attacks perpetrated by Islamofascists.

_____________________

Like what you just read? To protect our independence, we have never accepted advertising. Nor have we ever charged a subscription fee in order to reach the largest audience possible. Our operations budget depends solely on the generosity of readers like you. Please help us keep the timeless message of Liberty in front of grassroots Americans around the nation and make a donation today.

 

The Patriot Post Mission

 

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. We are not sustained by any political, special interest or parent organization, and we do not accept advertising to ensure our advocacy is not restrained by commercial influence. Our mission and operation budgets are funded entirely by the contributions from Patriots like you. Please support The Patriot Fund today! [MORE ON ABOUT PAGE]

 

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

 

Copyright © 2019 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

 

Holy Wars and Muslim Immigration


Islamic Political Correctness

Justin Smith is astounded that the American government allows Muslims who in their devotion to the Quran hate America, American Liberty and the U.S. Constitution yet allow them to immigrate to the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. Many Americans wonder the same as Justin and I am included.

 

JRH 3/19/16

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Holy Wars and Muslim Immigration

Consider Islam’s Violent Nature

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 3/17/2016 12:22 PM

 

Consider the violent nature at the heart of Islam. Consider that Islam is beyond reformation during this century. Consider that moderate Muslims are simply terrorists in a queue waiting for their imams’ call (fatwa) to “holy war” and martyrdom; that many mosques, such as the Islamic Center of Boston and Nashville and Orange County, all carry and advocate Islam’s message of hate and violence. Consider the decades long list of Muslim immigrants, Muslim converts and U.S. born Muslims – second and third generation – who have plotted and/or committed acts of terrorism against America and U.S. soldiers serving across the Middle East, from Ramzi Yousef, Anjem Shukrijuma and Adam Gadan to Mir Amal Kansi, Anwar Awlaki and on to the Tsarnaev brothers and Syed Farook, and one can only determine that Muslim immigration should be halted immediately and permanently.

 

On March 9th, 2016, Tairod Pugh, a U.S. Air Force veteran and a convert to Islam, was convicted on felony charges that he tried to travel to Syria to join the Islamic State. In a letter to his wife, Pugh had stated his desire for martyrdom, and he pledged to “use the talents and skills given me by Allah to establish and defend the Islamic State.” And then, on March 14th, Mohammed Jamal Amin, a 27 year old Palestinian-American from Virginia and a member of the Islamic State terror army, surrendered in Sinjar (northern Iraq) to Kurdish Peshmerga forces: Scores of Americans are already fighting for the Islamic State, and a real potential exists that they will return to America for the purpose of unleashing horrific acts of terror on our country and our people.

 

U.S. Muslims, who may really seek to peacefully practice their “religion” under their First Amendment rights, face a conundrum, since Islam is essentially an ideology that demands the submission of all it reaches, seeking to supplant any existing order. Its theological hierarchy, the muftis and ulema, is all too willing to sanction violence in order to achieve this end; these Muslim clerics readily violate everyone’s rights, whenever those rights conflict with the teachings of Mohammed and the Koran, and they command their followers to do the same.

 

In Muslim 31:5917, Ali, Mohammed’s son-in-law, questioned a plan to rob, kill and enslave the people in the peaceful farming community of Khaibar, when he asked, “Allah’s Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?” Mohammed replied, “Fight them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Mohammed is his Messenger.” Khaibar was attacked simply because its people were not Muslim. And this same path is still being followed by Islam today.

 

How many times have millions of Americans watched videos of Islam’s imams proclaiming that Sharia law will rule America one day? How many more attacks by these islamofascists must America suffer before Her people rise up and act decisively to halt all Muslim immigration now?

 

President Obama and other Leftists have suggested that denying a person entry to the U.S. because they are Muslim amounts to “a religious test”. Obama also called such a plan “un-American … offensive and contrary to American values.” They seem to forget that President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, banned Shiite Muslims from the U.S. and deported 15,000 Iranians in 1979, after their attack on our U.S. Embassy.

 

Several U.S. cities across America, from Michigan to Tennessee and California to New York, are quite close to becoming “No Go” zones and sanctuaries for islamofascist terrorists, similar to the 750 “Sensitive Urban Areas” in France. According to FBI Director Comey, Al Qaeda is currently operating in all 50 states.

 

As the Obama administration seeks to bring between ten and one-hundred thousand poorly vetted Syrian “refugees” into America this year, it is worth noting that Japan does not accept Muslim immigrants, and America’s own historical norm, since the days of Ellis Island, has been to refuse entry to undesirable, subversive, criminal and unassimilable foreign elements. Tight immigration controls remained in place between 1924 and 1965 under the National Origins Act. Muslims hold no inherent right to immigrate to America.

 

History does not detail any example — not one — of large numbers of Muslims ever assimilating into a non-Muslim culture. In fact, just the opposite occurs. As the Muslim population grows, it strives for preeminence and the domination of its host nation, just as witnessed in India, Cyprus, Lebanon, Nigeria, Serbia and many other nations.

 

In nations where huge Muslim majorities already exist, where are the Christians? Where are the Jews?

 

The recent cases surrounding Pugh and Amin should alarm us, for good reason. A slight majority of Muslims prefer Sharia law over U.S. law, according to numerous polls, and PEW polls show that 25% of American Muslims state that it “is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam.” Our intelligence agencies have acknowledged that Al Qaeda continuously seeks the acquisition of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons from the Chechen rebels, old Soviet stockpiles and elsewhere.

 

Although I hesitate to use the word “lucky”, especially in light of the real horrors America experienced on 9/11, in Boston, Chattanooga and San Bernadino — America has been lucky to this point. as good as our intelligence is presumed to be of late, the aforementioned cases reveal very real vulnerabilities, that, when combined with the Islamic State’s millions of dollars, our porous northern and southern borders and flawed immigration policies, present a disaster of mammoth proportion in the making. It is not a question of “if” America will be hit again, but rather, it has become a question of “when” and “how hard” will America be attacked.

 

Doesn’t America already have too many of “the enemy” within Her borders, without importing more islamofascists from the sectarian wars across the Middle East?

 

One might think it cold-hearted for America to turn away Muslim “refugees”, but it is even more cold-hearted for Muslims arriving on our shores to smile and caress Lady Liberty that day, as they bear their plot to destroy Liberty and American lives on another day. Let the U.S. Special Forces kill these Islamic State bastards first, in Sinjar, Mosul and Aleppo and every other place they step foot, and let the U.S. Courts deliver orders for the executions of all U.S. Muslims who commit treason against our nation — and in the meantime — Let’s not allow America to be overrun by islamofascists who murder us in our own streets upon every opportunity.

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Informational links are by the Editor

 

© Justin O. Smith