Islamic Hatred of Christians in Pakistan Evident


Saleem Masih murdered by Sher Doga in Pakistan (Photo foundIndependent News Coverage Pakistan)

 

Posted by John R. Houk

© March 12, 2020

 

Do you think Islam is evil? Here is a video from Peace Worldwide on Youtube (it’s in Urdu but you get the picture of anguish) which a Muslim murdered a Christian Gospel singer. Below is the video and below the video is the description of how the murder occurred written in English.

 

VIDEO: CHRISTIAN MAN MURDERED BY A PAKISTANI MUSLIM LANDLORD BECAUSE OF HIS FAITH IN CHRIST

Posted by Peace Worldwide

260 subscribers –  Mar 12, 2020

 

#PakistaniChristians #Genocide #persecution

 

This happened in Pakistan’s village called Bughyana in Kasur District. A Muslim landlord who is also a member of current government’s man Political Party killed a Christian man from that village because he was a Gospel Singer and that Muslim landlord didn’t like Gospel songs. He attacked his house, kidnapped him and tortured him in different ways including electrocution for days until he died. Now the government, Police or Courts of Pakistan are not doing anything because the man who died is a Christian and they just don’t care about a Christian. Pakistani Christians are facing genocide right now. Pakistani Government is actively involved in killing Christians everyday, they specifically target young Christian men. It seems like a crime to be a Christian in Pakistan. Please pray for this man’s family and share this video so more people can see the true face of Pakistan. You can’t find that kind of news on Mainstream Media which is why we need your help in spreading it. Pakistani Media always criticize India and other countries but at the same time they hide news in their own countries. This Christian woman who is speaking in the video has to hide her face because if she is recognized then Pakistani secret agencies will kidnap her and she will be disappeared forever.

 

When I finger point the reality of Islam, the race-baiters

Come out of the woodwork like cockroaches and scream, “ISLAMOPHOBE!” I’ll get over it but I expect the usual Social Media banning. In fact I would not be surprised if Youtube censors this 2 minute and 45 second video in one fashion or another.

 

If you think the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic is bad, try being a committed Christian in an Islamic dominated nation.

 

The Youtube description lacks details such as names and specific motives. I believe I have found more details from a Vatican News post from 3/5/20:

 

Pakistan’s religious leaders condemn brutal murder of young Christian

Pakistan’s Christian and Muslim leaders are calling for justice for the killers of Saleem and for stopping violence against Christians.

 

March 5, 2020 – 17:20

Vatican News

 

Outrage and condemnation are running high in Pakistan’s Christian communities following the brutal murder of a 22-year old young Christian in Kasur district, in Punjab Province.

 

Saleem Masih was attacked whilst taking a bath in a tube-well pool belonging to an influential local Muslim landlord.  Accusing him of polluting the pool water, his killers tortured him brutally causing multiple fractures and internal and external injuries all over his body.

 

The murderers kept him for about three days before returning the body to his family.  Taken to a hospital in Lahore Saleem succumbed to death on 28 February after three agonising days.

 

Several Christian and Muslim religious leaders met in Lahore on Wednesday to address the issue and plan their action, the Vatican’s Fides news agency reported.

 

At the meeting, chaired by Anglican Bishop Azad Marshal Raiwind of the Church of Pakistan, were present, among others, Father Francis Nadeem OFM Cap, Executive Secretary of the National Commission for Interreligious Dialogue and Ecumenism (NCIDE) of Pakistan’s Catholic Bishops’ Conference (PCBC), Pastor Emmanuel Khokhar and Islamic leader Muhammad Asim Makhdoom.

 

All present “expressed deep regret” over the episode, a sign of widespread intolerance towards Christians, and also over the inaction of the police to prevent the crime and releasing the perpetrators soon after.

 

“It is the state’s responsibility to provide security to all citizens of the country without any kind of discrimination. All citizens, of all religions, are equal, contribute to the development of their beloved nation and deserve equal rights,” Fr Nadeem told Fides.  “We are a nation and live under a single Constitution and a single flag. The state must enforce these fundamental principles,” he added.

 

Bishop Azad Marshal declared he will file a “First Information Report against the criminals and will not step back until the perpetrators receive the appropriate punishment”.

 

The assembly of religious leaders expressed While expressing pain and bitterness at the persecution of Christians in Pakistan, the assembly of religious leaders also recalled the sufferings of Muslims in India, inviting both countries to avoid discriminatory laws and behaviour and respect the “principle of citizenship”.

 

The assembly decided to appeal to human rights organizations of the world “to take immediate action to stop violence against Muslims in India and against religious minorities in Pakistan”.  It also planned to appeal to the government of Pakistan take practical measures to avoid this type of incident in the future and bring the perpetrators of Saleem Masih’s murder to justice and actively promote interreligious harmony in Pakistan.  (Source: Fides)

 

(Copyright © 2017-2020 Dicasterium pro Communicatione – All rights reserved.)

 

The Christian Post (CP) provides even more details. Search engine examinations only points to Peace Worldwide on Youtube about the murder victim being a Gospel Singer. Either Peace Worldwide video dated 3/12/20 got the details wrong or yet another incident of persecuting Christians in Pakistan has taken place. Below are the CP details:

 

Pakistani Christian man tortured to death for bathing in well water; family wants justice

 

By Samuel Smith, CP Reporter

MARCH 04, 2020

Christian Post

 

A 22-year-old Christian man was beaten to death in Pakistan’s Punjab province by men who accused him of “contaminating” water in a well owned by a Muslim farmer.

 

Sources have told human rights organizations that Christian laborer Saleem Masih from the Kasur district of Punjab was chained, dragged, and beaten with rods by a landowner and four other men around Feb. 25.

 

Masih died from his injuries on Feb. 28 at Lahore General Hospital, according to the U.K.-based Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement.

 

Masih’s older brother told the Union of Catholic Asia News that Masih was tortured for two hours for washing himself off in a tube well owned by a Muslim landowner who has been identified as Sher Doga.

 

“We have to take a bath after unloading husk from a trolley. Even the cold weather doesn’t matter. The itching from chaff, stuck in our clothes, disturbs our sleep,” Nadeem Masih was quoted as saying.

 

“They threatened him with dire consequences when he cleaned himself after unloading a vehicle last week. They accused him of desecrating their water. He was already being warned about making TikTok videos in farms belonging to Muslim landlords.”

 

Masih was discovered lying in Doga’s cattle farm with serious injuries on Feb. 25 in Bhagiana village, where many Christians work as farm laborers.

 

Nadeem Masih said local women informed him that they heard Masih moaning in pain around 7 a.m.

 

“He told the police about being chained, beaten and electrocuted by four men,” Nadeem Masih said. “They rolled a thick iron rod over his entire body. He was like a crushed sugar cane from a juice machine.”

 

Although Masih was taken to a hospital for surgery, he died from organ failure.

 

According to UCANews, Doga was arrested but later released. The high court in Lahore accepted a bail petition from the suspects who accused the Masih of stealing.

 

CLAAS Director Nasir Sayeed said in a press release that Doga summoned the police himself. Sayeed accused Doga of bribing police since police pressed Masih’s family to settle the matter.

 

According to Sayeed, Doga justified the crime by saying that Masih “committed a crime by dirtying” the well water.

 

“The Masih family had to plead with the landowner to free Saleem Masih so they could take him to a hospital for medical treatment,” Sayeed reported.

 

Ghafoor Masih told CLAAS that he wants justice for his son.

 

“Those who have killed my son must be punished for taking the law into their own hands and killing him for nothing but for being Christian,” Ghafoor Masih was quoted as saying.

 

According to Sayeed, it will not be easy to get justice for Masih because the “perpetrators are so influential.”

 

“The Pakistani police is often biased when it comes to the matter Muslims and non-Muslims,” Sayeed said.

 

Michelle Chaudhry, president of the Cecil and Iris Chaudhry Foundation, said in a statement that the “horrific act of violence is once again a grim reminder that intolerance in the name of religion in Pakistan has escalated beyond the rule of law.”

 

“Unfortunately, in Pakistan, when it comes to the religious minorities anyone is free to act as a prosecutor, judge and executor,” Chaudhry explained. “We cannot allow this to go on; impunity around violence against religious minorities in Pakistan has to end.”

 

Pakistan is ranked as the fifth-worst country in the world when it comes to Christian persecution, according to Open Doors USA’s 2020 World Watch List. Christians have often been victimized by societal persecution in the predominantly Muslim country.

 

In 2014, two Christians from Kasur were burned alive in a brick kiln by a Muslim mob after they were accused of desecrating a copy of the Quran.

 

“It is unacceptable that Christians in Pakistan still face discrimination and hatred on account of their religious identity,” CSW Executive Mervyn Thomas said in a statement.

 

“The government of Pakistan must take decisive action against the perpetrators of hate and those who carry out such crimes. We also urge the authorities to fully commit to the long-term work of overcoming the prejudiced mindset toward religious minorities in society.”

 

In a Feb. 26 tweet, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan warned that ” anyone in Pakistan targeting our non-Muslim citizens or their places of worship will be dealt with strictly.”

 

“Our minorities are equal citizens of this country,” Khan wrote.

 

According to UCA News, over 1,000 Christians attended Saleem Masih’s funeral held at an evangelical church in front of his home. Reportedly among those in attendance was Ejaz Alam, Punjab’s minister on human rights and minority affairs.

 

Masih’s killing has inspired the social media hashtag #JusticeForSaleemMasih.

 

© 2020 The Christian Post, INC. All Rights Reserved.)

 

JRH 3/12/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

 

BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

 

YOU TOO Could be Silenced Like Jayda Fransen


John R. Houk

© May 2, 2019

Ok, I realize I am entering the realm of Jayda Fransen fanboy, but her email update from May 1st is quote annoying. Living America one becomes quite accustomed to the Liberties and Freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. In Fransen’s case, she never would have become found guilty for exposing Islam, let alone even prosecuted. Fransen would have been protected by the Free Speech Rights of the First Amendment.

 

The UK’s Public Order Act 1986 came into existence with good intentions to battle racism and give protection to persecuted minorities. UNFORTUNATELY the UK Act has turned into a state weapon to force the public acceptance of Left-Wing Multiculturalist ideology. EVEN if the forced acceptance means abandoning the UK’s Western and Judeo-Christian heritage.

 

THAT MEANS a person standing for Biblical principles can actually convicted for promoting hate as defined by Multiculturalism (An Australian’s insight AND Conservapedia). THAT MEANS people who recognize Islamic principles run contrary to and EVEN disparages Jews and Christians, can be arrested, tried in court, fined, jailed and silenced ALL IN THE NAME OF Multiculturalist ideology forcing people to look away from Islam’s harmful history and future supremacist intentions in regard to non-Muslims ALL ACCORDING to Islamic revered writings in the Quran, Hadith and Sira – not to mention ages of Islamic commentary to those revered writings that stretch to this present time.

 

I have a huge suspicion I would be arrested for hate speech in the UK for sharing the prevalence codified hate and violence existent in Islam. So, when I read an email like what I received from Jayda Fransen, I BECOME UPSET. And you should be displeased as well.

 

JRH 5/2/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

*******************

WANTED AGAIN John

 

Jayda Fransen logo

 

Sent by Jayda Fransen

Sent May 1, 2019 1:02 PM

Sent via JaydaFransen.Online

 

Dear John,

 

As you know, I am currently on Bail in Northern Ireland waiting to be sentenced for ‘Hate Speech’ this Friday, 3rd May 2019.

 

One of my Bail Conditions states that I must live and sleep at my home address in Northern Ireland.

 

After I was found guilty of ‘Hate Speech’ at Laganside Court in Belfast on 29th March 2019, I contacted the Courts in England who have been Summoning me to attend.

 

I notified Bromley Magistrates Court in writing on 11th April 2019 that – due to my Bail Conditions – I could not attend a Court in London.

 

Fransen Summons for Breach of Post-Sentence Supervision

 

It would be impossible for me to adhere to my Bail Conditions of remaining in Northern Ireland and to appear at a Court in England.

 

I was confident that the Court would understand my position and agree to adjourn the Hearing.

 

I was wrong.

 

Instead, at the start of this week, Bromley Magistrates Court issued two Warrants for my arrest one to an address in England and one to my home address in Northern Ireland.

 

Jayda Fransen wanted 2-places at once 5-1-19 email

 

I am now therefore WANTED once again and facing imminent arrest.

 

This time, my crime is not being able to be in two places at once!

 

I am convinced that this is just a blatant continuation of State pressure to try and push me to breaking point.

 

There is simply no other explanation for such an irrational decision.

 

In less than 48 hours I will learn my fate at a Court in Belfast.

 

I could be spending the remainder of 2019 in a prison cell, just as I spent the majority of 2018.

 

If I manage to make it to Court this Friday without being arrested in my home tonight or tomorrow, I could be walking into a complete set up.

 

The Court will be crawling with Police so I am un likely to leave the building without handcuffs cutting into my wrists.

 

The only way for people to know what is happening to me is by signing up for my updates, just like you have John.

 

Please forward this email to all of your closest contacts and ask them to sign up to my updates by clicking this button:

 

SIGN UP FOR [FRANSEN] UPDATES

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Jayda Fransen

_____________________

YOU TOO Could be Silenced Like Jayda Fransen

John R. Houk

© May 2, 2019

______________________

WANTED AGAIN John

 

Jayda Fransen – My Story

 

Shameful Social Media Jew-Hatred


John R. Houk

© February 12, 2018

 

12 1 Now [in Haran] the Lord had said to Abram,

 

“Go away from your country,
And from your relatives
And from your father’s house,
To the land which I will show you;

 

3 And I will bless (do good for, benefit) those who bless you,
And I will curse [that is, subject to My wrath and judgment] the one who curses (despises, dishonors, has contempt for) you.
And in you all the families (nations) of the earth will be blessed.” (Genesis 12: 1, 3
AMP)

 

 

I chastised José Feliciano for his delusional anti-American photo:

 

 

The discussion became verbally heated. José then posted a long list of Jew-hating lies about what Jews did in which most cases the actual perpetrators were Muslims. I was about to respond when old José blocked me. Here is a truncated version that I gleaned from the email notification:

 

José Feliciano mentioned you in a comment on José Feliciano’s post.

+John Houk

A Brief history of Mossad Black Ops and False Flags, Mossad: a shell organization for Jewish/Israeli terrorism all over the world. False Flags: Committing an atrocious act, and blaming another party or nation for it. The point is to turn public opinion against an entity, and have someone else fight your battles for you.

Lusitania Churchill, who was 1/2 Jewish, leaked intelligence to Germany that Lusitania carried munitions, and then it was sent it in a U-boat infested area. The ship was…

 

Here is what I was about to respond with until José blocked me:

 

José, I don’t have time to go through the salacious lies about Jews here (but I will address them in a future blog post). But just as a point of reference for you and your fellow Jew-haters here are some links that discuss the blood libel lies that Antisemitic love to delusionally point their fingers at Jews:

 

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/conspiracy-theories-the-jews/

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/abraham-h-foxman/conspiracy-theories-anti_b_806777.html

 

https://www.adl.org/blog/explosive-growth-of-hateful-memes-and-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories-against-jared-kushner

 

José Feliciano is a Hispanic name typically associated with Catholicism. José is no Catholic because I was blocked I recall one of his retorts as something similar “God bless Hezbollah.” Hezbollah is a Jew-hating Islamic terrorist organization that nearly controls Lebanon and is a Shi’ite terrorist client of the crazy Shi’ite Muslims running Iran. Obviously, I can presume José Feliciano is a pseudonym for a radical believing Shi’ite.

 

I wish I had copied José’s Antisemitic tirade of lying accusations so I could rebut them with the truth. Oh well, c’est la vie.

 

This is what I’m going to do. I will address some Antisemitic blood libel lying Conspiracy Theories and put down a, “What really happened,” brief scenario. Beginning with what I can figure out of the cropped lie from my email notice.

 

Intelligence Agencies and National Interests

 

Intelligence agencies of nations with military/political power are very capable of acts that normal-citizens in society would find abhorrent. Nations off the top of my mind but probably not limited to are the USA, Russia (including 20th century versions of the USSR), China, UK, France, various Muslim nations, Germany AND even though a diminutive nation compared to any nation (powerful or not) – Israel. Those intelligence agencies typical motive for espionage is to act for the National Interest of their home nation. In this day and age, world domination is rarely ever viewed as a National Interest for any nation. Rather, National Interests typically surround a nation’s status in global economics and National Security from another nation’s National Interests which may do harm to the home nation. Today the clash of National Interests is the tinder box for war more than the useless concept of world domination.

 

In the USA a Capitalist economy and the personal Liberty of individuals to pursue happiness is the prime mover of American politics as viewed by voters. The current inner struggle among voters is the dichotomy of visions of traditional American values or a further transformation into a Social Democratic polity whence Liberty is defined by the State more than natural unalienable Rights. U.S. National Interests tend to sway back and forth depending on voter mandates during elections.

 

The National Interests of most European nations is a Social Democratic polity influenced highly by Multiculturalism.

 

The National Interests of Russia center around regional hegemony as a buffer from invaders.

 

The National Interests of China is also regional hegemony but more in the nature of securing economic power bolstered with the bully pulpit of an increasing military strength.

 

The Muslim nations’ National Interests primarily center around a medieval solidification of Islamic culture followed closely tribal power structures within the primarily European carved out national borders. In the case of solidifying Islamic Culture, itty bitty Israel has become a cultural slap in the face of the teaching that once conquered by Islam, then the land must always be Islam. It doesn’t help Israel that Judaism is eternally vilified in Islam’s revered writings – Quran, Hadith and Sira.

 

Tiny Israel’s National Interests center around securing their Biblical National Homeland and protecting its borders from Muslims believing Jews are the heritage of apes and pigs. Sometimes Israeli National Interests clash with Western Nations’ National Interest desiring to placate oil rich Muslim nations which too leads to cooperation with Muslim Antisemitism. It is in those cases that a sophisticated Israeli Intelligence agency (most noticeably Mossad) intrude in both the Muslim dominated world and Western Intelligence agencies which may include the USA when it shows sympathy to Jew-hating entities such as the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the umbrella of Islamic terrorist organizations that have the explicit goal of destroying Israel and killing Jews.

 

911 Executed by Jews

 

While there is no one theory uniting them [i.e. Truthers], it can generally be said they believe the U.S. government and/or the Jews and/or anyone other than unhinged terrorists orchestrated the events of 9/11 in order to further their own dark and secretive agenda.

 

 

Israel’s spy agency knew about the attacks, and got 4,000 Jews out of there

 

The blame-the-Jews theory is very popular in the Middle East. In a 2008 poll conducted in Egypt, as many as 43 percent of Egyptians thought Israel was somehow behind the 9/11 attacks. Among the most persistent post-9/11 rumors was that 4,000 Jews did not show up for work that September morning at the World Trade Center because Mossad, Israel’s spy agency, warned them against it.

 

Although an exact tally doesn’t exist, the consensus is that anywhere from 10 to 15 percent of the victims of the 9/11 attacks – up to 450 people – were Jewish religiously or had Judaism as their primary cultural affiliation. The U.S. Census has generally put the percentage of Americans who are Jewish at a maximum of 2 percent in recent years. It would be nonsensical of the Jews to leave hundreds behind as martyrs to cover their trail. Even if they had, it’s not as if Israel has been made any “safer” by 9/11. READ ENTIRETY (9/11 conspiracy theories won’t stop; By JOSHUA NORMAN; CBS News; 9/11/11)

 

 

Blame CIA and Mossad 

 

A former President of Italy gives conspiracy theories fuel when he assets that all of the Italian centre-left knows that the Central Intelligence and Mossad were behind the attacks, making Muslim terrorists as the fall guys. This allows the US to throw its full weight behind Israel. In addition, a former head of Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence agency asserts that the ISI had prior knowledge of the attacks, knowing that the CIA was acting with Israeli operatives to plan and mount the attacks. And the attacks were a perfect opportunity for the forces of Zionism to take control of world affairs in retribution. READ ENTIRETY (10 top 9/11 conspiracy theories; By Mick O’Reilly; Gulf News; 5/2/16 14:00)

 

Actual 911 Truth

 

WORLD TRADE CENTER

 

On September 11, 2001, at 8:45 a.m. on a clear Tuesday morning, an American Airlines Boeing 767 loaded with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center in New York City.

 

 

OSAMA BIN LADEN

 

The attackers were Islamic terrorists from Saudi Arabia and several other Arab nations. Reportedly financed by the al-Qaeda terrorist organization of Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden, they were allegedly acting in retaliation for America’s support of Israel, its involvement in the Persian Gulf War and its continued military presence in the Middle East.

 

Some of the terrorists had lived in the United States for more than a year and had taken flying lessons at American commercial flight schools. Others had slipped into the country in the months before September 11 and acted as the “muscle” in the operation.

 

The 19 terrorists easily smuggled box-cutters and knives through security at three East Coast airports and boarded four early-morning flights bound for California, chosen because the planes were loaded with fuel for the long transcontinental journey. Soon after takeoff, the terrorists commandeered the four planes and took the controls, transforming ordinary passenger jets into guided missiles.

 

 

TWIN TOWERS COLLAPSE

 

Less than 15 minutes after the terrorists struck the nerve center of the U.S. military, the horror in New York took a catastrophic turn when the south tower of the World Trade Center collapsed in a massive cloud of dust and smoke.

 

The structural steel of the skyscraper, built to withstand winds in excess of 200 miles per hour and a large conventional fire, could not withstand the tremendous heat generated by the burning jet fuel.

 

At 10:30 a.m., the north building of the twin towers collapsed. Only six people in the World Trade Center towers at the time of their collapse survived. Almost 10,000 others were treated for injuries, many severe. READ ENTIRETY (9/11 ATTACKS; History.com)

 

Steel Beams

 

 

One of the most-cited and well-publicized pieces of evidence offered by this group is the claim that jet fuel does not burn at high enough temperatures to melt the steel beams. By this logic, explosives or some other form of fuel must have been used to bring the buildings down.

 

While jet fuel, which burns at around 800 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit, may not reach the 2,750-degree melting point of steel, it is only about half as strong at 1,100 degrees, according to a comprehensive report compiled by Popular Mechanics in 2005. For the towers to collapse, the steel would not have needed to turn into a puddle of molten metal, it would only have had to bend enough to compromise the structural integrity of the building. READ ENTIRETY (5 Times Scientists Tackled Conspiracy Theories, and Won; By Nathaniel Scharping; Discover Magazine; 8/16/16 1:20 pm)

 

The Jews are Responsible for Sinking Sea-Liner Lusitania 1915

 

The U.S. and UK pointed fingers that a German U-Boat (submarine) sank the civilian sea-liner leaving New York City bound for Britain as a part of its WWI blockade. For sure this is at least a partial truth. A U-Boat shot a torpedo to sink the Lusitania. It is the “WHY” that history is having difficulty with:

 

The sinking of the Cunard ocean liner RMS Lusitania occurred on Friday, 7 May 1915 during the First World War, as Germany waged submarine warfare against the United Kingdom which had implemented a naval blockade of Germany. The ship was identified and torpedoed by the German U-boat U-20 and sank in 18 minutes. The vessel went down 11 miles (18 km) off the Old Head of Kinsale,[1]:429 Ireland, killing 1,198 and leaving 761 survivors. The sinking turned public opinion in many countries against Germany, contributed to the American entry into World War I and became an iconic symbol in military recruiting campaigns of why the war was being fought.[1]:497–503

 

Lusitania fell victim to torpedo attack relatively early in the First World War, before tactics for evading submarines were properly implemented or understood. The contemporary investigations in both the United Kingdom and the United States into the precise causes of the ship’s loss were obstructed by the needs of wartime secrecy and a propaganda campaign to ensure all blame fell upon Germany. Argument over whether the ship was a legitimate military target raged back and forth throughout the war as both sides made misleading claims about the ship. At the time she was sunk, she was carrying over 4 million rounds of small-arms ammunition (.303 caliber), almost 5,000 shrapnel shell casings (for a total of some 50 tons), and 3,240 brass percussion fuses, in addition to 1,266 passengers and a crew of 696.[2][3] Several attempts have been made over the years since the sinking to dive to the wreck seeking information about precisely how the ship sank, and argument continues to the present day.

 

Date 7 May 1915
Time 14:10 – 14:28
Location North Atlantic Ocean, near Old Head of Kinsale, Ireland
Coordinates 51°25′N 8°33′WCoordinates51°25′N 8°33′W
Cause Torpedoed by German U-boat U-20
Outcome
  • 1,198 of the 1,959 people aboard killed, leaving 761 survivors.
  • Turned international opinion against Germany.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Sinking of the RMS Lusitania; Wikipedia; last updated 1/30/18 14:53)

 

The general Conspiracy theory that has at least a probability of truth is that the Lusitania was that Germany was tricked by the UK or the USA (10 Conspiracy Theories That Sound Great, But PROBABLY Aren’t True!: 9 – The Lusitania was purposely sunk to draw the United States into World War I; Me Time For The Mind) to sink the Lusitania so American voters would abandon the long held Isolationist policy to foreign entanglements and the USA enter on the side of the Allies in WWI. The less credible Conspiracy Theory and frankly, quite absurd by lacking logic for the reality of resources, the Jews tricked the German Empire to sink the Lusitania for the U.S. to help secure a Jewish Homeland.

 

The credible Conspiracy website never mention any Jewish involvement with the Lusitania. However, there are plenty of Jew-hating websites of the White Supremacist or the Islamic nature spewing their fiction hate:

 

Steemit Example of Antisemitism

 

We are coming up to the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Lusitania, just off the Irish coast, on May 7th 1915.

We are also speeding towards the end of those liberties and freedoms which were won at such cost by our forebears, and given up so easily, by us, to the ‘Jew’ World Order.

 

Like every other ‘reason’ given before or since, for the occupied U.S.A government to ignore its own Constitution, and international law, and engage in official or unofficial war with nations that had never posed any threat to it, the sinking of the Lusitania was a ‘false flag’.

 

… the Lusitania was sunk by strategically positioned charges exploded at a discrete, observed, and documented interval after the German torpedoes had hit the Lusitania. We’ll consider the details of this particular false flag in a moment.

 

 

The Lusitania was a ‘success’ from the point of view of its planners. … the decision to go to war with Germany had been decided long in advance by the ‘Jewish’ Banksters in the U.S.A.

The false flag was just the last act in a chain of decisions and manipulations intended to produce the desired outcome.

 

 

The notion that America was forced to ensure ‘freedom of the seas’ after Germany began its campaign of submarine warfare was, and has always been, heavily pushed by the full spectrum propaganda machine of the Zionist ‘Jews’.

 

 

These forms of mass media were dominated and owned by the Jewish bankers who had made heavy investments in the European war. They had bought and sold bonds for the British government, which would have become worthless should Britain lose the war. These bankers would lose vast amounts of money should Germany win this war. Britain and France would have a terrible time trying to repay their huge war loans to the Banksters in the U.S and Europe.

 

 

Always and everywhere ‘Jews’ provoke fights, and then when their opponents fight back, they scream, in all the world’s media, that they are being ‘attacked’.

 

[Blog Editor: Now check out this blatant deceitful sanctification for both World Wars:]

 

In all cases in history it has been the Germans that were the most humane, and the Germans who always tried to respect international law and decency. Only to be demonized by the ‘Jewish’ propaganda machine, and thus demonized in all the official ‘histories’ of WWII, not to mention the mass media, and Hollywood, both of which have always been controlled and dominated by ‘Jews’.

 

 

Enjoy your ‘Jew’ World Order.

2800 ‘Goy’ slaves for every one of the 144,000 ‘Jewish’ masters.

Remember that ‘God’ made all the other non-Jews, the ‘Goys’, who are NOT human, in the FORM of humans, merely to be of better service to the ‘Jews’ as sex slaves, workers, and pets.

 

… This ENTIRE post on Steemit spews Jew-Hatred with proven lies. In fact, this post reminds me a lot of the José Feliciano Jew-Hate lies that he blocked me from responding (100 years after that ‘false flag’ called ‘The Lusitania’, we have learned nothing, and are being lead to war once more; By [Muslim sounding pseudonym[ troonatnoor; Steemit; “last year” being 2017)

 

Other Jew-Hatred Websites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trust me, the above is merely a sample of lying Jew-Hatred websites.

 

Jews Rule the World Via Rothschild Family Banking

 

It is the conspiracy theory perhaps most beloved by antisemitic anoraks the world over. First peddled in the mid 19th century, it’s now nearly 200 years and the myth that the Rothschild family – having plotted and profited from wars, caused the Holocaust and arranged the assassination of political opponents – secretly control the global economy is still going strong.

 

 

The Rothschilds have long been a favourite target of fascists. The Nazis made a 1940 movie about them, while American white supremacists and antisemites such as the Liberty Lobby have obsessed over their supposed control of the Federal Reserve Bank.

 

 

The original and most powerful Rothschild conspiracy theory contains many of the core elements of its later variations. The subject of the 1940 Goebbels production Die Rothschilds Aktien auf Waterloo, it dates back to 1846 and was published in a pamphlet written under the pseudonym Satan. It focuses on Nathan Rothschild, founder of the London branch of the bank and son of the dynasty’s creator, Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

 

As Brian Cathcart, professor of journalism at Kingston University and author of News From Waterloo: The Race To Tell Britain of Wellington’s Victory, has recounted, “Satan” (the cover adopted by a French left-wing antisemite Georges Dairnvaell), alleged that Nathan was on the battlefield in June 1815 to witness the French defeat. Hastily returning to Britain before the news broke back home, he was able to use his knowledge to make 20 million francs on the stock exchange. In Dairnvaell’s telling, Cathcart writes, the Rothschilds’ “vast fortune was built upon the bloodshed of the battle of Waterloo”.

 

 

Over time, the edifice upon which Dairnvaell constructed his story was demolished. Nathan was not at Waterloo. The newspaper which allegedly reported the story of his share spending spree turned out to contain no such item. And there was, in fact, not even a huge collapse in share prices from which he could have profited.

 

 

Perhaps the most pernicious and offensive of the Rothschild conspiracy theories, however, is that the family somehow engineered the second world war and the Holocaust in order to generate the sympathy necessary to establish the state of Israel. But, as Dunning notes, the “only seed of truth” to the claim that the Rothschilds “funded the Holocaust” is that the Nazis seized the Austrian Rothschilds’ assets, effectively holding the head of the family, Baron Louis, prisoner for several months as they stole his money. But for those wishing to stir the pot of antisemitism, the facts are never allowed to get in the way of a good story. READ ENTIRETY (The Rothschilds, the banks and antisemitism – the truth and the myths; By Robert Philpot; The Jewish Chronicle; 12/11/17)

 

Sandy Hook Massacre Antisemitic Idiocy

 

Iran’s Press TV scored an international scoop Tuesday. It turns out, it reports, the massacre of 20 schoolchildren and six of their teachers and administrators was not the work of a troubled loner. Rather, it was Israeli death squads exacting vengeance over a recent United Nations General Assembly vote granting Palestine nonmember observer status.

 

 

The claim came from Michael Harris, who was one of three panelists in a discussion about the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. While the other panelists focused on a culture of violence in America, or the issue of gun laws, Harris unleashed a torrent of Jew hatred. READ ENTIRETY (Iran TV Blames Israel for Sandy Hook; By Steve Emerson; Newsmax; 12/21/12 10:32 AM)

 

On December 14, 2012, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting occurred. The perpetrator, Adam Lanza, fatally shot his mother before murdering 20 students and six staff members at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and later committing suicide.[1]

 

 

Claims broadcast by Iranian television

 

 

The Washington Post reported that claims broadcast on Press TV contain a large number of “obvious logical fallacies” typical of Iranian propaganda, which “has a well-earned reputation for incendiary anti-Israel stories and for wild conspiracy theories.”[6] The Atlantic wrote that the story “obviously plays on the worst fears of those who believe in secret Jewish cabals that run the world, but it’s a pretty pathetic attempt at slander, even for Iran.”[5] – I just focused on the Antisemitic angle, there are a half-dozen or so other Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theories (Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories; Wikipedia; page last updated 1/31/18 19:07)

 

I’ve just looked at two of the idiotic accusations against Jews that absolutely make no sense. Here’s the granddaddy of Jewish Conspiracy theories created in France but most widely distributed in Czarist Russia that the Jews sole goal is world domination. I am writing about the most debunked document in modern history – The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

 

Five years after 9/11, lingering conspiracy theories hold that Jews planned the attacks. The charges’ staying power, though, is nothing compared to that of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

 

The century-old text has been discredited many times over its hundred-plus-year history. Yet even today the tale finds willing believers among those who oppose Zionism—the idea that Jews should have a homeland in Palestine, an idea that was fulfilled in the creation of the state of Israel in 1948.

 

 

The Protocols tell the tale of a secret plot in which a shadowy and powerful cabal of Jewish leaders and Freemasons sets out to dominate the world. The text purports to be the minutes of secret meetings held in Switzerland at the time of the First Zionist Congress in 1897.

 

The book outlines the group’s endeavors to conquer the globe by manipulating the media and the global economy, promoting religious conflicts, and supporting socialism.

 

A Web search reveals thousands of Web sites with Protocols-related content. Most refute the texts and offer ample evidence of their fraudulent nature. But plenty of others exist to propagate the myth.

 

 

Hoax Exposed

 

 

In 1921 the Times of London published convincing proof that The Protocols were largely plagiarized from books published decades earlier—primarily The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, by Maurice Joly (1864) and Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (1868).

 

In subsequent years similar exposés appeared in Germany and the United States. A U.S. Senate committee declared that The Protocols were bogus. And in 1993 they were officially declared fraudulent by a court in the country of their origin—Russia.

 

… READ ENTIRETY (pg. 1 & pg. 2) (Anti-Semitic “Protocols of Zion” Endure, Despite Debunking; By Brian Handwerk; National Geographic News; 9/11/06)

 

Here is a timeline excerpt of The Protocols from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM):

 

1864
French political satirist Maurice Joly writes The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Joly’s book never mentions Jews, but much of the Protocols would be fabricated based on ideas contained in it.

 

1868
Prussian writer Hermann Goedsche publishes the novel Biarritz, in which the twelve tribes of Israel meet secretly in Prague’s Jewish cemetery. Goedsche’s book, like Joly’s, contains ideas incorporated in fabricating the Protocols.

 

1897–1899
Although the origin of the Protocols is still a matter of debate, it was most likely fabricated under the direction of Pyotr Rachovsky, chief of the foreign branch of the Russian secret police (Okhrana) in Paris.

 

1903
An abbreviated version of the Protocols is published in a St. Petersburg, Russia, newspaper, Znamya (The Banner).

 

1905
Russian mystic Sergei Nilus includes the Protocols as an appendix to his book, The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth. By 1917, Nilus publishes four editions of the Protocols in Russia.

 

1920
The first non-Russian language edition of the Protocols is issued in Germany.

 

1920
The Protocols is published in Poland, France, England, and the United States. These editions blame the Russian Revolution on Jewish conspirators and warn of Bolshevism spreading to the West.

 

1920
Lucien Wolf, a British journalist and diplomat, exposes the Protocols as a fraudulent plagiarism in The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

 

1920
Automaker Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent publishes The International Jew, an Americanized version of the ProtocolsThe International Jew is translated into more than one dozen languages.

 

August 16–18, 1921
Journalist Phillip Graves exposes the Protocols as a plagiarism in series of articles in London Times.

 

1921
New York Herald reporter Herman Bernstein publishes The History of a Lie: The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion,the first exposure of the Protocols as a fraud for an American audience.

 

 

1924
Benjamin Segel, a German-Jewish journalist, exposes the Protocols as a forgery in his Die Protokolle der Weisen von Zion, kritisch beleuchtet (The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Critically Illuminated).

 

 

1927
Henry Ford issues a public apology for publishing the Protocols, which he admits are “gross forgeries.” Ford directs that remaining copies of The International Jew be burned, and he orders overseas publishers to cease publishing the book. Ford’s directives to foreign publishers are ignored.

 

 

1964
The US Senate Judiciary Committee issues a report titled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: A Fabricated “Historic” Document. The committee concludes: “The subcommittee believes that the peddlers of the Protocols are peddlers of un-American prejudice who spread hate and dissension among the American people.”

 

 

1988
Article 32 of the Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) reads: “The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”

 

1993
The Protocols is declared a fraud in a Moscow trial of Pamyat, an ultra-nationalist Russian organization that published the Protocols in 1992.

 

 

2002
The US Senate passes a resolution urging the government of Egypt and other Arab states not to allow government-controlled television to broadcast any program that lends legitimacy to the Protocols.

 

2005
A edition of the Protocols published in Mexico City suggests that the Holocaust was orchestrated by the Elders of Zion in exchange for the founding of the State of Israel.

 

2005
An edition of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, authorized by the Syrian Ministry of Information, claims that the Elders of Zion coordinated the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.

 

2007
A typical Internet search for the Protocols yields several hundred thousand sites.

 

READ ENTIRETY (PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION: TIMELINE; USHMM; Copyright © United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington, DC)

 

Evidently the last time the timeline was updated was in 2007. As the 2007 point suggests, an Internet search will display hundreds of thousands results. It will boggle your mind how many of those search results lead you to Jew-hatred websites. Hatred of Jews is becoming so virulent again, that even after proven debunking of the validity of The Protocols, the document is the center piece of spreading Antisemitism globally.

 

I just realized exposing Antisemites could turn into a book. If you’ve made this far, you are aware that I am erudite enough to write that book. If you are that erudite writer and have the time for research, PLEASE be the person that exposes the likes of Jose Feliciano and other Jew-Hating morons.

 

12 1 Now [in Haran] the Lord had said to Abram,

 

“Go away from your country,
And from your relatives
And from your father’s house,
To the land which I will show you;

3 And I will bless (do good for, benefit) those who bless you,
And I will curse [that is, subject to My wrath and judgment] the one who curses (despises, dishonors, has contempt for) you.
And in you all the families (nations) of the earth will be blessed.” (Genesis 12: 1, 3 AMP)

 

JRH 2/12/18

 Please Support NCCR

More Defense Favoring Steve Bannon


steve-bannon-wh-chief-stratagist-counselor

Edited by John R. Houk

Posted November 20, 2016

 

I voted for Donald Trump for President. Although I am not surprised, I am a bit annoyed the Left Stream Media is still printing propaganda and disinformation on the Trump team even though his election is a done deal. I am convinced the desperate Dems and their Leftist friends in the Mainstream Media (MSM – aka Left Stream Media) will character assassinate every single Cabinet and Advisor appoint from President-Elect Trump.

 

Here are a collection of Pro-Bannon posts defending him from the false accusations and false narratives of White Nationalism and Antisemitism.

 

JRH 11/20/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

Character assassination of Stephen Bannon is an attack on all Trump supporters

 

By Robert Romano

11.17.2016

NetRightDaily

 

Stephen Bannon, former Breitbart News Chief Executive is one of the true Donald Trump supporters in the incoming Trump administration.

 

Bannon was an incredibly effective force for the successful Trump campaign as its CEO, which he was appointed to in August. Now he has been named chief strategist and senior counselor by Trump, a top-tier position in the White House.

 

Bannon will be the conscience of the White House. As an outsider Bannon will serve as a counterweight to Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff, who is now the outgoing Republican National Committee Chairman. He will likely provide advice to Trump that will differ from that given by Washington, D.C. establishment types. It will help keep Trump honest and remind him of the commitments he made to his political base. Nothing wrong with that.

 

And so, it is no surprise then that the long knives are now out to take Bannon out. Now, there is the unproven charge being pushed by a few media outlets that Bannon is a white supremacist and anti-Semitic. Total nonsense.

 

This attempt at character assassination of Bannon is no less than an attack on all Trump supporters, who backed Trump’s message on America first, trade and illegal immigration regardless of race. This deplorable attack on a man who did nothing wrong must not stand.

 

“That’s just folks that are bitter the election’s over,” Jason Miller, Trump campaign spokesman, said to reporters outside Trump Tower on Wednesday. “They didn’t get the result that they wanted.”

 

Miller said Bannon is of “very high character” and is “someone who’s been a fantastic example of really being inclusive” and “who’s embraced diversity at every step.”

 

Miller added, “I think he’ll do a great job working with chief of staff Reince Priebus… to implement President-elect Trump’s vision.”

 

In fact, at a talk to the Vatican from 2014, Bannon actually dismissed anti-Semitic and racist elements in European nationalist movements as “fringe” that “all gets washed out,” according to a transcript released by Buzzfeed: “I’m not an expert in this, but it seems that they have had some aspects that may be anti-Semitic or racial. Some that are fringe organizations. My point is that over time it all gets kind of washed out, right? People understand what pulls them together, and the people on the margins I think get marginalized more and more.”

 

In the meantime, top Democrat and emeritus law professor at Harvard University Alan Dershowitz defended Bannon in a telephone interview, saying, “I think we have to be very careful before we accuse any particular individual of being an anti-Semite. The evidence certainly suggests that Mr. Bannon has very good relationships with individual Jews. My former researcher, Joel Pollak, is an Orthodox Jew who takes off the Jewish holidays, who is a committed Jew and a committed Zionist, and he has worked closely with him. He has been supportive of Israel.”

 

Dershowitz added, “I haven’t seen any evidence of personal anti-Semitism on the part of Bannon,” and “it is not legitimate to call somebody an anti-Semite because you might disagree with their policies.”

 

Of course, there being no evidence has not usually been a problem for media. Just run with the narrative and find some facts later.

 

“This is no different than the fake protests being organized by George Soros. It’s all theater being produced by the globalist hard left and certain media outlets,” Bill Wilson, a member of Americans for Limited Government’s board of directors commented.

 

“Having the media in collusion with the left is nothing new, as we recently learned from the election campaign via Wikileaks. They will do anything to undermine the Trump administration,” Wilson added.

 

In other words, this is just the latest drive-by hit squad attack by the media that hates Trump and hates the people who voted for him, and hates Bannon. If it is necessary to assassinate Stephen Bannon’s character to undermine the incoming Trump administration, then that is the price to be paid. The only thing that’s not news here is that the media has it in for Trump and his supporters.

 

Robert Romano is the senior editor of Americans for Limited Government.

________________

The Ellison Challenge

 

By Caroline Glick

November 18, 2016

CarolineGlick.com

 

The Democratic Party stands at a crossroads today. And so do the Jewish Democrats.

 

 

Out of power in the White House and both houses of Congress, the Democrats must decide what sort of party they will be in the post-Obama world.

 

 

They have two basic options.

 

 

They can move to the center and try to rebuild their blue collar voter base that President-elect Donald Trump captivated with his populist message. To do so they will need to loosen the reins of the political correctness and weaken their racialism, their radical environmentalism and their support for open borders.

 

 

This is the sort of moderate posture that Bill Clinton led with. It is the sort of posture that Clinton tried but failed to convince his wife to adopt in this year’s campaign.

 

 

The second option is to go still further along the leftist trajectory that President Barack Obama set the party off on eight years ago. This is the favored option of the Bernie Sanders’ wing of the party. Sanders’ supporters refer to this option as the populist course. It is being played out today on the ground by the anti-Trump protesters who refuse to come to terms with the Trump victory and insistently defame Trump as a Nazi or Hitler and his advisors as Goebbels.

 

 

For the Democrats, such a populist course will require them to become more racialist, more authoritarian in their political correctness, angrier and more doctrinaire.

 

 

It will also require them to become an anti-Semitic party.

 

 

Anti-Semitism, like hatred of police and Christians are necessary components of Democratic populism. This is true first and foremost because they will need scapegoats to blame for all the bad things you can’t solve by demonizing and silencing your political opponents.

 

 

Jews, and particularly the Jewish state, along with evangelical Christians and cops are the only groups that you are allowed to hate, discriminate against and scapegoat in the authoritarian PC universe.

 

 

From the party’s initial post-election moves, it appears that the Democrats have decided to take the latter path.

 

 

Congressman Keith Ellison from Minneapolis is now poised to be selected as the next leader of the Democratic National Committee. This position is a powerful one. The DNC chairman, like his Republican counterpart, is the party’s chief fundraiser. When a party is out of power, the party chairman is treated like its formal leader, and most active spokesman.

 

 

Ellison is the head of the Democrats’ Progressive caucus. His candidacy is supported by incoming Senate minority leader Senator Chuck Schumer and outgoing Senate minority leader Harry Reid. Obama has indicated his support for Ellison. Senator Bernie Sanders is enthusiastically supporting him.

 

 

Ellison made history in 2006 when he was elected to serve as the first Muslim member of Congress. As the representative of an overwhelmingly Democratic district, once he won the Democratic primary in 2006, he was all but guaranteed that he could serve in Congress for as long as he wishes.

 

 

As Scott Johnson, a prominent conservative writer who runs the popular Powerlineblog website reported extensively in 2006Ellison is an anti-Semite. He also defends cop killers.

 

 

As Johnson reported, Ellison was a long standing member of the anti-Semitic Nation of Islam. During his 2006 Congressional campaign, the local media gave next to no coverage to this association. But when it did come up, Ellison soothed concerns of Minneapolis’s Jewish community by sending a letter to the local Jewish Community Relations Committee.

 

 

In the letter Ellison claimed that he had only been briefly associated with Louis Farrakhan’s outfit, that he was unfamiliar with its anti-Semitism, and that he had never personally expressed such views.

 

 

The local media and the Jewish community were happy to take him at his word.

 

 

But as Johnson documented, his was lying on all counts.

 

 

Ellison’s association with the Nation of Islam dated back at least since 1989 and stretched at least until 1998. During that period, he not only knew about the Nation of Islam’s Jew hatred, he engaged in it himself.

 

 

As Johnson noted, in 1998, Ellison appeared at a public forum as a spokesman for the Nation of Islam. He was there to defend a woman who was under fire for allegedly referring to Jews as “among the most racist white people.”

 

 

Whereas the woman herself denied she had made the statement, Ellison defended and justified her alleged statement. Referring to her slander of Jews he said, “We stand by the truth contained in [the woman’s] remarks…Also it is absolutely true that merchants in Black areas generally treat Black customers badly.”

 

 

As Johnson reported, aside from engaging in anti-Jewish propaganda and actively promoting anti-Semitic messages and leaders, decades before the Black Lives Matter was formed, Ellison was a prominent defender of murderers of policemen.

 

 

After the Sept. 11 attacks, Ellison likened the attacks to the Reichstag fire in 1933, intimating that the al Qaeda strike was an inside job. He then agreed with an audience member who said that “the Jews” gained the most from the attacks.

 

 

As a member of Congress, Ellison has been among the most hostile US lawmakers towards Israel. He has close relations with Muslim Brotherhood related groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations and Islamic Society of North America. Both groups were unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding trial, implicated in funding Hamas and al Qaida.

 

 

And now, Sens. Schumer, Sanders and Reid and President Obama along with the Democratic grassroots activists and other party leaders are supporting Ellison’s bid to serve as chairman of the DNC.

 

 

As Ellison’s statement about “merchants” makes clear, the Democrats’ Jew hatred may not be of the “Jews are the sons of apes and pigs,” variety. In all likelihood, it will be propagated through angry rhetoric about “bankers” and “financiers,” and “the rich.”

 

 

Ellison, a supporter of the anti-Semitic BDS movement, has libeled Israel by likening the Jewish state to apartheid South Africa. Under his leadership, we can expect for Democratic politicians to veer even further away from Israel and to embrace the slander that Zionism is racism.

 

 

The populist Sanders’ route seems more attractive to the Democrats than Bill Clinton’s moderate path because the notion is taking hold that Sanders would have been a stronger candidate in the general election than Clinton was.

 

 

This view is hard to accept. Most Americans reject socialism, and populist or not, it is difficult to see how Sanders would have sold his radical positions to an uninterested public.

 

 

The other problem with the “Sanders would have won,” argument is that it misses the distinction between Trump’s populism and Democratic populism.

 

 

Trump’s populism stemmed from his willingness to say things that other politicians and authority figures more generally wouldn’t dare to say. Trump’s allegation that the political system is rigged, for instance, empowered Americans who feel threatened by the authoritarianism of the politically correct Left.

 

 

Trump’s opponents insist that his populism empowered white power bigots. But that was a bug in his ointment. It wasn’t the ointment itself. Trump’s willingness to seemingly say anything, and certainly to say things that were beyond the narrow confines of the politically correct discourse, empowered tens of millions of voters. It also empowered white bigots at the fringes of the Right.

 

 

Whereas empowering white bigots was a side effect of Trump’s populism, empowering bigots is a central feature of leftist populism. And this is where it gets dicey for Jews.

 

 

As Obama – and Ellison – have shown, when Democrats channel populism, they use it to demonize their opponents as evil. They are “fat cats on Wall Street.” They are “racists,” and other deplorables.

 

 

There are scattered voices on the Left that are calling for their fellow leftists to revisit their authoritarian practice of labelling everyone who doesn’t walk lockstep behind them as racists and otherwise unacceptable. But for the most part, the populists are winning the argument by essentially demanding more ideological radicalism and more rigidity.

 

 

This policy is completely irrational from a political perspective. It’s hard to see the constituencies that will be swayed to support an angry, hateful party.

 

 

But this brings us to the Jews, who voted 3:1 for the Democrats, and to the American Jewish leadership whose support for Clinton was near unanimous.

 

 

When anti-Semitic, populist voices like Ellison’s began taking over Britain’s Labour Party, British Jews began heading for the exits. When push came to shove they preferred their individual rights and their communal rights as Jews above their partisan loyalties.

 

 

So far, this doesn’t appear to be the case among Jewish Democrats.

 

 

Consider the Anti-Defamation League’s unhinged onslaught against Trump’s chief strategist, former Breitbart CEO Steve Bannon.

 

 

While ignoring Ellison’s record of anti-Semitism and support for Israel’s enemies, as well as his ties to unindicted co-conspirators in funding Hamas, the ADL launched a scathing assault on Bannon accusing him of being an anti-Semite.

 

 

The ADL’s assault on Bannon follows its absurd claim in the final days of the campaign that Trump’s ad criticizing George Soros was anti-Semitic. It also follows the group’s bizarre condemnation of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s recent video clip in which he stated the plain fact that the Palestinian demand that Jews be ethnically cleansed from the territory they wish to take control over is an anti-Semitic demand.

 

 

As many prominent US Jews on both sides of the partisan divide have made clear, the accusation that Bannon, whose Breitbart website is one of the most pro-Israel websites in the US, is anti-Semitic is appalling on its face. The allegation is simply unsubstantiated.

 

 

So why do it? Why allege that a friend of the Jews is a Jew hater while ignoring the actual anti-Semitism of another man?

 

 

The answer is depressingly easy to discern.

 

 

The ADL appears to be trying to give cover to the rising forces of anti-Semitism in the Democratic Party. By falsely accusing Bannon and through him Trump of anti-Semitism, the ADL defuses the real problem of Democratic anti-Semitism. And if the ADL doesn’t think there is a problem with Ellison taking over the DNC, but alleges that Republicans hate them, then rank in file Jews will stay put.

 

 

The ADL of course isn’t alone in sending this message.

 

 

Following the election, Conservative and Reform congregations in major cities throughout the US organized communal “shivas,” to mourn Clinton’s defeat as if it was a death in the family. Such actions, along with characterizations of Trump and his advisors as Nazis or Hitler or white supremacists work to bind Jews to a party that is inhospitable to their communal interests while blinding them to the fact that Republicans do not hate Jews or the Jewish state.

 

 

For decades, American Jews have been at the forefront of every major social movement on in the US. But the Democratic Party’s move towards anti-Semitism, a move made apparent through Ellison’s rise, is one movement the Jews mustn’t lead.

 

Originally published in The Jerusalem Post. 

___________________

MSM Hypocrisy: Pounds Bannon Appointment, Lets Ellison’s Radicalism Off The Hook

 

 can-you-spot-the-hypocrisy

Can You Spot the Hypocrisy?

 

By Rich Noyes

November 18, 2016

The Realistic Observer

 

Since Sunday evening, ABC, CBS and NBC (along with a host of other establishment media outlets) have been engaged in a feeding frenzy over Donald Trump’s appointment of Steve Bannon, with reporters relentlessly employing phrases such as “white nationalist,” “white supremacist,” “extremist,” “racist” and “anti-Semitic” to solidify the image of Bannon as a dangerous pick for a top White House position.

But since Friday, those same networks have been blind to the controversies surrounding the top candidate for Democratic National Committee Chairman, Rep. Keith Ellison. Ellison has been accused of ties to the radical Nation of Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood, and once suggested the 9/11 terrorist attacks were akin to the infamous Reichstag fire used to propel Hitler’s Nazi party into absolute power in 1933 Germany.

From Sunday night through Wednesday morning, MRC analysts found the Big Three had already churned out 41 minutes, 46 seconds of coverage devoted to Bannon’s appointment. An analysis finds that nearly three-fourths (74%) of all references to Bannon were negative; the only positive comments viewers heard came from interviews or soundbites with other Trump campaign officials or Republican officeholders……

The coverage has been so ridiculously excessive, The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro — who dislikes Bannon — said it was evidence the media had “gone nuts” over the appointment:

They claim that he’s personally anti-Semitic and racist and a white nationalist and anti-Israel, without evidence. This is ridiculous. And all it does is provoke defense from the right. For God’s sake, I’m now defending Steve Bannon! The media can’t stop their overreach, because everybody on the right is Hitler to the media, which means that Bannon must be Super-Duper-Hitler.

Contrast that with news coverage of a Democrat accused of radicalism. Since he was first mentioned as a potential candidate on Friday, Rep. Ellison’s bid to take over the DNC has received only two minutes, nine seconds of network airtime, and none of it has focused on his controversial comments or associations.

The only spin network viewers heard was positive. On NBC’s Today show on Sunday, MSNBC’s Joy Reid was brought on to sing his praises: “Keith Ellison as a young legislator, as a Muslim, as an African-American, he really feels like sort of an ideal candidate.”

Ellison has been endorsed by incoming Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer, a move which has led to protests against the New York Senator. While CBS has not mentioned those protests, their New York affiliate has done the reporting:

On a trip to Israel last summer, Ellison posted a photo of a sign in Hebron declaring Israel to be an apartheid state. He also proudly defended Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan against accusations of being anti-Semitic.

“(H)is vile beliefs… ought to disqualify him outright,” said Joel Mowbray, a consultant to Jewish groups. “If Chuck Schumer actually did his due diligence and is supporting Ellison anyway, that’s shameful.”…

Longtime terrorism expert Steve Emerson in 2010 documented that Ellison had financial “donors with a history of Muslim Brotherhood connections.” And in March 2010, according to Emerson, “Ellison attended a private fundraiser at the northern Virginia home of a man who led a group tied to the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Add it all up, and Ellison sounds at least as controversial as Bannon. So, if charges of extremism against a potential Republican White House aide are worth massive network coverage, where is the similar coverage of the radical ties of a Congressman who hopes to lead the Democratic Party?
continue

Dr. Bill Warner gives an insight into Islamism  

A jihadi said that beheading Kafirs, non-Muslims, is like killing chickens so he has no remorse. And why would he feel nothing? Could it be that he believes that Kafirs are worse than animals? Allah says:

Koran 25:44 Do you think that most of them hear, or understand? They are just like animals; no, they are far worse.

The jihadi has the moral right to behead the Kafir. He is following Allah’s commands:

Koran 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”

In the early Koran of Mecca, Allah condemns Kafirs to hell 146 times. Of these 146 condemnations, only 9 involve moral wrongs such as greed and lying. The other 137 times are because the Kafir did not think that Mohammed was the prophet of Allah. Kafirs reject Mohammed as a prophet and deny the Koran. Killing them by beheading is jihad. Raping them is jihad. The jihad advances Islam.

There are other chickens (cowards), as well. Chicken religious leaders do not stand up for persecuted Christians. There is a chicken media that does not tell the truth about Islam or criticize it. And there are chicken professors who do not teach the truth of the suffering in history caused by jihad over the last 1400 years.

We must stop being chicken cowards. We may have fear, but we must speak out. Only then can we prevent our civilization from being annihilated.
Source: Political Islam

 

VIDEO: Bill Warner, PhD: Just Like Killing Chickens

 

Posted by Political Islam

Published on Nov 1, 2016

_________________

Character assassination of Stephen Bannon is an attack on all Trump supporters

 

Copyright © 2008-2016 Americans for Limited Government 

 

About NetRightDaily

 

NetRightDaily.com is a project of Americans for Limited Government. The project, launched in August of 2008, offers liberty-minded thought on the federal government as well as the threats that exist to individual liberty at all levels of government.

 

You can connect with NetRightDaily on Twitter at @NetRightDaily. We are also on Facebook at Americans for Limited Government.

______________

The Ellison Challenge

 

All right reserved, Caroline Glick

______________

MSM Hypocrisy: Pounds Bannon Appointment, Lets Ellison’s Radicalism Off The Hook

 

How The Realistic Observer Works

 

Fancy yourself an author, columnist or commentator without your own blog or outlet for those important thoughts burning to get out.

Well, feel free to submit that breaking story or bombshell revelation to me. If it doesn’t suck and interests me in the slightest, I’ll publish your masterpiece here!

Heck, even if does suck, but has potential, I may choose to clean it up and publish it.


Try to keep the subject matter within the general purview of this site.
Simply submit your Post to: rdm3846@gmail.com or deef1923@gmail.com

Ideally, it should be between 300 and 1000 words. Accompanying photos or pictures are not required. I can always add them if I feel the need.


I will edit or change things as I see fit. If you prefer I not, please let me know. If I change the content somewhat, I will forward the draft to you for approval.

Your email address will not be published.

Your Name or Pen Name, for the article 

Send Me your e-mail Address

Your Web Site if you have one or a link to it.

Or If you Want to Blog For “The Realistic Observer” let us know, we will send you a sign on.

 

 

Are YOU a Kafir?


Islamic Hate Crime

John R. Houk
© April 6, 2015
 
What is a kafir (kafr, kufar and any similarly translated from Arabic to English)?
 
A kāfir (كافر ; plural كفّار kuffār) is a disbeliever, someone who rejects Allah and who does not believe in Muhammad as the final messenger of Allah.[1][2] Although Christians and Jews are called the People of the Book (أهل الكتاب ahl al-kitab), they qualify as disbelievers[3][4][5] according to the Qur’an. The word “kafir” can be offensive to non-Muslims, as it has roots meaning “concealer” and “ingrate” implying that non-Muslims are liars. It is also often used by Muslims as an extremely offensive curse word. Other terms which are used to refer to non-Muslims include “faasiq” (sinner, corrupt) and “munafiq” (hypocrite). (Kafir; WikiIslam; page was last modified 05:44, 3 August 2013 by WikiIslam user WIBot.)
 
I’m a Born Again Christian Right kind-of-guy with huge Counterjihad sympathies; ergo by Islamic definition I am a kafir.
 
Let’s presume someone is a Left Wing agnostic/atheist with huge critical thought issues about the existence of any religion. YOU would be a kafir.
 
I came across a little 4 minute 23 second teaching moment by Bill Warner that exposes just how much Islam is taught to hate anyone that fits the kafir bill. Warner uses an example of Muslim prayers that utilize the Arabic word “kafir” but which Muslim apologists might hide the meaning with that word by translating it into the English semi-equivalent “unbeliever”. Or further talk about kafir-Jews and/or kafir-Christians with cryptic meanings left for the Muslim to assume and for a non-Muslim think of a nicer equivalent from their own faith.
 
For instance in Christianity the Holy Bible says to pray for enemies. In Islam it says kill your enemies for disrespecting Allah or Mo. In Christianity we are taught that unbelievers of the Resurrection of the Son of God Jesus Christ will pay the price with eternal separation from God in Hell with Satan, the Antichrist and False Prophet. BUT God is the Judge thus an unbeliever has the opportunity to repent of unbelief right up to their last breath to be accepted into the Kingdom of God’s dear Son. In Islam if one remains an unbeliever in a state of refusal to submit to Allah, that unbeliever is worthy to suffer a horrible death today because Allah will inflict horrible torture upon the unbeliever in death in hell.
 
One surah Warner will talk about is Quran 1: 6-7:
 
Keep us on the right path. The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favors. Not (the path) of those upon whom Thy wrath is brought down, nor of those who go astray. (Bold text The Religion of Peace)
 
In the Hadith Bukhari 56: 662 Mo was asked for clarification of the above sura about who are those of “upon whom Thy wrath is brought down” and upon “those who go astray”.
 
Narrated Abu Said:
 
The Prophet said, “You will follow the wrong ways, of your predecessors so completely and literally that if they should go into the hole of a mastigure, you too will go there.” We said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Do you mean the Jews and the Christians?” He replied, “Whom else?” (Meaning, of course, the Jews and the Christians.)
 
Warner will tell you in the video the first reference are Jews and the second are Christians.
 
The very theopolitical religion known as Islam is a hate crime waiting to happen. The Muslim excuses to justify a hate crime against a kafir are all in the Quran, Hadith and Sira. If a Muslim ever tells you that Islam is peace, that person is either an outright deceiving liar or under the delusion of believing a lie.
 
Here are two fantastic analyses of the hate crime religion Islam:
 
 
·         Islam teaches Hate Crimes; By JAKE NEUMAN; FaithFreedom.org; 5/20/13
 
And now to Bill Warner’s roughly four minute teaching moment about Islam’s real theopolitical ideology on kafir.
 
JRH 4/6/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************
Prayers for Kafirs
 
April 1, 2015
 
Since over half of Islamic doctrine is about Kafirs (non-Muslims), it follows that prayers would include Kafirs too, so every day, a Muslim prays for the punishment and suffering of all Kafirs. The prayers also follow the Koranic doctrine that Muslims are not to be a true friend of them. Muslims are to forsake and turn away from Kafirs.
 
Not only are all Kafirs to suffer punishment in hell, but Christians and Jews are singled out to be worthy of Allah’s anger and are condemned in their beliefs.
 
In the end, all references to Kafirs in Islamic prayer are negative, demeaning and hateful.
 
 
 
Posted by Political Islam
Published on Apr 1, 2015
 
__________________________
Are YOU a Kafir?
John R. Houk
© April 6, 2015
________________________
Prayers for Kafirs
 
© 2007-2015 CSPI, LLC
 
About politicalislam.com
 
What is Islam?
 
Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.
 
Our Mission
 
Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.
 
The Five Principles
 
Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.
 
All of Islam is based upon the Trilogy—Koran, Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his Traditions).

Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.
 
Islam divides the world into Muslims and unbelievers, kafirs.
 
Political Islam always has two different ways to READ THE REST
 

Egyptian Cleric Muhammad Hassan Slams Western and Eastern Cultures and Religions


This is the of kind of hate that pervades the Muslim world with the projection of Islamic Supremacy and the condemnation of all the West holds as Liberty and tolerance. Islam is intolerant, filled with hate and anti-Semitic in particular.

 

JRH 6/11/12 (Hat Tip: Tyler Keogh Kennings – No Palestinian State-Facebook)

Please Support NCCR

********************************

VIDEO: Egyptian Cleric Muhammad Hassan Slams Western and Eastern Cultures and Religions

 

 

Published on Jun 10, 2012

by MEMRITVVideos