Islam – Danger to U.S. Constitution


John R. Houk

© December 14, 2015

When reading about life in the old Soviet Union one of the abhorrent facts of life was the encouragement of the Soviet government to their citizens to report any person and/or any family that was acting in an un-Communistic or anti-Soviet State manner. Many a good non-violent person or persons found themselves in a Siberian gulag or worse – executed – by this policy of squealing on your neighbor or family member.

In America – right here, right now – we are facing a time when Muslims that believe that Mohammed was the world’s purest man and best example of living are trying to imitate Mo’s actions because of purest thinking connected to Islam. I say “Islam” rather than radical Islam because the so-called majority of Islam called peaceful and moderate do not actually follow the entirety of their theopolitical ideology. And trust me – if Islam overtakes an indigenous Western culture to become the majority culture, YOU will witness the same experiences that Muslims now experience in Muslim majority nations. That experience is to be made to feel less than human in comparison to Islamic Supremacism meaning ANYTHING the local Muslim religious cleric defines as insulting, demeaning or un-Islamic will undoubtedly raise the ire of the local Muslim community to persecute, raid of property, kidnapping or raping of non-Muslim girls and women, just plain execute the non-Muslim in a horrendous torturous manner.

LOOK AT the persecution of Christians, Jews, Muslim sects labeled as heretical by Sunnis or Shias, Bahais, Buddhist or whatever non-Muslim religious creed followed in this day and this age.

So here we are in America in which civil and religious rights are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution – including Islam.

BUT the very essence of Islam demands its adherents that the civil and religious rights of the U.S. Constitution are inferior to the tenets of Islam and the prescribed actions of Islam’s Sharia Law. So how do good Americans who honor their Constitution and coincide this respect of the Law of the Land with the adherents of a religious belief that mandates the overthrow of the Constitution and replaced by Sharia Law?

My thought is to participate with ACT for America’s grassroots advocacy of hash-tagging the term ‘Open Eyes Save Lives’ and start reporting the suspicious behavior of Muslims that openly or in stealth imply the violent overthrow of the U.S. Constitution to occur and be replaced by Islamic Sharia Law. Muslims that advocate this kind of Mohammed-style purest ideology will participate in some kind of violence against a non-Muslim (or a Muslim that stands with the Constitution) to be slain to strike terror with the purpose of submitting to the superiority of all things Islam.

I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” (Quran 8:12 quoted from: Discover the Truth; 9/29/14)

JRH 12/14/15

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Awareness Alert: Open Eyes Save Lives

Sent by ACT for America

Sent: 12/14/2015 8:16 AM

Thank you for signing up to receive updates on our #OpenEyesSaveLives campaign! This is the first Alert of your new campaign and we hope that it, and further information we’ll provide, will be helpful to you.

The recent jihadist attack in San Bernardino was another clear wake-up call that the Islamist terror threat has long ago crossed the oceans and landed here in the U.S. Our leaders can no longer spin today’s terrorist attacks as something that is happening “over there.” U.S. law enforcement has been clear: they will not always be able to protect us from terror attacks, especially when jihadists are crossing our borders with such ease, and living amongst us as friends and neighbors. American citizens must help law enforcement by being extra eyes and ears for them — and we must never be afraid to report something seen as suspicious.

Remember: One next door neighbor in San Bernardino, California could have saved 14 lives by speaking out when confronted by unusual and suspicious activity in and around the home of Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook. But political correctness caused that individual to remain silent. The result was devastating.

That is why ACT for America, the nation’s largest national security-focused grassroots advocacy organization, has unveiled our #OpenEyesSaveLives campaign.

It is imperative that we stay alert and understand what to actually look for as we continue to witness many horrific events transpiring before our very eyes. This is where you come in. YOU can be the eyes and ears within your community. YOU can educate yourself and those around you on what to look for.

Remember: If you see any suspicious activity that is alarming, please call 911 or use the “See Something, Send Something” app from the Department of Homeland Security for reporting details to law enforcement.

In this #OpenEyesSaveLives issue, we wanted to focus on some traits that may be an indication of radicalization, as noted by experts in the national security arena—important information to know.

Possible Radicalization Traits

o The individual starts to grow a beard, stops listening to music, stops smoking and drinking (if they previously did these before), and begins to dress in Islamic clothing rather than Western clothing.

o Abruptly abandons friends and family members.

o Stops participating in activities that used to occupy much of their time such as sports or community associations.

o Exhibits growing hatred and intolerance towards others who don’t adhere to their beliefs.

o Turns his/her back on life as it was before radicalization.

o Surfing of violent jihadi/anti-government websites takes up increasingly large chunks of the day (12-16 hours).

o Develops obsessive patterns of behavior and pines for martyrdom and the apocalypse.

o Begins talking about known radical groups such as ISIS in a more positive light when he/she may have felt a different way in the past.

o Another important trait is when the individual actually used to be very devout, had a beard, wore Islamic clothing, and has now started to smoke and drink when he/she previously did not. This is another way that terrorist groups are evolving to radicalize Americans. They want them to fit in more with western civilization and be accepted.

o The individual changes his/her Islamic name to a more western accepted name.

o As mentioned by radical teachings, in order to better fit in with western society, an individual should not make it obvious he is a practicing Muslim nor grow a beard if he has not yet grown one for it will bring unwanted attention. If he has grown his beard out, he is advised not to shave the beard completely because that would cause suspicion from friends and family.

“Don’t make it too obvious you have become a practicing Muslim. For example: If you haven’t grown a beard, don’t grow it now, because you will bring unwanted attention onto yourself. Mujahideen in Muslim lands remove their beards for deceptive purposes.” In addition, “Practicing Muslims” are instructed “not remove their beard if they already have one. This would only draw unwanted attention to yourself from friends and family, and this will in turn lead them to spy on you.” – one ISIS training manual

Every jihadist who has come to the attention of the authorities has exhibited several, if not all, of these traits. However, not every individual who demonstrates some of them has necessarily become fully radicalized to violence.

Here are a few more national security tips on what to look for, as well as a few important reminders:

Unusual clothing in a particular setting

If you live in a warm state such as Florida or Arizona and see someone dressed in an overcoat or unusual clothing for the season and the place, they may be hiding or packing explosives or a suicide belt. Report anyone appearing unusual to the authorities immediately.

Backpacks, bags, and luggage left unattended

Be aware if a person strategically places and leaves a bag. It’s the holiday season where shopping malls and centers are packed with people. If you see any bag or backpack left unattended in any place, notify the authorities immediately.

Unusual activity in or around your neighborhood (you know best!)

The signs you heard about in the news in connection with the San Bernardino attack is the perfect example.

Surveillance behaviors

Take note of a person taking pictures or recording of a building’s side doors, loading dock, cameras and back alley. This includes any sporting event, concert, stadium or arena.

Always trust your instincts

We cannot emphasize this point enough. Better safe than sorry. If you strongly feel uncomfortable about a situation or a person, please do not hesitate to call the authorities and bring it to their attention. This is critical.

You can send information to authorities anonymously.

The “Open Eyes, Save Lives” campaign from ACT for America is more important today than ever before, but we need your help! Please help by donating today or setting up a monthly donation so that we are able to reach millions of Americans and help save lives.

Please help us share the message on social media by using #OpenEyesSaveLives on Facebook, Twitter, & Instagram along with our website www.actforamerica.org

Download the “See Something, Send Something” app for:

Apple devices | Android devices

Please forward this e-mail to everyone you know.

Stay tuned for more specific tips, reminders, and articles on what to look out for regarding national security in our #OpenEyesSaveLives email series. You do NOT want to miss these!

ACT for America accepts no funding from any governmental agency, any foreign influence peddlers, or political institutions. Your support of ACT for America is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate. ACT for America education is a 501(c)3 organization.

_________________________

Islam – Danger to U.S. Constitution

John R. Houk

© December 14, 2015

___________________

Awareness Alert: Open Eyes Save Lives

ACT for America
869 Lynnhaven Parkway,
Suite 113, #411
Virginia Beach, VA23452

 

About ACT for America

o ACT for America is the largest and the only grassroots organization dedicated to national security and defeating terrorism. Today, ACT for America has expanded to 890 chapters and 280,000 members with a goal of 2,500 chapters and 1,000,000 members by the end of the decade.

o ACT for America is a non-partisan organization whose mission appeals to every American concerned about national security and terrorism -a powerful, organized, informed and mobilized voice.

o ACT for America educates citizens and elected officials to help impact national security policy & stands ready to take action as the only national security grassroots organization in America.

Who We Are

We are all Americans first -citizens who put their differences aside and came together to secure our country. Every American has one thing in common – “we are all interested” in keeping our homes, communities, states, and nation safe. What makes ACT for America different is that our members and supporters come from every background, age, gender, race, social status, political point of view, and lifestyle choice. Remember, national security is not a conservative, liberal, or libertarian issue – it’s an American issue.

What We Do

ACT for America is continuing to expand its nationwide volunteer chapter network that trains citizens to recognize and help prevent criminal activity and terrorism in the United States while preserving civil liberties protected by the United States Constitution.

ACT for America focuses on activities that enhance the national security standing of the United States — such as educating elected officials from the school board level to Congress. Many of these officials go on to pass vital legislation to this end. ACT has driven the education process towards the successful passage of 37 bills in 19 states over the last six years.

If it Quacks like a Radical Muslim


On August 17 I cross posted Raymond Ibrahim’s explorative essay entitled, “How Nazism Explains ‘Moderate’ and ‘Radical’ Islam”. Ibrahim drew a comparative analogy between Hitler’s Nazism and Mohammed’s Islam to understand present day so-called Moderate Muslims and Radical violent Muslims. The essay though relatively short was quite enlightening and should be re-read every once in a while to under the paradigm that modern Muslims face.

I stashed away two comments on this analogy of Nazism and Islam and their adherents. The first comment is from a Facebook Group and the second comment is from a Google Plus individual. I concurred with both comments and that is why I am sharing them. The Google Plus comment I liked so well that I as an Editor added some source links.

JRH 9/8/15

Please Support NCCR

****************************

If it Quacks like a Radical Muslim

(Editor’s title)

Edited by John R. Houk

Posted September 8, 2015

Apostates and Infidels

Closed Group

August 17, 2015 3:51pm

The logic applied is on the surface a fair enough approach, but flawed. The flaw resides in the ideology and cultural grip of Islam on its adherents. Unlike Nazi Germany, which was essentially an outgrowth of the harshness of Versailles Treaty, using anti-Semitism as a lightning rod, Islam is a totalitarian system going back centuries. Thus, there is an inherited allegiance, not by biology but by socialization…Islam promotes honor in a manner that is at odds with Greco-Roman cognition, and it is this ability to reason that allowed Wallenberg, for example, the ability to negotiate for Jewish lives. Islam does not provide this level or even likelihood of negotiation. While nice individuals exist within in Islam, ultimately the Quran and cultural pressure will carry the day. Remember folks – Islam produced no Beethoven…the West did.

++++++++++++++++++++

Ray Lanfear G+

August 17, 2015

Are you aware what they pray for 5 times per day? Be aware, get the new book by Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Her AHA bio), former Muslim that speaks the truth about Islam and Quran. All lives do matter, not just black lives.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

 

Political correctness on Islam is the issue of our time for all candidates. We all should be tired of the Islamic advance in America and the PC given to Islam. Enough is enough forget about PC. A clear and present danger. It is long overdue to forget about political correctness and watch out for all Mosques, and the Imams that preach the hate and violence toward America with their Quran and Sharia law. And now Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan has called upon 10,000 blacks to kill [2 minute clip of Farrakhan in own words] all whites, and got a standing ovation at his church. He cites Islam and the Quran for justification to kill whites. Why was he not arrested for his hate and [his] call to violence, which would come under a terrorist is beyond me?

The “Trojan Horse” is here and in your neighborhood. It’s time to investigate all Mosques before further homeland attacks occur on our military, far too many Imams preach hate and violence toward America. How many more attacks will it take until America gets the message? 4 Marines and one sailor are dead, as a direct result of the Mosques, Islam and the Quran. What more is there to know? [I] Have studied Islam and the Quran for several years now and have been inside Mosques and spoken to their Imams. Let there be no mistake about it. Islam, from its beginning, has been a religion of the sword.

The concept of Holy War (Jihad) mandated by Allah, requires all of Islam to completely subdue the earth through military and violent conquest. The Quran says it all. When will America wake up? One sad sick religion. They place a premium on death versus life. They will never grasp the concept of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness on earth. Women are treated as a sub class under Islam with no rights at all. They will never adapt to our customs and culture but rather want to force Islam and Sharia upon the World. And if they can take a Jew, Christian or infidel to their death along with them, they view it as an honor.

Like it or not, politically correct or not, we are at War with Islam. And until America recognizes that fact, more tragic deaths will result. Sharia law will continue to expand. . Mosques are hiding places for terrorists and we have 3400 plus in America. Read the truth here about Islam and the Quran and Sharia. Get a copy of “Heretic” by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former Muslim that speaks from experience. Violence is inherit in Islam. It is not a religion of peace. When they are praying 5 times per day they are praying for death to Jews, Christians and infidels and most people are clueless. The threat is real folks. Read the book now and get the real truth. Also google “theprojectmuslimbrotherhood” and see their plan to destroy America from within.

_________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All Links by the Editor. Any text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

Setting up McCloskey and Hunt Thoughts on Islam


John R. Houk

© June 7, 2015

Below is a dialogue exchange between Dylan McCloskey and William Hunt that is over a SlantRight 2.0 post entitled “Destroying Western Culture Destroys USA”. That post was about Western Multiculturalism and its promoting the existence culture destroying immoral homosexuality and the religion of hate – Islam.

Dylan takes a Multiculturalist and atheistic stand typically accepting the propaganda that Islam is primarily peaceful as well as the atheistic stand that all religions are the reason for evil in the world.

William takes the stand that Islam is a violent death cult executing Christians from the beginning of its emergence. Allowing Islam to exist is the cause of violence in the world thus Islam should be eliminated for a better chance of peaceful coexistence between nations.

Dylan’s position no matter how altruistic, if it becomes the global future culture as we know it will end. For we Americans who love the Liberty enshrined by our Constitution’s Original Intent will lose that Liberty. Dylan’s Multicultural altruism will end two bad scenarios. 1) One level of Marxism ranging from elitist illusory Socialist Democracy to just plain Marxist despotism in which an elitist oligarchy tell the people what is good from them. 2) A rejuvenated Muslim global conquest that eliminates rival religions, American forms of Liberty AND former cooperating Leftist Multiculturalists that thought they were using Islam to aid in destroying Western Christian Values. If scenario one wins out one will see the global eradication of all religious faiths because values will subvert Multicultural Secular Humanist Values that are made as it suits the elitists’ socio-political designs.

William’s position is more in line with my thoughts. He sees American Exceptionalism and Constitutional Liberty as the socio-political platform as the only hope for harmony if not globally at least in a strong America. Where William enters into controversy is his perception that only an eradicated Islam will bring greater peace globally.

I understand William Hunt’s emotions. Until 9/11 I disliked all religions except my faith in Jesus Christ the Son of God, BUT as an American I stood by the Constitutional 1st Amendment Religious Freedom for all. I thought of Islamic terrorism as no more different than the Communist Soviet/Maoist terrorism that assaulted the free world. Even after Khomeini took American hostages with diplomatic immunity I was more disgruntled with Iranian revolutionaries attacking Americans without accountable consequences than the Twelver-Shia Islam responsible for attacking Americans.

After the 9/11 diabolical attack that resulted in thousands of deaths on U.S. soil I began to lump Islam alongside Marxist-Communistic ideology that cannot coexist with the Liberty and Freedoms of the U.S. Constitution nor the Christian Values that I thought could not be diminished because of the Religious Freedom and Free Speech guaranteed in the First Amendment.

It was after 9/11 that I embarked on studying Islam to understand why it was so hateful. This is when I discovered that Islam’s most holy book the Quran encodes the physical destruction of Jews and Christians if they do not submit to the superiority of Islam. In Islam lack of submission is represented in the Religious Liberty for a Christian to openly share that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who died on the Cross and arose from the tomb three days after the Crucifixion. That core belief of Christianity is considered blasphemy in the Quran. Such open blasphemy insults Mo and Allah. Those who insult Islam must die now before there is any afterlife judgment. That makes Islam an antichrist Religion.

Ergo I have reached a conclusion similar to William Hunt that as long as Islam places Mohammed and the Quran on the highest pedestal of authority then Islam cannot coexist with American (or Western for that matter) Liberty and Freedom. BUT to advocate the extermination of Muslim adherents is no better than Hitler’s holocaust against Jews or the hundreds of millions slaughtered by the commands of the Quran as recited by Islam’s considered perfect man Mohammed.

The New Testament Word of God tells us that it is God’s Will that all humanity be Saved and experience Christ’s deliverance from Satan’s grip to be transferred into the Kingdom of God’s dear Son. That means genocide is not an option. So how do we deal with the haters of non-Muslims?

I view the only solution to confronting Islam is to force a modernization of that religion which is harsh I realize. The religious leaders of Islam must expel the Medina portions of the Quran along with the Hadith and Sira that brings validation to the Medina surahs of the Quran. Also the areas where Islam dominates must be forced by a military if needed, is for other religions to bring their message to give people an authentic choice without fear of Muslim retribution. Of course I favor Christianity, but in the spirit of Religious Freedom other missionary religions should have an equal shot. Ergo either Islam must transform or the Muslim dominated areas experience Free Choice. That includes those I consider idiot atheists to present their concept that no God exists as long as it doesn’t infringe on the non-violent missionary religions.

I say this about atheists because when atheist embraces the ideology of the various forms of Marxism, those atheists tend to favor the same kind of violence as Muslims in forcing submission.

So feel free to pick a side or a modified choice of the dialogue exchange between Dylan McCloskey and William Hunt and add your thoughts. Try to separate yourself from the snarkiness that McCloskey and Hunt began to devolve into.

JRH 6/7/15

Please Support NCCR

******************************

Google + link to Discussion:

 

Dylan McCloskey

May 19, 2015

I know some nice Muslims. The post is very ignorant and doesn’t fly by the Constitution. Muslims are just as stupid and bad as every other religion. It has more to do with where they are from than what they believe. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and most Muslim nations, the people are poor as f**k and look like they are living over a hundred years behind. All religions are population control.

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 19, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey that’s a ridiculous statement. It’s been proven time and time again, there are no moderate Muslims, only combatants or dissidents in hiding. Their basic cultural beliefs do not blend with any civilization. There will be no peace on this planet until Islam is no more. It’s a death cult, there is no love or forgiveness in a death cult.

Dylan McCloskey

May 19, 2015

+William Hunt How much do you know about Islam? There are radicals in all religions. These radical Muslims are living in countries ruled by tyrants who take all their money and make them live in filth and disease, not to mention make their women slaves. Most worship Islam because, just like any other religion, they were born into it. The Muslims that live in America, and that are born here have not been causing problems. Most of them I know are more respectable than average people, and much more friendly than most Christians. I don’t hear or see Muslims that live in America talking s**t or starting anything with anyone. It’s because they teach to keep to their own and take care of their own. What you give back, you receive. Not to mention, real practicing Muslims don’t drink or smoke. All religions are cults. They take money from people and then let them believe they will go to heaven for their generous charitable contribution. As the priest rapes their sons in the ass because that’s what God intended… All religions are stupid and disgusting, to me personally. I don’t care what religion you are, but I’m not going to say one is better than the other either…

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 19, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey​ I’ve read and studied Islam in great detail. And to say all religions are evil is a lie. I’ve never been stabbed by a practicing Buddhist. I’ve never had my life threatened by a Christian. I and my very American culture have never been declared the enemy in an asymmetrical plan of warfare by any other religion.

Islam must be stopped. It must be destroyed. There will be no peace until it’s burned to the ground and the ashes swept into the sea.

Death to Islam! Two shoes on your head!!

Dylan McCloskey

May 19, 2015

+William Hunt You are crazy bro. What religion are most people in our prisons? Buddhism is not a religion, it’s a philosophy… And Islam has been around before anyone said the words “Death to America”… You are an idiot….

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 19, 2015

Dylan McCloskey [Dylan you say] “you are crazy”.

No, I’m not. I have a difference of opinion. Not tolerated by Islam. The result is my life being threatened. Or my family killed. I AM labeled an infidel from birth, by a cult of death.

[Dylan says,] “What religion are most people in our prison”

The prison population of America is a mixture of Islam and new Christian converts. Some atheist, some Buddhists, some Catholics, etc. All of them are criminals. What is the population of Islamic countries, what are their crimes? And how many have been put to death for crimes against Allah, the pedophile?

[Dylan says,] “And Islam has been around before anyone said the words death to America”

And in two hundred years without Islam, America has become the beacon of Freedom, and the light in the darkness for countless generations, and for countless cultures and people. America is the corner stone of all technological & medical advancement. Tripling the life span of the average human. Creating life, where none existed before.

And where is Islam in all this? In nearly two thousand years, Islam has oppressed and murdered countless innocent souls, molested and murdered millions of children. Never advancing beyond mud huts and the 50 year life span. You are all savages, and should be exterminated for the safety of the human race!

You and your kind are the epitome and the very reason the word “idiot” exist!!

Death to Islam!!!! Death to the molester prophet MoHammad!!!

Dylan McCloskey

May 19, 2015

+William Hunt​ You speak out your ass from what you think you know. I expected better from this community. You can’t say death to Islam and not expect to be called crazy at the least…

The most popular religion among prisoners is Christianity by a long shot. Atheist don’t make up 1%. Again Buddhism is not a religion. How many Christians are sex offenders and child molesters here at home? You are the worst kind of stupid.

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 19, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey​ And there it is. You don’t answer the important questions. I’ll pose a few more. How long does an infidel last in a Muslim community, in an Islamic country. Versus, an Islamic follower in a Christian majority community?

What is the religious make up of prisoners in an Islamic occupied country? What crimes can get your head cut off? Besides sneezing in public, or praying to the wrong God?

There will be no peace on the planet until Islam is no more.

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 19, 2015

Islam is a death cult

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 19, 2015

MoHammad didn’t want his followers eating swine because Allah was a pork lover. He loved the control of his swine lovers. He loved pork so much he incorporated it into his name. Mo”ham”mad. Mad for pork lovin’

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 20, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey Islam Is not a religion!!!

http://www.islam-watch.org/iw/aboutus.htm

We are a group of Muslim apostates, who have left Islam out of our own conviction when we discovered that Islam is not a religion at all. Most of us took a prolonged period of time to study, evaluate and contemplate on Islam, the religion of our birth. Having meticulously scrutinized Islam, we concluded that it is not a religion of peace at all, as touted by smooth-talking, self-serving Muslims and their apologists from non-Muslim backgrounds. The core of Islam—that is, the Qur’an, Hadis and Sharia—is filled with unbounded hatred of the unbelievers, is unbelievably intolerant toward them, and is extremely cruel and merciless to Muslims who dare to deviate from its doctrine.

We also realized that Islam is beyond alteration, because Muslims—who attempt to modernize and reform its unremitting bigotry, irrational rituals and its cruel and draconian punitive measures—are targeted for annihilation. Our verdict was that the only way to escape from the tyranny of Islam is to leave it altogether. We have, therefore … READ THE REST (Who are we? Islam-Watch About Page – “Who are we?” excerpt by Blog Editor)

Dylan McCloskey

May 20, 2015

+William Hunt​ You are a nut. America doesn’t have a religion to follow, you can worship what you want or not at all. That is called freedom. These countries full of Muslims don’t have that. Like I said before, the religion isn’t necessarily why these people are f**k*d up, it’s the people who control the Muslim nations by fear. Some of that fear stems from Islam. But Islam hasn’t claimed a fraction of a percent of American lives, as much as Christians have killed their own here at home.

There will be no peace on the planet until all religions are recognized as false. And after that, comes a new world order. To single out Muslims is low and ignorant. Some of the sexiest and smartest girls I know are Muslim. I have Muslim friends. They all have the same things in common. They are clean, educated, polite, and have money.

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 20, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey You are a child. You don’t have the knowledge or fear of Islam knocking on your door. Killing your family. Hunting your children. Wiping out entire villages.

None of your family have died at the hands of one of their barbarians, yet.

Islam is a death cult that has slaughtered millions of my people. I will never forget. We will never forget. Islam is a death cult. We will fight to the end. We will resist!!

Islam must be stopped. We must not forget the women and children slaughtered in the name of the false prophet, and child rapist, Allah.

Those that continue to follow Allah carry the guilt and shame of all those murdered in the false prophets name.

Death to Islam. Shame to all those that follow in his name. Shame to all those that support the murderous evil cult.

You’ve made your choice. My people have made theirs. We will fight. We will no longer be victims of the false prophet’s [Muslim] killers [of non-Muslims].

Death to Islam. Piss be upon you.

Dylan McCloskey

May 20, 2015

+William Hunt​ How old are you? You sound like a child. A scared, insecure, little boy. I’m a grown ass man who has been all over and have experienced quite a lot of different cultures. I have been to colleges in the North and South. The Muslims you are so frightened of are the same radical Muslims everyone else [is] weary of. The Muslims that live here, why do you think they live here? Because it’s insane over there. Have you ever researched the Crusades? It doesn’t matter the religion, it’s the ones dictating the people. That is what religions do. Have people act and do as they see fit… It’s not a hard concept. You are just rude, angry, and scared. Those are all personal problems you need to fix.

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 20, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey​ You insult my people. The death of millions. The near genocide of my culture and behave as though, that was some trivial moment in my history. Then you try to justify your love for Islam. Your ignorance will be your undoing.

Islam is a death cult.

You are part of the problem. You are an enemy of the civilized world.

Normal healthy people do not belong to a death cult.

Islam must be destroyed. And the soldiers of Islam eliminated and washed into the sea. There will be no peace on this planet till the complete death of Islam.

You haven’t felt the loss, yet. You can’t help but be blind.

Soon you will know the truth. And you will not be loved by Islam, you will not be its friend. You are and infidel by birth. Even if you convert, you will be a slave and not a man.

Death to the false prophet. Death to Islam. Shame on all those that follow the false prophet and carry his evil plan.

Dylan McCloskey

May 20, 2015

+William Hunt Continue to reiterate your hate message… You sound exactly just like them, brainwashed and robotic. Like you have a message on a recorder you play over and over… I never said I love Islam. You are trying to put words in my mouth. Nobody cares about this post and thinks you are a moron, hence why I’m the only one commenting back. Hopefully you stop acting like a dumbass.

William “Gentleman Adventurer” Hunt

May 20, 2015

+Dylan McCloskey​ It’s not a message of hate. It’s a warning. I must repeat it, you and your kind must have at least a fighting chance. You will make excuses for Islam. You will embrace Islam. You are a fool. How can you possibly know all the opinions of this group? You are projecting your ignorance. Beware. You will have a discussion to make. You are either for freedom and life. Or the death of the civilized world via Islam the death cult.

Your childhood ended when you started making excuses for a genocidal death cult.

Piss be upon your false, child molester, prophet.

And by the way, you keep replying because you want to force your opinion. “Convert or die” Just like Islam, they do not like to lose, and if they can’t win, someone must die.

Make good choices. Be a good person. Stay away from the allure of the death cult. Stay away from their followers. They have already surrendered to the cult. Fight for life. Not death. Otherwise you are the enemy of civilization.

_______________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All text in the McCloskey-Hunt dialogue embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

Deciphering Chain Email on Islam


No Coexistence with Islam killing U

John R. Houk

© May 26, 2015

 

About ten days ago I ran into a comment from a closed Facebook Group I am a member of – watch out America. The comment was in relation to a cross post originally written by Daniel Greenfield. Greenfield’s post was about the idiocy of not naming Muslim terrorists as “Muslims” or as followers of “Islam”.

 

The comment was remarkably accurate in its assertions that the agenda set up by Islamic considered holy writings. So I copied and pasted the comment to a Word document and saved it for further consideration as a post.

 

The thing is after reexamination, I clicked the link to the comment on watch out America and the comment had disappeared. I wanted to place a good old fashioned “Like” to the comment before I proceeded with a cross post project. So I went to the name I copied and pasted as the commenter to look him up on Facebook. If the individual ever had a page, either Facebook removed him or he terminated his Facebook account.

 

So I began to check out the section of the comment entitled “Civilizations Destroyed By Islam”. The first thing I noticed is the exact same and sometimes similar wording was all over Google without any source reference spread out over a number of years. And every post was authored by a different individual. Here are two examples:

 

QuoraAmeya Vombathkere, I am an Indian first, a student of 12th grade and like to read books on mythology [sic], crime, history, economics, wars and constitutions of various nations: http://www.quora.com/How-many-civilizations-has-Islam-destroyed-to-date

 

Daniel Pipes Comment section – Submitted by Mulla Sadra (United States), Nov 7, 2008 at 14:39: http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/142377

 

At this point I embarked on the quest to learn about each of those civilization this much passed around thought (probably begun as chain email) indicted Islam as their destroyer.

 

I discovered that Islam as a conquering army did not actually conquer and some of these noted civilizations. On the other hand Islam is not exonerated from ending these previously conquered peoples’ customs and religions. Most of these people that were conquered by non-Muslim incursions were for the most part allowed to retain their language, customs and religion (which ironically were already Christian or Jewish in most occasions). When Islamic rule assumed authority over any previously conquered people that was relatively near to the nascent Muslim empire, the people were Islamized and Arabized in religion, culture and language.

 

Thus even though the outward implication is off in some cases of direct civilization destruction, upon assumption of Muslim power the remnants of culture were eradicated.

 

I also noticed I could not find the spelling of some of the listed destroyed civilizations but when that occurred I think I made a pretty good educational guess on similar names to implied regions.

 

The point I am making though is that Islam is actually a cancer-like virus eradicating all that is non-Islamic. I am thinking the agenda of Islam is not deserving of 1st Amendment protections of Religious Freedom in the United States of America. Do you?

 

JRH 5/26/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Comment to Schrödinger’s Jihad

 

By Mīkhā’īl Adam Abraham

May 16, 2015 at 12:50pm

Facebook Closed Group: watch out America

 

Muslims are taught that when they have the power to do so, they are to dominate others, but when they don’t have enough power to do so they are permitted to lie – “taqiyya” – Deception and to live peacefully. When they get strong enough in a society, they are to rise up and overthrow that society and establish an Islamic state. History tells us Islam grew by violence and is held together by violence … Islam Never Came to Co-Exist. They came to Conquer and Dominate. It’s an evil intention of Invasion to kill, steal … Stop Islamization of our Countries … Say No to Islam … Beware … If you don’t support Israel today … Tomorrow your lands will become the Muslims’ … Beware … No peace as long as Islam Exists this is the Truth… Islam is Evil and Muslims are the first victims of it… IZZLAM IS NOT A RELIGION… It’s a POLITICAL SYSTEM FOCUSED ON WORLD DOMINATION …

 

**********Civilizations Destroyed By Islam**********

These are some of the civilizations destroyed by Islam.

 

CIVILIZATIONS IN THE ARABIAN PENINSULA:

 

Lakhmid Kingdom – Christian [Wikipedia & Iraqi Cultural Center – D.C.], Humyarite [or Himyarite] Kingdom – Jewish in Yemen area [fanack Chronicle & Eretz Yisroel], Hadramaut Civilization [Wikipedia & Saylor.org], Hejaz Civilization [Lesson 2 – Pre-Islamic Arabia], Heira [or perhaps Hira] Kingdom Yemenese Civilization [Iran and Islam to AD 1400], Nabatian [or Nabataean] Kingdom [Who were the Nabataeans?].

 

AFRICAN CIVILIZATIONS:

 

Carthaginian Empire (Tunis) [Wikipedia – Islamic conquest & African Kingdoms], Egyptian Empire [Actually Christian Egypt: Process of Islamization in Egypt, Muslim Conquests in Egypt and Iran & Muslim conquest of Egypt – Wikipedia], Siranaeek Kingdom (Libya) [I discovered no actual reference to a Libyan people with this appellation other than the numerous posts over the years with the same wording as found here], Nubian Kingdom (Sudan) [History of Jihad against the Nubians – webpage doesn’t work well in a Chrome browser – & NUBIAN CHRISTIANITY: THE NEGLECTED HERITAGE)

 

ASIAN CIVILIZATIONS:

 

Anatolia (Turkey) [History of the Jihad against Byzantine Christians of Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey (634-1453) & A Conflict of Civilizations], Phoenician Civilization [http://phoenicia.org/today.html], Sham Civilization (Syria and surrounding) [Bilad al-Sham: History – Wikipedia, Muslim conquest of the Levant: Expedition to Syria – Wikipedia & Islamization of Palestine – Wikipedia], Indian Civilization (Bangladesh, Pakistan & Afghanistan) [The Legacy of Jihad in India, Islam’s Indian slave trade (Part i) in Islam’s genocidal slavery: part 1 & PDF version on one of best books on Islamic aggression ever written – “Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery” By M.A. Khan].

 

 

So sad… This is not a religion… It is heathens trying to justify their sin…


Beware of Muslims acting like the rest of us to deceive … Allah the “fallen Angel” is the greatest of all deceivers… (Quran 3:54, 7:99, 8:30)

____________________________

Deciphering Chain Email on Islam

John R. Houk

© May 26, 2015

__________________________

Mīkhā’īl Adam Abraham about Islam

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Schrödinger’s Jihad


Islam- Moderate & Radical

 

The person who goes by the pseudonym Beowulf and signs his name as Randy found an excellent essay on StupidFrogs.com which in turn cross posted the original by Daniel Greenfield on Sultan Knish. Greenfield posted on May 13, I couldn’t find a date for StupidFrogs.com and Beowulf cross posted preceded with an astute observation on May 15. That is the brief history of cross posting of “Schrodinger’s Jihad”.

 

If you have been reading this blog you will see the relevance of Greenfield’s essay. His inspiration is the media condemnation against Pamela Geller and explaining a somewhat statistical reality of the real nature of Islam.

 

I am going to include Beowulf’s thoughts on the Conservative Christian Counselors Yahoo Group followed by the Greenfield essay on Sultan Knish.

 

JRH 5/16/15

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

RE: Schrodinger’s Jihad

 

By Beowulf

May 15, 2015 12:00 PM

ccpga

 

Two important problems regarding the claimed non-existent terrorism by Moslems:

 

1.  If there are no Moslem terrorists blowing themselves up or beheading dozens of people or shooting as many people as possible in suicidal attacks, that means that these barbarities are being conducted by “false flag operators”, meaning mostly American agitators.  Could someone please tell me where they find so many Americans willing to throw away their lives to accomplish some arcane political acts of protest in order to give the American hierarchy a strong excuse to conduct wars all over the world?  Doesn’t sound like any Americans I have ever met.

 

2.  If it is true that these “faux-Moslem terrorists” are not Moslems but actually members of other religions, why isn’t that group being fought ferociously by offended Moslems who are totally outraged by these usurpers who steal the good name and reputation of “The Religion of Peace” ™?  There should have been a long-standing armed avenging force such as an “All-Moslem, Anti-Terrorist, Rapid-Reaction, Elite Special Forces, World-wide Assault and Vengeance Regiment” that travels all over the world on a moment’s notice to kill, capture, torture, and execute all the pretenders to the shining Moslem heritage?  The best reason no such Regiment operates or even exists or is even in the planning stages, is the simple fact that everyone, including all the “supposedly offended” Moslem groups, is tacitly admitting that the original claims, evasions, and excuses are totally false.  Feel free to provide logical countervailing evidence.

 

Randy

+++

Schrödinger’s Jihad

 

By Daniel Greenfield

May 13, 2015

Sultan Knish

 

The great paradox of the War on Terror is that we are fighting an enemy that doesn’t exist. We are told incessantly that there is no such thing as a Muslim terrorist.

 

There may be a tiny minority of violent extremists, but they are only a tiny minority of no importance whatsoever. And yet we’ve been at war with this same infinitesimally tiny minority for decades.

This tiny minority has killed thousands of Americans. It has the support of entire governments in tiny countries like Pakistan (182 million), Iran (77 million) and Syria (22 million). We are told that this tiny minority is no way representative of the world’s billion Muslims, and yet it’s hard to find a Muslim country that doesn’t support or harbor a terrorist group.

We were told that the problems was their governments, but the Arab Spring showed us that democratic elections lead to governments that are even more supportive of tiny minority of extremists who are somehow taking over entire countries.

Everything we’ve been told is obviously a lie. And the best evidence comes from the liars themselves.

The media is howling that a bunch of cartoonists in Texas were irresponsible for sketching Islam’s dead warlord because they should have known that Muslim terrorists would come to kill them for it. But if the media is right and Islam is a religion of peace, then why should they have anticipated a terrorist attack?

And if Islam isn’t a religion of peace, then the media has been irresponsibly lying to us and the cartoonists have been risking their lives to warn us of that lie.

The talking heads on the television insist that the cartoon contest was irresponsible because there were bound to be “some crazies” who would “take the bait”. But if Islam is no more violent than any other religion, shouldn’t it be just as statistically likely that some Christian or Jewish crazies would attack one of the art exhibits, plays or musicals ridiculing and blaspheming against their religions?

Weren’t museums and galleries exhibiting “works of art” like Piss Christ or Shekhina provoking and baiting those Jewish and Christian crazies? And since there are more Christians than Muslims in America, isn’t it statistically far more likely that there should have been far more Christian terror attacks targeting blasphemous exhibits?

We can only conclude that there is a much higher proportion of “crazies” among Muslims than among Christians. How much higher? 78 percent of Americans identify as Christians. 0.6 percent claim to be Muslims. Only 0.3 percent appear to be Sunnis, who are responsible for ISIS and Al Qaeda attacks.

There is indeed a tiny minority of extremists in America. It’s known as Islam.

What keeps the lie alive is another paradox. Call it Schrödinger’s Jihad. The more famous Schrödinger’s Cat is a paradox in which a cat in a sealed box with poison that has a 50 percent chance of being released is in an indeterminate state. It is neither dead nor alive until someone opens the box.

In Schrödinger’s Jihad, the Muslim terrorist is in an indeterminate state until some Western observer opens the box, collapses his wave function and radicalizes him. The two Muslim Jihadists were in an indeterminate state until Pamela Geller and Bosch Fawstin and the other “provocateurs” suddenly turned them into terrorists in a matter of days or weeks. It didn’t matter that Elton Simpson, one of the Garland terrorists, had already been dragged into court for trying to link up with Jihadists in Africa.

Every Muslim is and isn’t a terrorist. He is both a peaceful spiritual person who is eager to embrace our way of life and a violent killer who can be set off by the slightest offense. Like the cat in the box that is neither dead nor alive, he is both violent and peaceful, moderate and extremist, a solid citizen and a terrorist. He does not choose which of these to be or to become; we decide what he will be.

The Jihadist paradox is that the Muslim terrorist is always defined by what we do, not by what he does.

 

Islamic terrorism does not exist independently of the Western observer. It is not a Jihad with deep historical and theological roots within Islam, but a reaction to our interactions with Muslims.

Obama insists that talking about Islamic terrorism ‘summons’ them into being. By admitting the existence of Islamic terrorists, we ‘radicalize’ Muslims. Even the words ‘Islamic terrorism’ creates Islamic terrorists who otherwise wouldn’t exist.

The real threat is not from the terrorists, it’s from the truth.

When we tell the truth, people die. The truth turns Muslims into terrorists while the lies soothe them back into non-existence. Underneath all the academic terminology is the dream logic of wishful thinking. If we believe that Islam is a religion of peace, it will be a peaceful religion, and if we accept the reality that it’s violent, then it will become violent. Islam does not define itself. We define it however we want. Our entire counterterrorism policy is based around the perverse ostrich belief that Islamic terrorism is a problem that we create by recognizing its existence. If we ignore it, it will go away.

The lies about Islam are sustained by a deep conviction among liberals that the “Other” minorities are not real people with real beliefs and cultures, but victims in a game of power played out in the West. Islamic terrorism, like gay marriage or Global Warming, is just another step in the progressive pilgrim’s progress. It’s a problem that we caused and need to atone for in our cosmic karmic journey.

Westerners are privileged observers who have power while those minorities they observe do not. The duel between the Western left and right is taking place outside the box to determine what will be in the box once it’s forced open, while the oppressed minorities are in a state of indeterminacy in the box.

The Schrödinger’s Jihad paradox has many other adjoining boxes. Some are filled with dictators and criminals. If the progressive observer can open the box and find the root cause, out comes a good person; if the right opens the box, then out will march the terrorists, drug dealers and warlords.

The other side of the rhetoric about oppression and colonization, of punching up and punching down is the conviction that those at the bottom do not have free will or agency. If the mugger chooses to mug, rather than being driven to it by poverty, if Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union gleefully chose conquest instead of being forced to it by Western imperialism, and if the Muslim terrorist is not a helpless victim, but an abuser, then the moral imperative of the left’s worldview collapses in a heap.

If Muslims are real people who are at least as capable of imperialism, racism, slavery and destroying the planet as any Westerner, and who have been doing all of these things a lot longer, then leftists would have to accept that they are tearing down the most progressive civilization on the planet on behalf of ridiculously reactionary civilizations. Not only would they no longer be the privileged observers in control of the future, but they would have to see themselves as destroyers of what is left of the future.

The left refuses to blame Islam or Muslims because that would mean admitting that they are people.

Schrödinger’s Jihad is a child’s toy box for overgrown children who view Muslims as social justice dolls and terrorist action figures instead of people as flawed and complicated as they are. The left refuses to take Islamic theology seriously because it is incapable of understanding different points of view.

It approaches Islam as a race, rather than a religion, because it refuses to delve into what its beliefs are. Instead it chooses to see Muslims as blank slates to be filled with its ideology, as indeterminate patterns that can be reshaped into whatever they want them to be. It does not want to know what it says in the Koran, because that ruins its wonderful fantasy of Muslims as an oppressed race, rather than a creed.

 

Lies that are based on what we want to be true are the hardest to disprove. A lie that is tied into identity cannot be touched without destroying the entire identity of an individual or a movement.

The lies about Islam run into the heart of what the left is. To the left, everything is indeterminate and everything can be reshaped. Existence flows from power and power is pitted against progress. By destroying that which exists, they can bring their dreams to life. The dream is stronger than reality.

The left doesn’t really believe that Muslim terrorists exist except when we bring them to life. The real animating force behind Al Qaeda was George W. Bush or Dick Cheney. The true power behind ISIS is Pamela Geller or the Pentagon. The Westerner opens the box and the Muslim terrorist comes out. When Western civilization as we know it is destroyed, then the left believes Muslim terrorism will end. Kill the observer and the cat never existed. Destroy the dreamer and the nightmare dies with him.

The truth is more dangerous than the terrorists. Terrorists can kill the body, but truth can kill the dream.

________________________

Sultan Knish Subscription Options

 

Islam: Not a Religion of Peace, but a ‘House of War’


I am going to proffer a guess that someone at WND read the May 13 post “The Muslim Solution”. That post offered two concepts to solving the perpetual Quranic edict against non-Muslims.
 
WND sent out a book review of a book they are releasing on July 8, 2015 – “House of War: Islam’s Jihad Against the World”. This book exposes the real nature of Islam according to its own considered holy writings. So if any generous soul decides to pre-order the book, perhaps contact me to let me know about your generosity. The need for contact is I’d hate to receive 100 copies of what promises to be an awesome read. J
 
House of War bk jkt 
JRH 5/15/15

Please Support NCCR

***************************
Islam: Not a Religion of Peace, but a ‘House of War’
 
Review sent by and by WND.com
Sent: 5/14/2015 12:22 PM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

WASHINGTON – With the toppling of one Mideast dictator after another and the ensuing “Arab Spring,” horrendous terrorist attacks are increasingly being perpetrated by groups and individuals claiming to act in the name of Islam.

“The bad quasi-secular dictatorships of the Middle East have been replaced,” says G. M. Davis, leaving chaos and anarchy, a “fertile ground for jihadist groups whose violent aspirations are in no way limited to their own societies.” Yet Western political leaders, with the support of the major media, have consistently affirmed their belief that, despite the violence done in its name, Islam is a religion of peace.

The critical question is, who is right? Do Muslims who wage violent jihad against unbelievers fundamentally misunderstand their own religion? Or are the jihadists following their holy book in their willingness to die as martyrs according to the dictates of their god, who promises paradise to those who “fight in his cause and kill and are killed, a promise binding on him in truth” (Koran 9:111)? With the West engaged in military operations in multiple Islamic countries and with a rapidly growing Muslim population at home, the answer is of critical importance to the future of Western Civilization.

 
Relying primarily on Islam’s own sources, House of War: Islam’s Jihad Against the World (formerly Religion of Peace? Islam’s War Against the World and now available in paperback), compellingly documents that Islam is indeed a violent, expansionist ideology that seeks the subjugation and destruction of other faiths, cultures, and systems of government.

To be published by WND Books on July 8, House of War explains how Islam is more than just a religion. It is a system of government, seeking to extend its own peculiar legal code – Sharia law – over the entire world. The “peace” Islam seeks is a world united by the Islamic faith and Sharia law under which all other faiths and political regimes have been either suppressed or eliminated. “Jihad” is the violent struggle against the non-Islamic world to bring it into “submission” to Islamic rule.


“The idea that Islam is a religion of peace,” says Davis, “is fundamentally, totally, and disastrously wrong.” Westerners have been indoctrinated to believe that the jihadists they see on television are extremists who have twisted their religion to serve a violent purpose, when in fact, “Islam is intrinsically violent. It is the impetus for modern terrorism, and its doctrines necessitate that the only possible relationship between Islamic civilization and non-Islamic civilization is war or subjugation,” says Davis. By delving into key Islamic writings, Davis reveals the fastest-growing religion in the world for what it is – an existential threat to Western Civilization, a reality to which Western leaders remain determinedly blind.
 
G.M. Davis (author)
 
G. M. Davis is a Mideast scholar, author, and filmmaker. He graduated from the University of Rochester in 1997 with a BA in political science, and from Stanford in 2003 with a PhD in the same area of study. In 2005, he produced and directed the feature documentary, Islam: What the West Needs to Know.
House of War will be available on July 8, 2015.

If you would like to receive a review copy of House of War, please contact WND marketing at marketing@wnd.com.

 
________________________________
WND | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006
Copyright 1997-2015 WND.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Countering Islamic Apologist with Truth


Insanity & Consequence of Islam

 

John R. Houk

© April 17, 2015

 

Zaheer Baig posted a comment on my “About Page” on my WordPress blog called NeoConservative Christian Right (NCCR). Raig is an apologist for Islam and is pursuing the deceptive (or self-deceived) line that Islam is peace and goes on to include other Quranic lies pertaining that Biblical persons were and always have been Islamic:

 

Zaheer Baig | April 14, 2015 at 2:26 AM

 

Islam is a natural way of life that encourages one to give due attention to their relationship with God and His creation. Islam teaches that it is through the doing of good deeds and seeking the pleasure of God that souls find true happiness and peace. It is in this context that the word Islam derives from the root word “salam,” or peace.

God sent Prophets to teach mankind how to worship Him; starting with Adam, including Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the last of the messengers, Muhammad (peace be upon them all). The Islamic position is that all of these prophets came with the same message, that there is no deity worthy of worship except the One True God, known in Arabic as Allah.

 

Vlad Tepes found an interesting quote about Islam from the irreligious yet seeker of a self-satisfactory answer about that which is divine – Voltaire (1694-1777):

 

“The Koran teaches fear, hatred, contempt for others, murder as a legitimate means for the dissemination and preservation of this satanic doctrine, it talks ill of women, classifies people into classes, calls for blood and ever more blood. Yet, that a camel trader sparks uproar in his tribe, that he wants to make his fellow citizens believe that he talked to the archangel Gabriel; that he boasted about being taken up into heaven and receiving a part of that indigestible book there, which can shake common sense on every page, that to gain respect for this work, he covers his country with fire and iron, that he strangles fathers, drags away daughters, that he leaves the beaten a free choice between death and his faith: now this is certainly something that no-one can excuse, unless he came as a Turk into the world, unless superstition has stifled any natural light of reason in him. ”

 

Voltaire (1694-1788) Translation by SIMONXML from “ISLAM – Dem Untergang geweiht” by Thomas K. Luther, p.24. (Voltaire quote on Islam from the 1700s; Posted by Eeyore; Vlad Tepes; 4/16/15 – Bold text by Editor JRH)

 

Voltaire was no friend of Christianity or any revealed religion including Islam. And yet he was also wise enough to provide an astute observation of that theopolitical religion’s Quran. In the first paragraph I called Zaheer Baig deceptive; however I also gave him (actually I don’t know if the person is male or female) the benefit of the doubt by throwing in parentheses “self-deceptive”. I mention this because there are a number of Muslims that toe the line about “Islam is Peace”. Frankly if you examine the Islamic writings as did Voltaire you will discover that Islam is so far from peace that is laughable not to exchange “peace” for “violent”.

 

To be clear though deceiving or self-deceived Muslims will tell a non-Muslim (Islam labels as kafir) that Islam is peace and quote Quranic references that show a shining light of a religion that embraces a brotherhood who has an opportunity to submit and worship their deity Allah which in turns provides the assurance of peace.

 

At al-Islam.org there is a demonstration ecstatic relationship between Allah perceived as the Creator and that deity’s so-called creation:

 

 

We cannot understand certain questions in this regard unless we know what sort of relationship there exists between Allah and the creation. …

 

Anyhow the relationship between Allah and the creation is not of the sort that exists, for example, between father and son, that is between two things existing independently but related to each other. The sun and its rays are an example of a closer relationship. In this case also the sun and its rays are two different things, each having a separate existence to some extent. Man and his mental and physical faculties are an example of another kind of relationship.

 

Even in this case man and his faculties are not identical, though they are closely related. Unlike all these examples, the relationship between the existing things and Allah, Who is the source of their existence, is of quite a different kind and cannot be compared to any of the relationships mentioned above. At several places in the Qur’an and the traditions the relationship between Allah and His creation has been described as Allah’s glory. The Qur’an says:

 

When his Lord revealed His glory to the mountain. (Surah al-A’raf, 7:143).

 

There is a sentence in the Samat Supplication which says:

 

‘By the light of Your glory You revealed to the mountain and thus sent it down crashing…’

 

 

Meanings of Al-Hamd

 

We said earlier that the first possibility about the definite article in al-Hamdu is that it might be denoting comprehensiveness. In that case hamd (praise) would mean all praises, and the word ‘hamd’ as well as the word, ‘ism’ will have a sense of multitude. From this point of view ‘al-hamdu lillahi’ would mean that every praise that is made is that of Allah, for it is always the praise of some aspect of His manifestation or glory.

 

The sun manifests itself in its rays. Man is manifested in his seeing and hearing faculties. Allah manifests Himself far more clearly in every creation of His. Therefore, when anything is praised actually a manifestation of Allah’s glory is praised.

 

As all the existing things are the signs of Allah, they are His names. According to the second possibility we mentioned, the meaning would be diametrically different, and ‘al-hamdu lillahi’ would signify that no praise made by any praiser was that of Allah, although in this case also His glory is revealed in all the objects which are praised. But our praise cannot be absolute, nor are we capable of praising the Absolute Being.

 

Anyhow, as all pluralities are lost and absorbed in the unity of the Absolute Being, it may be said that from one angle even in this case it is the Absolute Being that is praised. The only difference is … (Light Within Me: Part 3.2: Relationship between Allah and His Creation; By Ayatullah Murtadha Mutahhari; Allamah Sayyid Muhammad Husayn at-Tabataba’i, and Ayatullah Sayyid Imam Ruhallah al-Musawi al-Khomeini; Al-Islam.org [Shi’ite website]; Copyright Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project 1995 – 2015)

 

WOW! If you are a person searching for divine attunement with an eternal deity that provides inner peace and inner fulfillment this sounds alluringly enticing. You’ll figure out that this represents Shi’ite theopolitical theology which in full disclosure probably represents only about 10% of Islam, but the significance is the deception is an English translation of some big dogs from Iran. Also it is crap compared the part of Islam that abrogates these enticing words.

 

Take note the alluring enticement is also among the Sunni that roughly represent about 90% of Islam as well:

 

 

The Sunni ideology is directly related to the doctrine of monotheism, in which the relationship between God and the elements of nature, either humanity or even non-living beings, is that of a continuous state of complete submission and worshipping from the side of the created to God, the Creator:

 

[Blog Editor: This essay gives the translation for Quran 17:44 but mistakenly sources Quran 44:17. Or the essay author sets the Surah first than the chapter but I don’t think so.]

 

This relationship of servitude takes place without any merging or sharing of the divine nature by the Creator and his creation, but it takes place while God is completely outside of and beyond the world.

 

According to the Sunni ideology, God is God and man is man. Their relationship is very close. …

 

But this closeness does not imply identification between the two. Moreover, orthodox Sunni belief tends to hold a transcendental vision of Godhead in the way it believes that Allah does not resemble his creation. Allah describes Himself in Quran saying:

 

Quran 42: 11

 

This verse of the Quran encompasses that Allah is completely different from His creation in His attributes and actions.

 

Any created being, either man or any other element of nature, is liable to materialistic measures of existence, i.e. time and place which cannot be ascribed to Godhead. God exists but without a place. …

 

 

Although the relationship between God and man is that of servitude and submission to God’s will, it is not to be of subjugation or humiliation. On the contrary, it is of trust and respect. In the following long verse Allah the Almighty sheds light on the special and intimate relationship between Him and man amongst the other creations. He says:

 

Quran 2:30-34

 

We learn from these verses that God created humans with the purpose of being God’s vicegerents and trustees on earth.

 

 

According to the Sunni conception of God and His relationship with nature, nature is not the manifestation of God but of His infinite wisdom, capability and empowerment.

 

God has created nature in this perfect form as signs of His existence which guides humanity to strengthen their belief in Him. Allah the … (God, Nature, and Humanity; By Amani Aboul Fadl Farag; OnIslam.net; 2012/10/30)

 

Okay, I realize I probably overshared on Shia and Sunni subject pertaining to the allure of Islam, but you need to understand just how sugarcoated the deception is and the nature of the theology is taught to Muslim adherents who should know that the Quran, Hadith and Sira are very violent against Muslims AND toward Muslims who deviate from the submission standards that make Islam theopolitical.

 

The reality is Islam is a dualistic theological ideology that mixes the standard of political governance in its submission process. The short explanation for this dualism is that two opposite Quranic statements or commands are both correct depending on the circumstances presented to the Muslim.

 

Not only are there two Korans, Meccan and Medinan, that are different in tone and subject matter, but also the Koran has many verses that contradict each other.

 

Koran 2:219 says that Muslims should be tolerant and forgiving to People of the Book.
Koran 9:29 says to attack the People of the Book until they pay the jizyah, the dhimmi tax, submit to Sharia law and be humbled.

 

Which verse shows the true nature of Islam?

 

The Koran recognizes its contradictions and even gives a rule to resolve the contradictions. The later verse abrogates (supersedes) the earlier verse. This does not mean, however, that the earlier verse is wrong or in error. This would be impossible since the fundamental hypothesis is that Allah created the Koran and, hence, the earlier verse must be true or Allah would be wrong.

 

 

But, the earlier verse is true and still used. Abrogation does not negate the early verse. Indeed, the earlier “peaceful” verse that is abrogated is the one most apt to be used in public discourse.

 

… In Koranic logic, two statements can contradict each other and both are true. This is dualistic logic.

 

 

… Duality includes the special case of abrogation and it explains how the entire doctrine of Koran and Sunna work. It is not just the Koran that is contradictory, but all of the Sunna. 

 

… (Statistical Islam Part 5 of 9 – Abrogation and Dualism; By Bill Warner; Political Islam; 12/2/10)

 

In an earlier post by Bill Warner on Islamic Dualism he writes:

 

 

The Koran defines an Islamic logic that is dualistic. … … so in dualistic logic. All of the doctrine refers to two classes of people–Muslims and non-Muslims, kafirs. The doctrine that applies to kafirs is political in nature and is rarely neutral or positive. The part of the doctrine that applies to Muslims is cultural, legal, and religious.

 

The second grand division of Islamic doctrine is into religious Islam and political Islam. It is surprising how much of the doctrine is political. Approximately 67% of the Meccan Koran and 51% of the Medinan Koran is political. About 75% of the Sira is about what was done to the kafir. Roughly 20% of the Hadith is about jihad, a political act.

 

… (Duality and Political Islam; Bill Warner; Political Islam; 10/26/07)

 

You should also read “Peace or Jihad? Abrogation in Islam,” by David Bukay.

 

Zaheer Baig further asserts that Islam is derived from the Arabic salaam (he/she spelled it “salam”) which means peace, BUT is it true that Islam is derived from salaam?

 

 

The word Islam derives from the Arabic triconsonantal root sīn-lām-mīm (SLM [ س ل م ]). Many different words are created from this root word by inserting different vowels between the three root consonants. Many English speakers wrongly assume that if two Arabic words share the same root word then their meanings are related when in reality the fact that some words share the same root word does not imply a relationship between the meanings of the words. For instance, all of these words are derived from the root S-L-M:

 

o   Islam = Submission

 

o   Salam = Well-being/Peace

 

o   (Derivation of) Salama = To be saved or to escape from danger (when refering to a female)

 

o   Saleem = To be saved or to escape from danger (when refering to a male)

 

o   Aslam = To submit

 

o   Istaslama = To surrender

 

o   Musal = Undisputed

 

o   Tasleem = To receive a salutation or becoming submitted

 

Many people have wrongly attempted to equate the word Islam with peace by showing that Islam, meaning ‘submission’, shares a root word with Salaam, meaning ‘peace’. But if such relationships between the meanings of Arabic words can be created then that would imply that there is a relationship between one of the derivations of the infinitive Salama, meaning the stinging of the snake or tanning the leather, and Salam, meaning peace; a relationship which obviously does not exist.

 

The Compendium of Muslim Texts, compiled by the USC-MSA, the Muslim Students Association at the University of Southern California,[1] confirms READ THE REST (The Meaning of Islam; Updated by Axius; WikiIslam; page was last modified 15:59, 6 February 2014)

 

Mo recited Biblical stories but noticeably transformed those stories to fit a perception that validated Allah as the true god, Mo as the last prophet and the other Judeo-Christian faiths based on the Bible as corrupted and corrected by Mo’s prophetic words eventually edited and turned into the Quran. That should send up a red flag in the believability factor. Duped original Arabs fell for Mo’s line and Biblically knowledgeable Jews and Christians often paid with their lives knowing Mo was a false prophet.

 

,,,

 

The Quran alters stories and beliefs taught in the Christian Bible

 

… The Old and New Testament stories are anointed as divine messages from “prophets”, but the stories and beliefs those prophets introduced are noticeably altered before Islam’s holy book takes a new tack, condemning the people, message, and beliefs of both Judaism and Christianity.

 

 

The Quran tells different versions of New Testament stories

 

The Quran promotes its own modified view of Christianity and Jesus’ life. The Quran expands on Mary’s life, introduces new tales of Jesus’ early life, and goes to great lengths to deemphasize Jesus as a divine figure, proclaiming he was simply another “Messenger” (like Muhammad). In fact, Islam teaches its followers that Jesus’ crucifixion did not occur but rather was a cunning deception.

 

The Quran tells different versions of Old Testament stories

 

According to the Quran, God revealed new details of Old Testament stories to Muhammad. In particular, events surrounding Adam and Eve, Abraham, Lot, Joseph, Jacob, Noah, and numerous other minor Old Testament characters are revised. Most Old Testament stories related in the Quran are similar to the Christian (and Jewish) versions but with additional, surprising details “revealed by God” to Muhammad (these new versions of Old Testament stories are often repeated several times throughout the Quran).

 

 

Initial acceptance of other religions (e.g. Jewish, Christian)

 

Initially the Quran accommodates other religions and in particular, accepts the word of the Old and New Testaments as messages from God. While initially seeming tolerant of Jewish and Christian beliefs, it quickly reveals that the Quran has the authority to override Old and New Testament teachings.

 

 

The Muslim version of heaven

 

The Muslim vision of heaven differs slightly from the typical Christian depiction. In fact, there are seven heavens mentioned in the Quran (a concept carried over from the Jewish Talmud).

 

 

The Quran notes that people are “ranked” in heaven according to the number and quality of good deeds they do, and many Muslims believe this ranking dictates which “heaven” you will be admitted to.

 

In most instances, heaven is described as a “garden wherein streams flow”, a peaceful place where those granted entry can live an existence of luxury amongst flowing rivers, fruit trees, servants, and as noted in one verse, young virgin women. Notice that there is no mention of “72 virgins for every man” in the Quran. This often-quoted number comes from a hadith, a sort of eye-witness commentary on the Quran and life of Muhammad.

 

… Quite Lengthy but READ ENTIRETY (A Christian guide to the Quran – the surprising truth behind the religion of Islam; Bible Blender; 2/10/15)

 

Zaheer Baig mentions these names from the Quran that are also in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus:

 

Adam

 

·         In the Bible, God tells the man to name the animals.[22] In the Qur’an, God teaches Adam the names “of all things” and Adam repeats them.[15]

 

·         In the second of the Bible’s creation stories, the woman is created from the rib of the man. In the Qur’an, Eve is not mentioned by name, but it states that all mankind were created from one soul (Adam).[23][24]

 

·         In the Bible, the forbidden tree named is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (3:5), and while its fruit is often depicted as an apple, the Bible does not describe the fruit.[25] In the Qur’an the forbidden tree is not named but Shaitaan calls it The Tree of Eternity to deceive Adam and his wife.[15]

 

·         In the Bible, God creates man in His own image.[26] In the Qur’an, God says “Surely the likeness of (Prophet) Isa(Jesus in Bible) is with God as the likeness of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him, Be, and he was.”[8]

 

·         In the Qur’an, God tells the angels to prostrate before Adam (as a sign of respect and obedience), but Iblis (thereafter referred to as Shaitaan) refuses.[27] In the Bible, no such account is given.

 

·         According to the Bible, because of God’s curse, serpents have to crawl and eat dust, women have to suffer in childbirth, and men have to sweat for a living. The Biblical story also states that women will suffer from periods and will bear pregnancy pain.[28] This apparently differentiates blessing and obedience from pain and sinning. According to the Qur’an, no such curse was issued. The difficulties of life on earth are what makes it different from life in paradise. (Adam and Eve (آدم Adam and حواء Hawwaa); Wikipedia)

 

Cain and Able or (Qābīl and Hābīl)

 

The story of Cain and Abel

 

·         After Cain killed his brother Abel, The Quran says that “Allah sent a raven who scratched the ground to show him how to hide the shame of his brother.” Surah 5:31. This is not mentioned in the Bible. (The Bible vs. The Quran: The Story of Cain and Abel; By Abdullah al Araby; Islam Review)

 

Noah

 

·         The Qur’an focuses on a dialogue between Noah and the wicked (Hud 11:32–37), in which Noah unsuccessfully attempts to remonstrate with his countrymen, who reject his message. Genesis does not mention such a dialogue. (In the Christian Bible, 2Peter2:5, Noah is called a “preacher of righteousness”.)

 

·         In the Qur’an, Noah’s wife and one of his sons reject him (Hud 11:43) and die in the flood, while some people outside his family are faithful and join him (Hud 11:42). In the biblical narrative, Noah’s wife together with his three sons and their wives all board the Ark, but no others.

 

·         In the Qur’an, there is no such indication that the flood was universal, although many Islamic scholars claim to interpret otherwise.

 

·         In the Qur’an, the Ark is said to rest on the hills of Mount Judi (Hud 11:44); in the Bible, it is said to rest on the mountains of Ararat (Gen. 8:4) The Al-Djoudi (Judi) is apparently a mount in the Biblical mountain range of Ararat. The Qur’an cites a particular mount in the Ararat Range, whereas the Bible just mentions the Ararat Range by name. There is a Mount Al-Djoudi in the present-day Ararat mountain range in Turkey. (Noah (نوح Nūḥ); Wikipedia)

 

Abraham

 

·         In Genesis, the sacrificial son is Isaac, whereas in the Qur’an it is Ishmael (Ismā’īl إسماعيل), since it first narrates this story, followed by the account (mentioned above) of Abraham receiving the tidings of a son, Isaac (As-Saaffat 37:102–112. Therefore, Muslims believe the sacrificial son was Ishmael (Ismā’īl إسماعيل) and that this event happened prior to Isaac’s birth. It may be added that the name Abraham is a literary trope in Genesis Ab- “father-of(-many-nations)” while the Arabic name masks the connection. In the New Testament the son is Isaac (James 2:21).

 

·         While God seems to speak directly to Abraham in Genesis, He speaks through a vision in the Qur’an.

 

·         In the Qur’an, Abraham directly tells his son Ishmael (Ismā’īl إسماعيل) that he intends to sacrifice him. In Genesis, Abraham tells Isaac, that “God will provide the sacrifice.” (Abraham (Ibrāhīm ابراهيم); Wikipedia)

 

Isaac and Ishmael – Child of Promise?

 

·         Isaac was the only promised child of Abraham, a fact which the Quran agrees with (cf. Genesis 17:15-21; Surah 11:69-73, 37:112-113, 51:24-30). Ishmael was never a promised child.

 

·         Isaac was conceived miraculously to a barren mother and a very aged father, with the Quran likewise agreeing (cf. Genesis 17:15-17, 18:9-15, 21:1-7; Galatians 4:28-29; Surah 11:69-73, 51:24-30). Ishmael was conceived normally without the need of any miraculous intervention.

 

·         God promised that it would be Isaac’s descendants who would inherit the land given to Abraham. (Genesis 13:14-18, 15:18-21, 28:13-14). Ishmael had no part in the inheritance and promise given to Isaac through Abraham. (Abraham and the Child of Sacrifice – Isaac or Ishmael? By Sam Shamoun; Answering Islam)

 

The TRUE Word of God on Isaac and Ishmael:

 

21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the[a] two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar— 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children— 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.

 

28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise. 29 But, as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.”[a] 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free. (Galatians 4: 21-26, 28-31 NKJV)

 

Moses

 

·         The Biblical Moses is reluctant to become a prophet and makes excuses. He eventually agrees and Aaron speaks and performs miracles at first until Moses is ready and takes over. In Quran, Aaron was made God’s messenger on Moses’ request to back him up in the difficult task. Moses asked God to give him human support from Family, then ask for Aaron (his brother) praising Aaron by saying that he (Aaron) is better speaker than him (Moses).

 

·         The sorcerers, in the Quranic story, repent after seeing Moses’ signs and submit to God at the anger of Pharaoh.

 

·         In the Quran, Pharaoh didn’t repent but tried to deceive Moses and God by saying that now he believes in one God, the God of Moses and Aaron (while drowning). But God didn’t accept this because he sought repentance at the time of death after seeing the angels.

 

·         In the Bible, Moses first goes to Pharaoh without showing any signs.

 

·         In Exodus, Aaron helps make the golden calf. In the Quran, Aaron himself was a messenger of God and was representing Moses in his absences. He opposed that idea with all his might and warned the Israelites that God will be angry with them. In the Qur’an, a person named Samiri (not to be confused with Samaritans) leads the Israelites to worship the golden calf.

 

·         Pharaoh drowns in Exodus. In the Quran, Pharaoh drowned as well, but God said in the Qur’an that he preserved the pharaoh’s body as an example for generations to come (or made an example for coming generations) (Moses (Mūsā موسى); Wikipedia)

 

Jesus Christ the Son of God

 

 

… The Christian faith has several key beliefs. The teaching that is unique to the Christian faith is that there is one God who eternally manifests Himself in three persons: the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This is known as the Godhead or the blessed Trinity. The second critical doctrine is that Jesus of Nazareth is the only begotten Son of God; therefore He is unique from everyone else. His Father was not human, but the holy God of Israel. The third key doctrine is that the Lord Jesus died on the cross to pay the penalty for man’s sin and then rose from the dead. There are other important doctrines, but these three really comprise the very heart of the Christian faith.

 

 

… The Koran claims that the Lord Jesus is only an apostle and for Christians to desist from teaching the blessed Trinity! In this same Sura, the Koran denies the Lord Jesus is the Son of God.

 

In one Sura the Koran attacks the very heart of Christianity by denying the blessed Trinity and that the Lord Jesus is the only begotten Son of God! It calls Christians liars and demands that the preaching of the Trinity and Jesus being the Son of God stop. The Koran identifies Christians sometimes as “followers of the book,” but when they proclaim Christian doctrine, the Koran then calls them liars. …

 

 

… The Koran even states in Sura 9:30 that those that believe Allah has a son should be destroyed by Allah! The Koran is very clear that it was written to attack this Christian doctrine.

 

 

The Koran literally says the Lord Jesus did not die on the cross. It claims that He appeared to have died on the cross, but He was not killed nor was He crucified. Allah just took Jesus to heaven. The Koran directly attacks the vicarious death of Jesus of Nazareth on the cross, and thus rejects His redemption of man from sin. …

 

 

… The very heart of Christianity that the Lord is the Son of God is the worst sin in Islam! According to the Koran, Allah forbids heaven to anyone who commits this sin and their abode is hell without any help.

 

 

… The Koran states that God does not have a son. The Bible states that all life is in the Lord Jesus as the only begotten Son of God. With the Bible, if you have the Son, you have eternal life: if you do not have the Son, then you do not have eternal life. A person that does not believe this makes God a liar. The Koran written 500 years after these verses denies the Son, and therefore makes the God of the Bible a liar. The Bible is written in the positive stating God has a Son. …

 

 

… The warning of the Bible is same today as it was at the time of Muhammad:

 

1 John 5:9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.

 

(10) He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.

 

(11) And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.

 

(12) He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

 

(13) These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

 

… (The Koran Directly Attacks Christianity; By John McTernan; Defend and Proclaim the Faith; Copyright 2009 by John McTernan: All rights reserved.)

 

 

Needless to say, I highly disagree with Zaheer Baig assertions that Islam is a peaceful faith in which “…  souls find true happiness and peace” and that the “Islamic position is that all of these prophets came with the same message, that there is no deity worthy of worship except the One True God, known in Arabic as Allah.”

 

That Islamic deception is a blatant antichrist lie!

 

18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the[a] Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.

 

22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. 23 Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

 

24 Therefore let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father. 25 And this is the promise that He has promised us—eternal life.

 

26 These things I have written to you concerning those who try to deceive you.

 

4 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess that[a] Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world.

 

12 No one has seen God at any time. If we love one another, God abides in us, and His love has been perfected in us. 13 By this we know that we abide in Him, and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit. 14 And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world. 15 Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God.16 And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him. (1 John 2: 18-19, 22-26; 4: 1-3, 12-16 NKJVBold text by Editor)

 

JRH 4/17/15

Please Support NCCR

The Critics of Islam Were Right: …


Deception of Islam - Taqiyya

Mike Dobbins is an author most noted for writing “The Case Against Atheism” and “Atheism as a Religion” has written apology to the critics of Islam for besmirching them as wicked Islamophobes. Here’s the author profile I found on the Amazon author page:

 

Mike Dobbins is a life-long seeker. In his own journey of self-discovery, he has encountered many uplifting, humble, and thought provoking people. Stories of hope, transformation, and faith abound. Unfortunately, he has also encountered many arrogant, smug, and condescending individuals. Many of these people tend to be atheist or new atheist in nature. Consequently, Dobbins took it upon himself to start a dialogue with atheists and advocate for tolerance of religion and faith. This only led to more atheists exposing their true intolerant nature and denying their faith when it was laid bare. Dobbins felt obligated to take the case to the atheists. He started a website: http://www.TheCaseAgainstAtheism.com, a twitter feed, and researched and wrote the book ‘The Case Against Atheism’. He lays out how today’s atheism is based on faith, intolerant, unscientific, hopeless, and he isn’t backing down. It is long overdue for today’s atheism to be critiqued and confronted. Dobbins has taken up the charge and he asks you to join him.

 

Mike Dobbins

 

Mike Dobbins

 

(After I checked the website TheCaseAgainstAtheism.com, I discovered that the link is either dead or perhaps temporarily down.)

 

I gathered from Mr. Dobbins’ apology that he was a rabid apologist favoring the deception that Islam is peace. He took the challenge to read Islamic holy writings and discovered that was not the case. Hey, I learned a new word for my vocabulary – “smearest”.

 

JRH 4/14/15 (Hat Tip: Examine Islam)

Please Support NCCR

****************************

The Critics of Islam Were Right: An Apology to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Sam Harris, Bill Maher and Other So-Called Islamophobes

By MIKE DOBBINS, CP GUEST CONTRIBUTOR

April 13, 2015 1:38 pm

Christian Post

 

For years I was an apologist for Islam, as regrettably, many still remain. I only read books and believed those who painted Islam in a peaceful, glowing light. I made excuses for radical Muslims and lived in a flood of denial that religious teachings could still, in this modern age of drones and clones, motivate a person to commit evil. I criticized the numerous atheists including Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Sam Harris, and Bill Maher warning of the dangers inherent in Islamic doctrines, recklessly labeling them Islamophobes.

 

Today I’m writing to say I’m sorry, I apologize, and I ask for your forgiveness. We who have blindly defended Islam and called you Islamophobes are tragically wrong.

 

My mind first began to change last May when I read an interview by Sam Harris with Ayaan Hirsi Ali in which she addresses the misapplication of the term Islamophobia. This article, along with the seeds atheists planted over the years urging me to do more research, motivated me to delve into the religion. I read the Quran, many Hadith, the biography of Muhammad, the history of Jihad, and Islamic law. This is what I learned:

 

The critics of Islam are right. Islam is intrinsically, alarmingly violent, hateful and oppressive on a scale greater than all other major religions combined. To say that radical Islamists are motivated to commit atrocities and embrace oppression based on religious doctrine is the understatement of the century.

 

I, like most defenders of Islam, was ignorant, naïve, and in denial. I wrongly assumed all holy books have enough good messages to offset the bad. I wrongly assumed that, like Jesus, Muhammad promoted peace, love, and non-violence. I wrongly assumed criticism of Islam equates to criticism of all Muslims.

 

While I apologize to those wrongly labeled Islamophobes, my biggest apology is owed to Muslims. Muslims have needlessly suffered under oppressive Islamic religious and political doctrines as thousands of uninformed smearests like myself rushed to judge and silence critics of Islam. By not acknowledging the Islamic link to radical violence and hate, smearests have unwittingly allowed it to spread. The smearests, denialists, and the naïve have, unknowingly, turned their back on moderate Muslims and a reformed, peaceful Islam.

 

We who have carelessly thrown around the Islamophobe label including Glen Greenwald, Reza Aslan, and Karen Armstrong should lower our heads in shame and guilt. Few things are as morally depraved as attacking someone who criticizes Islam (Ayaan Hirsi Ali) rather than attacking the Islamic apostasy and blasphemy laws teaching Muslims they should kill her. We must now live with the knowledge that we’ve abandoned and betrayed our principles. Though we claim the mantle of human rights, free speech and equality, we lack the courage of our convictions when it offends someone. We make the cowardly lion look like Churchill.

 

In reality, those who criticize Islam, especially reform minded Muslims, are the bravest of the brave. They are literally putting their lives at risk by the simple act of criticizing the Quran, Muhammad, and Sharia.

 

It is the critics of Islam who are working steadfastly for equality and human rights for Muslims as apologists wallow in denial.

 

While we smearests have obsessed over shielding Islam from criticism, so-called Islamophobes were courageously standing up to oppressive Islamic doctrines and practices. While we smearests were unwittingly misinforming the public and deluding ourselves by not making the connection between Islamic religious teachings and Islamic hate and violence, so-called Islamophobes were connecting the dots and looking for solutions. While we smearests were busy tarnishing critics as bigots and racists, so called Islamophobes were busy defending equality of women, gays, and minorities, protecting free speech and religion, and advocating an end to cruel and unusual punishments.

 

Labeling every critic of Islam an Islamophobe has seriously diminished the smearests credibility. By grouping valid critics of Islam with bigots we water downed the meaning of Islamophobe and appear cruel and repressive of free speech.

 

Criticizing the Quran and Muhammad is not criticizing or stereotyping the Muslim minority just as criticizing The Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith is not criticizing or stereotyping the Mormon minority. When people criticize the Mormon holy book or prophet, rightfully, there is no attempt to shield Mormonism from criticism or smear the critics as Mormonophobes.

 

No religion, book, prophet, law, or God, no matter how sacredly held by the follower, is exempt from criticism. No religious belief or doctrine receives preferential treatment in a free society. Either all religions, books, and prophets are open to criticism or none are. We either live in a free society or tyrannical one.

 

Islam is a manmade religion (emphasis on the man part) and like all manmade religions, has serious moral shortcomings and requires rigorous criticism. Rather than self-censoring and abiding by Islamic blasphemy laws, we should be defending the importance of free speech, encouraging Islam to purge itself of blasphemy laws, and demonstrating the benefits free speech can bring to Islam.

 

Now, we smearests must make up for lost time and lost chances. We must double our efforts to criticize oppressive Islamic practices, doctrines, and regimes and demand reform. We must embrace Muslims who truly are moderate, acknowledge the faults in Islam, and are striving for coexistence, peace, equality, human rights, and freedom of expression and worship. All non-Muslims can support Muslims best by doing the same.

 

But by no means take my word for it. You owe it to yourself to do your own research and see if you too find a connection between Islamic teachings and Islamic violence and hate. I challenge everyone, especially smearests, to read the Quran, biographies of Muhammad, the history of Jihad, and the political ideology of Islam.

 

Perhaps you too will notice the Quran’s recurring theme of hating non-believers and the desert like absence of loving and inclusive passages to offset the vile and violent ones.

 

Perhaps you too will notice how Muhammad’s violent life mirrors that of members of the Islamic State and that it would be dangerous for any person to follow in Muhammad’s footsteps.

 

Perhaps you too will notice how there is no separation of Church and State in Islam and that most Islamic governments place Islamic law above Secular law.

 

It would be one thing if Islamic doctrines said Muslims should love non-Muslims and love their enemy. It would be one thing if the prophet Muhammad preached non-violence. It would be one thing if Islamic Laws supported equality for women, minorities, freedom of expression, and valued human rights. It would be one thing if the Quran taught the golden rule.

 

It is because they do the complete opposite that I am now speaking out.

___________________________

Copyright © 2015 The Christian Post, INC. All Rights Reserved.

 

About The Christian Post

The Heart of Darkness


Mo says convert to Islam or die

 

Justin Smith makes a very good case showing Obama and other deceived politically correct American leaders (Left, Center and Right) are full of baloney when it comes to the assertion that ‘Islam is peace’.

 

JRH 9/29/14

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

The Heart of Darkness

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 9/28/2014 11:25 PM

 

Islam is violent and repressive, and it is the “heart of darkness” at the center of the Islamic State’s inspiration and motivation, despite Barack Obama’s assertions in September 10th’s address to the nation that the Islamic State “is not Islamic” and that “no religion condones the killing of innocents.” Violence is an integral part of Islamic doctrine, following the example set by its prophet Mohammed, and in the name of Islam and Allah, Muslims have been murdering innocents, since 656 AD.

 

Six hundred years after Mohammed, one of Islam’s most respected scholars, Ibn Khuldan wrote ‘Muqaddimah’ (Introduction to History), which explained: “In the Muslim community, the holy war is religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or force.”

 

Like most good Muslims, Khaldun’s inspiration came from ‘The Verse of the Sword’, Sura 9:5, “revealed” towards the end of Mohammed’s life, as well as similar themes previous to Sura 9:

 

Sura 9:5__ “…kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them … But if they repent and perform As-Salat/ Iqamat-as-Salat [the Islamic ritual prayers], then leave their way free…” Also Sura 9:33__ “It is He [Allah] Who has sent His Messenger [Mohammed] with guidance and the religion of truth [Islam], to make it superior over all religions…”

 

The Hindu Kush, seventy-five thousand square miles between Afghanistan and Pakistan, was populated by Hindus until approximately 1000 AD and the Muslim invasions. An estimated 60 million Hindus were murdered by Muslims over a thousand year reign, and Hindu Kush is the Muslim name for the region. It means “Hindu Killer”.

 

Now today, the majority of the Muslim community worldwide, including the U.S., does not completely frown on their “holy warriors” in the Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Jaamat e-Islami and any other terror group one cares to mention, for fear of being called heretics or apostates themselves. The murderous “holy warriors” are following a literal interpretation of Koranic scripture, without omissions, innovation or revision. By contrast, heretical views deviate from doctrine.

 

The 2013 PEW Poll of the Muslim World shows that the majority of Muslims, in several countries, support the death penalty for Muslims who leave Islam, including Malaysia (58%), Egypt (88%), Jordan (83%), Afghanistan (79%), Gaza and the West Bank (62%) and Pakistan (75%); in 2006, a poll for ‘The Sunday Telegraph’ found 40% of British Muslims wanted Sharia Law in the UK and 20% supported the 7/7 bombers. And alarmingly, in 2011 nineteen percent of American Muslims stated they viewed Al Qaeda favorably, while a new poll shows 16% of the French population view the Islamic State favorably.

 

Are you beginning to see a pattern here?

Logical minded Americans were not fooled by the big lie Obama delivered before the United Nations on September 24th, when he spoke of Islam’s “great tradition that stands for … the dignity of life, not murder”. Americans see a significant number of Muslims still support Sharia Law, slavery, rape and Islamic inspired violence and murder in this 21st century, and rather than “a religion of peace”, Islam always has been and always will be an ideology of violence and conquest.

 

Don’t get me wrong. I am thankful for the many Muslims who simply adhere to the first early peaceful verses of the Koran, but let’s not allow that to dissuade us from seeing and revealing the fact that Islam was propagated through violence, staying with Mohammed’s teachings, and it is still utilizing violence today. This can clearly be seen by examining the teachings of Islam, the daily news reports and practically any good, scholarly history book.

 

One problem in Islamic tradition, affirmed by many scholars, is the doctrine of abrogation, which states that later revelation to Mohammed supersedes prior revelation. And the Koranic verses ordering Muslims to fight and slay infidels, Christians and Jews came after those admonishing Muslims to live with non-believers in peace and without religious compulsion.

 

As Obama spoke before the UN, he called on the Islamic nations and their leaders to address the spread of “extremism”, full well knowing that he was speaking to the very advocates of Wahabbist fundamentalism, other Islamic orthodoxies and proponents of inflexible, intolerant Islamic scholars, the likes of Sayyid Qutb. Saudi Arabia and Qatar, for example, have supported terrorism and financed the spread of Wahabbism and Qutb’s Islamic philosophy globally, including in America, for decades.

 

And now Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, the United Emirates and several others, who helped create, train and fund the Islamic State, are screaming for the U.S. and the West to end the vicious advance of the Islamic State. They look to destroy the Islamic State, only because they can no longer control its self-appointed “caliph”, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who has announced his intentions to take Mecca and Medina; so, it is fear of losing their power and their regimes that motivates them, not any disagreement with the Islamic State’s implementation of jihad and the violent doctrines of Islam.

 

What about the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hezbollah, which means “the party of Allah”, and Hamas, which means “Islamic Resistance Movement”? Does Obama deem these Islamic entities “not Islamic” too?

 

As Obama appealed to young Muslims to follow their “great tradition [Islam] that stands for education … innovation, not destruction”, he must have intentionally forgotten some of the other traditions of Islam. The recent spate of beheadings of Westerners by the Islamic State is only the old made new again, and although horrible beyond belief, they actually pale in comparison to the heinous atrocities committed in the name of Allah across the centuries. Three thousand Catholic nuns were raped at the Church of St Sophia during the sacking of Constantinople in 1453, and many other women and children were simply torn to pieces.

 

Hadith 107:13_ It was shown the Prophet said, “Allah wrote everything we need to know about Ihsan [kindness] so if you kill, perfect your killing and if you slaughter, perfect your slaughter, perfect your slaughter and sharpen your blade and comfort your sacrifice.”

 

Koran 8:12 “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

 

Millions of devout fundamentalist orthodox Muslims, devout in the manner of Osama bin Laden_ Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, are making preparations and have already been waging a divinely endorsed war against Europe, America and Israel. And, rather than continue against all reason and, in the light of Islam’s sacred texts, to propagate the lie that “Islam is peace”, which is placing America within a quagmire of reoccurring expansionist jihad, this administration and future administrations must cut all funding to all Islamic nations and acknowledge that “extremism” and violence are the basis of Islam, if America is to win the future war against Islam.

 

By Justin O Smith

________________________

Editor John R. Houk

© Justin O. Smith