Dem-Ukraine Impeachment Corruption


An intro by John R. Houk

Posted December 19, 2019

 

The Democratic Party is as corrupt as many of the Ukrainian oligarchs courted to depose President Trump. Giuliani ignored and vilified by the Dems and their propaganda machine MSM touches on some Dem-Ukrainian corruption. THEN Mark Alexander has some Original Intent thoughts on Impeachment.

 

JRH 12/19/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

***************************

Giuliani Says He’s Uncovered ‘Two Major’ Money-Laundering/Bribery Schemes Involving Joe Biden, Obama Admin

 

By Megan Fox

December 17, 2019

PJ Media

 

From right to left, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry and Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, Friday, Sept. 25, 2015, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

 

Rudy Giuliani went on Fox News with Laura Ingraham on Monday and dropped a huge bomb onto former Ukranian Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch and Joe Biden.

 

“What I uncovered, there are two major schemes,” said Giuliani. “One for 7.5 billion and the other one for 5 billion in money laundering that went on all through the Obama administration, part of it involved Joe Biden, the bribery part.” Giuliani went on to implicate American law enforcement at the very top for not investigating what he says is corruption.

 

“It’s a disgrace that he’s not under investigation in America, maybe because our law enforcement is too afraid, but the reality is it’s a complete defense for the president. When the president of the United States was asking the president of the Ukraine to investigate, he was asking him to investigate crimes at the highest level of both governments….he’s being impeached for doing the right thing.”

 

Giuliani also tweeted on Tuesday that “Yovanovitch needed to be removed for many reasons most critical she was denying visas to Ukrainians who wanted to come to the US and explain Dem corruption in Ukraine. She was OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and that’s not the only thing she was doing. She at minimum enabled Ukrainian collusion.”

 

 

Democrats have accused Giuliani of forcing Yovanovitch out for political reasons. He says that’s garbage. “I didn’t need her out of the way, I forced her out because she’s corrupt. I came back with a document that will show unequivocally that she committed perjury when she said she turned down the visa for [Ukrainian prosecutor] Mr. Shokin because of corruption. The fact is on the record…the reason given is because he’d had an operation and hadn’t recovered yet. The operation was two years before. There’s documented evidence that she committed perjury.”

 

These documents, according to Giuliani, were turned over to the State Department and included four other witness statements corroborating the allegations.

 

“I have 4 witnesses who will testify that she personally turned down their visas because they were going to come here and give evidence either against Biden or against the Democratic Party,” Giuliani told Ingraham. “There’s no question she that she was acting corruptly in that position and had to be removed. She should have been fired if the State Department weren’t part of the Deep State.”

 

Giuliani first heard about Yovanovitch’s deception from former Rep. Pete Sessions and a “number of congressman” who told him what Yovanovitch was up to. “When I interviewed witnesses they told me she was specifically holding up visas in order to obstruct the investigation of collusion in the Ukraine and specifically to obstruct the Biden investigation. I have that testimony under oath. I gave it to the State Department, they never investigated a single witness. When they say she’s innocent, it’s innocent without investigation. It is a cover-up.”

 

Giuliani says he has audio recordings to back up his story that also implicate Barack Obama in the scandal. “I also have tape recordings with Ukrainian officials including career prosecutors who say that during the Obama era the corruption in Ukraine became substantially worse and that she [Yovanovitch] was a contributor to the corruption.”

 

Senior officials in the White House are reportedly worried about Giuliani and his insistence on being vocal about Democrats’ involvement in Ukrainian corruption. He doesn’t care. “Joe Biden was involved in a multi-million dollar corrupt scheme along with a number of other Democrats. It’s never been resolved. They’ve never been held to account. As long as those issues remain between the U.S. and Ukraine we really can’t fight corruption in the Ukraine and the fact is that there are numerous Ukranian witnesses that want to come to the U.S. and explain how much during the Obama administration Ukraine was corrupted by Americans.”

 

The question now should be, why haven’t our State Department and Department of Justice launched an official investigation into what happened to billions of dollars of American aid money that was sent to Ukraine? Why doesn’t anyone in our government seem to want to know where it went? “I have a report from the Ukrainian accounting office in 2017 showing that 5.3 billion dollars in aid seems to have been wasted,” Giuliani said. “Our State Department under Yovanovitch went to the police and told them not to do the investigation… because our embassy was involved in wasting a great deal of that money by giving it to NGOs and when I was asked ‘do the NGOs have a political bent?’ They were left of left.”

 

Giuliani reports that he has been trying to get anyone in law enforcement to look at his evidence and no one will. “I am willing to show this to anybody who wants to pay attention to it. So far law enforcement has been afraid to look at it.” Obviously, it’s time for Giuliani to release the evidence to the press. PJ Media reached out to Giuliani’s office and offered to publish this evidence, but have not heard back yet.

 

Watch the interview below.

 

VIDEO: Giuliani admits to forcing out Yovanovitch: ‘She’s corrupt’

 

 

[Posted by Fox News

3.9M subscribers – Dec 16, 2019

 

Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani returns to Fox News claiming he has proof that impeachment is a ‘cover-up’ and explains why he was recently in Ukraine. MORE TO READ]

 

Megan Fox is the author of “Believe Evidence; The Death of Due Process from Salome to #MeToo.” Follow on Twitter @MeganFoxWriter

+++++++++++++++++++

The Impeachment Theater of the Absurd

Ironically, by claiming he needs more witnesses, Schumer is admitting that the House impeachment case is insufficient!

 

By Mark Alexander

Dec. 18, 2019

The Patriot Post

 

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” —U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 4 (1789)

 

Dems Want Impeachment Cuz Don’t Trust Voters

 

In Federalist No. 65, Alexander Hamilton outlined the Senate’s powers of impeachment, noting: “Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent? What other body would be likely to feel confidence enough in its own situation, to preserve, unawed and uninfluenced, the necessary impartiality between an individual accused, and the representatives of the people, his accusers.”

 

In 1788, our Founders anticipated that future senators should possess at least a modicum of decency, such that they would be able to judge articles of impeachment on the merits of such charges.

 

But Hamilton also noted that impeachment would “agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused.” He concluded, “In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.”

 

The partisanship that attended the impeachment of Bill Clinton for perjury (for which he was disbarred) was but a mere shadow of the all-consuming hatred the Democrat Party has for Donald Trump — a partisan hatred fanned and fueled nationwide by their shameless Leftmedia publicists.

 

And it’s within this disgraceful climate that the House of Representatives will vote today, on partisan lines, to refer articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial.

 

In preparation for that show trial, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared, “I think we’re going to get almost entirely partisan impeachment. I would anticipate an almost entirely partisan outcome in the Senate as well.”

 

He added, “Everything I do during this, I’m coordinating with the White House counsel. There will be no difference between the president’s position and our position as to how to handle this.”

 

Laughably, McConnell’s transparency led a demand from Sen. Chuck Schumer that he “recuse himself” from the entire impeachment proceeding: “Do the American people want Mitch McConnell not to be an impartial juror in this situation? I would ask every one of our Republican colleagues, ‘Do you want someone who proudly says they are not impartial to be on a jury, judging high crimes and misdemeanors, serious charges against the president of the United States?’ And I would ask every one of my Republican Senate colleagues, ‘Are you impartial jurors or are you like Mitch McConnell, proud not to be?’”

 

McConnell responded to Schumer, “I am not an impartial jury. This is a political process. There’s not anything judicial about it. Impeachment is a political decision.”

 

Of course, the list of those who most arguably should be recused because of conflict of interest or lack of impartiality starts with the most biased members of the Senate — those Demo candidates hoping to unseat Trump: Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, and Michael Bennet.

 

Hypothetically, a non-voluntary recusal would require a motion by one senator and would be decided by Chief Justice John Roberts, presiding. His ruling would then be appealed for a full floor vote. But if such a dubious claim were made and a vote called, it would likely result in a domino effect — 99 more votes, with the Republican majority ultimately prevailing by recusing each minority member, one by one.

 

None of that should happen in the Senate.

 

Corrupt Dems Reason Electoral College Exists

 

But weeks before these howls for McConnell’s recusal, I contemplated this recusal issue as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler displayed his historic, long-seething hatred for Trump while presiding over Rep. Adam Schiff’s contrived impeachment charges — charges that were devoid of any evidence of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

 

By “historic,” I don’t mean since the 2016 election, but since Nadler was in the New York State Assembly 35 years ago.

 

Back then, their dispute started when Nadler opposed Trump’s development of blighted sections of New York, becoming his arch adversary. So contentious was their antipathy for each other that in Trump’s 2000 book, The America We Deserve, he singled out Nadler as “one of the most egregious hacks in contemporary politics.”

 

After Trump’s election, Nadler posted on his official website a manifesto for the resistance detailing a plan for how to dispose of Trump: “We cannot wait four years to vote Mr. Trump out of office, as members of the GOP Senate and House Majorities have already stated that they will facilitate the Trump agenda. … So we must do everything we can to stop Trump and his extreme agenda now.”

 

Nadler called for “fierce battles against every regressive action he takes — from personnel appointments to his legislative program — in order to thwart or at least slow them down [and expose] his Republican enablers in Congress, voting them out of office in 2018, with the goal of taking back either the House or the Senate for Democratic control.”

 

“To achieve this,” insisted Nadler, “we must keep our eyes on two important goals: depressing Trump’s public support and dividing the Congressional GOP from him and from each other.”

 

And Democrats want McConnell to recuse himself?

 

If the head of the Judiciary Committee were held to a standard even remotely similar to that of a judge, Nadler’s vitriolic animus toward Trump would have been grounds for recusal, or even impeachment if necessary. Indeed, a legitimate process would’ve seen Nadler ousted before the first day’s testimony.

 

In his opening statement last month, Nadler declared: “We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems.”

 

In other words, Nadler and his fellow congressional Democrats cannot rely on the will and the wisdom of the American people. Clearly, they had no intention of doing so — even before Trump took office.

 

The evidence of their slo-mo coup d’état to take down Trump is now emerging, most notably with the exposure last week of the felonious FBI/FISA fiasco. A handful of Demo deep-state operatives in the FBI and CIA used that subterfuge to seed the Mueller investigation charade, which led to the current double-standard impeachment inquisition parade.

 

And recall what Nadler said about the impeachment of Bill Clinton in 1998: “We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office … without an overwhelming consensus of the American people. There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other.”

 

So, after Nadler’s predictable party-line committee vote, we now await the next episode of this political theater — a House vote that will most assuredly be a “narrowly voted impeachment … supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other.”

 

For his part, on the eve of the House vote, Trump issued a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi Tuesday that included the following key points in his typical rhetorical form:

 

“This impeachment represents an unprecedented and unconstitutional abuse of power by Democrat Lawmakers, unequaled in nearly two and a half centuries of American legislative history. The Articles of Impeachment introduced by the House Judiciary Committee are not recognizable under any standard of Constitutional theory, interpretation, or jurisprudence. They include no crimes, no misdemeanors, and no offenses… Your first claim, ‘Abuse of Power,’ is a completely disingenuous, meritless, and baseless… The second claim, so-called ‘Obstruction of Congress,’ is preposterous and dangerous. … Even worse than offending the Founding Fathers, you are offending Americans of faith by continually saying ‘I pray for the President,’ when you know this statement is not true… Speaker Pelosi, you admitted just last week at a public forum that your party’s impeachment effort has been going on for ‘two and a half years,’ long before you ever heard about a phone call with Ukraine. … Before the Impeachment Hoax, it was the Russian Witch Hunt. … You are the ones interfering in America’s elections. You are the ones subverting America’s Democracy. You are the ones Obstructing Justice.”

 

Mark Alexander Quote on Pelosipalooza

 

Trump continued: “By proceeding with your invalid impeachment, you are violating your oaths of office, you are breaking your allegiance to the Constitution, and you are declaring open war on American Democracy. … You and your party are desperate to distract from America’s extraordinary economy, incredible jobs boom, record stock market, soaring confidence, and flourishing citizens. Your party simply cannot compete with our record. … Any member of Congress who votes in support of impeachment — against every shred of truth, fact, evidence, and legal principle — is showing deeply they revile the voters and how truly they detest America’s Constitutional order. … Our Founders feared the tribalization of partisan politics, and you are bringing their worst fears to life.”

 

And that, fellow Patriots, adequately sums up this sorry affair. And the House vote comes in the same week we learned about the politically motivated FISA court abuses that seeded the whole effort to undermine Trump’s presidency.

 

The House of Representatives has initiated impeachment proceedings more than 60 times since 1789. Of the 19 federal officeholders or officials who’ve been brought up on impeachment charges, only eight have been convicted — all federal judges. Of the two presidents tried in the Senate — Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton — both had the charges dismissed after the Senate failed to meet its two-thirds majority requirement for conviction.

 

The Demo charges against Trump will also be dismissed, for the reasons outlined by the president in his letter to Pelosi. But the trivialization of impeachment removes the already low bar on constitutional Rule of Law, creating a menacing threat to Liberty.

 

In order to keep the Demos’ Trump/Russia/Ukraine narrative on life support after the Senate vote, Schumer will continue to claim that Trump is guilty, but that Republicans wouldn’t allow his witnesses to prove it. Those would be the same witnesses that the House could have called in its hearings — but didn’t in order to provide Schumer his “witness denial” layup. Ironically, by claiming he needs more witnesses, Schumer is admitting that the House impeachment case is insufficient!

 

In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton described impeachment as a pressure release valve in order to avoid the “crisis of a national revolution.” But this round of impeachment, if it were to actually succeed, would most assuredly set up a “crisis of a national revolution.”

 

P.S. Patriots, the most cost-effective investment you can make to ensure the future of Liberty is to support The Patriot Post. We’re the Web’s most influential grassroots journal for promoting freedom and challenging the dominant Leftmedia narrative. We rely 100% on the voluntary financial support of Patriots like you, so please support our Year-End Campaign today. Thank you.

 

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

__________________________

Giuliani Says He’s Uncovered ‘Two Major’ Money-Laundering/Bribery Schemes Involving Joe Biden, Obama Admin

 

Copyright © 2005-2019 PJ Media All Rights Reserved.

_______________________

The Impeachment Theater of the Absurd

 

Copyright © 2019 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

 

The Greatest Danger


Benedict Arnold Years From Now - More Dems can be Counted as Traitors

The House Dems setting themselves in the position to impeach President Trump out of Leftist hate rather than any identifiable crimes is indeed a great danger to the American Republic. Justin Smith elucidates below.

 

JRH 12/15/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**************************

The Greatest Danger

The Democratic Party’s Illegitimate Use of Impeachment

 

By Justin O. Smith
Last update sent 12/14/2019 12:01 AM

 

The House Judiciary Committee, led by the majority Democratic Party, voted 23 to 17 along party lines to impeach President Donald J. Trump on Friday December 13th 2019, and the Democratic Party is moving full steam ahead with its lies and the weaponized impeachment process, that is an extremely flagrant, unacceptable and odious act, ignoring the truth. This exercise in evil, based on a deep hatred for the President and for America, is so devoid of sense and prudence that it would embarrass all the kangaroos ever assembled in the courts of legend, since it issues two articles of impeachment, two articles of fiction, that charge “abuse of power” and “contempt of Congress”. These charges are dubious at best, as they project the Democratic Party’s own offenses, and even have many members of the greater Democrat caucus in the House nervous over staking their political futures on a vote for this idiocy.

 

On December 10th, Representative Lee Zeldin (R-NY) exclaimed, “With this disgusting impeachment charade, House Democrats have proven themselves guilty of Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress.”

 

According to the New York Times, as of December 13th, one hundred and fifty-five of 235 House Democrats have expressed their support for the impeachment of President Trump. [Blog Editor: My brief efforts could not locate Justin’s NYT data, but NYT data on Impeachment Inquiry dated 10/10/19 has 227 Dems supporting Impeachment. BUT that was long before the GOP confronted Schiff, Nadler & Pelosi with facts vs hearsay.] Twelve representatives are still undecided or unclear on their decision, and sixty-six have not responded yet. One, Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ), appears to be a solid “No”.

 

However, a point made by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November still holds true going into 2020, when he told reporters, “It is inconceivable to me that (the Senate vote) would be 67 votes to remove the president from office.”

 

During the airing of Meet the Press on December 8th, that highlights the hypocrisy and double-standards utilized by Democrats, host Chuck Todd noted that 21 years ago, as the impeachment of President Bill Clinton unfolded, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler [is quoted to have] stated: “Impeaching a president, when you have not got a broad consensus of the American people, a broad agreement of almost everybody that this fellow has to go, because he’s a clear and present danger to our liberty and to our Constitution, without that, you cannot and should not impeach a president. Because to do so is to call into question the legitimacy of all our political institutions.” Obviously, Nadler has departed a great distance from his former beliefs, as he invents new standards for impeachment.

 

On December 9th, former Independent Counsel Ken Starr, of Watergate fame, told Tucker Carlson at Fox News: “Impeachment should be the last resort and now it’s just a political tool.”

 

Since the 2016 elections, misusing the impeachment process, these Democratic Party traitors to America, such as Maxine Waters, Steve Cohen, Jim Cooper and Al Green, have attempted to impeach President Trump over everything imaginable, from his tax returns and the Emoluments Clause to Russian collusion, Ukrainian quid pro quo and on to obstruction of justice, obstruction of Congress and bribery. They have wasted weeks in formal impeachment proceedings that more closely resembled a Lefortovo Soviet style sham, where they unilaterally declared that President Trump’s intent was to harm Joe Biden’s bid for the Democratic Party presidential nomination; however, the facts do clearly exhibit, President Trump was actually more focused on seeing the Democrats’ real corruption and criminal acts, pertaining to kickback payments from Ukraine to Hunter Biden exposed and investigated.

 

[Blog Editor: Dem corruption pooh-poohed and/or ignored by Dem propaganda machine Mainstream Media:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dem Desperation 2020 toon

On December 5th, during an interview at the Women’s Leadership Summit, Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked, “Was there an ‘aha’ moment for you personally, a piece of evidence or testimony that swayed you now to take this step (forward with the rapid impeachment of President Trump)?” Pelosi answered this and two follow-up questions, with the following:  “… all I hear from the press is that I move so swiftly that it’s like a blur going by. This has been a couple of years — two and a half — since the initial investigation of the Russian involvement in America’s election, which started much of this and led to other things. … So all along, I have said for two years, this is an impeachment … We don’t take any glee in this at all. It is heartbreaking.”

 

So how could all of the current impeachment talk really be about Ukraine and an innocent phone call, when Ukraine wasn’t on the agenda two years ago, especially when all parties concerned, including Chairman Jerrold Nadler have admitted there wasn’t any quid pro quo? Even if there had been a quid pro quo, it wouldn’t have constituted an abuse of power,  since America has never just handed foreign nations money without any expectations. And as far as  President Trump’s instructions to White House staff not to honor Congressional subpoenas, rather than an “obstruction of Congress”, this is simply a classic struggle and an exertion of rights between co-equal branches of government; most certainly President Trump cannot allow a rogue House to trample, thwart and usurp the White House.

 

“We don’t take any glee in this at all” …? Like hell they don’t.

 

A few days after Pelosi’s revelation, House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins suggested America should look at the Articles of Impeachment. He observed that the term “abuse of power” is so ambiguous and so vague” that it’s hard to even define, and they use its ambiguity to make it mean whatever they want it to mean. And Alan Dershowitz, a civil libertarian professor of law at Harvard University and a Democrat opponent of President Trump, essentially agrees with that assessment in his December 10th article, as he noted that abuse of power and obstruction of Congress are not mentioned in the Constitution and neither one is a high crime and misdemeanor. Dershowitz focused on Alexander Hamilton’s position that “vague criteria would allow a majority of the House to impeach a president from the opposing party just because they had more votes than the president’s party”, which Hamilton called ‘the greatest danger”.

 

The Democrats are abusing their power and weaponizing impeachment, dividing the nation, because if the early hearings had utilized due process addressing the issue and the President’s alleged wrongdoing, the entire process would have already ended, since President Trump has absolutely done nothing wrong. The Democrats simply fear the coming 2020 elections and they wish to be able to repeat over and over the words “impeach, impeach … President Trump was impeached” in hopes of smearing him enough to make a difference.

 

From November to the present, President Trump has exuded a “bring it on” attitude, stating “Frankly, I want a trial.”

 

Only one attempt to impeach the president was seen in the first 184 years of our nation’s existence, and in the last 45 years our nation has witnessed three, with President Trump well on his way to be the third U.S. President in American history to be impeached, before the Christmas holidays, although it is highly unlikely that the Senate will also vote to remove President Trump, as the sham proceedings head into next year. The larger question will be whether or not the issue even gets more than 50 votes to remove President Trump, since some Democrats, such as Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and all the Republicans, with the possible exceptions of Senators Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney, will vote against removing President Trump. [Blog Editor: As in RINO alert!]

 

A trial in the senate would be quite a circus and it would reveal the Democrats for the real fools they are each and every day. It would reveal that Eric Ciaramella is a rogue CIA agent, not a “whistleblower”, aiding and abetting the implementation of a seditious conspiracy, who should be forced to testify along with his co-conspirator Michael Atkinson — Intel Community Inspector General — and former assistant attorney general John Carlin, one of the perpetrators of the “Crossfire Hurricane” prelude to RussiaGate. And it would also be most interesting to hear from Gina Haspel, the current CIA Director, in order to discover just what she might know of Ciaramella’s role if this entire sordid, so far as to who were his associates in this treasonous affair.

 

And every cogent thinking, logical freedom loving American would certainly want to hear testimony from Representative Adam “Shifty” Schiff — UNDER OATH — who engineered Ciaramella’s entrance into this Ukrainian imbroglio and sequel to the Russiagate hoax. Schiff will certainly stay true to his immoral character and lie about his involvement and his actions, and any such perjury regarding such a serious matter before all America should result in his expulsion from Congress in disgrace. Bring in all the bad actors with pertinent knowledge on the allegations and the plot against the President, from crack-cocaine smoking Hunter Biden to Lt Colonel Vindman, U.S. Army, U.S. National Security Council Director for European Affairs and a de facto Ukrainian agent, and on to Daniel Goldman, the attorney and director for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and compel them all to testify under penalty of perjury.

 

Each time I hear Nadler and Pelosi, or any other Democrat,  attempt to equate their treasonous impeachment tactic to “service to our duty to the Constitution and our country”, a white-flash passes through my eyes, bile fills my mouth and hot anger courses through my blood. In the end, the Democratic Party has provided all freedom and liberty loving Americans with more than ample reason to never vote for any Democrat ever again, as we join hands to right our country and renew and restore our Constitutional Republic.

 

This marks the first time in U.S. history that an impeachment has proceeded to a vote of the full House, without any clear criminal act and on the slimmest of “evidence” of any wrongdoing. Not only is this the most un-American act I have witnessed in my lifetime, it is a gross violation of the rule of law and the Constitution by Democratic Party petty tyrants, who have illegitimately changed the rules, manipulated our Supreme Law, and used any means at hand, both legal and illegal, in their numerous attempts to fully attain their endgame of ousting President Trump. And in the process, these traitors have subverted the will of the people and the U.S. Constitution, stopping at nothing in the pursuit of power, and created a Constitutional crisis that strikes at the heart of America’s society and Her Republic, deepening and widening our political divides and pushing America closer to a point of no return.

 

[Blog Editor: And I add: The actions the Dem Party is an open example of the Founding Fathers’ fear of the tyranny of the majority and the reason for the existence of the Electoral College in the election of POTUS.]

democracy-vs-republic

By Justin O. Smith

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets and source links are by the Editor.

© Justin O. Smith

 

The Coup Against Trump – IMPEACH All Dems


John R. Houk

© December 4, 2019

 

President Donald Trump has faced Leftist and Dem venom from the very point he decided to run as a Republican for President of the United States. I don’t know about you but just as a Conservative voter I was a bit mystified by this venom.

 

Trump’s entertainment days were not exactly a paradigm of Conservative values. I mean entertainment-wise, I enjoyed watching Donald Trump telling an Apprentice contestant not meeting Trump business standards that he/she had a – “YOU’RE FIRED!” It was fun to watch, but not exactly an endorsement for Family Values.

 

YET the Donald announces a GOP run and all of a sudden Leftist politicians, former Leftist pals in Entertainment and the ever wicked Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) all of a sudden hated Trump’s guts. These haters vilified and ridiculed Donald Trump and at the time … I didn’t care. I was voting for the most reputable Family Values Republican in Senator Ted Cruz.

 

BUT WHAT HAPPENED?

 

GOP candidate after candidate went down in flames to the witticism of Donald Trump. Finally, my guy Ted Cruz was eliminated by the numbers and Trump won the Republican nomination for President in 2016.

 

Leftist Politicians, Left-Wing Entertainers (former Trump buddies mind you) and of course RINOs proclaimed from the roof tops that the Republican Party just handed POTUS to Hillary Clinton –

 

  • the gal with an illegal government server as Secretary of State

 

 

 

 

  • the gal who as Dem Nominee for President had her Democratic National Committee (DNC) hacked (by someone) exposing nefarious Dem practices via Wikileaks

 

  • the gal while Dem Nominee told everyone the Russians and Trump meddle in the 2016 election YET would not all an FBI/CIA forensic examination of DNC to confirm Dem client Crowdstrike assertions “the Russians did it.”

 

*Was the DNC server really hacked? By George Parry; Knowledge is Good; 3/4/18

*NSA Whistleblower Has Evidence DNC Was NOT Hacked By Russia, Mueller Report Completely Based on Lies; American Liberty Report

 

*Probe: Hard evidence refutes DNC ‘Russia hack’ claim; By WND Staff; WND; 2/14/19 8:00pm

 

 

  • THE SAME GAL who as the Dem Nominee for President worked with Ukrainians to win the 2016 election she LOST to Donald Trump.

 

*Let’s get real: Democrats were first to enlist Ukraine in US elections; By John Solomon; The Hill; 9/23/19 06:30 PM EDT

*Nunes: DNC Staffer Worked with Ukraine to Dig Up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election; By Melanie Arter; CNSNews.com; 11/13/19 12:35pm EST

 

The above points are only those I recall off the top of mind, I am certain others could add more egregious actions under Crooked Hillary and her Dem Party.

 

AND YET the Dems in the House as the Majority Party are conducting Impeachment proceedings in which a majority of States via the Electoral College confirmed Donald Trump as President of the United States.

 

ONLY a Dem concerned about Trump’s reversing Obama’s fundamental transformation of America away from our nation’s Christian roots and away from our Founding Fathers’ Original Intent for America embodied in the Declaration of Independence and Ratified U.S. Constitution would support the Impeachment witch hunt being conducted in the House of Representatives.

 

And now I come to the inspiration for these thoughts. Yesterday Israpundit cross posted an American Thinker post referring to Judge Jeanine entitled, “Obama started the Trump hate”. The title sounds more like every Dem involved in this coup against President Trump in Congress and the Executive Branch (and perhaps every Obama Judiciary appointee) should be impeached.

 

JRH 12/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

*************************

Judge Jeanine: ‘Obama started the Trump hate’

 

By M. Catharine Evans, AMERICAN THINKER

December 3, 2019

Israpundit

 

Almost four years into the war on Donald Trump, any mention of Obama’s role in the banana republic tactics has been covered up.  The fact that high-ranking Obama-appointed FBI/CIA/intelligence officials have been caught plotting to delegitimize an election and remove President Trump from office makes it a sure bet that Obama, the consummate community organizer, had a tight leash on everything going on in the White House.  During her show this past Saturday, Judge Jeanine Pirro and her guest, The Plot against the President author Lee Smith, specifically called out Barack Obama for “interfering in the peaceful transition of power” in 2016.  It’s about time.

 

The five-minute interview, which aired on Fox’s Justice with Judge Jeanine, boiled this impeachment nightmare down to its essence: Barack Hussein Obama is the first president to orchestrate a coup against an incoming administration.  Smith even went on to suggest that Obama has set up a command post less than two miles from the White House.  As the “de facto head of the Democratic Party still … Barack Obama is right in the middle of the anti- Trump operation,” according to Smith.

 

Judge Jeannine then recalled Obama’s actions weeks before the 2016  election:

 

Watching Barack Obama taking the week off and doing nothing but campaigning for Hillary Clinton … to me I just remembered thinking to myself that’s a little weird, um, I know Presidents support incoming but that was full-on, all-in Barack Obama worried about Trump, making fun of Trump, it had never happened that way in the history of this country.  He started the Trump hate.

 

VIDEO: Author Lee Smith: Barack Obama Interfered with the Peaceful Transfer of Power to President Trump

 

In October 2016, a Sun-Sentinel article reported that the Clinton campaign had “deployed the President to key battleground states.”  At each stop, Obama mocked, derided, and attacked candidate Trump.  When it looked as though a tough New York real estate mogul might actually beat Hillary Clinton, and worse, if elected, have the cojones to expose the Obama regime as the third-world Marxist corruptocrats they are, President Obama put everything on hold and went all in, as Judge Jeanine observed.

 

Obama’s strategy of inciting hatred of candidate Trump was nothing new.  For eight years, Obama had inspired his followers to hate America; rich white people; the police; corporations; private enterprise; and, most of all, those ‘God, family, country’ conservatives who would rise up in 2016 to reject yet another hater.

 

Barack and Michelle Obama’s record of malice toward this country, from Michelle’s racist Princeton thesis to her speech in South Carolina calling the U.S. “a downright mean country” to candidate Obama’s  disdain for working-class “gun and religion clingers,” laid the foundation of hate from which Trump Derangement Syndrome would emerge.

 

The unprecedented attempted overthrow of a duly elected president continues this week in more impeachment hearings as the Democrats throw everything at POTUS, hoping something sticks.  Against all logic, the Democrats and their voter base really, really hate Trump’s guts.  Jeanine Pirro rightly puts the blame for this hate-filled mockery of our Constitution on the Deep State’s figurehead: Barack Hussein Obama.

++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

______________________________

The Coup Against Trump – IMPEACH All Dems

John R. Houk

© December 4, 2019

_______________________

Judge Jeanine: ‘Obama started the Trump hate’

 

Copyright © 2017- Israpundit – All Rights Reserved

 

Dems/Never-Trumpers Caught Lying – AGAIN


Edited by John R. Houk

Posted November 18, 2019

 

There is a truism you can count on in this day and time: Dems Lie. If you support lying Dems that equates you to a liar. Never-Trumpers are like Dems ergo the same as liars.

 

Keep the truism in mind as The Gateway Pundit exposes Dems and Never-Trumpers as liars.

 

JRH 11/18/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

 

I got this message from Fascistbook (11/13/19):

 

“You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups until November 20 at 7:05 PM.” So PLEASE SHARE. My Conservative voice is currently in a restricted Facebook jail.

***************************

BREAKING: Schiff Finally Releases Tim Morrison Testimony — NSC Sr. Director BLOWS UP Ukrainian Hoax — Destroys Schiff Top Witness Lt. Col. Vindman

 

By Jim Hoft

November 17, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

The NSC Senior Director for European Affairs testified before the Schiff secret star chamber in October.

 

The transcript of his testimony was released this weekend.

 

Morrison’s testimony COMPLETELY DESTROYED the Democrat’s latest attempt to remove President Trump from office.

 

Worse yet, Morrison’s testimony OBLITERATES Adam Schiff’s chief witness, and reported second whistleblower, Lt. Col. Vindman who is unreliable and reports to Morrison.

 

Tim Morrison

 

Morrison, who was on the July 25 Trump-Zelensky call testified in Schiff’s secret basement star chamber that nothing illegal was discussed on the Trump-Zelensky phone call.

 

This is why Schiff held his secret hearings behind closed doors in a basement.

 

Schiff doesn’t want the American public to know that President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was completely above board.

 

Here are the key points to Tim Morrison’s testimony.

 

  1. Mr. Morrison did not believe anything improper occurred on the July 25 call. (p. 60)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that the memorandum of conversation (a phrase used to describe the call transcript) of the July 25 call was complete and accurate. (p. 60)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison, who listened to the July 25 call, testified that he was not concerned about the substance of what was discussed on the call – only that the transcript might leak. (p. 46-47)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison was told by National Security Council lawyer John Eisenberg that the July 25 call record mistakenly ended up on the highly classified system, debunking the Democrats’ allegations of an attempted “cover up.”

 

  1. Mr. Morrison repeatedly testified that he purposefully kept Lt. Col. Vindman out of the loop on this matter because he had concerns about Vindman’s judgment, which were also raised to him by Fiona Hill and others.

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that, as the final clearing authority for any edits made to the 7/25 call package, he accepted all of Lt. Col. Vindman’s proposed edits. (p. 61-62)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that he does not believe Burisma came up on the call or that anyone suggested edits to the mem-con to include the word Burisma. (p. 64)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that Lt. Col. Vindman relayed two concerns to him about the July 25 call: that the call did not get into the subject matter they had hoped, and the fidelity of the translation. (p. 72-73)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that Lt. Col. Vindman never reported to Morrison any of the “light queries” that he received from Ukrainian officials in August regarding the hold on aid. (p. 93)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison confirmed that President Trump generally does not like foreign aid generally, and specifically held concerns that corruption in Ukraine may cause U.S. aid to be “misused.”

 

This should end the Democrat impeachment proceedings. There is no crime. There was no crime. And Democrats continue to lie to the American people about their secret sham investigation!

 

Democrats will pay for this.

++++++++++++++++++++++

BOOM! President Trump BLASTS “Nasty and Obnoxious” Chris Wallace on His “Dumb and Unfair” Interview with Steve Scalise

 

By  Jim Hoft

November 17, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

As reported earlier…
Never-Trump hack Chris Wallace continued his disgusting attacks on President Trump this weekend on FOX News Sunday.

 

On Sunday Wallace invited House Republican Whip Steve Scalise on to continue his attacks against President Trump.

 

Chris Wallace-Steve Scalise Fox News Sunday

 

At one point Chris Wallace accused NSC Senior Director for European Affairs Tim Morrison of testifying against President Trump in Schiff’s secret basement star chamber.

 

Wallace was lying. This is NOT TRUE AT ALL.

 

Tim Morrison testified IN SUPPORT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP!

 

 

President Trump was watching and also weighed in on “nasty and obnoxious” Chris Wallace’s “dumb and unfair” reporting.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

 

I got this message from Fascistbook (11/13/19):

 

“You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups until November 20 at 7:05 PM.” So PLEASE SHARE. My Conservative voice is currently in a restricted Facebook jail.

_____________________________

© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

 

SOMETHING FOUL


Since the Dems are clearly warping Constitutional Intent, creating gutless lies and  fabricating witnesses ex nihilo against President Trump to remove him from Office; this submission from 11/1 is still extremely valid TODAY November 4.

 

JRH 11/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

****************************

SOMETHING FOUL

Democrats: DANGEROUS TO THE REPUBLIC

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 11/1/2019 4:08 PM

 

Something foul has gripped the Democratic Party, and under Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s weak leadership, and prodded on by the despicable fraud and liar known as Representative Adam Schiff, the Democratic Party is weaponizing the process for impeaching a sitting U.S. president, despite the fact that President Donald J. Trump, love him or hate him, has not committed any high crime or misdemeanor. Their unhinged zeal to avenge the 2016 loss and damage Pres. Trump before the 2020 election has them snorting too much gas from imaginary smoking guns fired by people with an agenda, and in their non-linear manner of thinking, they continue their Marxist assault on the Republic, through their own lawless and criminal behavior and a kangaroo court and inquisition.

 

On October 31st, the House Democrats held a vote on a resolution to proceed with an impeachment inquiry, which passed with a vote of 232-196. Two Democrats, Jeff Van Drew (NJ) and Collin Peterson (Minn.) voted against the move, and one time Republican turned Independent, Justin Amash (Mich.) voted in favor of the inquiry.

 

This same day at 10:35 AM, Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Minority Leader in the House, tweeted: 100% of Republicans just voted AGAINST this sham impeachment. Two Democrats joined us. Speaker Pelosi and Chairman Schiff have both insisted that impeachment should be bipartisan. The only bipartisan vote today was AGAINST impeachment.”

 

Representative Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the Intelligence Committee, suggested the Democrats had turned into “a cult”, angrily adding: “We now have a full-fledged impeachment committee in the basement of the Capitol. Think about that, America.”

 

Prior to the vote, Democrats took their proceedings into the basement of the Capitol and conducted closed door hearings for weeks, overseen by the Intelligence Committee, as a justification for their secrecy, and controlled by Adam Schiff in a Soviet style process, when such hearings on impeachment have always been conducted in the Judiciary Committee in the past. Shifty Schiff limited Republican access to witnesses and details discussed and gave Democrats unfettered access to all the proceedings, and he has ignored due process by blocking President Trump’s counsel, creating a substandard process that is dangerous to the presidency and the future of the United States Republic.

 

Under this new resolution, the Democrats are still cutting the President’s counsel out of the hearings in unprecedented fashion and violating the due process that is his right. The President won’t even be able to question any witnesses until the process has long been underway, and, although Republicans can request witness testimony, the Democrats have voted themselves the option of refusing those requests.

 

Much of the Democrats’ supposed evidence of wrongdoing centers on allegations made by Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council staffer, and Eric Ciaramella, a CIA analyst. Both men have reason to oppose President Trump, but not to attack him in such a vicious manner as championing an impeachment process that wreaks of treason and a continued attempt to unseat a duly elected President of the United States.

 

[Blog Editor: On Vindman despite valor in battle:

 

 

 

 

 

When looking at Vindman valor there is something in historical context to look at. Benedict Arnold was one of George Washington’s best generals in the Revolutionary War – until he wasn’t.]

 

Paul Sperry, investigative journalist, notes that Ciaramella is an Obama holdover and a registered Democrat, who has previously worked with Vice-President Joe Biden and CIA Director John Brennan, who played a key role in the long-running soft coup against President Trump. Ciaramella was also removed from his National Security Council posting at the White House in the middle of 2017, due to his breach of the chain of command and numerous anti-Trump leaks to the media. He is also supposedly the “whistle blower”, although Sperry’s account still remains unconfirmed at this point; however, Ciaramella’s name does seem to be on everyone’s lips in D.C. at the moment.

 

[Blog Editor: On Eric Ciaramella’s credibility as any kind of witness against President Trump:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any questions? Dems Lie! The Dems are more concerned about transforming the Republic away from Founding Principles than preserving the Republic. AND Eric Ciaramella is ONLY one example of Dem-Marxist transformationism]

 

In a move the mainstream media saw as an attempt to out the whistle blower, Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX) recently asked a witness about Eric Ciaramella. Later, speaking to a Dallas radio station, Gohmert stated: “A lot of us in Washington know who it is. He’s a very staunch Democrat … a point person on Ukraine, during the time when Ukraine was its most corrupt, and he didn’t blow any whistles on their corruption.”

 

Lt Colonel Vindman was born in Ukraine, and although commendable, receiving a Purple Heart for being wounded in combat, as he was, doesn’t make him a hero whose every word must be taken as the Gospel. It only means he didn’t shirk his duty and he served honorably, as have so many millions of Americans.

 

He had a policy difference with President Trump regarding the country of his birth, and despite all the Democrats’ cries of “the Constitution, the Constitution”, Vindman could care less about any alleged violation of the Constitution by Pres. Trump. The gravamen of his complaint focused on the possibility that $380 million was going to be withheld from Ukraine, if the investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden’s Burisma dealings was pressed, alienating D.C. Democrats from the policy of using Ukraine as a tool against Putin and Russia. Essentially, this is a case of a Ukrainian born analyst butting into U.S. policy to ensure U.S. foreign aid continues flowing into Ukraine without objection.

 

After Schiff announced that the whistle blower might not even testify in a closed session, Republicans noted his motives cannot be properly assessed by the public, if he remains hidden. And Rep. Jim Jordan, head of the House Oversight Committee stated: “It’s tough to determine someone’s credibility if you can’t put them under oath and ask them questions.”

 

A former top National Security Council official, Tim Morrison, was on that call between President Trump and President Zelensky of Ukraine on July 25th, and Morrison states: “I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.”

 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters on October 30th, the following: “I heard the President very clearly on that call talking about making sure that corruption — whether that corruption took place in the 2016 election, whether that corruption was continuing to take place, that the monies that were being provided would be used appropriately. It was very consistent with what I’d understood President Trump and our administration to be doing all along.”

 

Aid to Ukraine was not withheld and most of the criticism is political opportunism from Democrats, who cared little about Ukraine, until Hillary lost the Big Brass Ring and the ticket to the White House. Trump’s only sin was not requesting anti-corruption assistance through proper channels, because Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma Holdings, while Ol’ Joe was Vice-President of the United States, is a legitimate priority for U.S. and Ukrainian anti-corruption investigations. The Biden’s activities shouldn’t be swept under the rug due to the embarrassment or criminal charges for bribery it may bring some people.

 

President Trump blurred the line between U.S. national interests and his own personal and political interests a little, but even taking the worst-case scenario on Ukraine — a quid pro quo exchange of foreign aid for political favor — political sin or not, it certainly doesn’t arise to the level of a crime or an impeachable offense.

 

Any normal decent American fully understands that this is an UGLY and DANGEROUS gambit to undo the 2016 election and throw the 2020 election into turmoil, due to the Democratic Party’s realization that they will not be able to beat President Trump in a FAIR ELECTION PROCESS.

 

Steaming ahead like an out-of-control train, the Democrats are ignoring the common law definition and the Founders’ understanding of the limited and technical meaning of “high crimes and misdemeanors” centered around abuse of power and grave breaches of trust and the Founders’ rejection of “maladministration”. They are attempting to impeach the president, despite the absence of impeachable offenses, and they are trying to neutralize and destroy President Trump, through a list of alleged impeachable offenses that they change each time one fails to produce the desired results: In the process, they are seeking to exercise control over the president that is not authorized in the Constitution and strictly forbidden by the Framers of the Constitution, since in the absence of any real and specified criminal conduct, the only legitimate remedy for a non-impeachable president lies with the voters, not Congress.

 

By Justin O. Smith

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

_________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links and text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith