Judge Lambeth Orders Crooked Hillary Deposition


Judge Royce C. Lamberth rules Crooked Hillary must face an in-person deposition from Judicial Watch over her illegal mail server that corrupt FBI Director James Comey gave her a pass. Hopefully enough dirt is exposed in this deposition that not even Teflon Dem crooks have to face jury trials.

 

Below is the Fox News and Judicial Watch versions of the Crooked Hillary deposition news.

 

JRH 3/3/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.

 

BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

***************************

Federal judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition to address private emails: ‘Still more to learn’

 

By Ronn Blitzer

March 2, 2020

Fox News

 

A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business.

 

Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about this and should not have to do so again — the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation — but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.

 

“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said.

 

The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, “those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Lamberth said that using written questions this time “will only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton’s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.”

 

Lamberth even gave some examples of lingering questions about Clinton’s emails, such as how did she come to believe that her private emails would be preserved under normal State Department processes, who told her this and when, at what point did she learn department records management officials did not know about the server, “[a]nd why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?”

 

The ruling comes after Judicial Watch revealed at a December 2019 status conference that the FBI released “approximately thirty previously undisclosed Clinton emails,” and that the State Department “failed to fully explain” where they came from.

 

The State Department has been pushing for the discovery phase of the case to come to a close, but Lamberth said he is not ready to do so, saying that “there is still more to learn.”

 

Judicial Watch, which initiated this case in 2014, is looking for information regarding whether Clinton used her private email server to intentionally get around the Freedom of Information Act, whether the State Department acted in bad faith when they tried to settle the case years ago, and whether the department had adequately looked for records in response to Judicial Watch’s initial FOIA request.

 

Given that the settlement attempts and records search took place after Clinton left office, the judge ruled that the deposition should focus on whether she intentionally tried to use her private server to evade FOIA and her understanding of the State Department’s record management requirements.

 

Lamberth also granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, IT specialist Paul Combetta who was involved in deleting Clinton’s emails, as well as Brett Gittleson and Yvette Jacks, who were State Department officials familiar with Clinton’s private email server.

 

Judicial Watch also wanted to question Clinton and Mills about government talking points in the aftermath of the 2012 Benghazi attack. Lamberth said that while they “cannot be questioned about the underlying actions taken after the Benghazi attack,” they can face questions regarding “their knowledge of the existence of any emails, documents, or text messages related to the Benghazi attack.”

 

Fox News’ Bill Mears contributed to this report. 

++++++++++++++++++++++

Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

 

Crooked Hillary JW Photo

 

Press Releases

March 02, 2020

Judicial Watch

 

Court: ‘It is Time to Hear Directly from Secretary Clinton’

 

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch today announced that U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills and two other State Department officials.

 

Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

 

The ruling comes in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit that seeks records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch famously uncovered in 2014 that the “talking points” that provided the basis for Susan Rice’s false statements were created by the Obama White House. This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

 

In December 2018, Judge Lamberth first ordered discovery into whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court also authorized discovery into whether the Benghazi controversy motivated the cover-up of Clinton’s email. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” The State and Justice Departments continued to defend Clinton’s and the agency’s email conduct.

 

Judge Lamberth today overruled Clinton’s and the State and Justice Department’s objections to limited additional discovery by first noting:

 

Discovery up until this point has brought to light a noteworthy amount of relevant information, but Judicial Watch requests an additional round of discovery, and understandably so. With each passing round of discovery, the Court is left with more questions than answers.

 

Additionally, Judge Lamberth said that he is troubled by the fact that both the State Department and Department of Justice want to close discovery in this case:

 

[T]here is still more to learn. Even though many important questions remain unanswered, the Justice Department inexplicably still takes the position that the Court should close discovery and rule on dispositive motions. The Court is especially troubled by this. To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous, especially when considering State’s deficient representations regarding the existence of additional Clinton emails. Instead, the Court will authorize a new round of discovery

 

With respect to Clinton, the court found that her prior testimony, mostly through written sworn answers, was not sufficient:

 

The Court has considered the numerous times in which Secretary Clinton said she could not recall or remember certain details in her prior interrogatory answers. In a deposition, it is more likely that plaintiff’s counsel could use documents and other testimony to attempt to refresh her recollection. And so, to avoid the unsatisfying and inefficient outcome of multiple rounds of fruitless interrogatories and move this almost six-year-old case closer to its conclusion, Judicial Watch will be permitted to clarify and further explore Secretary Clinton’s answers in person and immediately after she gives them. The Court agrees with Judicial Watch – it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton.

 

“Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal and we’re pleased that the court authorized us to depose Mrs. Clinton directly on her email conduct and how it impacted the people’s ‘right to know’ under FOIA,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

++++++++++++++++++

BLOG EDITOR (In Fascistbook jail since 1/20/20): I’ve apparently been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protester restrictions. Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely. Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in pop-up on 1/20/20: “You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”

__________________________

Federal judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition to address private emails: ‘Still more to learn’

 

©2020 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.

______________

Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

 

© 2020 Judicial Watch, Inc.

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

 

WHY IN THE WORLD IS CROOKED HILLARY NOT BEING PROSECUTED!?


John R. Houk

© July 8, 2019

 

In less than a week’s time the Crooked Hillary lawyer Heather Samuelson and the illegal email server have caught my attention:

 

 

 

In both those cases Judicial Watch was the listed primary source.

 

Out of curiosity I ran a label search of my SlantRight 2.0 blog for the label Heather Samuelson. I don’t understand the search protocol reasoning, for the results are scattered by date. And by “scattered” I mean there is no sequential order. In some cases “Heather Samuelson” may show only once and not the primary subject of the pages listed; however Crooked Hillary definitely was the central theme. If you run a similar label search you may or may not get the same results. At this point I’m not going to verify if the search results are the same every time. The dates stretch 2019 through 2016 where the name Heather Samuelson appears at least once.

 

My WordPress platform blog – NCCR – also returned scattered results for a Heather Samuelson search returning similar dates ranging from 2019-2016.

 

AGAIN Heather Samuelson is showing up implicating a Crooked Hillary criminal intent. This time from The Gateway Pundit who also sources Judicial Watch.

 

TGP lays out the Judicial Watch findings and the last 5 paragraphs or so has this damning conclusion:

 

And here is where Samuelson lays an egg!  Samuelson noticed during her review that Hillary’s emails were displayed as hrod17@clintonemail.com,  but this address was not even created until after Hillary was Secretary of State. 

 

You can’t send emails from an account that is not created or in place!

 

The only reasonable explanations for the receipt of emails from a domain that was not yet in place is, 1)  the source name in the emails had been doctored and updated to an email account not yet in service, or 2) a utility was used to copy the emails in bulk from one account to another and in the process change some of the fields including the original email source.

 

Why would Hillary do this?  The only explanation that makes sense is that the Hillary team was trying to eliminate or strip out all the classified markings in her emails, and in the process, they stripped out the old email addresses, and since that account didn’t exist anymore, their process added the new address.

 

To put it plainly – Hillary attempted to doctor (i.e. change) her emails for some reason and in so doing she inadvertently changed her email address.

 

Clearly if Hillary was caught editing her emails by the FBI, then former FBI Director James Comey knew very well that Hillary intended to break the law!  Three years ago Jim Comey lied to America!

 

In essence: WHY IN THE WORLD IS CROOKED HILLARY NOT BEING PROSECUTED!?

 

JRH 7/8/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

*************************

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Judicial Watch Uncovers Clinton Attorney Samuelson Interview with FBI – Indicates Hillary’s Emails Were Altered and Other Crimes

 

By Joe Hoft

July 8, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

Crooked Hillary Checking BlackBerry Wearing Sunglasses [2011]

 

Hillary Clinton likely attempted to alter her emails in an effort to cover up illegal activities rather than just deleting emails as was previously reported.  Judicial Watch’s efforts to obtain her attorney’s interview with the FBI show this and other criminal actions!

 

Judicial Watch again has performed a service to the country.  In its efforts to get to the truth, Judicial Watch may have uncovered another shocking revelation in the Hillary Clinton email saga.

 

In June of 2019 Judicial Watch posted the interview notes it received from the government between the FBI and Hillary Clinton’s attorney Heather Samuelson.  Hidden in the deposition are bits of information that when compared to information made public to date in the Hillary email case make no sense at all.

 

In the interview Samuelson states to the FBI’s Peter Strzok that she was assigned the duty of reviewing Hillary’s emails and in doing so, Samuelson reviewed the emails on her laptop both at her apartment and in Cheryl Mills’ office.

 

FBI Notes Heather Samuelson Interview 1

 

As is the case with the entire Hillary email coverup, the Clintons and her team were above the law.  Others have been thrown in jail for similar actions.  (For example, one NSA employee who brought hacking tools home was sentenced to 66 months in prison.)

 

Samuelson was assigned the task of obtaining Hillary’s emails for her tenure as Obama’s Secretary of State.  After making a request for Hillary’s emails from Platte River Networks (PRN), the firm that administered Hillary’s personal email system, Samuelson reviewed them and noticed that some of Hillary’s emails were missing.

 

FBI Notes Heather Samuelson Interview 2 red marks & redaction

 

Samuelson stated that she believed that Hillary’s emails that were missing for the period between January 2009 through March 2009 must have not been backed up.

 

But this makes no sense.  Classification only works on classification ‘enabled’ systems. For example, in a typical agency, when a document is created it is immediately stamped electronically and visually (water mark or text stamp) with the classification level. From that point forward, when the document is stored on a server, sent via email, or printed out, it will go through a number of security controls that will prevent certain operations on it. For example, if you are a user with lower level security clearance, you won’t be able to see the document name, its metadata, content, or be able to print it. In fact, the document won’t even show up in any of the searches.

 

This is where her story really begins to not make sense. There is no way that a backup would be deleted of anyone’s emails in the government, especially those of someone at the level of the Secretary of State.

 

The classified email systems used by the government are highly sophisticated (per an IT expert we contacted). These classification systems are fully automated in order to remove the human factor/errors from the process. These systems also control the entire document life cycle from its creation to its declassification and are tied to the organization’s access control and audit systems. So you can see exactly who and when the document was viewed (even which pages were views, how long it was on the screen, etc.). If there is no classification system in place, then all of the documents on the server can be considered breached. This is even without any proof of an external hacker accessing it.

 

The reason for this is the exact scenario described by Samuelson, i.e. one in which an individual such as a system/personal attorney without the proper security clearance would view and make electronic/physical copies of the documents.

 

Next Samuelson makes another shocking remark.  She states that after Clinton left the State Department she started using another domain for her emails (@hrcoffice.com).  But she states that no old emails were transferred from the clintonemail.com domain to the new domain.  She also stated that she didn’t know how Clinton or her close assistant Huma Abedin obtained her old emails once the new domain was established.

 

FBI Notes Heather Samuelson Interview 3

 

At this point it’s important to note that most people view the whole Clinton email server saga as an honest mistake that was going to be remedied somewhere down the road by putting the ‘proper security controls’ in place. This is certainly how Hillary, her staff, and the media justified it. But this is not the case; the whole purpose of a standalone email server from the get go was for Hillary to circumvent government email system security controls.

 

Hillary’s emails contained classified material because former FBI Director James Comey told us this in his infamous press conference three years ago nearly to the day.  But Samuelson stated that she didn’t believe that Hillary’s emails were classified because they did not have classified markings on them.

 

FBI Notes Heather Samuelson Interview 4

 

And here is where Samuelson lays an egg!  Samuelson noticed during her review that Hillary’s emails were displayed as hrod17@clintonemail.com,  but this address was not even created until after Hillary was Secretary of State. 

 

FBI Notes Heather Samuelson Interview 5 redaction

 

You can’t send emails from an account that is not created or in place!

 

The only reasonable explanations for the receipt of emails from a domain that was not yet in place is, 1)  the source name in the emails had been doctored and updated to an email account not yet in service, or 2) a utility was used to copy the emails in bulk from one account to another and in the process change some of the fields including the original email source.

 

Why would Hillary do this?  The only explanation that makes sense is that the Hillary team was trying to eliminate or strip out all the classified markings in her emails, and in the process, they stripped out the old email addresses, and since that account didn’t exist anymore, their process added the new address.

 

To put it plainly – Hillary attempted to doctor (i.e. change) her emails for some reason and in so doing she inadvertently changed her email address.

 

Clearly if Hillary was caught editing her emails by the FBI, then former FBI Director James Comey knew very well that Hillary intended to break the law!  Three years ago Jim Comey lied to America!

 

Hat tip D. Manny and Yaacov Apelbaum

_________________________

WHY IN THE WORLD IS CROOKED HILLARY NOT BEING PROSECUTED!?

 

John R. Houk

© July 8, 2019

____________________

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Judicial Watch Uncovers Clinton Attorney Samuelson Interview with FBI – Indicates Hillary’s Emails Were Altered and Other Crimes

 

© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

 

Hillary Clinton’s Lawyer Changes Story on When She Knew About Emails


On June 29 I cross posted a Vincent Vendetta video (a little over 7 minutes) which reported on a Judicial Watch deposition of the Crooked Hillary lawyer (Heather Samuelson)  that aided in wiping subpoenaed emails from the illegal server.

 

Three Search Engine Views of Person Identified as Heather Samuelson

 

Yesterday my Facebook friend Rose Reed Brown Messaged me a link from The Epoch Times went into greater detail about Samuelson than the video. The original Epoch Times article was posted June 30 but by the time Rose emailed the link, it had a July 3 update. That update is the detail I am cross posting below.

 

JRH 7/4/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Hillary Clinton speaks in Baltimore on June 5, 2017. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

 

Hillary Clinton’s Lawyer Changes Story on When She Knew About Emails

 

By MARK TAPSCOTT

June 30, 2019 Updated: July 3, 2019

The Epoch Times

 

WASHINGTON—Heather Samuelson, Hillary Clinton’s personal attorney, gave the FBI and Judicial Watch conflicting explanations of when she learned that the former secretary of state used a private email system to conduct official U.S. diplomatic business.

 

“I believe I first became aware when either she e-mailed me on personal matters, such as wishing me happy birthday, or when I infrequently would receive e-mails forwarded to me from others at the department that had that e-mail address listed elsewhere in the document,” Samuelson told Judicial Watch lawyers during a June 13, 2019, deposition.

 

Samuelson worked in the Department of State’s liaison office to President Barack Obama’s White House at the time, according to Judicial Watch.

 

Samuelson told the FBI in 2016 that she didn’t learn of the Clinton email system until becoming Clinton’s personal attorney in 2014, after serving for a year in the White House counsel’s office.

 

The 2016 conversation with the FBI was part of the bureau’s highly controversial investigation of the Clinton private email system, which culminated with then-FBI Director James Comey’s July 5, 2016, announcement that he wouldn’t recommend prosecution of the former chief diplomat.

 

Clinton used the private email system, originally on a server located in the New York mansion she shares with former President Bill Clinton, throughout her tenure as the top U.S. diplomat, from 2009 to 2013.

 

The non-profit government watchdog released the transcript of the deposition on June 28. The Samuelson deposition is the latest in a series of depositions by Judicial Watch of senior Clinton aides that were ordered Dec. 6, 2018, by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth.

 

Lamberth described Clinton’s private email system as “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” and ordered Samuelson and nearly a dozen other former Clinton aides to answer Judicial Watch’s questions either in depositions or in written responses.

 

“After Clinton left office, Samuelson worked for a year in the office of the White House Counsel before becoming Clinton’s personal attorney” in 2014, Judicial Watch said in a statement accompanying release of the deposition.

 

“She was primarily responsible for conducting the review of Clinton emails and sorting out ‘personal’ emails from government emails, which were returned to the State Department under the direction of [former Clinton Chief of Staff] Cheryl Mills and [another] Clinton lawyer, David Kendall,” the Judicial Watch statement said.

 

“After the emails were returned to State, Clinton deleted the rest of the ‘personal’ emails from her server, wiping it clean. Samuelson conducted the review of emails on her laptop, using Clinton server files downloaded from Platte River Networks, which housed the Clinton email server,” the statement continued.

 

Samuelson’s contradiction of her prior statement to the FBI is significant because she also told Judicial Watch that she had been granted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) what she described as “limited production immunity” in June 2016.

 

It isn’t known whether the DOJ’s grant of immunity insulated Samuelson against whatever legal obligation she may have had while working in the White House or the State Department to disclose to law enforcement officials her knowledge that Clinton wasn’t using a secured U.S. government communications system to conduct official diplomatic business.

 

U.S. officials knew that Chinese intelligence had hacked into Clinton’s private system, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) told The Epoch Times on June 29.

 

Gohmert said the Chinese “actually hacked Hillary Clinton’s personal server—as our intel community established without any question—even though the FBI refused to ever examine the evidence.”

 

A forensic analysis of Clinton’s emails conducted by the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) had determined that a copy of virtually every email from Clinton’s server was sent to an unauthorized source, Gohmert said.

 

Dozens of highly classified documents were sent to and from Clinton on her private email system when she was secretary of state.

 

Samuelson is the second former Clinton associate to be found in the Judicial Watch depositions to have told the FBI one thing in 2016, only to have it contradicted in 2019.

 

Former Clinton State Department aide Justin Cooper told Judicial Watch in a deposition released earlier this year that he worked with the secretary’s then-deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin in setting up the private email system.

 

Cooper’s claim contradicted Abedin’s previous claim in a 2016 deposition by Judicial Watch that she only learned of the private email system in 2015 by “reading in some news articles about a year, a year-and-a-half ago, when it was—it was being publicly discussed.”

 

Abedin was deputy chief of staff throughout Clinton’s tenure at the State Department and then worked for her throughout her primary and general election campaign for president in 2016.

 

“The news that the Obama DOJ gave immunity to Heather Samuelson, Hillary Clinton’s lawyer responsible for the infamous deletion of 33,000 emails, further confirms the sham FBI/DOJ investigation of the Clinton email scandal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in the statement accompanying the deposition’s release.

 

“And it is curious that Ms. Samuelson changed her story about what she knew and when about the Clinton email system. Attorney General William Barr can’t reopen the Clinton email investigation fast enough,” Fitton said.

 

Contact Mark Tapscott at mark.tapscott@epochtimes.nyc

_______________________

Copyright @ 2000 – 2019

 

ABOUT The Epoch Times

 

The Epoch Times is dedicated to seeking the truth through insightful and independent journalism.

 

We stand outside of political interests and the pursuit of profit, to educate readers about today’s most critical issues with the intention of broadening minds and uplifting society. A well-informed society is the cornerstone of a flourishing democracy.

 

Being independent, we investigate issues overlooked—or avoided—by other media outlets. We do this because we believe journalism must play the role of being truly responsible to society.

 

We strive to highlight solutions and what’s good in society rather than the conflicts that divide us. We recognize the value of the traditional arts and their ability to inspire humankind towards its highest ideals.

 

In our newsroom and our reporting, we are committed to being honest, respectful, and compassionate.

 

We stand against the systematic destruction of traditional culture by destructive ideologies such as communism, which continues to harm societies around the world.

 

We are inspired in this mission by our own experience. The Epoch Times was founded in 2000 to bring honest and uncensored news to people oppressed by the lies and violence of communism.

 

Fulfilling this mission is our passion and our greatest honor.

 

The Epoch Times provides award-winning newspapers and news platforms with the goal of being the global newspaper of record, with a positive influence on society. The Epoch Times provides critical in-depth analysis that has often been overlooked by other mainstream media outlets.

 

Our History

 

Having witnessed events like Tiananmen Square and the persecution of the spiritual group Falun Gong, and READ THE REST

 

Newbill Emails on Crooked Hillary


crooked-hillary-email-transparency

Edited John R. Houk

Posted on November 4, 2016

 

From time to time the pseudonymous individual Tony Newbill sends me Conspiracy concerns which I collect and edit for posting. Admittedly I am a bit late with this batch. Here you will read many of the October emails.

 

Newbill focuses on the corruption of Crooked Hillary which indeed includes longtime partner former President Bill Clinton. To some, this may be old news. To others that just get their information from the Mainstream Media, this might still be new information. Either way there is such a deluge of information on the nefariousness of Crooked Hillary that it is becoming difficult to keep up.

 

For example, as of writing this post I have learned that Crooked Hillary’s private illegal server has been hacked by at least FIVE foreign state entities. AND that the emails found on Weiner and Huma Abedin’s shared laptop discovered in the underage sexting probe has emails to the tune of 100,000 and are NOT duplicates of the emails Crooked Hillary has already released to the FBI. This leads to the logical suspicion that some or all those 100,000 email include the 33,000 emails that Crooked Hillary erased with bleach bit.

 

Look at this as a review of Crooked Hillary with more to come. My God! DO NOT ELECT THIS WOMAN AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

 

JRH 11/4/16

Please Support NCCR

***********

Why did Obama allow Hillary to do this????? What kind of Foreign policy is this???

10/5/2016 10:11 AM

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/3562745/october-surprise-via-wikileaks-delayed-but-heres-a-huge-bombshell-you-need-to-know-about/

 

The October surprise by way of WikiLeaks has, to the disappointment and outrage of many Republicans and Donald Trump supporters, been put on hold for the time being. However, a new bombshell of information has been uncovered by Infowars regarding Hillary Clinton’s time as Secretary of State, and it’s not something the former First Lady would want the American electorate knowing about.

 

This new information, which one could argue is damning enough to be considered this election’s October surprise all on its own, came forth like it does in many of these instances via a whistleblower, who claims he’s willing to put his life on the line if it means that Mrs. Clinton will not become the next President of the United States.

 

“There is far too much at stake for this great nation, America, for me to remain silent any longer,” says Dr. Kilari Anand Paul. “I know I’m risking my life going public with what I know—but God will hold me accountable if I know the truth and do not speak it for fear of Clinton.”

 

The information that is causing this man so much unrelenting anguish has to do with Hillary Clinton’s decision regarding the African nation of Libya while she served as Secretary of State under President Obama. Dr. Paul says that Clinton refused to READ THE REST (October Surprise Via Wikileaks Delayed, but Here’s a Huge Bombshell you Need to Know About; By Thea Conrad; Inquisitor; 10/4/16)

 

+++

Trump and Pence need to start asking this question

10/6/2016 11:41 AM

 

Trump and Pence need to start asking this question …… Hey Hillary Clinton why did you go against the hard work of General Wesley Clark and Congressman Kucinich to broker a Peace deal and bring democracy to Libya?????

 

Nobel Peace Prize Nominee Exposing Hillary Clinton’s Role In Libya

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nobel-peace-prize-nominee-exposing-hillary-clintons-role-202500006.html

 

WASHINGTON, Oct. 5, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Dr. K.A. Paul, known as the world’s most popular evangelist and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, will hold a press conference to discuss the role Secretary Clinton played in the Libyan government downfall and eventual death of Muammar Gaddafi.

 

Dr. Paul facilitated negotiations between General Wesley Clark, Secretary Clinton and the Gaddafi regime, arranging for his government to leave office peacefully only to see Mrs. Clinton decide to ignore the agreement and continue the relentless bombing of Libya. Mrs. Clinton’s decision led to the violent overthrow of the Libyan government, the death of Gaddafi and many others who had negotiated the peace agreement in good faith.

 

The vacuum created by Clinton’s regime change decision led to ISIS gaining a strong foothold there, millions of refugees and thousands of new terrorists. Today ISIS counts Libya as one of its READ THE REST (Nobel Peace Prize Nominee Exposing Hillary Clinton’s Role In Libya; By PR Newswire; Yahoo News; 10/5/16)

 

++++++

And the FBI said there was NO Intent at Clinton State Dept.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10/11/2016 9:41 AM

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4099

 

From: lroitman@hillaryclinton.com

To: john.podesta@gmail.com

Date: 2015-06-22 18:07

Subject: Fwd: Tomorrow

 

Begin forwarded message:

 

*From:* Erika Rottenberg<erika.rottenberg@gmail.com>

*Date:* June 21, 2015 at 9:20:19 PM PDT

*To:* Stephanie Hannon <hannon@hillaryclinton.com>, “Ann O’Leary” < aoleary@hillaryclinton.com>

*Cc:* Lindsay Roitman <lroitman@hillaryclinton.com>

*Subject:* *Tomorrow*

 

Hi Ann and Stephanie — Looking forward to our discussion tomorrow night. I suspect it will be broad ranging.

 

Few things:

 

1. are the two of you and john planning on spending about 15 mins chatting about the inside of the campaign, and policy broadly, and then opening up to Q&A for about 45 mins or doing all Q&A? I Actually think that it’d be great for y’all to hit on some key policy items first and i know folks would enjoy the inside glance at the campaign.

 

2. I plan to do an intro and Jeff will close with a very brief how to get involved. I’ll then close with a special toast and treat.

 

I have not reached out to John – -please let me know if you think I should.

 

Couple of questions that came in:

 

1. you’re obviously amongst friends, but here’s the one i referred to (can’t remember which of you i talked about it with, if not both). It’s from someone that wasn’t goign to come, and i encouraged him to come. he comes at the issue slightly differnetly than what I’ve dsicussed with both of you (Ok, one thing to use personal email, but why the “twisted truth” (not my words) on why – with the two problematic areas being (a) emails to bill (when they were to bill’s staff) and (b) i only used one device — BB, when 2 weeks earlier, it was an iphone, BB and ipad. As Ann and I discussed, hopefully that’s a timing issue and whilst in state, she only used one. 🙂

 

*For my question*, it’s basically some variation of [not quite phrased right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren’t satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.

 

2) someone wants to ask a very specific question about updating export control laws – and why they’ve haven’t been updated since (??) as they prevent american businesses selling READ THE REST (Wikileaks exposing crooked Dems in relation to Crooked Hillary)

 

+++

I just don’t know what to think any more ……

10/11/2016 1:24 PM

 

Its seems the FBI has been Covering up so much by all these Elitists and Politicians for Decades!!!!!!

 

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/dear-congressional-oversight-committee-stop-ignoring-elephant-room-911-saudis-hillary-clinton

 

Dear Congressional Oversight Committee… Stop ignoring the elephant in the room – 911 – Saudis – Hillary Clinton Cover-Up

 

Subject: Dear Congressional Oversight Committee… Stop ignoring the elephant in the room – 911 – Saudis – Hillary Clinton Cover-Up

From: Angry American Who Wants Genuine & EQUAL Justice For All

Date: 27 Sep 2016

 

An Open Letter To Congressman Chaffetz,

 

I respectfully ask you to read the letters sent to Senator Hillary Clinton and to FBI Director Robert Mueller dated September 15th, 2001 – one week following the 911 mass murder of almost 3,000 Americans here https://www.scam.com/?3644-Hillary-Clinton-The-FBI-Director-and-the-Bush-Family-Knew-The-Saudis-Paid-For-the-911-Murders-BEFORE-and-Again-1-Week-After-911-Here-Is-The-Proof! Fedex confirmed that all four recipients received their packages containing these letters and a video and audio tape, and related evidence in the form of dated phone bills including calls to (202) 456-3345. The recipients are identified at the bottom of page 2. One letter was signed by former RCMP officer and then lawyer William Gilmour, and the other letter was signed by former U.S. Treasury agent and FBI informant Bruce Gorcyca.

 

If the letters have been censored as they were last week, you can read them here as well:

 

https://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/img121.jpg
https://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/img122.jpg

 

 

Now then, if you honorable members of Congress subpoena the complete FBI file on FBI informant Bruce Gorcyca you would have more than ample “probable cause” to prosecute Hillary Clinton for “willful ignorance of a crime in progress”, perjury, bribery (accepting $10 million in hush money from the Saudi government), and even treason as she continued to accept another $90 million over the next 15 years through the Clinton Foundation. She circumvented the Hatch Act as well and made sure the bribes were paid as “donations” to the Clinton Foundation. Why do we have RICO laws in America sir, if they are only used for drug dealers and never applied in corruption cases? http://nypost.com/2016/07/15/yes-the-saudi-government-helped-the-911-terrorists/

 

If you get those files from the FBI, you will READ ENTIRETY (Dear Congressional Oversight Committee… Stop ignoring the elephant in the room – 911 – Saudis – Hillary Clinton Cover-Up; By An Angry American Military Veteran; opnlttr.com; 9/27/16)

 

++++

Are these issues why Hillary is LAWLESS???????

10/12/2016 11:04 AM

 

Obama knew about Hillary Clinton’s server:     https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/2016-u-s-presidential-election/obama-conspired-with-hillary-used-a-fictitious-name-to-communicate-with-hillary-on-her-private-server/

 

… The New York Post, who may become the American version of the British Guardian, has now exposed that Obama used a fake name to communicate with Hillary on her private server because he KNEW what she was doing. While tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails have been made public so far, the government has not released any emails from Obama.

 

Obama told CBS news that he had no idea that Hillary was using a private email server until it was reported by the New York Times on March 2, 2015. That is clearly an outright lie, and if he were in a private fraud case, he would be criminally charged with her for conspiracy. Hillary’s continuous crime included other parties who may join the plot later and incur joint liability. His use of fictitious names is PROOF that he knew what she was doing was a crime, for he tried to hide his identity as a co-conspirator. This raises the question of whether he will benefit from the Clinton Foundation in the future.

 

Of course, those in government are always exempt from the same laws they use to persecute the public. So there is no way the FBI would dare recommend indicting Obama, and the plot to ignore the law is beginning to be exposed a bit more. If they had indicted Hillary, then they would have to charge Obama as a co-conspirator. That is READ THE REST (Obama Used a Fictitious Name to Communicate with Hillary on Her Private Server; By Martin Armstrong; ArmstrongEconomics.com; 9/27/16)

 

+++

A “Theory”

10/13/2016 11:46 AM

 

I would “Bottle” all this up and shake it Really Hard and open it and say, “This all together tastes like how Obama was able to get Hillary to drop out in 2008, with a Little Bribed FBI Cover-up Twist!!!!!!!

 

http://truthuncensored.net/report-fbi-director-received-millions-from-clinton-foundation-his-brothers-law-firm-does-clintons-taxes-video/

 

FBI Director James Comey testified under oath at a hearing before Congress, that the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, where she sent and received ‘top secret’ emails, did not warrant pressing criminal charges against her.

 

In essence, he said, not only was Hillary not smart enough, or qualified, to know that using an unsecured email server put our nations security at risk, but she was incapable of determining what was top secret material was.

 

The truth is, that James Comey did not recommend federal charges against Hillary Clinton, in part, because he is connected to the Clinton Foundation through the Swiss bank HSBC.

 

 

More than 200 republicans sent a letter demanding to know why he didn’t recommend federal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of private email servers.

 

Clinton “clearly placed our nation’s secrets in peril,” the letter states. “No one is above the law, and the American people deserve a more robust explanation for your decision to not recommend criminal charges.”

 

According to Mini Planet a review of FBI Director James Comey’s professional history and relationships shows that the Obama cabinet leader — now under fire for his handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton — is deeply entrenched in the big-money cronyism culture of Washington, D.C. His personal and professional relationships — all undisclosed as he announced the Bureau would not prosecute Clinton — reinforce bipartisan concerns that he may have politicized the criminal probe.

 

In other words, his opinion was biased, and based on that fact, he should not have participated in the investigation let alone lead it and READ THE REST (BUSTED: FBI Director Received MILLIONS From Clinton Foundation – His Brother’s Law Firm Does Clinton’s Taxes (Video); By Jennifer Johnson; TruthUnCensored.net; 10/19/16 6:00 PM)

 

http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/bill-hillary-clinton-connections-sex-perv-jeffrey-epstein/

 

After billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein was exposed as a sex offender who seduced girls as young as 14, Bill Clinton seemed to walk away with his old friend. But according to author James Patterson‘s new tell-all about the sordid scandalFilthy Rich, Clinton and his Democratic presidential candidate wife, Hillary, may still have secret ties to the disgraced pervert.

 

READ THE REST (Bill & Hillary Clinton’s New Connections To Billionaire Sex Perv Jeffrey Epstein Exposed; By Radar Staff; RadarOnline.com; 10/12/16 7:11AM)

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/10/bill-clintons-fbi-head-is/

 

Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz has retained former President Bill Clinton’s FBI director to help show Clinton was not present at alleged sex orgies thrown by his former client, a convicted pedophile and close Clinton friend.

 

Clinton’s friendship with a convicted child sex predator, Jeffrey Epstein, again is coming under increased scrutiny, thanks in part to a recent civil lawsuit for defamation filed in Florida against Dershowitz by representatives for two of Epstein’s alleged victims. Dershowitz served as Epstein’s lawyer during Epstein’s criminal trial.

 

Not only has Bill Clinton’s name come up in the court proceedings, but Dershowitz, one of the key figures in the case, says that he cannot conclusively deny that Clinton was present at lavish sex orgies thrown on a Caribbean island by Epstein. What’s more, one of the victims said that Bill Clinton in fact was present at an Epstein island orgy.

 

Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution from a minor. Though he was represented at trial by Dershowitz, he still had to serve 13 months in prison on READ THE REST (Bill Clinton’s FBI Head Is Called In to Show Bill Clinton ‘Not Present’ at Jeffrey Epstein Underage Sex Orgy; By PATRICK HOWLEY; Breitbart; 1/10/16)

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/3590832/hillary-clinton-bill-exposed-secret-connection-billionaire-sex-perv-jeffrey-epstein-political-news/

 

Did Bill and Hillary Clinton lie about severing all ties with billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein? After the financier was exposed for seducing girls as young as 14, Bill and Hillary Clinton seemed to have parted ways with their old friend. But in a new tell-all called Filthy Rich, Clinton and his democratic presidential candidate wife, Hillary, may still have secret ties to the disgraced businessman.

 

READ THE REST (Hillary Clinton and Bill Exposed for Secret Connection to Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein; By Amanda Katherine; Inquistr.com; 10/12/16)

http://www.weeklystandard.com/pedophiles-fixer-maintains-close-ties-to-the-clintons/article/823759

 

A woman alleged to have been the fixer for Jeffrey Epstein, a pedophile and friend of Bill Clinton, has herself long had ties to the former president of the United States. Indeed, it’s clear that even as her associate, Epstein, admitted to procuring sex with someone under the age of 18 and registered as a sex offender in 2008, Ghislaine Maxwell’s relationship with the Clintons flourished.

 

[Blog Editor: The next paragraph also shows the Clinton commitment to the globalist goals of the UN Agenda 21 (See Also: Six Issues That Are Agenda 21 & Lesson 7: Regional Governments Will Destroy Our Local Representative Gov’t) which robs nations of their national sovereignty. Something to think as you read of the probable Slick Willie involvement in underage sex orgies.]

 

Maxwell is the president and founder of a non-profit that helps protect the ocean, the TerraMar Project. And as recently as 2013, she attended the Clinton Global Initiative, where her charity made a public commitment. The press release from the Clinton Global Initiative read, “Sustainable Oceans Alliance Commitment by: The TerraMar Project
. Partners: Michael Dorsey; Global Partnerships Forum
In 2013, the TerraMar Project committed to launch the Sustainable Oceans Alliance (SOA) to mobilize the international community and the public at large on the importance of the Oceans and the Seas and to ensure that the 193 UN Member States recognize and incorporate oceans in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to be adopted in 2015.”

 

The TerrMar Project commitment is still listed on the Clinton Foundation website. And that remains, even after Maxwell’s involvment in the Epstein pedophile scandal continues to grow and continue to raise questions about former President Bill Clinton.

 

“Ghislaine Maxwell was another person in Epstein’s inner circle and a co-conspirator in Epstein’s sexual abuse. She was someone who consequently also appreciated the immunity granted by the NPA for the crimes she committed in Florida,” reads a recently released court document related to the scandal.

 

The document alleges that Maxwell’s role was “to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities” and was “a primary co-conspirator” in Epstein’s sexual crime. “In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme. In fact, it became known to the government that Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane Doe #3. Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe #3 (who was then fifteen years old) to come to Epstein’s mansion in a fashion very similar to the manner in which Epstein and his other co-conspirators coerced dozens of other children (including Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2).”

 

She, the document alleges, helped Epstein convert a then underage woman into a “sex slave.” “Epstein then became enamored with Jane Doe #3, and with the assistance of Maxwell converted her into what is commonly referred to as a ‘sex slave.’”

 

But despite Maxwell’s sordid relationship with Epstein READ THE REST (Pedophile’s ‘Fixer’ Maintains Close Ties to the Clintons; By DANIEL HALPER; Weekly Standard; 1/15/15  8:22 AM)

 

+++

Media Rage over this

10/13/2016 2:33 PM

 

While the MS Media is Silent on the Real Issues of failure with the Obama/Hillary policies of the last 8 years. Let’s consider throwing them a Bone that they will not be able to ignore. Once the world sets their eyes on this Question and Ponders, could it have been what changed the 2008 Democratic Primary? The Media will not be able to deflect the world’s opinion about this and they will self-destruct trying too …. you will want to follow me into this Rabbit Hole for a Minute please…….

 

*******************ATTENTION******************

 

The Question below will Send the Media into a RAGE of Denial and Deception because of their Cover-up of this, which with Obama controlling the Media, would have been able to tell Hillary to drop out or I will tell the Media to run with this story, would have given him Leverage over the Clintons to Drop out in 2008. So, if you make this Question a Public one and send the Media off in a Frenzy over this Obama Revelation, it will Change the Narrative for the Final days of this Election Cycle … and in the process of shining light on this it will sour more voters to wanting this back in the Whitehouse!!!!!!

 

“Did the 2008 Jailing of Bill Clinton’s Pedophile Friend and Co-Founder of the Clinton Foundation Jeffery Epstein give Barack Obama the Leverage he Needed to get Hillary to Drop out of the 2008 Race when she had the Majority of Super Delegates support”???????????

 

The Media will Self-Destruct over trying to flip this snotty little goober off their key board finger, but while doing so they will shed light on it over and over as the Obama and Hillary camps deny and their lap dog media denies but the concept won’t be able to die for it is a real possibility in the eyes of the Independent “Think“ers.

 

Good Luck!!!!

______________

Edited by John R. Houk

All text and links embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill