In Defense of Delgaudio’s SNDA Stand


Eugene Delgaudio 2

 

John R. Houk

© March 26, 2012

 

I recently posted an email from Eugene Delgaudio of Public Advocate. Mr. Delgaudio was coming out against legislation dubbed by critics as the Homosexual Classrooms Act. The actual name of the legislation is the Student Non-Discrimination Act (SNDA). The legislation is being pushed by out-in-the-open homosexual Congressmen with the aim of protecting underage homosexuals that participate in Public Schools.

 

Delgaudio believes the SNDA will open a can of worms teaching children to accept homosexuality of way of life up to and including how homosexuals perform sex acts. Also there is the probability that SNDA will make it a crime of bullying when a Christian student shares that homosexuality is an abomination according to the Bible.

 

Here is a list of bad attributes that Delgaudio attributes to SNDA:

 

*** Require schools to teach appalling homosexual acts so “homosexual students” don’t feel “singled out” during already explicit sex-ed classes;

 

*** Spin impressionable students in a whirlwind of sexual confusion and misinformation, even peer pressure to “experiment” with the homosexual “lifestyle;”

 

*** Exempt homosexual students from punishment for propositioning, harassing, or even sexually assaulting their classmates, as part of their specially-protected right to “freedom of self-expression;”

 

*** Force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a “hostile learning environment” for homosexual students.

 

The problem has run into is that these attributes are not specifically in the SNDA. Leftists and Homosexual Activists have been having a field day pointing there is no such written language inherent in the SNDA.

 

Does that mean Delgaudio is wrong or worse a lying bigot attack poor unfortunate homosexual victims?

 

I say NO!

 

The two Bills from the House and the Senate are craftily worded to protect homosexuals from bullying. And I might add the kind of bullying that has occurred in reality to the point vicious attacks and murder. This is where I agree with the existence of an anti-bully Bill. No human being should be subject to humiliation, violence and especially murder for any reason. If there is a problem it can be litigated or if there is a criminal act it can be prosecuted. Unfortunately homosexuality is not against the law. Neither is it against the criminal law to watch or participate in pornography, adultery, fornication and probably other practices not looked upon with high esteem in American society. Even today in an American society continuously watered down morally by Moral Relativity and Secular Humanism which aims to dilute or eliminate the influence of Christianity.

 

Anti-bullying legislation should be enabled to all American citizens and not just a few alternate lifestyle perverts degrading American culture and society. Passing a Bill that upholds the ungodly practice of homosexuality is a victory for Homosexual activists that desire to be considered just as normal as heterosexuals.

 

The language of the SNDA may be designed to protect homosexuals from violence; however the actuality is SNDA becomes a toe in the door to give special privilege to homosexuals that grants the perverted to have marital rights designed for a male and a female. AND YES since the SNDA is aimed at homosexual kids of minority the legislation will lead to school policies that in effect will teach all children that homosexuality is an acceptable practice even though Biblically homosexuality is unholy abomination in the face of God Almighty.

 

Delgaudio needs to eat a little crow and admit that the SNDA legislation does not specifically spell out the teaching of homosexuality in Public Schools; however Delgaudio needs to stick to his guns that the SNDA legislation will indeed lead school curriculum that will be meant to enforce homosexual acceptance to prevent bullying of homosexuals.

 

And remember, the SNDA is not aimed at consenting adults over the age of 18. Rather the legislation is aimed at children and teenagers that are naïve and will believe most anything that an authority figure teacher tells them. If heterosexual couples tell their children that homosexuality is not normal and the school tells children that homosexuality is okay, then there is a bit of Big Brother interference in the god-given practice of parents teaching and training children what is right and what is wrong. And worse if parents are committed to Christian Morality and the schools contradict parents there is unconstitutional moment of government telling people how to practice religion.

 

If kids wisely listen to their parents and kids contradict teachers that homosexuality is normal then school discipline will be aimed at students. And if there is a student that is confused about his/her sexuality because of school teaching and a kid tells the confused kid my dad says homosexuality is wrong or wicked, that can be construed as bullying and thus a criminal act.

 

So I have to say that Delgaudio’s reference to SNDA as the Homosexual Classrooms Act is an appropriate appellation. With this in mind the Homosexual Classrooms Act must be stopped!

 

Now this post that somewhat defends Eugene Delgaudio was inspired by another email. In that email Delgaudio relates how Homosexual activists have been actually making physical threats to him for his anti-homosexual stand which if I may intimate is just as constitutional via Religion and Free Speech as immoral homosexuality is protected by the Constitution. Freedom of conscience and speech perhaps protects a decision by a person to be a homosexual; however it does not validate homosexuality as a normal practice in society on par with race, religion, sex or national origin. Homosexuality is a practice that is not normal. It is normal for a male and a female to have sex; it is perversely abnormal for same-sex individuals to have sex. I don’t care what the liberalized Psychiatrists and Medical Doctors claim. The Word of God trumps the proclamations of humans in matters of moral values.

 

Below is Delgaudio’s recent email exposing the hypocrisy of bullying by homosexuals and an appeal asking for donations to pay the legal bills for the innocuous civil suits designed to bury Delgaudio’s godly cause showing a light on the ungodly practice of homosexuality.

 

JRH 3/26/12

******************************

Legal threats and intimidation

 

By Eugene Delgaudio

Sent: 3/26/2012 11:04 AM

Sent from: Public Advocate of the United States

 

In the past, the radical homosexuals have attempted to kill me, even threatening and stalking my family.  However, all that did was make me more determined than ever to fight them.

And with Public Advocate supporters’ help, I did.

Together, pro-family Americans have really rocked the Homosexual Lobby.  We’ve held off so much of their agenda for so many years.

But now they want to take supporters like you out of the fight.

I’ve received letters from three different government agencies ordering me to stop sending mail to members like you.

One letter from a Post Office bureaucrat actually declared my correspondence with Public Advocate members to be obscene!

You see, in their sick world radical homosexuals can desecrate churches, spread their filth across the internet, and run naked through the very halls of Congress.

But when I try to tell people about it, my letters are labeled obscene by those who serve the homosexuals’ purposes.

And if they can find a judge who agrees with them, the legal consequences could be severe.  Even if we win, the legal fees could destroy your Public Advocate.

That’s why I’m desperate for you to send a contribution of $50 or even $100 today.  I need your help right away, so I ask you to send whatever you can afford today.

A second letter from deep within the bowels of the Tennessee bureaucracy threatened me with up to six months in prison and fines of up to $5,000 per letter for sending mail to our own members in Tennessee.

Another legal filing demanded I “cease and desist” from Public Advocate’s most effective lobbying campaign.

The outrageous charge?  That Public Advocate is somehow impersonating an agency of the federal government.

You and I know their claims are ludicrous, but fighting back cost me tens of thousands of dollars at the time and now the Homosexual Lobby is stronger than ever.

With the Obama White House and Senate Democrats indebted to the Homosexual Lobby — and Republicans betraying the family, the odds are already stacked against us.  I cannot afford to cut contact with a single Public Advocate member.

And the radical homosexuals know it.  If they can keep you from being informed about what they are up to in Washington, they will have a much better chance of passing the Gay Bill of Special Rights or the Homosexual Classrooms Act.

The Homosexual Lobby’s goal is to stop me from telling people what they’re up to.  They would be giddy to learn that you’ve been kicked out of the fight.

Any day this could turn into a legal battle for your right to stay involved in Public Advocate’s fight for decency.

I’ve already been worried there won’t be enough money to fight effectively this year, without unexpected legal expenses.

All across America — from California to New Hampshire — Public Advocate is being called on to take a stand against the radical homosexuals.

With a costly legal battle on the horizon, Public Advocate might not have the resources to fight at all.

If they silence Public Advocate and pass the Gay Bill of Special Rights or the Homosexual Classrooms Act, they will have succeeded in normalizing their perverse lifestyle.

Perhaps because of the hard economic times, contributions have dropped sharply recently — I hope it’s that, I’d hate to think supporters like you are giving up at this crucial time.

Please click here to help me.  There’s simply no margin for error this year.  If you and I don’t stand firm, we will lose.

The Homosexual Lobby will finally pass the Gay Bill of Special Rights AND the Homosexual Classrooms Act, establishing a whole set of special laws and privileges for homosexuals.

* These special laws will force schools, churches, day care centers, and nursing homes to employ confessed and admitted homosexuals including infected AIDS carriers and make it illegal to ever fire them.

* Millions of tax dollars will be given to radical homosexual front groups to “keep the money flowing.”

* Private and even religious schools will be forced to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a “hostile learning environment.”

In fact, it’s begun already.

Perhaps you’ve heard the stories of police protecting homosexual mobs as they harass church congregations and threaten the families that want to protect their children from homosexual depravity.

Radical Homosexual’s have even begun storming churches and harassing worshippers.

After all you and I have been through, the thought of losing now is unbearable.  That’s why I will not let them intimidate me.

The fight is too important to let the enemy scare me off, no matter how many assaults, attempts on my life and threatening letters I get I will not give in.

When you and I beat them in Congress, they attacked me personally.

And when that failed, they attacked my family.  Thank God, that attack failed too.

Now the enemy is trying to cripple me by dictating when and how I can talk to members like you.

You see, as long as you are standing with me, the radical homosexuals cannot win.

And they know it.

That’s what this attack is all about — cutting you and I off from one another — severing Public Advocate’s ability to mobilize the pro-family movement.

If they can stop me from contacting my members when they make their power grab, then Congress will never see the tens of thousands of petitions Public Advocate members normally send in.

If they succeed in that, they win.  Period.  End of story.  There will be no one else to stop them.

You and I are the only ones who can make sure this latest attack fails as well.

Won’t you please send back the enclosed reply memo today, along with the most generous contribution you can afford?

Don’t let them stop us now.

Help me stay in the fight.  Please.

Benjamin Franklin once said that “Unless we all hang together, assuredly we shall all hang separately.”  Those words have never been truer than they are today.

If you and I hang together, we can beat the radical homosexuals in Congress again this year.

If we don’t, they will pass the Gay Bill of Special Rights or the Homosexual Classrooms Act, probably both.  Using those bills to silence our voices and normalize homosexuality, they will force homosexual “marriage,” homosexual adoption and other elements of the radical Homosexual Agenda on our society.

And once they’ve done that, they’ll have free access to our day care centers, elementary schools and everywhere else our children used to be safe.

I’m counting on your support — contribution of $100 would go a long way in the fight ahead, even $50 will help.

I need to hear from you right away.  Please send back the enclosed reply memo today.

Sincerely,

Eugene Delgaudio
President

 

P.S. Our enemies are trying a new tactic: Divide and conquer.

With the Obama administration beholden to the Homosexual Agenda, I’m being threatened with fines and jail time just for writing to Public Advocate members like you.

I need your help to fight off those legal battles and be ready for the true fight in Congress.  John, please send a contribution of $50 or even $100 today or whatever you can afford.  Thank you.

Please Hurry!  Pro-homosexual congressmen are once again on the verge of passing the hideous Gay Bill of Special Rights AND the Homosexual Classrooms Act.  We need to be ready!

_______________________________

In Defense of Delgaudio’s SNDA Stand

John R. Houk

© March 26, 2012

_______________________________

Legal threats and intimidation

 

Because Public Advocate of the U.S. is a nonprofit, charitable organization that fights the radical agenda of the Homosexual Lobby, contributions are not tax deductible for IRS purposes. This email was not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense. Public Advocate’s phone number is (703) 845-1808, its address is 5613 Leesburg Pike, Suite 17 Falls Church, VA 22041, and its website is http://publicadvocateusa.org/.

To help Public Advocate grow, please forward this to a friend.

Christianity: Homosexuality is Barbaric


Sin Nature v. Spiritual Nature

 

John R. Houk

© July 16, 2011

 

Gay activists and Leftist blogs are apparently all agog with horror over Marcus Bachmann’s comment that was to go something like gays are barbarians. Left Wingers jumped on the husband of Michele Bachmann as a homophobic racist. In this world steeped in political correctness such a statement is criticized as coming from a moron and a Presidential candidate that is married to a moron cannot be eligible for President.

 

This is the first I have heard of this Leftist-homosexual hullaballoo; however if Marcus Bachmann said such a statement in the context that Leftists are implying then more power to Marcus. I would add that the practice of homosexuality is a deviant ungodly act that should be condemned rather than to be praised as natural. Homosexuality is UNNATURAL.

 

Alas it appears Marcus’ comment was taken out of context. From a Christian perspective any lifestyle that leads to sin is a rejection of God. Homosexuality is not the only lifestyle practiced openly in America that is ungodly. Although anyone could name more but here is a biggie: Cohabitation outside the holy institution of matrimony of one man and woman is as callous a sin as a lifestyle of homosexuality. This is the context that Marcus Bachmann’s thought was spoken.

 

JRH 7/16/11

Pro-Homosexual Advocate Destroys Traditional Marriage Banner


folsom-east-2009-electrotorture-remote

 

One always hears about the demand to accept homosexuality as a matter of multicultural diversity. In fact the Leftist MSM and the Leftist leaning entertainment industry have brainwashed most of America into believing that a stand for Biblical Morality or exposing the overt public perversion of homosexuals in their debauched public often outdoor parties is homophobic discrimination on par with racism.

 

So what happens when Christians or confirmed heterosexuals peacefully protest the stain of homosexuality? The homosexuals go psycho-medieval and assault peaceful protestors or those that expose the truth of homosexuality.

 

Check this out!

 

JRH 6/6/11 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)

***************************************

VIDEO: Pro-Homosexual Advocate Destroys Traditional Marriage Banner in New York

 

By John Ritchie

June 06, 2011

TFP Student Action

Defending Moral Values on Campus

 

Man Rips up TFP Marriage Banner in NY

 

TFP Student Action members were assaulted while peacefully demonstrating for traditional marriage in Fairport, New York, on June 2.

As young TFP volunteers stood at the corner of Main Street and Church Street with signs, a pro-homosexualist hurled himself against the group’s thirteen foot long banner inscribed with “God’s Marriage = 1 Man & 1 Woman.” The banner, held by three volunteers, was knocked down and violently torn to pieces.

 

Pro-homosexual advocate violently tears up TFP banner
in Fairport, New York
.

homosexual violence

 

The assailant also threatened to destroy the group’s cameras used to document their campaigns for moral values. “I’ll smash your camera,” he said. Approaching another TFP volunteer who was holding a sign that read “Honk for Traditional Marriage,” the aggressor said: “Are you going to give me your sign, or do I need to rip it up too!?”

Assault with glass bottle

In a separate incident at the same demonstration, another supporter of “gay marriage” threw a beer bottle at TFP volunteer Michael Shibler from a moving vehicle. The glass bottle hit him on the forehead, causing it to swell and bleed. Local police are investigating both incidents.

“These bully tactics do not even slightly dampen my resolve to continue promoting the truth about marriage in charity. Our cause is noble and we will win,” said Shibler.

“Some say that same-sex ‘marriage’ doesn’t harm or affect anybody. Well, I think my throbbing forehead is a good example of how it does harm people. Anti-family proponents would like to completely silence my first amendment right to free speech,” he said. “While demanding tolerance for what they call ‘diversity,’ they are utterly intolerant of opposing viewpoints.”

 

TFP volunteers and members of Citizens for a Decent Community joined forces in Rochester, New York, to defend true marriage.

Protesting in favor Traditional Marriage

 

On their tour for traditional marriage, TFP Student Action members are distributing flyers titled 10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” Is Harmful and Must Be Opposed. It calls on New Yorkers to firmly and peacefully resist the advance of the so-called gay-rights movement.

Help us stay on the road

 

To help us stay on the road for traditional marriage, please consider filling our gas tank. With an intense travel schedule, our fifteen passenger van consumes about one tank of gasoline per day. Your gift of $79.00 will keep us going for 330 miles.

Sponsor 1 Tank (330 miles) = $79
Sponsor 2 Tanks (660 miles) = $158
Sponsor 3 Tanks (990 miles) = $237

 

Top of Form

DONATE HERE

 

If you want to contact us on the tour, please call 717-495-5427. God bless you.

 

Bottom of Form

________________________________

©2011 TFP Student Action

A Homosexual Judge Ruled Proposition 8 Unconstitutional


John R. Houk

© April 16, 2011

 

On Election Day November 2008 California voters passed Proposition 8 which bans same-sex marriage. Reprobate homosexuals were caught a bit surprised considering large portions of California are the Sodom and Gomorrah of America. More disturbing was the fact a Federal Judge ruled Proposition was Unconstitutional a couple of years later on August 4, 2010. It was not surprising that an activist judge ruled a State Law Unconstitutional against the mandate of the voters. What is disgusting is that Judge Vaughn Walker is not only an openly practicing homosexual but that he is also has a homosexual long term partner; AKA a same-sex relationship.

 

HELLO! Proposition 8 was enacted by the will of California voters to prevent the immorality of same-sex marriage.

 

Judge Walker’s 136 page self-justifying ruling that overruled the people of California had less to do with the U.S. Constitution and more to do with protecting his lifestyle that I am sure he is currently enjoying as a retired Judge homosexual reprobate.

 

Walker definitely had a conflict of interest in making a Constitutional ruling. Walker should have recused himself from the suit and since he did not, Walker’s ruling should be vacated.

 

Fortunately retired Judge Walker’s ruling has been stayed pending further judicial review:

 

PROP 8 SUPPORTERS PLEASED BY APPEALS COURT RULING HALTING SAME-SEX MARRIAGES

 

by Andy Pugno – General Counsel on August 16th, 2010

 

SACRAMENTO — This afternoon, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request by Prop 8 proponents to stay U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s ruling, thereby upholding the vote of 7 million Californians while the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case is heard on appeal. The arguments will occur in San Francisco the week of December 6, 2010.

 

“California voters spoke clearly on Prop 8, and we’re glad to see their votes will remain valid while the legal challenges work their way up through the courts. Invalidating the people’s vote based on just one judge’s opinion would not have been appropriate, and would have shaken the people’s confidence in our elections and the right to vote itself,” said Andy Pugno, general counsel for ProtectMarriage.com, the defendants in the Perry v Schwarzenegger case.

 

Thank God Almighty for staying Walker’s obvious self-serving ruling. Now let’s look into the “why?” that Walker’s ruling should be vacated.

 

Let us look first at some of the reasons that retired Judge Walker had called overwhelming evidence that making a law (a State Amendment to California’s Constitution actually) preventing same-sex marriage is Unconstitutional. Frank Turek in an OneNewNow.com article lists the top ten reasons that Walker’s overwhelming evidence based on the 14th Amendment passed in 1868 is a bunch of homosexual hocus pocus:

 

1. “Sexual orientation is fundamental to a person’s identity and is a distinguishing characteristic that defines gays and lesbians as a discrete group.” (FF 44) This is the most important of the false facts because Walker’s entire case collapses without it. The “fact” is false because it ignores the difference between desires and behavior.

 

 

2. “California has no interest in asking gays and lesbians to change their sexual orientation or in reducing the number of gays and lesbians in California.” (FF 47) Other than helping them avoid disease and live longer, absolutely no reason. Statistics show that health problems are higher and life spans shorter for homosexuals.

 

 

3. “Same-sex couples are identical to opposite-sex couples in the characteristics relevant to the ability to form successful marital unions.” (FF 48) What does “successful” mean? It has nothing to do with children, according to Judge Walker. In his “the stork brings children” universe, marriage is merely about coupling; procreation is just incidental to it. He thinks a “successful” marriage is merely about commitment, but he can’t even support that case.

 

 

4. “Permitting same-sex couples to marry will not affect the number of opposite-sex couples who marry, divorce, cohabit, have children outside of marriage or otherwise affect the stability of opposite-sex marriages.” (FF 55) Judge Walker cites just four years of data from Massachusetts to make that sweeping conclusion about the most important relationship in human civilization. The truth is that evidence from other countries over a much longer period shows a mutually reinforcing relationship between same-sex marriage and illegitimacy. And the disastrous results of 40 years of liberalized divorce laws show how monumentally important marriage laws are to the health of marriages, children, and the nation.

 

5. “Proposition 8 does not affect the First Amendment rights of those opposed to marriage for same-sex couples.” (FF 62) It’s too bad Judge Walker didn’t look to evidence from Massachusetts for this false fact. If he had he would have seen that court-imposed same-sex marriage has severely affected First Amendment rights. Same-sex marriage may not affect heterosexual marriage behavior quickly, but it certainly affects the free exercise of religion very quickly.

 

 

6. “No credible evidence supports a finding that an individual may, through conscious decision, therapeutic intervention or any other method, change his or her sexual orientation.” (FF 46) I guess thousands of ex-gays just don’t exist in Judge Walker’s special-pleading universe. Neither does renowned Columbia University psychiatrist, Dr. Robert Spitzer, who concluded that some highly motivated individuals can change their orientation from homosexual to heterosexual through reorientation therapy.

This is significant because Spitzer is no propagandist for the religious right. Quite the contrary — a self-described “Jewish atheist,” Spitzer has been a hero to homosexual activists since 1973 when he helped get homosexuality declassified as a mental disorder. Recently, however, they’ve turned on him because he reported the truth.

 

 

7. “The gender of a child’s parent is not a factor in a child’s adjustment.” (FF 70) Incredibly, Judge Walker says that this conclusion “is accepted beyond serious debate.” Citing a study by the politicized APA, Walker never admits that not enough research has been done to evaluate the well being of children living with homosexual parents. And he ignored evidence presented by the defense that contradicted his “fact.”

 

8. “Religious beliefs that gay and lesbian relationships are sinful or inferior to heterosexual relationships harm gays and lesbians.” (FF 77) Really? Do religious beliefs that drunkenness is sinful or inferior to sobriety harm alcoholics? No, those beliefs help such people by telling them the truth about destructive behavior instead of enabling them with liberal fantasyland talk about how all behaviors and lifestyles are equal.

 

9. “Proposition 8 results in frequent reminders for gays and lesbians in committed long-term relationships that their relationships are not as highly valued as opposite-sex relationships.” (FF 68) This is not meant to be offensive, but what if certain relationships really are more valuable to society than others? Clearly, the procreative committed relationship of a man and a woman is more valuable than any other relationship in society because it is necessary for society’s very survival. To comprehend the impact of this, you just need to consider two questions.

 

(1) What would happen to society if everyone lived faithfully in natural marriage? Our country would thrive with a drastic reduction in numerous social problems including illegitimacy, crime, welfare, and abortion.

(2) What would happen to society if everyone lived faithfully in same-sex marriage? Society wouldn’t thrive because it wouldn’t even survive. It would end the human race!

 

This is not to say that such a law would cause this, but merely to point out that certain relationships are more valuable to a society than others. The truth is that homosexual and heterosexual relationships are not the same, can never be the same, and will never yield the same benefits to individuals or society.

 

 

10. “Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license.” (Conclusion) The real fact is that Judge Walker fails to provide any “rational basis” for overturning Proposition 8 — no rational basis from the Constitution or common sense. While lecturing the people of California that their “private moral views” cannot be used to make their laws, Judge Walker has simply imposed his own “private moral view” that same-sex marriage must be sanctioned. That is objectively immoral and unconstitutional itself.

 

Yeah, it sure reads like retired Judge Walker the homosexual made a ruling based on the U.S. Constitution, right?

 

NO!

 

JRH 4/16/11