News anchor: ‘Gay marriage’ critics are racist


Contessa Brewer 4 Left

The Mainstream Media including Fox News is in the tank in favor of the godless Homosexual agenda to pervert Biblical Morals to support the validity of homosexuality as normal. Check out this recent WND article that begins with a focus on NBC news journalist Contessa Brewer but elaborates on a fund raiser for National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association. One of the surprising sponsors for me was Fox News which usually is a voice for the Conservative perspective in a sea of committed Leftist journalism.

 

Kincaid then dropped the hammer when he said what the real agenda of the NLGJA is:

 

Let us be clear: the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association is a special interest group that manipulates news coverage on behalf of the homosexual movement, and they brag about their successes. Their website boasts how the Associated Press has just released a statement announcing a new AP Stylebook entry for husband and wife, “coming after a requested revision by NLGJA.”

 

Thanks to NLGJA’s “Rapid Response Task Force,” AP will now use the terms husband and wife, without quotes, when referring to two men or two women in same-sex marriages. In other words, a man can be a wife, and a woman can be a husband. (Excerpted from: Fox News Helps Fund The Homosexual Agenda; by Tim Brown; Freedom Outpost, 3/23/13; READ ENTIRITY)

 

 

JRH 3/28/13

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

News anchor: ‘Gay marriage’ critics are racist

‘I think that there’s a difference between being objective and being fair’

 

By Garth Kant

March 26, 2013

WND

 

WND Video Graphic of article: http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/nbc-anchor-gay-marriage-critics-are-racist/#ooid=dveTdoYTqPYg4bqtrP8nxjGc8x3Q2Jti

 

As the U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments two key same-sex marriage cases, a prominent member of the establishment media already is delivering her own verdict.

 

NBC’s Contessa Brewer compared people who oppose “gay marriage” to racists.NBC's Contessa Brewer

 

She made the comments at a fundraiser held Thursday night by the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association in New York City.

 

Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth asked Brewer if she had considered that the media may not be giving fair coverage to opponents of” same-sex marriage.

 

“You know what’s so funny about this? When we’re talking about racism, nobody ever says, ‘Do you think there’s fair coverage for racists?’ That’s my feeling about the matter. I think that there’s a difference between being objective and being fair. And sometimes wrong is wrong, and the right thing to do is say when it’s wrong,” she replied.

 

LaBarbera countered: “A lot of Christians, for example, think that racism is a sin, but they also think that homosexuality [is a sin].”

 

Brewer responded: “You know what I say? I grew up as the daughter of a Baptist preacher, and you know what my answer always is? If you think it’s wrong, then don’t do it. Thank you.”

 

She promptly walked away.

 

Brewer is a former MSNBC anchor who now hosts a weekend show on the cable network, regularly contributes to NBC and recently joined New York’s WNBC as an anchor.

 

Also attending the fundraiser were Matt Lauer and Savannah Guthrie of NBC, Gayle King of CBS News, Christine Romans of CNN, Amy Robach of ABC News and Amanda Drury of CNBC.

 

NLGJA says the event was sponsored by NBCUniversal, Bloomberg, CNN, CBS News, Fox News, the New York Times, Newsday, BuzzFeed, Newsday, Voli Light Vodka, Heineken, JetBlue, Hillshire, Eli Lilly and Company, General Motors, GPTMC and Fleishman-Hillard.

 

“We are not an advocacy group,” said NLGJA president Jen Christensen of CNN.

 

“But the entire evening was advocacy. There was no pretense of being even-handed in covering the homosexual rights movement, of which they are clearly a major part,” said Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media and America’s Survival, who covered the event.

 

“This was not just an event where journalists ‘came out of the closet’ for homosexual rights; it was a fundraiser for the cause. Our media paid big money to participate as sponsors and hosts,” added Kincaid, who videotaped the exchange between Brewer and LaBarbera.

 

Kincaid has written a letter to Fox News CEO Roger Ailes questioning Fox’s “funding of the homosexual rights movement.”

 

Natalie Morales of the NBC “Today” show hosted the event and described the establishment media’s treatment of “gay” issues.

 

“Many of us here in this room – the media – we are responsible for opening the world’s eyes to these issues and the stories that have brought about such change,” she told the crowd.

 

“When you think 18 years ago when this organization was founded – think of where the country was back then. And now, 50 percent – according to the Pew poll that we talked about on the news today – support gay marriage, and … some other polls put that number even higher. [This] reflects a change in attitudes in this country.”

 

Morales noted numerous developments in just the past year, including “the repeal of the military’s ban on gays and lesbians, the widening support for same-sex marriage.”

 

“The world seems to be evolving slowly but surely – from the president changing his position [on same-sex marriage] last year, to most recently this week … former Secretary [of State Hillary] Clinton now saying gays and lesbians are full and equal citizens and deserve the rights of citizenship. And last week of course Republican Senator Rob Portman said he now supports gay marriage because he wants his son, who is gay, to have the same rights to love equally. I mean this of course is 2013 but it is happening,” she said.

 

LaBarbera asked Morales: “If you disagree with homosexuality – you’re in a league with racists … if you disagree about gay marriage, disagree about fundamental issues surrounding homosexuality – do you agree with that view?”

 

Morales replied: “I think what’s happening here is this is a new civil rights movement. I mean I think clearly … I believe that gays have as much equal opportunity as we all should have. And I believe that they should be allowed to get married and love equally … But I don’t think everyone else has to believe how we believe. … I think there is a freedom of speech in this country and a freedom of free thought.”

 

There may be two sides to the story, but Brewer indicated which side she prefers. Before speaking with LaBarbera, she told the celebrity gossip TV show “Extra,” “I think it’s so important to embrace equality … and I’ve been a strong supporter of gay rights, same-sex marriage and privacy – politicians on both sides of the aisle [are] finally coming out and saying what should have been said decades ago: that everyone has the right to love who they choose and marry who they choose.”

 

Kincaid observed: “The nature of the bias is evident for everyone to see, however, the bias will take another turn, as journalists will ignore the evidence that the major media have taken one side of the debate. What is significant is the lack of any real major media opposition to this bias.

 

“Even though this event featured all kinds of media celebrities, you will not find the media reporting on themselves, because it would blow their cover – and blow the whistle on the bias they are implementing on a day-to-day basis,” he wrote.

 

LaBarbera said, “This event, like previous ones I had attended, had a ‘gay advocacy’ rather than journalistic feel to it.

 

“Past NLGJA events have featured homosexual journalists — including some working for major media outlets –denigrating pro-family opponents of ‘gay rights,’ and making analogies between covering them and covering hateful racists much like Brewer’s tendentious claim,” he added.

 

“It should be noted that many advocates of homosexual ‘marriage’ and other aspects of ‘gay rights’ – both homosexuals and non-homosexuals alike — reject this extreme characterization of pro-family voices,” LaBarbera observed.

 

Both Morales and Gayle King, co-host of “CBS This Morning” and close friend of Oprah Winfrey, told him “they dispute the idea that opponents of homosexual activism and same-sex marriage are in a league with racists, as Brewer alleged.”

 

But in her remarks Thursday, Morales did indicate the event was linked to political developments.

 

“We are at a turning point. I mean could this event be more perfectly timed? … Next week the Supreme Court will start to hear arguments on two major cases addressing gay rights: of course Proposition 8 (California law), and the Defense of Marriage Act. This is an issue at the forefront of our nation’s collective conscience right now, and making headlines all over the world,” she noted.

 

The Supreme Court heard arguments today on the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which defines in the state constitution marriage as a relationship between one man and one woman. Tomorrow, the court will consider the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which forbids the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.

 

SlantRight Editor: The WND article is running a poll at this point that asks: In 2013, what is your view of the ‘mainstream news media’? If you are interested in the poll or taking it scroll to the end of this article at WND.

____________________________

Garth Kant is a WND staff writer. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at “CNN Headline News,” three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director. He is the author of the McGraw-Hill textbook, “How to Write Television News.”

 

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

Adam Flanders Still using Legal Lies against Free Resistance


Adam Flanders mug shot - boy molestation

John R. Houk

© December 26, 2012

 

I have been following Mass Resistance battle with Man/Boy homosexual molester Adam Flanders largely through an anti-homosexual activist that goes by the pseudonym Solid Snake.

 

Here are a few past posts at SlantRight 2.0:

 

§  Maine Judges Protect Man/Boy Sex

 

§  MassResistance.com was Forced to Another Webhost by Flanders

 

§  Solid Snake – Mass Resistance Updates

 

These titles all relate how Flanders is using homosexual Lawfare to force Mass Resistance to pay exorbitant legal fees to prevent Mass Resistance from exposing Flanders’ past arrest record for Man/Boy sex. I am guessing Flanders is not independently wealthy for his part of the Lawfare legal expenses. Hence Homosexual activism must be paying the Lawfare tab to help Flanders shut up Mass Resistance.

 

Now whenever I have associated the debauchery of Man/Boy sex with homosexuality raging homosexuals have often commented that homosexuals simply want same-sex love as do heterosexuals. The comments go on to stipulate homosexuals do not support illegal actions as a male homosexual man having sex with a male minor even if that kid is a homosexual.

 

This Flanders Lawfare against Mass Resistance shows this to be a load fudge packing. Homosexual activism has joined Flanders to keep his Man/Boy past out of the public eye. I am curious why Mass Resistance has never exposed who exactly is funding Adam Flanders’ legal fees. You would think that would be a part of the Mass Resistance exposé, right?

 

Anyway … Solid Snake has sent me an email about the latest Adam Flanders Lawfare against Mass Resistance. Here is the Mass Resistance link; however I am cross posting from the email.

 

JRH 12/26/12

Please Support NCCR

*******************

New gay bullying tactic

Phony ‘copyright infringement’ charges vs pro-family websites

 

Sent: Dec 23, 2012 at 1:49 AM

Sent by Mass Resistance

 

MassResistance Update

 

Pro-family activism

“In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
– George Orwell

 

Continued attacks against MassResistance (we’re not backing down):

1. Gay sex offender files phony “copyright infringement” claim vs MassResistance — causing host company to block web pages indefinitely.

2. And more: Files legal complaint against our lawyers. New “harassment” claim against MassResistance and Camenker. Announces that FBI is “investigating” us.

3. Our lawyers at Thomas More Society are making the difference!

4.  What this means to you.

 

1. Gay sex offender files phony “copyright infringement” claim vs MassResistance — causing host company to block web pages indefinitely.

As we’ve reported, over the last year Adam Flanders, a homosexual activist and convicted sex offender, has unleashed a flood threats and legal attacks MassResistance. He wants to stop our work exposing the homosexual agenda targeting schoolchildren — and especially his involvement in some of the more loathsome aspects of that. He has also threatened others across the US and Canada who have worked with us. Now he has filed a phony “copyright infringement” claim to get our web pages blocked.
 

forbidden_screen_400

 

Blocked by web host company. This is what you get if you click on any of our past postings that mention Flanders, including our recent “victory in court” announcement.

 

Background

In 2006 Flanders wrote and distributed a public letter describing what really goes on at the “gay clubs” for schoolchildren run by homosexual adults in towns across the country. He described his own sexual relations with two 14-year-old boys and other horrible things (drug use, pornography, etc.) at the “gay youth club” in his town in Maine where he was an adult participant. He was later convicted and jailed for sexually molesting a teenage boy, along with other convictions, and is a
registered sex offender in Maine.

At that time, his 2006 letter appeared in the local media, which Flanders had encouraged. But MassResistance is using this letter to warn parents about the homosexual movement’s dangerous efforts to attract children — and this angers the homosexual radicals. So last year Flanders (and his unidentified allies) threatened us.  And when we didn’t take it down they began a vicious campaign to “punish” us and try to destroy us.

Over the past year, among other things, Flanders has: (a) filed a phony harassment order in Maine against MassResistance director Brian Camenker which was later thrown out by a judge; (b) threatened MassResistance’s web host company with legal action, causing them to close down our website and threatening our subsequent host company; (c) threatened other web sites across the country and in Canada which reported on Flanders’ actions; (d) filed two legal injunctions against Camenker, both of which were rejected by a judge; and (e) filed a $1 million “defamation” lawsuit against Camenker and MassResistance, which has been dismissed by a federal judge in Maine. (And recently there’s been even more, described in Part 2 below.)

Flanders has been spewing a stream of defamatory statements and lies about Camenker and MassResistance to anyone who will listen, including lawyers, web host companies, and even in legal documents.

Not backing down

Flanders’ vicious tactics are unfortunately being more commonly used by homosexual activists against pro-family groups they want to punish or destroy. The difference here is that MassResistance beats them in court and keeps going — which makes them furious!

The latest: Phony “copyright infringement” claim

A favorite method of corporations, cults, and radical groups who want to get embarrassing material taken off the Internet is to falsely claim violation of a copyright (or trademark). Now the homosexual movement is doing it. Last week this became Flanders’ latest tactic.

Unfortunately, they can take advantage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMC Act), passed in 1998, which makes it relatively easy for posted material to be immediately removed and tied up for an indefinite period of time — maybe months or years — by almost anyone willing to make a false or misleading claim.

Here’s the procedure outlined in the DMC Act (Sec. 512): All someone has to do is to fax the hosting company a copyright violation complaint letter. No matter how false or ridiculous the charges are, the company then permanently blocks all access to whatever material is described in the letter. If the affected website owner sends a properly worded “counter-notice” outlining its innocence, then the material continues to be blocked, but gets un-blocked if the complainant does not file a legal action within 14 days. But if a legal action is filed, the material stays blocked until a court rules in the website’s favor, which could drag on indefinitely. Websites across America are vulnerable to this terrible abuse of the legal process by activists.

Technically, the DMC Act also says that a person who knowingly files a false copyright complaint can be held liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees. (See Section 512(f).) But most of these activists seem undeterred by that, probably thinking that such a court action would be too difficult and expensive.

A hosting company may ignore the DMC Act and simply decide to allow the material to stay up, and let the courts decide. But then the company would also be liable for damages if the website lost in court, so few are willing to do that. Web hosting in the U.S. is price-competitive, and companies make very little profit from an individual customer. Thus they generally have no interest taking any stand to protect an individual website’s free speech rights.

The company we contracted with for our hosting, run by a fearless Christian, is actually a middleman — so Flanders went to the much larger hosting company he contracts from — which is not so fearless.

Flanders’ copyright infringement notice: Absurd claims and lies

Homosexual activists will to go to outrageous lengths. In Flanders’ copyright infringement notice which he faxed to the hosting company, he states under oath that the following are materials copyrighted by him, and which we have posted illegally:

 

  • The public letter that he wrote in 2006 about his involvement in the homosexual clubs for children. [NOT TRUE: A Maine District Court Judge ruled that we have a First Amendment right to publish that document.]
     
  • The court filings that he wrote regarding the cases against MassResistance and Camenker. [NOT TRUE: Court filings are public documents.]
     
  • The criminal background check on him from the State of Maine. [NOT TRUE: It is a public document which is not copyrighted by him.]
     
  • His police department mug shot. [NOT TRUE: It is a public document which is not copyrighted by him.]
     
  • A photograph of him from his website. [NOT TRUE: This is clearly and unequivocally “fair use” per US copyright law.]

 

In addition, Flanders includes in his copyright infringement notice a further narrative of outright lies and distortions about Camenker and MassResistance. For example, he claims that because we “falsely accused him of crimes,” a court made a “factual finding” that we harassed him (NOT true) and that we “encouraged the public” to harass him (NOT true), etc. And of course, like other homosexual activists across the country attacking pro-family groups, Flanders repeats the phony and libelous writings of the extremist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) listing hundreds of religious, civic, and mainstream pro-family groups like MassResistance as “hate groups” similar to the KKK.

Woven into this are common homosexual activist tactics: (1) Personalizing themselves as the victims and (2) Employing whatever lies, distortions, or illegal tactics they wish.

“Counter-notice” to hosting company from our lawyers

Immediately after Flanders filed his notice, our lawyers at Thomas More Society drafted a “counter notice” per the DMC Act, debunking the claims that Flanders made, which was then faxed to the host company. However, as described above, according to the DMC Act the material still stays blocked. The counter-notice simply gives Flanders and his allies 10-14 days to file a copyright action in court, which we’re sure he’ll do — and which we’ll fight .

Note: The “copyright infringement” tactic is not new. In 1939 a reporter named Alan Simpson (who later became a US Senator) published a version of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf which included the anti-Semitic and militaristic portions left out of the American version of the book. Hitler sued Simpson for copyright infringement, and a Connecticut judge ruled in Hitler’s favor!

We’ll keep you informed on what happens.

 

2. And more: Flanders, files legal complaint against our lawyers. New “harassment” claim against MassResistance and Camenker. Announces that FBI is “investigating” us.

The phony copyright infringement claim is just the latest abuse of the legal process that Flanders and his currently unseen allies are using to attempt to stop MassResistance, and to frighten everyone else.

Over the last several weeks we’ve been notified that Flanders is also:

A. Suing Thomas More Society for “defamation”!

On November 14 the federal judge dismissed Flanders’ absurd defamation case against Brian Camenker and MassResistance. However, Flanders has filed for a review of that decision and is amending it to add our legal counsel, the renowned Thomas More Society, as additional defendants! Flanders is claiming that the announcement which Thomas More Society made on its website about the dismissal of the case — which includes a re-statement of the facts — constitutes defamation of him!

This is another classic harassment tactic by the homosexual movement, and the left in general. They not only want to punish and intimidate pro-family people, but they harass the lawyers, too. And very often, this has the intended effect of scaring pro-family lawyers away from being aggressive or getting involved at all in these kinds of cases. But luckily, Thomas More Society is not intimidated!

 

B. Filing new “harassment” action against MassResistance and Camenker

On October 22 the District Court Judge finally threw out the 2011 “harassment” order against Camenker and MassResistance that Flanders had managed to fraudulently obtain. But that isn’t stopping him. On December 17, Flanders announced that he is initiating a new “protection from harassment order” against Camenker.

This “harassment complaint” will undoubtedly be as disingenuous and absurd as the previous one. As we reported, when Flanders tried to have the previous order “enforced” through an injunction, the judge completely denied it and declared that MassResistance’s actions were perfectly legal.

But this represents another common homosexual activist tactic: Keep harassing through any means possible.

 

C. Announced that the FBI is “investigating” Camenker and MassResistance

On December 19, Flanders wrote in an email to a web hosting company that “the FBI is currently investigating Mr. Camenker” because, said Flanders, he feels the need “to protect myself.” This is another incredible abuse, which unfortunately is likely to become more common as a tactic.

As we’ve recently reported, under the Obama Administration the FBI is now embracing the homosexual movement and “reaching out to the gay and transgender community.” (The FBI also now treats the extremist SPLC as a “reliable source.”) Thus, it doesn’t surprise us that Flanders would have relatively easy access to them. We intend to get to the bottom of this.

 

3. Our lawyers at Thomas More Society are making the difference!

We want to say that we are very proud of our legal team at the Thomas More Society in Chicago. No matter what Flanders and his friends in the homosexual movement throw at us — or at our lawyers — they are sticking by us and fighting strong.

 

ThomMore_logo

 

We’ve seen a constant temptation in conservative legal circles to compromise make a settlement, and move on. After all, time is money. But the Thomas More Society “gets it.” They understand the vicious and “bullying” nature of the homosexual movement and that this is a larger “culture war” battle where it’s crucially important not to be afraid or back down. They know that if good people fight back properly, we will ultimately win.

 

4.  What this means to you.

It’s necessary that people internalize the concept that the only effective strategy is not to back down and always fight back.

The overall homosexual (and now transgender) attack on families, culture, and society is hugely destructive. But their agenda targeting innocent children (as appallingly described in Flanders’ letter) is particularly horrible. So it is all the more necessary to confront evil rather than shrink from it.

 

Homosexual activists are obsessed with getting kids

 

Homosexual activists are obsessed with getting kids in school to join homosexual “clubs” run by adult activists. [MassResistance photo.]

 

Unfortunately, the battle is not going well. The radical and militant homosexual movement has become the 800-pound gorilla in the room that the mainstream conservative movement pretends it doesn’t even see. And even worse, many are starting to view radicals’ victory as inevitable, so conservatives turn away, give up, and talk about other things.

Most conservatives are in denial about the vicious and relentless nature of the homosexual movement. They are afraid — and hope that by placating them and moderating their opposition, it will persuade them to slow their aggressive push to change our culture.

For example, how many pro-family groups, for example, talk about “gay marriage” in the abstract but are terrified to anger the homosexual groups by discussing the perverted behavior? But if anything, the opposite is true. Silence on that only makes them bolder, more vicious, and more aggressive.

We know of pro-family groups that caved in to Flanders’ early demands to take down the incriminating letter. And others who were afraid to put it up once they saw what he did to us. On the other hand, every time someone publicly fights back and wins, it has an effect. It pushes the radicals back a little and in many cases it energizes many, many others on our side.

So don’t let the “moderate” conservatives drag you down and make you more afraid. Fight back with MassResistance!

HELP MASSRESISTANCE KEEP UP THE FIGHT . . .

MassResistance does what no other pro-family group can or will do.

Your financial support means a lot. If you’ve already donated to this fundraising drive — Thank you! You support will help us meet the challenges of 2013.

 

          As of: Dec. 22     GOAL: $100,000   Raised: $30,087.25   Donations: 199

PLEASE consider a donation of any size. Any amount you can spare will be a great investment in activism and information! Be a part of the resistance!

Informing you on the cutting edge culture war issues of the day is just one of the things we do. We also help activists around the country (and around the world) confront the forces against the family and society. We’ve worked with pro-family citizens from Hawaii to Maine, and from Australia to England, and of course here in Massachusetts, the “belly of the beast.” Your support helps us continue.

 

 DONATE HERE

Invest in our important work!

 

Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454.  ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.

 

_______________________________

Adam Flanders Still using Legal Lies against Free Resistance

John R. Houk

© December 26, 2012

________________________________

New gay bullying tactic

 

Please help support our work . . . Donate to MassResistance!

Better yet – become a monthly donor (email us back to get set up)!

Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454
ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.

Contact us if you want to get involved.

[If you are on this list by mistake, or do not want to get our email information alerts, please accept our apologies. Please call us at MassResistance at 781-890-6001 or email us back, and we’ll immediately take you off the list. We’ve tried to only include people who’ve contacted us at some point or otherwise indicated they would like to hear from us.]

Also, if this is being forwarded to you and you want to be on our primary list, please let us know!
 

Washington State Referendum 74


Referendum-74-Petitions

John R. Houk

© October 2, 2012

 

I am a Conservative Family Values kind of guy. Couple this to know that I grew up in a small town in Washington State (I currently live in Oklahoma). I have a tendency to pay attention to politics in the Evergreen State.

 

Two-thirds of the population of Washington State lives west of the Cascade Mountain Range. This is roughly one-third of the State.  In doing the math then obviously one-third of the population lives on the two-thirds east of the Cascades.

 

This important to know because most people think of Washington State as an in the tank people for Left Wing politics. The in the tank Leftists live west of the Cascades dominated by Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan area. East of the Cascades the voting bloc is generally Conservative even if they have been lifelong Democrats.

 

When I was growing up in Washington the State was divided by just two area codes: 206 and 509. Since I have moved from my beloved Eastern Washington multiple area codes mostly on the West side have emerged. As a kid I learned to call people the Seattle Side people 206ers. Yes it was meant in a pejorative sense.

 

So in Washington State the 206ers have politically bullied the Eastern two-thirds of the State. However once in a while there is a political issue in which 206er Center Left voters agree with Right Wingers and the Center Right voters of Eastern Washington.

 

That political issue is holy matrimony. Recently the Washington State legislature made ungodly same-sex marriage legal. The Washington folks that believe marriage is between a male and a female got together to get enough signatures to get Referendum 74 on the November ballot to repeal the legislative action. Referendum 74 gives the voters the power to what is right and not Left Wing Secular Humanist Moral Relativists.

 

The Traditional Marriage folks had to deal with hostility from homosexual activists that attempted to intimidate voters by publicizing petition signers’ names and addresses. The horror of hate-mail or vandalism is a near terrorist method to strike fear into voters to keep them from signing the petition to place Referendum on the November ballot. Even with the homosexual political terrorism the Traditional Marriage folks got twice as many signatures than was needed.

 

Referendum 74 is the work of Traditional Marriage proponents. Ironically the wording of the people’s initiative to reject State legislation works out like this: a yes vote makes homosexual marriage legal and a no vote makes homosexual marriage illegal. So it is actually fairly neutral with the positive favoring same-sex marriage and the negative rejecting same-sex marriage.

 

Something I might point out: As I was Googling for information about Referendum 74. I should have expected this but I was still a bit disappointed. The top Google listings emphasized the homosexual point of view stigmatizing the Traditional Family view. A quick perusal of the pro-homosexual stands highlighted polls in which Washington State citizens and Catholics support same-sex marriage. These pro-homosexual views treated percentages between 50 and 54 as overwhelming proof that Washington voters are in the tank for same-sex marriage. Forgive me for pointing out if the poll was taken on the West side of the State those percentages are a bit skewed. If the nearly half of those poll stats are coupled with the overwhelming Traditional Marriage voters of the Eastern Washington I suspect the outcome in November will be a bit of surprise for homosexuals. OR maybe it won’t be a surprise knowing that pro-homosexual propaganda is being pumped into the Washington State voters.

 

An email from Eugene Delgaudio is what touched off these thoughts on Referendum 74. Below is that email.

 

JRH 10/2/12

Please Support NCCR

Rush on Chick-fil-A: The target is Christianity


Rush Limbaugh - Chick-fil-A

Rush says the homosexual and Leftist attack on Chick-fil-A is really an attack on Christianity. Everyone should know that but no one in the MSM is publicizing that notion. GOOD FOR RUSH! Also the Lesbian actress – Jane Lynch – of the TV show Glee proclaimed in public at a roast for Rosanne Barr: “F*** Chick-fil-A”. You are darn toot’in the Chick-fil-A attack is an attack on Christianity!

 

JRH 8/7/12

 

Please Support NCCR

Chick-Fil Shows How Religious Freedoms Are Being Lost


Chick-fil-A Day

Ann Matos got my attention commenting on an article by Thomas Messner who writes that the Leftist and Homosexual activist attack on the Family Values promoted by Chick-Fil-A.

 

Messner’s point is that all the Leftist talk to ban Chick-Fil-A is just one more symptom of utilizing political power and money-sucking litigation to force Christians to be quiet about Biblical Morality.

 

Friends that is so evil that I can say that is Satanic.

 

JRH 8/1/12

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Chick-Fil Shows How Religious Freedoms Are Being Lost

 

By Ann Matos

Jul 30, 2012 10:44 pm

ReaganForge Yahoo Group (I believe Registration Required)

 

Use the above link to read a chilling article how Christians who express their conscience are being placed under legal, cultural and economic pressure to recant.  I feel these are signs of the end times and may indeed be unstoppable.  However, for the sake of our nation, for what it once was, for what it can be again, I haven’t yet given up hope that this situation can be reversed.  After all, when Jonah went to Ninevah, they repented.  Who knows?  Maybe we will yet have a great revival — a time of renewed Christian committment (sic), as Billy Graham prays for.  I still believe … … …

 

Ann

__________________________

Chick-fil-A Latest Example of How Same-Sex Marriage Threatens Religious Freedom

 

By Thomas Messner

July 30, 2012 at 3:30 pm

The Foundry

 

Same-sex marriage combined with nondiscrimination policies will result in significant discrimination against individuals and institutions that hold to the belief that marriage is—and should be defined in law as—the union of one man and one woman.

In the latest illustration of how this will happen, a Chickkago alderman recently explained that he plans to block the Chickkken restaurant Chick-fil-A from building a new restaurant in his ward because he is offended by the belief of the company’s owners that marriage is between one man and one woman.

 

“There are consequences for one’s actions, statements and beliefs,” the official stated. “Because of this man’s ignorance, I will deny Chick-fil-A a permit to open a restaurant in my ward.”

 

Under pressure, this official might attempt to alter his rationale for targeting Chick-fil-A—or even back down altogether like the mayor of Boston did when he was criticized for targeting Chick-fil-A in his city.

 

However it turns out, though, the Chick-fil-A situation certainly adds to the growing list of cases illustrating how individuals and institutions that continue to support marriage as one man and one woman will likely face a variety of significant burdens:

 

§  A Christian photographer in New Mexico who refused to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony was hauled before a human rights tribunal and forced to pay nearly $6,700 in attorneys’ fees to the complainant;

 

§  Christian charities have been forced to stop providing foster care and adoption services because they cannot in good conscience comply with laws that would require them to violate beliefs about marriage and family;

 

§  Boy Scouts of America has lost equal access to public facilities and programs because of its position on open homosexuality;

 

§  A graduate student claims that she was expelled from a public university counseling program after she conscientiously objected to counseling a potential client seeking assistance regarding a homosexual relationship; and

 

§  A Christian organization at a public university was denied official recognition because it required officers and voting members to adhere to traditional Christian teachings, including a prohibition on extramarital sex.

 

This is not “live and let live.” This is the state—and sometimes private citizens and the culture at large—punishing people who refuse to recant their belief that marriage is the union of a husband and wife.

 

This kind of thing happens because proponents of same-sex marriage declare support for marriage as one man and one woman to be a form of irrational prejudice and bigotry similar to racism. In this view, support for marriage as one man and one woman is the kind of belief that should be purged from public life through legal, cultural, and economic pressure.

 

This is precisely what is happening right now to Chick-fil-A.

 

Defending marriage takes courage. For more stories of people who have demonstrated courage in standing for marriage as one man and one woman, visit the website of the Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance, a group that stands up for people who stand up for marriage.

 

Posted in Family and Religion, Featured

_____________________________

The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation

 

© 2012, The Heritage Foundation
Conservative policy research since 1973

MassResistance.com was Forced to Another Webhost by Flanders


Adam Flanders

John R. Houk

© June 22, 2012

 

MassResistance.com has been exposing the heinous homosexual sex offender Adam Flanders much to his chagrin. Flanders and his homosexual legal team have been trying to combat MassResistance’s exposé by a tactic undoubtedly learned from Radical Muslims known as Lawfare. The Lawfare tactic is to smother a defendant with litigation to the point the legal fees make the defendant go broke even if or especially if his writing is the truth.

 

In MassResistance’s case I cross posted about the legal games of homosexual Adam Flanders and Lawfare homosexuals’ activists directly after my thoughts entitled, “Maine Judges Protect Man/Boy Sex.”

 

I now find out for awhile MassResistance’s website was shut down by homosexual activist complaints. MassResistance even reports that usually staunchly Conservative web news site WND backed away from reporting on Adam Flanders because of threats of litigation. Homosexual Flanders has taken the practice of SWATing to a new level by utilizing Leftist activist Judges like Maine’s District Judge Patricia G. Worth to take false information to execute a restraining order against Brian Camenker of MassResistance. As I wrote above I cross posted the MassResistance version in the link above. HERE is an independent report by Gina Miller at Renew America that backs up the MassResistance version.

 

SWATing began as a prank by Leftists against Conservative Bloggers and Pundits. SWATing has evolved into a practice in which Leftists attempt to intimidate Conservatives for writing anti-Leftist material. Leftists would call 911 and cops would show up at a Conservative’s home guns raring to blaze until it was discovered it was a prank. You can see how the prank can get out of hand and out of hand translates into intimidation to prevent Free Speech.

 

“SWAT-ing” refers to a hoax in which an anonymous prankster falsely reports a violent crime at an unsuspecting person’s home, prompting a police team to respond to the location believing a dangerous situation is at hand.

 

The illegal practice has in recent months targeted well-known conservative writers and commentators, including Erick Erickson, founder of the blog RedState.com — who claims he was eating dinner with his family in May when a SWAT team surrounded his home following such a false 911 call.

 

The growing trend, which some say could one day prove deadly, had conservatives on edge at the annual RightOnline conference of right-wing bloggers and activists in Las Vegas this weekend. (Conservative bloggers taking precautions over ‘SWAT-ing’ attacks; By Cristina Corbin; June 17, 2012; Fox News)

 

GOP Sen. Saxby Chambliss is taking up the cause of a number of conservative bloggers who claim they have been targeted and harassed with such tactics as ‘SWAT-ing’ where 911 emergency teams are sent to a blogger’s house.

The harassment has allegedly happened in retaliation for what they have written and Chambliss has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate, according to ABC News.

“I am writing with concern regarding recent reports that several members of the community of online political commentators have been targeted with harassing and frightening actions. Any potentially criminal action that incites fear, seeks to silence a dissenting opinion, and collaterally wastes the resources of law enforcement should be given close scrutiny at all levels,” Chambliss wrote, according to the report.

“Regardless of any potential political differences that may exist, threats and intimidation have no place in our national political discourse. Those who choose to enter into that political discourse should not have to worry about potential threats to their or their family’s safety,” Chambliss continued. “While I am certain that local law enforcement is reviewing each of these instances, I am asking you to please look into each of these cases as well to determine if any federal laws may have been violated. Future targets of SWAT-ting, whether engaged in political speech or not, may not be so fortunate as to escape physical harm.” (Senator Asks for DOJ Probe of SWAT-ing of Conservative Bloggers; Newsmax; 06 Jun 2012 10:22 PM)

 

 

Below is a forwarded MassResistance email from friend Solid Snake that reveals the details of homosexual lawfare against being exposed. I am posting the email because the MassResistance post is slightly different and can be read HERE.

 

JRH 6/22/12

Please Support NCCR

********************************

MassResistance website shut down after gay activist threatens web hosting company

 

MassResistance Update

Update Sent: June 18, 2012

Forwarded Date: Jun 18, 2012 at 11:51 PM

 

1. MassResistance web site shut down after homosexual activist threatens web hosting company — and company caves in! Latest in vicious (and illegal) “swat” campaign against conservatives.

2. WorldNetDaily removes articles reporting this incident after receiving threats from homosexual activist! A sad day for the “free” press.

3. MassResistance needs your support now. Be a part of the fight!

4. Camenker of MassResistance addresses Plymouth Rock Tea Party, also speaks at MARA breakfast.

_____________________

 

1. MassResistance web site shut down after homosexual activist threatens web hosting company — and company caves in! Latest in vicious (and illegal) “swat” campaign against conservatives.

The MassResistance website was completely shut down last week after a homosexual activist and convicted sex offender threatened the web hosting company, and the company caved in. Although the site has finally come back up, (after nearly three days of being down) the activist has now sent a threat to the owner of the owner of MassResistance’s new hosting company.

 

Taken down by hosting company: Starting on Monday afternoon this is what people saw when they went to the MassResistance website.

 

MassResistance Look after Taken Down

 

Adam Flanders is a well-known homosexual activist in Maine who has been convicted of molesting a 14-year-old boy and is a registered sex offender. In January 2007, Flanders wrote and publicly distributed a shocking letter describing the sexual acting out at a “gay youth” organization, including adult men having sex with boys. Flanders delivered the letter to local police departments, the local media, and pro-family groups. Now, five years later, Flanders had a change of heart and wants it removed from pro-family sites that have posted it. He has intimidated every pro-family group  into removing it — except MassResistance.

 

 

Adam Flanders Mug Shot

“Gay youth clubs” run by adults in schools and in communities are the worst nightmare of every parent with a vulnerable child. We have worked with parents who agonized terribly over their kids’ involvement with them. Flanders’ letter was an important revelation of what had been long suspected — and Flanders now realizes that. (Interesting, the letter is also still posted on at least one local Maine news site but since they are not “pro-family” Flanders has ignored it.)

But as our readers know, MassResistance has a long history of not backing down to threats from homosexual activists regarding material we’ve exposed.

 

The vicious “SWATing” tactics now being used against conservatives

Known as “SWATing,” Flanders’ action can be seen as part of a disturbing new strategy being used around the country to stifle free speech by viciously harassing conservative web sites, bloggers, and writers, by going after the individuals personally. This includes threats, frivolous lawsuits, false police crime reports, phony harassment filings, other various acts of terror and intimidation. Flanders has filed a false harassment complaint in a Maine District Court against Brian Camenker of MassResistance, personally, and the judge unbelievably agreed to the restraining order! In Massachusetts, a far-left pro-homosexual group has filed a lawsuit against Pastor Scott Lively for international “crimes against humanity” because of his pro-family activism.

Flanders has indicated in his emails that he is working in concert with radical homosexual groups around the country.

Web hosting company for MassResistance site caves in

On Monday afternoon, June 11, HostExcellence, located in Kentucky, decided to accommodate Flanders’ demand that they shut us down. The MassResistance website — which has been up for nearly 15 years — suddenly disappeared from the Internet.

Despite the fact that we had been hosted by HostExcellence for nearly eight years without any problems, the company was resolute. When HostExcellence began getting threats from Flanders they ordered us to take the material down or be shut down. We were contacted by Craig Witten, who works in the company’s legal department, with that directive. (Strangely, we were first told he was a lawyer, then they said he’s not a lawyer.) We explained to Witten the background of the situation, but he told us that doesn’t matter. He said that shutting us down is simply a business decision. The company doesn’t want to risk getting into a legal fight with those people, he said.

We suggested to Witten that by siding with a sex offender against a pro-family group helping parents, the company risks angering other pro-family people across the country, and sending a message that people’s sites aren’t safe from the ire of radicals like Flanders. Witten said that wasn’t a concern of theirs. He added that the decision was final, and there’s no one else at the company that we, or anyone, could talk to further about it. (This policy apparently reflects the sentiments of company president, Fathi Said.)

Threat to owner of MassResistance’s new web hosting company

By Wednesday evening we had found a new hosting company and had finished most of the painstaking task of restoring the large MassResistance website onto its servers.

As soon as the new site was up, Flanders traced the server addresses to identify the company. He then sent two chilling personal emails to the owner, also located in New England. The first email contained a series of legal fabrications about MassResistance. In the second email, Flanders listed the company owner’s full name, his home address, and his business address. (It was clearly meant to frighten him.) Flanders said he was giving him 24 hours to take down the MassResistance site. Flanders also threatened that he would begin various immediate legal actions against the owner personally, saying he was “personally culpable” and would be seeking “personal damages” from him.

The new web hosting company’s owner is a committed Christian, and so far is standing tall on this. He knows that Flanders has no actual legal basis for his claims. But Flanders’ range of threats and enraged intimidation tactics are naturally very worrisome to him and his family, to say the least.

Fighting back: Liberty Counsel steps up to help MassResistance!

As soon as word had gotten out that HostExcellence was considering shutting down MassResistance site, we got a call from Richard Mast, an attorney at Liberty Counsel! Liberty Counsel is a preeminent pro-family pro-bono law firm that has done great work around the country.

 

Liberty Counsel logo

 

This past week Attorney Mast has put in a lot of work on behalf of MassResistance. He sent a strongly worded letter to the company president outlining the legal risks of their action against MassResistance, and has since spoken to a “real” attorney there. (We’ll see what happens.) He has also communicated with authorities in Maine regarding Flanders, and is helping us with legal strategies to deal with him and his actions.

Local Maine attorney needed now for this: Help us find one!

From research so far, Flanders has likely broken a number of state and possibly federal laws in his harassment actions and abuse of the legal process. And his outrageous and frivolous harassment suits (which he’s continuing to file) need to be confronted. But unless we have attorneys to do this, it won’t get done.

There’s only so much Liberty Counsel can do (or has the time to do) from its offices in Florida and Washington, DC. Someone is who is aggressive and knowledgeable is needed on the ground in Maine to get the job done there, in the courtroom. This is an immediate need because we must move fast.

To our supporters in Maine: please help with this if you can.

(There is actually one “pro-family” attorney that national groups have used a lot. But we talked to him at length. He takes a fairly moderate approach to these issues, and is on not too interested in fighting this. We’ve seen too much of that among “pro-family” attorneys, unfortunately.)

Conservative media picks up on story

This story is starting to pick up steam. On both Monday and Tuesday, MassResistance was interviewed on the Bryan Fischer show on the American Family Association radio network. We were also interviewed on the Dr. Michael Brown Show, also syndicated across the country. Later that week were on radio in Maine.

 

Interviewed by American Family Association Radio on website shut down:

 

VIDEO: Brian Camenker: website pulled down because of his resistance to homosexuality 06/12/12

 

 

In addition, WorldNetDaily did two articles on this last week — but unfortunately both have been taken down (See #2 below.)

The time to fight back is now!

The pro-family movement has a long history of simply taking a defensive posture when confronted by radical activists. That has not served us well. At best, it temporarily “holds the line.” Left-wing groups like GLAD and the ACLU, on the other hand, are always hyper-aggressive and willing to take us on with every creative strategy they can think of. The “gay marriage” decisions and the legal attack on DOMA are just two recent examples, also going back to the removal of all religious expression from schools.

You can take this to the bank: If Flanders is allowed to get away with this, his radical cohorts across the country will soon all be doing the same, and much worse. The time to fight is now.

In fact, the First Amendment covers legitimate news reporting and political opinion for everyone — even if homosexual activists don’t like it. Or, at least it’s supposed to.

Soon after our site went down our office got a phone call from a web hosting country in a foreign country across the ocean. They said they’d be happy to host us if it’s become too dangerous in America. We’re thinking seriously about it. But has it really come to that?


2. WorldNetDaily removes articles reporting this incident after receiving threats from homosexual activist! A sad day for the “free” press.

As conservative news sites go, we have always held WorldNetDaily in very high regard. They bill themselves as a “Free Press for a Free People” and they have lived up to that. Over the years they have covered numerous cutting-edge MassResistance activities that others only covered afterwards. And we love reading their “Whistleblower” monthly magazine.

 

WND logo

 

But their recent action is very troubling.

On Tuesday, June 12, WorldNetDaily published an article on Flanders’ actions against MassResistance titled, “‘Gay’ activist uses ‘SWAT’ to silence critics.” The following day, Wednesday, they posted another article about our site being taken down, titled, “Web company censors ‘public’ letter.” They were thorough, well-written articles.

Then on Thursday, they were both missing from the WorldNetDaily site. We finally were able to speak to someone at WorldNetDaily who admitted that Flanders had contacted them and had made various claims and legal threats. So WorldNetDaily took them down . . . until further notice.

Someone retrieved the articles from the Google cache and sent them to us. Here’s what WorldNetDaily removed from its site:

 

WorldNetDailY: “‘Gay’ activist uses ‘SWAT’ to silence critics.”

WorldNetDaily: “Web company censors ‘public’ letter.”

 

 

It seems that even exposing Obama is considered less risky for the conservative media than this. Why does our side cower before the homosexual bullies?

 


3. MassResistance needs your support now. Be a part of the fight!.

This past week has been pretty tough. MassResistance is the only group that didn’t back down to the threats, intimidation, and harassment from the homosexual movement.

 

Our website got shut down over it. We worked around the clock and got it back up in less than three days. And the assault continues. The homosexual movement wants to destroy us more than ever.

 

But in these times, keeping you informed about the often horrible truth is preeminently important.

Please consider a generous donation to help us offset the costs we’ve encountered and to help us continue fighting back stronger than ever. We don’t have a board of directors of rich businessmen. We depend on you.

          DONATE HERE

Thank you for your support!

 

 


4. Camenker of MassResistance addresses Plymouth Rock Tea Party, also speaks at MARA breakfast.

MassResistance continues to be in demand for speaking engagements across the state spreading the word on a number of critical issues that don’t get reported by the mainstream media. But in particular, people want to know about the homosexual (and transgender) agenda in the public schools that no one else is exposing or even talking about.
 

On Sunday, June 3, Brian Camenker of MassResistance spoke at the “Politics and Eggs” breakfast at the Mildred F. Jefferson Chapter of the Massachusetts Association of Republican Assemblies (MARA) in Fall River. In contrast to most of the GOP establishment across the country, the Republican Assemblies proudly call themselves the “Republican wing of the Republican Party.”

 

June 3, 2012 Brian Camenker

 

On Tuesday, June 6, Brian Camenker of MassResistance spoke at the Plymouth Rock Tea Party, the major Tea Party group in the South Shore of Massachusetts.

 

June 6, 2012 Brian Camenker

_______________________________

MassResistance.com was Forced to Another Webhost by Flanders

John R. Houk

© June 22, 2012

_______________________________

MassResistance website shut down after gay activist threatens web hosting company

 

Please help support our work . . .
  

Donate to MassResistance!

Better yet – become a monthly donor (email us back to get set up)!

 

Donations can also be mailed to: MassResistance, PO Box 1612, Waltham, MA 02454

ALL donations are confidential. MassResistance does not sell or lend any of its lists.

 

Contact us if you want to get involved.

Maine Judges Protect Man/Boy Sex


ACLU-NAMBLA

John R. Houk

© June 8, 2012

 

Homosexuality is a sin according to the Word of God in BOTH the Old and New Testaments. The Word of God often compares acts of homosexuality to an abomination. What is an abomination?

 

Merriam-Webster on abomination:

 

1:  something abominable

 

1: worthy of or causing disgust or hatred: detestable

 

2: quite disagreeable or unpleasant

 

 

2: extreme disgust and hatred: loathing

 

TheFreeDictionary listings for abomination:

 

American Heritage® Dictionary

 

1. Abhorrence; disgust.

 

2. A cause of abhorrence or disgust.

 

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged

 

1. a person or thing that is disgusting

 

2. an action that is vicious, vile, etc.

 

3. intense loathing

 

The act of homosexuality is an abominable depravity worthy of loathing. Fortunately God has given His one and only Son to pay the price of sin and to deliver humanity from sin. Although homosexuals are worthy of loathing, Christians have the duty to share the Good News of the Redemption of Jesus Christ and pray for the unredeemed to lead them to the path of the God-Kind of life. Since forgiveness is the hallmark of Christ multiple acts of forgiveness is also the duty of Christians toward those deserving of loathing.

 

That sounds a bit condescending doesn’t it? The point of being a Christian is to walk in the God-Kind of love and so Believers need to learn to share the Good News without condemnation for there is NOW therefore no condemnation to those in Christ Jesus.

 

naked-twister-public-gay-sex-3

 

Saying all that, Christians are not door mats for the feet of sinners especially sinners that practice depravity. Yes, I am aware that a significant amount of homosexuals otherwise lead normal lives other than their proclivity for moral abomination. It is my opinion that homosexuals that otherwise lead normal lives exist because the radical homosexuals that flaunt their lifestyle in public even doing some of their depravity in public where someone’s mother or father has to explain to little Jack or Jill that is wicked in the sight of God just as it is for professional scantily clad women offering fornicating service to men single and married. Larger cities have a Vice division in their police departments to deal with the illegality of sex for pay propositioning among prostitutes. AND YET there are large urban areas that have homosexual parades in which public homosexual sex including S & M junk is practiced (Example of perversity – WARNING EXPLICIT DEPRAVITY) under the actual license of a City Government.

 

Democrats, Secular Humanists, Homosexual Activists, Hollywood Media and Small Screen Media (TV) have been pounding homosexual acceptance among Americans for decades. It has gotten particularly worse in the last few years.

 

If you are a Family Values organization or a Conservative organization in which Family Values is one of many issues supported, and your organization stands with the Biblical definition that the practice of homosexuality is an abomination you will be labeled a bigoted homophobe.

 

Homosexual activism has gotten so out of hand that activist judges representing Leftist ideology and/or judges that are actually gay have been making law from the bench to exclude Family/Biblical Values as part of the rule of law. It is so bad that Man/Boy homosexuality (which is STILL illegal) is being defended, smothered and persecuted above the mandate of the rule of law.

 

The people of MassResistance.org have exposed the State Judiciary of Maine to be adjudicating above the law and allowing homosexual activists to persecute American citizens that are exposing a homosexual youth camp as a haven for Man/Boy sexual interludes (See the Wickedness of NAMBLA).

 

JRH 6/8/12 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)

Please Support NCCR

************************************

Convicted sex offender gets judge in Maine to issue restraining order against Brian Camenker of MassResistance — for exposing offenses against kids at “gay youth” club!

 

Part of vicious new tactic by homosexual movement to silence critics.

 

MassResistance.org

June 8, 2012

 

The homosexual movement is now using local liberal judges to go after pro-family activists.

 

Adam Flanders mug shot - boy molestation

Homosexual activist Adam Flanders in custody after arrest.

 

An adult homosexual activist convicted of sexually molesting a 14-year-old boy he met at a “gay youth” event got a judge in Maine to issue a bizarre legal restraining order against Brian Camenker of MassResistance regarding an exposé of those activities, even though Camenker lives in Massachusetts and had never had any contact with the man.

 

This seems to follow a new, disturbing strategy of the left to personally intimidate and even terrorize prominent conservatives they don’t like. One recent example involves the “SWATing” of certain conservative bloggers. A “SWAT” is calling in a false report of a terrible shooting taking place at the home address of a conservative, resulting in a police SWAT team descending on the home and terrorizing the family. Closer to home, a far-left pro-homosexual group has filed a lawsuit against Pastor Scott Lively for international “crimes against humanity” because of his pro-family activism.

 

MassResistance becomes a target

 

In 2007, Adam Flanders, a well-known Maine homosexual activist, distributed a public letter he had written himself, exposing the horrific activities of the “gay youth club” in his area and describing his own sexual activities with under-age boys there. But recently, Flanders was angry that MassResistance refused his demand to take down the letter from our website, after he had a change of heart about exposing those activities.

 

So Flanders filed a complaint in Belfast Maine District Court claiming the posting constituted personal “harassment” against him. In an unbelievable and outrageous turn of events, the District Court judge agreed with him and has issued a legal restraining order against Camenker, as executive director of MassResistance.

 

The judge also refused to hear Camenker’s testimony on his own behalf on the blatant untruths in Flanders’ court complaint. And although parts of the Flanders’ letter are still also posted on a local newspaper website, the judge did not take that into consideration either.

 

This seems to follow a new, disturbing strategy of the left to personally intimidate and even terrorize prominent conservatives they don’t like. One recent example involves the “SWATing” of certain conservative bloggers. A “SWAT” is calling in a false report of a terrible shooting taking place at the home address of a conservative, resulting in a police SWAT team descending on the home and terrorizing the family. Closer to home, a far-left pro-homosexual group has filed a lawsuit against Pastor Scott Lively for international “crimes against humanity” because of his pro-family activism.

 

MassResistance becomes a target

 

In 2007, Adam Flanders, a well-known Maine homosexual activist, distributed a public letter he had written himself, exposing the horrific activities of the “gay youth club” in his area and describing his own sexual activities with under-age boys there. But recently, Flanders was angry that MassResistance refused his demand to take down the letter from our website, after he had a change of heart about exposing those activities.

 

So Flanders filed a complaint in Belfast Maine District Court claiming the posting constituted personal “harassment” against him. In an unbelievable and outrageous turn of events, the District Court judge agreed with him and has issued a legal restraining order against Camenker, as executive director of MassResistance.

 

The judge also refused to hear Camenker’s testimony on his own behalf on the blatant untruths in Flanders’ court complaint. And although parts of the Flanders’ letter are still also posted on a local newspaper website, the judge did not take that into consideration either.

 

2007: Incredibly incriminating public letter — exposing ‘gay youth’ clubs

 

In January 2007, Flanders — at the time a 20-year-old homosexual activist — wrote a shocking letter about the outrageous abuses going on between adults and kids in the local homosexual youth club, “OUT! . . . As I Want to Be,” a non-profit group for kids with adult “advisors.”

 

Flanders sent copies of the letter to two local police departments, other government agencies, the local news media, and various pro-family groups (including the Christian Civic League of Maine). The local news site Maine Today still has its article posted, with excerpts from the letter. The letter was also posted on the MassResistance website.

In the letter, Flanders talks about:

 

§  Sexual relations he had with two 14-year-old boys during group-related activities.

 

§  Sexual relations between older men and kids, and between youth members.

 

§  Drug and alcohol abuse by adults and youths.

 

§  An adult director who told stories to the youth about man-boy love and pedophilia at the group meetings.

 

§  Frequent suicide threats and attempts, which Flanders said became “a common part of our organization.”

 

§  How the group “hands out condoms and lubricant like candy” to the youth.

 

Flanders concludes the letter saying: “It is my hope that the Bureau of Health will do everything in their power to seriously investigate this seemingly innocent organization that has such a dark past full of negligence, irresponsibility, sexual harassment, abuse, and ultimately emotional harm that could leave permanent scars in the lives of many vulnerable youth in Maine, or even destroy their lives completely.”

 

Read Flanders’ public letter HERE

 

It’s what MassResistance has been warning about for years

 

This letter was a disturbing exposé of what we have been warning about for years. From everything we’ve seen, our belief is that this is more the rule than the exception. A number of similar “gay youth” clubs are operating across Massachusetts (funded with taxpayer money) and in other states around the country — with radical, hardcore homosexual and transgender activists “mentoring” vulnerable kids as young as middle-school age. And all the warning signs have been there for a long time. (Several homosexual volunteers for “gay youth” activities in Massachusetts have been convicted of sex crimes.)

 

Why did Flanders write this letter, distribute it widely, and then continue having sex with young boys? We don’t know for sure. But we’ve long observed that adult homosexuals fixated on schoolchildren are attracted to these “youth clubs” and likely continue pursuing the youths in other venues.

 

The following year — Flanders convicted of sexual abuse of a minor

 

The following year, in July 2008, Flanders was convicted of the sexual abuse of a minor. His profile on the Maine Sex Offender Registry describes the offense as “Engage in a sexual act with another person, not the actor’s spouse, who is either 14 or 15 years of age and the actor is at least 5 years older than the other person.” (He had a criminal history record going back to 2006, which also includes “violating condition of release.”) We’ve been told by people in Maine who followed this that the minor is one of the boys Flanders describes in his 2007 letter.

 

Adam Flanders’ criminal history record

Adam Flanders’ profile on Main Sex Offender Registry

 

Angry demands to take down the posting — and threats of legal action

At some point Flanders apparently had second thoughts about exposing the horrors of the homosexual movement’s activities with children so explicitly. So he decided to threaten the pro-family groups that still had it posted, to get them to take it down.

 

Starting in August, 2011 Flanders started sending a series of hostile emails to MassResistance saying that the letter he wrote and distributed nearly five years earlier actually constitutes “private and confidential information” that “nobody had a right to publish.” He threatened legal action if we did not immediately take it down from our website. He sent similar communications to the other pro-family sites that had the letter posted, including the Christian Civic League of Maine.

 

All of them backed down and removed it — except MassResistance!

 

We were advised by a lawyer that Flanders had no legal basis for his demands. But more important, we knew that by caving into his threats we were playing into the hands of the homosexual activists who do not want the public to know what really goes on in these “gay youth” groups.

 

Flanders continued to send MassResistance angry emails over the next few months, threatening a wide range of legal actions. He also threatened to set government agencies on us. He told us that we could expect him to have “the assistance of GLBT advocacy organizations in Maine and/or Massachusetts” in these endeavors.

 

MassResistance answered his emails only once, simply to say: “We have been advised that the postings on our website to which you refer are not illegal.” That was the only time we’ve communicated with him in any way. But it did not deter him in the least.

 

Flanders files fraudulent complaint against Camenker in Maine court

 

After MassResistance refused to remove the letter, Flanders, apparently in consultation with local homosexual groups, decided to use the tactic of going after Brian Camenker personally using the Maine restraining order statutes. He filed a formal “Complaint for Protection from Harassment” action restraining order against Camenker in the Belfast Maine District Court.

 

It was a complete abuse of the process and intent of harassment and restraining orders. Camenker had never met, seen, spoken to, visited, or communicated with Flanders. The organization MassResistance had simply posted a document which Flanders had written himself and distributed publicly. And it was posted nearly five years earlier.

 

Flanders’ complaint was made up of absurd lies and dishonesties (typical of the way the homosexual movement goes after people):

 

§  On the official document, Flanders checked off that his complaint against Camenker involves “domestic or dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.”

 

§  He additionally checked off that he wants the court to order Camenker to: (a) stop harassing him; (b) have no contact with him; (c) not enter his residence; (d) refrain from repeatedly, and without reasonable cause, following him or being at, or in the vicinity of, his home, school, business or place of employment; (e) refrain from interfering with his property; and (f) pay his attorney’s fees and court costs, and order any other necessary and proper relief.

 

§  He added the following misleading statement as his “Basis for Claim”:

 

“In 2007 MassResistance published information about me on their website. This included criminal investigatory information and private information about me and other private citizens, including graphic sexual information about minors … I believe the actions of MassResistance constitute stalking because it has caused me serious emotional distress. It also violates the privacy of me and many others … The posting was obviously made with malice. The title reads, Letter from gay ‘adult/youth’ group member in Maine reveals homosexual sex with kids as young as 14 at meetings. Also drugs, alcohol, suicide threats, more. An extremely sad and troubling story. The grave danger of ‘gay clubs’ in your schools.”

 

§  Interestingly, the complaint also included the first page of his letter as posted on the MassResistance website — which made it clear that Flanders himself had written it.

 

Read Flanders’ harassment complaint against Camenker HERE

 

After the complaint was filed, Flanders and his cohorts hired a process server in Massachusetts to go in person to Camenker’s house with it late one night.

 

Maine lawyer’s opinion: A clearly absurd complaint

 

Camenker forwarded the documentation to a pro-family lawyer in Maine, and spoke with him about it. He was pretty surprised that anything like that would even be allowed, and that any judge ought to just throw it out.

 

Several things stood right out, in his opinion. Among them: (1) There are serious jurisdictional issues. He’d never heard of a Maine restraining order against a person or organization from out of state that did not also have any presence in Maine. (2) It is a clear abuse of process. What Flanders is claiming is not harassment or stalking by any possible definition, especially since it was presented as a public document and has been posted for nearly five years. (3) Flanders should be charged with filing a false report. He is making wild claims about Camenker that are purposefully and blatantly untrue. (4) There is also a huge First Amendment issue. Could any media outlet or any website that similarly posted Flanders’ public letter be charged with harassment? These kinds of things are in fact reported on and written about all the time. The whole thing was absurd and contrary to any concept of justice.

 

The hearing: Hostile judge refuses to hear Camenker’s testimony

 

The hearing on the complaint was scheduled for November 14, 2011 in Belfast, Maine before District Judge Patricia G. Worth.

 

Belfast is over five hours away from the MassResistance office in Massachusetts. But suppose Camenker and MassResistance were in California or another distant state? Are the “defendants” required to appear in person? We called the Belfast District Court and spoke with two people in the Clerk’s office. Both of them said that due to the distance we could have a “telephone conference” hearing if we requested it in writing. Camenker submitted a letter of request to the court and it was accepted. (He was notified by phone.)

 

At the appointed hearing time Camenker called the courthouse and was connected to Judge Worth. She was openly hostile. Camenker first asked about the jurisdiction issue, since neither he nor MassResistance had any presence in Maine. She said she would consider that.

 

But then as Camenker began to bring up the other points, the Judge stopped him and said she would not accept anything else from him over the phone. But what about the “conference hearing” the court agreed to? It didn’t matter, she said. The conference was now over. She wasn’t accepting any testimony at all over the phone. Camenker asked if he could submit a statement in writing. No, she said, you have to be here in person — today. “But that’s not what I was told by your clerks,” Camenker said. That’s the way it is, she answered, and ended the call. The tone of her voice was as abrupt as the conversation. We’ve watched many court proceedings and never saw anything quite like this.

 

Judge sides with homosexual activist. Issues restraining order against Camenker!

 

About a week later, Camenker phoned the courthouse for the “verdict.” The Clerk’s office said they would not tell him, but that he would have the paperwork delivered to him.

 

About a month later he received the official “Order of Protection from Harassment” by the State of Maine against him. Judge Worth ruled that “the plaintiff was harassed by the defendant” and she ordered a list of absurd restraining conditions — which included not contacting, visiting, interfering, following, or destroying property of the defendant — none of which Camenker had ever done in the past. The judge also, obviously, ruled that her Maine court had jurisdiction in Massachusetts.

 

Judge Restraining Order

Photo of Restraining order

 

See the judge’s restraining order against Camenker HERE

 

Interestingly, the judge did NOT order that our posting of Flanders’ letter be taken down. (And of course, we have it up.) So what’s going on? It appears that the primary purpose of this was not to “protect” Flanders, but to “punish” Camenker personally for his willingness to confront the homosexual lobby, and his obvious “bigotry.” Think about all the ways a restraining order on public record with that list of restraining conditions can affect a person. Whether or not it is completely fraudulent has no bearing.

 

By reading the complaint, the Judge Worth obviously could see that Flanders had written the letter himself and had presented it as a public document. But as with many liberal judges, she appears to have been far more swayed by the homosexual movement than by justice. Her unusually hostile demeanor certainly indicated that.

 

Will we be seeing more of this odious tactic against pro-family citizens? Absolutely. And in particular, as the “gay marriage” movement starts to regain ground in Maine, you can expect this will just be the beginning.

 

Does this outrage you? Is this an offensive way for a judge to act? You can contact Judge Patricia G. Worth’s Belfast District Court HERE or HERE.

 

Further threats from Flanders (with his homosexual activist allies)

 

Since the restraining order, Flanders has continued to send emails to Camenker at MassResistance with further threats.

 

He has said he (and his well-funded supporters in homosexual activist groups) are preparing to attempt to have Camenker criminally prosecuted in Massachusetts under various “hate crime” statutes. He has also said that he is contacting businesses and others that MassResistance interacts with in our normal operations, to attempt to “shut us down.” As mentioned above, this tactic is becoming more common by the homosexual movement against those they are determined to silence.

 

We’re not caving in

 

We believe that we must not cave in to this. Informing people of the truth is far more important.

 

We’ve been through this before. Many of you will recall the hideous “Fistgate” incident in 2000, which we uncovered and publicized. We were subsequently sued by two different homosexual activists organizations, demanding we take down and destroy the “Fistgate tapes” (which graphically exposed their horrible activities with children), and they also sought monetary damages. It was a terrible experience. But we prevailed. The tapes are still posted here.

__________________________________

Maine Judges Protect Man/Boy Sex

John R. Houk

© June 8, 2012

________________________________

Convicted sex offender gets judge in Maine to issue restraining order against Brian Camenker of MassResistance — for exposing offenses against kids at “gay youth” club!

 

MassResistance.org Homepage

 

SlantRight Editor: The original MassResistance post has photos that I did not include in this cross post.

Egad! Romney Hires a Homosexual Activist


Vote the Bible

John R. Houk

© May 1, 2012

 

My son Adam is an absolutist when it comes to voting. He wants a candidate that meets the values of Conservatives and Biblical Morality. If the person fails that litmus test he is not worth voting for.

 

Now here is the difficulty Conservatives like me run into with that litmus test. The opposing candidate in Barack Hussein Obama is openly pro-homosexual activism, pro-Moral Relativity, pro-abortion, anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian State, pro-Socialism; anti-Christian and many other disagreeable pros and antis that drive me crazy. President Barack Hussein Obama is a disastrous President for the future of America in the realm of Biblical Values, Free Market Capitalism and Constitutional Liberty.

 

It is quite evident that Mitt Romney is going to be the GOP Nominee for President for 2012. The social values of Romney are questionable as evidenced by not actively fighting against homosexual activism and against abortion while he was Governor of Massachusetts. The institution of Romneycare places a dent in his Conservative ethics.

 

During the Primary stage of Romney’s campaign he went out of his way to assuage Conservatives about these huge question marks. It is apparent now that some true colors of Romney are being displayed by hiring homosexual activist Richard Grenell as a Foreign Policy and National Security advisor.

 

It is idiot moves like this that are going to keep away Conservative Republicans away from the polls on Election Day 11/6/12. In such a scenario the horror of reelecting Barack Hussein Obama looms.

 

My son Adam is so disaffected by having Romney give a nod to the homosexual lifestyle by hiring Grenell that he believes Conservative Family/Biblical Values should utilize the power of a Write-in Candidate. This would result in the same horror as Conservatives not going to the polls – Obama gets elected.

 

Frankly I am so teed off over Romney’s total disregard for Family/Biblical Values Conservatives I am tempted to join my son and write in a Candidate who undoubtedly may or may not be actively running. I am guessing from past emails my son would advocate abandoning the Republican Party and begin looking at the very small Conservative Party which posits all the Conservative principles from fiscal responsibility, to limited government, tax reform, Family/Biblical Values and so on.

 

At this point I was going to display what the Conservative Party stands for. Then I discovered that there are two Conservative Parties vying to replace the GOP. I am going to lead off with the Conservative Party USA and then follow up with the American Conservative Party.

___________________________

 

 

About The Conservative Party USA

 

The Conservative Party USA will rectify the consistent failures and corruption of the current two-party system.  CP-USA will impose fiscal discipline, restrain the reach of the federal government as outlined in the Constitution and defend America’s traditional family values.

 

The American two-party system is broken. It has become a system of elite political insiders who only serve the special interest groups that help keep them in control.  Some elites call themselves “Democrats” while others call themselves “Republicans”.

The elite of the two major parties continue to fail America based on our spiraling national debt, trillion-dollar annual budget deficits, off-budget Earmarks, escalating illegal immigration, weakening Dollar and loss of traditional American values.  They are stealing America’s future because they are only dedicated to getting re-elected.

 

The Conservative Party USA is emerging as America’s real “Second Party” because true conservatives, Independents and Tea Party activists will soon relegate the GOP into political irrelevance.  Republi-Dems are two sides of the same losing coin.

 

The Tea Party is mainly united by fiscal conservatism; the desire to get Congress to follow the Constitution and spend the people’s money wisely.  However, the Tea Party is not united by a socially conservative agenda because its membership consists of a broad spectrum of political views.

 

Who will address important social issues consistent with traditional American values beyond the fiscal and monetary problems facing America today?

 

Critical moral, social and Constitutional issues must also be considered.  These include: Illegal Immigration; Welfare; Gay Marriage; Gays serving openly in the Military; Abortion; Religious Freedom; Saving American Jobs; The War on Drugs; Maintaining a strong Military; Affirming States’ Rights; Clarifying the 14thAmendment on “Anchor Babies”; Stopping the Discrimination of Affirmative Action, to name a few.

 

America will not survive if it abandons its traditional values for the sake of solving only fiscal problems… we assert that both traditional values and fiscal solutions are equally important.

 

What happens to the Tea Party and like-minded groups beyond budget and fiscal issues?

 

The Conservative Party USA is the next evolutionary step of the Tea Party because it combines fiscal restraint with traditional American values that are outlined in a clear Platform and is managed by a strong leadership team that has a unified, long-term vision for America.

 

Conservative Party USA is the answer to those critical questions and Project Mayberry® is the key!

____________________________________

American Conservative Party

 

Principles

Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 18:15

 

The ACP Creed

 

WE BELIEVE:

 

·         Unalienable rights to life and liberty are given to us by our Creator; these rights exist separate from, and are superior to, government.

 

·         Individuals are responsible for securing the blessings of liberty through the exercise of their rights.

 

·         The individual is sovereign over one’s person; their labors constitute a foundation for private property that is not subject to the demands of others.

 

·         Governments are formed by the will of the people to secure and defend human liberty.

 

·         Law exists to support liberty and mediate disputes where conduct of one infringes upon the rights of another.

 

·         The armed forces and law enforcement exist to bolster private defense, not supplant it.

 

·         The American Experiment was born out of these beliefs and it has resulted in a bountiful gain for the human condition.

 

FOUNDATION:

 

From this Foundation, all principles flow:

 

The individual is sovereign

 

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

 

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just limited powers from the consent of the governed

 

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity do ordain and establish the Constitution for the United States of America.” What does this mean? Simply put, that the formation of a legitimate government can only occur when the citizens themselves choose to surrender a portion of their inherent authority. The citizens may chose to give, but the government cannot chose to take (or keep) authority against the wishes of its citizenry.”

 

Principles of the American Conservative Party

 

From our Principles, our Policy Issues will be derived:

 

FEDERALISM AND SOCIAL ISSUES

 

We reject the practice of using Government powers for any purpose of social engineering, and we uphold the principle that the individual is sovereign; where social conduct involves personal choices, the People are best served when those choices are embraced and defended at the family and community level.

 

AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT

 

·         The citizens of the United States are the sole source of power and life of the United States Government. All powers and authority not explicitly given by the citizens to their representatives remain with the states or the people thereof.

 

·         The United States Government has the authority and obligation to protect its citizens and their liberties from all actual and perceived threats regardless of the source, location or scope.

 

LIMITATIONS ON GOVERNMENT

 

·         The federal legislature may make no law that abridges or limits the Constitutional rights of an individual.

 

·         No state may abridge a citizen’s right to life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

 

·         Property currently owned or controlled by the Government is held in Trust for the citizens

 

·         Regardless of compensation, no property shall be forcibly taken by government for private use or profit.

 

CITIZENSHIP

 

·         Any child, born of a citizen, shall have all the legal rights of a citizen born or naturalized into the United States.

 

·         Persons who are not citizens or resident aliens of the United States have no right to petition or benefit from any agency of the government except for petition of entry or asylum.

 

·         A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.

 

CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITIES

 

·         Each adult citizen is responsible for the health, education and welfare of himself or herself and their family.

 

·         No adult citizen may call on the resources of another citizen or group of citizens without their explicit, expressed consent.

 

·         No citizen or group of citizens, by expression of any character or physical trait, may call upon the resources, nor abridge the rights, of another citizen or group of citizens without their explicit, expressed consent.

 

·         It is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in the political process.

 

 

_________________________________

 

Both of these Conservative Parties appear to be good alternatives if the GOP fails to live up to the base that will enable the return of a majority Republican Congress. I get the impression the Conservative Party USA is the better of the two so far because they seem to have a greater affinity for Christianity and an appreciation of the Social Conservative portion of the Tea Party Movement.

 

Much to the chagrin of my son I am still voting for Romney for President. Obama is that bad for America. However, if Romney goes out of his way to support the homosexual agenda and the murdering abortionist crowd, it will be the last time I vote Republican even if it means a Socialist Dem takes Office. Perhaps it will take the evil of Socialism to vote for a Conservative political party to get Conservative voters to leave the GOP if it fails this time around.

 

Here is the link my son pointed to me which is an article by Bryan Fischer at Renew America about Romney hiring homosexual activist Richard Grenell.

 

*****UPDATE AFTER COMPLETING MY THOUGHTS*****

 

Richard Grenell has resigned as Romney’s advisor for Foreign Policy and National Security. The Washington Post headline runs as follows: EXCLUSIVE: Richard Grenell hounded from Romney campaign by anti-gay conservatives.

 

It is not surprising that WaPo uses an invective like “hounded” in reference to Conservatives. It is my opinion I am not the only Conservative that was a bit miffed that Romney was affirming the homosexual agenda by hiring a homosexual activist like Grenell:

 

Richard Grenell, the openly gay spokesman recently hired to sharpen the foreign policy message of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, has resigned in the wake of a full-court press by anti-gay conservatives.

 

In a statement obtained by Right Turn, Grenell says:

 

I have decided to resign from the Romney campaign as the Foreign Policy and National Security Spokesman. While I welcomed the challenge to confront President Obama’s foreign policy failures and weak leadership on the world stage, my ability to speak clearly and forcefully on the issues has been greatly diminished by the hyper-partisan discussion of personal issues that sometimes comes from a presidential campaign. I want to thank Governor Romney for his belief in me and my abilities and his clear message to me that being openly gay was a non-issue for him and his team.

 

According to sources familiar with the situation, Grenell decided to resign after being kept under wraps during a time when national security issues, including the president’s ad concerning Osama bin Laden, had emerged front and center in the campaign.

 

Pieces in two conservative publications, the National Review and Daily Caller, reflected the uproar by some social conservatives over the appointment. (WaPo article by Jennifer Rubin; 5/1/12 03:00 PM ET)

 

I am still cross posting the Renew America article for it is worth the read.

 

JRH 5/1/12

Please Support NCCR

**********************************

Adam Houk intro thoughts:

 

Until we stop voting for people into office that are willing to change their values at the drop of a hat, we will always be getting these kinds of candidates to vote for.  The only way to show the public that they are losing valuable votes is to put it on record by making a write in.

 

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/120427

 

Email sent: 4/30/2012 4:12 PM

Christians Persecuted by Activist Judges


Christian American Flag

 

John R. Houk

© December 14, 2012

 

Secular Humanism particularly in the guise of homosexual activism is warring against Christianity in America. Here is an example.

 

Two gals that were Lesbians moved to Vermont take advantage of the allowance of perverted same-sex marriage. One of the Lesbians had a daughter obviously NOT with the Lesbian partner.

 

Then something scary to the likes of homosexual activism happened. One of the Lesbians found Jesus and abandoned the homosexual lifestyle. The reason it is scary to homosexual activists is because choice is involved rather biology. Homosexuals are not born, they are people who have made a choice.

 

Homosexuality by choice is not a lifestyle deserving equal rights as in race and religion. Homosexuality is a choice to live against God’s law and therefore is sin. Do homosexuals have a right to believe a homosexual creed? In America the answer is yes.

 

A creed is a matter of belief and not a matter for American government on the Federal, State and local level to promote as an equal rights situation. And yet homosexual activists with loads of money, the support of the MSM and the entertainment media have successfully utilized activists Judges on all levels of the Judiciary to legislate heterosexual acceptance of homosexuality. The only protection a homosexual receives under the law is that as any other person receives regardless of race, religion or creed.

 

The key to homosexual rights thus lay with the word “creed”. Creed according to Merriam-Webster:

 

1 a brief authoritative formula of religious belief

 

2 a set of fundamental beliefs; also: a guiding principle

 

Thus, only the unholy Church of Perverted Homosexuals or any guiding principle of a person espousing deviant same-sex practices can be used as a creed. Yes Butch, homosexuality is perverted and deviant according to God’s Word in the Bible. For Christians, Biblical Morality trumps the American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association (American Psychological Association).

 

22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. 23 Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is perversion. 24 ‘Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you. 25 For the land is defiled; therefore I visit the punishment of its iniquity upon it, and the land vomits out its inhabitants. 26 You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations, either any of your own nation or any stranger who dwells among you 27 (for all these abominations the men of the land have done, who were before you, and thus the land is defiled), 28 lest the land vomit you out also when you defile it, as it vomited out the nations that were before you. 29 For whoever commits any of these abominations, the persons who commit them shall be cut off from among their people. (Lev. 18: 22-29 NKJV)

 

13 If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. 14 If a man marries a woman and her mother, it is wickedness. They shall be burned with fire, both he and they, that there may be no wickedness among you. (Lev. 20: 13-14 NKJV)

 

4 Now before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, all the people from every quarter, surrounded the house. 5 And they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.”
6 So Lot went out to them through the doorway, shut the door behind him, 7 and said, “Please, my brethren, do not do so wickedly! 8 See now, I have two daughters who have not known a man; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men, since this is the reason they have come under the shadow of my roof.”
9 And they said, “Stand back!” Then they said, “This one came in to stay here, and he keeps acting as a judge; now we will deal worse with you than with them.” So they pressed hard against the man Lot, and came near to break down the door. 10 But the men reached out their hands and pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door. 11 And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.

12 Then the men said to Lot, “Have you anyone else here? Son-in-law, your sons, your daughters, and whomever you have in the city—take them out of this place! 13 For we will destroy this place, because the outcry against them has grown great before the face of the LORD, and the LORD has sent us to destroy it.” (Gen. 19: 4-13, 24-25 NKJV)

 

7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. (Jude 1:7 NKNV)

 

22 As they were enjoying themselves, suddenly certain men of the city, perverted men, [a] surrounded the house and beat on the door. They spoke to the master of the house, the old man, saying, “Bring out the man who came to your house, that we may know him carnally!”
23 But the man, the master of the house, went out to them and said to them, “No, my brethren! I beg you, do not act so wickedly! Seeing this man has come into my house, do not commit this outrage. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter and the man’s[
b] concubine; let me bring them out now. Humble them, and do with them as you please; but to this man do not do such a vile thing!” 25 But the men would not heed him. So the man took his concubine and brought her out to them. And they knew her and abused her all night until morning; and when the day began to break, they let her go.
26 Then the woman came as the day was dawning, and fell down at the door of the man’s house where her master was, till it was light. (Judges 19: 22-26
NKJV)

 

1 So all the children of Israel came out, from Dan to Beersheba, as well as from the land of Gilead, and the congregation gathered together as one man before the LORD at Mizpah. 2 And the leaders of all the people, all the tribes of Israel, presented themselves in the assembly of the people of God, four hundred thousand foot soldiers who drew the sword. 3 (Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel had gone up to Mizpah.)
Then the children of Israel said, “Tell us, how did this wicked deed happen?”
4 So the Levite, the husband of the woman who was murdered, answered and said, “My concubine and I went into Gibeah, which belongs to Benjamin, to spend the night. 5 And the men of Gibeah rose against me, and surrounded the house at night because of me. They intended to kill me, but instead they ravished my concubine so that she died. 6 So I took hold of my concubine, cut her in pieces, and sent her throughout all the territory of the inheritance of Israel, because they committed lewdness and outrage in Israel. 7 Look! All of you are children of Israel; give your advice and counsel here and now!”

 

9 but now this is the thing which we will do to Gibeah: We will go up against it by lot. 10 We will take ten men out of every hundred throughout all the tribes of Israel, a hundred out of every thousand, and a thousand out of every ten thousand, to make provisions for the people, that when they come to Gibeah in Benjamin, they may repay all the vileness that they have done in Israel.” 11 So all the men of Israel were gathered against the city, united together as one man.
12 Then the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin, saying, “What is this wickedness that has occurred among you? 13 Now therefore, deliver up the men, the perverted men[
a] who are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death and remove the evil from Israel!” But the children of Benjamin would not listen to the voice of their brethren, the children of Israel. 14 Instead, the children of Benjamin gathered together from their cities to Gibeah, to go to battle against the children of Israel. 15 And from their cities at that time the children of Benjamin numbered twenty-six thousand men who drew the sword, besides the inhabitants of Gibeah, who numbered seven hundred select men.

 

27 So the children of Israel inquired of the LORD (the ark of the covenant of God was there in those days, 28 and Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, stood before it in those days), saying, “Shall I yet again go out to battle against the children of my brother Benjamin, or shall I cease?”
And the LORD said, “Go up, for tomorrow I will deliver them into your hand.”

 

41 And when the men of Israel turned back, the men of Benjamin panicked, for they saw that disaster had come upon them. 42 Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel in the direction of the wilderness; but the battle overtook them, and whoever came out of the cities they destroyed in their midst. 43 They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them, and easily trampled them down as far as the front of Gibeah toward the east. 44 And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell; all these were men of valor. 45 Then they[a] turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon; and they cut down five thousand of them on the highways. Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom, and killed two thousand of them. 46 So all who fell of Benjamin that day were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword; all these were men of valor.
47 But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months. 48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found. They also set fire to all the cities they came to. (Judges 20: 1-7, 9-15, 27-28, 41-48
NKJV)

 

Judges 21 tells how the other tribes punished the Israelite inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead for not sending their allotment of soldiers to battle Benjamin that protected homosexuals and rapists. The Israelites saved 400 virgins from Jabesh Gilead for the fractional remnant of the tribe of Benjamin in order to preserve Benjamin’s existence within the twelve Hebrew tribes.

 

Here are some thoughts from Pastor Gil Rugh:

 

The other tribes condemned the actions of the men in the city of Gibeah saying, “‘Now then, deliver up the men, the worthless fellows in Gibeah, that we may put them to death and remove this wickedness from Israel.’ But the sons of Benjamin would not listen to the voice of their brothers, the sons of Israel” (Judges 20:13). Even the people of the tribe of Benjamin who did not participate in this sinful activity believed that those who did had every right to do what they wanted, and were willing to defend their right to participate in that behavior. In fact, they were so adamant in defending the rights of the wicked, that 25,000 of them died for the cause.

 

Did this make any sense? The tribe of Benjamin was almost annihilated while defending the rights of a group of bi-sexual rapists. Do you see how corrupted they had become?

 

Many are concerned that the Church is on the same track today. The same path to acceptance that the tribe of Benjamin took in Judges 19 seems to be the way many churches are going.

 

The Old Testament is very clear that all homosexual activity is sin. It is an abomination to God. The Good News is that God has provided a solution for all our sins: the God-man Jesus Christ. The New Testament reveals the forgiveness, redemption and freedom from sin (including homosexuality), that God has provided through Jesus Christ. (Emphasis SlantRight)

 

Homosexual activists love to obfuscate the point that homosexuality is an abominable sin by pointing the Old Testament solution for homosexual sin was death. They smugly ask if Biblically Moral Christians then support executing homosexuals?

 

I wish I knew the modern Jewish answer to this homosexual obfuscation but I don’t. The Christian answer is simple. The Crucifixion of Christ, His burial and His Resurrection has moved Believers into the Dispensation of Grace. The Blood of Jesus redeemed Believers from the curse of the Law of Moses. Part of that curse was executing homosexuals for that practice. If one discounts all the diseases associated with homosexuality it is an act that does not cause the physical death of an individual. Homosexuality is the act of persons of the same sex engaging in the godless sex voluntarily and by choice. Homosexuality is not an action that kills someone else when entered into by choice. Hence in a government of Liberty and the First Amendment homosexuality is not a capital crime. Thanks to a moral relativist Left oriented Judiciary homosexuality has moved from criminality and mental illness to forced cultural acceptance.

 

Under the age of Dispensational Grace Christians do not kill for sin but rather pray that the sinner overcomes sin and finds the Grace of God, the Remission of sins by Believing and becoming a joint-heir with Jesus Christ. Does this mean that Christians tolerate the practice of homosexuality within their ranks? No!

 

The New Testament which is the Word of God for the Dispensation of Grace specifically condemns homosexuality alongside many other sins.

 

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,

 

24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;

 

32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them. (Romans 1: 18, 24-28, 32 NKJV)

 

Now back to the two gals that started out as Lesbians in a same-sex marriage but ended in one finding Jesus and Redemption from homosexuality. Lisa Miller became the Redeemed of the Lord and is the birth mother of the daughter. Janet Jenkins is the Lesbian. Jenkins insisted on joint custody of the Miller’s daughter by birth. The custody battle was in the Left Wing judiciary of the State of Vermont. Jenkins received visitation rights; however birth mother Miller who is Redeemed from homosexuality and became stalwart in her Christian beliefs did not yield to the Judges edict that a homosexual sinner should be considered a co-parent for her daughter.

 

A Leftist Judge displeased that the ordered visitation rights were being restricted by Miller gave full custody of the daughter to the Lesbian sinner even though she was not the birth mother. So what is a Redeemed Christian forgiven by the Blood of Jesus for Lesbianism supposed to do when the government steals her daughter and gives the child to a Lesbian of no relation based on the validation of same-sex marriage law of Vermont?

 

Miller found help through Christians to flee America through Canada, to Mexico and ending up in Nicaragua under the protection of a Mennonite missionary. The price for Lisa Miller’s faith is to be labeled a fugitive and a perpetrator of kidnapping wanted by the law in the United States of America.

 

Is there a war against Christianity in America? YES!

 

It is time for Christians to lose the intimidation of the separation of Church and State malarkey and fight to retain our political rights to practice Christianity in the face of homosexual activist efforts to demonize Christianity. It is time to be louder that the homosexuals with money and the money backing of the MSM and the money of the entertainment industry that creates entertainment to pollute the minds of Americans into accepting the homosexual lifestyle as normal.

 

JRH 12/14/11 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)

Liberty and Morality and SB 1867


We the People

 

John R. Houk

© December 12, 2011

 

I am a proponent of utilizing the Patriot Act and FISA to combat Muslim hatred of America in the fashion of transnational Islamic terrorism. Radical Islam has reached inside the very borders of America with the phenomena known as Homegrown Terrorism. Homegrown Terrorism is when the influence of Radical Islam usually directly or indirectly from a foreign source militarizes Muslim-Americans against their own nation of the United States of America.

 

Islam has declared war on America in that Radical Muslim Mullahs have encouraged violence against America and Americans and NO so-called Moderate Muslim Mullah has expressed in outrage that a religion of peace would not contradict a religion of violence.

 

Congress cannot really declare war on transnational Islamic non-sovereign terrorists (except perhaps Iran). So it is left to the Executive Branch to protect Americans from a foreign threat that is not a sovereign nation. Thus it is up the Executive Branch to find that fine line that does not involve the military battling foreign threats inside America while at the same time neutralizing foreign threats within America.

 

The Patriot ACT and updating FISA to confront Islamic terrorism allows a civilian law enforcement response with the independence similar to the military to engage a foreign enemy or Americans turned against their nation by a foreign threat.

 

President Bush’s Administration effectively used the Patriot ACT to the level that there were no terrorist successes within the American homeland on the scale of the Islamic terrorist attack in New York City, Washington, DC (i.e. the Pentagon) and the crashing of Flight of United Flight 93 in Pennsylvania. Nevertheless, a huge scouring by the Left leaning MSM and the Democratic Party effectively propagandized Bush a President embroiled in war at the expense of American lives (the military) and of American personal Liberty. At this point we can say, “Enter Obama” with unfulfilled promises of “Change” from politics as usual (meaning Republican Conservatism) and “Transparency” to make the BHO Administration open to public scrutiny.

 

The only change that has occurred is to dilute the Constitution, move America into European entitlement Socialism and openly destroy the moral fabric of America by warring on Christian values. There has been ZERO transparency by BHO. The President has spent untold dollars on making sure his past did not find the light of day implying there was some kind of political embarrassment about his birth, schooling and initial moves into public life. Also BHO has issued Congressional usurping Executive Orders causing and affecting the rule of law by fiat many of which were quite secretive EOs. BHO has circumvented Constitutional accountability by creating a Czar-Commissar system that neither has Congressional oversight nor a Constitutional basis in the Executive Branch.

 

Now Republicans in Congress are showing just how unobservant they are by allowing a couple changes to the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2012 (SB 1867) to be attached. NDAA-2012 enables Obama to use the U.S. Military to detain and question American citizens as well as to be held for an indefinite amount of time without the Court System. Even the Left Wing Huffington Post is calling for President BHO to veto the Bill! You see the problem is there are loads of military funding goodies in the Bill if vetoed would slow down the military budget. Conspiracy Theorists believe this would be an opportunity for President BHO to create a domestic crisis in which the military might be used in the final push to transform America without the restraints of the U.S. Constitution.

 

If the President signs this Bill it would enable a huge amount of centralized power in the hands of the Executive Branch that certainly has crossed the line of the Constitution making the Patriot Act looking like a civil rights picnic. Now as if the NDAA-2012 is not bad enough for American Freedom, the Bill also completely transforms morality in the military. Part of SB 1867 changed Article 125 of the Unified Code of Military Justice that originally reads:

 

It states: ‘(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.’” (Emphasis SlantRight)

 

In an effort to codify homosexuality as normal and moral SB 1867 removes sodomy as a punishable crime in the Military. Now for me this is bad enough; however with all the lawyers that are lawmakers you would think that someone would catch that a blanket legalization of sodomy according Article 125 also legalizes bestiality, right?

 

You know voting constituents that finally give the Dems the boot out of the Senate and President Barack Hussein Obama the boot out of the Whitehouse will demand a return to at least “Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell”. This would mean sodomy as defined by the original Article 125 would return.

 

The thing is a battle is brewing between homosexual activists and Christian activists. You have to realize Christians are growing weary of Moral Relativist Secular Humanists marginalizing the Christian faith especially when we Christian Believers know that our faith is the foundation of the rule of law that has made the American Constitution great. When all these misinterpreters of the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment (erroneously labeled as Separation of Church and State) activate righteous indignation and push Christians into being just as verbally active as the anti-Christian cultural transformationists, then I believe political polarity will exist in America that will first go through the Left Wing influenced Judicial Branch ending with a Constitutional Amendment. I am guessing Original Intent Judges are outnumbered but will be vocal enough to push Christians to work on a new Amendment. The Christian-Humanist conflict will then begin to draw in a score of other Social Conservative issues with Pro-Life/Pro-Choice most likely at the top of the list.

 

Like there are Liberals and Conservatives alike dissatisfied with the Patriot Act and the portion of NDAA-2012 that gives the U.S. military power over the civilian population, there is an irony concerning making bestiality legal in the U.S. Military. That irony is an organization that most Conservatives believe are a group of Liberal nut jobs. The organization is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). PETA became riled with the legalizing of bestiality in the Military when the Obama Press Secretary Jay Carney flippantly dismissed a question from WorldNetDaily press corps journalist Les Kinsolving.

 

Les Kinsolving of WND

 

Does the Commander-in-Chief approve or disapprove of beastiality (sic) in our armed forces?”

 

The question did not please Jay Carney. He ignored the question by saying:

 

Let’s get to something more serious

 

VIDEO of Press Conference

 

PETA sent an open letter to Press Secretary Jay Carney:

 

December 6, 2011

Mr. Jay Carney
Press Secretary to the President
The White House

Dear Mr. Carney:

 

In watching last night’s news briefing, we were upset to note that you flippantly addressed the recently approved repeal of the military ban on bestiality. With respect, this is no laughing matter. Our office has been flooded with calls from Americans who are upset that this ban has been repealed—and for good reason. As we outlined in the attached letter sent yesterday to the secretary of defense, animal abuse does not affect animals only—it is also a matter of public safety, as people who abuse animals very often go on to abuse human beings.

 

I hope that in the future, you will address important issues with sensitivity and not dismiss them with a joke.

 

Very truly yours,

 

Colleen O’Brien
Director of Communications

 

I doubt that PETA will join Conservative organizations in condemning homosexuality as an ungodly lifestyle; however I do find amusing that there is an unnamed alliance between PETA and Conservatives over the moral issue of bestiality. Check out this excerpt from the Family Research Council:

 

The White House’s decision to ignore one question on bestiality is generating plenty of others. After Jay Carney’s Monday press conference, the President has started feeling the heat from his own base. It seems People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) doesn’t take too kindly to an administration that green lights animal cruelty. And while it’s not every day that FRC finds itself on the front lines with PETA, their involvement can only lend more legitimacy to the problem. In a letter to Jay Carney, PETA says its offices have been inundated with calls “from Americans who are angry that this ban has been repealed.” And while the press corps may have snickered, PETA says the issue “is no laughing matter.”

 

JRH 12/12/11 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)