Introducing Hans Kollmeyer Islamic Supremacist Venom against Critics


John R. Houk

© February 6, 2019

On my NCCR blog’s About Page, comments have somewhat become a hodgepodge of a message board of varying subjects and a few rants.

 

Islamophobia

 

Three days before Christmas 2018 a probable pseudonymous Hans Kollmeyer – a self-identifying Muslim perhaps living in Germany – commented a diatribe against those he identifies as Islamophobes. A few paragraphs down the lengthy diatribe he clearly aims most of his venom against a German expose-Islam blogger named Michael Stürzenberger. It took me a wile to realize this because I also have no respect for Islam considering that religion a theopolitical death cult whose tenets are quite murderous towards non-Muslims who would dare extoll their own religious faith or philosophical (oft times atheistic) ideology that runs contrary to Islam’s belief system. Living in America I must admit I never heard of the blogger Stürzenberger who writes in German. Even his Wikipedia notation is in German and I had to use Google-Translate to read about him.

 

You might wonder why I didn’t delete the oft times vulgar hate-filled diatribe against those who would expose Islam’s true ugly nature as written in the religion’s own revered writings and Muslim theological treatises. Here is the reason.

 

People need to be aware this is the standard mindset of Muslims adhering to the inherent Islamic Supremacism toward all things and people non-Muslim.

 

I have decided to respond to Hans Kollmeyer’s diatribe with some bold print text throughout the venom-laced comment. After awhile I realized old Hans was becoming a bit repetitive in which case you will notice less and less bold text responses. I am not a fan of profanity on my blogs, thus I edited profane words with asterisks replacing letters that would complete a vulgar word. The comment is quite lengthy, so I may have missed a profanity edit. Please forgive me for any misses.

 

JRH 2/6/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

********************

Hans Kollmeyer says:

December 22, 2018 at 10:15 AM

NCCR About Page

 

The truth concerns all Islamophobic and worthless atheist pigs in the world!

 

I don’t f*****g care about the police! – a German party names “FDP”, contraction for “F**k die Polizei”. In English it means “F**k the police!”.

 

TAKE THAT, YOU GODLESS PIECE OF S**T!

 

All Islam haters in the world are pathetic, meaningless, worthless and irrelevant failures! Your Germans do not interest me and are not matter! Especially dumb and ridiculous atheist pigs. Above all, the truth also refers to your provocative allusion to the headscarf ban.

 

The police is just an organization full of miserable and worthless failures, and most of all, the police are completely irrelevant to me. I f**k the police. If we want to voice our opinion aloud to the police, rate them as an “insult” and hand us fines to pay a high sum of fines. So you can rip us off and improve your salary in terms of corruption. But if you bull offend people on a small trifle – such as having someone look different, have a different taste, or practice a religion, etc. – we cannot say anything. Otherwise, you arrest us and condemn us to life imprisonment just because you are overwhelmed with your own life and take the nerve out of abusing the German Basic Laws, to seize the opportunity to omit your insignificant inferiority complexes to us, and we [have] nothing with your problem to be on guard. They get angry when they get insulted, but they themselves offend holy Islam, are hostile to Islam (because of their credulity of the feeble news of the media, so that they can achieve ratings by lying to them and invest a high sum and have fun our costs) and abusing the German Basic Laws [Blog Editor: Simple GBL and GBL More Detailed] to vent your frustration on us in the hope that you feel liberated. Without thinking about what causes you to discriminate against people. This represents your character and your character is miserable. You do not need to be surprised that I am not insulted here and loudly and clearly represent my point of view. I am not compelled to offend, let alone discriminate, just because you have a bad day or are mentally stressed about your personal problems or whatever complication you have in your life. That’s not my problem. To keep to the laws refers to both sides and to become law enforcement, you have to first study and understand the laws before you can provide law and order and what you have learned, you also keep in mind and you do not forget again, While most people work in a profession or club (such as martial arts clubs) or in a fitness center, they use them to make them jangle and verbally attack people in order to attract attention (which they have never had in the past) to be relevant. However, these meaningless subhumans have nothing in the bulb and consider stupidity to be intelligence as if they were something better. That was the first time with my “Intro”.

 

AND NOW READ THE TRUTH THROUGH [Now Comes the Islamic Supremacist Venom]:

 

You are a gang of wretched philistines, failures and worthless Islam haters who will never get far in their lives and sink deeper every day. Hanoverians are a waste of time and for me personally the stupidest subhumans I’ve ever experienced, like all of Germany. Cold-hearted, depressed, aggressive, unfriendly, insolent, intolerant, provocative, antisocial, far too underdeveloped and worthless. Especially the Germans (I myself German, but I despise the Nazi people [And yet book sales indicate Muslim admiration of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Final Solution for Jews –  SEE HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE {Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery expose with Muslim connivance at article’s end}, HERE and HERE]). You are the proof that Germany or slave country is not a free country but a dictatorship. Since Adolf Hitler. On your stupid posters is that you require no special rights for Islam and a few other ridiculous quotes, where I had to laugh scrap. Above all, it says: “Do not rot our city!” The people who oppose Islam or religions are the ones who endanger peace and ENHANCE the whole world. First think and then talk and not traffic. The Koran [The book dualistic Satanic deception] says, “The unbelievers are trying to extinguish Allah’s light with their mouths, but Allah will complete His light.” No matter how much you hate Islam and Muslims. You cannot stop Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala [Blog Editor: Arabic for “May He be glorified and exalted”, Muslim honorific.]. If the Almighty God wants Germany or the world to be Islamized, then it will also be Islamized and there is nothing to discuss at all. You stupid and worthless Germans should all take their own nose. The Muslims are peaceful people and are guided by the laws of God and are against war.

 

Your German atheist is exactly the opposite. You are a people that has 6 million people on their conscience. You keep saying “We are the people” over and over again, and many other racist and anti-religious slogans. However, you are all yourself, the traitors of your own nation. For these six million Jews were Germans themselves. [Blog Editor: There was not 6 million German-Jews killed by Nazis. The Nazis targeted ALL European Jews in Nazi-conquered lands stretching from France to Soviet Russia and from the Scandinavian (Norway, Denmark and Finland in the north (less Sweden) to Greece in southern Europe.]  You betrayed your own people and sold them to Hitler, or you sold your own souls to the devil. At the moment I often read the internet, I quote: “No human being is illegal”. In fact, no one should be illegal? And what about Hitler? Was not he illegal? It’s always better to keep silent, you fools. You are a contradictory party that is brain-underdeveloped and will never be able to maintain peace. Instead, you endanger peace and thus start the 3rd World War. Because of “Germany the Germans”. Your media-struck ignorant, the political system in Germany is AMERICAN (if you “can” read idiots, a FOREIGN SYSTEM, which disregards human rights [Hans is confused since by inherent nature Islam violates Human Rights especially if one is a non-Muslim]). Since the system is American, Germany is still an occupied country and will never advocate democracy [Blog Editor: Muslim idiocy on full display here]. You also want democracy, but according to your imagination. Actually, you are dictators of your own nation. Worse than Hitler allowed. You hate Allah the Almighty, Islam, foreigners and other religions. [Blog Editor: Hans view of “hate” is flawed when the reality

Germanistan Danger

is the awakening of the German populace to their Western Judeo-Christian heritage. Poor Hans totally ignores the huge amount of German Leftist Multiculturalists willing to sell-out their heritage for a delusional belief multiple cultures can coexist as represented by the current German Chancellor Merkel.] You spread nothing but lies and hate, just like the media and you are in cahoots with them. [Blog Editor: Poor blind Hans can’t see most of the European media backs idiotic Multiculturalism.] Especially with the police. You are as criminal and corrupt as the cops. [Blog Editor: AND YET the German police tows the government Multiculturalist line by hiding or denying Muslim atrocities against German non-Muslims!] You spread lies and hate slogans about Islam so you can invest more money. Because of such losers as her, Germany has completely gone down the drain and is getting rid of herself. [Blog Editor: I actually concur with Hans, but not in what he believes. Germany and much of the EU is self-destructing by allowing Islamic culture to gain roots in Western Civilization.] I bet 100% that Thilo Sarrazin is your idol [Blog Editor: Thanks! I had to look him up. From the sound of his new book, “Hostile Takeover: How Islam Impedes Progress and Threatens Society,” Mr. Sarrazin just may be numbered among my heroes. I hope it will be published in English.]. Thilo Sarrazin is also a worthless Islam hater, and because of Thilo Sarrazin and many other Islam haters, Germany breaks free and you worry about Germany abolishing itself. Germany gets rid of such disgusting insects (like you). Islam is against war and the Koran (Al Hamdulillah, in German: “Praise be to Allah”) contains no contradictions [Blog Editor: Not only are there loads of contradictions, those contradictions are viewed as truth due to Islamic theological doctrines of Dualism (See Also HERE) and Abrogation. Hans you are either a liar or a poor deceived Muslim], in contrast to your “The f*****g Hanoverian party” (I laugh at myself, old man).

 

So, let’s come to your contradictions.

 

  1. “No special rights for Islam”

 

Al Hamdulillah. Islam is a peaceful religion and forbids wars and murder and conforms to democratic ideas. Freedom, harmony, love, cohesion, respectful interaction with others and helpfulness. You’re doing the exact opposite. She’s looking in the telly too much and believes everything that is reported in the media / news. Without worrying about most of the scenes being cut out and added to lies, thus covering up the truth that makes it look like it’s true. So that the media can invest money through many ratings. At the expense of others. That is why there is much suffering and poverty in Germany (as in Hitler’s time). Also because of people like “The f*****g Hanoverian”. You are products and jokers of society and do exactly what others ask of you and are their slaves and behind your back they are laughing at you. You have no human rights, no hopes and no liberties. And why? Because you serve the devil and you are under the influence of the devil. The devil, unlike you, is smarter than Hanoverian. The devil knows how to MANIPULATE humanity and so he has manipulated you Hanoverians as well and therefore spreads all this quirky nonsense of posters where I had to shake my head. I am one of the people who does not advocate the hatred of Islam. Therefore: “No special rights for Islam hate”, that concerns particularly “the s***ty Hanoverian party. [Blog Editor: NOTICE old Hans doesn’t! He looks at the peaceful surahs that originate from Mecca and compares it to what is seen on television. The lying implication is Jihadi violence/terrorism is not true Islam. OOPS Hans! The Medina surahs composed/recorded after the Mecca surahs advocate killing non-Muslims especially if there is no submission to Islam.

 

Example of Mecca Surah – 73 (SAHIH INTERNATIONAL): 10-12

 

10 And be patient over what they say and avoid them with gracious avoidance.

11 And leave Me with [the matter of] the deniers, those of ease [in life], and allow them respite a little.

12 Indeed, with Us [for them] are shackles and burning fire

 

Example of Medina Surah – 9 (SAHIH INTERNATIONAL): 4-5, 8, 12, 29

 

4 Excepted are those with whom you made a treaty among the polytheists and then they have not been deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him].

5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

 

8 How [can there be a treaty] while, if they gain dominance over you, they do not observe concerning you any pact of kinship or covenant of protection? They satisfy you with their mouths, but their hearts refuse [compliance], and most of them are defiantly disobedient.

 

12 And if they break their oaths after their treaty and defame your religion, then fight the leaders of disbelief, for indeed, there are no oaths [sacred] to them; [fight them that] they might cease.

 

29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

 

Take note that “jizyah” protection (i.e. extortion) to be paid in the most humiliating way possible to remain alive.]

 

  1. “Colorful instead of brown” and “Women are not fair game”

 

The poster clearly shows a woman in a dress and a woman in a burka. The Qur’an says that Muslim women have to dress in a covered manner. Since they otherwise attract men’s attention or that the men stare at her and sexually harass her and then rape occurs. [Blog Editor: Duplicitous moron, you just admitted it’s okay to rape non-Muslim due to the lack of submission/compliance to Islam. Yup, Islam be evil.] These are, in my eyes, righteous servants of the Almighty God. These are real women and these women are not treated as “fair game”. Not like this woman wearing a dress on the poster. Where you can see the panties under her skirt? So, you can masturbate afterwards and I know that you are advocating HEARTY masturbation [Blog Editor: Sounds more like what Hans does when he is concerned about getting caught for raping non-Muslim women. Dear God, find Christ and a sanctified Christian marriage so you don’t burn in lust]. You are such a party and then you have the impudence to quote as a quotation: “Women are not fair game”. [Blog Editor: It’s not impudence, it’s righteousness to NOT call women “fair game” whatever social or religious stand a woman believes.] So you have contradicted yourself and set yourself up. You are super stupid and miserable. [Nope, YOU have implicated yourself as the wicked heathen that you are.] Typical Hanoverian. You have always been completely irrelevant to me and will remain so. [Blog Editor: That’s too bad I’m irrelevant to you, for in Christ even YOU a despicable heathen are relevant to God who died to give even the unrighteous eternal life by Resurrection life.] Al Hamdulillah. Thank God. Also, regarding the “fair game”. Most of the women who run around freely are guilty in retrospect, that they are groped and sexually harassed and afterwards they complain that they are turned on. That’s exactly what most women want. They want to be groped, so they have something to complain about afterwards. [What deceived heathens Muslims who believe like Hans, God have mercy on their eternal souls.] Exactly the same thesis as that most people absolutely want to be lied to, because firstly they cannot stand the truth (like the “f*****g Hanoverian” party) and secondly, so that they can attract attention and then have something to nag. This is truly a confirmation of the self-dissatisfaction of most people and their Hanoverian as well. You are just unhappy with yourself. [Blog Editor: I got some enlightening news for Hans. In Christ I am blessed. Those outside of Christ may find misery in the Last Judgement. Christ is the Judge. Seek redemption before you face Judgment.]

 

  1. “The wind is turning”

 

I have to throw myself away laughing. Where should the wind turn? Direction hell? Exactly. There you belong. Towards hell. [Blog Editor: Too bad for those who trust in that satanic book – Quran. Those devoted to Satanic Quran will probably dwell with Satan, the Antichrist and False Prophet in the Lake of Fire.] The Qur’an [LIES] says that the Hellfire is 70 times stronger than volcanic fire. On the other hand, a lighter is nothing. If you continue to do so with your underexposed Islam hatred and without Islam, you end up on ETERNITY in hell. [Blog Editor: Actually, those who refuse to believe Christ died on the Cross, then arose to Life bodily, then Glorified and sitting at the Right of the Father will roast eternally in hell. BELIEVE IN THE RISEN SAVIOR AND BE SAVED.] By the way, by the way. In hell there are no emergency exits. By the way, in the Qur’an, it is said that the deniers drink and drink hot water, then drink like ever-thirsty drinkers. This is their hospitable reception on the Day of Resurrection. And not to forget. The Qur’an [LIES] also says that the mischief-makers (like you, because of your hatred of Islam) are punished with terrible and severe punishment in this worldly life. This means that Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala will never leave you idolaters. In short. You are sinking deeper and deeper from day to day. You will never be able to achieve success with your hatred of Islam. Only with Islam one finds one’s own peace of mind. Only in Islam do you have rights and feel free as an eagle. Only ISLAM IS THE SENSE OF LIFE. POINT! [Islamic Satanic lies in Quran and demonized Muhammad!]

 

  1. “So that WE too have a future!”

 

Since you Hanoverian had bad luck. Islam haters [Hate Islam is true, but I harbor no hate for poor deluded Muslims. I have only sorrow for Muslims who refuse the Truth in Christ according the True Word of God which IS NOT the Quran.] have no future and may not possess any rights of existence. Your future is definitely HELL and that’s your new hostel.

 

  1. “The only real opposition since 2011”

 

You have been a true opposition to Islam haters since 2011. You were just waiting to insult Islam [The “insult” is a Muslim self-delusion believing the demonized Quran over the Holy Bible], by all means. So you can get more money, power and profit. To create a “better” world. To the dead laugh. In the Koran it says: “Do not trust anyone but Allah”. [When you believe a lying Quran, it makes you a liar.] How many parties in Germany or around the world have been formed to create a “better” world, even though they claim exactly the opposite? Think for a while. It is obvious. All parties claim that human rights and freedom are worth something. All wars, where there were numerous deaths, come mainly from parties (you belong to exactly such a party) or from politics. [Blog Editor: Islam has performed genocidal slaughter that makes the genocides committed by Nazis and Communists look like a picnic – 270 MILLION!] All the wars in the world, especially the Second World War, came from the side of the politicians. Short and sweet. The politicians and “party officials” talk and talk and talk, but they do not act. Just like Angela Merkel. She talks and talks so that the German people keeps their faces, so that Mrs. Merkel can continue to receive tax revenue and live at our expense [Blog Editor: Except the Muslim Refugees living on welfare]. That’s why there is a lot of suffering and poverty in Germany (as mentioned above). That’s why Muslims trust in Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala [Trusting a lie] because Allah is All-Knowing, Almighty, All-Hearing and All-seeing. And Allah knows what “the f*****g Hanoverian” party has in mind. I can grind it very well what you Islamic haters have in mind. You will not get away with your evil plans, because Allah will never allow it. [Allah transitioned from Moon-god] NO WAY! So, you have proven yourself that you are the terrorists. True Muslims are not terrorists, as they say in the news. You are 100%. Since I do not want to hear any explanations. [Blog Editor: The Hans lying delusion.]

 

  1. “Our country, our city, our rules Integration requires clear values.”

 

This is neither the land of Germans nor the land of foreigners. Allah [the demonic moon-god of ancient Arabia] has given you a land and allowed you to live in the land [Delusional lie]. Who gives hypocrites the right to claim that this is your land? So, after the motto: “Germany to the Germans”? All the countries of this world has created Allah [Satanic lie] and these are God’s lands or Allah rules the world and not such subhumans as you. Your national pride blinds you. [Your Islamic Satanic lie blinds you.] That’s why you are blind in the heart. You can see with your eyes, but not with the heart. Your hearts are surrounded by darkness, lies, dissatisfaction and hatred. Germany is a worthless Nazi country [Hmm… Inaccurate again.]. You have been talking about “integration” for many years, so that the foreigners would like to “adapt” and behave like Germans? I’m laughing. This “integration” does not exist in Germany and has never existed. Instead of treating foreigners as human beings and accepting them as they are, you evaluate the foreigners according to their origin, skin color and appearance [Hans is quite correct in denouncing ethnic racism, but Islam is a theopolitical ideology that must be condemned in Western Culture]. That’s why you want them to behave like Germans and strive for the German “culture”. Because you see the foreigners as a kind of “race”. And it’s also people like us. That is why it is disguised as “integration”. So, after the motto: “Think German, speak German and live German”, so a similar thesis Hitler had then also quoted. Pretty Nazi, right? Thus, you have declared yourself terrorists and Nazis and Germany is getting rid of terrorists (like you and Thilo Sarrazin) [I suspect the Left-Wing Multicultural Germans would like to concur with Hans]. Forever. That’s proof that you’re stuck and f*****g nationalists. Thus, you have the right to deserve hell [Without Jesus yes, yet hell will probably fill with Christ-hating and Jew-hating Muslims]. The integration is pure illusion like a mirage or Santa Claus. There is nothing of it. Unfortunately, your rules do not comply with the German Basic Laws. YOU DO NOT STAND ON THE GROUND OF THE GERMAN BASIC LAW! [Blog Editor: Good thing I live in America where Freedom and Liberty has not at least not yet been erased by Multiculturalism and Islam. Yet there is no lack of trying by the American Left.] Thus, this is a sign of self-justice or anarchy. Do not forget!

 

  1. “Victim protection instead of perpetrator protection! No tolerance for violent offenders.”

 

Then I will specify. “Muslim protection instead of terrorist protection!” How many people (especially the Muslims) were killed by the Americans themselves [Blog Editor: America kills lunatic Muslims who think their warped supremacist ideology okays murdering Americans and I hope that includes the likes of Muslims supporting the Taliban, al Qaeda, Hamas, ISIS, etc.], like the Jews in World War II? [The Jews attacked no one first as Muslims do today.] This is deliberately and exaggeratedly portrayed in the media, so that the stupid spectators (also terrorists [Blog Editor: If Germans are terrorized by Muslims on German soil, it would not be surprising vigilante reprisals would begin, especially if the police ignore Muslim violence]) have a reason to wipe out the Muslims. Because the Muslims preach the truth a LIE] and the truth [LIE] is Islam. That’s why you do not want special rights for Islam because you cannot stand the truth [the LIE]. This represents your character and you have a miserable character and then you wonder why I write the truth [the LIE] to you. I am one of the few people who absolutely do not like anything. YOU HAVE NO GOOD SETTING! The Muslims are the victims [PERPETRATORS] and in your eyes are scapegoats and their hates for Islam, terrorists, Nazis, fascists and criminals are the real culprits. That’s why I DO NOT REQUIRE TOLERANCE FOR TERRORISTS! [Perhaps because you are an Islamic terrorist?] (Especially “The f*****g Hanoverian” party).

 

Well, you got on with the wrong thing. That’s why I thank God that I’ve been well educated, unlike you terrorists. [Hans if profanity is the symbol of your education, then the education was quite lacking.]

 

That’s the way it was. If you cannot handle the truth [or Hans fabricated truth, meaning lie], it’s your problem. If it does not suit you, then that’s just your bloody bad luck and not the Muslims. [We’ll see…]

 

I’ll quote a quote from myself: “Those who laugh at you for not being able to endure the truth are those who are crying inside.” [As all Muslim perpetrators should cry as the cowards they are.]

 

This clearly means that you laugh [actually PITY is a better description] at people like me because you cannot bear the truth and cry inside. You are repressing your negative feelings that you carry with you on a daily basis. [Blog Editor: I indeed have negative thoughts toward heathen godless Islamic terrorists.] As soon as someone speaks openly about the truth, you begin to laugh because you are terrified [ANGERED] inside and you are afraid [ANGRY] of the [Islamic lie] truth in order to suppress this feeling of fear [NO fear but disgust of Islamic culture].

There are many Islam haters who have converted to Islam [I’ll wager NO ONE that has looked into the real Islam has converted voluntarily. Converts to Islam have been deceived or forced!] and become devout Muslims, and these former Islam haters [deluded non-Muslims] themselves testify that Islam is the true and peaceful religion of God [Those converts didn’t study a truthful Islamic history or adequately read the Quran, Hadith and Sira]. These former Islam haters regret [in self-deception] that they have insulted Islam and Muslims and ask Allah for forgiveness. You say yourself that you do not need to be afraid of Islam. The fear comes from the devil and whispers the man in his breast, that you stay away from Islam and that the devil brings you to paradise [Poor Muslims look for paradise and the carnal delights of eternal virgins will discover torturing demons]. But in the Koran it says that the devil takes you to hell. Even stupider are the people, because God has given man a brain. To think before we act. But rather you are under the influence of the accursed devil (in Arabic: “Seytan”), so you have to moan for no reason [Boy are you going to discover a damnable eternal surprise]. No matter what the topic is. This suggests that you are dissatisfied with yourself [Not even close]. That’s why you founded the party in 2011 to draw attention to you and not for “improvement in the well of the German fatherland”. This is a kind of cry for help to show us that you are getting dirty. But honestly. I do not care how bad you are. Do all of them have a therapy or get yourself instructed in psychiatry. But please stop flooding Germany with stupidity. NOBODY CARES! [If I was a German I’d demand the end of flooding refugees, migrants and/or immigrants of an Islamic origin.]

 

And another thing. Just because many would-be Muslims say they are Muslims does not mean that they practice Islam. They call themselves NAMELY “Muslims” to attract attention (just like the Hanoverian party) and thus abuse Islam for their own cravings. But even worse are subhumans like you [Or are they Muslims awakened to the ugly nature of Islam so lean toward assimilation], who believe everything they get told. This is already the next proof that you are gullible people and that is why you [Muslims] will perish and on the day of the Last Judgment you are the biggest losers [Muslim Christ-haters and Jew-haters will not find their names in the book of Life]. The Qur’an [the lie] also states that the infidels and idolaters are totally IRREGULAR. You should take your own nose and really deal with Islam. Then you will notice and testify that Islam is the true[a lying demonized] religion [affront to] of the Almighty God [of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus BUT NOT Ishmael].

 

So, miss. The truth [in Christ] goes to you, which you [Hans] will NEVER endure in your [his] life. You will spend your [Hans] entire life as an underexposed, wretched and worthless loser who is punished by Allah from day to day, will NEVER have your peace and will live day by day with fear in his heart and discontent, and you will sink deeper and deeper and deeper, until you scratch off. Back in 2012, I looked at all your video clips on your Youtube account and laughed at you for your ignorance of Islam [Probably not this Blog Editor’s Youtube Channel]. I know for a fact that you have secretly read the correct Quran translation. But since you could not endure the truth, you have searched INTENTLY and DESERVED for a false Qur’an translation [what a delusional statement]. In order to harass, provoke, insult and, above all, endanger peace for us Muslims. If you enjoyed your peace, then you idiot would not provoke us, you underexposed candelabrum [Jew-hatred exposed!]. They insult Islam only because Islam is the true [FALSE] religion. As it says in the Holy Quran. They find the peace boring and desperate for attention you NEVER got from the people. Now you have our attention. Oh, I forgot to mention. The funniest thing in one of your clips was that some people came after you and beat you up. I saw your annoying stupid injury, which was just a small scratch and you start to run around like a little girl. This scratch is NOTHING, boy. NOTHING! You have proven yourself by having been educated by your parents a wimp and a miserable [?]miserable[?]. No wonder Allah punishes you [the demon moon-god will Satan in the Lake of Fire]. Bad luck for [Muslims] you. You deserve the beatings [Typical Muslim attitude] because you’re a ridiculous big-mouth and you messed with the wrong ones and so you have something to complain about, and in your clip, say “no wonder, that’s how Muslims behave” [AMEN]. If you think you mock us Muslims, you deserve the just punishment. Al Hamdulillah (Praise be to Allah). What does that tell you? Very easily. They [Muslims] endanger peace and the Qur’an [LIE] says that the mischief-makers (and you are one of them, Michael [not this Blog Editor]) are being punished with appalling punishment. You know yourself that Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala punishes you every day [LIE]. Why? Because you are a disgusting, provocative and unnecessary mischief-maker. Well, Mr. Stürzenberger. You have a blow and you have to live with it. Well, it’s your bloody bad luck and not ours. We faithful Muslims (like me [highway to hell]) will NEVER change us. The Qur’an [LIE] says that Allah will complete His light. No matter how many times you insult Islam. This means that the time is coming when more than 90% of people convert [EXTREMELY DOUBTFUL] to Islam and by the way, there are so many of us. You will LOSE [Not according the True Word of God – the Bible], Mr. Stürzenberger. You will lose. Now I know why you are called “Stürzenberger” with your surname because you are plunging deeper and deeper every day in your level. Laugh. Gosh, you are stupid and ridiculous. You are one of the people who believe everything you hear. Be it in the news, on the Internet, in the newspapers and so on. They are media-savvy and bully believing Muslims, so you invest more money and live at the expense of others. [Blog Editor: I’m guessing this “Michael Stürzenberger” (Wikipedia-German – for English run a translate such as Google) is a stand-up guy that is being smeared by a typical Muslim hater of all thing non-Muslim] In particular, the s**t ISIS has nothing to do with Islam [Actually ISIS is just mimicking the Muhammad Islam glorifies as the perfect man]. Just because they mention “Allah U Akbar” and other verses in the Koran, so that ISIS [Blog Editor: More and more Muslim scholars agree ISIS practices a true Islam but now cloak ISIS-Islam as a virulent strain] has a reason to kill us real Muslims and other innocent people. They abuse Islam just as you do. They behave the same way as the ISIS and then you wonder why we are upset. In truth, you are aggressive, unfriendly, provocative, pathetic and a PURE TIME-DAMAGE to me. But leave out your frustration so you can say that we Muslims are the perpetrators and you make sacrifices. It’s the other way around. They are truly the perpetrators and we are the innocent. Because of our innocence and because Islam is the true religion of [Moon-]God, since September 11th and 9/11 so many of us have been killed so people like you can invest more money. Rather, we are killed for NOTHING. People like you are the problem, Mr. Stürzenberger. And with all my heart I pray to Allah that every day you suffer more and more from depression that you already have [How Islamic Hans is]. The ISIS is intentionally over-hyped in the media so that the media can gain ratings and viewers (and you are one of them), and thereby invest more money. Above all, I saw in one of your videos that the stupid cops were standing behind you. You’ve been desperate to have the police at your side because, firstly, you’re a miserable and inferior scarecrow, and secondly, so you can offend us the way you want. They acted like a little kid. When idiots (like you are one) are on your side, you feel “strong.” But standing alone with no one on your side makes you look very anxious and swallow your fear. And you realize yourself that you are really a little weakling and I do not want to have anything to do with weaklings. With this attitude, as you behave daily, you will be LUNKED for life and never progress in life. Besides, the police have just a bunch of underexposed and unnecessary bureaucrats in your f*****g organization. Since the police hates us, those miserable jokes are the real bad guys. They are corrupt, even arresting, suppressing, beating, insulting, and so on innocent people, etc. But if we defend ourselves from the law against the police, it means “civil servants” and we are arrested for nothing. That’s proof that the police are doing what Hitler did to the Jews. Just so they can invest more money themselves, like the judges in the courtroom. The judges only want to convict, whether the defendant is guilty or innocent, whether he is right or wrong. They just want to convict so they can get more money. So these spas earn their daily bread. And you have the same approach, Michael. No matter how many Muslims tell you the truth (as I tell you the truth), you just want to harass us and not accuse Islam of anything. So you can earn their daily bread. That’s proof that you’re a miserable loser, a bad guy upstairs and a miserable character. In addition, you have proven yourself that you do not comply with German laws and the f*****g police do not. So why should we integrate ourselves in the nasty state called “Germany” and stick to the law? Al Hamdulillah, I abide by the laws of God. And Al Hamdulillah I am integrated in Islam. Especially because people like you are afraid of the truth and you do not accept Islam. We should integrate ourselves in this worthless state of failure so that we behave like the stupid society? So that we do what the others ask us to do? And if we behave the way we want, are we suddenly a danger to society just because we are telling the truth and doing the right thing? You are disgusting and a lot of scum. I f**k the society. I do what Allah asks of me and do what I want. People like me accept us as we are. As they say? “I am not in the world to be what you would like me to be”. The people in Germany (and you belong to it) I do not care about s**t! German or foreigner, DO NOT INTEREST ME! You with your stupid, ridiculous claims that will never get you anywhere in your life. As I said, Mr. STÜRZENberger. Every day, you plunge deeper and deeper into your level. Remember that well. In your eyes, I can read that you are very provocative, unfriendly, aggressive and so on-the-edge. Her face is darkened. A devout Muslim like me, sees it. They are under the influence of the accursed devil. This means that you believe in the devil (like a stupid Satanist) and serve him. You do not need to wonder that I write the truth about you. That’s just the truth you’ll NEVER endure. And if you laugh at it, it means that you are crying inside. And in Quran Surah 18 Al Kahf (The Cave), verse 54, it says, “And of all beings, man is the most contentious.” That means very clearly that you are contentious and desperately seeking attention in a negative way, without worrying about compromising peace. They are a danger to us real Muslims, as I am one. I promise you that if you die without Islam, you will land on ETERNALS in hell with the other troublemakers and the fire in hell is 70 times stronger than volcanic fire. In contrast, a lighter is nothing. Well, you washcloths. That means you BURN to eternity. Your whole body will burn tremendously. Your body in hell melts like butter and the skin regenerates again. For you to pay the penalty for an eternity. There is no escape. Look forward to it and think about hell if you continue to insult Islam. I swear to god. Here in Germany, you risk a big lip, because people here do absolutely nothing, have to put up with everything (because they have no human rights) and they must be afraid. But imagine if you were in Syria (where the war reigns) or somewhere in another so-called “Islamic” country, you would go into panties. It is still a Hitler state. And since we are not allowed to have any rights (e.g. freedom of speech), it is still a DICTATURE and the bitch Merkel has taken over Hitler’s position and the politicians want to tell us all seriously that Germany is a democratic country. If it were a democracy, why do not we have the right to free speech? Simple, Michael. Because it is still a dictatorship and the Gestapo still exists in modern times. World War III is imminent because of such mischief-makers as you are one. Almighty God punishes you day by day, as mentioned earlier. And the deniers are blinded or petrified day by day in the heart and will never be successful and prosperous in their lives. This is what it says in the Koran. And another thing. The would-be Muslims, who have INTELLIGENTLY misinterpreted many Koran books, are abusing Islam for their own cravings and for investing more money. These Muslims are, in truth, idol worshipers, as stated in the Holy Qur’an. And you are also a miserable idolater because you serve the Devil (in Arabic: “Seytan”) and in your stupid videos on Youtube you claim that you are for peace. However, you insult Islam and us Muslims. They say you do not insult us Muslims. There is a lot in the Koran about us Muslims in it. That means you have insulted us. They contradict each other in their own statements. Therefore, I can NOT take such stupid Islam enemies like you seriously. You do not seriously believe that you can insult Islam for all your life. As promised, Allah Almighty will punish you every day and will never find your satisfaction in your heart. This also applies to all other enemies of Islam, who are punished daily and I do not care. She [is a] disgusting idolater. People like you do not interest me and will NEVER interest me. I pray to God that they scrape and burn in hell. Then we are true believing Muslims a miserable upper ranks as you finally go.

 

Here’s a quote from me: “Those who laugh at you are the ones who cry inwardly”. And since you laugh at people like me because you do not want to bear the truth, you’re crying inside. They are increasingly suffering from day to day, their miserable little child. Never forget that.

 

And another thing. Those who start insulting and provoking us as you do with us need not be surprised to call for defense. In fact, think that if you begin to insult us, we must be silent. So that nothing happens to us? We do not like anything and flatten cowards(like you are one). Not even the police will stop us, no matter if those stupid bull sluts have weapons with them. Only Allah can stop us. The police are a joke. You’re a pathetic joker like Mario Barth and I hope you die. As already mentioned above. There will come a time when no police will exist. And all people in Germany or around the world are on their own. And you spoiled cockroaches would have wished you had learned self-defense. People like you will be the first ones in danger. Especially when ISIS comes here. Look forward to it, Mr. Stürzenberger.

 

NEVER SEE YOU AGAIN! [That should be a promise from a Muslim troll like Hans Kollmeyer]

___________________

Introducing Hans Kollmeyer Islamic Supremacist Venom against Critics

John R. Houk

© February 6, 2019

______________________

Hans Kollmeyer Says

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Edited with English spellcheck. Some phrases were left alone due to uncertain meaning. All links are by the Editor. Most text enclosed by brackets and in bold are by the Editor.

 

Hans Kollmeyer may be pseudonym

 

Kristallnacht, 2016


kristallnacht

Intro to Kristallnacht, 2016

Edited by John R. Houk

By Ari Bussel

Posted November 13, 2016

 

Have you heard of the Kristallnacht? My guess is if you are younger than a Baby Boomer (and probably a significant amount of Boomers too), you have no clue what the word Kristallnacht represents.

 

Kristallnacht is German for “NIGHT OF BROKEN GLASS”. That horrendous night came on November 9, 1938 aimed at Jews:

 

… violence against Jews broke out across the Reich. It appeared to be unplanned, set off by Germans’ anger over the assassination of a German official in Paris at the hands of a Jewish teenager. In fact, German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels and other Nazis carefully organized the pogroms. In two days, over 250 synagogues were burned, over 7,000 Jewish businesses were trashed and looted, dozens of Jewish people were killed, and Jewish cemeteries, hospitals, schools, and homes were looted while police and fire brigades stood by. The pogroms became known as Kristallnacht, the “Night of Broken Glass,” for the shattered glass from the store windows that littered the streets.

 

READ THE REST (THE “NIGHT OF BROKEN GLASS”; United States Holocaust Memorial Museum)

 

Now that those of you who were unaware are updated this submission by Ari Bussel should have more meaning. Ari is a descendant of Holocaust Survivors. He attended his first remembrance event at annual conference held in California on the anniversary of Kristallnacht.

 

Ari writes of how few Holocaust survivors were at this annual event largely because of age. He notices that some of the other attendees were quite inconsiderate to the few survivors in attendance as if they forgot the significance of the reasons to remember that around SIX MILLION Jews were slaughtered by Nazi Germans.

 

Ari also spends a little time pointing out there is NO moral equivalence between Jews fleeing the Nazis and Syrian Muslims fleeing ISIS/Assad. The Syrian refugees are primarily Sunni. They may be fleeing the effects of war, but they are fleeing from a regime that hates their existence as the Jews did fleeing Nazis. Leftist err in vainly trying to make that moral equivalence.

kristallnacht-explained-2

JRH 11/13/16

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Kristallnacht, 2016

 

By Ari Bussel

Sent 11/9/2016 5:10 PM

 

And you will be mad of the sight of your eyes which you will see” (Deuteronomy 28:34)

 

And your life shall hang before you, and you will fear night and day and will have no assurances of your life.  In the morning you will wish it be evening, and in the evening you will say may it be morning, for the fear of your heart which you will fear and the sight of your eyes which you will see.”  (ibid:66-67)

 

It was a November night in 1938, a night that would be remembered ever after as the Night of Broken Glass.  Jews were no longer safe in Europe.

 

The 1939 Club – Members Now Extinct

 

Some years ago, Jews and Christians working together in defense of their shared values had an event at the exclusive Hillcrest Country Club in Los Angeles.

kristallnacht-event-ca-11-9-16

The event was held by the Israel Christian Nexus and sponsored by the 1939 Club (today the 1939 Society).  I remember entering the room designated for our event, alongside Pastor John Hagee of Christians United for Israel.

 

Our hosts, members of the Los Angeles based 1939 Club, were seated at tables.  What I clearly remember are not the individual faces, just the fact they were all very old, very frail and dressed up so elegantly as if they came from a different world.  I do not remember canes or walkers, but the image of people hardly able to stand or walk has been etched deeply in my mind.

 

Small people.  People who, if one dares touch them most gently, might turn to dust or fog and disappear.  Appearing as a figment of imagination, or perhaps a prop?  Clearly, they did not seem real, making the entire event both surreal and holy.

 

The 1939 Club was supporting many causes at that time and doing so most generously.  Their money had to be put to good use, and they were there observing, stewards and guardians.
They were not checking, micromanaging or overseeing and gave most generously, no questions asked.  Rather they were a living testament to an awful era, and their task, with plentiful means was:  Do whatever is necessary to ensure such evil happens “Never Again!”

 

I saw small, little, frail individuals from whom intense will and determination emanated.  Powered by the means to do good, educate, influence, teach, instill courage, fight and ensure continuity, they focused on the task at hand, for it was apparent to everyone that time was of the essence.  Time was running out, yet the obligation was as formidable as always.

 

These were the survivors, and I am told not one of them is here with us today.  How is it possible?  Simple:  My parents were young children during the Holocaust.  The members of the 1939 Club were at least 20 years older, thus, they would be nearing 100 today.

 

Like them, other survivors are all disappearing.  On October 28th, Sol Berger z”l, would have turned 97.  He passed away on Rosh Hashana, three and a half weeks earlier.  His younger friend, Joe Davis celebrated his 96th birthday on November 7th and his wife turned 92 on the very same day.

 

Sol z”l, a member of the Partisans, and Joe and his wife are three of several Holocaust survivors I know and dare to call my friends.  Julius with a number tattooed on his hand and Leslie, saved by Raul Wallenberg, are two other survivors.  They all reside at the same “retirement home,” and I am privileged and most blessed to be with them every Shabbat.

 

Remembering the Holocaust – Annual Events

 

Year after year, my friend Lily Steiner invites me to the annual Kristallnacht Commemoration event at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.  Year after year I promise to go, but something always comes up, and I never had; until this year.  Lily came back from Australia especially for me to join her, and I am so grateful I did.

 

The 10th annual event now joins Dr. Joel Geiderman’s annual event at Cedar Sinai Medical Center as a “must attend” event on my calendar.

 

Dr. Geiderman is the co-chair of the Emergency Department at Cedar Sinai and for some three decades has brought thousands of doctors, nurses and staff, alongside community members and Holocaust survivors for the annual lunch-and-lecture.

 

At Loyola I discovered some of the same elements:  faculty and staff, community members and students.  Students, young, oh so young and impressionable, yet eager to hear and learn.

 

While at Cedar Sinai the number of survivors dwindles down every year, there are still some.

 

Sol z”l, Joe and his wife, Leslie and Julius, as well as Irene (“I am 94, I survived the Holocaust and I am blind!”) all reside two blocks away from the hospital, yet there has been no effort to send someone and bring them and other Holocaust survivors who are alive and live nearby to the event.  Apparently this extra effort is beyond necessity.  It will be a “feel good” and fulfilling event anyway, so why bother.

 

At Loyola I found no more survivors.  The Director of Jewish Studies responsible for the ten annual commemoration events explained that the date was set a very long time in advance and happened to clash with a long weekend for Holocaust survivors, who were too exhausted to attend.

 

There was, though, one elderly woman with a walker who fit the age.  The intensity of her look convinced me she was a survivor, but I did not ask.  When the film screening started, she was unable to see from the place she was seated.  It was too far away.

 

I brought two chairs for her and her companion, likely her daughter.  A lady from the back came toward us, shouting, “you cannot sit here we will not be able to see!”

 
Not only was she very far back, the elderly lady could not have blocked her line of sight.  To be at a Holocaust memorial event and show not the tiniest iota of kindness begs the question, why does one even bother to show up?

 
The lady without compassion could have moved her chair two inches to the right or the left, as there was so much space.  But she decided to be confrontational toward a person much older and so much more fragile than she.

 
And we ask ourselves, how could a nation so intelligent, so cultured and advanced as Germany in the early 1930s become so evil?  We wonder if it can happen again, if we could have partaken in the same madness.

 

The answer apparently is yes.  As human beings we do not find in our hearts to be kind, to try, to overcome the urge to “go and make a scene,” “complain!” and insist “she must not sit in front.”  Instead, we behave in such an inconsiderate and loathsome manner.

 

Such untoward behavior at a Kristallnacht Commemoration event is tragic.  Oh, the person must be so proud!  She disappeared quickly before the last credits were shown, skipping the reception.  I was actually looking for her, to take her picture.  How people who look “normal” and “cultured” can turn so ugly and evil.

 

Refugees

 

Following the screening of “Jan Karski & the Lords of Humanity” about the Polish Karski who was assigned to inform the world of the Nazis exterminating the Jews, a panel response with the director allowed Q&A.

 

In a most vivid discussion about refugees, the survivors and the world’s reaction to them were compared to the modern-day Syrian refugees crisis.

 

Remember, my friend Lily and I were seated among some 120 people we did not know.  I am among the very few children of Holocaust survivors who were in the audience, and my friend Lily is a fierce fighter for Israel and the West.

slawomir-grunberg-and-lily-steiner-visiting-from-australia

I am thinking about the students, those young, impressionable minds, who experienced no war or real threat in their lifetimes, hearing from two prominent and very respected individuals (a professor and a film director) that Holocaust survivors, like my mother who managed to arrive illegally to Palestine then under British Mandate, or my father who managed to arrive to Israel after the formation of the modern state, are very like today’s Syrian refugees in Europe or those being admitted to the USA by the Obama administration.

 

I am livid.  I am ready to explode.  I boil.  Just moments earlier we all watched footage from the Warsaw Ghetto.  My father was there until his escape.  And now, I am told that he is very much the same as those purportedly escaping their brethren in Syria?

 

Those who are dressed nicer than I am?  Who demand where they prefer to live?  Many among whom rape and grope German women?  Or perpetrate horrific terrorist attacks against their new home countries?  Who have fake passports and ulterior motives to infiltrate and overtake Western civilization?

 

Or maybe the “similarities” can be found in the fact that the Arab world, other than Jordan, does nothing to aid the Syrians?  Indeed, the Jews of America during WWII behaved in much the same way.  But how can anyone compare the Muslims to Holocaust survivors?

 

Lily raised her hand, was given a microphone and very politely but powerfully contested the corrupt “moral equivalency” presented.

 

The same fake equivalency was shown in Spielberg’s movie “Munich.”

 

And the same has happened time after time when the world compares Israel and Gaza’s Hamas.  “So many dead among the Gazans; so few among the Israelis – Israel is at fault!  Israel is the evil-doer, not Hamas and the non-stop, non-discriminating barrage of rockets it unleashes against the Israeli population!”

 

Celebrating the Holocaust, Appeasing Our Senses

 

It seems that seven decades after the end of WWII, as Holocaust survivors are disappearing and their voices become too frail and hard to hear, we are creating our own notions of the Holocaust.

 

We have annual commemorations where we forget the most basic decency.

 

We bring politics and similar baggage to higher education institutions, and professors utilize the classrooms and their students as breeding grounds for indoctrination.
We allow anti-Israel and anti-Jewish sentiments, so prevalent nowadays, to pervade every fabric of our being.  Many of the detractors are Jewish.  Some even are Israelis.  And we do not really need any enemies.  The Arabs understood it all long ago, a simple lesson:  Leave the Jews to their own bidding, and they will destroy themselves.

 

Apparently, we will continue to “celebrate” the Holocaust, with more movies and stories, now done by members of the second generation who were not there but only witnessed the Holocaust via their parents or grandparents, the living remnants of the Holocaust.

 

We do not do the simplest deed that requires effort, like going out of our way to bring a Holocaust survivor, since we live in a different day and age.

 

Today the Holocaust does not really matter, except when we see a movie that manages to touch us, and we leave convinced “we remember,” and even that “we did something good by simply watching a movie.”

 

Can the same evil happen again?  Undoubtedly.

 

So what was Kristallnacht in 1938?  What happened in Europe from 1933—1945?  What started on September 1st, 1933?

 

Judging by the behavior of too many…a whole lot of nothing.

 

___________________

This is the latest in the series “Postcards from America – Postcards from Israel,” a collaboration between Zager and Bussel, a foreign correspondent reporting from Israel.

 

Ari Bussel and Norma Zager collaborate both in writing and on the air in a point-counter-point discussion of all things Israel-related.  Together, they have dedicated the past decade to promoting Israel.

© Israel Monitor, November, 2016

 

First Published November 8, 2016

Contact:  bussel@me.com

 

Holocaust Denial is Antisemitic


Gassed Jews stacked disposal

Antisemitism is Wicked Ungodly

John R. Houk

© March 18, 2016

VIDEO: The Nazi Gas Chambers

 

Posted by lizardboy347

Uploaded on Mar 23, 2008

 

This is an animation of the three methods of gasing the nazi’s used during WWII. I created this to go with my presentation for a class project- sorry about the text going so fast. I had to do it to fit most of the info in. A lot of the info was left out though because i couldn’t fit it all into the animation.

-And no I’m not a nazi, no I’m not trying to insult anyone, and no I do not think its funny. Its serious and I can easily understand why some people would find this very offensive and harmful. I’m terribly sorry about that….Feel free to leave your comments of emotion… Simply…. “Pass the knowledge”

-A lot of the walking parts of the animation are pretty messed up, I know. I was rushing to finish because I was behind schedule..

 

Jyrki Soini wants me to examine Germar Rudolf a convicted Holocaust denier. It is my opinion that if Germar Rudolf denies the existence of the Holocaust or denies that Adolf Hitler was evil is a dangerous proposition. The Holocaust was an evil agenda of Nazism that cannot be dismissed. So let’s profile Germar Rudolf,

 

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2007/09/germar-rudolf-on-nazi-crimes.html

 

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Germar_Rudolf

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germar_Rudolf

 

So let’s look at Holocaust deniers deny. I will show a series of excerpts of actual science and eye-witness collected testimony (which includes Nazi guards not just survivors).

While Auschwitz is the best known of the death camps, this is because it was also a large slave labour camp, so there are more survivors from it.  The dedicated death camps ofAktion Reinhard represented the most deadly part of the Nazi’s mass murder operations and are far less known largely because virtually everyone who entered these camps – Belzec, Chemlno, Sobibor and Treblinka – were gassed or shot.  Holocaust deniers try to pretend these camps were simply “transit camps”, but testimony from guards, Nazis, a few surviving prisoners and locals all prove that this is nonsense.

Between 2010 and 2012 a British archaeological team uncovered extensive evidence that the Treblinka camp was indeed a mass murder centre.  Ground penetrating radar detected three huge mass graves on the site, one of which is 26m long, 17m wide and at least 4m deep.  Using aerial photos from the 1940s, GPS technology and modern remote sensing equipment, the archaeologists were also able to detect the brick remains of the gas chambers, which the Nazis had dismantled when they abandoned the site.  Bone fragments and ash deposits on the site also clearly indicate the disposal of thousands of corpses at Treblinka, as attested by all witnesses.

Treblinka: The Hidden Graves of the Holocaust 

Secondly, we have forensic evidence that clearly demonstrates that cynide gas was used in the gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau.  Following claims by amateur hobbyist Fred Leuchter, which were touted by Holocaust deniers David Irving and Ernst Zundel as “proof” no Zyklon B was used to gas people at Auschwitz, the Institute for Forensic Research (IFRC) in Kraków undertook forensic examinations of the relevant areas of the five crematoria.  After factoring in elements that Leuchter had not calculated for, the IFRC concluded that, in fact, there were expected traces of cyanide gas in all relevant areas and that this was not due to them having been fumigated against a typhus outbreak. (Is there physical scientific proof that Jews were gassed to death in Nazi concentration camps? By Tim O’Neill; Quora)

Here’s a Birkenau (aka Auschwitz II) eyewitness account:

Regarding the liquidation of the Czech family camp in section BIIb, the following quote is from Don Moore’s article in the Sun-Herald:

“They told everyone in Camp B2B we were going to be sent to Germany as slave laborers, but we had to clean up and shower first and we’d be issued new uniforms,” he said. “When we reached what the guards said were the ‘showers’ there was a commotion going on. I could speak a little German and I heard the guards say something was ‘kaput.'”

He learned later the apparatus that filled the showers with poison gas was ‘kaput.’ The prisoners from B2B had escaped death. They were marched back to their barracks. Three days later they were marched back to the gas chambers to die.

“We were just about to go into the gas chambers once more and there was another commotion out front.

“A train with 10,000 Jews from Hungry had just arrived. They had no place to put them. We were sent back to our barracks once again. They marched all 10,000 Hungarian Jews into the three gas chambers at Auschwitz and killed them all in 24 hours.” (Auschwitz II – Birkenau: History of a man-made Hell; ScrapBookPages.com;  last updated 2/10/10)

Millions killed at Auschwitz-Birkenau:

 

On May 14, 1946, the former Commandant of Auschwitz-Birkenau, Rudolf Höß, also known as Rudolf Hoess, signed a sworn affidavit in which he stated that two million Jews had been gassed at Auschwitz-Birkenau between 1941 and 1943 while he was the Commandant. This did not include the period, during which Hoess was not the Commandant, when over 300,000 Hungarian Jews were gassed during a period of 10 weeks in the Summer of 1944, according to the Auschwitz Museum.

 

The English translation of the German text in the affidavit reads: “I declare herewith under oath that in the years 1941 to 1943 during my tenure in office as commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp 2 million Jews were put to death by gassing and a 1/2 million by other means. Rudolf Hoess. May 14, 1946.” The confession was signed by Hoess and by Josef Maier of the US Chief of Counsel’s office.

 

Affidavit signed by Rudolf Hoess, 5-14-1946 - 2 Million Jews Gassed 1941-43

Affidavit signed by Commandant Rudolf Hoess, May 14, 1946

 

 

In the last days of World War II, shortly before Berlin was surrounded by Soviet troops, Eichmann told Hoess that 2.5 million Jews had been murdered at Auschwitz Birkenau. Eichmann was an SS Lt. Col. who was the head of Department IV, B-4, the section of the Reich Central Security Office (RSHA) in Berlin, which was responsible for deporting the Jews. It was Adolf Eichmann who was in charge of deporting the Jews on the trains to the death camps.

 

 

On April 12, 1947, just before his execution, Rudolf Hoess signed the following Final Statement, in which he admitted his shame for committing Crimes Against Humanity and for participating in the genocide perpetrated by the Third Reich:

 

My conscience is forcing me to make also the following assertion: In the isolation prison I have reached the bitter understanding of the terrible crimes I have committed against humanity. As a Kommandant of the extermination camp at Auschwitz, I have realized my part in the monstrous genocide plans of the Third Reich. By this means I caused humanity and mankind the greatest harm, and brought unspeakable suffering, particularly to the Polish nation. For my responsibility, I am now paying with my life. Oh, that God would forgive me my deeds! People of Poland, I beg you to forgive me! Just now in the Polish prisons have I recognized what humanity really is. In spite of everything that happened I have been treated humanely, which I had never expected, and this has made me feel deeply ashamed. Would to God…that the fact of disclosing and confirming those monstrous crimes against mankind and humanity may prevent for all future ages even the premises leading to such horrible events. (Auschwitz-Birkenau: History of a man-made Hell; ScrapBookPages.com; last updated 1/10/10)

 

Next let’s look at what Holocaust Deniers might consider a work of holiness exposing the Holocaust as a hoax. Pamphlet was published by the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) entitled “66 Questions & Answers About the Holocaust”. The pamphlet is simply a bunch of pseudo-science disinformation derived from idiotic speculation or simple downright lies. The Jewish Virtual Library has a quite excellent refutation to this work of Antisemitism by Ben S. Swanson entitled “Holocaust Denial: How to Refute Holocaust Denial”. The refutation is quite lengthy because it refutes each of the 66 points of the IHR pamphlet. Here I am posting the point one refutation with the links to the other 65 points or you can simply go to the Jewish Virtual Library to read the entire refutation at your leisure. Do not be fooled by Neo-Nazi Antisemitic propaganda. There is no Jewish New World Order to dominate the globe. Even Israel exists as a homeland where the world’s practicing Jews and non-practicing Jews can live in the land of their heritage in which they KNOW their government will never persecute them for their faith or their ancestral heritage.

 

This post is going to end up to be quite lengthy because I am including excerpts of the links that Yurki1000 sent to me to examine the Holocaust denial Germar Rudolf. I have to be honest I was a bit surprised Yurki1000 wanted me to examine Rudolf thoughts because I’ve known him to be a staunch Christian in principle with only some minor disagreements on theology. In the fairness of the open mind request I am posting Rudolf musings after my expression of displeasure with Holocaust Deniers which I frankly consider to be a bit low-brow even though many of these guys try to place a flavor intellectualism in their Antisemitic delusions. That which is sad is these fellows for the most part truly believe the Antisemitic ideology about Jewish extermination and Nazi principles.

 

JRH 3/18/16

Please Support NCCR

********************

Holocaust Denial: How to Refute Holocaust Denial

 

By Ben S. Austin

Jewish Virtual Library

 

This page contains a point-by-point refutation of the half-truths and outright lies published in a pamphlet entitled “66 Questions & Answers About the Holocaust” published as a bible for Holocaust denial by the Institute for Historical Review (IHR).

 

The IHR’s questions and answers have been reproduced unaltered. Nizkor, a website devoted to combatting Holocaust denial, follows their answers by refuting the 66 claims.

 

Click on Any Question to Reveal the Answer:

 

General

 

  1. What proof exists that the Nazis practiced genocide or deliberately killed six million Jews?

 

IHR Says:

 

None. The only evidence is the postwar testimony of individual “survivors.” This testimony is contradictory, and no “survivor” claims to have actually witnessed any gassing. There are no contemporaneous documents and no hard evidence whatsoever: no mounds of ashes, no crematoria capable of disposing of millions of corpses, no piles of clothes, no human soap, no lamp shades made of human skin, no records, no credible demographic statistics.

 

Nizkor Replies:

 

Lie piled upon lie, with not a shred of proof.

 

This is as good a place as any to present some detailed evidence which is consistently ignored, as a sort of primer on Holocaust denial. It will make this reply much longer than the other sixty-five, but perhaps the reader will understand the necessity for this.

 

Let’s look at their claims one at a time:

 

Supposedly the only evidence, “the postwar testimony of individual survivors.”

 

First of all, consider the implicit conspiracy theory. Notice how the testimony of every single inmate of every Nazi camp is automatically dismissed as unconvincing. This total dismissal of inmates’ testimony, along with the equally-total dismissal of the Nazis’ own testimony (!), is the largest unspoken assumption of Holocaust-denial.

 

This assumption, which is not often spelled out, is that the attempted Jewish genocide never took place, but rather that a secret conspiracy of Jews, starting around 1941, planted and forged myriad documents to prove that it did; then, after the war, they rounded up all the camp survivors and told them what to say.

 

The conspirators also supposedly managed to torture hundreds of key Nazis into confessing to crimes which they never committed, or into framing their fellow Nazis for those crimes, and to plant hundreds of documents in Nazi files which were never discovered until after the war, and only then, in many cases, by sheer luck. Goebbels’ diary, for example, was barely rescued from being sold as 7,000 pages of scrap paper, but buried in the scattered manuscript were several telling entries (as translated in Lochner, The Goebbels Diaries, 1948, pp. 86, 147-148):

 

February 14, 1942: The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.

 

March 27, 1942: The procedure is a pretty barbaric one and not to be described here more definitely. Not much will remain of the Jews. On the whole it can be said that about 60 per cent of them will have to be liquidated whereas only 40 per cent can be used for forced labor.

 

Michael Shermer has pointed out that the Nazis’ own estimate of the number of European Jews was eleven million, and sixty percent of eleven million is 6.6 million. This is fairly close to the actual figure. (Actually, forty percent was a serious overestimate of the survival rate of Jews who were captured, but there were many Jews who escaped.)

 

In any case, most of the diary is quite mundane, and interesting only to historians. Did the supposed Jewish conspiracy forge seven thousand pages to insert just a few lines? How did they manage to know Goebbels’ affairs intimately enough to avoid contradictions, e.g. putting him or his associates in the wrong city at the wrong date?

 

As even the revisionist David Cole has admitted, revisionists have yet to provide a satisfactory explanation of this document.

 

Regarding postwar testimony from Nazis, were they all tortured into confessing to heinous crimes which they supposedly did not commit? This might be believable if only a few Nazis were captured after the war, or maybe if some had courageously stood up in court and shouted to the world about the supposed attempt to silence them. But hundreds testified regarding the Holocaust, in trials dating from late 1945 until the 1960s.

 

Many of these Nazis testified as witnesses and were not accused of crimes. What was the basis for their supposed coercion?

 

Many of these trials were in German courts. Did the Germans torture their own countrymen? Well, Holocaust-deniers sometimes claim that the Jews have secretly infiltrated the German government and control everything about it. They prefer not to talk too much about this theory, however, because it is clearly on the lunatic fringe.

 

The main point is that not one of these supposed torture victims — in fifty years, not one — has come forth to support the claim that testimony was coerced.

 

On the contrary, confirmation and reconfirmation of their testimony has continued across the years. What coercion could have convinced Judge Konrad Morgen to testify to the crimes he witnessed at the International Nuremberg Trial in 1946, where he was not accused of any crime? And to later testify at the Auschwitz trial at Frankfurt, Germany, in 1963-65? What coercion was applied to SS Doctor Johann Kremer to make him testify in his own defense in 1947, and then, after having been convicted in both Poland and Germany, emerge after his release to testify again as a witness at the Frankfurt trial? What coercion was applied to Böck, Gerhard Hess, Hölblinger, Storch, and Wiebeck, all former SS men, all witnesses at Frankfurt, none accused of any crime there?

 

Holocaust-deniers point to small discrepancies in testimonies to try to discredit them. The assumption, unstated, is that the reader will accept minor discrepancies as evidence of a vast, over-reaching Jewish conspiracy. This is clearly ludicrous.

 

In fact, the discrepancies and minor errors in detail argue against, not for, the conspiracy theory. Why would the conspirators have given different information to different Nazis? In fact, if all the testimonies, from the Nazis’ to the inmates’, sounded too similar, it is certain that the Holocaust-deniers would cite that as evidence of a conspiracy.

 

What supposed coercion could reach across four decades, to force former SS-Untersturmführer Dr. Hans Münch to give an interview, against the will of his family, on Swedish television? In the 1981 interview, he talked about Auschwitz:

Interviewer: Isn’t the ideology of extermination contrary to a doctor’s ethical values?
Münch: Yes, absolutely. There is no discussion. But I lived in that environment, and I tried in every possible way to avoid accepting it, but I had to live with it. What else could I have done? And I wasn’t confronted with it directly until the order came that I and my superior and another one had to take part in the exterminations since the camp’s doctors were overloaded and couldn’t cope with it.
Interviewer: I must ask something. Doubters claim that “special treatment” could mean anything. It didn’t have to be extermination.
Münch: “Special treatment” in the terminology of the concentration camp means physical extermination. If it was a question of more than a few people, where nothing else than gassing them was worthwhile, they were gassed.
Interviewer: “Special treatment” was gassing?
Münch: Yes, absolutely.

 

And what supposed coercion could reach across four decades, to force former SS-Unterscharführer Franz Suchomel into giving an interview for the film Shoah? Speaking under (false) promises of anonymity, he told of the crimes committed at the Treblinka death camp (from the book Shoah, Claude Lanzmann, 1985, p. 54):

 

Interviewer: You are a very important eyewitness, and you can explain what Treblinka was.
Suchomel: But don’t use my name.
Interviewer: No, I promised. All right, you’ve arrived at Treblinka.
Suchomel: So Stadie, the sarge, showed us the camps from end to end. Just as we went by, they were opening the gas-chamber doors, and people fell out like potatoes. Naturally, that horrified and appalled us. We went back and sat down on our suitcases and cried like old women. Each day one hundred Jews were chosen to drag the corpses to the mass graves. In the evening the Ukrainians drove those Jews into the gas chambers or shot them. Every day!

 

Ask the deniers why they shrug off the testimony of Franz Suchomel. Greg Raven will tell you that “it is not evidence…bring me some evidence, please.” Others will tell you that Suchomel and Münch were crazy, or hallucinating, or fantasizing.

 

But the fantasy is obviously in the minds of those who choose to ignore the mass of evidence and believe instead in a hypothetical conspiracy, supported by nothing but their imaginations.

 

That total lack of evidence is why the “conspiracy assumption” almost always remains an unspoken assumption. To our knowledge, there has not been one single solitary “revisionist” paper, article, speech, pamphlet, book, audiotape, videotape, or newsletter which provides any details about this supposed Jewish/Zionist conspiracy which did all the dirty work. Not one.

 

At best, the denial literature makes veiled references to the World Jewish Congress perpetuating a “hoax” (in Butz 1976) — no details are provided. Yet the entire case of Holocaust-denial rests on this supposed conspiracy.

 

As for the testimony of the survivors, which the “revisionists” claim is the only evidence, there are indeed numerous testimonies to gassings and other forms of atrocities, from Jewish inmates who survived the camps, and also from other inmates like POWs. Many of the prisoners that testified about the gassing are not Jewish, of course. Look for instance at the testimony of Polish officer Zenon Rozansky about the first homicidal gassing in Auschwitz, in which 850 Russian POWs were gassed to death, in Reitlinger, The Final Solution, p. 154:

 

Those who were propped against the door leant with a curious stiffness and then fell right at our feet, striking their faces hard against the concrete floor. Corpses! Corpses standing bolt upright and filling the entire corridor of the bunker, till they were packed so tight that it was impossible for more to fall.

 

Which of the “revisionists” will deny this? Which of them was there? Which of them has the authority to tell Rozansky what he did or did not see?

 

The statement that “no ‘survivor’ claims to have actually witnessed any gassing” is clearly false; this was changed to “few survivors” in later versions, which is close to the truth.

 

But we do not need to rely solely on testimony, from the survivors, Nazis, or otherwise. Many wartime documents, not postwar descriptions, specifically regarding gassings and other atrocities, were seized by the U.S. armed forces. Most are in the National Archives in Washington, D.C.; some are in Germany.

 

Regarding the gassing vans, precursors to the gas chambers, we find, for example, a top secret document from SS Untersturmführer Becker to SS Obersturmbannführer Rauff (from Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, 1946, Vol. I, pp. 999-1001):

 

If it has rained for instance for only one half hour, the van cannot be used because it simply skids away. It can only be used in absolutely dry weather. It is only a question now whether the van can only be used standing at the place of execution. First the van has to be brought to that place, which is possible only in good weather. …

 

The application of gas usually is not undertaken correctly. In order to come to an end as fast as possible, the driver presses the accelerator to the fullest extent. By doing that the persons to be executed suffer death from suffocation and not death by dozing off as was planned. My directions now have proved that by correct adjustment of the levers death comes faster and the prisoners fall asleep peacefully.

 

And Just wrote of the gas vans to Rauff, on June 5, 1942, in a letter marked both “top secret” and “only copy”. This is a horrific masterpiece of Nazi double-talk, referring to killing as “processing” and the victims as “subjects” and “the load.” (See Kogon, Nazi Mass Murder, 1993, pp. 228-235.)

 

Since December 1941, for example, 97,000 were processed using three vans, without any faults occurring in the vehicles. …

 

The normal capacity of the vans is nine to ten per square meter. The capacity of the larger special Saurer vans is not so great. The problem is not one of overloading but of off-road maneuverability on all terrains, which is severely diminished in this van. It would appear that a reduction in the cargo area is necessary. This can be achieved by shortening the compartment by about one meter. The problem cannot be solved by merely reducing the number of subject treated, as has been done so far. For in this case a longer running time is required, as the empty space also needs to be filled with CO [the poison exhaust gas]. …

 

Greater protection is needed for the lighting system. The grille should cover the lamps high enough up to make it impossible to break the bulbs. It seems that these lamps are hardly ever turned on, so the users have suggested that they could be done away with. Experience shows, however, that when the back door is closed and it gets dark inside, the load pushes hard against the door. The reason for this is that when it becomes dark inside, the load rushes toward what little light remains. This hampers the locking of the door. It has also been noticed that the noise provoked by the locking of the door is linked to the fear aroused by the darkness.

 

Slip-ups occurred in written correspondence regarding the gas chambers themselves, some of which, fortunately, escaped destruction and were found after the war. A memo written to SS man Karl Bischoff on November 27, 1942 describes the gas chamber in Krema II not with the usual mundane name of “Leichenkeller,” but rather as the “Sonderkeller” “special cellar.”

 

And two months later, on January 29, 1943, Bischoff wrote a memo to Kammler, referring to that same chamber as the “Vergasungskeller.” (See Gutman, Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp, 1994, pp. 223, 227.) “Vergasungskeller” means exactly what it sounds like: “gassing cellar,” an underground gas chamber.

 

Holocaust-deniers turn to Arthur Butz, who provides a specious explanation for the Vergasungskeller: “Vergasung,” he says, cannot refer to killing people with gas, but only to the process of converting a solid or liquid into gas. Therefore, he says the “Vergasungskeller,” must have been a special room where the fuel for the Auschwitz ovens was converted into gas — a “gasification cellar.”

 

There are three problems with this explanation. First, “Vergasung” certainly can refer to killing people with gas; Butz does not speak German and he should not try to lecture about the language. Second, there is no room that could possibly serve this function which Butz describes — years after writing his book, he admitted this, and helplessly suggested that there might be another building somewhere in the camp that might house a gasification cellar. Third, the type of oven used at Auschwitz did not require any gasification process! The ovens burned solid fuel. (See Gutman, op. cit., pp. 184-193.)

 

So what does the term “gassing cellar” refer to? Holocaust-deniers have yet to offer any believable explanation.

 

An inventory, again captured after the war, revealed fourteen showerheads and one gas-tight door listed for the gas chamber in Krema III. Holocaust-deniers claim that room was a morgue; they do not offer to explain what use a morgue has for showerheads and a gas-tight door. (See a photograph of the document, or Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation, 1989, pp. 231, 438.)

 

A memo from the Auschwitz construction office, dated March 31, 1943, says Hilberg, Documents of Destruction, 1971, pp. 207-208):

 

We take this occasion to refer to another order of March 6, 1943, for the delivery of a gas door 100/192 for Leichenkeller 1 of Krema III, Bw 30a, which is to be built in the manner and according to the same measure as the cellar door of the opposite Krema II, with peep hole of double 8 millimeter glass encased in rubber. This order is to be viewed as especially urgent….

 

Why would morgues have urgently needed peepholes made out of a double layer of third-of-an-inch-thick glass?

 

The question of whether it can be proved that the cyanide gas was used in the Auschwitz gas chambers has intruiged the deniers. Their much-heralded Leuchter Report, for example, expends a great deal of effort on the question of whether traces of cyanide residue remain there today. But we do not need to look for chemical traces to confirm cyanide use (Gutman, op. cit., p. 229):

 

Letters and telegrams exchanged on February 11 and 12 [1943] between the Zentralbauleitung and Topf mention a wooden blower for Leichenkeller 1. This reference confirms the use of the morgue as a gas chamber: Bischoff and Prüfer thought that the extraction of air mixed with concentrated prussic acid [cyanide] (20 g per cu m) required a noncorroding ventilator.

 

Bischoff and Prüfer turned out to be wrong, and a metal fan ended up working acceptably well. But the fact that they thought it necessary demonstrates that cyanide was to be routinely used in the rooms which deniers call morgues. (Cyanide is useless for disinfecting morgues, as it does not kill bacteria.)

 

Other captured documents, even if they don’t refer directly to some part of the extermination process, refer to it by implication. A captured memo to SS-Brigadeführer Kammler reveals that the expected incineration capacity of the Auschwitz ovens was a combined total of 4,756 corpses per day (see a photograph of the document or Kogon, op. cit., p. 157).

 

Deniers often claim that this total could not be achieved in practice (see question 45). That’s not the point. These crematoria were carefully designed, in 1942, to have sufficient capacity to dispose of 140,000 corpses per month — in a camp that housed only 125,000. We can conclude that massive deaths were predicted, indeed planned-for, as early as mid-1942. A camp designed to incinerate its full capacity of inmates every four weeks is not merely a detention center.

 

Finally, apart from the abundant testimonies, confessions, and physical evidence of the extermination process, there is certainly no want of evidence of the Nazis’ intentions and plans.

 

Here are just a few examples. Hans Frank’s diary (from Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, 1946, Vol. I, pp. 992, 994):

 

But what should be done with the Jews? Do you think they will be settled down in the ‘Ostland’ [eastern territories], in [resettlement] villages? This is what we were told in Berlin: Why all this bother? We can do nothing with them either in the ‘Ostland’ nor in the ‘Reichkommissariat.’ So liquidate them yourself.

 

Gentlemen, I must ask you to rid yourself of all feeling of pity. We must annihilate the Jews, wherever we find them and wherever it is possible, in order to maintain the structure of the Reich as a whole. …

 

We cannot shoot or poison these 3,500,000 Jews, but we shall nevertheless be able to take measures, which will lead, somehow, to their annihilation….

 

That we sentence 1,200,000 Jews to die of hunger should be noted only marginally.

 

Himmler’s speech at Posen on October 4, 1943 was captured on audiotape (Trial of the Major War Criminals, 1948, Vol. XXIX, p. 145, trans. by current author):

 

I refer now to the evacuation of the Jews, the extermination of the Jewish people. This is one of those things that is easily said: “the Jewish people are being exterminated,” says every Party member, “quite true, it’s part of our plans, the elimination of the Jews, extermination, we’re doing it.”

 

The extermination effort was even mentioned in at least one official Nazi court verdict. In May 1943, a Munich court wrote in its decision against SS-Untersturmführer Max Taubner that:

 

The accused shall not be punished because of the actions against the Jews as such. The Jews have to be exterminated and none of the Jews that were killed is any great loss. Although the accused should have recognized that the extermination of the Jews was the duty of Kommandos which were set up especially for this purpose, he should be excused for considering himself to have the authority to take part in the extermination of Jewry himself.

 

And Hitler spoke quite clearly in public on no fewer than three occasions. On January 30, 1939, seven months before Germany invaded Poland, he spoke publicly to the Reichstag (transcribed from Skeptic magazine, Vol. 2, No. 4, p. 50):

 

Today I want to be a prophet once more: if international finance Jewry inside and outside of Europe should succeed once more in plunging nations into another world war, the consequence will not be the Bolshevation of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.

 

By the way, this last phrase is, in German, “die Vernichtung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa,” which German-speakers will realize is quite unambiguous.

 

In September, 1942:

 

…if Jewry should plot another world war in order to exterminate the Aryan peoples in Europe, it would not be the Aryan people which would be exterminated but Jewry…

 

On November 8, 1942:

 

You will recall the session of the Reichstag during which I declared: if Jewry should imagine that it could bring about an international world war to exterminate the European races, the result will not be the extermination of the European races, but the extermination of Jewry in Europe. People always laughed about me as a prophet. Of those who laughed then, countless numbers no longer laugh today, and those who still laugh now will perhaps no longer laugh a short time from now.

 

There are many other examples of documents and testimonies that could be presented.

 

Keep in mind that the IHR#&146;s answer to “what proof exists?” is “none.” It has certainly been demonstrated already that this pat answer is totally dishonest. And this is the main point we wish to communicate: that Holocaust-denial is dishonest.

 

We continue by analyzing the remaining, more-specific, claims about what evidence supposedly does not exist.

 

“No mounds of ashes” is an internal contradiction. In an article in the journal published by the same IHR that publishes these Q&A, the Journal’s editor reported that a Polish commission in 1946 found human ash at the Treblinka death camp to a depth of over twenty feet. This article is available on Greg Raven’s web site.

 

(Apparently some survivors claimed that the corpses were always thoroughly cremated. Because uncremated human remains were mixed with the ash, the editor suggested that the testimonies were false. Amazingly, he had no comment on how a twenty-foot layer of human ashes came to be there in the first place. Perhaps he felt that to be unworthy of mention.)

 

There are also piles of ashes at Maidanek. At Auschwitz-Birkenau, ashes from cremated corpses were dumped into the rivers and swamps surrounding the camp, and used as fertilizer for nearby farmers’ fields.

 

“No crematoria” capable of disposing of millions of corpses? Absolutely false, the crematoria were more than capable of the job, according to both the Nazis’ own internal memos and the testimony of survivors. Holocaust-deniers deliberately confuse civilian, funeral-home crematoria with the huge industrial ovens of the death camps. This is discussed in much detail in the replies to questions 42 and 45.

 

“No piles of clothes”? Apparently, the IHR considers piles of clothes to be “hard evidence”! This is strange, because they do not deny the other sorts of piles found at Nazi camps: piles of eyeglasses, piles of shoes (at Auschwitz, Belzec, and Maidanek), piles of gold teeth, piles of burned corpses, piles of unburned corpses, piles of artificial limbs (see Swiebocka, Auschwitz: A History in Photographs, 1993, p. 210), piles of human hair (ibid, p. 211), piles of ransacked luggage (ibid, p. 213), piles of shaving-brushes (ibid, p. 215), piles of combs (ibid), piles of pots and pans (ibid), and yes, even the piles of clothes (ibid, p. 214) that the IHR claims do not exist.

 

Perhaps the authors of the 66 Q&A realized that it was dangerous for them to admit that these piles were hard evidence, because then they would also be forced to admit a number of other things as “hard evidence.” Perhaps this is why they removed this phrase from the revised 66 Q&A.

 

If items were not generally found in mass quantities, it is only because the Nazis distributed them to the German population. A memo on this was captured, revealing that they even redistributed women’s underwear.

 

“No human soap”? This is true, but misleading. Though there is some evidence that soap was made from corpses on a very limited experimental scale, the rumored “mass production” was never done, and no soap made from human corpses is known to exist. However, there is sworn testimony, never refuted, from British POWs and a German army official, stating that soap experiments were performed, and the recipe for the soap was captured by the Allies. To state flatly that the Nazis did not make soap from human beings is incorrect.

 

“No lamp shades made of human skin?” False — lampshades and other human-skin “ornaments” were introduced as evidence in both trials of Ilse Koch, and were shown to a U.S. Senate investigation committee in the late 40s. We know they were made of human skin because they bore tattoos, and because a microscopic forensic analysis of the items was performed. (A detailed page on this is being prepared.)

 

“No records”? This is nonsense (which may explain why this claim was removed from the “revised” versions of the 66 Q&A). True, extermination by gassing was always referred to with code-words, and those victims who arrived at death camps only to be immediately gassed were not recorded in any books. But there are slip-ups in the code-word usage that reveal the true meanings, as already described. There are inventories and requisitions for the Krema which reveal items anomalous with ordinary use but perfect for mass homicidal gassing. There are deportation train records which, pieced together, speak clearly. And so on. Several examples have been given above.

 

“No credible demographic statistics”? This is the second internal contradiction — see question 2 and question 15. The Anglo-American committee who studied the issue estimated the number of Jewish victims at 5.7 million. This was based on population statistics. Here is the exact breakdown, country by country:

 

Germany – 195,000
Austria – 53,000
Czechoslovakia – 255,000
Denmark – 1,500
France – 140,000
Belgium – 57,000
Luxemburg – 3,000
Norway – 1,000
Holland – 120,000
Italy – 20,000
Yugoslavia – 64,000
Greece – 64,000
Bulgaria – 5,000
Romania – 530,000
Hungary – 200,000
Poland – 3,271,000
USSR – 1,050,000

Total Number Jews Killed – 5,721,500

 

(This estimate was arrived at using population statistics, and not by adding the number of casualties at each camp. These are also available — for instance, a separate file with the ruling of a German court regarding the number of victims in Treblinka is available. The SS kept rather accurate records, and many of the documents survived, reinforced by eyewitness accounts).

 

Some estimates are lower, some are higher, but this is the magnitude in question. In an article in CMU’s student newspaper, the head of CMU’s History Department, Peter Stearns, is quoted as saying that newly discovered documents — especially in the former USSR — indicate that the number of victims is higher than six million. Other historians claim not much over five million. The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust uses 5,596,000 as a minimum and 5,860,000 as a maximum (Gutman, 1990, p. 1799).

 

In summary:

 

“Revisionists” often claim, correctly, that the burden of proof is on historians. The proof, of course, has been a matter of public record since late 1945, and is available in libraries around the world. The burden has been met, many, many times over. You’ve just seen a brief presentation of some of the highlights of that immense body of proof; much more is readily available.

 

To even argue that the Holocaust never happened is ludicrous. To claim straight-faced that none of this proof even exists is beyond ludicrous, and it is a clear example of “revisionist” dishonesty.

 

  1. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?

 

  1. Did Simon Wiesenthal once state in writing that “there were no extermination camps on German soil?”

 

  1. If Dachau was in Germany and even Simon Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination camp, why do thousands of veterans in America say that it was an extermination camp?

 

  1. Auschwitz was in Poland, not Germany. Is there any proof that gas chambers for the purpose of killing human beings existed at or in Auschwitz?

 

  1. If Auschwitz wasn’t a “death camp,” what was its true purpose?

 

Trivializing the Holocaust; Blaming the Jews

 

  1. Who set up the first concentration camps, and where and when?

 

  1. How did German concentration camps differ from American relocation camps which interned Japanese-, German- and Italian-Americans during WWII?

 

  1. Why did the Germans intern Jews in concentration camps?

 

  1. What extensive measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as early as 1933?

 

  1. Did the Jews of the world “declare war on Germany?”

 

  1. Was this before or after the rumors of the “death camps” began?

 

  1. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing?

 

The Fate of the Jews

 

  1. How many gas chambers to kill people were there at Auschwitz?

 

  1. How many Jews were in areas that came to be controlled by the Germans before the war?

 

  1. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?

 

  1. How many Jews fled to deep within the Soviet Union?

 

  1. How many Jews emigrated prior to the war, thus being outside of German reach?

 

  1. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant, Rudolf Hoss, confess that it was?

 

  1. Is there any evidence that it was American, British, French, and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact confessions before the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?

 

Conspiracies

 

  1. How does the “Holocaust” story benefit the Jews today?

 

  1. How does it benefit the state of Israel?

 

  1. How does it benefit many Christian clergymen?

 

  1. How does it benefit the Communists?

 

  1. How does it benefit Britain?

 

  1. Is there any evidence that Hitler knew of a mass extermination of Jews?

 

Zyklon-B

 

  1. What kind of gas was used by the Nazis in concentration camps?

 

  1. For what purpose was, and is, this gas manufactured?

 

  1. Why did they use this instead of a gas more suitable for mass extermination?

 

  1. How long does it take to ventilate fully an area fumigated by Zyklon-B?

 

  1. Auschwitz commandant Hoss said that his men would enter the gas chamber ten minutes after the Jews had died and remove them. How do you explain this?

 

  1. Hoss said in his confession that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled the dead Jews out of the gas chambers ten minutes after gassing. Isn’t Zyklon-B explosive?

 

General

 

  1. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate Jews?

 

  1. How could such a mass program have been kept secret from Jews who were scheduled for extermination?

 

  1. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did they go to their death without fight or protest?

 

  1. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?

 

  1. How did they die?

 

  1. What is typhus?

 

  1. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during this awesome period?

 

Cremation

 

  1. Many Jewish survivors of the “death camps” say they saw bodies being piled up in pits and burned. How much gasoline would have to be used to perform this?

 

  1. Can bodies be burned in pits?

 

  1. “Holocaust” authors claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about 10 minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body according to professional crematory operators?

 

  1. Why did the concentration camps have crematory ovens?

 

  1. Given a 100% duty cycle of all the crematoria in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period such crematoria were in operation?

 

  1. Can a crematory oven be operated 100% of the time?

 

  1. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?

 

  1. If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?

 

  1. Do Allied wartime photos of Auschwitz (during the period when the “gas chambers” and crematoria were supposed to be in full operation) reveal gas chambers?

 

Trivializing Anti-Jewish Laws

 

  1. What was the main provision of the German “Nuremberg laws” of 1935?

 

  1. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?

 

  1. What did the International Red Cross have to report with regard to the “Holocaust” question?

 

  1. What was the role of the Vatican during the time the six million Jews were alleged to have been exterminated?

 

General

 

  1. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of the ongoing Jewish extermination?

 

  1. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?

 

  1. What caused Anne Frank’s death just several weeks before the end of the war?

 

  1. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?

 

  1. What about the numerous photographs and footage taken in the German concentration camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?

 

  1. Who originated the term “genocide”?

 

  1. Were films such as “Holocaust” and “The Winds of War” documentary films?

 

About “Revisionism”

 

  1. About how many books have been published which refute some aspect of the standard claims made about the “Holocaust”?

 

  1. What happened when a historical institute offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?

 

  1. What about the claim that those who question the “Holocaust” are anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?

 

  1. What has happened to the historians who have questioned the “Holocaust” material?

 

  1. Has the IHR suffered any retaliation for its efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?

 

  1. Why is there so little publicity for the IHR point of view?

 

  1. Where can I get more information about the “other side” of the “Holocaust” story as well as facts concerning other areas of WWII Historical Revisionism?

++++++++++++++++++++

Revisionist Germar Rudolf

 

Sent by yurki1000

3/15/2016 6:29 PM

 

As I understand Germar Rudolf was captured because he needed answers.

 

Germar Rudolf is a scientist dissident who was recently torn from his young wife and baby in the United States and extradited to his native Germany to stand trial for a scientific investigation of Auschwitz, the best-selling Rudolf Report. “

 

+++

http://germarrudolf.com/2012/03/over-my-dead-body/

 

Over My Dead Body

March 22, 2012

 

The following is a letter I wrote on August 27, 2006, as a response to a question asked by Israel Shamir. I had received Shamir’s inquiry via a third person while sitting in a German prison for my peaceful historical views. If I remember correctly, Shamir had asked me, why I am so interested in WWII history and what compelled me to voice my opinions in spite of the government persecution which it triggered.

 

It is astounding that this my letter, which Shamir received and published online, made its way out of the German prison in the first place. Usually, letters from political prisoners with such highly charged, political content get confiscated by the prison censors, but since it was written in English, and because the German authorities are notoriously short of staff capable of reading foreign languages, my foreign language correspondence (English, French, Spanish) seems to have never been censored by anyone. So here we go:

_________________

I can not only understand Mr. Shamir’s disinterest in WWII as such, I actually share it. For some reason people think that WWII is a main focus of my intellectual interest because I got my life entangled in Holocaust studies.

 

The truth is that I never cared for the history of any war as such. I do have an interest in understanding how and why wars get to be, the intrigues, schemes, lies, and propaganda used by all sides to justify it, and of course how this propaganda is afterwards maintained by the victorious side. People keep sending me books on WWII history into prison, and after reading just one of them – a study of Patton’s campaigns, which was also the first book I ever read on battle history – I decided that this is quite enough. I didn’t touch any of the others that were sent my way and put the general message out to put a stop to that. I must admit that I do have a friend whose entire life centers around WWII, as he is a book dealer with the sole focus on WWII. Although he has thousands of titles on the topic and is quite an expert, we never talk about WWII when we meet, and I also never looked into – or received – a book of his collection, nor did I ever ask.

 

Holocaust propaganda is an ideological issue, not a historical one. I never focused on the actual aspects of persecution of minorities, Jewish or not, during WWII. It’s not a pleasant topic, nor is there a need to deal with it, as there are plenty of scholars worldwide who make a profitable business out of doing nothing else but this.

 

No, it’s propaganda – prewar, wartime, and postwar propaganda – I am interested in, and how to distinguish it from reality.

 

I could very briefly answer to the question what makes me tick by pointing to my respective essay I wrote back in 1995/96 and which I have added as an appendix to my expert report, which can be read online at (www.vho.org/GB/b/trr) in HTML format or as pdf at (www.vho.org/dl/ENG/trr.pdf)

 

 

That is, at age 18 (!), where my newly awakened interest in history started: The expulsion of 12 million Germans from East Germany and Eastern Europe. At age 18-23 I was a very patriotic German, still within the mainstream – I thought – yet at the right edge of it. This started to fade slowly later, for one thing due to stress during my university studies, but also because it became boring.

 

I never touched upon the Holocaust topic in any of those years. The usual claims about it seemed indubitable, undeniable to me, truth chiseled in stone, self-evident.

 

This changed in 1989 by pure accident, as I was handed a book written by Paul Rassinier, a former communist, partisan fighter against the German occupation in France during WWII, and eventually inmate in Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps. I probably would never have allowed any German to raise doubts within me about the prevailing view on the Holocaust, because I would have suspected him of bias and self-interest, but a Communist, Partisan-fighter, former inmate? He opened my eyes and allowed doubts.

 

Not more, just doubts. But that was enough to trigger a chain reaction, because I obviously had been raised in my German society to feel guilty if I doubt the truth in this regard. I actually did feel guilty for doubting, and that made me mad, because it contradicted everything I was taught: question authorities, don’t take paradigms at face value, criticism is noble, and all the other ideals of the enlightenment.

 

 

Now that they have destroyed my life, I’ll have no other way but to prove that I’m right, and the fact that more and more historians change sides – for now behind the scenes only, but that’ll change – and that these powers that be get increasingly frantic is proof enough for me that it’s working.

 

The postwar and the New World Order were erected on the Holocaust, and together with it, they’ll come down. But that’s not important, because it’ll come down anyway, if only because they ruin the planet and drive world economics against the wall.

 

For me it’s simple: I am sure I’m right, and unless one convinces me with rational, scientific arguments that I am wrong, I am not going to give in. If you like the comparison, I am kind of a human intellectual pit-bull terrier, and they made the mistake to provoke the blood out of me by persecuting me.

 

That’s it. No negotiations any more. It’s me or them now.

 

My father didn’t manage to break me with stick, whip, fists or by using me as a missile, and so they won’t break my will with violence either. It only gets stronger with every beating.

 

That’s my personality: a contrarian with enormous will power, stubbornness, if need be, when not reason is used to talk to me but brute force. Pressure causes counter pressure. In this way I am a simple physical principle. Here is my human right to doubt, research, scrutinize, disagree, dispute, refute, challenge, question. The only way to take this away from me is by killing me. Period.

 

And that is the strongest motivation: Anybody who punishes me for merely exercising my human right of being a human = a creature able to doubt and explore, will meet my utmost unbreakable resistance. I won’t allow anybody to reduce me to a submissive slave. Nobody.

 

___

 

Israel Shamir commented my letter as follows:

 

“In my view, Holocaust approval is an approval of Jewish superiority and exclusivity, while Holocaust denial is a rejection of this exclusivity claim, and thus a duty of non-racist and/or a Christian. Germar Rudolf is a scientist dissident who was recently torn from his young wife and baby in the United States and extradited to his native Germany to stand trial for a scientific investigation of Auschwitz, the best-selling Rudolf Report. Born in 1964, he is one of the youngest high-profile Revisionists who came out of the post-war generation – young folks as a rule brutally brain-washed with conventional Holocaust lore. Germar, as we know, is different.”

 

READ ENTIRETY if choose

++++

http://germarrudolf.com/germars-views/an-introduction-to-historical-revisionism/

 

104: An Introduction to Historical Revisionism

 

In the following text you will find the questions which are most frequently asked about Holocaust Revisionism. You will find my answers by simply clicking on the question. I also have a leaflet for free download which summarizes Holocaust Revisionism in a nutshell. This is the good flyer for a brief introduction and as a handout to others. I wish you a lot of worthwhile discoveries while browsing through the following page.

 

_____________

 

Questions and Answers

 

  1. What is revisionism?

 

  1. Why is historical revisionism important?

 

  1. Why is Holocaust revisionism necessary?

 

  1. What is meant by “The Holocaust” or “Shoah?”

 

  1. What does Holocaust revisionism claim?

 

  1. Why should I take Holocaust revisionism any more seriously than the claim that the earth is flat?

 

  1. Since mainstream scholars don’t take Holocaust revisionism seriously, why should I?

 

  1. What about those pictures of mountains of dead bodies in the concentration camps?

 

  1. How about the testimonies by survivors and confessions by perpetrators?

 

  1. Does it really matter whether prisoners died from disease or poison gas?

 

  1. Does it matter how many Jews were killed during the Third Reich since even one thousand would have been too many?

 

  1. Whatever the circumstances, don’t Jewish victims deserve respect and compensation?

 

  1. Who are the Holocaust revisionists?

 

  1. What do Holocaust revisionists want?

 

  1. Is Holocaust revisionism illegal?

 

  1. Where can I learn more about Holocaust revisionism?

 

If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.

 

_________

  1. What is revisionism?

 

The word “Revisionism” is derived from the Latin word “revidere,” which means to view again. The revision of long held theories is entirely normal. It occurs in the natural sciences as well as the social sciences, to which the discipline of history belongs. Science is not a static condition. It is a process, specifically the creating of knowledge by searching for evidence. When ongoing research finds new evidence, or when critical researchers discover mistakes in old explanations, it often happens that old theories have to be changed or even abandoned.

 

By “Revisionism” we mean critically examining established theories and hypotheses in order to test their validity. Scientists need to know when new evidence modifies or contradicts old theories; indeed, one of their main obligations is to test time-honored conceptions and attempt to refute them. Only in an open society in which individuals are free to challenge prevailing theories can we ascertain the validity of these theories, and be confident that we are approaching the truth. For a fuller discussion of this, the reader should acquaint himself with the essay by Dr. C. Nordbruch in the Neuer Zürcher Zeitung of 12 June 1999.

_____________________

  1. Why is Historical revisionism important?

 

Like other scientific concepts, our historical concepts are subject to critical consideration. This is especially true when new evidence is discovered. We must constantly re-examine historical theories, particularly in case:

 

  1. We are dealing with events which occurred in the far distant past. In this case our problem is that we have very little evidence on which to base our theories.

 

  1. We are dealing with events which occurred in the recent past. In this case, our problem is that we must contend with political influence, which derives from these events.

 

When we are dealing with the distant past, even a small piece of new evidence can profoundly change our views. As for the recent past, the truism “the victor writes the history of the war” still holds; and victor is hardly ever objective. Revision of victor-history is usually not possible until the confrontation between victor and vanquished has ceased to exist; and sometimes these confrontations last for centuries. Since historiography has negligible monetary significance, almost all historical institutes are financed by their respective governments. Free and independent historical institutes are practically nonexistent. In contemporary history, in which individual governments have huge political interests, we must be skeptical toward the official historiography. Another truism reminds us that “he who pays the piper, calls the tune.” These reasons explain why Historical Revisionism is important and why the rulers of the world tend to oppose it.

 

READ THE REST

 

+++

 

http://josephpedepoetry.blogspot.fi/2016/03/holocaust-deprogramming-it-just-never.html

 

Holocaust Deprogramming (It Just Never Happened)

Posted by Joseph Pede

March 14, 2016 10:10 pm

Joseph Pede Poetry

 

Holocaust Depramming photo

Holocaust Deprogramming photo

 

holocaust hoax-summary photo

holocaust hoax-summary photo

 

“Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers… or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument.”

 

— ‘Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust’ at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000

 

“One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”

 

— “34 reputable historians” published in the prominent French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

 

 

Holocaust Denial question photo

Holocaust Denial question photo

 

Free yourself from a lifetime of Holo-brainwashing about “Six Million” Jews “gassed” in “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms” —

 

An Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism
http://germarrudolf.com/germars-views/an-introduction-to-historical-revisionism/

 

“The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting?”

 

– John Weir, The Holocaust as Myth: Betraying the Public Trust

 

VIDEOS & DOCUMENTARIES

 

The ‘Gas Chambers’ not demonstrated at the Nuremberg Tribunal This is a bi-lingual video from Vincent Reynouard. The narration is in French, with English sub-titles. At Nuremberg, the existence of the “gas chambers” was never demonstrated.


In seventy years, no forensic study proving the … READ THE REST of the pseudo-science drivel if you can endure it

 

+++

http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/

 

HOLOCAUST Handbook Series, Vol. 2

 

Germar Rudolf

The Rudolf Report

Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects

of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz

 

This Expert Report–online version– is dedicated to Ernst Zündel who, at the time when this document was released, was held in jail as a result of his dissenting historical views.

 

Read more about this dedication.

Table of Content

 

… READ THE REST if you desire to be brainwashed with pseudo-science propaganda from Germar Rudolf

 

+++

+++

 

Still. I’m no specialist. Simply I try be an open-minded person.

 

Blessings

Jyrki

______________________

Holocaust Denial is Antisemitic

John R. Houk

© March 18, 2016

_________________

Holocaust Denial: How to Refute Holocaust Denial

 

Sources: Nizkor

Copyright © 2016 American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise

_________________

Revisionist Germar Rudolf

 

Edited by John R. Houk

 

Links sent by Yurki1000

 

NETANYAHU BOMBSHELL: Palestinian leader led Holocaust


Photo: Five SS officers on the staff of Adolf Eichmann who were involved in the extermination of Slovakian Jewry. In the photo Dieter Wisliceny (second from the right); Viktor Nagler (center); Viktor Hahn; Guedler (first name unknown); Franz Matz. – Ghetto Fighters House Archives

 

Intro to: NETANYAHU BOMBSHELL …

Intro by John R. Houk

Posted 11/2/15

In conjunction with the post “Genocidal Jew-Hater Amin al-Husseini,” I found an email notification in my Gmail account I wish I would have read earlier. The email was sent on October 27 from Historical and Investigative Research (HIR) and was in response Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech placing the blame for the Holocaust on then Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini inspiring Adolf Hitler.

Unsurprisingly in the Antisemitic climate so pervasive in the world today, Netanyahu has received irascible hostility for his thoughts. By the way in case you have had your head in the sand, Netanyahu’s thoughts on Arab-Muslim Jew-hatred are the result of the latest round of attacks by Arabs who call themselves Palestinians against Israeli Jews with knives. The knife attacks were first incited by PA President Mahmoud Abbas with Hamas having no problem in joining in the indiscriminate targeting of Jewish men, women, and children, young and old.

The HIR article linked to in the email was posted on October 23 right the time of Netanyahu’s speech to the 37th Zionist Congress in Jerusalem. Here is the HIR teaser in the email that then links to the October 23 article:

NETANYAHU BOMBSHELL: Palestinian leader led Holocaust

Sent by HIR

October 27, 2015

Part 1 | Is this true?

Historical and Investigative Research – 23 Oct 2015
by Francisco Gil-White

___

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a speech to the World Zionist Congress, stated that Hajj Amin al Husseini, the founding father of the Palestinian movement, had convinced the Nazis to exterminate the European Jews. We examine here the evidence relevant to this claim.

___

According to my own opinion, the Grand Mufti [Hajj Amin al Husseini], who has been in Berlin since 1941, played a role in the decision of the German Government to exterminate the European Jews, the importance of which must not be disregarded. He had repeatedly suggested to the various authorities with whom he has been in contact, above all before Hitler, Ribbentrop and Himmler, the extermination of European Jewry. He considered this as a comfortable solution of the Palestine problem. In his messages broadcast from Berlin, he surpassed us in anti-Jewish attacks. He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and has constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard say that, accompanied by Eichmann, he has visited incognito the gas chamber at Auschwitz.

Nuremberg testimony of
SS Hauptsturmfuehrer
Dieter Wisliceny
(Adolf Eichmann’s right-hand man)

READ THE FULL ARTICLE

WATCH THE DOCUMENTARY

This is what I’m going to do. I going to cross post the article and the documentary. The documentary is about 15 minutes long and HIR links to the VIMEO version. There are more video parts that I am not going to cross post, but if you want to be educated on the true nature of the Jew-hating movement inspired by Haj Amin al-Husseini. The article has the video at the top so I am going to actually begin with that. I’m going to use the Youtube version because it is more compatible with all more blog platforms.

 

JRH 11/2/15

Please Support NCCR

************

VIDEO: THE NAZIS AND THE PALESTINIAN MOVEMENT

 

Posted by Changeling9au

Published on Jul 30, 2013

!!IMPORTANT UPDATE 28th Oct 2015!! With Netanyahu’s recent comments pertaining to this history, and the media’s and “experts’ ” hysterical reactions to them, a lot of fog has been generated. Carve through the fog here – http://www.hirhome.com/israel/nazis_palestinians_2.htm

For a better version of this video: https://vimeo.com/69991225

See also https://www.youtube.com/user/FACESHIRHOME

Documentation, chapters, and videos at: http://www.hirhome.com/colapso/colapso.htm  [Spanish Language]

See also: http://www.hirhome.com/israel/nazis_palestinians.htm  for an analysis of the likely reason why Youtube are blocking this video in Israel, as well as an analysis of Wikipedia’s whitewash of Haj Amin Al Husseini.

See also: http://www.hirhome.com/israel/netanyahu_bar_ilan_husseini_nazis.htm  for an analysis of Netanyahu’s speech at Bar Ilan University, and why he was forced to make it.

In short, it’s an attempt to placate those who are aware of the history documented in this video. It is likely also an attempt by Netanyahu to kind of cover his back and avoid charges of Treason – http://www.hirhome.com/israel/netanyahu_bar_ilan_husseini_nazis2.htm

Traces the history of PLO/Fatah, now better known as the ‘Palestinian Authority,’ the organization that will govern a future Palestinian State. The video shows how PLO/Fatah emerged from the German Nazi Final Solution. Hajj Amin al Husseini, father of the Palestinian Movement, creator of Fatah, and mentor to Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, was co-director with Adolf Eichmann of the death camp system that exterminated between 5 and 6 million European Jews in WWII.

JRH 8/2/15

Please Support NCCR

*********************

THE NETANYAHU BOMBSHELL:

Founder of Palestinian movement instigated the Holocaust

Part 1 – Is this true?

Historical and Investigative Research – 23 Oct 2015
by Francisco Gil-White

__

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a speech to the World Zionist Congress, stated that Hajj Amin al Husseini, the founding father of the Palestinian movement, had convinced the Nazis to exterminate the European Jews. We examine here the evidence relevant to this claim.

__

Read also: The Nazis and the Palestinian Movement

According to my own opinion, the Grand Mufti [Hajj Amin al Husseini], who has been in Berlin since 1941, played a role in the decision of the German Government to exterminate the European Jews, the importance of which must not be disregarded. He had repeatedly suggested to the various authorities with whom he has been in contact, above all before Hitler, Ribbentrop and Himmler, the extermination of European Jewry. He considered this as a comfortable solution of the Palestine problem. In his messages broadcast from Berlin, he surpassed us in anti-Jewish attacks. He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and has constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard say that, accompanied by Eichmann, he has visited incognito the gas chamber at Auschwitz.

Nuremberg testimony of
SS Hauptsturmfuehrer
Dieter Wisliceny
(Adolf Eichmann’s right-hand man)
[11]

Photo: May 17, 1947 – Other Arab States Support Iraq Revolt

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently stated that the father of the Palestinian movement, Hajj Amin al Husseini, convinced the Nazis to exterminate the European Jews. Here is a brief summary of what happened, published by the Jerusalem Post on 21 October 2015:

“In a speech to delegates at the 37th World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem on Tuesday, the premier claimed that Hitler’s original intentions were solely to expel the Jews.

According to Netanyahu, the Fuhrer changed his mind at the insistence of the Palestinian Arab leader at the time, Haj Amin al-Husseini, who argued that the expulsion of the Jews would result in their arrival en masse to Palestine, which at the time was under British Mandatory rule.”[1]

This has created a storm. Immediately, authorities of all sorts were quoted in the media stating that Netanyahu’s claims were outrageous and untrue. I will examine the outraged reactions in a future piece. Here, I examine Netanyahu’s claim in light of the available historical evidence, so that readers may form an opinion as to whether they are true.

For context, I begin with a short summary of what is not in dispute.

First, Hajj Amin al Husseini is the father of the Palestinian movement, and mentor to such figures as Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, the current leader of this movement.

Second, Husseini organized several mass terrorist attacks against the Jews in British Mandate Palestine. The first was in 1920. Then, after the British made him the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, he used that position to launch new terrorist attacks in 1921, 1929, and 1936-39. The last was called the ‘Arab Revolt’ and Husseini and allies waged it with weapons supplied by Adolf Hitler.

Third, after he left the Mandate in 1939, Husseini went to Iraq to organize a pogrom against the Iraqi Jews that destroyed the Jewish community there (the Farhud).[2]

Fourth, Husseini traveled to Italy and then to Berlin, where he was received with full honors and sat down for a high-profile chat with none-other than the Führer himself. The Nazi film (included in the documentary shown at top right) and a Nazi memorandum of this meeting both survived.

An especially relevant excerpt from that memorandum is the following:

“The Führer then made the following statement to the Mufti, enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart

1. He (the Führer) would carry on the battle to the total destruction of the Judeo-Communist empire in Europe.

2. At some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia.

3. As soon as this had happened, the Führer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power…” [3]

So Husseini got assurances from Adolf Hitler that the German Nazis would exterminate the Jews in British Mandate Palestine. This is what the father of the Palestinian movement most wanted.

Fifth, Husseini spent the rest of the war in the German-occupied sphere and played an important role in Nazi propaganda inciting Muslims on the German radio to murder Jews.

Sixth, he recruited and supervised the formation of large SS divisions made up of Bosnian and Albanian Muslims that participated in the massacres of the Yugoslav chapter of the Holocaust (photographic evidence for these latter activities is abundant, and may be found on the internet [Blog Editor: Many of those photos can be found on the HIR webpage. I’m not posting those numerous photos]).

All of the above points are uncontroversial, and for those not specifically footnoted here you may consult the relevant documentation in a different HIR article.[4] You may also consult the documentation put together by The Nation in the 1947 article reproduced at right.

So what is the great brouhaha in the media all about? It is about the following two questions:

1) Did the Nazis, as Netanyahu claims, initially mean to expel the Jews, rather than kill them all?

2) Did Hajj Amin al Husseini, as Netanyahu claims, convince the Nazis to abandon the expulsion programme for a death camp system that would kill every Jew?

There is very little controversy on the point that the Nazis initially meant to expel the European Jews.

At the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem, the Attorney General expressed in his opening statements that “At the beginning, when the Nazis were still sensitive to the reaction of world opinion, the solution took the form of forced emigration.” After summarizing at some length that very policy, he states: “The pressure on Jews to emigrate was not discontinued after the outbreak of war.” In fact, “it was only as the invasion of the Soviet Union drew near that the Germans went over to ‘the final solution’ in the new sense, that is, utter physical extermination.” The Attorney General interprets Hermann Goering’s instructions to Heydrich, issued on 31 July 1941, as marking the change to a policy of extermination, but these instructions state explicitly that Goering was giving Heydrich special powers “ ‘In order to complete the mission imposed on you in the order of 24 January 1939, to solve the problem of the Jews by means of emigration or evacuation’ ” (my emphasis). This was the middle of the summer of 1941, and still they were talking about expulsion. It was not until 27 October 1941 that Himmler “issued a decree forbidding any emigration of Jews from the areas of German rule.”[5]

Thus it seems that, until the fall of 1941, to the Nazis ‘Final Solution’ still meant pushing most of the Jews out. As explained in another HIR article on this question,[5a] a number of historians have concluded precisely this from the bulk of the evidence.

For example, Gunnar Paulsson explains that “expulsion”—not extermination—“had initially been the general policy of the Nazis towards the Jews.”[6] Tobias Jersak writes: “Since the 1995 publication of Michael Wildt’s documentation on the SS’s Security Service (Sicherheitsdienst SD) and the ‘Jewish Question,’ it has been undisputed that from 1933 Nazi policy concerning the ‘Jewish Question’ aimed at the emigration of all Jews, preferably to Palestine.”[7] Even after the conquest of Poland, writes Paulsson, “Jewish emigration continued to be permitted and even encouraged, while other expulsion plans were considered.”[8] Christopher Simpson points out that, though many Jews were being murdered, and people such as Reinhard Heydrich of the SS pushed for wholesale extermination, “other ministries” disagreed, and these favored “deportation and resettlement,” though they disagreed about where to put the Jews and how much terror to apply to them.[9]And so, “until the autumn of 1941,” conclude Marrus & Paxton, “no one defined the final solution with precision, but all signs pointed toward some vast and as yet unspecified project of mass emigration.”[10]

It is true that a great many Jews were being killed on the Eastern front, and these deaths of course must be counted in what is called the Shoa (or ‘Holocaust’), but, according to these historians, “until the autumn of 1941” there wasn’t as yet a decision to kill all of the European Jews in death camps. Husseini arrived in Berlin in “the autumn of 1941” (November 1941, to be precise). Husseini thus arrived right on time to argue powerfully in favor of what became the Wannsee Conference decision to kill every last living European Jew. This agrees nicely with Netanyahu’s claims.

But, in fact, the evidence is even more agreeable than this to Netanyahu’s claims.

At his trial, Adolf Eichmann confessed that he made an early trip to British Mandate Palestine in 1939 to see if the Jews could be sent there. Another objective of his trip, he confessed, was to meet with ‘Grand Mufti’ Hajj Amin al Husseini.[10a] So Husseini had ample opportunity to argue influentially in favor of total extermination well before November of 1941, for he was in contact with the very Nazi leaders who wanted to send the Jews to Palestine much earlier than that (something that is obvious, anyway, from German Nazi shipments of weapons to Husseini’s terrorists during the so-called ‘Arab Revolt’ of 1936-39). Nothing necessarily hinges, therefore, on Husseini’s arrival in Berlin, or on the exact date of the first killings to be labeled ‘Holocaust,’ as many seem to think.

Finally, according to Dieter Wisliceny, right-hand man to Adolf Eichmann, Husseini did contribute to the Nazi decision to create a death camp system, precisely in the manner that Netanyahu claims.

After the war, and prior to his execution for crimes against humanity, Wisliceny was asked to comment on the testimony of one Eng. Andrej or (Endre) Steiner. During the war, according to Steiner’s testimony, Wisliceny had stated that the Mufti Husseini had played an important role convincing the Nazis to opt for extermination. Wisliceny confirmed the testimony. This was all summarized by State Attorney Bach at the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem:

[Excerpt from the Eichmann trial transcript begins here]

 

State Attorney Bach: This is our document No. 281. Mr. Steiner first tells us that Wisliceny described his talks with Eichmann, why Palestine cannot be considered as the destination for emigration: “When I asked him why, he laughed and asked whether I had never heard of the Grand Mufti Husseini. He explained that the Mufti has very close contact and cooperation with Eichmann, and therefore Germany cannot agree to Palestine being the final destination, as this would be a blow to Germany’s prestige in the Mufti’s eyes.”

 

Then he goes on: “At this further conversation Wisliceny gave me more details about the cooperation between Eichmann and the Mufti. The Mufti is a sworn enemy of the Jews and has always fought for the idea of annihilating the Jews. He sticks to this idea always, also in his talks with Eichmann” – and here we have one of the points about which Wisliceny has reservations – “who, as you know, is a German who was born in Palestine. The Mufti is one of the originators of the systematic destruction of European Jewry by the Germans, and he has become a permanent colleague, partner and adviser to Eichmann and Himmler in the implementation of this programme.”

 

Here Wisliceny adds: “I have read these descriptions and find them correct, except for this, that Eichmann was born in Palestine, and that the Mufti was a permanent partner of Himmler’s; this is not what I said.”[11]

 

[Excerpt from the Eichmann trial transcript ends here]

Wisliceny, an eyewitness to the relationship between the Mufti Husseini and Eichmann, agreed to everything that Steiner had said except for the bit about Eichmann having been born in Palestine and about his relationship with Himmler. So Wisliceny agreed that “The Mufti is one of the originators of the systematic destruction of European Jewry by the Germans”—in other words, that he had played an important role in the decision to set up the death camp system.

Those who disagree with Netanyahu cannot simply express ‘outrage’ and claim, in the abstract, that Netanyahu is wrong. No matter that they consider themselves great ‘authorities’ invested with institutional prestige. No matter that they claim to speak for Yad Vashem, or ‘Holocaust survivors,’ or the ‘Jewish people’ or ‘real’ or ‘serious’ historians—or any other category of presumed scientific or moral authority which they hope will seem like a big enough stick to beat Netanyahu with. The sources are the sources. If Netanyahu’s detractors wish to disagree with the sources that support his claims, they must speak directly to their content and make a specific argument. That is the sport of historical interpretation. We’ll be waiting.

In closing, I will add that I find the moral arguments brandished to attack Netanyahu especially interesting. And they are most revealing, I believe, about a number of things, including who really has influence over media content, and which forces are ultimately responsible for shaping Israeli politics. I shall have much to say about this in a future piece, soon to come.

Read also:

How did the ‘Palestinian movement’ emerge? The British sponsored it. Then the German Nazis, and the US. http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm

The CIA protected Adolf Eichmann, architect of the Holocaust
Has the US ruling elite been pushing a pro-Nazi policy? http://www.hirhome.com/israel/eichmann.htm

PLO/Fatah’s Nazi training was CIA-sponsored http://www.hirhome.com/israel/cia-fatah.htm

The Collapse of the West: The Next Holocaust and its Consequences http://www.hirhome.com/colapso/colapso.htm

Footnotes and Further Reading:

[1] “Palestinian mufti convinced Hitler to massacre Europe’s Jews, Netanyahu says”; Jerusalem Post; 21 October 2015. http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Palestinian-mufti-convinced-Hitler-to-massacre-Europes-Jews-Netanyahu-says-427592

[2] Black, E. (2010). The Farhud: Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance in the Holocaust. Washington DC: Dialog Press. http://www.farhudbook.com/

[3] Author: Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Title: Documents on German foreign policy, 1918-1945, from the archives of the German Foreign Ministry. Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik. English Publisher: Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949- Description: Book v. fold. maps. 24 cm. [Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515] http://www.hirhome.com/israel/muftihitler.htm

[4] “How did the ‘Palestinian movement’ emerge? The British sponsored it. Then the German Nazis, and the US.”; from UNDERSTANDING THE PALESTINIAN MOVEMENT; 13 June 2006; by Francisco Gil-White http://www.hirhome.com/israel/pal_mov4.htm

[5] SOURCE: The Trial of Adolf Eichmann, Sessions 6-7-8. http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/e/eichmann-adolf/transcripts/Sessions/Session-006-007-008-05.html

[5a] “The Nazis and the Palestinian Movement: Documentary and discussion”; Historical and Investigative Research; 26 July 2013; by Francisco Gil-White http://www.hirhome.com/israel/nazis_palestinians.htm

[6] Paulsson, G. S. (1995). The ‘Bridge over the Oresund’: The Historiography on the Expulsion of the Jews from Nazi-Occupied Denmark. Journal of Contemporary History, 30(3), 431-464. (p.442)

[7] Jersak, T. (2000). Blitzkrieg revisited: A new look at Nazi war and extermination planning. The historical journal, 43(2), 565-582 (p.571)

[8] Paulsson, G. S. (1995). The ‘Bridge over the Oresund’: The Historiography on the Expulsion of the Jews from Nazi-Occupied Denmark. Journal of Contemporary History, 30(3), 431-464. (p.442)

[9] Simpson, C. (1995). The Splendid Blond Beast: Money, Law, and Genocide in the Twentieth Century. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press. (p.77)

[10] Marrus, M. R., & Paxton, R. O. (1982). The Nazis and the Jews in occupied Western Europe, 1940-1944. Journal of modern history, 54, 687-714. (p.687)

[10a] Here follows what Eichmann stated on the question of an early meeting with Hajj Amin al Husseini:

[Prosecution lawyer] Q. You have told us of your programme to “put soil under the feet” of the Jewish people. I assume that this was not your personal invention. Could you tell us who were the righteous men who conceived this programme: Heydrich, Himmler, Streicher, Rosenberg – which one of them?

[Eichmann] A. As far as I know, at that time, when I tried to sell this idea within the Service, no one else expressed it.

Q. Only you?

A. At that time, in any event, I did not hear it from anyone else and I also know that this idea was, at that time, ridiculed and scoffed at by some. My impetus came from Adolf Boehm’s book, and there I recognized the root of all evil in the homelessness of this people, and I made no bones about it, within my official sphere of service.

Q. And a clear expression of the need to give this people a homeland, you gave, for instance, in the report about your journey to Palestine in 1939, correct?

A. This is not my report. I have said so myself, and it was confirmed recently in testimony by the person who had then been the superior in command of both myself and the author.

Q. That is not correct, but let me refer only to what you have stated. You have said, in your interrogation, that this report had been corrected by you in your handwriting. This appears on page 341 and 342 of your Statement, where you said that the report had been shown to you before being passed on. Is that correct?

A. I corrected it, but only the spelling, as one can easily find out.

Q. Your journey was designed among other things, to establish contact with Hajj Amin al-Husseini, isn’t that correct?

A. The purpose was, first, to get to know the land and its people, and secondly, to establish contact with all kinds of persons.

Q. I am talking about Hajj Amin al-Husseini.

A. If this were possible, yes, that too, of course.

Q. One of the objects of your journey was to establish contact with Hajj Amin al-Husseini, is that correct? “Yes” or “no”?

A. Yes, that too.

SOURCE: The Trial of Adolf Eichmann, Session 90. http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/e/eichmann-adolf/transcripts/Sessions/Session-090-01.html

[11] http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/e/eichmann-adolf/transcripts/Sessions/Session-050-07.html

For the Rudolf Kastner testimony, also confirmed by Wisliceny at Nuremberg,see the reproduction of the relevant pages, below, of:

Pearlman, M. (1947). Mufti of Jerusalem: The story of Haj Amin el Husseini. London: V Gollancz. (pp.71-73)

Photo: Mufti of Jerusalem: The story of Haj Amin el Husseini

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any comment text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor

How Historical and Investigative Research (HIR) came to be…

SHORT SUMMARY

Historical and Investigative Research was created to make important documentation available to the general public, because the academic system is rife with politically biased censorship when it comes to examining the foreign policy of the United States.

Francisco Gil-White found out about this censorship the hard way, when, as a result of his discovery of the vastly important research done by Jared Israel and other journalists at Emperor’s Clothes, he began investigating the official and media representation of the civil wars in the former Yugoslavia, and the relationship of the US government to terrorist forces in that country. Without ever complaining that Gil-White had made a single error of documentation, Gil-White’s employer, the University of Pennsylvania psychology department, began harassing the young assistant professor, making it clear that it didn’t want him doing this kind of research. But Gil-White ignored this and continued his work, casting his eye now also on the Arab-Israeli conflict, for there appeared to be some interesting similarities in the demonization of Serbs and Jews. In time, he published a documentation of PLO origins, showing that this organization traced its roots to the German Nazi Final Solution (the most complete documentation on this is here), which explained why it was chartered to exterminate the Israeli Jews.

After this, Gil-White was threatened with the loss of his job unless he ceased doing this kind of investigative work. Francisco Gil-White has now been fired from the University of Pennsylvania despite READ THE REST

Genocidal Jew-Hater Amin al-Husseini


An Introduction by John R. Houk

© October 31, 2015

About a week ago in Jerusalem Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke at the World Zionist Organization’s 37th Zionist Congress. At the Congress the Prime Minister spoke of the Jerusalem Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini’s participation in Hitler’s Holocaust against the Jews which resulted in their brutal murders to the tune of about SIX MILLION human beings by the end of 1945.

It boggles my mind that the Leftist media has joined in a chorus of heated criticism of Netanyahu’s finger-pointing at al-Husseini as a joint Holocaust instigator with Hitler. SO WHAT if Netanyahu was off about the degree of pivotal involvement in convincing Hitler to cleanse Europe of Jews rather than deport them?

The real point should be that al-Husseini cooperated so much with Hitler’s Final Solution against European Jews that he brought the Nazi Jew-hatred ideology back to Muslim dominated areas inspiring genocidal concepts against Jews that continue to this very day. This is evidenced in particular by the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians current murder spree against Jews in Israel.

Haj Amin al-Husseini

Below is a Middle East Forum backgrounder on al-Husseini followed by a more in depth look at the dead Jew-hater by Pamela Geller.

JRH 10/31/15

Please Support NCCR

************************

Backgrounder: Hajj Amin al-Husseini

Compiled by Gary C. Gambill

October 30, 2015

Middle East Forum

MEF backgrounders highlight select news-relevant research and analysis from Middle East Forum staff, fellows, and publications. Sign up to the MEF mailing list to stay abreast of our work.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu caused a storm of controversy on October 20 by quoting Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the infamous grand mufti of Jerusalem during the interwar years, as having told Adolf Hitler in 1941 to “burn” rather than deport the Jews of Europe, insinuating that this influenced the unfolding Nazi genocide.

Hitler and Husseini in Berlin, November 1941

While the veracity of this quote is in question, few dispute that Husseini could well have said something to this effect given his genocidal hatred of Jews, penchant for blood-curdling rhetoric, and determination to prevent Jewish immigration to Palestine. However, opinions differ sharply, even among MEF staff and fellows, as to the degree of Hussein’s influence, both in Nazi Germany and the Middle East.

MEF Hochberg Family Writing Fellow Wolfgang G. Schwanitz, coauthor of Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East (2014), argues that two components of this question are unmistakably clear. First, Husseini’s overarching goal prior to and during Hitler’s reign, he notes, was that “whatever happens with Jews under Hitler’s reign in Europe, they should not come to the Middle East.” At the very least, the Germans understood that deportation as a solution to Europe’s “Jewish Question” risked alienating their top protégé in the Arab world – a region they expected in 1941-42 to be invading soon.

Second, Schwanitz notes that the historical record shows the mufti to be unquestionably the “foremost extra-European adviser in the process to destroy the Jews of Europe.” Adolf Eichmann and his subordinates frequently briefed Husseini as the genocide unfolded, “as if to reassure him that Hitler had not changed his mind,” he writes in a forthcoming article.

Husseini (left), Indian nationalist leader Subhash Chandra Bose, and Iraqi leader Rashid Ali al-Gaylani in Berlin, 1943

In contrast, MEF fellow Jeffrey Herf, author of Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World (2010), contends that the Husseini’s “importance in Nazi Berlin lay far more in assisting the Third Reich’s Arabic language propaganda … and in mobilizing Muslims in Eastern Europe to support the Nazi regime.” Although these achievements surely facilitated Nazi atrocities, Hitler “made the decisions to implement the Final Solution and had communicated those decisions to key actors in the Nazi regime at the latest a month before his [1941] meeting with Husseini.”

Whatever his role in the Holocaust, MEF staff and fellows widely agree that Husseini was a critical ideological progenitor of Middle Eastern extremism today. The mufti was among the first to “exploit the draw of the Islamic holy places in Jerusalem to find international Muslim support” for the anti-Zionist cause, notes MEF President Daniel Pipes, a theme very much in evidence today among Palestinian Islamists.

Moreover, Husseini “can be largely held responsible for the Middle East’s endemic antisemitism,” writes Daniel Pipes in a recent Washington Times op-ed, pointing to his postwar tutelage of Yasser Arafat and other rising Palestinian figures, as well the Muslim Brotherhood during his stay in Egypt after the Nazi defeat.

Hitler’s Mein Kampf has been a bestseller in the Middle East since the 1930s.

As Boris Havel illustrates in a recent Middle East Quarterly article, Husseini’s propaganda traced “alleged Jewish power and ambitions” in the here and now “to supposed Jewish activities at the time of Muhammad,” a theological innovation that is today a staple of Islamist discourse.

Because of Husseini, there remains an “inescapable and inextricable connection between Islamists … and the Nazi movement” today, MEF Director Gregg Roman told Al-Jazeera English on October 22. In an early Middle East Quarterly article, famed Princeton University historian Bernard Lewis notes (without specific reference to Husseini) the “astonishing degree” to which “the ideas, the literature, even the crudest inventions of the Nazis and their predecessors have been internalized and Islamized” in the Middle East.

At the same time, it is important not to overstate Husseini’s influence. When the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) placed ads on Philadelphia buses displaying a photo of Husseini and Hitler with a caption reading “Adolf Hitler and his staunch ally, the leader of the Muslim world,” Daniel Pipes cautioned that the “text is factually inaccurate,” calling Husseini “a British appointee in the Mandate for Palestine, where Muslims constituted less than 1 percent of the total world Muslim population.”

Compiled by Middle East Forum web editor Gary C. Gambill

+++

Pamela Geller, WND Column: Netanyahu tells truth about mufti’s role in Holocaust

By Pamela Geller

October 29, 2015

Pamela Geller – Atlas Shrugs

The mufti of Jerusalem, Muhammad Hajj Amin Husseini, visits the volunteer Nazi Waffen-SS division in Bosnia, made up of Bosnian Muslims

If case you missed my column at WND this week:

DEFENDING THE WEST
Netanyahu tells truth about mufti’s role in Holocaust

Exclusive: Pamela Geller defends Bibi against onslaught of media attack

The condemnations have been way over the top: Benjamin Netanyahu is being denounced by the media and political elites all over the world, in a way that the openly genocidal jihadist Mahmoud Abbas never has been. Netanyahu’s crime? He told the Zionist Congress last Tuesday, “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time; he wanted to expel the Jews.” Netanyahu quoted Hitler asking the mufti, “So what should I do with them?” The mufti responded, according to Netanyahu, “Burn them.’”

Those who are excoriating Netanyahu for this are overlooking one fact: Netanyahu was right.

The mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, lived in Berlin from 1941 to 1945 and recruited a Muslim SS division for Hitler. And Netanyahu was correct: The Nazis originally pursued a policy of exiling Jews to Eastern Europe, and even to Palestine – until the mufti protested that they must not be sent there. The decision to exterminate the Jews came soon after that.

It is good to see that Netanyahu is not backing down. He called the criticism of his remarks “absurd,” which it is: Netanyahu’s remarks mirror my ads highlighting the role of the Muslim world during the Holocaust, and Netanyahu is experiencing the same blowback from Islamic supremacists and Islamic apologists that I got.

The premier front man for the failed idea that we should place all our hope in “moderate Islam,” Daniel Pipes, claimed several months ago that our ad campaign in Philadelphia calling attention to the mufti’s relationship with Hitler was a failure. Pipes took issue with our factual assertions, asserting that the mufti’s meeting with Hitler was a “one-time, opportunistic consultation.” Really? Tell that to the 400,000 Jewish women and children Husseini sent to their deaths at Nazi concentration camps. Tell that to the victims of the Muslim armies in Bosnia that Husseini raised for Hitler.

Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books – featured at the WND Superstore

Al-Husseini lived in Berlin during World War II on Hitler’s dime and made weekly radio addresses from Berlin to the Axis power nations and the Muslim world. In one, he screamed: “Arabs, rise and fight as one for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases Allah, history and religion. This saves your honor, Allah is with you.”

The mufti made similar appeals, always pointing to the Quran, time and time again in his radio addresses during the war. He organized propaganda services to the Muslims of the world from Berlin. He used Axis radio stations calling Muslims to arms in a holy war against the Allies. He aided the Nazi espionage service. He raised Muslim parachute groups for sabotage in the Middle East. He raised Muslim formations to fight the allies. He helped in the Nazi plan to exterminate nearly 6 million Jews.

“Hitler,” Netanyahu said in further remarks after the media firestorm began, “was responsible for the Final Solution to exterminate six million Jews; he made the decision. It is equally absurd to ignore the role played by the mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini, a war criminal, for encouraging and urging Hitler.”

Right again. At my website, PamelaGeller.com, I have been calling attention to this for years. SS Hauptsturmfuehrer Dieter Wisliceny, a close collaborator of Adolf Eichmann, testified that “the grand mufti, who had been in Berlin since 1941, played a role in the decision of the German government to exterminate the European Jews the importance of which must not be disregarded. He had repeatedly suggested to the various authorities with whom he had been in contact, above all before Hitler, Ribbentrop and Himmler, the extermination of European jury. He considers this as a comfortable solution of the Palestine problem. In his messages broadcast from Berlin, he surpassed us in anti-Jewish attacks. He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and has constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard say that, accompanied by Eichmann, he has visited incognito the gas chamber it Auschwitz.”

Eichmann made the statement referred to in the affidavit in his office in Budapest on June 4, 1944; the confirmation by Wisliceny was given some days later also in Budapest.

To his Eminence the Grand Mufti, a Souvenir, July 4, 1943” H. Himmler

Not only that: According to testimony at the Nuremberg trials, “[T]he mufti was a bitter arch enemy of the Jews and had always been the protagonist of the idea of their annihilation. This idea the mufti had always advanced in his conversations with Eichmann.”

The mufti’s role in the Holocaust has been covered up. The New York Post reported back in 1948 that “on Aug. 28, 1946, Dean Acheson, then Acting Secretary of State, announced that ‘the State Dept. is preparing a White Paper concerning the activities of the ex-Mufti of Jerusalem.’ Acheson said the publication would be in the form of a book, which would cover all the documents concerning the ex-Mufti seized from German files. This White Paper has not yet been published, although 17 months have passed. What keeps the State Dept. from publishing it? Who is interested in the delay? Are all the documents safe?”

That delay has now continued for nearly seventy years. The white paper was never published. I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request several years ago, asking for a copy of it, as well as of all State Department correspondence relating to it. The State Department responded that such a white paper did not exist and had never existed, and that there was no correspondence about it.

So what did happen to that promised white paper? Under whose auspices, and for what reason, has the mufti’s role in the Holocaust been shrouded in silence?

Netanyahu did the world a great service by calling attention to this. The intensity of the attacks against him only testifies to how much he struck a nerve. In the mainstream media, Islam and Muslims must never, ever be criticized. We may only hope that the controversy will lead to some of the details being revealed about the mufti’s role in Hitler’s genocide.

__________________________

Genocidal Jew-Hater Amin al-Husseini

An Introduction by John R. Houk

© October 31, 2015

___________________________

Backgrounder: Hajj Amin al-Husseini

 

This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

 

©1994-2015 The Middle East Forum

__________________________

Pamela Geller, WND Column: Netanyahu tells truth about mufti’s role in Holocaust

 

About Pamela Geller

 

Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of Atlas Shrugs.com and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). She is the author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America, with Robert Spencer (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton) (Simon & Schuster) and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for World Net Dailythe American ThinkerBreitbart.com and other publications.

 

Geller’s activism on behalf of human rights has won international notice. She is a foremost defender of the freedom of speech against attempts to force the West to accept Sharia blasphemy laws, and against Sharia self-censorship by Western media outlets. Her First Amendment lawsuits filed nationwide have rolled back attempts to limit Americans’ free speech rights and limit speech to only one political perspective, and exposed attempts to make an end-run around the First Amendment by illegitimately restricting access to public fora. Her free speech event in Garland, Texas led to the capture or killing of several murderous jihadists, smoking out terror cells, leading to an increase in the threat level to BRAVO and to the consequent arrests of jihadists in several states.

 

Geller has also led awareness campaigns in U.S., Europe, and Israel on behalf of the victims and potential victims of honor killing, for the human rights of apostates from Islam, for the freedom of speech, and more. She has placed ads nationwide on READ THE REST

CERTAINLY the Grand Mufti Inspiring a 2nd Holocaust


John R. Houk

© October 24, 2015

VIDEO: Netanyahu accurately describes the Mufti’s role in the Holocaust

 

Published by elderofziyon2

Published on Oct 21, 2015

This clip of part of a speech from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made at the 37th Zionist Congress in Jerusalem has gotten him into a spot of controversy by blaming the Nazi Holocaust more on the long dead Jerusalem Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini rather than on Hitler. Leftists, Muslim Apologists and revisionist historians have gone near apoplectic over the Netanyahu assertion. Mainstream historians and Pro-Israel accede that PM Netanyahu overstated his case but was entirely accurate at least as to being an influence on evolving Hitler’s policy decision to move from deporting all European Jews to Madagascar to exterminating them from the planet earth.

From what I have briefly read, the historians saying Netanyahu overstated his case but was correct on al-Husseini’s murderous intentions for Jews, believe Hitler wasn’t sure of how far the war would go before what was left of European resistance might sue for peace. In that sense the Madagascar Plan was a diplomatic solution that could be imposed on Britain and France as part of the terms of the peace (More on Madagascar Plan). However it is my assumption after the USA entered WWII in December 1941 and the then Soviet Union was placing a stiffer resistance than expected, then Hitler proceeded with his original intentions of killing all Jews.

In that case Jerusalem Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini became more of a Nazi tool than a Hitler collaborator of the Nazi’s Final Solution for global Jewry.

BUT, in any case, the historical reading of the tea leaves can be shown to be as much speculation as it is speculation that al-Husseini had a greater role in the extermination of nearly SIX MILLIION Jews.

To those casting dispersions toward PM Netanyahu I like the assertion I found at the Jewish Journal:

Netanyahu said: “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews. “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here.’ ‘So what should I do with them?’ he asked. He said, ‘Burn them’.”

Netanyahu’s quotation of the Grand Mufti is word-for-word accurate, but it is not true that the Fuhrer needed the advice of Islam’s leading anti-Jewish fanatic to implement the Final Solution. That was his dream as far back as 1919 as a letter that he authored and signed now on display at the Simon Wiesenthal Center Museum of Tolerance documents.

Prime Minister Netanyahu has been accused of “a dangerous historical distortion” and even “Holocaust Denial” from the predictable political quarters who even dismiss the Grand Mufti as “a lightweight” inconsequential in the history of the Holocaust. This claim wrongly mitigates the Mufti’s mindset and crimes as one of the Hitler era’s leading anti-Jewish haters. READ ENTIRETY (Bold Text Mine – The truth about Jerusalem’s grand mufti, Hitler and the Holocaust; By Abraham Cooper and Harold Brackman; Jewish Journal; 10/21/15 1:36 pm)

Frankly I consider it irrelevant if the Jew-hating Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini inspired Adolf Hitler to exterminate Jews or if Hitler had it planned from his Jew-hating beginnings. What is import is that al-Husseini was criminally in agreement and did his part both during and after WWII to kill Jews. ALSO al-Husseini planted the Jew-hatred seeds that caught the eyes of Muslim purists like Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan al-Banna that propagated the Jew-hatred along with the hate all non-Muslims Caliphate agenda.

In this sense history taught in the West (including America) is completely deficient in our schools regardless of Elementary, Secondary AND College education. Along these lines Danny Jeffrey has written a post that may be conspiracy theory to many but is loaded with a strong amount of educated theorizing that should give clues to some reasons of the inevitable next global conflict that will probably be called World War III.

Take a good gander.

JRH 10/24/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************

OUR HISTORY WAS ALTERED BY THE POWERS THAT BE. WHY?

By Danny Jeffrey

October 22, 2015 2:37 AM

Fix Bayonets

This is not the essay that I had planned to publish next, nor is it one that I thought that I would ever write. I foresee another one or more 911 events and a collapse of this nation within the next year and have been very busy preparing for the event while writing three other essays. What I have now learned must be delivered to the American people for it upsets much of what we have been taught and believed all of our lives. We have been betrayed and lied to by our leaders and educators since WWII ended, and a non-politically correct fact is now coming out these many years later. Why was it hidden in the first place unless, as I have suggested in the past, that the Globalist agenda was put into place in the aftermath of the Second World War?

That fact: Hitler did not plan the Jewish genocide. That was the brainchild of his ally the Grand Mufti, Allah’s direct representative here on Earth.

Amin Al Husseini inspecting Nazi Muslim troops – 1943

At the moment Netanyahu is coming under a great deal of fire for revealing a long hidden, deep dark secret. That secret is long overdue for the light of day. The Prime Minister did the unthinkable and stood before the World Zionist Congress and exonerated Adolph Hitler as being the perpetrator of the Jewish genocide and placed the guilt right where it belongs; in the hands of Islam … the Religion of Peace.

True, Hitler and his henchmen implemented that cycle of death, but that second ‘Final Solution’ was not of their making. They had their own original Final Solution which also called for ridding Europe of Jews but their plan was to transport all of those Jews to Madagascar where they would be isolated from the rest of the world.

I shall now bring you up to date…

Very important excerpt from the following link. Also watch the very brief video within the link…

“Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said: ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here [to Palestine].’” According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: “What should I do with them?” and the mufti replied: “Burn them.”

The Guardian … October 21, 2015
Anger at Netanyahu claim Palestinian grand mufti inspired Holocaust

The Guardian, being one of the more liberal participants in the MSM goes on to list detractors of Netanyahu’s statement. The only reason that I chose to use their version of the speech and following attacks was due to a open letter to the editor of the Guardian from a Mister Maurice Ostroff.

The Algemeiner … October 21, 2015
An Open Letter to The Guardian About Netanyahu’s Comments on the Mufti and Hitler

That letter begins…

I believe you owe your readers an explanation for referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statement about the Mufti as “incendiary,” while barely noticing Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ truly incendiary statements praising the murderers of Jewish civilians, including children, and his use of hateful rhetoric, including calling for Jews “with their filthy feet” to be banned from entering the Temple Mount.

But far and away the true nugget of information that open letter provided led me to a history of the The Madagascar Plan as found in the Jewish Virtual Library.

Jewish Virtual Library … July 3, 1940
The Nazis & the Jews: The Madagascar Plan

The above link will take you to a history of the Nazi’s actual intent in regard to the Jews, and provide many links for the curious to follow. Perhaps most important is the document itself which you will find below in its entirety.

Text of the Madagascar Proposal

The approaching victory gives Germany the possibility, and in my view also the duty, of solving the Jewish question in Europe. The desirable solution is: all Jews out of Europe.

The task of the Foreign Ministry in this is:

a) To include this demand in the Peace Treaty and to insist on it also by means of separate negotiations with the European countries not involved in the Peace Treaty;

b) to secure the territory necessary for the settlement of the Jews in the Peace Treaty, and to determine principles for the cooperation of the enemy countries in this problem;

c) to determine the position under international law of the new Jewish overseas settlement;

d) as preparatory measures:

1) clarification of the wishes and plans of the departments concerned of the Party, State and Research organizations in Germany, and the coordination of these plans with the wishes of the Reich Foreign Minister, including the following:

2) preparation of a survey of the factual data available in various places (number of Jews in the various countries), use of their financial assets through an international bank;

3) negotiations with our friend, Italy, on these matters.

With regard to beginning the preparatory work, Section D III has already approached the Reich Foreign Minister via the Department Germany [interior affairs], and has been instructed by him to start on the preparatory work without delay. There have already been discussions with the Office of the Reichsfuehrer SS in the Ministry of Interior and several departments of the Party. These departments approve the following plan of Section D III:

Section D III proposes as a solution of the Jewish question: In the Peace Treaty France must make the island of Madagascar available for the solution of the Jewish question, and to resettle and compensate the approximately 25,000 French citizens living there. The island will be transferred to Germany under a mandate. Diégo Suarez Bay and the port of Antsirane, which are [sea-] strategically important, will become German naval bases (if the Navy wishes, these naval bases could be extended also to the harbors – open road-steads – Tamatave, Andevorante, Mananjara, etc.). In addition to these naval bases, suitable areas of the country will be excluded from the Jewish territory (Judenterritorium) for the construction of air bases. That part of the island not required for military purposes will be placed under the administration of a German Police Governor, who will be under the administration of the Reichsfuehrer SS. Apart from this, the Jews will have their own administration in this territory: their own mayors, police, postal and railroad administration, etc. The Jews will be jointly liable for the value of the island. For this purpose their former European financial assets will be transferred for use to a European bank to be established for this purpose. Insofar as the assets are not sufficient to pay for the land which they will receive, and for the purchase of necessary commodities in Europe for the development of the island, the Jews will be able to receive bank credits from the same bank.

As Madagascar will only be a Mandate, the Jews living there will not acquire German citizenship. On the other hand, the Jews deported to Madagascar will lose their citizenship of European countries from the date of deportation. Instead, they will become residents of the Mandate of Madagascar.

This arrangement would prevent the possible establishment in Palestine by the Jews of a Vatican State of their own, and the opportunity for them to exploit for their own purposes the symbolic importance which Jerusalem has for the Christian and Mohammedan parts of the world. Moreover, the Jews will remain in German hands as a pledge for the future good behavior of the members of their race in America.

Use can be made for propaganda purposes of the generosity shown by Germany in permitting cultural, economic, administrative and legal self-administration to the Jews; it can be emphasized at the same time that our German sense of responsibility towards the world forbids us to make the gift of a sovereign state to a race which has had no independent state for thousands of years: this would still require the test of history.

signed Rademacher

Berlin, July 3, 1940

Granted, the above plan was far from Utopia for the Jews who were be transported from their homes in Europe to a ghetto existence in Madagascar. The plan was also far from the Final Solution proposed by the Grand Mufti and accepted by Adolph Hitler.

Now, I must ask, why were we not taught this in school. Why has it never been revealed in any of our documentaries of WWII, or any of the historically accurate movies? Why was Islam’s participation in the Final Solution swept under the rug, giving them a get out of jail free card?

Breitbart … February 7, 2010
THE MUFTI OF JERUSALEM: ARCHITECT OF THE HOLOCAUST

The Mufti successfully demanded that 400,000 Jews who were about to be deported to the Holy Land instead be sent to their deaths. That’s not merely a collaborator, that’s a partner with great influence and power.


Yet after the war the Mufti was not prosecuted. He got off scot-free, and lived comfortably until 1974. Why? And why the cover-up now about in whose apartment were the documents found? Germany does not hide information like this after World War II; why are they hiding this now? The only plausible reason to keep this location secret would be because it would incriminate the Mufti. There are no other reasons. German authorities should come clean.

There is not much on the topic of totalitarianism that I have not already written about, and several of those essays will help to show the truth of Netanyahu’s words.

American’s Want Communism Part One

Follow that link. View the images. They were taken by Hitler’s personal photographer who had no animosity for the Jews, and tried to show them at their best under adverse situations. Note how they are dressed. Not the black and white stripes of the death camps, that was for the distant future. These photos were taken in 1939 and the existing plan was simply to dis-empower and isolate the Jews from the German population. Until the Mufti had his way there was no plan at all for a Jewish genocide.

Of one young lady, lost somewhere in time, I made the following observation:

Clueless Smiling Jewish Woman 1939


Also from 1939 we find this image of a beautiful young lady, still vibrant and appearing happy in spite of what was happening around her. I cannot help but wonder if she were still smiling in 1940, and by 1942 when she was shipped to a concentration camp it is highly unlikely that she could ever remember the day when she smiled.

The above information about the Madagascar Plan was new to me leading me to question the integrity of our leaders and the leaders of the nations of Europe. That thought led me back to yet another essay that prompted oh so many questions, and provided just as many answers.

In January of 2014 I wrote the following link about the dangers we face today.

In A World Gone Mad-Part Five-The Globalists

I shall not bother introducing Rodney Adkinson. If you follow the suggested link below you will know that he speaks as an authority on what you should know and fear. Your time is precious and I shall not even ask you to read my link, although you will learn much if you do. Short of reading the entire essay just read the two following thoughts from it:

Consider the fact that Islam sided with the Nazi Party during WWII and that Mein Kampf is number one on the best seller list in the Middle East, and factor in the mass immigration of Muslims to Europe, promoted by the EU. We have long been led to believe that the Nazi movement was past tense. Not so, it is alive and well, and calling the shots. It has simply merged with other Marxist siblings and morphed into what we call The Globalists. The fact remains that they want the world.

And…

With the dots properly connected, I have found a new weapon: Another source of knowledge with a traceable history. The link to that video will be found below in Suggested Reading. As a rule when I post a link I can only hope that readers will follow it. This is one of the most relevant links that I have ever posted, and I implore you to view it. If you do you will come away with a better understanding of current events, for the very same agenda that is taking place in Europe is occurring here as well.

The above excerpt from the previous essay tells you that the link referred to is in Suggested Reading.(Suggested Reading of that essay) This is the link I so desperately hope you watch for it is so very important.

The Nazi-Fascist Origns of the EU Superstate – Rodney Atkinson
My friends, our history has indeed been altered, and the process began after the end of WWII when the surviving Nazi Party began to evolve into the Globalists. Later they were joined by the changing Communist Party that had forsaken the doctrine of Lenin and Stalin. They are Nazis and Communists nonetheless and they have gained total control of our western nations. Today is October 22, 2015, I am convinced that we have to expect the fall of the west to occur in less than a year.

The title of this essay is ‘Our History Was Altered By The Powers That Be. Why?’ I shall now answer my own question: Because in 1945 the the next world war was being planned and they knew the old ways did not work. They were protecting the next wave of warriors…Islam.

We all have much to do and learn while there is yet time.

SHARE this essay…
This feature will allow you to share the above essay to your timeline, a friend’s timeline, a group, to a page you manage, or in a private message. It also allows you to leave a comment about the essay. If that comment is meant for me please use the comment section below Suggested Reading.
Danny
Suggested Reading…Click the red link to read.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT

OF THOSE WHO DENY REALITY AND THE APPROACHING CIVIL WAR

THE WINDS OF CIVIL WAR ARE BLOWING ACROSS EUROPE AND AMERICA

MINE EYES HAVE SEEN THE GLORY

__________________________

CERTAINLY the Grand Mufti Inspiring a 2nd Holocaust

John R. Houk

© October 24, 2015

_________________________

OUR HISTORY WAS ALTERED BY THE POWERS THAT BE. WHY?

 

Top of Fix Bayonets Page Intro:

 

Seeking answers to today’s issues.

Some see, few know, many choose to wander aimlessly in a fog, devoid of sunlight. I seek the light of day and leave the others to their chosen realm of ignorance. They are the ones who have brought this great nation down. I write only for the benefit of those who possess the courage required to restore our birthright.

NO PLACE IS SAFE


The faces of Jew-hating Muslims that killed Eitam & Naama Henkins

About the eulogy for Rabbi Eitam Henkin and his wife Naama that took place at the Mount of Rest Cemetery just outside of Jerusalem:

Following President Rivlin was the mother [Chana Henkin wife of Rabbi Yehuda Henkin] of Rabbi Eitam. Grieving, she first cared about those in attendance: “We are sorry for the long stay in the sun,” she said, concerned, then continued, “it is incomprehensible, if only you (my son) would have eulogized me and not vice versa.”

Her son and his wife – a young, energetic, life-filled, productive and inspiring couple – were murdered the previous day by “Palestinian Heroes.” The perpetrators made sure the couple was dead, but did not murder their four children who were in the car with their parents.

Four orphans were spared, nine-, seven- and four-year old and a four month old baby. Why? Age and innocence never stopped the Palestinian Muslim murderers before.

This time they stopped short murdering only the adults because it was previously established that the backlash from murdering children alongside their parents is too much to bear, while murdering adults is permissible, justified and highly rewarded. (Bracket text addedA Blood Sacrifice; By Ari Bussel; SlantRight 2.0; 10/6/15)

VIDEO: ISRAELI PARENTS MURDERED BEFORE THE EYES OF THEIR CHILDREN 1 October 2015

 

Posted by Roni Stoker

Published on Oct 3, 2015

The Israeli family came under fire when they slowed down before making a turn. At that moment, a Palestinian vehicle accelerated toward the family. Two attackers opened fire on the family with a handgun and a rifle.

Both parents were struck multiple times in their upper bodies, paramedics said. They were pronounced dead at the scene.

“It was a very difficult scene,” said MDA paramedic Boaz Malka, one of the first to arrive. “We saw a vehicle in the middle of the road, and a man in his 30s lying next to it with wounds in his upper torso. Inside the car sat a woman in her 30s, also with severe wounds to her upper torso. They were READ ENTIRETY

Ari Bussel adds more appalling details by first taking you on a journey through Holocaust Antisemitism leading to the added details of the horrific murder of Rabbi Eitan Henkin and his wife Naama with their four children in the backseat of a car.

JRH 10/8/15

Please Support NCCR

**********************

NO PLACE IS SAFE (but Israel)

By Ari Bussel

Sent: 10/6/2015 9:29 PM

Most of us were not in Europe in the 1930s. My parents and grandparents were. Most of them did not survive. My grandmother, for instance, left one day, never to return. Her mother went after her and she also did not return.

Most of us derive our “knowledge” of the Holocaust from stories we have heard, accounts we have read in books or scenes we have seen in movies. Some of us know, or have known or met, Holocaust survivors, most of us have not.

When it began, Jews were being humiliated or beaten senselessly in the streets of Vienna, Hamburg, Strasbourg, Dusseldorf or Warsaw. Elegant women, religious men, young children, the elderly, no one was spared. They were stripped of their dignity, first as Jews, then as human beings. Then the systematic extermination began.

People gathered around for spontaneous public humiliations, cheering, participating, inflicting additional pain, laughing loudly at the people who just hours before were their neighbors, business partners, colleagues, schoolmates or even friends.

The fine Strasses of Europe’s capitals and major cities were filled with horror-stricken Jews whose lives collapsed on them one fine day. Nowhere was safe and there was no place to hide or to escape.

Alas, what took place in real time had been foretold thousands of years earlier. Deuteronomy 28 describes the scene with chilling accuracy. I have chosen only four verses (28, 34, 66, 67), and my body shivers each time I read this chapter in the Bible.

The Jews will be “smite with madness, and with blindness, and with astonishment of heart. … so that thou shalt be mad for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. … And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear night and day, and shalt have no assurance of thy life. In the morning thou shalt say: ‘Would it were even[ing]!’ and at even[ing] thou shalt say: ‘Would it were morning!” for the fear of thy heart which thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see.”

Europe roared with the fires of hell that spread upward, spewing ashes of millions, consuming lives with an ever-growing appetite. The advance of evil seemed unstoppable.

Prior to 1948, there was no homeland for the Jews. Israel, their ancient homeland, was under British Mandate, and the Brits prevented the Jews from the one safe haven they should have had. America closed her doors too. No one wanted the Jews, the world allowed Germany do what was right and necessary.

Today, things are different: There is a modern state of Israel, in the ancient Land of Israel, and Jews – wherever they are in the world – know they have a place to call home, no questions asked.

Fourteen million Jews existed in 1939. Today, there are still 14 million Jews in the World. Six million perished during the Holocaust, in a systematic attempt to wipe them off this earth. Today, Iran promises to wipe Israel and her six point two million Jews off the face of the map. It seems not much has changed and history is determined to repeat itself once again.

Jerusalem, Present Day

I always enjoy wandering around in the streets of Israel’s capital city of Jerusalem. I think of things past; I witness a bustling city of many faces. I breathe the sights and sounds, smells and noises; a mix of voices, exhilarating and invigorating. I think of all the times Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible, and in my head and on my lips I replay Naomi Shemer’s (Israel’s national song writer’s) song Yerushalim Shel Zahav, Jerusalem of Gold.

Not too many years ago it was not safe to wander around while the Arabs’ Intifada raged. Jerusalem remains strewn with memorials, scars on her most beautiful body. The Arab terrorists murdered senselessly to inflict fear and terror in people’s hearts and to stop the flow of life.

The only people who continued walking, their heads high, were the religious Jews, in their holiest city, and every-day Jewish-Israelis in their nation’s capital. They had no other choice; they were determined to fight back, not to capitulate.

This past Sunday, the first Sunday in October, at the eve of the last day of Sukkot, the Festival of Tabernacles, during which Jews are commended to come to Jerusalem to see their God at the place He has chosen to dwell, I walked from Jaffa Gate of the Old City toward Christ Church, a three minute walking distance, looking apprehensively at passersby.

Who might attack? Who may start running with a knife or a gun and try to murder and maim as many innocent people as possible?

In store fronts, selling memorabilia or cold drinks, Jerusalem bagels or other munchies, stood Arabs, residents of Jerusalem, looking somewhat bored, somewhat bemused, at those that passed.

I looked at them with obvious disgust, vowing to not approach any of them to spend money in their stores, avoiding their wares.

Just hours earlier a couple walking in the Old City was attacked. They tried to protect each other, to fight back, but the husband was subdued, stabbed so many times he died. The wife, with a knife in her shoulder, close to the neck, managed to escape, seeking refuge at one of the neighboring stores.

She was running, screaming, begging for anyone to help.

The storeowners rushed to the front of their stores, witnessed the commotion, and stood at ease: A Jewish woman, bleeding, running and begging for her life, how amusing, how greatly satisfying!

One held a can of soda, laughing. Another spat on her. A third cursed her.

Some applauded. One kicked her with utter disgust, “Filth,” he uttered, “may you die!”

Not one, not two. They all stood as one, aiding and abating. Participating. Cheering. Taking part in Satan’s work.

The scene was taken directly from the capitals and major cities of Europe of 1939, but this is the Jerusalem of October 2015.

It took less than two minutes for the border police and other security forces to arrive at the scene, to restore a semblance of normalcy back to the area.

The shopkeepers, many young Arab males, simply turned around and continued smoking, laughing, discussing what could and should have happened to that Jewish woman.

There was hatred and spite in their eyes and voices, flowing in their blood. These Israeli citizens are filled with hatred so deep the Nazis would have been proud. Then again, their forefathers aided Hitler so there is nothing new under the sun.

Civilized people, not barbarians, would have stopped what they were doing and run out to aid the woman. Undoubtedly some would have frozen with fear or disbelief before springing to action, but normal people would have done something. Not because she is a woman, but because she is a human being, bleeding, pleading for help. But not the Arabs of Jerusalem.

One would say, protesting, “you cannot generalize” or maybe with a stronger tone, “you must not do so!” Today, in Israel, there may still be a few good Arabs, but one would be hard-pressed to find them.

There were some good Christians in Europe in the early 1940s as well. Yet so few, a breed so rare, that Yad VaShem in Jerusalem lists each and every one of them under the heading “Righteous Gentiles.”

It was not many hours before that attack that I attended the funeral of a young couple that was murdered in front of their four children just because they were Jews living in their homeland. The only reason the children were spared was the knowledge that past executions were not accepted very well when kids were murdered alongside their parents.

The account I have written, “A Blood Sacrifice,” elicited the following response from John Houk in America:

Ari I can’t help but think that there is more to this story. It seems intriguingly unfinished.

Undoubtedly, the story is not finished. It is only beginning. We are reliving 1939, this time around right here in the Land of Israel.

The world needs to know there is an Israel, and each Jewish person around the world needs to know that she and he has a home within her borders.

Safety will be restored. Those who stood by and chose to not prevent a crime will be brought to justice and prosecuted on criminal charges. But more than that is needed, a complete change of society’s stance, upbringing and values. There must be zero tolerance for barbarism and the Arab culture of death must be eradicated. Not only for the sake of the Jews, for the sake of the whole world.

Indeed, John, there is much more to this story, for the events unfolding before our very eyes are just the beginning of yet another end of what we have come to accept as civilization.

_______________________________

Blog Editor: John R. Houk

 

This is the latest in the series “Postcards from America – Postcards from Israel,” a collaboration between Zager and Bussel, a foreign correspondent reporting from Israel.

 

Ari Bussel and Norma Zager collaborate both in writing and on the air in a point-counter-point discussion of all things Israel-related.  Together, they have dedicated the past decade to promoting Israel.

 

© Israel Monitor, October, 2015

 

First Published October 6, 2015

Contact:  bussel@me.com

Honoring E. Randol Schoenberg


 
Published by MOVIECLIPS Trailers
Published on Dec 23, 2014
 
 
Academy Award winner Helen Mirren stars in the incredible story of Maria Altmann, a Jewish refugee who is forced to flee Vienna during World War II. Decades later, determined to salvage some dignity from her past, Maria has taken on a mission to reclaim a painting the Nazis stole from her family: the famous Lady In Gold, a portrait of her beloved Aunt Adele. Partnering with an inexperienced but determined young lawyer (Ryan Reynolds), Maria embarks on an epic journey for justice 60 years in the making.
 
 
The movie is about the legal miracle of Maria Altman and her lawyer E. Randol Schoenberg won the return of the portrait of her Aunt Adele Bloch-Bauer painted by the renowned artist Gustav Klimt completed in 1907 and stolen by the Nazis circa 1938 after Austria was annexed by Hitler’s Germany forcing owner Jewish millionaire to flee Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer.
 
Ari Bussel’s largely photo essay about a night of honoring the lawyer E. Randol Schoenberg against all odds winning the Lady in Gold back to the rightful owner and descendant Maria Altman.
 
E. Randol Schoenberg at the premiere of the Lady in Gold (from MovieWeb.com)
 
JRH 4/23/15

Please Support NCCR

************************
Honoring E. Randol Schoenberg
By Ari Bussel
Sent: 4/22/2015 8:57 PM
 
The very fact that the event was over-subscribed beyond the imagination (about ten times the normal attendance) was explained not by the screening of the BBC documentary about the late Maria Altmann and her family’s looted paintings, rather than by “Randy-of-the-Klimt-paintings” being there.  So much so, that the place was a life safety hazard, and had anything happened, the hand would have been pointed squarely at Cedars Sinai for allowing it to take place at all.
 
Randy of Woman in Gold
 
Schoenberg has become “Our Randy.”  We know his every feeling, manner of behavior and willingness to risk all that is dear to him while pursuing the cause.  But it is the “Randy” of “Woman in Gold:”
 Helen Mirren & Ryan Reynolds
Helen Mirren and Ryan Reynolds as Maria Altman and Randol Schoenberg
 
 Katie Holmes and Ryan Reynolds as Pam and Randol Schoenberg
Katie Holmes and Ryan Reynolds as Pam and Randol Schoenberg
 
 Ryan Reynolds, Helen Mirren and Daniel Brühl (Hubertus Czernin)
Ryan Reynolds, Helen Mirren and Daniel Brühl (Hubertus Czernin)
 
 Woman in Gold movie poster
Woman in Gold Poster
 
[Pictures by The Wienstein Companyhttp://twcpublicity.com/movie.php?id=200#photos]
 
Gary Ratner – Georgette Gelbard
 
Some years ago, my friend Gary Ratner (today a top executive at Stand With Us, an Israel advocacy group headquartered in Los Angeles) hosted a special evening honoring E. Randol Schoenberg for bringing the case.
 
Gary then headed the local American Jewish Congress (a non-profit since defunct).  The program at the Four Seasons at (not in) Beverly Hills was well attended, but nothing similar to today’s.  Then it took very hard work to get people to show up.  Now, they stood in a very long line, waiting patiently one after the other for the anticipated event.  (Neither “standing patiently” nor “standing in line” is something many Israelis and Jews standing there actually understand).  Again, unusual in so many respects.
 
All roads lead to one place:  The Power of Movies.  The immense power of movies.
 
For their own connection with funding, distributing and promoting movies, I recently dedicated my weekly column to the Simon Wiesenthal Center/Museum of the Tolerance.  Even if they did nothing else, it is this element that has by far the greatest reach and effect.
 
I asked Gary Ratner about his AJC event all these years ago.  Why?  Because I vaguely remembered Mr. Schoenberg and Mrs. Altmann at the end, with a few of the organizers, going to have their pictures taken.  The event itself did not otherwise leave an imprint in my mind.  Another event by the same organization, same organizer and at the same location is remembered much more vividly:  honoring R. James Woolsey, Jr., the former head of CIA (1993-1995).
 
Another good friend, Georgette Gelbard, headed the event alongside Ratner, and knows to tell that it was one of the most meaningful events she has ever organized.  It turns out that it was the first time Mr. Woolsey was invited and recognized by a Jewish organization.
 
All roads lead to Rome, but both the Roman Empire and the Vatican have lost their standing.  Contrary to them, we, the Jewish People, have persisted and survived, and we are still today a Light Unto the Nations.  [Please be warned thought, that when Isaiah talks about a Light Unto the Nations, say in 49:6, the context is most disturbing – see for instance verse 17.]
 
ו  וַיֹּאמֶר, נָקֵל מִהְיוֹתְךָ לִי עֶבֶד, לְהָקִים אֶתשִׁבְטֵי יַעֲקֹב, ונצירי (וּנְצוּרֵי) יִשְׂרָאֵל לְהָשִׁיב; וּנְתַתִּיךָ לְאוֹר גּוֹיִם, לִהְיוֹת יְשׁוּעָתִי עַדקְצֵה הָאָרֶץ.  {ס}
6 Yea, He saith: ‘It is too light a thing that thou shouldest be My servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the offspring of Israel; I will also give thee for a light of the nations, that My salvation may be unto the end of the earth.’ {S}
יז  מִהֲרוּ, בָּנָיִךְ; מְהָרְסַיִךְ וּמַחֲרִיבַיִךְ, מִמֵּךְ יֵצֵאוּ.
17 Thy children make haste; thy destroyers and they that made thee waste shall go forth from thee.
 
Gary Ratner replied he honored Mr. Schoenberg for bringing the case.
 
I wanted to honor him because of the guts (for lack of better term) of doing this when he was told there was no hope of ever winning.  Schoenberg did it because it was “just the right thing to do and for justice to be served.”
 
The years have passed.  Mr. Schoenberg won the case.  Mrs. Altmann passed away four years ago.  There is a movie that follows a very well-written script, based mostly on the actual events but incorporating elements that may hold true (but not exactly in the way or sequence as in the movie) and omit other stories that are equally as intriguing (although did not lead to proceeds of almost $330m for five paintings, to be split among five family members).
 
There are several documentaries and books, and likely at least one or more in the future (“Randy” himself did not write a book, and from the presentation he gave, it is clear he knows how to captivate a very demanding audience).
 
Charuzi – “Esphir”
 
Something unique happened in that evening at Cedars.  Dr. Yzhar Charuzi and Esther Blau created a most memorable event.  Dr. Charuzi has dedicated his life to doing good for Israel.  For over a quarter of a century he brought Israeli doctors to Cedars for a two year stay.  In Israel today there exists a full contingency of “Save A Heart” doctors, Dr. Charuzi’s doctors.
 
Standing by Yzhar’s side, Esther (Esphir) has continues to promote the Cedars-Sinai Alumni Association and Medical Staff with regular events and programs.  This was only one in a long sequence.
 
A day earlier, Mr. Schoenberg spoke at “the event at the [Pan Pacific] Park.”  Mayor Garcetti, Consul General Siegel and many other dignitaries were there.  But unlike at Cedars, there were no lines there.  In fact, there were rows and rows of empty seats.
 
The empty seats, the life going on around the event and completely ignoring it and the tiny number of Holocaust survivors who are still with us struck me.  When the survivors were asked to stand, there were so few of them, that Israel’s Consul General could have just walked to each one, shake her or his hand, and still be back at his seat before they all sat down.
 
Remembering and “Never Again”
 
After my parents’ generation, only we be left – the children and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors.
 
After us, there will only be books, movies, curricula taught here and there and a few museums.  But more than anything, there will be the findings of a scientific conference convened by a sovereign country at the beginning of the 21st Century that proved, beyond any doubt, that the Holocaust has never happened.  It simply did not take place.  [A few years after that Scientific Conference, a competition among 56 countries was held for the best caricature about the Holocaust-that-never-happened.]
 
Another point will be remembered, some decades from now, for it is repeated time and again – at the halls of the United Nations and in every possible venue:  Israel came into being only because the world was raped to allow the Jews to steal a land not theirs.  The world was made to feel so bad by the invention of the Holocaust that it had to sacrifice the so-called “Palestinians” on the altar and give away “their” land.
 
The Holocaust that did not happen (logic and rationality do not have to enter into the picture) was just another scheme by the Zionists.  (Another was the 9/11 attacks perpetrated by them – the Mossad – to blame the innocent Muslims.)
 
We already hear today the calls for us – Israelis – to return to our home countries – Poland, Germany, Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, ….  After the Charlie Hebdo massacres in France, at a Muslim outreach program in Irvine, I was told quite specifically to go back to Poland, for “the Jews from Poland, like Menachem Begin, were the worst!”
 
As my friend, Dr. Daryl Temkin, often reminds:  A lie told often enough, with such strength and conviction, becomes truth, no matter how removed it from reality.
 
Israel Forever
 
And so, as we gathered to hear the lawyer of the Klimt paintings, as we look at the pictures below and possibly think of our children and their children and the legacy that we are to leave, let us remember this:
 
 
THE HOPE 
 
As long as deep within the heart
A Jewish soul stirs,
And forward, to the ends of the East
An eye looks out, towards Zion.

Our hope is not yet lost,
The hope of two thousand years,
To be a free people in our land
The land of Zion and Jerusalem.

 
[Israel’s National Anthem, English from:  http://www.hebrewsongs.com/?song=hatikva]
 
 
Photo- As long as deep in the heart
 
For millennia we craved a return to our homeland, to the Land of Israel.  For the past sixty seven years we have a modern country in our ancient homeland.  We must do all we can to protect it.  We must stand and fight, against all odds.  This seems to be our destiny.  As in the past, so in the future.
 
Faith and Action
 
We must fight for what is right.  Not only in word but in deed.  We must not let go, we must not give up.  The fight is never easy.  There are very few moments that encourage us and even fewer people who will stand by us at the time of need.  But that is exactly what makes what one does meaningful.
 
When Pastor Andre Trocme (http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/righteous/stories/trocme.asp) of the village of Le Chambon-sur-Lignon, France, was asked toward the end of his life why did he do what he did, saving thousands of Jews at a great risk to his congregants and himself, he looked straight at the camera and did not understand the question.  He did the obvious, and he would do it again.
 
Pastor Trocme lived the way he preached.  For him “Faith” and “Action” were one.
 
He was a Righteous Among the Nations, what we call in Hebrew Yechidei-Sgula – the few of the few, of a very special character.
 
And now, join me please to pix from the event:
 
Cedar Sinai
 L-to-R-  Dr. Charuzi, Esther Blau, E. Randol Schoenberg
L-to-R:  Dr. Charuzi, Esther Blau, E. Randol Schoenberg
 
 
Dr. Charuzi, Esther Blau, E. Randol Schoenberg & Susanne Reyto
Also in the picture:  Susanne Reyto, activist, speaker and author
 
 Esther Blau at Speaker’s Podium
Esther Blau at Speaker’s Podium
 
 Maria Altmann
Maria Altmann
 
 E. Randol Schoenberg at Speaker’s Podium
E. Randol Schoenberg at Speaker’s Podium
 
 Dalia Ulmer, a most gifted writer [in audience]
Dalia Ulmer, a most gifted writer [in audience]
 
Epilogue
 
My father, Dr. Bussel, who along with my uncle, Capt. Hillel Yarkoni, escaped the Warsaw Ghetto before the uprising, are fighting for decades in the Polish courts to reclaim the family property.  The case went all the way to the Polish Supreme Court and back, and there is no end in sight.  The Poles do not want a resolution, lest the flood-gates be opened.
 
The modus operandi seems to be:  It is easier to fight, until the survivors are gone.  Eventually they will give up (or they will die and their descendants will give up).
 
And for that, the Bible teaches us a phrase:  Haratzachta ve gam Yarashta (to murder and to inherit)
 
Kings 1:21:19
 
יט  וְדִבַּרְתָּ אֵלָיו לֵאמֹר, כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה, הֲרָצַחְתָּ, וְגַםיָרָשְׁתָּ; וְדִבַּרְתָּ אֵלָיו לֵאמֹר, כֹּה אָמַר יְהוָה, בִּמְקוֹם אֲשֶׁר לָקְקוּ הַכְּלָבִים אֶתדַּם נָבוֹת, יָלֹקּוּ הַכְּלָבִים אֶתדָּמְךָ גַּםאָתָּה.
19 And thou shalt speak unto him, saying: Thus saith the LORD: Hast thou killed, and also taken possessions? and thou shalt speak unto him, saying: Thus saith the LORD: In the place where dogs licked the blood of Naboth shall dogs lick thy blood, even thine.’
E. Randol Schoenberg (L) & Dr. Joseph Bussel (R)
E. Randol Schoenberg (L) & Dr. Joseph Bussel (R)
 
 
E. Randol Schoenberg (L), Dr. Charuzi (C) & Dr. Joseph Bussel (R)
E. Randol Schoenberg, once a lawyer, now a major philanthropist-activist (L), Dr. Charuzi (C) & Dr. Joseph Bussel (R)
 
 
Thank you Esther and Yzhar.  Thank you Gary and Georgette.  Thank you, Randy Schoenberg and Maria Altmann Z”L.  And most of all, it is my grandparents and parents’ generation – survivors who rose from the ashes of the Holocaust – for whom Israel was everything.
 
It is the love of Israel that they instilled in me that drives me forward, to do, act, and then do even more.
 
On this Eve of Yom Ha-atzmauet, Israel’s Independence Day, Happy Birthday Israel!
 
Always,
 
Ari Bussel
_____________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Some photos from the original submission were not included.
 
© Ari Bussel

Remember Holocaust NAZI Death Camps


John R. Houk
© January 27, 2015
 
Today – January 27, 2015 – is the 70th anniversary of the liberation of the NAZI death camp of Auschwitz located in Poland. January 27 is the infamous day commemorated as International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
 
 
 
Published by euronews (in English) 
Published on Jan 27, 2015
 
When he was 21, Ivan Martynushkin was a lieutenant in the Soviet Red Army, commanding a machine-gun unit. By the start of 1945 they had walked thousands of kilometres in Stalin’s drive to defeat Hitler, in this war where civilians suffered untold brutalities.

On January 27 the troops were in Poland.

Martynushkin: “We were moving around Krakow. We didn’t know a thing about any concentration camps in Auschwitz. Our unit had just been told to go to a certain line and set up our position. After …

 
Auschwitz was the worst death toll of murdered people under the German NAZI superiority policy:
 
… A complex of camps, Auschwitz included a concentration camp, killing center, and forced-labor camps. It was located 37 miles west of Krakow (Cracow), near the prewar German-Polish border.
 
… Nearly 60,000 prisoners were forced to march west from the Auschwitz camp system. Thousands had been killed in the camps in the days before these death marches began. Tens of thousands of prisoners, mostly Jews, were forced to march to the city of Wodzislaw in the western part of Upper Silesia. SS guards shot anyone who fell behind or could not continue. Prisoners also suffered from the cold weather, starvation, and exposure on these marches. More than 15,000 died during the death marches from Auschwitz. On January 27, 1945, the Soviet army entered Auschwitz and liberated more than 7,000 remaining prisoners, who were mostly ill and dying. It is estimated that at minimum 1.3 million people were deported to Auschwitz between 1940 and 1945; of these, at least 1.1 million were murdered.
 
 
The Holocaust was a horrific occurrence aimed primarily Jews but also included Gypsies (Romani), homosexuals, various Slavs and the physically and mentally challenged. Here is a Youtube video showing explicit original filmography of Holocaust survivors (a little than 14 minutes):
 
 
 
Published on Feb 23, 2012
 
Shannon Ward writing as a guest blogger on Danny Jeffrey’s blog Fixed Bayonets has an awesome post that reminds the world Antisemitism is again a growing fixture of prejudice. It’s as if no one learns from the mistakes history has shown a light on.
 
JRH 1/27/15

Please Support NCCR

*****************************
Arbeit Macht Frei
[Work Will Set You Free]
 
By Guest Blogger Shannon Ward
January 27, 2015 5:43 AM
Auschwitz gate - Arbeit Macht Frei
 
“Work will set you free.” This was above the gate at Auschwitz 1. Why do we remember what has happened so long ago? Why do we explore the evil that exists in the minds of men? Because to forget is to lose the ability to learn from history. History has a habit of repeating itself. If we, as a people, do not learn from the history we are doomed to repeat it, be it good or bad.

 

On January 27th, 1945, Soviet troops of the First Army of the Ukrainian Front, happened upon the gates of Auschwitz. Auschwitz is a name that is synonymous with the evil that was Nazi Germany. What horrors were found by the troops as they and other allied units came upon camp after camp established by the SS to deal with those that were deemed “racially undesirable.” Those who had been left as ‘survivors’ were nothing but walking skeletons. Emaciated human beings, some with blank stares, with obvious signs of disease present.

The bodies of those who died horrible inhuman deaths were stacked like cord wood. Other victims, in mass graves bore witness to the inhumanity that was suffered by so many. The stench of the living, and of the dead. Seeing for themselves the inhumanity that was perpetrated on others because they were deemed inferior because of their race, religion, and other reasons that marked them as needing to be eradicated from the earth.

Information had leaked out as early as 1942 if not before that these camps were operating in the countries of Europe under German occupation. “Relocation” of whole families from throughout Europe meant that many would be used as slave labor, horrible experiments such as what was done by SS officers such as Joseph Mengele. As one of many camps that the Germans established as a place to carry out the “final solution” in the extermination of those the Nazis deemed substandard.

Many camps, including Auschwitz, were located in the country of Poland. The deaths of Jews, Gypsies, and those who were deemed “racially undesirable” from throughout Europe, met evil at the hands of those who hated them. Some were dissidents who objected to the evils of the Nazis. Some were mentally unfit, the physically handicapped. Some died because of ethnic origins.

 
Anne Frank, a German born Jew who had lived in the Netherlands for most of her life and her sister Margo existed in the horrors ofAnne Frank Auschwitz, were evacuated to another camp in late 1944 and died just weeks prior to the liberation of the camps throughout Europe. 

Approximately 1,200 camps were running throughout Europe. Some camps had sub-camps, camps such as Auschwitz had areas that were for the slave labor and other areas for the extermination of of those who were too young or too old to be of use. An estimated 15 to 20 million people were interned in the camps, many of them never experienced freedom again. Auschwitz was just one camp, but represents through its name what we know of that era. 

We are now living in a time when we see a repeating hatred of Jews. The anti-Semitic rhetoric we are seeing now in countries across the world including in our own country is disheartening. It exhibits that the memories of what happened not so long ago are not being remembered by our civilization. That we have forgotten the horrors of not only WWII but other times of persecution of people. After WWII many said we will never forget. Then they said we should never never forget.

 Holocaust Survivors

Now it is evident that we have forgotten.  Many deny that it occurred, others say that they got what they deserved. Still others will say that it doesn’t concern them. Well it does concern each of us, and humanity as a whole. We should never forget what has occurred to millions of men, women and children starting as early as the late 1930s until the end of WWII.   

January 27, 1945 is a date that we should remember. January 27, 2015 marks 70 years since the liberation of Auschwitz. It is also recognized as the International Day of Remembrance of the Holocaust. For all those who died; for those who survived; we must remember! We need to educate those who do not know what happened during those years. There are many books, and movies that are recorded history of what was endured. There still are some who are survivors of a terrible time in history.  For all of those living and long dead, we must never forget.

 Mountain of shoes from Auschwitz

Shoes! Countless thousands of shoes that form a small mountain at Auschwitz. Those shoes are still there, standing as a mute reminder of the men, women, and children, that once wore them. Yes, the shoes remain long after their owners died as victims of the Final Solution. If they could only speak!

Editor’s [Danny Jeffrey] note… Want to know more?
The biggest prisoner escape of WWII occurred at the secretive extermination camp in Sobibor Poland. While no movie can accurately portray the horrors these people knew, this movie goes a long way as a voice for the dead.

Escape From Sobibor [1987 (2:22:41)]
+++
[Blog Editor: the below info is from the Youtube video above not posted by Danny Jeffrey.]
 
Published by yekoya
Published on Oct 2, 2012
 
Sobibor – The Forgotten Revolt www.sobibor.info
Selected material by Thomas Toivi Blatt.

The facts presented on this website are the Historical research and first-hand account of Holocaust survivor Thomas ‘Toivi’ Blatt, who escaped from the Nazi death camp Sobibor during the prisoner-led Revolt on October 14, 1943. The Sobibor revolt was the most successful revolt and escape from any Nazi camp during World War II. In his search for the truth about Sobibor, Mr. Blatt has extensively researched, investigated and written about its history – the results of which are also presented in two extraordinary books Sobibor – The Forgotten Revolt and From The Ashes of Sobibor. Additionally, the story of the revolt was told in Escape From Sobibor, the award-winning Chrysler Corporation film special of 1987.

Synopsis et détails
Le 14 octobre 1943, la révolte éclate à Sobibor, l’un des plus terribles camps d’extermination nazi. Seuls 300 prisonniers réussiront à en en échapper…

 
[Blog Editor: Google Translate from French –
 
Synopsis and details
 
On 14 October 1943 the revolt broke out in Sobibor, one of the worst Nazi death camps. Only 300 prisoners manage to escape in …]

Sgt. Frenzel Kurt Raab
Capt. Franz Reichleitner Eric P. Caspar
Sgt. Hurst Klaus Grünberg
Lt. Niemann Henry Stolow
Eda Patti Love
Mundek David Miller (II)
Naomi Sara Sugarman
Kapo Sturm Peter Jonfield

 
_____________________________
Holocaust Remembrance Day 2015
John R. Houk
© January 27, 2015
____________________________
Arbeit Macht Frei
 
Shannon Ward
 
Edited by John R. Houk with spellcheck

When Jews Stand Silent


Concentration Camp Murdered Jews

Result of Jew-Hatred – My GOD Don’t Forget!

 

 

After Hitler’s Holocaust was discovered by the winning Allied

armies, the West experienced a collective guilt on how badly Jews were treated in a horrific Jew-hatred manner. In Ari Bussel’s essay he expresses the very legitimate concern that the pre-Holocaust days are here again – even in America.

 

JRH 10/23/14

Please Support NCCR

************************

When Jews Stand Silent

 

By Ari Bussel

Sent: 10/21/2014 6:23 PM

 

Allow me to start with a bit of family history.

 

During WWII, among the Allied forces, my grandfather was in General Anders’ (Polish) army fighting the Nazis.  At the end of the War he was in Italy.  After the war, my grandfather joined his brother in NY and remarried (my grandmother had been murdered by the Nazis). 

 

To his last day, my grandfather lived on the Upper West Side, whereas his brother lived on the Upper East Side.  NYC was his favorite city, a magical place with much to do.  He regularly attended operas and concerts at the Lincoln Center.  I remember when my father and I were packing his things, after my grandfather passed away, and found stacks of programs of performances he had attended.  We may still have some of them.

 

My grandfather is buried in NY, where he is likely turning in his grave, at how—after seventy-five years—we have come full circle backward.  Not just in Europe, but in the USA as well.

 

Today, everything is permissible, even in America.  Acceptable now, first and foremost, is Jew-hatred.

 

Once we knew how to differentiate between right and wrong, good and evil.  Today, the lines are blurred, terrorists become “freedom fighters,” and the blame always lies with someone else, most readily and easily with Israel and the Jews. 

 

Metropolitan Opera of the pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-Israel opera “Death of Klinghoffer.”

 

Tonight at the Met is the opening night of Death of Klinghoffer.  So what is all the fuss about?  “Munich” humanized the terrorists who targeted and murdered Israeli athletes because they were Jewish.  Its director was none other than Schindler’s List director, Steven Spielberg, himself a Jew.

 

Many movies in recent years that vilify Israel and glorify her enemies are made in Israel and are supported by funding from the Israeli government.

 

So why is everyone up in arms against yet another such occasion, one that happens to be at my grandfather’s favorite city and performing arts center?

 

Those who do not understand the premise we must fight all these instances may stop here.  Others will dwell into the following questions:

 

* Who stands up and takes action?

 

* What type of action is sufficient to effect change?

 

* Can we even fight modern-day anti-Semitism?

 

I will attempt to answer these three questions.

 

Good people are expected to fight back but seldom do.  A major shock to the system is necessary before they spring to action and for its effects to remain etched in memory.  The Holocaust was a drastic shock and its effects lasted some seven decades but now have almost faded away.

 

Short of a major system-wide tsunami, as we learned time and again, “money talks.”  To effect change, one must get to the major source of funding.  Then those at the helm pay attention.  For change to be meaningful and lasting, rather than passing, pressure must be sustained. 

 

Thus the call for major funders of the NY Met to withhold their donations must be a consideration. 

 

Experience, though, teaches us that such efforts rarely work.  Ha’Aretz, Israeli leading intellectual paper, is still up and running, none of its advertisers has backed off, despite its working tirelessly to bring about the fall of the Jewish state.

 

Not only in Israel.  The NY Times, LA Times and other major papers still exist and their main advertisers (many Jewish) have not backed off, despite a systematic anti-Israeli approach.

 

And this experience extends well beyond the printed media.

 

To effect change, there has to either be a major groundswell or the major benefactors behind an operation must take a stand (i.e. stop the flow of funds) and remain firm on their convictions. Either one will create the necessary shock effect.  Yet, this is as rare as a major earthquake here in California.

 

There are instances when we must stand up and take action, not just hope that a storm will pass and everything be forgotten.  These shocks have positive effects, for they force us to change the status quo.  And what is happening today is not good, by any stretch of one’s imagination.

 

So allow me to highlight a friend, who is now on a plane to NYC, to participate tonight in the demonstration in front of the Lincoln Center.  She will be sitting in a wheelchair this evening at the Klinghoffer Demonstration against the Met.  It is inspiring, but not enough.

 

Several years ago, a professor from Ben Gurion University, the head of the Poli-Sci department, wrote an op-ed that was published by the Los Angeles Times.  It was not personal musings, rather the professional presentation of a person very established in this field.  He called to “Boycott Israel.” 

 

Jews were outraged.  The University President flew in to Los Angeles to meet with the major donors who were very upset.  She refused to meet with anyone else; they were of no concern or value to her.  The major donors were appeased, and nothing much has changed since.  Post-Zionism is alive and well at BGU.

 

The Jews have persuaded themselves that everything is OK, someone else is to blame (clearly noise created by some troublemakers) and there is nothing the university president can actually do.  Life continues.

 

The same happened when J Street, the self-proclaimed “pro-Israel, pro-peace” (anti-Israel, undermine-AIPAC) organization came into being.  The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles was gravitating toward supporting it, until Newt Becker went from one friend to another (all major donors) and made it an issue.

 

Then, and only then, the Federation paid attention.

 

Promises were made.  The Federation resorted to legalities and ultimately confused the issue.  “It depends what ‘supporting’ really means,” they said, and the shenanigans continued.  United we stand, divided we fall, and J Street continues to bring about the fall of the walls of Jerusalem.  Alas, it happened before, we will survive it again.

 

Newt’s actions were a necessary, but not a sufficient condition. 

 

In Orange County, activist Dee Sterling has been fighting the Olive Tree Initiative (and the world-wide travel intifada) for years. Philanthropist Dr. Shelley Ventura Cohen arranged several meetings at the Federation here in LA, alongside a major contributor.  The president of the Federation had to make time for these meetings, but not much has resulted.  Shelley passed away, the philanthropist spends her time abroad and the Olive Tree Initiative goes from strength to strength, having expanded now to numerous other universities.

 

Major Met Donors Deafening Silence Is An Operatic Kristallnacht- If Bloomberg, Annenberg, Neubauer, Toll Bros. Spoke Out, Anti-Semitic “Klinghoffer” May Have Been Cancelled

 

Mort Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, in a press release this morning, calls the Deafening Silence of major Met donors “an Operatic Kristallnacht.”  He names names – Bloomberg, Annenberg, Neubauer, Toll Bros – and points out that had they spoken out, the anti-Semitic Klinghoffer may have been cancelled.

 

He recognizes a necessary, but not necessarily sufficient condition.

 

But I am a simple, practical person, and I know that ZOA’s calls will not bear fruit.  Not yet at least.  Tomorrow is another day, and life continues.  Today’s “noise” becomes tomorrow’s history, thus must be relegated to oblivion.  That is exactly what we learned with the President, the Democrats and Benghazi.  The 2012 “Spontaneous” attacks did happen, whether because of a video or not.  “Who really cares?  Get on with your lives, Republicans, you are just starting trouble” has been the prevailing attitude.

 

ZOA’s call is a call to action.  It follows James 2:14-26.  It expects the obvious, which is simply too much.

 

The Annenbergs were Jewish, but their main focus was the arts.  Alas, Jews in the USA were not very concerned about their brethren in Europe.  Life here was somewhat isolated.  Life was good.

 

That was then.  It evolved into an anti-Israel sentiment coming first and foremost from American Jewry today.  It is well concealed under layers of “just criticism of Israel,” “disagreeing with policies,” “love and strength to tell the truth,” “the overarching community tent,” and on and on as a never-ending list of excuses that permits Israel hatred to blossom.

 

A few years ago, Wallis Annenberg opened her “Space for Photography” in Century City with a National Geographic exhibit about water.

 

Covered with the most beautiful dress of “National Geographic” and a brand new “museum,” hatred became the new truth.  Israel became the guilty party.  20% of the exhibit was focused on Israel.  But rather than highlighting all the good Israel has bestowed on the region and the world in terms of water (including conservation, reclamation, desalination, development of drought resistant crops, drip irrigation, regional cooperation and assistance), Israel was highlighted and portrayed as the wasteful thief and the source of all evil.

 

Reality was obfuscated in favor of baseless attacks and a most amazing portrait of lies, most befitting the new Annenberg Space.

 

Apparently, this sells.  More accurately, it is acceptable.  It spreads like bacteria on a Petri dish.

 

Where were the Israelis and the Jews?  Where were the State of Israel and her local representatives?  How about other sane and rational people?

 

Were there any demonstrations?  Was the exhibit scrapped or corrected?  Annenberg definitely has the clout to achieve it, had she only wanted.

 

Some people remember work done “behind the scenes.”  Alas, the exhibit continued as planned, and the many thousands of visitors were exposed to one of the worst viruses ever to dwell on earth – the purest form of anti-Semitism, blood libels distilled to such high proof, their potent strength alone is dangerous.

 

Wallis Annenberg was being courted at that time for money for the new Beverly Hills Cultural Center.  Money, it seems, is the solution for all the world’s ills.  One would ignore evil for a payment of $25 million.  Oh, how satisfying.

 

Israelis in Israel were busy too, and the National Geographic special issue was allowed to stand, thus remaining a testament to a new reality.  Students in the near future will study water shortage and its aftermaths, and they can always refer back to an amazing pictorial presentation, accompanied by some of the most horrific lies; “it is all Israel’s fault.”

 

Likewise, the President of Iran’s Conference on the Holocaust-that-never-was also remains a factual resource for future generations, of history that was re-written while the world, Jews and Gentiles alike, stood silent.

 

Mort, salvation will not come from Wallis Annenberg.

 

From her fellow mega-donors?

 

My experience has taught me that until something affects them directly, we can talk and shout until we fall exhausted out of breath, and nothing will happen.

 

A case in point:  A member of the Board of Regents for the University of California system was kind enough to hear my ranting about what was happening at the UC Irvine campus with dangerous activities of the Muslim Student Union, the threat to Jewish students and the implications to all of us.

 

She was kind not to me, but to a close friend of hers, whose guest I was year after year after his wife died.

 

Except, nothing was internalized.  I talked and was gently dismissed as the “Meshugane” (the crazy one, not really in possession of his faculties).

 

This continued until Israeli Ambassador to the US, Prof. Oren, came to give a talk at UCI.  Until the pressure on Jewish students and others intensified so much that people started taking notice. Everything I had described time and again happened, and everyone was shocked at the “discovery.”

 

It happened right under their watch.  They enabled it.

 

We can continue with other examples.  I seem to carry a bag full of them.  But allow me to return to my own family history.

 

I am the son and grandson of Holocaust survivors.  Not much was left of our family, and all of us here and now have an obligation:  Not to Forget. 

 

When we remember, we know that our true mission is to protect Israel, thus protecting the Jewish people.

 

Remembering, the essence of “Never Again,” does not translate to the fanfare usually connected with “remembering” the Holocaust.  Rather, it is off the well-traveled road that we venture. 

 

In Israel, one started “remembering” the survivors when the deplorable living conditions of many were highlighted for all to see.  It shamed Israel into action.

 

While survivors are struggling in their last years, there is a robust and thriving “Claims Conference.”  Many years ago, they told my mother they did not reach her mother’s year of birth.  They did not reach it until my grandmother passed away.  But throughout the years, they enjoy their salaries, benefits and other perks, like clockwork.  It became their “entitlement,” not the survivors’.  

 

For those who wonder, not much has changed with the Claims Conference.

 

In Los Angeles, I regularly pass the statue of Raoul Wallenberg and stop to salute.  The plaque reads “he restored our faith in humanity,” signed “the survivors.”  (For those who may want to read more, here is the link to “The Angel of Faith” I wrote in 2010: http://newsblaze.com/story/20100404083512buss.nb/topstory.html)

 

Not long ago, LA Councilmember Paul Koretz held a major event at the intersection where the statue stands.  There were numerous Holocaust survivors in attendance, yet not a single child from all the religious day schools or the high school (Fairfax High) just a few blocks walking distance from there.

 

No one bothered to clean the square where the statue stands, daily the sleeping place for homeless people.

 

The act of “remembering” has to translate to action, and that action must be meaningful.  I found the ceremony lacking, since it did not translate into meaningful action.  No one thought of bringing children, and I stood at shock and wept.

 

Somewhat like the neighborhood itself, once the heart of Jewish LA, turned into a heap of eateries and trendy t-shirt, shoes or skateboard stores, the generation of survivors is slowly disappearing into the memory bins of history.  A sad story, for who may remember the past? Should we even bother with it? Will it ultimately be rewritten out of existence completely?

 

My grandfather, Newt, Shelley, Atara, Roz’s mother and so many others are up there, in council, looking down, advocating on behalf of the Jewish people. Hoping now is the time for all sane, rational beings to ponder.

 

They understand well when good people stand silent, evil is triumphant, and tonight will be no different.

_______________________

This is the latest in the series “Postcards from America – Postcards from Israel,” a collaboration between Zager and Bussel, a foreign correspondent reporting from Israel.

 

Ari Bussel and Norma Zager collaborate both in writing and on the air in a point-counter-point discussion of all things Israel-related.  Together, they have dedicated the past decade to promoting Israel.

 

© Israel Monitor, October 2014

 

First Published October 20, 2014

Contact:  bussel@me.com