In Support of Eugene Delgaudio


Eugene Degaudio

John R. Houk

© December 14, 2012

 

You should Google the name Eugene Delgaudio. The inevitable first impression you will from the links provided is that Delgaudio is an evil homophobe. The word “homophobe” would indicate an unnatural fear of homosexuals. However, homosexual activists and Leftists will turn “homophobe” from fear to hate. Thus a homophobe is a person that hates homosexuals. The word “hate” indicates a propensity to act on hate such as verbal diatribes, violence or worse the act of murder.

 

Are there people that hate homosexuals so much that those diatribes that are threatening, a crime of violence or the downright horror of murder will be committed? I stipulate such people are not homophobes, rather these kinds of people are of the malicious minded truly demented in their thinking and worthy of prison or a death sentence whichever is appropriate.

 

How about those people taking a stand against homosexuality because their religious beliefs proclaim the act of sex between two people of the same sex to be morally repugnant? Are these people that hate or fear homosexuality? In the case of Christianity loathing homosexuality is not hate or fear, rather loathing homosexuality is lining up with Father God that calls homosexuals an abomination (Since our current President is pro-same-sex marriage maybe the word could also be ‘Obamanation’).

 

Thus it is quite infuriating when homosexual activists label a person promoting the Biblical Christian of homosexuality as a hating-homophobe.

 

Eugene Delgaudio’s mission in life is to fight the moral acceptance of homosexuality which is viewed by Biblical Christians as a perversion. Delgaudio is only a hater if he speaks and writes that violence and murder should be exacted on homosexuals. Delgaudio is no friend of homosexuality yet he is not a promoter of violence say like Obama’s old friends Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn that spent their youth working to bring down the USA with violent bombings replacing Freedom with Communist despotism.

 

On the other hand, I wonder how many homosexuals or homosexual activists speak or write threats of violence against Eugene Delgaudio? Regardless of threats and vilification by the MSM, homosexual activists, Leftists and even some Conservatives queasy of the well moneyed homosexual agenda proponents; Delgaudio was reelected to his County Commissioner post for the fourth time Loudon County Virginia.

 

After Delgaudio was reelected as Commissioner the homosexual and Leftists came against through the courts.

 

§  Delgaudio sued for using the sick marriage picture of homosexual couple

 

§  Delgaudio is being investigated for using County resources to raise funds

 

Frankly the civil litigation and criminal investigation has all the appearance of the homosexual version of Lawfare to make an attempt to break Delgaudio financially and to make a big effort to silence his Biblically Moral stand against the abomination known as the homosexual lifestyle.

 

So with this back drop Delgaudio is facing it is good to know he is still exposing the consequences of the homosexual agenda. Below is an email I received today sent by Delgaudio’s watchdog organization Public Advocate of the United States.

 

JRH 12/14/12

Please Support NCCR

***********************************

Disgusting!

 

By Eugene Delgaudio

Sent 12/14/2012 10:08 AM

Sent by Public Advocate

 

Washington State residents are experiencing firsthand the horrors that accompany the Homosexual Agenda.

Only days before the anti-marriage referendum passed in the state, a disgusting story surfaced.

“Colleen” Francis — a 45-year-old man who claims to be a woman — was lounging in the women’s sauna at the Evergreen State College pool when a local high school girls’ swim team came in to use the facilities.

The sauna’s glass wall gave “Colleen” full view of the girls while they were changing!

The swim coach threw the man out, but school officials quickly apologized to “Colleen” and insisted he be allowed to continue using the women’s facilities.

College officials claim that his right to violate the women’s rooms is “protected” since Washington State has given homosexuals and transsexuals a superior “protected-class” status.

As disturbing as this is, instances like this are becoming far too common.

And President Obama’s Justice Department is doing its best to make sure this continues.

Not that long ago, Public Advocate alerted pro-Family Americans to the case of “Jennifer.”

This 38-year-old man actually bragged about using the women’s restrooms at the University of Arkansas.

And when actual women complained about “Jennifer” using their facilities, Obama’s Department of Justice rushed to defend his “special rights.”

The Homosexual Lobby is determined to see their agenda anywhere and everywhere.

That’s why the efforts of Public Advocate in states like Washington get more important every day.

And why your support of Public Advocate means more now than ever before.

The Homosexual Lobby won’t settle for the recent passage of homosexual “marriage” in Washington State.

They’ll stop short of nothing but absolute victory for their agenda in the hearts and minds of our children and our country.

But with your help, Public Advocate is fighting back against homosexual “marriage” and the creation of “special rights” for deviants like “Colleen” and “Jennifer.”

For the Family,

Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States

P.S. Please consider chipping in with a donation of $10 or more to help fund Public Advocate’s fight for traditional values.

_______________________________

In Support of Eugene Delgaudio

John R. Houk

© December 14, 2012

_______________________________

Disgusting!

 

Because Public Advocate of the U.S. is a non-profit, charitable organization that fights the radical agenda of the Homosexual Lobby, contributions are not tax deductible for IRS purposes. This email was not produced or emailed at taxpayer expense. Public Advocate’s phone number is (703) 845-1808, its address is 5613 Leesburg Pike, Suite 17 Falls Church, VA 22041, and its website is http://www.publicadvocateusa.org/.

To help Public Advocate grow, please forward this to a friend.

Geert Wilders: Marked for Death


Marked for Death - Geert Wilders bk jk

Fjordman has written an essay that focuses on Geert Wilders because of the May 2012 release of the book “Marked for Death: Islam’s War Against the West and Me.” The book is about Geert’s realization about the dark side of Islam and how Muslims have responded to him for exposing the dark side of Islam.

 

Fjordman takes up from the book to defend this bastion of Free Speech in the Western World. The West is under a huge dose of Leftist Multiculturalism in which it is politically correct to disdain Christianity and politically incorrect to speak or write the truth about Islam. In writing the truth of Islam a person like Geert Wilders is then labeled a hate-bigoted Islamophobe. Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists consider the term Islamophobe an epithet; however I personally where the term as a badge of honor. The honor is not living in fear and loathing of Islam rather the honor is in not becoming intimidated by the intolerance of Islam.

 

Geert Wilders in the irony of defending Free Speech has landed into the position of being the focal point of Islamic hatred with his life under constant threat.

 

Here is Fjordman’s essay.

 

JRH 5/11/12 (Hat Tip: Gates of Vienna)

Please Support NCCR

********************************

Geert Wilders: Marked for Death

 

By Fjordman

May 11, 2012 @ 12:30 am

FrontPageMag.com

 

The courageous Dutch politician Geert Wilders released his book Marked for Death: Islam’s War Against the West and Me in May 2012. The foreword to this title was written by the eloquent Canadian-born political commentator and cultural critic Mark Steyn, who has a special talent for writing about serious topics in a humorous way. He has published several books and written essays for publications ranging from the Jerusalem Post and the Chicago Sun-Times to the National Review, The Australian and Canada’s National Post.

 

Steyn is honest enough to admit that when he was first asked to contribute to Wilders’ new book, his initial reaction was to say no. The main reason for this is the potentially high cost of being associated with a man who lives with constant death threats.

 

Yet, after taking a stroll in the woods, Mark Steyn felt ashamed at the ease with which he was caving in to the enemies of freedom, and decided to accept the offer after all. He recalled how the Canadian Islamic Congress boasted that their attempts by legal aggression to silence Steyn’s critical writings about Islam had cost his magazine substantial sums, and thereby attained their “strategic objective” of increasing the cost of publishing anti-Islamic material.

 

In the case of Geert Wilders, that cost is not merely limited to money. Despite being an elected Member of Parliament in what used to be one of Europe’s freest and most tolerant countries, he is regularly vilified by Western mass media. When trying to enter Britain, a nation that once was a champion of liberty, he was detained by plainclothes border guards on arrival at London’s Heathrow airport in February 2009 and deported from the country.

 

The democratic Dutch MP had been invited to the House of Lords, where Baroness Cox and Lord Pearson wanted to show his 17-minute Islam-critical film Fitna. The Home Office refused him entry on the grounds he “would threaten community security and therefore public security,” not because he threatened to use violence, but because Muslims might use it.

 

Lord Ahmed from the Labour Party, Britain’s first Muslim member of the House of Lords, the upper house of the British Parliament, pledged to bring a 10,000 strong force of angry Muslims to lay siege to Parliament. A spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain claimed that Wilders has been an open and relentless preacher of “hate.” At the same time, London has become a notorious intentional center for Islamic militants, who spew hate on a daily basis.

 

Geert Wilders accused the Labour government of Prime Minister Gordon Brown of being “the biggest bunch of cowards in Europe.” He was later allowed entry to the UK, however. He was also put on trial in the Netherlands accused of criminally insulting religious and ethnic groups. Wilders was eventually found not guilty in 2011, but the entire process took several years.

 

As Mark Steyn puts it, “He is under round-the-clock guard because of explicit threats to murder him by Muslim extremists. Yet he’s the one who gets put on trial for incitement. In twenty-first century Amsterdam, you’re free to smoke marijuana and pick out a half-naked sex partner from the front window of her shop. But you can be put on trial for holding the wrong opinion about a bloke who died in the seventh century. And, although Mr. Wilders was eventually acquitted by his kangaroo court, the determination to place him beyond the pale is unceasing: ‘The far-right anti-immigration party of Geert Wilders’ (the Financial Times)… ‘Far-right leader Geert Wilders’ (the Guardian)… ‘Extreme right anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders’ (AFP) is ‘at the fringes of mainstream politics’ (Time). Mr. Wilders is so far out on the far-right extreme fringe that his party is the third biggest in parliament.”

 

Maybe those who are out on the fringe are the ones who think that disliking Islam is “far-right.”

 

Yet it’s not just Wilders himself who is being attacked in this fashion. Those who dare to meet him or support some of his views could find themselves attacked by the mass media and the political elites in a comparable manner. Cory Bernardi, born and raised in Adelaide and currently representing the state of South Australia for the Liberal Party in the Australian Senate, in 2011 came under fire not only from members of other parties but also from his own — allegedly conservative — party when he wanted to facilitate a trip to Australia by Wilders.

 

The Sydney Morning Herald simply labeled Geert Wilders “an Islamaphobic Dutch politician.” The Melbourne-based The Age claimed that Wilders’ “objectionable” and “poisonous anti-Islam views” are “abhorrent and plainly wrong” and that his ideas are self-evidently “repugnant.” The newspaper continued to suggest that if Senator Bernardi did not dissociate himself from Mr. Wilders’ views, then perhaps his own party should demote him.

 

Wayne Swan, Treasurer and Deputy Prime Minister of Australia under PM Julia Gillard, said Bernardi has right-wing extremist views. Other senior Labor Party members indicated that Opposition Leader Tony Abbott should discipline the senator and remove him from his portfolio responsibilities. Labor frontbencher Peter Garrett declined to say whether he believed Abbott should have Bernardi expelled from the Liberal Party, or copy the way former Prime Minister John Howard had Pauline Hanson disendorsed as a candidate ahead of the 1996 national election due to her vocal opposition to non-European mass immigration. Australian Greens senator Richard Di Natale also condemned Bernardi’s associations with Wilders. “Multiculturalism is one of this country’s great successes and it must be defended,” he stated.

 

Wilders commented in an essay published in The Washington Times on May 4 2012 that “As I write these lines, there are police bodyguards at the door. No visitor can enter my office without passing through several security checks and metal detectors. I have been marked for death. I am forced to live in a heavily protected safe house. Every morning, I am driven to my office in the Dutch Parliament building in an armored car with sirens and flashing blue lights. When I go out, I am surrounded, as I have been for the past seven years, by plainclothes police officers. When I speak in public, I wear a bulletproof jacket. Who am I? I am neither a king nor a president, nor even a government minister; I am just a simple politician in the Netherlands. But because I speak out against expanding Islamic influence in Europe, I have been marked for death. If you criticize Islam, this is the risk you run. That is why so few politicians dare to tell the truth about the greatest threat to our liberties today.”

 

Wilders received his first death threats in 2003 after asking the government to investigate a radical mosque. In November 2004, after a Muslim fanatic murdered filmmaker Theo van Gogh, policemen armed with machine guns pushed him into an armored car and drove him off into the night. That was the last time he was in his own house. Since then, he has lived “in an army barracks, a prison cell and now a government-owned safe house.” The security detail has become part of his daily routine, but it must still be hard getting used to being a virtual prisoner in your own country and unable to visit a restaurant or cafe in a normal manner.

 

Hostile journalists often denounce Wilders and his Party for Freedom as “populists,” but they are popular for a reason: They state uncomfortable truths that the ruling elites want to sweep under the carpet. The natives are rapidly being turned into a harassed minority in Amsterdam, Rotterdam or The Hague, a pattern that can now be seen in far too many European cities.

 

Fifty-seven percent of the Dutch people say that mass immigration was the biggest single mistake in Dutch history. Yet what is arguably the greatest change their country and their continent have experienced in historical times is beyond honest discussion in the mainstream media.

 

Wilders goes on to note that “I have read the Koran and studied the life of Muhammad. It made me realize that Islam is primarily a totalitarian ideology rather than a religion. I feel sorry for the Arab, Persian, Indian and Indonesian peoples who have to live under the yoke of Islam. It is a belief system that marks apostates for death, forces critics into hiding and denies our Western tradition of individual freedom. Without freedom, there can be no prosperity and no pursuit of happiness. More Islam means less life, less liberty and less happiness.”

 

Geert Wilders has sacrificed his personal freedom of movement and the prospects of a normal life in order to warn his country, his continent and his civilization against serious threats to their freedom. We should honor that sacrifice by listening carefully to what he has to say.

__________________________

About Fjordman

 

For a complete archive of Fjordman’s writings, see the multi-index listing in the Fjordman Files.

                                  

Copyright© 2012 FrontPageMagazine.com