GOP Convention: Sandmann on MSM Fake News & Johnson Exposes Baby-Killers


John R. Houk

© August 27, 2020

 

Nicholas Sandmann was in a Catholic High School in Kentucky when a made a Pro-Life school trip to Washington DC. While at the Lincoln Memorial a group of racist members of the radicalized Black Hebrew Nationalists (ironically one focus of hate are Jews ergo Black Hebrew Nationalists has zero to do with Judaism), then enter elderly Native American Nathan Phillips (not associated with Black Hebrews) was lionized as a hero by the MSM while the Pro-Life teen from Kentucky was demonized as a White racist. Phillips definitely tried to agitate Sandmann. THE PROBLEM: The MSM LIED to smear a Trump-supporting kid.

 

Thank God Sandmann and his family had the cajones to stand up to LEFTIST LIES. To date under the legal counsel of L. Lin Wood a number of defamation lawsuits have been filed against:

 

  • ABC News 
  • NBC News
  • CBS News
  • the New York Times
  • Gannett
  • Twitter
  • Rolling Stone
  • CNN
  • Washington Post

 

The later two was for $275 million (CNN) and $250 million (Washington Post) were settled out of Court for an undisclosed amount.

 

This defamed Nicholas Sandmann made of one the best speeches at the Republican National Convention that I heard. I don’t watch MSM news outlets anymore so I am unaware if any actually aired the Sandmann speech. If you didn’t catch it, HERE IT IS:

 

VIDEO: Covington Catholic student Nicholas Sandmann’s speech at the RNC | FULL

 

Posted by Fox News

6.02M subscribers – Aug 25, 2020

 

Former Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann makes remarks at the Republican National Convention. (Courtesy: RNC) MORE TO READ

 

Today will be Day Four of the Republican National Convention that I am convinced will culminate with a stirring President Trump speech. And there have been some great speeches in support of a Trump reelection. But this Pro-Life speech from Day Two by Abby Johnson shows just how murderous Dems supporting unborn Baby-Killing are. And Johnson assures listeners the stench of Baby-Murder will increase under a Biden/Harris Administration. WATCH WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT:

 

VIDEO: Abby Johnson’s full remarks at the GOP Convention

Posted by Donald J Trump

959K subscribers – Aug 25, 2020

 

Abby Johnson’s full remarks at the GOP Convention.

 

JRH 8/27/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

 

Christie Crooked Hillary Indictment Speech


Hillary indicted

John R. Houk

© July 21, 2016

 

On Fox News I heard a couple of minutes of Chris Christie’s speech at the Cleveland 2016 GOP National Convention. I was fired up with just a couple of minutes. So I wanted listen to Governor Christie’s entire speech. GLORTY TO GOD! Governor Christie needs tp be the next Attorney General of the United States under the Administration of a President Donald Trump!

 

Below is the entire roughly 15-minute speech Governor Christie’s Crooked Hillary indictment Speech. Then I am following that with an article that has the entire speech in print format – just to allow that speech to sink in.

 

JRH 7/21/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

VIDEO: Chris Christie FULL speech at Republican National Convention in Cleveland

 

 

Posted by Headlines Wiki

Published on Jul 19, 2016

 

Chris Christie: Governor of New Jersey Speaks at 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland

“I am proud to say that the voice of the people of our nation is being heard in this hall and those voices want Donald Trump to be the next President of the United States,” Christie said on Tuesday.

 

+++

READ: Chris Christie’s full speech at RNC 2016 where he prosecutes Hillary Clinton

 

By Matt Arco | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com 

July 19, 2016 at 9:51 PM, updated July 20, 2016 at 8:30 AM

NJ.com

 

Chris Christie GOP Natl Convention 2016

Gov. Christie addresses the convention. The 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland. Tuesday July 19, 2016. Cleveland, OH, USA (Aristide Economopoulos | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com)

 

CLEVELAND  — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie spoke to the Republican National Convention Tuesday night in Cleveland.

 

Here’s the prepared text of the governor’s speech:

 

I am here tonight not only as the Governor of New Jersey, but also as Donald Trump‘s friend for the last fourteen years.

 

We are about to be led by not only a strong leader but by a caring, genuine and decent person.

 

I am proud to say that the voice of the people of our nation is being heard in this hall and those voices want Donald Trump to be the next President of the United States. But this election is not just about Donald Trump.

 

It is also about his Democratic opponent, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

 

In the past few weeks we have seen this Justice Department refuse to prosecute her.

 

Over the last eight years, we have seen this Administration refuse to hold her accountable for her dismal record as Secretary of State.

 

Well, tonight, as a former federal prosecutor, I welcome the opportunity to hold her accountable for her performance and her character.

 

We must present those facts to you, a jury of her peers, both in this hall and in living rooms around our nation.

 

VIDEO: Governor Chris Christie attacks Hillary Clinton [the 5-minute version]

 

Since the Justice Department refuses to allow you to render a verdict, let’s present the case now, on the facts, against Hillary Clinton. She was America’s chief diplomat. Look around at the violence and danger in our world today every region of the world has been infected with her flawed judgment.

 

But let me be specific so you can render your verdict. In North Africa, she was the chief engineer of our disastrous overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya.

 

Libya today after Hillary Clinton’s grand strategy? Libya’s economy in ruins, death and violence in the streets and ISIS now dominating the country.

 

Hillary Clinton, as a failure for ruining Libya and creating a nest for terrorist activity by ISIS guilty or not guilty? In Nigeria, Hillary Clinton amazingly fought for two years to keep an Al-Qaeda affiliate off the terrorist watch list.

 

What happened because of this reckless action by the candidate who is the self proclaimed champion of women around the world? These terrorists abducted hundreds of innocent young girls two years ago.

 

These schoolgirls are still missing today.

 

What was the solution from the Obama/Clinton team? A hashtag campaign! Hillary Clinton, as an apologist for an Al-Qaeda affiliate in Nigeria resulting in the capture of innocent young women guilty or not guilty? She fights for the wrong people.

 

She doesn’t fight for us. She doesn’t get the real threats America faces. In China, Hillary Clinton praised the Chinese government for buying our debt to finance President Obama’s bloated stimulus plan.

 

So desperate for Chinese cash, she promised to oppose the Buy American provision in the stimulus bill in exchange for the cash to finance his huge expansion of government spending.

 

Hillary Clinton, putting big government spending financed by the Chinese ahead of jobs for middle class Americans guilty or not guilty? In Syria, she called President Assad a “reformer” and a “different kind of leader”.

 

With 400,000 now dead … think about that.

 

Four.

 

Hundred.

 

Thousand. Dead.

 

At the hands of the man Hillary defended.

 

We must ask this question: Hillary Clinton, as an awful judge of the character of a dictator-butcher in the Middle East guilty or not guilty? In Iran, she led the negotiations that brought about the worst nuclear deal in history.

 

Let me be clear: America and the world are measurably less safe and less respected because of the Iran deal Hillary helped cut.

 

Period. After she launched those negotiations, she became the biggest cheerleader for it at the end.

 

A deal that will lead to a nuclear Iran, an Israel that will be less safe and secure and much more dangerous Middle East.

 

Hillary Clinton, as an inept negotiator of the worst nuclear arms deal in American history guilty or not guilty? In Russia, she went to the Kremlin on her very first visit and gave them the symbolic reset button.

 

The button should have read, “delete” she is very good at that because she deleted in four years what it took 40 years to build. The next year, she said our goal was to strengthen Russia.

 

Strengthen an adversary led by a dictator who dreams of reassembling the old Soviet empire? What a dangerous lack of judgment.

 

Once again, as a flawed evaluator of dictators and failed strategist who has permitted Russia back in as a major player in the Middle East is Hillary Clinton guilty or not guilty? In Cuba, Hillary Clinton supported concessions to the Castro brothers and got almost nothing in return for ending the embargo.

 

She supported a deal that didn’t even require this murderous regime to return a cop killer, JoAnne Chesimard, to face justice.

 

Chesimard murdered a New Jersey State Trooper in cold blood, fled to Cuba and lives there to this very day.

 

How do you live with your own conscience when you reward a domestic terrorist with continued safety and betray the family of fallen police officer waiting for decades for justice for his murder? Hillary Clinton as coddler of the brutal Castro brothers and betrayer of the family of fallen Trooper Werner Foerster guilty or not guilty?

 

Finally, here at home, in one of her first decisions as Secretary of State, she set up a private e-mail server in her basement in violation of our national security.

 

Lets face it: Hillary Clinton cared more about protecting her own secrets than she did about protecting America’s secrets.

 

Then she lied about it over and over again.

 

She said there was no marked classified information on her server.

 

The FBI Director said that was untrue.

 

She said that she did not email any classified information. The FBI Director said that was untrue.

 

She said all work related emails were sent back to the State Department.

 

The FBI Director said that was untrue.

 

As to Hillary Clinton, putting herself ahead of America guilty or not guilty?

 

Hillary Clinton, lying to the American people about her selfish, awful judgment guilty or not guilty? Time after time the facts, and just the facts, lead you to the same verdict both around the world and at home.

 

In Libya and Nigeria guilty.

 

In China and Syria guilty.

 

In Iran and Russia and Cuba guilty.

 

And here at home on risking America’s secrets to keep her own and lying to cover it all upguilty. Her focus group tested persona, with no genuineness to be found, is a sham meant to obscure all the facts and leave you able to vote for her. We cannot promote someone to Commander-in-Chief who has made the world a more violent and dangerous place with every bad judgment she has made.

 

We cannot make the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States someone who has risked America’s secrets and lied about this to Congress and the American people.

 

We didn’t disqualify Hillary Clinton to be President of the United States the facts of her life and career disqualifies her. We in this hall agree with all of this.

 

But I want to talk to all of you at home, in your living rooms. You are the ones who will decide this election. We have an alternative.

 

We have a man who is unafraid.

 

We have a man who wants to lead us.

 

We have a man who understands the frustrations and the aspirations of our fellow citizens.

 

We have a man who judges people based on their performance regardless of your gender, race, ethnic or religious background. We do not need to settle for less.

 

We cannot reward incompetence and deceit. We need to demand more than what Hillary Clinton offers for America.

 

We know exactly what four years of Hillary Clinton will bring: all the failures of the Obama years, but with less charm and more lies. It is our obligation to stop Hillary Clinton now and never let her within 10 miles of the White House again.

 

It is time to come together and make sure that Donald Trump is our next President.

 

I am proud to be part of this team.

 

Now let’s go win this thing.”

_________________

Christie Crooked Hillary Indictment Speech

John R. Houk

© July 21, 2016

________________

Chris Christie FULL speech at Republican National Convention in Cleveland

 

Headline Wiki Facebook About Page

 

Short Description

Latest headline and breaking news trending around the world

 

Long Description

Latest headline and breaking news trending around the world @headlines.com

 

Website

http://www.headlineswiki.com/

_______________________

READ: Chris Christie’s full speech at RNC 2016 where he prosecutes Hillary Clinton

 

Matt Arco may be reached at marco@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @MatthewArco or on Facebook. Follow NJ.com Politics on Facebook.

 

About NJ.com

 

NJ.com is New Jersey’s largest website for local news, sports, entertainment, jobs, autos, real estate and information, affiliated with 12 New Jersey newspapers. NJ.com offers forums, blogs, webcams, and listings on where to go and what to do in and around the Garden State. No matter what part of the state you hail from, you can find news on NJ.com from your your town.

 

 

Thank you for visiting NJ.com. READ THE REST

 

3 Comments Against Suissa ‘dump Trump’ Article


Trump Gamble or For Sure Crooked Hillary

Ari Bussel is a frequent contributor on my blog. This submission is about three comments to an anti-Trump post in the Jewish Journal by David Suissa. The three comments are pro-Trump. The third comment is penned by Ari Bussel. If you read this blog you are probably aware that I have been in Trump’s corner since Senator Ted Cruz looked at the math, realized he could not secure the GOP nomination and so dropped (or suspended) out of the nomination race. I am a Trumper primarily because the alternative is crooked Hillary, one of the most corrupt American politicians next President Barack Obama and former President Slick-Willie Clinton.

 

Ari’s submission includes the anti-Trump post entitled “Republicans must dump Trump”. Ari placed the article at the end of the comments, but if you want to know what the three comments are defending against you may wish to scroll down and read the Suissa article first.

 

JRH 6/27/16

Please Support NCCR

***********************

3 Comments Against Suissa ‘dump Trump’ Article

Republicans must dump Trump

 

Article By David Suissa

Comments Submitted by Ari Bussel

Originally: Jewish Journal

Sent: 6/26/2016 2:26 PM

Focus: Three Comments to Suissa Article

 

[COMMENTS] In the order they were written:

 

1) Lily Steiner (lilily@earthlink.net):

 

David SHAME ON YOU! Do you not understand who ‘We the people’ are? Do you have so much disdain for people that do not agree with you? Do you have to be right to the exclusion of the Democratic process? Is your ego so huge that just because you have taken a vendetta to Trump anyone that does not also see it is wrong? Has it ever occurred to you that you may be, perhaps, just a little wrong yourself? Do you care nothing about a free and democratic election? Can you not even entertain that you are one of the elitists causing the problems. Do you not understand that the SILENT MAJORITY, who do not usually even vote, have taken the time and trouble to leave their chairs and couches and go out and show their support for a candidate they can finally support?

 
I don’t know how we have survived almost 8 years of the current leadership, and in fact we have not yet, as he has deeply and widely embedded Islamists into every department and level of government in a way, only someone like Trump can weed out.

 
But you of all people David, the wonderful father that you are, MUST understand that to raise a family as good and supportive and respectful and dedicated to a father like Trump, especially after 2 failed marriages, that type of father, that type of man cannot even come close to your close minded description of his character. The Trump kids, who grew up in wealth and privilege and the pain of 2 divorces, are exemplary citizens, ALL OF THEM, and totally support and respect their father. Do you in any way question that as their foundation and nurturer he could be anything but a man of solid values and integrity? You’ve raised many kids, you know the challenges, and how they turned out could only be a testament to his moral fiber.

 
All men have egos, and Trumps main challenge is that he is not a smooth charismatic speaker. So yes, you elitists will jump on media extracted sound bites that paint him so negatively, but take the time to see the substance of his ‘straight from the hip, unfiltered’ comments and you will not see lines of insulted workers of all backgrounds waiting to add their stories of the despicable boss they had, you will find stories and comments of a man that treated everyone fairly and equally.

 
When the media tried to show how awful he was to women, you had those same women come out and support him, showing the media, the folks you are supporting, to be totally biased with a lack of integrity to the truth. Now you, David, join them too!

 

You have created the most shameful column you have ever written. You besmirched the good character of a man who doesn’t need the power or aggravation or home or airplane that come with this office. Trump is running because he really does want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT again. With all the votes on the ground and support of all the We The People, not acknowledging him as the Republican Candidate shows you to have a TOTAL DISREGARD for the democracy we enjoy. I respect your disapproval of Trump, even though it does diminish you in my eyes, but I respect your right to your opinion. Your suggestion that we overthrow the democratic process because you feel you are smarter than the rest of us, is just plain ego on your part, far more vulgar than anything you describe in Trump.

 

2) Paul Schnee (sch290@hotmail.com):

 

During the last 12 months nobody has won any money betting against Donald Trump. As I understand it the gravamen of Mr. Suissa’s argument is that some method should be found to deny the will of the primary voters either before or at the Republican convention in July. This suggestion would have been more beneficially applied to Obama’s candidacy in 2008. Had it been successful the likelihood of a populist Trump candidacy, which seems to horrify Mr. Suissa even more than the 8 mirthless, poisonous and treacherous years of Obama’s presidency, would have been remote. Denying the will of the people is a conceit of the political elite as Prime Minister Cameron just discovered on Thursday.

 

Those conservatives and Republicans who will not support Donald Trump because they imagine themselves to be too politically pure, too morally superior, too well educated and too sophisticated because they consider Trump to be an unprincipled quasi-liberal vulgarian are committing a costly form of sanctimony which will hand over America and the Supreme Court to a political party which has abandoned Israel, supports the hate-group, Black Lives Matter, and whose members have moved so far to the left they would be unable to see the center if they were standing on top of a ladder looking through a pair of binoculars.

 

3) Ari Bussel (bussel@me.com):

 

Dear David,

 

Good writing evokes emotions and transfers the piece from the writer to the reader.

 

I am not going to say you are misguided, wrong or otherwise delusional.  I have read at least two lengthy comments to that effect.  Quite on the contrary, I immensely enjoyed, as always, reading your column.  The comments show that people read your column and that what you write affects them, sufficiently to drive them to engage in a discussion with you and/or with the piece.

 

I wonder, and you might too, of all the very many columns you have written this year, is that the single most “profound” or “comment-enticing” one.  Time will tell.  And your readers may think differently than you (each holds a different column of a writer as “most memorable”).

 

I would say, though, that had your “Dump Trump” been published a few weeks ago, it would have been timely, suggestive and thought-provoking.  As it is now, it is stale, outdated and plain sour.

 

The current timing is similar to all those Britons who, moments after the final Brexit results were announced, started calling for another vote, and will likely demand another and another … until their vote is the one that prevails!  Two million, three million and the count is rising.  But how many of them voted to separate in the first place?

 

You admit that “Love him or hate him, the man has earned his delegates.”  You do not question the process; you simply do not like the results. Thus, you call to tailor new regulations, just so that we can change what is truly rightfully earned and fait accompli.

 

You care not that you undermine the integrity of the process, and that is exactly how Democrats today behave; as if they are the owners of the process, and the process must therefore fit itself to them.

 

You advocate somewhat similar to Ehud Barak’s call, at present time in Israel, for a “rebellion” or an “uprising” or anything of the sort, simply because he does not like the current government and/or because he is desperate seeing the “Left,” of which he is a part, evaporating to non-existence.  [I wonder what would happen if I were to use the same about the sitting President of the United States.  “Ousting” or “Rising Against” or anything similar, and I might find myself – in a best case scenario – in a jail cell, keys thrown to oblivion.]

 

You further suggest to Republican leaders to take the long view, the high road and to set an example.  You say, inter alia:

 

Republican leaders must say to America, “We have decided that Donald Trump is so far out of line that we can’t in good conscience support him. Even if we have to bear the wrath of his supporters, divide our party and forfeit the election, we will encourage delegates to go in another direction.”

 

Since when did party leaders – Democrats or Republicans – do the right thing?  They care about one thing, and one thing only – perpetuating the status quo:  immense power and wealth, corruption and politics all concentrated in their hands.

 

Out of necessity – like the Israelites at the Red Sea, with the Egyptians fast approaching – Republican leaders finally understood the demand of (everyday) Republicans – we, the (simple) people, those who have a single, legitimate vote – and internalized the call to stop “Washington Politics.”  Further they understood (not so much by choice, but by sheer and overwhelming reality) that if the party is to survive, they must unite and reflect the people; not the comforts of the status quo where they rule and “let the people be damned!”  Thus you call for them to do the right thing; they have already done so.

 

In Biblical times, Nachshon jumped into the raging waters.  In current day Washingtonian politics, it was the Speaker of the House who was last remaining at the edge of the cliff, refusing to jump to save the institution, the party and himself.  He had no choice but to finally relent as well.

 

Once Paul Ryan announced he will vote together the entire party behind its presumptive nominee, the last fort of opposition to the New Reality has fallen.  Had your column appeared until that moment, it would be a wonderful, thought-provoking, reality-questioning piece.

 

But as it was published after that tipping point, it is nothing but a lamentation of a sore loser; and I know you are not.

 

Imagine a similar column published moments after the Berlin Wall was toppled on 11/9/1989 or at the time President Reagan said, on 6/12/1987, “Tear Down This Wall!”  Timing – all the difference in the world.

 

DJT might be a narcissist, but what is new under the sun?  Are we not completing eight years under another similar narcissist (“it is my way, and only my way!”), simply from the other side of the aisle?  The difference is that with one we had to undergo eight long years of subjugating everything we hold dear (from the Constitution, tumbled under his feet, to the medical care we used to get to anything else that was “life in America” before BHO) to him, and you seem to be afraid of the next four years of “narcissism break[ing] loose.”

 

Anything – either Clinton or Trump – will be better than what we have endured thus far.  As a Republican all my life, and for the sake of America, I hope it will be DJT.  My vote will be for him.

 

Always,

 

Ari Bussel

bussel@me.com

 

+++

From the Jewish Journal

 

Republicans must dump Trump

By David Suissa

 

 Donald Trump by Gage Skidmore-Flickr

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Photo by Gage Skidmore/Flickr

 

It’s bad enough when a narcissist is so full of himself that even a defeat can’t humble him. Win or lose, he’s always right. Imagine, then, what happens when an extreme narcissist starts to win, and wins big. All narcissism breaks loose. He goes from being drunk on his greatness to being totally plastered.

 

This is what is happening to Donald Trump.

 

He has passed the drunken phase. His stunning victories in the Republican primaries, his endless media exposure and his raucous rallies have become like cocaine-heroin speedballs to the part of his brain that triggers his ego. Blinded by self-love, he has doubled down on his offensiveness and recklessness.

 

His critics inside the Republican party say, “What did you expect? This is who Trump is.” But I think it’s worse than that.

 

What we’re seeing now is Trump becoming more and more Trumpish, a man so hypnotized by his own success that he can’t see himself unraveling (with a 70 percent disapproval rating). He can hire and fire advisers, but it won’t help, because he can’t help himself.

 

If Trump pulls off a miracle and wins the White House, we will have an unhinged leader of the free world, intoxicated by his greatness, prone to even more recklessness.

 

But even if he loses, which is more likely, we will still have to brave another few months of Trumpian bile. Come November, there won’t be anyone left to offend. We will all need a National Detox Day.

 

Among the many fallouts of this cringe-inducing year is how Trump’s crassness has overshadowed some genuine grievances among his working-class voters. Many of them feel, rightfully, that the economic recovery has left them behind and the Washington establishment has ignored them.

 

Some Trump voters also are tired of seeing their country getting ripped off, whether by a badly run war in Iraq that squandered $3 trillion, a badly negotiated nuclear deal that empowered a terror-sponsoring Iran, or unfair trade agreements that have cost American jobs.

 

The great GOP tragedy of 2016 is that it was a vulgar and divisive circus clown who figured out how to tap into many of those grievances.

 

In the beginning, many of us saw the Trump phenomenon as a harmless and amusing sideshow. Now, we see it is contaminating a party — and a nation.

 

That’s why Republicans must do everything they can to dump the Trumpster.

 

This is no longer about partisan politics; it’s about defending the honor of our country. As Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said recently, “There’ll come a time when the love of country will trump hatred of Hillary.”

 

With their convention only a month away, for Republicans that time is now. Trump’s beyond-the-pale behavior justifies looking for every possible angle in the playbook to allow delegates to nominate another candidate.

 

Yes, it’ll be messy, but as John Fund writes in National Review Online, there are expert opinions in support of freeing up the delegates:

 

“Curly Haugland, a member of both the Republican National Committee and the convention’s Rules Committee, has co-authored with Sean Parnell a persuasive mini-book, ‘Unbound: The Conscience of a Republican Delegate,’ to make the case that delegates to the GOP convention are free to vote their conscience.”

 

Denying Trump the nomination is a long shot, to be sure. Love him or hate him, the man has earned his delegates. Still, this is one of those torturous moments when one imperative overrides another. If there is a legitimate way to replace Trump with another candidate, it must be tried.

 

Republican leaders must say to America, “We have decided that Donald Trump is so far out of line that we can’t in good conscience support him. Even if we have to bear the wrath of his supporters, divide our party and forfeit the election, we will encourage delegates to go in another direction.”

 

Politicians and operatives inside the GOP who have mocked and criticized Trump but are nevertheless supporting him are simply proving his point about the cronyism of the political class. The only way they can salvage their integrity is to throw themselves at the mercy of principle and work to replace him.

 

This would be good not only for America — in the long run, it also would be good for the Republican Party.

 

“There will always be other Trumps until Republicans decide to make defeating Trumpism a cause, even if that means short-term losses,” former Democratic speechwriter Jon Favreau writes on The Ringer website. “If the party does not become more welcoming and inclusive, young people and other voters will tune it out.”

 

Donald Trump is too narcissistic to learn from his experience, either in victory or in failure. The Republican Party cannot afford to become like him.

 

To read this article online, visit jewishjournal.com.

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

As you might relate, there were some typos in the comments – something we all do when placing comments ourselves. I used spellcheck to edit.

 

Conservatives Must Unite


GOP 2012

 

John R. Houk

© March 7, 2012

 

Mitt Romney is again beginning to be the anointed to win the Republican nomination for President among the MSM and Conservative pundits. This is not pleasing to me; however the reality is people are looking at the present numbers and the potential future.

 

It is my opinion that it is not too late for Conservatives to have a GOP candidate other than Mitt Romney. What is standing in the way for that Conservative nominee? That would be the political egos of Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. It is time for Santorum and Gingrich to make a Conservative deal that might run something like a President/Vice President deal. According to the numbers the logical deal would be Santorum as President and Gingrich as Vice President.

 

As it stands to date according to the WSJ Delegate Counter:

 

Romney: 415

 

Santorum: 176

 

Gingrich: 105

 

Paul: Not a chance in H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks

 

If Santorum and Gingrich unite at this point the delegate count for Conservatives is 281.

 

Undoubtedly Romney will score more delegates in the future; however if a Santorum/Gingrich team worked together there is the chance they could catch up at least and at worst keep Romney from acquiring 1144 delegates to win the nomination outright. I believe the Conservatives at the Convention would take over and select another candidate other than Romney which would undoubtedly honor a Santorum/Gingrich deal.

 

Without deals, Romney will be the next GOP nominee for President.

 

Dan McLaughlin over at RedState.com kind of brings the numbers and reality together in a post.

 

JRH 3/7/12