Newbill Conspiracy insights & Propositions Part 2


List of Why Hillary Lies Matter

Tony Newbill examines Crooked Hillary insinuated her goals in the matrix of a clandestine government. (Part One can be read HERE.)

 

JRH 7/19/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Newbill Conspiracy insights & Propositions Part 2

Tony Newbill

Posted July 19, 2016

 

Wed 7/13/2016 10:07 AM

Hilary is 2 Candidates in One

 

Hilary is 2 Candidates in One, first she’s a candidate for POTUS and then She’s a candidate for the “Deep State” and this is where the problem with maintaining USA Sovereignty exists.

 

The Deep State is who gave Hilary a Pass on accountability to the Civilians of the USA thus making US Citizens Subjects of the DEEP STATE!!!!!
These 2 links give insight to the Concept that Hilary Clinton is 2 candidates in one:

 

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/deep-state-america/

Deep State America

 

[Blog Editor: Newbill also used the last two links are also used as a comment to the dual post “Deep State USA” which includes the Deep State Conspiracy thoughts of Daniel Gladstein. Newbill has several comments on that post largely related to Gladstein’s thoughts. Newbill’s comments to the Deep State post will show in a later blog post because they are a little different than here even though the links are the same.]

 

It has frequently been alleged that the modern Turkish Republic operates on two levels. It has a parliamentary democracy complete with a constitution and regular elections, but there also exists a secret government that has been referred to as the “deep state,” in Turkish “Derin Devlet.”

 

The concept of “deep state” has recently become fashionable to a certain extent, particularly to explain the persistence of traditional political alignments when confronted by the recent revolutions in parts of the Middle East and Eastern Europe. For those who believe in the existence of the deep state, there are a number of institutional as well as extralegal relationships that might suggest its presence.

 

Some believe that this deep state arose out of a secret NATO operation called “Gladio,” which created an infrastructure for so-called “stay behind operations” if Western Europe were to be overrun by the Soviet Union and its allies. There is a certain logic to that assumption, as a deep state has to be organized around a center of official and publicly accepted power, which means it normally includes senior officials of the police and intelligence services as well as the military. …

 

 

As all governments—sometimes for good reasons—engage in concealment of their more questionable activities, or even resort to out and out deception, one must ask how the deep state differs. While an elected government might sometimes engage in activity that is legally questionable, there is normally some plausible pretext employed to cover up or explain the act.

 

But for players in the deep state, there is no accountability and no legal limit. Everything is based on self-interest, justified through an assertion of patriotism and the national interest. …

 

 

If all this sounds familiar to an American reader, it should, and given some local idiosyncrasies, it invites the question whether the United States of America has its own deep state.

 

 

In truth America’s deep state is, not unlike Turkey’s, a hybrid creature that operates along a New York to Washington axis. Where the Turks engage in criminal activity to fund themselves, the Washington elite instead turns to banksters, lobbyists, and defense contractors, operating much more in the open and, ostensibly, legally. U.S.-style deep state includes all the obvious parties, both public and private, who benefit from the status quo: including key players in the police and intelligence agencies, the military, the treasury and justice departments, and the judiciary. It is structured to materially reward those who play along with the charade, and the glue to accomplish that ultimately comes from Wall Street. “Financial services” might well be considered the epicenter of the entire process. Even though government is needed to implement desired policies, the banksters comprise the truly essential element, capable of providing genuine rewards for compliance. As corporate interests increasingly own the media, little dissent comes from the Fourth Estate as the process plays out, while many of the proliferating Washington think tanks that provide deep state “intellectual” credibility are READ ENTIRETY (Deep State America: Democracy is often subverted by special interests operating behind the scenes; By PHILIP GIRALDI; American Conservative; 7/30/15)

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department

 

Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States’ oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

 

Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region’s fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Department’s documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.

 

 

These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing — the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 — contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.

 

The Saudi deal was one of dozens of arms sales approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that placed weapons in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.

 

Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure — derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) — represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.

 

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.

 

American defense contractors also donated to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and in some cases made personal payments to Bill Clinton for speaking engagements. Such firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of Pentagon-negotiated deals that were authorized by the Clinton State Department between 2009 and 2012.

 

 

… She noted that “UAE-based donors have provided financial support to a variety of terrorist groups.” All of these countries donated to the Clinton Foundation and received increased weapons export authorizations from the Clinton-run State Department.

 

READ ENTIRETY (Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department; By DAVID SIROTA and ANDREW PEREZ; IBT; 5/26/15)

 

 

This link shows how the DEEP STATE is Protecting Hilary Clinton: [Blog Editor: The link below is actually a comment to the article entitled ‘Loretta Lynch Ducks 74 Questions From Congress: “Either Avoiding Appearances or Protecting Hillary”’. The identity of the commenter is “Tommy”. This means Tony Newbill and Tommy are one and the same. Since “Newbill” is a pseudonym, the mystery: has the anonymity been revealed? Or is it another pseudonym? The mystery continues. After the comment link is an excerpt from the actual article which I believe is Newbill’s actual intention.]

 

http://www.shtfplan.com/conspiracy-fact-and-theory/ag-lynch-ducks-74-questions-from-congress-either-avoiding-appearances-or-protecting-hillary_07132016#comment-3586197

 

Did Attorney General Loretta Lynch lie about or obfuscate her role in clearing Hillary in the investigations concerning the handling of classified emails on her private server?

 

Is there a quid pro quo among the two women, in which Lynch could have been promised a role in the next Clinton Administration in exchange for her help in calling off potential criminal charges that might derail Hillary’s campaign.

 

Lynch claims there is no such relationship. But she also refused to answer at least 74 of Congress’ questions about her private meeting with former President Bill Clinton and her relationship with the Clintons and/or their staff.

 

Recall, that the announcement that Hillary was off the hook, as it were, came immediately after the Attorney General and former president met.

 

As The Daily Caller reported at the time:

Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court late Wednesday seeking a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.

 

 

As example to this, Loretta Lynch refused an entire line of questions from Rep. Jason Chaffetz about whether or not it was hypothetically legal or illegal to retain classified information.

 

Despite the straightforward nature of this questioning, Attorney General Lynch refused to even acknowledge whether or not it is illegal to lie under oath.

 

Wow. This is stonewalling of READ ENTIRETY (Loretta Lynch Ducks 74 Questions From Congress: “Either Avoiding Appearances or Protecting Hillary”; By Mac Slavo; SHTFplan.com; 7/13/16)

 

++++++++++

Fri 7/15/2016 12:45 PM

Hilary’s Red and Blue Camps Plan to deal with peoples conflicting Religious views

 

Hilary’s Red and Blue Camps Plan to deal with peoples conflicting Religious views:

 

http://tinyurl.com/jecht9f 

[Blog Editor: The tiny url is to a Youtube post that demonstrates that Hillary Clinton intends to continue Barack Obama’s fundamental transformation of the USA away from American values by further diluting the Christian faith’s moral standards.]

 

VIDEO: Clinton Demands Christians Deny Jesus!

 

 

Posted by NicholasPOGM

Published on May 26, 2015

 

As I stated in the video, before making public statements, political candidates do demographic research so as to see what the public will accept or reject. And this is especially true with presidential campaigns! What Hillary Clinton says during a campaign speech confirms the powers that be, know for a fact that the majority of the churches in America no longer bow to Jesus, His Word, or even common sense for that matter! Her comments CONFIRM the leaders in the USA will remove religious liberty soon! The fact they have proof there will be little opposition is the green light they have been looking for.

(original video)
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4220594877001/same-sex-marriage-case-raising-religious-liberty-concerns/?#sp=show-clips

 

http://tinyurl.com/j3abcsw

 

[Blog Editor: This tiny url is to a Youtube video in which Hillary Clinton says she believes Americans need “Adult Camps” to teach them how to relate to cultural socio-religious mores acceptable to modernity (i.e. transform minds). Hmm… Crooked Hillary’s speech should make you think of Communist Chinese re-education camps or old Soviet re-education camps]

 

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton Says ” We Need Camps For Adults” (Concentration Camps)

 

 

Posted by DTAShieldOFaith

Published on Apr 14, 2015

 

At an event for camp professionals, Hillary Clinton pitches camp for grownups, where the “red” and “blue” cabins would have no choice but to work together.

.All praises to Yahawah Bahasham Yahawashi Shalawam ahchyam Double Honors to the Apostles and Elders of GMS
(The Elect) around the world teaching the word in sincerely and truth

 

And we have General Wesley Clark saying the same kind of thing about Camps:

https://theintercept.com/2015/07/20/chattanooga-wesley-clark-calls-internment-camps-disloyal-americans/

 

[Blog Editor: I am guessing the link about General Clark suggesting that radicalized Muslims be rounded up and placed in camps is Newbill’s shot at being fair and balanced. Clark is a Leftist in the Dem Party thus making his statement against Muslim be castigated by Obama and the current Crooked Hillary campaign. Think of the clamor if Trump made such a statement! I sense the point Newbill is reaching for is the willingness of Dems to form re-education camps – PERIOD.]

 

Retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of the mass shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

 

He called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”

 

READ THE REST (Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for “Radicalized” Americans; By Murtaza Hussain; The Intercept; 7/20/15 9:12 a.m.)

 

And there has been a lot of debate within the Policy making positions of authority regarding Radical Religious people, https://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

 

(U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment

 

7 April 2009

 

(U) Prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division. Coordinated with the FBI.

 

(U) Scope

 

(U//FOUO) This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States. Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States Government sponsorship.

 

 

(U) Key Findings

 

(U//LES) The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.

 

— (U//LES) Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts. Nevertheless, the consequences of a prolonged economic downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit—could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past.

 

— (U//LES) Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.

 

(U//FOUO) The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other READ THE REST (Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment; By Homeland Security Department – posted by Federation of American Scientists (FAS); Unclassified version released 4/7/09)

 

And Justice Scalia [was] saying we will see Camps in the USA, so it seems there is an Ideology within the hierarchy of Government of this train of thought: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/justice-antonin-scalia-says-world-war-ii-style-internment-camps-could-happen-again/article/2543424

 

Justice Antonin Scalia predicts that the Supreme Court will eventually authorize another a wartime abuse of civil rights such as the internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II.

 

“You are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again,” Scalia told the University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States, the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps.

 

The local Associated Press report quotes Scalia as using a Latin phrase that means “in times of war, the laws fall silent,” to explain why the court erred in that decision and will do so again.

 

READ THE REST

 

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any information enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill Content

 

Trump Speech Shows Real Crooked Hillary


2 Hillary Faces- not lying & lying

John R. Houk

© June 23, 2016

 

I was browsing the Google+ communities that I belong to and came across a 41-minute speech of Donald Trump. The speech was hugely anti-Hillary and smacked around like a crooked ragged doll. For all of Hillary’s half-truth innuendos and outright lies campaigning against Trump, the anti-Hillary speech was a tour de force of triumph. Trump exposed every bit of the hypocrisy that Hillary has been tossing like dried cow-pies at the presumptive GOP nominee for POTUS. Essentially Trump’s speech rebuttals forced Hillary to slip on some wet slimy cow-pies which she also found on her face after ground impact.

 

I had a slight problem with two points of Trumps speech:

 

  • Inviting disgruntled Sanders voters to vote for Trump for real change against establishment politics.

 

  • Highlighting Trump’s stand against the U.S. invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush’s direction.

 

In the case of inviting disgruntled Sanders voters onto the Trump although potentially helpful for election is ideologically dangerous. Bernie Sanders is an avowed Socialist which means a big dose of taking everyone’s and redistributing it to people who are undeserving able bodies workmen who didn’t earn the money. Obama is a discreet Socialist/Marxist and Hillary follows that path of redistribution clandestinely as well. BUT Bernie (actually to his credit for truthfulness) forget the traditional Dem Party fooling American voters, let’s just be honest and tell that the Dems want to transform America into a failed faux-utopia. AND SANDERS VOTERS ABSOLUTELY BUY INTO THE MYTH OF UTOPIAN SOCIALISM! If Trump welcomes Sanders voters he may want to do that with a pro-Capitalist caveat.

 

As to invading Iraq, I then believed and still believe it was important to rid the world of the real Butcher of Baghdad in Saddam Hussein. Saddam was despotic dictator that terrorized his populace with equal opportunity. The Shia Muslims and the Kurdish Sunni Muslims were targets of often bloody oppression. And any Sunni Muslims that were not a part of Saddam’s Arab tribalistic affiliation faced his venom at any hint of backbone against the dictator’s regime. And there was the continuous threat against Israel that included sending scud rockets to Israel in the first Iraq war against American allies and the USA. Also let’s not forget at least two Saddam’s sons who marched around lawlessly even kidnapping women off the street to rape them. I might be wrong, but it seems the least persecuted group under Saddam Hussein were the indigenous Christian population. However, I have no doubts the Iraqi Christians had their share of Saddam persecution just not on the level of the rest of Iraqis and certainly not on the level Christians are currently experiencing under ISIS control.

 

It is my opinion that the big mistake with GW’s invasion of Iraq was the attempt to nation build Iraq as a single nation under the same ethnic-religious divides that existed from British creation right through the horrific regime of Saddam Hussein. The nation building would probably worked if Iraq was divided into at least three independent nations roughly along the lines of Sunnis, Shias and Kurds.

 

I understand the geopolitical reasons as to why GW didn’t divide Iraq up. Those reasons largely were the probability the huge Shia population would have become at least a dominion of Iran. And neither Turkey (our ally at the time) nor Iran (troublesome U.S. enemy) were too fond of an independent Kurdish nation since both those nations had significant Kurdish citizens also persecuted by Turkey and Iran.

 

American Leftists like to use the hindsight that no nuclear material was found in Iraq capable of making nukes. AND YET the Dems read the same Intelligence reports the Bush Administration read and signed-off on invading Iraq’s crazy Saddam. There are some legitimate reports that Russian Spetsnaz forces clandestinely transferred the usable WMD material Assad’s Syria (See Also HERE) and it is absolutely proven that U.S. naval vessels shipped yellowcake (See Also HERE) from uranium to Canada for reasons or purposes I’m currently unaware of. So it is understandable that American Intelligence erred on the side of inflating Saddam’s nuke capabilities. Saddam was so crazy that even a hint of the possibility of a nuke potential should have been good enough to remove the Butcher of Baghdad. ANYWAY, Hillary thought so as well (See Also HERE). She voted for invasion with the same Intelligence reports.

 

So, below is the full anti-Hillary speech from Donald Trump giving us a clue that he won’t lay down for the Left like Mitt Romney did and I’m following that with a FrontPageMag article showing the Trump speech closer to reality than the stench protruding from Hillary’s lips.

 

JRH 6/23/16 (Hat Tip: Josh S 6/22/16 – 4:57 PMUnited We Stand G+ Community)

Please Support NCCR

********************

VIDEO: Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Anti-Hillary Clinton Speech in NYC (6-22-16)

 

 

Posted by Right Side Broadcasting

Published on Jun 22, 2016

 

Wednesday, June 22, 2016: Full replay of Donald Trump’s anti-Hillary Clinton speech at Trump SoHo in New York City.

Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Anti-Hillary Clinton Speech in NYC (6-22-16)

 

+++

LIAR, LIAR PANTSUIT ON FIRE

And with Donald Trump’s renewed focus, is the comeuppance of economically illiterate “Crooked Hillary” at hand?

 

By Matthew Vadum

June 23, 2016

FrontPageMag.com

 

Editor’s note: Credit goes to Dr. Bob Shillman for the title of this article.

 

Hillary Clinton’s bizarre claim that billionaire businessman Donald Trump will cause a recession if elected to the presidency was overshadowed yesterday as Trump took deadly aim at the pathological liar’s horrifying public service track record.

 

For her part, Clinton glibly dismissed Trump.

 

“As I said yesterday in Ohio, Donald Trump offers no real solutions for the economic challenges we face,” Clinton said in a speech to the faithful in Raleigh, N.C. “He just continues to spout reckless ideas that will run up our debt and cause another economic crash.”

 

Around the same time, Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, laid into “Crooked Hillary” with a vigor and focus that Americans haven’t seen for a while. Trump’s speech, in which he accurately described Clinton as a “world-class liar,” was very well received and is making left-wing pundits nervous — for good reason.

 

Unlike Trump’s address, Clinton’s speech was a carefully constructed alternate reality held together by a tissue of leftist lies. Clinton’s oration was an economically illiterate catalog of hoary Marxist clichés, or as Dr. Bob Shillman quipped, “liar, liar, pantsuit on fire.”

 

Clinton offered a vague outline of her disastrous socialistic economic agenda, largely a continuation of President Obama’s anti-growth policies and tainted as it is by a focus on so-called social justice objectives at the expense of economic growth and individual rights.

 

She spoke nonsensically of “growth that’s strong, fair, and lasting … that reduces inequality, increases upward mobility, that reaches into every corner of our country.” To keep her union thugs happy, Clinton vowed to “say no to bad trade deals and unfair trade practices, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership,” and no to the “assault on the right to organize and bargain collectively.”

 

Ignoring the fact that she served front and center in a radically left-wing administration that over the last nearly seven and a half years has presided over the weakest economic recovery since the Great Depression, Clinton promised “to make this economy work for everybody … building it from the ground up, from every home and every community, all the way to Washington.”

 

Leftists like Hillary enjoy anthropomorphizing inanimate objects and abstract concepts because they can’t win policy arguments on the merits. They prefer fabricating monsters they can slay.

 

Guns and gas-guzzling SUVs “kill” people, they routinely claim as if machines were sentient, volitional beings. To them the U.S. Constitution is a “living document” that changes with the times. And like their cousins the Keynesians, they treat the economy like a circus animal that can be manipulated and taught tricks, instead of as the product of billions of individual decisions made every day by producers and consumers.

 

Clinton dredged up one of the Left’s favorite and most insidious talking points, declaring “it is way past time for us to guarantee equal pay for women.”

 

The fanciful claim that women earn less than men will probably never die because it is essential to the Left’s narrative that America is inherently unfair. Of course comparing men’s wages to women’s wages is like comparing apples to oranges. Women pull in less money because they tend to opt for more humanities and fewer science and math majors in college. Owing to family and child-rearing obligations, women as a group also tend not to work the long hours that men work.

 

Critiquing President Obama’s claim that women earn just 77 cents for every dollar men earn, the Manhattan Institute’s Diana Furchtgott-Roth wrote in 2013 that the 77-cent figure “is bogus because it averages all full-time women, no matter what education and profession, with all full-time men.”

 

“Unmarried childless women’s salaries, however, often exceed men’s,” she wrote. “In a comparison of unmarried and childless men and women between the ages of 35 and 43, women earn more: 108 cents on a man’s dollar.”

 

The feminist fabulist continued spinning yarns.

 

“Excessive inequalities such as we have today reduces economic growth,” Clinton said, pretending she likes the market economy. “Markets work best when all the stakeholders share in the benefits,” she said, paying homage to candidate Obama’s mantra that “when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

 

“There are great ideas out there,” Clinton said. “And we are going to be partners in a big, bold effort to increase economic growth and distribute it more fairly, to build that economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top.” The “Wall Street corporations and the super rich,” also known as her most ardent supporters, must be made to “pay their fair share of taxes.”

 

She promised to “make college debt-free for all” and to “rewrite the rules so more companies share profits with their employers and few ship profits and jobs overseas.”

 

Clinton defended the international cash-for-future-presidential-favors trading platform known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. She belittled Trump for highlighting the corruption endemic to the enterprise that is primarily devoted to enriching the Clinton family.

 

Trump is trying “to distract us” by “attacking a philanthropic foundation that saves and improves lives around the world,” she said with a straight face. “It’s no surprise he doesn’t understand these things.”

 

The Heritage Foundation’s Stephen Moore dismantled what he called Clinton’s “Twilight Zone” grab bag of proposals. A related speech Hillary gave the previous day “was vacant of ANY ideas at all about how to help the economy. The left’s idea cupboard is entirely empty. ”

 

Moore mocked her claim that here “in America we pay our bills,” a reference to what he called “Trump’s sensible idea of refinancing out debt to lock in historically low interest rates.” The Obama administration in which Clinton served has generated some $8 trillion of new debt, which is hardly “paying the bills.”

 

“It’s passing them on to the next generation,” Moore wrote.

 

Clinton’s claim that Trump doesn’t understand the new economy and job creation, is “a bold claim since Donald Trump is a highly successful businessman who actually has created thousands of jobs, while Hillary has gotten rich off of… politics.”

 

Moore continued:

 

“The class warfare theme ran throughout the speech, and yet this presents Hillary with another uncomfortable problem. Obama has raised the minimum wage, he already did spend $830 billion on infrastructure stimulus spending, and he has taxed the bejesus out of the rich. And the result wasn’t more equality and a resurgent middle class, but an angry and worried worker class that hasn’t seen a pay raise in 15 years and with household incomes in the last seven years that have fallen behind inflation. Some 95 million Americans aren’t working and the poverty rate is still hellishly high.”

 

 

Clinton “is selling the American voters sand in the desert: four more years of stay the course economic bromides at a time when two out of three voters say that the U.S. is on the wrong, not the right track.”

 

Trump fired back at Hillary yesterday, hitting her hard enough that Clinton worshippers are getting anxious.

 

Slate’s Michelle Goldberg lamented that the tide may be turning against the Benghazi bungler Trump paints as a corrupt, money-grubbing, political hack. Crestfallen, the diehard leftist called Trump’s Wednesday speech on Clinton’s record dishonest and demagogic but “terrifyingly effective” and “probably the most unnervingly effective” speech the man has ever given.

 

“In a momentary display of discipline, he read from a teleprompter with virtually no ad-libbing, avoiding digs at Bill Clinton’s infidelity or conspiracy theories about Vince Foster’s suicide,” speaking “for 40 minutes without saying anything overtly sexist.” Instead, he took aim at “Clinton’s most-serious weaknesses, describing her as a venal tool of the establishment.”

 

“Hillary Clinton gave China millions of our best jobs and effectively let China completely rebuild itself,” Trump said. “In return, Hillary Clinton got rich!” He added, “She gets rich making you poor,” and declared her possibly “the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency.”

 

Goldberg treated Trump’s address as brilliant performance art in which he “interwove truth and falsehood into a plausible-seeming picture meant to reinforce listeners’ underlying beliefs.”

 

Pretending her readers were complete idiots ignorant of Hillary’s history, Goldberg wheeled out Washington establishment yes man David Gergen to denounce what he called Trump’s “slanderous speech.” On CNN an animated Gergen made a fool of himself by castigating Trump for relying on the exhaustively documented allegations of graft and corruption in Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer.

 

Regurgitating the self-serving nonsense peddled by leftist slander shop Media Matters for America, the “conservative misinformation” monitor that Hillary herself takes credit for founding, Gergen said that the “book has been basically discredited.”

 

Not so. In fact, the New York TimesNew YorkerWashington PostWall Street JournalPolitico, Bloomberg, Reuters, ABC News, and CBS News have all confirmed several key details in Clinton Cash, investigative reporter Matthew Boyle points out.

 

Gergen added, “I’m sorry, at this level, you can’t slander somebody.”

 

Why Gergen has attained such prominence at this level in the Washington punditocracy is unclear.

 

What is clear is that he seems to know nothing about the Clinton family and has been asleep throughout Barack Obama’s Saul Alinsky-inspired presidency.

____________________________

Trump Speech Shows Real Crooked Hillary

John R. Houk

© June 23, 2016

___________________________

LIAR, LIAR PANTSUIT ON FIRE

 

ABOUT MATTHEW VADUM

 

Matthew Vadum, senior vice president at the investigative think tank Capital Research Center, is an award-winning investigative reporter and author of the book, “Subversion Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts Are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers.”

 

© COPYRIGHT 2016, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM


About FRONTPAGE MAG 

 

FRONTPAGE MAG IS A PROUD PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER

 

The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

 

DiscoverTheNetworks.com, launched in 2005, is the largest publicly accessible database defining READ THE REST

 

 

Nefarious Implications for the USA via the Muslim Brotherhood


MB Trojan Horse to USA

John R. Houk

© October 17, 2013

 

Yesterday I posted on the battle of wills between Rep. Michele Bachmann and CAIR-MN (and CAIR national for that matter). In doing some precursory research on Rep. Bachmann accusing Muslim Mosques in America of being primarily financed by foreign nations with ties to violent Radical Islam. Rep. Bachmann points to Saudi Arabia and Qatar in which Wahhabi Islam is enshrined as the rule of law and which spouts the exact same theopolitical ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). AND CAIR-MN is whining (probably) because CAIR and numerous other Muslim-American organizations as well as individuals of political power can be directly linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) had its name associated with now defunct Holy Land Foundation (HLF). The HLF is defunct because its operating officers have been convicted of funneling Muslim-American donations to the Muslim Brotherhood-connected Islamic terrorist organization known as Hamas. The Department of State lists Hamas as a terrorist organization. Hamas’ sole reason to exist is NOT just to establish a new Muslim-Arab State to be called Palestine, rather Hamas’ raison d’être is to destroy Israel and kill Jews. The insidious transnational web of the Muslim Brotherhood in one of many of Muslim-American organizations can thus be described like this: CAIR-MB-Hamas. No matter how you look at that it is an Islamic Terrorist support scheme between CAIR and Hamas.

 

Since the days of the HLF convictions for funding Hamas more and more public information has come to light about CAIR receiving funding from foreign entities which is illegal since CAIR is not registered as a representative foreign agent. Under it non-profit status it is illegal for CAIR to receive foreign funds and the IRS not be notified from whence the money came from. So what did CAIR do?

 

CAIR began establishing phony coney groups in an attempt to legitimize foreign donations without revealing the origin of money. Of interest in particular of CAIR dividing its non-profit status into two organizations.Bachmann on MB Govt Infiltration CAIR began using names such as Washington Trust Foundation (WTF) and the CAIR-Action Network:

 

 

The scheme works like this:

 

CAIR is registered as a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization. The IRS says this is for social welfare organizations and that can include “organizations that engage in substantial lobbying activities.” Donors to this type of non-profit do not have to be disclosed.

 

In June 2013, CAIR changed its name to Washington Trust Foundation, Inc. Another previous name it used was CAIR-Action Network.

 

In 2005, CAIR sets up CAIR Foundation, Inc. and it receives its 501(c)(3) non-profit two years later. The IRS says these are charitable organizations that are prohibited from campaign activity. Its donors are disclosed and receive tax deductions.

 

This second organization did not file the required IRS forms from 2008-2010 and lost its non-profit status in 2011. In 2013, its status was revised and it changed its name to CAIR-Action Network, Inc.

 

The Daily Caller explains that it is legal for an organization to have two different types of non-profit entities, but they must be strictly separated. In CAIR’s case, they function as one.

 

To disguise its foreign donors, the financier writes a check to “CAIR” without specifying which entity. The funds are placed in the CAIR/Washington Trust Foundation account so the original source can be hidden.

 

From there, the money goes to the CAIR Foundation. As explained, donors to this non-profit must be disclosed but the original sources are hidden by routing the donation this way. In a single 5-year period, the CAIR-Action Network transferred $1.8 million to the CAIR Foundation.

 

(READ ENTIRETYReport: CAIR Engaged in Money-Laundering to Hide Foreign Donors; By Ryan Mauro; Clarion Project; 9/23/13)

 

Keeping this all in mind I found an excellent webpage disseminating information on the Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim-American organizations, and most emphasized organization is CAIR and the MB infiltration into the USA including the government. The website is put out as akdart.com and seems to be operated by Andrew K. Dart. I don’t know if A.K. Dart is an actual name or a pseudonym. A cursory Google search turned up nothing on the person and loads on articles – mostly from akdart.com – written by Dart. At the end of an article attributed to Andrew K. Dart at the Canada Free Press is a one sentence profile at the end entitled “Here Comes the Odometer Tax” and posted on 3/30/11:

 

“Andrew K. Dart is a broadcast engineer in Dallas, Texas, and is also the editor of akdart.com.”

 

I became weary of searching so if anyone knows any pertinent profile info about Dart let me know in the comment section. I would love to know more about a guy that gathers such great info.

 

At any rate below is an info page on the nefarious operations of Muslim Brotherhood activities in America emphasizing CAIR. The info is quite lengthy so really, take a couple of days to become knowledgeable.

 

JRH 10/17/13

Please Support NCCR