Was The Fix In On FBI Investigation Of Hillary Clinton’s Emails?


comey-hillarys-private-servor

Crooked Hillary and her acolytes are using FBI Director James Comey’s pronouncement that she committed many mistakes but there exists nothing to prosecute as an exoneration in an absolute sense, Now I’m a Conservative so I’m a bit incredulous about Comey’s, “Nothing to see hear – move along” pronouncement. Despite Comey’s pocket exoneration of Crooked Hillary, most sane people smell yet another Obama Administration cover-up or as I just read at the NoisyRoom.net, the fix is in!

 

JRH 10/1/16

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Was The Fix In On FBI Investigation Of Hillary Clinton’s Emails?

 

Posted by TMH

By Roger Aronoff | Accuracy in Media

9/30/16

NoisyRoom.net

 

The more that details about the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices come to light, the more their efforts appear to have been a sham designed to exonerate her of wrongdoing from the very beginning. As we wrote, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) failure to indict Hillary, based on the recommendation of FBI Director James Comey, has moved the United States closer to banana republic status.

 

The Clinton family’s ongoing corruption and Hillary Clinton’s pay-to-play as secretary of state have also created a precedent which could encourage other politicians to enrich themselves at the expense of the integrity of their office. The FBI’s light touch also has created a double standard on national security, where high-profile figures such as Mrs. Clinton walk free while others lose their security clearance or are fined or jailed.

 

Yet some on the left are unhappy with Comey’s investigation because of the comments he made publicly characterizing Mrs. Clinton as “extremely careless” with classified information. “What Comey should have done…was handle the Clinton probe like any other routine inquiry: provide confidential recommendations to prosecutors, release a strictly factual statement noting that the investigation would be closed, and resist external pressures to inappropriately air the FBI’s findings outside a court of law,” argues Riley Roberts, former speechwriter for former Attorney General Eric Holder, in Politico Magazine.

 

Arguably, Clinton’s status as a presidential candidate under FBI investigation may have called for some public justification of the FBI’s decision. However, despite Comey’s open criticisms, the fact remains that he decided to recommend no indictment for Hillary Clinton. There will be no accountability for Clinton’s many lies about classified information on her private email server or the way she jeopardized national security as secretary of state.

 

Upon further review, it appears that Mr. Comey’s investigation was highly unusual, given the five immunity agreements that were handed out. According to Paul Sperry, writing for the New York Post, not only was Platte River Networks’ Paul Combetta granted immunity, the DOJ upheld this immunity despite the fact that he had lied to the investigators during an interview.

 

“Instead of asking Attorney General Loretta Lynch to revoke his immunity deal and squeezing him, Comey let [Combetta] go because he was a ‘low-level guy,’ he testified at the House hearing. It’s yet another action by Comey,” wrote Sperry, “that has left former prosecutors shaking their heads.”

 

At that September 28 House Judiciary Committee hearing featuring Director Comey as a witness, Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) accused Combetta of “trying to cover-up the cover-up” by first using Reddit to solicit information on how to strip email address information and then trying to delete his posts. “The same guy later took Bleachbit and did delete emails,” continued Rep. Jordan.

 

But Comey insisted that the immunity agreement was necessary to ensure that the FBI got the facts.

 

“There’s no doubt Combetta was involved in deleting emails,” said Comey. “He had the ‘O-sh-t’ moment, as he told us, and that’s why it was very important for us to interview this guy to find out who told you to do that, why did you do that.”

 

According to Andy McCarthy, writing for National Review, Secretary Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills and Clinton aide Heather Samuelson also received immunity agreements meant to ensure that they gave the FBI access to their laptops. However, the FBI could have just subpoenaed the computers or obtained a search warrant instead.

 

Sperry makes it clear that Mills was lying to investigators, as well. She, apparently, “told agents she had no idea Clinton maintained a private email server,” he writes. However, the email record demonstrates that she emailed the server administrator to ask about the status of that very server.

 

McCarthy calls the granting of these immunity agreements “very strange” behavior by the FBI. “The Justice Department could have required the production of the computer by simply issuing a grand jury subpoena,” he writes. “And had there been any concern that Mills would not cooperate, would destroy the computer, or would ‘misplace’ it (as Team Clinton claims to have misplaced so many Hillary devices), investigators could have applied for a search warrant and seized the computer.”

 

To add insult to injury, the FBI allowed Samuelson and Mills to sit in on Hillary Clinton’s interview with the bureau.

 

Former U.S. attorney Solomon Wisenberg, who conducted the grand jury questioning of President Bill Clinton, argues that the FBI should never have allowed Cheryl Mills to sit in on Mrs. Clinton’s interview. “Competent prosecutors do not allow a key witness to participate as an attorney in an FBI interview of the main subject,” he writes. “It just isn’t done.” He writes that “if Clinton insisted on Mills’s attendance, the interview would be conducted under the auspices of the federal grand jury.”

 

In addition, it was inappropriate that the only interview of such a high profile subject wasn’t recorded. It is preposterous that nine people were allowed to sit in during the interview. Comey acknowledged that this was unusual, but he said it was not unprecedented, though he didn’t cite any precedents.

 

The FBI should have convened a grand jury instead of just conducting light touch interviews, argued former U.S. attorney Joe DiGenova, speaking at a recent Judicial Watch event. “Now, it is evident to me…what Mr. Comey should have done at the beginning of this investigation was empanel a grand jury,” said DiGenova. “When you want to investigate crimes involving national security information, classified information, you don’t do interviews. You issue subpoenas to witnesses, third parties for documents. You make people come into court and fight them in front of a federal judge…”

 

The left continues to claim that Mrs. Clinton is held to a different standard, a double standard when compared to other candidates. However, it is clear that the FBI did hold Mrs. Clinton and her aides to a different standard—one which gives a free pass to lies and corruption.

 

___________________

Roger Aronoff

 

Roger Aronoff is the Editor of Accuracy in Media, and a member of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi. He can be contacted at roger.aronoff@aim.orgView the complete archives from Roger Aronoff.

 

© 2016 NoisyRoom.net

 

 

Gowdy Pointed Out FBI Investigation Screw-Up


martha-mccllum-trey-gowdy

John R. Houk

© September 14, 2016

 

Thanks to the email of the American Patriot Daily, I came across a video that many of you may have seen or read about in one format or another. Nevertheless, it is the first time I have seen it. The video comprises of Martha MacCallum interviewing Rep. Trey Gowdy about the Comey’s news conference where there is an imbecilic explanation of the FBI investigation into Crooked Hillary’s email private server and the reasons that prosecution was not recommended.

 

Rep. Gowdy was in the law profession before he became a Congressmen. Due to this you have to believe he knows what he is talking about when he explains that James Comey’s FBI boys epically failed to ask questions that Hillary told the truth she would be prosecuted OR if she lied it would be discoverable thus AGAIN would be prosecuted.

 

The American Patriot Daily places the video in the middle of its article. I am placing at the top and then read the article to fully comprehend Rep. Trey Gowdy’s frustration with an inept investigation into Crooked Hillary and her email server.

 

These kinds of investigations are the very reason that Crooked Hillary and her hubby Slick Willie have never been successfully prosecuted to an end result of a conviction!

 

JRH 9/14/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

Trey Gowdy Blew Up Hillary Clinton’s Illegal Conduct

 gop-benghazi-comt-press-comference

Email Notification Sent: September 9, 2016

American Patriot Daily

 

VIDEO: Trey Gowdy lays out what answers Clinton still hasn’t given about use of private email server

 

Posted by Washington Free Beacon

Published on Aug 25, 2016

 

Many Americans believed the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server was a whitewash.

 

They contend the investigation was conducted just for the purpose of clearing Clinton of any wrongdoing.

 

And Trey Gowdy just proved how the investigation went off the rails.

 

Appearing on America’s Newsroom, Gowdy explained the investigators never asked about Hillary’s intent.

 

The Washington Free Beacon reports:

 

Gowdy, a House Oversight Committee member, said he did not see questions about Clinton’s intent in the FBI report on the bureau’s interview with her. While FBI Director James Comey said Clinton was “extremely careless” with emails, he did not recommend prosecution largely because she did not seem to have intent to commit wrongdoing.

 

 “I didn’t see any questions on that,” Gowdy said. “She said she did it for convenience, but I didn’t see the follow-up questions in the interview I read.”

 

Fox News host Martha MacCallum asked Gowdy, a career prosecutor, what questions he would have asked during the FBI interview of Clinton.

 

“The direct evidence would be, Madam Secretary, why did you set up this email server this way? Why did you not take a state-dot-gov email address?” Gowdy asked. “And her response was, and it always has been, convenience. And then that’s when you press and say, well, what could be more convenient than just doing a state-dot-gov email address?”

 

The “labyrinthine” efforts she used to have a home-brewed server were actually inconvenient, Gowdy said.

 

“I would then ask, why did you delete emails that you kept for a year and a half? Keep in mind these personal emails, she didn’t bother to delete them for a year and a half,” Gowdy said. “It was the fall of 2014, a year and a half after she left the State Department, that she decided to start deleting emails. Why didn’t you delete them the month you left? Why didn’t you delete them six months after you left? And the other question they should have asked her is, Madam Secretary, why didn’t you turn your emails over the day you left service? Why did you hold onto them for almost two years?”

 

While some pundits thought FBI Director Comey put the email scandal to rest by not recommending charges and allowing Clinton to move on, the opposite has happened.

 

Questions about the email server continue to gnaw at the Clinton campaign.

 

The polls have tightened as Trump has focused his message and more details emerge about Clinton’s corrupt behavior.

 

A recent Monmouth University poll showed Hillary’s lead cut in half from their previous survey.

 

And the just released Fox News poll found Hillary and Trump in a statistical tie when third party candidates Gary Johnson and Dr. Jill Stein were included.

 

Every day, revelations like the ones Gowdy discussed are brought to the forefront of the campaign and will continue to weigh down her support.

 

After the Democratic convention, the media breathed a sigh of relief as Hillary surged to a seven or eight point lead in the polls.

 

But that lead has narrowed in recent weeks.

 

If more scandal surrounding the Clinton Foundation and her email server comes to light, Hillary can expect to see a further drop in her numbers.

 

Do you think Donald Trump can continue to close the gap in the polls?

 

Let us know in the comment section.

______________

Gowdy Pointed Out FBI Investigation Screw-Up

John R. Houk

© September 14, 2016

____________

Trey Gowdy Blew Up Hillary Clinton’s Illegal Conduct

 

Copyright © 2016 American Patriot Daily. All Rights Reserved.

 

About American Patriot Daily

 

We are dedicated to the pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness.

We believe in one’s Right to Defend themselves.

We are committed to defending your rights and standing up to the man.

We are AmericanPatriotDaily.com

 

 

Christie Crooked Hillary Indictment Speech


Hillary indicted

John R. Houk

© July 21, 2016

 

On Fox News I heard a couple of minutes of Chris Christie’s speech at the Cleveland 2016 GOP National Convention. I was fired up with just a couple of minutes. So I wanted listen to Governor Christie’s entire speech. GLORTY TO GOD! Governor Christie needs tp be the next Attorney General of the United States under the Administration of a President Donald Trump!

 

Below is the entire roughly 15-minute speech Governor Christie’s Crooked Hillary indictment Speech. Then I am following that with an article that has the entire speech in print format – just to allow that speech to sink in.

 

JRH 7/21/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

VIDEO: Chris Christie FULL speech at Republican National Convention in Cleveland

 

 

Posted by Headlines Wiki

Published on Jul 19, 2016

 

Chris Christie: Governor of New Jersey Speaks at 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland

“I am proud to say that the voice of the people of our nation is being heard in this hall and those voices want Donald Trump to be the next President of the United States,” Christie said on Tuesday.

 

+++

READ: Chris Christie’s full speech at RNC 2016 where he prosecutes Hillary Clinton

 

By Matt Arco | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com 

July 19, 2016 at 9:51 PM, updated July 20, 2016 at 8:30 AM

NJ.com

 

Chris Christie GOP Natl Convention 2016

Gov. Christie addresses the convention. The 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland. Tuesday July 19, 2016. Cleveland, OH, USA (Aristide Economopoulos | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com)

 

CLEVELAND  — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie spoke to the Republican National Convention Tuesday night in Cleveland.

 

Here’s the prepared text of the governor’s speech:

 

I am here tonight not only as the Governor of New Jersey, but also as Donald Trump‘s friend for the last fourteen years.

 

We are about to be led by not only a strong leader but by a caring, genuine and decent person.

 

I am proud to say that the voice of the people of our nation is being heard in this hall and those voices want Donald Trump to be the next President of the United States. But this election is not just about Donald Trump.

 

It is also about his Democratic opponent, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

 

In the past few weeks we have seen this Justice Department refuse to prosecute her.

 

Over the last eight years, we have seen this Administration refuse to hold her accountable for her dismal record as Secretary of State.

 

Well, tonight, as a former federal prosecutor, I welcome the opportunity to hold her accountable for her performance and her character.

 

We must present those facts to you, a jury of her peers, both in this hall and in living rooms around our nation.

 

VIDEO: Governor Chris Christie attacks Hillary Clinton [the 5-minute version]

 

Since the Justice Department refuses to allow you to render a verdict, let’s present the case now, on the facts, against Hillary Clinton. She was America’s chief diplomat. Look around at the violence and danger in our world today every region of the world has been infected with her flawed judgment.

 

But let me be specific so you can render your verdict. In North Africa, she was the chief engineer of our disastrous overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya.

 

Libya today after Hillary Clinton’s grand strategy? Libya’s economy in ruins, death and violence in the streets and ISIS now dominating the country.

 

Hillary Clinton, as a failure for ruining Libya and creating a nest for terrorist activity by ISIS guilty or not guilty? In Nigeria, Hillary Clinton amazingly fought for two years to keep an Al-Qaeda affiliate off the terrorist watch list.

 

What happened because of this reckless action by the candidate who is the self proclaimed champion of women around the world? These terrorists abducted hundreds of innocent young girls two years ago.

 

These schoolgirls are still missing today.

 

What was the solution from the Obama/Clinton team? A hashtag campaign! Hillary Clinton, as an apologist for an Al-Qaeda affiliate in Nigeria resulting in the capture of innocent young women guilty or not guilty? She fights for the wrong people.

 

She doesn’t fight for us. She doesn’t get the real threats America faces. In China, Hillary Clinton praised the Chinese government for buying our debt to finance President Obama’s bloated stimulus plan.

 

So desperate for Chinese cash, she promised to oppose the Buy American provision in the stimulus bill in exchange for the cash to finance his huge expansion of government spending.

 

Hillary Clinton, putting big government spending financed by the Chinese ahead of jobs for middle class Americans guilty or not guilty? In Syria, she called President Assad a “reformer” and a “different kind of leader”.

 

With 400,000 now dead … think about that.

 

Four.

 

Hundred.

 

Thousand. Dead.

 

At the hands of the man Hillary defended.

 

We must ask this question: Hillary Clinton, as an awful judge of the character of a dictator-butcher in the Middle East guilty or not guilty? In Iran, she led the negotiations that brought about the worst nuclear deal in history.

 

Let me be clear: America and the world are measurably less safe and less respected because of the Iran deal Hillary helped cut.

 

Period. After she launched those negotiations, she became the biggest cheerleader for it at the end.

 

A deal that will lead to a nuclear Iran, an Israel that will be less safe and secure and much more dangerous Middle East.

 

Hillary Clinton, as an inept negotiator of the worst nuclear arms deal in American history guilty or not guilty? In Russia, she went to the Kremlin on her very first visit and gave them the symbolic reset button.

 

The button should have read, “delete” she is very good at that because she deleted in four years what it took 40 years to build. The next year, she said our goal was to strengthen Russia.

 

Strengthen an adversary led by a dictator who dreams of reassembling the old Soviet empire? What a dangerous lack of judgment.

 

Once again, as a flawed evaluator of dictators and failed strategist who has permitted Russia back in as a major player in the Middle East is Hillary Clinton guilty or not guilty? In Cuba, Hillary Clinton supported concessions to the Castro brothers and got almost nothing in return for ending the embargo.

 

She supported a deal that didn’t even require this murderous regime to return a cop killer, JoAnne Chesimard, to face justice.

 

Chesimard murdered a New Jersey State Trooper in cold blood, fled to Cuba and lives there to this very day.

 

How do you live with your own conscience when you reward a domestic terrorist with continued safety and betray the family of fallen police officer waiting for decades for justice for his murder? Hillary Clinton as coddler of the brutal Castro brothers and betrayer of the family of fallen Trooper Werner Foerster guilty or not guilty?

 

Finally, here at home, in one of her first decisions as Secretary of State, she set up a private e-mail server in her basement in violation of our national security.

 

Lets face it: Hillary Clinton cared more about protecting her own secrets than she did about protecting America’s secrets.

 

Then she lied about it over and over again.

 

She said there was no marked classified information on her server.

 

The FBI Director said that was untrue.

 

She said that she did not email any classified information. The FBI Director said that was untrue.

 

She said all work related emails were sent back to the State Department.

 

The FBI Director said that was untrue.

 

As to Hillary Clinton, putting herself ahead of America guilty or not guilty?

 

Hillary Clinton, lying to the American people about her selfish, awful judgment guilty or not guilty? Time after time the facts, and just the facts, lead you to the same verdict both around the world and at home.

 

In Libya and Nigeria guilty.

 

In China and Syria guilty.

 

In Iran and Russia and Cuba guilty.

 

And here at home on risking America’s secrets to keep her own and lying to cover it all upguilty. Her focus group tested persona, with no genuineness to be found, is a sham meant to obscure all the facts and leave you able to vote for her. We cannot promote someone to Commander-in-Chief who has made the world a more violent and dangerous place with every bad judgment she has made.

 

We cannot make the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States someone who has risked America’s secrets and lied about this to Congress and the American people.

 

We didn’t disqualify Hillary Clinton to be President of the United States the facts of her life and career disqualifies her. We in this hall agree with all of this.

 

But I want to talk to all of you at home, in your living rooms. You are the ones who will decide this election. We have an alternative.

 

We have a man who is unafraid.

 

We have a man who wants to lead us.

 

We have a man who understands the frustrations and the aspirations of our fellow citizens.

 

We have a man who judges people based on their performance regardless of your gender, race, ethnic or religious background. We do not need to settle for less.

 

We cannot reward incompetence and deceit. We need to demand more than what Hillary Clinton offers for America.

 

We know exactly what four years of Hillary Clinton will bring: all the failures of the Obama years, but with less charm and more lies. It is our obligation to stop Hillary Clinton now and never let her within 10 miles of the White House again.

 

It is time to come together and make sure that Donald Trump is our next President.

 

I am proud to be part of this team.

 

Now let’s go win this thing.”

_________________

Christie Crooked Hillary Indictment Speech

John R. Houk

© July 21, 2016

________________

Chris Christie FULL speech at Republican National Convention in Cleveland

 

Headline Wiki Facebook About Page

 

Short Description

Latest headline and breaking news trending around the world

 

Long Description

Latest headline and breaking news trending around the world @headlines.com

 

Website

http://www.headlineswiki.com/

_______________________

READ: Chris Christie’s full speech at RNC 2016 where he prosecutes Hillary Clinton

 

Matt Arco may be reached at marco@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @MatthewArco or on Facebook. Follow NJ.com Politics on Facebook.

 

About NJ.com

 

NJ.com is New Jersey’s largest website for local news, sports, entertainment, jobs, autos, real estate and information, affiliated with 12 New Jersey newspapers. NJ.com offers forums, blogs, webcams, and listings on where to go and what to do in and around the Garden State. No matter what part of the state you hail from, you can find news on NJ.com from your your town.

 

 

Thank you for visiting NJ.com. READ THE REST

 

Hillary More Crooked than Anyone Realizes


I'm Not Crook Hillary toon

Here is a compilation of comments from Tony Newbill on the NCCR post “The essential guide to Hillary’s high crimes, misdemeanors”. Newbill demonstrates Hillary Clinton indeed is as crooked and corrupt as a nefarious person can be.

 

JRH 5/19/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Hillary More Crooked than Anyone Realizes

 

By Tony Newbill

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:23 PM

 

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/counterintelligence/economic-espionage

 

Economic Espionage

 

Economic espionage is a problem that costs the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year and puts our national security at risk. While it is not a new threat, it is a growing one, and the theft attempts by our foreign competitors and adversaries are becoming more brazen and more varied in their approach. The FBI estimates that hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars are lost to foreign competitors every year. These foreign competitors deliberately target economic intelligence in advanced technologies and flourishing U.S. industries.

 

Definition

 

According to the Economic Espionage Act (EEA), Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1831, economic espionage is (1) whoever knowingly performs targeting or acquisition of trade secrets to (2) knowingly benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent. And Theft of Trade Secrets, Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1832, is (1) whoever knowingly misappropriates trade secrets to (2) benefit anyone other than the owner.

 

Historically, economic espionage has been leveled mainly at defense-related and high-tech industries. But recent FBI cases have shown that no industry, large or small, is immune to the threat. Any company with a proprietary product, process, or idea can be a target; any unprotected trade secret is ripe for the taking by those who wish to illegally obtain innovations to increase their market share at a victim company’s expense.

 

The FBI’s role

 

Economic espionage falls under the Bureau’s Counterintelligence Program, designated by the FBI Director as the Bureau’s number two investigative priority—second only to terrorism.

 

In terms of our operational efforts, the FBI:

 

  • Conducts an increasing number of investigations into suspected acts of economic espionage using our full arsenal of lawful tools and techniques.

 

  • Takes part in the DOJ’s Intellectual Property Task Force, which seeks to support prosecutions in priority areas, promote innovation through heightened civil enforcement, achieve greater coordination among federal, state, and local law enforcement partners, and increase focus on international law enforcement efforts, including reinforcing relationships with key foreign partners and U.S. industry leaders.

 

  • Participates in the multiagency National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center, which facilitates the exchange of intellectual property theft information, plans and coordinates joint domestic and international law enforcement operations, generates investigative leads from industry and the public, provides law enforcement training, and works closely with industry partners on intellectual property crime.

 

Beyond its investigative activity, the FBI works to counter the economic espionage threat by raising public awareness and READ THE REST

Clintons make Mockery of FBI & Land of LAWS that DO NOT APPLY to Monarchy? #clintoneconomicespionagescandal
http://tinyurl.com/gqd8xv5

 

BOMBSHELL REPORT: CROOKED HILLARY TOOK $100 MILLION FROM MIDDLE EAST REGIMES: “MASSIVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST”

 

How much more of Hillary Clinton’s scandals can America take?

 

A bombshell report from The Daily Caller says the Clinton Foundation, a purported not-for-profit charity headed by Bill, Hillary and daughter Chelsea, has reportedly amassed a fortune from oil-rich mid east nations to the tune of $100 million.

 

 

National Security Analyst Patrick Poole says the amount of cash donated to the Clintons is “simply unprecedented.”

 

“These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension,” Poole told The Daily Caller.

 

A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton received at least $100 million from autocratic Persian Gulf states and their leaders, potentially undermining Democratic presidential candidate Hillary’s claim she can carry out independent Middle East policies.

 

The benefits for mid east oil producers amount to billions of dollars in oil trade, and as you might expect, Hillary Clinton is more than happy to oblige – at the expense of American energy companies and READ THE REST (BOMBSHELL REPORT: CROOKED HILLARY TOOK $100 MILLION FROM MIDDLE EAST REGIMES: “MASSIVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST”; By MAC SLAVO; The Daily Sheeple; 5/12/16)

 

FBI made a Mockery over #ClintonEconomicEspionageScandal
http://tinyurl.com/z87pt84 

 

Major Hillary Clinton Donor Caught Up in Fresh Panama Papers Scandal

 

The new leaks name hedge fund manager Donald Sussman, who has contributed millions to Clinton’s campaign.

 

A major donor to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s is featured in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist’s records on offshore bank accounts.

 

A major donor to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s is featured in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist’s records on offshore bank accounts.

 

Sussman heads the Paloma Partners, a holding company that provides security brokerage, investment and management consultancy services. According to OpenSecrets.org, Paloma Partners has donated $4,007,900 to Clinton’s campaign during the 2016 election cycle…

 

Sussman is linked to two offshore holdings by ICIJ’s Offshore Leaks: Simply Radiant, Limited and New China Technology Licensing, Inc. According to ICIJ, Sussman is director of British Virgin Islands-based Simply Radiant, which was founded in 1994 but which no longer operates. Paloma Partners is also a Simply Radiant shareholder. Sussman is also named director of China Technology Licensing, Inc., started in 2002 but READ THE REST (Major Hillary Clinton Donor Caught Up in Fresh Panama Papers Scandal; teleSur; 5/10/16)

 

http://tinyurl.com/hhkqfl9

 

Shocked face: Hillary helps out Swiss bank UBS and then UBS donates $600K to the Clinton Foundation, pays Bill $1.5M

 

More problems for Hillary Clinton? Could be…

 

Today’s Wall Street Journal has a new report out on Hillary Clinton’s time as Secretary of State and potential conflicts of interest with donors to the Clinton Foundation. In summary, Hillary helped Swiss banking giant UBS negotiate a favorable deal with the IRS regarding an investigation into Americans who had secret accounts at the bank and then — surprise, surprise — donations from UBS poured into the Clinton Foundation as well as $1.5 million paid to Bill Clinton in READ THE REST (Shocked face: Hillary helps out Swiss bank UBS and then UBS donates $600K to the Clinton Foundation, pays Bill $1.5M; Posted by Greg P.; Twitchy; 7/30/15 7:53 am)

 

http://tinyurl.com/j3f6gh9

 

The Clintons: is the Oregon standoff really about uranium?

 

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrixclick here.)

 

Note: This article was written before the Oregon shootout in which one man was killed and another wounded.

 

Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff? That’s the question I’m asking. It isn’t a flippant question.

 

I realize there are many other issues swirling around this event. The Hammonds, the Bundys, militias, the feds, cattle grazing on federal lands, federal land grabs, and so on. This article isn’t meant to take apart those matters.

 

It’s meant to follow up on my previous article, in which I present a circumstantial case for the Clintons’ heavy involvement in a scheme that’s transferred 20% of US uranium production to Putin and Russia. And the key company in that piece is Uranium One. Remember the name. It’s apparently a major clue in what I’m about to discuss.

 

I also want to say READ THE REST (The Clintons: is the Oregon standoff really about uranium? By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 1/27/16)

 

Caught! Clinton taking cash from DoJ 

 

http://tinyurl.com/zt8yosn

 

[Blog Editor: The tinyurl is actually to a comment to “Caught! Clinton taking cash from DoJ.” The comment itself links to a petition which is the title below.]

 

Assign Special Prosecutor 2 Clinton Investigation DOJ holds conflict of interest

 

https://wh.gov/ioMdt

 

Created by S.Z. on May 10, 2016

 

Should the FBI move to prosecute Hillary Clinton due to her use of a private email/server, a special prosecutor should be assigned. The DOJ employs a sizeable number of individuals who’ve donated to the Clinton Campaign. Many of them have donated the maximum allowable amount of $2,700 -(http://www.opensecrets.org/) Loretta Lynch is affiliated with Hillary Clinton via Bill Clinton; who appointed her the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York in 1999. Objectively speaking, Loretta Lynch and her history with the Clintons could potentially cause a conflict of interest. To allow Loretta Lynch and the DOJ to handle this is not in the best interests of the American People. We, The American People, demand that this case is handled in a manner in which true justice is the priority.

 

GO HERE to sign Petition

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:24 PM

 

What Kinda Police State would we have with Hillary????

 

https://twitter.com/mtoneyshae/status/731261113845747713

 

#BLACKS FOR TRUMP!!!

@mtoneyshae

 

#HILLARY BLACK PEOPLE ARE JUST PREDATORS FIRST WE HAVE TO BRING THEM TO HEEL.

 

#CROOKED HILLARY 2016

 

#TRUMP2016

 

#MAGA

 

TWITTER VIDEO of Crooked Hillary in 1996

 

 

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

 

Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet

 

http://tinyurl.com/hdw2cxn

 

Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’

 

Newly released flight logs show former US president Bill Clinton flew on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “Lolita Express” jet at least 26 times.

 

Initial reports in January suggested Clinton was on board the billionaire’s Boeing 727 on “only”11 occasions, but documents obtained by Fox News show he flew with Epstein more than two dozen times.

 

READ THE REST (Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’; RT.com/usa; 5/14/16 15:48)

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:31 PM

 

http://absoluterights.com/are-hillary-clintons-china-ties-behind-a-dropped-espionage-investigation/

 

Are Hillary Clinton’s China ties behind a dropped espionage investigation?

 

  • It’s always a possibility that cases are dropped because of national security concerns regarding other operations that are ongoing, but sometimes the U.S. government makes decisions based purely on political considerations, especially when it comes to China

 

Few Americans could fathom the notion that the United States is so indebted to China that one of Beijing’s spies could get away with espionage – especially with an White House in love with espionage prosecutions. But that might be the only reasonable explanation for the Obama administration’s decision to pass on prosecuting a State Department contractor who was allegedly paid thousands of dollars to someone believed to be a Chinese agent seeking information on Americans.

 

According to Fox News, a November 2014 FBI affidavit that was filed in U.S. district court in Maryland indicates that the FBI launched a probe into the matter but that the Justice Department eventually decided not to prosecute.

 

The affidavit shows that the FBI investigated the contractor after she admitted she was in contact with individuals she believed were Chinese intelligence officers. Fox News further reported:

 

The affidavit from agent Timothy S. Pappa states the translator, Xiaoming Gao, was paid “thousands of dollars to provide information on U.S. persons and a U.S. government employee.”

 

According to the documents, she admitted these meetings took place in hotel rooms in China for years, where she reported on her “social contacts” in the U.S. to an individual who went by the name of “Teacher Zhao.”

 

The affidavit, which was quite detailed, even says that translator lived briefly “for free” with a State Department employee who held a top-secret clearance and at the time designed high-security embassies, including the U.S. compound in Islamabad, Pakistan (which is a client state of China’s).

 

The State Department employee was not named in the affidavit, Fox News reported, but he initially told the FBI he had not discussed his job with Gao, only to later change that statement.

 

The documents also note that Gao told the FBI during interviews in 2013 that she once informed “Teacher Zhao” about travel plans regarding an American and ethnic …

 

 

But sometimes the U.S. government makes decisions based purely on political considerations, especially when it comes to China, and here is where this unusual decision deserves more scrutiny:

 

— In recent days International Business Times reported that Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state (and head of the State Department), threw tech company Cisco “a lifeline” in 2009 shortly after the company had undergone a high profile Senate hearing regarding its Chinese operations. It seems Cisco had a large part in developing China’s “Great Firewall that helps China’s authoritarian regime censor information and surveil its citizens.”

 

… as IBT noted:

 

Cisco was honored as a finalist for the State Department’s award for “outstanding corporate citizenship, innovation and democratic principles.” The next year, the company won the award. While the honors were for the company’s work in the Middle East, they gave Cisco a well-timed opportunity to change the subject and present itself as a champion of human rights.

 

The company’s ties to Clinton?

 

What Clinton did not say at the State Department award ceremonies was that Cisco had been pumping money into her family’s foundation. Though the foundation will not release an exact timeline of the contributions, records reviewed by International Business Times show that Cisco had by December 2008 donated from $500,000 to $1 million to the foundation.

 

 

There are other potential Clinton-China ties as well. In March CBS News reported that a Chinese firm with ties to North Korea had donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation:

 

Rilin Enterprises- pledged $2 million in 2013 to the Clinton Foundation’s endowment. The company is a privately-held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate and run by billionaire Wang Wenliang, who is also a delegate to the Chinese parliament. Public records show the firm has spent $1.4 million since 2012, lobbying Congress and the State Department. The firm owns a strategic port along the border with North Korea and was also one of the contractors that built the Chinese embassy in Washington.

 

 

— Then there is the little-known 100,000 Strong Foundation, which was launched by Clinton at the State Department during her final weeks there. The program focuses on sending American students abroad to “study” in China, a program Clinton touted as essential to improving future relations between both countries.

 

 

During her tenure as the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton seems to have had China’s support – and China’s back. READ ENTIRE ARTICLE – Crooked Clinton is running POTUS election 2016 (Are Hillary Clinton’s China ties behind a dropped espionage investigation? By Jon Dougherty; Absolute Rights; 4/23/15)

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:36 PM

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/hillary_and_the_espionage_act_of_1917.html

 

Hillary and the Espionage Act of 1917

 

Last week I asked about Hillary Clinton’s email practices, Is it Espionage?  Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted that she “had broken no rules” to conduct government business through the use of a private email service in lieu of the U.S. government’s unclassified system, the Non-classified Internet Protocol (IP) Router Network (abbreviated as NIPRNet) and the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet).  These are a system of interconnected computer networks used by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of State to transmit classified information.

 

 

The Democratic Presidential candidate under investigation by the FBI has disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 30,000 emails that she deemed personal.  30,000 emails printed out represents a stack of 60 reams of paper, a stack 10 feet tall. …

 

Attorneys fresh out of law school are familiar with the legal issue known as “spoliation of evidence.”  When parties fail to produce relevant evidence within their span of control, evidence which they are otherwise naturally expected to possess, the U.S. legal system allows and even mandates that unfavorable presumptions be drawn against them.  So when some item of relevant evidence — whether documents, physical objects or data relevant to an ongoing legal matter — is destroyed, discarded or modified in some way, the U.S. legal system allows us to presume that the missing evidence was unfavorable to that party and allows us to draw conclusions accordingly. …

 

Spoliation of evidence is prohibited by an array of laws and regulations.  Also, anyone who destroys relevant evidence or assists in such destruction is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, tort liability, exclusion of testimony and dismissal of claims, as well as adverse evidentiary inferences.  Intentional destruction or negligent loss of evidence suggests that the party in possession believed that it was harmful to them, and that consciousness of guilt led them to destroy, hide or lose it.

 

 

… Emails now released reveal that her State Department minions were directed to strip off the classification headers and footers off classified documents and input those documents, or even essential information that would make the information classified.  Whether she directed others to do it or she performed the action herself, the FBI has reported thousands of cases exist where classified information was moved to an unsecured email server.

 

Seventy years ago, senior State Department official Alger Hiss found a way to remove classified information from State Department offices.  Hillary Clinton found a way to remove classified information from State Department offices.  The essence of espionage is to get classified documents out of a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a SCIF, and into the hands of “someone not authorized to receive them.”

 

Among those charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 were READ ENTIRETY (Hillary and the Espionage Act of 1917; By Mark A. Hewitt; American Thinker; 3/4/16)

 

n3angus

May 17, 2016 at 8:50 AM

 

How the American People get left out of their Political Process and LOSE their Liberties: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/05/hedge-fund-megadonors-capitalize-on-offshore-opportunities/

 

Hedge fund megadonors capitalize on offshore opportunities

 

On the list of the largest U.S. companies by market value, those in the $30 billion to $45 billion range are household names: Capital One Financial, DirecTV, Phillips 66, Yahoo.

 

But far fewer people know much, if anything, about Citadel Multi-Strategy Equities Master Fund Ltd., with a gross asset value of $33 billion, or Elliott International, L.P., at $30.8 billion, or AQR Style Premia Master Account, valued at $16.6 billion. All are hedge funds organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

 

They’re also just a handful of the funds under the control of some of the biggest political donors in the nation: Kenneth C. GriffinPaul Singer and Cliff Asness.

 

 

(The fund once managed by George Soros, another major industry donor, is now a family office and has no SEC Form ADV on file.)

 

The release of the Panama Papers has brought fresh reminders of the stunning amount of wealth held offshore, but that’s a world these donors and their firms navigate routinely as part of a rarefied investment community far more wealthy and sophisticated than the market to which most people have access.

 

 

All told, the value of their 151 hedge funds is as high as $390 billion. Most of that is in the funds based overseas, mostly in the Cayman Islands. Of the 151 funds in the firms’ SEC reports, 67 are organized under the laws of the Caymans, where the firms manage some $282 billion in current asset value. About $103 billion of the wealth is held in Delaware-based hedge funds.

 

 

A quarter of the funds report greater than 50 percent ownership by non-U.S. investors (which could include offshore holding companies and other entities), and foreign investors own at least part of 41 percent of the funds. By far, most of the funds catering to these offshore entities are organized in the Cayman Islands.

 

In the presidential contest, hedge fund managers have played an enormous role in plumping up the coffers of several candidates’ super PACs. Sussman, for instance, who has given out more than $7 million this cycle in all, has contributed $4 million to Priorities USA Action, the group backing presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Sussman and Simons combined have given Priorities $16 million in the past two cycles. (Priorities supported President Barack Obama’s second campaign for the White House before it pivoted to Clinton.)

 

Mercer, who socked $13 million into Keep the Promise I, one of the super PACs supporting Sen. Ted Cruz‘s (R-Texas) recently … READ ENTIRETY (Hedge fund megadonors capitalize on offshore opportunities; By Will Tucker; OpenSecrets.org; 5/12/16)

 

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Arbitrary title by the Editor.

 

Compiled by Tony Newbill