Radical Islam is Islam


pigman-above-the-law-sharia-law

 

John R. Houk

© December 5, 2011

 

I first became acquainted with Bosch Fawstin during the time period the Muslim world was going flipping nuts over a series of Mohammed cartoons published by a Danish newspaper. Those Mo-toons were widely condemned by Muslims (Moderate & Radical), Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists. The death threats and the fatwas began to fly via the Religion of Peace. Cartoonists had to go into hiding out of fear for their life. At the time I could see going into hiding if you lived in a predominantly Muslim nation but I was having a difficult time grasping the reason why a person in the West would have to go into hiding for exercising Free Speech. I mean the West is supposed to be the paragon of nations living by the rule of law rather than the rule of man. The law should be sufficient to protect a citizen by investigating a threat of death and arresting the person or persons involved in the conspiracy to commit murder, right?

 

These were the days I became aware that Europe had a sizable immigrant, naturalized, 2nd and 3rd generation Muslims. These Muslims who were supposed to be living in the West for a job or persecution relief acted in the same way as the Muslims in Islamic lands. The European Muslims went flipping nuts. I am not talking about a mere protest on the sidewalks of newspaper publishers expressing their Free Speech right of displeasure with the Mo-toon publications. I am talking about scary unruliness that added fuel to the death threats. How is a police force going to investigate tens of thousands (if not millions) of suspects that have a motive to murder?

 

What path did European law enforcement take? Law enforcement, EU and European governments chose to condemn the publishers with the hint of leveling hate-speech accusations rather than protect the right to Free Speech. This is when I discovered Islam is dangerous to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness beyond a terrorist level but also on the cultural level. Islamic Supremacism demands a violent response to the perceived insult to Islam, their prophet Mohammed or to their Allah.

 

So then I ran into Fawstin’s Blogger site (he has more) and enjoyed the politically incorrect graphic novel pictures of anti-Jihadist Pigman. Have not really paid attention to Fawstin’s story. So now I have discovered he is an ex-Muslim motivated to drawing anti-Jihad toons as his form of Free Expression in the post 9/11 world we live in.

 

Political Islam has cross posted a FrontPageMag.com in which Fawstin writes about the thought that a small minority of Muslims are radical and most Muslims are Moderate. Fawstin who is an ex-Muslim expresses anguish that Muslims living in the West are not Islamic terrorists; however the Moderate majority does not actively get involved in condemning Radical Islam. Here are some teasers:

 

So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that. …

 

Another problem with Muslims who aren’t very Muslim is that they lead some among us to conclude that they must be practicing a more enlightened form of Islam. They’re not. They’re “practicing” life in non-Muslim countries, where they are free to live as they choose. But their “Islam” is not the Islam. There’s no separate ideology apart from Islam that’s being practiced by these Muslims in name only, there’s no such thing as “Western Islam”.

 

This is a good read from someone who is not squeamish about exposing his former faith. Read the article that I am actually posting from Political Islam because is who sent me the FrontPageMag.com article.

 

JRH 12/5/11

No Muslim in the Military Controversy


Rick Womick. TN State Senator

 

John R. Houk

© November 30, 2011

 

A few weeks ago State Representative Rick Womick a member in Tennessee’s General Assembly made this statement:

 

Personally, I don’t trust one Muslim in our military” and “if they truly are a devout Muslims, and follow the Quran and the Sunnah, then I feel threatened because they’re commanded to kill me,” the U.S. Air Force vet told Think Progress. (Quoted from New York Daily News. Emphasis Mine)

 

Ooh can you imagine how the MSM and the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Muslim-American organizations wanting to throw Womick into the proverbial frying pan? How much more politically incorrect can a public figure get?

 

You have to know though, no matter how harsh Womick sounded, he has a good point. If you are a good Muslim following the totality of the Quran, Hadith and Sira as well as believing that Islam’s prophet is the perfect man and the example that all men should follow (and women follow the example of his rules for women) then you are person attempting to follow the totality of the Islamic path laid out in those three Islamic holy writings (and offshoots) to the best of your ability. If you follow that path that means are willing to dish out bad news for non-Muslims (kafir) up to and including killing.

 

Now do all Muslims make their goal in life to be a Muslim that follows the totality of what is written down for them to seek? This is unlikely. In this modern age most Muslims choose to follow the portions of the Quran that are attributed to Mohammed in the pre-Hegira days of Mecca.

 

Do all Christians follow the New Testament the path of Christ to share the Good News of Redemption from the darkness of this world age, sharing the love of God between Believers and unbelievers and letting all people know you are a Christian by the God-kind-of-Love (agape) fruit you produce?

 

Of course all Christians do not follow the Christian path to the letter. Those Christians who make every effort to follow the Christian path to the letter might be called Radical Christians. Think very carefully though. A Radical Christian is non-violent by nature. The Lord Jesus Christ gave instructions on how to share the Good News and the Great Commission:

 

1 After these things the Lord appointed seventy others also,[a] and sent them two by two before His face into every city and place where He Himself was about to go. 2 Then He said to them, “The harvest truly is great, but the laborers are few; therefore pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest. 3 Go your way; behold, I send you out as lambs among wolves. 4 Carry neither money bag, knapsack, nor sandals; and greet no one along the road. 5 But whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace to this house.’ 6 And if a son of peace is there, your peace will rest on it; if not, it will return to you. 7 And remain in the same house, eating and drinking such things as they give, for the laborer is worthy of his wages. Do not go from house to house. 8 Whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you. 9 And heal the sick there, and say to them, ‘The kingdom of God has come near to you.’ 10 But whatever city you enter, and they do not receive you, go out into its streets and say, 11 ‘The very dust of your city which clings to us[b] we wipe off against you. Nevertheless know this, that the kingdom of God has come near you.’ 12 But[c] I say to you that it will be more tolerable in that Day for Sodom than for that city. (Luke 10: 1-12 NKJV)

 

18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore[a] and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.[b] (Matthew 28: 18-20 NKJV)

 

The Christ-Way of spreading Christianity is sharing the Good News. If faith in Christ is rejected for whatever deluded reason, those that share are to shake the dust off their feet of those who rejected Christ. God will deal with the rejection. Christ did not command to war against rejection and kill those who refuse the Good News.

 

On the other hand the Quran, Hadith and Sira triumvirate Islamic holy writings take another path. After the recorded words of Mohammed were preached they were quite profound as a monotheistic message in Mecca for that city overtly practiced polytheistic faith and counted on polytheism as part of its economy. Mohammed was rejected in Mecca and forced to flee which is a holy event to Muslims known as the Hegira.

 

Something happened to Mohammed’s mind between pre-Hegira Mecca and post-Hegira Medina. Mohammed went from a message of ubiquitous oneness of God (Allah) and the inner peace available to voluntarily submitting to that oneness to an angry man that slowly built a cult army of Muslims that when strength was attained violently sought out all his detractors and offered them conversion, second class citizenship or death. The latter became the paradigm for Islamic imperial conquest in later years that stretched from India to Spain and managed to make an incursion in Eastern Europe to Vienna until repulsed by King Jan III (John) Sobieski of Poland.

 

America needs more people like State Rep. Rick Womick and Sobieski that understand Islam is a theopolitical culture that would transform America away from the heritage of Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness and of Christianity.

 

There is a difference between a good person seeking theological or philosophical inner peace and a good Muslim seeking the path laid out by Mohammed according to the Quran, Hadith and Sira. Thus there is a difference between a Muslim who is a good person (perhaps the hoped for Moderate Islam) and a good Muslim (perhaps the real Islam known as Radical Islam).

 

Bill Warner eschews the bonds of political correctness to defend Rep. Womick by defining the theopolitical nature of Islam that Womick alludes toward in his reasoning that Muslims should not serve in the US Military. Warner’s essay is awesome!  

 

JRH 11/30/11

The West Sticks their Heads in the Sand as Muslims Persecute Christians


persecution-chains

 

John R. Houk

© November 29, 2011

 

Egypt has been the recent paradigm of the persecutions of Christians by Muslims especially since the fall of Hosni Mubarak and the emerging power of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Coptic Christians of Egypt (10% of population – 8,200,000) are the largest grouping of Christians in a Muslim nation in which Islamic Supremacism dominates. There are pockets of Christians remarkably dwelling in other Muslim nations. The American ally (allegedly) Pakistan and partner in the GWOT (allegedly) also has a contingent of Christians in their population.

 

Figures cited in Wikipedia show there are a little less than 182 million Muslim in Pakistan. The same Wikipedia article shows 2,700,000 Christians reside in Pakistan. Pakistani Christians receive severe treatment under Sharia Law. Sharia is often used as an excuse for Muslims to exploit Christians in the case of property. Simply make up a blasphemy accusation of a Christian leader and your Church may be subject to confiscation and the leader on trial for his/her life.

 

Western media barely covers the horrific treatment of Christians in Egypt. Western media coverage of persecuted Christians in Pakistan is near zero. If it was not for a few bloggers people would not know there were Christians in Pakistan let alone persecuted Christians.

 

I have been following the plight of two Pakistani Christians both of whom have been charged with breaking blasphemy laws in Pakistan. I have not come upon any information as to their outlook in several months. I have to run across their status from organizations dedicated to exposing Muslim mistreatment of Christians or a few brave Pakistani Christians willing to risk detection by getting info out via the Internet. The two I am writing about are Hector Aleem and Asia Bibi. Both faced death sentences under Pakistani Blasphemy and both have receive some kind of legal reprieve the last I have read of them yet the last I heard they both were in a Pakistani jail or prison for whatever ludicrous Islamic Sharia Law ruling. (If anyone has heard anything about Hector and Asia let me know)

 

Join the Walid Shoebat Foundation in helping persecuted Christians in Pakistan and that Foundation be a whistleblower of the vicious tragedies perpetrated by Muslims upon Christians in Pakistan. Below is a little piece writing about Pakistan from the Foundation.

 

JRH 11/29/11

********************************

So, What about War with Islam?


Khomeini- Conquer the World

 

John R. Houk

© November 19, 2011

 

It is extremely politically incorrect to say we are at war with Islam. Things get a bit stickier in attempting to define the “we” that is at war with Islam. Is the “we” Western Culture? If the “we” is Western Culture, this would include Europe (Eastern and Western), Australia, North America and South America.

 

The part of Europe dominated by the European Union would go into apoplectic spasms at the suggestion that the EU was at war with Islam. Islam has made such enormous inroads into European culture that the doctrine of multicultural diversity makes it anathema to criticize Islam as inimical to a Christian influenced European culture.

 

As an amateur analyst (meaning more guessing than data) it appears Islam is not yet a multicultural diversity factor in most of Latin America (Mexico & Central America of North America and Central America & South America). Of the miniscule Muslims in Latin America there is significant Radical Islamic influence occurring in Latin America. The Radical Islamic influence is from overt Islamic terrorists (Like Hezbollah) or supporters of Islamic terrorism (Like Wahhabi Saudis, Muslim Brotherhood and Iran). The Islamic terrorist connection appears to be a hook-up with Drug Cartels. It is a good guess that Drug Cartels are clients of Radical Islamists that produce the poppy plants that are then turned into opiates (e.g. heroine) which the Drug Cartels sell to the North American addicts with money. The Islamic Terrorist/Drug Cartel symbiotic relationship is based on messing up America even if the reasons might be diverse.

 

Australia has shared Europe’s Multiculturalism; however Australia is experiencing a bit of an awakening toward Islam’s threat to Western Culture and even big dog politicians are hollering from the mountain tops about the dark side of Islam.

 

Then there is English speaking North America – USA and Canada.

 

Canada is still inflicted with Multicultural Diversity when it comes to Islam. A negative publication concerning Islam or a negative radio/TV piece on Islam will land you in jail, a fine or a civil suit for defaming a religion.

 

There are many people and organizations in America striving to educate Americans about the dark side of Islam. Brigitte Gabriel’s ACT for America is my favorite and the work of Pamela Gellar of Atlas Shrugs and American Freedom Defense Initiative/Stop Islamization of America (AFDI/SIOA) is excellent as well.

 

Islamic organizations are active in America to bring Islam to America. In this nation in which religious freedom is considered a preeminent freedom, it might sound odd that I raise the flag that there is an Islamic threat. After all Christianity is an evangelistic religion determined to follow the Great Commission of our Lord and Savior to share the Good News of Redemption by the Blood of Christ. The problem with Islam is that it is not merely a religion that is what Christians would call an evangelistic religion. Rather Islam is as much a socio-political ideology as it is a theo-religious faith. Islamic holy writings desire not only an inner struggle to follow the path of submission to Allah, but also an outer struggle to politically bring the Islamic religion to non-Muslims. Don’t be deceived by such attributions as there is no compulsion of religion in Islam.

 

There is no compulsion in Islam if the Sharia rules are complied with. Let us take a Christian nation or people in the cross hairs of an imperialistic conquest minded Muslim army. The socio-political instruments Islam developed a system to degrade non-Muslims to sweeten the deal of convert, dhimmi livelihood or death. Conquest was relatively quick by Muslim conquering armies but conversion to Islam was not. Islamic Supremacism, with the usage of humiliation of the non-Muslim, brought converts to Islam over the centuries to the point that Christians ended up as the minority. Additionally, the pockets of Christians allowed to survive became accustomed to the second class citizenship of a dhimmi; hence Christian communities in the lands conquered by Muslims actually developed the brainwashed concept that their humiliation and the jizya tax brought protection from persecution.

 

If you exclude what is left of Communist nations like, China, N. Korea and Vietnam; the primary persecutors of Christians globally are Muslims. This is where my ire begins to stir! The West is so invested in political correctness that if a Muslim or an Islamic belief is condemned, the Leftists and Muslim apologists come crawling out of the woodwork to cry victim insinuating that prejudicial hate-speech is being leveled. AND YET when Christians in Muslim nations (Middle East and Africa primarily but else ware as well) are beaten, the women raped, the children stolen, a convert to Christianity faces death for apostasy, Christians in general are murdered and sometimes slaughtered for just being Christian and on and on; then where is the moral outrage?

 

No European nations are standing up with threatening messages to Muslim nations to do something about persecution of Christians. Frankly I am not even hearing preachers, priests, Bishops, Cardinals or the Pope take a stand and have the guts to protest the heinous treatment of Christians in Muslim lands. THIS SILENCE IS REPREHENSIBLE!

 

Are “we” at war with Islam? Doggone it; we are at war with Islam because Islam is at war with the West. The problem is the West is too comfortable to admit we are at war with Islam. Western religious wars of yesteryear have made the admission that a theo-political religion like Islam would engage with the superior technology of the West causing the strife and the return to national pride that many Western nations have lost. The loss of cultural pride is particularly the case of Europe. The loss of cultural pride is a symptom of multicultural diversity that accepts the uniqueness of diverse foreign cultures rather than honoring the foreign culture and expects assimilation into the host culture.

 

If the West does not wake up soon, the same treatment Christians receive in Muslim lands will be the identical treatment in Western lands for Christians, Secularists and atheists alike.

 

Raymond Ibrahim inspired my thoughts on Islam and the West. A couple of days ago he posted an essay that examines the persecution of Christians by Muslims for just the month of October 2011. If you are a person that can feel righteous indignation beyond political correctness then you should read what Muslims have done to Christians in October alone.

 

JRH 11/19/11

Al Taqiyya – Islam Muslims and Lies


Al Taqiyya is honorable, right? Perhaps deception and dissimulation might be honorable in Islam, but it is not a revered principle in the West. Certainly deception is a part of Western thought in politics, MSM, business and unfortunately among individuals; however deception is looked upon as a stain to honor. Lying breeds mistrust. Mistrust breeds conflict. Truth breeds honor.

 

JRH 10/6/11 (Hat Tip: Shoebat.com)

******************************

Al Taqiyya – Islam Muslims and Lies

 

Who is More Heinous for Killing in the Name of Religion?


Crusader vs Muslim battle

 

Christians or Muslims

John R. Houk

© September 23, 2011

 

You know when Islam is exposed as violent rather than a religion of peace, Muslim apologists love to tell you that Christians have a huge history of killing in the name of Jesus. The Muslim apologists love to specify two Christian historically violent periods as the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition. The Muslim apologists love to point the torture, blood and guts that were spilled by Christians.

 

My primary response to the evils perpetrated by those calling themselves Christians and executing torture and killing in the name of Jesus Christ did so contrary to the Holy Scriptures (primarily the New Testament). Jesus Himself warned of future wars and rumors of wars; however the sense was that the Christ was speaking of turbulence that Christians would have to deal with in the future. The meaning of wars and rumors of wars was it would be the beginning of planet earth’s birth pangs of travail that will produce the New Earth and New Heaven with the Jesus the Son of God as the King both religiously and politically. The return of Jesus is the one actual time that politics and religion merge symbiotically and operate according the goodness of God.

 

Then I continue my response that Islam’s holy writings have the diametric opposite focus from Christianity’s goal to the straight path to Oneness with the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The Quran, Hadith and Sira of Islam are filled with ways to kill the kafir (Islam for unbeliever) along the way to a global Caliphate in which the Muslim version of Jesus and Mohammed come back to wrap up the job of kill or convert the kafir.

 

Here is something else you should know about the Muslim apologists’ claim that the historical warring Christians were as reprehensible if not more so than Muslim imperialistic wars that were justified to liberate kafir (Christians, Jews, Hindus et al) from their deceived path to the correct path of submission to Allah and the deity’s prophet Mohammed. That “something” is the death toll.

 

Now here is a shot of truth. Those that died by the hand of nations and religious orders in the name of Christ but contrary to Christ’s commandments is a quite huge number – 17,000,000:

 

It is true that in the world’s history of beliefs and practices, there have been many wars and cruel inhumanities conducted in the name of different religions and ideologies. Those notorious events stand rightly condemned. The total number of deaths estimated to lie at the feet of humanity’s poor practice of Christianity is approximately 17 million. This number would include ancient wars, the Crusades, the Inquisitions, various European wars during the Middle Ages, and witchcraft trials. (Isn’t religion to blame for most of history’s killings? ProveTheBible.net)

 

Here is some clarity: people killed in the name of Jesus but not according to the commands of the New Testament were 17,000,000 fellow Christians (disputes over theology), Crusaders (attacking Eastern Orthodox Christians, Muslims and Jews) and the Inquisition (primarily aimed at Jews and Muslims).

 

Now that 17,000,000 sure is a huge number of people killed contrary to the Word of God! How dare Christians declare themselves as followers of a peaceful religion when so many human souls were senselessly kill in the name of Jesus, right? AGAIN, the deaths occurred contrary to the Prince of Peace and not according to the Prince of Peace.

 

If you think 17,000,000 is a huge number check out how many people died by the imperialist sword of Islam that happened by specific Quranic, Hadith and Sira instructions on how to spread Islam: Conquer, Humiliate, Convert OR live the humiliating Dhimmi life or DIE for refusing to the suzerainty and submission to Allah: 270,000,000 human souls died by Muslims fulfilling their holy writings.

 

TWO-HUNDRED-SEVENTY-MILLION non-Muslims killed is nearly SIXTEEN TIMES more killed by Christians acting outside of Christian Holy Scriptures! A probable exaggerated figure of Muslims killed during the Crusades by Rhonda Roumani is “… several million Muslims” (Crusades-Encyclopedia: The Hall of Shame; Point 2). The death of millions of Muslims is bad. The death of 270,000,000 non-Muslims by the instrumentality of the Islamic death cult is force worse.

 

Bill Warner writes essentially about how political correctness how historians (authentic, revisionist and Muslim Apologists) muse over the horrors of the West and Christian culture yet ignores the truth of the Muslim horrors of the past. You need to read the Warner article entitled, “The Victim’s View of Islam”.

 

JRH 9/23/11

Dutch Justice and Geert Wilders


John R. Houk

© June 26, 2011

 

In America Geert Wilders is often vilified as a racist by Leftists. Remarkably I have even heard the “Right Wing extremist racist” denunciation from a few fellow Conservatives. This is the case with some Conservatives that I follow in reading their opinions.

 

Many of you know who Geert Wilders is. The few that do not know who Wilders is should know he is the Dutch politician that put together the movie short known as Fitna. Wilders’ Fitna is an exposé of the ugly violent nature of Islam that most Muslims refuse to admit is in their Quran, Hadith and Sira.

 

Fitna and some of the speeches delivered by Wilders hit the European concepts of political correctness, multiculturalism and diversity right smack in the groin. The Leftists of Europe and the Muslims of Europe (which are more radicalized than many would dare to comment on) went in violent seizures that someone would dare speak out against people that are divergent from Western Culture.

 

Complaints of hate-speech were leveled against Geert Wilders. Free Speech is not an absolute thing in Europe. If your conscience and common sense demonstrate that something is very wrong to be accepted politically or religiously and you speak your mind, in Europe you can be fined or jailed or both. We cannot be insulting those Muslim immigrants or second generation Muslim citizens by speaking the truth about the dark side of Islam.

 

Wilders decided to take a stand for Liberty which is a concept that is increasingly diluted when it comes to Western Cultural expression. However, hate-speech is rampant among Muslim inhabitants of Europe toward we kafir who do not believe in Mohammed or his deity Allah. Muslim speakers of hate are doing more than saying their way of life is correct and that the Secularists, Christians and Leftists is a corrupt incorrectness. The European double standard on who is allowed to speak freely and who is not allowed to speak freely is crazy-nuts.

 

HERE IS THE THING. GEERT WILDERS HAS BEEN ACQUITTED IN THE DUTCH JUDICIAL SYSTEM!

 

Wilders’ acquittal is a reversal of the typical trend of punishing Europe’s Westerners for speaking their mind.

 

Robert Spencer writes about Wilders’ acquittal with a reminder that the judicial victory is only a dent in Europe’s present system of Rights and Liberty. Let us all pray the Wilders’ acquittal is a judicial precedent in Europe that allows Western Culture to be exterminated by a foreign violent Islamic culture.

 

JRH 6/26/11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Become an Activist to Expose Islam


John R. Houk

© June 10, 2011

 

There is an agenda in Islam for America. It is irrelevant if a Muslim is moderate or radical. Recent polls have demonstrated the spectrum from moderate to radical Islam fully supports the implementation of Sharia Law in America.

 

Friends, WE CANNOT EVER ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN IN AMERICA!

 

Regardless of what a Muslim may tell you, even if that Muslim claims to be moderate, Sharia Law principles are unconstitutional. There is no Free Speech, no Religious Freedom, no Freedom of Conscience, no tolerance for breaking Sharia principles such as homosexuality, greater freedom for females (husbands can beat wives) and more issue too numerous to mention.

 

Here is some full disclosure: I believe homosexuality is immoral according to the Holy Bible. The Old Testament punishment for homosexuality is death. Thank God for the Blood of Jesus that Redeems Believers from the penalty of the Law of the Old Testament. This is the age of Grace in which God so loved the World that He gave His one and only Son:

 

14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, 15 that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.


18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21 But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.”
(John 3: 14 – 21 NKJV)

 

Do not kill or physically abuse a homosexual because of following sinful darkness, rather share the Good News of the Deliverance of Jesus Christ. If a homosexual receives the Good News then hallelujah, one has entered into the Kingdom and Family of God. If a homosexual rejects the Good News of Jesus Christ then you have done your part of the Great Commission and you have planted a seed that prayerfully another can water to help produce the first blade of the fruit of Redemption.

 

It is not unconstitutional to be immoral in too many things. The Constitution protects the rights of citizens to have Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. However, I am one that will fight to prevent the narrowing of the Constitution to specifically add rights to a citizen that specifically provides rights to sinful gender deviance.

 

I in no way advocate the death of a homosexual because of his lifestyle. However, that is the specific penalty of Sharia Law for a homosexual.

 

Now I have gone off on a sidebar that needs a return to the topic.

 

Sharia Law is evil. Muslims who support the institution of Sharia Law in our American Constitutional society are enemies of the Constitution and thus of our nation America. A Constitutional Amendment needs to be specific dividing political anti-constitutional elements from any religion that its followers interpret as a reason to break the rest of the law or to overthrow the nation. Such agitation toward violence to be subversive to overthrow the nation has to be looked upon as either rebellion or foreign intrusion. Utilizing Religious Liberty as a platform to incite terrorism, whether it is Islam or some religious cult, needs a spotlight from a new Constitutional Amendment.

 

Sure my aim is Islam; however the same Amendment could apply to any religion or political ideology that aims to overthrow the Constitution. I realize there is a fine line of exploitation on the part of the Left to aim at the Christian Right; however no American on the REAL Christian Right advocates the overthrow of the American government. The American Christian Right advocates the prevention of legalizing more and more deplorable sinful deviancy to prevent the decay of America. There is a vast difference between working to protect the Constitution and finding ways to blur the Constitution in order to rid America of the Constitution.

 

Islamic activists that support the implementation of Sharia Law indeed blur the Constitution with the objective to replace the Constitution with Islamic Supremacist Sharia Law.

 

I was initially working my to an introduction to a Guy Rodgers of ACT for America call for vigilance to expose Islam and work against the implementation of Sharia Law. Rodgers writes about engaging community organizing (take that Obama), teaching and activism.

 

Unlike Leftists and Muslim activists/apologists, the activism of ACT for America has zero to do with violence and everything to do with educating Americans about Islam.

 

JRH 6/10/11

*****************************

Successfully Combating Jihad and Sharia

Vision + Strategy + Organization = Victory

 

By Guy Rodgers, Executive Director

Sent by ACT for America

Sent: 6/9/2011 2:31 PM

 

Consider these alarming data.

 

  • ·       A 2003 survey of Detroit-area Muslims conducted by a Muslim organization found that 81% agreed with the statement that sharia law should be imposed in Muslim lands—with 59% strongly agreeing. How likely do you think it is that most of these Muslims also support the imposition of sharia law in America?

 

  • ·       A 2007 survey of nearly 4,500 Muslims worldwide, including approximately 500 Indonesian Muslims who identified themselves as “moderates,” found over 65% support for a requirement that strict sharia law be applied in all Muslim countries.

 

  • ·       A Pew study released in 2009 revealed that 78% of Pakistanis supported the death penalty for those who leave Islam and 83% supported stoning adulterers.

 

  • ·       According to a study just published, which was highlighted in our email Monday, a representative sample of 100 mosques in America found that 81% had moderate to high support for advocating jihad to advance sharia law.

 

This snapshot leaves us with the unmistakable conclusion: Support for sharia law among Muslims across the world is widespread and growing.

This is what the apologists for radical Islam, those who arrogantly dismiss concerns about sharia law, either are ignorant of or willfully blind to.

Are there “moderate” and “reformist” Muslims who do not subscribe to either violent jihad or stealth jihad, who do not subscribe to the advance of sharia law and the unity of mosque and state? Of course.

We work with some of these leaders and promote what they do. We commend them and hope their efforts succeed.

But, for many reasons, the odds are clearly against them. As the poll results above demonstrate, Islamic organizations and leaders that are committed to the advance of sharia law, either through violent or stealth jihad, are driving the agenda for worldwide Islam.

This is why those who follow ACT! for America see our staff, chapter leaders and members working hard, day in and day out, to build a formidable, ever-increasing national citizen action network, employing strategies and tactics that are producing legislative and other kinds of victories to roll back this threat.

You saw an example of this network in action in our email yesterday, which highlighted chapter leader Michael Hayutin’s challenge to a public school textbook in California. You saw it in the passage of the refugee resettlement legislation in Tennessee.

We are not going to wait until, like the UK, we have sharia courts dotting the American landscape.

Talking about the threat isn’t enough. Education is necessary, but it’s not sufficient. We don’t want to just combat radical Islam—we intend to defeat it. Strategic action is what is needed—and strategic action is what we do.

 

For example, to challenge the threat of sharia law creeping into our courts, we have thus far gotten bills passed in Arizona and Tennessee that prohibit state courts from using foreign law, and by extension sharia law, in their decisions.

To challenge pro-Islamic bias and indoctrination in public school textbooks, our sister organization, ACT! for America Education, will release this fall an analysis of 38 such textbooks.

We will mail this to every one of America’s 50,000 school board members, and then we will urge ACT! for America chapter leaders and members to pour into school board meetings demanding changes to textbooks to eliminate this bias and indoctrination.

These are just two examples of how we are honing in on the threat and developing and applying strategic action to counter the threat.

We’ve said this before, but it bears repeating: The bigger our national organization becomes, the bigger and more numerous the victories we will achieve.

Vision + Strategy + Organization = Victory.

Or to put it another way:

People power… with a purpose… and a plan… achieves results.

I have reviewed polling data and analyzed how our opposition, such as CAIR, is reacting to national trends. CAIR is clearly desperate as it sees America waking up. We are turning the tide.

And I am convinced that the only thing that will prevent us from prevailing over radical Islam is, to paraphrase Edmund Burke, when “good people do nothing.” Brigitte Gabriel understood the power of organized, strategic action when she had a vision of an organization that is today ACT! for America.

As we are fond of saying, if everyone does a little, together we accomplish a lot. What can you do today?

 

  • ·       Encourage a friend to sign up for our email alerts.

 

 

 

 

Yours for a safe and free America,

Guy Rodgers

________________________________

Become an Activist to Expose Islam

John R. Houk

© June 10, 2011

______________________________

Successfully Combating Jihad and Sharia

 

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam. We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

 

The Next Operation SledgeHammeR


John R. Houk

© April 26, 2011

 

History shows many instances in which governments and the military of a nation have been fond of the term “Operation Sledgehammer”.

 

Operation Sledgehammer WWII:

 

Operation Sledgehammer and Operation Roundup was an Allie plan devised to invade Europe in 1942 and 1943 to place pressure on a seemingly successful Nazi-German invasion of Russia. The reasoning for the strategy was Americans and the Soviet government was convinced that the Nazi invasion would collapse the Soviet government thereby giving the Nazis a one front war against Britain and America.

 

More patient minds in Britain realized the resources were not yet available in 1942 and 1943 to successfully maintain the design of Operation Sledgehammer even if a beachhead invasion succeeded. The Brits talked to America to attack via North Africa which turned out to be the correct decision even though that strategy was completely abhorrent to Josef Stalin.

 

Operation Sledgehammer CIA Conspiracy Theory 1996:

 

Operation Sledgehammer was called into life during February of 1996. The operation is a joint operation by the Office of Economic Growth and Regulation due to the many new corporations that are being founded in the United States. The group responsible for IPO’s (Independent Public Offerings) stock market certificates, otherwise known as open corporations, had been draining lots of funds from the various FUND management companies.

The operation is being administered by the Federal Reserve Bank and the Securities Exchange Commission. They want to drive initial public offerings out of the Elite controlled stock market, and cause the stock market to adjust to what it was, before all these new upstarts caused the market to reach all time highs. The SEC is using the Company (CIA) to boot out all these upstarts–one way or another.

 

 

Operation Sledgehammer – Fighting European Crime:

 

Fight Against Internet Paedophiles:

 

At the start of September 2007, Internet provider Iskon Internet notified the police of an unusually large amount of users at a website of a civil association. The website, which has 700 hits per week, was visited by 12 million users from 172 countries, including Croatia, from August 5 until 8. This was reason enough for the Croatian police to …

READ THE REST at SlantRight 2.0.

WalidShoebat.com: The Danger to Pakistan’s Christians



The link is to a Walid Shoebat post that shows the plight of Christians in Pakistan. This is a nation that has experienced more and radical Islam which does not bode well Christians who are looked upon as barely tolerated second class citizens.

 

WalidShoebat.com: The Danger to Pakistan’s Christians