Truth, Massacres, Brochures, and Jihadi John

A wounded man is evacuated from the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, 11-13-15

Elsa writes about the truth of Islam, Islamic terrorism in Paris, an upcoming World Truth Summit with Steve Amundson who publishes expose Islam brochures and a bit of a poetic taunt to Jihadi John recently killed by a U.S. drone.

JRH 11/15/15

Please Support NCCR


Truth, Massacres, Brochures, and Jihadi John

By Elsa Schieder

Sent: 11/14/2015 10:28 AM

Via World Truth Summit

Lots of painful truths. The one that will briefly get the most attention: the jihadic terrorist attacks in Paris.

The terrorists shouted ‘Allah Akbar’ and ‘This Is For Syria’ as they burst in and opened fire, witnesses have said . . . More than 140 dead in series of terror attacks: 100 are killed after hostages are taken at theatre. Kalashnikov-wielding gunman opens fire in restaurant. Two SUICIDE bombs detonate near the Stade de France. Gunfire at shopping centre . . .

[Blog Editor: Here is an updated list from the above link about Islamic terrorist murders in Paris France]

o 129 people killed, 352 injured and 99 in critical condition following a series of co-ordinated terror attacks in Paris

o Up to 100 were massacred in the Bataclan concert hall after suicide bombers took hostage then blew themselves up

o First gunman identified as Ismaël Omar Mostefaï, a 29-year-old who lived in Chartres, southwest of Paris

o First British national killed in attack named as Nick Alexander, who was working in band merchandise at Bataclan

o British-educated lawyer Valentin Ribet who studied at London School of Economics was the first victim to be named

o American design student Nohemi Gonzalez was studying at the Strate College of Design and was killed last night

o More than 20 others were gunned down outside restaurants by militant brandishing an AK-47 machine gun

o Two suicide bombers targeted the Stade de France stadium where President Francois Hollande was watching game

o Two of the gunmen believed to have travelled to France by disguising themselves as migrants entering via Greece

o The French President has declared a state of emergency for the whole country and reinstates border checks

o He has vowed to ‘mercilessly’ strike back against ISIS and has declared three days of national mourning

o See more of the latest news and updates on the Paris terror attacks

With Open Gates has the hard-hitting truth that I would most recommend sending to anyone who insists Islam is not a threat (that the jihad massacres, for instance, are just from a few misguided individuals).

With Open Gates:
The forced collective suicide of European nations

[Blog Editor: The Vimeo has a descriptive that goes along with it. That is posted below this Editor intro.]

With Open Gates The forced collective suicide of European nations Extended Cinematic 1080p

From Wigitgetit

With Open Gates The forced collective suicide of European nations Extended Cinematic 1080p from Wigitgetit on Vimeo.


This video will not be online long, download and mirror it while you can.

I gain nothing from this. Editing takes a lot of work and time, if you want to support me, you can do it with BTC at 1ybX49kKFNN7hKnrzaegnha4Fy9WrFATu

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC

You are witnessing what will be shown to future generations as the reason for the fall of an Empire.

At current immigration levels and disappearing birth rates native Europeans are destined to become a minority in their own countries within decades. This is already the case for many of Europe’s largest cities.

Europeans have effectively lost their right to exist as cultures and nations in their own homelands and are facing extinction.

Millions of young Muslim men leave behind their family, pay thousands to criminal traffickers to reach the land they have been promised by European politicians illegally.

Dubbed by the media as “refugees”, they cross through 6-10 safe countries to reach wealthy nations like Germany or Sweden where they hope to receive a better life at the expense of the taxpayer.

Only a fraction of them are Syrian, as they enter unfiltered, without any documents and without any legitimate right to claim asylum. Women and children are rarely seen, except in the cherry-picked sob stories of the media.

Any indigenous resistance of Europeans who refuse to hand over the countries of their ancestors to often radical and criminal Muslim foreigners is labeled “hateful”, “racist”, even “Nazi”.

The level of cultural, moral and political subversion with egalitarian and Marxist ideologies has reached levels the KGB would never have dreamed of. Equality and tolerance are lies that serve none but a few.

The Left, mainly orchestrated by Zionist interests, is destroying our countries from the inside. Patriotism, the most basic and fundamental trait of any nation that wants to survive, has become something to be ashamed of.

Feminism has destroyed family values and birth rates. Healthy nationalism has been replaced with a culture of guilt, self-hatred, apathy, degeneracy and pathological altruism. We are told to embrace “diversity”, in reality this simply means instead of just being a global minority, Europeans are supposed to become a minority in their own countries as well. No civilized society can keep up with the birth rate of third world immigrants, especially when the main goal is integration rather than assimilation. Parallel societies breed poverty, crime and radicalism.

Multiculturalism has never, at any time in human history, worked anywhere. If you believe otherwise, you’re delusional. In fact it’s the primary reason for every major conflict.

The crimes committed by the EU against the European peoples are directly in violation of the 1948 UN genocide convention, Article II: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Because of this injustice, far-right parties everywhere in Europe are gaining astonishing amounts of support, becoming the biggest parties in some countries.

Any European that does not rise up to defend his country from foreign invasion because he’s too scared of words does not deserve it.

We are still at a point where you will not get imprisoned for your political opinion in most European countries, but this will change very soon. Do not be apathetic, do not be weak. Be someone that can be proud to call himself European.

The video was briefly on Youtube, then was removed. The videomaker suggests that you download, and conveniently provides a download link. He also asks you to mirror – that is, post the video wherever you can, so that even if some copies are removed, other copies remain online.

For another bit of hard-hitting truth, here are college officials at Yale, Cornell and Syracuse shredding the US constitution:

In the words of BareNakedIslam: “We saw an official at North Carolina State ban the Constitution from student dorms. Now, officials from 3 more so-called leading institutions of higher learning have no problem destroying the very document that gives them right to be such America-hating morons.”

We all know, of course, that these college officials would not dare ban the Quran from students’ dorms, or shred it (though it certainly qualifies as hate speech).

About the mass jihad attacks in France. We’ve known for years – meaning, anyone paying attention to Islam has known for years – that this kind of thing is going to happen ever more. It comes from Islamic ideology.

Yet the ostrich leaders in much of Europe, as well as millions upon millions of ostrich citizens, have refused to look closely at Islam. Right now, Germany’s Merkel is hitting hard at . . . what? Oh yes, websites that promote a negative attitude to the Islamic migrants.

[Blog Editor: BNI excerpt]

German Chancellor Angela Merkel orders shutdown of websites that slam Muslim freeloaders, rapists, and terrorists posing as refugees


Berlin police say they’ve raided 10 buildings in the German capital as part of a crackdown on ‘far-right hate speech’ on social media networks against Merkel’s suicidal policy of taking in masses of Syrian Muslim ‘refugees’ most of whom are neither Syrian nor refugees.

FOX News Police said Thursday that the morning raids involved 60 officers, who confiscated smartphones and computers as evidence, which are now being evaluated. They didn’t have any immediate information on arrests.

They say the raids are part of an ongoing investigation into hate speech spread over social media meant to incite people against asylum-seekers and refugee housing. Angela Merkel got Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook to agree to start deleting anti-Muslim invader posts. … READ THE REST

I’ve heard the Paris massacres called a tragedy. Yes, they’re a tragedy – like death from lung cancer is a tragedy for the person who has smoked 5 packs a day for decades.

It’s also frustrating for those who have watched the chain smoker polluting not only him or herself but those around.

I ask: how much responsibility do the non-Muslims of France – of the West – have for not paying attention to Islam, and for not taking action much sooner. The French president, Hollande, was ELECTED – in other words, his insanity re Islam goes with the refusal to acknowledge reality of so many non-Muslim citizens. And Canada has just elected Trudeau who is intent on importing 25,000 more Islamic migrants in the next seven weeks.

Where am I heading? Almost all of us who pay attention to Islam acknowledge the insanity of allowing mass Islamic influx into the West. We also recognize the insanity of West-hating Westerners who avoid any kind of critical gaze at Islam. Sometimes we get massively frustrated. Sometimes we don’t know what to do next.

To give you a bit of relief, here’s an introduction to Steve Amundson of the Counter Jihad Coalition:


Steve Amundson of Counter Jihad Coalition

Perhaps most important, here are 24 brochures from the Counter Jihad Coalition that you can download and distribute anywhere and everywhere. They include:

Migrants or Invaders?
The 4 Stages of Islamic Conquest
Sharia for Dummies,
Surah 9: Mohammad’s Last Will and

You may know the material inside out. But the brochures make it so much easier to pass on the knowledge.

The interview with Steve will be aired Nov 25, 8 pm EST (New York time). You will have 2 days to listen free. You will also have the chance to send questions that Steve will answer the following week.

And now, as always, all the best to all of us who care and dare – to life and to love,


PS. In case you haven’t heard, it’s very likely Jihadi John has been killed.
And in case you don’t know why that’s a good thing,
or if you just enjoy fun music, here is:

VIDEO: I Love Islam, says Jihadi John. Perfectly Politically Correct Political Music.

Published by Creativity Emporium

Published on Nov 13, 2015

I Love Islam, says Jihadi John. Perfectly Politically Correct Political Music. NOT!

For more freedom music, political music, perfectly politically incorrect, come to:

And once again, enjoy Merkel

VIDEO: It’s Just One Lone Jihadi. Perfectly Politically Correct Political Music. NOT!

Published by Creativity Emporium

Published on Oct 18, 2015

For the full lyrics and to buy the song, click here:

For more FREEDOM MUSIC, click here:

It’s Just One Lone Jihadi. Perfectly Politically Correct Political Music. NOT!

Political correctness: not for those who are awake, those who face reality.


Edited by John R. Houk


© Elsa Schieder


No Muslim Moral Obligation to Keep Agreements to Kafir & Spouse

Counterjihad anonymous writer and expert on interpreting Islamic writing – Dajjal – commented on the NCCR post “I’m with Dr. Carson on Constitution and Islam”. Dajjal points out in the comment that a Muslim has no moral obligation to keep any agreement with a non-Muslim or a woman.

JRH 9/29/15

Please Support NCCR


No Muslim Moral Obligation to Keep Agreements to Kafir & Spouse

[Editor’s Title]

By Dajjal

Edited by John R. Houk

September 23, 2015 at 2:48 AM

Dr. Carson did not propose legislation to bar Muslims from the Presidency. He explained why he would not vote for one. His explanation fell short. In a later interview, which I heard Tuesday on Hannity’s radio show, Carson admitted that he only read part of the Koran.

When a Muslim makes a promise to his wife, Allah has already permitted the dissolution of his oath. 66_2


“Whoever makes an oath and then sees that something else would be better than it, should do kaffara for his oath and do what is better.” [Blog Editor: As of 9/29/15 1:15 PM CT this message appears – 404 – File or directory not found.] [Blog Editor: As of 9/29/15 1:15 PM CT this message appears – 404 – File or directory not found.]

9:3. And a declaration from Allâh and His Messenger to mankind on the greatest day (the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations to the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if you (Mushrikûn) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away, then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful torment to those who disbelieve.

A Muslim is allowed to break a promise to his wife and Moe & Allah are free of obligations made to the pagans of Mekkah. Got a clue yet? A Muslim’s oath is worth as much as used toilet paper. When he promised to defend and protect the Constitution, Obamination was spewing shit: he had mental reservation and purpose of deception. Why then should we trust any other Muslim?

The root word of religion means “to bind”. What does Islam bind Muslims to do?
War against us!


Got a clue yet? Moe is the role model for ‘slimes to emulate.

What did Moe do for them to mimic? He waged war, took, raped and enslaved captives and committed genocide.


Got a clue yet?

Challenge to LibTards:

Should any of the following be elected President? If not, why not??

Klansman of the KKK


Made Mafiosa

Challenge to Nihad Awad, obnoxious A*s**ole:

Shari’ah requires that the Caliph be a Muslim, Infidels are disqualified. Subordinate rulers must be Muslims, Infidels are disqualified. Judges must be Muslim, infidels are disqualified. An infidel has no right to authority, even over other infidels. Have you ever considered reciprocity?


http://www. [Blog Editor: As of 1:48 pm on 9/29/15 my browser could not locate link. Here is an link to the entire Reliance of the Traveller]

Now therefore I direct you to dissolve CAIR and go directly to Hell. Tax exempt organizations are not permitted to interfere in elections, you violated our law.


Edited by John R. Houk


© Dajjal

Khana Dak

Shamim Masih writes about the exploitation and deprivation of Pakistani Christians in a slum colony just outside of Islamabad. The Christians in Pakistan may not be having their heads chopped off en masse as in the terrorist pseudo-nation calling itself the Islamic State but their lives are lived in oppression just as the dhimmitude (See Also HERE) Pact of Omar (Umar) etched in the Islamic stone of Sharia Law.

VIDEO: The Dhimmi Contract


Published by lnfideI

Published on Jul 13, 2009

*** [Blog Editor: Youtube video description translated to English from Dutch]


There is no official Islamic “dhimmitude” in Pakistan or in most of the Muslim dominated nations; however the treatment of non-Muslims is still in the dhimmitude Muslim mentality in Islamic culture. ERGO the Christians Shamim are advocating for are essentially treated as dhimmis by Pakistan Sunni Muslims.

JRH 9/24/15


Khana Dak

By Shamim Masih

Sent: 9/24/2015 1:28 AM

Khana Dak Christians

Islamabad: Christians of Khana Dak celebrated Independence Day across the Korang Nala, where, they have no access to a road. The local government has turned a cold face towards this community. Residents raised small funds, which are awfully short of the total budget. On the 69th Independence Day celebration of Pakistan, I was invited to join the celebration at Khana Dak, (a Christian colony with more than 70 houses). There, Rah-e-Nijat Ministry arranged singing and a debate competition for young church members with the local priest. We drove through the pasture. The event was good and we all enjoyed it, at the end youngsters were encouraged [by] distributing shields to the winners.

But I noticed the disheveled existence of the local community in the area. This community lives across the Korang Nala, or Korang River, (Korang River is the outlet stream of Rawal Dame. This stream crosses Islamabad Express Highway from Korang Town and Judicial Colony). This river strikes this colony every year and destroys what meager housing the poor have which includes the elimination of food supplies, crops, and form animals. The recent and last year, I met with victims of the massive deluge but these Christians received no help from the authorities. They have been affected by the flood every year and yet no disaster recovery plan or infrastructure has been put in place to enhance their safety or security. Another difficulty they face [is] that the owner of the nearby colony (Qutbal Town) has banned their way to a road. Last year, there was a flood all around [Khana Dak] but there was no passage to this colony.

This year, the residents have been able to negotiate with the owner of the town and got the passage towards the road side. But there is a problem to construct the bridge on the Korang Nala. The local government should construct a bridge on the nala but the Capital Development Authority (CDA) does not fulfill its responsibility. The families have been working together to arrange funds. In the meantime, they raised funds for two big pipes. But this is woefully short of the level they need. There is an urgent call for support to the downtrodden families.

During the last year, when government agencies and charities have set up temporary shelter in the form of tents and providing food, clean water and medical aid in the flood affected areas, poor Christians of this area as well as Layyah, Sharoon Colony and Gilgit were overlooked and forgotten. Christian communities have survived quite miraculously and remain unscathed. Victims had lost most of their possessions which had been washed away with their homes or irretrievably ruined by water damage and bruising carriage via the water surge.

Presently, Rah-e-Nijat Ministry® is raising funds for the construction of the bridge; sources said that the total cost of the project is more than 2.5 million Pak rupees. Please help them by giving financially, that they might continue the work. I hope hearts are stirred to offer help to these victims, as I believe one day we all have to answer to our maker.

Be Blessed,

Shamim Masih

For donations [to the project] and any further [information] you can contact Shamim at, or Safdar Saleem at:

The best way to SUPPORT Shamim’s Christian advocacy in Pakistan is via Western Union sending money with this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Include Shamim’s phone – +92-300-642-4560


Pakistan Today, (About Pakistan Today)

Blogger and Human Rights Activist


Edited by John R. Houk

Words enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.


© Shamim Masih




*** Youtube video description:


Dutch translation [Google Translate to English]:


* Dhimmis at all times should be aware that they are inferior to Muslims and to behave accordingly.


* Dhimmis owe a special tax. Which must be personally handed, with the dhimmis ritual will be humbled (for example by saving them in the face). Pays a dhimmi not, you lose the right to protection and can do every Muslim to him what he wants.


* Muslims dhimmis can prescribe what clothes to wear so that their submission is emphasized.


* Dhimmis may not have cars or other motor vehicles, most bikes. They should always give priority to Muslims.


* When a Muslim wishes to sit in public places, a dhimmi must release his chair.


* Dhimmis may no finer or higher inhabit houses than the Muslims in their environment.


* Dhimmis may only perform a menial job or heavy work.


* It is dhimmis not allowed to build new churches or synagogues, or repair dilapidated churches or synagogues.


* Dhimmis are free to practice their religion, but allowing to not only reveal a stir. It is forbidden to display publicly in prayer or singing too loudly. It is also forbidden to wear religious symbols, or attach it to the outside of a building.


* Dhimmis cannot criticize Islam, the Koran and Muhammad, this is punishable by death or long imprisonment.


* Dhimmis cannot prevent their relatives are Muslim.


* It is not allowed Muslims to convert to Christianity or Judaism.


* It is male dhimmis forbidden to marry Muslim women, a Muslim man can marry a dhimmi woman of course.


* The testimony of a Muslim always counts more than that of a dhimmi. An oath or declaration of a dhimmi in a case against a Muslim has no legal validity.


* Dhimmis should never, ever carry a weapon and can therefore do no service to the police or the army.


* The insult or offend Muslims with dhimmis is strictly prohibited, the converse is not a problem. A dhimmi who reproves a Muslim inflicts injury is heavy, the opposite case is a modest fine enough. If a Muslim kills a dhimmi and therefore no acceptable reason can argue he should pay blood money. On the killing of a Muslim with a dhimmi is of course the death penalty.


* If a dhimmi converts to Islam and later rejects it, he will be put to death.


* It is not allowed in many cases dhimmi children to attend university education.

Two Bill Warner Videos Exposing Islam

White House Future- Radical Islam flag

Here are a couple of short teaching moments from Bill Warner of Political Islam exposing the reality of Islam. Dr. Ben Carson was correct and morally effective when he proclaimed he would not “advocate” for a Muslim President. Check out this dose of reality from Bill Warner.

JRH 9/23/15

Please Support NCCR


Two Bill Warner Videos Exposing Islam

[Arbitrary Editors title]

Posted by John R. Houk

Posted on September 23, 2015

Warner’s blog: Political Islam

Love in the Koran

By Bill Warner

September 20, 2015


Love is not a frequent topic of Islam, but it mentions negative and positive love. An example of negative love is – don’t love money. A Muslim should love his Muslim brothers, but not his blood relatives who are Kafirs. Allah does not love Kafirs.
Allah loves Muslims. The Koran says that you not truly righteous until you give what you love to charity.

The saddest part of Islamic love is that there are twelve verses in the Koran say that a Muslim is never a true friend to a Kafir. A Muslim can be friendly to a Kafir, but must always favor other Muslims.


Migration as Jihad

By Bill Warner

September 15, 2015


Migration is part of the doctrine of jihad. Migration is so important that the Islamic calendar is based upon the Hijra, Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina. Why? Because it was migration that lead to the creation of jihad in Medina. And it was jihad that made Islam triumphant.

In the past Muslims tended to stay in Islamic countries. Today, the new politics is to migrate to Kafir lands and immerse themselves in local politics. This is the jihad of money, writing and speech. Their politics is to bring the Sharia to Kafir culture. An example is using Islamic money is to build departments in universities that will support Sharia and never criticize Islam.


© 2007-2015 CSPI, LLC. all rights reserved.


Political Islam About Page


What is Islam?


Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.


Our Mission


Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.


The Five Principles


Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.

All of Islam is based upon the TrilogyKoran, Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his Traditions).

Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.

Islam divides the world into Muslims and unbelievers, kafirs.


Political Islam always has two different ways to treat kafirsdualistic ethics. Kafirs can be abused in the worst ways or they can be treated like a good neighbor.


Kafirs must submit to Islam in all politics and public life. Every aspect of kafir civilization must submit to political Islam.


These Five Principles can be put in five words—Trilogy, politics, kafirs, dualism and submission. These five words bring clarity and ease of learning about political Islam.


Up until now Islam has been hard to understand because it seemed complex and contradictory and did not make sense. But, once you see how the Five Principles work, everything falls into place. Complexity becomes simplicity. Chaos becomes order.


All CSPI books are based on these Five Principles.


  1. Trilogy


The Trilogy contains three books


The Koran is what Mohammed said that the angel Gabriel said that Allah said. But the Koran does not contain enough guidance for one to be a Muslim. The Koran repeatedly says that all of the world should imitate Mohammed in every way. Mohammed’s words and deeds are called the Sunna. The Sunna is found in two different texts—the Sira and Hadith.


The first source of the Sunna is the Sira which is Mohammed’s biography. The most authoritative version is by Ibn Ishaq.


The other source of the Sunna is the Hadith, the Traditions of Mohammed. There are several versions of Hadith, but the most commonly used is by Bukhari.


So the Trilogy is the Koran, Sira and Hadith.


  1. Political Islam


Political Islam is the doctrine that relates to the unbeliever, the kafir. Islam’s relationship to the kafir cannot be religious since a Muslim is strictly forbidden to have any religious interaction with them. The religion of Islam is what is required for a Muslim to avoid Hell and enter Paradise.


The Trilogy not only advocates a religious superiority over the kafir—the kafirs go to Hell whereas Muslims go to Paradise—but also its doctrine demands that Muslims dominate the kafir in all politics and culture. This domination is political, not religious.


As mentioned earlier, the Koran has 61% of its text devoted to the kafir. The Sira (Mohammed’s biography) has about 75% of its text devoted to the kafir and jihad.


Islam’s success comes primarily from its politics. In thirteen years as a spiritual leader, Mohammed converted 150 people to his religion. When he became a political leader and warrior, Islam exploded in growth, and Mohammed became king of Arabia in ten years.


Islam has a complete doctrine of how to treat the kafir that is found in the Trilogy.


  1. Kafirs


Non-believers are so important that they have several names. Christians and Jews are called People of the Book or infidels. Other religious names for non-Muslims are atheist, polytheist, and pagan. But the Koran uses one word that includes all of the religious names. That name is kafir, an Arabic word.


Kafir is usually translated as unbeliever, but that translation is wrong. Unbeliever is a neutral word. The Koran is very clear about the kafir. Indeed, the Koran defines the kafir by how it speaks of them. Kafirs are the lowest and worst form of life. Kafirs can be robbed, murdered, tortured, enslaved, crucified and more. Later in this chapter, more of the Koran’s doctrine of the kafir is given in some detail. But the key point is that a kafir is not only a non-Muslim, but also a person who falls under a different moral code from the Muslim.


The Koran is devoted to the division between those who believe Mohammed, Muslims, and those who do not, kafirs. This grand division of the Koran means that there are two points of view of the Koran—the view of the Muslim and the view of the kafir.


  1. Dualism


The third principle is duality, and is unique to Islam. As an example, here is a verse from the Koran:


109:2 I do not worship what you worship, and you do not worship what I worship. I will never worship what you worship, and you will never worship what I worship. You to your religion, me to my religion.


This sounds very tolerant, but this verse was written later:


9:5 When the sacred months are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful.


Now we have absolute intolerance. This contradiction is normal for the Koran and is even addressed in the Koran. The solution to contradiction is called abrogation where the later verse is better than the earlier verse.


The logic here is very important. Since Allah is perfect and the Koran is the exact words of Allah, then both contradictory verses are true, but the later verse is better or stronger. This leads to dualistic logic where two contradictory facts can both be true.


  1. Submission


Islam means submission and Muslim means one who has submitted. It is clearly stated in the Trilogy that all kafirs and their civilizations must be annihilated. Mohammed’s success depended on violence to persuade kafirs that he was the prophet of Allah.


Submission is political, as well as religious. Islam demands that kafirs submit in every aspect of public life.  Every part of kafir culture is an offense to Allah.


Political Islam Book Store

Yurki1000 – Islam, Conspiracy and Christian Faith

By Yurki1000

September 14, 2015

I cross posted a Google Plus comment entitled “A Compendium of Quotes about Islam”. I post on three different blogs. A commenter known as Vladdi or Uncle Vladdi added to this compendium on my NCCR blog thus I am using blog as a point of reference. The Google Plus author and Vladdi’s compendium are quotes from Counterjihadists, historical figures and from Muslims of notoriety in which their own words expose the nefarious nature of Islam toward ALL non-Muslims.

Another frequent commenter to my NCCR blog is Yurki1000. Yurki placed a comment on Vladdi’s compendium.

Yurki then commented on “If it Quacks like a Radical Muslim”.

Then finally Yurki posted three comments on the 11/30/14 “Serving The Truth”.

Some of the comments are Counterjihadist, some would define as Conspiracy Theory and some as appreciated theology and/or unappreciated theology.

(Praise is always welcome. Criticism is welcome as long as it is measured thought and cordial disagreement.)

JRH 9/14/15

Please Support NCCR


Yurki1000 Comments to ‘Vladdi’s Compendium of Quotes about Islam

September 8, 2015 at 11:10 AM

“Voltaire” reminds me of Paris. Then and now.

The name “Voltaire”, which the author adopted in 1718, is an anagram of “AROVET LI,” the Latinized spelling of his surname, Arouet, and the initial letters of “le jeune” (“the young”). The name also echoes in reverse order the syllables of the name of a family château in the Poitou region: “Airvault”. The adoption of the name “Voltaire” following his incarceration at the Bastille is seen by many to mark Voltaire’s formal separation from his family and his past.

Richard Holmes supports this derivation of the name, but adds that a writer such as Voltaire would have intended it to also convey its connotations of speed and daring. These come from associations with words such as “voltige” (acrobatics on a trapeze or horse), “volte-face” (a spinning about to face one’s enemies), and “volatile” (originally, any winged creature). “Arouet” was not a noble name fit for his growing reputation, especially given that name’s resonance with “à rouer” (“to be broken on the wheel” – a form of torture then still prevalent) and “roué” (a “débauché”).

In a letter to Jean-Baptiste Rousseau in March 1719, Voltaire concludes by asking that, if Rousseau wishes to send him a return letter, he do so by addressing it to Monsieur de Voltaire. A postscript explains: “J’ai été si malheureux sous le nom d’Arouet que j’en ai pris un autre surtout pour n’être plus confondu avec le poète Roi”, (I was so unhappy under the name of Arouet that I have taken another, primarily so as to cease to be confused with the poet Roi.) This probably refers to Adenes le Roi, and the ‘oi’ diphthong was then pronounced like modern ‘ouai’, so the similarity to ‘Arouet’ is clear, and thus, it could well have been part of his rationale. Indeed, Voltaire is known also to have used at least 178 separate pen names during his lifetime.

VIDEO: [Blog Editor: This video title not in original commentReligion of Piss:] Muslim RIOT in Paris France July 2014



Published on Nov 15, 2014

Religion of Piss: muslim RIOT in Sarcelles, Paris France July 2014
Business as Usual. VERY VERY PISSFUL. [Original video description added by Editor and not Yurki1000]

Britain First


Yurki1000 comment to ‘If it Quacks like a Radical Muslim

September 10, 2015 at 3:09 PM

Once Upon a Time “At a CAIR Banquet”.

VIDEO: CAIR Reacts to Brandeis University’s Plan to Honor Ayaan Hirsi Ali


Posted by Acts17Apologetics

Published on Apr 10, 2014

Brandeis University recently announced that it would be honoring women’s rights advocate Ayaan Hirsi Ali. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), however, despises Ali for her criticisms of Sharia and jihad. After numerous complaints, Brandeis University bowed to Sharia, and cancelled its plan to honor Ali.

This video is an attempt to introduce CAIR to the concept of consistency.


Part of the Establishment

When President George W. Bush visited the Islamic Center of Washington several days after September 11, 2001, to signal that he would not tolerate a backlash against Muslims, he invited CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, to join him at the podium. Two months later, when Secretary of State Colin Powell hosted a Ramadan dinner, he, too, called upon CAIR as representative of Islam in America.[14] More broadly, when the State Department seeks out Muslims to welcome foreign dignitaries, journalists, and academics, it calls upon CAIR.[15] The organization has represented American Muslims before Congress. The National Aeronautics and Space Agency hosted CAIR’s “Sensitivity and Diversity Workshop” in an effort to harmonize space research with Muslim sensibilities.[16]

Law-enforcement agencies in Florida, Maryland, Ohio, Michigan, New York, Arizona, California, Missouri, Texas, and Kentucky have attended CAIR’s sensitivity-training sessions.[17] The organization boasts such tight relations with law enforcement that it claims to have even been invited to monitor police raids.[18] In July 2004, as agents from the FBI, Internal Revenue Service, and Homeland Security descended on the Institute of Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America, a Saudi-created school in Merrifield, Virginia, a local paper reported that the FBI had informed CAIR’s legal director, Arsalan Iftikhar, that morning that the raid was going to take place.

CAIR is also a media darling. It claims to log five thousand annual mentions on newspapers, television, and radio, including some of the most prestigious media in the United States.[19] The press dutifully quotes CAIR’s statistics, publishes its theological views, reports its opinions, rehashes its press releases, invites its staff on television, and generally dignifies its existence as a routine part of the American and Canadian political scenes.

CAIR regularly participates in seminars on Islamic cultural issues for corporations and has been invited to speak at many of America’s leading universities, including Harvard, Stanford, Johns Hopkins, and Columbia. American high schools have invited CAIR to promote its agenda, as have educationally-minded senior citizens.[20]

Ties to Extremists, Left and Right

The Council on American-Islamic Relations has affinities to extremists of both the left and right, sharing features with both. Its extensive ties to far-left groups include funding from the Tides Foundation for its “Interfaith Coalition against Hate Crimes”;[65] endorsing a statement issued by Refuse & Resist[66] and a “National Day of Protest … to Stop Police Brutality, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation.”[67] CAIR supported the “Civil Liberties Restoration Act,” legislation drafted by Open Society Policy Center, an organization founded by George Soros that would obstruct U.S. law enforcement from prosecuting the “War on Extremism.” Far-left members of Congress such as Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) and Jim McDermott (Democrat, Washington) have turned up as featured speakers at CAIR fundraising events.

Its neo-Nazi side came out most clearly in CAIR’s early years. In 1996, according to testimony by Steven Emerson, Yusuf Islam—the Muslim convert formerly known as the singer Cat Stevens—gave a keynote speech at a CAIR event. The contents of the speech itself are not known but Islam wrote a pamphlet published by the Islamic Association of Palestine, CAIR’s stepparent, which included these sentences:

The Jews seem neither to respect God nor his Creation. Their own holy books contain the curse of God brought upon them by their prophets on account of their disobedience to Him and mischief in the earth. We have seen the disrespect for religion displayed by those who consider themselves to be “God’s Chosen People.”[68]

In 1998, CAIR co-hosted an event at which an Egyptian Islamist leader, Wagdi Ghunaym, declared Jews to be the “descendants of the apes.”[69]

CAIR continues to expose its fascistic side by its repeated activities with William W. Baker, exposed as a neo-Nazi in March 2002.[70] Even after that date, CAIR invited Baker to speak at several events, for example in Florida on August 12, 2003[71] and New Jersey on October 18, 2003.[72] CAIR liked Baker’s work so much, it used the title of his book, More in Common Than You Think, in one of its ad campaigns in March 2004 and as the title of an Elderhostel lecture.[73] [Blog Editor: Yurki1000’s text above is from this link he provided. You may wish to read the entire post.]


3 Recent Yurki1000 comment to ‘Serving The Truth

ONE: September 11, 2015 at 11:22 AM

I’d like to add…

VIDEO: Charlotte Iserbyt – Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World


Posted by mearbhrach

Published on Oct 14, 2006

Charlotte Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration, where she first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America’s classrooms.

http// (book)

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.” ~Ronald Reagan, 40th president of U.S.

USA vs. US:

See Also [Dead Link]

From the DVD “One Nation Under Siege” [As of 9/14/15 this link is dead. Alternative site with storyline: Here is a Youtube link to the full length one hour and 21 minute documentary]

Watch Beverly Eakman on the effects of the psychologized classroom; Dangers of Public Education on Vimeo – about 58 minutes


TWO September 11, 2015 at 12:36 PM

Our New Home :-)

VIDEO: The 4-Square City – New Jerusalem


Posted by watchman4wales

Published on Mar 1, 2010

This video unveils some absolutely awesome facts about the design of the New Jerusalem!


New Jerusalem on Globe

How large is the city? That varies slightly depending on the version of the Bible. The ESV and NIV versions say it is 12,000 stadia in length and width (Rev. 21:16), where a stadia is 607 feet. This translates to 1,400 miles, which is what the NLT Bible says. However, the KJV and other versions say 12,000 furlongs, which translates to 1,500 miles.

Regardless of whether the city is 1,400 miles or 1,500 miles in length and width, it is shaped like a square at the base. This means New Jerusalem is larger than India with nearly 2 million square miles. These measurements are meant to be literal since they are described as man’s measurements (Rev. 21:17).

Even more astounding than the size at the base is the height that is also at least 1,400 miles (Rev. 21:16). This goes well beyond Earth’s atmosphere and into space. If a building in the city is this high and has a generous 12 feet per story, the building would be over 600,000 stories!

To give you a better idea just how big New Jerusalem is, here are some representations of what it would look like on Earth if the city is shaped like a cube.


THREE September 11, 2015 at 1:03 PM

Futuret [Two Futuret comments preceding Yurki1000’s comment: 11/30/14 1:00 PM and 11/30/14 1:53 PM]. You made me think about – a thing. Hmm…

7 He told some Pharisees and Sadducees who came for the ritual baptism,

John: You children of serpents! You brood of vipers! Did someone suggest you flee from the wrath that is upon us? 8-9 If you think that simply hopping in the Jordan will cleanse you, then you are sorely mistaken. Your life must bear the fruits of turning toward righteousness. Nor are you correct if you think that being descended from Abraham is enough to make you holy and right with God. Yes, the children of Abraham are God’s chosen children, but God can adopt as daughters and sons anyone He likes—He can turn these stones into sons if He likes.

To be made right with God, one must truly repent. It means to turn completely away from sin and completely toward God.

Secret Societies Killed Jesus

This incredible DVD reveals that the Pharisees and Sadducees who hated Jesus with an unnatural hatred and provoked the Lord into uncharacteristic animosity toward them, were secretly Satanists practicing what later became known as the Cabala (Kabbala, Qabbala).

Now you will know why the Pharisees killed Jesus even though they knew with 100% certainty that He was the Promised Messiah. But, Jesus was not the Messiah KING for which they were awaiting; rather, He was Messiah Suffering Servant, of which they most definitely did not want.

Now you will know why these Jewish leaders looked at Jesus’ miracles and concluded that He was drawing His power from Beelzebub, one of Satan’s chief demons. When the Pharisees told the people that Jesus did not possess inherent power, but was merely accessing the power of Beelzebub, they caused Jesus to proclaim a brand new type of sin, the ‘Unpardonable Sin’!

This type of Satanism which the Pharisees practiced is the major power behind the drive to the ‘New World Order’, which is the ‘Kingdom of Antichrist’, and is the Corner Stone of every major type of Satanism in the past 2,500 years! Even Adolf Hitler loved and revered the Cabala, even as he was plotting to slaughter all Jews.

VIDEO: Mark Passio – What On Earth Is Happening – Part 3 of 4 [2:53:48]


Published by Mark Passio

Published on Sep 24, 2012

What On Earth Is Happening is a culmination of many years of extensive research and investigation into the nature of our shared reality. It is a journey of self-exploration, examining human Consciousness and the way it relates to the universal problems which we currently face as a species.

Part 3 of 4: Subversive Use Of Symbolism, The Hegelian Dialectic, & The Globalist Agenda

Themes: how symbolism is used for influence and control; specific symbols and their interpretations; the Hegelian Dialectic; a breakdown of the 9/11 ritual; an analysis of the globalist esoteric agenda.

Recorded December 2008 by Karen DeBiasse and David Simmons.


Edited by John R. Houk

© Yorki1000

Islam, Elsa and I

Traditional Biblical Faith and Non-Traditional Thinking

John R. Houk

© September 7, 2015

I had cross posted an email from Elsa Schieder by some thoughts her email inspired. The title of that post is “My Thoughts on Same-Sex Marriage & Nobel for Pastor Mulinde”. The subject title of Elsa’s email was “Honor Umar Mulinde – we stand with this man”. If you don’t know, are uniformed or are multiculturally brainwashed here are some quotes on Islam from experts and Muslims alike – HERE and HERE.

The reason I added some personal thoughts on same-sex marriage is because after promoting Pastor Umar Mulinde for a nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize for being a Christian Pastor persecuted for his faith with a Muslim acid bath Elsa addressed some flak on her position on same-sex marriage. Evidently she lost a huge amount of subscribers who looked forward to her Counterjihad newsletters.

Here is an excerpt of the email addressing the cancelling subscribers:

And now I will come back to the response to my piece saying that I don’t see how permitting gay marriage threatens marriage. A few people wrote comments like, brilliant! They were in the minority. I also had a couple of thoughtful responses against gay marriage. Again, these were in the minority. I’ve never had so many people cancel – including people who have been getting the updates for 3 years, since I started the initial interview series. Several cancelled with comments like: “God says homosexuality is a sin. Just what don’t you understand?”

I could have answered that we don’t all believe in the same god. Quite a few of us don’t believe in any cosmic force.

But that would have been a response to the words, not to the emotion.

What I saw most was that my not being against gay marriage touched what I might call a hot button, often a hot anger button. Game over. Get out now. No more updates ever. (Found in post “My Thoughts on Same-Sex Marriage & Nobel for Pastor Mulinde”)

I have to admit I did not read Elsa’s supportive email for same-sex marriage. Nonetheless, if I had read it I would have gone through that inner search that weighs what I am acutely aware about Islam as anti-Western and anti-Christian (and numerous anti-this or that which should alarm the full scale of the political spectrum) in its revered writings measured against the Biblical principles that homosexuality is a sinful abomination. Here are a couple of blog posts that will give some insight into my stand on the Bible pertaining to homosexuality:

o Homosexual Sin and the Christian Approach

o Introductory portion to “This is Why we Call the Gay Lobby Fascist!

I responded to Elsa with surprise that subscribers left a Counterjihad subscription because of a stand that Conservative Americans (including myself) would disagree. I still believe in her role as a Counterjihad writer regardless of disagreeing with her stand on same-sex marriage. Here is an excerpt from what I wrote about same-sex marriage:

In the matter of same-sex marriage: For me there is no way around the fact that marriage is a religious oath of fidelity. As far as the Bible informs then, same-sex marriage should not be performed or accepted by Christians. However, a civil union as in a defined and binding contract is Constitutional according to even [Constitutional] Original Intent and a matter of choosing Life in Christ or death in the Last Judgment with Satan and his deceived minions. Christians should never give up on showing a person lost in sin the Light of Christ and the path to eternal redemption. (I added “Constitutional” for clarity – John R. Houk; My Thoughts on Same-Sex Marriage & Nobel for Pastor Mulinde)

I am fairly certain that some fellow believers will find the “civil union” concept as something still unacceptable. Nevertheless we do live in a nation of laws. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are central to American culture. It is our Constitution that allows some sort of agreeing harmony among Leftists, Conservatives, religious adherents, Secular Humanists and atheists pertaining to the respect for law and order. Constitutional interpretation is becoming a wider gap in the American political spectrum. I have come to the conclusion that Multiculturalism and politically correct Left Wing thinking has eroded the American harmony into more and more conflict.

Elsa’s email response to my thoughts on same-sex marriage relate to the point that not all people have my perspective on the supremacy of a monotheist God from the Judeo-Christian Holy Bible. She wrote as follows:

Hello John,

Thank you for writing. I don’t see anyone as insignificant.

I have also noted your many efforts on google plus. Not insignificant.

Much more, I know we are not insignificant as ourselves, who we are.

Yes, we disagree on gay marriage – however, like you I want to do this respectfully.

On my side, as you must know, my spirituality, and also my beliefs about the more-than-5-sense-world, are different from yours. So what for you is sin and death, for me is fine – freedom unless you are hurting someone (hitting, insulting, etc.).

The most amazing thing for me: this experience with traditional Christians is something new for me – except for some encounters with Jehovah’s Witnesses as a mid-teen. Yours is an alien inner landscape for me.

My sense is we come to counter-jihad from different angles – for me Islam is against freedom, the right to flourish.

And now I want to tell you about a strength of the traditional Christians I have noticed (and you most likely know).

I’ve had to hold out against political correctness on my own – through thinking. Most people around me have gone the brain-wrecked route of political correctness.

Traditional Christians have more tools – starting with being encouraged to stand strongly for the truths they believe in, not caving in if someone else is offended.

And yet, like the non-religious politically correct people, so many of them have caved in as well.

Anyway, I find it vital that we can stand for our beliefs – and also learn – and discuss.

From my “experience” (meaning, one can’t verify as one can verify the experience of a sunset) of the “cosmic” (or however one might designate it), I don’t see that my view on gay marriage will ever coincide with yours.

By the way, re-marriage – I think you read my viewpoint: the different religions should have the option to marry (or not marry) in accordance with their beliefs, except when this violates the law (like marrying a child). I know, for instance, that the different branches of the Lutheran church have very different understandings of the biblical texts – re: women, gays, etc. (I am not going to mix into this argument – not mine.)

A big thing, for me: respecting each other, even when there is disagreement.

Again, thank you for writing,

All the best,


On 2015-09-01, at 2:18 PM

When I asked for permission to use Elsa’s permission to post her email, she gave permission and responded thus including a quote from my intro to her promotion of Pastor Umar Mulinde for the Nobel Peace Prize (“My Thoughts on Same-Sex Marriage & Nobel for Pastor Mulinde”):

I agree:

“(E)ven in disagreement there is still ground for agreement. Christians (of all Denominations), atheists, Secularists and other religions not Islamic should unite and agree that Islam is a threat to all of our lines of thought and beliefs.”

All the best to all of us on the side of life, love, freedom,


There is a time when political and social disagreements need to be set aside in Western Culture. The theopolitical tenets of the revered writings of Islam inspiring Sunni and Shia aspirations for a global Caliphate at the expense of the Liberties and Freedoms that have come to pass in West should/MUST unite a common goal to stop the un-Western concepts of Islam from finding any kind of ascendance. Since I am an American this unity must especially coalesce insuring the efficacy of the United State Constitution.

JRH 9/7/15

Please Support NCCR

Vladdi’s Compendium of Quotes about Islam

A fellow WordPress blogger going by Vladdi added some brilliant additions to the post I made on 9/2/15 entitled “Compendium of Quotes about Islam”. Although I also post on other blog platforms this was on my WordPress blog called NeoConservative Christian Right (NCCR). As usual when cross posting comments I have to create a title not made by the author. In this case – Vladdi’s Compendium of Quotes about Islam.

JRH 9/5/15

Please Support NCCR


Vladdi’s Compendium of Quotes about Islam

By Vladdi

Compendium Comments posted – September 5, 2015

Original Date: September 3, 2015 – 5:04 PM, 5:19 PM, & 5:26 PM

Here’s one they missed:

“Islam wishes to do away with all states and governments which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of this ideology and program, regardless of which nation assumes the role of standard-bearer of Islam, and regardless of the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic state. Islam requires the earth — not just a portion, but the entire planet…”

– Maududi –



Recall Khomeini’s words during his 1980 speech in Qom, the Shi’ite spiritual hub:

“We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land [Iran] go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.”


Ali Gomaa, the grand mufti of Egypt, the highest Muslim religious authority in the world, supports murdering non-Muslims. In the daily Al Ahram (April 7, 2008), he said, “Muslims must kill non-believers wherever they are unless they convert to Islam.” He also compares non-Muslims to apes and pigs.


Muhammad Sayyid Al Tantawi, president of Al Azhar University (the most prominent and authoritative institute of Islamic jurisprudence in the world) also approves of killing and maiming Christians, Jews, and other infidels. He added, “This is not my personal view. This what the Shari’a Law says, the law of Allah, the only valid law on the earth.”


And here you have it from the biggest terrorist of all time:

“I have been made victorious with terror”
– The Prophet Muhammad
(Hadith Bukhari 4:52:220 – Islamic scripture)

Indeed in the Prophet Muhammad you have a good example to follow”.

– The Quran (Surah Al-Ahzab, Verse 21)

Syed Abul Ala Maududi, founder of the Pakistani political party Jamaat-e-Islami, said non-Muslims have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.”


The Chief Justice of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid teaches that “at first fighting was forbidden, then it was permitted, and after that it was made obligatory.” He clearly identifies two groups Muslims are obligated to fight: “(1) they who start fighting against Muslims, and (2) they who worship gods other than Allah.”


The most prominent Muslim scholar of the 20th century, Sheikh Abu Ala Maududi, stated in his book, Islamic Law and Constitution, on p. 262, that the Islamic State “seeks to mould every aspect of life and activity. In such a state no one can regard any field of his affairs as personal and private. Considered from this aspect the Islamic State bears a kind of resemblance to the Fascist and Communist states.” Maududi added “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam.”


Hasan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood (the largest international Islamic organization in the world) wrote, “Islam is an all-embracing concept which regulates every aspect of life, adjudicating on every one of its concerns and prescribing for it a solid and rigorous order.” Hasan al-Banna acknowledged there are many levels of jihad, including mere “interior spiritual struggle,” which he deemed the lowest level. According to al-Banna, waging warfare against the infidels is the highest expression of fidelity.


Hasan al-Banna also wrote, “it is a duty incumbent on every Muslim to struggle towards the aim of making every people Muslim and the whole world Islamic, so that the banner of Islam can flutter over the earth and the call of the Muezzin can resound in all the corners of the world.” Now remember, this is the founder of the largest international Muslim organization in the world.

Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz Bin Abdullah Bin Mohammed al Sheikh said on Iqra’ TV channel,

“Killing producers who show women unveiled is legal.”


The Saudi Sheikh Saleh Al-Lehadan, head of the Supreme Judiciary Council, told Al Watan Daily, (March 5, 2008)

“After getting rid of the Jews in our Arab land, we must turn to the Christians. They have three options: either they convert to Islam, or leave, or pay Jizia (protection taxes).”


And source for THAT:


80% of young Turks in Netherlands see nothing wrong with jihad against unbelievers


And let’s not forget Voltaire:


Voltaire found prophet Mohammed grotesque in character and conduct.

In his tragedy Le Fanatisme ou Mahomet, Voltaire described Mohammed as an “impostor”, a “false prophet”, a “fanatic” and a “hypocrite”. Voltaire defended the play, he said that he “tried to show in it into what horrible excesses fanaticism, led by an impostor, can plunge weak minds”.

When Voltaire wrote in 1742 to César de Missy, he described Mohammed as a “deceitful character.”

In 1748, after having read Henri de Boulainvilliers and George Sale, he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in an article, “De l’Alcoran et de Mahomet” (On the Quran and on Mohammed). In the article, Voltaire
maintained that Mohammed was a “sublime charlatan” and wrote that furthermore he was not an illiterate.

Drawing also on complementary information in the “Oriental Library” of Herbelot, Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, had a judgement (sic) of Qur’an where he found the book in spite of “the contradictions, the absurdities, the anachronisms”, “rhapsody, without connection, without order, and without art”. Thus he “henceforward conceded” that “if his book was bad for our times and for us, it was very good for his contemporaries, and his religion even more so. It must be admitted that he removed almost all of Asia from idolatry” and that “it was difficult for such a simple and wise religion, taught by a man who was constantly victorious, could hardly fail to subjugate a portion of the earth.” He considered that “its civil laws are good; its dogma is admirable which it has in common with ours” but that “his means are shocking; deception and murder”.

In his play about Moe, Voltaire continues about Islam that “Nothing is more terrible than a people who, having nothing to lose, fight in the united spirit of rapine and of religion.”

In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that “is assuredly nothing any man can excuse” and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition and lack of enlightenment. Voltaire continued in his letter, “But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him.” – Referring to Muhammad, in a letter to Frederick II of Prussia (December 1740), published in Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, Vol. 7 (1869), edited by Georges Avenel, p. 105.

In a 1745 letter recommending his play Fanaticism, or Mahomet to Pope Benedict XIV, Voltaire described the founder of Islam, Muhammad as “the founder of a false and barbarous sect” and “a false prophet.”

Voltaire wrote that “Your holiness will pardon the liberty taken by one of the lowest of the faithful, though a zealous admirer of virtue, of submitting to the head of the true religion this performance, written in opposition to the founder of a false and barbarous sect. To whom could I with more propriety inscribe a satire on the cruelty and errors of a false prophet, than to the vicar and representative of a God of truth and mercy?”


Edited by John R. Houk

© Vladdi