In the post “Islam’s Allah is NOT the same as Christianity’s GOD Almighty” I affirmed that which the title proclaims. Denis Saldanha left this comment on G+ comments:
“Why Christianity, it is compatible with none.”
emma jones took Denis’ comment as a criticism of Christianity. I am actually not sure if it was a criticism. If one looks at this question enough one might either negative or positive connotations. If Denis’s query was in a negative sense, then emma’s answer is awesome. Indeed, emma’s comment criticism is insightful enough for a stand-alone post. You can read an edited version below.
This is what Islam Allows as Faith
[Arbitrary Editor’s title]
By emma jones
2/23/15 11:50 AM
Islam is the only religion with a holy book that allows:
–Murdering those who won’t convert
–Having sex with 1 year old children
–Allowing people to lie if it furthers Islam
–Having sex with a dead body (Moe ham head did this with his dead aunt)
–Taking the lives and property of anyone who disagrees with Islam
–Cutting off limbs of people for crimes
–Beheading, burning people alive, rape
–Having sex with animals as long as you kill them and don’t eat them
–Predicts a paradise in the after-life with 72 virgins for sex, young boys for sex, and rivers of wine …… which would know as a Roman orgy in the real world
ISLAM cannot agree with any other religion. If a muslim leaves islam he must be killed. So shut up if you haven’t read the Hadith, Koran, etc. Are you talking out of your ass?
I’m probably not as much an erudite writer as I am one who writes within the scope of a sense frustration. Thus when I do run into an erudite writer as the Patriot Post’s Mark Alexander, I am quite happy to cross post their thoughts. In this post Alexander succinctly writes what I have been blogging for some time. Read, enjoy, but most of all, understand the message!
BO’s Blinding Islamophilia
The REAL National Security Threat
By Mark Alexander
Feb. 11, 2015
“There is a rank due to the United States, among nations, which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of weakness. If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity, it must be known that we are at all times ready for war.” –George Washington (1793)
Islamophile: One who is so enchanted by Islam as to be under the influence of its tenets.
In 2009, I noted that Barack Hussein Obama’s remarkably brief White House bio began with this fallacious assertion: “His story is the American story – values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family…” And you can make up the rest.
Amazingly, his [BIG Lie] (http://patriotpost.us/alexander/22209] bio page has not been altered since then.
So, in an effort to better understand who Obama really is, and where his religious alliances fall, let’s briefly review.
Barack was conceived to unwed parents, Ann Dunham and his Kenyan father, BHO senior, both atheists. They were later married and then divorced. When Obama was four, his mother remarried, this time to an Indonesian Muslim, Lolo Soetoro. In his 1995 memoir “Dreams from My Father,” Obama wrote that Soetoro subscribed to “a brand of Islam that could make room for the remnants of more ancient animist and Hindu faiths.”
At the age of 10, Obama returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, who might best be described as agnostic. There, he would fall under the spell of an avowed Marxist, Frank Marshall Davis.
As a young adult and budding “community organizer,” Obama was taken under wing by a radical black supremacist pastor, Jeremiah Wright, who married Barack and his wife, Michelle, baptized their children and stewarded BO’s “faith” for 20 years. For those two decades, Obama also developed close associations with many other leftist radicals, including Michael Pfleger, William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi, Bob Creamer, Edward Said, Roberto Unger and others.
That is the real Barack Obama bio, and those are his “values from the heartland.” Further, while he self-identifies as “Christian” rather than Muslim, that claim may be as deceptive as his bio.
With that in mind, in this seventh year of Obama’s seemingly limitless foreign and domestic policy failures, despite the ominous and impending threats from resurgent al-Qa’ida terrorist networks, the Islamic State, and clear evidence that Islamist Jihadis are targeting the USA, Obama never mentioned al-Qa’ida or Islam in his 2015 SOTU address three weeks ago.
Nor did Obama mention Islam when referencing the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris in early January, except to insist again that Islam is the “Religion of Peace.”
British journalist Douglas Kear Murray, an expert on Islam, asserts that many Muslims today subscribe to “a creed of Islamic fascism – a malignant fundamentalism, woken from the dark ages to assault us here and now.” He notes, “The claim that Islam is a religion of peace is a nicety invented by Western politicians so as either not to offend their Muslim populations or simply lie to themselves that everything might yet turn out fine. In fact, since its beginning Islam has been pretty violent.”
More recently, Obama dismissed the subsequent slaughter of Jews in Paris as an act committed by “a bunch of violent vicious zealots who … randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli.” Obama’s spokesman Josh Earnest demonstrated a heroic display of verbal contortionism in endeavoring to explain Obama’s assertion that the attack was random. Those “violent vicious zealots” were Islamists, and there was nothing “random” about terrorists targeting a kosher Jewish deli.
Last week, Obama used a Christian forum, the National Prayer Breakfast, to sanctimoniously denigrate Christians. The theme for this year’s event was “Remembering the Armenian Genocide of 1915,” when more than a million Christians were murdered by Muslims. That notwithstanding, he claimed Christians and Muslims are equal partners in murder and mayhem:
“Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place – remember that the Crusades and the Inquisition committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ.” He added, “Slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”
Really? For the record, Obama has ordered drone strikes against Islamic targets that have killed more Muslims in six years than were killed during three centuries of the Spanish Inquisition. (Look it up!) And the Crusades were, arguably, undertaken in the name of “the church,” not Jesus Christ. As Islamic scholar and historian Bernard Lewis notes,
“The Crusades could more accurately be described as a limited, belated and, in the last analysis, ineffectual response to the jihad – a failed attempt to recover by a Christian holy war what had been lost to a Muslim holy war.”
Clearly, there is nothing in the Gospel of Jesus Christ that advocates or could even be loosely construed to advocate violence against non-Christians. However, there is plenty in the Quran and the Hadith (the teachings of Muhammad) advocating death to infidels. As Franklin Graham reminds us,
“Jesus taught peace, love and forgiveness. He came to give his life for the sins of mankind, not to take life.”
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, the child in Indian immigrants, rebutted Obama’s assertion, saying,
“It was nice of the President to give us a history lesson at the Prayer breakfast. Today, however, the issue right in front of his nose, in the here and now, is the terrorism of Radical Islam. … The Medieval Christian threat is under control, Mr. President. Please deal with the Radical Islamic threat today.”
As to Obama’s reference to slavery, the abolitionist movement to end chattel slavery in the United States 150 years ago was led by white and black Christian men and women, as was the movement to end segregation 50 years ago. Christians of yore were at the forefront of these sweeping changes, while Muslims today are at the forefront of murderous global Jihad.
This metastasizing Islamic threat advocates for a “master race,” much as did Adolf Hitler prior to World War II. However, rather than a world dominated by Aryans, Islamists seek a worldwide caliphate of Islamists, or “Jihadistan.” And on the subject of percentages, some have suggested that because only 10 percent of Muslims are extremists we need not worry. However, in 1940 only seven percent of Germans belonged to the National Socialist German Workers Party. How did that work out?
Notably, the 2014 Global Slavery Index reports that of the more than 29 million humans held today in captive slavery – defined as “the possession and control of a person in such a way as to significantly deprive that person of his or her individual liberty, with the intent of exploiting that person through their use, management, profit, transfer or disposal” – more than 18 million are being held in Islamic countries, primarily (and ironically) in Africa.
Indeed, ISIL has institutionalized slavery in the Middle East.
In an interview this week, Obama delusionally insisted that concern about [Islamic] terrorism is simply media-driven hype:
“If it bleeds it leads, right? … It’s all about ratings.”
When asked why Obama would posit such a ludicrous assertion, my favorite psychiatrist, Charles Krauthammer, said flatly,
“Because he believes it. … If he was just being cynical as a way to dismiss this because of the failure of his policies, that would be one thing. I think he believes this. … This is what is so terrifying about the man who is commander in chief of a country, essentially a civilization, under attack.”
“For the last six years Obama has acted as if the biggest threat American security [in the Middle East] is the Israeli government.”
Curiously, at the National Prayer Breakfast, Obama asserted, “We are summoned to push back against those who would distort our religion for their nihilistic ends.” Whose religion was he referencing?
Perhaps the answer is found in Obama’s many words of praise for Islam since 2009:
“I will stand with [Muslims] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. … The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. … We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world – including in my own country. … As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam. … Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. … Islam has always been part of America. … We will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities. … These [Ramadan] rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings. … America and Islam … share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings. … America is not and will never be at war with Islam. … Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace. … So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. … In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education. … Throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality. … That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. … Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”
So, why does Obama refuse to mention Islam in connection with worldwide Islamic Jihad that is at our doorstep?
I believe it is because he is, first and foremost, an Islamophile, and thus he has what is almost a pathological blindness to the threat posed by Jihad.
On the other hand, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former Defense Intelligence Agency director, has been very clear in his assessment of our enemy:
“You cannot defeat an enemy you do not admit exists. … There are many sincere people in our government who frankly are paralyzed by this complexity. … [They] accept a defensive posture, reasoning that passivity is less likely to provoke our enemies. … A strong defense is the best deterrent. … The dangers to the U.S. do not arise from the arrogance of American power, but from unpreparedness or an excessive unwillingness to fight when fighting is necessary. I think there is confusion about what it is that we are facing. It’s not just what has been defined as 40,000 fighters in the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, it’s also a large [radicalized segment of Muslims] who or threatening our very way of life. … We really don’t have an effective strategy that is coherent, that actually addresses the wider problem. … I think what the American public is looking for is … moral and intellectual courage and clarity, and not a sense of passivity and confusion.”
Flynn’s assessment follows that of the Director of National Intelligence, Lt. Gen. James Clapper, who, in testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said a year ago,
“Al-Qa’ida is morphing and franchising itself … in Yemen, Somalia, in North Africa, in Syria … and what’s going on there … is very, very worrisome. … Looking back over my more than half a century in intelligence, I have not experienced a time when we’ve been beset by more crises and threats around the globe.”
Even one of the Democratic Party’s most liberal members, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, insisted,
“The presence of terrorist groups including those formerly affiliated with al-Qa’ida and others, has spread over the past year. In fact terrorism is at an all-time high worldwide.”
And this week, Congress provided the Army an end-run around Obama’s classifying Nidal Hasan’s murderous attack at Fort Hood as “workplace violence.” Instead, it is now classified as an act of terrorism and Hasan’s victims will now receive Purple Hearts.
But Obama can’t bring himself to call it what it is.
In fact, he insisted this week that climate change is a far greater threat, but noted it’s “happening [on] such a broad scale and [is] such a complex system, it’s a hard story for the media to tell on a day-to-day basis.”
Fact is, bloody Islamist attacks are also “happening on a broad scale” and on a “day-to-day basis” – and are getting closer to home every day. The murder of American relief worker Kayla Mueller, as confirmed yesterday, is yet another example of the evil we are confronting.
So, let me script this one for Obama so at his next stump speech he gets it right:
“We are at war with radical Islamic terrorists. Violent global jihad poses an immense existential threat to the civilized world, particularly since Iran is, or already has, the capacity to hand its asymmetric surrogates a nuclear weapon.”
Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Fortis Vigilate Paratus et Fidelis
Edited by John R. Houk
As Editor I took the liberty to block quote the quotations used by Mark Alexander if those quotations were at the end of a paragraph.
© 2015, The Patriot Post.
About The Patriot Post
“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!“ —George Washington
The Patriot Post is the nation’s highly acclaimed Journal of Essential Liberty, advocating individual Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and the promotion of free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values.
We believe, as did our Founders, that we have an irrevocable right and obligation “to support and defend” Liberty, as “endowed by our creator” and enshrined as Rule of Law in our Republic’s Constitution.
The Patriot Post frames current policy and culture issues in the correct constitutionally constructionist context established by our Founders, and supported today by the plurality of Americans who uphold the most basic tenet of our Republic: “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Key Managers of the Patriot Team
The Patriot Post—inspired by our National Advisory Committee and crafted by an editorial team headed by Mark Alexander—is an indispensable resource for “grass-top” leaders across the nation. These conservative gate keepers use our content as a force multiplier, a source of critical information and inspiration for their grassroots constituencies. The Patriot Post provides a hard-hitting rebuttal to contemporary political, social and mainstream media protagonists on the Left. We offer a brief, informative and entertaining analysis of the week’s most significant news, policy and opinion in our Daily Digest, while … READ THE REST
I wish I would like to see more bloggers post about the contributions of Fjordman exposing Islam’s anti-Western nature. Dave the Sage does this on the blog The Conservative Citizen.
Meet Fjordman: Europe’s Most Infamous Anti-Islamist Writer
February 1, 2015
“The civilization of Europe, America, and Australia exists today at all only because of the victories of civilized man over the enemies of civilization, because of victories stretching through the centuries from the days of Miltiades and Themistocles to those of Charles Martel in the eighth century and those of John Sobieski in the seventeenth century. During the thousand years that included the careers of the Frankish soldier and the Polish king the Christians of Asia and Africa proved unable to wage successful war with the Moslem conquerors; and in consequence Christianity practically vanished from the two continents; and today nobody can find in them any ” social values” whatever, in the sense in which we use the words, so far as the sphere of Mohammedan influence and the decaying native Christian churches are concerned. There are such “social values” today in Europe, America, and Australia only because during those thousand years the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do, that is, to beat back the Moslem invader. It is of course worth while for sociologists to discuss the effect of this European militarism on “social values,” but only if they first clearly realize and formulate the fact that if the European militarism had not been able to defend itself against and to overcome the militarism of Asia and Africa, there would have been no “social values” of any kind in our world today, and no sociologists to discuss them.” -Theodore Roosevelt, “Social Values and National Existence”, Papers and Proceedings of the American Sociological Society
The writer and author Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, better known as Fjordman, is a European treasure and a near extinct rarity unfortunately. I have admired and followed him for many years.
He’s been an inspiration to me personally as a writer and essayist. In fact, his book Defeating Eurabia was the catalyst for my own book No Apologies which will be released on Amazon for the Kindle this spring.
Fjordman has paid the price for having the courage to stand up for what is right and true. It is incredible, that in today’s Europe, one can hardly dare to stand up ones culture and country without undergoing intense scrutiny, harassment, and sometimes even persecution from the authorities. Not to mention risking death at the hands of the Muslims hordes who those same authorities have allowed to overrun the borders and flood the continent in their millions.
The goal of European and Western survivalists — and that’s what we are, it is our very survival that is at stake — should not be to “fix” the ideology of Multiculturalism but to be mentally prepared for its collapse, and to develop coherent answers to what went wrong and prepare to implement the necessary remedies when the time comes. We need to seize the window of opportunity, and in order to do so, we need to define clearly what we want to achieve. What went wrong with our civilization, and how can we survive and hopefully regenerate, despite being an increasingly vulnerable minority in an often hostile world? – Fjordman
There was once a time when the countries and nations of Europe fought ferociously and bravely against the various barbarian waves that sought to conquer it. Those days are apparently only mere memories now in the minds of those who read dusty history books and no longer part of the mentality of a civilization that is under unending racial, cultural, and religious assault. One would think that the literal descendants of the vast hordes of fierce warriors who vigorously attacked and eventually helped destroy the great and once powerful Roman Empire would learn from what occurred in their own past, on their own continent, by their own forefathers.
It is heartbreaking to watch the slow and steady suicide of a once proud and powerful race, people, continent, and civilization. They have become utterly, and possibly fatally, infected with the deadly diseases of progressivism; multiculturalism, atheism, socialism, tolerance, diversity, and political correctness. Europe has been stubborn in clinging to these discredited ‘isms’ that undermine the very foundations of the very things that once made them great and powerful Peoples and Empires.
The two great European civil wars of the last century seems to have so weakened and disillusioned the cradle of Western Civilization that the infection of progressivism was able to get a stranglehold on its victim. It hasn’t yet let go yet as it has swept from country to country across the continent with barely a whimper of dissent from the population.
Fjordman is an admirable exception to that rule and has for many years been a forceful voice for the preservation of European civilization and against the Islamization of Europe. After the 2011 Norway attacks by Anders Behring Breivik (see Is Anders Behring Breivik the Nordic Che Guevara?) Peder was ‘outed’ as Fjordman (a dangerous thing in Europe), lost his job, came under intense scrutiny from the government, and had his personal computer confiscated by the police. He is currently in exile from his native Norway and has paid the price for speaking out for the truth.
If you are not acquainted with the writings of Fjordman and his essays then I humbly suggest you take the time to explore his passionate and intellectual defense of Europe, common sense, and the preservation of Western Civilization. An up to date collection of his writings, the Fjordman Files, can be viewed here.
A little bit about my future plans. At the time of writing, I am completing the manuscript for a book that will be partly about the Breivik case. I have chosen to call it Witness to Madness. This will probably be self-published and should be in circulation at Amazon.com and other venues … most likely as both an ebook and as a printed paper book. At the time of writing I have surpassed 51,000 words that have already been edited and largely proofread. I am editing an analysis of Breivik’s so-called manifesto that will not be published in advance online, but will be exclusive to the book. When this is added within a few days, the word count for already edited material will be about 70,000 words.
Strictly speaking, this would be long enough to publish a full-length book if I so choose. However, I wish to include a bit more material before I publish, partly about how I experienced the Breivik case — including my meeting with Norwegian police — partly about Breivik’s psyche and the trial, and finally a section about the mass media and dishonest journalism. I have the option to include even more material than this, for instance about Islamization and Western appeasement.
I will wrap up the book at some point this fall and have already hired a proofreader.
Thereafter I will complete the manuscript for my book The Curious Civilization, which was already 90% finished at the time of Anders Behring Breivik’s massacre…. I hope to find a regular publisher for this title from the start, so it won’t be in circulation for some time yet.
After that, I will complete a book about Islam, and why I don’t think it can be reformed.
I have plans for several more books, too, possibly one about the self-destruction of Sweden and its model of the welfare state; maybe one about the EU, or about what went wrong with Western civilization.
In the long run I have serious plans for a huge brick of a book of a thousand-plus pages about European accomplishments over the past 40,000 years, from beer to Beethoven. This ambitious project is going to take me several more years to complete, however. It won’t be in circulation any time soon. –Fjordman
© 2014 The Conservative Citizen
THE CONSERVATIVE CITIZEN PROJECT
Visit The Conservative Citizen Project to access articles, blogs, websites, videos, and documents pertaining to the conservative philosophy. Knowledge is power, and every conservative should be well armed for the ideological struggle.
Bill Lively cross posted a book review to “Christ, Muhammad, and I” as a comment to a post by Morgan Brittany. Ms. Brittany’s post is about her displeasure of President Barack Hussein Obama’s do-nothing solution to Islamic terrorism with a big finger point to ISIS. This book review sheds more light on reasons I cross posted a petition entitled “Examine whether Islam is antithetical to Human Rights”. Sign that PETITION!
Lively’s Google Plus Comment about Islam
1/30/15 11:51 AM
President Mu’ammar al Qadhafi of Libya gave his permission to edit his book in English…Could this be another reason he was marked for Death by the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton..?
Book Review: Christ, Muhammad, and I
Book author: Mohammad Al Ghazoli
Mohammad Al Ghazoli was raised a Muslim. But the more he read the ancient literature of Islam, the more convinced he became that Allah could not be the True God. And the more he studied the life of Muhammad, the more obvious it became that Muhammad was not God’s prophet. Then one day, someone placed a Bible in his hands and said, “Read.” Soon Ghazoli had found the True God, and forgiveness through His Son.
This book isn’t just Ghazoli’s testimony. It is much more than that. It contains the facts from the literature of Islam that shows why Allah can’t possibly be the True God. It gives proof from Islam itself that whenever Muhammad wanted more wives, or riches, or when he had a problem, Gabriel was always standing by, ready to give another “verse” to exempt Muhammad from the law and morality. How convenient!
Many of the stories in the book will be unfamiliar to the Western reader, but very familiar to Muslims. It is this “inside view” of things that makes the book so powerful as a witnessing tool for Muslims. Over and over again, Ghazoli asks, “Is this the behavior of a prophet who was sent by God? What kind of god would send a prophet like that?”
The arguments contained in this book will give you powerful evidence you can show to Muslims you may try to witness to. Because it is written by a respected Arab writer, who was an advisor to the Arab league and even to Libyan ruler Qhadaffi [one of many versions of this name], you can give the book to a Muslim and tell him, “Read.”
• The 220 contradictions in the Qur’an.
• Verses which reverse and replace prior verses. Did Allah make a mistake?
• The verses used to justify terrorism.
• Even the Qur’an admits Jesus was crucified! Then it denies it.
• Muhammad’s 23 marriages, including one to a little girl.
A note from the editor:
This book was so exciting! It held me speechless as I read. It was a storehouse of information! But more importantly, at every turn I saw Muhammad, “Gabriel” and Allah compared to our loving Saviour, Jesus Christ. You’ve got to experience this for yourselves!
That is why I couldn’t wait to publish this book. Mohammad Al Ghazoli, former advisor to President Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi of Libya, gave permission to edit his book in understandable English… to help us Westerners understand the – who, what, when and where – of Islam’s history, as well as why it is so important to us today….
Table of Contents
Introduction: The “I”
Chapter 1 Allah’s Messenger or Man with a Message?
Chapter 2 Muhammad’s 23 Marriages
Chapter 3 The Dictator, the King of Racism
Chapter 4 Terrorism and Intimidation in Islam
Chapter 5 Is the Qur’an God-Sent or Man-Made?
Chapter 6 Christ vs. Muhammad
Chapter 7 Christ in The Qur’an
Chapter 8 The Cross and The Crucified
Chapter 9 Was the Bible Altered?
Chapter 10 How The Qur’an Distorts The Bible
Chapter 11 Muslim Rituals
Chapter 12 Suicide Bombers and Paradise
Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets are by this blog’s Editor.
Published by tvochannelPublished on Dec 8, 2010Ayaan Hirsi Ali on her book Nomad: From Islam to America: A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations. [Blog Editor: This info from Youtube is not a part of the Change.org petition.]
‘He (The Prophet) had their hands and feet cut off. Then he ordered that nails should be heated and passed over their eyes, and they were left in the rocky land of Medina. They asked for water, but none provided them with water till they died.’ 
5:101. O you who believe! Ask not about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if you ask about them while the Qur’ân is being revealed, they will be made plain to you. Allâh has forgiven that, and Allâh is Oft Forgiving, Most Forbearing.Sahih Bukhari Volume 2, Book 24, Number 555:Narrated Ash-sha’bi:The clerk of Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba narrated, “Muawiya wrote to Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba: Write to me something which you have heard from the Prophet (p.b.u.h.).” So Al-Mughira wrote: I heard the Prophet saying, “Allah has hated for you three things:
12.111. Indeed in their stories, there is a lesson for men of understanding. It (the Qur’an) is not a forged statement but a confirmation of the Allâh’s existing Books [the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel) and other Scriptures of Allâh] and a detailed explanation of everything and a guide and a Mercy for the people who believe.52:29. Therefore, remind and preach (mankind, O Muhammad of Islâmic Monotheism). By the Grace of Allâh, you are neither a soothsayer, nor a madman.52:30. Or do they say: “(Muhammad is) a poet! We await for him some calamity by time.!”52:31. Say (O Muhammad to them): “Wait! I am with you, among the waiters!”52:32. Do their minds command them this [i.e. to tell a lie against you (Muhammad)] or are they people exceeding the bounds (i.e. from Belief in Allâh to disbelief).52:33. Or do they say: “He (Muhammad) has forged it (this Qur’ân)?” Nay! They believe not!52:34. Let them then produce a recital like unto it (the Qur’ân) if they are truthful.81:22. And (O people) your companion (Muhammad ()) is not a madman;81:23. And indeed he (Muhammad) saw him [Jibrael (Gabriel)] in the clear horizon (towards the east).81:24. And he (Muhammad ()) withholds not a knowledge of the unseen.81:25. And it (the Qur’ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).
3:32. Say (O Muhammad): “Obey Allâh and the Messenger (Muhammad).” But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like the disbelievers.33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
“until they are all dead or they no longer seek to spread Islam by the sword and go forth to make war no more.”
“its leaders have stubbornly refused to modify, humanize and reform Islam and reconcile Islam with the modern, civilized world.”
Reform Reform Islam??!!Islam!!Published by Kab AshrafCalls for reforming Islam are generally oriented towards image, not substance. The speech by Egypt’s President Al-Sisi on new year’s day is no exception. I reproduce below… [You Can Read the Rest at the Scribed Link or view my valiant effort of the embed below.]
“problem within Islam that awaits rectifying”
“why do the leaders of the United States and the European Union insist on bringing hundreds of thousands more Muslims into our nations, when the greater percentage of them seek our destruction and the end of our liberty?”
“irrational, angry Islamofascists”
“without a peep of protest squeaking out from any of the so-called “moderate” Muslims”
”Islamic component of terrorism”
Intro to ‘Islam is Islam’
Edited by John R. Houk
Intro Date: January 18, 2015
Dajjal also left a very apt comment pertaining to the NCCR cross post written by Danny Jeffrey “JEWS, NETANYAHU, FRANCE, ISLAM AND THE AGENDA”. Dajjal’s comment begins with a quote from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
“Radical Islam is an enemy to us all”.
Frankly I was curious of the full context of the quote. I found several locations but here’s the context of all Netanyahu said in relation to participating to that unity march against terrorism in Paris from Israel Hayom:
“These are the values upon which modern France was built and these are the values that are worth fighting for,” Netanyahu said.
“Justice and truth are with us. And here is the truth: Radical Islam is an enemy to us all. Not Islam, not regular extremists, but radical Islam. The enemy has many names — Islamic State, Hamas, al-Qaida, Nusra, Hezbollah — but all are branches of the same poisonous tree.
“It is not by chance that radical Islam has wanted to destroy Israel since its founding. This is because it is the only democracy in the Middle East. Here is another truth: Radical Islam does not hate the West because of Israel, rather it hates Israel because Israel is an organic part of the West. It justly sees Israel as an island of democracy and Western tolerance in a sea of extremism and violence that it wishes to impose on the Middle East and the entire world.
“Those who massacred Jews at a synagogue in Jerusalem and those who massacred Jews and journalists in Paris belong to the same murderous terrorist movement — they must be condemned and fought against equally.” (Netanyahu in Paris: Radical Islam is an enemy to us all; By Mati Tuchfeld, Israel Hayom Staff and Reuters; Israel Hayom; 1/12/15)
In Danny Jeffrey’s essay he said he had a great disdain for politicians but admired Benjamin Netanyahu. Dajjal in this comment also shares a great disdain for politicians but rather than admiring Netanyahu, Dajjal criticizes the Prime Minister for using the term “Radical Islam”.
Dajjal’s comment then goes on to correctly explain that Islam is Islam. That there is no Moderate or Radical in Islam. Dajjal’s argument is really quite effective; however if you the full context of Netanyahu’s speech he was doing what good politicians do. Netanyahu’s comment was aimed at the Palestine Authority President Mahmoud Abbas who spews hate toward Jews and Israel as well as paints a picture of reconciliation with Muslim Brotherhood lackey in Hamas that currently rules the Gaza Strip.
Now with that all in mind read Dajjal’s very effect case that Islam is Islam.
Islam is Islam
[Title by Editor derived from Comment content]
Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:
Netanyahu in Paris: “Radical Islam is an enemy to us all”: ‘Radical Islam’. Politicians piss me off; Netanyahu is no exception as regular readers of my blog know. Islam is Islam: what Moe preached and practiced as recorded in the Qur’an & Sunnah. Appending adjectives to Islam malignantly postulates a false ‘moderate’ Islam. Nothing of the sort exists. Islam amassed an empire stretching from China to Portugal by the sword, in compliance with the imperatives contained in Surah Al-Anfal & At-Taubah which are codified in Reliance of the Traveller o9.8 & 9.9 in reverse order of sequence. At Jumah Salat, Muslims recite Surah Al-Baqarah 2.286 as a supererogatory prayer, asking Allah to grant them victory over us. Allah & Moe murdered, burned orchards and built a well-deserved reputation for barbarian repine to terrify those they sought to conquer without a fight. Doubters & dissenters: it’s documented in this pdf file: https://www.scribd.com/doc/101297086/Terrorism.
Which of the terrorists involved in recent attacks in Beslan, Madrid, London, New York, Mumbai and Paris was not a Muslim? In whose name did they perform those acts; what did they say when shooting and detonating? What do they say when slitting the throat of hadi at Eid? Blog Editor info-clarification: Sacrificing a hadi during Eid] Cameron, Hollande, Merkel, Ban Ki-moon, Shrub, Clinton, Carter & Obamination cannot get a clue, can you? We have provided a few, take hold of them and share them.
The terrorism problem does not have any moderate term solution that does not involve expelling and excluding Muslims. The Jihad problem has no long term solution that does not involve extinction. That is because Muslims believe that they will go to Paradise if they attempt to conquer us or to Hell if they hold back. They will not cease attacking until they cease to believe in Allah, his imperatives, threat and promise. Push them back far enough from our borders so that their weapons cannot reach us. Prevent them from mating nuclear warheads with ICBMs.
Inviting Abbas or any other Muslim to an anti-terror/pro-free expression rally is the moral equivalent of inviting Kermit Gosnell [Blog Editor: Gosnell was a murdering abortionist actually convicted of killing live babies. Pre-conviction description of Gosnell’s abortion practice] to an anti-abortion rally.
[Blog Editor: The last paragraph was added on January 15, 2015 at 8:26 PM
Edited by John R. Houk
Content within brackets are by the Editor.
Dajjal adds a comment to the NCCR blog cross-post “The Threat of Islam” by Martha Vanderpol. Ms. Vanderpol effectively explains what Islam is doing to Western Europe. Dajjal’s comment explains that a good Muslim is a violent Muslim because it is encoded in Islam’s considered holiest book known to us as the Quran. Next to the Quran in reverence is the Hadith which are from man rather than Allah. Hadith are broken down into degrees of reliability or authenticity. Sunnis represent about 90% of all Muslims and Shias roughly about 10%. As expected Sunnis and Shias do not agree with each other on what is a reliable Hadith. Since Dajjal’s expose on Islam uses a Sunni reliable Hadith Let’s narrow down the Sunni expectations.
Just to be clear the Quran is so holy to Muslims because it is considered the uncreated words of Allah delivered through the lips of Islam’s considered perfect man Mohammed. With all this divine and perfect association you MUST understand that Islam is NOT a religion of peace regardless of the propaganda you read or hear from the media and Muslim apologists.
At any rate Sunnis divide Hadith reliability into Sound (Sahih), Good (Hasan), Weak (Da’if) and Fabricated (Maudu). For Sunnis a Hadith follows certain rules to the crossed “t” and the dotted “i” then you had pay attention almost like it came from Allah although it may not have. Here are those rules:
1. Each of its narrators is of good character,
2. Each of its narrators has a precise memory,
3. The isnad (chain of narrators) is uninterrupted from the beginning to end,
4. The hadith is sound and free of any shudhudh (irregularity) in its isnad or matn (text), and
5. The hadith is sound and free of any ‘illah (fault) in its isnad or text (What Is “Hadith Sahih” and “Isnad Sahih”; from OnIslam.net; a pro-Islam site)
Dajjal quotes from Sahih Muslim which from what I have read is second only to Sahih Bukhari which is of course surpassed by the so-called uncreated words of Allah delivered through the lips of Mohammed.
The below title and subheading was constructed from the Editor.
It’s in the Quran
Islam: Moderate or Radical Irrelevant
January 4, 2015 1:03 AM
Radical, radicalization & Islamism are false memes. The mission of Islam is the personal emolument of its founder and his successors. It is an Arab war crime syndicate gone global.
Islam is incapable of reform; it was created to enrich its founder through the professional practice of plunder & extortion. Global imposition of Allah’s will is a pretext, not a purpose; part of Moe’s clever marketing scheme.
Islam is a real, proximate and continuing threat. It is persistent because each generation of Muslims is confronted with the threat of Hellfire if they hold back and promise of eternity in Allah’s celestial bordello if they wage offensive warfare to conquer the world.
It ain’t about radicalism; it’s about belief. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause. When MINOs [Blog Editor: Muslims in Name Only] get [an] Imam and believe, they go to war. That is Islam, not radicalization.
If the masses were aware of the fundamental facts, they would be with Robert Gentle, clogging the streets echoing demands for nuking every Islamic nation.
I will now display to you something others will not reveal: an excerpt from Sahih Muslim 19.4294 [Blog Editor: For the Islam challenged it’s from a Hadith]:
… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. Then invite them to migrate from their lands to the land of Muhajirs and inform them that, if they do so, they shall have all the privileges and obligations of the Muhajirs. If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muslims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai’ except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them …
Muslims threaten, if the victims succumb, they are recruited to victimize others. If not, they are attacked. After the conquest, they are enslaved, dhimmified or convert to Islam, in which case they are recruited to victimize others. Islam is vampirism: stake it!!!
Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed in brackets are by the Editor.
Blog Editor for further learning check out below links:
http://www.crusadersarmory.tk/ (Crusader’s Amory – Copious Expose Islam site)
http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Hadith/Ulum/asb7.html (Pro-Islam on Hadith Classifications)
http://www.theonlyquran.com/hadith/Sahih-Muslim (Pro-Islam on Sahih Muslim Hadith [Hadis, Hadiths, Ahadith or whatever])
John R. Houk
© December 29, 2014
David Partridge posted a comment that he attributes to Dr. Emanuel Tanay a Holocaust survivor. The comment was to a post by Shamim Masih a Christian Pakistani that keeps updated on the treatment of Christians in Muslim dominated Pakistan. Shamim was reporting a bird’s-eye view of the Taliban attack on a Pakistan army managed school for children for first and secondary school education. The Taliban slaughtered 132 school-age children in retribution for the Pakistan army clamping down on Taliban activity in the outer-reaches of Pakistan near Afghanistan. Shamim entitled his report “Racism and Injustice Must End”.
The thing is the Tanay attribution is actually a chain-email that has been passed around for years. Dr. Tanay did not actually write the essay which was originally entitled “A German’s Point of View on Islam”. I myself was impressed with the essay and posted it on my oldest blog site simply called SlantRight.com in 2008 (currently an archive site that occasionally goes down at the end of the month when monthly data usage exceeds its servers limits). Dr. Tanay sent me an email correcting the original author:
I received an email from Emmanuel Tanay, MD. This information may change the conclusions of the story below.
I did not write the article attributed to me; I have forwarded it to some friends. Someone put my name as the author. I am not German but a Holocaust survivor from Poland. Obviously, I am aware of the danger of fanaticism.
My book Passport to Life (Amazon.com) gives some of my reflections on the subject of fanaticism.
The author of the article you are referring to was Paul E. Marek of Saskatoon, Canada. The original Title was Why The Peaceful Majority Is Irrelevant. Paul E. Marek is a second-generation Canadian, whose grandparents fled Czechoslovakia just prior to the Nazi takeover. He wrote it in February of 2006.
http://inrepair.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/why-the-peaceful-majority-is-irrelevant/ [Blog Editor: website no longer available]
Also http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/6996 [Blog Editor: The link is still good. The link is to Paul Marek’s original article posted on Israel Nation News – Arutz Sheva 7. However the link is a redirect probably because it was written so long ago.]
Although Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists glory in pointing out that Dr. Tanay did not pen the original it nevertheless is an awesome essay that should be attributed to Paul Marek. Below is David Partridge’s comment that should be read again and again.
David Partridge Comment
From Facebook Group: Infidels Are Us
Should be attributed to Paul E. Marek
A German’s View on Islam – worth reading because this is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya (sic) [Blog Editor: David Partridge actually means Dr. Emanuel Tanay rather than “Tanya”], a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist–a man, whose family was German aristocracy prior t…o World War II, and owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.
‘Very few people were true Nazis,’ he said, ‘but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of our world had come.
My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.’
We are told again and again by ‘experts’ and ‘talking heads’ that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.
The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.
The average Japanese individual, prior to World War II, was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians, most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.
And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were ‘peace loving’?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt. Yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.
Islamic prayers have now been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord’s Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?! To whom? Not to the vast majority of Canadians!).
The Islamic way is only peaceful until the fanatics move in.
In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food products in your local supermarket. Foods on aircraft have the halal emblem, just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding throughout the world.
In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of ‘no-go’ zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuses to acknowledge British law.
As for we who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts — the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Anyone who doubts the seriousness of this issue and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand.
So, I beg you, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on in the hope that thousands, world-wide, read this, think about it, and send it on – before it’s too late . . .. Because we remained silent.
Tanay, Marek and any Peaceful Majority
John R. Houk
© December 29, 2014
David Partridge Comment
December 21 at 7:05pm
From Facebook Group: Infidels Are Us
Should be attributed to Paul E. Marek
Edited by John R. Houk
[This blog post has received 4537 views since it was published four years ago. Since then, links have been broken by web site changes and new resources have been found. This post was therefore supplanted by a new page, but it continues to get the hits while the new page does not. I have therefore updated this post, repairing broken links and adding a few, notably to Ibn Sad’s Sira and The Sealed Nectar to make more detailed information available to the reader.]Islam was contrived for the purpose of its founder’s personal emolument & empowerment through accrual of spoils & dominion through perpetual war. Three ayat in Surah Al-Anfal make this matter crystal clear. Four ahadith confirm it Beyond all doubt. [Emphasis added for clarity.]… Either Read the REST at Scribd or the embed below
Liars misinform us that Islam is a “great religion of peace”. What need does a religion of peace have for divinely ordained rules regulating the allocation of spoils of war? The following Qur’an quotes come from the Hilali & Khan translation. They are linked to a table containing ten parallel translations for comparison.With one exception from Sunni Path, the hadith quoted herein are from the collections published by the Muslim Student Association at USC. Tafsir quotes are from Islam-Universe. You can search Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir at http://www.qtafsir.com. USC-MSA had its own search engines for the Qur’an & hadith. I recommend http://www/qurambrpwser/com/ for Qur’an searches and http://www.sunnah.com/ for hadith searches.Surah Al-Anfal is titled “The Spoils of War” “B1ooty” or “Windfalls” depending on the translator. It begins with a declaration that … Either Read the REST at Scribd or the embed below
This post exhibits evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that:· Muhammad, aka. Moe had a devil· Moe was demon possessed· Allah is Satan.The evidence is found in the canonical texts of Islam: Qur’an, hadith & Sira which are quoted and linked so that you can verify the quotes and examine their context. [Emphasis added for clarity.]When Moe had his hallucination in the cave at Hira, he feared for his probity and sanity. There is some interesting information in Abu ‘Abd Allah Muhammad Ibn Sa’d Ibn Mani” al-Zuhri al-Basri KITAB AL-TABAQAT AL-KABIR.Moe reported strange perceptions and feared he was becoming a … Either Read the REST at Scribd or the embed below