Blog Archives

The Dangers of Ignorance in a Civilization Jihadi World


Paul Sutliff highlights the idiocy of our government’s denial of enemy of Jihadis.

 

JRH 3/17/15

Please Support NCCR

*************************

The Dangers of Ignorance in a Civilization Jihadi World

 Ignorance of Civ. Jihad

 

By Paul Sutliff 

March 16, 2015 10:08 AM

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

 

When a group of people have organized and stated their purpose is to commit acts of aggression against your government it is time to pay attention and recognize a self-declared enemy as simply that, an enemy.

 

When you recognize you have an enemy, it is important to analyze everything about them. Why? Because an enemy must have a weakness! In order to survive and be prepared for whatever an enemy may do against you, you need this information.

 

Sun Tzu, a Chinese General of great wisdom wrote, “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

 

What does knowing your enemy mean? If they have a religious belief, it means learning everything about that belief structure. If they have committed acts of aggression previously it would prove beneficial to study them to learn how they may attack and how you can counter that attack. Does the enemy wear something to identify themselves? Does the enemy follow certain rules and laws? Where is there headquarters? Who is their leader? These are all drastically important questions to answer when you start to learn about your enemy.

 

We were attacked on 9/11/2001. We learned the coordinated attack was committed by Al Qaeda. What did we know about Al Qaeda by this point? We knew they were Islamic terrorists because previous to this they had attacked the USS Cole on October 12, 2000, and had bombed our embassies in Tanzanian and Kenya. Did we know who their leader was? Yes, President Clinton stated he was given a chance to take out Osama Bin-Laden just hours before the towers came down (Good, 2014)

 

We should be analyzing history to understand fully anything and everything about our enemies. A recent article by Muhlenberg entitled Appeasement Kills. Has a clear message on this topic that needs to be heard,

 

History was meant to be the vehicle by which we learn some hard lessons. But regrettably we mostly ignore the lessons of history, and therefore keep repeating the same old mistakes. And one of the great lessons of history is the folly of seeking to appease our enemies.

 

When groups have clearly declared their intentions to kill you, you do not seek to just get along with them, or compromise with them – you seek to steadfastly resist them, or else. The story of the Second World War is a classic example of this. (Muehlenberg, 2014)

 

You may be asking how appeasement fits here. The answer is simple. If we do not recognize a self-declared enemy, they could make demands or requests under the pretense of being a friend for the purpose of manipulation. A self-declared enemy, one who in secret or openly proclaims a mission to destroy you. We have such an enemy and the government is aware of it. – But, the US government has not recognized them as an enemy!

 

Is this dangerous for America? Read the one paragraph of the Explanatory Memorandum of the North American Muslim Brotherhood found below and decide for yourself.

 

4- Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America:

 

The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.

 

(http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf)

 

Our current president in the United States has issued a statement on White House.gov that states that the “Muslim Brotherhood is a non-violent group.” This is so erroneous that I devoted an entire chapter to it in my book, Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam.

 

When was the last time you heard about the CIA, FBI and various other intelligence groups studying Islam to learn more about their belief structures concerning Jihad? Have you seen any reports of a historical analysis of Islamic governments and there methods of attack?

 

Why not? Because, if they did report on the various methods of attack they would be telling us about al-hijrah, migration or immigration for the purpose of jihad. This doctrine of migration for the purpose of jihad is as old as Islam itself. The very start date of the Islamic calendar begins when Mohammad and his followers left Mecca for Medina. Without this move Islam would not have grown. Simple analysis of this Islamic concept would place large concerns regarding an increase in Islamic migration to this country, to any country! Sam Solomon and E. Al Maqdasi have written an incredible book on this concept, which the government should read: Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam?

 
So what about the Islamic State (IS) or ISIL as Obama insists we call them. He has recruited numerous people to make the claim that they are not Islamic. But why? Several Islamic scholars have backed IS, one only need look at MEMRI.org/MEMRItv.org for the evidence. Is it not dangerous to not know your enemy so much that you insist he does not believe what he openly professes? What purpose does that serve? Look where else this same message is being employed and the answer is there………its sole purpose is a failed attempt to stop Muslims from giving financial assistance to IS.
 

So what has continual professed ignorance of Islamic terrorism brought us?

 

·         The inability to understand an increase in Islamic migration into Western civilization as coordinated with a Jihad intent.

 

·         Public lies by three presidents stating, “Islam is a peaceful religion.” Historically, this is erroneous.

 

·         Public schools that now preferentially teach more Islam to students than other religions in some states.

 

·         Social Studies textbooks that prefer Islam to other religions (http://www.meforum.org/559/islam-and-the-textbooks)

 

·         Removal of Subject Matter Experts who consider the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist entity from training government employees

 

·         Removal of any and all references to “Islamic terrorism” and “jihad” from all federal training manuals on terrorism.

 

·         Associated Press insisting that Islamic terrorism not be coupled. AP sets the media standards.

 

·         Highly placed members of the Muslim Brotherhood in all levels and branches of the federal government (http://patdollard.com/2015/02/4-star-admiral-under-obama-muslim-brotherhood-have-infiltrated-all-of-the-national-security-agencies-of-the-united-states )

 

 

IS IT TIME TO “USE OUR BRAINS” YET?

 

Bibliography

 

Good, D. (2014, August 1). Bill Clinton, Hours Before 9/11 Attacks: ‘I Could Have Killed’ Osama bin Laden. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from ABC News: http://abcnews.go.com/US/bill-clinton-hours-911-attacks-killed-osama-bin/story?id=24801422

 

Greenfield, D. (2014, November 27). Peace with Islam. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from FrontPage Mag: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/peace-with-islam-in-our-time

 

Muehlenberg, B. (2014, November 28). Appeasement Kills. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from Culture Watch: http://billmuehlenberg.com/2014/11/28/appeasement-kills

________________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Paul Sutliff

 

About Paul Sutliff 

 

I am writer and a teacher. You can find my books on Amazon portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad!


http://www.amazon.com/Paul-Sutliff/e/B00HEUCHRI

Lepanto: One of Three Christianity Preserving Battles


Battle of Lepanto 1571 3


John R. Houk
© March 16, 2015
 
I am a Christian. In full disclosure my faith might be better pinned with the terms Pentecostal, Charismatic and Word of Faith. Much of mainline Protestant Denominations would call one or all those descriptions as heretical in their faith. I am not a Roman Catholic or an Eastern Orthodox Christian although I do not condemn their faith as many Protestants do in various degrees of virulence. On a personal level I place more faith in the Bible than in tradition, but I do not condemn tradition for tradition preserved Christianity during the Dark Ages in the West and Muslim domination in the East.
 
I recognize that the dogma of Churches or of individuals are not absolute, because perfection will only come to the Body of Christ until the Second Coming of Christ that brings finality to the eradication of Satan’s realm on earth which was bequeathed to old slew foot via a load of deception fed to Eve (deceived) then to Adam (not deceived) who knew better than to accept deception as truth.
 
Now in saying all that I ran across an article about the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. That battle was one of three defining battles that resulted in preserving Christian Europe from Islamic conquest. The first is one battle that has two historical names in 732 AD: Battle of Tours/Poitiers. The last Battle marked the beginning of the end of the last Muslim super power the Ottoman Empire which found its death bed at the end of WWI between 1918 and 21: Battle of Vienna (1683). The 1571 Battle of Lepanto was as significant as the other two in which it was in between; however unlike those other battles Lepanto was a naval one.
 
The account below is from the perspective of a militant Roman Catholic website which hasn’t necessarily a good opinion of Protestants but justly are high lighting the nature of Islam.
 
JRH 3/16/15

Please Support NCCR

*****************************
The Battle of Lepanto–Why We Are Free
 
By Ashley Ladouceur and Marty Arlinghaus
 
Let me tell you the story of the Battle of Lepanto.
Don John in the Battle of LepantoDon John in the Battle of Lepanto
 
The year is 1571.

The Ottoman Empire has been expanding by method of jihad (in other words, military conquest).

This is the extent of the empire at the beginning of the battle:

 Ottoman Empire up to 1571
The Ottoman Empire extent in 1571
 
 
“The inmost sea of all the earth is shaken with their ships.”
 
“The Ottoman Turks yearned to bring all Europe within the dar al-Islam, the ‘House of Submission’ — submissive to the sharia law. Europe, as the land of the infidels, was the dar al-Harb, the ‘House of War.’” (From Lepanto, 1571: The Battle that Saved Europe by H. W. Crocker, III posted to CatholicCulture.org. Copyright by Morley Publishing Group Inc.)

Meanwhile, Christendom was divided by the Protestant Reformation

 
“The North is full of tangled things and texts and aching eyes
And dead is all the innocence of anger and surprise,
And Christian killeth Christian in a narrow dusty room,
And Christian dreadeth Christ that hath a newer face of doom.”
 
The scene is set.
On the Christian side we have a strong leader in Don John of Austria, a handsome 24 year-old son of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor. At his command were 206 galleys, 40,000 oarsmen and sailors, 28,00 soldiers and knights, the thousands of rosaries said by faithful Christians as requested by Pope Pius V, the ministries of the religious and priests who accompanied the fleet, and the entreaties of the hosts of saints and angels in Heaven.
 
Don John of Austria
Don John of Austria
 
On the side of the Turks, led by Ali Pasha, there were 328 ships, 77,000 men (including 10,000 Janissaries—Christian boys taken from their families as tax payment when they were about the age of 6. They were forced to convert to Islam, taught the art of war, and given the opportunity of advancement in the Turkish army.), and 50,000 oarsmen—many of them Christian slaves.
 
The Battle
Spies warned Ali Pasha of the Christian advance thus he had time to set up his fleet in a battle line. This fleet was more experienced and stronger than the Christian one. The naval battle began. The galleys fired cannon balls at each other.
 
The Battle of Lepanto 1571
The Battle of Lepanto
 
 
When ships got close, a floating hand-to-hand combat was commenced with scimitars, bows, and muskets on the Turk’s side and swords, pikes, and arquebuses on the Christian’s side. An unexpected strong wind allowed the Christian fleet to pin part of the Ottoman fleet against some shoals; this wind seems to have been a gust of the Holy Spirit. Some of the Christian galley slaves on the Ottoman ships revolted, incapacitating those galleys.
 
But Don John of Austria has burst the battle-line!
 
The Christian fleet was victorious. The Turks lost 170 ships, 33,000 men to death, wounds, or capture, and 12,000 Christian slaves. Christians endured 7,500 men killed and 22,000 men wounded.

The turning of the tide of the Ottoman advance is due to the prayers of the millions of Catholics in Christendom. October 7th, the day the battle took place, is now the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary, and the month of October is the month of the Rosary.

Are we not facing similar battles today, if not even greater ones? Christians are being massacred and exiled from their homes where they have dwelt for nearly 2,000 years in Iraq and Syria by Islamic groups such as ISIS (or Islamic State). Christians in other Islamic countries continue to face anti-Christian laws that prevent them from freely practicing their religion on pain of imprisonment or death. Unlike in the 16th century when Lepanto was fought, these atrocities are met with apathy by the modern Western culture, which is experiencing its own anti-Christian secularization which thinks Christians cannot possibly be persecuted. The overt culture of death advanced by the Islamic State has just as strong a hold in the hearts of Westerners who accept abortion, assisted suicide, euthanasia and other life-denying practices such as contraception that continues to cause populations of developed countries to plummet to the point where future generations will collapse under the weight of the much larger older generations. Christianity itself continues to suffer from splintering and a lack of unity of believers. The odds seem to be overwhelmingly against the Church.

But we are the Church Militant. We are united as members of the Body of Christ. We are the Catholic Church. Just as 500 years ago Christians united in prayer to defeat the Ottomans, we can unite in prayer now to combat the spiritual and physical evils in our world today.

 
For more exciting information on the Battle of Lepanto: http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7391

To read the poem G. K. Chesterton wrote about the battle: http://www.bartleby.com/103/91.html

To listen to a chant of the Templars as they march to war: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0d4qM7gCH8

______________________________
Lepanto: One of Three Christianity Preserving Battles
John R. Houk
© March 16, 2015
______________________________
The Battle of Lepanto–Why We Are Free
 
 

Sharia: The Unifying Ideology Among Modern Terror Groups


Keep Sharia out U.S.

Brigitte Gabriel writes about Islam being a common dominator among Islamic terrorist groups AND that our American government (under the management of the Obama Administration) is failing to educate the American public about the radicalness inherent in Islam’s Sharia Law.

 

3/14/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Sharia: The Unifying Ideology Among Modern Terror Groups

 

By Brigitte Gabriel

Sent from Act For America

Sent: 3/13/2015 12:14 PM

 

Boko Haram and the Islamic State. Lashkar Taibi. Al-Shabab.

We hear these names all the time used synonymously with terrorism. Commentators and political pundits try to draw them into distinct boxes by geography or by their ethnicity.

But in actuality there is a deep connection among all these groups and their barbaric practices — an ideology that is at the very heart of the danger facing Western civilization, and that we are working every day to stop.

We’ve all known about the horrors of ISIS — an English acronym for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. In recent months the group has grown beyond the last two letters of its title. The Islamic State is now active in Libya and is expanding its influence rapidly.

In India, Lashkar Taibi is actively working to bring about the fall of the Indian Republic, destroy Hinduism and Judaism, and see the disputed areas of Kashmir and Jammu made part of Pakistan, which would then itself become part of a larger pan-Islamic state.

In the Horn of Africa, Al-Shabab continues to fight to gain a foothold for sharia in the power vacuum that has existed since the early 1990s. And in Nigeria, Boko Haram kidnaps schoolgirls, murders Christians and Jews, and grinds those under its rule into ever-deeper misery and oppression.

The ideology that bonds all these groups together is a strict adherence to sharia law — the all-encompassing legal code of Islam, as practiced during the early days of the original empire that grew from Mohammad’s conquest of the Arabian Peninsula.

Most if not all of these groups talk about the desire to establish sharia rule in their lands. Much of the horror we see on the evening news from the Islamic State comes from their dedication to apply their 7th century views on everything from slavery to women’s rights to every aspect of life.

People unfortunate enough to find themselves under sharia rule find themselves in a place with little to no freedoms at all. Virtually every aspect of their lives is dictated by the omnipresent religious rules. Women are held as little more than property. They can be beaten and in many cases killed with impunity.

Girls have no chance at an education. Indeed, Boko Haram’s very name means “Western education is forbidden.”

In the lands of sharia, those who dare to profess a faith other than Islam are, under the best of circumstances, treated as second-class citizens, and more often than not rounded up for persecution or murder.

Just last year in Mosul, Islamic State fighters went house-to-house, finding Christians and marking their houses with an Arabic character — an abbreviation for “nasrani,” a pejorative term rooted in the word Nazarene. The choice given to those non-Muslims was simple: convert, pay a fine, or face “death by the sword.”

And as in so many other countries ruled by jihadis, the only thing more prevalent than efforts to kill and displace Jews is the perpetual stream of threats against Israel.

What our national security leaders have at best failed to teach the public — or at worst failed to realize themselves — is that these groups are not composed of lunatics, or any group of “lone wolves” that have congregated together in common madness.

These horrors are not the actions of a few malcontents in need of jobs or social programs. Graeme Wood put it very well in his story in this month’s Atlantic:

 

“The reality is that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic. Yes, it has attracted psychopaths and adventure seekers, drawn largely from the disaffected populations of the Middle East and Europe. But the religion preached by its most ardent followers derives from coherent and even learned interpretations of Islam.”

 

Rather than the irrational acts of madmen, the beheadings, kidnappings, and terrorist attacks around the world are the end result of a long-developed reading of Islam and what it requires of its followers.

Under their ideology, the only permissible form of government is that of a theocracy, specifically a revived caliphate, ruled by one man who will follow the will of Allah to rule the entire world.

It is this ideology – that sharia is the only acceptable law, and those who will not accept its rule must be destroyed – that we fight against. Jihadis know no color, they know no national borders, and they cannot be placed into neat boxes.

They only know that those who refuse to accept the rule of their caliph must die.

This is what we’re fighting against. A handful of people can change the world, for good or ill. It’s up to each of us to sound the alarm and be agents for change, to defend the country that we love against this great threat.

Brigitte Gabriel

_________________________

Every day, ACT for America Education a 501c3 non-profit organization is on the front lines fighting for you in meeting with politicians, decision makers, speaking on college campuses and planning events to educate and inform the public about the threat of radical Islam. To maintain and bolster our efforts, we need your continued solidarity, activism and financial support. We are only as strong as our supporters. We thank you for helping us carry on this important work.

ACT for America Education
869 Lynnhaven PKWY
Suite 113 #411
Virginia Beach, VA 23452

http://www.actforamerica.org

 

About ACT for America

 

 

ACT for America is the largest and the only grassroots organization dedicated to national security and defeating terrorism. Today, ACT for America has expanded to 890 chapters and 280,000 members with a goal of 2,500 chapters and 1,000,000 members by the end of the decade.

 

ACT for America is a non-partisan organization whose mission appeals to every American concerned about national security and terrorism -a powerful, organized, informed and mobilized voice.

 

ACT for America educates citizens and elected officials to help impact national security policy & stands ready to take action as the only national security grassroots organization in America.

 

Who We Are

 

We are all Americans first -citizens who put their differences aside and came together to secure our country. Every American has one thing in common – “we are all interested” in keeping our homes, communities, states, and nation safe. What makes ACT for America different is that our members and supporters come from every background, age, gender, race, social status, political point of view, and lifestyle choice. Remember, national security is not a conservative, liberal, or libertarian issue – it’s an American issue.

 

What We Do

 

ACT for America is continuing to expand its nationwide volunteer chapter network that trains citizens to recognize and help prevent criminal activity and terrorism in the United States while preserving civil liberties protected by the United States Constitution.

 

ACT for America focuses on activities that enhance the national security standing of the United States — such as educating elected officials from the school board level to Congress. Many of these officials go on to pass vital legislation to this end. ACT has driven the education process towards the successful passage of 37 bills in 19 states over the last six years.

 

About Brigitte Gabriel

Expose Islam and Racists by Shining Bright Sunlight


Mo's Mouth 2 your ears

Dajjal made a passionate comment to the post “Europe: Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism”. Dajjal comments most frequently on my NCCR blog. The spam protection on NCCR is oft times hyper-sensitive which is something I do appreciate. Unfortunately the WordPress spam software for NCCR marks some of Dajjal’s comments with an approval stamp. It doesn’t do that to all of Dajjal’s comments. Well, Dajjal’s comment to “Europe: Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism” was one of those comments so marked.

 

If I had to guess the reason I suspect it is because Dajjal will back his thoughts with authoritative links. When those links are numerous evidently the software raises a red flag. Also I suspect the software raises a red flag in the face of profanity. When Dajjal becomes impassioned on a point he does have a tendency toward profanity.

 

Dajjal made his comment on March 2, 2015. I discovered it needed approval on March 9. Sorry about that Dajjal.

 

Now my post on Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism was in regard to an open letter by the Nordic Supremacist Norwegian butcher Anders Breivik that murdered 76 people mostly at a Norwegian political party youth camp located on Utoya Island about 25 miles from Oslo. Breivik’s demented thinking was to kill white Norwegians and blame Muslims with the hope of causing like-minded racists to rise up to topple European governments and replace them with a Nordic Supremacist government that deports Muslims back to Muslim dominated lands.

 

My first paragraph after offering a quote from Breivik sums up the post “Europe: Nordic Supremacism vs. Counterjihadism”:

 

The above translated to English quote defines the real difference between Europe’s Neo-Nazi/Fascist movements and the nationalistic Right Wing Counterjihadist movements. The first is nationalistic racism politically and the second is nationalistic cultural preservation that is anti-Islamic (but not maliciously violent racist) and not antisemitic.

 

To get a more concrete idea what set off Dajjal perhaps read the entire post, but in lieu of that I think the summation paragraph could be enough. I am going edit Dajjal’s more colorful language with asterisks. Clearly Dajjal aligns himself with the Counterjihadists.

 

JRH 3/9/15

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Expose Islam and Racists by Shining Bright Sunlight

[Title by Editor]

 

Dajjal

Original date: March 2, 2015 at 5:04 PM

 

There is one proper way to deal with s**t: expose it to the bright sunlight, let the birds pick out the worms and till it under so that it will nourish crops without being seen or smelled again.

 

I view supremacism as s**t. Nordic, N*gg*r, Arab, Asian; any and every kind & combination. Flush it or plow it under, don’t eat it.

 

I view authoritarian government: top down, might makes right fascism as another form of solid excrement. I object equally to national & international Socialism, Communism, cronyism and corruption whether imposed by individuals, cliques, minorities or majorities.

 

I take a firm stand on the solid foundation of the Declaration of Independence & Constitution. That government is best which governs least.

 

I do not give a damn about skin pigment, hair or facial features. It’s what’s on the inside that counts.

 

It’s the belief that they [Muslims] have a divine mission to conquer me ‘cuz I do not kiss their idol’s ass that I strenuously object to. That includes imperialism, conquest, occupation, exploitation, enslavement, murder, rape, plunder & extortion.

 

The proponents of that evil philosophy are called Muslims. Their ideology is called Islam. Their actions are atrocious and entirely unacceptable. Their goals, objectives and aspirations are intolerable regardless of the means used to realize them.

 

Supremacism & imperialism cannot be accepted; neither from Breivik nor Qaradawi. I do not accept it from the Democrat Party, Republican Establishment, SPLC, United Nations, Ecclesiastic authorities, academics or editors. They can all go to Hell.

 

My stand is on the rights of free men and their violation by authoritarian regimes including Islam. At present, Islam is the worst of them, and I concentrate on exposing it, turning the clods and separating the turds so that they can be clearly seen, smelled and identified.

 

Whomever labels me ‘racist’, ‘extremist’, ‘fascist’ or ‘Nazi’ thereby exposes himself as a slanderous liar, unable to contest verifiable facts and logical opinions clearly stated.

 

Let those in need of facts choose one of three books to read, checking their Qur’an & hadith citations with these search engines:

 

http://www.quranbrowser.com/

 

http://www.sunnah.com/

 

http://www.bharatvani.org/books/jihad/

 

http://wolfpangloss.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/malik-quranic-concept-of-war.pdf

 

http://api.ning.com/files/qnlif5STwXWJllDpiD8eR4ZJaME0iAeChqROisCh9REBFkr*W8yLdvIgQU-DjaJtNHTh1BG5Tmz20bVZDZmrci6TNPb5lEYS/MashariAlAshwaqilaMasarialUshaaqRevisedEdition.pdf

 

_____________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Any text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor

 

© Dajjal

This is what Islam Allows as Faith


This is Islam - Atrociities

In the post “Islam’s Allah is NOT the same as Christianity’s GOD Almighty” I affirmed that which the title proclaims. Denis Saldanha left this comment on G+ comments:

 

Why Christianity, it is compatible with none.

 

emma jones took Denis’ comment as a criticism of Christianity. I am actually not sure if it was a criticism. If one looks at this question enough one might either negative or positive connotations. If Denis’s query was in a negative sense, then emma’s answer is awesome. Indeed, emma’s comment criticism is insightful enough for a stand-alone post. You can read an edited version below.

 

 

JRH 2/25/15

Please Support NCCR

******************************

This is what Islam Allows as Faith

[Arbitrary Editor’s title]

 

By emma jones

2/23/15 11:50 AM

 

Islam is the only religion with a holy book that allows:

–Murdering those who won’t convert


–Having sex with 1 year old children


–Allowing people to lie if it furthers Islam


–Having sex with a dead body (Moe ham head did this with his dead aunt)


–Taking the lives and property of anyone who disagrees with Islam


–Cutting off limbs of people for crimes


–Beheading, burning people alive, rape


–Having sex with animals as long as you kill them and don’t eat them


–Predicts a paradise in the after-life with 72 virgins for sex, young boys for sex, and rivers of wine …… which would know as a Roman orgy in the real world


–Endorses slavery



ISLAM cannot agree with any other religion.  If a muslim leaves islam he must be killed.  So shut up if you haven’t read the Hadith, Koran, etc. Are you talking out of your ass?

BO’s Blinding Islamophilia


Caution - BO-Hazard (as in BHO)

I’m probably not as much an erudite writer as I am one who writes within the scope of a sense frustration. Thus when I do run into an erudite writer as the Patriot Post’s Mark Alexander, I am quite happy to cross post their thoughts. In this post Alexander succinctly writes what I have been blogging for some time. Read, enjoy, but most of all, understand the message!

 

JRH 2/12/15

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

BO’s Blinding Islamophilia

The REAL National Security Threat

 

By Mark Alexander

Feb. 11, 2015

The Patriot Post

 

“There is a rank due to the United States, among nations, which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of weakness. If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity, it must be known that we are at all times ready for war.” –George Washington (1793)

 

Islamophile: One who is so enchanted by Islam as to be under the influence of its tenets.

 

In 2009, I noted that Barack Hussein Obama’s remarkably brief White House bio began with this fallacious assertion: “His story is the American story – values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family…” And you can make up the rest.

 

Amazingly, his [BIG Lie] (http://patriotpost.us/alexander/22209] bio page has not been altered since then.

 

So, in an effort to better understand who Obama really is, and where his religious alliances fall, let’s briefly review.

 

Barack was conceived to unwed parents, Ann Dunham and his Kenyan father, BHO senior, both atheists. They were later married and then divorced. When Obama was four, his mother remarried, this time to an Indonesian Muslim, Lolo Soetoro. In his 1995 memoir “Dreams from My Father,” Obama wrote that Soetoro subscribed to “a brand of Islam that could make room for the remnants of more ancient animist and Hindu faiths.”

 

At the age of 10, Obama returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, who might best be described as agnostic. There, he would fall under the spell of an avowed Marxist, Frank Marshall Davis.

 

As a young adult and budding “community organizer,” Obama was taken under wing by a radical black supremacist pastor, Jeremiah Wright, who married Barack and his wife, Michelle, baptized their children and stewarded BO’s “faith” for 20 years. For those two decades, Obama also developed close associations with many other leftist radicals, including Michael Pfleger, William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi, Bob Creamer, Edward Said, Roberto Unger and others.

 

That is the real Barack Obama bio, and those are his “values from the heartland.” Further, while he self-identifies as “Christian” rather than Muslim, that claim may be as deceptive as his bio.

 

With that in mind, in this seventh year of Obama’s seemingly limitless foreign and domestic policy failures, despite the ominous and impending threats from resurgent al-Qa’ida terrorist networks, the Islamic State, and clear evidence that Islamist Jihadis are targeting the USA, Obama never mentioned al-Qa’ida or Islam in his 2015 SOTU address three weeks ago.

 

Nor did Obama mention Islam when referencing the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris in early January, except to insist again that Islam is the “Religion of Peace.”

 

British journalist Douglas Kear Murray, an expert on Islam, asserts that many Muslims today subscribe to “a creed of Islamic fascism – a malignant fundamentalism, woken from the dark ages to assault us here and now.” He notes, “The claim that Islam is a religion of peace is a nicety invented by Western politicians so as either not to offend their Muslim populations or simply lie to themselves that everything might yet turn out fine. In fact, since its beginning Islam has been pretty violent.”

 

More recently, Obama dismissed the subsequent slaughter of Jews in Paris as an act committed by “a bunch of violent vicious zealots who … randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli.” Obama’s spokesman Josh Earnest demonstrated a heroic display of verbal contortionism in endeavoring to explain Obama’s assertion that the attack was random. Those “violent vicious zealots” were Islamists, and there was nothing “random” about terrorists targeting a kosher Jewish deli.

 

Last week, Obama used a Christian forum, the National Prayer Breakfast, to sanctimoniously denigrate Christians. The theme for this year’s event was “Remembering the Armenian Genocide of 1915,” when more than a million Christians were murdered by Muslims. That notwithstanding, he claimed Christians and Muslims are equal partners in murder and mayhem:

 

“Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place – remember that the Crusades and the Inquisition committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ.” He added, “Slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

 

Really? For the record, Obama has ordered drone strikes against Islamic targets that have killed more Muslims in six years than were killed during three centuries of the Spanish Inquisition. (Look it up!) And the Crusades were, arguably, undertaken in the name of “the church,” not Jesus Christ. As Islamic scholar and historian Bernard Lewis notes,

 

“The Crusades could more accurately be described as a limited, belated and, in the last analysis, ineffectual response to the jihad – a failed attempt to recover by a Christian holy war what had been lost to a Muslim holy war.”

 

Clearly, there is nothing in the Gospel of Jesus Christ that advocates or could even be loosely construed to advocate violence against non-Christians. However, there is plenty in the Quran and the Hadith (the teachings of Muhammad) advocating death to infidels. As Franklin Graham reminds us,

 

“Jesus taught peace, love and forgiveness. He came to give his life for the sins of mankind, not to take life.”

 

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, the child in Indian immigrants, rebutted Obama’s assertion, saying,

 

“It was nice of the President to give us a history lesson at the Prayer breakfast. Today, however, the issue right in front of his nose, in the here and now, is the terrorism of Radical Islam. … The Medieval Christian threat is under control, Mr. President. Please deal with the Radical Islamic threat today.”

 

As to Obama’s reference to slavery, the abolitionist movement to end chattel slavery in the United States 150 years ago was led by white and black Christian men and women, as was the movement to end segregation 50 years ago. Christians of yore were at the forefront of these sweeping changes, while Muslims today are at the forefront of murderous global Jihad.

 

This metastasizing Islamic threat advocates for a “master race,” much as did Adolf Hitler prior to World War II. However, rather than a world dominated by Aryans, Islamists seek a worldwide caliphate of Islamists, or “Jihadistan.” And on the subject of percentages, some have suggested that because only 10 percent of Muslims are extremists we need not worry. However, in 1940 only seven percent of Germans belonged to the National Socialist German Workers Party. How did that work out?

 

Notably, the 2014 Global Slavery Index reports that of the more than 29 million humans held today in captive slavery – defined as “the possession and control of a person in such a way as to significantly deprive that person of his or her individual liberty, with the intent of exploiting that person through their use, management, profit, transfer or disposal” – more than 18 million are being held in Islamic countries, primarily (and ironically) in Africa.

 

Indeed, ISIL has institutionalized slavery in the Middle East.

 

In an interview this week, Obama delusionally insisted that concern about [Islamic] terrorism is simply media-driven hype:

 

“If it bleeds it leads, right? … It’s all about ratings.”

 

When asked why Obama would posit such a ludicrous assertion, my favorite psychiatrist, Charles Krauthammer, said flatly,

 

“Because he believes it. … If he was just being cynical as a way to dismiss this because of the failure of his policies, that would be one thing. I think he believes this. … This is what is so terrifying about the man who is commander in chief of a country, essentially a civilization, under attack.”

 

Krauthammer added,

 

“For the last six years Obama has acted as if the biggest threat American security [in the Middle East] is the Israeli government.”

 

Curiously, at the National Prayer Breakfast, Obama asserted, “We are summoned to push back against those who would distort our religion for their nihilistic ends.” Whose religion was he referencing?

 

Perhaps the answer is found in Obama’s many words of praise for Islam since 2009:

 

“I will stand with [Muslims] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. … The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. … We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world – including in my own country. … As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam. … Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. … Islam has always been part of America. … We will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities. … These [Ramadan] rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings. … America and Islam … share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings. … America is not and will never be at war with Islam. … Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace. … So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. … In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education. … Throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality. … That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. … Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”

 

So, why does Obama refuse to mention Islam in connection with worldwide Islamic Jihad that is at our doorstep?

 

I believe it is because he is, first and foremost, an Islamophile, and thus he has what is almost a pathological blindness to the threat posed by Jihad.

 

On the other hand, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former Defense Intelligence Agency director, has been very clear in his assessment of our enemy:

 

“You cannot defeat an enemy you do not admit exists. … There are many sincere people in our government who frankly are paralyzed by this complexity. … [They] accept a defensive posture, reasoning that passivity is less likely to provoke our enemies. … A strong defense is the best deterrent. … The dangers to the U.S. do not arise from the arrogance of American power, but from unpreparedness or an excessive unwillingness to fight when fighting is necessary. I think there is confusion about what it is that we are facing. It’s not just what has been defined as 40,000 fighters in the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, it’s also a large [radicalized segment of Muslims] who or threatening our very way of life. … We really don’t have an effective strategy that is coherent, that actually addresses the wider problem. … I think what the American public is looking for is … moral and intellectual courage and clarity, and not a sense of passivity and confusion.”

 

Flynn’s assessment follows that of the Director of National Intelligence, Lt. Gen. James Clapper, who, in testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said a year ago,

 

“Al-Qa’ida is morphing and franchising itself … in Yemen, Somalia, in North Africa, in Syria … and what’s going on there … is very, very worrisome. … Looking back over my more than half a century in intelligence, I have not experienced a time when we’ve been beset by more crises and threats around the globe.”

 

Even one of the Democratic Party’s most liberal members, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, insisted,

 

“The presence of terrorist groups including those formerly affiliated with al-Qa’ida and others, has spread over the past year. In fact terrorism is at an all-time high worldwide.”

 

And this week, Congress provided the Army an end-run around Obama’s classifying Nidal Hasan’s murderous attack at Fort Hood as “workplace violence.” Instead, it is now classified as an act of terrorism and Hasan’s victims will now receive Purple Hearts.

 

But Obama can’t bring himself to call it what it is.

 

In fact, he insisted this week that climate change is a far greater threat, but noted it’s “happening [on] such a broad scale and [is] such a complex system, it’s a hard story for the media to tell on a day-to-day basis.”

 

Fact is, bloody Islamist attacks are also “happening on a broad scale” and on a “day-to-day basis” – and are getting closer to home every day. The murder of American relief worker Kayla Mueller, as confirmed yesterday, is yet another example of the evil we are confronting.

 

So, let me script this one for Obama so at his next stump speech he gets it right:

 

“We are at war with radical Islamic terrorists. Violent global jihad poses an immense existential threat to the civilized world, particularly since Iran is, or already has, the capacity to hand its asymmetric surrogates a nuclear weapon.”

 

Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Fortis Vigilate Paratus et Fidelis

_______________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

As Editor I took the liberty to block quote the quotations used by Mark Alexander if those quotations were at the end of a paragraph.

 

Contribute to The Patriot Post

 

© 2015, The Patriot Post.

 

About The Patriot Post

 

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind! —George Washington

 

Mission

The Patriot Post is the nation’s highly acclaimed Journal of Essential Liberty, advocating individual Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and the promotion of free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values.

 

We believe, as did our Founders, that we have an irrevocable right and obligation “to support and defend” Liberty, as “endowed by our creator” and enshrined as Rule of Law in our Republic’s Constitution.

 

The Patriot Post frames current policy and culture issues in the correct constitutionally constructionist context established by our Founders, and supported today by the plurality of Americans who uphold the most basic tenet of our Republic: “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

 

Operations

Key Managers of the Patriot Team

 

The Patriot Post—inspired by our National Advisory Committee and crafted by an editorial team headed by Mark Alexander—is an indispensable resource for “grass-top” leaders across the nation. These conservative gate keepers use our content as a force multiplier, a source of critical information and inspiration for their grassroots constituencies. The Patriot Post provides a hard-hitting rebuttal to contemporary political, social and mainstream media protagonists on the Left. We offer a brief, informative and entertaining analysis of the week’s most significant news, policy and opinion in our Daily Digest, while READ THE REST

 

Meet Fjordman: Europe’s Most Infamous Anti-Islamist Writer


Fjordman - Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen

I wish I would like to see more bloggers post about the contributions of Fjordman exposing Islam’s anti-Western nature. Dave the Sage does this on the blog The Conservative Citizen.

 

JRH 2/11/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Meet Fjordman: Europe’s Most Infamous Anti-Islamist Writer

 

By DAVE THE SAGE

February 1, 2015

The Conservative Citizen

 

“The civilization of Europe, America, and Australia exists today at all only because of the victories of civilized man over the enemies of civilization, because of victories stretching through the centuries from the days of Miltiades and Themistocles to those of Charles Martel in the eighth century and those of John Sobieski in the seventeenth century. During the thousand years that included the careers of the Frankish soldier and the Polish king the Christians of Asia and Africa proved unable to wage successful war with the Moslem conquerors; and in consequence Christianity practically vanished from the two continents; and today nobody can find in them any ” social values” whatever, in the sense in which we use the words, so far as the sphere of Mohammedan influence and the decaying native Christian churches are concerned. There are such “social values” today in Europe, America, and Australia only because during those thousand years the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do, that is, to beat back the Moslem invader. It is of course worth while for sociologists to discuss the effect of this European militarism on “social values,” but only if they first clearly realize and formulate the fact that if the European militarism had not been able to defend itself against and to overcome the militarism of Asia and Africa, there would have been no “social values” of any kind in our world today, and no sociologists to discuss them.” -Theodore Roosevelt, “Social Values and National Existence”, Papers and Proceedings of the American Sociological Society

 

The writer and author Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, better known as Fjordman, is a European treasure and a near extinct rarity unfortunately. I have admired and followed him for many years.

 

He’s been an inspiration to me personally as a writer and essayist. In fact, his book Defeating Eurabia was the catalyst for my own book No Apologies which will be released on Amazon for the Kindle this spring.

 

Fjordman has paid the price for having the courage to stand up for what is right and true. It is incredible, that in today’s Europe, one can hardly dare to stand up ones culture and country without undergoing intense scrutiny, harassment, and sometimes even persecution from the authorities. Not to mention risking death at the hands of the Muslims hordes who those same authorities have allowed to overrun the borders and flood the continent in their millions.

 

The goal of European and Western survivalists — and that’s what we are, it is our very survival that is at stake — should not be to “fix” the ideology of Multiculturalism but to be mentally prepared for its collapse, and to develop coherent answers to what went wrong and prepare to implement the necessary remedies when the time comes. We need to seize the window of opportunity, and in order to do so, we need to define clearly what we want to achieve. What went wrong with our civilization, and how can we survive and hopefully regenerate, despite being an increasingly vulnerable minority in an often hostile world? – Fjordman

 

There was once a time when the countries and nations of Europe fought ferociously and bravely against the various barbarian waves that sought to conquer it. Those days are apparently only mere memories now in the minds of those who read dusty history books and no longer part of the mentality of a civilization that is under unending racial, cultural, and religious assault. One would think that the literal descendants of the vast hordes of fierce warriors who vigorously attacked and eventually helped destroy the great and once powerful Roman Empire would learn from what occurred in their own past, on their own continent, by their own forefathers.

 

It is heartbreaking to watch the slow and steady suicide of a once proud and powerful race, people, continent, and civilization. They have become utterly, and possibly fatally, infected with the deadly diseases of progressivism; multiculturalism, atheism, socialism, tolerance, diversity, and political correctness. Europe has been stubborn in clinging to these discredited ‘isms’ that undermine the very foundations of the very things that once made them great and powerful Peoples and Empires.

 

The two great European civil wars of the last century seems to have so weakened and disillusioned the cradle of Western Civilization that the infection of progressivism was able to get a stranglehold on its victim. It hasn’t yet let go yet as it has swept from country to country across the continent with barely a whimper of dissent from the population.

 

Fjordman is an admirable exception to that rule and has for many years been a forceful voice for the preservation of European civilization and against the Islamization of Europe. After the 2011 Norway attacks by Anders Behring Breivik (see Is Anders Behring Breivik the Nordic Che Guevara?) Peder was ‘outed’ as Fjordman (a dangerous thing in Europe), lost his job, came under intense scrutiny from the government, and had his personal computer confiscated by the police. He is currently in exile from his native Norway and has paid the price for speaking out for the truth.

 

If you are not acquainted with the writings of Fjordman and his essays then I humbly suggest you take the time to explore his passionate and intellectual defense of Europe, common sense, and the preservation of Western Civilization. An up to date collection of his writings, the Fjordman Files, can be viewed here.

 

A little bit about my future plans. At the time of writing, I am completing the manuscript for a book that will be partly about the Breivik case. I have chosen to call it Witness to Madness. This will probably be self-published and should be in circulation at Amazon.com and other venues … most likely as both an ebook and as a printed paper book. At the time of writing I have surpassed 51,000 words that have already been edited and largely proofread. I am editing an analysis of Breivik’s so-called manifesto that will not be published in advance online, but will be exclusive to the book. When this is added within a few days, the word count for already edited material will be about 70,000 words.

 

Strictly speaking, this would be long enough to publish a full-length book if I so choose. However, I wish to include a bit more material before I publish, partly about how I experienced the Breivik case — including my meeting with Norwegian police — partly about Breivik’s psyche and the trial, and finally a section about the mass media and dishonest journalism. I have the option to include even more material than this, for instance about Islamization and Western appeasement.

 

I will wrap up the book at some point this fall and have already hired a proofreader.

 

Thereafter I will complete the manuscript for my book The Curious Civilization, which was already 90% finished at the time of Anders Behring Breivik’s massacre…. I hope to find a regular publisher for this title from the start, so it won’t be in circulation for some time yet.

 

After that, I will complete a book about Islam, and why I don’t think it can be reformed.

 

I have plans for several more books, too, possibly one about the self-destruction of Sweden and its model of the welfare state; maybe one about the EU, or about what went wrong with Western civilization.

 

In the long run I have serious plans for a huge brick of a book of a thousand-plus pages about European accomplishments over the past 40,000 years, from beer to Beethoven. This ambitious project is going to take me several more years to complete, however. It won’t be in circulation any time soon. –Fjordman

 

______________________________

© 2014 The Conservative Citizen

 

THE CONSERVATIVE CITIZEN PROJECT

 

Visit The Conservative Citizen Project to access articles, blogs, websites, videos, and documents pertaining to the conservative philosophy. Knowledge is power, and every conservative should be well armed for the ideological struggle.

Lively’s Google Plus Comment about Islam


Christ, Muhammad and I Bk Jk

Bill Lively cross posted a book review to “Christ, Muhammad, and I” as a comment to a post by Morgan Brittany. Ms. Brittany’s post is about her displeasure of President Barack Hussein Obama’s do-nothing solution to Islamic terrorism with a big finger point to ISIS. This book review sheds more light on reasons I cross posted a petition entitled “Examine whether Islam is antithetical to Human Rights”. Sign that PETITION!

 

JRH 1/30/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Lively’s Google Plus Comment about Islam

 

Bill Lively

1/30/15 11:51 AM

Comment to: “SlantRight 2.0: IT’S OFFICIAL! I’M EMBARRASSED FOR MY COUNTRY

 

President Mu’ammar al Qadhafi of Libya gave his permission to edit his book in English…Could this be another reason he was marked for Death by the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton..?

What kind of god would send a prophet like that?

 

Book Review: Christ, Muhammad, and I

Book author: Mohammad Al Ghazoli

Mohammad Al Ghazoli was raised a Muslim. But the more he read the ancient literature of Islam, the more convinced he became that Allah could not be the True God. And the more he studied the life of Muhammad, the more obvious it became that Muhammad was not God’s prophet. Then one day, someone placed a Bible in his hands and said, “Read.” Soon Ghazoli had found the True God, and forgiveness through His Son.

This book isn’t just Ghazoli’s testimony. It is much more than that. It contains the facts from the literature of Islam that shows why Allah can’t possibly be the True God. It gives proof from Islam itself that whenever Muhammad wanted more wives, or riches, or when he had a problem, Gabriel was always standing by, ready to give another “verse” to exempt Muhammad from the law and morality. How convenient!

Many of the stories in the book will be unfamiliar to the Western reader, but very familiar to Muslims. It is this “inside view” of things that makes the book so powerful as a witnessing tool for Muslims. Over and over again, Ghazoli asks, “Is this the behavior of a prophet who was sent by God? What kind of god would send a prophet like that?”

The arguments contained in this book will give you powerful evidence you can show to Muslims you may try to witness to. Because it is written by a respected Arab writer, who was an advisor to the Arab league and even to Libyan ruler Qhadaffi [one of many versions of this name], you can give the book to a Muslim and tell him, “Read.”

Learn about:

• The 220 contradictions in the Qur’an.

• Verses which reverse and replace prior verses. Did Allah make a mistake?

• The verses used to justify terrorism.

• Even the Qur’an admits Jesus was crucified! Then it denies it.

• Muhammad’s 23 marriages, including one to a little girl.

A note from the editor:

 
This book was so exciting! It held me speechless as I read. It was a storehouse of information! But more importantly, at every turn I saw Muhammad, “Gabriel” and Allah compared to our loving Saviour, Jesus Christ. You’ve got to experience this for yourselves!

That is why I couldn’t wait to publish this book. Mohammad Al Ghazoli, former advisor to President Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi of Libya, gave permission to edit his book in understandable English… to help us Westerners understand the – who, what, when and where – of Islam’s history, as well as why it is so important to us today….

Table of Contents

 

Introduction: The “I”
Chapter 1 Allah’s Messenger or Man with a Message?
Chapter 2 Muhammad’s 23 Marriages
Chapter 3 The Dictator, the King of Racism
Chapter 4 Terrorism and Intimidation in Islam
Chapter 5 Is the Qur’an God-Sent or Man-Made?
Chapter 6 Christ vs. Muhammad
Chapter 7 Christ in The Qur’an
Chapter 8 The Cross and The Crucified
Chapter 9 Was the Bible Altered?
Chapter 10 How The Qur’an Distorts The Bible
Chapter 11 Muslim Rituals
Chapter 12 Suicide Bombers and Paradise

 
   Conclusion
   Appendix A
   Appendix B

________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets are by this blog’s Editor.

Examine whether Islam is antithetical to Human Rights


ISIS Torches Jordanian Pilot

ISIS Torches Jordanian Pilot
 
 
This is a petition placed on Change.org by a person who wisely only identifies them self as “Examine Islam”. It is wise because a religious Muslim will very upset with the design of this petition. The media has demonstrated that Muslims who might be identified as “Moderate” act as “Radical” when they feel their prophet or their so-called religion of Islam has been insulted. Westerners exercise their Free Speech rights to parody Mohammed and Muslims across the Islamic world and significant Muslim population centers in Europe riot in streets – in many cases violently.
 
This petition lays out the reasons that Islam is more an anti-Human Rights ideology than a religion and asks World Leaders – especially in the non-Muslim World – to rule Islam is an unacceptable ideology that violates Human Rights.
 
The reality of the matter is that these kinds of petitions rarely have any political effect. AND YET if such large number sign this petition that not even the Lame Stream Media cannot ignore population sentiment may be influenced to wake-up. That means the voice of the voters in the Free World would begin to make their voices heard at the polls.
 
 
JRH 2/4/15 (Hat Tip: Europe News)
 

Please Support NCCR

*************************
Examine whether Islam is antithetical to Human Rights
 
Click Above Link to Sign Petition!
 
 
Published by tvochannel
Published on Dec 8, 2010
 
Ayaan Hirsi Ali on her book Nomad: From Islam to America: A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations. [Blog Editor: This info from Youtube is not a part of the Change.org petition.]
 
This petition urges the leaders of the Western and non-Muslim World and the UN to examine whether Islam is in fact antithetical to Human Rights law, and incites violence towards non-Muslims and apostates, incites hatred and the rejection of Civil Law. We the undersigned urge our Political Leaders and the United Nations Human Rights Council to examine whether Islam is an ideology rather than a religion and as such should be banned as a belief system in the non-Muslim world.
 
The Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights ruled in February 2003 that Islamic Sharia law is “incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy.” The court said that a legal system based on Sharia law “would diverge from the European Convention on Human Rights, particularly with regard to the rules on the status of women, and its intervention in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts.” 
 
Further, the European Court of Human Rights determined on July 31, 2001, that “the institution of Sharia law and a theocratic regime, were incompatible with the requirements of a democratic society.”
 
Sharia law is Islam. Islamic Theocratic regimes are founded upon Islam. In all its manifestations, whether in violent responses to ‘blasphemy’ such as the Charlie Hebdo attacks, or in forcing women to cover their faces, child marriage, beheadings or intolerance towards non-Muslims, Islam, Muslim nations, leaders and Islamic organisations are continuously flouting Human Rights laws.
 
This is evidenced today in Saudi Arabia‘s theocratic (religious) legal system enforcing regular beheadings, banning women from driving and the persecution of minorities, or the much better known barbarism of Isis which takes slaves of women and children and is currently engaged in the extermination of the Yazidi people and conquest of land in Iraq and Syria.
 
Muslim groups Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab in Kenya and Somalia terrorise and kill thousands. Iran regularly hangs and whips dissenters, is close to having a nuclear weapon and has stated its intention to destroy Israel. Jews have been expelled from Muslim nations and Christians continue to be persecuted and killed there for their religious belief.
 
Closer to home, Hizbut Tahir works to establish a global Caliphate and rejects UK law openly. ‘Islamophobia’ is shouted each time Islam causes another horror, in order to crush dissent and debate – regardless of the fact that Islam is responsible for oppression and slaughter, most recently in Paris – NOT non-Muslims.
 
We constantly hear Muslim voices condemning non-Muslim actions (such as publishing cartoons) – yet these are as nothing compared to the killing and oppression BY Muslims. 
 
It is now incumbent on our political leaders and the UN to listen to the voices of non-Muslims and to ex-Muslim testimony in order to finally examine in a dispassionate manner Islam and its relationship to the non-Islamic world. Specifically we ask that a major enquiry is set up to examine whether or not Islam  will pose a threat to the freedoms and Human Rights which we have fought oppression to guard and which we hold so dear in the non-Muslim world.
 
There are now many Muslim groups wanting to establish Sharia law in the West and to make Muslim lands of our nations. The existent rulings by Strasbourg that there no place for Sharia law in a democracy must be upheld everywhere and it means too that non-Muslim nations should stop allowing the voices of Islam to demand special treatment or the silencing of dissent. Ultimately it is the purpose of this petition to ask our leaders to honestly examine whether Islam is compatible with Human Rights in non-Muslim nations. If it is found not to be it should be banned just as Nazism is banned.
 
People like Ayaan Hirsi-Ali and Serkan Engin have left Islam and as such are able to see it clearly. They compare it to a cult or to Nazism – NOT to a religion. Nazism is rightly condemned today, yet Islam has an even worse track record historically. Muhammad was a warlord who himself killed many people and persuaded his followers to kill any who didn’t believe in his new religion.
 
This tendency to kill non-believers is very evident in the history of Islam right through to the present day. Islam was started by Muhammad who was not peaceful nor tolerant -he had Jews and Christians killed. The fact that Iran has a stated aim to ‘destroy Israel’, and the rise of Isis and Islamic terrorist attacks on the West shows clearly that Islam uses the cover and protection of religious freedom to promote its hate-filled, intolerant and violent ideology.
 
If followers of the cult of Scientology were to begin beheading people and violently taking over large parts of the world there would be immediate calls to ban it. Yet there is a popular myth which our leaders and media maintain, that Islam is a religion of the same caliber as Judaism or Christianity. In fact whilst terrible things were done in the name of these religions – the Judeo-Christian faith model is based on strongly moral teaching. Jesus was so peaceful he allowed himself to be killed and abused rather than exhort his followers to kill for him. Islam is based on the example of a violent warlord who did exhort violence as the solution to non-believers.
 
It is Islam which leads to Islamism. The roots of the violence and persecution of other religions which we see both today, and in the history of the belief, are there plainly in the Koran and especially the Hadith or life of Muhammad.
 
Read the following from Bukhari, The Book of Jihad, and consider whether Isis and Boko Haram are in fact much more likely to be simply Muslims rather than radical Muslims – for they DO follow the life of their prophet:
 
‘He (The Prophet) had their hands and feet cut off. Then he ordered that nails should be heated and passed over their eyes, and they were left in the rocky land of Medina. They asked for water, but none provided them with water till they died.’ [3018]
 
Please sign this petition now, and share it widely, to ask our world leaders to stop calling Islam the ‘Religion of Peace’ when it is no such thing – rather it has a history of violence and conquest of non-believers which has not abated to this day.
 
Humanity itself and the freedom of Western civilisation is at threat from this fastest growing belief system which incites hatred, violence and oppression, intolerance and fear wherever it spreads.
 
Islam must be examined as a cult or belief-system which has always and is now a threat to Human peace and civilisation – NOT as a religion. If Sharia and Theocratic Regimes are disallowed under the Human Rights act then why is Islam given the respect of any other religion? Islam is the foundation of Sharia and Islamic Theocracies.
 
There is no place for such a belief system within the non-Muslim world. Please watch Ayaah (sic) Hirsi Ali’s account of Islam and read more on how Islam breaches Human Rights Law here.
 
Thank you for your time and please help us in this struggle to retain our basic freedoms, in the face of this violent oppressor which passes for a ‘religion’ when it is rather no more than a cult.
 
We would not allow Nazism to flourish again unchecked in our lands – we should therefore not allow Islam to place more and more checks on our behaviour until all we hold dear has been destroyed.
 
+++
LETTER TO
 
The White House President Barack Obama
 
Prime Minister, United Kingdom David Cameron
 
United Nations Human Rights Council and 2 others
_______________________

A Dajjal Compilation of Informative Comments


Evil Mo

Editor John R. Houk
© January 28, 2015
© Dajjal
I have three comments worthy of an independent post from the pseudonymous Dajjal. The thing is I have lost patience in posting each one separately.  Ergo I have taken the liberty to provide a title to each comment which includes an introduction that I intended in separate posts.
Dajjal is a very knowledgeable Counterjihad writer. Indeed he has a resource he has compiled entitled the Crusader’s Armory. If you want to spend a little time educating yourself on the evils of Islam from Dajjal’s perspective you should go to that site and check it out.
In the meantime here is a compilation of Dajjal comments that were originally posted to my NCCR blog.
JRH 1/28/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************
Dajjal makes a comment to Justin O. Smith’s “Free Speech and Muslim Rage” on my NCCR blog. Dajjal sets the environment to comprehend any Muslim rage using the Quran, Hadith and Sunnah. So when a Muslim Apologist or Left Wing advocate tells you that is not what most Muslims believe know that is poppycock. Dajjal gets his information from Islamic sources that are revered.
JRH 1/26/15
**********************
Full Comprehension of Muslim Rage
(Title by Editor)
By Dajjal
Original Comment: 1/18/15 10:52 PM
Comment to: ‘Free Speech and Muslim Rage
Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:
Full comprehension of Islamic rage over exposure of Moe’s foibles requires some background information.
The tribal society where Islam was invented and expanded is based on honor and shame. Moe’s real name was Kauthar; he bestowed the undeserved honorific “Muhammad” upon himself. Moe had no witnesses; his epileptic fits were observed, but nobody else saw or heard Jibril talking to him. Islam stands or falls on Moe’s character. If you discredit Moe, you destroy the foundation of Islam.
We see pictures of raging mobs in Asia & Arabia because passions are intense in their tribal culture. They accept Islam as Moe preached it: a gift from Allah, the ultimate truth & justice. They are totally invested in it. If Islam is dishonored, they are dishonored.
Moe knew that Islam is CamelS**t. That fatal fact makes it weak and vulnerable to questioning and criticism. He took great pains to minimize those threats.
5:101. O you who believe! Ask not about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if you ask about them while the Qur’ân is being revealed, they will be made plain to you. Allâh has forgiven that, and Allâh is Oft­ Forgiving, Most Forbearing.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 2, Book 24, Number 555:
Narrated Ash-sha’bi:
The clerk of Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba narrated, “Muawiya wrote to Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba: Write to me something which you have heard from the Prophet (p.b.u.h.).” So Al-Mughira wrote: I heard the Prophet saying, “Allah has hated for you three things:
1. Vain talks, (useless talk) that you talk too much or about others.
2. Wasting of wealth (by extravagance)
3. And asking too many questions (in disputed religious matters) or asking others for something (except in great need). (See Hadith No. 591, Vol. Ill)
Because of that sensitivity, Allah found it necessary to pass revelations defending his Messenger. In reality, Moe was issuing situational scripture, posing as Allah in retort to critics.
12.111. Indeed in their stories, there is a lesson for men of understanding. It (the Qur’an) is not a forged statement but a confirmation of the Allâh’s existing Books [the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel) and other Scriptures of Allâh] and a detailed explanation of everything and a guide and a Mercy for the people who believe.
52:29. Therefore, remind and preach (mankind, O Muhammad of Islâmic Monotheism). By the Grace of Allâh, you are neither a soothsayer, nor a madman.
52:30. Or do they say: “(Muhammad is) a poet! We await for him some calamity by time.!”
52:31. Say (O Muhammad to them): “Wait! I am with you, among the waiters!”
52:32. Do their minds command them this [i.e. to tell a lie against you (Muhammad)] or are they people exceeding the bounds (i.e. from Belief in Allâh to disbelief).
52:33. Or do they say: “He (Muhammad) has forged it (this Qur’ân)?” Nay! They believe not!
52:34. Let them then produce a recital like unto it (the Qur’ân) if they are truthful.
81:22. And (O people) your companion (Muhammad ()) is not a madman;
81:23. And indeed he (Muhammad) saw him [Jibrael (Gabriel)] in the clear horizon (towards the east).
81:24. And he (Muhammad ()) withholds not a knowledge of the unseen.
81:25. And it (the Qur’ân) is not the word of the outcast Shaitân (Satan).
So intense was the sensitivity to criticism that Moe ordered his companions to murder several critics including Kab Ashraf, Asma bint Marwan and Umm Qirfa. Read about it in his biography.
Murder of Umm Qirfa
Murder of Asma bint Marwan
Assassination of Kab Ashraf pg. 368
Dissing Allah or Moe entails apostasy, which carries the death penalty for Muslims. The same punishment is applied to infidels under Shari’ah.

 

o8.1 Apostasy: penalty

 

 

o11.10 mentions something impermissible
o9.14 alternatives for captured male
Last week, Obanination’s hired Liar said that Obamination would attempt to suppress publication of any article about Jihadism deemed likely to provoke Muslims to attack our troops who are in harm’s way. That threat must be recognized as a direct infringement on the first amendment’s free speech clause.
Since the first Barbary War, this nation has been under attack or threat of attack from Muslims. We must be free to discuss that threat and its basis in Islamic scripture, exegesis, sunnah & jurisprudence. If we cannot fully and truthfully discuss those matters, our liberties will be lost sooner rather than later.
_________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
© Dajjal
+++++++++++++++++
Expose the Evil Core of Islam
(Title by Editor)
By Dajjal
Unlike Europe, America enshrines freedom of expression in our Constitution. We therefore have a right to expose the evil core of Islam. Before reading this excellent post, I read another at Jihad Watch, and replied as follows to another comment:
3:32. Say (O Muhammad): “Obey Allâh and the Messenger (Muhammad).” But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like the disbelievers.
33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
Islam commands obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe. Allah commanded Jihad under penalty of eternal damnation, local disbelievers first. Moe conquered the local Jewish settlements in the Hijaz.
How then can we be expected to respect and tolerate Islam? We must amend our organic law to state flatly: “No person enslaved by Allah and under orders therefrom to attack, rape, plunder and enslave those of us nearest them shall enter or reside within the borders of the United States of America and no Islamic institution shall remain or be established within those borders. The manifesting, practice & propagation of Islam are felonies punishable by de-naturalization and expulsion.” [Bold Text by Editor]
_________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
© Dajjal
+++++++++++++++++++
Islam is Inseverable
(Title by Editor)
By Dajjal
Compiled from Comments beginning January 25, 2015 at 4:53 PM
Comment to post ‘Islam: A Diseased Ideology
Islam cannot be contained, it is contagious, spread sexually and by military force as well as dawah. It can also be contracted voluntarily, from books and the internet.
“until they are all dead or they no longer seek to spread Islam by the sword and go forth to make war no more.”
Each Muslim can have up to four wives and keep them constantly knocked up. Due to the large population base, they breed faster than we could kill them with conventional weapons if we had the political will to exterminate them, which we do not.
“its leaders have stubbornly refused to modify, humanize and reform Islam and reconcile Islam with the modern, civilized world.”
Reformation: false expectation. It ain’t possible!!!
Reform Reform Islam??!!Islam!!
Published by Kab Ashraf
Calls for reforming Islam are generally oriented towards image, not substance. The speech by Egypt’s President Al-Sisi on new year’s day is no exception. I reproduce below… [You Can Read the Rest at the Scribed Link or view my valiant effort of the embed below.]

Reform Reform Islam??!!Islam!!

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/252004497/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

“problem within Islam that awaits rectifying”
Islam is the problem: it is mercenary and martial by design and beyond any hope of reform.
“why do the leaders of the United States and the European Union insist on bringing hundreds of thousands more Muslims into our nations, when the greater percentage of them seek our destruction and the end of our liberty?”
They are TRAITORS, not leaders; part of the problem, not the solution. They seek to destroy our system and replace it with Communism; they view Muslims as allies in that Communist revolution.
“irrational, angry Islamofascists”
Muslims; normative, nothing extraordinary.
“without a peep of protest squeaking out from any of the so-called “moderate” Muslims”
Muslims who abjure Islam sign their death warrants thereby. See Reliance O8.0–7.
”Islamic component of terrorism”
Islam is inseverable; terrorism is an intrinsic component which cannot be ignored, abandoned or removed. I refer doubters, deniers & dissenters to 2.85 and this list of ayat & ahadith: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented:
See my comments on the original post. [Blog Editor: which is this post I believe.]
In the present case, I found several important points to drive home and took them on immediately and serially as I discovered them.
The part I missed was “diseased ideology”. Islam is not infected, distorted, perverted, twisted nor hijacked. It is Islam: contrived for Moe’s personal empowerment & emolument through the perpetuation of war. It is what it is by design. It cannot be cured, repaired, restored or rendered anodyne. For clues, turn in the Koran to Surah Al-Anfal (8) and in Khan’s translation of Bukhari, to The Book of Khumus (53).
_____________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Although the old ‘spellcheck’ tried to capitalize the first letter in some sentences I left those alone because they were within quotes. Text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
© Dajjal
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 104 other followers

%d bloggers like this: