Britain Criminalizes Truth – Ask Jayda Fransen


By John  R. Houk

© March 31, 2019

 

While I was surfing around my Social Media connections I ran into a post on the soon to be dead G+ related to British Counterjihad activist Jayda Fransen. On G+ someone had shared a Youtube video of Ms. Fransen for support because she was found guilty of violating the UK’s Hate Speech laws. When I clicked to watch, a message informs you the video is unavailable on G+ but can be viewed at Youtube.

 

Ok, no problem. I clicked to go to Youtube. I get there and a content warning is plastered on the video telling you to be aware of offensive content and making sure you know that before you proceed. ALSO Youtube disabled the like, share and embed access.

 

TALK ABOUT CENSORSHIP!

I watched that roughly 9½ minute video. There is NO visual nudity, blood and gore. There is NO description of nudity, blood and gore. There is NO graphic profanity or even PG rated profanity. Now this is a lady reputed for her raw language a la fellow persecuted Counterjihadist Tommy Robinson. Jayda Fransen has the same raw language reputation. BUT NO SUCH RAW LANGUAGE IS IN HER PLEA FOR SUPPORT VIDEO censored by Youtube.

 

I’m not sure how I pulled it off due Youtube restrictions on downloading video, but I managed to do so. Since Ms. Fransen asks to share her video, I’m going to upload it to Facebook. But keep in mind I have had my share Facebook Jail and Censorship. Even if the upload is successful, Facebook may pull an unjust Youtube and restrict or remove the video under the lie it violates Facebook Community Standards.

VIDEO: Jayda Fransen – Enemy of the State

Youtube Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcWl8Gj3Ac0

Facebook Video Link:

 

You should be aware the British Press treats Counterjihadists as Far Right Extremist purveyors of hate. Certainly many if not most of the British Counterjihadists have a raw language issue and a past history riot provocations that both Left and Right-Wing Extremists are guilty. (Interestingly, one rarely if ever read negative reviews of Leftist provocateurs in the European Press.)

 

Below is a Press-friendly profile of Jayda Fransen – Cuz it’s her website:

 

Jayda Fransen – My Story

 

Jayda was born in South East London in 1986.

 

Jayda practised and studied law for many years before founding a recruitment consultancy.

 

Jayda has been involved in the counter jihad struggle for many years before joining Britain First.

 

In 2014, Jayda was elected Deputy Leader of Britain First.

 

Jayda has stood in elections to Parliament and the Greater London Assembly.

 

Jayda also served as Britain First press officer and has taken part in numerous high profile TV documentaries.

 

Jayda is a devout Christian from a Catholic background.

 

Jayda has risked her life on many occasions confronting dangerous Islamists and terrorists, such as hate preacher Anjem Choudary.

 

For many years Jayda has endured police persecution and harassment at the hands of the establishment.

 

Jayda was sent to prison in March 2018 for ‘harassing’ a migrant paedophile rape gang in Ramsgate.

 

And here are some not so friendly British Press on Ms. Fransen’s Hate Speech violations and court experience. These actions – keep in mind – in America would be laughed at as crimes because have the First Amendment:

 

A former deputy leader of far-right group Britain First has been convicted of stirring up hatred during a speech about Islam in Belfast.

 

Jayda Fransen, 33, was found guilty over a speech at a rally in August 2017.

 

She was also convicted for separate comments at a peace wall in the city.

 

 

The judge, when convicting Fransen, of Moat Avenue in Donaghadee, County Down, described her words as “a general, vehement attack against a religious group”.

 

 

The court heard that Fransen told those gathered at the rally that there was no moderate version of Islam and that: “These people are baying for our blood.”

 

She added: “Islam says every single one of you wonderful people here today deserves to be killed.”

 

Those attending the rally were then told it was time for the world to come together against “the one common enemy”.

 

The judge told the court: “I’m satisfied these words were intended to stir up hatred and arouse fear.”

 

He also found her guilty over a separate, filmed incident at a Belfast peace wall in December 2017.

 

‘Menacing in nature’

 

On that occasion, the court heard that Fransen declared the “Islamification” of Britain will lead to similar walls to separate the two sides.

 

She claimed the country was “descending into civil war” and said it was time to “rise up against the biggest threat against the entire world”.

 

Confirming a conviction for that episode, the judge said: “I’m satisfied the words were menacing in nature.”’ (Jayda Fransen: Ex-Britain First deputy leader convicted over hate speech; BBC; 3/29/19)

 

AND HERE:

 

‘A former deputy leader of far-right group Britain First has been convicted of stirring up hatred during a speech about Islam in Belfast at a rally in August 2017, according to media reports.

 

Jayda Fransen, 33, was also convicted for separate comments filmed at a peace wall in the city, the BBC reported.

 

 

The group gained international notoriety in 2017 after US President Donald Trump was condemned by the UK prime minister’s office for retweeting anti-Muslim videos posted on Fransen’s Twitter account, MEE reported. A spokesman for Prime Minister Theresa May said at the time: “British people overwhelmingly reject the prejudiced rhetoric of the far right, which is the antithesis of the values that this country represents – decency, tolerance and respect. It is wrong for the president to have done this.”’

 

I have to wonder how many Brits “overwhelmingly” agree with PM Theresa May?

 

Story continues…

 

‘‘The judge described Fransen’s speech as “a general, vehement attack against a religious group” and told Fransen to return to Belfast Magistrates’ Court for sentencing in May.

 

 

The court heard that Fransen told those gathered at the rally that there was no moderate version of Islam and that “These people are baying for our blood,” the BBC reported.

 

She added: “Islam says every single one of you wonderful people here today deserves to be killed.”

 

Those attending the rally were then told it was time for the world to come together against “the one common enemy,” the BBC said.

 

The judge told the court: “I’m satisfied these words were intended to stir up hatred and arouse fear.”’ (Ex-Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen convicted of hate speech: Reports; By MEE staffMiddle East Eye; 3/30/19 21:14 UTC – Updated 3/31/18 1:20 UTC)

 

The British Judge is vehemently outraged with Jayda Fransen for telling the truth about Islam according to the theopolitical religion’s own revered writings. ERGO, she is being punished by the force of law … for telling the truth!

 

JRH 3/31/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

 

Lan Astaslem – I Will Not Surrender


Criticizing Islam has long been branded as racism by the Left-Wing Press (which apparently now includes Fox News – see Judge Jeanine Pirro) and Muslim Apologists. The reality is even though a majority may follow (or perhaps pretend to follow) only the peaceful portions of the Quran, Hadith and Sira; the majority of terrorism committed globally is done in the name of Islamic revered writings’ teachings.

 

Depending who read, 49 or 50 Muslims died at the hands of a Left-Wing White Supremacists. The Media drools over telling the atrocity committed by a White Man against Muslim victims. AND YET the media and national governments seem to be in a blind slumber as THOUSANDS OF CHRISTIANS are murdered (oft times graphically) annually.

 

Justin Smith elaborates on the violent murders committed by Muslims in the name of Islam. DO NOT BE LIKE A MUSLIM AND SLIP INTO HATE, but react in self-preservation at all costs knowing that Christ died for an undeserving humanity and arose from death to life that the undeserving could attain eternal life through in the Risen Christ.

 

JRH 3/22/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Lan Astaslem – I Will Not Surrender                             

The Commonality of Muslims, Nazis and Klansmen

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 3/20/2019 11:37 PM

 

Nobody wants to die before their allotted time for an average lifespan has been realized, but it happens when evil comes to call, in whatever form it has assumed that day. Many truly innocent people have been murdered over the course of history by all manner of evil, such as the Communist Bolsheviks, the National Socialists, Stalin, Mao, the Ku Klux Klan and much more, and no person who has served such masters, including Islam, can claim innocence, even though they themselves may not have ever killed a person as one of their members. Those who allowed the murders, in some cases praised and cheered, the mayhem, the chaos and evil, are complicit in the atrocities and just as culpable, including the so-called “innocents” murdered at Christchurch.

 

Right away the Leftist mainstream media gave every predictable response under the sun, from falsely proclaiming the Christchurch terrorist to be a “right wing conservative” to blaming President Trump and his alleged fanning the flames of “white supremacy”, when the only supremacists of the terror event were in the two mosques. Although the Christchurch, New Zealand terror attack was seen as horrible and heinous and the media wailed to the rooftops over its cost in human life, every single day we have massacres of Christians and infidels by devout Muslims occurring across the globe.

 

In Nigeria, the mostly Muslim Fulani tribesmen murdered nearly 8,000 Nigerian Christians, between January and July of 2018. During the three weeks prior to the gunmen murdering 50 Muslims in Christchurch, 120 Nigerian Christians were slaughtered by Muslims, and there was not one peep, not one utterance of shock, dismay or horror from the mainstream media, only the sound of crickets chirping.

 

Why the silence? Could it be that black Muslims killing black Christians was of no concern to a Far Left movement with a history of racism against people of color? Heaven forbid that their brown skinned Muslim allies meet any similar fate; that would not play well to their false political narrative seeking to always portray the Muslim as poor “peaceful” souls desiring only a “peaceful coexistence”.

 

In France alone, between January 7th 2015 and December 11th 2018, 262 people [Blog Editor: I found 245 killed in the same time frame] were murdered by Muslims in terror attacks. And in a nation with only 66 million people and 66 dead per year on average at the hands of Muslims, one understands that Frenchmen are ten times more likely to be murdered by a Muslim than a Muslim is likely to be killed by a non-Muslim anywhere in the Western world.

 

Islam and its adherents are so peaceful that one-hundred twenty-one Islamist groups across the globe killed 84,000 people in 2017, 22,000 of them civilians in sixty-six countries. While the list is long, we should also consider it is never ending, as exhibited by recent new attacks at a Philippine Church that killed 20, a Nigerian Church with 32 deaths and an Egyptian Church with 9 dead.

 

And who can forget the twin suicide bombings on Palm Sunday April 9th 2017 at St George’s Church and St Mark’s Coptic Orthodox Cathedral that killed 45 and wounded 126 Christians? Evidently the Western media and politicians who virtually ignored the attacks.

 

As the organization ‘The Religion of Peace’ notes, in the month of February 2019 one-hundred and fifty-nine deadly Islamic terror attacks occurred in 22 different countries, that resulted in 883 deaths and 547 injured and wounded. Muslim attacks are nearly a routine event, and the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge that Islam is a violent ideology that represents an existential threat to all free countries.

 

If the Muslims at Christchurch were “innocent” — the term used by Muslim appeasers to harangue their opposition — they would not have continued in the Islamic ideology, that contains a supremacy demand in its Sharia law doctrine, that notes all other religions and ideologies must be forced, one way or another, to submit to Allah and Islam or eventually be killed. Innocents would not have stayed members of a so-called “religion of peace” understanding what transpires in the name of their false “prophet” and “god”, exhibited across the span of time and millions of murderous acts of violence from 622 A.D. to the present, as the Islamic hordes swarmed out of the Arabian Peninsula conquering nation after nation in military conquests, along with political warfare, conquest through rape and procreation and immigration, all methods addressed in the Koran and the Hadith.

 

Calling a Muslim an “innocent” just because he has never killed anyone is like calling a Klansman who has never lynched a black man “innocent”. He may never have killed anyone, but he full well understood the mission and his continued membership, inaction to stop the killing, and his silence amounted to tacit approval of such murders, just as a Nazi wasn’t “innocent” just because he never personally walked any Jews to the gas chambers.

 

One surely must wonder how many of these “innocents”, these intolerant Muslims, cheered and celebrated when America’s Twin Towers were brought down by an act of Islamic terrorism on 9/11.

 

Referencing the April 7th 2017 Islamic terror attack in Stockholm, that took the life of eleven year old Ebba Akerlund, the Christchurch shooter notes in his manifesto: “I could no longer turn my back on the (Islamic} violence. Something, this time, was different. That difference was Ebba Akerlund.”

 

If the Muslims of Christchurch are truly seeking a peaceful path in life, they should leave Islam, as so many already have.

 

America and the Western world must stop opening any portion of their nations to these sons and daughters of Allah and Islam, who have no desire to assimilate, while they also make no secret that they expect America, and Europe too, to completely succumb to Islam eventually. They have mounted invasion after invasion, not much different from the brutal incursions of the Ottoman Empire in the 14th and 15th centuries; only this time they use children, boats and suicide-bombers rather  than troops and cannons.

 

We greet them as guests, and they immediately act as if they own the country, as they join forces with the socialist authoritarian leftists and anti-American advocates of multiculturalism to suppress conservatives and Christians by decrying overblown and exaggerated incidents of “Islamophobia”, that are largely unverified. And now they seek to use a rare incident like Christchurch to enable sellout politicians in host nations to propose and pass new “hate-speech” laws, squashing individual liberty with stifling statism: Islam and Muslims work to make any host nation a new colony of Islam.

 

American culture is different from Islamic culture. There is no common ground. We are different.

 

Popularized by Oriana Fallaci, a much loved journalist and open critic of Islam, here are my final words to any and all who may take interest: “Lan astaslem”  (Arabic) — “I will not surrender“. [Bold text by Editor]

 

By Justin O. Smith

__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links as well as text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Intro to Justin’s Thoughts on ‘No Apologies’


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© March 9, 2019

On Thursday (3/7/19) the House dominated by Dems passed an anti-Hate-Speech Resolution. A Resolution is not a binding law which is good because I doubt the Resolution would pass First Amendment muster.

 

The story behind the Resolution was the Antisemitism openly displayed by new House members – both Dems – both Muslims – have both been caught openly displaying Jew-hatred speech. It appears Ilhan Omar was the most egregious, but Rashida Tlaib has had her share of Antisemitism as well.

 

When the Dems were called out on their members’ Antisemitism, they ended up protecting Omar and Tlaib by a watered down Resolution – 030719 aimed at labeling criticism of Islam as Hate-Speech. And although I couldn’t find specific mention of labeling criticism of the ungodly LGBTQ lifestyle as hate, I suspect some Humanist/Multiculturalist would such criticism the Resolution’s use of the word “bigotry”.

 

Condemning anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values and aspirations that define the people of the United States and condemning anti-Muslim discrimination and bigotry against minorities as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contrary to the values and aspirations of the United States. (Resolution – 030719. With elaboration of what constitutes Hate-Speech.)

 

I found a Justin Smith post on his Facebook page that illustrates the same ire I felt in realizing where this Hate-Speech Resolution could lead. Now I don’t know if Justin’s passion for Free Speech has something to with Resolution – 030719 or some other situation, but in my opinion it applies.

 

(The title is extrapolated from the content by this Blog Editor.)

 

JRH 3/9/18

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

***********************

No Apologies for Free-Speech Truth

 

By Justin Smith

March 8, 2019 7:07 PM

 

No apologies should ever be made for hating something, because certain people, activities and ideologies have full well earned any hatred directed towards them. The term “hate-speech” is the Progressive Democrats’/Communists’ catch-phrase assault on the Truth, when the Truth exposes one of their nefarious agendas or allies. And I hate with a passion, and I love with a passion, as is my God-given right to think as I believe and feel about issues as I choose. It is a part of all human psyche to hate and to love, as well as to experience anger and joy. No thought police will ever keep me from speaking my mind through their own hypocrisy in the use of the term “hate-speech”!

 

This definition is from ‘Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary’ (1977):

 

hate 1a: intense hostility and aversion usually from fear, anger or a sense of injury

 

2a: extreme dislike or antipathy. I fear very little, so my hatred stems from anger, a sense of injury and an extreme dislike. The poet Maya Angelou shouts: “Be angry. It is right to be angry. It is healthy.”

 

Do I hate?…Damn straight I hate!

 

Psalms 97:10: You who love the Lord hate evil!

 

I hate the small-minded miniature Joe Stalins of the Democratic Party and their Muslim allies within their party, such as Representative Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, who in turn have shared their own hatred of this America I love so well.

 

I loathe those Muslims and Muslim sympathizers who advocate the spread of Sharia Law across the entire U.S., such as Dalia Mogahed (Advisor to Pres. Obama) and Harold Koh (Head of Obama’s Legal Counsel-U.S. State Dept.). Sharia Law is evil; Islam is not a religion, because it has little to do with God and primarily promotes Mohammed’s doctrines and policies.

 

Psalms 119:104: I gain understanding from Your precepts; therefore I hate every false way.

 

Islam and its Sharia Law doctrines represent an ideology diametrically opposed to the U.S. Constitution and are the enemy to America and freedom. And yet, Muslims live in the heart of America, for the most part and until just the past few years, without having their differences questioned, without checking their bad intentions, and without being penalized for their sullen fanaticism.

 

The Progressives, Muslims and Communists of the world can mock Christianity, the Virgin Mary or Jesus and nobody touches their right of thought or expression, but if myself or Pete Doughtie or anyone else simply states facts concerning Islam. the Koran and the Prophet Mohammed, we are called bigots, xenophobes and racists. Progressive Democrats/Communists and Code Pink can yell anti-American slogans, call our soldiers “murderers” and “baby-killers”, fly the Mexican or any other nationality flag over the U.S. flag or even burn our beloved American flag and nothing happens; but if anyone does the identical thing against Islam, all Hell breaks loose! This conflict is ideological and has no racial quality whatsoever.

 

If we can condone Islamofascism and Sharia Law within the U.S. in the name of broadmindedness, understanding and pluralism, why did we fight Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin? Why did we organize the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba? Why did we go to Korea and Vietnam? Why does the U.S. send soldiers, such as Seal Team Six, to kill and die in wars declared against the enemies of freedom, of democracy and of civilization? Are these principles valid in certain cases only, with certain nations only? Aren’t Islamic tyrannies as unacceptable as the communist and fascist ones? I’ve had enough of this Leftist duplicity, ambiguity and hypocrisy! I am a free spirit, a free individual, and I refuse any form of tyranny such as Islamic Sharia; I refuse to listen to the clamor for the Theocratic State.

 

The Leftists and the Muslim sympathizers would exterminate the right of dissent within our representative democratic Republic. They would see us punished and our admonishments against Islam made criminal, just as the case in Europe, where we witnessed numerous notable people, such as Brigitte Bardot and Geert Wilders, prosecuted for “hate-speech” against Muslims. They would silence America’s children, hand them to the enemy and abandon them to a minority that swaggers and blackmails as it re-establishes heresy and burns the free minds on the stake. They would build a non-democracy…a deceit…a lie!

 

Upon their death, I full well suspect that all Progressive Democrat/Communists will plunge headlong into Hell and down Lucifer’s throat due to multiple un-repented sins, but especially their intellectual terrorism. They presume and assume to hold the Truth in a dogmatic manner; if you do not think as they do, you are an idiot and an outcast. And now, Hollywood, public education, university professors and pseudo-intellectuals have poisoned the minds of two generations, as they work on the third. Let’s state facts. The mendacious pacifists who disseminate the most obtuse illiberalism and the most bullying fascism were spawned by the Left; anti-Americanism originated with the Democratic Party, and now they are engaging in an even more despicable sin, as they foster Islamism and Sharia Law in America!

 

What kind of freedom would allow us to be invaded or muzzled or prevented from thinking, speaking or rebelling? What kind of freedom would allow Americans to live in fear of being prosecuted and convicted as criminals for the fiction of “hate-speech”? What kind of freedom seeks to censor my thoughts and feelings, to decide whom I must love and whom I must hate, so that if I hate my country and my fellow Americans I go to Heaven and if I hate Muslims I go to Hell? A non-freedom, I say…a mockery…a farce!

 

Like love, hate belongs to human nature…to Life…and cannot be forbidden by some article of some penal code. It can be judged, adversed or condemned, but only on a moral basis. I have the right to love whom I want, and I also have the right to hate whom I want. Let’s start with those who hate me. Yes, I hate the Bin Ladens, the Zawahiris and the kamikazes and suicide bombers who blow our people up; I do hate the bastards who smear the facades of churches and urinate on them. I do hate the Michael Moores, the Ward Churchills, the Noam Chomskys, the George Soroses, Cloward and Pivens, the Barack Obamas, their accomplices and the domestic traitors who sell us to the enemy. I do hate them as much as I hate the Ayatollah Khomeini, Putin, Ahmadinejad, Hu and Chavez. I hate them as I always hated any murder of Freedom. It is my sacrosanct right…my sacrosanct duty.

 

John 8:32: You will know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free.

 

Millions of American patriots, such as myself, Pete Doughtie, Kevin Fisher, Lou Ann Zelenik, Rebecca Bynum, Pam King, Sam Solomon, Bill Warner, Jerry Gordon, Frank Gaffney and Bill Ketron, have led the battle against the introduction of Sharia Law and Islamofascism within the U.S. through the use of honest facts. All of us are fulfilling a very difficult, a very grievous duty…the duty of speaking the Truth. And in speaking the Truth, giving voice to the voiceless!

 

by Justin O. Smith

___________________

Intro to Justin’s Thoughts on ‘No Apologies’

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© March 9, 2019

________________

No Apologies for Free-Speech Truth

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Source Links by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Intro to ‘HEIDI MUND IN SPOKANE’


Intro by John R. Houk

© January 5, 2018

Heidi Mund is a German gal who has experienced an awakening in Christ and the dangers of Islam to Western Civilization. She is decried as a bigot by Multiculturalist Leftists and Muslims who don’t want the non-Muslim world to know Islam’s legacy of conquest and forced conversion.

 

Yup, I said “forced conversion.” When a Muslim tells you, “there is no compulsion in Islam,” it is a load of crap. Mo’s early conquering hordes would sweep through non-Muslim lands with the object of striking fear among the populace to terrify conversions or booty. A lack of submission by the conquered ALWAYS resulted in extermination. AND proper submission without conversion required the Muslim to humiliate the non-Muslim as an extorted protection tax (called jizya) was extracted.

 

Here is some background info on Heidi Mund excerpted from Tea Party Manatee of Bradenton, FL who sponsored a speaking engagement for Mund last 4/10/18:

 

“The Challenge of Islam and radical Leftism – How to save our Western Civilization”

 

She grew up as an atheist in Communist East Germany. Then she declared, “Jesus is Lord” at a combined Muslim/Christian concert. Now she is traveling the world for Christ, and speaking the truth about the Muslim agenda.

 

Germany is ahead of us in being taken over by Islam, but like the U.S., their media is silent as the Muslim rape gangs wander through their cities. Heidi Mund is getting the word out and embarrassing the German government. Be inspired and find out how she did it and what we can do here in America before it is too late.

 

 

Heidi Mund “The Brave German Woman” Bio:

 

Heidi has appeared on several TV and radio shows across America and worldwide, including the Glenn Beck Radio Show and the 700 Club with Pat Robertson. She became an Internet sensation in 2013 when she stood up and spoke the truth at an “interfaith” concert featuring a Muslim Imam saying the call to prayer at the historic Memorial Church of Martin Luther in Speyer. Speaking up from the balcony, she warned the concert-goers that Islam is a lie. She broke the curse from the Imam’s Islamic prayer, and she repeated the famous words of Martin Luther, “Here I stand, I can do no other.” YouTube video of the event went viral and has been viewed by millions around the world.

 

Heidi grew up in the same region as Martin Luther, but as a young woman she was a convinced atheist and communist in the former East Germany. It was during this time that she had an encounter with the Living God and committed her life to Jesus Christ. But persecution from the communist government forced her to flee East Germany before the Wall fell. After arriving in West Germany she worked as a teacher and lecturer in mathematics, German and business economics.

 

Her first book, A Woman According to the Heart of God, was published 2015 in the German language. Heidi speaks to churches and political groups such as the National Federation of Republican Women, Act for America and Tea Party events. Her spiritual gifts are evangelistic and prophetic. Since 2010 she has been in full-time ministry as a speaker and evangelist in the USA, Israel, Indonesia, India and Great Britain. (Heidi Mund; The Brave German Woman – 4/10; TEA PARTY MANATEE; © 2019. All Rights Reserved.)

 

You can see that Mrs. Mund is doing grassroots work in the USA. Due to the Multiculturalist laws of the EU and Germany, Mund would be in constant legal persecution from the powers that be. Also, I have little doubt her life is under threat from huge European Muslim population who follow the teachings of their revered writings that tell Muslims to NOT tolerate criticism of Islam.

 

Below is a BITCHUTE video of one of those grassroots meetings. This one take place in Spokane, WA in March 2017. The BITCHUTE video was posted 1/3/19 and a Youtube version was posted 4/3/17 (which I will embed on my WordPress blog).

 

Heidi Mund is German and has the thick accent to prove it. Listen through the accent, she has something to say worthy of being heard.

 

In full disclosure, it piqued my interest that Mund spoke where I grew up in Washington State. My home State unfortunately leans Left as does most of the Left Coast. For clarity though my upbringing was in Central Washington which (at least back then) was more Conservative than the Seattle-side of the Cascades.

 

JRH 1/5/19 (Hat Tip: G+ Community Americans Against Jihad)

Please Support NCCR

****************

BITCHUTE VIDEO: HEIDI MUND IN SPOKANE

For WordPress embed:

 

Posted by apologiamixer

First published at 18:24 UTC on January 3rd, 2019.

 

Heidi Mund who has spoken boldly against Islam in Germany shared her experience in Spokane, WA.

____________________

Intro to ‘HEIDI MUND IN SPOKANE’

Intro by John R. Houk

© January 5, 2018

____________________

HEIDI MUND IN SPOKANE

 

About APOLOGIAMIXER

 

We do video book reviews, research projects on religious cults and Christian apologetics. On occasion we will do a travel/music video. Dale Brown is an artist and musician. https://dalebrownartist.blogspot.com/ His music can be found at www.cdbaby.com/cd/dalebrown.

 

Growing up in a small town, he ventured into the perilous and confusing arena of the occult. Later, as a Christian, he was thrust headlong into a much broader view of religion through Biblical apologetics and the life experience of missionary outreach among a variety of denominational traditions. In effort to understand and meet the needs of people from different cultures and religious backgrounds his wife, Peggy, and he have always tried to find some form of practical application to what they have studied. As he says on his blog, “In 1989 we traveled with a medical missionary team made up of an assortment of Christian denominations to Haiti with Peggy serving as the dentist. To get a glimpse at the mind of Islam we listened to the Muslims and Christians debate at “Speaker’s Corner” in London’s Hyde Park in 1988. On the Alaska/Canadian coast we have logged thousands of miles on boats exploring remote towns and villages. Several road trips across the United States put us in Mormon fundamentalist towns where polygamy is still a part of that “old time” religion. We have been to Jehovah’s Witness conventions, Bahai Faith meetings, Muslim Mosques, Buddhist temples and Mormon testimony meetings.” https://dale-apologetica.blogspot.com

 

The Major Vulnerability of Islam


Elsa shows optimism in human nature relating Islam. She believes the more non-Muslims are educated into the true facts relating to Islamic history – including the actions of its self-proclaimed prophet, people will understand Islam ideology is unacceptable and incapable of merging into Western Culture.

 

I pray she is correct, but I do have doubts. What about you? In essence, the observed vulnerability of Islam is TRUTH.

 

JRH 8/1/18

Please Support NCCR

***********************

The Major Vulnerability of Islam

 

By Elsa Schieder

Sent July 29, 2018, 12:42 PM

Sent Via World Truth Summit

Original Post: Elsa’s Blog

 

I’ve been wondering, what is the Achilles’ heel of Islam in the West? What is its major vulnerability? 

 

 

Everything has vulnerable points. But until you know that Achilles’ vulnerable point is his heel, you’re not likely to attack it.

It’s clear that Islam very much cares to maintain the image of Islam-religion-of-peace, which it has gone to great pains to project to non-Islamics in the West. Otherwise why would Islamic forces (OIC, CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood, etc., etc.) have invested such an enormous amount of money and energy into:

– blocking and criminalizing freedom of speech about Islam via the many hate laws and blasphemy laws throughout the West;

– creating an environment in which many people are hit by negative consequences if they speak out – loss of job, loss of friends, loss of reputation, law suits, jail (just think of Tommy Robinson);

– purchasing text book publishing houses in the West and rewriting textbooks so the content on Islam becomes major and positive;

– trotting out the story of “it was mental illness” every time there is a jihad murder spree.

It is clearly important to Islam to be seen, overtly anyway, as benign, by most non-Islamics in non-Islamic countries.

Yet most Islamic organizations have not worked to stop violence done in the name of Islam, including in the West. Instead, for instance, Saudi Arabia has openly promoted and exported very traditional Islam.

So it also seems to matter to most Islamic forces that non-Islamics in the West simultaneously experience Islam as dangerous. Maybe all the people working to spread the truth about Islam have in fact helped Islam be experienced as dangerous. Fear helps keep people in line.

My image is of a huge veiled dancer, supposedly a beauty, veils swirling so they reveal glimpses, to all, of hairy legs and who knows what else. By now, millions of people are tugging at the veils, so that ever more of what’s underneath becomes visible.

It becomes tricky, keeping some balance between the main image and the unsavory glimpses, especially as ever people know Islamic ideology and talk about it. Each person who knows moves aside tiny bits of the veil.

Of course at some point there is a tipping point. The indoctrination about Islam as a religion of peace stops working, by and large. The reality of Islam becomes visible to too many people. Currently we have the proliferation, in Europe and Australia, of political parties against Islamization and sometimes against Islam – parties labeled by the mainstream as ultra right wing, racist and even Nazi, to keep as many people away from them for as long as possible.

Yet the breakthrough is inevitable. It’s just a question of when, how soon, and how fully the shift to reality perception of Islam is made.

There’s also the question of what will the outcome be.

What’s the vulnerable point, the Achilles’ heel, for Islam? One vulnerability is the possibility of being seen early, so that, for instance, Islamic incoming is stopped before there is a considerable Islamic population. That has happened in only a few eastern European countries.

It’s my sense that another vulnerable point is during the shift in perception. It’s like when an animal with an exoskeleton molts. No shell, for a time. In this case, no veil.

My sense is also that, the quicker the shift, the more likely there can be a relatively non-violent resolution in favor of human rights and freedoms, for the re-establishment of freedom of speech and good thinking skills.

That makes our efforts ever more important, each of us doing what we can to help with the shift – millions of us each tugging aside more and more of the veil.

Part of the impact will be on things like whom we vote for, the education about Islam in the schools, the stories about the mental health of jihadis.

Another part of the impact will be on Islamics. As our knowledge of their ideology changes, as ever more non-Islamics are aware of Islamic ideology, aware of Islamic history, aware of the story of Mohammed. Islamics will know, when we look at them, that the ideology of their religion and the life of Mohammed, are generally known. There will be a powerful group energy in our gaze. Each of us will know we’re not alone. And they will know they are being seen, as people adhering to an ideology that aims to destroy Western human rights and freedoms. Quite a shift, I’d say.

I wonder, is the core vulnerability of Islam, that Islamics will know their religion is accurately seen? Not noble. Not savory. Not peaceful. Calling for the subjugation and killing of non-Islamics.

What will this do to the many Islamics who are used to denying or ignoring the reality of Islamic ideology, who might even be ashamed of much of it?

Will Islam be drained of a considerable portion of its energy?

Just think of the response of most Germans and Austrians after World War II, when the reality of the Holocaust became known. Generations of people feeling shame.

Anyway, I am sure that the major Islamic organizations are aware of the impending tipping point. 

We will see how things go.

As always, all the best to all who care and dare,

Elsa

 

PS. This is online at:
http://elsasblog.com/180729-islam-achilles-heel.html

By the way, re the tipping point in the perception of Islam, the kids’ video, Islam – Who, What, How, can be very helpful. It tells the truth in a simple fun sweet non-confrontational manner. And it tells it to children, to inoculate them against indoctrination, so they won’t have to undo brainwashing. If you haven’t seen it, join the 165,000 peoplewho have. And please keep sharing.
http://livefreedom.net/islam-who-what-how.html

PPPS. It’s clear that the rights movements have been hijacked, from movements for the rights of people who very obviously do not have equal rights, to movements like Black Thugs Matter. Now someone has written that “Hyper-liberalism is liberalism turned inside out and upside down.” In other words, the same hijacking has happened to liberalism. Of course. The hijacking is everywhere. It’s clearly more than time to take back the rights movements! Here’s the article on the hijacking of liberalism:
https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/john-gray-hyper-liberalism-liberty/

 

PPPPS. In case you’re worried about polar bears:

 

Billboard- Stop Global Warming Hype

 

The info is from http://cfact.org:

For lots more, come explore
http://elsasblog.com
and
http://ElsasEmporium.com

 

Intro to Robert Spencer on Geert Wilders


John R. Houk, Editor

June 13, 2018

Most Americans are clueless about the enormous assault of European so-called democracies against any Free Speech exposing the god-awful crimes of Muslim immigrants, refugees and next-gen born Muslims perpetuated AGAINST the inherent non-Muslim citizens.

 

Why are Americans clueless? Because the American Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) is quite supportive of these Free Speech restrictions.

 

Why are European democracies restricting Free Speech? Because the idiocy of cultural Multicultural Diversity has capture the political elites running those nations. Muslim crimes therefore must be hidden from their European citizens to maintain the perversity that Islamic culture is compatible with the values of Western culture.

 

In Europe you can actually go to jail for exposing Muslim crimes to the public! The latest victim that I am aware of is Tommy Robinson. I wonder how many others have been jail or prosecuted for exposing the nature of Islamic culture?

 

Americans need to pay attention to what is occurring in Europe. American Leftists (i.e. Democrats) desire to follow the European Multiculturalist paradigm.

 

JRH 6/13/18 (Hat Tip: Freedom Outpost)

Please Support NCCR

***********************

GEERT WILDERS PUTS THE POLITICAL ELITES ON NOTICE

The people are rising up. Can the elites put the genie back in the bottle?

 

By Robert Spencer

June 11, 2018

FrontPage Mag

 

Geert Wilders – Photo by Jan Kranendonk

 

Geert Wilders spoke at a massive rally for Tommy Robinson on Saturday. 20,000 people came out to call for Tommy’s release, and Wilders took the opportunity to put the political elites of Britain and continental Europe on notice.

 

“Our governments,” Wilders declared, “sold us out with mass immigration. With Islamization. With open borders. We are almost foreigners in our own lands. And if we complain about it, they call us racists and Islamophobes. But I say, no more! And what do you say? No more! And that’s right: enough is enough. We will not be gagged anymore. No more tyranny.”

 

It was extraordinary that the British authorities allowed Wilders into the country at all. Several years ago he was banned from entering the country, but although the ban was reversed on appeal, the British government recently banned Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern and Lutz Bachmann from entering, all for the crime of opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression, and thereby made it clear that it is more authoritarian and unwilling to uphold the freedom of speech than ever – at least when it comes to criticism of Islam, Muslim rape gangs, and mass Muslim migration.

 

Even worse, the bannings of Sellner, Pettibone, Southern, and Bachmann were just part of a long pattern. Pamela Geller and I were banned from entering Britain in 2013, apparently for life, also for the crime of telling the truth about Islam and jihad. Meanwhile, Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain.

 

The UK Home Office also admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.”

 

Theresa May’s relentlessly appeasement-minded government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.

 

But now matters are coming to a head. Apparently British authorities decided that it would be too politically costly for them to bar Wilders again. And so he entered, and spoke, and gave them a strong dose of the reality that they are determined to ignore and deny.

 

Tommy Robinson is in prison today because he violated a court order demanding that he not film videos outside the trials of Muslim rape gangs. Clearly the government’s intent was to make sure that as few people as possible discovered the truth about its massive, years-long cover-up of those rape gangs, and refusal to prosecute the perpetrators. Theresa May and company obvious hope that other Britons who are furious about the sacrifice of thousands of British girls to the idols of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” will see what happened to Tommy, and be frightened into silence.

 

The British government, in imprisoning Tommy Robinson, has shown itself willing to incarcerate people for having opinions that it considers unacceptable. That heralds the death of Britain as a free society and the beginning of an authoritarian police state there, unless this slide to totalitarianism is stopped now. British public figures, whatever criticism they have leveled against Tommy Robinson in the past, should be calling for him to be freed today, or else they will be exposing themselves as supporting the degeneration of Britain into a police state.

 

Wilders addressed this endeavor head-on, declaring: “We will not be silenced. We will not be intimidated. And we tell the governments, we are not afraid of you. We will never surrender. We will stand strong and do our duty. We will defend our civilization. And we will protect our people.”

 

Wilders added: “And I tell you, to the governments. You can throw us in jail, but you will never defeat us. Because, my friends, for every Tommy whom you imprison, thousands will rise up. So take notice, Theresa May. Take notice, Dutch Prime Minister Rutte. Take notice, Mrs. Merkel or President Macron. Take notice: the future is ours and not yours. We will defeat you politically, because we, my friends, we are the people.”

 

If Wilders’ words don’t prove true, it will be because the death of free societies in Britain and Western Europe is truly at hand.

______________________

Intro to Robert Spencer on Geert Wilders

John R. Houk, Editor

June 13, 2018

_____________________

GEERT WILDERS PUTS THE POLITICAL ELITES ON NOTICE

 

© COPYRIGHT 2018, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM

 

About Robert Spencer

 

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About MuhammadHis new book is The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

 

FRONTPAGE MAG IS A PROUD PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER

 

The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.

 

The David Horowitz Freedom Center combats the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values and disarm this country as it attempts to defend itself in a time of terror.  The leftist offensive is most obvious on our nation’s campuses, where the Freedom Center protects students from indoctrination and intimidation and works to give conservative students a place in the marketplace of ideas from which they are otherwise excluded.  Combining forceful analysis and bold activism, the Freedom Center provides strong insight into today’s most pressing issue on its family of websites and in the activist campaigns it wages on campus, in the news media, and in national politics throughout the year.

 

David Horowitz began the Center for the Study of Popular Culture in 1988 to establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground. Over the next 18 years, CSPC attracted 50,000 contributing supporters and established programs such as The Wednesday Morning Club, the Individual Rights Foundation, and Students for Academic Freedom.

 

FrontPage Magazine, the Center’s online journal of news and political commentary has 1.5 million visitors and over 870,000 unique visitors a month (65 million hits) and is linked to over 2000 other websites.  The magazine’s coverage of and commentary about events has been greatly augmented over the last two years by the presence of four  Shillman Fellows in Journalism underwritten by board member Dr. Robert Shillman. FrontPage has recently added a blog called “The Point,” run by Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield, which has tripled web traffic.

 

READ THE REST

 

Multiculturalists Malign Tommy Robinson to Discredit Him


John R. Houk

© May 31, 2018

Tommy Robinson’s arrest in front Leeds Court for ONLY shining a light on 29 Muslims involved in rape, trafficking, pedophilia and grooming to perpetuate those crimes of horror; is beginning to be criticized.

 

Defenders of Free Speech are pointing fingers at the United Kingdom claiming the Brits have descended into totalitarianism. Bruce Bawer writing for the Gatestone Institute also criticizes the British Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) for tarnishing Tommy Robinson by painting a picture of a Right-Wing extremist, you know, the kind of violent people that the USA would characterize as the violence-minded KKK or Arian Brotherhood, or other Neo-Nazi White Supremacist bigots.

 

Indeed Robinson’s is indicative of a history of thuggery noted among British soccer (known as football in UK) fans. The Multiculturalist Leftist website Resisting Hate elaborates Robinson’s past thuggery and crimes even giving examples of purported racist tweets. Here’s a photo from Resisting Hate displaying Robinson’s run-in with British law:

 

List of Tommy Robinson criminal convictions

 

Yet some time during this behavior, Robinson boned up on Islam and found out the Quran, Hadith and Sira legitimizes much of the crimes committed by the 29 Muslims most heinous of crimes of rape, trafficking, pedophilia, etc. Jamie Glazov did a two-part interview with Tommy Robinson discussing his 2015 book, Enemy of the State. You’ll have to go to the Glazov site to watch the interview, but below is an excerpt of the description:

 

Welcome to our special 2-Part Glazov Gang video series with Tommy Robinson, the founder and ex-leader of the EDL, the coordinator of Pegida UK and the author of his new memoir, Enemy of the State.

 

In Part I, Tommy discusses his new memoir and his continuing fight against the Islamization of his country. He talked about his opposition to all forms of racism and the slanders against him, the British authorities’ persecution of him for being a British patriot, the vicious Islamic assault on his nation and the mass denial about it, and much more.

 

In Part II, Tommy focuses on Rotting in Solitary, sharing the excruciating ordeal he has endured in the UK prison system. (TOMMY ROBINSON VS. ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM: SPECIAL 2-PART VIDEO SERIES; JAMIE GLAZOV; JamieGlazov.com; 4/2/16)

 

It sounds to me that Robinson has hung up his thug guns to be an activist for British patriotism, defender of Western Culture and an expose the truth about Islam kind-of-guy.

 

And yet, the British MSM often paints a picture of Robinson of using his past thuggery to wail on counter-culture Muslims.

 

In a 2017 interview between Piers Anthony and Robinson, Anthony went off on a Leftist diatribe to Robinson’s face demeaning anything that exposes Islam. Here’s an excerpt according Hugh Fitzgerald:

 

Piers Morgan had Tommy Robinson on his show recently, but only very briefly, and he hardly let Robinson have a word edgewise, interrupting him at every turn. …

 

Morgan registered his objection, saying, “Here’s my point. Right, I’ve read a lot of stuff that you’ve said and done. I know your history, I know all of it. Good, bad and ugly. Some of it is ugly, some of it, I agree with.”

… And what you were doing, was fomenting hatred and almost suggesting that somehow this attack, this revenge attack as you put it, was somehow deserving because of the historical behavior of certain people at a completely different mosque — that was my problem.”

“OK, Piers,” Robinson responded, “the newspaper you work for said exactly the same within an hour — Abu Hamza’s mosque. Were they fomenting hate, the newspaper you work for? Were they? Were they inciting hate?”

“I don’t run the Daily Mail,” Morgan protested.

“Now, if I hold up this book [i.e. the Quran] and say, ‘There will never be peace on this Earth so long as we have this book, it’s a violent and cursed book,’ Can I say that? Sir William Gladstone said that,” Robinson continued, referring to the 19th century prime minister of Great Britain’s description of the Quran.

“Would you say that of the Bible? Show some respect,” Morgan retorted.

“Show some respect? Have you read this book?” Robinson shot back. “Have you read this book? There are a hundred verses in this book that incite violence and murder against us.”

 

Why didn’t Piers Morgan answer Robinson’s question? Has he read the Qur’an? If he had, why wouldn’t he say so? The problem for Piers Morgan is that either he has not read the Qur’an (which is entirely possible, for study is not his strong suit, and he seems to be noticeably unwilling to engage on its contents, never having mentioned a single one of its verses) and therefore has no business taking issue with what Tommy Robinson, channeling Gladstone, maintains, or he has read it in which case he knows what it contains and and [sic] wants to keep that information from the public. After all, if he had said, “Yes of course I’ve read the Qur’an,” Robinson’s next question would have been: “Okay, can you recall even one verse out of the more than one hundred that incite violence and murder against the Infidels?”

 

READ the whole post to understand how Multiculturalists would rather defend a culture of hate rather Western Culture (Piers Morgan, Bigoted Lunatic; By HUGH FITZGERALD; Jihad Watch; 6/24/17 11:26 AM)

 

The most balanced reporting that did not accuse Robinson of being a Right-Wing extremist was Fox News:

 

The arrest and jailing of British right-wing activist Tommy Robinson for covering a child grooming trial has led to an outpouring of anger from conservative political figures in the U.S. and Europe — with Donald Trump Jr. citing it as a reason “for the original Brexit.”

 

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Lennon, was arrested Friday outside a court in Leeds for filming men accused of being part of a gang that groomed children. Britain has been rocked by an epidemic of child sex scandals perpetuated by gangs of predominantly Muslim men.

 

Fox News reported Friday that he had been jailed for 13 months for contempt of court, but British media initially were unable to report on the sentence due to a reporting ban slapped on the case by the judge. That ban was lifted Tuesday after appeals by media outlets.

 

Robinson, the former leader of the English Defense League known for his acerbic criticism of Islam, reportedly pleaded guilty to breaching the terms of a previously suspended sentence from 2017 when he reported on a similar case.

 

Robinson is a polarizing figure in the U.K. Supporters say he speaks out against political correctness and the growing influence of Islamic extremism, while opponents claim he is a racist who stokes fear and division, and note that he has previous convictions.

 

 

The details of the case Robinson was reporting on last week are still blocked by a reporting ban. Consequently many British media outlets reported only that he was arrested outside a courthouse, but gave no specifics about the case itself. However, Robinson’s supporters say he repeated allegations that have been published in local media outlets.

 

Robinson’s jailing has tapped into a long-standing narrative among conservatives in the U.K. and Europe that authorities are quick to clamp down on anyone bringing attention to crimes associated with Islam, while being lax about the perpetrators of those crimes.

 

Consequently, as news trickled out over the weekend, conservative figures reacted with fury. On Saturday, crowds descended outside Downing Street to demonstrate for Robinson’s release.

 

Others expressed concern for Robinson’s welfare, suggesting that due to his profile as an Islam critic, he may be a target in prison. U.K. Independence Party leader Gerard Batten said that one of the party’s members of the House of Lords wrote to Home Secretary Sajid Javid threatening a private prosecution as “an accessory, or for misconduct in public office.”

 

 

Quickly, the case picked up international attention. Trump Jr. responded to a tweet about the case and the gag order, saying it was “Reason #1776 for the original #Brexit.”

 

 

 

READ ENTIRETY (‘Free Tommy Robinson’: Trump Jr., European populists slam UK over jailing of right-wing activist; Fox News; 5/29/18)

 

Bruce Bawer writing for the Gatestone Institute lays out criticism of Robinson’s arrest, the British Multiculturalist MSM unrighteously castigating Robinson’s current character and the UK’s apparent descent into anti-Free Speech totalitarianism.

 

JRH 5/31/18

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

British Media: Lockstep Lies

 

By Bruce Bawer

May 30, 2018 at 9:00 am

Gatestone Institute

 

  • Did the Daily Mail’s lawyers have to check with the British government, which had placed a gag order on reporting about the arrest, to make sure that it was permissible to report on the protest, if not directly on the arrest itself?

 

  • It seems fair to say that the incident has shocked, outraged, and scared people around the world who, until now, had thought of the United Kingdom as a free country.

 

  • “Britain used to be a bastion of free speech. Today its leaders are behaving like North Korea and Saudi Arabia.” – Geert Wilders, MP; The Netherlands

 

  • Meanwhile, Robinson remains in jail for daring to exercise his free speech, and what the mainstream media have won back is the right to resume repeating their lockstep lies about who he is and what he stands for.

 

Hundreds of supporters of Tommy Robinson filled the streets of London on Saturday in protest against his arrest in Leeds on Friday, but it was not until shortly after midnight on Monday that the Daily Mail posted a report about the protest on its website. The story, which was unsigned, was updated on early Monday afternoon. How to explain the delay? Did the Daily Mail’s lawyers have to check with the British government, which had placed a gag order on reporting about the arrest, to make sure that it was permissible to report on the protest, if not directly on the arrest itself?

 

The Mail made sure to describe the hundreds of protesters as “far-right.” How did the Mail ascertain their politics? Does it not occur to the Mail that even if Robinson were far-right, which he is not, a British subject would not have to be far right to want to take in a protest against his shockingly rapid-fire arrest, trial, conviction, and imprisonment for the sole offense of reporting from outside a courthouse?

 

The Evening Standard also reported on the protest – and also labeled the participants “far-right.” “The incident,” wrote the Standard ‘s Tom Powell, “has triggered a furious reaction from his fans.” In fact, it seems fair to say that the incident has shocked, outraged, and scared people around the world who, until now, had thought of the United Kingdom as a free country.

 

Hundreds of supporters of Tommy Robinson protest his imprisonment, at a May 25 demonstration on Downing Street in London, England. (Image source: Ruptly video screenshot)

 

In America, for example, Robert Spencer warned that “the darkness of Sharia-compliant totalitarianism descends upon the UK.” Thomas Lifson asked:

 

“Is Britain lost to the ranks of free nations? The land that bequeathed the world the Magna Carta and the ‘mother of parliaments’ is indulging in totalitarianism with its handling of Tommy Robinson, a famous political activist agitating about the threat of radical Islam, and attempting to report on the trial of a Muslim ‘grooming gang’ that allegedly preyed on young English girls, forcing them into prostitution.”

 

In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders declared solidarity with Robinson: “Britain used to be a bastion of free speech. Today its leaders are behaving like North Korea and Saudi Arabia.”

 

At least the Mail and Standard ran stories about the protests. Other major British dailies did not. The Metro website, for its part, posted a story that made the Mail look objective: “The controversial nationalist and far-right commentator, real name Stephen Lennon, was posing as a ‘reporter’ when police officers approached him,” wrote Olivia Waring in a piece headlined “Why Was Tommy Robinson Arrested?” In fact, Robinson was not “posing” as anything – he is a citizen journalist who at the time of his arrest was being watched live on Facebook by supporters around the world. Waring went on say that Robinson’s supporters “abide by slogans like ‘White Lives Matter.'” She also mentioned that Robin was a founder of the English Defence League, but omitted to acknowledge that he left the organization after it adopted a racist line of which he could not approve. In any event, Waring’s piece did not even pretend to answer the question posed in the title, leaving the reader to wonder exactly who is, in fact, posing as a reporter.

 

Whereas Robinson was arrested for “breaching the peace” – “apparently British police code for ‘offending Islam,'” noted Spencer wryly – and was immediately thereafter found guilty of “contempt of court” and hustled off to the hoosegow, the savages whose case he was covering have apparently been on trial for several weeks now. They face multiple charges, including rape, racially aggravated assault, and inciting a child into prostitution. One of the defendants is accused of fifty-one separate counts, including twenty-one counts of rape. During the weeks of their trial they have, of course, had legal representation and have apparently been allowed to go home at night. Meanwhile Robinson’s attorneys were apparently unable to contact him in the first hours and days after his arrest.

 

Finally, on Tuesday, in response to complaints by the British media, the gag order on reporting news about the Robinson case was lifted. Presumably this counts as a modest recovery for freedom of the press in Britain. Meanwhile, Robinson remains in jail for daring to exercise his free speech, and what the mainstream media have won back is the right to resume repeating their lockstep lies about who he is and what he stand[s] for.

 

Bruce Bawer is the author of the new novel The Alhambra (Swamp Fox Editions). His book While Europe Slept (2006) was a New York Times bestseller and National Book Critics Circle Award finalist. His other books include A Place at the Table (1993), Stealing Jesus (1997), Surrender (2009), and The Victims’ Revolution (2012). A native New Yorker, he has lived in Europe since 1998.

______________________________

Multiculturalists Malign Tommy Robinson to Discredit Him

John R. Houk

© May 31, 2018

___________________________

British Media: Lockstep Lies

 

© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

 

[Blog Editor: I did not get permission. If the Gatestone Institute asks the to post to be removed, I will comply.]

 

About the Gatestone Institute