Russia Hacked Emails like a Movie Caused Benghazi


lying-crooked-hillary

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2016

 

Is it illegal to hack an individual’s email account? YES! Is it illegal to hack government email accounts? YES! Is it illegal for government employees to conduct government business on a private email or private server? YES! Is Wikileaks reprehensible if their organization is involved in any illegal hacking whatsoever – which would be illegal? YES!

 

Did Russia hack the Democratic Party emails? THERE IS NO PROOF, other than the words of the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party!

 

These are the same people who told America in 2012 that the Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack that killed FOUR Americans was the result of an obscure Youtube Movie trailer. That was a lie fabricated to make sure Barack Hussein Obama was reelected. It was a cover-up in part to make Obama/Crooked Hillary Foreign Policy and Clandestine decisions to make them appear competent rather than inept.

 

Crooked Hillary claimed in the third Presidential Debate that SIXTEEN American Intelligence organizations pointed their fingers at Russia and Putin as the definite hackers of the Dem National Committee emails. I have to ask, “Which vague 16 Intelligence organizations claim that Russia is responsible for the hacking?”

 

I gotta tell you. Crooked Hillary’s condescending and vague accusation against Russia to make Donald Trump look nefarious brought me back to the Benghazi Lies of 2012. At this point the difference Crooked Hillary’s accusation is probably a Benghazi-like lie. A LIE TO GET ELECTED President of the United States!

 

These Leftist Dems will say anything to get elected to any Office.

 

It has come my attention a former British Ambassador – Craig Murray – that lost his British diplomatic job with the UK government for “exposing the UK government’s knowing use of intelligence obtained from suspects who had been tortured by the Uzbekistan Government,” is vouching for Wikileaks that the hacked emails did NOT COME from Russia. AGAIN! The Dems are lying to win the election. The Dem lie has the complete cooperation of America’s Left Stream Media who are not focusing on the Wikileaks exposing just how nefarious Crooked Hillary and the Dems truly are.

 

My fellow American voters, DO YOU WANT CROOKED HILLARY TO BE POTUS KNOWING SHE AND HER DEMS ARE THIS CORRUPT? REALLY?

 

Everything Crooked Hillary says she will do to benefit Americans at worst is a nefarious evil lie with another agenda she desires to be hidden. At best whatever Crooked Hillary speaks to Americans is well-meaning deception to bring America into a disastrous transformed Leftist utopia that tears up EVERYTHING the Founding Fathers put on paper that would lead America to become great.

 

MY GOD DEAR VOTERS – VOTE TRUMP TO GIVE AMERICA A CHANCE!

 

Below is the Constitution.com article about Craig Murray denying the Dem-line that Russia is behind the hacking thorn in Crooked Hillary’s side.

 

JRH 10/22/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

Breaking! British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks!

 

By Onan Coca

October 21, 2016

Constitution.com

 

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray is an ally and friend of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and he visited Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy on Wednesday to discuss his ongoing plight. What Murray learned could have a huge impact on the 2016 election, if the American people are allowed to hear it.

 

One of the main media arguments for people not to give credence to the hacked DNC, Clinton emails is that this is a deliberate attempt by Vladimir Putin and Russia to impact our electoral process. The narrative goes something like this; ‘Russia illegally hacked the DNC and are now trying to steal the election from Clinton. So Republicans shouldn’t use the ill-gotten information, the media shouldn’t report on it, and the American people shouldn’t pay attention to it. In that way, we’ll be standing up to the tinpot dictator Putin.’ The only problem with this is that it means we should all completely ignore the criminality and corruption at the DNC and in the Clinton campaign team! It’s a stupid argument, but it’s become so prevalent that even some conservatives are parroting it.

 

WATCHING WIKILEAKS

 

VIDEO: Breaking British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks – The Constitution [ORIGINALLY LIFEZETTE]

 

Here’s the thing… there’s no proof that Russia did any of this. They’ve never admitted to it, and our intelligence community has never proven it. It’s simply a theory that the media and the Clinton team have implied is fact.

 

Well, Ambassador Murray is here to dispel the rumors and to clear the air. Vladimir Putin and Russia had nothing to do with hacks on the Democrats, nor with the release of the hacked emails.

 

Here’s what Ambassador Murray had to say from his personal website:

 

I left Julian after midnight. He is fit, well, sharp and in good spirits. WikiLeaks never reveals or comments upon its sources, but as I published before a fortnight ago, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave the Democratic National Committee and Podesta material to WikiLeaks. The claim is nonsense. Journalists are also publishing that these were obtained by “hacking” with no evidence that this was the method used to obtain them.

 

The control of the Democratic party machinery deliberately to unfairly ensure Clinton’s victory over Bernie Sanders is a matter of great public interest. The attempt by the establishment from Obama down to divert attention from this by a completely spurious claim against Russia, repeated without investigation by a servile media, is a disgrace.

 

The over-close relationship between the probable future President and Wall Street is also very important. WikiLeaks has done a great public service by making this plain.

 

The attempts by the mainstream media to portray WikiLeaks as supporters of Trump and Putin because they publish some of Clinton’s darker secrets is completely illogical and untrue in fact. The idea we must pretend Clinton is a saint is emetic.

 

But the key point is that WikiLeaks is a publisher. It is a vehicle for publishing leaks, and is much more of a vehicle for whistleblowers than for hackers. It does not originate the material. I have often seen comments such as “Why has WikiLeaks not published material on Israel/Putin/Trump?” The answer is that they have not been given any. They publish good, verifiable material that they are given by whistleblowers. They are not protecting Israel, Putin, or Trump. Nobody has given them viable material.

 

Did you get that?

 

  • Russia did not get/give WikiLeaks any of the leaked emails/data.

 

  • The media says the info was “hacked,” but WikiLeaks has never said that the information was gathered in that manner. Meaning, it could have been leaked by a whistleblower.

 

  • The same people who “stole” the Democrat nomination from Bernie Sanders are now trying to shift attention from their corruption to Russia.

 

  • Obama and the media are complicit in both the corruption and the cover up of the corruption.

 

  • WikiLeaks doesn’t have a “dog in the fight;” they simply publish the information that is given to them by whistleblowers.

 

Ladies and gentlemen, please don’t buy the media/establishment spin on the WikiLeaks releases. This isn’t about Russia, or hacking, or anything like that –

 

This is all about how the Democrat Party is corrupt, anti-democratic, and very likely criminal.

 

This is all about how the media has been complicit, not only in the crimes of the Democrat Party, but in covering up their crimes as well.

 

This is all about how liberals will literally do whatever it takes to win. In their minds the ends always justify whatever dastardly means must be employed to ensure victory.

 

This is all about how the American people continue to have their rights stripped away from them by a bloated and corrupt government.

 

Don’t let them get away with it.

 

_________________

Russia Hacked Emails like a Movie Caused Benghazi

John R. Houk

© October 22, 2016

_________________

Breaking! British Politician says Russia has NOTHING to do with the DNC Email Leaks!

 

Onan Coca

 

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Liberty Alliance media group. He’s also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

 

Copyright © 2016 The Constitution. All Rights Reserved. 

 

Decision 2016: A Guide for Hillary & Trump Voters


whos-with-crooked-hillary-screen-capture

Yesterday I posted on Donald Trump’s assertion that he would wait and see before making any commitment to honor election results titled, “If I Was Trump, I’d Examine Election Results TOO!” The focus of that post is the fact that Dems admitted in an undercover video that the American Left had been committing voter fraud for decades.

 

While I was looking around in research I discovered an even better video at the G+ Conservative Community that addresses all the lies and deceptions of Crooked Hillary in the third Presidential Debate.

 

JRH 10/21/16 (Hat Tip Kevin Cunniff)

Please Support NCCR

***********************

VIDEO: Decision 2016: A Guide for Hillary & Trump Voters

 

Posted by Black Pigeon Speaks

Published on Oct 20, 2016

 

⚫ Tip Jar: via PayPal to: NAVYHATO@gmail.com
If you would like to support this channel, it would be GREATLY appreciated.
⚫ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/blackpigeon?ty=h

 

… There is more to read unrelated to the video

If I Was Trump, I’d Examine Election Results TOO!


skeleton-not-always-vote-until-dead-patriot-post-version

John R. Houk

© October 20, 2016

 

I watched the Presidential Debate from Wednesday Oct. 19 on Fox News. After the debate one thing the Fox analysts was astonished by Trump’s saying he may not support the outcome of the election to be held on November 8. And sure enough one of the analysts did a quite online perusal of debate headlines and they called condemned Trump for his unwillingness to commit to supporting the election outcome if he lost.

 

The thing is I did not even think Trump’s stand was even close to being outrageous when he said that. I mean most Conservatives are quite aware the Dems either directly or indirectly through surrogates, have done their best to rig or fix elections toward a positive Dem Party outcome for decades.

 

Debate moderator Chris Wallace asked the Republican presidential nominee whether he would honor the election results despite his unfounded declaration that the election may be “rigged” against him.

 

I will look at it at the time. I’m not looking at anything now. I’ll look at it at the time,” Trump replied.

 

Pressed again by Wallace moments later, Trump said he’ll “keep you in suspense” about his decision. (Trump refuses to say whether he will accept results of election: ‘I will keep you in suspense’; By Maxwell Tani; Business Insider; 10/19/16)

 

If you examine actually said in Chris Wallace question and the Donald Trump response, YOU will notice the context was in view of decades of Crooked-Fraudulent election acts by Democrats and Dem surrogates in voter fraud. James O’Keefe through Project Veritas have caught the Dems in their own words saying the very same thing that Donald Trump was talking about!

 

Here’s the Debate context which includes a blurb of Crooked Hillary obfuscating Dem voter fraud by trying to change the subject about half-truths (contrarily meaning half-false) on Donald civil problems. Keep in mind folks that any civil problems Trump has or has had is dwarfed by Crooked Hillary’s felonious activities as Secretary of State that FBI Director James Comey choose to ignore OR was told to ignore by higher ups.

 

VIDEO: Trump on accepting election outcome: “I’ll keep you in suspense”

 

Posted by AL.com

Published on Oct 19, 2016

 

Donald Trump responds to a question over whether he would accept the results of the election.

 

AND NOW Project Veritas:

 

VIDEO: Rigging the Election – Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

 

 Posted by Project Veritas Action

Published on Oct 17, 2016

 

In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging.

A shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations are revealed. A key Clinton operative is on camera saying, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this m**erf***er.” [Profanity editing by Blog Editor]

Website: http://projectveritasaction.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit[Blog Editor: On browser this Facebook link comes up broken. After a Facebook search here are two pages related to the above link:]

 

 

 

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action

 

NOW! Do you think should examine an election loss before conceding OR WHAT?

 

JRH 10/20/16

Please Support NCCR

 

Crooked Hillary: Prosecute & Lock Up


bill-congrats-hillary-no-text-relations-toon

John R. Houk

© October 16 2016

 

I am taking this 2016 election cycle personally AND if you are a Conservative or a Patriot, you should take this election personally as well.

 

In 2012 Mitt Romney was the GOP nominee for President. I was not in the Romney camp during the Primaries! I voted for him anyway because President Barack Hussein Obama was and is a deceiver and liar. Indeed, Obama’s reelection in 2012 was largely predicated on the lie that the entire Benghazi debacle that resulted in four American deaths was the fault of an obscure anti-Muslim movie trailer rather than the ineptitude of lackadaisical security protection on the part of Crooked Hillary which in turn resulted in an organized predetermined Islamic terrorist attack.

 

Hillary Clinton’s ineptitude did not stop or begin with the Benghazi Massacre, but was evidenced in signing off on 20% of American uranium going to Russia via the idiotic Uranium One deal, the idiotic deal Obama-Crooked Hillary-John Kerry made with Iran and probably leaving more idiotic actions yet allow me to highlight the felonious action of setting up an illegal private server at Crooked Hillary’s private residence. AND Crooked Hillary is telling everyone she too incompetent to know the letter “c” meant CLASSIFIED data which was received and sent. And the letter “c” was too incompetent she was too incompetent to understand that unmarked data may be marked CLASSIFIED retroactively! AND SHE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT?

 

Uranium One Hypocrisy

 

Of all the Clinton Foundation/Clinton cash scandals, the one I’ve always considered most disturbing involves the Russians gaining control over a large share of America’s uranium. Relying on a New York Times report, I wrote about this scandal here.

 

Newly uncovered State Department documents shed additional light on this scandal. But before getting to the new material, I’ll summarize what the New York Times reported.

 

What we knew already

 

In 2005, Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra visited Kazakhstan. Giustra is a massive donor to the Clinton Foundation.

 

Giustra’s goal was to buy uranium mines in Kazakhstan. To this end, he and Bill Clinton met with leaders of the Kazakhstan government.

 

As a result of the visit, Giustra got major mining concessions, which were approved by the Kazakhstan government. Kazakhstan got Bill Clinton publicly to praise its alleged progress in democracy and human rights. The Clintons received a $31 million donation to their Foundation from Giustra, along with a pledge to donate $100 million more.

 

The deal with Kazakhstan made Giustra’s company, Uranium One, a major player. It proceeded to buy large amounts of holdings in the United States, and became an attractive target for Russia. A Russian company made a hugely attractive offer to purchase the company. Uranium One agreed to the purchase.

 

The deal required approval by the U.S. government, including by the Secretary of State — Hillary Clinton. During the period when the deal with Russia was under consideration, the Clinton Foundation reportedly $2.6 million from Uranium One. Its contributions were not disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Hillary had reached with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.

 

During this period, Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank that was promoting Uranium One stock. This was more than his usual speaking fee.

 

Hillary Clinton duly approved the deal. It made the Russian company Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Vladimir Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

 

The deal left huge amounts of U.S. uranium under the control of Russia. The New York Times estimates this share at 20 percent. But Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, say that it amounts to up to 50 percent of projected U.S. uranium output.

 

What we have recently learned

 

When Hillary Clinton was questioned about the deal, she said READ THE REST (MEMO SHEDS NEW LIGHT ON CLINTON-RUSSIA URANIUM SCANDAL; By PAUL MIRENGOFF; Power Line; 8/26/16)

 

And Fox News on October 12 shows that Crooked Hillary is much closer to the Russia she accuses of hacking emails to benefit Donald Trump:

 

Shame on the New York Times. Despite leaked emails revealing collusion with the Clinton campaign that should embarrass any legitimate news organization, the paper continues to carry water for the Democrat candidate.

 

Among other fictions, the Times frequently repeats the meme that Donald Trump is in cahoots with the Russians. Wednesday, in fact, the supposed collaboration between Trump and Vladimir Putin occupies prime turf as the paper’s lead editorial. It’s time to pull the plug on this nonsense.

 

The narrative that the Russians are trying to manipulate our election in favor of Mr. Trump has proved vital cover for the damaging emails released by Wikileaks that indeed show election manipulation – by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

 

 

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton actually does have ties to the Kremlin – ties which, had they been reported with any honesty, would have become an issue in this campaign.

 

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton helped Russian interests, operating under a directive from Putin, buy majority ownership of Uranium One, a Canadian firm that was on its way to controlling almost half of U.S. uranium production. Expanding its access to uranium around the world had become a priority for the Kremlin; control of the raw material would bolster its opportunities to build nuclear power plants such as the Bushehr facilities in Iran and similar projects in North Korea and Venezuela.

 

In pursuit of the transaction, which required sign-off by Secretary Clinton, tens of millions of dollars flowed to the Clinton Foundation through its Canadian branch – moneys that were not reported by the foundation. Moneys, too, that violated Secretary of State Clinton’s memorandum of agreement with the Obama White House and contradicted information provided by Hillary to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

 

Not only did the Clinton Foundation benefit from ties to Russia, Bill Clinton personally collected half a million dollars at about the same time for a speech made at a forum organized by a financial firm called RenCap, whose ranks were known to include ex-KGB types hand-picked by Putin.

 

 

It’s not only Hillary Clinton who helped out Putin. President Obama has arguably given the Russian leader an enormous boost, allowing him to reassert his country’s influence around the globe even as its coffers are depleted by the collapse of oil prices.

 

Russia effectively is in control of the Middle East, dictating the terms of battle in Syria, resurrecting Bashar Al-Assad’s presidency, supplying Iran with a missile defense system designed to protect its Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility, reestablishing ties with Turkey, threatening to shoot down U.S. planes. And let us not forget that Obama stood by as Russia took over Crimea.

 

 

So, when Trump calls Putin a “strong leader”, he’s right. Putin is reprehensible, devious and undoubtedly hostile to the U.S. But let us not underestimate who has been Putin’s best bud over the past decade. It is not Donald Trump.

 

In 2011, Hillary Clinton accused Vladimir Putin of READ ENTIRETY (It’s Hillary, Obama who have boosted Putin’s fortunes, not Trump; By Liz Peek; Fox News; 10/12/16)

 

Undisclosed Secrets Enable Iranian Nukes

 

 

However, according to a think tank report, the USA and its negotiating partners agreed “in secret” to allow Iran to evade some restrictions in last year’s landmark nuclear agreement in order to meet the deadline for it to start getting relief from economic sanctions. Among the exemptions outlined in the think tank’s report were two that allowed Iran to exceed the deal’s limits on how much low-enriched uranium (LEU) it can keep in its nuclear facilities, the report said. LEU can be purified into highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium.

 

Israel and Saudi Arabia found this attitude of USA unacceptable. One senior “knowledgeable” official, however, was cited by the report as saying that if the joint commission had not acted to create these exemptions, some of Iran’s nuclear facilities would not have been in compliance with the deal by Jan. 16, the deadline for the beginning of the lifting of sanctions. The US government has said that the world powers that negotiated the accord made no secret arrangements.

 

Real concessions?

 

The United States and its negotiating partners apparently agreed “in secret” to allow Iran to evade some restrictions in last year’s landmark nuclear agreement in order to meet the deadline for it to start getting relief from economic sanctions, according to a recent think tank report.

 

The exemptions were approved by the joint commission the deal created to oversee implementation of the accord. The commission is comprised of the United States and its negotiating partners — called the P5+1 — and Iran.

 

The report, which was released by the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security, is based on information provided by several officials of governments involved in the negotiations. The group’s president David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector and co-author of the report, said the exemptions or loopholes are happening in secret, and it appears that they favor Iran.

 

The report ignited a chorus of Republican criticism, including from the campaign of presidential nominee Donald Trump. His campaign sought to link the findings to Trump’s Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state when secret talks were held with Iran but had left office before formal negotiations began. “The deeply flawed nuclear deal Hillary Clinton secretly spearheaded with Iran looks worse and worse by the day,” said a statement issued by retired Army General Michael Flynn, a top Trump adviser. “It’s now clear President Obama gave away the store to secure a weak agreement that is full of loopholes.”

 

The Clinton campaign did not immediately comment on the report. The White House said it took “significant exception” to some of the report’s findings, saying that the easing of sanctions was always dependent upon Iran’s adherence to the agreement. “The implementation date was driven by the ability of the International Atomic Energy Agency to verify that Iran had completed the steps that they promised to take,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at a briefing. “That is what precipitated implementation day. Since then Iran has been in compliance with the agreement,” Earnest said.

 

Among the exemptions outlined in the think tank’s report were two that allowed Iran to exceed the deal’s limits on how much low-enriched uranium (LEU) it can keep in its nuclear facilities, the report said. LEU can be purified into highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium.

 

One senior “knowledgeable” official was cited by the report as saying that if the joint commission had not acted to create these exemptions, some of Iran’s nuclear facilities would not have been in compliance with the deal READ ENIRETY (Iran since the nuclear deal with West; By DR. ABDUL RUFF; Modern Diplomacy; 9/27/16)

 

These secret deals will not America safe from a nuclear armed Iran as Crooked Hillary claims:

 

The Associated Press reported earlier this week that a previously secret document showed that a number of restrictions imposed by last year’s nuclear deal with Iran will expire after ten years, allowing Iran to achieve a nuclear breakout time as little as three months by the end of the deal in 15 years.

 

 

One other implication of this document is its formal acceptance of Iran’s uranium enrichment program. Emily Landau, head of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program at the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies, told the The Jerusalem Post earlier this week, the document “proves that Iran’s enrichment program has been totally legitimized by this deal.”

 

 

While the document obtained by the AP may have been secret, the idea that Iran would be able to replace old centrifuges with newer ones has been known since last year. When it wrote its assessment of the deal last year the Institute for Science and International Security took these replacements into account and estimated Iran’s breakout time at the end of the 15-year deal to be about three months. (According to the institute by year 18, Iran’s breakout time would be a matter of days.) This of course goes against the administration’s boast that the deal cut off all Iran’s pathways to a bomb for at least a year. [Emphasis added by Blog Editor]

 

 

Nor would these be the only secret documents kept from Congress. Last year there was a scandal over side deals between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Iran governing the inspection of military sites. According to those side deals, which were reported in August of last year, Iran, not IAEA inspectors would take samples for testing. This side deal raised questions as to how accurately the IAEA could assess suspicious activity by Iran.

 

As it happens, the Parhcin testing turned up two uranium particles last year that even the administration, in June, acknowledged came from Iran’s past nuclear research. Yet despite this find, the IAEA, in December of last year, declared its investigation into Iran’s past nuclear activities closed allowing the deal to proceed to Implementation Day and the ending of nuclear sanctions against Iran.

 

 

Taken together – allowing Iran to improve its enrichment, giving Iran control over inspections, watering down the reporting of the IAEA – we have a deal that was designed not to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but rather a deal designed to ensure that Iran is never penalized for future nuclear violations.

 

 

So yes the revelation that Iran will be able to ramp up its uranium enrichment as part of the nuclear is a big deal. But given the administration’s behavior so far READ ENTIRETY (More proof Iran Nuke Deal not about stopping a nuclear weapon; By David Gerstman; Legal In.sur.rec.tion; 7/25/16 8:30 am)

 

Crooked Hillary Broke the Law in Private Server Use

 

 

Hillary Clinton Was Trained in Classified Information

 

As secretary of State, Clinton had been trained by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security in the “Safe Handling of Information.” In addition, she was fully aware of President Obama’s 2010 executive order on “Classified National Security Information” that requires heads of departments to be informed of the requirements regarding classified information.

 

As reported by Kristinn Taylor of Gateway Pundit in 2015, Clinton received training in handling classified information as stated in the “Diplomatic Security 2009 Year in Review” booklet. Under the heading “Safe Handling of Information” on page 21, the bureau boasted of its efforts to quickly bring new Obama administration appointees up to speed on security issues.

 

 

Clinton was also given the authority “to personally classify as ‘Top Secret’ government intelligence such as the emails containing reportedly unlabeled highly classified information she received on the private home-brew server Clinton used throughout her four-year tenure as secretary.”

 

In addition to her Diplomatic Security training, Clinton, as secretary of State, was bound by President Obama’s 2010 executive order on classified information. That order “prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism.”

 

 

Get Trained Or Lose Your Clearance and Face Prosecution

 

According to the president’s order, “Every person who has met the standards for access to classified information in paragraph (a) of this section shall receive contemporaneous training on the proper safeguarding of classified information and on the criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions that may be imposed on an individual who fails to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure.”

 

 

Not only that, the order by the president clearly prohibits removing classified information from “official premises without proper authorization.”

 

 

Only Negligence Is Required, Not Intent

 

“None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system,” Comey said. In addition, the FBI found that “with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems,” the State Department “was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.”

 

This is in direct conflict with federal law on the management of classified information by agency heads. But, as Comey has repeatedly said, no criminal charges can be filed because he thinks Clinton did not intentionally mishandle classified information.

 

But how can an individual endowed with classification authority and trained in handling classified information repeatedly and consistently violate that training? The president’s order clearly says … READ ENTIRETY (Documents Say Hillary Clinton Knew She Was Breaking National Security Laws; By D.C. McAllister; The Federalist; 7/7/16)

 

Rare Integrity in Obama Administration: Whistleblowers Expose that FBI & DOJ Members Crooked Hillary Exonerated by Political Order!

 

Washington, D.C. – A high-ranking FBI official has blown the whistle on what they say was a politically motivated, top-down decision to not recommend Hillary Clinton face criminal charges for her mishandling of classified intelligence.

 

The anonymous source that worked intimately on the Clinton investigation told Fox News that FBI agents working the case, as well as DOJ attorneys on the case, unanimously believed that Clinton should have her security clearance revoked, with the “vast majority” believing she should be criminally charged.
“It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked,” the senior FBI official told Fox news. “It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted. We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

 

The entire team was stunned when FBI Director Comey announced on July 5 that he would not be recommending a criminal indictment to the Attorney General’s office, according to the source.

 

“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute — it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and actual role in the case were vetted and verified by Fox News.

 

… a number of veteran FBI agents who have come forward to rebuke Comey’s politicization of a once respected law enforcement organization.

 

“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time. I hold Director Comey responsible,” Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, told the NY Post.

 

Retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello also noted in the Post’s report that, “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”

 

“The FBI could not seize anything related to the investigation, only request things. As an example, in order to get the laptop, they had to agree to grant immunity,” Napolitano said.

 

According to a report by Fox News:

In early 2015, it was revealed that Clinton had used a private email server in her Chappaqua, N.Y., home to conduct government business while serving from 2009-2013. The emails on the private server included thousands of messages that would later be marked classified by the State Department retroactively. Federal law makes it a crime for a government employee to possess classified information in an unsecure manner, and the relevant statute does not require a finding of intent.

 

Although Comey found that Clinton was “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” he said “no charges are appropriate in this case.”

 

Just days before Comey’s announcement, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who was originally appointed as a federal prosecutor by Bill Clinton, met with in secret on the tarmac of an airport runway Bill Clinton.

 

Another oddity of the investigation, signaling that it was intentionally being manipulated from above, was the fact that the FBI forced its agents and analysts involved in the case to sign non-disclosure agreements.
“This is unheard of, because of the stifling nature it has on the investigative process,” the source said.

 

Adding the strange behavior displayed by FBI during READ ENTIRETY (BREAKING: FBI in Revolt — Top FBI Official Exposes Massive Corruption Which Let Clinton’s Crimes Slide; By Jay Syrmopoulos; TheFreeThoughtProject.com; 10/13/16)

How an American voter could place someone like Crooked Hillary in Office is far-far beyond me?!

 

Of Interest

 

 

 


Below is an article from WND promoting a petition encouraging Congress and Donald Trump to investigate Crooked Hillary independently from the FBI. It is quite evident that all the government Branches under Obama’s Administration is so corrupt that the prosecution of actual crime will not be forthcoming.

 

In full disclosure these kind of petitions are typically fund raising ploys. It is quite obvious unless WND can collect signatures numbering in the millions such a petition will be ignored. However, this petition doesn’t seem to be a fund raiser. Perhaps in guessing, at least an outlying purpose is to collect email addresses for WND subscriptions or promotions. I urge you to sign the petition for the potential for signatures in the millions to occur. That potential outcome would boggle the mind of the Left Stream Media and the Elitist Republican Establishment.

clinton-corruption-deman-answers

JRH 10/16/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

TELL CONGRESS AND TRUMP TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY!

New demands for fresh, apolitical probe of Espionage Act violations, mishandling state secrets, destroying evidence, more


WND

October 13, 2016

 

Ever since the second presidential debate, when Donald Trump told Hillary Clinton that as president he would “instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation,” Democrats and the big media have gone wild – accusing Trump of emulating the world’s most evil tyrants and dictators, from Hugo Chavez to Robert Mugabe to Vladimir Putin, despots who routinely imprison – if not shoot – their political opponents.

 
Trump, however, claims he wants to see Clinton investigated, not because she is a political opponent, but because she has blatantly violated U.S. espionage laws, mishandled top-secret information, destroyed government files and obstructed justice.

 

Is Trump right in calling for a fresh, independent investigation of Clinton’s “situation”?

 

Sign the precedent-setting petition supporting Trump’s call for an independent prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton!

 

How relevant is it that, as multiple news reports confirm, “FBI agents are ready to revolt” over Director James Comey’s “cowardly” whitewash of the bureau’s investigation? Or that even the left-leaning PolitiFact website confirms 33,000 emails were indeed deleted from Clinton’s unsecure private server three weeks after she received a congressional subpoena demanding the production of her emails – an act that normally would result in being held in contempt of Congress. Or that more than half of all Americans – 56 percent according to an ABC News/Washington Post survey – believe Hillary Clinton should have been indicted.

 

With not only FBI agents and half the electorate outraged at Comey’s refusal to indict, but legal experts like Judge Andrew Napolitano openly saying “the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming” and “it was obviously a policy decision by the White House not to investigate her,” Donald Trump has promised as president to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct a complete and fair investigation – one not compromised by shameful political loyalties.

 

What do YOU think? If Trump wins, should he prosecute Hillary? Sound off in today’s WND poll

 

In light of this situation and the dangerous precedent of allowing certain “royalty” to operate above the laws that govern the rest of Americans, WND is launching an important online petition intended to show support for a truly impartial investigation of Hillary Clinton’s violation of the Espionage Act, as well as her blatant contempt of Congress in destroying 33,000 emails three weeks after they were subpoenaed by Congress.

 

“We’re taking this extraordinary editorial measure because it’s clear now no one but Trump will ever actually attempt to hold the Clintons accountable for their many overt criminal activities,” said Joseph Farah, founder and chief executive officer of WND. “We believe this is reason enough to vote for Trump. He needs encouragement to run hard, win and fulfill his promise to seek a special independent counsel to investigate and prosecute Hillary Clinton as well as to encourage contempt of Congress charges and penalties.”

 

Sign the petition calling for a new investigation of Hillary Clinton and demanding Congress hold her in contempt!

 

The petition asks Congress “to hold Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for purposely destroying evidence three weeks after it was subpoenaed,” and supports Donald Trump’s intention, if he is elected president, to appoint a special prosecutor to conduct a complete and fair investigation – one not compromised by craven political loyalties – into Hillary Clinton’s egregious abuse of America’s state secrets.”

 

SIGN THE PETITION NOW!

___________________

Blog Editor: In case you have not yet signed the petition, here’s a petition excerpt to further encourage you to at least take your frustrations out on the current elitist system abused especially by the Democrats but obviously by Establishment/Elitist Republicans!

 

PETITION URGING SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON’S CRIMES

 

WND

October 13, 2016

PETITION URGING DONALD TRUMP, IF ELECTED PRESIDENT, TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT – AND URGING CONGRESS TO HOLD HER IN CONTEMPT FOR DESTROYING OVER 30,000 EMAIL DOCUMENTS AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED

 

clinton-corruption-deman-answers

Whereas, Donald Trump, during the second presidential debate on Oct. 9, said to Hillary Clinton, “If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so much deception. There has never been anything like it, and we’re going to have a special prosecutor”;

 

Whereas, Trump added that not only are Americans “furious” over Clinton’s crimes, but the FBI as well, stating, “In my opinion, the people that have been long-time workers at the FBI are furious. There has never been anything like this, where … you get a subpoena, and after getting the subpoena you delete 33,000 emails and then you acid wash them or bleach them … So we’re going to get a special prosecutor and we’re going to look into it”;

 

Whereas, even the left-leaning PolitiFact website confirms 33,000 emails were indeed deleted from Hillary’s unsecure private server three weeks after she received a congressional subpoena demanding the production of her emails – an act that normally would result in being held in contempt of Congress;

 

Whereas, news reports confirm that “FBI agents are ready to revolt” over Director James Comey’s “cowardly” whitewash of Hillary Clinton’s long-term mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server, with Dennis V. Hughes, former chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, saying, “The FBI has politicized itself and its reputation will suffer for a long time – I hold Director Comey responsible,” and retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello adding, “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization”;

 

Whereas, fully 56 percent of Americans, including many Democrats, say FBI Director James Comey should have recommended that Hillary Clinton be indicted over her intentional mishandling of classified emails while secretary of state, according to an ABC News/Washington Post survey;

 

Whereas, legal expert …  READ THE REST & SIGN!!!

___________________

Crooked Hillary: Prosecute & Lock Up

John R. Houk

© October 16 2016

___________________

TELL CONGRESS AND TRUMP TO INVESTIGATE HILLARY!

 

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com

 

Trump the same as a Dem Administration?


Emphatically NO!

donald-trump-america-first 

John R. Houk

© October 12, 2016

 

Sifu is a Google+ comment contributor that usually makes a reasonable stand when he disagrees with me rather than a hysterical ad hominem attack. I appreciated that. Even though I do disagree.

 

These comments are between Sifu and I relating to the post “Trump vs. Crooked Hillary – Conservative vs. Leftist”. Sifu’s thoughts are in normal text and mine are in bold text as well as being indented.

 

JRH 10/12/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

Sifu Mode

22 hours ago

 

+John Houk He supports massive growth of government. That is his vision of “great”. How is that so different than Obama? Maybe he won’t be as weak. Maybe he will be rabidly nationalist. How are those necessarily good? Putin isn’t weak. Doesn’t make him good. Hitler was nationalist. Didn’t make him good. His goals are still very much in alignment with the liberals. Look at his recent history of support publicly and financially for Hillary and others on the left.

 

Hmm… I don’t see any massive growth of government EXCEPT in terms of an efficient military and National Security. In terms of National Debt and Gross Domestic Production I see government decrease. Obama is a globalist tending toward ending National Sovereignty – Crooked Hillary too. Is Trump a rabid Nationalist? NO, he is an America First Nationalist. Trump admires Putin’s leadership skills NOT his Russian imperialistic agenda. Trump is not Hitler! Hitler wanted a Socialist Despotic Aryan German Empire where nations were subservient and Jews dead. Trump wants to keep America good without Multiculturalist globalism destroying American exceptionalism. Trump’s goals are VERY MUCH unaligned with the American Left that supports the globalism of NAFTA and TPP! Trump supported the Clintons when it would benefit his business. He paid to get Clintons to play. The play benefited Clintons financially while charging for government favors. It is legal to donate. It is illegal to play for pay in government. It’s called corruption.

Those qualities can be good or bad. It depends on the underlying principles they are used to accomplish. Trump’s only consistent principle is to HIS PERSONAL DESIRES; see his history of the use of eminent domain. His ego and selfishness do nothing to inspire hope that those qualities would be used for good.

 

Trump worked within the law. Bill and Hillary worked outside the law and used power to become Teflon so no charges were filed. By the way Trump lost his imminent domain case and complied. Bill and Hillary LIED and people have died and American foreign policy has is in full disarray. Trump’s business is just fine.



Trump apolitical? That’s laughable. He is not PC, but that does NOT mean apolitical. He is VERY well versed in navigating politics and manipulating people to get what he wants. He is a very political personality; he simply hasn’t held office before.

 

Hmm … I believe history proves that wrong Sifu. You yourself mentioned how he has donating money to Dems. He also donating money to Republicans. The donations demonstrate advancing his business goals and profiting his investors. That’s not politics, that’s solid business in the realm of profit and loss. In America we call that Capitalism. Capitalism has made America wealthy enough that foreigners who hate us want to dip into that wealth by hook or by crook (mostly crook). Donald Trump at worst is a business personality and not a power-grabbing-monger like the Clinton clan.

 

Hillary Clinton Exposed Full Documentary


clinton-acronym

I discovered a video stamped made from SoulJa of God, that exposes Hillary Clinton as a Lying-Crooked-Crony-Capitalist more interested in self-aggrandizement, political power and the continued transformation of America from the ORIGINAL vision of the Founding Fathers into a totalitarian Leftist utopia.

 

In order to get the full impact of this video I recommend it to be viewed in full screen on your Internet device!

 

JRH 9/6/16 (Hat Tip Rebecca at the G+ Community Can You Handle the Truth?)

Please Support NCCR

**************

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton Exposed Full Documentary [13:23]

 

 

Posted by Anonymous News

Published on Apr 27, 2016

 

Hillary Clinton Exposed Full Documentary

 

***********

Blog Editor: I was just going to post the above video; however, in the process of youtubing I found this roughly 29-minute documentary touching on the same subject of Crooked Hillary. It is my opinion the above video is more effective, yet this longer expose probably adds details that are not used above.

 

JRH (Hat Tip: Don Domingue at the G+ Community HILLARY CLINTON CRIME NETWORK)

************

VIDEO: Hillary Final Collapse! Criminal Evidence Is Staggering!! Must See!!

 

 

Posted by ProjectClarity

Uploaded on Sep 3, 2016

 

There is so much information about Clinton corruption that it’s hard to keep up with it. The new FBI release makes it clear that she is sick and could not be president. I actually think that now that the elites know she will not be elected she will be assassinated. Very well could be a fake assassination, but she will be removed! When editing this video it became clear just how corrupt our system is. Hillary should not even be allowed to run for office. I’m 59 and I have never seen corruption like this. It’s in your face. Daring you to do anything about it. The only thing that makes sense is that she has blackmailed almost everyone in Congress! It’s the only way she could get away with this massive criminal activity. All the people that are asleep, don’t even know it’s happening!

 
I tried to keep the video under 20 minutes, but I could do another one. I didn’t even touch on the new FBI emails or Hillary’s health. She will not make it to the election in my opinion! If you can watch this video and still think things are OK in America, you are living in a dream world!

Donald Trump 10 PT Immigration Speech from Phoenix


PHOENIX, AZ - AUGUST 31:  Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally on August 31, 2016 in Phoenix, Arizona. Trump detailed a multi-point immigration policy during his speech. (Photo by Ralph Freso/Getty Images)
PHOENIX, AZ – AUGUST 31: Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally on August 31, 2016 in Phoenix, Arizona. Trump detailed a multi-point immigration policy during his speech. (Photo by Ralph Freso/Getty Images)

John R. Houk

© September 2, 2016

 

On August 31 in a Phoenix Arizona speech, Donald Trump outlines his ten-point plan for immigration reform. Most Conservative outlets were very pleased with the speech. I have not checked the American Left’s (Dems and MSM) viewpoint on the speech yet. The reason for that is the spin of lies and warped criticism that typically flows from a Leftist’s mouth.

 

Even the Never Trumper Conservatives of the Nationally Review grudgingly praised the speech as sensible:

 

After two weeks spent waffling on immigration, and making noises on the subject largely indistinguishable from those of Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, Donald Trump has settled on a hawkish position — and a practical one. Trump’s crowd-pleasing antics aside, in his immigration speech in Phoenix, Ariz., on Wednesday he laid out a sensible, realistic path forward on genuine immigration reform.

 

Trump’s rhetoric on immigration has frequently been reckless, and on occasion he has seemed to play to feelings of animosity. He would be well served to strike a soberer tone. But on the merits, Trump has put forward a responsible immigration agenda. READ ENTIRETY (A Tough but Sensible Immigration Policy; By The Editors; National Review; 9/1/16 7:30 PM)

 

The Trump plan for immigration reform is awesome! It focuses on security, the border and unvetted Muslim regugees.

 

Donald Trump’s speech in entirety can be read at DonaldTrump.com. I am excerpting the ten points followed by the entire speech (about 1:17 and some odd seconds) courtesy of ABC.

 

Number One: We will build a wall along the Southern Border.

 

On day one, we will begin working on an impenetrable physical wall on the southern border. We will use the best technology, including above-and below-ground sensors, towers, aerial surveillance and manpower to supplement the wall, find and dislocate tunnels, and keep out the criminal cartels, and Mexico will pay for the wall.

 

Number Two: End Catch-And-Release

 

Under my Administration, anyone who illegally crosses the border will be detained until they are removed out of our country.

 

Number Three: Zero tolerance for criminal aliens.

 

According to federal data, there are at least 2 million criminal aliens now inside the country. We will begin moving them out day one, in joint operations with local, state and federal law enforcement.

 

Beyond the 2 million, there are a vast number of additional criminal illegal immigrants who have fled or evaded justice. But their days on the run will soon be over. They go out, and they go out fast.

 

Moving forward, we will issue detainers for all illegal immigrants who are arrested for any crime whatsoever, and they will be placed into immediate removal proceedings. We will terminate the Obama Administration’s deadly non-enforcement policies that allow thousands of criminal aliens to freely roam our streets.

 

Since 2013 alone, the Obama Administration has allowed 300,000 criminal aliens to return back into U.S. communities – these are individuals encountered or identified by ICE but who were not detained or processed for deportation.

 

My plan also includes cooperating closely with local jurisdictions to remove criminal aliens.

 

We will restore the highly successful Secure Communities program. We will expand and revitalize the popular 287(g) partnerships, which will help to identify hundreds of thousands of deportable aliens in local jails. Both of these programs have been recklessly gutted by this Administration. This is yet one more area where we are headed in a totally opposite direction.

 

On my first day in office, I am also going to ask Congress to pass “Kate’s Law” – named for Kate Steinle – to ensure that criminal aliens convicted of illegal reentry face receive strong mandatory minimum sentences.

 

Another reform I am proposing is the passage of legislation named for Detective Michael Davis and Deputy Sheriff Danny Oliver, two law enforcement officers recently killed by a previously-deported illegal immigrant. The Davis-Oliver bill will enhance cooperation with state and local authorities to ensure that criminal immigrants and terrorists are swiftly identified and removed.

 

We are going to triple the number of ICE deportation officers. Within ICE, I am going to create a new special Deportation Task Force, focused on identifying and removing quickly the most dangerous criminal illegal immigrants in America who have evaded justice.

 

The local police know who every one of these criminals are. There’s no great mystery to it, they’ve put up with it for years. And now, finally, we will turn the tables and law enforcement will be allowed to clear up this dangerous and threatening mess.

 

We’re also going to hire 5,000 more Border Patrol agents, and put more of them on the border, instead of behind desks. We will expand the number of Border Patrol Stations.

 

I’ve had a chance to spend time with these incredible law enforcement officers, and I want to take a moment to thank them. The endorsement I’ve received from the Border Patrol officers means more to me than I can say.

 

Number Four: Block Funding For Sanctuary Cities

 

We will end the Sanctuary Cities that have resulted in so many needless deaths. Cities that refuse to cooperate with federal authorities will not receive taxpayer dollars, and we will work with Congress to pass legislation to protect those jurisdictions that do assist federal authorities.

 

Number Five: Cancel Unconstitutional Executive Orders & Enforce All Immigration Laws

 

We will immediately terminate President Obama’s two illegal executive amnesties, in which he defied federal law and the constitution to give amnesty to approximately 5 million illegal immigrants.

 

Hillary Clinton has pledged to keep both of these illegal amnesty programs – including the 2014 amnesty which has been blocked by the Supreme Court. Clinton has also pledged to add a third executive amnesty.

 

Clinton’s plan would trigger a Constitutional Crisis unlike almost anything we have ever seen before. In effect, she would be abolishing the lawmaking powers of Congress in order to write her own laws from the Oval Office.

 

In a Trump Administration, all immigration laws will be enforced. As with any law enforcement activity, we will set priorities. But, unlike this Administration, no one will be immune or exempt from enforcement – and ICE and Border Patrol officers will be allowed to do their jobs. Anyone who has entered the United States illegally is subject to deportation – that is what it means to have laws and to have a country.

 

Our enforcement priorities will include removing criminals, gang members, security threats, visa overstays, public charges – that is, those relying on public welfare or straining the safety net, along with millions of recent illegal arrivals and overstays who’ve come here under the current Administration.

 

Number Six: We Are Going To Suspend The Issuance Of Visas To Any Place Where Adequate Screening Cannot Occur

 

According to data provided to the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, between 9/11 and the end of 2014, at least 380 foreign-born individuals were convicted in terror cases inside the United States. The number is likely higher, but the Administration refuses to provide this information to Congress.

 

As soon as I enter office, I am going to ask the Department of State, Homeland Security and the Department of Justice to begin a comprehensive review of these cases in order to develop a list of regions and countries from which immigration must be suspended until proven and effective vetting mechanisms can be put into place.

 

Countries from which immigration will be suspended would include places like Syria and Libya.

 

For the price of resettling 1 refugee in the United States, 12 could be resettled in a safe zone in their home region.

 

Another reform involves new screening tests for all applicants that include an ideological certification to make sure that those we are admitting to our country share our values and love our people.

 

For instance, in the last five years, we’ve admitted nearly 100,000 immigrants from Iraq and Afghanistan – in these two countries, according to Pew research, a majority of residents say that the barbaric practice of honor killings against women are often or sometimes justified.

 

Applicants will be asked for their views about honor killings, about respect for women and gays and minorities, attitudes on Radical Islam, and many other topics as part of the vetting procedure.

 

Number Seven: We will ensure that other countries take their people back when we order them deported

 

There are at least 23 countries that refuse to take their people back after they have been ordered to leave the United States, including large numbers of violent criminals. Due to a Supreme Court decision, if these violent offenders cannot be sent home, our law enforcement officers have to release them into U.S. communities. There are often terrible consequences, such as Casey Chadwick’s tragic death in Connecticut just last year. Yet, despite the existence of a law that commands the Secretary of State to stop issuing visas to these countries, Secretary Hillary Clinton ignored this law and refused to use this powerful tool to bring nations into compliance.

 

The result of her misconduct was the release of thousands of dangerous criminal aliens who should have been sent home.

 

According to a report from the Boston Globe, from the year 2008 through 2014, nearly 13,000 criminal aliens were released back into U.S. communities because their home countries would not take them back. Many of these 13,000 releases occurred on Hillary Clinton’s watch – she had the power and the duty to stop it cold and she didn’t do it.

 

Those released include individuals convicted of killings, sexual assault and some of the most heinous crimes imaginable, who went on to reoffend at a very high rate.

 

Number Eight: We will finally complete the biometric entry-exit visa tracking system.

 

For years, Congress has required a biometric entry-exit visa tracking system, but it has never been completed.

 

In my Administration, we will ensure that this system is in place at all land, air, and sea ports. Approximately half of new illegal immigrants came on temporary visas and then never left. Beyond violating our laws, visa overstays pose a substantial threat to national security. The 9/11 Commission said that this tracking system should be a high priority and “would have assisted law enforcement and intelligence officials in August and September 2001 in conducting a search for two of the 9/11 hijackers that were in the U.S. on expired visas.”

 

Last year alone, nearly a half a million individuals overstayed their temporary visas. Removing visa overstays will be a top priority of my Administration. If people around the world believe they can just come on a temporary visa and never leave – the Obama-Clinton policy – then we have a completely open border. We must send the message that visa expiration dates will be strongly enforced.

 

Number Nine: We will turn off the jobs and benefits magnet.

 

We will ensure that E-Verify is used to the fullest extent possible under existing law, and will work with Congress to strengthen and expand its use across the country.

 

Immigration law doesn’t exist just for the purpose of keeping out criminals. It exists to protect all aspects of American life – the worksite, the welfare office, the education system and much else. That is why immigration limits are established in the first place. If we only enforce the laws against crime, then we have an open border to the entire world.

 

I will enforce all of our immigration laws.

 

The same goes for government benefits. The Center for Immigration Studies estimates that 62 percent of households headed by illegal immigrants used some form of cash or non-cash welfare programs, like food stamps or housing assistance. This directly violates the federal public charge law designed to protect the U.S. treasury.

 

Those who abuse our welfare system will be priorities for removal.

 

Number 10: We will reform legal immigration to serve the best interests of America and its workers

 

We’ve admitted 59 million immigrants to the United States between 1965 and 2015.

 

Many of these arrivals have greatly enriched our country. But we now have an obligation to them, and to their children, to control future immigration – as we have following previous immigration waves – to ensure assimilation, integration and upward mobility.

 

Within just a few years immigration as a share of national population is set to break all historical records.

 

The time has come for a new immigration commission to develop a new set of reforms to our legal immigration system in order to achieve the following goals:

 

  • To keep immigration levels, measured by population share, within historical norms

 

  • To select immigrants based on their likelihood of success in U.S. society, and their ability to be financially self-sufficient. We need a system that serves our needs – remember, it’s America First.

 

  • To choose immigrants based on merit, skill and proficiency

 

  • And to establish new immigration controls to boost wages and to ensure that open jobs are offered to American workers first.

 

We want people to come into our country, but they have to come in legally and properly-vetted, and in a manner that serves the national interest.

 

We’ve been living under outdated immigration rules from decades ago. To avoid this happening in the future, I believe we should sunset our visa laws so that Congress is forced to periodically revise and revisit them. We wouldn’t put our entire federal budget on autopilot for decades, so why should we do the same for immigration?

 

Let’s talk about the big picture

 

These ten steps, if rigorously followed and enforced, will accomplish more in a matter of months than our politicians have accomplished on this issue in the last fifty years.

 

Because I am not a politician, because I am not beholden to any special interest, I will get this done for you and your family.

 

We will accomplish all of READ ENTIRE SPEECH (Donald J. Trump: Address On Immigration; DonaldTrump.com; 8/31/16)

 

YOU should really take the time to read or to watch the entire speech! The speech was focused on immigration HOWEVER, the atmosphere exudes quite believable patriotism to make AMERICA GREAT.

 

VIDEO: Trump FULL Immigration Speech in Phoenix

 

 

Posted by ABC News

Streamed live on Aug 31, 2016

 

Donald Trump FULL Immigration Speech from Phoenix | Donald Trump has started giving his long-awaited immigration speech in Phoenix tonight after touching down in the U.S. after a surprise visit to Mexico.

When he started talking about the “beautiful” wall that he wants to build along the southern U.S. border, Trump reiterated his earlier claim that Mexico will pay for the wall. That became READ THE REST

 

JRH 9/2/16

Please Support NCCR

U.S. Communists fret as some progressives shun Hillary


CPUSA & Crooked Hillary

This article was originally posted on WND. The writing is about how the U.S. Leftist Communists are concerned that Crooked Hillary is alienating some Dem Leftists. The article uses the pc version for Leftists with the word Progressives.

 

JRH 8/29/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

U.S. Communists fret as some progressives shun Hillary

 

Posted by Dee Fatouros

Sourced from WND

August 28, 2016 07:26 PM PDT

The Realistic Observer

 

 The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) has infiltrated the Democrat Party far more than most realize. Its influence has been steady and pernicious like a slow growing cancer. It has now taken over the entire body politic in varying degrees. Although much of the electorate remains uninformed or in denial as to this phenomenon, many exist who do recognize that something is not quite right with the Dems.

Numerous progressives remain idealistic and cannot neither relate nor stomach what they are seeing in the present party as corruption, hypocrisy, and betrayal. (Many in the GOP have the same disgust with their party, but that is another story).

Witness the rise of Bernie Sanders. Was it because his supporters were true hard core Socialists/Communists or because they were fed up with leaders who talked out of both sides of their mouths and saw him as “the real thing”.

The following post discusses the dismay of the CPUSA over the fact that not all Dems seem willing to support Hillary. They are concerned. She must win in November in order for the agenda begun in earnest by the present WH occupant to continue.   

These voters have apparently abandoned Hillary and possibly the party.  

 

Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton (Photo- Twitter)Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton (Photo: Twitter)

 

They deeply despise her ties to Wall Street and call her a warmonger and a liar’

 

WASHINGTON – How deep and wide is the Communist Party USA’s support for Hillary Clinton?

It’s unambiguous. It’s 100 percent. And it’s uncompromising.

A new editorial on the party’s home page calls any thoughts about voting for the Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein or not voting for the top of the Democratic ticket “a flawed strategy.”

The CPUSA, birthed by Josef Stalin’s pocketbooks and sustained through the fall of the Soviet Union by KGB subsidies, is all in for Hillary.

The party is also excited about America’s corporate press jumping on the bandwagon with support for its candidate.

“Unprecedented early endorsements of Clinton have appeared in the Washington Post and Houston Chronicle, which described Trump as a ‘danger to the Republic,’” the editorial states with approval. “Many refer to Trump as an extreme authoritarian or worse, as a fascist.”

On the other hand, the Democrats meet the political litmus test with flying rainbow colors:

“The message from the DNC was the polar opposite. It reflected the broad electoral coalition backing Clinton, including the labor movement, African American, Latino, Asian and other communities of color, women, the LGBT community, youth, environmentalists, immigrant and disabled rights advocates.”

However, the CPUSA is concerned that not all ‘progressives” are on board for Clinton.

“But there are still some progressives, including some Bernie or Bust activists, who refuse to support Clinton,” the editorial says. “They deeply despise her ties to Wall Street and call her a warmonger and a liar. They see nothing positive in Clinton, her historic candidacy or the Democratic Party platform. They dismiss the broad electoral coalition, including the labor movement, that is backing Clinton and that has shaped the platform, a coalition with obvious leverage. To them, she is as bad as Trump.”

It continues: “Some are voting for Green Party candidate Jill Stein to ‘send a message.’ Still others hope a Clinton defeat provokes a crisis in the Democratic Party leading to its break-up.”

 

Jill Stein of the Green PartyJill Stein of the Green Party

 

Sounding like a press release from the DNC, the Communist Party editorial explains: “This is a flawed strategy. First, like it or not, we have a two party system. One of the two major parties will win and govern. If this were a parliamentary democracy different tactics would be called for.”

“To call for a vote against Clinton is to separate oneself from this electoral coalition,” it states.

Not only do the Communists want Hillary to win, they want her to win big, explaining “mandates are real. This election will be a national referendum on racism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia and Islamophobia. The aim should be a landslide defeat of Trump and a decisive rejection of hate. The election of Clinton as the first woman president would make history. A landslide would not end sexism, but it would represent a mighty blow just as the election of President Obama was a blow against racism. It would advance democracy. A landslide makes it more likely that GOP congressional and state legislative majorities can be ousted and an end put to the politics of obstruction. Most people tend to vote straight ticket.”

“A landslide will give added weight to the progressive platform adopted at the Democratic Convention and give encouragement to appoint progressive Supreme Court justices,” the editorial continues. “It would be added pressure against backsliding on opposition to TPP and other trade deals. It will put public opinion and the movements in a better position to pressure against Clinton’s tendency toward military adventurism and policies of regime change.”

Again, the CPUSA warns off against voting Green.

“Voting Green Party separates activists and voters from these key forces,” the editorial says. “One cannot credibly engage in mobilizations of labor, civil rights, women’s organizations, LGBT community, and environmentalists while also advocating voting Green Party.”

The Communist Party “press” was out in force at the Democratic National Convention in full support of the Dems and their nominee from the beginning.

Joseph Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth, said the CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put MSNBC to shame.

“Back in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”

The Communist Party was so eager to endorse Barack Obama for re-election, it couldn’t wait until 2012.
It did so a year before the campaign officially got under way. The party was jubilant in 2008, when Obama won his first race for the presidency.

 

Saul AlinskySaul Alinsky

 

Hailing Barack Obama’s win as a victory for the “working class,” the Communist Party USA called on the president-elect to carry out his promises, including his noted commitment to “spread the wealth.” An editorial by the People’s Weekly World, the official newspaper of the party, said the victory was for “workers of all job titles, professions, shapes, colors, sizes, hairstyles and languages.”

In 2009, President Obama’s leadership was “one of the best opportunities that Americans have had in decades,” declared a civil-rights activist addressing an overflow crowd at a gathering sponsored by the official newspaper of the Community Party USA.

The party was never disappointed by Obama. Here’s how it critiqued Obama’s final State of the Union Address earlier this year:

“In his final SOTU address, President Obama projected a bold vision for a more socially and economically just nation while appealing to the hopes of the American people. … President Obama pointedly rejected right-wing-Republican policy solutions including repeal of Obamacare, aggressive military buildup and action, tax cuts to the wealthy, blocking common-sense gun control … He also rejected efforts to exploit the fears of the American people using hate, anti-Muslim bigotry, racism and division.

“The challenges facing the nation and planet are immense: climate crisis, massive concentration and inequality of wealth, growing poverty and declining wages, joblessness, including skyrocketing unemployment in the African-American community, over $1 trillion in student debt, a crumbling infrastructure, underfunded schools and social services, lack of affordable housing, a frayed retirement security system, etc.”

David Kupelian, managing editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year in a commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties: “Amazing as it may seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic Party so far leftward over the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic Party has become almost indistinguishable from the Communist Party.

“If that sounds hyperbolic to you, just stop reading right now and pull up the CPUSA’s website,” he added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to discern any major differences between the Communist Party’s concerns, sensibilities and solutions – on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered immigration, to renewable energy, to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops as racist, to universal health care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”

Hillary Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist Party activist. Interest has been largely fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely positive critique of Saul Alinsky and his work.

Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals” author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.

Clinton was said to have met with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing her thesis. In her most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job offer from Alinsky to instead attend law school.

Read the history of the attacks on marriage and the family, from the days of Karl Marx and Margaret Sanger to those now pushing for mandatory recognition of same-sex “marriage,” in “Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left has Sabotaged Family and Marriage.”

Last year, WND found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton co-chaired maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community organizing outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF. The partnership extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education policy of the Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by Alinsky in 1940 and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national community-organizing network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive organizing agenda. After Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his longtime associate and designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the group’s executive director.

Dick Morris, a former top political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of Arkansas and as president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue Hillary Clinton used to propel herself independently to the forefront of Arkansas politics during Bill’s governorship.”

“The revelation of how closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have been since – to an Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands our understanding of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new left of Saul Alinsky,” Morris said.

David Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party and who himself became a leader in the new left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before rejecting it, said the revelation is significant though not surprising.

“When radicals set out to fundamentally transform a society, the first institution they attack is the educational system which under their influence becomes a system of indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.

Interestingly, the Communist Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It hasn’t walked back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is the Democratic Party.

The drift leftward hit warp speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah. That’s the year Bernie Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

“One of his first actions in Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was partnered with the Democratic Socialists of America,” recounts Farah. “No surprise there, because most Americans have no idea of what the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America are really all about.”

Farah reported on the antics of the caucus in 1998.

“Back then the Congressional Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he wrote. “In other words, these two organizations, one government-funded and the other a tax-exempt nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page politically. What I found back then was astonishing – even for me. On this shared website, that was quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection of songs I can almost hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites back then – was ‘Red Revolution’ sung to the tune of ‘Red, Red Robbin.’”

Here are the lyrics as they still appear on the Congressional Progressive Caucus website as captured by the Wayback Machine: (The original site was scrubbed within hours after it was exposed by WND)

 

When the Red Revolution
brings its solution
along, along

There’ll be no more lootin’
when we start shootin’
that Wall Street throng

Wake up you proletarians
Don’t act like seminarians
Expropriate barbarians
Build a workers’ republic

Exploitation and degradation
you won’t find here
Surplus value and capital will disappear

I’m just a Red again,
saying what I’ve said again,
When the Red Revolution … da, da, da, da
brings its solution … da, da, da, da, da
along


“How do these people get away with denying they are redder than a robin’s breast while singing songs like this – and printing them on the Internet?” asked Farah incredulously.

The song list also included lyrics to “Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie,” sung to the tune of “Frere Jacques.”

 

Are you sleeping, are you sleeping,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill you all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie

 

“For those not trained in the lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of ‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in contrast to the proletariat or wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with property values,’” wrote Farah. “If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the middle class, these people not only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill you with knives and guns!”
Source:   WND
__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

The Realistic Observer posts everything in bold text. Honestly I find that annoying thus I took away most of the bold text. I indented the short verse prose in the post.

 

The Realistic Observer Homepage

 

The Anti-Hillary


If Hillary Elected -  Uncle Sam Dies

In this latest submission from Justin Smith, he expands upon his Facebook thoughts in which I cross posted entitled, “Memo to Third Party and ‘Never Trump’ Thinkers”. I concur with Justin that for Conservatives to stay home on election day or to vote for a Third Party candidate is the EXACT same thing as placing a check mark next to Crooked Hillary’s name on the ballot in November. Justin thus expands this theme.

 

JRH 8/28/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

The Anti-Hillary

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 8/27/2016 1:46 PM

 

Donald Trump may not be the strong constitutionalist that many conservatives saw in Ted Cruz. Still, we can acknowledge Trump’s abundant flaws, his Big Government Leftist leanings, just as I have done in several columns, and vote for him with a clear conscience, since a corrupt society gave us both Trump and Hillary Clinton. Save the political infighting over “true conservative values” for after the election. We are not responsible for Trump’s shortcomings; but, we can certainly take advantage of his known strengths, as we unify against Hillary Clinton, who is an evil ideologue hell-bent on the abolition of individual and religious liberties, the most corrupt elitist to ever seek the presidency.

 

Hurt feelings or not, the intransigent “never Trump” conservatives appear to be throwing a politically immature toddler-like temper tantrum. Reveling in their false pride, their patriotism questionable, they point to Trump’s assertion he could survive without them, while they endanger our republic by still refusing to vote for Trump, who is the only candidate with a real chance of beating Clinton. They bring Hillary Clinton one vote closer to the White House and the Clinton Foundation ever closer to its next billions in “donations” [bribes] from foreign governments, forcing the Founding Fathers’ edifice ever closer to becoming a banana republic.

 

Morally speaking, everyone, including “never Trump” groups and conservative Democrats, must look at which candidate will preserve human rights, our unalienable rights under the U.S. Constitution. Which candidate will best protect our right to free speech, property ownership, self-defense and life that natural law and reason guarantees all human beings?

 

Hillary Clinton is a political chameleon, changing position as the situation demands __ pro and anti-free trade [TPP], anti and pro-raising the minimum wage and anti and pro-same sex marriage. Her consistent views are shameful. She met with 57 Islamic nations in December of 2012 in New York to discuss how best to induce the Senate and the House to criminalize any criticism of Islam, a blatant attack on free speech. And during her presidential campaign, Clinton has warned abortion opponents moved by faith that their “religious beliefs” would “have to be changed.”

 

On June 21st, 2016, Donald Trump met with hundreds of Christian leaders in New York City [A Conversation with Donald Trump], where he gave extremely encouraging answers to the tough questions posed by nearly 1000 evangelical and Catholic leaders. He pledged to always appoint pro-life, pro-Second Amendment and pro-religious liberty judges and Supreme Court Justices, and he promised to eradicate the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which unconstitutionally silences pastors from the pulpit on issues of the day.

 

Clinton will be a full scale disaster. Along with her pro-Death [abortion] comments, she has already been clear about her intentions to succeed in disarming Americans. She will appoint a fifth Supreme Court Justice to gut the First and Second Amendments. She’ll further cripple our military, and she’ll force American industry to bow to her will through tax ploys and the regulatory infrastructure.

 

Leftist indoctrination of two generations of Americans, through our universities, has moved the Democratic Party far left of many European socialist parties; so much so that Hillary Clinton feels comfortable enough to brazenly suggest that her government will dictate to companies how much employees must be paid. Can you say “unconstitutional”? How about “fascist”?

 

Trump’s proposals to undo the immense tax and regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, the job creators, will bring many old businesses back into the U.S., along with new businesses. Money currently outside the U.S. will return, and the result will be an economy that will benefit all Americans, if they are willing to work.

 

Concerning the Supreme Court, Donald Trump has sought the guidance of the conservative Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation, as he notes that these well respected think tanks have set “the gold standard” on judicial appointments. These think tanks helped him list 11 judges with the judicial temperament and constitutional knowledge that we can expect from any of his potential nominees to any federal court or the Supreme Court.

 

If Hillary Clinton is elected, she’ll bury every one of her and Bill’s secrets and settle old scores with her enemies. Her agenda and the Progressive agenda is at stake, from Uranium One and donors like Gilbert Chougary and advocating unnecessary wars like Libya to Obamacare, the Iran Nuclear Deal and more potential unConstitutional Executive Orders, which is great motivation for the vast left-wing Clinton apparatus to fight to retain the levers of government power.

 

Unlike Obama’s “experts” in the DOJ and the CIA and Hillary’s State Department, Trump takes a more pragmatic approach to governance. He will encourage law enforcement policies that make U.S. cities safe for all regardless of color or ethnicity in opposition to progressive policies of division. He correctly sees the Islamic State as a bigger problem than Assad, where Obama and Hillary failed. He doesn’t mind re-evaluating allegiances that have been taken for granted, and he has castigated U.S. ally Mexico for its lack of border controls and the flood of illegal aliens into America. He has also said that Saudi Arabia would have to do more in the fight against the Islamic State, which would be a significant change from the Saudis’ prominent role in funding terrorism against the West.

 

Hillary Clinton policies vary only slightly from Obama’s. If Obama’s progressive policies had been proper and backed by action over the past seven years, would we now have such racial and ethnic strife in America? Would the Islamic State’s diseased brutality persist? Would America’s middle class be disintegrating? Hillary will give America four more years of Obama’s malaise and defective, negligent, incompetent and treasonous government.

 

I’m not voting for Trump to be my new best friend. I’m voting for him to be the Anti-Hillary. I don’t care if he’s mean and hurts the tender feelings of the fey and fainthearted, or even if he grows fangs and fur every full moon. I know Hillary Clinton is a worse person who would be unrestrained in power and pose a significant chance of plunging America into violence.

 

Donald Trump’s nationalist populism is not the death knell to conservative values that several conservative Christian pundits will have one believe. His current proposed policies will actually serve as a breastwork against all of Obama’s policies and terrible legislative legacy and Hillary’s planned radical destruction. Trump is a strong advocate, by and large, for the GOP platform, which contains mostly traditional conservative positions, and placing Trump in the Oval Office will prevent Hillary Clinton’s undoing of America, the destruction of the U.S. Constitution and America’s transformation into a godless neo-Marxist banana republic.

 

By Justin O. Smith

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Memo to Third Party and ‘Never Trump’ Thinkers


Hillary- Worked for, Married to & IS a LIAR

Justin Smith made a good case to vote for Trump in the 2016 election cycle under the title “Vote for America — Vote for Trump”. This new pro-Trump editorial explains – quite passionately – the reasons why it is dangerous for Conservatives to not vote for Donald Trump as President of the United States.

 

JRH 8/26/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

Memo to Third Party and ‘Never Trump’ Thinkers

 

By Justin O. Smith

August 25, 2016

Facebook Notes

 

Hillary is in fact a Much Greater threat in the White House than Trump — if only You look at the two opposing platforms alone. The difference is stark and black and white.

 

A Third Party candidate in America stands absolutely ZERO chance when looking at the numbers, even if they get on all 50 ballots — it’s too little, too late.

 

The reality is that either Hillary or Trump will be president. After considering ALL possible scenarios from domestic to foreign policy, Trump will at least act as a buffer and protect traditional institutions and law i.e. the Bill of Rights (FOR THE MOST PART) — I’ve said time and again that Trump carries a list of difficulties with him, but that is why we have checks and balances — supposedly. So, vote for the BEST Conservative Statesmen You can for both houses.

 

If too many, such as Yourself, stay on the current course you’ve chosen, not only will you find yourselves without enough votes to win anything, but You’ll have ensured the election of Hillary by splitting the “conservative” vote and THUS ENSURING THE CEMENTING OF OBAMA’s POLICIES and THE FINAL COMPLETION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA INTO A WORLD OF SERFS SURVIVING IN THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR OF POVERTY AND TYRANNY.

 

Let Your Conscience Be Your Guide — But at this juncture, in my own learned opinion — You are more wrong than You know.

 

If We elect Trump — WE CAN PLAN FOR 2020 and WORK TO EDUCATE THE POPULACE TO THE LOGIC AND PROSPERITY AND LIBERTY THAT GOES HAND IN HAND WITH CONSERVATIVE VALUES. OTHERWISE — CONSERVATIVE VALUES WILL BE BLOCKED FROM THE POLITICAL ARENA THE REST OF THIS CENTURY — MARK MY WORDS.

 

I choose to give the Wild Card Trump a CHANCE, because otherwise — If Hillary is elected — We will be forced to go against our conscience on ALL Important Issues that Concern Liberty and the Constitution and Judeo-Christian values OR FIGHT A FULL BLOWN REBELLION. [Bold emphasis is Blog Editor’s]

 

There is no time limit on rebellion, so I’d rather see if Trump might prove us wrong by being a fine president, rather than seeing our nation thrown into the subsequent Blood-Shed of CIVIL WAR. If Trump is no better, WE can still rebel later.

 

By Justin O Smith

_________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith