No Overall Bias?


OIG Pulls a Comey in Horowitz Report

 

John R. Houk

© June 15, 2018

The Horowitz IG Report on the FBI/DOJ handling of Crooked Hillary’s email server investigation came out June 14. I have no doubt the Leftist MSM will report this underlying theme: Horowitz found no political bias.

 

I haven’t personally read the 568-page report yet, but a quick read of primarily Conservative sources commenting the report, Michael Horowitz both let’s the FBI off the hook relating bias and singles out bias of certain FBI/DOJ members. How Horowitz can generalize no overall bias and individual bias simultaneously is beyond me. I believe another instalment of Horowitz’s IG investigation is in the future.

 

Here are some salient observations that Conservative sources are observing:

 

  • Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch acted improperly in not cutting short a meeting aboard an aircraft with former President Bill Clinton during the investigation of Hillary Clinton. Both Lynch and Bill Clinton denied discussing the ongoing email probe during the meeting.

 

  • The FBI improperly permitted two Clinton aides who were witnesses in the investigation to sit in on the FBI’s questioning of Clinton

 

  • Comey drafted an initial statement exonerating Clinton months before the investigation ended. FBI agents’ actions surrounding the DOJ/FBI interview of Hillary Clinton were ‘inappropriate’ and created appearance of bias

 

  • The draft statement exonerating Clinton also removed the term “gross negligence”—a condition that could have been used for prosecution—and replaced with “especially concerning.” – Comey usurped the authority of the attorney general when he announced during a July 2016 press conference that the FBI would not be recommending charges against Clinton, then the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.

 

  • An initial assessment in the Comey draft statement saying foreign spy services were “reasonably likely” to have accessed the classified data on the Clinton server was replaced with “possible.”

 

  • FBI ethics officials “did not fully appreciate” the potential conflict of interest by former FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s wife receiving $675,288 in 2015 from Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe, then-governor of Virginia, for her political campaign for a state senate seat. McCabe became head of the email probe in early 2016.

 

  • The FBI improperly regarded a parallel investigation of Russian collusion with the Trump presidential campaign in 2016 to be more important the Clinton email probe.

 

  • New texts between FBI lovers Strzok and Page were ‘disappointing’ and cast a shadow over the integrity of the entire Clinton email probe – Strzok’s and Page’s text messages expressing pro-Clinton and anti-Trump views raised questions about whether they allowed their political leanings to interfere with their work. – The senior FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page may have had a “willingness to take official action” to hurt Donald Trump’s chances of winning the 2016 election.

 

 

  • Five unnamed FBI employees — including one lawyer who later worked on the Mueller probe — are under scrutiny for anti-Trump bias

 

  • President Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Hillary Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account

 

  • Despite Clinton connections, former Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe didn’t fully recuse themselves 

 

  • ‘Insubordinate’ Ex-FBI Director James Comey repeatedly violated policy and inaccurately described the legal situation surrounding Clinton’s emails – While Comey’s conduct was “insubordinate,” his actions and those of others in the FBI were not affected by bias.

 

  • Comey departed “clearly and dramatically” from FBI and DOJ guidelines while overseeing the Clinton investigation. Comey’s decisions “negatively impacted the perception of the FBI” and the DOJ.

 

 

These points are hardly exhaustive, but they provide a decent snapshot of political bias even though the Horowitz IG Report erroneously claims no political bias affected the FBI/DOJ investigation of the Crooked Hillary illegal private email server.

 

I don’t know if you noticed. The Horowitz IG Report sounds an awful lot just Comey going down a list of Crooked Hillary practices that any two-bit lawyer could match to U.S. Statutes violated. Violations that have had criminal prosecutions!

 

I will cross post some of Conservative sources I felt aligned more with my thoughts, but first here are a few titles that I perused through.

 

NEW STRZOK TEXT: ‘WE’LL STOP’ TRUMP FROM WINNING

IG report finds Comey ‘insubordinate’ in Hillary probe; By Art Moore; WND; 6/14/18

 

IG REFERS 5 FBI EMPLOYEES OVER ‘HOSTILE’ MESSAGES

‘F— Trump,’ candidate’s supporters ‘retarded’; By ART MOORE; WND; 6/14/18

 

‘WILLINGNESS’ TO IMPACT THE ELECTION: IG’S CLINTON REPORT IS LOADED WITH BOMBSHELLS; By Peter Hasson; The Daily Caller; 06/14/2018 6:16 PM

 

‘A Cloud’: 4 Top Takeaways of Watchdog Report on FBI’s Clinton Email Probe; By Fred Lucas; Daily Signal; June 14, 2018

 

Justice Department IG Reveals FBI Corruption Senior FBI agent threatened to prevent Trump election in text message; agents took gifts from reporters; By Bill Gertz; Washington Free Beacon; 6/14/18 5:02 pm

 

JRH 6/15/18

Please Support NCCR

*********************

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Another Lawyer Was Removed From Mueller’s Team This February Over Anti-Trump Text Messages

 

By Cristina Laila

June 14, 2018

Gateway Pundit

 

The IG report released Thursday revealed ANOTHER lawyer was removed from Mueller’s team of liberal hacks February of this year after anti-Trump text messages surfaced.

 

‘Viva Le Resistance,’ said the unidentified Trump-hating (future) Mueller lawyer in a November 2016 text message.

 

Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller reported:

 

An FBI attorney who worked on the special counsel’s Russia investigation until earlier this year sent anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, including one exclaiming: “Viva le Resistance.”

 

The attorney’s comments are revealed in a Justice Department inspector general’s report released on Thursday.

 

The lawyer is not identified, but he worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and was the FBI’s lead attorney on the investigation into Russian election interference. He was assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation soon after it began in May 2017 and left in late February of this year after some of his private messages were shared with the special counsel.

 

The unidentified FBI lawyer said he was “numb” just days after Trump was elected to the White House.

 

Apparently the FBI lawyer became galvanized in his effort to resist Trump, reported Chuck Ross:

 

“Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?” one FBI lawyer wrote on Nov. 22, 2016.

 

“Hell no. Viva le resistance,” the future Mueller attorney responded.

 

According to the report, this Trump-hating FBI lawyer claimed in an interview with the Office of Inspector General he didn’t let his political feelings or beliefs impact his work on Hillary’s email investigation or the Russia probe.

 

RIGHT.

 

And Horowitz said there was no political bias at the FBI…

+++++++++++++++++++++

CNN: Strzok and Page Didn’t Attack Trump, HE Attacked Them!

 

Biggest takeaway from IG report: With all odds stacked against him by a crazed, frenzied mainstream/social media, Hollywood/Entertainment, Never Trumpers, backstabbers in his own party, an Obama-weaponized FBI, Trump was elected President

 

By Judi McLeod 

June 15, 2018

Canada Free Press

 

Deep State & White House

 

“We’ll stop it.”  Three now infamous little words that can never be walked back and ones that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that the media of the day and a rogue Obama-weaponized FBI were on the same choir page during the 2016 presidential election campaign.

 

How the mighty are falling like dominoes before the very eyes of the masses—in spite of intense media backup.  The same masses that Hillary Rodham Clinton called “deplorables”  and that some unidentified FBI yob described as “mostly poor and middleclass”  members of society who voted Donald Trump.

 

“All the people who were initially voting for her would not, and were not, swayed by any decision the FBI put out,” the employee wrote. “Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS (sic) that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing. They probably didn’t watch the debates, aren’t fully educated on his policies, and are stupidly wrapped up in his unmerited enthusiasm.” (Fox News, June 14. 2018)

 

All Obama’s voters were ever after, Mr. Yob, were kitchens, welfare for life and Obama phones.

 

“Despite Strzok’s extremely inappropriate texting — it’s wildly improper for someone in his position to express animus or favoritism toward a particular candidate — the inspector general found no evidence that Strzok acted on his text to Page.” (CNN, JUNE 14, 2018.)

 

No acting on his text other than turning the political world upside down, inside out and on its head.

 

VIDEO – Mark Levin: Not a single pro-Trump FBI agent in IG report

 

[Posted by Fox News

Published on Jun 14, 2018]

 

The biggest three little words, which came in August 2016 from disgraced FBI agent, Peter Strzok, once deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI, working on both the Trump-Russia probe and the ‘investigation’ into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, were referenced in yesterday’s massively toned down, 500-page IG report, but the biggest laugh comes a day later from Fake News Grand Central CNN:

 

“The massive report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz makes clear that while several FBI officials broke with bureau protocol in their handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server during the 2016 campaign, they were not motivated by political bias against Donald Trump.” (CNN)

 

ONLY “several FBI officials “broke with bureau protocol” in their handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.  And they “WERE NOT” motivated by political bias against Donald Trump.”

 

Take THAT, President Trump, you paranoid, “not-MY-president, you!

The biggest reaction to the questionable IG report didn’t come from the public, media-teased for weeks before its final inelegant release—but from the media—shown as working for the same goals as Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page.

 

Unforgettable LOLs for today’s CNN headline: ‘How 7 words in the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the ‘deep state’ ammo he wanted’.

 

Trump had his Deep State ammo from the get-go.  Video proof exists in the hysterics, wailing and weeping of the networks’ talking heads in the wee hours of Nov. 9, 2016.

 

In their unprofessional, desperate lovers’ texts, Strzok and Page were only putting into words the collective fervent wishes of the mainstream and social media.

 

Evidence of the ill will the pair bore for Donald Trump:

 

PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

 

“Even before the release of these new text messages between Page and Strzok, who were having an extramarital affair during the campaign, Trump has focused on the duo as aligned against him. (CNN)

 

“SPYGATE is in full force! Is the Mainstream Media interested yet? Big stuff!” (There’s no evidence that Strzok, Page or the broader FBI were spying on Trump’s campaign.)

 

No, they were only trying to dump it.

 

And this is richest of all: “Trump has attacked the two since, at least last December, when emails and text between Strzok and Page were released, showing that both were skeptical of Trump. (Strzok was dismissed from the special counsel probe being run by Robert Mueller in summer 2017.)

 

This meme advances the outrageous lie that Trump was “attacking” Strzok and Page, rather than them attacking him.

 

Nor was Strzok merely dismissed from the special counsel being run by Robert Mueller in the summer of 2017, he was demoted and will some day be handsomely pensioned off.

 

Page left the scene returning to the same kind of obscurity she had before becoming FBI agent Strzok’s mistress.

 

The media will be falling over backwards to keep the masses from thinking about the report’s real biggest takeaway:

 

The biggest takeaway from the IG report is this: With all odds stacked against him by a crazed and frenzied mainstream/social media, Hollywood/Entertainment Industry, Never Trumpers, backstabbers in his own party and an Obama-weaponized FBI, etc., etc., etc, Donald Trump was handily elected as President of the United States.

+++++++++++++++++

Strassel: ‘Don’t believe anyone who tells you Horowitz didn’t find bias. I can still hear the echoes of the howls…’

 

By Tom Tillison 

June 15, 2018

BizPac Review

 

Wall Street Journal opinion columnist Kimberley Strassel took to Twitter to say what many Americans are thinking about Thursday’s release of the Department of Justice inspector general’s report, that something’s amiss because what’s in the report does not match the summary of the report.

 

In a series of tweets, Strassel began by noting the careful play on words by inspector general Michael Horowitz when he stressed that they “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed.”

 

“Don’t believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn’t find bias,” she tweeted. “He very carefully says that he found no ‘documentary’ evidence that bias produced ‘specific investigatory decisions.”

 

Strassel notes that while no one actually put it in writing that they were politically motivated, Horowitz “in fact finds bias everywhere.”

 

And that “this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation” is now to be trusted working the Trump-Russia probe.

 

She also highlighted “stunning examples of incompetence,” such as former FBI director James Comey explaining that he didn’t grasp the importance of Anthony Weiner’s laptop because he wasn’t aware of Weiner being married to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin.

 

 

And people dared to question President Donald Trump’s decision to fire Comey?

 

One thing is certain, the wording of the report allowed the anti-Trump media to run with headlines screaming that the IG report “found no political bias.”

 

But there’s a theory on what that was all about, as seen in a tweet from social media account The Last Refuge — that also happens to support the idea that the summary, “written post facto by administrators in FBI/DOJ leadership,” fails to correspond with what’s in the report.

 

“The ‘executive summary’ was written to protect the institutions and that’s where the media are getting ALL of their headlines,” the tweet reads. “However, the internal body, the investigative report inside, is entirely contradictory to the summary. The facts are DEVASTATING.”

 

Others commented, saying that Horowitz “pulled his punch just like Comey did with Hillary [Clinton].”

 

“I see some really damning stuff in this IG report,” tweeted social media user Brian Wilson. “But I’ll just go ahead and say it: The IG pulled his punch just like Comey did with Hillary. I’m stunned by the gathered evidence of bias … and shocked the IG doesn’t think the bias impacted the investigation.”

 

 

The liberal media has been quick to dismiss the IG’s findings, but as former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino noted, the report is “devastating.”

 

“The IG report is only a ‘nothing-burger’ to people who know nothing about the case. It’s a devastating report which will damage Obama, Comey, Hillary, Page, Strzok, and more. Read it and you’ll clearly see the troubling pieces of it,” he tweeted.

_______________________

No Overall Bias?

OIG Pulls a Comey in Horowitz Report

 

John R. Houk

© June 15, 2018

_____________________

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Another Lawyer Was Removed From Mueller’s Team This February Over Anti-Trump Text Messages

 

© 2018 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

______________________

CNN: Strzok and Page Didn’t Attack Trump, HE Attacked Them!

 

Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com 

_________________________

Strassel: ‘Don’t believe anyone who tells you Horowitz didn’t find bias. I can still hear the echoes of the howls…’

 

Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved. BizPacReview

 

Tinker, Tailor, Clapper, Carter, Downer, Halper, Spy


In this Jewish World Review post, Mark Steyn relates the obvious to readers: There was indeed interference in the 2016 election cycle, BUT it was not Donald Trump colluding with Russians. Rather it was the Dems and their Deep State comrades in the Obama Administration pulling out ALL efforts to make Trump was not elected. OR if elected, to undermine President Trump so malignantly, he’d get impeached or resign.

 

JRH 5/28/18

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Tinker, Tailor, Clapper, Carter, Downer, Halper, Spy

 

By Mark Steyn

May 28,2018

Jerusalem World Review

 

Facts – Myths

 

As I think most persons paying attention now realize, the investigation into foreign interference with the 2016 election was created as a cover for domestic interference with the 2016 election.

 

It was run at the highest (or deepest) Deep State levels by the likes of James Clapper and John Brennan, whose frantic and hysterical Tweets are like no utterances of any CIA director in history. That also explains one of the puzzling aspects of the last year that I’ve occasionally mentioned here and on TV and radio: If you were truly interested in an “independent” Special Counsel, why would you appoint Robert Mueller? He’s a lifetime insider and the most connected man in Washington – a longtime FBI Director, and Assistant Attorney-General and acting Deputy Attorney-General at the Department of Justice.

 

Exactly. His most obvious defect as an “independent” counsel is, in fact, his principal value to the likes of Andrew McCabe and Rod Rosenstein: He knows, personally, almost every one in the tight little coterie of discredited upper-echelon officials, and he has a deep institutional loyalty to bodies whose contemporary character he helped create. In other words, he’s the perfect guy to protect those institutions. As for the nominal subject of his investigation, well, he’s indicted a bunch of no-name Russian internet trolls who’ll never set foot in a US courthouse. That’s not even worth the cost of printing the complaint. Rush Limbaugh has been kind enough to quote, several times, my line that “there are no Russians in the Russia investigation”. Which is true. Yet that doesn’t mean there aren’t foreigners. And an inordinate number of them are British subjects – or, to use today’s preferred term, “Commonwealth citizens”. All the action in this case takes place not in Moscow but in southern England.

 

Let’s start at Cambridge University with a two-day conference called “2016’s Race to Change the World“, held on July 11th and 12th 2016 – or three weeks before the FBI supposedly began its “counterintelligence” operation against Trump, codenamed “Crossfire Hurricane”. That’s from the first line of the Rolling Stones’ “Jumpin’ Jack Flash”. The song and its key signature figure in the plot of a ho-hum Cold War thriller of the same name, about a British spy trying to get info from the Russians to an [sic] heroic American woman.

 

Yes, really. Jonathan Pryce played “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” , and I asked him about it when I moderated a panel on acting at St Catherine’s College, Oxford with him and Patti Lupone a few years later.

 

If you think that’s a weird event for an Oxbridge college to host, it’s as nothing to this “Race to Change the World” beano. I do my share of international junketing, but the bill of fare for this curious symposium is so bland as to be almost generic – panels titled “Europe and America”, “2016 and the World”, “Global Challenges Facing the Next President”. Compared to the laser-like focus of a typical Cambridge confab (“A Westphalia for the Middle East?“), it’s almost as if someone were trying to create an event so anodyne and torpid no one would notice it. All that distinguished these colorless presentations was the undoubted eminence of the speakers: former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright; former UK Foreign Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind; and Sir Richard Dearlove, former C (that’s M, for 007 fans) at MI6. The conference appears to have been put together at a couple of weeks’ notice by Steven Schrage, former “Co-Chair of the G8’s Anti-Crime and Terrorism Group” and a well-connected man on the counterterrorism cocktail circuit: Here he is introducing Mitt Romney to the director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center, and here he is spending election night in the UK at a party with Scotland Yard elite counterterrorist types. Make of that what you will – it’s a somewhat odd background for the convenor of an insipid, vanilla, cookie-cutter foreign-policy seminar – but among the small number of strangely prestigious attendees at Mr Schrage’s conference were:

 

~Carter Page, a petroleum-industry executive and Trump campaign volunteer;

 

~Christopher Steele, the former head of the Russia house at MI6;

 

~Stefan Halper, a University of Cambridge professor with dual UK/US citizenship.

 

Today, Mr Page is better known as the endlessly surveilled “person of interest” whose eternally renewable FISA warrant was the FBI’s gateway into the Trump campaign; Mr Steele is a sometime FBI asset who, a week before the Cambridge conference, had approached the G-men with the now famous “dossier” that provided the pretext for the FISA application; and Professor Halper turns out to be not some tweedy academic but a man with deep connections to MI6 and the CIA, on the payroll of something at the Pentagon called the “Office of Net Assessment”, and (one of) the supposed FBI informant(s) inside the Trump circle.

 

Carter Page says that in the course of this two-day conference he met Professor Halper for the first time. But I was struck by this aside Mr Page made to Sara Carter:

 

Madeliene [sic] Albright was always trying to get me to go into public debates. I told her I was there just as a listener, just as an attendee.

 

Hmm. If you’ll forgive another Patti Lupone-type digression, many years ago our mutual pal Ned Sherrin decided to launch, just for a laugh, a rumor that me and Carol Thatcher (Mrs T’s daughter) were having an affair. Ned told somebody, and somebody told somebody else, and about eight months later it turned up as an item in Nigel Dempster’s highly authoritative Daily Mail gossip column, along with a rather goofy picture of me and Carol at a David Frost shindig at the Grosvenor House in Park Lane. And Ned was stunned – because he assumed the Daily Mail story was true. Because, by the time it circled back to him, he’d clean forgotten he’d started the whole business.

 

Oddly enough, that’s exactly how James Comey and Andrew McCabe and John Brennan work. At the FISA court, the FBI, to bolster their reliance on the Steele dossier, pointed to newspaper stories appearing to corroborate aspects of it – even though, as he subsequently testified under oath at the Old Bailey, those stories were in fact fed to those reporters by Steele himself. Nevertheless, it works like a charm on gullible FISA judges. You take one thing and you make it two things. Or even better, you take nothing and you make it a thing: Here, from yesterday’s letter by Senator Ron Johnson, are McCabe, Sally Yates and other FBI/DOJ honchos arranging for Comey to brief Trump on the Steele dossier for the sole purpose of giving CNN a news peg for leaking details about what’s in it.

 

It’s almost as if that’s what Madeleine Albright is doing here, isn’t it? It’s one thing to invite Carter Page to show up at some tedious yakfest at Cambridge with Halper sitting in front of him and Chris Steele sitting behind. But what if you could get Page to stand up and say something? Then you could find a friendly journo to report it and, instead of just a nobody on the fringes of the campaign, you’d have a “senior Trump advisor” sharing his thoughts on the global scene with Madam Albright and Sir Richard and Sir Malcolm and all the other bigshots, and then you could use that story three weeks later at the FISA court, to demonstrate how deep into the heart of the campaign the Russkies had penetrated.

 

Instead, Professor Halper has to make do with chit-chatting to Mr Page over the tea and biscuits, and planting the seeds for a friendly relationship.

 

Herewith a note on the academic circuit: emeritus professors and visiting fellows are popular covers with espionage agencies because there’s minimal work and extensive foreign travel, to international talking shops like the one above. If you make the mistake of being a multinational businessman and go to foreign countries to meet with other businessmen, you’ll be investigated up the wazoo. But, if you’re a professor and you go to foreign countries to meet with other professors, the world is your oyster. You also get to meet young people, who are the easiest to recruit.

 

Here’s another professor, and from another Commonwealth country: Malta. Joseph Mifsud is (was) a professorial fellow at the University of Stirling in Scotland, but is (was) based in London as a principal of the “London Centre of International Law Practice” and a director of the “London Academy of Diplomacy”, both of which sound fancy-schmancy but are essentially hollow entities operating from the same premises – 8, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, a tony address (next to the London School of Economics and the Royal College of Surgeons) but the “London Centre/Academy’s” fifth in three years and at which they and a handful of other endeavors are holed up in a minimally furnished back room filled by four interns round a trestle table on fifty quid a week.

 

Professor Mifsud also has (had) similarly undemanding academic sinecures at the “Euro-Mediterranean University” in Slovenia and “Link Campus University” in Italy. At the beginning of March 2016, a young man called George Papadopoulos joined the Trump campaign. On March 14th, traveling through Italy, he met with Professor Mifsud. They got together again in Britain, and at some point Papadopoulos became head of the “London Centre of International Law Practice’s” soi-disant “Centre for International Energy and Natural Resources Law & Security”, a post for which he had no obvious qualifications. Happily, like most other jobs at the “London Centre”, it didn’t require work, or showing up at the “London Centre” or even being in London.

 

Mifsud is said to have ties to high-ranking figures in Moscow, but there seems to be more prima facie evidence of ties to high-ranking figures in London. That’s Professor Mifsud above with my old friend Boris Johnson, Britain’s Foreign Secretary, at some Brexit event last October 19th. On October 31st Joseph Mifsud disappeared and has not been seen since. I know how he feels: The same thing happened to me twelve days after I lunched with Boris at The Spectator in early 2006. Is (was) Mifsud an FSB asset? An MI6 asset? Both? Neither? Well, there’s more circumstantial evidence of Mifsud’s ties to British intelligence, including multiple meetings with, inter alia, Claire Smith of the UK’s Joint Intelligence Committee.

 

At any rate, back in London on April 26th 2016, Professor Mifsud told young Papadopoulos that the Russians have all this “dirt” on Hillary, “thousands of emails”. A couple of days later, a friend of George’s at the Israeli Embassy, Christian Cantor, introduced him to Erika Thompson, who worked for Alexander Downer, Canberra’s High Commissioner in the UK, at Australia House. On May 4th, Papadopoulos was quoted in The Times of London denouncing David Cameron for calling Trump “divisive, stupid and wrong“. On May 6th, Ms Thompson called Papadopoulos to say that Mr Downer wanted to meet him. On May 10th they met for drinks at the Kensington Wine Rooms. Young George claims that the High Commissioner told him to “leave David Cameron alone”. Which doesn’t sound quite right to me.

 

As longtime readers may recall, I have drunk with Alexander Downer and that is not something to be undertaken lightly. Somewhere in the course of the evening a pretty squiffy Papadopoulos lifted his head up from the bowl of cocktail olives and started blabbing about Russian “dirt” on Hillary.

 

Another digression: Mr Downer was Australia’s longest serving foreign minister and, as I used to say in those days, “my favorite foreign minister”. Since then, he has spent many years on the “advisory board” of Hakluyt, a curiously named body set up by former MI6 chaps. I’m not saying he spends his nights rappelling down the walls of presidential palaces (although I would be tickled to be proved wrong), but I don’t think I’m betraying any confidences when I say that, after tea with Alexander in Adelaide a couple of years back, whence he had just returned from some meeting with some group or other in Lisbon, I remember musing about that select circle of people who can jet around the world in the expectation that doors will open for them and some useful tidbit will drop into their laps. As for Hakluyt, its website is here: I do believe it’s the coolest thing I’ve seen since (another long me-‘n’-Carol-type story) I was given Marlon Brando’s business card, which had the words “Marlon” and “Brando” on it and nothing else.

 

At any rate Mr Downer relayed the information about young George to Aussie Intelligence back home. Canberra sat on the info for two months and then passed it along to the Yanks in late July, just in time for that FISA application.

 

And so, as July turned to August, Peter Strzok bade farewell to his “paramour” Lisa Page and flew to London for a sit-down with the High Commissioner at Australia House. When Strzok reported back to Washington, the FBI sicced the omnipresent “professor” Stefan Halper on George Papadopoulos. So the Trump aide woke up one August morning to an email from a Cambridge academic he’d never heard of, inviting him on an all-expenses-paid trip back to Britain to give a speech for $3,000. Once in London, Halper casually inquired of his new friend, “George, you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?”

 

Right. As Rush put it, the day before I guest-hosted last week:

 

He was a nothing. He was a nobody, which made him a perfect mark. He was a young guy who wanted to go places… He actually put on his résumé that he had participated in Model UN in high school.

 

Just so: Papadopoulos was the perfect mark. And the easiest way to reel him in is to get him off his home turf. In your own neighborhood, you have your routine – your usual bars, favorite restaurants; you notice if something’s off. But, flown to London, you have no routine, no old haunts. You go where you’re invited, you’re introduced to important people – like “High Commissioners”, woshever the hell thash ish, hic – [Blog Editor: As an American I think Steyn is expressing a drunken form of “whoever the hell they is, hiccup] and you want them to think you’re important, too, so you reveal that you know all about the Russian “dirt” on Hillary.

 

So you got that from the Russians, right? Er, no. I got it from a Maltese guy in Italy who’s a Scottish professor and plugged in to MI6, and then I told it to an Australian bloke in London who’s also plugged in to MI6 and told me to lay off David Cameron, and then an American guy in Cambridge who’s plugged in to MI6 reminded me about it to see if I’d deny all knowledge of it, which would be suspicious, wouldn’t it..?

 

As I said, and as Rush likes to quote, there are no Russians in the Russia investigation. But, like that rumor about me and Carol Thatcher, you just put these things out there and a few months later they come back to you, via Canberra and the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing program and suddenly it’s “independently” “corroborated” “evidence” from a respected ally and you can take it to a FISA judge.

 

There were two investigations into presidential candidates during the 2016 election. But, as Andrew McCarthy reminds us, these two investigations were not the same. The Clinton “matter” was a criminal investigation – because there was credible evidence that Hillary had committed criminal acts. The FBI had no such clear-cut goods on Trump. So they had to find something else:

 

The scandal is that the FBI, lacking the incriminating evidence needed to justify opening a criminal investigation of the Trump campaign, decided to open a counterintelligence investigation. With the blessing of the Obama White House, they took the powers that enable our government to spy on foreign adversaries and used them to spy on Americans — Americans who just happened to be their political adversaries.

 

And the advantage of a “counterintelligence investigation”, unlike a criminal investigation, is that everything in it is “classified”. So that even an obvious set-up at a Cambridge confab or Kensington wine bar is “intelligence” that has to be “protected” for “national security” reasons. It’s a brazen, audacious scheme, and unlikely to have been loosed without the approval, however discreetly stated, of the then President. Occam’s Razor suggests that the man running the operation was the CIA’s John Brennan through the “inter-agency taskforce” that met at Langley. But Brennan isn’t that reckless: Go back to Madeleine Albright urging Carter Page to speak up at a Cambridge conference; Christopher Steele leaking parts of his dossier to the newspapers; a staffer at Australia House inviting George Papadopoulos for a drink… The best way to turn nothing into something is to plant it somewhere far away and wait for it to work its way back to you:

 

Britain’s spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told.

 

Golly, you don’t say! I wonder who “told” The Guardian that. A conference here, a speech there, a cocktail round the corner, and pretty soon you have the simulacrum of “counterintelligence” concerns from America’s closest allies:

 

According to one account, GCHQ’s then head, Robert Hannigan, passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan. The matter was deemed so sensitive it was handled at “director level”. After an initially slow start, Brennan used GCHQ information and intelligence from other partners to launch a major inter-agency investigation.

 

Er, wait a minute. If it’s “so sensitive” it’s being handled “director-to-director”, why isn’t the head of GCHQ meeting with his opposite number at NSA? Why’s he meeting with Brennan?

 

Hey, don’t get hung up on details. It all went brilliantly – except for one tiny detail: Hillary managed to do the impossible and lose. On January 23rd 2017, three days after Trump’s inauguration, GCHQ at Cheltenham Tweeted the sad fate of Mr So Sensitive:

 

We’re sorry to announce that Robert Hannigan, our Director since 2014, has decided to step down as head of GCHQ.

 

Oh, dear. Well, enjoy your sudden retirement, old boy. Unfortunately, for Brennan and Comey and McCabe and Strzok and the others on this side of the Atlantic in the third week of January, it wasn’t quite that simple. Because, instead of protecting Hillary, they were now protecting themselves – so it was necessary to dig in and double-down on the “Russia investigation”.

 

Which sounds super-credible except for one small point: there was never a Russia investigation. As Andrew McCarthy sums it up:

 

Opening up a counterintelligence investigation against Russia is not the same thing as opening up a counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign.

 

Which is what they did – Brennan and Clapper and Comey and McCabe. They took tools designed to combat America’s foreign enemies and used them against their own citizens and their political opposition. It was an intentional subversion of the electoral process conducted at the highest level by agencies with almost unlimited power. And, if they get away with it, they will do it again, and again and again. That’s what Brennan’s telling us on Twitter, and Clapper on “The View”:

 

Yeah? So what? Whatcha gonna do about it?

 

Good question.

________________________

Mark Steyn is an international bestselling author, a Top 41 recording artist, and a leading Canadian human rights activist. His latest book is “The Undocumented Mark Steyn: Don’t Say You Weren’t Warned“. (Buy it at a 57% discount by clicking here or order in KINDLE edition at a 41% discount by clicking hereSales help fund JWR)

 

© 2018 Mark Steyn Enterprises (US) Inc.

 

© 1997- 2018 Jewish World Review 

 

About JWR

 

JWR is a free magazine published five days a week on the World Wide Web of interest to people of faith and those interested in learning more about contemporary Judaism from Jews who take their religion seriously.

 

Our inaugural editorial is also our mission statement.

 

Readers, individuals wishing to submit an article on “spec,” or make a tax deductible donation and those seeking advertising rates may contact JWR by email or by calling (718) 972-9241. Please note that all correspondence with JWR remains our property and may be used accordingly.

 

READ THE REST

 

What! Obama FBI Spied on Trump Campaign


With TWO Spies?

John R. Houk, Editor

Posted May 22, 2018

 

Even as the Leftist Mainstream Media and Obama Deep State operatives spin an alternative story, only a fool or a lying spin doctor would not admit Obama inserted his political desires into the 2016 election cycle.

 

Here are two news articles discussing FBI spying.

 

JRH 5/22/18

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Hold On, The FBI Was Spying On The Trump Campaign *Before* The Counterintelligence Probe Officially Started?

 

By Matt Vespa

May 22, 2018 2:27 PM

Townhall

 

Donald Trump

 

Who is the FBI spy that was trying to glean information on the Trump campaign? Well, reportedly, it’s longtime CIA operative Stefan Halper. And no, it wasn’t leaked. If this is true, and most likely it is, there’s enough public information on him, along with the news media leaving a trail of breadcrumbs that confirmed his identity. They were as subtle as a sledgehammer.

 

Last week, it was reported that the FBI had spied on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election. It was later revealed by Axios that Halper had tried to get a top-level job in the administration after the campaign. Yet, before we get into what The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald and others have noted about the timeline of the FBI’s Russia probe, let’s look real quick at the linguistic martial arts the news media is playing here. All of this deep state/Trump was spied on stuff was written off by the news media as conspiratorial garbage. Well, it turns out they were wrong. They’re wrong about everything it seems, especially reports covering this White House. This is how The New York Times covered this development. They also said that this spy is someone well known within D.C. circles.

 

President Trump accused the F.B.I. on Friday, without evidence, of sending a spy to secretly infiltrate his 2016 campaign “for political purposes” even before the bureau had any inkling of the “phony Russia hoax.”

 

In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.

 

[…]

 

F.B.I. agents were seeking more details about what Mr. Papadopoulos knew about the hacked Democratic emails, and one month after their Russia investigation began, Mr. Papadopoulos received a curious message. The academic inquired about his interest in writing a research paper on a disputed gas field in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, a subject of Mr. Papadopoulos’s expertise.

 

The informant offered a $3,000 honorarium for the paper and a paid trip to London, where the two could meet and discuss the research project.

 

“I understand that this is rather sudden but thought that given your expertise it might be of interest to you,” the informant wrote in a message to Mr. Papadopoulos, sent on Sept. 2, 2016.

 

Mr. Papadopoulos accepted the offer and arrived in London two weeks later, where he met for several days with the academic and one of his assistants, a young woman.

 

Over drinks and dinner one evening at a high-end London hotel, the F.B.I. informant raised the subject of the hacked Democratic National Committee emails that had spilled into public view earlier that summer, according to a person familiar with the conversation. The source noted how helpful they had been to the Trump campaign, and asked Mr. Papadopoulos whether he knew anything about Russian attempts to influence the 2016 presidential election.

 

Yeah, how is that not spying? It is. And this is the problem with liberalism as of late; they’ve wantonly decided to ignore the definition of what words mean. Spying is now informing. Invasions are now called “uncontested arrivals,” but back to Mr. Halper and the timeline. It seems that his alleged information gathering operation started way before his rendezvous with Papadopoulos. Carter Page and Sam Clovis, two others affiliated with the Trump team, were also approached by Halper as well.

 

Greenwald noted that Halper has history with this sort of operation; he reportedly did something similar to Carter’s 1980 re-election campaign. Halper with some other former intelligence operatives allegedly funneled information on then-President Carter’s foreign policy to Republican candidate, and future president, Ronald Reagan. This was all revealed in 1983.

 

 

Greenwald also noted that while the news media knew who the FBI spy was, they refused to reveal his name, though they left so many clues that they might as well have disclosed the source. He also adds that the FBI and members of Congress are being more or less absurd that revealing the source would be damaging to national security; we pretty much already know who it is. And his work was already been reported. The Intercept then details how the Daily Caller was able to discern whom the source was using entirely public information, which brings us to FBI timeline. When did this investigation begin because it seems there were other times that Halper reached out to Trump team members prior to the Papadopoulos meeting that supposedly led to the FBI opening up a counterintelligence investigation in July of 2016. By the way, this theory was published by the Times in December of 2017, and it was ripped apart.

 

Via Intercept:

 

…the New York Times reported in December of last year that the FBI investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia began when George Papadopoulos drunkenly boasted to an Australian diplomat about Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton. It was the disclosure of this episode by the Australians that “led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired,” the NYT claimed.

 

But it now seems clear that Halper’s attempts to gather information for the FBI began before that. “The professor’s interactions with Trump advisers began a few weeks before the opening of the investigation, when Page met the professor at the British symposium,” the Post reported. While it’s not rare for the FBI to gather information before formally opening an investigation, Halper’s earlier snooping does call into question the accuracy of the NYT’s claim that it was the drunken Papadopoulos ramblings that first prompted the FBI’s interest in these possible connections. And it suggests that CIA operatives, apparently working with at least some factions within the FBI, were trying to gather information about the Trump campaign earlier than had been previously reported.

 

Then there are questions about what appear to be some fairly substantial government payments to Halper throughout 2016. Halper continues to be listed as a “vendor” by websites that track payments by the federal government to private contractors.

 

[…]

 

Equally strange are the semantic games which journalists are playing in order to claim that this revelation disproves, rather than proves, Trump’s allegation that the FBI “spied” on his campaign.

 

So, there’s the new line of inquiry. The FBI spy was investigating something prior to the official start of the counterintelligence probe. Byron York’s column in The Washington Examiner noted that Trump March meeting with The Washington Post editorial board is where the FBI and DOJ probably got the first batch of names to peruse; Trump has announced that Papadopoulos and Carter Page would be lending a hand:

 

Trump’s announcement did not go unnoticed at the FBI and Justice Department. The bureau knew Page from a previous episode in which Russian agents had tried, unsuccessfully, to recruit him. It’s not clear what the FBI knew about the others. But then-Director James Comey and number-two Andrew McCabe personally briefed Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the list of newly-named Trump foreign policy advisers, including Page, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

 

Lynch told the House Intelligence Committee that she, Comey, and McCabe discussed whether to provide a “defensive briefing” to the Trump campaign. That would entail having an FBI official meet with a senior campaign official “to alert them to the fact that … there may be efforts to compromise someone with their campaign,” Lynch said.

 

It didn’t happen, even though it was discussed again when Comey briefed the National Security Council principals committee about Page in the “late spring” of 2016, according to Lynch’s testimony. (The principals committee includes some of the highest-ranking officials in the government, including the secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense, and Homeland Security, the attorney general, the head of the CIA, the White House chief of staff, U.N. ambassador, and more.)

 

So the nation’s top political appointees, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies were watching Trump campaign figures in the spring and early summer of 2016.

 

And all of this brings us to a figure that has remained under the radar in all of this: President Barack Obama. What did he know and when did he know it because the intelligence apparatus of the U.S. was under his administration, along with the FBI/DOJ. It’s relevant to bring the former president and his team under the microscope again. Until then, what we know via Larry O’Connor is that a) the Trump campaign was spied on; and b) the motive was political pending new developments:

 

First, let’s hope that all Americans, Left, Right and Never Trump, can agree that this operation was unprecedented and extraordinary. The FBI has never, as far as we know, conducted a clandestine investigation on a presidential campaign complete with electronic surveillance and a spy. The bar to initiate such an investigation would have to be pretty high. The FBI would not, under normal circumstances, authorize this kind of operation unless there was extreme and justifiable reasons to do so.

 

So, whatever the reason to initiate this operation, one expects that reason to be pretty concrete and conclusive.

 

Now, let’s examine the underlying political atmosphere surrounding the decision to launch this extraordinary, unprecedented investigation.

 

Donald Trump was President Obama’s political enemy. He was running, specifically, to undo Obama’s legacy and everything he had instituted through executive actions. He was also running against Obama’s chosen successor.

 

[…]

 

We know that the atmosphere surrounding the decision to launch the investigation was highly political. It was political in the most personal sense for President Obama, who held the reigns [sic] of power over the FBI and the DOJ at the time of the investigation.

 

We know that the political document known as the “Steele dossier” was used, at least in part, to justify many elements of the spying operation against the Trump campaign.

 

We know that George Popadopoulos’ statement in a bar with an Austrailian [sic] diplomat triggered some element of the investigation as well.

 

A guy making a statement in a bar and a pile of unverified opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign doesn’t even come close to the very high bar needed to be cleared to initiate a clandestine investigation on any American citizen, let alone a member of a presidential campaign just weeks before election day.

 

But, it appears, that’s all we have

 

[…]

 

Given the politically charged backdrop of the Obama versus Trump death match, coupled with the use of the Steele dossier (by definition a political document paid for by Trump’s political opponent) the only reasonable conclusion to reach is that the FBI spying operation was launched for political purposes.

 

And now the wait begins—and it could take years.

++++++++++++++++++

Ex-Trump Aide Comes Forward… Says There’s Second Spy, Second Intel Agency

 

BY CILLIAN ZEAL
MAY 22, 2018 AT 7:27AM

Conservative Tribune by WJ

 

Michael Cavuto on Fox News – Screen Capture of CT Video

 

One of President Donald Trump’s most explosive claims about the 2016 election — one that was dismissed out of hand until recently — was that his campaign was the subject of extensive surveillance.

 

Now, a former Trump aide is saying something even more explosive: There wasn’t just a mole inside the Trump campaign, there was a second spy and intelligence agency.

 

Michael Caputo is pretty much the definition of a political lifer. A media strategist, he worked with Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and various other Republicans. After the fall of the Soviet Union, he began doing work with the Russians.

 

This didn’t get the attention of too many people until he started working for Trump. Much like Carter Page, the low-level Trump campaign staffer whose ties to Russia became the subject of a million conspiracy theories, Caputo’s ties to the Russians became of intense interest to the overzealous FBI people charged with finding some sort of evidence that Trump was the Siberian Candidate.

 

Caputo appeared on Fox News just hours after Axios reported “President Trump’s top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, recommended appointing Stefan Halper, an academic and suspected FBI informant on the Trump campaign, to a senior role in the Trump administration.”

 

That’s bad. According to Caputo, things were even worse.

 

“Let me tell you something that I know for a fact, this informant, this person that they planted, that they tried to plant into the campaign and even into the administration, if you believe Axios — he’s not the only person that came into the campaign!” Caputo said.

 

“And the FBI is not the only Obama agency who came into the campaign,” he added.

 

“I know because they came at me. And I’m looking for clearance from my attorney to reveal this to the public. This is just the beginning and I’ll tell you, when we finally find out the truth about this, Director Clapper and the rest of them are gonna be wearing some orange suits.”

 

Orange suits are an unlikely outcome, but Caputo’s statement indicates that Obama-era surveillance of the Trump campaign — once dismissed as tinfoil-hattery — might actually be very real.

 

Of course, Caputo may have a reason to prevaricate about such things. Kimberley Strassel doesn’t. She’s the Wall Street Journal writer whose reporting has indicated that she believes there was an FBI mole inside the campaign.

 

“The Bureau already has some explaining to do. Thanks to the Washington Post’s unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes’s request deals with a ‘top secret intelligence source’ of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S. citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe,” she wrote in an article earlier this month.

 

“When government agencies refer to sources, they mean people who appear to be average citizens but use their profession or contacts to spy for the agency. Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly had a person on the payroll who used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in some capacity with the Trump campaign.

 

“This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting,” she added. “It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough.”

 

During and after the campaign, Trump’s claims that he was surveilled (and that the surveillance was politically-motivated) were dismissed as baseless fantasies, yet another sign this was an unbalanced person who shouldn’t be normalized or believed.

 

And yet, here we are, weeks away from the inspector general’s report on the Clinton investigation, which doesn’t sound like it’s going to simply be the pro forma postmortem it normally would be, considering it involved a losing campaign. The report is expected to detail a whole host of tactics by the “deep state” that could easily be construed as being in service of the Clinton campaign and to the detriment of the Trump campaign.

 

If Caputo is telling the truth, this means there’s a whole host of issues here. Who was involved? The DOJ and FBI, obviously, but the CIA too? Other agencies under the aegis of the ODNI?

 

I can predict just one thing: Things are about to get very interesting for everyone who called Trump crazy when he talked about surveillance.

 

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

____________________

Hold On, The FBI Was Spying On The Trump Campaign *Before* The Counterintelligence Probe Officially Started?

 

Townhall.com is the leading source for conservative news and political commentary and analysis.


Copyright © Townhall.com. All Rights Reserved.

_______________________

Ex-Trump Aide Comes Forward… Says There’s Second Spy, Second Intel Agency

 

Conservative Tribune by WJ homepage

 

Newbill Emails on Crooked Hillary


crooked-hillary-email-transparency

Edited John R. Houk

Posted on November 4, 2016

 

From time to time the pseudonymous individual Tony Newbill sends me Conspiracy concerns which I collect and edit for posting. Admittedly I am a bit late with this batch. Here you will read many of the October emails.

 

Newbill focuses on the corruption of Crooked Hillary which indeed includes longtime partner former President Bill Clinton. To some, this may be old news. To others that just get their information from the Mainstream Media, this might still be new information. Either way there is such a deluge of information on the nefariousness of Crooked Hillary that it is becoming difficult to keep up.

 

For example, as of writing this post I have learned that Crooked Hillary’s private illegal server has been hacked by at least FIVE foreign state entities. AND that the emails found on Weiner and Huma Abedin’s shared laptop discovered in the underage sexting probe has emails to the tune of 100,000 and are NOT duplicates of the emails Crooked Hillary has already released to the FBI. This leads to the logical suspicion that some or all those 100,000 email include the 33,000 emails that Crooked Hillary erased with bleach bit.

 

Look at this as a review of Crooked Hillary with more to come. My God! DO NOT ELECT THIS WOMAN AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

 

JRH 11/4/16

Please Support NCCR

***********

Why did Obama allow Hillary to do this????? What kind of Foreign policy is this???

10/5/2016 10:11 AM

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/3562745/october-surprise-via-wikileaks-delayed-but-heres-a-huge-bombshell-you-need-to-know-about/

 

The October surprise by way of WikiLeaks has, to the disappointment and outrage of many Republicans and Donald Trump supporters, been put on hold for the time being. However, a new bombshell of information has been uncovered by Infowars regarding Hillary Clinton’s time as Secretary of State, and it’s not something the former First Lady would want the American electorate knowing about.

 

This new information, which one could argue is damning enough to be considered this election’s October surprise all on its own, came forth like it does in many of these instances via a whistleblower, who claims he’s willing to put his life on the line if it means that Mrs. Clinton will not become the next President of the United States.

 

“There is far too much at stake for this great nation, America, for me to remain silent any longer,” says Dr. Kilari Anand Paul. “I know I’m risking my life going public with what I know—but God will hold me accountable if I know the truth and do not speak it for fear of Clinton.”

 

The information that is causing this man so much unrelenting anguish has to do with Hillary Clinton’s decision regarding the African nation of Libya while she served as Secretary of State under President Obama. Dr. Paul says that Clinton refused to READ THE REST (October Surprise Via Wikileaks Delayed, but Here’s a Huge Bombshell you Need to Know About; By Thea Conrad; Inquisitor; 10/4/16)

 

+++

Trump and Pence need to start asking this question

10/6/2016 11:41 AM

 

Trump and Pence need to start asking this question …… Hey Hillary Clinton why did you go against the hard work of General Wesley Clark and Congressman Kucinich to broker a Peace deal and bring democracy to Libya?????

 

Nobel Peace Prize Nominee Exposing Hillary Clinton’s Role In Libya

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nobel-peace-prize-nominee-exposing-hillary-clintons-role-202500006.html

 

WASHINGTON, Oct. 5, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Dr. K.A. Paul, known as the world’s most popular evangelist and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, will hold a press conference to discuss the role Secretary Clinton played in the Libyan government downfall and eventual death of Muammar Gaddafi.

 

Dr. Paul facilitated negotiations between General Wesley Clark, Secretary Clinton and the Gaddafi regime, arranging for his government to leave office peacefully only to see Mrs. Clinton decide to ignore the agreement and continue the relentless bombing of Libya. Mrs. Clinton’s decision led to the violent overthrow of the Libyan government, the death of Gaddafi and many others who had negotiated the peace agreement in good faith.

 

The vacuum created by Clinton’s regime change decision led to ISIS gaining a strong foothold there, millions of refugees and thousands of new terrorists. Today ISIS counts Libya as one of its READ THE REST (Nobel Peace Prize Nominee Exposing Hillary Clinton’s Role In Libya; By PR Newswire; Yahoo News; 10/5/16)

 

++++++

And the FBI said there was NO Intent at Clinton State Dept.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10/11/2016 9:41 AM

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4099

 

From: lroitman@hillaryclinton.com

To: john.podesta@gmail.com

Date: 2015-06-22 18:07

Subject: Fwd: Tomorrow

 

Begin forwarded message:

 

*From:* Erika Rottenberg<erika.rottenberg@gmail.com>

*Date:* June 21, 2015 at 9:20:19 PM PDT

*To:* Stephanie Hannon <hannon@hillaryclinton.com>, “Ann O’Leary” < aoleary@hillaryclinton.com>

*Cc:* Lindsay Roitman <lroitman@hillaryclinton.com>

*Subject:* *Tomorrow*

 

Hi Ann and Stephanie — Looking forward to our discussion tomorrow night. I suspect it will be broad ranging.

 

Few things:

 

1. are the two of you and john planning on spending about 15 mins chatting about the inside of the campaign, and policy broadly, and then opening up to Q&A for about 45 mins or doing all Q&A? I Actually think that it’d be great for y’all to hit on some key policy items first and i know folks would enjoy the inside glance at the campaign.

 

2. I plan to do an intro and Jeff will close with a very brief how to get involved. I’ll then close with a special toast and treat.

 

I have not reached out to John – -please let me know if you think I should.

 

Couple of questions that came in:

 

1. you’re obviously amongst friends, but here’s the one i referred to (can’t remember which of you i talked about it with, if not both). It’s from someone that wasn’t goign to come, and i encouraged him to come. he comes at the issue slightly differnetly than what I’ve dsicussed with both of you (Ok, one thing to use personal email, but why the “twisted truth” (not my words) on why – with the two problematic areas being (a) emails to bill (when they were to bill’s staff) and (b) i only used one device — BB, when 2 weeks earlier, it was an iphone, BB and ipad. As Ann and I discussed, hopefully that’s a timing issue and whilst in state, she only used one. 🙂

 

*For my question*, it’s basically some variation of [not quite phrased right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren’t satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.

 

2) someone wants to ask a very specific question about updating export control laws – and why they’ve haven’t been updated since (??) as they prevent american businesses selling READ THE REST (Wikileaks exposing crooked Dems in relation to Crooked Hillary)

 

+++

I just don’t know what to think any more ……

10/11/2016 1:24 PM

 

Its seems the FBI has been Covering up so much by all these Elitists and Politicians for Decades!!!!!!

 

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/dear-congressional-oversight-committee-stop-ignoring-elephant-room-911-saudis-hillary-clinton

 

Dear Congressional Oversight Committee… Stop ignoring the elephant in the room – 911 – Saudis – Hillary Clinton Cover-Up

 

Subject: Dear Congressional Oversight Committee… Stop ignoring the elephant in the room – 911 – Saudis – Hillary Clinton Cover-Up

From: Angry American Who Wants Genuine & EQUAL Justice For All

Date: 27 Sep 2016

 

An Open Letter To Congressman Chaffetz,

 

I respectfully ask you to read the letters sent to Senator Hillary Clinton and to FBI Director Robert Mueller dated September 15th, 2001 – one week following the 911 mass murder of almost 3,000 Americans here https://www.scam.com/?3644-Hillary-Clinton-The-FBI-Director-and-the-Bush-Family-Knew-The-Saudis-Paid-For-the-911-Murders-BEFORE-and-Again-1-Week-After-911-Here-Is-The-Proof! Fedex confirmed that all four recipients received their packages containing these letters and a video and audio tape, and related evidence in the form of dated phone bills including calls to (202) 456-3345. The recipients are identified at the bottom of page 2. One letter was signed by former RCMP officer and then lawyer William Gilmour, and the other letter was signed by former U.S. Treasury agent and FBI informant Bruce Gorcyca.

 

If the letters have been censored as they were last week, you can read them here as well:

 

https://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/img121.jpg
https://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/img122.jpg

 

 

Now then, if you honorable members of Congress subpoena the complete FBI file on FBI informant Bruce Gorcyca you would have more than ample “probable cause” to prosecute Hillary Clinton for “willful ignorance of a crime in progress”, perjury, bribery (accepting $10 million in hush money from the Saudi government), and even treason as she continued to accept another $90 million over the next 15 years through the Clinton Foundation. She circumvented the Hatch Act as well and made sure the bribes were paid as “donations” to the Clinton Foundation. Why do we have RICO laws in America sir, if they are only used for drug dealers and never applied in corruption cases? http://nypost.com/2016/07/15/yes-the-saudi-government-helped-the-911-terrorists/

 

If you get those files from the FBI, you will READ ENTIRETY (Dear Congressional Oversight Committee… Stop ignoring the elephant in the room – 911 – Saudis – Hillary Clinton Cover-Up; By An Angry American Military Veteran; opnlttr.com; 9/27/16)

 

++++

Are these issues why Hillary is LAWLESS???????

10/12/2016 11:04 AM

 

Obama knew about Hillary Clinton’s server:     https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/2016-u-s-presidential-election/obama-conspired-with-hillary-used-a-fictitious-name-to-communicate-with-hillary-on-her-private-server/

 

… The New York Post, who may become the American version of the British Guardian, has now exposed that Obama used a fake name to communicate with Hillary on her private server because he KNEW what she was doing. While tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails have been made public so far, the government has not released any emails from Obama.

 

Obama told CBS news that he had no idea that Hillary was using a private email server until it was reported by the New York Times on March 2, 2015. That is clearly an outright lie, and if he were in a private fraud case, he would be criminally charged with her for conspiracy. Hillary’s continuous crime included other parties who may join the plot later and incur joint liability. His use of fictitious names is PROOF that he knew what she was doing was a crime, for he tried to hide his identity as a co-conspirator. This raises the question of whether he will benefit from the Clinton Foundation in the future.

 

Of course, those in government are always exempt from the same laws they use to persecute the public. So there is no way the FBI would dare recommend indicting Obama, and the plot to ignore the law is beginning to be exposed a bit more. If they had indicted Hillary, then they would have to charge Obama as a co-conspirator. That is READ THE REST (Obama Used a Fictitious Name to Communicate with Hillary on Her Private Server; By Martin Armstrong; ArmstrongEconomics.com; 9/27/16)

 

+++

A “Theory”

10/13/2016 11:46 AM

 

I would “Bottle” all this up and shake it Really Hard and open it and say, “This all together tastes like how Obama was able to get Hillary to drop out in 2008, with a Little Bribed FBI Cover-up Twist!!!!!!!

 

http://truthuncensored.net/report-fbi-director-received-millions-from-clinton-foundation-his-brothers-law-firm-does-clintons-taxes-video/

 

FBI Director James Comey testified under oath at a hearing before Congress, that the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, where she sent and received ‘top secret’ emails, did not warrant pressing criminal charges against her.

 

In essence, he said, not only was Hillary not smart enough, or qualified, to know that using an unsecured email server put our nations security at risk, but she was incapable of determining what was top secret material was.

 

The truth is, that James Comey did not recommend federal charges against Hillary Clinton, in part, because he is connected to the Clinton Foundation through the Swiss bank HSBC.

 

 

More than 200 republicans sent a letter demanding to know why he didn’t recommend federal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of private email servers.

 

Clinton “clearly placed our nation’s secrets in peril,” the letter states. “No one is above the law, and the American people deserve a more robust explanation for your decision to not recommend criminal charges.”

 

According to Mini Planet a review of FBI Director James Comey’s professional history and relationships shows that the Obama cabinet leader — now under fire for his handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton — is deeply entrenched in the big-money cronyism culture of Washington, D.C. His personal and professional relationships — all undisclosed as he announced the Bureau would not prosecute Clinton — reinforce bipartisan concerns that he may have politicized the criminal probe.

 

In other words, his opinion was biased, and based on that fact, he should not have participated in the investigation let alone lead it and READ THE REST (BUSTED: FBI Director Received MILLIONS From Clinton Foundation – His Brother’s Law Firm Does Clinton’s Taxes (Video); By Jennifer Johnson; TruthUnCensored.net; 10/19/16 6:00 PM)

 

http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/bill-hillary-clinton-connections-sex-perv-jeffrey-epstein/

 

After billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein was exposed as a sex offender who seduced girls as young as 14, Bill Clinton seemed to walk away with his old friend. But according to author James Patterson‘s new tell-all about the sordid scandalFilthy Rich, Clinton and his Democratic presidential candidate wife, Hillary, may still have secret ties to the disgraced pervert.

 

READ THE REST (Bill & Hillary Clinton’s New Connections To Billionaire Sex Perv Jeffrey Epstein Exposed; By Radar Staff; RadarOnline.com; 10/12/16 7:11AM)

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/10/bill-clintons-fbi-head-is/

 

Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz has retained former President Bill Clinton’s FBI director to help show Clinton was not present at alleged sex orgies thrown by his former client, a convicted pedophile and close Clinton friend.

 

Clinton’s friendship with a convicted child sex predator, Jeffrey Epstein, again is coming under increased scrutiny, thanks in part to a recent civil lawsuit for defamation filed in Florida against Dershowitz by representatives for two of Epstein’s alleged victims. Dershowitz served as Epstein’s lawyer during Epstein’s criminal trial.

 

Not only has Bill Clinton’s name come up in the court proceedings, but Dershowitz, one of the key figures in the case, says that he cannot conclusively deny that Clinton was present at lavish sex orgies thrown on a Caribbean island by Epstein. What’s more, one of the victims said that Bill Clinton in fact was present at an Epstein island orgy.

 

Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution from a minor. Though he was represented at trial by Dershowitz, he still had to serve 13 months in prison on READ THE REST (Bill Clinton’s FBI Head Is Called In to Show Bill Clinton ‘Not Present’ at Jeffrey Epstein Underage Sex Orgy; By PATRICK HOWLEY; Breitbart; 1/10/16)

 

http://www.inquisitr.com/3590832/hillary-clinton-bill-exposed-secret-connection-billionaire-sex-perv-jeffrey-epstein-political-news/

 

Did Bill and Hillary Clinton lie about severing all ties with billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein? After the financier was exposed for seducing girls as young as 14, Bill and Hillary Clinton seemed to have parted ways with their old friend. But in a new tell-all called Filthy Rich, Clinton and his democratic presidential candidate wife, Hillary, may still have secret ties to the disgraced businessman.

 

READ THE REST (Hillary Clinton and Bill Exposed for Secret Connection to Billionaire Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein; By Amanda Katherine; Inquistr.com; 10/12/16)

http://www.weeklystandard.com/pedophiles-fixer-maintains-close-ties-to-the-clintons/article/823759

 

A woman alleged to have been the fixer for Jeffrey Epstein, a pedophile and friend of Bill Clinton, has herself long had ties to the former president of the United States. Indeed, it’s clear that even as her associate, Epstein, admitted to procuring sex with someone under the age of 18 and registered as a sex offender in 2008, Ghislaine Maxwell’s relationship with the Clintons flourished.

 

[Blog Editor: The next paragraph also shows the Clinton commitment to the globalist goals of the UN Agenda 21 (See Also: Six Issues That Are Agenda 21 & Lesson 7: Regional Governments Will Destroy Our Local Representative Gov’t) which robs nations of their national sovereignty. Something to think as you read of the probable Slick Willie involvement in underage sex orgies.]

 

Maxwell is the president and founder of a non-profit that helps protect the ocean, the TerraMar Project. And as recently as 2013, she attended the Clinton Global Initiative, where her charity made a public commitment. The press release from the Clinton Global Initiative read, “Sustainable Oceans Alliance Commitment by: The TerraMar Project
. Partners: Michael Dorsey; Global Partnerships Forum
In 2013, the TerraMar Project committed to launch the Sustainable Oceans Alliance (SOA) to mobilize the international community and the public at large on the importance of the Oceans and the Seas and to ensure that the 193 UN Member States recognize and incorporate oceans in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to be adopted in 2015.”

 

The TerrMar Project commitment is still listed on the Clinton Foundation website. And that remains, even after Maxwell’s involvment in the Epstein pedophile scandal continues to grow and continue to raise questions about former President Bill Clinton.

 

“Ghislaine Maxwell was another person in Epstein’s inner circle and a co-conspirator in Epstein’s sexual abuse. She was someone who consequently also appreciated the immunity granted by the NPA for the crimes she committed in Florida,” reads a recently released court document related to the scandal.

 

The document alleges that Maxwell’s role was “to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities” and was “a primary co-conspirator” in Epstein’s sexual crime. “In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme. In fact, it became known to the government that Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane Doe #3. Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe #3 (who was then fifteen years old) to come to Epstein’s mansion in a fashion very similar to the manner in which Epstein and his other co-conspirators coerced dozens of other children (including Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2).”

 

She, the document alleges, helped Epstein convert a then underage woman into a “sex slave.” “Epstein then became enamored with Jane Doe #3, and with the assistance of Maxwell converted her into what is commonly referred to as a ‘sex slave.’”

 

But despite Maxwell’s sordid relationship with Epstein READ THE REST (Pedophile’s ‘Fixer’ Maintains Close Ties to the Clintons; By DANIEL HALPER; Weekly Standard; 1/15/15  8:22 AM)

 

+++

Media Rage over this

10/13/2016 2:33 PM

 

While the MS Media is Silent on the Real Issues of failure with the Obama/Hillary policies of the last 8 years. Let’s consider throwing them a Bone that they will not be able to ignore. Once the world sets their eyes on this Question and Ponders, could it have been what changed the 2008 Democratic Primary? The Media will not be able to deflect the world’s opinion about this and they will self-destruct trying too …. you will want to follow me into this Rabbit Hole for a Minute please…….

 

*******************ATTENTION******************

 

The Question below will Send the Media into a RAGE of Denial and Deception because of their Cover-up of this, which with Obama controlling the Media, would have been able to tell Hillary to drop out or I will tell the Media to run with this story, would have given him Leverage over the Clintons to Drop out in 2008. So, if you make this Question a Public one and send the Media off in a Frenzy over this Obama Revelation, it will Change the Narrative for the Final days of this Election Cycle … and in the process of shining light on this it will sour more voters to wanting this back in the Whitehouse!!!!!!

 

“Did the 2008 Jailing of Bill Clinton’s Pedophile Friend and Co-Founder of the Clinton Foundation Jeffery Epstein give Barack Obama the Leverage he Needed to get Hillary to Drop out of the 2008 Race when she had the Majority of Super Delegates support”???????????

 

The Media will Self-Destruct over trying to flip this snotty little goober off their key board finger, but while doing so they will shed light on it over and over as the Obama and Hillary camps deny and their lap dog media denies but the concept won’t be able to die for it is a real possibility in the eyes of the Independent “Think“ers.

 

Good Luck!!!!

______________

Edited by John R. Houk

All text and links embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Tony Newbill

 

Russia/Trump Hacked DNC? NOT!


hillary-worked-married-is-liar

John R. Houk

© November 2, 2016

 

Do remember in the Trump-Hillary debates that Crooked Hillary said the Russians are trying to elect Trump and the proof is that seventeen different U.S. Intelligence agencies claimed that Russia was behind the DNC hacks that Wikileaks was/is dumping for Americans to read?

 

VIDEO: The Quint: Final US Presidential Debate: Clinton and Trump on Vladimir Putin

 

Posted by The Quint

Published on Oct 19, 2016

 

The U.S. presidential candidates clashed over the issue of Russian hacking during Wednesday night’s debate in Las Vegas.

Both accused the other of not doing enough to combat foreign interests from influencing the US election campaign.
Republican Donald Trump said Russian president Vladimir Putin had no respect for his rival Hillary Clinton who accused Trump of failing to condemn Russia for an alleged cyber attack.

 

READ THE REST

 

YUP, SHE LIED!

 

JRH 11/2/16

Please Support NCCR

____________________

FBI: No Tie Between Trump and Russia

 

By Philip Hodges

November 1, 2016

Eagle Rising

 

The New York Times is reporting that the FBI has found no evidence that ties Donald Trump to the Russian government.

 

Most of what has been said by Democrats and Hillary’s campaign regarding Trump’s alleged ties to Russia and Putin are unsubstantiated claims. They’re pure conjecture. But if you repeat a lie enough times, it becomes self-evident. And it gives Hillary’s supporters something to blame for all of her woes.

 

WikiLeaks

@wikileaks

 

No link between Trump & Russia
No link between Assange & Russia
But Podesta & Clinton involved in selling 20% of US uranium to Russia

 

8:48 PM – 31 Oct 2016

 

The New York Times seems to corroborate at least one of those statements made by WikiLeaks: 

 

For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.

 

Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.

 

This seems to contradict claims from the left that FBI Director James Comey is “sitting on” information that indisputably proves Trump to be an “unwitting agent of Putin.”

 

Senator Harry Reid wrote a scathing letter to Comey in response to the FBI Director’s decision to reopen the Bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton.

 

“In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity,” Reid wrote.

 

Even in the case of Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, the FBI’s concern over his connection to Russia had little or nothing to do with foreign influence over the U.S. election. The concern there was that he didn’t declare income that he had made in the Ukraine. Remember, what’s worse than a drug dealer or a terrorist in the eyes of the U.S. government? A tax cheat.

 

By now, Manafort’s ancient history. And what’s left of any supposed tie between Trump and Russia is so little that it doesn’t warrant any investigation. Ironically, Hillary Clinton and John Podesta have more ties to Russia than Trump does.

 

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com

_______________

Russia/Trump Hacked DNC? NOT!

John R. Houk

© November 2, 2016

_____________

FBI: No Tie Between Trump and Russia

 

Copyright © 2016. EagleRising.com is a member of Liberty Alliance. All rights reserved.

 

About Eagle Rising

 

Eagle Rising seeks to share breaking news about culture, media, politics, etc., from a Christian perspective.

 

Eagle Rising is a division of Bravera Holdings, LLC. Founded in 2013 by Gary DeMar and Brandon Vallorani.

 

GOHMERT EXPLAINS WHY COMEY HAD TO NOTIFY CONGRESS


slick-willie-loretta-lynch-toon-branco

Rep. Louie Gohmert provides another reason FBI Director James Comey notified Congress that he was reopening the Crooked Hillary investigation. That reason had less to do with conscience and more to do with concern about perjuring himself in Congressional testimony addressing Comey’s previous decision not to recommend prosecution.

 

JRH 11/1/16

Please Support NCCR

*****************

GOHMERT EXPLAINS WHY COMEY HAD TO NOTIFY CONGRESS

Also reveals only way Hillary will ‘answer for some of the things she’s done’

 

By GREG COROMBOS

October 31, 2016

WND

 

rep-louie-gohmert-r-texas

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas

 

While many Democrats publicly fume at FBI Director James Comey and many Republicans sense political opportunity, a member of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee tells WND and Radio America the letter was really Comey’s way of avoiding a perjury investigation against him in Congress.

 

On Friday, Comey sent a letter to several committee and subcommittee chairman and ranking members, informing them that new emails “pertinent to the investigation” had been discovered. Twice in the three-paragraph letter, Comey noted his duty to keep Congress up to speed on the case.

 

“Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony,” Comey stated.

 

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, said this really boils down to Comey keeping his sworn promise to lawmakers given during testimony in the wake of the FBI refusing to recommend charges against Hillary Clinton.

 

“It is actually the director of the FBI avoiding lying to Congress. He said he would update us,” Gohmert told WND and Radio America. “I think at the time he said it, he probably did not anticipate that there was going to be any other developments sufficient to get him to pursue the case further.”

 

What do YOU think? Is FBI Director James Comey a hero or villain? Sound off in today’s WND poll

 

Shortly after the Comey letter was reported, sources within the FBI revealed that the newly discovered emails were found on a device belonging to Clinton aide Huma Abedin and her estranged husband, former Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.

 

Gohmert said that is significant.

 

“If it’s true what we’re told that Weiner had emails that were for Huma Abedin, if any of those are classified, then Huma broke the law by allowing her husband – even though they’re married – to have access to those emails,” Gohmert explained.

 

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas:

 

 

WND VIDEO: Have to go to the WND article to listen to Gohmert.

 

 

He said that arrangement also made both Weiner and Abedin ripe for blackmail.

 

“One of the reasons it’s so important for our high officials to be above reproach is the fact that, because Weiner was doing all this sexting, that kind of thing could have made him vulnerable to blackmail,” Gohmert said.

 

He said the impending Weiner-Abedin divorce could have put Abedin at the same risk.

 

“If he has emails that Huma should not have let him see, then she could be a target for blackmail,” Gohmert said. “If Hillary were elected, then Huma would be the closest confidante to the president of the United States but very vulnerable to blackmail.”

 

Gohmert is also struck by the Clinton team demanding the FBI reveal everything it has since this revelation comes so close to Election Day.

 

“It takes an awful lot of gall to say, in effect, ‘I thought I destroyed all of those emails. I demand to know what emails you have found because I thought I destroyed them all.’ Basically, it’s a bit of an admission of obstruction of justice,” Gohmert said.

 

The congressman is disappointed the Clinton investigation did not broaden into a probe of Clinton Foundation activities and how they influenced Clinton’s decisions at the State Department.

 

“For heaven’s sake, when you’re allowing the sale of our uranium and it ends up going to Russia and our enemies, that’s pretty amazing,” Gohmert said. “None of that seemed to pique the interest. Some of us sure think it sounded like there may have been crimes involved. [It] certainly merited having a grand jury impaneled and at least [having] them look into these things.”

 

Sign the precedent-setting petition supporting Trump’s call for an independent prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton!

 

According to reports, the FBI did aggressively push for permission to investigate the Clinton Foundation, but it was forbidden from proceeding by the Justice Department. Gohmert said that proves nothing will happen to Hillary Clinton while Loretta Lynch runs the Justice Department.

 

“As long as she’s there, Hillary Clinton will never be prosecuted,” Gohmert said. “The only chance there is that Hillary Clinton may eventually have to answer for some of the things she’s done is if Donald Trump is elected.”

 

He continued, “We have got to clean out the cesspool. It stinks to high heaven.”

 

While the Clinton campaign demands to see what emails the FBI has and simultaneously insists they are nothing of consequence, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is taking the Comey criticism to a new level.

 

In a letter, Reid is accusing Comey of violating the Hatch Act by sending his letter so close to the election. What’s more, Reid accused Comey of sitting on “explosive” evidence of Trump’s ties to the Russian government.

 

“In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisers, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity. The public has a right to know this information,” wrote Reid.

 

Gohmert minced few words about Reid. First, the congressman contends Comey may have violated the Hatch Act if he didn’t send the letter updating member of Congress on the probe.

 

“I think it would be a potential violation of the Hatch Act to use his position to prevent Americans from knowing the substantial change, the new evidence that has been found,” he said.

 

As for Reid himself, Gohmert said the Nevada Democrat’s reputation is already worthless.

 

“For lying Harry Reid, the guy that said (2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt) Romney didn’t pay taxes for 10 years, it turned out Reid had no basis. He just totally lied. He still says he is so proud he went and lied about Romney because it helped [President Obama] win the election,” Gohmert said.

 

“That tells us that Harry Reid is a guy who is so unscrupulous, so immoral that I don’t really much care what allegations he makes.”

 

While he does encourage a quick report on these new findings, Gohmert is pleading with the FBI to do a thorough job examining the new emails and not feel that it has to make a conclusion to meet a political deadline.

 

“The FBI needs to get their reputation back, and the only way to do that is to handle this more professionally,” he said.

____________________

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

 

Brother Can You Spare A Dime


trump-make-america-feel-the-earn

I have been posting over the last week primarily on Crooked Hillary’s corruption, Dem corruption, Clinton crime corruption and the corruption that has been inherent in the Obama Administration especially coming to light in cover-ups trying to protect a Crooked Hillary election in November 2016.

 

In sum – a load of CORRUPTION!

 

This Justin Smith submission addresses the substance of what Trump desires to achieve for America compared to the Leftist agenda of Crooked Hillary that will further diminish America.

 

JRH 10/31/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Brother Can You Spare A Dime

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 10/29/2016 1:46 PM

 

“Once I built a tower to the sun. Brick and rivet and lime … Now it’s done. Brother can You spare a dime?”

 

Donald Trump is telling America the truth about our economy, and he has offered wise and courageous solutions that will in fact set our economy afire with prosperity for all, despite assertions of the naysayers of the Democratic Progressive Party. He doesn’t have all the answers, but he knows enough to understand that policies that create a Democratic base of takers must be ended if all America is going to thrive and prosper once more. He will throw out the policies Hillary and her progressives seek to extend and expand, that have betrayed American workers, who are mucking through the worse economic “recovery” of the past 80 years, and America First will replace globalism as our guiding light.

 

The Obama administration wants us to believe inflation is at zero, after they removed everything that matters from the inflation index, but one’s grocery, electric and healthcare bills, along with college tuition, proves that inflation is raging. Obama’s policies have pushed the GDP down to barely above zero, while they have very nearly destroyed all the high-paying skilled jobs for the middle class and college grads. And in the meantime, over 90 million working age Americans are on welfare and foodstamps, and the workforce participation rate is under 63%.

 

America must exit this economic crash-and-burn trajectory and stop the Federal Reserve’s policy of manipulating low interest rates, printing an excess of U.S. dollars backed only by U.S. taxpayers and monetizing our debt. Without controls on government spending and a balanced budget, the Federal Reserve is merely delaying another inevitable economic crash — the worse yet.

 

Trump doesn’t lie about it, stating plainly that “we have a very false economy.” He has noted that the “stock market is bloated“, as a result of quantitative easing and centrally planned government financial stimulus.

 

Hillary, bought and paid for by George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Bill Gates and always eager to redistribute the wealth between failing Wall Street firms, instinctively knows not to discuss the Fed’s inflationary actions and interest rates price fixing. She sees the Federal Reserve Bank as the tool that smooths the way for more Big Centralized Government. She also expects the Fed to keep interest rates low so she can continue Obama’s rape of the American economy.

 

Pure uncorrupted laissez-faire capitalism offers the best path for achieving enormous prosperity, and those who advocate laissez-faire capitalism are the only true advocates for liberty, since great economic prosperity has historically always brought forth great liberty for men and women alike. Donald Trump isn’t quite a “laissez-faire capitalist”, but he gets close enough for government work.

 

Hillary Clinton is mimicking FDR’s 1944 policies and referring to wants and needs as “rights”. She would have one believe that one has a “right” to a job, food, clothing, homes, healthcare and a college education, whether you have worked and earned it or not. This is what she now offers to the takers and the socialists of America, with 50% of young Americans now viewing socialism favorably, according to Pew Research.

 

Who will pay for all of this?

 

Ayn Rand, who escaped the Bolshevik communists in 1917, noted the following in 1963:

 

If some men are entitled by right to the products of the work of others, it means that those others are deprived of rights and condemned to slave labor. … Any alleged ‘right’ of one man, which necessitates the violation of the rights of another is not and cannot be a right.”

 

On August 18th, Trump told a Charlotte, NC crowd: “I will not rest until children of every color in this country are fully included in the American Dream. Jobs, safety, opportunity. Fair and equal representation. This is what I promise to African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and all Americans. … [Adding] Let our children be Dreamers too,” as he co-opted a term used by immigration activists.

 

Trump plans to remove all job killing regulations and reduce corporate taxes from 35% to 15%, and this will open our economy to new investments and business expansions. These two common sense acts alone will unfetter capital for old businesses and see new businesses form more easily, creating thousands of new jobs.

 

America can forget about economic growth and new jobs if Hillary is elected. She has spent her entire career voting and advocating for tax increases, and now she wants a massive $1.3 trillion dollar job killing tax increase [See Section: TAXES AND REGULATION]. She wants to hit some of the wealthiest private sector with an 80% tax rate [The Federalist & DonaldTrump.com], and she will tax small businesses at close to 50%, driving many of them to close their doors and lay off employees.

 

Hillary likes to brag that her energy plan will “put a lot of coal companies and coal miners out of business“. She intends to continue Obama’s energy restrictions, and according to the Heritage Foundation, these restrictions will eliminate 500,000 manufacturing jobs and reduce our nation’s output by $2.5 trillion by 2030, and individual incomes will drop $7000 annually.

 

The Institute for Energy Research likes Trump’s plan to lift restrictions on all sources of American energy, noting that it will have a near immediate effect of adding over 500,000 new jobs annually. His plan increases our GDP by more than $100 billion dollars annually, and it increases federal, state and local tax revenues by $6 trillion dollars over forty years. It also increases annual wages by more than $30 billion dollars over the next seven years. And overall, this one plan increases total economic activity in America by more than $20 trillion dollars over the next four decades.

 

Hillary’s judgement on trade isn’t any better. She supported Obama’s South Korean trade deal, which was supposed to increase our exports to South Korea by more than $10 billion dollars and make 70,000 American jobs. Instead, this deal has killed 100,000 U.S. jobs, and our exports to South Korea haven’t seen any increase; however, their imports to us increased more than $15 billion dollars and more than doubled our trade deficit with them.

 

Americans should be prepared for Hillary to betray them on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty too. She has been for it all along and from the very beginning, until just recently. If the TPP makes it to the Oval Office during a presidency led by Clinton, she will enact it, because her donors will demand it, and she won’t cut off her pipe-line to millions of dollars more of ill-gotten gains.

 

During his campaign rally in West Bend, Wisconsin, Trump told a huge throng of people:

 

I am fighting for you. … It’s time to stop making the special interests rich. It’s time to make the American people rich. I am going to make America wealthy again.  … On trade, I am going to renegotiate NAFTA, stand up to China, withdraw from the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and protect every last American job.”

 

Vote for Hillary and the poor will grow poorer and the middle class will become the new poor. Poverty will become a way of life in America.

 

Vote for Trump and Americans will do more than subsist. More Americans will have significantly greater incomes that allow them to increase their savings, invest, recreation time, luxury items or give money to charities to help any Americans who are still struggling.

 

Americans have always saved our fellow countrymen who were homeless or impoverished, long before our republic, long before FDR and long before Johnson’s Great Society, and we will continue to do so whenever it is necessary. But America will soon be on a road to a thriving economy by any standard, because we are going to build an economy that creates jobs for people who want to work and contribute to society and grow our economic engine, by unbinding the hands of those people in positions to do that very thing, if only we reject the progressive socialist vision of taxation — rejecting this collectivist tyranny — and vote for Donald Trump.

 

By Justin O. Smith

________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All source links as well as text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith