The rise of Leftist Eco-Fascism



The Conspiracy Theory involving Environmentalists and Ecologists that desire a world in which people and property are subservient to the agenda of a One World Government authority is something I have called Eco-Marxism. Below is an article that speaks of this but utilizes the Socialism that evolved into Fascism and Nazism. The author calls his train of thought Eco-Fascism.


This is a good read that I discovered by reason of a relatively new Multiply friendship with Drew.


JRH 5/6/12

Please Support NCCR

Food Consumption and the Depopulation Agenda

Caution NWO

John R. Houk

© April 13, 2012


I pay attention when I run across information that points to two Eco-Marxist agendas. One is Club of Rome (More Detail) an NGO and Agenda 21 is the other one which operates under the initiative of the United Nations.


The Club of Rome is a basically a Think Tank which I have no doubt feeds the Agenda 21 dudes of the UN ideas of implementing Eco-Marxist goals. Agenda 21 is the operative instrument utilizing the auspices of government to implement Eco-Marxist goals. Agenda 21 works somewhat on a pyramid style: United Nations filtering down through member nations and further filtering down to local governments like State, County and City.


Club of Rome/Agenda 21 goals sound noble in that the goal is to manage a planet earth to make human life better via various options that invoke sustainable results. That is the noble part. The ignoble part is the path to make life sustainable for humanity via a managed environment. The essence of getting the earth to a position of sustainability is to depopulate the earth.


The methods of human depopulation are nefarious. The Club of Rome writings do not even try to make their philosophy secret, rather a consensus of global elites including the USA openly present ideas to depopulate the earth. Some of that planning is a little less visible and is exacted via a long term corruptions of certain services and food to get the depopulation wheel rolling.


I received an email from Off The Grid News that writes about the nefarious nature of the Global Elites to depopulate the earth. The information in the email starts out well in raising righteous indignation of the methods used by the Global Elites to slowly cull the earth’s population.


I have to point out though; the email turns out to be an ad for something called Survival Clay. The theme of this particular depopulation method is the use of toxins in our food and water supply that is not immediately life threatening; however the long term consumption of these toxins via potentially a couple generations begins to cause health problems for the general population.


You can see where that is going, right? Long term ingestion of toxins cause a rise in diseases and Pharmaceutical companies then create synthesize medicines which in turn have some side-effects that are harmful to human life. Universal Medicine controlled by the government that has bought into Agenda 21 then makes selective decisions that are worthy to receive life saving medicine or treatment. The concept just snowballs into an Eco-Marxist depopulation plan.


Toward the end of the article there is a link that provides greater detail on Survival Clay. As would be expected that link has little to do with the depopulation plans of the global elite and more details on the benefits of Survival Clay finishing with an opportunity to buy it. Most times I have a problem with this kind of marketing; however the path to the marketing strategy is brilliant if you know anything about Agenda 21 and the depopulation agenda.


Here is a bit of info on Survival Clay from a different source just so you know the concept is not snake oil:


Minerals have been used for medicinal purposes, both topically and internally, for millennia. Clay minerals have been used for the treatment of wounds, skin afflictions, stomach and intestinal problems, malaria, for cleansing, as anti-inflammatories, cicatrizers, and more (Carretero 2002). The adsorptive and absorptive properties of natural clays, with their fine particle size and high cation exchange capacity, make them useful in a range of industrial (Eisenhour and Brown 2008; Gates et al. 2008), pharmaceutical, and cosmetic applications. They are effective absorbers of secretions and toxins, exhibiting bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties (Williams et al. 2009; Haydel et al. 2008).



Clays vary greatly in composition. “Edible earth” may be monominerallic or polyminerallic mixtures of smectite, illite, and kaolinite in a quartz sand matrix, and will likely affect people idiosyncratically, depending on the different physical properties of the clay and the quantities of elements extracted by reactions in the stomach and intestine (Ferrell 2008). Given these factors, it is important to choose your edible clay with care.


The “Body Burden” and Detoxification

Smectite bentonite clays in particular have a high cation exchange capacity, meaning that they drawn positive ions to them, adsorbing and absorbing toxins, binding them. They have exceptionally strong drawing power, and are thought to be especially effective in pulling toxins, including heavy metals, from the body. Topical applications (see, e.g., Rodrigo), foot- and whole-body-baths are used to remediate a range of health problems by reducing the body burden.



… Body burdens can result from long-term storage (e.g., lipophilic polychlorinated biphenyls stored in adipose tissue; heavy metals stored in bone) or short-term storage (e.g., carbon monoxide [carboxyhaemoglobin] in the blood), but of increasing concern are the long-term consequences of the industrial chemicals building up in our bodies, affecting people of all ages, from fetuses to the elderly (EPA; EWG). We explore these issues on other pages of this site (see Autism & Neurodevelopmental Disorders, and Pollution in People: Toxic and Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals in Plastics and Everyday Products).



The terms “heavy metal” and “toxic metal” are overlapping, but there is a difference: “heavy” refers to atomic weight, while “toxic” refers to physiological effect. Not all heavy metals are toxic; in trace amounts, some are essential for human health but become toxic in larger amounts, building up in and disrupting normal function in physiological systems. … (Medicinal Clay Therapeutic Uses, Clinical Studies, Sources U.S. and Canada;; 10-2-11 – READ IN ENTIRITY)


Part of the marketing plan for Survival Clay is the link that directs on first to a disclaimer page to avoid potential future litigation.


Below is the ad sent by Off The Grid News. When you read keep Club of Rome and Agenda 21 in the back of your mind.


JRH 4/13/12

Please Support NCCR


The Secret Government Plan to Kill You


Sent by Off The Grid News

Attribution: Solutions From Science

Sent: April 11, 2012 6:05 AM


To begin our story, we must go back to the year 1798 when Thomas Malthus published his famous essay titled “An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society.”


Malthus was a gloomy 18th century economist who put forth the idea that the planet was overpopulated. He believed that population growth would always outpace the earth’s ability to produce food. Robert L. Heilbroner summarizes Malthus’s view:


Instead of being headed for Utopia, the human lot was forever condemned to a losing struggle between ravenous and multiplying mouths and the eternally insufficient stock of Nature’s cupboard, however diligently that cupboard might be searched. (The Worldly Philosophers, p. 78)


Malthus’s dismal view of the future of mankind led him to some shocking conclusions. In his essay, he wrote:


The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to provide subsistence… that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation… But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array and sweep off their thousands and tens of thousands. Should success still be incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow, levels the population with the food of the world. (The Worldly Philosophers, p. 90)


As appalling as it is to hear Malthus describe the vices of mankind as “able ministers,” his ideas did not die with him. In fact, they were picked up by many of the world’s elite and continue to live on to this day. If anything, Malthus’s ideas are more alive… and more sinister… than they’ve ever been.


The Globalist Plan to Wipe Out Billions of People


When people hear that world rulers want to depopulate the planet, many are skeptical. After all, the idea of wiping out a few million or billion people sounds preposterous. But sometimes it’s better to hear things straight from the horse’s mouth, so to speak. With that in mind, here are a few statements that have been made by powerful people during the last 100 years or so…


“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” –Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood and funded by the Rockefeller family

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” –Ted Turner, American media mogul

“U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation.” –Henry Kissinger, political scientist and foreign policy advisor

“In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.” –Jacques Cousteau, famous explorer and filmmaker

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.” –Mikhail Gorbachev, former Soviet statesman

“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion people. This must be implemented within 30-50 years, two-thirds of the population must be cut.” –Michael Coffman, September 9, 1994, during the UN Biodiversity Assessment on Sustainable Human Population


This is just a sampling of many public quotes about the elite’s desire to depopulate the planet. But while their desires may be somewhat public (if you know where to look), their plans have been mostly kept in secret.


The Doctor Who Warned Us 54 Years Ago


In 1958, Dr. R. Swinburne Clymer published a controversial book. It was called Your Health and Sanity in the Age of Treason. The subtitle was “Food and Liquids Used as a Medium in Deliberately and Carefully Planned Methods Developed by the Vicious Element of Humanity, for the Mental Deterioration and Moral Debasement of the Mass, as a Means Toward Their Enslavement.”


Clymer was perhaps the first person to thoroughly expose toxic food additives and fluoride with documentation. He also made note that the elite were using these toxins deliberately “for the mental deterioration and moral debasement of the mass[es].”


In the 1950s, many people thought Dr. Clymer was crazy. But today he sounds as if he had had a crystal ball with the ability to see 54 years into the future. He writes:


Imagine yourself if you can, becoming conscious that you are gradually losing your manhood; that your mind is rapidly deteriorating so that you are no longer capable of thinking clearly; unable to plan your future actions. Your resistance is becoming so weakened that you are no longer master of yourself. In short, you are rapidly developing into a moron, a robot, a zombie, readily subject to the dictates of others.


If you carefully observe our society today, Clymer’s uncanny prediction doesn’t seem that far off. And it’s only going to get worse…


Hidden Toxins That Are Making You Sick


Right now, the globalists are doing their level best to introduce hidden toxic substances to make you sick. Any delivery method will do: our water supply, our food supply, vaccinations, and pharmaceutical drugs are all fair game.


These are the “able ministers” of modern times. For example:


·         Fluoride is added to the water supply to slowly poison the population and weaken their immune systems.


·         Artificial sweeteners and chemical flavor enhancers are added to food in spite of their toxic effects on the brain.


·         Pesticides, herbicides, and highly toxic weed killers are used in mass-scale commercial farming — and we then ingest those harmful chemicals when we eat produce from our local grocery store.


·         Mercury, thimerosal, and other toxic additives in vaccines have increased the incidence of autism and, in some rare cases, sudden death.


·         The entire industry of psychotropic drugs (commonly called “antidepressants”) is wreaking havoc on Americans, causing many to commit suicide within just weeks of taking them for the first time.


·         And ever since the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March of 2011, we’ve been exposed to low-level nuclear radiation, and must now worry about the long-term effects of such exposure.


How to Fight Back Against the Globalists

And Foil Their Evil Plans…


It’s clear that the globalist agenda is real. They will not stop until they’ve achieved their genocidal dreams.


With that in mind, one of the best ways to fight back against their evil plans to depopulate the planet is to make sure you’ve got a ready supply of what we call “Survival Clay.”


Survival Clay is an especially rare form of clay. It is so rare, in fact, that armed security forces guard the entrance to the remote caves in Italy where this clay is harvested.


And it’s no wonder… Survival Clay may be the world’s most powerful agent for drawing out positively charged free radicals and heavy metals from inside your body.


In other words, Survival Clay could help reverse the slow poisoning you’ve been subjected to for years. And even if you feel 100% healthy right now, you’ll want to have this amazing survival product on hand when the globalists launch their next toxic attack.


With that in mind, I strongly encourage you to learn more about Survival Clay here:


-Solutions From Science


P.S. Dr. Rima E. Laibow has practiced drug-free, natural medicine for 35 years. In 2002, one of her patients was a head of state. He warned her:


“It’s almost time for the great culling to begin.”


If you are anything like us, you believe the time to prepare is short indeed. Don’t put this off. Get your own Survival Clay here:


Food Consumption and the Depopulation Agenda

John R. Houk

© April 13, 2012


The Secret Government Plan to Kill You


Tell A Friend! Click here to let a friend know about Off The Grid News

This newsletter is a free weekly service of Solutions From Science. You can reach us at:

Solutions From Science
815 W. Main St.
P.O. Box 518
Thomson, IL 61285
Email us at


Off The Grid News * Copyright © Solutions From Science 2012

Agenda 21 losing freedoms in one easy lesson

Agenda 21 & Liberty Loss

Tony Newbill is disseminating some Agenda 21 information.


JRH 3/16/12


Agenda 21 losing freedoms in one easy lesson


By Tony Newbill

Sent: 3/13/2012 10:32 AM


I listened to this video and it is really worth the time. It’s selling info, but the message is Huge 


Warning: Controversial Content. Viewer Discretion Advised.


His first five predictions have already come true!


Critical Warning Number Six


Fail to heed this final warning at your own risk!


[SlantRight Editor: Below is a much smaller version of the 32 minute video from the Newbill link above. I thought you would like to get a good idea of the information Newbill wanted you to grasp. If you want to listen to the entire Lombardi to sell a financial advice Newsletter that comes with some free incentives listen to the entire message.]


VIDEO: Lombardi’s Crisis Profit Alert (snipped)



Once the capital system collapses as is described above, the New Agenda will be released as the solution to a New America and a New World … order!!!


 Agenda 21 losing freedoms in one easy lesson


I thought everyone should have this. Please see my pamphlet on this and pay special attention to the BioDiversity Map! 



Dr. Coffman is probably best known for his Biodiversity map, the product of 2 years of research, which was delivered to the US Senate by Coffman and three other esteemed gentlemen just one hour before they were to vote on the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (often referred to as the “Biodiversity Treaty”) which aimed to set aside nearly 50 percent of US land for wilderness preserves.  That map and other documentation was responsible for exposing and thwarting the plan.


For more about the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Wildlands Project and Agenda 21, please see “Taking Liberty”


Taking Liberty is a comprehensive look at the lower 48 states showing, region by region, how the Environmental Movement is rapidly abolishing Private Property in America.





What is Agenda 21?


My definition is Agenda 21 is a United Nations Global governance plan to regulate and control every facet of human activity on the face of the earth to implement one-world government and “global citizenship!”


If you were to hear that in the very near future the United States will have no privately owned property, no air conditioning, no dams, no paved roads, no way to correct rivers for flood control, no golf courses, no pastureland used for grazing, would you believe it?


These are all mandates of a United Nations program called Agenda 21 which was born in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. All delegates watched as four men, holding poles attached to an “Ark of Hope” which contained this Agenda 21 document! Within its pages are a substantial attack on the American Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. The primary target for the changes proposed in 1992 is the United States of America.


If you have been thinking that the information regarding Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 was simply “crazy” and incorrect information being spread by “conspiracy nuts”, think again!  Once you read this program line-up, you will understand that there are those in our society who truly believe they “know best” and they will transform your world!


It is clear that AGENDA 21 is designed to replace the economic and social structure of the United States. The first version of the Declaration of Independence used the phrase “Life, Liberty and Property” and was changed to “Pursuit of Happiness” so that non-landowners could aspire to ownership, thus happiness.


According to the United Nations, the objective of sustainable development is to integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.


Biodiversity is a key component of the UN Agenda 21. Through READ IN ENTIRITY


(Hat tip to Ginger Russell for uncovering the information on the Consortium!)


Please follow this link for the full program and the cast of characters:

The Club of Rome and the Smithsonian Institution are hosting this symposium  


Perspectives on Limits to Growth:


Challenges to Building a Sustainable Planet Co-sponsored by The Club of Rome and the Smithsonian Institution’s Consortium for Understanding and Sustaining a Biodiverse Planet

1 March 2012  [This quote placed by Newbill]


The Club of Rome and the Smithsonian Institution are hosting this symposium in Washington, DC to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the launching of Limits to Growth, the first report to the Club of Rome published in 1972. This book, which sold over ten million copies in various languages, was one of the earliest scholarly works to recognize that the world was fast approaching its sustainable limits. Forty years later, the planet continues to face many of the same economic, social, and environmental challenges as when the book was first published.



The Club of Rome


The Club of Rome was founded in 1968 as an informal association of independent leading personalities from politics, business and science, men and women who are long-term thinkers interested in contributing in a systemic interdisciplinary and holistic manner to a better world. The Club of Rome members share a common concern for the future of humanity and the planet.


The aims of the Club of Rome are: to identify the most crucial problems which will determine the future of humanity through integrated and forward-looking analysis; to evaluate alternative scenarios for the future and to assess risks, choices and opportunities; to develop and propose practical solutions to the challenges identified; to communicate the new insights and knowledge derived from this analysis to decision-makers in the public and private sectors and also to the general public, and to stimulate public debate and effective action to improve the prospects for the future.


The Club of Rome, in its early years, focused on the nature of the global problems, the “problematique”, on the “limits to growth”, and on new pathways for world development. The Club of Rome is focusing in its new program on the root causes of the systemic crisis by defining and communicating the need for the vision and the elements of a new economy which produces real wealth and well-being; which does not degrade our natural resources and provides meaningful jobs and sufficient income for all people. …



The four Smithsonian Consortia (Understanding the American Experience, Valuing World Cultures, Understanding and Sustaining a Biodiverse Planet, and Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe) help to foster a spirit of interdisciplinary collaboration to stimulate intellectual exchange and scholarship within the Smithsonian and beyond. They incubate, develop, and launch collaborations among scholars in our museums, research centers, and educational programs to address the four Grand Challenges of the Smithsonian’s Strategic Plan.


Historically, scientists at the Smithsonian have studied species in a range of ecosystems with the goal of enhancing knowledge of biodiversity and the healthy functioning of sustainable ecosystems. Through the Consortium for Understanding and Sustaining a Biodiverse Planet the Smithsonian fosters interdisciplinary research and harnesses its institutional power to expand its work and find innovative approaches to global problems that stem from biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation, climate change, and human-biosphere interactions. The Consortium supports Smithsonian projects that READ IN ENTIRITY [Quote placed by SlantRight Editor]


[SlantRight Editor: You have to read between the lines to understand the threat these Agenda 21/Club of Rome present to American Liberty. The document is written as if Eco-Marxism is good for America and the world.]


In addition, there is a prominent coalition here in the USA, devoted to transforming our country into one that will meet the “Global Standards for Sustainable Development”.  One of those coalition partners is an organization right here in Houston, TX!  For the full list please follow this link!


“Our Coalition/Smart Growth America”


Please become involved in stopping the “Transformation of America”, not to mention the World!

Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance?

OWS vs. Tea Party Movement

Occupy Wall Street (OWS) promoters are becoming confident with their movement to transform America away from a Capitalistic Market Economy to a spread the wealth Marxist Economy they are beginning to admit so publically.


Tony Newbill touches on OWS and follows his thoughts with a link to a article exposing the intentions of OWS.


JRH 3/15/12


Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance?


By Tony Newbill

Sent: 3/9/2012 9:39 AM


Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance in Fuel or anything else that provides for an economic capital system to Prosper and the people to prosper as well?


In any given day the amount of Oil in excess in world reserves is 4 Million barrels , and the world is consuming 86 million barrels a day , considering this is a Global market and the Price of fuel is reflective of the Global demand, then with 1/3rd the oil coming out of the middle east and all the volatility in that region we can see how interruption in that area’s distribution would cause a spike in the price that we in the USA could not manage to keep the free market stable enough that collapse in the market would result .


We need an All hands on deck approach, and I think the Algae approach with the extra resource that it produces in the Pulp for food additive in just Livestock feeds and fertilizers let alone the Fiber content this material would bring to the Fiber Industry that could be used for some many things is why the idea of this secondary material being created for No Additional Monetary Investment is a Golden Opportunity for expansion of the Overall supply-side markets.


The Suppression of this resource development is coming from two very opposite groups, one being the Oil Industry, and the second is from the Environmentalist side. And the resistance from the environmentalist’s side is a funny one because you world think they would be all for a Green Energy right?? The problem with this is it Empowers a Society to be more self-reliant, and more able to create abundance. These 2 factors are NOT what Environmentalists who have become Marxist Ideologues want to see as an economic Policy for society as a whole, because this in their Point of view is Destroying Earth and they would rather not have any self-reliant individual Prosperity and this is why we have a NO Growth economic recovery underway. And why the Capitalist System is slowly collapsing as the Government funds itself with Federal Reserve Bond buying programs trying to wait this out slowly sucking the cash reserves away from the private sector so that when the economy finally collapses due to No capital expansion from true supply-side expansion growth and tax revenues increasing from that. Then when the S_H_T_F they can say Capitalism failed and we are going to move to a New system. This all in the name of sustainability, but really it is all about Controlling how much people consume.


This is the ultimate goal of the Population control experts that make up the Global Elites Think Tanks. This is why we have No true capital growth recovery in our economy system of Capitalism.


Here is a story on how the OWS movement is being used to try and bring down Capitalism. OWS is a cover for the Environmentalists who control Obama and all his CZARs, The Czars are ideologues with Obama too, they are creating an environment with this envy of rich wealth Capitalists as the oppressors of society and the destroyers of earth. Along with Regulations, the Obama Administration is setting the stage for Fear to Invade the Minds of Investors who without these powers of Influence effecting their willingness to take risk investments, see these elements and actions as more and More private investors leave the markets. And this makes the Federal Reserve have to buy more and more Bonds to keep the Government funded. This sets the stage for a systematic Economic breakdown, slow and steady, like guiding the Economic ship right towards Land and beaching the Ship. Hopefully the beaching is easy enough that people don’t become unsettled to the point of civil unrest.

This is the Globalists plan to fundamentally transform the USA:



Occupy leaders admit they want to abolish capitalism

Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM EDT




There was some incredible audio released over the weekend of a meeting of several union and Occupy Wall Street leaders, including Stephen Lerner, where they pretty much admit that they are looking to bring an end to capitalism because it just can’t co-exist with democracy! Sure, it’s worked ever since America was founded and led to the rise of The United States as a superpower and beacon of hope and freedom for the rest of the world – but that’s not what Occupy Wall Street wants. They and their leaders want us to be just the same as everyone else, and this video reveals that it means an end to capitalism in order to bring about their version of true democracy…aka socialism!


Watch the video below, courtesy of


Breitbart TV VIDEO


In the video, Lerner says:


How do we give workers the confidence? … How do we create a mood in the nation where we’re occupying our workplaces, where we’re shutting down our workplaces? … Where workers are sitting in, where workers are shutting down their places of work, and when the police come, when the injunctions come, we’re all there with them, so we can really deal with part of the reason that the economy’s so screwed up … which is a few people have got all the power. Think stew, think hope, death to the Stockholm Syndrome!


“This is what they are now saying out loud,” Glenn said.


“I want you to listen to its logical conclusion.  This is exactly what we’ve been saying but being hammered for.  Anybody ‑‑ you could play games and say, ‘Oh, well, that’s not really going to…; but if you use logic and play this out to its logical conclusion, it is the end of capitalism and that’s exactly what he’s saying,” Glenn warned.


“Please, America, take these people at their word,” Glenn said.


Glenn said that they are starting to develop their own value system, one that replaces capitalism with socialism, and they are trying to impose it on the rest of the country. adds, “This is where the unions and the Occupy movement and the academy all come together under one big anti-capitalist umbrella. Lerner, representing labor, says that the job of labor is to shut down business; Occupy says that its job is to smash the machines of capitalism; academia provides them the forum to recruit.”


In March of last year, Glenn and The Blaze reported on Lerner’s call for people to take action against big banks like JP Morgan Chase. At the time, Glenn said:


“You can call it a conspiracy theory, but the language that he uses is already being used by labor leaders and those who are whipping people up into a frenzy in Wisconsin and wait until you see how they are going to use the state and county and local labor unions to do exactly what they did to the housing market.  It’s the same tactic, gang.  The same tactic.  And it ends with the destruction of the economic system of the United States of America.  They are bringing it on through chaos and bringing down of Wall Street and the stock market.”


Since then, unions have been at the forefront of the Occupy Wall Street movement and have leveraged disaffected youth in order to achieve their goals of economic chaos, collapsing capitalism, and spreading socialism. Should we be more than a little concerned about Lerner’s latest comments? After all, this time last year he basically laying out the ideas that fueled the then non-existent Occupy movement. What could be coming next?


Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance?

© Tony Newbill

Tony Newbill is an elusive person to know about. I believe this is his Facebook page.


Occupy leaders admit they want to abolish capitalism

Copyright © 2012, Mercury Radio Arts, All Rights Reserved.


Romney Supported De-Population Enthusiasts and Eco-Marxists

Romney RINO rides Dem Ass


John R. Houk

© December 23, 2011


Tony Newbill has been loading me up with links that demonstrate Mitt Romney is a Republican in Name ONLY (RINO) in a huge way.


In a 12/21/2011 email Newbill sent three links that tie Romney to Leftist thought on population control. And when I say population control I mean de-populating the earth to make earth resources more sustainable for those chosen humans to use in a way that is comfortable for the chosen few and the Secular Humanist Green Earth.


Now two of those links are the same story from the same author so I’m using the Human Events story. The first link is from a blog that begins with Mitt Romney’s connection and association with John Holdren which is one of President Barack Hussein Obama’s Czars. Holdren is one of these Left Wing de-populate the earth at all costs to save the earth.


The blog post on Romney-Holdren is excellent but lengthy and spends most of its space on Holdren. I am going to excerpt the part that relate to Romney; however if wish to know the Obama-Holdren agenda for planet earth and humanity you would do well to read the whole thing.


The Human Events article focuses on Mitt Romney’s connect to Paul Tsongas a former Dem Senator from Massachusetts. Romney was supporting Tsongas’ run for the Dem nomination for President in 1992. Tsongas was plugged into Holdren thoughts on de-population of the human race and eco-Marxist concepts of extreme Green ideology at the expense of Liberty and the Free Market to return the earth to some kind of illusory pristine utopian magical environment for the chosen few. The first half of the article is about Paul Tsongas the second half is about Romney’s support for Tsongas’ run for the Dem nomination in 1992.


JRH 12/23/11


Republican Mitt Romney consulted Population Control Eugenics Czar John Holdren


By Saynsumthn

October 18, 2011

Excerpted from: Saynsumthn’s Blog

Original Newbill Link: World Freedom Watch


H/T Pajamas Media


So we’ve learned over the past few days that a trio of Mitt Romney’s chosen advisers helped the Obama administration craft ObamaCare. And on top of that, that Gov. Romney sought the advice of Malthusian green activist John Holdren, when Romney was considering a cap and trade regime for Massachusetts.


Holdren’s views humanity as a plague on the planet and the Industrial Revolution as a tragic mistake. The fewer people, he believes, the better, and he’s not shy about the ways he would use to reduce their number.


Why Gov. Romney, a reasonable person, would pick such a man to advise him on anything is beyond us.


On Jan. 1, 2006, Massachusetts became the first state to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants, something the Obama administration is trying to do to all states through the Environmental Protection Agency’s draconian job-killing regulations and mandates.


A Dec. 7, 2005 memo from the governor’s office announcing the new policy listed among the “environmental and policy experts” providing input to the policy one “John Holdren, professor of environmental policy at Harvard University.”


This is the same person who wrote that a “massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States.”

Holdren wrote that along with Paul and Anne H. Ehrlich in the “recommendations” section of their 1973 book, “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.”


Paul Ehrlich is also the author of the 1968 tome, “The Population Bomb,” which warned of imminent mass starvation from overpopulation unless excess humanity is dispensed with.

Holdren has spoken in favor of such things as forced abortions, confiscation of babies, mass involuntary sterilization, bureaucratic regulation of family size, and a planetary regime to enforce climate regulation and population control.


Read Rest of story here [SlantRight: a further excerpt]


Campaigning: The GOP front-runner for 2012 sought advice on global warming and carbon emissions from the president’s current science czar — an advocate of de-developing America and population control.


Politics is said to make strange bedfellows, but no coupling in our view is more bizarre than when John Holdren, now President Obama’s assistant for science and technology, once advised GOP presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney on environmental policy.


Holdren’s bizarre views are best suited for an adviser to someone like, say, Pol Pot.


He views humanity as a plague on the planet and the Industrial Revolution as a tragic mistake. The fewer people, he believes, the better, and he’s not shy about the ways he would use to reduce their number.


Why Gov. Romney, a reasonable person, would pick such a man to advise him on anything is beyond us.


On Jan. 1, 2006, Massachusetts became the first state to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants, something the Obama administration is trying to do to all states through the Environmental Protection Agency’s draconian job-killing regulations and mandates.



Romney, speaking at a University of New Hampshire town hall on June 3, said: “I don’t speak for the scientific community, of course, but I believe the world’s getting warmer. I can’t prove that, but I believe based on what I read that the world is getting warmer. And number two, I believe that humans contribute to that.”


So do Holdren and Al Gore.


In June, Gore, on his blog, praised Romney’s climate stance: “While other Republicans are running from the truth, he is sticking to his guns in the face of the anti-science wing of the Republican Party.”


After researching eugenics and I reading several chapters of the book, Ecoscience, written in the 70s, by Paul Holdren, who is Obama’s Science Czar, I can see clear signs that everything that is coming down from Washington was being birthed in our society in READ THE REST FOCUSING JOHN HOLDREN


Romney Voted for Population-Control Fanatic Presidential Candidate


By Terence P. Jeffrey


Human Events


When he ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1992, Paul Tsongas repeatedly made it clear: He loathed President George H.W. Bush‘s flip-flopping on abortion and his inattentiveness to what Tsongas perceived as the urgent need for global population control.
And he won
Mitt Romney‘s vote in the 1992 Massachusetts presidential primary.
“This land, this water, this air, this planet, this rain, this is our legacy to our young, yet the Reagan-Bush years have been a time of cynical avoidance of one environmental issue after another — acid rain, energy conservation, depletion of the ozone layer, global warming and uncontrolled world population,” Tsongas, a former U.S. senator from Massachusetts, said when he announced his presidential campaign in April 1991.

“I will tell you very strongly the No. 1 environmental issue I’m going to push for when I’m president is population control around this world so we can turn to later generations and say something except, ‘Sorry, folks,'” Tsongas vowed.
Two months later, Romney cast his vote for Tsongas.
That Massachusetts primary was a landslide in both parties. Bush beat Pat Buchanan
(who I served as research and issues director that year) 66 percent to 28 percent. Among Democrats, native son Tsongas took 66 percent to then-former California Gov. Jerry Brown’s 15 percent and Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton‘s 11 percent.
Two years later, when he announced he would seek the Republican Senate nomination to challenge Ted Kennedy, Romney told the Boston Globe
about his vote for Tsongas.
“Romney confirmed he voted for former U.S. Sen. Paul Tsongas in the state’s 1992 Democratic presidential primary, saying he did so both because Tsongas was from Massachusetts and because he favored his ideas over those of Bill Clinton,” the Globe reported on Feb. 4, 1994. “He added he had been sure the GOP would renominate George Bush, for whom he voted in the fall election.”
Romney’s vote for Tsongas came up again in a profile the Globe published Aug. 7, 1994.
“Like his father, he wasn’t a strong party man,” the Globe said. “He had been a registered independent all his life. He still was, as he pondered the Kennedy challenge. He had even voted for Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Massachusetts Democratic presidential primary.”
When the Los Angeles Times mentioned the Tsongas vote in a profile published Oct. 7, 1994, it did so in the context of Romney’s wife pointing out that Romney had considered running for the Senate as an independent.
“When Romney decided to run, Republicans exchanged quizzical looks: ‘We didn’t know a single Republican when we jumped in in December,’ his wife, Ann, says,” the Times reported.
“As a registered independent, Romney had voted in the Democratic presidential primary in 1992 to support Paul E. Tsongas (though he backed George Bush in the general election, he says),” the Times reported. “He briefly considered running for the Senate seat as an independent, as well, his wife says, before rejecting the idea as impractical.”
Thirteen years later, when Romney was seeking the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, he appeared on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos.”  Stephanopoulos asked him about the Tsongas vote.
Now, Romney said he did it because he wanted the Democrats to nominate the weakest candidate.
“When there was no real contest in the Republican primary, I’d vote in the Democrat primary, vote for the person who I thought would be the weakest opponent for Republican,” Romney said.
“I’m a Republican and have been through my life,” Romney said. “I was with Young Republicans when I was in college back at Stanford. But a registered independent, so I could vote in either primary.”
And that is the core of his explanation.



Romney Supported De-Population Enthusiasts and Eco-Marxists

John R. Houk

© December 23, 2011


Republican Mitt Romney consulted Population Control Eugenics Czar John Holdren


Saynsumthn’s Blog Home Page


Romney Voted for Population-Control Fanatic Presidential Candidate


Terence P. Jeffrey is the author of  Control Freaks: 7 Ways Liberals Plan to Ruin Your Life (Regnery, 2010.)


Copyright 2011 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.

The Elite’s Plan for Global Extermination Exposed

All Seeing Eye Genocide


John R. Houk

© June 23, 2011


This exposé demonstrates the thinking of the Obama Administration with his thoughts of “change”.


To those that are unfamiliar with anti-population terms of the early to middle 20th century here is a micro-primer that is in this post.




The origin of apocalyptic overpopulation theory


In his 1798 Essay on the Principle of Population, Thomas Malthus argued that the growth in the food supply is linear, whereas the growth in the population rate is exponential. Whenever the population exceeds the food supply, social turmoil erupts until drastic checks such as famines, wars, and epidemics lowered populations down to sustainable levels. The only way to avoid periodic disaster is to implement strict population controls, which have historically included both voluntary restraints, as well as coercive measures such as limits on family size and mass sterilization of “undesirable groups.”


Malthus was wrong


Malthus predicted a population crash by the middle of the 19th century. In reality, living standards have increased over sixty times since 1820 despite a tripling of the European population in the 18th century.1 Meanwhile, family sizes fell naturally without the need for coercive measures.

Nevertheless, modern Malthusians perpetually extend the date of the inevitable apocalypse to the near future. Faced with the astounding growth of agricultural yields which virtually eliminated hunger in the West, environmentalists are continually discovering new resources to run out of, whether fossil fuels, metals, land, or water.

The discrepancy is explained by two errors in the Malthusian model: the population growth rate is not exponential, while the potential growth in human productivity is.


Read More at the Malthusianism Link.





Ehrlich, one of the prominent thinkers in the neo-Malthusian tradition, argues that ‘…civilization is in imminent serious jeopardy.’ [6] The roots of the problems are mainly to be found in Asia and Africa where populations are growing the fastest. He continues by saying that population growth at current levels is a relatively new phenomenon, and has particularly occurred from the 1950s onwards, but has roots back to the industrial revolution. Despite this, the problem, he argues, lies in the fact that population does not grow so fast that it is perceived by individuals, and hence not regarded as a problem. If we do not end the population increase, he predicts, there is a real chance that nature will do it for us. [7] This reasoning stems from a view that environmental degradation is caused by how many people there are, and not how many resources they use, a criticism that will explored below.


Ehrlich further argues that instead of having nature controlling the population for us, we have to do so ourselves, as this will be a more human way than having ‘nature wiping out the surplus’ of human population. Population growth is labelled a cancer-like disease that needs to be treated by lowering birth-rates to just under the human death rate, through the use of contraceptions. [8] He also believed that if policies of population control were not accepted willingly, they should be forced, like in India where he advocated that all men with more than 3 children should be forcibly sterilised. He has also glorified China’s one-child policy. It is such an attitude that has helped justify incidents of forces sterilisation that has taken place in Africa and other parts of the developing world. [9] [Full disclosure: two typos were corrected]


To read of the variations of Neo-Malthusianism read this rather tongue-in-cheek toned essay entitled, “The definitive guide to modern-day Malthusians”.


Anti-Human Ideology


The global warming dispute starts with a doctrine which claims that the rough coexistence of climate changes, of growing temperatures and of man-made increments of CO2 in the atmosphere — and what is more, only in a relatively short period of time — is a proof of a causal relationship between these phenomena. To the best of my knowledge there is no such relationship between them. It is, nevertheless, this claim that forms the basis for the doctrine of environmentalism.


It is not a new doctrine. It has existed under various headings and in various forms and manifestations for centuries, always based on the idea that the starting point of our thinking should be the Earth, the planet or nature, not man or mankind. It has always been accompanied by the plan that we have to come back to the original state of the Earth, unspoiled by us, humans. The adherents of this doctrine have always considered us, the people, a foreign element. They forget that it doesn’t make sense to speak about the world without people because there would be no one to speak. If we take the reasoning of the environmentalists seriously, we find that theirs is an anti-human ideology. (Read the Rest …)



John P. Holdren


John P. Holdren has been named President Barack Obama’s ‘Science Czar.”


Holdren’s official titles are: Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy; Assistant to the President for Science and Technology; and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (Kathy Shaidle)



In 1969 Holdren wrote that it was imperative “to convince society and its leaders that there is no alternative but the cessation of our irresponsible, all-demanding, and all-consuming population growth.” That same year, he and professor of population studies Paul Ehrlich jointly predicted: “If … population control measures are not initiated immediately and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”

In 1971 Holdren and Ehrlich warned that “some form of ecocatastrophe, if not thermonuclear war, seems almost certain to overtake us before the end of the century.”

Viewing capitalism as an economic system that is inherently harmful to the natural environment, Holdren and Ehrlich (in their 1973 book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions) called for “a massive campaign … to de-develop the United States” and other Western nations in order to conserve energy and facilitate growth in underdeveloped countries. “De-development,” they said, “means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.” “By de-development,” they elaborated, “we mean lower per-capita energy consumption, fewer gadgets, and the abolition of planned obsolescence.” The authors added:


“The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge. They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than in the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential if a decent life is to be provided for every human being.”


On another occasion, Holdren, when asked whether Americans would “need to reduce their living standards,” said:


“I think ultimately that the rate of growth of material consumption is going to have to come down, and there’s going to have to be a degree of redistribution of how much we consume, in terms of energy and material resources, in order to leave room for people who are poor to become more prosperous.”


… (Discover The Networks excerpt)


Paul Ehrlich



Ehrlich started his academic career as an entomologist, an expert on Lepidoptera – butterflies.  But in 1968 he wrote one of the biggest best-sellers in the history of pseudo-scientific literature, The Population Bomb.  In it, Ehrlich reprised the work of Thomas Malthus, arguing that population growth would eventually, inevitably lead mankind to three choices:  Stop making new humans, stop consuming resources, or starve to death.  The book started “The battle to feed all of humanity is over … hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death.” He spent much of the next decade writing other books and articles in support of his thesis in Population Bomb, adding in a later article “By 1985 enough millions will have died to reduce the earth’s population to some acceptable level, like 1.5 billion people.” The book and his body of “work” through the seventies proposed a number of radical solutions to the overpopulation crisis; dumping sterilizing agents into water supplies, allowing only selected people the privilege of reproduction, and performing mass “triage” of nations, the same way an emergency room triages patients – …


By the mid-seventies, though Ehrlich broadened his sights a bit, beyond overpopulation and into geopolitics.  In 1975′s The End of Affluence, Ehrlich predicted cataclysmic food riots in America, leading the President to declare martial law.  But it did no good – in Ehrlich’s narrative – because the world was driven to destroy the US in a combined nuclear assault, spurred by our use of…




He broadened it further with 1978′s The Race Bomb, which was a paranoid melange on the dangers of racial diversity, followed by The Golden Door: International Migration, Mexico, and the United States, in which he called for sealing off the border long before it became Tom Tancredo’s issue.


By the eighties, he’d joined with much of the left’s elite (who were, by the by, not busy participating in food riots or race wars, and were well-fed enough to go to protests) in warning about the danger of nuclear war, joining with Carl Sagan to write The Cold And The Dark, demanding the US disarm just in time for our generations of deterrence to render the point moot with the fall of the Soviet Union.


He was, of course, early on the Climate Change bandwagon, with Betrayal of Science and Reason: How Anti-Environment Rhetoric Threatens Our Future, a 1998 book co-authored with his wife Anne, which basically served as a model for the left’s response to questions about Global Warming this past decade – he didn’t call for Nuremberg trials per se, but he wasn’t that far off, either.



He’s (sic) blamed Western Civilization – especially our economic freedom – for successive waves of self-caused, predicted catastrophes.


He’s (sic) prescription to deal with these catastrophes has been, in every case, for the individual to surrender his/her autonomy, and even future, to an all-wise, all-knowing, all-powerful central entity that’ll make all the hard, life and death choices for them.


… (Ehrlich’s lifetime of hot air; Mitch Berg; Hot Air, 3/7/2010)



Planetary Regime


White House science czar John Holdren has called for the United States to surrender sovereignty to a “Planetary Regime” armed with sufficient military power to enforce population limits on nations as a means of preventing a wide range of perceived dangers from global eco-disasters involving Earth’s natural resources, climate, atmosphere and oceans.


As previously reported, WND has obtained and reviewed a copy of the 1970s college textbook “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” that Holdren co-authored with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich’s wife, Anne. The authors argued that involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by “climate change.”


On page 943, the authors recommended the creation of a “Planetary Regime” created to act as an “international superagency for population, resources, and environment.”


The authors argued, “Such a Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist.” (Holdren sought ‘planetary regime’; Jerome Corsi; WND, 10/10/2009)


Climate Change


2007-03-21 — WDC Media News — WASH—Mar 20—DJNS– The President of the Czech Republic , Vaclav Klaus responded in a letter to questions from U.S. Congressmen about global warming. Klaus is a free market economist and has seen first hand the debate in Europe over global warming. He told Congressmen, “As someone who lived under communism for most of my life I feel obliged to say that the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity at the beginning of the 21st century is not communism or its various softer variants. Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism.” Klaus said that this ideology preaches earth and nature and wants a “central (now global) planning of the whole world.”

Klaus said, “The environmentalists consider their ideas and arguments to be an undisputable truth and use sophisticated methods of media manipulation and PR campaigns to exert pressure on policymakers to achieve their goals. Their argumentation is based on the spreading of fear and panic by declaring the future of the world to be under serious threat. In such an atmosphere they continue pushing policymakers to adopt illiberal measures, impose arbitrary limits, regulations, prohibitions, and restrictions on everyday human activities and make people subject to omnipotent bureaucratic decision-making.” Klaus has revealed the spirit behind global warming, it is the spirit of communism by another name. (The Communist Influence Of Global Warming; Bill Wilson; PR with a Higher Purpose; 3-21-07)


JRH 6/22/11


The Elite’s Plan for Global Extermination

Exposed by Dr. Webster Tarpley 1/4


Posted by Tomas Carter

Post on June 19, 2011

InChristNetwork (Registration and Approval Needed)


In this interview, Dr. Tarpley reviews the writings of John P. Holdren, the current White House science advisor. This interview conclusively exposes scientific elite’s true agenda: world-wide genocide and the formation of a global government to rule.


Historian and author Webster Tarpley exposes how White House science czar John P. Holdren, who infamously co-wrote a 1977 textbook in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, is a Malthusian fanatic in the tradition of the arcane anti-human ideology that originated amongst British aristocracy in the 19th century.


Holdren calls himself a “neo-Malthusian” in his own book, and as Tarpley explains, is a historical pessimist who has rejected the idea that America and humanity as a whole can progress through ingenuity, industry and economic growth. Instead, Holdren sees humankind as a cancer upon the earth.


Holdren wants to set up a “Science Court,” where potential developments could be blocked by government decree if they don’t conform to the planned society necessary under Holdren’s “planetary regime”. He also seeks to institute “de-development” worldwide to prevent the third world from ever lifting itself out of poverty and roll things back to “pre-industrial civilization” where average life spans would not be much more than 30 years.


Holdren’s co-author, Paul Ehrlich, is a discredited crank who wrote books in the 70’s claiming that England would not exist as a land mass by the year 2000 because of climate change. As Tarpley explains, Ehrlich’s warning of a “population bomb” has proven incorrect, with population in Europe, Japan and the United States falling when immigration is removed from the equation.


Not a member? CLICK HERE to subscribe now!


[SlantRight Editor: you can read the entire Prison Planet article HERE.]