Was Obama’s White House Politicizing Intelligence To Influence The 2016 Elections


Intro to ‘Was Obama’s White House Politicizing Intelligence To Influence The 2016 Elections’

Blog Editor John R. Houk

By Fred Fleitz

Posted 4/6/17

 

The Dems and the Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) have been hell-bent to disqualify President Trump since election day 2016. All disqualification agendas seem to gravitate around President Trump colluded with Russia to win over Crooked Hillary.

 

It is my belief the “collusion” accusation is horse pucky, but Russian attempts to manipulate the American voter is very possible. AND if POSSIBLE turns into reality, Russia needs to suffer any kind consequences the Trump Administration is willing to inflict. By inflict I mean at least with a Cold War-style agitation to see how far the Russians are willing to confront the still most powerful nation in the world which of course is the United States of America.

 

That being said, the continuous disparaging of President Trump should be examined by the Trump Administration Department of Justice for crimes by Dems, the Left MSM, current government civil servant lifers loyal to BHO AND former Obama Administration Officials INCLUDING the treasonous former President Barack Hussein Obama.

 

My thoughts on American collusion with evil leads me to a Fred Fleitz article entitled, “Was Obama’s White House Politicizing Intelligence To Influence The 2016 Elections”.

 

JRH 4/6/17

Please Support NCCR

***************

Was Obama’s White House Politicizing Intelligence To Influence The 2016 Elections

 

By Fred Fleitz

April 6, 2017

The Federalist

 

The truth is that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies did not conclude that Russia tried to interfere in the election or help Trump win. Not even close.

 

Although there are strong indications the Obama administration abused intelligence collection by U.S. agencies to gather information on the Trump campaign to leak to the news media, it also appeared to abuse another U.S. intelligence mission: intelligence analysis.

 

Congressional Democrats and the mainstream media consider it gospel truth that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies unanimously concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump win. But should we treat this assessment as true in light of major errors in U.S. intelligence analysis in the past and its politicization? Is something gospel truth just because U.S. intelligence agencies say it is?

 

The truth is that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies did not conclude that Russia tried to interfere in the election or help Trump win. Not even close.

 

What Intelligence Has Really Confirmed About Russia

 

U.S. intelligence agencies issued two assessments on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. The first was an October 7 statement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that said WikiLeaks disclosures of Democratic emails during the election were “consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” but did not say there was any evidence of Russian involvement.

 

Moreover, although this statement said the U.S. intelligence community held this position, the memo was issued by only two agencies, and was called a “Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement.” Hillary Clinton seized on this statement in the last presidential debate on October 19 by inaccurately claiming “We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin.”

 

The fact that this memo was not an intelligence community document issued by all agencies with equities in this issue was very unusual. It also was suspicious that an unclassified intelligence analysis so advantageous to one presidential candidate was issued just before the election and only two weeks before the last presidential debate. In my view, this looked like looked like a clumsy attempt by the Obama White House to issue an intelligence assessment to boost Clinton’s presidential campaign and hurt the Trump campaign.

 

The second intelligence assessment on this question, issued on January 6, 2017, I believe represents a serious instance of a presidential administration manipulating U.S. intelligence analysis to issue a politicized analysis to sabotage an incoming president from a different political party. The January 6 analysis found that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election and hurt Hillary’s candidacy to promote Trump. The assessment said this interference came at the direction of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

 

What About All the Missing Intelligence Agencies?

 

Like the October memo, congressional Democrats and the news media have said this was the unanimous conclusion of all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies. But also like the October memo, this was not the case. The January 6 assessment was an “Intelligence Community Assessment.” Such analyses are usually issued and cleared by most if not all U.S. intelligence agencies and have a statement on the first page that usually reads “this is an IC-coordinated assessment.”

 

The January 6 Intelligence Community Assessment lacked such a statement because it reflected the views of only three U.S. intelligence agencies: Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and National Security Agency. The CIA and FBI concluded with high confidence that Russia intervened in the election to help Trump win. NSA concluded this with moderate confidence.

 

Why did other U.S. intelligence agencies with major equities in this issue not participate in the January 6 assessment? Why were the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security part of the October assessment but not the January one? Where were the Defense Intelligence Agency, the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, and the military intelligence agencies?

 

The January assessment also was very unusual because it was such a conclusive analysis of a very controversial subject with no dissenting views. Based my CIA experience, this is unprecedented and makes me wonder whether intelligence agencies that may have dissented were deliberately excluded.

 

There also is the question as to whether this assessment was written to conform to a predetermined conclusion by the Obama White House to undermine the Trump administration. The U.S. intelligence community has played political games like this before with interagency assessments to promote political agendas. One of the most notorious examples of this was the controversial 2007 National Intelligence Estimate on Iran’s nuclear program that was intended to undermine President Bush’s Iran policy.

 

There Are Indications Intelligence Has Been Politicized

 

CIA Director John Brennan’s role in approving this assessment raises serious questions about whether it was manipulated for political reasons. Brennan has been heavily criticized for politicizing intelligence for the Obama administration. This includes the role he played in the 2012 CIA talking points on the Benghazi terrorist attacks. He also has been openly and extremely hostile toward Trump before and after the election.

 

Given FBI Director James Comey’s statements at a recent House Intelligence Committee hearing that the conclusion in the January 6 assessment that Russia intervened in the election to help Trump was based on logic and not evidence, it is hard to believe this was not a pre-cooked conclusion driven by the highly partisan Brennan.

 

I strongly believe that if there were any evidence that Russia intervened in the election to help Trump win, or that Russia and the Trump campaign collaborated to affect the outcome of the election, this intelligence would have been leaked by Obama holdovers in government and the so-called “Deep State” to The New York Times long ago. The fact that Comey could not point to such evidence and this information has not been leaked suggests there is no such evidence because this didn’t happen.

 

The current congressional investigations of possible Russian interference in the election and the Obama administration’s misuse of U.S. intelligence collection to surveil the Trump campaign must also include whether intelligence analysis was politicized to damage Trump’s candidacy and presidency. These investigations must look at how the above analyses were drafted, who drafted them, and why some agencies did not participate. The committees also need to uncover any evidence of the White House trying to influence the outcome of these assessments or excluding certain agencies from participating.

 

It is time to call out Democrats and reporters who portray the idea that Russia intervened in the election to help Trump win as established truth because it is the unanimous assessment of all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies. I expect the congressional investigations will conclude this claim is false and actually represented a deliberate effort to manipulate intelligence analysis to undermine the Trump presidency.

 

________________

Fred Fleitz is senior vice president for policy and programs with the Center for Security Policy. He worked in national-security positions for 25 years with the CIA, the State Department, and the House Intelligence Committee. Follow him on Twitter @fredfleitz.

 

Copyright © 2017 The Federalist, a wholly independent division of FDRLST Media, All Rights Reserved.

 

Obama’s Insidious CVE


catastrophic-failure-islamic-terrrism

John R. Houk

© February 9, 2017

 

Americans that have not been brainwashed by eight years of the Obama Administration in collusion with the Leftist MSM, should not be surprised at the Dems and media excoriating President Trump’s protection of American from Islamic terrorism.

 

Obama and the Southern Poverty Law Center (More specifics on the SPLC from the Social Contract Press) were fairly successful in purging Law Enforcement of knowledgeable Counter Terrorism experts. Then proceeded to label Conservative organizations, Traditional Values Christian organizations and Counterjihad organizations as bigoted, hate-inspiring, and Islamophobic American right wing terrorists.

 

Check this out:

 

Unreal… Obama’s DHS Continues to Target Conservatives & Liberty Lovers As Terrorists (Video)

 

It’s an Obama bizarro world
The Obama administration holds peace talks with Taliban killers but treats patriotic Americans as terrorists.
Go figure.

 

The Department of Homeland Security is continuing to target patriotic Americans and conservatives who “believe that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack” as terrorists.  They even have this listed in their latest report.
This is unbelievable.

 

VIDEO: DHS continues to target conservatives and ignore Islamists


 

[Not part of Gateway Pundit article but important] Posted by usACTIONnews

Published on Jul 9, 2012

“Groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent.” describes potential terrorists? WTH? DHS is using left wing hate groups and even Islamic groups with ties to terrorism as consultants to determine who are threats.

From a Jan, 2011 article “How Dept. of Homeland Security identifies ‘right wing extremists’:

The radical leftist group Southern Poverty Law Center has partnered with the Department of Homeland Security in a ‘Working Group’ called Countering violent Extremism to paint conservatives as hate groups and extremists.

Former Attorney General Edwin Meese says it is “despicable” for the Southern Poverty Law Center to classify the Family Research Council and a dozen other top conservative organizations as “hate groups” similar to the Ku Klux Klan.

The SPLC has a history of targeting conservatives and conservative groups as racist, homophobic, or extremist if they disagree with the radical left positions of the SPLC on any number of issues. An article at Discover the Networks.org says “What makes the Southern Poverty Law Center particularly odious is its habit of taking legitimate conservatives and jumbling them with genuine hate groups (the Klan, Aryan Nation, skinheads, etc.), to make it appear that there’s a logical relationship between say opposing affirmative action and lynching, or demands for an end to government services for illegal aliens and attacks on dark-skinned immigrants. The late novelist/philosopher Ayn Rand called this “the broad-brush smear.””

…..
The SPLC has joined the Department of Homeland Security in a ‘Working Group’ called Countering violent Extremism. John Cohen, President and CEO of SPLC is listed as a member and Laurie Wood, Analyst, Southern Poverty Law Center/Instructor, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center is listed as an ‘expert in subject matter’. The members of the group also include three from Muslim organizations but we don’t see any conservatives. (see the list at the end of the report)

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) which has been determined by the courts to be a terrorist support group proudly points out on their Facebook page that its Michigan members ‘participated a Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Working Group meeting with law enforcement officials and community advocates in Dearborn, Mich.'[ibid].

So we have the Southern Poverty Law Center, also known as The Church of Morris Dees, which calls groups and individuals like the Family Research Council, Eagle Forum, the Heritage Foundation, Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Rep. Steve King (R-IA), and Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) ‘right wing extremists’ and the Council on American-Islamic Relations which the FBI has proven to be linked to a terrorist organization teaming up with the US Department of Homeland Security to determine what groups in America should be categorized as ‘extremist’ and potentially violent.

Now you can see why the DHS came out with its Rightwing Extremism report in April of 2009 that warned of potential violence by people against illegal immigration and gun control, and returning military veterans. Now that’s change.

[The rest of the Gateway Pundit article is an excerpt of above info] (Unreal… Obama’s DHS Continues to Target Conservatives & Liberty Lovers As Terrorists (Video); By Jim Hoft; Gateway Pundit; 7/11/12 4:45 am)

 

If you want to see the idiotic SPLC list of legitimate Counterjihadists labelled as dangerous right wing hatemongers, you can go to this one of many titles (this one 10/25/16): “A Journalist’s Manual: Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists”.

 

Here is an excerpt pointing to the Obama purge of anything Islamic from training manuals and official reports:

 

 

In another example of the administration’s ability to make key words disappear, a 2013 Judicial Watch report revealed that the FBI scrubbed its law enforcement training material of any language that might be deemed “offensive” to Muslims. Per those guidelines, hundreds of references to “Muslim,” “Islam” or “jihad” were removed from the 2004 9/11 commission report.

 

U.S. Government Terrorism Terminology References

 

The witnesses provided more evidence to corroborate these findings. Mr. Philip Haney, a retired Customs and Border Protection Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, revealed that the CIA has scrubbed more than 800 law enforcement records that were almost all connected to the Muslim brotherhood.

 

The first “great purge,” he said, was in 2009. Yet, in 2012 they didn’t just modify the records, they eliminated them out of the system, which, he noted, bypasses security protocol in Homeland Security. READ ENTIRETY (Cruz Hearing Exposes the Obama Admin’s History of Purging References to Islamic Terror; By Cortney O’Brien; Townhall; 6/29/16 9:15 AM)

 

More details on the Obama purge by Patrick Poole 3/26/14: “A detailed look at ‘the purge’ of U.S. counter-terrorism training by the Obama administration”.

 

So, why the heck am I rehashing Obama’s treacherous history after a majority of States elected Trump over Crooked Hillary? BECAUSE America’s Left is doing everything from lying, Fake News, civil disturbances, and questionable legal procedures to prevent President Trump from following through on his campaign promises.

 

I was alerted by email via Counterjihadist writer Paul Sutliff, that the Donald is going undo Obama’s Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) agenda which focused on White Supremacists. Please recall from above, that the Obama Administration lumped Conservatives, Christian Values and Counterjihadists with right wing extremists.

 

The new agenda focus will be Islamic terrorism. Paul Sutliff’s email alerts the reader he has been writing about the CVE agenda for some time:

 

Last night I was about to go to sleep and a friend called full of excitement saying did you see what Trump just did? He ended CVE! CVE is Countering Violent Extremism. I have written a few articles exposing their friendliness with the Muslim Brotherhood and the granting of special privileges for members of the Muslim Brotherhood. I wrote Why is Heritage Foundation Promoting Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)? (Part 1 of 3) on May 13, 2016, I wrote My What Strange Bedfellows the Heritage Foundation Has! on May 26, 2016 which further exposed the CVE and on July 5, 2016 I wrote Countering Violent Extremism: A Ghost Buster Solution to a Real World Problem. These articles earned me an interview with Vlad Tepes of TheRebel.media. Maybe Trump is reading my stuff, but I think it is more likely that he has hired good people!

 

SO imagine my excitement with that news! All I can say now is thank you Mr. President. You have earned my prayers and respect.

 

Get informed on Obama’s CVE in Paul’s articles linked above. For your convenience, I am cross posting the Tepes-Sutliff interview from The Rebel linked above.

 

JRH 2/9/17

Please Support NCCR

****************

Paul Sutliff interview (Part II): “Countering Violent Extremism” strategy is anything but

 

Posted by VICTOR LASZLO

REBEL COMMENTATOR

July 16, 2016

The Rebel

 

This is the second part of the interview with Paul Sutliff. Paul explains the US Government’s use of the office of Countering Violent Extremism to assist the Muslim Brotherhood, and of all things, fund mosques.

 

VIDEO: Paul Sutliff interview Part II The CVE


 

Posted by Vlad Tepes

Published on Jul 16, 2016

 

The first part of the interview can be seen here at The Rebel. 

 

His books can be purchased at Amazon.com

Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam

and Stealth Jihad two: American Colleges. 

 

Paul’s website is here.

 

At the end of the interview, Paul mentions Stephen Coughlin, the retired Maj. who was in Army intelligence. His website is hereand an interview he did for the Rebel can be seen here.

 

+++

Blog Editor: Here is a cross post from PJ Media by Patrick Poole CVE:

******

Trump Seeks to End Obama’s ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ Scam

 

By PATRICK POOLE

FEBRUARY 5, 2017

PJ Media

 

Among the litany of Obama administration disasters, the rapid collapse of his “Countering Violent Extremism” (CVE) agenda is among the most consequential.

 

But groups in line to receive federal CVE grants announced just days before the end of the Obama era are now whining as the Trump administration seeks to put an end to the CVE scam.

 

Driven directly from the White House, the Obama administration’s CVE agenda was a replacement following a purge of counter-terrorism training across the federal government during 2011-2012 in response to a targeted series of reports by far-Left bloggers and reporters claiming widespread bias and “Islamophobia.”

 

Many of those claims were later debunked, but with the damage done the administration’s purge pressed ahead as it implemented CVE at the demand of Islamic groups, some of whom were directly involved in the formation of the administration’s CVE policies.

 

But as it became apparent that terror recruitment was escalating rapidly at nearly the same time that CVE was being imposed on agencies and departments across the board, the inability of CVE to actually countering any “extremists” was exposed. The same Islamic groups that urged the imposition of CVE then turned against the efforts when they realized that CVE was still primarily directed at the growing threat of Islamic recruitment, and not towards stigmatizing the administration’s perceived domestic political enemies.

 

By January 2015, Politico was already declaring that CVE was a complete flop:

 

POLITICO

@politico

 

No answer for homegrown terrorism? Obama’s plan to combat radicalization is a flop, critics say.

POLITICO Twitter Photo

 

No answer for homegrown terrorism?

Obama’s plan to combat radicalism is a flop critics say.

politico.com

 

The CVE pilot programs in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and Boston were already so unsuccessful that the media had to announce they were off to a “slow start” a year ago:

 

WTOP

@WTOP

 

Effort in 3 US cities to combat extremism off to slow start https://t.co/4DMrdthiUn 

 

8:30 AM – 24 Mar 2016

 

The failures of the program were so pronounced that NPR conceded the point, claiming that even if the CVE programs were not effective they still somehow helped the communities.

 

NPR Popular 

@nprpopular

 

Whether It Works Or Not, U.S. Anti-Radicalization Plan Can Benefit Communities https://t.co/Xn34FdLc4N 

 

7:15 AM – 3 Apr 2016

 

As I noted in an assessment of Obama’s CVE policies here at PJ Media last year, and in a separate monographmeasuring Obama’s policies by his own stated White House goals, the CVE program was proven to be a complete failure in the very three areas it was intended to support: community engagement, training, and counter-propaganda.

 

It’s no surprise then that one of the first moves by the Trump administration will be to shut down the failed CVE program, as reported by Reuters:

 

Reuters Top News

@Reuters

 

Exclusive: Trump to focus counter-extremism program solely on Islam – sources https://t.co/9wHw9pKAn6 

 

Trump – CVE

 

7:11 PM – 1 Feb 2017

 

That decision in turn set off a wave of complaints by groups that were hoping to receive federal CVE grants that were rushed out by the Obama administration in its last few days in office:

 

CVE Community 

@CVEcommunity

 

Statement by @DHSgov‘s Jeh Johnson Announcing 1st Round of Countering Violent Extremism Grants

 

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/13/statement-secretary-jeh-johnson-announcing-first-round-dhss-countering-violent #CVE #PVE

 

2:58 PM – 13 Jan 2017

 

Those would-be federal grant recipients are now turning to the media to air their complaints:

 

Adam Goldman

@adamgoldmanNYT

 

Pointing to Trump, Groups Reject U.S. Aid to Fight Extremism w/@mattapuzzo https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/us/politics/trump-muslim-groups-aid-extremism.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share 

 

5:09 PM – 2 Feb 2017

 

One of the first groups that took to the media was the Twin Cities-based Ka Joog (which in Somali means “stay away”). Ka Joog had already been one of the groups to receive $300,000 in federal money and another $250,000 appropriated by the state of Minnesota, and was in line to receive another $500,000 federal grant from Homeland Security.

 

Star Tribune 

@StarTribune

 

Citing “unofficial war on Muslim-Americans” launched by Trump, Minneapolis nonprofit rejects $500,000 federal grant https://t.co/lIlfSIw5j5 

 

12:25 AM – 2 Feb 2017

 

AVE 

@ave_org

 

Somali nonprofits get federal grants to counter extremism, Minneapolis #CVE https://t.co/obtvf32BuV 

 

7:30 AM – 19 Jan 2017

 

Ka Joog has been one of the premier programs that CVE defenders have pointed to in calling for additional funding for the CVE program.

 

And yet in one of the group’s most visible failuresthe nephew of the organization’s executive director was recruited by the Islamic State and eventually tried and convicted in federal court.

 

Another Twin Cities groups, Heartland Democracy, was scheduled to receive $165,000.

 

That group had been among the first to participate in a pet “deradicalization” project by the chief federal judge in Minnesota who tried many of the Islamic State recruiting cases.

 

But court documents exposed that Heartland Democracy had no experience in “jihadi rehab,” and its curriculum was described as “more high school civics course than religious deprogramming.”

 

The Daily Beast

@thedailybeast

 

Group With No Jihadi Experience Rehabs ISIS Recruit: http://t.co/8jWwAioziU 

 

8:35 AM – 25 Aug 2015

 

The Daily Beast reported on the regimen established for their first “deradicalization” client:

 

He and a Somali-American mentor began to work through an extensive reading list, which included Richard Wright’s Native Son, a novel about growing up poor and black in the 1930s, and an article by Native American author Sherman Alexie about how poetry freed him from the “reservation” of his mind.

 

McKinley would not say how often Yusuf met his mentor.

 

“We met with him regularly, I don’t know the number of times a week,” she said. When pressed on whether they met weekly, biweekly, or at a different pace, McKinley would not clarify. “We met with him regularly.”

 

Court documents also reference Yusuf meeting with religious leaders, but McKinley wasn’t sure about that.

 

“I don’t know if he’s met with any religious leaders,” she said in response to a question about meeting with imams. “I mean, he’s an adult, he can get any visitor he wants.”

 

That first client was sent back to jail after a search of his room at a halfway house found a box cutter.

 

The Obama administration’s CVE programs have a lengthy history of failure:

 

  • As I reported here at PJ Media just a few days ago, an Associated Press investigation into the Pentagon’s $500 million WebOps program to counter Islamic State propaganda found widespread incompetence and corruption. According to whistleblowers, civilian Arabic specialists with no understanding of Islam tried to defeat complex religious justifications for terrorism, resulting in the program becoming a laughingstock in jihadist circles.

 

  • In December 2014, the New York Times reported that the then-head of Special Operations Command, Major Gen. Michael Nagata, convened a series of conference calls with outside experts attempting to understand why the message of the Islamic State had grown so dangerous. But after the Obama administration’s counter-terror training purge, Gen. Nagata was forced to admit that “we do not understand the movement, and until we do, we are not going to defeat it….We have not defeated the idea. We do not even understand the idea.

 

  • In September 2011, Obama signed an executive order creating the State Department’s Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications (CSCC).One of their early failures was a graphic video produced called “Welcome to ISIS Land,” targeting would-be Islamic State recruits. The center’s director was quickly replaced. Then a Twitter campaign, “Think Again Turn Away,” was largely panned by terror experts who claimed the effort was largely ineffective and was actually legitimizing the terrorist narrative. A panel of outside experts convened by the State Department agreed, finding that the CSCC was so counterproductive to its mission that they questioned whether the U.S. government should be involved in counter-propaganda at all. The center was promptly closed.

 

  • One of the first CVE guidelines produced by the Department of Homeland Security in 2011 was to instruct federal agencies to avoid using “trainers who are self-professed ‘Muslim Reformers,'” and yet documents uncovered regarding meetings with DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano show the agency soliciting advice from known extremist groups and controversial Islamic leaders. Some of these extremist leaders even held official positions advising DHS. Last June, when the DHS Countering Violent Extremism Subcommittee released its recommendations urging $100 million in new CVE funding, it urged banning the use of “jihad” or “sharia” in training — two very common terms used by terrorist recruiters. One of the subcommittee members, a Syrian immigrant, had previously said that the 9/11 terror attacks had “changed the world for good.” And in DecemberDHS teamed up with the State Department to bring in the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization that the Justice Department had argued in federal court had supported terrorism, to teach a CVE course for French officials. Even though the State Department programs have been universally panned, it was reported last August that they had tripled the budget.

 

  • In implementing the Obama administration’s CVE agenda, the FBI had conducted a wide-scale purge of its terrorism training curriculum at the request of Islamic groups claiming it was biased. In a move questioned by members of Congress, the FBI classified the identities of the outside experts brought in to censor the material. A subsequent review of the censored terror-training material discovered suspect and inconsistent standards in purging the curriculum. More recently, a FBI website and video game (“Don’t Be a Puppet”) intended to target youth vulnerable to terrorist recruitment was launched, and then suspended after just a day in response to complaints of Islamic groups, terror experts, and even teachers unions that the effort was biased, ineffective, and encouraged students to inform on each other. Some of the criticism came from the FBI’s own Muslim outreach partners that were brought in to advise the bureau on its CVE policies.

 

So it’s no great mystery why the incoming Trump administration began discussions about scaling back and ending Obama’s CVE program.

 

Others contend that the CVE grants were political payoffs to groups to enlist their aid in scuttling counter-terror programs and to silence any possible criticism of the Obama national security and foreign policy agenda.

 

The chairman of one group that was scheduled to receive a $400,000 CVE grant, Life After Hate, has publicly launched attacks on the incoming Trump administration and even called for the violent removal of President Trump one day after his inauguration.

 

Meanwhile in Minneapolis, as Ka Joog declines the $500,000 in announced DHS CVE grants the group has quickly transitioned from attempting to deradicalizing area Somali youth to publicly declaring that President Trump is engaged in “an official war against Islam” — parroting a standard terrorist narrative.

 

But as mentioned previously, the nephew of the executive director who had participated in Ka Joog programs was still recruited to join the Islamic State.

 

In another instance, an Islamic State recruit from Alexandria, Virginia, later captured by Kurdish troops and currently facing federal charges, lived less than 50 yards from one of the Obama administration’s top go-to CVE experts.

 

If these so-called CVE “experts” can’t prevent their closest relatives or neighbors from joining terrorist groups, why should the Trump administration continue to entrust them with our national security?

 

Despite all the media hand-wringing, it seems that questioning the effectiveness of Obama’s CVE program is entirely in order given its constant track record of failure.

 

Yet in light of the current media climate, the new administration should expect that it will come under fire for whatever they eventually replace the failed CVE agenda with. And the Islamic State and other terrorist groups continue to recruit and encourage supporters to conduct attacks inside the homeland.

 

Ending the CVE scam would be a good first step in reversing the corrosive policies established by the Obama administration that have hampered and sometimes punished our law enforcement and national security professionals for doing their job.

___________________

Obama’s Insidious CVE

John R. Houk

© February 9, 2017

_________________

 

Paul Sutliff interview (Part II): “Countering Violent Extremism” strategy is anything but

 

Copyright © TheRebel.media. Some rights reserved.

 

___________________

Trump Seeks to End Obama’s ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ Scam

 

Copyright © 2005-2017 PJ Media All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Somalis Given Access to Sensitive Information


Not only has Obama set the stage for Islamic terrorists to come to America as refugees, it appears the Obama Administration has allowed the “Department of Homeland Security has given Somalis “community engagement tours,” including security briefings, in secured areas at least three major U.S. airports – Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and Columbus, Ohio.”

JRH 12/18/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Somalis Given Access to Sensitive Information

 

U.S. Customs, Homeland Security Records Reveal Somalis Given Security Briefings, ‘Community Engagement Tours’ in Secured Areas at Major U.S. Airports

 

Sent by ACT for America

Sent 12/17/16 6:09 AM

 

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 31 pages of records from U.S. Customs and Border Protection revealing that the Department of Homeland Security has given Somalis “community engagement tours,” including security briefings, in secured areas at least three major U.S. airports – Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and Columbus, Ohio.

 

The records came in response to a May 2016 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, which sought records, documents and communications regarding a “Community Engagement Tour” in Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport on February 18, 2016.

 

The briefings provided to the Somali groups were so sensitive that in 14 instances the agency redacted portions of the records under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption (B)(7)(e), the law-enforcement “risk circumvention” exemption, which reads:

 

Exemption 7(E) of the Freedom of Information Act affords protection to all law enforcement information that would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law.

 

In another instance, Customs and Border Protection exempted under (B)(7)(e) a portion of a February 16, 2016, “Minute by Minute Agenda” provided during a tour/briefing of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP). The material that was withheld from Judicial Watch as too law-enforcement sensitive – but provided in full to the Somali group – included a section entitled: “TSA Overview — Processing [Redacted].”  The invitees were provided briefings of the Global Entry system, APC [Automated Passport Control] system, secondary screening procedures, baggage-screening procedures and given tours of the holding cells/interview rooms.

 

Notes from the February Minneapolis St. Paul Airport tour include: “Current CBP and TSA job vacancies were discussed. Attendees responded with requests for DHS outreach efforts during Somali community events to further advertise these positions to interested individuals.”

 

The newly released records also reveal:

 

  • In addition to the Minneapolis Airport tours/briefings given to Somalis during 2014 and 2015 – and first revealed by Judicial Watch in August 2016– tours of U.S. airports and security briefings also have been provided to other groups at airports in Los Angeles and Columbus, Ohio: “Once we agree on the dates we will select the time based on prayer schedules. Another idea could be the roundtable to take place at the airport after the tour. We have done that before in LA and Columbus and it worked well both times”.

 

  • The timing of the Minneapolis Airport tour given to a group of Somalis in February 2016 was scheduled between 6-8 pm because it would “accommodate prayer times well”

 

  • During the “annual” tour, federal authorities granted excursions of the facility’s “secure areas.” It is also noted that two parties in the previous year “did not pass vetting.”

 

  • The invitation extended to the Somalis for the Minneapolis Airport tour addressed them as “Dear Colleague,” and promised “walking people through CBP’s process, walking people through TSA’s process” and provide “a step-by-step tour of our operations, designed to offer a greater understanding of airport processes and procedures.”

 

Eight senior ranking Homeland Security and Customs officials were tasked with accompanying and briefing the Somalis on the February 18, 2016, Minneapolis Airport tour, including the Minneapolis Area Port Director, the Assistant Port Director, the Watch Commander, a Homeland Security Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Senior Policy Advisor (flown in from Washington), the TSA Federal Security Director and TSA Deputy Federal Security Director.

 

The documents show Customs officials reporting that one of the invited individuals had given “CBP Chicago a hard time” following the last tour and noted three of the invitees had had investigations against them, which had since been closed.  Another invitee had an active investigation pending.

 

“Logically, information that is too sensitive to provide to Judicial Watch and the public should not have been given to a ‘community engagement tour,’” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “The U.S. government has been aware for years that Minnesota is a hotbed of Somali terrorist-cell activity. The behind-the-scenes tours and security briefings of the Minneapolis airport very well could have created a threat to public safety.”

 

In August 2016, the Judicial Watch blog, Corruption Chronicles, reported on the Muslim airport tour story: “The Obama administration gave Somali Muslims behind-the-scenes tours at a major U.S. airport after the group complained to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson about feeling harassed and profiled, government records obtained by Judicial Watch reveal. The special security tours not offered to any other group occurred at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport after Department of Homeland Security roundtable meetings with local Somali leaders to obtain feedback for ‘modifications to practices that would allow for operations to be more culturally sensitive.’”

_______________________

SUPPORT ACT FOR AMERICA’S VITAL WORK

ACT for America is a registered 501 (c)(3) organization. All donations are tax deductible.

 

About ACT

 

ACT for America is the nation’s largest non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots national security organization with 400,000 members and more than 1,000 chapters around the country focused on educating, engaging, and mobilizing citizens and elected officials to impact legislative outcomes to protect America.

 

We’re committed to recruiting, training, and mobilizing citizens community by community to help protect and preserve American culture and to keep this nation safe.

 

ACT for America stands ready to take effective action as the only national security grassroots organization in America. If each of us does just a little, together we can accomplish a lot. We are America.

 

Who We Are

 

 

What We Do

 

ACT for America educates citizens and elected officials to impact public policy and protect America from terrorism. As a result, ACT’s grassroots network (1000 chapters strong) has driven the education process toward the successful passage of 43 bills in 22 states. ACT for America is continuing to READ ENTIRETY

 

Bachmann: Orlando is ‘wake-up call of all wake-up calls’


See Something Say Nothing bk jk

An Intro to “Orlando is ‘wake-up call of all wake-up calls’

Intro by John R. Houk

Intro date: June 22, 2016

 

WND sent me a book promotional that I believe is truly relevant for right now. The book exposes how the Obama Administration has transformed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from a protect American citizens’ department, into a protect Muslims at-all-costs organization even if the Muslim may show a tendency for Islamic terrorism. The book is by former DHS agent Philip Haney and WND journalist Art Moore and it is entitled “See Something Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes The Government’s Submission to Jihad”.

 

The promotional email itself is penned by former Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN). Since it is penned by Ms. Bachmann I think it might be a good guess that elements of the email are a part of the Forward she also penned for See Something Say Nothing.

 

The email has what appears to be a video of Michele Bachmann getting ready to promote the book however, the link embedded on the email takes one directly to the WND Super Store purchase page. The purchase page does have even more data about the book but no Bachmann video as implied by the email. Since I was in Bachmann’s corner while she was in the House in exposing radical Islam which made her an initial favorite of mine in the 2012 race for President (gag, she lost ultimately to Mitt Romney), I am going to post a few Bachmann book promotion videos from the WND Youtube channel.

 

The longer of the Bachmann promotionals will be in this intro and the shorter promotional will be in the body of the WND email roughly located in the same place. Also the WND Super Store page has a book trailer which I couldn’t figure out how to embed. So I will use a WND Youtube channel version I don’t think is quite as impressive as the one on the purchase page which the email links to several times if you desire to watch the original.

 

Michele Bachmann’s email starts out with making the Haney-Moore book relevant by tying it to the Orlando Massacre which she leaves the impression that act of Islamic terrorism was a result of Obama desiring to protect the civil rights of terrorists more than the lives of law abiding American citizens.

 

VIDEO: Former Rep. Michele Bachmann: Why I believe DHS Whistleblower Phil Haney

 

 

Posted by WNDTV

Published on Jun 16, 2016

 

One day after a prominent U.S. Muslim leader reacted to the November 2015 Paris attacks with a declaration that the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, has nothing to do with Islam, President Obama made the same assertion.

Who exactly is the enemy we face, not only in the Middle East but also within our borders? Is it “murderers without a coherent creed” or “nihilistic killers who want to tear things down,” as some described ISIS after 130 people were brutally slain and another 368 injured in a coordinated attack on Western soil that authorities say was organized with help from inside France’s Muslim communities.

After the Paris attacks, Obama, himself, described ISIS as “simply a network of killers who are brutalizing local populations.”

But how much do words and definitions really matter? According to the legendary military strategist Sun Tzu, if “you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one (battle) and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.”

When the Department of Homeland Security was founded in 2003, its stated purpose was “preventing terrorist attacks within the United States and READ THE REST

 

JRH 6/22/16

Please Support NCCR

********************

Bachmann: Orlando is ‘wake-up call of all wake-up calls’
Former congresswoman relied on ‘patriot’ DHS whistleblower Philip Haney

 

Attribution: Michele Bachmann

Sent: 6/21/2016 6:00 AM

Email sent from: WND

 

Former Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., urged Americans to stop deceiving themselves about the threat posed by radical Islamic terrorism and admit the obvious: We’re at war.

“This is the wake-up call of all wake-up calls,” Bachmann told WND. “This is an unbelievable tragedy that we saw. It isn’t just a mass shooting; it’s another jihadist attack against America. America is at war. We’re under attack on our own soil. Remember, George W. Bush said we’d have to fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here. Well guess what, we’re fighting them here.”

 

VIDEO: Former Rep. Michele Bachmann endorses book SEE SOMETHING SAY NOTHING

 

Posted by WNDTV

Published on Jun 15, 2016

 

Visit our website: http://www.wnd.com/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WNDTV-294590057337142/

 

Bachmann made the comments to WND editor Art Moore, co-author with former Department of Homeland Security agent Philip Haney of “See Something, Say Nothing.” Haney, who spearheaded investigations at the National Targeting Center, specialized in uncovering Islamic terrorist networks. However, his investigation was shut down by the Obama administration because of fears his research showed a connection between terrorism and Islam. Since the Orlando attack, Haney has alleged a connection between Sunday’s terrorist attack in Orlando and the attack in San Bernardino, California, in December.

Bachmann spoke of her experience working with Haney and contrasted his professionalism with the Obama administration’s seeming determination to promote a mythical version of a peaceful Islam.

“What Philip’s story is telling us is that we’re going down the wrong road,” Bachmann said. “Innocent Americans have gotten killed by following this false fantasy delusional view of Islam, that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. … Not all Muslims believe it, but this radical ideology is subscribed to by people who continue to carry out these terrorist attacks.”

 

Bachmann slammed President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as not really serious about stopping terrorism.

“Just as we saw, the FBI did in fact conduct not just one, not just two, but three interviews with this killer down in Orlando,” Bachmann charged. “Three interviews, and they couldn’t stop this guy. He had all sorts of, not even red flags, but blaring billboards about who he was, who his connections were and what his intentions were. And we still couldn’t stop him.”

Has our own government already surrendered to Islamic jihad? A national security insider uncovers the terrible truth. Philip Haney’s “See Something, Say Nothing” is available now from the WND Superstore.

“If we had all these clues and we still couldn’t stop him, we really aren’t serious about stopping terrorism. What this tells us is we have to change course. Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton is going down the same road of Barack Obama’s failed policies. It was her failed policies that got four Americans killed in Benghazi. Innocent Americans just got killed this weekend. This is a serious matter. It’s time to wake up.”

Bachmann called for a screening and vetting process at the borders of the United States to prevent the admission of Muslims committed to an extremist ideology.

 

“When we get a real view [of radical Islamic ideology], then we’ll understand that at the border, we’ll do vetting of people and find out what their ideology is,” she said. “And if they share these views, they shouldn’t be allowed into the United States because they intend upon violent acts upon people and institutions here.

“In any sane country, you protect yourself and your institutions. We no longer act with sane, common sense thoughts anymore.”

In a time of madness, Bachmann identified Haney as a model for what a federal employee should be, calling him a “patriot” and a “constitutionalist.” She also revealed she had worked with Haney when she was in Congress and had a seat on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

“A lot of time in front of these committees, we get a very whitewashed, sanitized version of what is going on because the agencies want to look good when they come before Congress,” she recalled. “They don’t want problems to be exposed; they want to look good. Our job is to find out what the truth is, what’s going on. In the area of intelligence, we deal with America’s classified secrets, and in particular, our focus was on terrorism. This is an extremely important job we have in Congress to keep the American people safe, and so I took this very seriously.”

Read more about “See Something Say Nothing”

As a result, Bachmann had her staff seek out experts who could tell her what was really going on when it came to threats to the United States.

“I was casting about, trying to find out more information than what I was getting in front of the Intel committee,” she recalled. “I just felt like I was not getting the full and complete picture. And I asked my assistant to find good, credible people. She brought in Philip Haney to me. The reason I found him credible is because he was working on the inside. He knew what he was talking about. I knew enough about his area of jurisdiction that I knew he knew what he was talking about.

“But more than that, he had facts, knowledge and information that he had put together. And it was clear to me that this was a guy whose motivation and purpose wasn’t personal. He wasn’t trying to self-promote; he was a genuine public servant.”

 

According to Bachmann, she and Haney worked together “as a good team.” She paid tribute to the analyst’s ability to find connections and patterns, a skill which made him a successful counter-terrorism agent but also a threat to the Obama administration.

“Philip Haney had information,” she said, explaining his situation. “He found patterns. He did exactly what he was told to do so ‘If you see something, say something.’ He did that, and when he did that, he was punished for doing his job. I saw what he was doing. I saw his information, and I took it to committee chairs, to committee sub-chairs. I tried to get his information published as far and wide as I possibly could because America needed a course correction. We needed to change our policy.”

Bachmann accused the federal government of deliberately concealing the motivations for Islamic terrorism.

“The bottom line is the administration made a decision that Islamic ideology has nothing to do with terrorism,” she alleged. “Well, if you listen to the terrorists themselves, it’s just the opposite. Almost 100 percent of the terrorists point to Islamic ideology as the reason they do what they do. But the United States government wasn’t even allowed to look in that direction.

“The official view that Hillary Clinton follows, that Barack Obama follows, is what was forced upon Philip Haney. And he was a person that wanted to follow the truth, not a delusional view, a false view of Islam.”

Bachmann said the example of Haney should serve as a rallying point for reforms to protect politically incorrect whistleblowers within the American government.

“There are good people who know what’s going on,” she commented. “They said something. And when they said something, they were punished for it. That’s wrong; that’s gotta stop. We’ve got to change the rules so that if they see Islamic terror, they can actually point to the cause and not be punished for it.”

Has our own government already surrendered to Islamic jihad? A national security insider uncovers the terrible truth. Philip Haney’s “See Something, Say Nothing” is available now from the WND Superstore.

 

[Blog Editor: The WND email goes on to promote another book. I am not sharing that part, but if you have interest the book is entitled “STOLEN SOVEREIGNTY: HOW TO STOP UNELECTED JUDGES FROM TRANSFORMING AMERICA (HARDCOVER)” by Mark Levin.]

 

+++

SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING – (HARDCOVER)

 

 

DETAILS

 

by Philip Haney and Art Moore

 

“Autographed Edition” available exclusively from the WND Superstore. Signed books are precious treasures. An autographed book from your favorite author can turn an item of personal value into a cherished keepsake and a wonderful addition to any book collection. To Purchase your copy, Click Here.

 

Product Description

 

One day after a prominent U.S. Muslim leader reacted to the November 2015 Paris attacks with a declaration that the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, has nothing to do with Islam, President Obama made the same assertion.

 

Who exactly is the enemy we face, not only in the Middle East but also within our borders? Is it “murderers without a coherent creed” or “nihilistic killers who want to tear things down,” as some described ISIS after 130 people were brutally slain and another 368 injured in a coordinated attack on Western soil that authorities say was organized with help from inside France’s Muslim communities.

 

After the Paris attacks, Obama, himself, described ISIS as “simply a network of killers who are brutalizing local populations.”

 

But how much do words and definitions really matter? According to the legendary military strategist Sun Tzu, if “you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one (battle) and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.”

 

When the Department of Homeland Security was founded in 2003, its stated purpose was “preventing terrorist attacks within the United States and reducing America’s vulnerability to terrorism.” The Bush administration’s definition of the enemy as a tactic, terrorism, rather than a specific movement, proved consequential amid a culture of political correctness. By the time President Obama took office, Muslim Brotherhood-linked leaders in the United States were forcing changes to national security policy and even being invited into the highest chambers of influence. A policy known as Countering Violent Extremism emerged, downplaying the threat of supremacist Islam as unrelated to the religion and just one among many violent ideological movements.

 

When recently retired DHS frontline officer and intelligence expert Philip Haney bravely tried to say something about the people and organizations that threatened the nation, his intelligence information was eliminated, and he was investigated by the very agency assigned to protect the country. The national campaign by the DHS to raise public awareness of terrorism and terrorism-related crime known as If You See Something, Say Something effectively has become If You See Something, Say Nothing.

 

In “See Something, Say Nothing,” Haney – a charter member of DHS with previous experience in the Middle East – and co-author Art Moore expose just how deeply the submission, denial and deception run. Haney’s insider, eyewitness account, supported by internal memos and documents, exposes a federal government capitulating to an enemy within and punishing those who reject its narrative.

 

Haney discloses:

 

  • How the Bush administration stripped him and other frontline officers of their ability to define the threat;

 

  • How much the Obama administration knew in advance of the Boston Marathon bombing and how it launched an ongoing cover-up on behalf of a major ally;

 

  • The administration’s stealth policy to protect Islamic leaders with supremacist beliefs and violent-jihadist ties, allowing them to freely travel between the U.S. and the Middle East;

 

  • The scope of access to the White House and the classified information the Obama administration gave to members of Muslim Brotherhood front groups;

 

  • The damning intelligence on Muslim Brotherhood-linked leaders invited to sit at the table and help form national-security policy;

 

  • The “words matter” memo imposing the demands of radical U.S. Muslims leaders on the DHS, including stripping intelligence and official communications of any mention of Islam in association with terrorism;

 

  • The purging of training material that casts Islam in a negative light;

 

  • The erasing and altering of vital intelligence on terrorists and terror threats;

 

  • The fear-based tactics imposed by the Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the U.S. and their accomplices that paralyze officials, members of Congress and any Department of Homeland Security employee who dares to expose or resist their agenda; and

 

  • Much more …

 

In this well-documented, first-person account of his unique service with DHS, Haney shows why it’s imperative that Americans demand that when they see something and say something, the servants under their charge do something to prevent a cunning, relentless enemy from carrying out its stated aim to “destroy Western Civilization from within.”

 

About the Author

 

Art Moore is an editor for WND.com and its monthly magazine and book-publishing division. He entered the media world as a public relations assistant for the Seattle Mariners and a sports correspondent for Associated Press Radio. Moore served for ten years in Eastern Europe with a Christian organization and earned a master’s degree in communications from Wheaton College. Before joining WND shortly after 9/11, he was a reporter for a daily newspaper and senior news writer for Christianity Today magazine.

 

Philip Haney studied Arabic culture and language while working as a scientist in the Middle East before becoming a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security in 2002 as a Customs & Border Protection agriculture officer. After advancing to an armed CBP officer where he served several tours of duty at the National Targeting Center near Washington, DC, where he quickly was promoted to its Advanced Targeting Team, an unprecedented accomplishment for an agent on temporary duty assignment. Officer Haney won numerous awards and commendations from his superiors for meticulously compiling information and producing actionable reports that led to the identification of hundreds of terrorists. He has specialized in Islamic theology and the strategy and tactics of the global Islamic movement. He retired in July 2015.

 

Product Details

 

  • Hardcover: 240 pages

 

  • Publisher: WND Books (May 24, 2016)

 

  • Language: English

 

  • Dimension: 6 x 9 inches

 

  • ISBN-13: 9781944229207

 

VIDEO: Philip Haney: Why I wrote See Something, Say Nothing

 

 

Posted by WNDTV

Published on May 18, 2016

 

Order your copy of See Something, Say Nothing here: http://superstore.wnd.com/See-Something-Say-Nothing-Hardcover

In “See Something, Say Nothing,” Haney – a charter member of DHS with previous experience in the Middle East – and co-author Art Moore expose just how deeply the submission, denial and deception run. Haney’s insider, eyewitness account, supported by internal memos and documents, exposes a federal government capitulating to an enemy within and punishing those who reject its narrative.

Visit our website: http://www.wnd.com/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WNDTV-294590057337142/

________________________________

Review all the investigative works WND has done here.

 

Call Toll-Free to Order:
If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps
toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266),
Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.

 

WND | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006

Copyright 1997-2016 WND.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Jeh Johnson, DHS Secretary: Is he a fox guarding hens or an ignorant hound?


VP Biden, Jeh Johnson & BHO

 

Here is a snapshot quote from Sutliff about Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson:

 

Now, we have to ask if Jeh Johnson is a Muslim practicing taqiyyah (lying to protect the Islamic faith) or if he is simply clueless. The answer is sadly not definitive. But then being in charge of one of the US government’s national security should mean that HE HAS A RESPONSIBILITY to know certain things, such as who are the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States, and that they have written a declared mission to commit Civilization Jihad on North America! – Paul Sutliff

 

That pretty much sums up this exposé on Secretary Jeh Johnson which will include an insightful comparison of the Bill of Rights and the Quran.

 

JRH 5/28/15

Please Support NCCR

************************

Jeh Johnson, DHS Secretary: Is he a fox guarding hens or an ignorant hound?

 

By Paul Sutliff 

May 26, 2015

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

 

For too long I have pondered the silence of the alphabet soup that is supposed to be protecting us. Where have the FBI, CIA, DHS, NSA been when they should be arresting even those in power who commit acts of treason? I have long pondered how I, a Special Education Teacher, can see the actions of treason and the men and women paid to protect our Constitution and the American people can not or simply refuse to act!

I have long been a believer that America is the land of equalization. But perhaps I forgot about the dangers of an evil boss. The employer who thinks nothing of lying to discredit an employee, purposefully tarnishing their name for no other reason than to satisfy their lust for power!

Combine that lust for power with evil intent bent on the destruction of our government and what do you get? Bosses and administrators who are so feared because of the heavy footprint they have left on good men and women as they crushed them into silence or complicity.

Now is the time to look at WHO is in power at the head of the Alphabet soup agencies! Do those who lead personify a lust for power with evil intent?

Jeh Johnson, the current Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was appointed by President Obama to a post he had no qualifications for. He had not served in the military protecting America, nor had he spent one day as police officer where he would have learned to protect and serve. What pushed Jeh Johnson into the lime light as a potential DHS leader then?

Jeh Johnson is one of the lawyers who worked for the terrorists detained at Gitmo. He was President Obama’s inside man working to give the terrorists, who are not American “citizens” the rights of Americans under the Constitution. Debbie Schlussel and the Journal both wrote of their concerns about President Obama’s nonsensical choice to fill this post. What qualified him for Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security in President Obama’s eyes was his work helping terrorists!

 

Jeh was one of the leaders who spoke eloquently about how we meet today’s threats in a way that are consistent with our values, including the rule of law. (President Barak Obama, October 18, 2013, The White House)

Considering that President Obama stated in the 2014 State of the Union Address this January that  “…  no challenge — no challenge — poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change… that climate change poses immediate threat for national security.”

 

VIDEO: President Obama: Act on climate

 

Is it that President Obama’s choice for DHS Secretary leaving him uniformed to the immediate threats on our national security regarding Islamic terrorists?

Jeh Johnson was placed at the head of DHS for aiding the enemy! Then it must be asked if it is his personal ambition to continue aiding Islamist terrorists?

Just two months ago, that answer was given. Jeh Johnson accepted an award from the Muslim Public Affairs Council. MPAC is an entity known to everyone who has studied terrorism, as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. Taking an award from a Muslim Brotherhood entity when it has issued a threat against Americans in Egypt on their own television network reveals the evil nature of this boss of the Department of Homeland Security.  Some may claim he did not know who MPAC are. But Jeh Johnson is in charge of defending America! How is it even conceivable that an average American like me, could be more informed than the head of the DHS?

What was Jeh Johnson’s original purpose in seeking to give constitutional rights of American citizens to those captured in war? Is this not also act of attempting to destroy the American government by making little of the rights of its citizens by granting them to enemy combatants? Or, was his appointment something more sinister? Looking at his speech to the MPAC audience as his received his reward truly revealed that Jeh Johnson is engaged in Civilization Jihad, for it was here he said, “reading the Quran reminds him of quintessential American values.”

Really? In order for Mr. Johnson to see “quintessential American values” in the Koran, he would have to deny many things in our Constitution. It is important to understand that under Islam there is no separation of Church and State. Islam is the government and under this principle examining the Koran, the Sunna and the Hadith takes on a whole new unAmerican perspective. Don’t take my word for it. Read just a few examples of what the Constitution states vs. the Koran and decide for yourself if, the Quran does speak to American values.

 

 

US CONSTITUTION

 

KORAN

FIRST AMENDMENT: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ”

 

“Those who reject Islam must be killed. If they turn back (from Islam), take hold of them and kill them wherever you find them.” Quran 4:89

 

 

Quran 9:73

 

FIRST AMENDMENT: Congress shall not abridge “the freedom of speech.”

 

Quran 33:57-61

 

Asma bint Marwan [Blog Editor: here is some more detail on Asma – http://www.answering-islam.org/Muhammad/Enemies/asma.html] – Asma was a poetess who belonged to a tribe of Medinan pagans, and whose husband was named Yazid b. Zayd. She composed a poem blaming the Medinan pagans for obeying a stranger (Muhammad) and for not taking the initiative to attack him by surprise. When the Allah-inspired prophet heard what she had said, he asked, “Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?”

 

A member of her husband’s tribe volunteered and crept into her house that night. She had five children, and the youngest was sleeping at her breast. The assassin gently removed the child, drew his sword, and plunged it into her, killing her in her sleep. The following morning, the assassin defied anyone to take revenge. No one took him up on his challenge, not even her husband. In fact, Islam became powerful among his tribe. Previously, some members who had kept their conversion secret now became Muslims openly, “because they saw the power of Islam,” conjectures biographer Ibn Ishaq (d. 767).

 

SECOND AMENDMENT: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

 

Sharia forbids those “who are at war with Muslims” It is a condition that someone buying

 

weapons be of a people who are not at war with

 

Muslims. (Sharia k1.2)

 

FIFTH AMENDMENT: “no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime… without due process of law.”

 

No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir (infidel)” (Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, No. 50).

 

SIXTH AMENDMENT: guarantees a “public trial by an impartial jury.”

 

Islamic law does not give non-Muslims equal legal standing with Muslims, even prohibiting a non-Muslim from testifying in court against a Muslim.

 

 

A woman’s word under Islam is not equal to that of a man in a court also!

 

Now, we have to ask if Jeh Johnson is a Muslim practicing taqiyyah (lying to protect the Islamic faith) or if he is simply clueless. The answer is sadly not definitive. But then being in charge of one of the US government’s national security should mean that HE HAS A RESPONSIBILITY to know certain things, such as who are the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States, and that they have written a declared mission to commit Civilization Jihad on North America!

Secretary Johnson should have been able to give a kind refusal when offered the award instead of giving the Muslim Brotherhood, through their MPAC award, a sense of legitimacy. But this is not the first time Jeh Johnson has been called out for his relationships with terrorists.

_________________________

About Paul Sutliff

 

Educator who pushes truth and rightness even when it is unpopular! I am writer and a teacher. You can find my books on Amazon portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad!

 

http://www.amazon.com/Paul-Sutliff/e/B00HEUCHRI

 

Paul Sutliff was born and raised in Rochester, NY. He is an educator and a writer. He says he is only an awakened Patriot to what is happening around him. Paul first started to look into the Muslim Brotherhood after one of their groups gave the college where he earned his MSED $500,000. It took only a short bit of research to realize that a former Catholic college had opened its doors to an enemy of the United States.

Paul now gives speeches and does radio hoping to awaken America to an enemy that now works in every branch of the US government.

Tony Newbill Emails 12/21/13 to 1/4/14


BHO- Reject Warnings of Coming Tyranny

These sets of emails are quite varied. The first email explores Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). The next email is about the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – undoubtedly under Obama’s directions – reuniting children smuggled into the USA via busted human trafficking or Drug Cartel mules with their illegal immigrant parents already breaking the law by being in the USA. The next email combines DHS enforcement of the REAL ID Act (See Also HERE), Bailouts and a modern version of debtors’ prison. The next few emails deal with the global economy looking at issues as the value of gold and more. In those nefarious activities pertaining to the global economy one particular email is how the NSA can use data to manipulate markets because of its ability to monitor any kind of electronic messaging which includes phone usage.

 

JRH 1/6/13

Please Support NCCR

***************************

Fox News Shockingly Reports The Truth On GMOs

Sent: 12/21/2013 7:57 AM

 

Fox News Shockingly Reports The Truth On GMOs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koLz-guYRao#t=23

 

Looking around I found an extremely helpful info-graphic on GMOs, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, which can be seen here.

 

http://nutribulletblog.com/gmos-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/

 

GMOs: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

 

The debate continues over whether genetically modified organisms are out to save the world or destroy it. But the argument for either side is far from cut-and-dry.

 

We always recommend the consumption of non-GMO whole foods; GMOs have only been around for the last two decades and the longstanding social and medical effects of GMO production and consumption is yet to be seen.

 

Learn a little about the history of GMOs. Should their labeling be required in the United States? (Go to Website to see the Charts)

 

The seven most genetically modified foods are Corn, Soy, Yellow Crookneck Squash and Zucchini, Alfalfa, Canola, Sugar Beets and Milk.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/builtlean/diet-and-nutrition_b_4323937.html

 

Genetically modified material sounds a little bit like science fiction territory, but in reality, much of what we eat on a daily basis is a genetically modified organism (GMO). Whether or not these modified foods are actually healthy is still up for debate — and many times, you don’t even know that you are buying something genetically modified.

 

It is not required to label GMOs in the U.S. and Canada, but there are substantial restrictions, and even outright bans, on GMOs in many other countries.

 

However, by 2018, Whole Foods Market will start labeling GMOs in the U.S. This grocery chains’ locations in Britain already provide GMO labeled products, as required by the European Union. According to the EU, GMO refers to plants and animals “in which the genetic material has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination.”

 

1) Corn

Almost 85 perecent (sic) of corn grown in the U.S. is genetically modified. Even Whole Foods’s brand of corn flakes was found to contain genetically modified corn. Many producers modify corn and soy so they are resistant to the herbicide glyphosate, which is used to kill weeds.

 

2) Soy

Soy is the most heavily genetically modified food in the country. The largest U.S. producer of hybrid seeds for agriculture, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, created a genetically engineered soybean, which was approved in 2010. It is modified to READ THE REST (7 Most Common Genetically Modified Foods; By Caroline Young; HuffPo; 12/3/13 8:38 am)

 

China rejects unapproved US origin GM corn

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-_Jh5IOERU

 

Posted by CCTV News

Published: Dec 19, 2013

 

China has returned 12 shipments of genetically modified US corn which violate China’s rules on GM products. 545-thousand tonnes of MIR162 genetically modified corn were returned. MIR162 is a variety of insect-resistant transgenic corn and hasn’t been authorized by China’s Agriculture Ministry. China’s quality authority has urged the United States to improve its inspection procedures to ensure that they comply with Chinese quality standards.

 

Broiler Chickens Found At Grocery Retailers Grow Three Times Faster Than Normal Chickens, Plagued With Lameness and Disease

 

http://preventdisease.com/news/13/121913_Broiler-Chickens-Grow-Three-Times-Faster-Than-Normal-Chickens-Plagued-With-Lameness-Disease.shtml

 

Billions of chickens around the world suffer in the intensive farming systems every year. Broilers chickens have been selectively bred and genetically modified so that they are reared quickly and cheaply to have enough meat to fulfill demand. Most these chickens suffer from painful lameness and disease related to their growth rates.

 

Intensification of the broiler chicken industry started in the late 1950’s, when the use of ‘dual purpose’ chickens for egg and meat production ceased and new poultry strains were produced specifically for meat production.

For example, in 1950, well under 50 million commercial broiler chickens were raised commercially, and now that number is well into the billions. When Kentucky Fried Chicken stores opened in the 1970s, production of these chickens skyrocketed over 40%.

The result of the narrowly focused breeding programs has been a bird which grows twice or three times as fast as a normal chicken and converts its food into meat in a much more efficient way. Most are raised under intensive systems and reach slaughter weight at 5-7 weeks of age. As a consequence the price of chicken meat has declined and consumption has risen several fold.

Intensive Selective Breeding

Over 50 years ago it took 98 days for a chicken to grow to 1.6kg. By 1986, due to selective breeding, it only took 37 days. Baby birds, who still chirp and have soft feathers, have the bodies of adult birds. This unnatural growth rate puts enormous pressure on the heart and immature skeleton and is the cause of many health problems.

Extreme selection pressure for large breast muscles has further distorted the anatomy of these animals and READ THE REST (Broiler Chickens Found At Grocery Retailers Grow Three Times Faster …; By APRIL McCARTHY; PreventDisease.com; 12/19/13)

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Judge claims DHS delivering smuggled children to illegal immigrant parents

Sent: 12/21/2013 8:40 AM

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/19/judge-claims-dhs-parents-smuggle/

 

A federal judge in Texas is accusing the Department of Homeland Security of hand-delivering children smuggled into the United States to their illegal immigrant parents.

 

U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen revealed the practice in a blistering court order filed late last week. He said the “dangerous” practice is effectively aiding human traffickers and particularly the drug cartels, which run many of these operations.

 

“These actions are both dangerous and unconscionable,” he wrote.

 

The judge attempted to lift the curtain on what is happening behind the scenes of the Obama administration’s changing approach to immigration enforcement. It has been well-documented that DHS is allowing some illegal immigrants already inside the country to skirt deportation, and particularly those who came to the U.S. as children.

 

But the “conspiracy” outlined by Hanen would take that controversial policy a big step further. He detailed the case of an illegal immigrant parent in Virginia, but used that as an entry point to describe what he suggested was a broader program.

 

Hanen claimed that, in more than one case before his court, immigration officials are arresting human traffickers smuggling children into the U.S. — and then “delivering the minors to the custody of the parent illegally living in the United States.”

 

“The DHS has simply chosen not to enforce the United States’ border security laws,” he wrote.

 

Further, he said READ THE REST (Judge claims DHS delivering smuggled children to illegal immigrant parents; By Judson Berger; Fox News – Politics; 12/19/13)

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

Being Jailed for Delinquent Fines Triggered a Thought…..

Sent: 12/27/2013 10:16 AM

 

REAL ID Enforcement Begins in 2014, 21 States Compliant

http://www.sacbee.com/2013/12/20/6016990/real-id-enforcement-begins-in.html

 

WASHINGTON, Dec. 20, 2013 — /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The Department of Homeland Security

 

The REAL ID Act’s enforcement will start next year, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced today. The enforcement steps will begin in April 2014 within restricted areas of the DHS headquarters, followed by a phased approach, with substantial enforcement in 2016. The 2005 REAL ID Act prohibits the federal government from accepting driver’s licenses and ID cards that do not meet minimum security standards set by DHS, no later than May 2017. The minimum standards require that driver’s license security features be routinely upgraded to be counterfeit resistant and require applicants to provide documentary proofs confirm true identity.

 

REAL ID compliant driver’s licenses and ID cards are key elements of the nation’s homeland security strategy. Enforcement of the law will clarify and differentiate between compliant state-issued identity credentials versus less reliable proofs of identity when admitting people to secure federal facilities or, beginning in 2016, to board airlines.

 

Coalition for a Secure Driver’s License (CSDL) President Brian Zimmer said, READ THE REST (REAL ID Enforcement Begins in 2014, 21 States Compliant; By Coalition for a Secure Driver’s License; Sacramento Bee; 12/20/13 9:12 am)

Globalists have and always will try and create the Utopian Society because of their Finite Earth Perspective and Population growth. These links tell this story that is continuing again today.

 

The Cronies will pocket all the tax extras just like they did all the “Shovel Ready” stimulus cash!!!!!!!

 

Bailouts leave a legacy of cronyism: Opposing view

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/12/22/bailouts-tarp-general-motors-mark-calabria-editorials-debates/4168419/

 

This month’s sale by the Treasury of its remaining shares in General Motors should offer us all an opportunity to say “never again.”

 

OUR VIEW: Auto rescue a triumph

 

Pay no attention to the the Obama and Bush administration cheerleaders. The federal rescue of GM, along with the TARP in general, serves as an example of everything wrong with Washington.

 

The TARP was little more than a transfer of losses from inept corporations to the taxpayer, mistaking the redistribution of losses with their avoidance.

 

Let’s start with the easy part: The taxpayer is projected to take a loss of more than $20 billion on two of the TARP programs. About half of that loss is from the $50 billion GM bailout; the remainder is largely the result of various failed housing assistance programs.

 

It didn’t have to be this way. When GM entered bankruptcy, the creditors should have taken their losses, and the company could have been reorganized at no cost to taxpayers. The same is true of the banks. A conversion of debt to equity would have recapitalized the banks at no cost to the taxpayer. Any upside would have been shared with the creditors.

 

We were repeatedly told, however, that the only choices were bailout or liquidate. GM, among others, proved that a false choice. Just as many of us have flown on bankrupt airlines, banks and automakers could have been operated in a reorganization.

 

Let’s also not forget that there was no authority under the TARP to assist automakers. Congress had voted down an auto bailout. But the READ THE REST (Bailouts leave a legacy of cronyism: Opposing view; By Mark Calabria; USA Today; 12/22/13 6:42 p.m. EST)

 

I bet those who can’t pay the Obamacare fines and taxes are jailed at the state level and reimbursed by the federal Government.

  

How Debtors’ Prisons Are Making A Comeback In America

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-26/how-debtors-prisons-are-making-comeback-america

 

Apparently having 5% of the world’s population, but 25% of its prisoners simply isn’t good enough for neo-feudal America. No, we need to find more creative and archaic ways to wastefully, immorally and seemingly unconstitutionally incarcerate poor people. Welcome to the latest trend in the penal colony formerly known as America. Debtors’ prisons. A practice I thought had long since been deemed outdated (indeed it has been largely eradicated in the Western world with the exception of about 1/3 of U.S. states as well as Greece).

 

From Fox News:

 

As if out of a Charles Dickens novel, people struggling to pay overdue fines and fees associated with court costs for even the simplest traffic infractions are being thrown in jail across the United States.

 

Critics are calling the practice the new “debtors’ prison” — referring to the jails that flourished in the U.S. and Western Europe over 150 years ago. Before the time of bankruptcy laws and social safety nets, poor folks and ruined business owners were locked up until their debts were paid off.

 

Reforms eventually outlawed the practice. But groups like the Brennan Center for Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union say it’s been reborn in local courts which may not be aware it’s against the law to send indigent people to jail over unpaid fines and fees — or they just haven’t been called on it until now.

 

The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s School of Law released a “Tool Kit for Action” in 2012 that broke down the cost to municipalities to jail debtors in comparison with the amount of old debt it was collecting. It doesn’t look like a bargain. For example, according to the report, Mecklenburg County, N.C., collected $33,476 in debts in 2009, but spent $40,000 jailing 246 debtors — a loss of $6,524.

 

Don’t worry, I’m sure private prisons for debtors will soon READ THE REST (How Debtors’ Prisons Are Making A Comeback In America; Submitted by Tyler Durden who found a submission by Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg; Zero Hedge; 12/26/13 14:32 -0500)

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Selling 1 Oz Gold Coin for $25 (when it’s worth over $1,200)

Sent: 12/28/2013 9:36 AM

 

The Sheep are asleep, that’s why Government handouts are working to keep Liberals in Power expanding the same Powers over Independence and Liberty.

 

VIDEO: Selling 1 Oz Gold Coin for $25 (when it’s worth over $1,500)

 

Posted by Mark Dice

Published: May 29, 2012

 

Mark Dice tries to sell a 1 ounce solid gold coin for $25 outside of a coin shop in San Diego, CA. HINT- It’s worth WAY more than $25, but does anyone want it? Mark Dice is a media analyst, political activist, and author who, in an entertaining and educational way, gets people to question our celebrity obsessed culture, and the role the mainstream media and elite secret societies play in shaping our lives. Check out Mark’s books in paperback on Amazon.com or e-book on Kindle, Nook, or Google Play.

 

Mark frequently stirs up controversy from his commentaries, protests, and boycotts, and has repeatedly been featured in major media outlets around the world.

Several of Mark’s YouTube videos have gone viral, earning him a mention on ABC’s The View, Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor, TMZ.com, and other mainstream media outlets. Mark has also been featured in (or attacked in) the New York Post’s Page Six, Rolling Stone Magazine, USA Today, The New York Daily News, and in major papers in Pakistan and Iran.

Mark Dice appears in several documentary films including Invisible Empire, The 9/11 Chronicles, and READ THE REST at bottom of Youtube Video

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This Guy does a 100 Million Dollar Real Estate Investment Fund

Sent: 12/29/2013 8:38 AM

 

This guy does a 100 million dollar real estate investment fund ……..what he talks about is financially paramount!!!!!!

 

MUST WATCH!! 7 Steps to The Global Economic Reset & U.S. Dollar Collapse, he talks extensively on china’s currency goals and why:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICSoWW7pBeQ

 

Posted by Fabian4Liberty

Published: Nov 15, 2013

 

**NEW Global Economic Reset Audio Program **[[Private meeting where Fabian spoke to a room filled with top hedge fund managers and private equity fund managers and their top 100 clients. Over 3 hours of INFO. Find out the TRUTH about the Global Economic Reset]]**


ORDER NOW http://www.ger2015.com


Retail Price $59.95-Your Price $39.95*


Your Savings $20.00


Please get the word out to as many people as READ THE REST beneath the video

 

In this He talks about china’s ghost cities and what they are for ….

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba6hADXeY0w

 

Posted by Fabian4Liberty

Published: Nov 6, 2013

 

Here are some pretty important articles about the Global Economic Reset:
“Yuan Rocks Markets”

http://www.vancouversun.com/Business/…

China seeks world role for ‘people’s money’
http://www.france24.com/en/20131106-c…

China Strips Army Official of Position After Attack
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/04/wor…

 

READ THE REST beneath the video

 

This is his website:

 

http://ger2015.com/

 

http://www.fabian4liberty.com

++++++++++++++++++++++

Have you Watched this Guy Before?

Sent: 12/30/2013 9:11 AM

 

WORLD WAR 3? China US Prepare For War Global Economic Reset Update

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6v_Vgn_QLI

 

*NEW Global Economic Reset Audio Program **[[Private meeting where Fabian spoke to a room filled with top hedge fund managers and private equity fund managers and their top 100 clients. Over 3 hours of INFO. Find out the TRUTH about the Global Economic Reset]]**

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

These 2 stories show how the economic recovery could be manufactured with manipulating tactics!!!!!!!

Sent: 1/3/2014 9:13 AM

 

Is The NSA Changing Bank Accounts?

http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/03/is-the-nsa-changing-bank-accounts/

 

Has the National Security Administration (NSA) been changing the amounts held in the financial accounts of people it targets?

 

The question would seem absurd if it were not for a 308-page report on the NSA that was released on Dec. 12 by an official White House panel. Recommendation 31, “Institutional Measures for Cyberspace,” on page 37 and repeated on page 221 reads:

 

(1) Governments should not use surveillance to steal industry secrets to advantage their domestic industry;

 

(2) Governments should not use their offensive cyber capabilities to change the amounts held in financial accounts or otherwise manipulate the financial systems.

 

Upon reading the panels’ report, Trevor Timm (a surveillance expert from the Electronic Frontier Foundation) sent a tweet; it was retweeted by Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who originally leaked documents from Edward Snowden.

 

[Blog Editor: Trevor Timm Tweets on NSA cyber attacking financial systems]

 

Does it imply that the NSA is or has been altering the financial data of targeted individuals or agencies?

 

The NSA certainly has the ability to do so, because it has the information to do so. The German news source Der Spiegel reported Sept. 15 on an internal NSA branch known as “Follow the Money” (FTM). The branch monitors “international payments, banking and credit card transactions.” In a responsive statement, the NSA admitted to tracking financial information but only as it related to terrorist financing and terror networks. It states, “This information is collected through regulatory, law enforcement, diplomatic, and intelligence channels, as well as through undertakings with cooperating foreign allies and partners.”

 

One “cooperating” ally is apparently the international bank messaging system Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication or SWIFT. The system promotes itself as READ THE REST (Is The NSA Changing Bank Accounts? By The Dollar Vigilante; Personal Liberty Digest; 1/3/14) 

 

Is This The End Of The Phony Recovery?

http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/03/is-this-the-end-of-the-phony-recovery/

 

While the mainstream media continue to push the meme that the economy is in (slow) recovery, some important facts point out that things are not as rosy as you are being told. In fact, most Americans feel the recession never ended.

 

An analysis of retail sales post-Christmas indicates that in-store retail sales decreased more than 3 percent over the same week last year. Retail brick-and-mortar shopper traffic decreased by 21.2 percent over the same period in 2012. The lack of in-store sales didn’t translate to an increase in Web sales.

 

In September, homes sales dropped more than at any time in the last 40 months. New mortgage applications dropped 66 percent from READ THE REST (Is This The End Of The Phony Recovery? By Bob Livingston; Personal Liberty Digest; 1/3/14) 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Western Debt Exceeds 200 Year High, IMF Warns Of 1930′s Depression Style Write Offs Ahead

Sent: 1/4/2014 10:53 AM

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/economy/2014/01/western-debt-exceeds-200-year-high-imf-warns-of-1930s-depression-style-write-offs-ahead-2-2583726.html?utm_campaign=&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FqRhN

 

(Before It’s News)

 

According To The IMF  in a “White Paper” just release at the end of December 2013, warns much of the Western world will require defaults, a “savings tax” and “higher inflation” to clear the way for Western Economic recovery as debt levels reach a 200-year high. This according to a new report by the International Monetary Fund. IMF.org pdf

 

The IMF working paper states that debt burdens in developed nations have become extreme by any historical measure and will require a wave of haircuts, either negotiated 1930s-style write-offs or the standard mix of measures used by the IMF in its “toolkit” for emerging market blow-ups. This would mean that America’s low income and middle class would feel the financial pain the most, as they did during the Great Depression.

 

“The sheer magnitude of the problem suggests that restructuring will be needed, for example, in the periphery of Europe, far beyond anything discussed in public to this point,” said the paper, by Harvard professors Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff.  How will the public react now that the IMF has made public their “White Paper” that announces the coming 1930′s style depression that lies ahead?

 

The IMF white paper said policy elites in the West still are still clinging to the illusion that rich countries are different from poorer regions and can therefore chip away at their debts with a blend of austerity cuts, growth, and tinkering (“forbearance”). But history reveals that this simply is not true.

 

The presumption is that advanced economies “do not resort to such gimmicks” such as debt restructuring and repression, which would “give up hard-earned credibility” and throw the economy into a “vicious circle”. (Depression)

 

But the paper says this mantra borders on “collective amnesia” of European and US history, and is built on “overly optimistic” assumptions that READ THE REST (Western Debt Exceeds 200 Year High, IMF Warns Of 1930′s Depression Style Write Offs Ahead; By Josey Wales; Before It’s News; 1/3/14 4:43) 

__________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

© Tony Newbill

Tony Newbill Emails 10/9 to 10/16/13


Economic Collapse view. DeesIllustration

In early October Newbill looked at the perils that might happen due the government not paying its bill and the debt ceiling. What would happen in America fiscal policies led to an economic collapse? Read and see.

 

JRH 11/1/13

Please Support NCCR

************************

Is Homeland Security Preparing for the Next Wall Street Collapse?

Sent: 10/9/2013 9:57 AM

 

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-Homeland-Security-Prepa-by-Ellen-Brown-Bail-in_Bailout_Banks_Budget-131008-976.html

 

Reports are that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is engaged in a massive, covert military buildup. An article in the Associated Press in February confirmed an open purchase order by DHS for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. According to an op-ed in Forbes, that’s enough to sustain an Iraq-sized war for over twenty years. DHS has also acquired heavily armored tanks, which have been seen roaming the streets. Evidently somebody in government is expecting some serious civil unrest. The question is, why?

 

Recently revealed statements by former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown at the height of the banking crisis in October 2008 could give some insights into that question. An article on BBC News on September 21, 2013, drew from an explosive autobiography called Power Trip by Brown’s spin doctor Damian McBride, who said the prime minister was worried that law and order could collapse during the financial crisis. ….

 

 

The Next Time WILL Be Different

 

What triggered the 2008 crisis was a run, not in the conventional banking system, but in the “shadow” banking system, a collection of non-bank financial intermediaries that provide services similar to traditional commercial banks but are unregulated.  They include hedge funds, money market funds, credit investment funds, exchange-traded funds, private equity funds, securities broker dealers, securitization and finance companies. Investment banks and commercial banks may also conduct much of their business in the shadows of this unregulated system.

 

The shadow financial casino has only grown larger since 2008; and in the next Lehman-style collapse, government bailouts may not be available. According to President Obama in his remarks on the Dodd-Frank Act on July 15, 2010, “Because of this reform, . . . there will be no more taxpayer funded bailouts — period.”

 

 

When depositors cannot access their bank accounts to get money for food for the kids, they could well start breaking store windows and helping themselves. Worse, they might plot to overthrow the financier-controlled government. …

 

Fear of that result could explain the massive, government-authorized spying on American citizens, the domestic use of drones, and the elimination of due process and of “posse comitatus” (the federal law prohibiting the military from enforcing “law and order” on non-federal property). Constitutional protections are being thrown out the window in favor of protecting the elite class in power. (READ ENTIRETY; Is Homeland Security Preparing for the Next Wall Street Collapse? By Ellen Brown; OpEdNews; 10/8/2013 at 14:54:17; Read Page 2)

 

The Real Crisis Is Not The Government Shutdown

http://paulcraigroberts.org/2013/10/02/real-crisis-government-shutdown-paul-craig-roberts/

 

The inability of the media and politicians to focus on the real issues never ceases to amaze.

 

The real crisis is not the “debt ceiling crisis.” The government shutdown is merely a result of the Republicans using the debt limit ceiling to attempt to block the implementation of Obamacare. If the shutdown persists and becomes a problem, Obama has enough power under the various “war on terror” rulings to declare a national emergency and raise the debt ceiling by executive order. An executive branch that has the power to inter citizens indefinitely and to murder them without due process of law, can certainly set aside a ceiling on debt that jeopardizes the government.

 

The real crisis is that jobs offshoring by US corporations has permanently lowered US tax revenues by shifting what would have been consumer income, US GDP, and tax base to China, India, and other countries where wages and the cost of living are relatively low. On the spending side, twelve years of wars have inflated annual expenditures. The consequence is a wide deficit gap between revenues and expenditures.

 

Under the present circumstances, the deficit is too large to be closed. The Federal Reserve covers the deficit by printing $1,000 billion annually with which to purchase Treasury debt and mortgage-backed financial instruments. The use of the printing press on such a large scale undermines the US dollar’s role as reserve currency, the basis for US power. Raising the debt limit simply allows the … (READ THE REST; The Real Crisis Is Not The Government Shutdown; By Paul Craig Roberts; PaulCraigRoberts.org; 10/2/13)

 

 

Obama Destroying Dollar, China to Take U.S. Land for DEBT: Ann Barnhardt Video

http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2013/10/obama-destroying-dollar-china-to-take-u-s-land-for-debt-ann-barnhardt-video-2457188.html

 

VIDEO: OBAMA DESTROYING DOLLAR, CHINA to TAKE U.S. LAND for DEBT: Ann Barnhardt

 

Discussed in this interview:


*Government Shutdown, all “Theater” – (1:45)

*Obamacare to be Defunded? – (14:10)

*Difference Between the Republican and Democrat Parties? – (22:05)

*Events that might Trigger War or Financial Collapse – (33:12)

*Debt Ceiling Raised Till Debt Implodes; China to Take U.S. Land for Debt? (36:00)

 

Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/obama-destroying-dollar-china-to-take-u-s-land-for-debt-ann-barnhardt

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is incredible … you are not going to believe this!!!

Sent: 10/12/2013 9:02 AM

 

http://www.naturalnews.com/042427_Obamacare_private_details_Trojan_Horse.html

 

Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits

 

(NaturalNews) We have already established that Healthcare.gov is not a functioning database application that allows people to shop for competing health plans. It is actually a government-run Trojan Horse that suckers people into creating accounts where they hand over:

• Name and address

• Email address and password

• Social security number

• Private bank account details

• Employer details and other information

During the enrollment process, your computer also hands over your IP address which is then tied to your social security number.

This IP address is then handed over to the NSA thanks to its new mega-black-hole data center in Utah, where your IP is cross-referenced with all website visits, including:

• “Anti-government” websites

• Porn sites

• Gambling sites

• File sharing sites

• “Terrorism” support sites

• Encryption service sites like Hushmail

• Chat rooms, message boards and more

Armed with this information, the NSA can then link your seemingly-anonymous online chats, comments and posts with your social security number. Linguistic algorithms can “score” your online posts to create red flags that call for additional investigations of anyone using words like “liberty” or “patriot.”

This information can then be turned over to … (READ THE REST: Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits; By Mike Adams; NaturalNews.com; 10/10/13)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Check out what Sebelius says here

Sent: 10/12/2013 10:12 AM

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5z7i1H2z7U

 

Sebelius: We Are Bringing Western Civilization to Its Knees With Obamacare

 

http://code-interactive.com/ad-in/2013/10/the-most-infuriating-10-minutes-of-your-life/

 

Jon Stewart recently had HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on his show to defend the debacle that is Obamacare. Little did he know he would be providing content for the most infuriating 10 minutes of your life.

 

First, Sebelius fumbles as she tries her best to defend the glitches in the program launch in which thousands of users were denied access to the websites. Then, she absolutely bombs when Stewart asks her a reasonable question: why are big corporations getting exemptions when everyday Americans aren’t? Steward had an answer that Sebelius couldn’t admit: it’s because big corporations have lobbyists; everyday Americans do not.

 

Stewart gets close to the real answer to all of this when he questions the mandate: why should individuals be forced to do something they don’t want?

 

Sebelius’s answer is that everyone must get health insurance (except for big corporations with lobbyists) because we don’t know when we’ll get sick, so you must pay for insurance regardless of whether you have high risk.

 

The problem with that mentality is that it artificially increases the demand for insurance, which inflates the cost of the product and inevitably creates a bubble, similar to the housing bubble in the 2000s. What’s more is that the government is (READ THE REST: The Most Infuriating 10 Minutes of Your Life; By TAP 1; Ad-in; 10/8/13)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Oh isn’t This Great News…..

Sent: 10/12/2013 11:33 AM

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W6eL4OosJE

 

The End Goal!

 

http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/index.php?news=3089

 

Henry Kissinger: “If You Can’t Hear the Drums of War You Must Be Deaf”

 

NEW YORK – USA – In a remarkable admission by former Nixon era Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, reveals what is happening at the moment in the world and particularly the Middle East.

 

Speaking from his luxurious Manhattan apartment, the elder statesman, who will be 89 in May, is all too forward with his analysis of the current situation in the world forum of Geo-politics and economics.

 

“The United States is baiting China and Russia, and the final nail in the coffin will be Iran, which is, of course, the main target of Israel. We have allowed China to increase their military strength and Russia to recover from Sovietization, to give them a false sense of bravado, this will create an all together faster demise for them. We’re like the sharp shooter daring the noob to pick up the gun, and when they try, it’s bang bang. The coming war will be so severe that only one superpower can win, and that’s us folks. This is why the EU is in such a hurry to form a complete superstate because they know what is coming, and to survive, Europe will have to be one whole cohesive state. Their urgency tells me that they know full well that the big showdown is upon us. O how I have dreamed of this delightful moment.”

 

“Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.”

 

Mr Kissinger then added: “If you are an ordinary person, then you can prepare yourself for war by moving to the countryside and building a farm, but you must take guns with you, as the hordes of starving will be roaming. Also, even though the elite will have their safe havens and specialist shelters, they must be just as careful during the war as the ordinary civilians, because their shelters can still be compromised.”

 

After pausing for a few minutes to collect his thoughts, Mr Kissinger, carried on: “We told (READ THE REST: Henry Kissinger: “If You Can’t Hear the Drums of War You Must Be Deaf”; By Alfred Heinz; Daily Squib; 11/27/11 09:40:00)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This Story Makes me Sick…..

Sent: 10/16/2013 8:58 AM

 

The Politics and then the reality behind the scenes of Politics is what this story portrays, and it makes me sick to think that we the people are so ignorant to think that today’s 2 party system is our way to sustain Liberty!!!! 

 

http://shoebat.com/2013/10/15/ann-coulter-raises-important-question-liz-cheney/

 

Ann Coulter raises important question about Liz Cheney

 

During an appearance on Hannity, Ann Coulter singled out Republican establishment figures and identified them as ‘shysters’. Of all the ones she mentioned, Hannity took most exception to one – Liz Cheney. To this point, Coulter comes closest to our concerns about the daughter of the former vice president. The former asks a very important question relative to Cheney that many conservatives are willing to overlook because of a perception that Cheney is more conservative than her soon-to-be Republican primary opponent, incumbent Mike Enzi. Here is the relevant part of the exchange:

 

VIDEO: Ann Coulter says Liz Cheney a ‘Shyster’

 

The good news is that Coulter may be reaching the right conclusion albeit for incomplete reasons. The bad news is that some critical questions may need to be asked about Cheney and, to this point, Hannity exemplifies someone unwilling to ask them because he’s accepted the premise that she is an unabashed conservative. Coulter raises one of those questions, which is:

 

Why is Liz Cheney spending her time running against one of the most conservative Republican incumbents in the U.S. Senate? Could not her time be better spent elsewhere?

 

Coulter chalks it up to ego and an unhealthy dose of self-interest, which may be true. She’s asking a legitimate question and (READ THE REST: Ann Coulter raises important question about Liz Cheney; By Shoebat Foundation; Shoebat.com; 10/15/13)

 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So what would be the best way to see the U.S.A. go in dealing with its debts and obligations under these 2 scenarios?

Sent: 10/16/2013 10:57 AM

 

Would a default give Obama unprecedented presidential power?

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/americas-newsroom/index.html#http://video.foxnews.com/v/2747976637001/would-a-default-give-obama-unprecedented-presidential-power/?playlist_id=86909

 

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2747976637001/would-a-default-give-obama-unprecedented-presidential-power/

 

Dennis Kucinich explains theory

 

Sequesters, Shutdowns and Defaults

http://leconomistamascherato.blogspot.com/2013/10/sequesters-shutdowns-and-defaults.html

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-zarlenga/sequesters-shutdowns-and-_b_4086071.html

 in 225 years has the full faith and credit of the United States been held to ransom. But also never in 225 years has a solution been ready that can resolve this problem: the monetary reform bill HR2990 introduced into the 112th Congress by Dennis Kucinich.

 

For the 95th time in the last 67 years, Congress and the president are confronted with passing legislation to raise the “debt ceiling.”

 

What citizens should know is that our country can pay off its debt as it comes due; can put millions of people back to work rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure; can provide debt-free federal support for cash-strapped State governments, and end the so called great recession by putting cash in the hands of all our citizens through a citizens dividend. This gives small businesses what they need most – customers with cash to spend on their goods and services. All these things are made possible by the HR 2990 bill introduced by Dennis Kucinich and co-sponsored by John Conyers.

 

The bill accomplishes this by adjusting our money system from one of “debt money created by banks” when they make loans, to one of “money by law” created as money, not as debt, by our government. That power is already vested in Congress by the Constitution; “The Congress shall have the Power To… coin Money, regulate the Value thereof…” (Article 1, Section 8).

 

Congressmen should re-introduce and pass H.R. 2990, The National Emergency Employment Defense Act (NEED) that Congressmen Kucinich and Conyers sponsored in the last Congress.

 

The banking class and their economists have spread confusion over the nature of money. The confusion is largely responsible for the present misdirection of our leaders. So they allow the destruction of the American middle class, and of our democracy, our privacy and civil liberties. Even the planet is now threatened by degradation of Earth’s environment.

 

Throughout our history, great leaders such as Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, Wright Patman, Henry Gonzalez and Dennis Kucinich have confronted banks over the main question in our nation’s past: Who should have the power to create money – the banks for the enrichment of their “elite” owners, or the people through their elected representatives, to promote the general welfare and benefit our entire society.

 

Congress squabbles but the present system just can’t relieve or solve the problem —because the debt money system itself is the problem!

 

How The NEED Act Solves the Problem in 3 major steps:

 

1) The Federal Reserve is incorporated into our government, where people think it is now. A new Monetary Authority is established to avoid both inflation and deflation.

 

2) Simple accounting rule changes will prohibit banks from creating what we use for money by decisively ending fractional reserve lending. Banks would lend real money they have or receive from savers. This is what people think happens now.

 

3) Government creates and spends new money into circulation for infrastructure, education and health care; starting with the $2.2 trillion the engineers say we need to make our infrastructure safe, over the next 5 years. This alone will create over 7 million good jobs quickly.

 

Additionally: The national debt gets paid off as it comes due. If we continued with a “debt-money” system, we could never pay off the debt. The NEED Act provides a tax free Dividend to get money into the hands of all our citizens; and has a provision where (READ THE REST: Sequesters, Shutdowns and Defaults; By Stephen Zarlenga; L’economista ($)mascherato; Posted 10/15/13)

 

[Blog Editor: I have to admit I was a little leery about Tony Newbill using the opinion of a Left Wing ideologue writing originally for HuffPo; however if his idea is modified away from such things as Marxist-Green thinking then ending the Fed and banks controlling how money is created is a good thing. The problem I have Zarlenga’s removal of money-control from banks is he strongly believes that Big Government should completely take on that role. Zarlenga vainly tries to veil Big Government control by saying representative members of both Houses of Congress would control the shots on government control. The reality absolute government control would go to the Executive Branch in which Obama has proven that Left Wing POTUS executes laws by fiat without Congress. Money-control should not be in the hands of Elitist Crony Capitalists (Banks/Fed) nor the hands of Big Government. Perhaps an innovative Free Market person can develop something like the Fed but accountable to voters rather than an Executive Branch appointment or Congressional approval.]

______________________________________

© Tony Newbill

Edited by John R. Houk